dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
57,294,693	== Please stop your personal attacks, == * invited himself into a discussion on my user page. He gave his opinion which included Terryeo lied about other editors and . . .made false accusations with nothing to back them up. When I moved the discussion to my discussion page, I asked him to stop his personal attacks. He and I replied to each other and might have worked it out. But his most recent statement denys good faith by threatening what he is going to do at my next RfAr. Full Discussion *That is the situation. tells me to notify you directly, I am doing so. Please stop your personal attacks,	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
57,297,369	` == Template:User CCP DRV of speedy == I noticed that you closed the deletion review of Template:User CCP, a discussion in which neither of us participated. Your result was ``keep deleted``; how did you arrive at that conclusion? My rough count of editors who expressed an opinion (at ) indicated there were slightly more editors in favor of keeping than of deleting. Such an outcome (majority keep, but not supermajority keep) is supposed to return the deleted item to its associated deletion process actually send it there for the first time, since in this case the original deletion was a speedy (citing the nonexistent T2 criterion, no less). Really, I don't care if this template exists or not; I'm just trying to understand how a ``keep deleted`` conclusion can be reached in this case. `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
57,297,672	`::::::As a Wikipedian and an Administrator, listening to what another member 'consider' is the least to ask. Never when you did obvious mistakes like placing a tag including edit warring(which was ridiculous) had you admited your mistakes. What I am saying is that what you placed as last warning does not qualify by any standard as warning material. As well, placing a block for incivility directed at your person isen't the right thing to do, usually an experienced administrator leave this sort of thing being settled by another administrator. I admit, ``he started it`` is not an excuse, but neither is claiming that you only warn when you see things, you seem to have a rather selective sight here. I just request that you leave another administrator to handle the situation, and I consider you personally involved, of course you can ignore my considerations, but this is not the most respectful thing to do. Incivity is always the easiest thing for an administrator that does not bother to check the situation, but in comparaison to edit warring POV pushing, intimidations, suckpopetry, threats, it is absolutly nothing. And here is where your decision is not only unfair but had you decided to check the situation, there could have been no way in all impartialy taken that decision. Again, I request you to leave this being handled by another administrator, I question your impartiality in your uses of administrator power. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,300,224	== POV map == The map is POV, because it shows the counties in the US but doesn't show them in Canada. -	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,301,247	==Becoming Cool== Hey Yanksox! I added my endorsement to your Prod of the above article, with a rationale describing a walled garden of articles and naming them. If the prod is removed, I imagine you will likely take the article to afd. Just wanted to inform you of the garden so that if the prod is removed, you would know about them all for a combined afd.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,310,671	` == Work via WikiProjects == Hi Mirlen, As you may have seen here, we are planning to start contacting projects again soon (once Oleg gets ``Importance`` added to the bot), using a message something like . Would you be willing to help? It involves posting a message on each project page, recording what you're doing on our page, then following up a few days later to see how the project has responded. Often there is no response, but sometimes (as with Military History) they go off and create their own worklist of 6000 articles! We are also encouraging groups to start using the bot. Can you help out? Thanks, `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,316,608	== RfA+DYK == Hi. I like your(and Srikeit's) version a lot. I think that should make it on the front page. Thanks. All the best for your RfA. Things are looking great (at this moment). But RfA's are like Indian politics. A week is a long time. And Anwar hasn't made his appearance yet. Take care. -	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,316,622	== Current event == I added the {{currentevent}} tag after reading this piece by Ralph Nader in Counterpunch; seems the shit is about to hit the fan in the next couple of days. ==	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,319,142	:::::::::: I am against the merger.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,322,786	you gotta let somebody love you.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
57,323,156	your hot dog vendor will get you one day. gooooo pancreatic bad-ness!	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
57,323,339	Can we get this page protected== I'm talking about the untitled Batman Begins sequel as this user keeps posting B.S about Michael Keaton, Robin Williams and Mark Hamill being considered for the role of The Joker in the movie. He puts up articles on other sites (which have surprisingly come up today when I warned him about his vandalising and being blocked for it) to try and cover his vandalising tracks. Now I'm not saying let's block him, I'm saying lets protect the page Batman Begins oh and as for Bob Orton Jr. ==Bob Orton Jr. I'm sorry my answer is no, because lil crazy thing keeps deleting anything I put up in those pages. She's harrasing me by excluding me from editing the pages with truthful facts that she likes to edit! So my answer is no	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,324,735	== Experiences == Dubious practice is performed here only by you, my dear Hanuman Das. You claim these 3 articles are biographies and yet you completely disregard even the slightest thought of looking into biography of Haidakhan Babaji (the one you speculate that died in 1984). There are several really good books (about experiences with Him, not mere beliefs) out there on the subject, which you don't seem to acknowledge. Why is that? Please, do not misunderstand me, I respect your effort here, but it is obvious that you are not being objective (and, to me, you act like you own this place - which you don't). Why not present all relevant info on Mahavatar Babaji by not preferring only one idea about him? Hmm. Why not present info of those people that have actually been blessed by Mahavatar Babaji, directly, in person? Is speculation, based on certain books, really sincere effort to present Mahavatar Babaji and His teachings? Is this the best service we can offer to Mahavatar Babaji and people at large? Hmm. And, while we are on the subject, have you even met Mahavatar Babaji, Haidakhan Babaji or Hairakhan Babaji in person? - (GTM+2)	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,339,979	:: There seems to be a pan neo-conservatist gang-banging pervading not to mention perverting the objective real politik of this Scoop Jackson article. Desist from your neo-conservatist pigeon-holing of the late Senator as there is a severe lack of objective verifiable evidence to support your spurious claims. Third party authors with a poltical agenda are not verifiable sources in my book so desist from this pigeon-holing forthwith	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
57,342,780	`I'm just responding likewise. You insist on double-talk and a lack of integrity and I'll treat you as you deserve. You accuse me of not fully responding to you prior challenges. After 2 weeks I'm still want you to explain the Jupiter/Pluto midpoint in your natal chart. OR GET LOST!!! Obviously, your ``problems`` which magnetizes you to a topic which you're not qualified to discuss plus your confession that you haven't studied Astrology PROVES you have ``issues`` you're not dealing with. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,343,129	::: Typical neo-con sympathiser, imposing his personal views on us all and deciding (with no authority to do so) what is warranted and what is unwarranted by somehow claiming a mandate when none exists. Desist from your rambling and mildly amusing pontifications as they are tangential and deal with the issue, that being that there are no objectively neutral verifiable sources to back your ill-conceived assertion about the neo-conservatist legacy of the late Senator. The sources are not reliable as they are agenda-based in their nature.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
57,343,407	== Calling a vote on a picture of Mohammed == I consider it necessary, as well as fair, that Wikipedia not pander to Religion - Pictures of Mohammed appear quite frequently in Ottoman Art as well as various illustrated Historical manuscripts from around that time - It is extremely useful to have these pictures, or at least one, as a reference to what how Mohammed was perceived by different nations at different times, as well as it's effect upon art. Therefore I vote: *For a picture of Mohammed, on the grounds that the only reason one has not been included is religious sensitivites.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,344,660	*Agree I'd say, that the first sentence should explain the meaning of the phrase rather than who has used it before.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,345,210	:: Your argument defeats itself. It is tantamount to saying that I am not a vegetarian because I eat meat yet my policy on food was a guiding influence to all vegetarians who came after me. It doesn't add up, desist from the neo-conservatist line in relation to the late Senator, you all come across quite foolish, at least ill-informed with your silly claims and spurious agenda-based sources. Please refrain from peddling these falsehoods forthwith.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
57,345,235	Can I consider that a 'For' Blightsoot?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,352,998	I really do question Blnguyen's judgment, considering he's only been an admin since 29/5. A more experienced admin should deal with this one.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,357,520	`::sounds like you a little ill Gorgonzilla, Isarig is right and has edited the Controversies and allegations of bias perfectly. And i will help it remain like it currently is. put all your non issues about ``faux`` on its own ``Controversies and allegations of bias`` and stop being so childish. (sorry i keep forgetting to sign my comments) `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,358,689	` :You foolishly defer to quantity rather than quality in your opening statement. It is about the quality of the sources, not how many there are, and seeing as the most verifiable sources from your point of view have already been put forward here ad nauseum, your case that there is widely accepted verifiable and neutrally based evidence of the late Senator's neo-conservative legacy is seriously flawed. The citations you highlight at the forefront of your case are agenda-based so heaven knows how superfluously irrelevant the other sources are. Your very deference to the quantity of sources in your opening gambit reflects the tenuous nature of your argument. I refer you back to my vegetarian analogy. The tide of truth is flowing against you, desist from your misinformed unreliable agenda-based pigeon-holing of the late Senator or risk being swept away to the sea of ignorance. I refuse to let the late Senator's name become besmirched and mislabelled by a case built on subjective sources. Those who propagate such skewed sources on WP, some would suggest are merely the ``agents of ignorance``.`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,364,389	I hope you told Smith the same thing	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
57,375,527	` ::::::Well, if you feel personally attacked, if someone would claim, that you are supporting the decisions of the Israeli goverment, you are probably a strong opponent of Israeli politics as well. Though certainly not everybody who opposes Israelis policies approves the term ``Israeli apartheid``, it is certainly not a fringe group. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,375,933	` == Inheiritance == I think there should be 4 Inheiritance books because in the third Eragon gets married and gets a new blue sword and then he finishes his training and him and Roran should save Katrina. Then Roran and Katrina also get married. Then Roran gets the yellow dragon egg and names him Katrinak. Then Eragon trains Roran and one day Roran's yellow enchanted sword slid and sliced his stomach open Eragon heals it as much as he could but it leaves a scar like Eragon had from Durza then they gather the dragons that give Roran ``The gift of the dragons`` Then Roran transformed into an elf. Roran and Eragon both had children then Saphira and Katrinak mated then there were 10 dragon eggs that were given to their children and those eggs had hatched then Eragon and Roran train them`	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
57,377,805	::::::I'd say, that symetry should be achieved by listing motivation (why), aim (what they want to get by it) and identities (who) of those who oppose the term and those who approve it.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,388,223	` Request/proposal: Just for ha-has, would someone want to calculate how much of the time this article exists in a vandalized state, based on the history log, say over the last couple weeks or so? (Or pick any random interval.) In other words, what are the chances that a random visitor here will see a vandalized/erroneous article? I'm curious. My feeling, unconfirmed by evidence as of yet, is that this article spends a significant amount of time in a corrupt state, as do many, many articles on this so-called ``encyclopedia``. And yes, I'm too lazy at the moment to do this. Besides, I'm not really a statistician. == `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,389,552	` == Edits to St. George's School (Vancouver) == Thank you for your contributions to St. George's School (Vancouver). However, you must be careful to write with a neutral point of view, otherwise the article comes off looking like a recruitment pamphlet. Edits that are not neutral will likely be reverted. ... `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,393,397	== Fragment offset == In the examples in this article the fragment offset is measured in bytes, however RFC 791 states that fragment offset is measured in groups of 8 bytes (64 bits). In my opinion this article should be updated...	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
57,395,904	` ===Complaint=== First, I am not a sock puppet (I assume you mean Jason). Second, I have to figure out how to file a complaint with Wikipedia. I am amazed that I am providing factual information and you call it a ``white wash``. The article says LBU makes false accreditation claims. They do not. It says degrees by Life experience, they do not. I have made the challenge to show me several times and NO ONE has done so. When I edited I left the good and bad in there. LBU is at least honest. This article is dishonest and you have an obvious bias that means deleting material that does not serve your interest. I provided facts, you nothing. In arbitration your assertions will not stand up. LBU catalogue clearly says...we are not accredited, you are unlikely to become a certified teacher...you will not be able to obtain counselor certifcation, etc. What you and the folks who dislike LBU and refuse to at least present factual unbiased information are doing is essentially bullying. It is also dishonest. Nordundsud`	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
57,397,069	` ==User: KI LOL== Thought you might appreciate this quote from Ki's userpage (which seems to have been hit by actual Wiki-vandals?!?!? (() ===Opposes=== * Userboxes. * Hu Jintao * The House of Saud. * To the death penalty. Censorship – online or off for minors or adults. < LULZ Anyway. Hopefully he didn't scare you off too much. Believe me, I've seen my fair share of ``stop the vandalism``, and his does not read like a Wiki-official. It's sad what too much marijuana and belief in the Falun Gong can do to a mind.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,399,124	`::The word is ``uncivil``, you brain-dead mouthbreather. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	true
57,404,017	:But this is my page, I should be allowed to do what I want with it. 15:38, 8 June 2006	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,404,244	Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ann Coulter, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,404,643	` == Can I Change The Image? == Can I change the image that reads ``Promotional Shoot For Goodies``, because that picture is like super old. Her hair's not even that color anymore. that was in mid 2004, this is mid 2006. 15:42, 8 June 2006`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,404,960	:::Well, then don't TALK to me, you jackass! 15:44, 8 June 2006	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	true
57,406,174	:::::Get a life Miss Ciara	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,406,315	\|Miss Ciara]] 15:52, 8 June 2006	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,407,250	Hello Big DT writes me please!. Your edition from Plymouth Brethren had following errors: closed are no a recent division from exclusives. closed are very different to exclusives. Even publish a cassette/book displaying Exclusive teachings and rebuking it as hereticals. closed NEVER had chosen an universal leadership. closed and open brethren are NO identical to open and closed communion plymouth brethren. By example El Salvador plymouth brethren are closed and open communion. Plymouth brethren in Venezuela are closed and closed communion. Plymouth brethren in mexico are open and closed communion. Plymouth brethren in switzerland are closed and closed communion but no related to closed p b in venezuela. Please reads encyclopedia britannica 1968 edition and shawn abigail website. my e-mail adress is freelebanon at baptistmail dot com.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
57,407,294	, you stupid ass fucker, retarded whore, incompetent loser! I'm unblocked! Miss Ciara 15:52, 8 June 2006	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
57,407,892	I was talking on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Baptists&oldid;=51773434 when you can writes me?. I had links and articles-no copyrighted- to contributes here. Review and edit it when you can. eliecer	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
57,412,498	Let us assume all that is accurate, meaning the side of President Kennedy's head was blown out above the right ear: What conclusions, if any, can be drawn from that?	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,420,285	Who and Why keeps deleting the I Stand Alone section	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,421,059	` :I don't think that is the official chart. Listed at United World Singles Chart: ``The South African sales and airplay chart is merged into one to form the official singles chart which is published weekly``. From what I've seen, ``Get Together`` has yet to enter the record chart.`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,422,110	` == Reason For Iraq Invasion? == A bunch of friends and i have been carefully trying to follow the war and the progress of the U.S.A. in Iraq. However, we are extremely confused to why they invaded in the first place. I have read many articles and have herd many theories regarding the invasion. I am from Canada and we have not sent any troops to aid the U.S.A in Iraq, but we have sent troops to Afghanistan to help out. In my understanding, it was Afghanistan who attacked the U.S.A in 9/ 11, right? So we have NATO, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, France, New Zealand, Italy, and Germany stationed in Afghanistan. My question is: why are the Amercians in Iraq if it is Afghanistan who has attacked them? I am sory this is such a dumb question i was just hopeing someone could give me an educated answere other then ``because Saddam is a jerk``. I was also wondering why other countries have not joined the U.S.A in Iraq if it is as seriouse as i've been hearing. Thanks!`	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,427,478	`::::::::That's quite arrogant of you, as an administrator using terms such as ``all you want`` is disresctful and arrogant. You have to show me where in this there is anything at all warrant to a warning, the entire issue revolve around this, since if it happens that there is indeed a mistake, one of the reasonable explainations would be that you tried to provoke me. I am not insulting you any more than you are insulting me. You provoke me by an empty warning and then block me because you qualify my answer to a provokation as block material even if the victim and provokator happens to be you. It is like an alleged victim acting as a judge and condemn the alleged agressor of his. Also, have in mind that abusing ones administrator provilages is worst than some insults percieved or real in a talkpage. There are various administrators who administered in articles or talkpages in which I have contributed, and I am not a newbie, and I rarely had any problem nor have I accused administrators the way I did with you, except for two newbie administrators chatting with Coolcat. Also, you must consider that politically heated articles more than often are not like others, and there might be incivility, but as long as there is a relevent exchange, administrators shall rather edit such incivilities unless it becomes overboard and incivility and personal attacks becomes a members only way of answering. In such articles people deal with pov pushing, and repeated edit warrings ad well as incivility, unless as an administrator you do not take the time to understand the context, it is for you futile to throw a warning because of one or to displaced words in an edit of hundreds or perhaps over a thousand word. Now, since your block is not justifiable, I request an unblock and I am ready to forget this incident. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,430,624	` :::FRCP, You are beginning to sound like a broken record. I refer you back to the vegetarian analogy. Furthermore if the likes of Beinart and Kaufman are quoted, this does not make them verifiable, your best sources are not neutral and objectively acceptable, they are agenda-based commentators on the late Senator's alleged and I emphasise alleged (since it is most certainly not verified) neo-conservatist legacy. Your tedious counter-argument to this normally goes ``Refer me to verifiable sources to the contrary``. This is not good enough. You are the one making the contentious assertions, the burden of proof and verifiability falls on you and to date, in my opinion, the case you have built based on the sources you have offered is tenuous to say the least and utterly ambiguous at best. End of term report for FRCP11 - Must do better, try harder, Student must come to terms and grasp the meaning of the word ``verifiable``. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,433,316	::::In both headers, eh? Learn to read. — \|	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,434,293	: Ahh, carry on, sally forth, and all that rot, then. ;)	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
57,435,312	::No, I'm afraid I am not, there is nothing in that phrase that can be qualified in anyway as warrant to a warning. And where have I used the everybody is doing it? To the contrary, I am ready to pay the price, but THIS, does not warrant any warning, and I advice you to submit that phrase to any administrator and see what he/she has to say. As for your adminsitrator abilities, I judge what I see, it is my right to question it, you should not dump every critics, when they are in ones talk page, as incivility and justify a block. Now you tell me how am I supposed to assume good faith when you single me out on the middle of discussions that when my 'incivilities' are compared to what is done else, it is nothing, while you appear to totally ignore those, I simply request common sense. Being administrator should assume that you know that the most important thing is what Wikipedia is, it is an encyclopedia and articles are the most important thing. You as an administrator are above all a user like any other user, administrative privilages should only be used when a user is disturbing, so for you to warn me, you should justify how telling someone that he refuse to listen, when he really refuse to listen warrant to a warning, or how am I disturbing. It is to you to convince me now that your blocking of a contributor a Wikipedian as much as you is not disturbing. Also, that you refuse to accept your mistake on the face of the obvious doesn't give a good opinion of you. But I am sure, that is the last of your worries. Just consider that everyone make mistakes, whatever or not they recognize it is what matters.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,436,026	` :::- :That encyclopedia would be guilty of sourcing the same agenda-based commentators if that is the case and in no way does it make this spurious radical claim ``verifiable``. This allegation of Jackson's neo-conservatist legacy remains unverified and I have little faith in the mutual abilities of ``tweedle-dum`` and ``tweedle-dee`` to proffer anything substantial to give their fruitless quest (to establish nonsense as a mainstay on WP articles) even a modicum of integrity. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,436,181	==Message to administators that might read my unblock request== As of yet, I have not recieved any answer on whatever or not my request has been rejected. If this means that it is not a clear cases, I request abstinence in doubt and an unblock. I think it is important that if some administrators consider this block as a mistake, to make it known then saying nothing about it and wait the 24 hours. I don't think any administrator would want being blocked for 24 hours for a mistake, and it is important that Inshaneee be adviced that some indeed think it was a mistake if they really think it is. I am waiting an answer, I have seen many cases and haven't seen as I remember a cases that took that much time.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,438,057	` ::Look, she the one that ``personally attacked`` me, did you NOT just read her post. They gonna try to be smart with it, because they scared to say what they feel. You unfair, ! 19:08, 8 June 2006.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,438,867	::Don't you have someone else to bother? 19:13, 8 June 2006	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,446,884	Not Manpower, as it said before I fixed it. What moron thought Manpower is the largest private employer in this country? LOL.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
57,450,409	::In general, I'm sick of your obnoxious excuses and immature piling-up. This will be all. — \|	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
57,450,698	:::It seems as though your honesty is going to fail your RfA — our community really is hopeless. Sorry about this. — \|	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,454,236	== My mistake == My mistake on the archive there, i figured since the page was so long it would be appropriate.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,454,923	:Becca: I'm sorry, but Gabby blew my spot, and ruined my chance of my father seeing me place on this team. 21:06, 8 June 2006	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,455,099	`::::Oh, I thought he was ``tryna`` make me look stupid. 21:07, 8 June 2006 `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
57,463,621	==THX== Hi ! I want to thank you a lot for unblocking my userpage. Cheers ! '''''' 8 June 2005	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,465,307	Are you serious? Wow, that's cool ! But are you an American of Romanian ancestry? BTW:they unblocked my userpage, you can write there now. '''''' 8 June 2006	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,468,923	Ann Coulter too, there is no way she's conservative, she can't even articulate a conservative position, which is why she resorts to ignorant name-calling and provocation. She does nothing but lower most people's views of conservatives.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
57,469,973	Which brings the question...should it have it's own article or just be added on to this one? It seems to be a port, so it may not need a seperate page, though several games before it have had pages dedicated to ported versions.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
57,479,456	That's it, I am editing it.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,480,614	` {\| class=``messagebox standard-talk`` style=``text-align:center;`` \|- \| width=``50px`` \| \|\| This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. \|} {\| class=``messagebox standard-talk`` style=``text-align:center;`` \|- \| width=``50px`` \| \|\| This article was nominated for deletion on 15 May 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. \|} This page was placed on Votes for Deletion in July 2004. Consensus was to keep; view discussion at /Delete. Documented examples???? What the F are you talking about? Tell you what, my girlfriend is pretty wild, I'll do a dirty sanchez tonight. There. In 4 hours, it will not be an urban legend anymore. I'm sorry, but I'm not going to post photos or give you a juicy description. But it will happen. I will stick my finger in her anus and wipe the poo on her upper lip. And then it will be real. And if you don't believe me, well, I think you should do it yourself to prove it is real. Happy camping! == urban legend? ummm... == There's a lot of freaks out there. If it was an urban legend before it became a popular toilet-humor reference, I'm sure some poo-loving weirdos have made it a reality. Yes, what's the basis for saying it's an urban legend? Face-sitting, front and back, is common enough. Dirty Sanchez is not face-sitting. Actually I'm inclined to remove the reference to face-sitting as it's a bit of a wild conjecture and in no way related to the act, which is performed with the finger. \| On the urban legend question, well if there are documented examples of this practise let's have them. Until then it could be regarded as an urban legend because of its viral circulation and the absence, or elusive nature, of concrete cases. I'm not wedded to this idea, though. It's a judgement call. One could just as well refer to it as an apocryphal sexual practise. \| Yes there are web sites that feature the Dirty Scanchez... It is quite alarming to see it happen and you wonder what drugs the person is on.... usually after anal penetration the member is thrust into the mouth of the other partner(s)... More shocking than sexual... RW :If you're talking about ass to mouth, it's well-documented in gonzo porn and at least has the barest minimum of sexual arousal value (humiliation and/or actual penetration) and I know for a fact that the practice is not limited to just porn. A dirty sanchez is just plain absurd, most likely even for scat-lovers. I dare anyone to actually present links to a sites that even advertise to stock actual pornographic footage of it. : == swingers film == i know the movie swingers pretty well. no recollection of a ``dirty sanchez`` bar. == Should be Dirty Sanchez, not Dirty Mexican == I'm not sure why this article was moved. Does anyone have sources that refer to a ``Dirty Mexican``? == AJ Matthews T-shirt? == What is that line doing in the external links anyhow? Does it belong as a popculture reference? I'm going to move it, and hopefully someone will be able to figure that out for me. Also, while the intro could be improved, I definitely think it's short enough as an appropriate intro to have that tag removed. == South Park: ``hitler,`` not ``shitler`` == I'm 99.9% sure that in the episode of South Park mentioned where Cartman gives Butters a poop ``moustache,`` it's called a hitler, not a ``shitler.`` Some googling seems that it should be ``hitler`` instead of ``shitler`` as well (Google query of ``cartman gives butters a hitler`` with quotes gives 160 results.. changing hitler to shitler and still keeping the quotes returns 0 results). I've changed it on the page. ==Move== This page should be moved to [	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
57,491,366	` == Clarification == * In 2002, Waterston and fellow Law & Order castmate Jerry Orbach were honored as ``Living Landmarks`` by the New York Landmarks Conservancy. This means that Sam Waterston is no longer at risk for being demolished to make way for a new CVS. Do they mean their homes? I dont get the ``Sam Waterston is no longer at risk for being demolished to make way for a new CVS`` part. Couldn't Sam just step outta the way? P Someone help me out here. ... and who cares where he stands on firearms? Thats his business, not ours. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,496,298	::Yep, its 104 on the Langley platform and 4 on the Bromley platform. I'll edit it.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,498,362	== Yoshi == I think there is far too much detail on Yoshi for an article about Mario and it dilutes an otherwise reasonable article. I'd jump in and start ripping stuff out like all but the briefest mention in SMS for example, but I thought I'd garner some feedback first. /	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,502,237	` == Your Application == Dear Lithpiperpilot, Thank you for applying for (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that for security reasons, VandalProof's creator requires it's users to have made 250 edits to articles, which you have not. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - '''''''' '' `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,524,065	` ==Sydney== Sydney didn't have a modern ``CBD`` in 1836, let alone anything like the subject of the article Sydney central business district. I have removed the term and the link (again). I also suspect that the acronym CBD is not well-known outside Australia. \| `	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
57,532,810	::: Memo to Paul Cyr, quit your bumbling ramblings, the references you cite as examples are in no way personal and exemplify my dealing with the real issues so I suggest you try and analyse situations a little more efficiently rather than engaging in a witch-hunt of the innocent. Do your job and go after the real personally offensive vandals with no interest in rational debate and who only serve to disrupt, not those interested in rational debate like myself. Hurry along now....	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
57,533,209	`Copied from my talk page: Yesterday, you deleted the entry on the band Old Canes. As far as i can figure out (cf. talk above), they're eligible to be on wikipedia. First, they're mentioned in the Appleseed Cast article. Second, they are on a label: http://www.secondnaturerecordings.com/. Last, two of the band members are also members of the Appleseed Cast, who has quite a few records out. I have noted that you wrote A7. if it is because the article is too short, would it be possible to mark it as a stub instead of simply deleting it? Please let me know what you think or if there are other reasons for your action. Thanks! `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
57,535,430	Look, stop it, this has gone much too far.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,537,035	This article doesn't use proper footnoting, also the references are webpages, I don't usually use webpages by works which are not accessible on the web. I'll see what I can do. I will be also modifying the leads of the history section, the etymology of the term must be expended and also what most believe of its ethymology. Also must be expended that deportation of Jews and Armenians under prior Persian rules (The Jewish encyclopedia document it), as well as the destruction of Julfa and the deportation of the Armenians in the 12th century. The entire information about the Armenians is totally missing in this article, most importantly prior to the 12th century.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,537,423	:::::In the same direction, is it really necessary to name all the US states who recognize it? Why not give just the number of states? This is not an American encyclopedia, but an universal one, I don't see why every single US states which recognize it should be named.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,538,082	` :No such thing as false and true in here, only positions. I agree that the first sentence isen't neutral, ``The weakening control of the Ottoman government over its empire in the following 15 years led many Armenians to believe that they could gain independence from them`` too is not neutral, but that section could be neutralise at least with words such as 'according to' (citing the author), Davison here could be cited, as he covers the Armenian situation (irronically Davison has been placed in the list of 'denialist' by Deepblue06) and their aspiration in his work covering the Armenian crises (1912-1914) prior to the war. This work is really a must read. BTW, the rest of what you write is POV and at this point irrelevent. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,549,034	:::Of course you are. And that's because I was right about the images on Kelly Clarkson and you were not. — \|	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,549,868	:Listen well: I was certainly happy to return to Wikipedia and I wanted to edit articles. The only issue I've ever truly had is you and your friends. When you found out about who I was, you teased me, insulted me behind my back and through e-mail, etc., etc., which is why I have become so angered with the community. Is this really necessary? Yes, you are certainly allowed to do whatever you want but some comments just pushed my buttons, which is why from time to time I exhibited infinite and random stupidity. Of course I am going to admit this — because I did. No, an arbitration will not be necessary because I am leaving the second We Belong Together finishes FAC and this is not a lie. Will I return? Maybe. I am not going to be present throughout late June–late September (I'll be studying elsewhere in the world). Therefore, I will not be making edits on Wikipedia during this time. However, following September, I might come back. Just do me this one favour: if you find out who I am (if I return), please don't tease me and do the things you have done; that was why I became uncivil and angered. Again, if you find out, just leave me to be and we wouldn't have to get caught up in such a fiasco. I really do wish you well. Seriously. :My only complaint is that HeyNow10029 is complaining because she knows that I was right about the images in the Kelly Clarkson article. Why exactly does each image that she uploaded onto the website have to be displayed and not the ones with actual and very strong fair use rationale? I know you're tired of reading this (that being you ever did), so see you. The last message I post here will be the final goodbye, after WP:FAC is completed. — \|	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
57,553,000	In addition, neither the Beatles, nor the the Stones ever had the ability to to play with soft delicacy AND the unihibited fury of modern rock.	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
57,562,456	== Proposed merge == I say no, this page is for U.S. highway and Interstates, the other page is specifically for state highways.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,564,879	== SHUT yOUR bUTT == Thats right, i siad it. I hate yuo and i wish yuo wood die.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
57,565,385	` == WHAT?!?! == ``damaging the hard work of others`` I did nothing of the sort. Your user talk is open to anyone. i was just expressing my opinions. Frickin idiot, gosh....`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
57,565,507	` ::I would like to point out that there used to be a great deal of, in my opinion, very unnecessary fighting over terms such as ``circumcised`` vs ``unmutilatedcastratedstabbedpenismurdered``. ::Isn't it advisable, to at least be able to use a more scientific sounding vocabulary - as in, detached from everyday speech and associations to avoid emotions. Synonyms like that are an important part of an article when stuff is looked up primarily by text search - if relevant words are missing, the article fails as a whole. Dictionaries are never complete, and neither is Wikipedia. The advantage of Wikipedia being, that we can update her ourselves as new information becomes more widely available. IAR2TR. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,565,618	==Sir== No, I entirely agree with you. I was just thinking the same thing myself.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,565,999	== How dare you! == How dare you delete my user talk to you. WTF. I was just trying to tell you that i didnt mess with anyone's page at that moment and then you go and delete my message to you. Thats nice	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
57,567,090	== Admin == Can i be an admin? please	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
57,568,069	== 69th comment == LOL HAHA. its like sex	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,569,528	` :Hi Catamorphism, thanks for your question on my talk page about why I reverted the removal of the tags. I was watching recent changes for vandalism or unwise edits and I observed that an anonymous user removed 4 citation tags with no discussion on this talk page. They did this in two edits: One with no summary, the other with an edit summary I believed to be uninformative about their reason for removal. :My thinking was that someone had found those tags needed for some reason, and that they were deleted with no discussion. (I did not make the connection betwee n your question and the anonymous user - although even your posting does not seem to question the need for the other 3 tags. :Of course it is always a matter of opinion how strict we are going to try to be with ourselves about citing our sources. :In this case, in my opinion, the tag you question is probably the tag that is least needed. I don't really see an urgent need to provide a citation for the fact that women can achieve organism from oral sex. On the other hand, surely such a source would be trivially easier to find. So ideally, we should just put a source in rather than deleting the tag. :In the case of the other 3 statements that are flagged as needing a source - these 3 statements are much weaker and really should be cited because as it is they smack of personal opinion and/or original research and/or contaminated by weasel words: :#Oral sex is often used as the principal form of sexual expression or as part of foreplay. Not only are the sexual organs sensitive and well supplied with nerve endings, the same is true of the mouth, tongue and lips, so enjoyment of oral sex is not always limited to the person on the receiving end. :::``is often used as the principal`` is a weasel phrase. How often? By what percentage of people? How often is it enjoyed by the person giving the oral sex and how often is it not? :#As in all human sexual behaviour, the variety of techniques in cunnilingus and individual responses to them are almost endless. :::``almost endless`` is not a very encyclopedic term. Who claims this? Who claims this is also true of all ``human sexual behaviour``? :#As always, communication, experimentation and practice are the best way to learn how to please a particular partner. :::This is very encyclopedic. It reads more like a how-to. Who claims these things are important? Why do they belong in an encyclopedia? :Thanks again for your question. \ `	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
57,578,251	` Agggh!!! and of coulse I talked to coneveanT, he talked to me first, I'm just answering. It's not like ``here we go again``, that CS makes me so angry!. I don't even care for the stuff they argue. I already proved them wrong and now they are complaing about minor unrelevant issues I don't care for. `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
57,578,278	what the fuck who deleted the spider loc and hot rod sections fucking wikipedia stupid ass ignorant people can we get it back ?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
57,578,904	I am IMPERVIUS THE MAGNIFICENT title courteousy of my physics teacher	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,589,672	who are you to comment on what I do?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,597,349	:The split has been made, although the The Ladykillers (2004 film) page may need editting and reformatting.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,597,379	June 2006 (UTC) SO WHY DO YOU KEEP DELETING IT WHEN THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CORUS STUDY HAS AN EXTERNAL SOURCE OF INFORMATION?!!!!!!!!!!!!. 21:45, 8	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,603,619	== So not a rip-off == This is, like, the best book ever. You just need to get into it.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,605,059	No, I specifically made the proposal as I did to get an answer to the question, How much of the time does this article spend in a vandalized or erroneous state?. In other words, for a given interval, this article spends X% of the time being a bad source of information. (From which one can infer that one's chances of getting bad information from it, based on a random visit, are also X%.) :It would be interesting, I guess, to find out how many times it's been vandalized in some interval, but I think the number above would be a more useful metric. ==	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,606,166	` It is my opinion that the most accurate/up to date image be used. The old one can be used to illustrate the development history. `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,609,623	` ::There was I thinking you people wouldn't care about ``the real world`` and preferred ``reliable sources`` (that you get to pick and judge) instead! Despite the term not being very widespread, it is used in the ``real world`` of people trying to sound scientific about the state of circumcision and the adoration thereof - see the links. ``The real world`` is thus exactly an argument why the synonym should be mentioned in the article. Spreading information is the purpose of wikipedia. Here we have a synonym for being circumcised belonging to an article that is in desperate need for a richer vocabulary about that state. Remember the ``circumcised vs natural`` wars? That problem would be reduced if there were actually more words - outside gym shower room talk - to describe the state of circumcision. Addition of the synonym (and subsequent, occasional use) would be without a doubt beneficial to the article as a whole. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false

57,294,693

== Please stop your personal attacks, == * invited himself into a discussion on my user page. He gave his opinion which included Terryeo lied about other editors and . . .made false accusations with nothing to back them up. When I moved the discussion to my discussion page, I asked him to stop his personal attacks. He and I replied to each other and might have worked it out. But his most recent statement denys good faith by threatening what he is going to do at my next RfAr. Full Discussion *That is the situation. tells me to notify you directly, I am doing so. Please stop your personal attacks,

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

57,297,369

` == Template:User CCP DRV of speedy == I noticed that you closed the deletion review of Template:User CCP, a discussion in which neither of us participated. Your result was ``keep deleted``; how did you arrive at that conclusion? My rough count of editors who expressed an opinion (at ) indicated there were slightly more editors in favor of keeping than of deleting. Such an outcome (majority keep, but not supermajority keep) is supposed to return the deleted item to its associated deletion process actually send it there for the first time, since in this case the original deletion was a speedy (citing the nonexistent T2 criterion, no less). Really, I don't care if this template exists or not; I'm just trying to understand how a ``keep deleted`` conclusion can be reached in this case. `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

57,297,672

`::::::As a Wikipedian and an Administrator, listening to what another member 'consider' is the least to ask. Never when you did obvious mistakes like placing a tag including edit warring(which was ridiculous) had you admited your mistakes. What I am saying is that what you placed as last warning does not qualify by any standard as warning material. As well, placing a block for incivility directed at your person isen't the right thing to do, usually an experienced administrator leave this sort of thing being settled by another administrator. I admit, ``he started it`` is not an excuse, but neither is claiming that you only warn when you see things, you seem to have a rather selective sight here. I just request that you leave another administrator to handle the situation, and I consider you personally involved, of course you can ignore my considerations, but this is not the most respectful thing to do. Incivity is always the easiest thing for an administrator that does not bother to check the situation, but in comparaison to edit warring POV pushing, intimidations, suckpopetry, threats, it is absolutly nothing. And here is where your decision is not only unfair but had you decided to check the situation, there could have been no way in all impartialy taken that decision. Again, I request you to leave this being handled by another administrator, I question your impartiality in your uses of administrator power. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,300,224

== POV map == The map is POV, because it shows the counties in the US but doesn't show them in Canada. -

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,301,247

==Becoming Cool== Hey Yanksox! I added my endorsement to your Prod of the above article, with a rationale describing a walled garden of articles and naming them. If the prod is removed, I imagine you will likely take the article to afd. Just wanted to inform you of the garden so that if the prod is removed, you would know about them all for a combined afd.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,310,671

` == Work via WikiProjects == Hi Mirlen, As you may have seen here, we are planning to start contacting projects again soon (once Oleg gets ``Importance`` added to the bot), using a message something like . Would you be willing to help? It involves posting a message on each project page, recording what you're doing on our page, then following up a few days later to see how the project has responded. Often there is no response, but sometimes (as with Military History) they go off and create their own worklist of 6000 articles! We are also encouraging groups to start using the bot. Can you help out? Thanks, `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,316,608

== RfA+DYK == Hi. I like your(and Srikeit's) version a lot. I think that should make it on the front page. Thanks. All the best for your RfA. Things are looking great (at this moment). But RfA's are like Indian politics. A week is a long time. And Anwar hasn't made his appearance yet. Take care. -

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,316,622

== Current event == I added the {{currentevent}} tag after reading this piece by Ralph Nader in Counterpunch; seems the shit is about to hit the fan in the next couple of days. ==

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,319,142

:::::::::: I am against the merger.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,322,786

you gotta let somebody love you.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

57,323,156

your hot dog vendor will get you one day. gooooo pancreatic bad-ness!

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

57,323,339

Can we get this page protected== I'm talking about the untitled Batman Begins sequel as this user keeps posting B.S about Michael Keaton, Robin Williams and Mark Hamill being considered for the role of The Joker in the movie. He puts up articles on other sites (which have surprisingly come up today when I warned him about his vandalising and being blocked for it) to try and cover his vandalising tracks. Now I'm not saying let's block him, I'm saying lets protect the page Batman Begins oh and as for Bob Orton Jr. ==Bob Orton Jr. I'm sorry my answer is no, because lil crazy thing keeps deleting anything I put up in those pages. She's harrasing me by excluding me from editing the pages with truthful facts that she likes to edit! So my answer is no

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,324,735

== Experiences == Dubious practice is performed here only by you, my dear Hanuman Das. You claim these 3 articles are biographies and yet you completely disregard even the slightest thought of looking into biography of Haidakhan Babaji (the one you speculate that died in 1984). There are several really good books (about experiences with Him, not mere beliefs) out there on the subject, which you don't seem to acknowledge. Why is that? Please, do not misunderstand me, I respect your effort here, but it is obvious that you are not being objective (and, to me, you act like you own this place - which you don't). Why not present all relevant info on Mahavatar Babaji by not preferring only one idea about him? Hmm. Why not present info of those people that have actually been blessed by Mahavatar Babaji, directly, in person? Is speculation, based on certain books, really sincere effort to present Mahavatar Babaji and His teachings? Is this the best service we can offer to Mahavatar Babaji and people at large? Hmm. And, while we are on the subject, have you even met Mahavatar Babaji, Haidakhan Babaji or Hairakhan Babaji in person? - (GTM+2)

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,339,979

:: There seems to be a pan neo-conservatist gang-banging pervading not to mention perverting the objective real politik of this Scoop Jackson article. Desist from your neo-conservatist pigeon-holing of the late Senator as there is a severe lack of objective verifiable evidence to support your spurious claims. Third party authors with a poltical agenda are not verifiable sources in my book so desist from this pigeon-holing forthwith

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

57,342,780

`I'm just responding likewise. You insist on double-talk and a lack of integrity and I'll treat you as you deserve. You accuse me of not fully responding to you prior challenges. After 2 weeks I'm still want you to explain the Jupiter/Pluto midpoint in your natal chart. OR GET LOST!!! Obviously, your ``problems`` which magnetizes you to a topic which you're not qualified to discuss plus your confession that you haven't studied Astrology PROVES you have ``issues`` you're not dealing with. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,343,129

::: Typical neo-con sympathiser, imposing his personal views on us all and deciding (with no authority to do so) what is warranted and what is unwarranted by somehow claiming a mandate when none exists. Desist from your rambling and mildly amusing pontifications as they are tangential and deal with the issue, that being that there are no objectively neutral verifiable sources to back your ill-conceived assertion about the neo-conservatist legacy of the late Senator. The sources are not reliable as they are agenda-based in their nature.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

57,343,407

== Calling a vote on a picture of Mohammed == I consider it necessary, as well as fair, that Wikipedia not pander to Religion - Pictures of Mohammed appear quite frequently in Ottoman Art as well as various illustrated Historical manuscripts from around that time - It is extremely useful to have these pictures, or at least one, as a reference to what how Mohammed was perceived by different nations at different times, as well as it's effect upon art. Therefore I vote: *For a picture of Mohammed, on the grounds that the only reason one has not been included is religious sensitivites.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,344,660

*Agree I'd say, that the first sentence should explain the meaning of the phrase rather than who has used it before.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,345,210

:: Your argument defeats itself. It is tantamount to saying that I am not a vegetarian because I eat meat yet my policy on food was a guiding influence to all vegetarians who came after me. It doesn't add up, desist from the neo-conservatist line in relation to the late Senator, you all come across quite foolish, at least ill-informed with your silly claims and spurious agenda-based sources. Please refrain from peddling these falsehoods forthwith.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

57,345,235

Can I consider that a 'For' Blightsoot?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,352,998

I really do question Blnguyen's judgment, considering he's only been an admin since 29/5. A more experienced admin should deal with this one.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,357,520

`::sounds like you a little ill Gorgonzilla, Isarig is right and has edited the Controversies and allegations of bias perfectly. And i will help it remain like it currently is. put all your non issues about ``faux`` on its own ``Controversies and allegations of bias`` and stop being so childish. (sorry i keep forgetting to sign my comments) `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,358,689

` :You foolishly defer to quantity rather than quality in your opening statement. It is about the quality of the sources, not how many there are, and seeing as the most verifiable sources from your point of view have already been put forward here ad nauseum, your case that there is widely accepted verifiable and neutrally based evidence of the late Senator's neo-conservative legacy is seriously flawed. The citations you highlight at the forefront of your case are agenda-based so heaven knows how superfluously irrelevant the other sources are. Your very deference to the quantity of sources in your opening gambit reflects the tenuous nature of your argument. I refer you back to my vegetarian analogy. The tide of truth is flowing against you, desist from your misinformed unreliable agenda-based pigeon-holing of the late Senator or risk being swept away to the sea of ignorance. I refuse to let the late Senator's name become besmirched and mislabelled by a case built on subjective sources. Those who propagate such skewed sources on WP, some would suggest are merely the ``agents of ignorance``.`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,364,389

I hope you told Smith the same thing

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

57,375,527

` ::::::Well, if you feel personally attacked, if someone would claim, that you are supporting the decisions of the Israeli goverment, you are probably a strong opponent of Israeli politics as well. Though certainly not everybody who opposes Israelis policies approves the term ``Israeli apartheid``, it is certainly not a fringe group. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,375,933

` == Inheiritance == I think there should be 4 Inheiritance books because in the third Eragon gets married and gets a new blue sword and then he finishes his training and him and Roran should save Katrina. Then Roran and Katrina also get married. Then Roran gets the yellow dragon egg and names him Katrinak. Then Eragon trains Roran and one day Roran's yellow enchanted sword slid and sliced his stomach open Eragon heals it as much as he could but it leaves a scar like Eragon had from Durza then they gather the dragons that give Roran ``The gift of the dragons`` Then Roran transformed into an elf. Roran and Eragon both had children then Saphira and Katrinak mated then there were 10 dragon eggs that were given to their children and those eggs had hatched then Eragon and Roran train them`

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

57,377,805

::::::I'd say, that symetry should be achieved by listing motivation (why), aim (what they want to get by it) and identities (who) of those who oppose the term and those who approve it.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,388,223

` Request/proposal: Just for ha-has, would someone want to calculate how much of the time this article exists in a vandalized state, based on the history log, say over the last couple weeks or so? (Or pick any random interval.) In other words, what are the chances that a random visitor here will see a vandalized/erroneous article? I'm curious. My feeling, unconfirmed by evidence as of yet, is that this article spends a significant amount of time in a corrupt state, as do many, many articles on this so-called ``encyclopedia``. And yes, I'm too lazy at the moment to do this. Besides, I'm not really a statistician. == `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,389,552

` == Edits to St. George's School (Vancouver) == Thank you for your contributions to St. George's School (Vancouver). However, you must be careful to write with a neutral point of view, otherwise the article comes off looking like a recruitment pamphlet. Edits that are not neutral will likely be reverted. ... `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,393,397

== Fragment offset == In the examples in this article the fragment offset is measured in bytes, however RFC 791 states that fragment offset is measured in groups of 8 bytes (64 bits). In my opinion this article should be updated...

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

57,395,904

` ===Complaint=== First, I am not a sock puppet (I assume you mean Jason). Second, I have to figure out how to file a complaint with Wikipedia. I am amazed that I am providing factual information and you call it a ``white wash``. The article says LBU makes false accreditation claims. They do not. It says degrees by Life experience, they do not. I have made the challenge to show me several times and NO ONE has done so. When I edited I left the good and bad in there. LBU is at least honest. This article is dishonest and you have an obvious bias that means deleting material that does not serve your interest. I provided facts, you nothing. In arbitration your assertions will not stand up. LBU catalogue clearly says...we are not accredited, you are unlikely to become a certified teacher...you will not be able to obtain counselor certifcation, etc. What you and the folks who dislike LBU and refuse to at least present factual unbiased information are doing is essentially bullying. It is also dishonest. Nordundsud`

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

57,397,069

` ==User: KI LOL== Thought you might appreciate this quote from Ki's userpage (which seems to have been hit by actual Wiki-vandals?!?!? (() ===Opposes=== * Userboxes. * Hu Jintao * The House of Saud. * To the death penalty. ** Censorship – online or off for minors or adults. ** < LULZ Anyway. Hopefully he didn't scare you off too much. Believe me, I've seen my fair share of ``stop the vandalism``, and his does not read like a Wiki-official. It's sad what too much marijuana and belief in the Falun Gong can do to a mind.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,399,124

`::The word is ``uncivil``, you brain-dead mouthbreather. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

true

57,404,017

:But this is my page, I should be allowed to do what I want with it. 15:38, 8 June 2006

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,404,244

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ann Coulter, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,404,643

` == Can I Change The Image? == Can I change the image that reads ``Promotional Shoot For Goodies``, because that picture is like super old. Her hair's not even that color anymore. that was in mid 2004, this is mid 2006. 15:42, 8 June 2006`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,404,960

:::Well, then don't TALK to me, you jackass! 15:44, 8 June 2006

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

true

57,406,174

:::::Get a life Miss Ciara

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,406,315

|Miss Ciara]] 15:52, 8 June 2006

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,407,250

Hello Big DT writes me please!. Your edition from Plymouth Brethren had following errors: closed are no a recent division from exclusives. closed are very different to exclusives. Even publish a cassette/book displaying Exclusive teachings and rebuking it as hereticals. closed NEVER had chosen an universal leadership. closed and open brethren are NO identical to open and closed communion plymouth brethren. By example El Salvador plymouth brethren are closed and open communion. Plymouth brethren in Venezuela are closed and closed communion. Plymouth brethren in mexico are open and closed communion. Plymouth brethren in switzerland are closed and closed communion but no related to closed p b in venezuela. Please reads encyclopedia britannica 1968 edition and shawn abigail website. my e-mail adress is freelebanon at baptistmail dot com.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

57,407,294

, you stupid ass fucker, retarded whore, incompetent loser! I'm unblocked! Miss Ciara 15:52, 8 June 2006

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

57,407,892

I was talking on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Baptists&oldid;=51773434 when you can writes me?. I had links and articles-no copyrighted- to contributes here. Review and edit it when you can. eliecer

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

57,412,498

Let us assume all that is accurate, meaning the side of President Kennedy's head was blown out above the right ear: What conclusions, if any, can be drawn from that?

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,420,285

Who and Why keeps deleting the I Stand Alone section

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,421,059

` :I don't think that is the official chart. Listed at United World Singles Chart: ``The South African sales and airplay chart is merged into one to form the official singles chart which is published weekly``. From what I've seen, ``Get Together`` has yet to enter the record chart.`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,422,110

` == Reason For Iraq Invasion? == A bunch of friends and i have been carefully trying to follow the war and the progress of the U.S.A. in Iraq. However, we are extremely confused to why they invaded in the first place. I have read many articles and have herd many theories regarding the invasion. I am from Canada and we have not sent any troops to aid the U.S.A in Iraq, but we have sent troops to Afghanistan to help out. In my understanding, it was Afghanistan who attacked the U.S.A in 9/ 11, right? So we have NATO, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, France, New Zealand, Italy, and Germany stationed in Afghanistan. My question is: why are the Amercians in Iraq if it is Afghanistan who has attacked them? I am sory this is such a dumb question i was just hopeing someone could give me an educated answere other then ``because Saddam is a jerk``. I was also wondering why other countries have not joined the U.S.A in Iraq if it is as seriouse as i've been hearing. Thanks!`

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,427,478

`::::::::That's quite arrogant of you, as an administrator using terms such as ``all you want`` is disresctful and arrogant. You have to show me where in this there is anything at all warrant to a warning, the entire issue revolve around this, since if it happens that there is indeed a mistake, one of the reasonable explainations would be that you tried to provoke me. I am not insulting you any more than you are insulting me. You provoke me by an empty warning and then block me because you qualify my answer to a provokation as block material even if the victim and provokator happens to be you. It is like an alleged victim acting as a judge and condemn the alleged agressor of his. Also, have in mind that abusing ones administrator provilages is worst than some insults percieved or real in a talkpage. There are various administrators who administered in articles or talkpages in which I have contributed, and I am not a newbie, and I rarely had any problem nor have I accused administrators the way I did with you, except for two newbie administrators chatting with Coolcat. Also, you must consider that politically heated articles more than often are not like others, and there might be incivility, but as long as there is a relevent exchange, administrators shall rather edit such incivilities unless it becomes overboard and incivility and personal attacks becomes a members only way of answering. In such articles people deal with pov pushing, and repeated edit warrings ad well as incivility, unless as an administrator you do not take the time to understand the context, it is for you futile to throw a warning because of one or to displaced words in an edit of hundreds or perhaps over a thousand word. Now, since your block is not justifiable, I request an unblock and I am ready to forget this incident. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,430,624

` :::FRCP, You are beginning to sound like a broken record. I refer you back to the vegetarian analogy. Furthermore if the likes of Beinart and Kaufman are quoted, this does not make them verifiable, your best sources are not neutral and objectively acceptable, they are agenda-based commentators on the late Senator's alleged and I emphasise alleged (since it is most certainly not verified) neo-conservatist legacy. Your tedious counter-argument to this normally goes ``Refer me to verifiable sources to the contrary``. This is not good enough. You are the one making the contentious assertions, the burden of proof and verifiability falls on you and to date, in my opinion, the case you have built based on the sources you have offered is tenuous to say the least and utterly ambiguous at best. End of term report for FRCP11 - Must do better, try harder, Student must come to terms and grasp the meaning of the word ``verifiable``. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,433,316

::::In both headers, eh? Learn to read. — |

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,434,293

: Ahh, carry on, sally forth, and all that rot, then. ;)

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

57,435,312

::No, I'm afraid I am not, there is nothing in that phrase that can be qualified in anyway as warrant to a warning. And where have I used the everybody is doing it? To the contrary, I am ready to pay the price, but THIS, does not warrant any warning, and I advice you to submit that phrase to any administrator and see what he/she has to say. As for your adminsitrator abilities, I judge what I see, it is my right to question it, you should not dump every critics, when they are in ones talk page, as incivility and justify a block. Now you tell me how am I supposed to assume good faith when you single me out on the middle of discussions that when my 'incivilities' are compared to what is done else, it is nothing, while you appear to totally ignore those, I simply request common sense. Being administrator should assume that you know that the most important thing is what Wikipedia is, it is an encyclopedia and articles are the most important thing. You as an administrator are above all a user like any other user, administrative privilages should only be used when a user is disturbing, so for you to warn me, you should justify how telling someone that he refuse to listen, when he really refuse to listen warrant to a warning, or how am I disturbing. It is to you to convince me now that your blocking of a contributor a Wikipedian as much as you is not disturbing. Also, that you refuse to accept your mistake on the face of the obvious doesn't give a good opinion of you. But I am sure, that is the last of your worries. Just consider that everyone make mistakes, whatever or not they recognize it is what matters.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,436,026

` :::- :That encyclopedia would be guilty of sourcing the same agenda-based commentators if that is the case and in no way does it make this spurious radical claim ``verifiable``. This allegation of Jackson's neo-conservatist legacy remains unverified and I have little faith in the mutual abilities of ``tweedle-dum`` and ``tweedle-dee`` to proffer anything substantial to give their fruitless quest (to establish nonsense as a mainstay on WP articles) even a modicum of integrity. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,436,181

==Message to administators that might read my unblock request== As of yet, I have not recieved any answer on whatever or not my request has been rejected. If this means that it is not a clear cases, I request abstinence in doubt and an unblock. I think it is important that if some administrators consider this block as a mistake, to make it known then saying nothing about it and wait the 24 hours. I don't think any administrator would want being blocked for 24 hours for a mistake, and it is important that Inshaneee be adviced that some indeed think it was a mistake if they really think it is. I am waiting an answer, I have seen many cases and haven't seen as I remember a cases that took that much time.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,438,057

` ::Look, she the one that ``personally attacked`` me, did you NOT just read her post. They gonna try to be smart with it, because they scared to say what they feel. You unfair, ! 19:08, 8 June 2006.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,438,867

::Don't you have someone else to bother? 19:13, 8 June 2006

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,446,884

Not Manpower, as it said before I fixed it. What moron thought Manpower is the largest private employer in this country? LOL.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

57,450,409

::In general, I'm sick of your obnoxious excuses and immature piling-up. This will be all. — |

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

57,450,698

:::It seems as though your honesty is going to fail your RfA — our community really is hopeless. Sorry about this. — |

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,454,236

== My mistake == My mistake on the archive there, i figured since the page was so long it would be appropriate.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,454,923

:Becca: I'm sorry, but Gabby blew my spot, and ruined my chance of my father seeing me place on this team. 21:06, 8 June 2006

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,455,099

`::::Oh, I thought he was ``tryna`` make me look stupid. 21:07, 8 June 2006 `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

57,463,621

==THX== Hi ! I want to thank you a lot for unblocking my userpage. Cheers ! '''''' 8 June 2005

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,465,307

Are you serious? Wow, that's cool ! But are you an American of Romanian ancestry? BTW:they unblocked my userpage, you can write there now. '''''' 8 June 2006

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,468,923

Ann Coulter too, there is no way she's conservative, she can't even articulate a conservative position, which is why she resorts to ignorant name-calling and provocation. She does nothing but lower most people's views of conservatives.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

57,469,973

Which brings the question...should it have it's own article or just be added on to this one? It seems to be a port, so it may not need a seperate page, though several games before it have had pages dedicated to ported versions.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

57,479,456

That's it, I am editing it.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,480,614

` {| class=``messagebox standard-talk`` style=``text-align:center;`` |- | width=``50px`` | || This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |} {| class=``messagebox standard-talk`` style=``text-align:center;`` |- | width=``50px`` | || This article was nominated for deletion on 15 May 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |} This page was placed on Votes for Deletion in July 2004. Consensus was to keep; view discussion at /Delete. Documented examples???? What the F are you talking about? Tell you what, my girlfriend is pretty wild, I'll do a dirty sanchez tonight. There. In 4 hours, it will not be an urban legend anymore. I'm sorry, but I'm not going to post photos or give you a juicy description. But it will happen. I will stick my finger in her anus and wipe the poo on her upper lip. And then it will be real. And if you don't believe me, well, I think you should do it yourself to prove it is real. Happy camping! == urban legend? ummm... == There's a lot of freaks out there. If it was an urban legend before it became a popular toilet-humor reference, I'm sure some poo-loving weirdos have made it a reality. Yes, what's the basis for saying it's an urban legend? Face-sitting, front and back, is common enough. Dirty Sanchez is not face-sitting. Actually I'm inclined to remove the reference to face-sitting as it's a bit of a wild conjecture and in no way related to the act, which is performed with the finger. | On the urban legend question, well if there are documented examples of this practise let's have them. Until then it could be regarded as an urban legend because of its viral circulation and the absence, or elusive nature, of concrete cases. I'm not wedded to this idea, though. It's a judgement call. One could just as well refer to it as an apocryphal sexual practise. | Yes there are web sites that feature the Dirty Scanchez... It is quite alarming to see it happen and you wonder what drugs the person is on.... usually after anal penetration the member is thrust into the mouth of the other partner(s)... More shocking than sexual... RW :If you're talking about ass to mouth, it's well-documented in gonzo porn and at least has the barest minimum of sexual arousal value (humiliation and/or actual penetration) and I know for a fact that the practice is not limited to just porn. A dirty sanchez is just plain absurd, most likely even for scat-lovers. I dare anyone to actually present links to a sites that even advertise to stock actual pornographic footage of it. : == swingers film == i know the movie swingers pretty well. no recollection of a ``dirty sanchez`` bar. == Should be Dirty Sanchez, not Dirty Mexican == I'm not sure why this article was moved. Does anyone have sources that refer to a ``Dirty Mexican``? == AJ Matthews T-shirt? == What is that line doing in the external links anyhow? Does it belong as a popculture reference? I'm going to move it, and hopefully someone will be able to figure that out for me. Also, while the intro could be improved, I definitely think it's short enough as an appropriate intro to have that tag removed. == South Park: ``hitler,`` not ``shitler`` == I'm 99.9% sure that in the episode of South Park mentioned where Cartman gives Butters a poop ``moustache,`` it's called a hitler, not a ``shitler.`` Some googling seems that it should be ``hitler`` instead of ``shitler`` as well (Google query of ``cartman gives butters a hitler`` with quotes gives 160 results.. changing hitler to shitler and still keeping the quotes returns 0 results). I've changed it on the page. ==Move== This page should be moved to [

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

57,491,366

` == Clarification == * In 2002, Waterston and fellow Law & Order castmate Jerry Orbach were honored as ``Living Landmarks`` by the New York Landmarks Conservancy. This means that Sam Waterston is no longer at risk for being demolished to make way for a new CVS. Do they mean their homes? I dont get the ``Sam Waterston is no longer at risk for being demolished to make way for a new CVS`` part. Couldn't Sam just step outta the way? P Someone help me out here. ... and who cares where he stands on firearms? Thats his business, not ours. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,496,298

::Yep, its 104 on the Langley platform and 4 on the Bromley platform. I'll edit it.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,498,362

== Yoshi == I think there is far too much detail on Yoshi for an article about Mario and it dilutes an otherwise reasonable article. I'd jump in and start ripping stuff out like all but the briefest mention in SMS for example, but I thought I'd garner some feedback first. /

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,502,237

` == Your Application == Dear Lithpiperpilot, Thank you for applying for (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that for security reasons, VandalProof's creator requires it's users to have made 250 edits to articles, which you have not. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - '''''''' '' `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,524,065

` ==Sydney== Sydney didn't have a modern ``CBD`` in 1836, let alone anything like the subject of the article Sydney central business district. I have removed the term and the link (again). I also suspect that the acronym CBD is not well-known outside Australia. | `

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

57,532,810

::: Memo to Paul Cyr, quit your bumbling ramblings, the references you cite as examples are in no way personal and exemplify my dealing with the real issues so I suggest you try and analyse situations a little more efficiently rather than engaging in a witch-hunt of the innocent. Do your job and go after the real personally offensive vandals with no interest in rational debate and who only serve to disrupt, not those interested in rational debate like myself. Hurry along now....

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

57,533,209

`Copied from my talk page: Yesterday, you deleted the entry on the band Old Canes. As far as i can figure out (cf. talk above), they're eligible to be on wikipedia. First, they're mentioned in the Appleseed Cast article. Second, they are on a label: http://www.secondnaturerecordings.com/. Last, two of the band members are also members of the Appleseed Cast, who has quite a few records out. I have noted that you wrote A7. if it is because the article is too short, would it be possible to mark it as a stub instead of simply deleting it? Please let me know what you think or if there are other reasons for your action. Thanks! `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

57,535,430

Look, stop it, this has gone much too far.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,537,035

This article doesn't use proper footnoting, also the references are webpages, I don't usually use webpages by works which are not accessible on the web. I'll see what I can do. I will be also modifying the leads of the history section, the etymology of the term must be expended and also what most believe of its ethymology. Also must be expended that deportation of Jews and Armenians under prior Persian rules (The Jewish encyclopedia document it), as well as the destruction of Julfa and the deportation of the Armenians in the 12th century. The entire information about the Armenians is totally missing in this article, most importantly prior to the 12th century.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,537,423

:::::In the same direction, is it really necessary to name all the US states who recognize it? Why not give just the number of states? This is not an American encyclopedia, but an universal one, I don't see why every single US states which recognize it should be named.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,538,082

` :No such thing as false and true in here, only positions. I agree that the first sentence isen't neutral, ``The weakening control of the Ottoman government over its empire in the following 15 years led many Armenians to believe that they could gain independence from them`` too is not neutral, but that section could be neutralise at least with words such as 'according to' (citing the author), Davison here could be cited, as he covers the Armenian situation (irronically Davison has been placed in the list of 'denialist' by Deepblue06) and their aspiration in his work covering the Armenian crises (1912-1914) prior to the war. This work is really a must read. BTW, the rest of what you write is POV and at this point irrelevent. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,549,034

:::Of course you are. And that's because I was right about the images on Kelly Clarkson and you were not. — |

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,549,868

:Listen well: I was certainly happy to return to Wikipedia and I wanted to edit articles. The only issue I've ever truly had is you and your friends. When you found out about who I was, you teased me, insulted me behind my back and through e-mail, etc., etc., which is why I have become so angered with the community. Is this really necessary? Yes, you are certainly allowed to do whatever you want but some comments just pushed my buttons, which is why from time to time I exhibited infinite and random stupidity. Of course I am going to admit this — because I did. No, an arbitration will not be necessary because I am leaving the second We Belong Together finishes FAC and this is not a lie. Will I return? Maybe. I am not going to be present throughout late June–late September (I'll be studying elsewhere in the world). Therefore, I will not be making edits on Wikipedia during this time. However, following September, I might come back. Just do me this one favour: if you find out who I am (if I return), please don't tease me and do the things you have done; that was why I became uncivil and angered. Again, if you find out, just leave me to be and we wouldn't have to get caught up in such a fiasco. I really do wish you well. Seriously. :My only complaint is that HeyNow10029 is complaining because she knows that I was right about the images in the Kelly Clarkson article. Why exactly does each image that she uploaded onto the website have to be displayed and not the ones with actual and very strong fair use rationale? I know you're tired of reading this (that being you ever did), so see you. The last message I post here will be the final goodbye, after WP:FAC is completed. — |

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

57,553,000

In addition, neither the Beatles, nor the the Stones ever had the ability to to play with soft delicacy AND the unihibited fury of modern rock.

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

57,562,456

== Proposed merge == I say no, this page is for U.S. highway and Interstates, the other page is specifically for state highways.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,564,879

== SHUT yOUR bUTT == Thats right, i siad it. I hate yuo and i wish yuo wood die.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

57,565,385

` == WHAT?!?! == ``damaging the hard work of others`` I did nothing of the sort. Your user talk is open to anyone. i was just expressing my opinions. Frickin idiot, gosh....`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

57,565,507

` ::I would like to point out that there used to be a great deal of, in my opinion, very unnecessary fighting over terms such as ``circumcised`` vs ``unmutilatedcastratedstabbedpenismurdered``. ::Isn't it advisable, to at least be able to use a more scientific sounding vocabulary - as in, detached from everyday speech and associations to avoid emotions. Synonyms like that are an important part of an article when stuff is looked up primarily by text search - if relevant words are missing, the article fails as a whole. Dictionaries are never complete, and neither is Wikipedia. The advantage of Wikipedia being, that we can update her ourselves as new information becomes more widely available. IAR2TR. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,565,618

==Sir== No, I entirely agree with you. I was just thinking the same thing myself.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,565,999

== How dare you! == How dare you delete my user talk to you. WTF. I was just trying to tell you that i didnt mess with anyone's page at that moment and then you go and delete my message to you. Thats nice

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

57,567,090

== Admin == Can i be an admin? please

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

57,568,069

== 69th comment == LOL HAHA. its like sex

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,569,528

` :Hi Catamorphism, thanks for your question on my talk page about why I reverted the removal of the tags. I was watching recent changes for vandalism or unwise edits and I observed that an anonymous user removed 4 citation tags with no discussion on this talk page. They did this in two edits: One with no summary, the other with an edit summary I believed to be uninformative about their reason for removal. :My thinking was that someone had found those tags needed for some reason, and that they were deleted with no discussion. (I did not make the connection betwee n your question and the anonymous user - although even your posting does not seem to question the need for the other 3 tags. :Of course it is always a matter of opinion how strict we are going to try to be with ourselves about citing our sources. :In this case, in my opinion, the tag you question is probably the tag that is least needed. I don't really see an urgent need to provide a citation for the fact that women can achieve organism from oral sex. On the other hand, surely such a source would be trivially easier to find. So ideally, we should just put a source in rather than deleting the tag. :In the case of the other 3 statements that are flagged as needing a source - these 3 statements are much weaker and really should be cited because as it is they smack of personal opinion and/or original research and/or contaminated by weasel words: :#Oral sex is often used as the principal form of sexual expression or as part of foreplay. Not only are the sexual organs sensitive and well supplied with nerve endings, the same is true of the mouth, tongue and lips, so enjoyment of oral sex is not always limited to the person on the receiving end. :::``is often used as the principal`` is a weasel phrase. How often? By what percentage of people? How often is it enjoyed by the person giving the oral sex and how often is it not? :#As in all human sexual behaviour, the variety of techniques in cunnilingus and individual responses to them are almost endless. :::``almost endless`` is not a very encyclopedic term. Who claims this? Who claims this is also true of all ``human sexual behaviour``? :#As always, communication, experimentation and practice are the best way to learn how to please a particular partner. :::This is very encyclopedic. It reads more like a how-to. Who claims these things are important? Why do they belong in an encyclopedia? :Thanks again for your question. \ `

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

57,578,251

` Agggh!!! and of coulse I talked to coneveanT, he talked to me first, I'm just answering. It's not like ``here we go again``, that CS makes me so angry!. I don't even care for the stuff they argue. I already proved them wrong and now they are complaing about minor unrelevant issues I don't care for. `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

57,578,278

what the fuck who deleted the spider loc and hot rod sections fucking wikipedia stupid ass ignorant people can we get it back ?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

57,578,904

I am IMPERVIUS THE MAGNIFICENT title courteousy of my physics teacher

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,589,672

who are you to comment on what I do?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,597,349

:The split has been made, although the The Ladykillers (2004 film) page may need editting and reformatting.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,597,379

June 2006 (UTC) SO WHY DO YOU KEEP DELETING IT WHEN THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CORUS STUDY HAS AN EXTERNAL SOURCE OF INFORMATION?!!!!!!!!!!!!. 21:45, 8

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,603,619

== So not a rip-off == This is, like, the best book ever. You just need to get into it.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,605,059

No, I specifically made the proposal as I did to get an answer to the question, How much of the time does this article spend in a vandalized or erroneous state?. In other words, for a given interval, this article spends X% of the time being a bad source of information. (From which one can infer that one's chances of getting bad information from it, based on a random visit, are also X%.) :It would be interesting, I guess, to find out how many times it's been vandalized in some interval, but I think the number above would be a more useful metric. ==

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,606,166

` It is my opinion that the most accurate/up to date image be used. The old one can be used to illustrate the development history. `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,609,623

` ::There was I thinking you people wouldn't care about ``the real world`` and preferred ``reliable sources`` (that you get to pick and judge) instead! Despite the term not being very widespread, it is used in the ``real world`` of people trying to sound scientific about the state of circumcision and the adoration thereof - see the links. ``The real world`` is thus exactly an argument why the synonym should be mentioned in the article. Spreading information is the purpose of wikipedia. Here we have a synonym for being circumcised belonging to an article that is in desperate need for a richer vocabulary about that state. Remember the ``circumcised vs natural`` wars? That problem would be reduced if there were actually more words - outside gym shower room talk - to describe the state of circumcision. Addition of the synonym (and subsequent, occasional use) would be without a doubt beneficial to the article as a whole. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false