dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
690,118,148	== The Game Discography. == Please do NOT change the sales number for the Games albums. I have access to Nielson SoundScan which is the same data base Billboard uses to gather sales figures and record labels also have access to this. As a result my sales figure are 100% accurate. Thanks.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,145,339	Missing Section I definitely support splitting off the controversies, with one caveat. Shouldn't there be a brief synopsis of the criticism? As the article is, it doesn't look like anyone had any issues with the book, which has been very well documented. Not asking to recreate the whole thing, just a link to the other article and a mention how much of an issue this book has stirred up? I would be WP:BOLD and do it myslef, and maybe I will later when I am not on break at work, but as is the split is a little misleading.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
690,159,478	` ::::: Like Egypt and Hamas? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
690,163,449	==Re:== You said you apologized? No, you didn't.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
690,164,877	` : OK,OK! I'm sorry for that too. I won't sent you ``THOSE`` pictures again. And I thought you leave your apologize comment on my talk page. But you didn't. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
690,165,562	` — Preceding unsigned comment added by • `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
690,173,133	` ::::::: Does Egypt control the border of Gaza similar to how Israel controls the border? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
690,176,316	`:Hi, – thank you for discussing this, although it is better to discuss things about articles on the talk page of the article. I understand your concerns, and yet the Help page that you continue to refer to over and over references the DiPi website at the bottom of the page. Nothing on the Help page itself gives the detail you have given above, which by the way is impressive. Since the Help page you reference links to the DiPi as an IPA reliable source, then until you can show an alternative reliable source, the status quo pronunciation should remain in the article. To be clear, I have shown a reliable source for the pronunciation [krisˈtɔforo koˈlombo], and you have not shown a reliable source for the pronunciation you prefer. Wikipedia relies upon reliable sources first, consensus second, and consensus has never gone against reliable sources. Please show a reliable source for your change, or else the status quo must remain in the article. Thank you for your understanding! Be prosperous! '''' `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
690,181,773	` ::::::::: Egypt also has a blockade of Gaza. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
690,182,281	::::::::: And if you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governance_of_the_Gaza_Strip you'll see that Hamas was at one point occupying Gaza, even according to International authorities.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
690,195,924	` : I agree that Israel is blockading Gaza, so is Egypt, but how is Israel occupying Gaza? The claim that they use is that Israel is blockading Gaza, if so why isn't Egypt occupying Gaza? It makes no difference if the UN says they are, the UN also says Saudi Arabia is a decent country as far as human rights is concerned. It's like asking Hillary Clinton if Hillary Clinton is a good candidate. You can't occupy a country if you're not occupying it. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
690,199,089	:Taken a look. Thanks, but I'll pass on that one.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
690,229,697	` ==Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Yossiea~enwiki== Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a ``clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors`` is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action. To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED). ; Appealing user – ; Sanction being appealed 48 hour block for https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_military_occupations&diff;=690173133&oldid;=690166858 ; Administrator imposing the sanction ; Notification of that administrator The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification. ===Statement by Yossiea~enwiki=== That was not a personal attack. Don't come in the middle of a discussion just because one person decides to complain, if that happened at all. If you want to chase people away from editing Wikipedia, that's a good way to do it. ===Statement by Swarm=== ===Statement by (involved editor 1)=== ===Statement by (involved editor 2)=== ===Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by Yossiea~enwiki === ===Result of the appeal by Yossiea~enwiki=== :This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above. *`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,230,453	Look at the Talk page for Military Occupation, and how serialjoepsycho does not assume good faith and how he attacks me and my editing merely because he doesn't like it, yet he doesn't get warned. That's because I didn't complain to an admin. He complains so I get warned. That is not fair. I did not violate any policies.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,244,784	I signed up to taste test the upcoming Aquafina Sparkling Black Cherry and Dragonfruit flavour. Here is some evidence. http://imgur.com/e1WpnIx	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
690,248,442	` : Have you read the talk page? It's full of bad faith, and furthermore, one of the editors is a supporter of hezbollah, look at his userpage. Why would I assume good faith for a terrorist supporter? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
690,249,127	` :: It is unfair that I get blocked but others do not for also not assuming good faith. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,249,242	` ::: It is also unfair that I can't respond to the allegations. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,253,127	OK il be sure to add the correct citations. I have a friend who also has access to Nielson Soundscan and he uploads it to a website. Il be sure to apply the correct citations. Thanks.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,274,514	== ... == Protect GoAnimate article and permanently lock it as only admins will edit it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoAnimate	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
690,333,895	:I guess you can put it back. The only reason why I removed it was because I was concerned that the section had too many photos. That particular photo mentioned the East India Company, which is not mentioned anywhere in the article text, so I figured it was less important than the photos which depicted people and events that are referred to in the article text.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
690,343,231	== Can anyone remove sick editor ? == Can anyone remove ? He is catastrophic for Wikipedia and apparently sick. See Talk:List of Macedonians (ethnic group) or Talk:World Macedonian Congress or even Talk:Macedonia naming dispute. ::Mr. Jimbo, remove sick editor Future Perfect at Sunrise.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	true
690,356,286	:: Not ignoring you, but haven't been in all day. We are the hosts for Belize-Mexico hospital run for the next week or so, so my time is limited what with taking folks for doctor visits and whatnot. If someone hasn't already looked at it, I'll try later tonight.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
690,374,334	== alex fuck you == ...	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	true
690,374,461	== fuck you == Wanker	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
690,415,780	Fort Blunder border moved by Webster-Ashburton?	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
690,418,350	: Also, if you are in any way connected to Richard A. Werner, you need to state so. It is Wikipedia policy that potential conflicts of interest need to be declared. Additionally, if you have edited Wikipedia before using another account, you need to clearly state so on your userpage.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
690,431,691	` ::::: Wait, are you under the impression that every sentence must have its own inline citation? No, that's not how it works. 🍁 `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
690,441,283	==Mafia article== Two weeks ago you banned a user from Italy who was making disruptive edits to the Mafia article (he kept adding IPAs to the lede despite a consensus that they weren't necessary). I think he's back under a new name: REDSEEKER. Can you deal with this guy?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,447,743	people out of poverty and improve the lives of everyone – rich and poor,” says the blurb on the home page on the website www.billionsinchange.com.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
690,448,344	:::::::Whitlam thought a half Senate election would put pressure on Fraser to give in	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
690,460,195	ummm... margot robbie was in home and away not neighbours get your facts straight	2,015	false	user	random	test	false
690,462,479	::::The other guy is the one at fault. I'm sure it's the same Italian guy, who created a new account to get around his own block. Why don't you do something about him?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,467,070	:Yes I have - how do our awards (professionally respected as the definitive Bingo Awards) constitute spam?	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
690,468,427	== Internet censorship == You just told me you undid a serious contribution that I made to Wikipedia about internet censorship. You just censored me over the internet! You claim this is an encyclopedia but it is a free one that free one that relies on the public to contribute. Maybe you should hire a paid staff. A couple of other of your cohorts have accused me of touching articles I haven't been to. Maybe if you didn't censor edits and articles, You would not find vandals. I have already seen inaccurate articles here. Wikipedia is unreliabe.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
690,472,126	== Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom ==	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,479,426	::::Her husband is Jewish so I don't get why do you think Zooey's conversion to Judaism is so far fetched. holiday of Hannukah.]]	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
690,496,067	:Thanks for the review, Hink! Made all the corrections~	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
690,507,150	` == Cycles? == Every mention of ``cycles`` (with or without prefixes) should be changed to ``Hertz``. Peppering Wikipedia articles with archaic scientific terms helps nobody.`	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
690,525,812	== FYI == Hey you! yes you! You really are a massive C U N T!!!!!	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
690,540,983	: Not done: The lede is meant to summarize the article as a whole and this article does not mention very much philanthropic work, more activism than anything. To contrast, take a look at Bono's article, where his philanthropic work is thoroughly covered	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
690,595,957	` ::::After more research I'll retract what I said about the classroom being the south corner. I was going on my memory of an aerial photo showing the south corner marked, but I can't find that now. The only thing I can find referring to a specific location is this transcript of an early CNN report, in which the reporter refers to the ``southeast`` corner. Due to the NW-SE orientation of the building, there is no southeast corner, and he must have been referring to the east corner. That contradicts my memory, so neither is particularly reliable or definitive. If Gordon takes more photos, he needn't go out of his way to capture that south corner. If anyone else has better information about this, feel free to speak up. `	2,015	false	article	random	dev	false
690,598,929	::GOSH; uh. Well, - I suggest that you and (who uploaded the picture) write an article together, and then try to co-nom with HIM. That will surely do. In worst case I will help you guys to write that article, either way, you should co-nom with him, he is the one who uploaded of the pic.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
690,639,401	== Mandatory == It needs a table with all finals, not just the winners, including the result of the final !	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
690,656,747	:Please find new logic at Talk:Meena for your entertainment.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
690,671,765	` ::They're back! `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
690,676,620	` == In the news == The wording is accurate and does not use buzzwords like ``terrorism`` to describe the incidents. This is a neutral stance and objective to conveying information. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
690,694,236	Without Turko-Persian culture, Seljuk architecture does not get transmitted to India(Architecture of Mughal India, Part 1, Volume 4, by Catherine Blanshard Asher, page 10;Central Asia in World History, by Peter B. Golden, page 107). If the Seljuq Empire was not Turko-Persian in culture, how does the Sultanate of Rum have Persian as it's lingua franca?(Grousset, Rene, The Empire of the Steppes: A History of Central Asia, (Rutgers University Press, 2002), 157) Instead of seeing race and ethnicity in the word Turko-Persian, you should see how Turks(Seljuqs, Ghaznavids) used a language and culture, built empires, spreading their art and architecture; through that language. The Seljuqs and Ghaznavids contributed just as much into the Turko-Persian culture as they got out, hell even more so!	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
690,700,507	:::::I will set it up when its ready and invite you to co-nominate it with me. We will then receive various comments on what the article needs to be considered a featured list and are expected to resolve them satisfactorily before it is promoted. I will expect you to contribute and help resolve the comments.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
690,713,537	== Lead Singer == Can anyone verify who the lead singer is/was on this song. While all the singers in the group seem to blend harmony in the chorus parts, are the stanzas being sung by Mike Pinera? If it can be verified, place it in the article please. Thanks	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
690,718,789	== GoAnimate article need full protection... == === GoAnimate === * indefinite full protection From semi-protection to full indefinite protection that only admins can edit it.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
690,719,241	It's considerably a high-rish article/template	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
690,722,690	So you can see the vertices of the two dual tetrahedra (or stellated octahedra) and cube in the outer 8 vertices, and the vertices of the octahedron on the middle 6 vertices. 8 of the vertices of the dodecahedron match the cube, while 12 don't and none of the 12 vertices of the icosahedra match.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
690,736,974	` Note - what Wikidemon describes as ``low level mud-slinging nonsense``, that was ``hardly reported in the press``, happened to be rather widely covered (hello !) by, among others in the mainstream media: the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, CNN, and NBC News, as well as by People Magazine and Politico.If you don't consider those reliable and noteworthy sources by whatever your standards are, then it puzzles me what it is exactly that you might deem a valid source (??) in your universe. - (And, BTW, the rather apparent and thinly disguised pro-Hillary biases - - of those commenting here, would really best be tempered just a tad, and held in check a wee bit, in accord with Wikipedia:NPOV policies, when you are editing political articles.)`	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
690,765,169	:Thanks ! But, ref. no. 27 and 28 cover the same thing with much finesse and detail.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
690,769,405	` == it seems that you are very busy in pushing your ``short one`` in the hole of ur mother == Son of a whore `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
690,770,039	This user is busy in molesting his own mother.	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
690,770,729	This user is busy in molesting his own mother	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
690,785,976	}} {{WikiProject French Overseas Departments\|class=	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
690,791,442	low\|list-as=Girl-Thing Who Went Out for Sushi, The\|needs-infobox=yes	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
690,803,222	:Thank you, . — /	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,813,893	== Paris == Please revert this and take it to the article talk page. Since ISIS claim to have perpetrated the attacks, their reaction is a given. You are stoking up trouble for no reason. -	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
690,820,429	` == Noise == fart `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,821,286	` ::: The BBC source that is already in the article mentions a few. Sorry, but I do not understand your ``though``. I thought I'd already explained that as soon as we start mentioning some, we open the floodgates. The same, indeed, applies with the list of cities which, for example, got really silly at articles such as India Against Corruption. The need to give examples escapes me. - `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
690,823,656	` I see. I have an idea, although it has some undesirable side effects (though it does not conflict with the Style Guide recommendation, which I agree is what is most important); in the infobox, if I list the alias ``First Rock Star of the Middle`` first, it should correct the problem without any loss of the preferred source order, as the citations for the alias are the same as they are for the mention in the lead. The problem with that, though, is a most sickening aesthetic redundancy, as this alias is part of the infobox photo's caption and is visually too near to it. This alias is also not the most prominant nickname, and therefore I prefer that it come last, or, at the very least, not first. Can you think of another (tricky) way? ) Otherwise, I will place it as the first alias and then respectfully request that you kindly let your bot loose on the article again if this does not solve the Style issue entirely. I have one other, relatively unrelated, question, if you don't mind. Concerning the article's citations in general, is the entire citation text supposed to be linked when it's an online source, or just part of the citation text? Am I doing it right? Thank you! `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
690,824,273	` :::oh shit, nooooo, is someone going to spank me now? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
690,830,123	== This is your buttbuddy == Enjoy, queen! https://plus.google.com/+JohnZelcs/posts/2zXpdLmoDo4	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
690,833,174	` ::dude, I'm like totally cool, but thank you for your words of support, peace out, word. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,838,892	== Absurd claims == Stop, you dimwit. Your accusations and insinuations may be well-intentioned but you are clueless. Sure, be bold but don't be fucking stupid. -	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
690,839,424	:Well, it is better but you didn't have consensus. I'm doped on morphine so I will leave it for now, safe in the knowledge that the clued-up will eventually get their point proven. Fed up of the cluelessness that AGF insists we accept. And fed up of the snide accusations of Auslondonder - one more of those and I'll see them at ANI. Dimwit. -	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
690,839,631	November 2015 (UTC) :::Fuck off. Your accusations are baseless, your writing style is atrocious. Prose means prose, not fluff. - 00:39, 16	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	true
690,840,385	::You and your behaviour at the Paris article. It isn't the first time I've seen it but it is the first time I have been the target. You start commenting about the contributor rather than the content then you'll get it back in spades. I'm out of here for a while now due to meds but, believe me, my interest in your antics has suddenly grown immensely. That does not bode well. -	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
690,840,524	:Do you think I give a fucking shit? Have you seen the PAs aimed at me beforehand? -	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
690,840,934	` :::I haven't ``repeatedly`` done any of those things. Perhaps we have a problem with the English language here? That would explain a lot. - `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
690,841,348	:I refer you to the crap as discussed above around 11 November, for starters. Anyway, like I said, it is probably best that I retire. -	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
690,841,576	` :::::I couldn't care less about admins right now. Particularly not ones who fail to recognise that I am reacting to numerous ``civil`` PAs and insinuations made here in the last few hours. Admins are not gods. - `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
690,844,946	` ::dude, you think I give a fuck about you posting this bullshit warning? do something useful with your time rather than flexing your little authoritarian muscle here, don't you have anything better to do, in meatspace, perhaps; shove your block up my ass for all I care. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
690,845,188	Friday 13th: Paris: 129: DEAD. Thank fucking you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
690,846,056	` == Fuck you Roger == Swivel. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
690,846,533	` == Oh please, please, please, can I be unblocked sir? == `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,850,712	` :History of Tibet (1950–present) `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,855,980	James....thanks for pointing out the COI issue. I just want to say that one can be completely objective and still provide accurate information. The information that your removed for no apparent or justifiable reason that I restored were not written by me, so I did not violate the COI rules. In any case, since the rules are the rules I will not contribute to the page any longer.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
690,856,809	Fred: Thank you for your clarification. I did not realize that if you are an author in a field that you are automatically conflicted. That kind of keep all experts out of the knowledge cycle...curious. Just to be perfectly clear, original contributions to the page were made by others. I merely noted the vandalism of the page by Doc James, and restored the uncalled for deletions. If I have suggestions for additions in the future I will certainly submit them officially for review. But here is my question to you...what happens when someone with no experience or knowledge removes properly submitted information as in the case of Doc James? Does one just sit idly by and allow misinformation or removal of accurate information? I was under the impression that Wiki was there for educational purposes. So for me and others I have discussed this with, random removal of information without justification runs contrary to the Wiki goals. Can you help me out with understanding this?	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
690,857,971	James: I am an educational advisor to the company. I am in private and academic practice, and perform these procedures weekly, as well as teach them at most major universities internationally. I do not receive a salary from this company nor do I own stock, so your supposition about making a lot of money from the company is off base and offensive. Since I get paid by insurance companies to do this procedure, then I suppose this is also a conflict? In any case, I will do as instructed by Fred, and submit anything regarding this posting to the board for approval to avoid any further charges of conflict of interest. Now please tell me what are your conflicts? Why have you decided to spend so much of the time you have so little of to remove non-conflicted information placed on the site by others? What is your motivation? Why would you deliberately try and harm a technology? These are my questions. Are you being paid by someone to do this, a competitor perhaps? One must ask the question. I will look forward to your answers. And please do not continue to vandalize the site.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,859,393	James....Are you suggesting that because I know someone that they are conflicted? I know thousands of people, so based upon your arbitrary definition you feel that you have the right to exclude information that I had nothing to do with? You have vandalized the site once again with information taken out of context and applied it to cast a negative light on the technology. Again I ask for your motivation? Did you even ready the study to which you seem to want to promote? Are you friends with the authors? I believe you have an ethics issue. Does Wiki have a policy on bearing false witness?	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
690,860,399	OK, let's get it straight, I have never earned $100,000 from this or any other company. Insurance pays very little for this procedure, so I cannot even say I have made anywhere close to those kinds of professional fees as a physician. You are one very thin ice making accusations like this. I believe that people should also have the same access, but you are hypocritical, since your continued quoting of a flawed study to influence opinion negatively is anything but neutral. Ask yourself this my friend...How would the ethics panel at your University regard this type of baseless false accusation and supercilious behavior? I am betting that you have crossed a line here ethically. Want to find out?	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
690,868,291	== Manning benched == Manning was benched on 11/15/2015 for poor play. First time he was yanked from a game as starting QB for poor play.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
690,869,647	` I am new to this format and you can check and see that I only recently joined a few days ago. I do not operate under any other name or account, and your suggestion that I have is unfounded and offensive. If I have violated your Wiki rules I apologize. I was made aware by an outside source of the page recently, and merely selected the review history option to see what had been done and by whom. I did in fact make all my comments via the TALK section, and never received and answer as to why Doc James was so consistent in his posting misinformation and taking information out of context. Your organization calls that vandalism according to your own documentation. His response to me was to attack and impune my character. My response was to question his ethics, which are still in question and remain unanswered. If this is not an ethical issue than it is one of competence and that raises quality control issues within the Wiki community and why when questioned the response is to exclude rather than explain. This is all about education isn't it? I only entered into this site to make sure that the truth was preserved. What is wrong or misplaced with questioning errors? What is misplaced is the ability of the person who is questioned, in your words ``even if he was completely wrong in his edits``, to not come clean and fix the issue and admit the wrongdoing or mistake vs. attacking someone who actually was trying to make sure the information in Wiki was correct. I understand that this is a circling of the wagons to protect Doc James, and that I have no power or standing. So be it. But who will protect the innocent when the wolf is in the hen(WIKI)house? With respect and understanding... `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
690,871,598	Sir: My meager edits were factual, direct authors' quotes and in context. Doc's edits were and remain out of context and reflect that he never read the articles he is mentioning, which puts the procedure in a negative light. I am sorry to ask but have you read the information to see the actual facts? Vandalism by the Wiki definition speaks to the repetitive introduction of inaccurate information for no constructive purpose. Please review my posts and show me what was inaccurate or out of context. I am not afraid to admit when I am wrong. I have had a number of physicians and lay people review the history and they were also amazed and dismayed, as I was. You need to stop making this personal and focus on the published facts, otherwise Wiki as a resource is doomed. Finally, I am the just the last in a long line of contributors, both individuals and corporations, that have questioned his motives and accuracy. Questions make many feel uncomfortable. I have also privately shared my exact written comments to Doc with some colleagues both in the US, the EU and Canada, and I was told by everyone that I was spot on. Sorry again for all the trouble.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
690,966,840	Included some relevant links and edited some emotive language	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
690,981,986	` == Tech News: 2015-46 == Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes * Superprotect has been removed. * You can now switch between the wikitext editor and the visual editor without saving. You will not lose the changes you have made. * JSON dumps of the production search indexes are now available. They can be imported to Elasticsearch. Problems * Some translations for the Thanks and Echo extensions were missing. Translators have been asked to help and this should be solved soon. Changes this week * Thumbnails of 16-bit TIFF files will be displayed properly. Before, this didn't work. * The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 10. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 11. It will be on all Wikipedias from November 12 (calendar). Meetings * You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 10 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join. Future changes * A new tool to navigate through diff pages is being developed. You can test it out and give feedback. * The options on Special:Watchlist will look slightly different. Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
690,995,808	Sorry, I wasn't aware but it appears that I was blocked sometime in the last 24 hours. All that would appear to prove is that was somewhat myopic when it comes to the big picture. A prominent part of that big picture, aside from the obvious cluelessness of Auslondonder, is the notice at the top of this very page. I also mentioned somewhere in that palaver that I was doped on morphine and was going to bed. The block came after that, I think, because I certainly didn't see it. D'oh. -	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
691,010,143	` Done. Presumably this is the journal article of which the reference preceding it is the popular report? - `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
691,028,897	` ::Widely rejected by ``the world``, or widely rejected by wikeditors? `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
691,041,686	::Excuse me, why are you editing an article you know nothing about, and removing sources you aren't familiar with? Is this some kind of new editing style? I asked you to do research, and you still haven't done it! But you continue to talk about the subject...I'm sorry, but this makes no sense to me.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
691,043,627	:::No, we are looking at the same thing. The book has been published for decades by the largest and most reliable publishers on the planet, from Random House to Oxford University, in every major language. Authors routinely release updates to their books on their websites, but the site in question cites material from the print version.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
691,048,940	== Ron Stewart == Hi Jbignell, was that you editing as the IP earlier? I was hoping it was you, because I didn't want someone else thinking I was stepping on them here. I was meaning for awhile to update article, and had some content already written on my computer, bit it completely slipped my mind until an edit this morning to the article was on my watch list. So I added what I had already done to the article. I wasn't trying to bully you out of the way or anything, like I said I too had been working on this. I was after gathering up a lot of potential sources, some which could be helpful if needed.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
691,055,401	` == A barnstar for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Half Barnstar \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| Look, Love, about your work on the Children Act 1989, I can't say that it was perfect when you did your little bit of work on it—in fact, I only found you when I set out to hunt down a suspected hypothetical Troll or Vandal who I thought was deliberately (either that, or that he was incompetent, because his mother tongue wasn't ``English British English``) changing the tense of the verb or verbs into the past tense—anyway, just to let you know, in the English language, legislation, unless it was repealed in the entirety (entirely), (usually) uses the present tense (entirely, and throughout)—-still, I thank you for your sterling, steady and steadfast work, effort and dedication, because I think that I myself am probably now a little too old and am probably also a little to disabled and also barking to do half of what you did, without boring or depressing myself to death unless I were to start doing a bit of drink or drugs or sex or some or all of the above on the side! (Well, I wouldn't mind too much, though!) (P.S.: I myself am an amateur mature law student who alas would never actually graduate and never practise law because I am a bit of an invalid, both a bit blind and a bit barking mad. Still, if you live a bit ``Up North`` (of England), might perhaps meet up some time for a drink or two before Christmas, who knows?!) Anyway, TTFN, Sweetheart! \|}`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
691,093,198	` Please stop making test edits or whatever you're doing. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
691,115,712	::Earl King, you should not continue to edit any article on Wikipedia until you begin to show competency and understanding about our basic sourcing and citation guidelines concerning reliable sources and links to hosting websites.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false

690,118,148

== The Game Discography. == Please do NOT change the sales number for the Games albums. I have access to Nielson SoundScan which is the same data base Billboard uses to gather sales figures and record labels also have access to this. As a result my sales figure are 100% accurate. Thanks.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,145,339

Missing Section I definitely support splitting off the controversies, with one caveat. Shouldn't there be a brief synopsis of the criticism? As the article is, it doesn't look like anyone had any issues with the book, which has been very well documented. Not asking to recreate the whole thing, just a link to the other article and a mention how much of an issue this book has stirred up? I would be WP:BOLD and do it myslef, and maybe I will later when I am not on break at work, but as is the split is a little misleading.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

690,159,478

` ::::: Like Egypt and Hamas? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

690,163,449

==Re:== You said you apologized? No, you didn't.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

690,164,877

` : OK,OK! I'm sorry for that too. I won't sent you ``THOSE`` pictures again. And I thought you leave your apologize comment on my talk page. But you didn't. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

690,165,562

` — Preceding unsigned comment added by • `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

690,173,133

` ::::::: Does Egypt control the border of Gaza similar to how Israel controls the border? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

690,176,316

`:Hi, – thank you for discussing this, although it is better to discuss things about articles on the talk page of the article. I understand your concerns, and yet the Help page that you continue to refer to over and over references the DiPi website at the bottom of the page. Nothing on the Help page itself gives the detail you have given above, which by the way is impressive. Since the Help page you reference links to the DiPi as an IPA reliable source, then until you can show an alternative reliable source, the status quo pronunciation should remain in the article. To be clear, I have shown a reliable source for the pronunciation [krisˈtɔforo koˈlombo], and you have not shown a reliable source for the pronunciation you prefer. Wikipedia relies upon reliable sources first, consensus second, and consensus has never gone against reliable sources. Please show a reliable source for your change, or else the status quo must remain in the article. Thank you for your understanding! Be prosperous! '''' `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

690,181,773

` ::::::::: Egypt also has a blockade of Gaza. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

690,182,281

::::::::: And if you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governance_of_the_Gaza_Strip you'll see that Hamas was at one point occupying Gaza, even according to International authorities.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

690,195,924

` : I agree that Israel is blockading Gaza, so is Egypt, but how is Israel occupying Gaza? The claim that they use is that Israel is blockading Gaza, if so why isn't Egypt occupying Gaza? It makes no difference if the UN says they are, the UN also says Saudi Arabia is a decent country as far as human rights is concerned. It's like asking Hillary Clinton if Hillary Clinton is a good candidate. You can't occupy a country if you're not occupying it. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

690,199,089

:Taken a look. Thanks, but I'll pass on that one.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

690,229,697

` ==Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Yossiea~enwiki== Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a ``clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors`` is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action. To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED). ; Appealing user – ; Sanction being appealed 48 hour block for https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_military_occupations&diff;=690173133&oldid;=690166858 ; Administrator imposing the sanction ; Notification of that administrator The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification. ===Statement by Yossiea~enwiki=== That was not a personal attack. Don't come in the middle of a discussion just because one person decides to complain, if that happened at all. If you want to chase people away from editing Wikipedia, that's a good way to do it. ===Statement by Swarm=== ===Statement by (involved editor 1)=== ===Statement by (involved editor 2)=== ===Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by Yossiea~enwiki === ===Result of the appeal by Yossiea~enwiki=== :This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above. *`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,230,453

Look at the Talk page for Military Occupation, and how serialjoepsycho does not assume good faith and how he attacks me and my editing merely because he doesn't like it, yet he doesn't get warned. That's because I didn't complain to an admin. He complains so I get warned. That is not fair. I did not violate any policies.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,244,784

I signed up to taste test the upcoming Aquafina Sparkling Black Cherry and Dragonfruit flavour. Here is some evidence. http://imgur.com/e1WpnIx

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

690,248,442

` : Have you read the talk page? It's full of bad faith, and furthermore, one of the editors is a supporter of hezbollah, look at his userpage. Why would I assume good faith for a terrorist supporter? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

690,249,127

` :: It is unfair that I get blocked but others do not for also not assuming good faith. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,249,242

` ::: It is also unfair that I can't respond to the allegations. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,253,127

OK il be sure to add the correct citations. I have a friend who also has access to Nielson Soundscan and he uploads it to a website. Il be sure to apply the correct citations. Thanks.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,274,514

== ... == Protect GoAnimate article and permanently lock it as only admins will edit it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoAnimate

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

690,333,895

:I guess you can put it back. The only reason why I removed it was because I was concerned that the section had too many photos. That particular photo mentioned the East India Company, which is not mentioned anywhere in the article text, so I figured it was less important than the photos which depicted people and events that are referred to in the article text.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

690,343,231

== Can anyone remove sick editor ? == Can anyone remove ? He is catastrophic for Wikipedia and apparently sick. See Talk:List of Macedonians (ethnic group) or Talk:World Macedonian Congress or even Talk:Macedonia naming dispute. ::Mr. Jimbo, remove sick editor Future Perfect at Sunrise.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

true

690,356,286

:: Not ignoring you, but haven't been in all day. We are the hosts for Belize-Mexico hospital run for the next week or so, so my time is limited what with taking folks for doctor visits and whatnot. If someone hasn't already looked at it, I'll try later tonight.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

690,374,334

== alex fuck you == ...

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

true

690,374,461

== fuck you == Wanker

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

690,415,780

Fort Blunder border moved by Webster-Ashburton?

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

690,418,350

: Also, if you are in any way connected to Richard A. Werner, you need to state so. It is Wikipedia policy that potential conflicts of interest need to be declared. Additionally, if you have edited Wikipedia before using another account, you need to clearly state so on your userpage.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

690,431,691

` ::::: Wait, are you under the impression that every sentence must have its own inline citation? No, that's not how it works. 🍁 `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

690,441,283

==Mafia article== Two weeks ago you banned a user from Italy who was making disruptive edits to the Mafia article (he kept adding IPAs to the lede despite a consensus that they weren't necessary). I think he's back under a new name: REDSEEKER. Can you deal with this guy?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,447,743

people out of poverty and improve the lives of everyone – rich and poor,” says the blurb on the home page on the website www.billionsinchange.com.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

690,448,344

:::::::Whitlam thought a half Senate election would put pressure on Fraser to give in

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

690,460,195

ummm... margot robbie was in home and away not neighbours get your facts straight

2,015

false

user

random

test

false

690,462,479

::::The other guy is the one at fault. I'm sure it's the same Italian guy, who created a new account to get around his own block. Why don't you do something about him?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,467,070

:Yes I have - how do our awards (professionally respected as the definitive Bingo Awards) constitute spam?

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

690,468,427

== Internet censorship == You just told me you undid a serious contribution that I made to Wikipedia about internet censorship. You just censored me over the internet! You claim this is an encyclopedia but it is a free one that free one that relies on the public to contribute. Maybe you should hire a paid staff. A couple of other of your cohorts have accused me of touching articles I haven't been to. Maybe if you didn't censor edits and articles, You would not find vandals. I have already seen inaccurate articles here. Wikipedia is unreliabe.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

690,472,126

== Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom ==

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,479,426

::::Her husband is Jewish so I don't get why do you think Zooey's conversion to Judaism is so far fetched. holiday of Hannukah.]]

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

690,496,067

:Thanks for the review, Hink! Made all the corrections~

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

690,507,150

` == Cycles? == Every mention of ``cycles`` (with or without prefixes) should be changed to ``Hertz``. Peppering Wikipedia articles with archaic scientific terms helps nobody.`

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

690,525,812

== FYI == Hey you! yes you! You really are a massive C U N T!!!!!

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

690,540,983

: Not done: The lede is meant to summarize the article as a whole and this article does not mention very much philanthropic work, more activism than anything. To contrast, take a look at Bono's article, where his philanthropic work is thoroughly covered

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

690,595,957

` ::::After more research I'll retract what I said about the classroom being the south corner. I was going on my memory of an aerial photo showing the south corner marked, but I can't find that now. The only thing I can find referring to a specific location is this transcript of an early CNN report, in which the reporter refers to the ``southeast`` corner. Due to the NW-SE orientation of the building, there is no southeast corner, and he must have been referring to the east corner. That contradicts my memory, so neither is particularly reliable or definitive. If Gordon takes more photos, he needn't go out of his way to capture that south corner. If anyone else has better information about this, feel free to speak up. `

2,015

false

article

random

dev

false

690,598,929

::GOSH; uh. Well, - I suggest that you and (who uploaded the picture) write an article together, and then try to co-nom with HIM. That will surely do. In worst case I will help you guys to write that article, either way, you should co-nom with him, he is the one who uploaded of the pic.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

690,639,401

== Mandatory == It needs a table with all finals, not just the winners, including the result of the final !

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

690,656,747

:Please find new logic at Talk:Meena for your entertainment.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

690,671,765

` ::They're back! `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

690,676,620

` == In the news == The wording is accurate and does not use buzzwords like ``terrorism`` to describe the incidents. This is a neutral stance and objective to conveying information. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

690,694,236

Without Turko-Persian culture, Seljuk architecture does not get transmitted to India(Architecture of Mughal India, Part 1, Volume 4, by Catherine Blanshard Asher, page 10;Central Asia in World History, by Peter B. Golden, page 107). If the Seljuq Empire was not Turko-Persian in culture, how does the Sultanate of Rum have Persian as it's lingua franca?(Grousset, Rene, The Empire of the Steppes: A History of Central Asia, (Rutgers University Press, 2002), 157) Instead of seeing race and ethnicity in the word Turko-Persian, you should see how Turks(Seljuqs, Ghaznavids) used a language and culture, built empires, spreading their art and architecture; through that language. The Seljuqs and Ghaznavids contributed just as much into the Turko-Persian culture as they got out, hell even more so!

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

690,700,507

:::::I will set it up when its ready and invite you to co-nominate it with me. We will then receive various comments on what the article needs to be considered a featured list and are expected to resolve them satisfactorily before it is promoted. I will expect you to contribute and help resolve the comments.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

690,713,537

== Lead Singer == Can anyone verify who the lead singer is/was on this song. While all the singers in the group seem to blend harmony in the chorus parts, are the stanzas being sung by Mike Pinera? If it can be verified, place it in the article please. Thanks

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

690,718,789

== GoAnimate article need full protection... == === GoAnimate === * indefinite full protection From semi-protection to full indefinite protection that only admins can edit it.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

690,719,241

It's considerably a high-rish article/template

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

690,722,690

So you can see the vertices of the two dual tetrahedra (or stellated octahedra) and cube in the outer 8 vertices, and the vertices of the octahedron on the middle 6 vertices. 8 of the vertices of the dodecahedron match the cube, while 12 don't and none of the 12 vertices of the icosahedra match.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

690,736,974

` Note - what Wikidemon describes as ``low level mud-slinging nonsense``, that was ``hardly reported in the press``, happened to be rather widely covered (hello !) by, among others in the mainstream media: the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, CNN, and NBC News, as well as by People Magazine and Politico.If you don't consider those reliable and noteworthy sources by whatever your standards are, then it puzzles me what it is exactly that you might deem a valid source (??) in your universe. - (And, BTW, the rather apparent and thinly disguised pro-Hillary biases - - of those commenting here, would really best be tempered just a tad, and held in check a wee bit, in accord with Wikipedia:NPOV policies, when you are editing political articles.)`

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

690,765,169

:Thanks ! But, ref. no. 27 and 28 cover the same thing with much finesse and detail.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

690,769,405

` == it seems that you are very busy in pushing your ``short one`` in the hole of ur mother == Son of a whore `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

690,770,039

This user is busy in molesting his own mother.

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

690,770,729

This user is busy in molesting his own mother

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

690,785,976

}} {{WikiProject French Overseas Departments|class=

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

690,791,442

low|list-as=Girl-Thing Who Went Out for Sushi, The|needs-infobox=yes

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

690,803,222

:Thank you, . — /

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,813,893

== Paris == Please revert this and take it to the article talk page. Since ISIS claim to have perpetrated the attacks, their reaction is a given. You are stoking up trouble for no reason. -

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

690,820,429

` == Noise == *fart* `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,821,286

` ::: The BBC source that is already in the article mentions a few. Sorry, but I do not understand your ``though``. I thought I'd already explained that as soon as we start mentioning some, we open the floodgates. The same, indeed, applies with the list of cities which, for example, got really silly at articles such as India Against Corruption. The need to give examples escapes me. - `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

690,823,656

` I see. I have an idea, although it has some undesirable side effects (though it does not conflict with the Style Guide recommendation, which I agree is what is most important); in the infobox, if I list the alias ``First Rock Star of the Middle`` first, it should correct the problem without any loss of the preferred source order, as the citations for the alias are the same as they are for the mention in the lead. The problem with that, though, is a most sickening aesthetic redundancy, as this alias is part of the infobox photo's caption and is visually too near to it. This alias is also not the most prominant nickname, and therefore I prefer that it come last, or, at the very least, not first. Can you think of another (tricky) way? ) Otherwise, I will place it as the first alias and then respectfully request that you kindly let your bot loose on the article again if this does not solve the Style issue entirely. I have one other, relatively unrelated, question, if you don't mind. Concerning the article's citations in general, is the entire citation text supposed to be linked when it's an online source, or just part of the citation text? Am I doing it right? Thank you! `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

690,824,273

` :::oh shit, nooooo, is someone going to spank me now? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

690,830,123

== This is your buttbuddy == Enjoy, queen! https://plus.google.com/+JohnZelcs/posts/2zXpdLmoDo4

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

690,833,174

` ::dude, I'm like totally cool, but thank you for your words of support, peace out, word. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,838,892

== Absurd claims == Stop, you dimwit. Your accusations and insinuations may be well-intentioned but you are clueless. Sure, be bold but don't be fucking stupid. -

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

690,839,424

:Well, it is better but you didn't have consensus. I'm doped on morphine so I will leave it for now, safe in the knowledge that the clued-up will eventually get their point proven. Fed up of the cluelessness that AGF insists we accept. And fed up of the snide accusations of Auslondonder - one more of those and I'll see them at ANI. Dimwit. -

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

690,839,631

November 2015 (UTC) :::Fuck off. Your accusations are baseless, your writing style is atrocious. Prose means prose, not fluff. - 00:39, 16

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

true

690,840,385

::You and your behaviour at the Paris article. It isn't the first time I've seen it but it is the first time I have been the target. You start commenting about the contributor rather than the content then you'll get it back in spades. I'm out of here for a while now due to meds but, believe me, my interest in your antics has suddenly grown immensely. That does not bode well. -

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

690,840,524

:Do you think I give a fucking shit? Have you seen the PAs aimed at me beforehand? -

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

690,840,934

` :::I haven't ``repeatedly`` done any of those things. Perhaps we have a problem with the English language here? That would explain a lot. - `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

690,841,348

:I refer you to the crap as discussed above around 11 November, for starters. Anyway, like I said, it is probably best that I retire. -

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

690,841,576

` :::::I couldn't care less about admins right now. Particularly not ones who fail to recognise that I am reacting to numerous ``civil`` PAs and insinuations made here in the last few hours. Admins are not gods. - `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

690,844,946

` ::dude, you think I give a fuck about you posting this bullshit warning? do something useful with your time rather than flexing your little authoritarian muscle here, don't you have anything better to do, in meatspace, perhaps; shove your block up my ass for all I care. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

690,845,188

Friday 13th: Paris: 129: DEAD. Thank fucking you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

690,846,056

` == Fuck you Roger == Swivel. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

690,846,533

` == Oh please, please, please, can I be unblocked sir? == `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,850,712

` :History of Tibet (1950–present) `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,855,980

James....thanks for pointing out the COI issue. I just want to say that one can be completely objective and still provide accurate information. The information that your removed for no apparent or justifiable reason that I restored were not written by me, so I did not violate the COI rules. In any case, since the rules are the rules I will not contribute to the page any longer.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

690,856,809

Fred: Thank you for your clarification. I did not realize that if you are an author in a field that you are automatically conflicted. That kind of keep all experts out of the knowledge cycle...curious. Just to be perfectly clear, original contributions to the page were made by others. I merely noted the vandalism of the page by Doc James, and restored the uncalled for deletions. If I have suggestions for additions in the future I will certainly submit them officially for review. But here is my question to you...what happens when someone with no experience or knowledge removes properly submitted information as in the case of Doc James? Does one just sit idly by and allow misinformation or removal of accurate information? I was under the impression that Wiki was there for educational purposes. So for me and others I have discussed this with, random removal of information without justification runs contrary to the Wiki goals. Can you help me out with understanding this?

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

690,857,971

James: I am an educational advisor to the company. I am in private and academic practice, and perform these procedures weekly, as well as teach them at most major universities internationally. I do not receive a salary from this company nor do I own stock, so your supposition about making a lot of money from the company is off base and offensive. Since I get paid by insurance companies to do this procedure, then I suppose this is also a conflict? In any case, I will do as instructed by Fred, and submit anything regarding this posting to the board for approval to avoid any further charges of conflict of interest. Now please tell me what are your conflicts? Why have you decided to spend so much of the time you have so little of to remove non-conflicted information placed on the site by others? What is your motivation? Why would you deliberately try and harm a technology? These are my questions. Are you being paid by someone to do this, a competitor perhaps? One must ask the question. I will look forward to your answers. And please do not continue to vandalize the site.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,859,393

James....Are you suggesting that because I know someone that they are conflicted? I know thousands of people, so based upon your arbitrary definition you feel that you have the right to exclude information that I had nothing to do with? You have vandalized the site once again with information taken out of context and applied it to cast a negative light on the technology. Again I ask for your motivation? Did you even ready the study to which you seem to want to promote? Are you friends with the authors? I believe you have an ethics issue. Does Wiki have a policy on bearing false witness?

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

690,860,399

OK, let's get it straight, I have never earned $100,000 from this or any other company. Insurance pays very little for this procedure, so I cannot even say I have made anywhere close to those kinds of professional fees as a physician. You are one very thin ice making accusations like this. I believe that people should also have the same access, but you are hypocritical, since your continued quoting of a flawed study to influence opinion negatively is anything but neutral. Ask yourself this my friend...How would the ethics panel at your University regard this type of baseless false accusation and supercilious behavior? I am betting that you have crossed a line here ethically. Want to find out?

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

690,868,291

== Manning benched == Manning was benched on 11/15/2015 for poor play. First time he was yanked from a game as starting QB for poor play.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

690,869,647

` I am new to this format and you can check and see that I only recently joined a few days ago. I do not operate under any other name or account, and your suggestion that I have is unfounded and offensive. If I have violated your Wiki rules I apologize. I was made aware by an outside source of the page recently, and merely selected the review history option to see what had been done and by whom. I did in fact make all my comments via the TALK section, and never received and answer as to why Doc James was so consistent in his posting misinformation and taking information out of context. Your organization calls that vandalism according to your own documentation. His response to me was to attack and impune my character. My response was to question his ethics, which are still in question and remain unanswered. If this is not an ethical issue than it is one of competence and that raises quality control issues within the Wiki community and why when questioned the response is to exclude rather than explain. This is all about education isn't it? I only entered into this site to make sure that the truth was preserved. What is wrong or misplaced with questioning errors? What is misplaced is the ability of the person who is questioned, in your words ``even if he was completely wrong in his edits``, to not come clean and fix the issue and admit the wrongdoing or mistake vs. attacking someone who actually was trying to make sure the information in Wiki was correct. I understand that this is a circling of the wagons to protect Doc James, and that I have no power or standing. So be it. But who will protect the innocent when the wolf is in the hen(WIKI)house? With respect and understanding... `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

690,871,598

Sir: My meager edits were factual, direct authors' quotes and in context. Doc's edits were and remain out of context and reflect that he never read the articles he is mentioning, which puts the procedure in a negative light. I am sorry to ask but have you read the information to see the actual facts? Vandalism by the Wiki definition speaks to the repetitive introduction of inaccurate information for no constructive purpose. Please review my posts and show me what was inaccurate or out of context. I am not afraid to admit when I am wrong. I have had a number of physicians and lay people review the history and they were also amazed and dismayed, as I was. You need to stop making this personal and focus on the published facts, otherwise Wiki as a resource is doomed. Finally, I am the just the last in a long line of contributors, both individuals and corporations, that have questioned his motives and accuracy. Questions make many feel uncomfortable. I have also privately shared my exact written comments to Doc with some colleagues both in the US, the EU and Canada, and I was told by everyone that I was spot on. Sorry again for all the trouble.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

690,966,840

Included some relevant links and edited some emotive language

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

690,981,986

` == Tech News: 2015-46 == Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes * Superprotect has been removed. * You can now switch between the wikitext editor and the visual editor without saving. You will not lose the changes you have made. * JSON dumps of the production search indexes are now available. They can be imported to Elasticsearch. Problems * Some translations for the Thanks and Echo extensions were missing. Translators have been asked to help and this should be solved soon. Changes this week * Thumbnails of 16-bit TIFF files will be displayed properly. Before, this didn't work. * The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 10. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 11. It will be on all Wikipedias from November 12 (calendar). Meetings * You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 10 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join. Future changes * A new tool to navigate through diff pages is being developed. You can test it out and give feedback. * The options on Special:Watchlist will look slightly different. Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

690,995,808

Sorry, I wasn't aware but it appears that I was blocked sometime in the last 24 hours. All that would appear to prove is that was somewhat myopic when it comes to the big picture. A prominent part of that big picture, aside from the obvious cluelessness of Auslondonder, is the notice at the top of this very page. I also mentioned somewhere in that palaver that I was doped on morphine and was going to bed. The block came after that, I think, because I certainly didn't see it. D'oh. -

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

691,010,143

` Done. Presumably this is the journal article of which the reference preceding it is the popular report? - `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

691,028,897

` ::Widely rejected by ``the world``, or widely rejected by wikeditors? `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

691,041,686

::Excuse me, why are you editing an article you know nothing about, and removing sources you aren't familiar with? Is this some kind of new editing style? I asked you to do research, and you still haven't done it! But you continue to talk about the subject...I'm sorry, but this makes no sense to me.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

691,043,627

:::No, we are looking at the same thing. The book has been published for decades by the largest and most reliable publishers on the planet, from Random House to Oxford University, in every major language. Authors routinely release updates to their books on their websites, but the site in question cites material from the print version.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

691,048,940

== Ron Stewart == Hi Jbignell, was that you editing as the IP earlier? I was hoping it was you, because I didn't want someone else thinking I was stepping on them here. I was meaning for awhile to update article, and had some content already written on my computer, bit it completely slipped my mind until an edit this morning to the article was on my watch list. So I added what I had already done to the article. I wasn't trying to bully you out of the way or anything, like I said I too had been working on this. I was after gathering up a lot of potential sources, some which could be helpful if needed.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

691,055,401

` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Half Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Look, Love, about your work on the Children Act 1989, I can't say that it was perfect when you did your little bit of work on it—in fact, I only found you when I set out to hunt down a suspected hypothetical Troll or Vandal who I thought was deliberately (either that, or that he was incompetent, because his mother tongue wasn't ``English British English``) changing the tense of the verb or verbs into the past tense—anyway, just to let you know, in the English language, legislation, unless it was repealed in the entirety (entirely), (usually) uses the present tense (entirely, and throughout)—-still, I thank you for your sterling, steady and steadfast work, effort and dedication, because I think that I myself am probably now a little too old and am probably also a little to disabled and also barking to do half of what you did, without boring or depressing myself to death unless I were to start doing a bit of drink or drugs or sex or some or all of the above on the side! (Well, I wouldn't mind too much, though!) (P.S.: I myself am an amateur mature law student who alas would never actually graduate and never practise law because I am a bit of an invalid, both a bit blind and a bit barking mad. Still, if you live a bit ``Up North`` (of England), might perhaps meet up some time for a drink or two before Christmas, who knows?!) Anyway, TTFN, Sweetheart! |}`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

691,093,198

` Please stop making test edits or whatever you're doing. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

691,115,712

::Earl King, you should not continue to edit any article on Wikipedia until you begin to show competency and understanding about our basic sourcing and citation guidelines concerning reliable sources and links to hosting websites.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false