dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
57,006,078	` :::Don t wory be happy. Serbia is going to be independent, but first Kosovo must be regotnazied, after thate Vojvodina and Sandjak and then the word is going to know what is this nationalistic creature ``Serbia``.`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,010,537	In Kosovo was UÇK not UÇPMB, and ther are so many serbian propagande!!!!!	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
57,011,595	` Thats not very nice for the people of San Roque... I personally know quite a few people from this town. San Roque has a place in wikipedia just as any other town does. Perhaps you would like to delete the whole article? I see your hispanophobia is slowly being brought to the surface. By the way, Gibraltar was just another town in the southern coast of Spain until the British conquest. Why write its history before that moment? Since before the British it was so ``unremarkable`` is there any point, according to your own logic, to grant it a history of its own? `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,012,433	== Your contribution == Is only serbian propagander. Sorry my frend but you have nothing to do with Wikipedia	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
57,013,187	== Kosovo Post code is seperated from Serbia == Since 2000 Kosovo hase owen Post code. Ex: Prishtina District	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
57,016,702	` The College of Charleston claims to be the oldest municipal college in the U.S. (est 1770, chart. 1785). The medical school which became U of L has operated continously since 1837, but I'm not sure when we became officially municipally funded. A google search usually brings up the ``Louisville Municipal College for Negros``, which was purchased by U of L; so I may have email someone to find out Brando03`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,020,657	` :pasting the following comments from: Not really. I suspect the problem is that external links are generaly meant to go at the end of the article. ::They were for example and use. :::examples are better surved by links to articles. The use bit runs into some stuff a WP:NOT. :Your edit to include direct links to external sites seems redundant given the List of web directories link already in the article. I spend a fair bit of time doing this sort of ``cleanup``articles on software-related subjects in particular are magnets for spam or just gratuitous mentions for the purpose of raising pagerank. So some practical guidelines have emerged independently on a number of articles. External links should go in the external links section. External links shouldn't multiply beyond necessity (i.e., beyond the point necessary to clarify or minimally exemplify the content of the articlesany more and you get into web directory territory, and then everybody with a site to push says ``well, if site X is there, my site has a right to be there as well.``) *Sites linked to should preferably pass general Wikipedia notability guidelinesthat means wikilinks are preferred so there is at least a quality control process in place (look at, say Comparison of content management systems for a place where that idea has broken down, however). So a lot of what I do is pruning external links and redlinks from articles, looking for spam, SEO, self-promotion, registration-only sites that turn into sales pitches, disguised google ad sites, etc., sometimes very deviously salted among large lists of legitimate sites. Figuring out which are the quality links and which aren't is a tedious process, and involves some personal judgment and inevitably some mistakes, no doubt. In this particular case, the judgment would have been easy, thoughlegit or not, those links were in the wrong place, and a couple wikilinks (maybe Google and Yahoo) would have done the trickbut oh, wait, those, and more were already in the article. As an aside, please go easy on accusations of vandalism. Vandalism doesn't mean ``an edit that makes me mad.`` Good faith edits are never vandalism.·· `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,027,681	Fuck, Shit, Damn, Cock, Pissant, Motherfucker, and horse dick.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	true
57,048,145	And I am not interested in your opinion on what was lost and what was won. You don't know what you're talking about as I was the defendent I think I know more about the case than you do. Unless of course yopu're just another Smith sock puppet.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
57,048,184	` ==RCP Nonsense== The nonsense Ron keeps inserting about the RCP does not belong here. The Weakly Standard point is BS we have a link to NION already, if people want to learn more about that organization, they can click the link. McGovern was not a member of RCP to my knowledge; the fact that NION was started by people who included RCP members is a strange guilt by association argument that has no place here. Beyond that, to claim NION is not ``anti-war`` because some of its members may belong to a Maoist group makes no sense. NION opposed the war, did they not? `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,048,645	Who was this woman that lost a major libel case? What did smith win? Besides a big solicitors bill and the fact he forked out £7,500 in court costs? Please do Light the way on that one, lightoftheworld.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
57,050,131	== nonsense== generally articles get AFDs, where as nonsense gets {{nonsense}} tags	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
57,050,392	== FUCK == Why hasn't anyone included this information yet? http://ultimate-guitar.com/news/general_music_news/red_hot_chili_peppers_accused_in_plagiarism.html	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
57,051,026	== Is the city safe for greeks to go to? == I have always wanted to go and see Istanbul/Constantinople as I am a great lover of both Greek History and Architecture in general. Is it safe like Western capitols or is it like middle-eastern capitols where it is dangerous to go to?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,057,790	It would also be advisable for other people to refrain from undoing my edits as well. This is my article and is about me after all.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,058,021	The real personal attacks are the repeated undoing of my edits by everyone else.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
57,062,372	:I personally think it adds too much detail, but I'm not strongly opposed to it.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
57,063,201	`:I can't rewrite something like that, if I did all I would say is ``some people gonna get killed``. You could rewrite it, you're a genius 17:20, 5 June 2006 `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,065,956	` :Actually, the officer pronounced her name (KY-AIR-RUH) then he asked if her friends called her ``Ki-Ki``. Ciara should've known it was fake then, that was a totally irrelevant question for an officer to ask. (sigh) The world of entertainment... so horrid. 20:36, 5 June 2006`	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,066,953	:You might be right. I'm going to certainly correct the third and fourth examples, but I don't understand why the second example requires elaboration. — \|	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,067,319	`45, 5 June 2006 (UTC) You need to explain why ``We Belong Together`` is a ``universal love anthem`` if you want to use that phrase. ``Once the studio session was complete,.... confident that the album was complete,`` sounds repetitious. Also, ``The composers experienced a lengthy discussion`` is an odd phrasing. Maybe it would be better to say ``Carey and Dupri discussed the melody at length,`` or words to that effect. I don't think that's quite the sense that the original phrase is trying to convey, though. :You might be right. I'm going to certainly correct the third and fourth examples, but I don't understand why the second example requires elaboration. — \| 21:`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,074,012	:::I've given a full source; Carey was the critic. What other portions of the article require rewriting? (I've become pretty lousy at this.) — \|	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,074,573	:Done. Check it out. :By the way, is that actually IPA in your username? Ewwwww. ==	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,076,952	==Look, I will not be playing this stupid game with you== I gently request that you step down and ask another administrator to manage this thing. There is hardly any policies or guidelines being respected on that talk page of that article, either you decide to read what is happening there and pay attention or stop giving up to trouble makers. Just for your information, deepblue06 that is reporting me, has done much worst, and here an example. Slandering an academic with words such as this: 'Dadrian is only good at one thing: Propoganda and Forgeries' is worster than calling some anonymous user a liar. Also, it would be interesting that you highlight the words which you think would qualify as ban material. Also, don't worry, other than slandering academics like this, which is a clear cases of diffamation and is criminal under the laws of his state, deepblue06 isen't immune of making personal attacks like accusing me of hallucination. But since that articles talk page is in a choas, I won't take part in scrutinizing who slandered whom most by whom and to whom. Being an administrator is not to distribute warnings without taking the time to understand, even in court of law, an element of the evidences are not processed before trying to place it in context.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
57,077,125	== The Editors of this page, are really an insult to the ideal of Wikipedia == I love how the author's of this page, are so freaked out when ANYONE else but them, actually takes the time to research facts and uses them (sourced) to correct thier innacuracies. The Authors of this page have insrted so many bias and unfactual things into this article, it's no wonder Wikipedia is looked down on by Schools, and professional historians. If Wikipedia is ever to be credible, these authors need to put aside thier pathetic ego's, and allow others to help edit these pages with sourced facts...even if the facts are contrary to the bias of the original authors. I will edit this page daily, and I will inform Wikipedia about the unprofessional behavior of the editor's of this page, who revert and discard any changes to the article, no matter how well sourced or factual they are.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,081,296	2006 (UTC) :: Not that any of the rest of us have ever gone past 3RR, have a good one, Vivaldi. 23:16, 5 June	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,081,635	2006 (UTC) :: eeek, I just saw this. I do not mean to fool people. Well, I have tried to fool someone, perhaps 3 or 4 times in my life. But that is very rare. What have I said that leads you to think that? 23:18, 5 June	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,087,843	Sometimes all you need is three sentences to get a point accross, and for it to be constructive. But you have your head stuck too far up your ass trying to defend Thoth. Why dont you let him answer the question. Besides, this is the talk page, you don't have to be neutral. Also, why don't you get off your lazy ass and create a user name?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
57,088,288	Also, look in any up to date history book, and it will confirm that it happened.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,089,327	== Do they Work? == Has anyone ever had an experience where an ouija board has worked?	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,100,317	:: How about you do it? I simply asked because I had no time, had no experience with how to handle this kind of information on Wikipedia. Stop being smartass if I asked why anyone hasn't ALREADY included this information even after such a long time.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,103,482	` -Why'd you delete the ``kufi smacker`` bit, it's not anti-Islam. Juelz Santana, of Dipset, is a well known Muslim who associates with the ``kufi smacker`` movement. By the way, let's start a ``kippa smacker`` movement.`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,108,627	Thanks for the praise. I'm taking Wikipedia a lot more seriously now than I used to. I have to admit that a few months ago I did silly things like vandalize articles. I never really didn't anything slanderous, just silly and stupid stuff. Recently, I've been doing my best to contribute positively to Wikipedia and I've even been correcting the same sort of vandalism I used to take part in.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
57,108,970	`I am sure that the ``durability`` of a site is at premium in field that is causing a great deal of excitement. My`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,111,115	BTW, there's this dipshit (his name is LILVOKA) who keeps on deleting the article saying that I didn't cite my sources (which is a complete lie). He pretty much admitted to me that he doens't LIKE what I posted so therefore that's grounds for deletion. I thought you weren't supposed to interject you POV into how you correct or type articles.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	true
57,119,208	Leave me the fuck alone you nosy little bastard. Stop fucking with me or my pages. Thanks	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
57,121,727	` == Thank you == Thank you for the compliment. I will let you know if I need any help. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,125,366	` ``How is that not chill?`` :``How can you claim to be a Wikipedian..`` ::WP:NPA ``What['s wrong with saying ``allegedly`` anyway?`` :No significant group that says otherwise. Plus, Bin Laden admitted to it repeatedly. ``Which are you more afraid of, being branded a terrorist, or a liar?`` :??? `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,127,847	:Thank you kindly for the explanation. Best wishes,	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,127,954	You're seriously confused. This is an article about Zodiac Signs NOT arbitrary Star Constellations. Different terms, different definitions. Ophiuchus has NOthing to do with Astrology.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,128,436	`As I'm continually being slimed by anti-constitution Republicans is one real estate office after another, these last 3 years; I'm, also, sick of the mean-spirited ``half-logic`` psuedo-academic debunkers here on Wikipedia pretending that they're objective skeptics. I'll tone-down when the knuckle draggers discover integrity. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,128,766	Agreed any changes from 12 million to 9.4 will be reverted from now on.-CAYA	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,128,996	Lundse has been passing off opinion for knowledge. Why should he stop now? It's types like him that makes it easy for me to pick up chicks at parties. The Lundses of the world inadvertantly enhance my social life. You to should employ a little psychological jujitsu with the Lundses of the world to improve your love life.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,129,288	Agreed all changes to 9.4 million will from now on be reverted-CAYA	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,129,923	==VANDALISm== EVERYONE VANDALISE MY HOME PAGE (or just sign your name)	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,133,568	== Please stop your personal attacks == Please stop your personal attacks, User Antaeus Feldspar.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
57,135,157	Are you even reading what I write? Read Bournatian one more time, this time more carefuly, he speifically covers the preiod which I was talking about, he also is the one providing the data of the Armenian emigration from Erivan region from 1795 to 1827, he document the desertion and the Armenian refugees in his works. He does not contradict what I am saying. And you new data, well, again, you are not reading me, I do not disagree about this, it was those years that Julfa was destroyed and its Armenian population deported this is also documented, the Armenians will later, during the Ottoman partial controls where Nakhichevan will be used as a storing place for the marchandises from India etc, recolonise that region and rebuild Julfa. I already contended that during the Mongol invasion the Armenian population dropped. What on the other hand I said was that pre Abbas in the 17th century just before the deportation, Armenians were there constituting a majority, and I have provided various works that equal the population to Armenian and I have also provided another work which you author you claim has not much knowledge. We are not talking about the same period at all. While I recognize every periods when Muslim have constituted a majority, with obstinence you refuse to listen as if Azerbaijan will lose Nakhichevan just because I wrote that and that you accepted it. Give yourself a brake Grandmaster, we are debating about this whole affair because of a simple word, just like your obstinence about the term enclave which you wanted to remove.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,136,310	You can create a list and add me and to it, going by your comments in the other section.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
57,137,853	There weren't even proper data for those years from Europe and you expect me to provide statistics? It is like requesting statistics to claim that Gaule was populated of Gaulois. I have provided records using the term Armenian ecxluding other groups, I have provided records statistics of 250-300,000, I have provided another work which claims majority. What you ever did was to provide datas that at least 200 years pre that period or 300 years after. The closest data was provided by me and which either equated population for 'Armenians' or another one used the term majority, and another one only talked about the depopulation of Armenians. Being neutral doesn't mean to add misleading wordings, the way it is, no one would guess that the Armenians and this in the entire article had even a history there or they had ever constituted an significant part of the population. It isen't enough for you that the entirity of the history of the Armenians in Nakhichevan is entirly missing from the article, for hell sake Grandmaster you even disputed that the word is generally known as Armenian, you even have a problem with the term Armenian being added anywhere or accept that Armenians for some period in the history of Nakhichevan have constituted a majority. If you are really good intentioned, I think you would not have had the problem with the word Armenian there when the history section start with trash about the etymology of the word and with referrences that aren't cited anywhere.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
57,142,977	` ==Image Tagging Image:Microsoft Logo.svg== {\| align=``CENTER`` style=``background-color:#FFFFFF; border:8px solid #FF0000; padding:5px;`` \|- \| \| This media may be deleted. \|} Thanks for uploading Image:Microsoft Logo.svg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ```` link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ``Image`` from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. `	2,006	false	user	random	train	false
57,143,386	` ==Chile== Cielo Estrellado please please do not support Al Andalus on this. The word Mestizo is never used in the hispanic world to describe people who are predominantly European as is the case for most Chileans. Firstly, as you may know, in Latin America it is used for those who are predominantly amerindian in their ancestry. (It would apply in Mexico and Central America). Secondly, there is no defined ethnic group in Chile which can be defined as mestizo, there are just people with more or less Indian bood, Spanish origin being nearly always the larger part of the ancestry. There is no sense of common belonging shared exclusively by people with amerindian ancestry which excludes people who dont have this ancestry. This is a vital characteristic of an ethnic group. The word mestizo is pejorative in our language and should be used as little as possible. Ill give you an example. When the movie ``Harry Potter and the half-blood prince`` came out in the Spanish speaking world, it was translated into Harry Potter and the Prince, because of the negative connotations that the word mestizo implied. Finally, in our cultural community, Latinness, Spanishness (or if you want to use racial terms ``whiteness``) is an expansive concept which does not exclude people placind then in a different ethnic group on the basis of their blood being ``tainted`` as happens in the Anglo Saxon world. Although, I agree that that in certain countries where racial divisions have been stronger due to a much larger Amerindian community, (such as Peru or Guatemala) leading to implications regarding identity and ethnicity.. Anyways I hope you understand my position and we can establish some dialogue on this issue which transcends the narrow (and in my opinion racist) perspective of Genetic studies. I also hope you are not a sock puppet of user: al andalus! This would make things much harder:-) `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,143,608	`::::This is a very good summary. Also, this talk page was protected by Tony Sidaway, which is very wrong, but very predictable (and the atmosphere is such that I dare not unprotect this page myself). Add my voice to those of the ``trolls`` requesting that Anittas be unbanned. `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
57,145,200	` ==Height== Have corrected Lancaster's height to 6'1``, which is what he was at his peak.`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,155,196	I requested deletion for file in question in favor of a color corrected version. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,156,100	`::: Unfortunately Jafafa Hots appears to be ignorant of the facts and engages in petty-minded cynicism, feel free to do so as it is the preserve of the fool who cannot deal in rational debate. There are political connotations to using the term British Isles when describing the Republic of Ireland, we find it offensive, the law provides for it to be called the British & Irish Isles in light of the establishment of our free State in 1921 and independence in 1948. So such political connotations exist in calling people of the U.S.A. ``Americans``, the term exists because every other country in the Americas have their own identifiable description and you outlined some of those, this left the U.S.A. citizens to be dubbed ``Americans`` and it is not politically offensive nor is it legally incorrect. You go on to say by labelling us ``irishmen``, you ``mislabel`` (No such word, swot up on your English!!) half of us. The 4 million population of the Republic of Ireland overwhelmingly consider themselves Irish and of the 1.5 million in Northern Ireland, 700,000 consider themselves Irish leaving roughly 800,000 to consider themselves British. Now the last time I indulged in Mathematics, 800,000 did not strike me as half of 5million so come back to me when you have a little better grasp of the situation and stop making ignorant and idiotic comments on an issue that you have little or no real understanding of. Go back to important stuff like contributing to articles on college ice hockey, that's where I would suggest you belong my good man. Go make a difference. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
57,156,970	` :: You are mistaken (again). I am happy to engage in discussion, however it is getting me nowhere in light of your refusal to accept the stark facts, my edit summary is correct, ultimately truth is reflected in legal provisions and legally a reference to the islands of Ireland and U.K. is provided for by the definition ``British & Irish`` Isles. You were the one who ended the discussion on the topic concerned, with an expression of boredom which suggested to me you had nothing to counter-debate the stark reality of the situation. I will possibly continue making the factual adjustments on your userpage but more infrequently. I don't understand why you won't revert to the legal description, you are letting personality clashes get in the way of facts, egos shouldn't compromise the truth. Am I correct in stating it would not be too much work for you to revert to my version or are their difficulties in upholding the link? Be a man and swallow your pride in the interest of truth please Stemonitis. Thank you for your time and patience. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,161,743	` :::: Your ignorance is all too apparent now. :: The term ``British & Irish`` Isles is provided for in English and in Irish Law, nowhere is the term ``British Isles`` provided for in law. :: WP also follows the principle of not using terms which are not offensive, especially when the legal and factial term is largely similar and requires little extra effort to print``. :: I agree it is a question of terminology and the terminology you use(without wishing to repeat myself) is wholly inappropriate and offensive not only to me but the citizens of the sovereign State of the Republic of Ireland, I know this because I speak with them, work with them and mix with them socially, just because they do not use WP does not deny the reality that many of my fellow citizens are offended by the term, not only is the terminology you use in this case inappropriate and offensive, it is legally and factually incorrect in both of the jurisdictions concerned to which you refer. :: I am sorry that the links are broken and rendered unworkable. The other points you make about the reference being less concise and widely-used etc. are not only very much debatable but do not justify its' usage. :: * I will put my point of view across in any forum I see fit, whether that be a forum of 3 people or 3 million people is my decision and I shall not be lectured to on how to exercise my freedom of expression and speech. Sometimes ``vandalism`` is the only recourse against ignorance, stubborness and egomania. :: * You are making another subjective assertion, the employment of sockpuppets is a tactic widely used by ones of a higher ego and insecurity to develop and give the perception of a consensus when none, or at the least am ambiguously minor one exists and for you to have the nerve to pontificate to me about one's suitability for WP is analagous to George Galloway lecturing to Kofi Annan on political sophistication and being ``statesmanlike``. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,162,949	If that is the case, he appears to be sillier than I envisaged and fails to grasp the political connotations of the reference in question and chooses to indulge in ignorant and frivolous comments.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
57,166,444	is this kane clone going to be like the fake undertaker or is it realy meant to be kanes evil side	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
57,168,441	` == Rasmussen Reports in Controversies and allegations of bias == ``A poll conducted by Rasmussen Reports during October, 2004 found that the public perceived Fox news as the second most politically biased news network, with 34% respondents saying they believed that Fox's goal was to ``help elect Bush``, leaving Fox second only to CBS, which was perceived by 37% as being biased in the wake of the memogate scandal.[1]`` so basically this is saying FNC is not the most biased, CBS is. Im pretty sure this section may as well be removed. The whole Controversies and allegations of bias section is a mess really. Put it all on its own page, this bit only needs to be a brief summary of complaints`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,172,318	` This is rediculous. I indeed have several accounts at Gamefaqs, but most of them I have are newly created ones either closed or banned by Gamefaqs moderators. If you look at the details of this Fenriswolf person: User Name Fenriswolf User ID 538693 Board User Level 34: Icon Awarded to users with at least 1000 Karma. No posting restrictions. Account Created 11/3/2002 5:39:52 PM Last Visit 6/6/2006 2:59:12 PM Public E-Mail Address Ask me IM MSN: Ask me Signature Secret boards: -1, 9, 250, 486, 542, 622, 709, 417148, 8535937, 8675309, 20040401, 123456789, 314159265, 909090909 Quote Wishlist: Neverwinter Nights 2, Dragon Age Karma 1168 Contributor Page Contributor Page Fenris has been at Gamefaqs for nearly 4 years, whereas I have only stumbled across Gamefaqs in early 2005. I have seen Fenriswolf's posts in the Asia and Japan regional boards, and from the nature of them he seems to be a loyal, unquestioned admirer of the Chinese communist government. Myself however, is an Australian citizen. Although I do not oppose the Chinese government, I support eventual democracy in China, and can at least acknowledges its negative aspects. If I was indeed a mindless follower of the Chinese government, then why didn't I remove entire sections of articles such as Falun Gong and Epoch Times regarding negative aspects of the government? I reverts some of TJive's edits due to his choice of wording, such as his insistance in calling certain governments ``regimes``, and his tendency to edit without discussion, dismissing me as a stooge of the Chinese government on his user page.. If you look at my edit history, I do not delibrately start any vandalism or edit wars, and has contributed lots to science-fiction and videogame related articles. It's unfair to judge me as a vandal based TJive's hearsay, as I do not have such resources this Fenriswolf person claimed, other than my home computer. What concrete evidence do you have to block me indifinitely, other than TJive's hearsay? `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,173,213	:Will go into excruciating detail on the Talk page if and when the next edit/revert comes up.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,181,445	Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Thomas Jefferson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,181,771	I have done what I can, but the order of words in the Nahawand entry appears to be garbled. Can you let me have it again?	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
57,183,520	He had one younger brother named Hugo. He also had three sisters Margaret, Elizabeth and Susan. Margaret married Lord Spencer and is thus the (great?)-grandmother of Lady Diana Spencer, who married Prince Charles. Thus the siblings of the Baring family are kin to the royal family. Elizabeth married the 5ht Earl of Kenmare, Susan married James Reid, who was in attendance to queen Victoria.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
57,200,674	:This needs clarification, OCD is classified as GAD and its treatment is in most cases SSRI used in combination or alone to CBT, on the other hand, when anxiety doesn't appear to have sign of obsessive or compulsive behavior anxiolytic agents are tried, but due to the dependence and the need to increase the dosage, CBT is favoured. But those are not the only treatment, in some cases, when in cases of severe social-phobia, uncontrolable depersonalization/derealization and the patient doesn't respond, atypical anti-psychotics at lower dosage might be tried. Anxiety treatment depending on the severity or the type is a case by case matter, but when taken 'anxiety alone' it is generally known that meanstream treatment includes anxiolytic agents and/or CBT.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,203,772	Zombine article I removed the bit about never finding dead zombine. The first one you ever see in game is a dead one! although you are right that you dont seem to see any after that. The old zombine pic was a picture of a dead one.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
57,208,584	:Someone else must have vandalised then - this was the edit. May I suggest that you register for an account please so that you can be spared these irrelevant messages. TIA,	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
57,211,041	You are a gay homo. I hope you choke on your penis and die. I am sending a big bleck guy to jizz in your face.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
57,214,113	I've read your reply to Vartan's talkpage, I don't think there need be any more evidences that Ankaram, Laciner and Falcon are all the same user. The one disapear and one reapear just after is just more than a coincidences, that each add links to his journal is more than just coincidences, that each have contributions covered in his journal is just more than coincidences. That Falcon has the same prejudicial beliefs as Laciner is also not a coincidences at all. If you are attempting to show us that there is nothing surprising that three different users contribute in the same articles where nearly no one else has contributed and that they all registered just after the other has left, than, I think it is failed. Probabilisticly, when adding all the elements, there can be no rational doubt that they are all the same person. Quebec Science is also something I read, which is more notable, but it doesn't have any entry in Wikipedia, neither has its president or what have you, his page. and I'm sure he does give lectures around the world too.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,218,665	Pott, and listening to Nirvana, but thats not the point.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,220,473	*Long Term Remission and Alleviation of Symptoms in Allergy and Crohn's Disease Patients Following Spinal Adjustment Vertebral subluxation in the thoracic and lumbar regions had a significant effect on the immune function of these allergy and Crohn's disease patients.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,220,692	Are you even listening to me? In 1838, the Armenian Oblast (Armenian province) population was numbering of about 165,000 people according to statistics, about half were Armenian(excluding the later 200,000 on its seroundings who later immigrated). In 1924 the population of Azerbaijan was of 2 million, 75% were Azeri Tartars, it compromised of Baku province , Elizavetpol Province and the adjoining districts, (including Nagorno Karabakh and Nakhochevan). From 250-300,000 Armenians were moved from Julfa, Erivan and Nakhichevan in 1604 and following, if you claim that there was even as much Muslim there, you are totally ignoring the history of the period. Since the partial control by the Ottoman, Nakhichevan and Erivan served as depots of goods, intermedary from the Ouest and East, Persia even further pushed that but replaced the Armenians who would rather trade on the Shah's capital. You claim having provided data, but you have provided absolutly nothing, because the only things you have provided, even before I covered them, and what you present in no way contradict what you claim. A projection of that much people (250-300,000), to claim that Tartars at least presented that much in the Western zone, would have been just sensless. What I have provided. 1-That there were reasons specifically targetting Armenians which do not apply and were not applied to Muslims. 2-I have provided materials excluding the Muslims in reference to the depopulation. 3-I have provided materials equating the population with the word Armenian. 4-I have provided a reference prior to Gultestan Treaty, and you dismissed the author, while in Wikipedia we only present sources and if there exist critics from notable published materials of those sources. What you think of the author is original research. You answered by presenting 13-14th century and post Gulestan materials, which in no way have I contested nor do they contradict what I have been saying. I have provided figures of Armenian moved, which by projection represent 2 million or more Armenians if projected for 1918, and those excludes the recorded numbers of Armenians who escaped depopulation and inspite of it, there still remained a considerable number of Armenians pre Gulestan, which I also documented. I have documented everything I have been claiming, you request things that do not exist, because there was no Nakhochevan delimitation in that period, nor statistics for a bordering which is quite modern in comparaison to Abbas period. In short, what you have highlighted is that the word Armenian has no place in this article, and that you have no intention to improve it. You know that what you propose is misleading but you still claim it is neutral. As we speak 98% of Nakhichevan population is Azeri, so claiming depopulation could only be misleading in that it suggest that Azeris were those moved when the Armenians were those mostly affected. Obviously here, we do have a problem, and as it appears, you in no way want to correct it.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,224,930	You mean that there is 20,000 people logged onto the same server at the same time, hardware wise?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,236,871	` == Evil! == Here is an 6/6/6, aka Evil Day, greeting for you . These type of messages promote WikiLove in an unknown way. Spread this evil love to others by making a derivative work of this... Or another evil something that is flowing about. `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
57,238,979	Oh boy, where is Francis? Grandmaster, I can not know any other words than POV pushing to discribe what you are doing. WHERE DID I EVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT NAKHICHEVAN POPULATION IN 1830s, do you see me ever contesting those statistics? Do you even see me contesting 14th century material? Besides, Nakhichevan discribed there is NOT Nakhichevan with its current bordering. Grandmaster, don't get offended but up to now you have demonstrated that you have no clue of what you are talking about. Taking Nakhichevan as a whole, in its pick, the population jumped to 150,000, it was its most important period, after the 13th century it was replaced, in 14th century, it droped to about half of its prior population, it lost its statue, at 15th century it was taken over by Armenians from the vicinities of Van, and after the desertion of Ani, people moved there. Julfa alone represented a significant portion of the entire population. The closest to the Abbas period you cam is of over 200 years, while I provided data which covered that period. You are the one making up things which you can in no way backup. Here, let readd the materials I have provided. ::For the next four centuries, Armenians, who had begun their dispersion after the fall of Ani and the Seljuk Turkish invasions in the eleventh century, continued to emigrate. In the meantime, Persia ( Iran) experienced a revival under the Shi'i Safavids, who became the adversaries of the Sunni Ottomans. From 1501 until 1639, the two fought each other periodically in Armenia. Armenians were uprooted during these wars, and, in 1604, some 250,000 Armenians were forcibly transferred by Shah 'Abbas to Iran. By the seventeenth century, the Armenians had become a minority in parts of their historic lands. The merchants of Julfa in Nakhichevan were among those who were brought to Iran by Shah 'Abbas; he moved them to a suburb of Isfahan where they built the New Julfa community. The support of 'Abbas and subsequent shahs enabled the Armenians to expand Iran's trade with India, China, Russia, and Western Europe. These merchants helped to make the Persian Gulf an important trade center. An Ethnohistorical Dictionary of the Russian and Soviet Empires by James S. Olson, Lee Brigance Pappas, Nicholas C. J. Pappas. p. 44 ::Shah Abbas devastated his frontier areas, which included parts of Armenia, as a defensive measure and so displaced nearly all the population. [from it] He settled some 13,000 families in the silk-growing northern provinces of Gilan and Mazanderan bordering on the Caspian. (Source: The Armenians and the East India Company in Persia in the Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Centuries by R. W. Ferrier, The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 26, No. 1 (1973), p. 39) ::Linda K. Steinmann in her work Shah 'Abbas and the Royal Silk Trade 1599-1629, Vol. 14, No. 1 (1987), pp. 68-74 covers the evacuation of the Armenians, and to a lesser extent elsewhere of Georgians, but nowhere does she say anything about any evacuation of Tartars. ::Ina Baghdiantz McCabe covers the evacuation in her work The Shah's Silk for Europe's Silver: The Eurasian Trade of the Julfa Armenians in Safavid Iran and India (1530-1750), I don't see anything about Tartars being evacuated or an undiscriminate evacuation, or any reference of an important Tartar population in Nakhichevan. ::Josepho Barbaro while visiting the devastation reports destruction of Armenian towns and its desertion, not Tartars. ::Sir William Ouseley during his visit in 1812 has only discribed the destruction of the Armenian city during the evacuation. ::In 1603 Shah 'Abbas, the great Safavid ruler of Persia, sent an expedition into Armenia in answer to the appeals of the inhabitants for assistance against the Turks. The death of the Sultan Mahmud III in December 1603 and the succession of his son Ahmed, a boy of twelve, opened the way to an easy conquest in the course of which both retreating Turks and invading Persians plundered the Armenians. The Persian victory was followed by a forced emigration of the population to the Shah's capital of Isfahan. « That dragon of hell, Shah Abbas, nourished from the beginning in the ways of the serpent, saw with an eye of envy the prosperity of the Christians. » So Arakel of Tauriz, the seventeenth-century Armenian historian, puts it, and it was indeed the skill of new... Armenia was left desolates... (A Seventeenth-Century typological cycle of paintings in the Armenian cathedal at Julfa, T. S. R. Boase, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, Vol. 13, No. 3/4 pp.323-324) ::D.M. Lang writes that one of the two major reasons of the deportation was: ...he desired to make use of the industrial and commercial talents of the Armenians... (Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1969) p. 622) Julfa population was so i	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
57,240,085	== regarding your edits to the WP:AFD == please try and avoid accidental blankings of large pages	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
57,241,656	June 2006 (UTC) Ermm...I actually designed and built the shopfront, are you really telling me what I was thinking when I did it? Hiding the crack was the ORIGINAL reason, not the ONLY reason. Another thing, the shopfront only 'juts out' by 6 inches in a couple places and is mainly set back from the building line by up to 4 feet! This creates the impression that it hangs out over the pavement. I will dig out a picture of the shopfront from the side if it will make you happy. Chris Ostwald, 21:40, 6	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,244,443	== yes, yes, yes == blocking an AOL user for daring to report vandalism by a registered user? yeah, I'm not sure if irony is the word you're thinking of	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
57,247,671	:::No. You and I agreed that GNU Emacs is used more. That doesn't automatically translate to consensus, and certainly not to a consensus to swap the Emacs and GNU Emacs articles.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
57,248,460	*It's very messy and time consuming to cleanup	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
57,248,576	, especially when other people don't notice it and go on adding things to the page, making a simple revert impossible	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
57,249,506	Yo what up, This ya boy right here. Welcome 2 my talk page.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,252,246	Some Buddhists have believed that anarchism is an expression of ancient Aryan culture which they see as central to buddhism. Clarify this? No citations.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
57,255,064	I was blocked for personal attacks, not 3RR. Why then was the grounds refused based on 3RR?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,262,688	== zero faults is a sock puppet == very amusing. Anybody notice the syntactical similarities? The obvious fact that zero faults is following merecat around like standard sock puppet behavior? The clue in sign back on after signing off? Rex, you are an ad hominem using jerk who only ever got the better end of the abuse you dished out to everybody else. Of course abusive editors get confronted; they are abusive editors. Merecat was always a patently abusive editor, and should have been stomped out of existence long before it actually happened.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
57,263,830	Why create this article? I've created this article largely to help stop the Brighton article get too bogged down in unecessary detail. The main Brighton article has a Landmarks section where I think the obvious and important buildings can go. In this article we can freely add more and more. Although I've added the content as two simple lists, I hope in time this article will expand to provide greater depth.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
57,265,400	` == A problem with your exegesis of ``physics`` == In your user page you say: entities that physically argue are assumed not to have knowledge of how natue actually behaves for what is being considered This sentence is very unclear because of several problems: #The meaning of ``entities``. You could mean anything from electrons to angels. As I read this sentence and try to make sense of it I flip-flop between ``anything that is or appears to be discrete enough to have an identity, e.g., lever bars,`` and ``sentient entities.`` #The meaning of ``physically argue.`` Unless you believe in mental telepathy, any arguing that I have ever heard about is conducted via some kind of physical interaction. But maybe by ``argue`` you mean ``interact.`` Maybe you are talking about any mass, any electromagnetic radiation, etc., and how it and other such things interact. Or, it just occurred to me, maybe you mean ``people who argue about physics.`` #The phrase ``are assumed not to have knowledge`` could mean that, e.g., ``some proton does not have knowledge of the neutron nearest to it,`` or ``bricks falling from the top of a building know nothing of the air.`` But if you are using these words to discuss philosophy in natural language, then probably that means that ``entities`` must mean ``people`` until such time as we find other sentient beings to talk to. #The final ``for what is being considered`` would normally be interpreted as pertaining to the word immediately preceding it. But probably you don't really mean to say that nature behaves for us (the way my dogs behave well or badly for me). #Why use ``assumed``? In ordinary language, when we say something like, ``I assume she must be his daughter,`` we indicate a belief that the speaker knows is not well grounded. It amounts to saying something like, ``I don't have very good grounds for saying it's his daughter. Maybe she's a paid escort.`` But if I am following you correctly you actually mean to say that we have absolutely no grounds for affirming that we know how nature actually works. Supposing that the ``axiom`` quoted above is talking about people, you may be trying to say something like: ``People who communicate with each other in an attempt to understand some facet of physics have absolutely no grounds for believing that they actually understand, or could eventually understand, the real way that things work.`` In other words, we know that we are always in the situation of poking various things into the black box, watching what comes out of the black box, and trying to make up a persuasive story to account for what has happened. I hope this crituque is helpful. At least it may indicate to you how at least one ``average well-informed reader`` interprets what you have written. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
57,283,474	* Your comments are your personal opinion, mine are basesd on actual important facts. Take it to your personal diary.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,283,656	I didn't have a libel case, Mike Smith had a libel case and he lost big time. The only sout grapes are yours.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
57,283,716	:No, it's not just you. Just more evidence that the current model for Wikipedia (i.e., let any fucking idiot in to do anything they please, then wait for someone to clean up after) won't last much longer. ==	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	true
57,283,752	You are an utter fucking faggot...u need a life outside of wikipedia...maybe a didlo fuk by ur mom?	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
57,283,960	```But you are not entitled bring your sour grapes onto Wiki;pedia `` wanna bet! * `	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
57,288,107	:If your intention is to follow any single posts I make and provoke me, you won't obtain any results from that. I will ignore your last warning because there is absolutly nothing remote to what could be constituted as warning material. Having administrative privilages doesn't give you the right to throw peoples warning like this. In my book you don't fit to administratorship and I am confident that more you distribute such empty warnings and more it will become clear as it is a matter of time. But what was I expecting, when an administrator retaliate for a critic of himself and sign an RfC in which he was not involved in anyway or ban another member because he criticised him/her and didn't left another administrator handle it, obviously there is something wrong. Stop searching bugs, I have no problem being watched over and will gladly welcome any administrators to pay attention to my conducts, but out of respect to veterans here many who are registered before even you came here, at least you should leave them tell you step down and leave another administrator handle the situation. You are taking this matter too personally, and consider that you don't have to do that everytime some criticize your use of administrative privilages.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,289,729	==Photo== Dear Kahuroa, Well, the sensei that I worked with wasn't able to perform Kopasho, but I'll get one that can on Thursday, or Saturday at the latest. Sorry that this dojo has, well, multiple functions. The one on Saturday's a pure dojo, though. And the senseis there are the karate masters of Chicago. Here's an example at my Tuesday & Thurday dojo. Cheers! Sincerely,	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
57,289,950	== what the?== Fadix if you are a psychiatrist how can you find so much time to write all these crap in a dozen of pages. I respect you in that sense. I wish we could have met under better conditions	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,291,459	Iam Ok with RIAA certification numbers.-CAYA	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
57,292,169	==Ten Sales== We Can end this for good if you approve to put RIAA certifications instead of sales numbers.The chose is preety much yours,also you may want to report the nonuser that keeps vandlising your name.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
57,292,311	(I'm Christian I don't like the cussing going on.)	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
57,294,389	` I beg to differ. What makes you think that I'm pro-CCP, and that I ``glorified the government and speared the opposition``? It is used entirely to discredit my views. I have been warned for my previously, and some of them are deleted. To make his point, the user blanked sections on both the article and talk page, and was reverted by the admin , before being restored by . In one of his posts here he clearly referred me, telling me to email him. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false

57,006,078

` :::Don t wory be happy. Serbia is going to be independent, but first Kosovo must be regotnazied, after thate Vojvodina and Sandjak and then the word is going to know what is this nationalistic creature ``Serbia``.`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,010,537

In Kosovo was UÇK not UÇPMB, and ther are so many serbian propagande!!!!!

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

57,011,595

` Thats not very nice for the people of San Roque... I personally know quite a few people from this town. San Roque has a place in wikipedia just as any other town does. Perhaps you would like to delete the whole article? I see your hispanophobia is slowly being brought to the surface. By the way, Gibraltar was just another town in the southern coast of Spain until the British conquest. Why write its history before that moment? Since before the British it was so ``unremarkable`` is there any point, according to your own logic, to grant it a history of its own? `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,012,433

== Your contribution == Is only serbian propagander. Sorry my frend but you have nothing to do with Wikipedia

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

57,013,187

== Kosovo Post code is seperated from Serbia == Since 2000 Kosovo hase owen Post code. Ex: Prishtina District

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

57,016,702

` The College of Charleston claims to be the oldest municipal college in the U.S. (est 1770, chart. 1785). The medical school which became U of L has operated continously since 1837, but I'm not sure when we became officially municipally funded. A google search usually brings up the ``Louisville Municipal College for Negros``, which was purchased by U of L; so I may have email someone to find out Brando03`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,020,657

` :pasting the following comments from: Not really. I suspect the problem is that external links are generaly meant to go at the end of the article. ::They were for example and use. :::examples are better surved by links to articles. The use bit runs into some stuff a WP:NOT. :Your edit to include direct links to external sites seems redundant given the List of web directories link already in the article. I spend a fair bit of time doing this sort of ``cleanup``articles on software-related subjects in particular are magnets for spam or just gratuitous mentions for the purpose of raising pagerank. So some practical guidelines have emerged independently on a number of articles. *External links should go in the external links section. *External links shouldn't multiply beyond necessity (i.e., beyond the point necessary to clarify or minimally exemplify the content of the articlesany more and you get into web directory territory, and then everybody with a site to push says ``well, if site X is there, my site has a right to be there as well.``) *Sites linked to should preferably pass general Wikipedia notability guidelinesthat means wikilinks are preferred so there is at least a quality control process in place (look at, say Comparison of content management systems for a place where that idea has broken down, however). So a lot of what I do is pruning external links and redlinks from articles, looking for spam, SEO, self-promotion, registration-only sites that turn into sales pitches, disguised google ad sites, etc., sometimes very deviously salted among large lists of legitimate sites. Figuring out which are the quality links and which aren't is a tedious process, and involves some personal judgment and inevitably some mistakes, no doubt. In this particular case, the judgment would have been easy, thoughlegit or not, those links were in the wrong place, and a couple wikilinks (maybe Google and Yahoo) would have done the trickbut oh, wait, those, and more were already in the article. As an aside, please go easy on accusations of vandalism. Vandalism doesn't mean ``an edit that makes me mad.`` Good faith edits are never vandalism.·· `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,027,681

Fuck, Shit, Damn, Cock, Pissant, Motherfucker, and horse dick.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

true

57,048,145

And I am not interested in your opinion on what was lost and what was won. You don't know what you're talking about as I was the defendent I think I know more about the case than you do. Unless of course yopu're just another Smith sock puppet.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

57,048,184

` ==RCP Nonsense== The nonsense Ron keeps inserting about the RCP does not belong here. The Weakly Standard point is BS we have a link to NION already, if people want to learn more about that organization, they can click the link. McGovern was not a member of RCP to my knowledge; the fact that NION was started by people who included RCP members is a strange guilt by association argument that has no place here. Beyond that, to claim NION is not ``anti-war`` because some of its members may belong to a Maoist group makes no sense. NION opposed the war, did they not? `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,048,645

Who was this woman that lost a major libel case? What did smith win? Besides a big solicitors bill and the fact he forked out £7,500 in court costs? Please do Light the way on that one, lightoftheworld.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

57,050,131

== nonsense== generally articles get AFDs, where as nonsense gets {{nonsense}} tags

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

57,050,392

== FUCK == Why hasn't anyone included this information yet? http://ultimate-guitar.com/news/general_music_news/red_hot_chili_peppers_accused_in_plagiarism.html

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

57,051,026

== Is the city safe for greeks to go to? == I have always wanted to go and see Istanbul/Constantinople as I am a great lover of both Greek History and Architecture in general. Is it safe like Western capitols or is it like middle-eastern capitols where it is dangerous to go to?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,057,790

It would also be advisable for other people to refrain from undoing my edits as well. This is my article and is about me after all.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,058,021

The real personal attacks are the repeated undoing of my edits by everyone else.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

57,062,372

:I personally think it adds too much detail, but I'm not strongly opposed to it.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

57,063,201

`:I can't rewrite something like that, if I did all I would say is ``some people gonna get killed``. You could rewrite it, you're a genius 17:20, 5 June 2006 `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,065,956

` :Actually, the officer pronounced her name (KY-AIR-RUH) then he asked if her friends called her ``Ki-Ki``. Ciara should've known it was fake then, that was a totally irrelevant question for an officer to ask. (sigh) The world of entertainment... so horrid. 20:36, 5 June 2006`

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,066,953

:You might be right. I'm going to certainly correct the third and fourth examples, but I don't understand why the second example requires elaboration. — |

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,067,319

`45, 5 June 2006 (UTC) You need to explain why ``We Belong Together`` is a ``universal love anthem`` if you want to use that phrase. ``Once the studio session was complete,.... confident that the album was complete,`` sounds repetitious. Also, ``The composers experienced a lengthy discussion`` is an odd phrasing. Maybe it would be better to say ``Carey and Dupri discussed the melody at length,`` or words to that effect. I don't think that's quite the sense that the original phrase is trying to convey, though. :You might be right. I'm going to certainly correct the third and fourth examples, but I don't understand why the second example requires elaboration. — | 21:`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,074,012

:::I've given a full source; Carey was the critic. What other portions of the article require rewriting? (I've become pretty lousy at this.) — |

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,074,573

:Done. Check it out. :By the way, is that actually IPA in your username? Ewwwww. ==

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,076,952

==Look, I will not be playing this stupid game with you== I gently request that you step down and ask another administrator to manage this thing. There is hardly any policies or guidelines being respected on that talk page of that article, either you decide to read what is happening there and pay attention or stop giving up to trouble makers. Just for your information, deepblue06 that is reporting me, has done much worst, and here an example. Slandering an academic with words such as this: 'Dadrian is only good at one thing: Propoganda and Forgeries' is worster than calling some anonymous user a liar. Also, it would be interesting that you highlight the words which you think would qualify as ban material. Also, don't worry, other than slandering academics like this, which is a clear cases of diffamation and is criminal under the laws of his state, deepblue06 isen't immune of making personal attacks like accusing me of hallucination. But since that articles talk page is in a choas, I won't take part in scrutinizing who slandered whom most by whom and to whom. Being an administrator is not to distribute warnings without taking the time to understand, even in court of law, an element of the evidences are not processed before trying to place it in context.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

57,077,125

== The Editors of this page, are really an insult to the ideal of Wikipedia == I love how the author's of this page, are so freaked out when ANYONE else but them, actually takes the time to research facts and uses them (sourced) to correct thier innacuracies. The Authors of this page have insrted so many bias and unfactual things into this article, it's no wonder Wikipedia is looked down on by Schools, and professional historians. If Wikipedia is ever to be credible, these authors need to put aside thier pathetic ego's, and allow others to help edit these pages with sourced facts...even if the facts are contrary to the bias of the original authors. I will edit this page daily, and I will inform Wikipedia about the unprofessional behavior of the editor's of this page, who revert and discard any changes to the article, no matter how well sourced or factual they are.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,081,296

2006 (UTC) :: Not that any of the rest of us have ever gone past 3RR, have a good one, Vivaldi. 23:16, 5 June

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,081,635

2006 (UTC) :: eeek, I just saw this. I do not mean to fool people. Well, I have tried to fool someone, perhaps 3 or 4 times in my life. But that is very rare. What have I said that leads you to think that? 23:18, 5 June

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,087,843

Sometimes all you need is three sentences to get a point accross, and for it to be constructive. But you have your head stuck too far up your ass trying to defend Thoth. Why dont you let him answer the question. Besides, this is the talk page, you don't have to be neutral. Also, why don't you get off your lazy ass and create a user name?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

57,088,288

Also, look in any up to date history book, and it will confirm that it happened.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,089,327

== Do they Work? == Has anyone ever had an experience where an ouija board has worked?

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,100,317

:: How about you do it? I simply asked because I had no time, had no experience with how to handle this kind of information on Wikipedia. Stop being smartass if I asked why anyone hasn't ALREADY included this information even after such a long time.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,103,482

` -Why'd you delete the ``kufi smacker`` bit, it's not anti-Islam. Juelz Santana, of Dipset, is a well known Muslim who associates with the ``kufi smacker`` movement. By the way, let's start a ``kippa smacker`` movement.`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,108,627

Thanks for the praise. I'm taking Wikipedia a lot more seriously now than I used to. I have to admit that a few months ago I did silly things like vandalize articles. I never really didn't anything slanderous, just silly and stupid stuff. Recently, I've been doing my best to contribute positively to Wikipedia and I've even been correcting the same sort of vandalism I used to take part in.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

57,108,970

`I am sure that the ``durability`` of a site is at premium in field that is causing a great deal of excitement. My`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,111,115

BTW, there's this dipshit (his name is LILVOKA) who keeps on deleting the article saying that I didn't cite my sources (which is a complete lie). He pretty much admitted to me that he doens't LIKE what I posted so therefore that's grounds for deletion. I thought you weren't supposed to interject you POV into how you correct or type articles.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

true

57,119,208

Leave me the fuck alone you nosy little bastard. Stop fucking with me or my pages. Thanks

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

57,121,727

` == Thank you == Thank you for the compliment. I will let you know if I need any help. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,125,366

` ``How is that not chill?`` :``How can you claim to be a Wikipedian..`` ::WP:NPA ``What['s wrong with saying ``allegedly`` anyway?`` :No significant group that says otherwise. Plus, Bin Laden admitted to it repeatedly. ``Which are you more afraid of, being branded a terrorist, or a liar?`` :??? `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,127,847

:Thank you kindly for the explanation. Best wishes,

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,127,954

You're seriously confused. This is an article about Zodiac Signs NOT arbitrary Star Constellations. Different terms, different definitions. Ophiuchus has NOthing to do with Astrology.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,128,436

`As I'm continually being slimed by anti-constitution Republicans is one real estate office after another, these last 3 years; I'm, also, sick of the mean-spirited ``half-logic`` psuedo-academic debunkers here on Wikipedia pretending that they're objective skeptics. I'll tone-down when the knuckle draggers discover integrity. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,128,766

Agreed any changes from 12 million to 9.4 will be reverted from now on.-CAYA

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,128,996

Lundse has been passing off opinion for knowledge. Why should he stop now? It's types like him that makes it easy for me to pick up chicks at parties. The Lundses of the world inadvertantly enhance my social life. You to should employ a little psychological jujitsu with the Lundses of the world to improve your love life.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,129,288

Agreed all changes to 9.4 million will from now on be reverted-CAYA

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,129,923

==VANDALISm== EVERYONE VANDALISE MY HOME PAGE (or just sign your name)

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,133,568

== Please stop your personal attacks == Please stop your personal attacks, User Antaeus Feldspar.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

57,135,157

Are you even reading what I write? Read Bournatian one more time, this time more carefuly, he speifically covers the preiod which I was talking about, he also is the one providing the data of the Armenian emigration from Erivan region from 1795 to 1827, he document the desertion and the Armenian refugees in his works. He does not contradict what I am saying. And you new data, well, again, you are not reading me, I do not disagree about this, it was those years that Julfa was destroyed and its Armenian population deported this is also documented, the Armenians will later, during the Ottoman partial controls where Nakhichevan will be used as a storing place for the marchandises from India etc, recolonise that region and rebuild Julfa. I already contended that during the Mongol invasion the Armenian population dropped. What on the other hand I said was that pre Abbas in the 17th century just before the deportation, Armenians were there constituting a majority, and I have provided various works that equal the population to Armenian and I have also provided another work which you author you claim has not much knowledge. We are not talking about the same period at all. While I recognize every periods when Muslim have constituted a majority, with obstinence you refuse to listen as if Azerbaijan will lose Nakhichevan just because I wrote that and that you accepted it. Give yourself a brake Grandmaster, we are debating about this whole affair because of a simple word, just like your obstinence about the term enclave which you wanted to remove.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,136,310

You can create a list and add me and to it, going by your comments in the other section.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

57,137,853

There weren't even proper data for those years from Europe and you expect me to provide statistics? It is like requesting statistics to claim that Gaule was populated of Gaulois. I have provided records using the term Armenian ecxluding other groups, I have provided records statistics of 250-300,000, I have provided another work which claims majority. What you ever did was to provide datas that at least 200 years pre that period or 300 years after. The closest data was provided by me and which either equated population for 'Armenians' or another one used the term majority, and another one only talked about the depopulation of Armenians. Being neutral doesn't mean to add misleading wordings, the way it is, no one would guess that the Armenians and this in the entire article had even a history there or they had ever constituted an significant part of the population. It isen't enough for you that the entirity of the history of the Armenians in Nakhichevan is entirly missing from the article, for hell sake Grandmaster you even disputed that the word is generally known as Armenian, you even have a problem with the term Armenian being added anywhere or accept that Armenians for some period in the history of Nakhichevan have constituted a majority. If you are really good intentioned, I think you would not have had the problem with the word Armenian there when the history section start with trash about the etymology of the word and with referrences that aren't cited anywhere.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

57,142,977

` ==Image Tagging Image:Microsoft Logo.svg== {| align=``CENTER`` style=``background-color:#FFFFFF; border:8px solid #FF0000; padding:5px;`` |- | | This media may be deleted. |} Thanks for uploading Image:Microsoft Logo.svg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ```` link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ``Image`` from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. `

2,006

false

user

random

train

false

57,143,386

` ==Chile== Cielo Estrellado please please do not support Al Andalus on this. The word Mestizo is never used in the hispanic world to describe people who are predominantly European as is the case for most Chileans. *Firstly, as you may know, in Latin America it is used for those who are predominantly amerindian in their ancestry. (It would apply in Mexico and Central America). *Secondly, there is no defined ethnic group in Chile which can be defined as mestizo, there are just people with more or less Indian bood, Spanish origin being nearly always the larger part of the ancestry. There is no sense of common belonging shared exclusively by people with amerindian ancestry which excludes people who dont have this ancestry. This is a vital characteristic of an ethnic group. *The word mestizo is pejorative in our language and should be used as little as possible. Ill give you an example. When the movie ``Harry Potter and the half-blood prince`` came out in the Spanish speaking world, it was translated into Harry Potter and the Prince, because of the negative connotations that the word mestizo implied. *Finally, in our cultural community, Latinness, Spanishness (or if you want to use racial terms ``whiteness``) is an expansive concept which does not exclude people placind then in a different ethnic group on the basis of their blood being ``tainted`` as happens in the Anglo Saxon world. Although, I agree that that in certain countries where racial divisions have been stronger due to a much larger Amerindian community, (such as Peru or Guatemala) leading to implications regarding identity and ethnicity.. Anyways I hope you understand my position and we can establish some dialogue on this issue which transcends the narrow (and in my opinion racist) perspective of Genetic studies. I also hope you are not a sock puppet of user: al andalus! This would make things much harder:-) `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,143,608

`::::This is a very good summary. Also, this talk page was protected by Tony Sidaway, which is very wrong, but very predictable (and the atmosphere is such that I dare not unprotect this page myself). Add my voice to those of the ``trolls`` requesting that Anittas be unbanned. `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

57,145,200

` ==Height== Have corrected Lancaster's height to 6'1``, which is what he was at his peak.`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,155,196

I requested deletion for file in question in favor of a color corrected version. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,156,100

`::: Unfortunately Jafafa Hots appears to be ignorant of the facts and engages in petty-minded cynicism, feel free to do so as it is the preserve of the fool who cannot deal in rational debate. There are political connotations to using the term British Isles when describing the Republic of Ireland, we find it offensive, the law provides for it to be called the British & Irish Isles in light of the establishment of our free State in 1921 and independence in 1948. So such political connotations exist in calling people of the U.S.A. ``Americans``, the term exists because every other country in the Americas have their own identifiable description and you outlined some of those, this left the U.S.A. citizens to be dubbed ``Americans`` and it is not politically offensive nor is it legally incorrect. You go on to say by labelling us ``irishmen``, you ``mislabel`` (No such word, swot up on your English!!) half of us. The 4 million population of the Republic of Ireland overwhelmingly consider themselves Irish and of the 1.5 million in Northern Ireland, 700,000 consider themselves Irish leaving roughly 800,000 to consider themselves British. Now the last time I indulged in Mathematics, 800,000 did not strike me as half of 5million so come back to me when you have a little better grasp of the situation and stop making ignorant and idiotic comments on an issue that you have little or no real understanding of. Go back to important stuff like contributing to articles on college ice hockey, that's where I would suggest you belong my good man. Go make a difference. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

57,156,970

` :: You are mistaken (again). I am happy to engage in discussion, however it is getting me nowhere in light of your refusal to accept the stark facts, my edit summary is correct, ultimately truth is reflected in legal provisions and legally a reference to the islands of Ireland and U.K. is provided for by the definition ``British & Irish`` Isles. You were the one who ended the discussion on the topic concerned, with an expression of boredom which suggested to me you had nothing to counter-debate the stark reality of the situation. I will possibly continue making the factual adjustments on your userpage but more infrequently. I don't understand why you won't revert to the legal description, you are letting personality clashes get in the way of facts, egos shouldn't compromise the truth. Am I correct in stating it would not be too much work for you to revert to my version or are their difficulties in upholding the link? Be a man and swallow your pride in the interest of truth please Stemonitis. Thank you for your time and patience. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,161,743

` :::: Your ignorance is all too apparent now. :: *The term ``British & Irish`` Isles is provided for in English and in Irish Law, nowhere is the term ``British Isles`` provided for in law. :: *WP also follows the principle of not using terms which are not offensive, especially when the legal and factial term is largely similar and requires little extra effort to print``. :: *I agree it is a question of terminology and the terminology you use(without wishing to repeat myself) is wholly inappropriate and offensive not only to me but the citizens of the sovereign State of the Republic of Ireland, I know this because I speak with them, work with them and mix with them socially, just because they do not use WP does not deny the reality that many of my fellow citizens are offended by the term, not only is the terminology you use in this case inappropriate and offensive, it is legally and factually incorrect in both of the jurisdictions concerned to which you refer. :: * I am sorry that the links are broken and rendered unworkable. The other points you make about the reference being less concise and widely-used etc. are not only very much debatable but do not justify its' usage. :: * I will put my point of view across in any forum I see fit, whether that be a forum of 3 people or 3 million people is my decision and I shall not be lectured to on how to exercise my freedom of expression and speech. Sometimes ``vandalism`` is the only recourse against ignorance, stubborness and egomania. :: * You are making another subjective assertion, the employment of sockpuppets is a tactic widely used by ones of a higher ego and insecurity to develop and give the perception of a consensus when none, or at the least am ambiguously minor one exists and for you to have the nerve to pontificate to me about one's suitability for WP is analagous to George Galloway lecturing to Kofi Annan on political sophistication and being ``statesmanlike``. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,162,949

If that is the case, he appears to be sillier than I envisaged and fails to grasp the political connotations of the reference in question and chooses to indulge in ignorant and frivolous comments.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

57,166,444

is this kane clone going to be like the fake undertaker or is it realy meant to be kanes evil side

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

57,168,441

` == Rasmussen Reports in Controversies and allegations of bias == ``A poll conducted by Rasmussen Reports during October, 2004 found that the public perceived Fox news as the second most politically biased news network, with 34% respondents saying they believed that Fox's goal was to ``help elect Bush``, leaving Fox second only to CBS, which was perceived by 37% as being biased in the wake of the memogate scandal.[1]`` so basically this is saying FNC is not the most biased, CBS is. Im pretty sure this section may as well be removed. The whole Controversies and allegations of bias section is a mess really. Put it all on its own page, this bit only needs to be a brief summary of complaints`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,172,318

` This is rediculous. I indeed have several accounts at Gamefaqs, but most of them I have are newly created ones either closed or banned by Gamefaqs moderators. If you look at the details of this Fenriswolf person: User Name Fenriswolf User ID 538693 Board User Level 34: Icon Awarded to users with at least 1000 Karma. No posting restrictions. Account Created 11/3/2002 5:39:52 PM Last Visit 6/6/2006 2:59:12 PM Public E-Mail Address Ask me IM MSN: Ask me Signature Secret boards: -1, 9, 250, 486, 542, 622, 709, 417148, 8535937, 8675309, 20040401, 123456789, 314159265, 909090909 Quote Wishlist: Neverwinter Nights 2, Dragon Age Karma 1168 Contributor Page Contributor Page Fenris has been at Gamefaqs for nearly 4 years, whereas I have only stumbled across Gamefaqs in early 2005. I have seen Fenriswolf's posts in the Asia and Japan regional boards, and from the nature of them he seems to be a loyal, unquestioned admirer of the Chinese communist government. Myself however, is an Australian citizen. Although I do not oppose the Chinese government, I support eventual democracy in China, and can at least acknowledges its negative aspects. If I was indeed a mindless follower of the Chinese government, then why didn't I remove entire sections of articles such as Falun Gong and Epoch Times regarding negative aspects of the government? I reverts some of TJive's edits due to his choice of wording, such as his insistance in calling certain governments ``regimes``, and his tendency to edit without discussion, dismissing me as a stooge of the Chinese government on his user page.. If you look at my edit history, I do not delibrately start any vandalism or edit wars, and has contributed lots to science-fiction and videogame related articles. It's unfair to judge me as a vandal based TJive's hearsay, as I do not have such resources this Fenriswolf person claimed, other than my home computer. What concrete evidence do you have to block me indifinitely, other than TJive's hearsay? `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,173,213

:Will go into excruciating detail on the Talk page if and when the next edit/revert comes up.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,181,445

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Thomas Jefferson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,181,771

I have done what I can, but the order of words in the Nahawand entry appears to be garbled. Can you let me have it again?

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

57,183,520

He had one younger brother named Hugo. He also had three sisters Margaret, Elizabeth and Susan. Margaret married Lord Spencer and is thus the (great?)-grandmother of Lady Diana Spencer, who married Prince Charles. Thus the siblings of the Baring family are kin to the royal family. Elizabeth married the 5ht Earl of Kenmare, Susan married James Reid, who was in attendance to queen Victoria.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

57,200,674

:This needs clarification, OCD is classified as GAD and its treatment is in most cases SSRI used in combination or alone to CBT, on the other hand, when anxiety doesn't appear to have sign of obsessive or compulsive behavior anxiolytic agents are tried, but due to the dependence and the need to increase the dosage, CBT is favoured. But those are not the only treatment, in some cases, when in cases of severe social-phobia, uncontrolable depersonalization/derealization and the patient doesn't respond, atypical anti-psychotics at lower dosage might be tried. Anxiety treatment depending on the severity or the type is a case by case matter, but when taken 'anxiety alone' it is generally known that meanstream treatment includes anxiolytic agents and/or CBT.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,203,772

Zombine article I removed the bit about never finding dead zombine. The first one you ever see in game is a dead one! although you are right that you dont seem to see any after that. The old zombine pic was a picture of a dead one.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

57,208,584

:Someone else must have vandalised then - this was the edit. May I suggest that you register for an account please so that you can be spared these irrelevant messages. TIA,

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

57,211,041

You are a gay homo. I hope you choke on your penis and die. I am sending a big bleck guy to jizz in your face.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

57,214,113

I've read your reply to Vartan's talkpage, I don't think there need be any more evidences that Ankaram, Laciner and Falcon are all the same user. The one disapear and one reapear just after is just more than a coincidences, that each add links to his journal is more than just coincidences, that each have contributions covered in his journal is just more than coincidences. That Falcon has the same prejudicial beliefs as Laciner is also not a coincidences at all. If you are attempting to show us that there is nothing surprising that three different users contribute in the same articles where nearly no one else has contributed and that they all registered just after the other has left, than, I think it is failed. Probabilisticly, when adding all the elements, there can be no rational doubt that they are all the same person. Quebec Science is also something I read, which is more notable, but it doesn't have any entry in Wikipedia, neither has its president or what have you, his page. and I'm sure he does give lectures around the world too.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,218,665

Pott, and listening to Nirvana, but thats not the point.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,220,473

*Long Term Remission and Alleviation of Symptoms in Allergy and Crohn's Disease Patients Following Spinal Adjustment Vertebral subluxation in the thoracic and lumbar regions had a significant effect on the immune function of these allergy and Crohn's disease patients.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,220,692

Are you even listening to me? In 1838, the Armenian Oblast (Armenian province) population was numbering of about 165,000 people according to statistics, about half were Armenian(excluding the later 200,000 on its seroundings who later immigrated). In 1924 the population of Azerbaijan was of 2 million, 75% were Azeri Tartars, it compromised of Baku province , Elizavetpol Province and the adjoining districts, (including Nagorno Karabakh and Nakhochevan). From 250-300,000 Armenians were moved from Julfa, Erivan and Nakhichevan in 1604 and following, if you claim that there was even as much Muslim there, you are totally ignoring the history of the period. Since the partial control by the Ottoman, Nakhichevan and Erivan served as depots of goods, intermedary from the Ouest and East, Persia even further pushed that but replaced the Armenians who would rather trade on the Shah's capital. You claim having provided data, but you have provided absolutly nothing, because the only things you have provided, even before I covered them, and what you present in no way contradict what you claim. A projection of that much people (250-300,000), to claim that Tartars at least presented that much in the Western zone, would have been just sensless. What I have provided. 1-That there were reasons specifically targetting Armenians which do not apply and were not applied to Muslims. 2-I have provided materials excluding the Muslims in reference to the depopulation. 3-I have provided materials equating the population with the word Armenian. 4-I have provided a reference prior to Gultestan Treaty, and you dismissed the author, while in Wikipedia we only present sources and if there exist critics from notable published materials of those sources. What you think of the author is original research. You answered by presenting 13-14th century and post Gulestan materials, which in no way have I contested nor do they contradict what I have been saying. I have provided figures of Armenian moved, which by projection represent 2 million or more Armenians if projected for 1918, and those excludes the recorded numbers of Armenians who escaped depopulation and inspite of it, there still remained a considerable number of Armenians pre Gulestan, which I also documented. I have documented everything I have been claiming, you request things that do not exist, because there was no Nakhochevan delimitation in that period, nor statistics for a bordering which is quite modern in comparaison to Abbas period. In short, what you have highlighted is that the word Armenian has no place in this article, and that you have no intention to improve it. You know that what you propose is misleading but you still claim it is neutral. As we speak 98% of Nakhichevan population is Azeri, so claiming depopulation could only be misleading in that it suggest that Azeris were those moved when the Armenians were those mostly affected. Obviously here, we do have a problem, and as it appears, you in no way want to correct it.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,224,930

You mean that there is 20,000 people logged onto the same server at the same time, hardware wise?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,236,871

` == Evil! == Here is an 6/6/6, aka Evil Day, greeting for you . These type of messages promote WikiLove in an unknown way. Spread this evil love to others by making a derivative work of this... Or another evil something that is flowing about. `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

57,238,979

Oh boy, where is Francis? Grandmaster, I can not know any other words than POV pushing to discribe what you are doing. WHERE DID I EVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT NAKHICHEVAN POPULATION IN 1830s, do you see me ever contesting those statistics? Do you even see me contesting 14th century material? Besides, Nakhichevan discribed there is NOT Nakhichevan with its current bordering. Grandmaster, don't get offended but up to now you have demonstrated that you have no clue of what you are talking about. Taking Nakhichevan as a whole, in its pick, the population jumped to 150,000, it was its most important period, after the 13th century it was replaced, in 14th century, it droped to about half of its prior population, it lost its statue, at 15th century it was taken over by Armenians from the vicinities of Van, and after the desertion of Ani, people moved there. Julfa alone represented a significant portion of the entire population. The closest to the Abbas period you cam is of over 200 years, while I provided data which covered that period. You are the one making up things which you can in no way backup. Here, let readd the materials I have provided. ::For the next four centuries, Armenians, who had begun their dispersion after the fall of Ani and the Seljuk Turkish invasions in the eleventh century, continued to emigrate. In the meantime, Persia ( Iran) experienced a revival under the Shi'i Safavids, who became the adversaries of the Sunni Ottomans. From 1501 until 1639, the two fought each other periodically in Armenia. Armenians were uprooted during these wars, and, in 1604, some 250,000 Armenians were forcibly transferred by Shah 'Abbas to Iran. By the seventeenth century, the Armenians had become a minority in parts of their historic lands. The merchants of Julfa in Nakhichevan were among those who were brought to Iran by Shah 'Abbas; he moved them to a suburb of Isfahan where they built the New Julfa community. The support of 'Abbas and subsequent shahs enabled the Armenians to expand Iran's trade with India, China, Russia, and Western Europe. These merchants helped to make the Persian Gulf an important trade center. An Ethnohistorical Dictionary of the Russian and Soviet Empires by James S. Olson, Lee Brigance Pappas, Nicholas C. J. Pappas. p. 44 ::Shah Abbas devastated his frontier areas, which included parts of Armenia, as a defensive measure and so displaced nearly all the population. [from it] He settled some 13,000 families in the silk-growing northern provinces of Gilan and Mazanderan bordering on the Caspian. (Source: The Armenians and the East India Company in Persia in the Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Centuries by R. W. Ferrier, The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 26, No. 1 (1973), p. 39) ::Linda K. Steinmann in her work Shah 'Abbas and the Royal Silk Trade 1599-1629, Vol. 14, No. 1 (1987), pp. 68-74 covers the evacuation of the Armenians, and to a lesser extent elsewhere of Georgians, but nowhere does she say anything about any evacuation of Tartars. ::Ina Baghdiantz McCabe covers the evacuation in her work The Shah's Silk for Europe's Silver: The Eurasian Trade of the Julfa Armenians in Safavid Iran and India (1530-1750), I don't see anything about Tartars being evacuated or an undiscriminate evacuation, or any reference of an important Tartar population in Nakhichevan. ::Josepho Barbaro while visiting the devastation reports destruction of Armenian towns and its desertion, not Tartars. ::Sir William Ouseley during his visit in 1812 has only discribed the destruction of the Armenian city during the evacuation. ::In 1603 Shah 'Abbas, the great Safavid ruler of Persia, sent an expedition into Armenia in answer to the appeals of the inhabitants for assistance against the Turks. The death of the Sultan Mahmud III in December 1603 and the succession of his son Ahmed, a boy of twelve, opened the way to an easy conquest in the course of which both retreating Turks and invading Persians plundered the Armenians. The Persian victory was followed by a forced emigration of the population to the Shah's capital of Isfahan. « That dragon of hell, Shah Abbas, nourished from the beginning in the ways of the serpent, saw with an eye of envy the prosperity of the Christians. » So Arakel of Tauriz, the seventeenth-century Armenian historian, puts it, and it was indeed the skill of new... Armenia was left desolates... (A Seventeenth-Century typological cycle of paintings in the Armenian cathedal at Julfa, T. S. R. Boase, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, Vol. 13, No. 3/4 pp.323-324) ::D.M. Lang writes that one of the two major reasons of the deportation was: ...he desired to make use of the industrial and commercial talents of the Armenians... (Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1969) p. 622) Julfa population was so i

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

57,240,085

== regarding your edits to the WP:AFD == please try and avoid accidental blankings of large pages

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

57,241,656

June 2006 (UTC) Ermm...I actually designed and built the shopfront, are you really telling me what I was thinking when I did it? Hiding the crack was the ORIGINAL reason, not the ONLY reason. Another thing, the shopfront only 'juts out' by 6 inches in a couple places and is mainly set back from the building line by up to 4 feet! This creates the impression that it hangs out over the pavement. I will dig out a picture of the shopfront from the side if it will make you happy. Chris Ostwald, 21:40, 6

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,244,443

== yes, yes, yes == blocking an AOL user for daring to report vandalism by a registered user? yeah, I'm not sure if irony is the word you're thinking of

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

57,247,671

:::No. You and I agreed that GNU Emacs is used more. That doesn't automatically translate to consensus, and certainly not to a consensus to swap the Emacs and GNU Emacs articles.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

57,248,460

*It's very messy and time consuming to cleanup

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

57,248,576

, especially when other people don't notice it and go on adding things to the page, making a simple revert impossible

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

57,249,506

Yo what up, This ya boy right here. Welcome 2 my talk page.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,252,246

Some Buddhists have believed that anarchism is an expression of ancient Aryan culture which they see as central to buddhism. Clarify this? No citations.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

57,255,064

I was blocked for personal attacks, not 3RR. Why then was the grounds refused based on 3RR?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,262,688

== zero faults is a sock puppet == very amusing. Anybody notice the syntactical similarities? The obvious fact that zero faults is following merecat around like standard sock puppet behavior? The clue in sign back on after signing off? Rex, you are an ad hominem using jerk who only ever got the better end of the abuse you dished out to everybody else. Of course abusive editors get confronted; they are abusive editors. Merecat was always a patently abusive editor, and should have been stomped out of existence long before it actually happened.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

57,263,830

Why create this article? I've created this article largely to help stop the Brighton article get too bogged down in unecessary detail. The main Brighton article has a Landmarks section where I think the obvious and important buildings can go. In this article we can freely add more and more. Although I've added the content as two simple lists, I hope in time this article will expand to provide greater depth.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

57,265,400

` == A problem with your exegesis of ``physics`` == In your user page you say: entities that physically argue are assumed not to have knowledge of how natue actually behaves for what is being considered This sentence is very unclear because of several problems: #The meaning of ``entities``. You could mean anything from electrons to angels. As I read this sentence and try to make sense of it I flip-flop between ``anything that is or appears to be discrete enough to have an identity, e.g., lever bars,`` and ``sentient entities.`` #The meaning of ``physically argue.`` Unless you believe in mental telepathy, any arguing that I have ever heard about is conducted via some kind of physical interaction. But maybe by ``argue`` you mean ``interact.`` Maybe you are talking about any mass, any electromagnetic radiation, etc., and how it and other such things interact. Or, it just occurred to me, maybe you mean ``people who argue about physics.`` #The phrase ``are assumed not to have knowledge`` could mean that, e.g., ``some proton does not have knowledge of the neutron nearest to it,`` or ``bricks falling from the top of a building know nothing of the air.`` But if you are using these words to discuss philosophy in natural language, then probably that means that ``entities`` must mean ``people`` until such time as we find other sentient beings to talk to. #The final ``for what is being considered`` would normally be interpreted as pertaining to the word immediately preceding it. But probably you don't really mean to say that nature behaves for us (the way my dogs behave well or badly for me). #Why use ``assumed``? In ordinary language, when we say something like, ``I assume she must be his daughter,`` we indicate a belief that the speaker knows is not well grounded. It amounts to saying something like, ``I don't have very good grounds for saying it's his daughter. Maybe she's a paid escort.`` But if I am following you correctly you actually mean to say that we have absolutely no grounds for affirming that we know how nature actually works. Supposing that the ``axiom`` quoted above is talking about people, you may be trying to say something like: ``People who communicate with each other in an attempt to understand some facet of physics have absolutely no grounds for believing that they actually understand, or could eventually understand, the real way that things work.`` In other words, we know that we are always in the situation of poking various things into the black box, watching what comes out of the black box, and trying to make up a persuasive story to account for what has happened. I hope this crituque is helpful. At least it may indicate to you how at least one ``average well-informed reader`` interprets what you have written. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

57,283,474

* Your comments are your personal opinion, mine are basesd on actual important facts. Take it to your personal diary.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,283,656

I didn't have a libel case, Mike Smith had a libel case and he lost big time. The only sout grapes are yours.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

57,283,716

:No, it's not just you. Just more evidence that the current model for Wikipedia (i.e., let any fucking idiot in to do anything they please, then wait for someone to clean up after) won't last much longer. ==

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

true

57,283,752

You are an utter fucking faggot...u need a life outside of wikipedia...maybe a didlo fuk by ur mom?

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

57,283,960

```But you are not entitled bring your sour grapes onto Wiki;pedia `` wanna bet! * `

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

57,288,107

:If your intention is to follow any single posts I make and provoke me, you won't obtain any results from that. I will ignore your last warning because there is absolutly nothing remote to what could be constituted as warning material. Having administrative privilages doesn't give you the right to throw peoples warning like this. In my book you don't fit to administratorship and I am confident that more you distribute such empty warnings and more it will become clear as it is a matter of time. But what was I expecting, when an administrator retaliate for a critic of himself and sign an RfC in which he was not involved in anyway or ban another member because he criticised him/her and didn't left another administrator handle it, obviously there is something wrong. Stop searching bugs, I have no problem being watched over and will gladly welcome any administrators to pay attention to my conducts, but out of respect to veterans here many who are registered before even you came here, at least you should leave them tell you step down and leave another administrator handle the situation. You are taking this matter too personally, and consider that you don't have to do that everytime some criticize your use of administrative privilages.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,289,729

==Photo== Dear Kahuroa, Well, the sensei that I worked with wasn't able to perform Kopasho, but I'll get one that can on Thursday, or Saturday at the latest. Sorry that this dojo has, well, multiple functions. The one on Saturday's a pure dojo, though. And the senseis there are the karate masters of Chicago. Here's an example at my Tuesday & Thurday dojo. Cheers! Sincerely,

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

57,289,950

== what the?== Fadix if you are a psychiatrist how can you find so much time to write all these crap in a dozen of pages. I respect you in that sense. I wish we could have met under better conditions

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,291,459

Iam Ok with RIAA certification numbers.-CAYA

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

57,292,169

==Ten Sales== We Can end this for good if you approve to put RIAA certifications instead of sales numbers.The chose is preety much yours,also you may want to report the nonuser that keeps vandlising your name.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

57,292,311

(I'm Christian I don't like the cussing going on.)

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

57,294,389

` I beg to differ. What makes you think that I'm pro-CCP, and that I ``glorified the government and speared the opposition``? It is used entirely to discredit my views. I have been warned for my previously, and some of them are deleted. To make his point, the user blanked sections on both the article and talk page, and was reverted by the admin , before being restored by . In one of his posts here he clearly referred me, telling me to email him. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false