Datasets:
dirtycomputer
/
Wikipedia_Talk_Labels

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
56,089,815
== BULLSHIT == UNBLOCK 195.93.21.74 NOW OR IM GONNA FUCK ABOUT WITH WIKIPEDIA SO MUCH, AND STOP BEIN DICKS I JUS WANNA USE THE REFERENCE DESK FFS, NO NEED FOR THIS BULLSHIT
2,006
false
user
blocked
test
true
56,103,533
==.38 Calibre== Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources which reflects that citations are wanted at the Wiki. This is a well researched article with appropriate citations, it is not a dump.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,112,724
Ahm, it wouldn't be the first time I'm wrong... would you fix that yourself? And add some about chipá guazú? cheese bun sounds better, since a roll reminds me more of a cylinder. /
2,006
true
article
random
dev
false
56,114,817
Hi,CharlotteWeb -
2,006
true
user
random
dev
false
56,151,052
REDIRECT Talk:Sweat Monkey Sex
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
56,154,867
:Actually, much to my relief it didn't develop much further, and has stopped for now. I'll leave the block to your discretion!
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
56,159,426
== Expansion == I find it UNBELIEVABLE that there isn't a page on this man. He is surely one of the most influential people in Britain! As you can see from my meagre efforts, it's very difficult to track down info on him. Can we put this on a category for fast expansion or something?
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
56,161,955
==Friendly warning== REgarding large-scale deletions of comments from AN/I, let me just give you a friendly reminder that NPA policy on removal of comments indicates that the preferable option is to remove or comment out the offending words, if the commentary as a whole is viable. As I consider that a fair comment on Slimvirgin's behavior, I have removed the two obvious personal attack words from it. Please do not remove the user's comments, however.
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
56,167,169
He wasn't a Highland Scot, he was from Strathclyde, you utter spastic.
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
false
56,167,840
AimeeLee you are a dumb fuck. You are an American, i guess. Or a reall, really, really thick Canadian/aussie/kiwi.
2,006
false
article
blocked
test
true
56,171,629
` == Phanariotes == hi dahn. i think that maybe the section ``starting point``should be renamed to make clear that it refers to a period of romanian history. what about ``phanariote rule/period in Romania``? tell me what you think. best `
2,006
true
user
random
dev
false
56,175,675
` == List of computer and video game companies == I tried adding our company to the ``List of computer and video game companies`` page and it flagged it. The trademarked name is ``GOPODULAR!`` (www.gopodular.com) so that's probably why. I bet it thought it was some nut screaming about something. Is there a way to have it added? See: == List of countries by GDP == Where's Cuba on this list? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28PPP%29_per_capita == sorry == im sorry for the vandalism. i feel SO bad please forgive me—The preceding unsigned comment was added by • . == Not vadalism == I also was reverted for something that I don't believe is vandalism. If it was can someone explain to me why. What I did was insert a 2 line blurb on the christian prespective of mohammed in the section titled == mohammad in other religions == was that incorrect? Seems to me there should be a hindu / buddest prespective as well but I did not have time to research that. : Replied on the user talk page. Appears that the bot reverted vandalism *after* the user's edits, back to the user's version, rather than the bot actually having reverted the above user. - == Better warning message? == Could the warning message be modified to start a new section with == delimiters? I think that would make it easier to read the resulting user talk pages. :Done ::Ack; WP:UWLS! ~ == What are u talkin aboot == I ain't be changing no articles on Wikipedia. Must be the User Dementedcat. He hijacked my account cause he stole my pasword. Says he wants to send you guys pointless stuff since your site is pointless. I feel the complete opposite. Sorry for his misrtake. == Bot mistake == Your bot recently dumped a whole page I was editing under the ``Australian Immigration`` heading. I'm not pissed off because I've fixed it now, but you said you wanted feedback so here it is. == Doug problem == Okay, I added that he was gay because he is. Just rent it or something. He just seems like he is gay. I did not mean to vandalize tha article. anonymous user == King Rising levitation == Hi. The Twakerbot deleted a change I made to the King Levitation document and I would like that to be changed back. Corey King and the Ellusionist team have spent a lot of time on that specific effect and do not want it to be spread around on the internet like it is on wikipedia. They are currently selling this effect and they do not want their buissiness to drop because of this. my user talk number is 67.185.147.231. Please change this so it does not spoil this effect. Thank you. == Bellon == Sorry. My family name is Bellon and I did not think it should be a redirect to lead poisoning. But do as you think. I looked it up on google and saw on the 5 page that it can also meen lead poisoning. == Cigarette Revert. == I entered a valid name for ``cigarettes`` and it becamem reverted. I think it happened because the name of cigarettes in Ireland are called ``Fags`` == Change to entry == There is alot of fighting going on about just what said entry should say. people are constantly changing it, putting inappropriate commentary and hate speach on it. I changed it to ``Mostly Harmless`` both to make them realize what they are doing is dumb, and because it does not sound like an attack on either side. If you would, could you please change it back to what I posted? thank you. - == Vandalism (Snooker ) == Dear Friend, Can I suggest that the following IP address be blocked permanently: 125.236.44.45 as repeated warnings to that user's talk page have had no effect? I saw your recent message there about vandalism to the article ``snooker``, to which I contribute regularly. Even if it is a shared terminal somewhere, whoever regulates it has a duty of care to Wikipedia that is not being met. All the best, Patrick McWilliams (bigpad) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • . ==thorn hill hampshire== the edit about macaklan is not vandalism —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • . ==MMM Commentaries removal of entries== Why are entries concerning the fan group MMM Commentaries being removed? == chelsea norris == today chelsea norris said live on key 103 that she didn't think wikipedia could be aditted. i put this at the bottom of the info concerning her and it was reverted. please don't! == An edit == The edit submitted to this article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra-ordinary_%28album%29 ) is a legitimate edit and should stay as is. The information that was posted in that article is false information that a Justin Timberlake fan site made up. == User talk:65.89.98.22 == i'm not sure what you're talking about. I've never edited a page on here. jakeb == Goregrind edited == i add fuck i'm dead to the list of gore grind bands...i think it was just reverted because of the swearing in the name == Edit profanity? == Someone edited out profanity in the song lyrics for the following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feel_Good_Inc. I restored the original profanity and corrected improper use of apostrophes/commas, but this bot removed them. Can this be fixed? I didn't know Wikipedia had a ``no profanity`` policy - does it? If so, then I won't have much to do with Wikipedia any more. == to nicole richie from Leighann Heier == I promise to only write good things I truly think I belive Nicole Richie could be like or very close too the next Pamala Anderson because if you look at some of their photos they really look alot alike and I think that is a very huge compliment for Nicole I really belive she could be transformed in pams twin sister.well that's just my opinunion good enough LUV ya Richie your fan leghiann. == A change I made to the Ogre Kingdom page got reverted. == I changed the entry for Ogre Maneaters on the Ogre Kingdoms page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogre_%28Warhammer%29#Maneaters, basically I felt that the origional entry for them was misleading, I felt as if the statement about their Bull Charge rule made if appear that only the maneaters got that rule, so I removed it and added text about Golfag Maneater, a famous ogre maneater. I'm pretty sure I wasn't making Wiki actively worse, I was only removing innacurate information, so I dont see why Tawkerbot re-edited me. == Durantard == Durantard is an obsessed fan of Duran Duran. Anyone who knows about the Duranie fandom knows what a Durantard is. == Palm Desert map is incorrect == I attempted to remove the map currently posted to represent the location of Palm Desert (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_Desert%2C_California), as it is significantly off its mark (by over 60 miles). The dot on the map is a very close match to the location of Rubidoux, CA. I do not possess the software to fix this map myself, but attempted to remove the inaccurate material. == Vandalism == I have never edited a Wikipedia entry. I don't even know how to edit a wikipedia entry. I do not have an account to edit Wikipedia. Either someone is impersonating me, or there is a mistake somewhere. Please help me clarify this and clear it up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • . My name was on this page without permission thank you == answer to the message == All I did is corrct mistakes, I don't see why I would get a warning for that! == ``One In A Million`` == I changed the page for the Guns N' Roses song ``One In A Million`` from ``spread some expletive disease`` to ``spread some fucking disease``; I thought wikipedia didn't use euphemisms of that sort. Perhaps I was wrong. It was, however, a legitimate edit attempt. == good job == on the lost keys on tool's 10000 days pageNEWL
2,006
true
user
random
dev
false
56,177,673
JERK ASS!!! WHY DID YOU DELETE MY HELPFUL INFORMATION?
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
56,178,206
FAG FAG FAG FAG FAG FAG FAG... GET A REAL JOB PANSY!
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
56,178,968
and sticking your man cock in my ass
2,006
false
user
blocked
test
true
56,179,920
== I sincerely wish i could meet you chumps== You freaks really get my goat. Etaonsh(still stuck in 1940's Europe), Firestar(firststatr Kung Fu extraordinaire), COvenantD(typical east coast jerk), Mibhofroovvsskskkety(russkie man frozen in USSR), Samuel Luo(weird lookin crazy), and crazy ol' Tomanandaaa!(brokeback mt.! u give w.hollywood a bad name!) Hey tom, when are you going to make a real citation? your scholarship is the worse i have ever seen. stay in your hole in the public library, transient! We know you have no lives and are failures, I really can't believe how much you guys are on this site. I have been away for awhile(thanks to some good old censorship courtesy of that advocate of free speech, Fristare, kung fu chump) but you have been here night and day it appears. It's like you are writing books on the Falun Gong page alone. Freaks! Get a life! enjoy the sun, the wind, the air.
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
true
56,183,773
Request for a correction The current (locked) version of the article states that the war brought the second statehood to the Bulgarian people. This is not accurate, as there had already been two Bulgarian Empires. The period of Bulgarian statehood following the war correctly should be referred to as the Third Bulgarian Kingdom.
2,006
false
article
random
train
false
56,185,560
` {| class=``messagebox standard-talk`` |- | |An entry from appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 31 May, 2006. | |}`
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
56,187,679
` Prominent Italian historians - need I say more? Either way, it is very clear you have an inherent bias against Tito, no matter what ``sources`` you provide. Anybody can find any source with any POV easily, but finding more than a few is what will allow you to prove your argument (especially with non-peer reviewed sources) `
2,006
true
article
random
dev
false
56,190,284
==Games and Polls== ===Games=== (None at the time) ===Polls=== (None at the time)
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,191,659
:::It is still there. i have tryed to go to the page to delete the rey sabu match but on the edit page it doesn't show up. yet it is still seen on the main page. why is this
2,006
false
article
blocked
dev
false
56,192,505
::So where could I propose this change?
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
56,193,368
` ==Short and sweet== I was logged in. Wiki unlogged as I made my save. Bizzarre. All you ever wanted was a NPOV article?!! You should stick to something you know and care aboutthat you can give a fair and accurate perspective on. Why would you choose Ron Gostick unless you had a biasyour don't give a rat's - shows your contempt for the subject of the article to begin with and evidently your bias. As I said, whoever started this article couldn't even get the dates correct and was filled with all kinds of hostile language as you said. The wiki ``researched`` links you provided are more of that kind of prejudice. `
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
56,199,410
==Hello Young Lady== The articles were amended, please read them before reverting them again.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,209,530
` ==Patrick Walsh on the role of ``extreme rightwing`` Agent-Provocateurs== As documented by the former Royal Canadian Mounted Police undercover agent, Mr. Patrick Walsh, in a recently published book in Canada, ``The Unholy Alliance``, Zionists have played a major role in promoting ``Nazi`` and other allegedly anti-Jewish movement. The much publicised ``Nazi`` leader Lincoln Rockwell was a creature of the Zionist terror machine, and played a major role in persuading rich American Jews that they should contribute to the Zionists, who would protect them from threatened ``anti-Semitism``. Patrick Walsh thoroughly exposes the role of the agent provocateur. The Walsh exposures have, according to Canadian reports, thrown the Zionists and their dupes into some confusion. Patrick Walsh would have been most interested to hear Andrew Campbell's strong objection to a recent reference to ``Zionist thuggery``. He was the victim of this thuggery when brutally attacked by a group of Jewish Defence League members outside a room in the Royal York Hotel, Toronto, who were attempting to break up a school being conducted by Eric Butler. Zionist thuggery has been used against lawful patriotic groups right around the world. The League of Rights has constantly warned against extending encouragement to any type of violence, stressing that evil policies can be defeated through the British system of constitutional government. `
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,212,132
== Not convinced that this is unencylopedic == I'll readily agree that this isn't the best article in Wikipedia, but I don't think that it should be deleted without further discussion.
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
56,222,937
In the beginning of the text and in the chart on the right side I can find two different numbers of participants of the NPT. 188 and 187. Probably he latter one refers to the opting out of North Korea. Is that right? Philipp
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
false
56,223,583
` == you are Southern Baptists'? == No! nobody in a southern baptist church post garbage as ``free distribution of bibles by protestants led to PROFANE uses from Bible``. And you call it a neutral point of view?. What book from southern baptist theology you has ever reads?. I`m a baptist. your catholic proselytism using wikipedia will be reported to jimbo wales. I will writes entire articles on catholic massacres from evangelicals,orthodoxs and jews. If you delete it,I will writes it again and again.`
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
true
56,230,606
== Re: Catholic Bias in Wikipedia == I want to know How I can overcome these two problems: Abusive use from Wikipedia by Catholics,by example to term free distribution from Bibles by protestants as a PROFANE use from Bible. Or articles as spiritual warfare are edited in order to delete any reference to evangelical theologians.
2,006
true
user
blocked
dev
false
56,233,652
== I sincerely wish i could meet you chumps== You freaks really get my goat. Etaonsh(still stuck in 1940's Europe), Firestar(firststatr Kung Fu extraordinaire), COvenantD(typical east coast jerk), Mibhofroovvsskskkety(russkie man frozen in USSR), Samuel Luo(weird lookin crazy), and crazy ol' Tomanandaaa!(brokeback mt.! u give w.hollywood a bad name!) Hey tom, when are you going to make a real citation? your scholarship is the worst i have ever seen. stay in your hole in the public library, transient! We know you have no lives and are failures, I really can't believe how much you guys are on this site. I have been away for awhile(thanks to some good old censorship courtesy of that advocate of free speech, Fristare, kung fu chump) but you have been here night and day it appears. It's like you are writing books on the Falun Gong page alone. Freaks! Get a life! enjoy the sun, the wind, the air.
2,006
false
article
blocked
dev
false
56,233,807
I noticed that on the media page there are only FM radio stations. Can someone add some AM stations?
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
56,235,219
dude this suckes everytime i try to edit a page to thank you guys for wasting your time i keep getting blocked...it sucks balls...big elephant balls
2,006
true
user
random
test
true
56,238,870
== re: 65.184.159.115's vandalization of pages == My little sister was the one vandalizing the pages. I talked to her and told her to stop. If it happens again please drop me a line at evillizhaha@gmail.com. Thanks so much.
2,006
false
user
random
train
false
56,249,971
` ==Murtha calls U.S. Marines ``cold-blooded killers``== Someone needs to type up a section on this. I think it's a pretty big deal when an elected representive calls our soldiers war criminals before their American right to a fair trial even begins. Regardless of your pro-war/anti-war position, Murtha is a total disgrace.`
2,006
false
article
blocked
test
false
56,250,082
2006 (UTC) hi 02:46, 1 June
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
56,250,096
WARNING: Please do not edit the pictures on this page... or WINDOWS WILL GET YOU!!!
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
56,250,639
hahaha my name is danielle nicole meyer and i am retarded
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
true
56,251,421
` == This article needs to be cleaned up. == Look at this quote for instance: ``However, despite the man's awesome prowess`` It's also strange that the article doesn't make a distinction between novel and history information. There is also a problem with the timeline. The article also gives the impression that Gan Ning stopped being a boodthirsty murderer after ``reading literature``. Of course, it was very convenient for whoever wrote this article to leave out the incidence with Lu Meng and the kitchen boy. `
2,006
false
article
blocked
dev
false
56,253,615
nobody knows if its true they just did a thing on the history channel and they thought it was true so I dont know.
2,006
false
article
blocked
test
false
56,253,676
2006 (UTC) :::Cool. I am actually well known for making long posts, especially in forums. This is just a summary, and isn't intended to elaborate on all the main points. It's just to give people an idea of what you are writing so they will understand your long rant better. And I agree with some of your points, especially anti-elitism. I wrote the Google Groups article. As an experienced Google Groups user who owns a successful teen chat group and moderates several other large groups, I am more than qualified to write the Google Groups article, even if I am not the most knowledgable Google Groups user in the world. However, much of my information was tagged as unsourced. This will discourage experts from contributing their knowledge. I have also seen complaints about rogue admins abusing their powers 03:16, 1 June
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
56,256,353
` : You've made a total of 18 edits throughout Wikipedia, which, to me, suggests inexperience, so it is hardly inaccurate to claim that you are new, regardless of how long ago you signed up. Wikipedia policy encourages patience and understanding towards those who are new. Please explain how, precisely, this is being ``condescending.`` I'll admit that some of my early posts here were snarky, but, only in response to such comments as: :* ``This is blind POV.`` :* ``This is ridiculous.`` :* ``Well, suit yourself. I'll use a citation from the KC Star. If you revert again it will be without valid reason, so take care.`` :* ``You are trying to abuse Wikipedia's policies by claiming that your biased or unreasonable actions have been in line with them. That tactic shouldn't work. It's your attempts to vandalize the article because of irrational bias that I find ridiculous.`` :* ``I think you are trying (unsuccessfully) to cover up your bias and POV by claiming to be on the side of Wikipedia guidelines. That won't work with me, and hopefully it won't work with other people.`` :* ``That means you are lying in the paragraph above when you suggest this is original research, unsupported claims, or laziness. And you know you are. Well, great. I hope you're happy. Perhaps you've violated the 3-reverts rule by now?`` :- `
2,006
true
article
random
dev
false
56,258,388
== Thanks == For the kind support, once again...
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
56,260,119
I am NOT the user vandalizing these pages. It is not my fault others sharing the same IP are causing this trouble. Whoever maintains this website, please stop sending me warning messages when I happen to view pages here.
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
56,260,251
I feel dumb, I suggested a redirect on the other page. P
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
56,262,771
` == Political neutrality & citations == The article claims that ``Jehovah's Witnesses are politically neutral`` citing The Watchtower as the source. This is somewhat dubious; the fact that it's a doctrine doesn't make it so, and citing The Watchtower as an authoritative source on the matter seems quite POVish (this may apply to other citations in the article as well).`
2,006
false
article
random
dev
false
56,270,705
the scholarship you display Tom has to rank amongst the worst known to man. go find something better to do you transient!
2,006
false
article
blocked
dev
false
56,270,916
== Samuel is a chump with no life== i hope that is the case you chump. if i find out the reason u have so much time to work on this page is because you are getting paid to do it, my respect for you will fall even lower.
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
true
56,271,541
`Miborrovovovovsky can you issue a report called ``I have no life, therefore I enjoy looking at a computer screen all day?`` it would be much appreciated. `
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
true
56,280,247
` :Weasel words. Weasel words, are not to be used. This is in fact, what we were discussing. :The page I gave in reference, goes into this. See the section called ``Examples``. This is where they frown on words with ``some`` in them. Its not my opinion, so I'd rather copy and paste as it were, then ramble about why I personally wouldnt use it. Its not what I believe, its what Wikipedia allows. But as you request, I'll ``articulate``. :The word ``some``, is broad. It can refer to a number of ``things``. This however, is poor usage of words. As I have noted above, it leaves a large number of questions, more so, than the first question the reader has when looking for this article (whats a scottish rite?). Plus, its not allowable on Wikipedia. So I agree, and am disputing it. :I bring up bias, because it is. It gives the illusion of an NPOV (neutral point of view), but isnt. And when its not an NPOV statement, its a POV, which is bias. And support of such a statement, shows it. And gamesmanship...no. Originally I was willing to leave the sentence without citation. `
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
56,285,532
== Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard//Incidents Brian J. Bruns (Brian Bruns) == I responded to your opinions at ANI about Brian J. Bruns. Look at the court dox. )
2,006
true
user
random
test
false
56,289,223
==3RR== One more revert and you will be 3RR...Go ahead make my day !
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,295,760
== why is a book with sex and hardcore orgys a childrens book == why is a book with sex and hardcore orgys a childrens book. do many childrens books have orgys and hardcore porn (i wish!) no they are clean unlike this book. which is full os sex. its a can of sex
2,006
true
article
blocked
dev
true
56,297,002
Bleh. I'm all out of ideas. Is there really something wrong with the server or what? The damn thing won't work for me, either Helvetica_font_new.svg (my upload of Segoe UI was actually a PNG to begin with...)
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,308,103
== Re edits to ME == Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
56,311,277
== Goodbye? == See: Meatball: Goodbye. What reason was there for it?
2,006
false
user
blocked
dev
false
56,313,684
Mild notoriety only within Wikipedia? Within Wikipedia, it has been the single most discussed web site for the past 6 months straight, far surpassing the likes of Wikitruth, which has its own article. Outside of Wikipedia, it has an Alexa ranking currently of 35,000, which also far exceeds Wikitruth's of 100,000 or so. It has been in an increasing number of news reports as well, up around 20 from reputable sources now, and the frequency of these is increasing as well. It is known for things outside of Wikipedia too: 1) As an example of censorship - Wikipedia has gone to pains to censor it. This is relevant to people who have no idea what Wikipedia is, because this is a critic site that is not allowed to exist. 2) Cyber stalking, hate speech, and many other issues which Wikipedia Review has hit on, and it has been viewed by some pro-Wikipedia loyalists that Wikipedia Review is an example of these, and that it should be discussed in a context that does not include discussion of Wikipedia, or of its criticisms of Wikipedia. It is the first and largest place for criticism of Wikipedia. In such circumstances, notability is clearly established. It is not just a forum, it has its own domain name too and exists as a legal entity. The original article was created as spam just days after the forum was created. At that time, it should have been deleted. We are looking at a vastly different picture now.
2,006
false
article
blocked
dev
false
56,317,390
` Sinatra's version of ``White Christmas`` was better.`
2,006
false
article
blocked
test
false
56,319,601
Thank you for your clarification. The reason that I did not answered you because I am still looking for etymology of this word and I wanted to come back after a complete study. I thought you are a linguistic, that is why I asked you this question, but I appreciate your usefull help. By the way, do you know any Turkish linguistic?Behmod
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
56,324,158
:: I agree. There needs to be a Wikipedia-wide policy on diacritics; and in point of fact, whatever the consensus ends up being, I'd be happy to go along with it. But there does need to be a consensus across those working on all cultures. The Japan Wikiproject recently reached a consensus on our own use of macrons (the little lines over a 'u' or 'o', representing the long vowel sounds 'oo', 'ou' or 'uu'). Perhaps a discussion needs to be begun over at WP:MOS or somewhere else major and central.
2,006
true
article
random
dev
false
56,330,206
== Hello == Hi my name is Danielle!!! and i googled myself and this came up!!! How weird, well what is this??? siempre, Danielle Whitman
2,006
false
user
blocked
test
false
56,334,566
== No more this shit! == OK, Russian friends, you vandalized the article once again with your stylistic history laquering as well as with brutal deletions and inadequate templates. I'm getting tired of this shit. Do it again, and I'll fulfill this threat!. BTW, another external link for you to consider your behaviour. Alex Bakharev, please think about mentoring your compatriots in order to avoid a massive PR-problem for Russia here on Wikipedia. Worst wishes,
2,006
true
article
blocked
dev
true
56,341,004
== golden age of hip hop == Why do you support this article so much. Rap has not helped save anyone. It is not important. Besides, you sound like an idiot. I believe you should change your ideas about life, before you do something stupid.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
true
56,341,257
` :Unfortunately the title of my page has been missunderstood. Call me naive, but I've never thought about the idea, that the admins could think, that I would assume them to deliberately persecute Muslims. Is a fact, that presumably Muslims have been blocked in the minute they removed the cartoons the first time, and it that sense I've used the title. It reminds me of a missunderstanding that happened to me before, when editors were claiming, that they have no plan to ``get the muslims here``. I thought, that they must have meant ``get the muslims away``, when they actually meant ``get them`` in the meaning of ``To take revenge on, especially to kill in revenge for a wrong.`` Anyway, I've been blocked days after I've repeatedly agreed to change the title. I don't know, whether I should take Zoes warning serious, where she told, that I'll be blocked indefinitely should I recreate the page in any fashion. Would you care to ask her, whether I can recreate the page using your title for it? `
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,341,669
Something needs to be done about this Chilvers character. He has a wrecking agenda.
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
false
56,341,992
You don't know history! You are alone troublesome admirer of dictator Broz in this discussion: an administrator needs block you! Moreover in my next change i use different words.
2,006
true
article
blocked
dev
false
56,342,254
` We're all anonymous Mr Zero. Even you. Yes, the British electorate are like sheep. I agree with what's been said above. You seem to get very upset when anyone disagrees with you. There is a book out at the moment called ``Bloody Foreigners``. Can't remember the author but I'd get a copy iof I were you. `
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
false
56,342,931
Yes I'd agree. You're going nowhere. I looked at the opposition and they appear to be in North America. Amazing. They know more about us than we do here? Incredible.
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
false
56,343,218
I live in Washington D.C and I work as a security officer at the Pentagon. I love star wars and have seen all the movies 50 times.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,343,962
==Hey== It's not big, we all have each other's backs.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,345,603
Well if you used your eyes for reading, then you would notice that it is reference to THIS page. did I say anything about it being applicable to YOUR page or any other page? NO i did not.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,345,642
` :::I wonder what difference that would make, since I haven't thought of the meaning ``to overcome or destroy`` either. `
2,006
true
user
blocked
dev
false
56,347,400
how do you KNOW it? I could equally argue that you and i know i wasnt intending it as a personal attack.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,347,939
hello yamla- yup sorry about that last comment...i guess it could be percieved as vandalism.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,351,030
` ===Straw poll=== What do we use in the article? *Unofficial source says Macanese; possibility of Cantonese #[[WP:EA|E]] + at 17:30 UTC (2006-06-01) *Macanese, no mention of Cantonese *Cantonese, no mention of Macanese *Official source says Cantonese; possibility of Macanese #[[WP:EA|E]] + at 17:30 UTC (2006-06-01)`
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
56,357,830
oh hello fnarf...um il think about it
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,358,914
oh hello again fnarf. i do apologise, my sincerest condolences for my disruptiveness. I am not being sarcastic
2,006
true
user
blocked
dev
false
56,362,660
Oh hello again yamla. No actually im still having fun. Right now I am laughing, at you! and its great. if only you could see me, im having a whale of a time. hahahaha!:)
2,006
true
user
blocked
dev
false
56,369,183
You asked about my (extremely limited) knowledge of Hungarian: I've been there, once (a week in 1995, in Budapest and elsewhere), and I play Hungarian music here. You're right; it's one of the more exotic languages here. By the way, having been to a few places in the country, I decided if I were to retire somewhere, I'd like to do it in Tihany. That was my favorite spot of all the places we visited. Just a little estate there with a vineyard and wine cellar ... ==
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,373,645
You know i really disprove of your actions Yamla
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,377,567
There are 3 articles. Contract Bridge, Rubber bridge and Duplicate bridge. It is possible there are more and that I've missed something. One article is the parent article, it should include some history of how the game developed from Whist and that article would be Contract Bridge. That there is bidding should be spelled out in the parent article. That there are only 15 useable words which partners may use to describe their hand and to arrive at a contract should be spelled out, the concept of strain or demonination should be presented and the rules of play. But I don't believe it would be appropriate to do more than touch on bidding systems. Rubber bridge is the way Contract Bridge is scored. Then, Duplicate bidge adds another layer of scoring complexity in addition to the already present and continually used, rubber bridge scoring. In addition, Duplicate Bridge adds another layer of rigidity to what cards partnerships hold. In this manner the element is skill is boosted while the element of luck (unavoidably present) is made smaller. The Duplicate bridge article could get into the bidding boxes, the curtain used in large, international tournements and so on. But I would very much like to see these articles be friendly and readable so that a person who had never played bridge could read them and could find a logical development of complexity and of expertise required. So that a green player could view both how to begin to learn to play and where the top is too, that people make their living at playing bridge, that there are international tournements of great interest, that some top bridge players are recognized by various public figures and so on. So that a person can follow the logical development of being a beginning player, right through to becoming a top player. And the joy of the intellectual compitition combied with the social intercourse of sitting at a table with 3 people. We could compare that, perhaps, to Chess which is likewise an intellectual compitition but is less social with each board lasting longer and being less casual. You know what I mean? As it stands now a new player isn't introduced to the game in a logical sequence. This article covers too much ground and brings too much stiffness into the game too early.
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
56,386,573
` :::: ``Wollersheim, who had long suffered from manic depression, joined the church in 1969 ... leaving the church in late 1979 or early 1980`` metnews which means the court cases of Wollersheim v Church of Scientology revolves around Church Policy during that time period. The statements found in the court documents unless otherwise stated would be about that time period. You notice how the website which presents those quotations carefully omits a reference to when statements. Personal websites are notorious for omitting some information, for presenting that information which most manifests the website's personal point of view. `
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
56,388,598
:::: Futurix, you have mistakenly presented an arguement here which has been extensively argued out already at WP:RS. Specifically, Wikipediatrix, Fahrenheit451 and others attempted to make that arguement. Clambake.org presents that it is the personal property and opinion of its author. That situation has been extensively talked about at WP:RS, the result being that clambake is a personal website and editors are to treat it as a personal website. Which means, it can not be used as a secondary source of information. Which means, if there is a book or document which is accurately present at Andreas Heldal-Lund's personal website, then that could be quoted and cited. Your venue for changing Wikipedia guideline is WP:RS, not here on a discussion page, especially because that particular website has been particularly and exhaustively talked about there, at the guideline page.
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
56,389,540
::::::::::: No, it can't because that 1994 court proceeding is in reference to an action that happened in 1970 or therabouts. The quote uses a few of the words mentioned, without the context which is not in regards to 1994, or even to 1990, but in regards to an earlier time. metnews spells out that timeline.
2,006
true
article
blocked
dev
false
56,392,940
:Guys, the GPD/capita in Romania is over 10.000$, for the simpple fact that Romania is experincieng an economical boom, and the GPD rised enormly in th epast few years. Personally I approved GPD's figures.
2,006
true
article
blocked
dev
false
56,393,063
Hello Fnarf. Indeed, i agree. Well, only to a certain extent. I think that the picture of the young man should go, and i dont have an problem with the other pictures. I dont like the picture of the young man, it is too weird and just distracts from the article. I am not saying my suggestion of replacement picture is the only one, i just changted it before because i owned the rights to the picture.
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
56,399,085
== Why posting units should exist == If sites like GNAA can have a wiki article - they're far worst to be honest. Why not TPU. Furthermore TPU is not a club nor is it about someone. It is an IDEA, come on wikipedia you know what they are surely. Anyone with half a brain can join. Its not about abuse, its about the birth of a new internet where nothing is free from potential dispute by others, no one is safe. Before this gets deleted, which it probably will. I urge you to reconsider your speedy deletions. Think a little more. Give time for me to add more substance; ideology, methodolgy, a genuine study into why how and what the posting units does and how it exists. You've succesfully demonstrated the thing most people do, judge a book by its cover and for this i forgive your ignorance. This is not an attack on you merely an anoyyance at hasty decisions by people in power with nothing better to do at 23:31 GMT. To be honest I'm off to bed, and if this is still here in the morning I'll judge it as my second chance. Until tommorow. PU
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
56,401,609
== US == Why on earth is there a massive US section on this page? There's a big enough article at Wheel of Fortune for that version. If no one objects I'll delete the section tomorrow.
2,006
true
article
random
test
false
56,404,625
`, 1 June 2006 (UTC) ::::::I'm not sure if I get the fire chickens part, but I do like the rhyming! And self-service vindaloo is certain to be very tasty! That's very exciting about the admin-ness, I'm going to have to figure out how to thank you properly! ) 23:12`
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
56,405,279
== Kungfu Adam == Kungfu Adam is a fucking dumbass.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
true
56,405,359
== Cunt Editing == You should be added to the list I was creating, erg you are a cunt.
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
56,405,407
== Cunt Editing == You should be added to the list I was creating, ergo you are a cunt.
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
56,409,012
Fnarf, like anyone takes notice of what you think. oh how rude of me, i forgot to say hello.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,413,145
== Neutral Point of View? == Catholicism Catholics believe that the Bible cannot be reliably interpreted without the aid of tradition and Church teaching, and that evangelism requires more personal contact than simply giving away the text of the Bible(Catholic Propaganda. Catholics NO evangelize). In some cases free distribution of Bibles has simply led to these copies being used for profane purposes.(This is too much derogatory toward evangelicals,and MUST TO BE DELETED JUST NOW!).
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,413,223
` == More about Barriers == The second paragraph presently begins: Study tech attempts to remove what it calls ``barriers to study``. Study Tech defines 3 barriers. As a dictionary defines words and as biology defines the cell ``nucleus`` and the ``cell membrane``, well, Study Tech defines 3 barriers which it says exist. It says, ``there are three barriers to study``, that is its message. It spells out the barriers and it says how to deal with these barriers when a student encounters them. Could we have Study tech defines three barriers to study and purports a methodology of dealing with them? The reason the present sentence is not accurate is because no matter how many times a student removes a barrier, he may meet the same barrier in the next word he reads. A student educates himself and then deals with barriers when he meets them. `
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
56,414,571
` == Suggestion == I saw your edit, which was really not a bad edit, in the Dianetics article and think it is an interesting contribution. I'm referring to: Drs. Ankerberg and Weldon state that Hubbard, through Scientology and Dianetics, have made a significant contribution to the New Age movement. If I may suggest. It might stand in the article if it had an attribution. If it had, per WP:CITE, some indication of having been published. You know, its not that anyone is doubting that information, but information needs to have been published to the public. So a newspaper or a book attribution would be appropriate. In Dianetics or possibly in Scientology (maybe better in Scientology, but that is just an opinion) it would be a good piece of information. Put the information into the article as you did and then immediately follow the period at the end with Book name, publisher, maybe page number. Just like you read it, the no wiki that you read when editing is called ``markup`` and I put it in so you could read the how to reference ~~~~`
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
56,425,892
:Someone should have told you by now, if you stop sucking so many dicks, you'll be more relaxed. Too much dick-sucking (so I'm told) can lead to temporary psychosis.
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
56,429,116
==Wost Ever== Would it hurt to note that some historians consider him the worst president ever?
2,006
true
article
blocked
test
false
56,431,206
*There's plenty of links proving that 50 actually said all that. I know it sounds unusual for a black gangsta rapper to be supporting George W. Bush but the evidence is there to proof it.
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
false
56,433,649
Keep up the good work, 172.201.253.232!
2,006
false
user
blocked
test
false
56,436,948
` I also removed the ``1901`` listing on the note about the inscription on his tombstone - the 1903 date has been confirmed and is now listed by the Who's Who and Guinness Book of Records etc. It has even been corrected at findadeath.com.`
2,006
false
article
blocked
dev
false