rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
56,448,429
|
` Symptoms: Fever shivering joint pain vomiting aneamia symptoms haemoglobinuria tingling preventative measures: *dependant upon control and elimination of the insect vector . *There is currently no artificial means of prevention. *Methods used to prevent the spread of disease, or to protect individuals in areas where malaria is endemic, include prophylactic drugs, mosquito eradication, and the prevention of mosquito bites. There is currently no vaccine that will prevent malaria, but this is an active field of research. Some drugs that can be used for treatment of malaria can also be used for its preventative qualities however they need to be taken daily or weekly. These are seldom used by those living in a malaria abundant enivornment and are commonyl found amongst travellers visitng regions of hight malaria activity. *Quinine was used starting in the seventeenth century as a prophylactic against malaria. The development of more effective alternatives such as quinacrine, chloroquine, and primaquine in the twentieth century reduced the reliance on quinine. Today, quinine is still used to treat chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum, as well as severe and cerebral stages of malaria, but is not generally for malaria prophylaxis. Modern drugs used preventively include mefloquine (Lariam®), doxycycline (available generically), and atovaquone proguanil hydrochloride (Malarone®). The choice of which drug to use is usually driven by what drugs the parasites in the area are resistant to, as well as side-effects and other considerations. The prophylactic effect does not begin immediately upon starting taking the drugs, so people temporarily visiting malaria-endemic areas usually begin taking the drugs one to two weeks before arriving and must continue taking them for 4 weeks after leaving (atovaquone proguanil only needs be started 2 days prior and continued for 7 days afterwards). **Controlling the vector is the most useful way of preventing the spread of malaria. Efforts to eradicate malaria by eliminating mosquitoes have been successful in some areas. Malaria was once common in the United States and southern Europe, but the draining of wetland breeding grounds and better sanitation, in conjunction with the monitoring and treatment of infected humans, eliminated it from affluent regions. In 2002, there were 1,059 cases of malaria reported in the US, including eight deaths. In five of those cases, the disease was contracted in the United States. Malaria was eliminated from the northern parts of the USA in the early twentieth century, and the use of the pesticide DDT eliminated it from the South by 1951. In the 1950s and 1960s, there was a major public health effort to eradicate malaria worldwide by selectively targeting mosquitoes in areas where malaria was rampant.[12] However, these efforts have so far failed to eradicate malaria in many parts of the developing world - the problem is most prevalent in Africa. The United States itself may face the spread of malaria in the future as climate change (warming) leads to an expansion of the areas in which mosquitoes are active.. Mosquito nets and prevention of mosquito bites Mosquito nets help keep mosquitoes away from people, and thus greatly reduce the infection and transmission of malaria. The nets are not a perfect barrier, so they are often treated with an insecticide designed to kill the mosquito before it has time to search for a way past the net. Insecticide-treated nets (ITN) are estimated to be twice as effective as untreated nets.[16] Since the Anopheles mosquitoes feed at night, the preferred method is to hang a large ``bed net`` above the center of a bed such that it drapes down and covers the bed completely. The distribution of mosquito nets impregnated with insecticide (often permethrin) has been shown to be an extremely effective method of malaria prevention, and it is also one of the most cost-effective methods of prevention. These nets can often be obtained for around US$2.50 - $3.50 (2-3 euros) from the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and others. For maximum effectiveness, the nets should be re-impregnated with insecticide every six months. This process poses a significant logistical problem in rural areas. A new type of impregnated net, called Olyset, releases insecticide for approximately 5 years[17], and costs about US$5.50. ITN's have the advantage of protecting people sleeping under the net and simultaneously killing mosquitoes that contact the net. This has the effect of killing the most dangerous mosquitoes. Some protection is also provided to others, including people sleeping in the same room but not under the net. Unfortunately, the cost of treating malaria is high relative to income, and the illness results in lost wages. Consequently, the financial burden means that the cost of a mosquito net is often unaffordable to people in developing countries, especially for those most at risk. Only 1 out of 20 people in Africa own a bed net.[18] A study among Afghan refugees in Pakistan found that treating top-sheets and chaddars (head coverings) with permethrin has similar effectiveness to using a treated net, but is much cheaper.[19] A new approach, announced in Science on June 10, 2005, uses inert spores of the fungus Beauveria bassiana, sprayed on walls and bed nets, to kill mosquitoes. While some mosquitoes have developed resistance to chemicals, they have not been found to develop a resistance to fungal infections.[20] [edit] Vaccination Vaccines for malaria are under development, with no completely effective vaccine yet available (as of January 2006). A team backed by the Gates Foundation and the pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline have announced results of a Phase IIb trial for RTS,S/AS02A, a vaccine which reduces infection risk by approximately 30% and severity of infection by over 50%. The study looked at over 2000 Mozambican children.[21] Further research will delay this vaccine from commercial release until around 2010. In January 2005, University of Edinburgh scientists announced the discovery of an antibody which protects against the disease. The scientists will lead a £17m European consortium of malaria researchers.[22] It is hoped that the genome sequence of the most deadly agent of malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, which was completed in 2002, will provide targets for new drugs or vaccines. [23]`
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,451,990
|
==Lists== Someone's gotta do something about this article. The lists of misanthropes is way too long compared to the entire article. Either simplify the lists, or elaborate more on the subject at hand. I know I wont do it, I'll just leave it up to some of the humans passing across this page who, by the way, I hate! (Except for the 10~15 who I have developed a mutually advantageous relationship with). Also, just tell me if any other misanthropes have experienced this: Falling in love with a fellow human, without his/her knowledge, then tossing the argument around in your head that you have no right to like her, because shes just a human and you know a relationship would be pointless and futile, but you continue to freak out about it? -I'm leaving this unsigned purposely, don't cut yourself over it.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,456,407
|
If you use another IP, We will find out and Ban that one to.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,456,691
|
==Idiots== I have already file a formal compliant with their web hosting company and the police about this site. When they are closed down I will laugh.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
56,460,295
|
:That is not a reason to put articles in the a stub-category. Sorry.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
56,463,491
|
:Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I added a note about it on the RfAr page: And the anon sock started posting there too.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
56,471,599
|
::I've seen many versions of his famous line but which one is the most accurate translation?
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,474,314
|
:It comfused me at first - suggest they get changed?
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
56,476,596
|
==Mahmoud Ahmadinejad== I added the Category:Anti-Semitic people and there is a small group of anti-Semites their that keep removing it. They identify themselves with the following barnstar If you feel [[[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]] is anti-Semitic please add this +cat. Cordially
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,477,342
|
== Give it up == Here's something you should take to heart, Anger22: “Stupidity is better kept a secret than displayed.” —Heraclitus of Ephesus. Of course, that's from the Stupidity article your page links to. (The funny thing is, you don't realize the joke's on you.) Don't revert right away. Think about it. If you're capable of figuring it out, I'll know by the fact that this page no longer exists, and you've given up editing articles.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
56,481,056
|
`*I disagree. I've witnessed drug abuse on many fronts and I've found that this book, though it certainly doesn't apply to every situation, is actually closer to the truth than simply being ``propaganda``. `
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,482,560
|
::I am playing by the rules, you need to breathe out mate, How can a law suit be brought for defammation or libel when the word alleged is used and other such provisional language, ok a case can be brought but having studied law myself, the judge would not rule in the plaintiffs favour (the plaintiff's legal rep would probably advise against bringing such a silly action in the first place) if he brought a case on the basis of such ambiguous language lacking in positivity so stop over-estimating and exagerrating the legal potential of this type of statement. You worry too much, it probably stems from ignorance of the facts in your case.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,484,456
|
` ::::: The less offensive term of equal clarity and brevity is ``British & Irish Isles``. Believe when I say that the Manx natives have no trouble with this description as they are linked to the U.K. as a protected and supported territory, Republic of Ireland on the other hand is a sovereign nation with no link to the U.K. Did you read the article on wiki about the basis for usage of the term? Completely flawed logic as it refers to ancient texts etc and precedent for calling them the British isles. Place names reflect current realities, thus we have Istanbul and not Constantinople. A better example would be the Aegean coast of Turkey and its islands. this whole area was once referred to as the Greek coast and all the islands were Greek islands. since the political landscape has changed and the Turkish state has jurisdiction, the only islands which are now ``Greek islands`` are those within the jurisdiction of Greece. if you were to rebut by saying that British refers to something more than a political term, but rather than an ethnic or geographical one, then the same argument (or even a better one can be made of Greek). the Greek world once referred to an area far greater than modern or ancient Greece (e.g. southern Italy, Sicily, turkey, Armenia etc) and many of the people residing in those parts of turkey which were formerly designated ``Greek`` are ethnically and linguistically Greek but live in the state of turkey, and therefore the islands and coast are Turkish. Thus, you could not refer to the island of Ireland as British.`
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,484,526
|
: I'm a completely uninterested party: I'd also have failed the GA nom for three reasons: emotional text (a.k.a. non-NPOV), it needs inline cites over just a bunch of refs (no context), and I'd like a few more pictures (although I'm pretty open for convincing otherwise). |
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
56,489,966
|
`:SSS108|talk]]-email :The vandalism is currently continuing by user: 209.200.60.124. This person is removing court records, which are reputable sources that can be included in the article. -email ==Hello== has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this alk`
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
56,490,374
|
I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg I am a bad egg
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,496,343
|
` :: Hello Alun, thank you for your contribution. Can I put two points to you, firstly in relation to editing against consensus, to answer ``yes`` - it is possible to edit against consensus. People like me stand on my own two feet, stand up to scrutiny, stand up to debate and discussion, stand up to a weight of opinion against me and stand behind my name and only my name each time I weigh in with my opinion. It is my belief that many others however employ sockpuppets to corroborate and support their point of view which in my view is a very cowardly and dishonourable method of ``argeing`` one's point. This is the reason why you can edit against consensus, because if there was a stipulation against it, the victim of the stipulation would employ the use of sockpuppets. I'm sure there are some contributors on here who employ them e.g. Velela, Mrs Trellis, Vashti, Stemonitis. My 2nd point concerns the verifiable source issue, I should not have to provide verifiable source as an alternative to the one provided if I do not subscribe to the verifiability of the source provided to support the supposition that ``Wales is known for its' musicla heritage etc.`` Thank you `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,497,131
|
Well then, let me suggest that you do a simple change in your userpage and maintain it, then I will leave it otherwise prepare to get very bored. You have been warned.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,499,354
|
` ::::::::: IMDB says ``Big Brother``. The official website also just says ``Big Brother``. - `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
56,500,716
|
Oh excellent someone changed the picture...well done. Oh hello yamla if your reading this
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,501,120
|
` :: It's not verifiable, where in the Encyclopedia Britannica does it say ``Wales is known for its' musical heritage``. IT DOESN'T, it may refer to the ``Land of Song`` but that is merely a tagline and not a factual reference from the Encyclopedia. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,501,514
|
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Wiki. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
56,506,057
|
` ==Gibraltar== Hello Woohookitty, User Ecemaml has told us to ask you for help with a problem me and a number of users, including Ecemaml, have had with the article on Gibraltar. Perhaps you could provide some form of arbitration. There is no particular dispute at this moment although over the past few months, user Gibnews has imposed his POV version of the article on the vast majority of users. Other opinions backed with acceptable sources are dismissed by him as pro-Spanish. He also seems to convey a sense of irrational hostility towards Spain and Spaniards which are reflected in his edits. If you check the history of the talk page, he has driven away a number of users over the past few months. He is now engaged in disputes regarding articles on ``San Roque`` and ``Algeciras`` (cities close to the British territory of Gibraltar.) Permanently banned user ``Gibraltarian`` has recently returned to support him as an unregistered user signing as ``yanito``. On the other side of the debate, the only user showing a (Pro Spanish POV) tendentious and aggressive behaviour is User Ismael76, although he seems to have got bored of the issue and left the debate. I was wondering if you could give us some advice on what we should do with Gibnews and the article in general. It is sad when users appropriate articles as their own to express their POVs. Please have a look at the following: [Talk page 1] [Talk page 2] [Edits to Gibraltar Article] [User contributions by Gibnews] Thanks alot Burgas00.`
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,506,478
|
::::Get with the programme, it's a tagline, a catchphrase, it is a sorry state of affairs if someone is using a tagline as verifiable proof of the supposition that Wales is known for its' musical heritage. Surely someone can provide more verifiable references than this.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,509,441
|
is approved, the edit history of this page will be transfered to the talk page of your new user name account>
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
56,509,520
|
:Wasn't Wen Qin's son called Wen Yang? Wen Yuan doesn't bring up anything relevent in goolge while Wen Yang does.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
56,510,459
|
` :: A recent article in the Scottish Historical Review reaffirms the stupidity of ``Canmore dynasty``, saying it is a product of 19th century ``Teutonist`` fancy. For me, I'd prefer Uí Crínaín and Uí Ailpín as dynasty names, but that ain't gonna happen. I too, though, would be happy to see these dynasyties deleted. - (')''' `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
56,510,893
|
` ::::Hate speech is serious, Mr Malber. As I recall, your involvement with Wikipedia Review was because you were guilty of hate speech, in that you suggested that ``people with autism should not be allowed to edit Wikipedia``. Malber, you are a poor person to comment on such an issue. You should have been banned from Wikipedia for your comments, yet here you remain, continuing with your hate speech. You are quite correct that Amorrow engaged in hate speech, although of a lesser variety of the kind used by you. He was banned, as you were. You, Malber, were banned for hate speech. Did you forget this? Perhaps you forgot this. The place that is the only place devoted to criticism of Wikipedia is indeed important. You can disagree with as much of it as you like. Criticism, by its very nature, is not generally accepted by those who it is critical of. This does not illegitimise it. There are many and varied very legitimate criticism. One such criticism is why a hate-monger such as yourself is not banned from Wikipedia. Perhaps you are biased in this however. Perhaps you'd like to argue how you are less of a hate speaker than anyone who has ever posted on Wikipedia Review. As far as our evidence has proven, you are much worse than the worst on WR. Yet here you remain, free to post on Wikipedia. Strange that. `
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,515,252
|
` :::::: DON'T MISQUOTE ME, DON'T PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH, Don't try and embellish your argument with falsehoods in the best traditions of a tabloid journalist. I never said ``there was no evidence that Wales was known as ``the land of song`` or ``a land of song````, Show me where I said this. You have lost any diminishing credibility you ever possessed. You are a fraud. I have no intention of dealing with people who lie, you have no honour and therefore I have little or no time for you. Let that not prevent me from wishing you all the best in your future pursuits. Good luck. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,517,066
|
Yamla is a child molester who raped 20 children. You are disgusting!
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
56,518,182
|
== SSSSSSSSSSSSShhhhhhhh == Go away. Don't use my suerpage again for any reason or you will regret it.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
56,518,309
|
. You have been warned.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,519,602
|
`:: I don't really want to deal with an amoeba but just to set the record straight for the Anti-Einstein, how in the name of all that's earthly does ``there was NO evidence that Wales was known as ``the land of song`` or ``a land of song```` correspond to that quotation of mine i.e. that the vast majority of Dublin inhabitants would not recognise Wales as the land of music or song. You are a fraud, it's pure and simple, now stop debating out of your anus and don't smoke weed when you're trying to make serious contributions please. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
56,521,096
|
:Works for me, though I'm fairly new at this. I just correct things that appear to be incorrect or mistakes. At the moment I'm thinking of severely trimming the article for The Chase because I think it's entirely too dense and too detailed.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
56,521,825
|
:::Hi Kim, I move that the edit-freeze be unlocked as I believe I have made my point, what with my neutrality flag being frozen in the article long enough now. I move that with the overwhelming consensus of opinion against me (even with sockpuppets in play) the neutrality flag be de-activated and the edit function restored. I vow not to flag the music section in this article again unless provoked into doing so by ungracious comments. I reserve the right to maintain my point of view about the subjectivity of this section but I uphold to defer to the majority as my point has been well-established and my neutrality flag maintaining its' presence is synonymous with this point. I thank you all for an engaging debate and I look forward to hopefully supporting your views in the future. Thanks once again. Bazzajf
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,536,951
|
It is all copy paste from official iraklis website.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
56,537,307
|
You are the troll, leave my talk page alone....stop harassing me for no reason. What is wrong with you?
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| true
|
56,542,498
|
`Khoikhoi where is your ``NPOV`` idea in Armenian Genocide article. Please go that article and show your ``NPOV``. This photo has no copyright problems, it is reality and it will be published here. Sorry but you can't do anything for this my friend. Your admin friends also cannot help you. Sorry ( `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,544,848
|
Ya know they say Selene is in love with michel but I don't see it
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
56,546,047
|
== 1389 or 1453 == These dates 1299-1453 and 1453-1789 not true. The simulation in the article proves that the Ottoman Flag comes from Kosova war whicn happened in 1389. As you can see these date 1453 is false. I change that.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,547,777
|
“65.219.212.128”& “24.105.219.78” The links do work, which is proof that you’re not even attempting to look at them. Can you consider actually looking at the evidence for once? I see you are quick to make accusations that are baseless. How surprising. The problem is that they are not proof of what they claim to be. Damn, how hard is that to understand? Some of you are full of it, and you know it. See WP:V: “3. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.” So, you want to include it, provide an accurate citation. You act as though all of this is obviously true, but it’s not. Your opinions are not facts and your arguments should have something other than namecalling to back them up. If you were truly interested in the accuracy of this article, you would read the lengthy rebuttals above and respond to them. Instead you make pathetic accusations and ignore the hard work of other Wikipedians, and, of course, you never bother to deal with actual facts.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| true
|
56,547,864
|
`Regarding ``personal attacks``, I took out the disclaimer (that I had put in). I first considered copying it over to the Wikipedia Review link, as this is the same site the disclaimer referred to, but then I realized, no, that's insane! What, now we're warning people that there might be bad language and not-nice things said on a website? What the fuck? That's like warning people before reading a newspaper that there might be articles that would be ``a bummer, man; might bring you down all day``. What is this world turning into, Disneyland, where every protruding thing that could possibly hurt you is covered in nice soft padding? Sheesh! == `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,549,936
|
== -( == Hi, you... Please don't insult fat people like myself in the edit summaries of the fat acceptance movement article. It's exactly this sort of piece of hatred that necesitates the movement itself. People of size aren't just a dog, we have feelings too, and often come to Wikipedia. See, Hateful edITing spreads pain only further. You should read the article, it's pretty interesting, and you might get a new perspective on overweight citizens and even make a few new friends. You'd be surprised at the unique experiences some of them have to share; it's not often you get to hear about weight prejudice in a serious manner. I hope you take my advice; maybe you could even suggest an article for me to read to reduce my own prejudice! So, happy editing! - iamen gorged
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,550,197
|
, and it's mean as shit
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
56,552,499
|
`Excuse me for rudely interrupting, but: :Just what the fuck is the purpose of this so-called article? I ask this question in the existential sense of the word ``purpose``. What possible purpose could this serve, other than '''your own voyeurism or compulsive curiosity? Think about it. Now back to your small-minded list-making task. == `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
56,556,890
|
` How about the ``comarca`` of tarifa? What is its total population including surrounding villages?`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,560,924
|
==Bormalagurski== Hey i just stumbled upon Bormalagurski's user page and was reading some rather offensive stuff he had written on it at the moment which you suddenly erased it. Why was that? Just asking out of curiosity. Thanks
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,561,836
|
Sure, well they offended me. I was just about to vandalise his user page when u intervened:-) There are quite a few of these fascistic Serbs around. Its a pity, they give a bad name to their country... If it wasnt for them, Serbia would be in a very different shape right now.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,567,953
|
==Expand== There should be more written on what EEO is.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
56,568,336
|
==Ki$$== U know what u can kiss and don't post anymore spam on my talk page !
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,569,087
|
` ::::``No``? I think the answer needs to be more along the lines of ``Yes, but...`` myself. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
56,569,627
|
`Hooray Osli! Good job. Ilir, if ``neutral`` editors disagree with you, and you accuse them of P)V, then it's most likely that you're the one POV pushing. And in fact, you are. Why would Osli spread ``Serb propaganda``, if not Serb and has nothing to gain from it? He has said before he agrees with Kosovo independence, and I respect his opinion, even though it is not the same as mine. However, you can't ignore the evidence that he presented coming from very reputable sources. I'd advise you to stop such childish games, you are waging a losing battle my friend:)))) `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,570,023
|
==Mahmoud Ahmadinejad== I added the Category:Anti-Semitic people and there is a small group of anti-Semites their that keep removing it. They identify themselves with the following barnstar If you feel Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is anti-Semitic please add this +cat. Cordially
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,572,469
|
::Is this the same Michael Dorosh with 20,000+ posts at the Battlefront Forum ? The last time I read there six months ago, CMSF was suppose to be released in June 2006 !
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
56,579,779
|
::Dude, you need to chill with the reverting. That's my point. It's annoying.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
56,587,685
|
` == JP cartoon ``victims`` == Since you've warned to block me indefinitely should I recreate the page in any fashion, I'd like to ask you, whether you'd agree if I'd follow and use his title for my page. If you wish, I'll blank out the names of the admins as well. Can you live with that? `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,588,596
|
` == 3RR == You have 4R on Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations. Revert yourself, or get reported, and blocked. :There's nothing I could revert there. :: Yes, cos I reverted first. Please make sure to stay within the rules in future. Even now you could be blocked if someone chooses to report you I have blocked you for 24+24 hours for 3RR violations to Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy and, apparently, also Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations. In addition your continual removal/hiding of the image on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy (for many months) against strong community consensus is very disturbing. ==Sockpuppetry on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy== Greetings Raphael1, please be aware of this Request for Check User. Raphael1, your evasion of WP:3RR and resultant blocks with sockpuppets in the pursuit of vandalism has eroded my respect for you as an editor. Please play by the rules. Thanks. :Raphael1, has been impersonating you; see . Apologies for the above. :Timioty Usher, I made it pretty clear that I was not Raphael1. You chose not to believe me. == the image == Raphael1 if you can get a consensus that the image should be linkimaged by means of a straw poll or otherwise then feel free to linkimage it, otherwise leave the image as it is until you can gain said consensus. | | Email *Agreed with Pegasus. While WP:NBD is policy it should not be used as a convenient means of ignoring prior consensus and taking actions based on your own opinion on the matter. If you want to have the image removed from the article or only linked to it, then by all means engage in consensus building mechanisms to achieve that balance. Without it, you will be engaging in revert warring. You've been blocked twice already for WP:3RR violations. Please, don't let it happen again. Thank you, * I couldn't put what these lads said better myself. Please respect the consensus, or try and form a new one. **As I have stated before, if you would like you are welcome to try to overturn the current consensus by garnering comment on the article's talk page and/or starting a straw poll to determine if there has been a chance in consensus and if consensus has changed then so be it but until that time the consensus is to keep the image as is and any removal of them is disruption. | | Email :Totally agree with those three other fellows. == Mediation in New anti-Semitism == More to the point, I don't have a position on the dispute, and am not familiar with the specific contreversy (even know I am aware of the disputes regarding Israel in general). I know I can reasonably claim NPOV in my examination of the article. Call me sheltered or something. -) ==Islamic scripture template news=== 1) Template:Quran-usc has been altered in two respects: :a) it’s no longer required to input three digits - this is automated thanks to . :b) the template no longer includes “Qur’an” in the bluelighted display. Editor may choose to write it or not (or “Sura”, or “verse”, etc.) according to context. :c) thus the “-num” variants are redundant and should not be used. 2) The “range display” problem is still not solved - more information coming soon. 3) Template:Bukhari-usc is operative, with three variables (volume, book, hadith), and automated tridigitation as per Quran-usc. 4) Template:Quran-usc-num, Template:Quran-usc-numrange and Template:Buhari are defunct and should be deleted. == Nomination revert == Please DO NOT change the rules of the nominations, we have reached consensus on them so no change can be made without group consensus. You cannot change the rules for your own whim. Cheers, :Whatever Anjoe did or didn't do has nothing to do with me! You cannot change to your whim, the disputes and nominations are opposite areas. ::Ah, Anjoe's edit were an update in policy. Your's weren't. == WP: NOT evil == Hi Raphael, The proposal itself, and more importantly where it is going looks pretty strange to me. I however can see that proposers are trying to do something good. It was my quick impression in 5 min, I was not aware of it before. What is your take on it? The statement you quoted is completely French to me: either I cannot see what it means or if I understand correctly it is hard for me to believe that it can be stated. By the way, I will organize the Wikiethics and ask for community approval soon. Best, == Religious racism == Raphael, that concept does not exist. The semites can, if you insist, be considered a race, but how is that related to their religion. What race is the Muslims? :African Jews who are not semites ... What race would that be? (Reference please!) ::Great! -D So the Jews are not targeted because of their race, but because of their religion (or more likely, the political idea of Zionism), which apparently is not the same as race, as you have now conveniently proven! ::Have a nice evening. :::You say that there are many kinds of racism? I believe that I understand what you are after and to a certain extent, I actually agree ... just that ``racism`` is the wrong word to use when we are not talking about race. Give me a better description, will you? == Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons == I won't be the first to warn you, and I don't think I'll be the last. Earlier today, you moved the cartoons of Muhammad behind a link. It was clear to you that there is an overwhelming consensus against that option. You may disagree with it, you may desire/request a new poll, but you may not ignore it. On , you wrote ``I really can understand, why you did remove the cartoons. Unfortunately the non-muslim majority here is full of ignorance. I will not revert your changes and will probably remove the cartoons again myself.`` I'll be very straight-forward to you: don't. Don't. Try to get people on your side on the article's talk page, but until there is a new consensus, the one we have reached in the past counts. Regardless of whether that consensus was reached last week, three months ago or twenty years ago. You are not the wikipedia community. The next time you make any such edit to the image of the Muhammad cartoons (whether that is linkimaging, outright deletion or any other means), I will block you. I'll start mildly, at 12 hours. I will double the block at each new violation. The choice is yours: will you accept the rules of wikipedia and play by them, or will you be blocked? == User:82.36.48.237 == I unblocked him. It had been long enough anyway. ==Spurious warning templates== Raphael1, please stop leaving spurious warning templates on my User talk page. Thanks. :Fee
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,591,846
|
` :In none of those quotes does GWB use the phrase ``religion of peace``, so either we change the first sentence or we look for another source. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
56,608,365
|
== Delete this farcical article == New anti-Semitism is a myth. It is not encyclopaedic to even have an article on this. It is supporting the anti-semitic point of view by justifying their position that Jews deserve the persecution that they have been subjected to. This article should be wiped off the face of the planet. In spite of certain editors claiming to be Jewish whilst systematically supporting an anti-Judaism point of view, a much more logical explanation is that they are, quite simply, not Jewish. Let's run with that idea instead of supporting the nonsense idea that they might be examples of New anti-Semitism.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,609,035
|
:No, its not vandalism. I am sure that MSK would agree that Malber is horrible, and changing the way she says it is most certainly not vandalism.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
56,609,197
|
` :I answered this before, while he was still pretending he'd left: - Simply a publicity stunt to gain support for banning Mistress Selina Kyle and Blu Aardvark (her comments on WP:AN/I were along the lines of ``I'm leaving unless you reban them``. Sadly, this clear case of manipulation succeeded. `
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,623,085
|
`== Lost in GNU or Linux == I am lost in the distinction between GNU and Linux. I have never used either but am thinking about it. Is it realy true GNU has been developing the OS sinc 1983 and HAVE STILL NOT COME UP WITH A COMPLETE OPERATING SYSTEM? And on top of that, want to add the GNU/ prefix to Linux OS's? seems ridiculous to me. If there exists a fully functional GNU OS somebody please point me to it. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
56,628,854
|
GOOD! I am going to tell them about you harrasing me
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,631,526
|
Hi. I don't know who Col. Hauler is, but its not me. Boy you guys clutch at straws with your sock puppet allegations, don't you? I just saw a situation where his comments were being censored, that's all. Does it make me a sock puppet because I did this? Its a stretch, for sure. So does this mean that you think that is ? Ah, if only you silly people could see IPs, you'd have some serious egg on your face.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,632,922
|
Deletion!?!??!? Why the hell would Calton propose this article be deleted? Zahedi has 76,000 hits on Google. I don't understand. This article should be kept and protected from deletion.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,633,041
|
Thank you for experimenting with the page Scanline rendering on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
56,642,074
|
Well needing residence permits is understandable (for some) but not being in Schengen benefits nobody and harms all... With Schengen there would be NO queues whatsoever which I am sure all Gibraltarians are sick of. In this case, as Gibnews has pointed out, its not Spain which is responsible for this problem...
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,642,586
|
== Simpsons movie poster == Did you create the Simpsons movie poster image or did you source it from somewhere else?
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,642,962
|
== http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:62.203.172.174 == What the fu** are you talking about? If you had an ounce of reason in your scull you would have seen that I just removed a double entry - nothing else. By the way, there is more of it further down on that page, but I refrained from doing that, as I am not a native speaker. NB: It is people like you that make life hell for ordinary wikipedians.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
56,643,415
|
==Demographics of Chile== I generally like your edits which are better sourced and more clear except for a few things: You make it seem that lower class Chileans are mainly Indian, Middle Class are half half and higher class are mainly Spanish. This is not the case. Middle class Chileans are of mainly Spanish origin as are most those of lower class. I would like to see a source for the figure of 43% Indian admixture. Your language also denotes and intent to maximise the Indian origin of Chileans? Why is this?
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,644,221
|
Addendum: You are quick to correct would-be mistakes by others but are slow to recognize and correct your own. 'This user tries to do the right thing'? Trying is not sufficient. 'This user is not a Wikipedia administrator but would like to be one'?! In the interest of Wikipedia, I sincerely hope this will not happen.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,652,981
|
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
56,654,042
|
` I think this is an out-dated concept - we are ``broadcasting`` in front of things that look like televisions. electronic media IS verifiable if it is recorded. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
56,658,341
|
` Yep, best leave it until after World Cup. Following Rolland Garros is already taking up too much of my time dammit! Work is piling up... will have to take a ``wikibreak``...`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
56,659,446
|
== Thank you Tony == Dear Tony, I don't know you, and you don't know me, but I would like to express my sincerest appreciation for the balanced and interesting article you wrote about me. I am very humbled to be counted in your list of notable Puerto Ricans and intensely flattered. I am frankly rather impressed at the amount of research you must've put into it. I am not going to touch it, and I don't to touch what you've written, however, if you could use an image, I have uploaded this one for your use and for anyone else who might find it useful. Thank you SO much for the honor! Vanesa Littlecrow Colón-Ortiz de Wojtanowicz (a.k.a. Vas Littlecrow/Vanesa Littlecrow)
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
56,670,565
|
== Link underlined? == I have noticed that today at 11am the links got underlined. I prefer it the way it was as it is distracting all those lines. Please reply on my userpage.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,675,109
|
er no he's 6 ft 4 ACTUALLY so get bent.if he was 6 ft 2 kurt angle and people would have to be fucking midgets! but if u wanna get arsey on wrestlers sizes BATISTA ISNT, 320 lbs or some bullshit like that he's 300 so neh!! ive seen them in person,u probably havent, end of.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
56,679,802
|
Thank you. Let's get this page off. It seems to have been the target of interest for people with no stake in its content. Now they can move on to objects of more legitimate concern and leave me alone. I do not know why everyone insisted on editing a page which is about me, but I guess I should be flattered. I hope they are happy to find someone else to harrass.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,680,139
|
Gidonb has made a final edit and hopefully you all will leave this page for deletion. It seems to have been the target of interest for people with no stake in its content. Now they can move on to objects of more legitimate concern and leave me alone. I do not know why everyone insisted on editing a page which is about me, but I guess I should be flattered. I hope they are happy to find someone else to harrass.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,695,901
|
`== Westminster (High) School == The link for ``Westminster School`` incorrectly jumps to the Westminster School in the UK and not the one located in Simsbury, Connecticut.`
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
56,698,341
|
` ::Hey, I'm a Yank, and I've followed Michael Caine's career from a long time ago, possibly before you were born, and I'm telling you that Laurie's grasp of our talk is remarkable. Caine's a great actor, but he's never achieved the ``assimilation`` of our speech patterns that Laurie has. The only other Brit who comes close, in my estimation, is the equally awesomely talented Tracy Ullman. == `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,698,683
|
`==We need to add this statment to the MVP 2006 section== ``He is also the first player to win back-to-back MVPs without a championship or an appearance in the NBA Finals.`` You tell me why not??? Why not??? We have him listed with all those other greats. They do not relate to the award either. This article is so POV, it is disgusting. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,700,409
|
:: IM GLAD THAT THE MOTHERFUCKERS WIFE DIED! FILLS ME WITH IMMENSE PLEASURE TO KNOW SUCH A BIGOT HAD TO SUFFER TERRIBLY D D D D D D D D
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
56,700,449
|
He served with the Wolfhoundsnot the Tiger Force. Nor did he serve in the Rangers, as often quoted. And according to his Official Service record (and people who knew him), he joined the Army at age 19, not 15.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
56,705,896
|
. Also it should be noted that Sinatra doesn't even approach Bing in terms of record sales, either today or when they were alive
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,707,594
|
` :I have given you a one hour time-out block for continuing to remove the IFD message from Image:Poke Clean Up.gif. Do not remove the template again, as doing so would violate the 3-revert rule and result in a block at the blocking admin's discretion, usually 24 hours. smurrayinchester(), `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
56,714,301
|
`WHAT??? Till he's retired?? He is the first player to not win a championship with back to back MVPs. It's redundant?? So is everything positive about the guy. No it is not because people from all around the world don't know that. Do you want me to add NEVER??? I will add it. It is not inappropriate. Explain how the other players are appropriate then??? Explain that category that he falls into with the 8 others. They did not vote him as MVP and most of them were not playing when he ``WON`` his back to back awards. He is also different from those guys because he never won a championships. He is the same as those 8, now we must post how he's different. You have agendas man, that is why this site is so horrible. It is so biased. hganesan `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
56,718,544
|
== Blind reversions == I would appreciate it if you would actually check what you are reverting. You reverted Discospinster after he undid a paragraph deletion. You then reverted me when I tried to fix your mistake.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,719,340
|
, 3 June 2006 (UTC)hganesan BTW it is not redundant, because the statement is saying he is the FIRST to win back-to-back MVPs WITHOUT a TITLE. So it is not like saying he has 0 titles. I am making clear here that the others all have won a title in their careers. 21:17
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,719,865
|
` *Seriously, what is your problem? Do you think the paragraph deletion and the insertion of the word ``nipples`` was correct? Are you just too lazy to type anything? Or, are you just an asshole who doesn't really care about vandalism? `
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
56,719,867
|
. It tastes like shit
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| true
|
56,720,688
|
What nonsense Gibnews! Really, you surprise me.... Muslims did not kill the inhabitants of Gibraltar in 711 just as the Castilians didnt do so in the 15th century. Such an event has never ocurred during the reconquest. You have a very surreal perception of Spanish history...
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,722,376
|
==What's the problem?== The Guardian is quoted....unless you consider it a biased newspaper then leave it.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,723,916
|
Hi, I dont really care much for the Serb/Albanian disputes but I thought it was common knowledge that Kosovo is an autonomous province of Serbia (at least theoretically). The way it is written it makes it sound that Kosovo is a province of Yugoslavia. I am pretty sure this is not the case otherwise its position under international law would be similar to that of Montenegro and independence would be much less of a problem than it is at this point. The article should be unprotected and reference to Serbia should be included. I dont think Albanian wikipedians should try to stop this from happening. The problem (and paradox) of Kosovo still being part of Serbia is not going to go away by negating it on wikipedia. If I were Kosovar Albanian i would be trying to make this be known so as to find a solution for the future of my territory. Asterion, q pasaa quishooo! ya me he metío en l embolao este... q vicio! jeje.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
56,724,782
|
Hey Burgas00, why did you make that personal attack on me on my user page? I found it rather funny:)))
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,739,655
|
:*Aldux, ::As far as I kow, an article has to be nominated as a Good Article or Featured Article. I am certainly not a judge of a well written article by any means, however as per the accessment table, a B Grade is the highest I could give the article. Please feel free to change it if you feel it should be higher.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,744,861
|
Ahhhhhh! There is vandelism who would dare? although they are cool...
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
56,747,650
|
well said nicholas
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,756,507
|
== I commend you == You and I are making Wikipedia a much better place.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
56,758,418
|
Would you do me a favor and STOP FUCKING WITH MY INFORMATION. I don't know what your problem with me is, I am not a therapist, but I really think you need to take care of your own control issues. By the way you are neither a gentleman or a ghost. Take care of your own life and back off. Let this page be deleted and concentrate on your own excuse for existence.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.