rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25,808,078
|
at 2805 Broadway in San Francisco (he does not live there now)
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,808,212
|
Margherita resembled some of my father's sisters.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,808,358
|
` BTW Margherita's other boyfriends included Albert Einstein (they were teenagers in Italy) and G. Marconi - a life-long relationship to Marconi's death. Details in ``Il Duce's Other Woman.```
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,809,456
|
== Wireless Computer== It is interesting that the State of Oregon of the United States (as of 2005) has the greatest number of wireless computer communications for the Internet, and the British do not have it. Even Starbucks, the coffee company, offers wireless computer communications on their coffee lands (grounds). U.S.A. does something and that is American Know How.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,809,752
|
` ::::Oh lord, spare us. Your side makes out that it's just a slur aimed at the Israeli government, and then you complain that it's also used for other Zionists! Lots of people call expansionists ``Zionists``, not just neo-Nazis and ``Islamists``, although they are well represented as doing so on Google. And few people would use the phrase ``Zionist terrorists`` who aren't so describing the government and armed forces of Israel (and it's true that the combination is unlikely to be much seen in mainstream work, because it's rare that governments of any kind are described as ``terrorists`` in mainstream publications). But the phrase is used, and it is used by people outside those mentioned. And it's not necessarily true that it has ``fallen into disrepute`` (more original research you simply will not source any of this stuff, will you?) so much as it has never been much used. I don't doubt that. There are relatively few ``Zionist terrorists``. Given the nature of terrorism, that's hardly a surprise. There aren't many American terrorists either. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,827,579
|
== You're Not Going to believe this == You're not. NSLE is nominating me for adminship. I haven't accepted yet, I got sit on it for a short bit, but I'm a little stunned right now. I originally got involved with Wikipedia just as a medium for my hurricane obsession. I never in my wildest dreams thought that someone would feel I would deserve the honor. I feel like a rookie going to the World Series. I don't know what to think now.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,830,082
|
Your Josef Stalin edits are absolutely retarded, Ben. Do something funny. - Mike (Right across from you)
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
25,830,104
|
Your Josef Stalin edits are absolutely retarded, Ben. Do something funny.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
25,835,170
|
Border terriers are cool!
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,837,949
|
`==Eye Witness Testimony on Writing of Dancing Wu Li Masters== Yes, I do and they are written by the people in both my books ``Destiny Matrix`` and ``Space-Time and Beyond II`` that you refuse to look at or recognize as legitimate. North Beach in San Francisco is a small community and many people know the story as they wiitnessed it. Here are e-mail addresses of some key witnesses you can contact about this matter of simple fact: LMCLEARIE7@aol.com Lorna McClearie - she was Gary Zukav's significant other at the time. There is a photo of her and Gary in Space-Time and Beyond II at that time. She is completely aware of the facts. She was there. lensman137@sbcglobal.net Kim Burrafato - he was there at the time, jagdish.mann@gmail.com Jagdish Mann - he was there at the time, d14947@gmail.com David Gladstone - he was there at the time, rmt@protium.de Randy Tinkerman - he was there at the time, dwishnie@aol.com - he was there at the time, sirag@mindspring.com Saul-Paul Sirag - he was there at the time and he also advised Gary on the editing and physics content fred@fredalanwolf.com Fred Alan Wolf - he was there at the time rebeccapaxton@mac.com Lee Myers - he was there at the time. Lee does not do e-mail, his wife Becky Paxton does it for him. BTW I never submitted any of my books since 2002 to a regular publisher and I turned down a contract offer from a major German publisher for the German edition of ``Destiny Matrix``. I will eventually hire a professional writer to cull the popular pieces from all of my books into a popular book that will be published mainstream. These books I am doing now are simply my preliminary sketch books, like Leonardo's - keeping notes for the historical record. As such many people will find them interesting. Also, as I don't need the money, I have not been doing what authors usually do to promote their books. I am too busy creating new content right now. Remember I am in Star Trek and on some major TV Shows and on IPOD Radio with RU Sirius and will be doing more of that bye and bye. If I wanted to go the usual route I could. I simply have not tried because I am not ready to do so. That is the fact. -) | 09:20AM, 18 October 2005 (UTC) `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,839,172
|
, 18 October 2005 (UTC) Huh? Sued? By whom? Not by me. Please do not make those insinuations at this point. Thanks. I think Uncle Ed agrees with that suggestion. -) | 09:36AM
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,840,204
|
`First note that my 3 books since 2002: Destiny Matrix, Dark Energy STB II, Super Cosmos, Are part of a SERIES i.e. ``Space-Time and Beyond - The Series`` of which the first in 1975 (which I wrote most of the first edition of, Fred Alan Wolf did a revision years later that I did not participate in because by then the Ira Einhorn murder case broke) sold well and was published by Dutton. There is a lot of junk published by big publishers today. The only difference is that the BIG CORPORATE JUNK has few typographical and grammatical errors. But the key issue here is: Will the reader who wants to know more about me find it in my books? Obviousy yes. Furthermore there are writings of other people in my books and there are photocopies of important documents like letters from Cap Weinberger on DOD stationary, letter from Bootsie Galbraith wife of US Ambassador to France at the time on official stationary, documents from the late CIA Chief of Station Harold Chipman - who BTW was the model for and wrote some of the episodes for the TV Series ``The Enforcer``. Also Author House is quite cheap for what they do. The publishing costs are inconsequential. They do not at all fit the above description in my experience. | 09:51AM, 18 October 2005 (UTC) `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,841,476
|
` The evidence is in the photographs of Margherita and her family and my father's family - obvious close genetic similarities. Also in some common personality characteristics. I have no documentary proof of course. Remember I was born in Brooklyn just at the start of WWII and my mother intentionally dropped the final ``i`` in my birth certificate to hide the connection. Everything was done to cover up the connection for obvious reasons since we were at war with Italy at the time. The best evidence I have is from my Aunt Victoria Sarfatti as related above. Also when I was in Brazil with Fred Alan Wolf in 1984 wined and dined by the wealthiest people in Brazil, an older woman came up to me and said, ``I knew Margherita Sarfatti.`` She simply assumed I was her blood relative from looking at me. I made no mention of the connection at that meeting. It was not relevant. In any case that is really not the point. The point is the artistic and occult connections as shown in my 1980 meeting with David Padwa - a very odd occult tale of high strangeness told in detail in ``Destiny Matrix`` with a corroborating photograph. Padwa lives today in Santa Fe New Mexico and he will confirm the true story in my book. 10:06 PM, 18 October 2005 (PCT)`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,843,631
|
`Correction I think that's ``The Equalizer``. I will check. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,849,926
|
==New Age Music== The last batch of edits by Sidp were excellent, but I think it still needs to be said somewhere that Enya's music is often classified as New Age even though many fans and, it has been reported, Enya herelf do not consider her music to be part of the genre. I wish I could provide a source but the best I can come up with is a newspaper interview she gave back around 1989.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,854,037
|
== Official Wikipedia rules and regulations == I would like to dispute the inclusion of Fred Phelps comments under the Wikipedia Offical Rules for Civilty
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,871,878
|
YOURS TOO, MOLOBO! You can delete this sentence as much as you want!
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,874,250
|
== Sorry about that == Yes, this is one of my accounts related to . I admit that and I are related somewhat, but I swear up and down that I have nothing at all to do with that character. Do I seem like that guy at all? Shelburne was an obvious doppelganger, I know, but I don't think that Wiki_brah guy, whoever the hell he is, should be caught up in all this. I'm willing to accept my ban but I hate for innocents to be caught up in it. Anyway, I had even targetted Wiki_brah for a bit, along with , posing as , who I'm sure you know was also related to me. Why would I take the trouble to compose a Request for Comment against myself? It doesnt make sense. So please re-consider the block on . You yourself believed him to be who he claimed to be, and who really could be that but him? I'm going to post the same on my pal Essjay's page and then be done with Wikipedia. I've caused enough problems for innocents. Sorry.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,874,507
|
== I'm Sorry about all the trouble. == Yes, this is one of my accounts related to . I admit that and I are related somewhat, but I swear up and down that I have nothing at all to do with that character. Do I seem like that guy at all? Shelburne was an obvious doppelganger, I know, but I don't think that Wiki_brah guy, whoever the hell he is, should be caught up in all this. I'm willing to accept my ban but I hate for innocents to be caught up in it. Anyway, I had even targetted Wiki_brah for a bit, along with , posing as , who I'm sure you know was also related to me. Why would I take the trouble to compose a Request for Comment against myself? It doesnt make sense. So please re-consider the block on . You yourself believed him to be who he claimed to be, and who really could be that but him? On a related note, would it be too much to ask that in the future, when you make sock-check requests, you do it in the open like everyone else, by posting to a developer's talk page instead of in private?
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,874,749
|
You know what? I think you are right. Right about Esperanza and about me too.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,876,593
|
I fully accept responsibility for my actions and I expect this account too to be blocked posthaste per the pending ArbCom ban on Rainbowwarrior1977.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,878,008
|
== Sorry == Yes, this is one of my accounts related to . I admit that and I are related somewhat, but I swear up and down that I have nothing at all to do with that User:Wiki_brah character. Do I seem like that guy at all? Shelburne was an obvious doppelganger, I know, but I don't think that Wiki_brah guy, whoever the hell he is, should be caught up in all this. I'm willing to accept my ban but I hate for innocents to be caught up in it. Anyway, I had even targetted Wiki_brah for a bit, along with , posing as , who I'm sure you know was also related to me. Why would I take the trouble to compose a Request for Comment against myself? It doesnt make sense. So please re-consider the block on User:Wiki_brah. You yourself believed him to be who he claimed to be, and who really could be that but him? I'm going to post the same on my pal Essjay's page and then be done with Wikipedia. I've caused enough problems for innocents. Sorry.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,881,909
|
== Neck and Neck == I don't think that one's nonsense, but it could have gone under A1 or the infrequent A4.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,886,940
|
== Congratulations! == Thanks for your message at the bottom of my talk page - your personalized WikiThanks is quite sincere, and I'm sure the other Wikipedians who supported you appreciated them equally well. I have no doubt about that you'll be a good administrator. I hope we get to know each other better on the Wiki now that we've briefly met during your RfA. If you ever need a hand, let me know and I'll do my best to help you out. All the best,
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,896,422
|
This page is not here to tell people what they want to hear. It is not here to promote your blog (which does not stop being a blog simply because you have a unique style). It is here to provide objective facts about Jack Thompson, with just enough context to highlight their significance. If you can't accept that someone is going to edit, alter, or delete what you add to this page, then you should not be editing Wikipedia articles in the first place, because that is the nature of how this website functions.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,916,578
|
Whatever. I don't think you have any legal ground for what you're saying, and I don't think you have a compelling moral argument either. But since we've agreed on the state of the article none of this matters, and since Wikipedia isn't a discussion forum I'll leave the matter as it stands.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,917,210
|
== hello == I edited the page Jacob because the boy called Jacob who is sitting next to me now said he was a magical leprechaun. You schould not let your life be controlled by fucking religion. You sad, sad christian bastard. Have a nice day wanker. KTJackson.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
25,924,517
|
Witkacy is blocked, and Molobo will be blocked, too!
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,928,859
|
. :::- Sorry about that, looks like you are right- but why move the content to a subpage only he knows about - it's not on the page itself
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,931,059
|
` :``Warez - I was involved in the illegal transfer of copyrighted software for a good 15 years.`` :``uNITED cRACKING fORCE - a cracking group I was a member of for 5 years.`` :``aPOCALYPSE pRODUCTION cREW - a music piracy group I was in for a few years`` :: - courtesy of ALKIVAR's home page. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,934,770
|
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,942,317
|
on Mara Salvatrucha,
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,947,719
|
why is this done? I personal feel that this is information that might be needed but thats just my say!
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,957,439
|
::::::Oh God, you guys too? What is the world coming to?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,976,450
|
` ::: EDT usage is justified because all the official warnings from the National Weather Service are given in that time zone. We adjust to local time when the Tropical Prediction Center of the NWS does, because that's from where we get our information. This has been discussed to death before. xd `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,979,595
|
== Napoleon Factor == This movie is like Napoleon Dynamite The audience loves it, even though there's actually nothing to it but clichés which literally get the shit beat out of them (as do most things in this movie). To be fair, Napoleon Dynamite's bullettime scenes were only in how slow the characters thought. All of them, multiplied together, gets an IQ of less than 50. Is this the new style? To have something suck so badly (saving special effects) that people can't help but love it? I am going to kill someone; this is the new blockbuster style. And before anyone starts trying to find out where I live, so they can hunt me down, I will reinforce that crochety old man persona with these parting words: Pfeh! Bah humbug! Hrmph! Good day, sir. ...no, nonononononjesusfuckingchristno! Don't say anything. Think first this time. I said good day, sir.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
25,982,167
|
I'd also like to refer you here in defense of a eukaryotic origin for the plastid outer membrane. I really think Cavalier-Smith is kind of a lone gun on this hypothesis. -Peter
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,992,541
|
hello old and crazy man.....
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
25,994,755
|
`:: Ecemaml, your obsession with attempting to blacken the name of Gibraltar is well known. As you will see from the text you quoted, Gibraltar was REMOVED from that list in 2001. And NO, ``paraiso fiscal`` is not an accurate translation for tax haven as it contains particular connotations of illegality, illicit activity, and lax financial controls none of which apply in Gibraltar. In any case Gibraltar was REMOVED from the list of NCCT's in 2001. Either way nothing even remotely justifies blocking the whole of Gibraltar from editing .es, WP is a FREE site, for editing by ALL, not just when you find it convenient, or they happen to agree with your version. You & Dodo have self-appointed yourselves as Dictators of WP.es, and are abusing your position there. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,004,004
|
Was Dick Emery jewish?
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
26,017,771
|
Is that supposed to defend your point?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,020,729
|
::::Isn't it obvious? He is Rialian the owner of Rialian.com
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
26,022,447
|
The guy who thinks he is secretly a bunny rabbit is insulting me. Wow.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
26,040,222
|
I suggest we don't feed the troll, and just keep reverting him until he goes away. Eventually he'll either give up or get a job and move on.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
26,048,496
|
Thank You, And Do You Have Any Clue Who Wrote All Those Other Charcters, I Highly Doubt There Were In The Poll. Willaim Burch
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,048,575
|
195.64.95.116]] 11:53, 12 October 2005
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,048,733
|
Oh, by the way: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
26,048,959
|
I Will Not Take The Info Away However(It Was 50% Good And 50% Bad) Untill Someone Agrees With Me.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,059,194
|
== holiday special == I have a reliable source that tells me that an eventual release will happen by Lucasfilm, but not as a serious release, more as a comedic novelty.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,061,379
|
` ''I agree that you're being very cautious, and I think caution is right, as I noted. However, I think in the case of the BUAV images in particular that they are clearly ``fairly used``. You have to ignore their provenance to think otherwise. I can see from your discussion with her that Slim was not very successful in communicating her point of view, because she interpreted legitimate concern over copyright for a personal attack, largely because, I think, you didn't take into account the source of the photos and their likely reaction to their being in WP. Still, I do agree that she should ask for confirmation from BUAV that they are cool with our using the photos; but I think you should lay off them (and her) so long as she has made the commitment to acquire that confirmation. (this message copied to Slim's talkpage for her notice. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
26,061,571
|
` == Issue on images still unresolved == Slim, I'm copying this message and my reply to your page for your notice. I appreciate your inputs in Image talk:Monkey3.jpg and I agree once in a while I might sound rude (purely unintentional, since I put facts blantly). But SlimVirgin is abusing his admin power to overrule anyone. Slim is not a ``he``. Given that she named herself after a Javanese princess, perhaps you could take the hint and note that she's a woman. Also, I don't think you were simply blunt. I think you were rude to Slim. I recognise it's a fine line but given that I've mentioned it to you, perhaps you'll take more care to stay on the right side of it? She has suggested in an email to me, that she is in talks with another editor. Now, I don't know who this other editor and i certainly don't like this secrecy. Instead of having a discussion on this, she wants to finish the matter begind closed doors. She could've atleast told me who this reputed editor was to let me have a word with him/her. Perhaps she is seeking guidance on how she should approach you and wants that to be untainted by your input. I think that would be reasonable. I have a high regard for Slim and I don't think she would have a nefarious purpose in speaking to a third party. Inso far as the images are concerned, I had stated to her a couple of images on one issue (animal rights) is ok, but she insists she needs to showcase the entire album provided by PETA and its assocites. So you have a dispute. You need to recognise that you are not necessarily right! You disagree about how many images are necessary. I feel that you have to allow that your disagreement might be fuelled by your political differences as much as how you interpret the image policy. This should could easily achieve by providing an external link to the images provided by a controversial organization. The BUAV is not a ``controversial organisation``. It is a highly respected body, whose voice is listened to in all circles of British society. A viewpoint doesn't become ``controversial`` just because you don't share it. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and not have extreme viewpoints - But you expect it to reflect your viewpoint. thus I requested her to limit her fair use policy in this regard to 2-3 images which can be used across similar articles. this she refuses. I don't see how it is any fairer to use one, two or ten images in this instance. While I agree that Slim could have taken more care to provide a rationale for using the images, I simply don't feel that your argument about how many she should have used has much weight. One factor in deciding fair use is how much of a thing you use, that's true, but it's only one factor, and obviously, each picture is a separate case to be considered as well as part of a whole. As far as the other images, some are on personalities she claims have ``agreed`` to use their photos here. Unless she gets a written consent and a permission how can I believe. First of all, you can believe Slim because you assume good faith. Perhaps you're not aware of that policy. Yes, you can ask Slim to provide evidence of that, but your assumption should be that she has in fact acquired that agreement. Harassing another editor to provide evidence to your satisfaction and insisting you won't believe them until they have do not show an assumption of good faith. Once I pointed out that {permission} photos would be deleted anyway, she backed off and argued that it be kept on the grounds of fair use asking me to trust her. Yes, okay. Trust her AND ask for proof. Both of us are editing in good faith, but one of us has power and a circle of friends to back her while the other (me) relies on the hope that ppl. like you will help me out in this. I'd urge you to rely on the issues rather than the personalities. Yes, Slim does have powerful friends, who will back her regardless, but you should still do your best to make it about the issue in question and not about her. If she gets away with this and sets a precedence then I'm afraid there are hordes of copyviolaters straining at the leashes to bomb Wikipedia with copyrighted information. I think that's a bit dramatic but I agree that she has to obey the rules, which exist for good reason, and shouldn't be given a pass just because she is friends with the arbcom. However, she is not a ``copyviolater`` trying to destroy Wikipedia. Partly, I think she simply didn't understand your problem, and that was in part a failure of your communication, and partly she has become too used to having her views echoed by her friends and doesn't handle disagreement well. So perhaps you could recognise that and be more helpful than combative? I know it's hard. I find the establishment hard to deal with sometimes. They tend to say ``Wikipedia thinks this...`` when they mean ``My friends think this...`` They forget the diversity and multiplicity of opinion that exists here and live in an echo chamber because they know they are empowered and do not need to pay any attention to that diversity to get what they want. fyi, 70% of her images are tagged as fair use without providing a single rationale (few of them fall under the subcategories like stamp, logo etc. where it's easy to understand). Yes. But as I noted, plain common sense would direct you to understand that fair use is being made of the photos. They are the product of a not-for-profit organisation whose goal is to educate people about animal torture. Having their material illustrate an encyclopaedia article about animal torture would clearly suit their purpose, as Slim pointed out to you, I believe. Ignoring that makes your approach seem malicious. I think Slim is in part bewildered by your making such a huge, urgent issue out of it, when the chances of legal dispute are so very small. So perhaps we could agree that Slim should provide rationales in due course, and preferably have the photos released under a suitable licence, but in the meantime there's no particular urgency to re-tag them or to insist on rapid action? Surely a commitment to act would be sufficient. She also keeps reverting to her tags, violating all admin rules. That's another issue. I think Slim is one of many admins who would be better off not having the powers, because they lead her into disputes of this nature, where the issue all too rapidly becomes her and not her edits, which is unfortunate. As it stands I'm erring on the side of caution, while Slim wants to stretch the boundry of ``fair use``. Tx 4 ur interest in this. ''I agree that you're being very cautious, and I think caution is right, as I noted. However, I think in the case of the BUAV images in particular that they are clearly ``fairly used``. You have to ignore their provenance to think otherwise. I can see from your discussion with her that Slim was not very successful in communicating her point of view, because she interpreted legitimate concern over copyright for a personal attack, largely because, I think, you didn't take into account the source of the photos and their likely reaction to their being in WP. Still, I do agree that she should ask for confirmation from BUAV that they are cool with our using the photos; but I think you should lay off them (and her) so long as she has made the commitment to acquire that confirmation. (this message copied to Slim's talkpage for her notice. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
26,061,620
|
` == == Issue on images still unresolved == == I appreciate your inputs in Image talk:Monkey3.jpg and I agree once in a while I might sound rude (purely unintentional, since I put facts blantly). But SlimVirgin is abusing his admin power to overrule anyone. Slim is not a ``he``. Given that she named herself after a Javanese princess, perhaps you could take the hint and note that she's a woman. Also, I don't think you were simply blunt. I think you were rude to Slim. I recognise it's a fine line but given that I've mentioned it to you, perhaps you'll take more care to stay on the right side of it? She has suggested in an email to me, that she is in talks with another editor. Now, I don't know who this other editor and i certainly don't like this secrecy. Instead of having a discussion on this, she wants to finish the matter begind closed doors. She could've atleast told me who this reputed editor was to let me have a word with him/her. Perhaps she is seeking guidance on how she should approach you and wants that to be untainted by your input. I think that would be reasonable. I have a high regard for Slim and I don't think she would have a nefarious purpose in speaking to a third party. Inso far as the images are concerned, I had stated to her a couple of images on one issue (animal rights) is ok, but she insists she needs to showcase the entire album provided by PETA and its assocites. So you have a dispute. You need to recognise that you are not necessarily right! You disagree about how many images are necessary. I feel that you have to allow that your disagreement might be fuelled by your political differences as much as how you interpret the image policy. This should could easily achieve by providing an external link to the images provided by a controversial organization. The BUAV is not a ``controversial organisation``. It is a highly respected body, whose voice is listened to in all circles of British society. A viewpoint doesn't become ``controversial`` just because you don't share it. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and not have extreme viewpoints - But you expect it to reflect your viewpoint. thus I requested her to limit her fair use policy in this regard to 2-3 images which can be used across similar articles. this she refuses. I don't see how it is any fairer to use one, two or ten images in this instance. While I agree that Slim could have taken more care to provide a rationale for using the images, I simply don't feel that your argument about how many she should have used has much weight. One factor in deciding fair use is how much of a thing you use, that's true, but it's only one factor, and obviously, each picture is a separate case to be considered as well as part of a whole. As far as the other images, some are on personalities she claims have ``agreed`` to use their photos here. Unless she gets a written consent and a permission how can I believe. First of all, you can believe Slim because you assume good faith. Perhaps you're not aware of that policy. Yes, you can ask Slim to provide evidence of that, but your assumption should be that she has in fact acquired that agreement. Harassing another editor to provide evidence to your satisfaction and insisting you won't believe them until they have do not show an assumption of good faith. Once I pointed out that {permission} photos would be deleted anyway, she backed off and argued that it be kept on the grounds of fair use asking me to trust her. Yes, okay. Trust her AND ask for proof. Both of us are editing in good faith, but one of us has power and a circle of friends to back her while the other (me) relies on the hope that ppl. like you will help me out in this. I'd urge you to rely on the issues rather than the personalities. Yes, Slim does have powerful friends, who will back her regardless, but you should still do your best to make it about the issue in question and not about her. If she gets away with this and sets a precedence then I'm afraid there are hordes of copyviolaters straining at the leashes to bomb Wikipedia with copyrighted information. I think that's a bit dramatic but I agree that she has to obey the rules, which exist for good reason, and shouldn't be given a pass just because she is friends with the arbcom. However, she is not a ``copyviolater`` trying to destroy Wikipedia. Partly, I think she simply didn't understand your problem, and that was in part a failure of your communication, and partly she has become too used to having her views echoed by her friends and doesn't handle disagreement well. So perhaps you could recognise that and be more helpful than combative? I know it's hard. I find the establishment hard to deal with sometimes. They tend to say ``Wikipedia thinks this...`` when they mean ``My friends think this...`` They forget the diversity and multiplicity of opinion that exists here and live in an echo chamber because they know they are empowered and do not need to pay any attention to that diversity to get what they want. fyi, 70% of her images are tagged as fair use without providing a single rationale (few of them fall under the subcategories like stamp, logo etc. where it's easy to understand). Yes. But as I noted, plain common sense would direct you to understand that fair use is being made of the photos. They are the product of a not-for-profit organisation whose goal is to educate people about animal torture. Having their material illustrate an encyclopaedia article about animal torture would clearly suit their purpose, as Slim pointed out to you, I believe. Ignoring that makes your approach seem malicious. I think Slim is in part bewildered by your making such a huge, urgent issue out of it, when the chances of legal dispute are so very small. So perhaps we could agree that Slim should provide rationales in due course, and preferably have the photos released under a suitable licence, but in the meantime there's no particular urgency to re-tag them or to insist on rapid action? Surely a commitment to act would be sufficient. She also keeps reverting to her tags, violating all admin rules. That's another issue. I think Slim is one of many admins who would be better off not having the powers, because they lead her into disputes of this nature, where the issue all too rapidly becomes her and not her edits, which is unfortunate. As it stands I'm erring on the side of caution, while Slim wants to stretch the boundry of ``fair use``. Tx 4 ur interest in this. ''I agree that you're being very cautious, and I think caution is right, as I noted. However, I think in the case of the BUAV images in particular that they are clearly ``fairly used``. You have to ignore their provenance to think otherwise. I can see from your discussion with her that Slim was not very successful in communicating her point of view, because she interpreted legitimate concern over copyright for a personal attack, largely because, I think, you didn't take into account the source of the photos and their likely reaction to their being in WP. Still, I do agree that she should ask for confirmation from BUAV that they are cool with our using the photos; but I think you should lay off them (and her) so long as she has made the commitment to acquire that confirmation. (this message copied to Slim's talkpage for her notice. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,073,678
|
*:Yes, indeed. A misunderstanding caused by my not being able to see deleted versions.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,075,877
|
g'day! Welcome! Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,075,972
|
== Confusion == Please define A1 and A2 more succinctly.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
26,081,728
|
` ... just a comment: The concept of home video could be approached from an ontological perspective as well: ``It is unrelenting footage that rolls on and on. It has an aimless determination, a persistence that lives outside the subject matter. You are looking into the mind of home video, It is innocent, it is aimless, it is determined, it is real.`` [Don Delillo, Underworld, p. 156] the 'home video business' focus seems to represent only the commercial aspects... [Sune Blicher, 21/10/05]`
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,085,591
|
` ==Incomplete description== There's a fuller description at the new Hawthorne effect article. Also, the derivation of the name is less important then the effect itself. And is this ``effect`` mainly speculation based on a single study, or what? Last, but not least: what are the implications for teaching and learning in schools? If expectation is a significant factor, can it be managed to improve student achievement? Or can improper expectations be reduced? I'm particularly interested in how the teacher's hopes affect the student. Given the materialistic view of human beings, one might expect that ``only behavior`` can be measured or studied. But simply deciding to ``think about a matter`` a certain way is possible. * I decided this wasn't going to work; i.e., that it was useless * Kelly decided that the best thing was for her to become a violinist; her grandfather said she had a talent for it. Mark Twain said he could ``live for two months on a compliment`` (like it was a kind of food!). And why do coaches or parents tell children, ``You can do it!``? Does instilling confidence really have an effect on performance? Why are some teachers or coaches significantly better than others? Some, spectacular so. A related question is: why have teachers in many American cities formed labor unions which insist on contracts which adamantly refuse to allow any form of merit pay and insist on a pure seniority system? You get paid based on ``qualifications``, i.e., diplomas and certificates, but mostly on how many years you've been on the job. In NYC you start at around 35K and work up to around 90K. But how well you teach is not measured or tracked, and has no bearing on you job assignments, your influence on curriculum, or your paycheck. In private schools, a teacher will be paid, promoted or fired mainly on results. Entire schools are judged based on results: i.e., I send my child to Philips Exeter Academy because he'll learn more there. Perhaps the entire school uses the Pygmalion effect? You were chosen for this school because you're the best => the student feels the confidence teachers have in him, so really applies himself. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,090,406
|
==IBTYLGOTD== I've created a page for I Bet You Look Good On the Dancefloor add put in the standard stuff. There's loads more to be said though, so some contributions from people in the know would be good.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,103,647
|
` You could say instead that phenotype is a function of genotype and environmental factors. Also, the ``nuanced`` version including ``random variation`` might be misleading. Isn't such ``random`` variation due to environmental factors which are difficult to track? `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,107,439
|
:Not connection between Konigsberg and Gdansk. Konigsberg has a well-established English name for the whole of its pre-WWII history. Not so with Danzig/Gdansk. Further discussion moved to the Talk:Kant State Russian University.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
26,111,673
|
, Hollywood, Elvis, PETA or the Illuminati
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
26,112,784
|
== Tarpit = Teergrube? == Is this the same thing as Teergrube, or is a Teergrube one of several kinds of Tarpit? Could somebody explain how they relate to each other, or point out differences? If they are the same, the articles should be merged. If not, Teergrube should get a stub notice. Thanks in advance, ~~
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,120,718
|
:::Oh yes...I'm Big Daddy. Definitely. No question. It's so obvious to a big strong intelligent person like you, Elo. Ps Rex, good luck dealing with these douchebags. lol! I punk'd them so hard, they had to ban me. I guess they did the same to you too, huh? I'm sure it's merely a coincidence that we're both conservatives...
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,125,676
|
Pss Rex, be sure to DOCUMENT all the things you've discovered on the John Kerry page etc. It's awesome that you and I INDEPENDENTLY observed (and can corrorborate) virtually the exactsame pattern by these liberals. Demonizing conservatives; lionizing liberals. It's repeated ad infinitum, ad nauseum. The more proof we have, the easier it will be to persuade all but their fellow brain-dead truth haters to give a red cent to Wikipedia. And, until WHOLESALE changes are made from the top down, that's exactly what's about to happen. It's almost like this is the liberal's religion. Too bad they're gonna have to find a church other than Wikipedia to practice their faith, huh? I've heard rumors that my actions are already sending users Hippocrite, Fred Bauder, WoohooKitty, Kizzle, FVW, Derex and especially the pimply faced 15 year old RedWolf to become so verklempt they don't know whether to schedule an appointement with their psychiatrist...or their gynecologist. Big Daddy- PHASE II Dry up the funding (on the road)
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,128,719
|
=== From Big Daddy=== Well, as long as you're here trying to edit, I can't say I blame you. But, keep up the good work.... Ps I don't take back a singlething I said. Big Daddy (on the road)
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
26,131,700
|
to omarion i pray that u be sucessful for everything u do and i pray that u make it all the way and go on and on and on. love kila from the big BX AND YOUR #1 FAN HOLLA!
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
26,140,520
|
` :Hm. Like the 18th century ended at Waterloo in 1815 and the 20th century began in 1914. It's ``catchy history speak.`` The war, as a war, ended in 1945. It's reprecussions still continue. But we must state the obvious and acceptable here. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
26,142,986
|
I dug out my old textbook. Seems that given the transfer function in Laplace form H(s) you evaluate for H(jω) and convert to magnituded and phase H(jω) =A(ω) e j φ(ω) and plot A(ω) vs φ(ω) on polar paper for the Nyquist plot. You need to label points along the curve with the ω but you can display the whole -inf< ω < inf on one page. I don't remember using these either, we did a bunch of Bode phase plots though. Can you just take the data you used for the Bode Phase plot and change it to polar graphing?
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,150,633
|
::::I agree and have removed it. I suspect is the source of a lot of problems here.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
26,159,778
|
::::Uhh, no. Nintendo built the GameCube from the ground-up to be more cost-effective to produce than Sony or Microsoft did with their systems. Lack of DVD support also helps reduce manufacturing costs. P.S.: Quit adding that POV paragraph to the article.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,162,130
|
` :``Otherkin`` are not qualified to diagnose their mental state as they are typically not mental health professionals. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,163,909
|
` :::Which means nothing so ever. Thank you ever so much for adding your heap of useless to this conversation. The point is just because some Otherkin site says ``We don't have CL``, it doesn't mean they don't. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
26,167,657
|
== Cut and paste move == The article on Beethoven's sonata already existed with two different names. I only deleted the content of the improperly named article and replaced it with a redirect. If I understand how things should be done, I didn't do anything wrong (at least there was no other way to fix the problem). Greetings,
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
26,220,623
|
Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /usr/local/apache/common-local/php-1.5/extensions/LuceneSearch.php on line 402 what do i do??!! i really need some help
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,223,231
|
` Do U Know Who Wrote All That ``Monkey`` Stuff This Morning (October 22 2005) and tottally ruined this page. That Is Such A Big Shame for Whoever Wrote All That Junk. William Burch`
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,237,151
|
Oh, just now I have seen that there is already an article about Autosexuality. So I feel entitled to add autosexuals to Queer
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,240,243
|
==what is the reason== for removing a link onS upershadow i personaly fell you are now abusing you powers and have no right to do this
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
26,240,704
|
if you feel thatyou have done nothing wrong i want a link that i can report you to a proper athorty you will have no probelm giving me a link if you have done nothing wrong
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
26,251,591
|
::::::::There's no need for you to undo my legitimate edits, Moriori. Perhaps you need a cooling down period?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,266,910
|
== Edits to Unplugged (Alicia Keys album) == Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose its deletion, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
26,272,142
|
October 2005 (UTC) ::Sorry if I was terse above! Lots of issues here. The discussion on redirects seems to now be at Talk:Units of measurement/Format of articles about units, so I've joined in there. 14:04, 23
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
26,285,571
|
==sandbot== the sandbot is not working again just to let you know!
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,289,431
|
:Re: User Page - Thanks for your help!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
26,299,170
|
` == Apology and thank you note == Hi Jeremy, I am sorry for not replying to you promptly. Almost went down with a flu, and could not think of how to reply to your message. Honestly, the ``Special thanks`` list was not up to date. I didn't realize that anyone would read it. Since you have mentioned it, I must either keep it updated or else delete it. Thank you for drawing to my attention. I will keep it. This section was actually meant for my reference, because I had to count my blessings in an environment that is admittedly quite hostile. Many a times in the early days (as if there is anything other than ``early days``, LOL — being active with Wikipedia for only about 2 months), I had wanted to give up for good, but the attraction of writing kept pulling me back. — `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
26,305,481
|
Won't anybody mention anything about the people of Trebinje and the surrounding region being the tallest in the world on average? It would look good and is something about the towns pride surely! There must be some sources. Celtmist 23-10-05
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
26,308,785
|
== Heaven of God == To understand Heaven, then God must be understood: * 1. God is the all powerful supreme being of the Universe. * 2. Universe is defined as everything that is seen and unseen, and defined as everything known and unknown. Any concept of a multi-universe shall be defined as the mathematical subspace where there can be many subspaces, but only one Universe. A mathematical subspace is a subset of dimensions that does not have to include all other dimensions. The subspace we exist within can be a subspace of a larger subspace. The subspace that includes all dimensions is the Universe itself. The Universe itself is a subspace that includes all dimensions. * 3. God is either above the Universe as the creator, or part of some subspace of the Universe, or both above and part of the Universe. The fourth condition that God is not part of the Universe, and God is not above the Universe negates God's existence; therefore, the fourth condition is not considered a valid condition of God. * 4. God is supreme over the Universe. It is God's creation and obeys God's rules. Each rule can be obvious or non-obvious, and each rule can be hidden or allowed to be known. * 5. God has the ability to create and destroy energy. Without such a thing, then the Universe simply exists and is eternal and everlasting with no known explanation of its ability to exist; there can still be God as a supreme being of the Universe in such a condition, but God's energy ability is changed to the ability to manipulate energy without the ability to create or destroy energy. * 6. God is smart, is intelligent, is wise, has knowledge, is a creator, is good, is benevolent, has mercy, and has understanding. God has these abilities that are significant as the supreme being of the Universe. * 7. God expects God's creation to do well, since as a creator, then the Universe was created for God's purpose and enjoyment; therefore, life elements of God's creation, such as people, are expected to improve their own condition for their benefit and exercise wisdom, understanding, and knowledge when possible to exercise such thingsintelligence is good. * 8. Because God is supreme, then Heaven and its rules of existence are defined by God. * 9. God not only deals with people of Earth of our Sol system of the Milky Way galaxy, God is a supreme being that can interact with the entire Universe in whole, or God can interact with the Universe in part; therefore, God truly understands some of the issues and survival strategies of life, and this implies that God may be truly forgiving and God may expect certain behavior for the improvement of ourselvesto survive and prosper is important. *10. It is always believed that God likes people, so help from God can be asked by petition for help or intervention using prayer. *11. God likes to be acknowledged from God's own creation, so it is good to acknowledge God as the benevolent intelligent creator of the Universe. *12. Love God. Love is a survival strategy of people that helps to define society, family, nation, benevolence, and many good things of life. Be who you are as a person and love God, and God is expected to understand this as love is part of the defining qualities of people. God has created the Universe and has the ability to define Heaven in any way. Each person can get a personal Heaven, or Heaven may be a interaction for people, or Heaven may be a combination of both personal and interaction of people. Heaven is always defined as a good place; but, a personal Heaven can also be a personal Hell tailored to your life, attitude, and existence where God could give us, by observation, an environment where the individual prospered. The personal Heaven and Hell would be much like an metaphorical ant farm that is designed for ants, but you would not expect things like body building equipment in the ant farm, and the ant farm would function in a way ants survive, and this can be bad news for people who were ruthless where their environment was ruthlessness as a survival strategy (visit a zoo and see how the environmentshowever limitedare tailored to the different animal species). God can define Heaven in any way, and Heaven is defined as a good place, but as a supreme being God can allow many things, and maybe God might include a body building set for the metaphorical ant farm, so the possibilities of Heaven are expected to be many, if not endless possibilities. God is benevolent in Heaven and the possibilities are many. Love God.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,317,844
|
::Hi Rex, nice to meet you. ) Kinda was feeling lonely like in hostile lands! For a while I thought Wikipedia is a place between Mecca and Medina. LOL 00:39 24 October 2005
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,321,452
|
== Heaven of God == For the atheist anarchist, the subject is Heaven, and it is religion, moron> I saw your kind at University, go feed yourself in the mountains. To understand Heaven, then God must be understood: * 1. God is the all powerful supreme being of the Universe. * 2. Universe is defined as everything that is seen and unseen, and defined as everything known and unknown. Any concept of a multi-universe shall be defined as the mathematical subspace where there can be many subspaces, but only one Universe. A mathematical subspace is a subset of dimensions that does not have to include all other dimensions. The subspace we exist within can be a subspace of a larger subspace. The subspace that includes all dimensions is the Universe itself. The Universe itself is a subspace that includes all dimensions. * 3. God is either above the Universe as the creator, or part of some subspace of the Universe, or both above and part of the Universe. The fourth condition that God is not part of the Universe, and God is not above the Universe negates God's existence; therefore, the fourth condition is not considered a valid condition of God. * 4. God is supreme over the Universe. It is God's creation and obeys God's rules. Each rule can be obvious or non-obvious, and each rule can be hidden or allowed to be known. * 5. God has the ability to create and destroy energy. Without such a thing, then the Universe simply exists and is eternal and everlasting with no known explanation of its ability to exist; there can still be God as a supreme being of the Universe in such a condition, but God's energy ability is changed to the ability to manipulate energy without the ability to create or destroy energy. * 6. God is smart, is intelligent, is wise, has knowledge, is a creator, is good, is benevolent, has mercy, and has understanding. God has these abilities that are significant as the supreme being of the Universe. * 7. God expects God's creation to do well, since as a creator, then the Universe was created for God's purpose and enjoyment; therefore, life elements of God's creation, such as people, are expected to improve their own condition for their benefit and exercise wisdom, understanding, and knowledge when possible to exercise such thingsintelligence is good. * 8. Because God is supreme, then Heaven and its rules of existence are defined by God. * 9. God not only deals with people of Earth of our Sol system of the Milky Way galaxy, God is a supreme being that can interact with the entire Universe in whole, or God can interact with the Universe in part; therefore, God truly understands some of the issues and survival strategies of life, and this implies that God may be truly forgiving and God may expect certain behavior for the improvement of ourselvesto survive and prosper is important. * 10. It is always believed that God likes people, so help from God can be asked by petition for help or intervention using prayer. * 11. God likes to be acknowledged from God's own creation, so it is good to acknowledge God as the benevolent intelligent creator of the Universe. * 12. Love God. Love is a survival strategy of people that helps to define society, family, nation, benevolence, and many good things of life. Be who you are as a person and love God, and God is expected to understand this as love is part of the defining qualities of people. God has created the Universe and has the ability to define Heaven in any way. Each person can get a personal Heaven, or Heaven may be a interaction for people, or Heaven may be a combination of both personal and interaction of people. Heaven is always defined as a good place; but, a personal Heaven can also be a personal Hell tailored to your life, attitude, and existence where God could give us, by observation, an environment where the individual prospered. The personal Heaven and Hell would be much like an metaphorical ant farm that is designed for ants, but you would not expect things like body building equipment in the ant farm, and the ant farm would function in a way ants survive, and this can be bad news for people who were ruthless where their environment was ruthlessness as a survival strategy (visit a zoo and see how the environmentshowever limitedare tailored to the different animal species). God can define Heaven in any way, and Heaven is defined as a good place, but as a supreme being God can allow many things, and maybe God might include a body building set for the metaphorical ant farm, so the possibilities of Heaven are expected to be many, if not endless possibilities. God is benevolent in Heaven and the possibilities are many. Love God.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,324,063
|
:::::Hi Ahasuerus: Not sure if I understand you. Could you please explain a bit more ) 00:2:05 24 October 2005
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,325,506
|
Anarchism versus Religion Anarchism what does it mean for this anarchist hobbyist? Anarchism started the First World War over the anarchist assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria. A anarchist decided to interrupt a world power practicing imperialism and assassinated the Archduke as he drove by the anarchist in the tiny nation of Serbia. What the anarchist did not know is that there were a multitude of secret treaties among no less that fourteen nations including attitude from the Ottoman Empire and within weeks the world was at war as Serbia was invaded. The result of the war that started in the tiny nation of Serbia is millions of deaths, chemical warfare, proof of machine gun and artillery fire, introduction of aviation into warfare, the Russian communist revolution, and a new world order that led to World War Two, since the Germans believed it was their leaders who failed them causing them to lose the war. World War Two led to millions of deaths and a larger battlefield across the world including China and the Pacific Ocean (Japan was part of World War One, but the results were insignificant compared to the bloody battlefields of Europe). The results of World War Two led to nuclear weapons, a space race, spy satellites, nuclear ships, nuclear bombers, nuclear missiles, communism across the world from communist Russia, United States being called imperialist due to being a world wide undefeated military power who is unafraid to invade anyone except the nations with the largest and best militaries (Iraq had a lager but sad capability military). World War Two also led to the Cold War, Korean War, Vietnam War, and Desert Storm One that was the result of the former allies of World War Two dividing among themselves into two parties and fighting low intensity and hot wars across the world until the year 1991 including, for many families, three or more generations of military service from the United States. Serbia as a result of the wars across the world of the 20th century has been subjected to the Muslims, Russians, United States, Germans, and civil war within itself and still has United States intervention this 21st century. Under President Clinton Serbia was made smaller requiring a split of Kosovo and Serbia after a long bombing campaign that exhausted the stockpile of conventional United States missiles during the 1990s. Serbia got its anarchy and is a backwards nation that has been under subjugation and gunfire since the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Embrace anarchy and declare Heaven non-religion in a discussion section where Heaven is something of the Christian, Jewish, and Muslim faith where the other faiths are atheistic in nature and worship man by a code of conduct, then you should embrace anarchy and go live off the lands in a mountain. You have little knowledge of mythology and I bet you have no idea what you are doing concerning religion other than your personal attitude.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,327,353
|
` Very nice, thank you. It looks like the family really has been in North Carolina for a long time! ``Holt`` kinda sounds Germanic and ``Daniel`` is Biblical but usually English, I guess. Maybe it is Evan's mother who is Jewish, which takes out the Roger Moore blood relation possiblity. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
26,328,995
|
== Before Attitude Increases due to lack of Blood in Brain == Whatever your personal feelings you are nothing more than a communist who want to own your own board and are using illicit tactics. I have been on the net for over a decade and have seen a lot of attitude, and you need to take your attitude home and understand that in the United States of America your way of life is based upon despots, censorship, and hate. Moron. The subject is Heaven and you believe God has no part of Heaven. Does your friends know what kind of anti-faith atheist you are in a public message board? Please tell me you are someone who swore an oath to the Constitution for the United States, since you would believe in your little power plays versus actual faith and truth in the source of the American Way of Life.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,329,071
|
Bolt (firearm) Should Bolt (firearm) redirect here?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,335,756
|
` Well, dear Ahasuerus: It is actually difficult to edit any page in Wikipedia without Muslims jumping at you and trying to censor you with all sorts of excuses. You must understand that the freedom of speech for Muslims is an alien concept. In Islamic countries if you say something against Islam they kill you. Where they can't kill you, they censor you. Wikipedia seems to be dominated by Muslims. This of course is not true in all the pages where Muslims have no interest, but when the interest of Islam comes in, they can be quite bullish in making their word prevail. But that is another story. This article started with some explanation like this: In recent years especially after the 9/11 some observers, including Muslim dissidents have stated that Islam presents a threat bigger than Nazism not to just the Western world but to all non-Islamic countries. They have labeled those who defend Islam and try to be politically correct about it, the today’s useful idiots. [Ali Sina] states: “They are idiots because they speak without knowledge of Islam and its threat to mankind and they are useful to the Islamists with whose help they can penetrate the non-Muslim countries and destroy them from within.” The same author writes: “More abhorrent than war is making peace with evil. In the words of the 18th Century British parliamentarian Edmund Burke, ``All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.`` Those who advocate peace with Islam are idiots of this century. If we do not stand against Islam it will grow and then billions will die. Trying to appease Muslims is foolish. It is informed by ignorance of Islam. Most cancers are treatable, if detected in time. But if ignored, they will grow to a stage that will kill you. Today we have the choice. We can either fight Islam and extirpate it before it threatens our existence or wait and face the apocalypses.” Muslims obviously don't like Ali Sina. For some reason anything you post here from him they will delete at once. So the above passage that explained the concept was deleted. The administrator SlimVirgin despite claiming impartiality, has yet to show that in actions. I could be wrong but for reasons that I explained to her, I have still to be convinced of that claim. I found out that she is Iranian, like Ali Sina, but of course most Iranians are still Muslims. She even once tried to discredit Ali Sina saying that he is Islamophobic. Obviously she sees genuine criticism of Islam unwarranted and interprets that as Islamophobia. My judgement about her is just based on my first impression and I could be wrong. I have explained to her my concern about her impartiality already and I hope she will eventually show I had misjudged her. In Wikipedia there is a lot of Islamic propaganda which are not true at all, but generally critical views about Islam do not survive. Why? If Wikipedia is impartial shouldn’t we give equal space to both sides? Would we accept if e.g. scientologist or any other cultists try to take over the Wikipedia and disallow any criticism of their cult? What is happening is very disturbing. There are hundreds of pages in Wikipedia that are misleading because they are edited and controlled by Muslims and as soon as you try to post anything showing the other side of the coin they revert it and even call your contribution “hate speech”. What about the Quran? Isn’t that book a hate speech? Funny thing is that they throw at you the basic rules of Wikipedia when in reality it is they who constanly breach those rules. If you try to write anything that Muslims don’t like they will delete it with invalid justifications. This is a very disturbing trend. For example the quotes of Ali Sina were removed because, as they said, he is not notable. There are 200,000 pages talking about faith freedom international. There have been death threats in Islamic sites against him, there are a few Islamic sites created just to refute him. Doesn’t all that say that he is notable at least to be quoted? Finally if he is notable enough to have a page in Wikipedia why his quotes should not be published? I am not familiar with the structure of Wikipedia, but I suppose there must be some committee that would check into complaints. (All I am hoping is that this committee is not already taken over by Islamists) Is there a forum where important questions such as the direction Wikipedia is taking is discussed? Sorry, this subject might have not belonged to this page but these are things I would like to discuss. Is there a place to do that? My point is that if Wikipedia loses its impartiality and becomes the guardian angel of a certain cult or religion, it loses its credibility fast. 05:13 2
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
26,354,426
|
* Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Coolcat, Davenbelle and Stereotek/mentorship
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
26,358,093
|
:Did they also say something on the LUNAR-A launch date?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,363,682
|
` == blanking == Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! | Esperanza `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,367,205
|
== Margaret Turnbull == Per the discussion at Deletion review, I have restored this article and relisted it on AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Turnbull (2nd nomination). -
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
26,373,196
|
: I believe you simply did not explain why the article should be divided and try to reach an agreement.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
26,374,717
|
==RfA== What I did was actually to restore a lot of comments, including BYT's vote, but some other stuff was apparently lost in that process. I apologize if I have contributed to the confusion there, but fact is that I was actually also a bit confused myself about what was actually going on, and the same time the servers are terribly slow today... However, when I now take a closer look at the diffs there, it all seems to have been solved (due to your efforts!). I apologize again if my edits somehow made a mess there, but it was never my intention.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.