rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25,371,031
|
== Thanks! == Your dog is just the right size for barbecue. Yum!
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
25,371,382
|
== You're a real cunt, you know that? == You're a real cunt, you know that?
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
25,373,767
|
Dai Grepher: Well then lets find out what arbitration thinks the article should state, shall we? How much time do you need to prepare your side of the debate?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,377,752
|
cristibur, Ok i understand that you don't want ot believe me that Tarom has destinations at Montreal, it's okay. I want just ot tell you that the destinations is not me who invented. I took them from the Tarom's official website, at site's map, in update timetable. I also to tell to check on admtl.com and to look at airlines serving Dorval and Mirabel.If you don't want anymore to answer here, no problem, me to I'll not post anymore.I'm sorry that we quarreled. ArthurNorbert
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,377,871
|
, and oyu sure gonna see the writen:Tarom Romanian Airlines
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,381,011
|
== COPYVIO Tags- What's the procedure == Graemel, How do you tag URL's for copyright violations? Should it just be addressed on the talk page, or in the article. The WP policy says you should flag the links and allow an admin to review. Please advise. Jeff
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,384,543
|
` Removed the ``stub.`` This isn't a geographic article. `
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,387,969
|
`Well if people had not vandalized all that detailed info in the first place that would not be necessary would it? Double standard. They broke the rules and called me the real victim here the ``vandal``. Saul-Paul Sirag and Creon Levit at NSAA AMES have all those details. I have them somewhere. When I find them I will put them in. But for now as reprinted in my book Super Cosmos p. 25 on Amazon My discovery of the recently observed SUPERSOLID was published in PHYSICS LETTERS Vol 30A, No 5 3 Nov 1969 months before Nobel Prize Tony Leggett published his similar prediction. The title of my paper is ``DESTRUCTION OF SUPERFLOW IN UNSATURATED 4He FILMS AND THE PREDICTION OF A NEW CRYSTALLINE PHASE OF 4He WITH BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION. Pages 23 -26 have quotes from real BIG SHOT physicists about my work that someone vandalized because it refuted their libel or slander and smears that I am merely a ``kook`` and a ``crank`` and a ``crackpot`` - these are not personal attacks? Huh? ``Dear Jack: Congratulations! What greater pleasure can a physicist have than see a long range prediction finally come true. David`` David Finkelstein on March 26, 2005. Finkelstein emeritus from Georgia Tech Also on Feb 16, 2005 ``Jack, Your solid He4 superfluid paper is wonderful! You actually did something once of very great importance - and apparently you did not realize this. This paper is a precursor to quantum gravity, and much more important in that regard than string theory (you can quote me). George`` George Chapline, Jr Ed Teller's Golden Boy at Lawrence Livermore for many years, PhD in physics from Cal Tech. ``To whom it may concern, The Glogower Susskind paper of 1963 which introduced phase operators for a quantum oscillator was in direct response to discussions between Glogower, Susskind, and Jack Sarfatti. Sarfatti's contributions were significant. The correct attribution should be to the 'Glogower, Sarfatti, Susskind' operators. Sincerely, Leonard Susskind`` Professor of Physics, Stanford University written on Dec 31, 2004 All three of these reports were vandalized off the article on me and replaced with a false claim from I think Chris Hillman that my co-worker Alexander Burinski in Moscow said that my formula B(curved spacetime tetrad) = (hG/c^3)^1/2'd'(Goldstone Phase of Higgs Field) was nonsense. Burinski refuted that false allegation allegedly made by Chris Hillman? Instead they let smears by alt.Kooks and other unqualified people stand in a prominent place and erased the above remarks by important physicists! Now that' the truth. Now as to my Goldstone paper with Stoneham later head of Theoretical Physics, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, Didcot, Berks (see photo in my autobiography ``Destiny Matrix`` on Amazon. The American Institute of Physics in 1980 or so published a Resource Letter on Symmetry in Physics citing that paper as noteworthy. You can ask Ray Chiao at Berkeley Physics Dept on how my laser filament paper influenced his early experiments. You can ask Creon Levit at NASA AMES about out oft-cited paper on applying Bohm's quantum potential to molecular structure computer simulations. Nobel Prize physcist Brian Josephson has been similarly smeared like me because of his interest in the paranormal and cold fusion. Even John Wheeler has been smeared because he uses literate language and metaphor that rankles the hacks who can barely formulate a sentence and hide behind unreadable jargon. To say I use jargon is Pot calling Kettle Black. I am a much clearer writer than most. Finally my paper explaining the universal slope of the Regge trajectories of the hadronic resonances as tiny Kerr black holes with strong short-range gravity G* ~ 10^40G on 1 fermi scale was published by Herbert Frohlich in 1973 in his journal ``Collective Phenomena``. It caused Abdus Salam (Nobel Prize) to invite me to ICTP in Trieste, Italy 1973-74. You can ask historian of physics Jagdish Mehra about that. He was there. BTW I was tutored in group theory at Cornell by Robert Brout who I later met again in Brussels in 1973 when I visited Prigogine. Yuval Neeman and others in Israel are working still on this idea connecting QCD to strong short-range gravity. You can also ask Eshel Ben-Jacob head of the Israel Physical Society about me. No, Wikis for shame, for shame! This has been a vicious smear against me perhaps politically motivated because of my national security work. I do not know, but others may well find out. Also my adventures in the weird - paranormal, UFOs have been part of a long-standing covert intelligence operation involving American, British, French, Israeli and other Intelligence organizations. Some of this is explained in all three of my books since 2002 all on Amazon. To focus on my early adventures as a young man 30 years ago as if that's the whole story is clearly a gross distortion. Also I wrote almost all the physics parts of Gary Zukav's best seller (millions of copies) ``Dancing Wu Li Masters``. I did not write the goofy New Age philofawzy in the book. That was all Gary. Also it is insulting to say Author House is ``self-publishing`` - the context in the global smear spin of the campagin to defame me, is that somehow this makes the books illigitimate. Everyone knows the economics of publishing is changing and that Author House is the in the vanguard because of the takeover of publishing by Mega Corporations diluting the quality of literature to the level of Wal Mart. [User:Jack Sarfatti|JackSarfatti]] 4:01PM, 12 October 2005 (PCT) `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,392,160
|
Disambiguation page needed to point to Ma-hi-ya-sqa the sacred white buffalo.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,400,971
|
i think this som bitch is fuckin nuts...i mean who the fuck cares....does this info help the yankees win the pennant? no. does it help me pay child support for my 14 kids all of different racial decent? no....in short FUCK THIS
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
25,401,346
|
Your assumption is wrong, LevKamensky is a friend of mine, not even a close friend, we share the same IP address.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,402,360
|
` Thanks for that tip. Yes, I will learn how to use it, since everything I do uses math - I mean when I am not fighting off rabid currs nipping at my cuffs. Can one put pictures and sound in as well? Yes, back to Uncle Ed. There are matters of general policy here: 1. Defamatory words like ``crank``, ``kook``, ``crackpot`` should be banned by Wikipedia as they are literally used in the commission of hate crimes against dissident minorities. They EMOTIONALLY mean the same as ``Kike``, ``Nigger``, ``FAGGOT`` et-al. I and others like Nobel Prize winner Brian Josephson are persecuted for daring to write about the paranormal, about consciousness, about UFOS, about cold fusion (Brian's interest). We are automatically stereotyped as ``kooks`` by clueless fearful generally intellectual inferiors who mistake their inability to understand what is on the page as our fault. Rather than they rising to us, we are to stoop to their low level of achievement and keep away from Taboo Topics. Is that a Free Society? How is that better than 7th Century Talabanism? We dissident physicists and there are many in the closet are treated as second-class citizens without the same rights that the majority like CH pretends to stand for keep for themselves in a double standard. One can say ``Jack Sarfatti's ideas are highly original and advanced and not easily understood by the majority of people who reject them.`` Something like that is accurate. If one says something negative then they must justify it with a precise quote with a name otherwise it is simply vicious defamation. It is simply a hate crime on the WEB. We live in a SYMBOLIC INFO NATION in CYBERSPACE. Words are everything. WORDS are WEAPONS! Soon Internet Law will evolve and the kinds of defamations of my character seen on these pages by dillettantes will be judged as HATE CRIMES like beating up a Gay Man or lynching a Black Man used to be. How can anyone reading my words, looking at my math, so insult me as to call me a such words as ``crank``. Why not say what you really mean deep down which is ``Jack Sarfatti is a Jew``? Do I sound like Shylock in The Merchant of Venice? 2. Flaky internet sources like Alt.Kooks, Crank.Dot.Net should not be cited to debase and humiliate anyone deemed worthy enough to have a page in Wiki. They are cultural PORNOGRAPHY of no redeeming social value. 3. Critiques should be COMPETENT, as DSiegel's is not when he cites Martin Gardner. A solid TEXTUAL justification is required like one must do as a grad student learning to do PhD research. The basic issue here is QUALITY CONTROL, ACCURACY, FAIRNESS, JUSTICE. 07:50 PM, 12 October 2005 (PCT)`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,402,571
|
`PS Even if my formula B = (hG/c^3)^1/2'd'(Vacuum Phase) were ``incorrect`` does that ipso facto make me into a crackpot? Not even Chris Hillman understood what the formula meant, though others who are real physicists, do. The idea is a good one, indeed a great and beautiful one, and those that mock it now will not have a good place in history. I guarantee it. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,402,780
|
` Indeed it is ironic, even hypocritical and inconsistent for Wikis to attack a book for being ``self-published`` when Wiki itself is the Quintessential Self-Publishing Machine!`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,405,629
|
` Definitely his views contradict the current principles of Wikipedia. I don't think his intention is to comply with them. If no one expresses dissatisfaction and advocates change, there would be no improvement. On the other hand there are users who are abusing the system covertly, like user Zoe and user Mikkalai. User Zoe is using Wikipedia to torture people by artificially finding fault in people's contributions. If she is not sufering from Sadistic Personality Disorder, why doesn't she make contributions herself? What's there in it for her? User Mikkalai's point of view is not neutral. User Mikkalai from Belarussia (an area notorious for right wing tendencies) who is behind the current edition of the Intelligentsia article seems to have a political has reconstructionist, zarist, and nationalistic bias and his edits distort the truth through omission, taking things out of context, and other tools of propoganda. For some reason he stops on pre-revolution Russia, as if there was no further developments after that? Is that neutral? The important role intelligentsia played during the Soviet epoch (70 years of history) is understated if not absent from the article. There is no explanation of the role Jewish intelligents played in the revolution, and why many Jewish intelligents joined the revolution (pogroms and cherta osedlosti) is not mentioned. He is quoting Lenin as calling Intelligents ``the shit of the nation``, while he does not mention that Lenin and Trotsky were intelligents themselves. The attribute of a cosmopolitan is not mentioned either, obviously because it is associated with Jews. He listed for deletion about Abram Kamensky, under the pretext of not being notable enough to be in Wikipedia. Abram Kamensky was mentioned in Russian Jewish Encyclopedia, which is a printed encyclopedia compiled by international experts. How is it that this person is not notable enough to be mentioned in an online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone? This person was mentioned in a Solzhenitsin's novel, he was a deputy minister of the ministry of national affairs, one of the first people to join the bolshevik party, as mentioned in the debate involved in the founding of the short-lived Donetsko-Krivorogian Soviet Republic, father of a well-known russian art critic. This is enough to make him notable. The reason he was demoted to a lower post was because he was briefly a member of the Trostkyst opposition, which Stalin didn't forgive him for. At any rate, the argument that he was somewhat obscure by the time of his death does not hold water, because many people who were famous died in obscurity. The point is, user Mikkalai from Belorussia does not possess a thorough enough knowledge of Soviet history to make that judgement. The reason he listed the article for deletion was personal and political bias. I thought the purpose of Wikipedia was so people could add research and facts to someone's start-up. Not to list every start-up that is perhaps not well researched enough for deletion. User Mikkalai even listed Aleksander Kamensky article for deletion for reason of non-notability one of the most well known art crtitics in later twentieth century Russia, and an internationally recognized expert on Marc Chagall, whose book Marc Chagall, The Russian Years was an international best-seller, and was postthamously reprinted and presented at the Tretiakov gallery with Marc Chagall's granddaughters in attendance. What do you think, this guy knows what he is talking about? He has vandalized Aleksander Kamensky article. He took out Kamensky's definition of the stern style that was one of the three quotes from one of his books, translated personally by LevKamensky for the article. While in the articles discussion page he requested stern style to be defined. This shows that he deleted it without even reading it. If that is not vandalism, than what is? This is a wolf in sheeps clothing. I suggest reverting the article to LevKamensky's last edition and blocking it from further editing. Wikipidia articles are always on the first page when you make a search on Google, or another search engine. This makes Wikipidia a very influential tool in swaying public opinion. Many people complain that Americans are dumb, and they don’t know basic facts, or that they are shallow. Well now with the internet, they are becoming more aware, but don’t leave them in the hands of half-illiterate graduate students, or right wing fanatics. Why was the Russian Intelligentsia category deleted, that LevKamensky created, that contained some three dozen brightest minds in Russian culture of the XX century? Why does the Russian social groups category contain cosacs and peasants but not intellectuals? We think this is more political than neutral. So stop using Wikipedia as a political soapbox. At least LevKamensky is open about his opinions, he is not manipulative like these charachters.`
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,419,993
|
==User Alkiviadis== I uploaded a wrong logo and replaced by mistake the logo of BNP Paribas. I uploaded then one from it's site but it doesn;t look the same. I am sorry for the mistake and I would be thankful if you could re-upload it.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,420,799
|
Moronvilliers was totally destroyed in WWI and was also a dite for French dry-nuclear testing?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,429,532
|
== Hi == Hi Husky. Just to let you know, This is actually speaking, but I am logged out because for some reason I can't access my talk page when I'm logged in at the moment. I see you're sending anti-vandalism messages to the IP that I am using, Ipod's or something, please note that I am not vandalising anything, I assume it's someone else on this IP. I'm trying to ask an admin about my talk page issue, so please don't block this IP for the time being. If you could just aknowledge here, not my talk page for obvious reasons, I'd be grateful. Thanks
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,436,487
|
) *Reasons for Name Change. :Isabel is the Spanish form of the name. :If the name is to be Anglicized it should be Elizabeth. :Isabella is not the English form of the name. :Isabella is not the Spanish form of the name. :Foreign names are often Anglicized in order to facilitate their pronunciation in English which is not the case here. :Isabella sounds harsh to the ear of the Hispanophone. :The use of Isabella can be attributed to the anti-Spanish Black Legend. :Even though Isabella has been used traditionally there is no technical problem in redirecting it to Isabel. :The many comments below over the months and years expressing dissatisfaction with the use of Isabella is ample proof of the desirability of changing the name. :Since most editors in the English Wikipedia are monolingual Anglophones a simple count of those in favor versus those in opposition to the proposed name change based on a naming policy which favors the view of the majority would be unfair to the minority of Hispanphones who access the English Wikipedia. :Simple respect for the wishes of Hispanophones should trump all other considerations. :(MST
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,461,468
|
Theres also a cheat where u lag and can still hit people and launch rockets from ur sword while playin a only sword match.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,481,638
|
` ==More False Allegations== I HAVE NOT MADE ANY LEGAL THREATS I HAVE A SUGGESTION. WHY DON'T YOU SIMPLY REMOVE EVERYTHING ABOUT ME FROM WIKI? I WOULD BE HAPPY WITH THAT. YOU GUYS ARE TOO LITERAL AND HUMORLESS FOR ME TO DEAL WITH. I AM USED TO MORE COMPLEX AND SUBTLE MINDS. THERE IS A COARSENESS IN THE RESOLVING POWER OF THE ``EDITORS`` WHO ARE NOT ABLE TO MAKE THE RELEVANT DISTINCTIONS. YOU GUYS CAN'T SEEM TO SEE WHAT DAVID BOHM CALLED 'SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES``. Right now I consider that several of your ``editors`` are in fact Cyber-Terrorists who are stalking me. CH is a good example. He has been stalking me on the WEB years before Wiki. I suspect some of the others are in league with him. [Jack Sarfatti]`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
25,482,276
|
` == Last invasion of England? == ``It remains the last successful contested military invasion of England.`` This is a very romantic sort of statement, but I think at least Henry VII of England and William III of England (and perhaps others) would have begged to differ – both led very successful contested invasions of England! `
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,483,217
|
October 2005 (UTC) If that is correct, we are seeing another wierd storm like Vince on our hands. 04:01, 14
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,486,952
|
`Legal action? Legal action? Are you talking to me? I don't need to take no damn legal action. What are you talking about anyway? On Oct 13, 2005, at 7:45 PM, Cliff May, Foundation for the Defence of Democracies, Washington DC wrote to Jack Sarfatti: Walid Phares weighs in: Cliff Either suggested suicide: someone gave him the revolver and suggested it's better to trigger.. Or assisted suicide: someone shot him and a press release was issued Here is what I wrote and said so far ``Top news on al Jazeera and in the Arab world, the officially dubbed ``suicide`` of Brigadier General Gaazi Kanaan, Syria's interior minister is a high indicator of storms to come. The Security General had ruled Syrian occupied Lebanon for almost two decades. His knowledge of the intelligence and terrorism web is boundless. Some sources in Syria and Lebanon, reacting to the news this morning called the death, an ``assisted suicide.`` Kanaan, according to these sources knew ``significantly`` about the assassins of former Prime Minister Hariri. He ``committed`` suicide as the time President Assad would be addressing world opinion and the American public via CNN.`` Walid Phares Phares on al Hurra TV: ``Syria: General Kanaan's ``assisted`` suicide?`` Phares on al Hurra TV: ``General Ghazi Kanaan was the security ruler of Syrian-occupied Lebanon for decades. He has ordered executions, torture, transfer to Syrian prisons and has been in the center of Syrian connections with Terrorist regimes and organization for 30 years. He knew mountains of information on Terror and crimes executed in Lebanon and the region. He was on the UN commission's list of high suspects in the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. His suicide was most likely ``assisted.`` -Original Message- From: Jack Sarfatti Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 4:26 PM To: Cliff May Subject: Re: SYRIAN SADDAM'S SUICIDE? Yeah sure. Odd, but perhaps not surprising since he was the Syrian Intel guy in Lebanon. Maybe it was payback for the assassination? I am going to check out Greer's Colby story again with my friend who knew him well. On Oct 13, 2005, at 12:05 PM, Cliff May wrote: Also (from NR's Corner): SYRIAN INTERIOR MINISTER'S ``SUICIDE`` [Andy McCarthy] The Washington Times reports: ``A Syrian official who declined to speak on the record told the Associated Press that Gen. Kenaan shot himself in the mouth with a silencer-equipped gun.`` How thoughtful to use a silencer. Wouldn't want to disturb your neighbors down the hall or call lots of attention to what was going on in your office. That would probably be your top priority while blowing your brains out. Posted at 06:19 AM [Jack Sarfatti} `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,489,588
|
```But if it be a sin to covet honour, I am the most offending soul alive.``== 1) ``It is simply a fact that many critics of Sarfatti are very negative about his theories and speculations.`` False. You have not given even ONE valid example of that. I doubt you would be able to understand what the physics is about anyway. You cannot produce even ONE objective valid refutation of any of my physics ideas by anyone. CH saying ``it's nonsense`` is not objective. It's not valid. It is not rationally argued. No reasons are given. Also I retracted my FTL Communication Idea 15 years ago. Furthermore, making a mistake in physics does not make one into a crackpot! Also, you have suppressed the fact that I predicted the SUPERSOLID decades before it was discovered and before Tony Leggett, who gets the credit published his paper. George Chapline and David Finkelstein confirm that in writing and you have consistently deleted that important factual information from the article. That is hardly fair is it? 2) ``It is also a fact that Usenet is not the usual venue for publishing even highly unconventional ideas in physics.`` Sez who? That is exactly what Usenet SHOULD be for! INSTANT WORLD WIDE COMMUNICATION OF IMPORTANT IDEAS NOT THE CRAP THAT MOST IDIOTS PUT ON IT. Peer review is a joke in physics today. Everyone in the field knows it. The free market place of ideas is supposed to be the Wiki idea, or am I wrong? Mainstream journals DO NOT PUBLISH UNCONVENTIONAL IDEAS! What planet are you on? 3) Sarfatti has been considered negatively by many since his involvment with paraphysics dating back to ths 1970s, long before the existince of Usenet, for which I have proveided reputable sources (and can provide more). STOP RIGHT THERE! You just committed a HATE CRIME! Are you ABOVE THE LAW? So working on paranormal stuff automatically makes one a crackpot? Is that your position? That's like saying it's OK to lynch niggers because they are less than human. Same idea. Think about it. Sarfatti thinking outside the box means he is not entitled to the same respect as someone taking the safe boring path through life. Who are your reputable sources? Show them. Martin Gardner? Show where his exact text justifies your false extrapolation. Also, I do not in 2005 hold to the same ideas I did in 1975! Why focus on 1975 and exclude 2005? 4) It is also a fact that were it not for his provocative statements and the largely negative reaction to them, Sarfatti would not be in any way notable. False. I would be notable for several ideas in physics. The quotations by David Finkelstein, Lenny Susskind, George Chapline and Tony Smith prove that. It's OK to say ``negative reaction``, but it's not OK to LYNCH ME and DEFAME ME with putting ``crank`` and ``crackpot`` on a very scant article in such a way that that is the KEY MESSAGE the casual reader will go away from. Now ANY LAWYER will tell you you are treading on shaky ground if you do that and cannot prove your case should it ever go to court. This is NOT a threat. I am on several TV shows and I am in Paramount Pictures Star Trek. That does not make me notable. I am cited in several popular books. That also makes me notable. For example, Herbert Gold's book Bohemia, not to mention The Dancing Wu Li Master that I ghost wrote most of for Gary Zukavand that sold a jillion copies and is still selling after 25 years. My original Space-Time and Beyond sold fairly well also. So look David E. Siegel from Two Independence Way Suite 100, Princeton NJ 08540, your research on me is pure shlock. It's fragmentary and it gives a completely distorted image of who I really am and what I really think and WHY I AM NO LE! 5)`` Now, none of that means that his critics are correct. It is true that many well-known people are strogly attacked, and it is also true that many eventually widely acccepted scientific ideas are considered absurd and crankish early in their history. (Continental drift comes to mind and there are many other examples.) It is possible (although I belive unlikely) that Sarfatti's ideas will be similarly respected in the future. (Of course that fact that many respected theories were once thought crankish does not alter the fact that most ideas thought crankish are always so regarded the crank thory that proves correct is a rare beast.)`` OK, THAT'S ENOUGH you SOB! I have several MAINSTREAM PAPERS of importance that are recognized. Details were systematically vandalized from the article. Prediction of the SUPERSOLID is a KEY ONE. That ALONE makes me NO LE as a physicist. You DEFAME ME here and you maliciously SUPPRESS the facts. You owe me a BIG PUBLIC APOLOGY! So what you SYSOP geeks are above the law here? You can defame me, but I can't defend myself? This is still American not the Soviet Gulag! 6) ``But the fact is that his reputation as
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,491,583
|
==Suicide?== From what I understand, this is still suspected. Am I outdated?
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,492,495
|
` You are another Genius I see. ;-) ==Fred Alan Wolf== Wiki has a page on my long-time partner Fred Alan Wolf who has written many books on the same kind of paranormal consciousness stuff that I am skewered for. Yet nowhere on Fred's page is he called a ``kook``, a ``crackpot`` etc. Try the stupid Google test on him. 12:26 AM, 14 October 2005 (PCT)`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,493,301
|
My understanding is that NCOs who join are on probation for their first four years. Officers are not, because they only serve four, as opposed to an NCO who could serve as much as fifteen or so.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,493,707
|
Books that mention Jack Sarfatti significantly include== Not a complete list: Cosmic Trigger by Robert Anton Wilson The Star Gate Conspiracy by Pincknett & Prince Time Warps by John Gribbon Alien Intelligence by ... Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav [Jack Sarfatti] 12:58 AM PCT October, 14, 2005 ==
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,494,060
|
`? But the real question is WHY is that noteworthy? Is it news? Why don't you also write about how my farts smell? Shall I write about how you pick your nose in public and then eat your bubbkas? Shall I write that you never wipe your arse well enough and that there are always urine stains down your pants and you frequently forget to zip your fly as you eat twinkies? Suppose I write in the article about you that many people think you are a pedophile and in fact there are several demented people on the net who have said that you are a pedophile? Is that not actionable? This is all hypothetical Mr. David E. Siegel because in fact I have no evidence at all that you are a pedophile and I am not at all accusing you of being a pedophile right? This is all an academic exercise to get through your obviously thick skull that me calling you a pedophile, I mean simply reporting that other people have written such lies, would be actionable if I really were to do that on the basis of baseless reports by vicious low-life scumbags who were out to do you harm. You writing that I am a ``crank`` etc. is exactly as bad as if I were to falsely accuse you of being a predatory pedophile, which I am not doing of course, simply because I found such trash about you on the Usenet groups. Capsice`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,525,440
|
Oh, that's good to know. I'll go and fix the date in my list of cities in California.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,533,019
|
`Yes I was blocked again on Oct 14, 2004. Look I am not aware of the WIKI rules. Also some the Admins are baiting me. There is a group of maybe 30 of them forming a virtual cyber-terrorist cabal inside of Wiki IMHO. ==Victorian Station Master's Academy for Wiki Editors== On Oct 14, 2005, at 3:20 AM, ANTIGRAY@cs.com wrote: Victorian Station Masters Academy Founded 1839 Greetings Prospective Station Masters. This course leads to an SM Degree. At Victorian Station Masters Academy rigorous training for a position with a great future (but anchored firmly in the past) awaits you. We will train you to be a respected Station Master (SM) in the time-honored tradition of being an unimaginative SM who unduly emphasizes minutiae in the presentation or use of his knowledge, and can narrowly, stodgily, and often ostentatiously show how learned they are. Our graduates learn all the basics a great Station Master must master. You will be taught to be dull, ill-natured, and ill-humored, and narrowly inflexible in standards of conduct. The public expects this. A Station Master must be Self Righteous, convinced of his own righteousness especially in contrast with the actions and beliefs of others and narrow-mindedly moralistic. You will learn to be: Hidebound, extremely old-fashioned, tedious, tiresome because of the length or dullness of your prognostications, pompously Victorian, slow in perception or sensibility, and lacking brilliance or luster. Our graduates are renowned for having an inflexible and ultraconservative character. We offer advanced classes in arrogance, imperiousness, and special workshops to practice irritably sullen and churlish mood and manner. Learn an imperious manner marked by arrogant assurance, so as to exercise arbitrary or overbearing control over and tyrannize subordinates. All Station Masters are taught to be MASTERFUL. When you graduate, you will have the ability to act authoritatively with an obstinate determination to enforce one's will. Our graduates typify the moral standards, attitudes, and conduct of the age of Victoria. You will take pride in being a stuffy and hypocritical representative figure of the Victorian era. Applications to register for the Class of 2006 are available at all train stations during normal business hours. ``Station Masters always know their station in life.`` ======================== Jack, Now you know where they get their training. Art ==Wikimedia is a Battlefield in the Cyber War on Terror== Background information bcc D-Day On Oct 14, 2005, at 11:21 AM, Dan Smith wrote: ``Jack,`` << I have not seen ONE IOTA of valid technical information.>> ``I agree with that. What I should have said was that the Visitation was of UTs, initially masquerading as ETs. It was the ET version that was given to the Aviary, as the basic cover story. How much of that ET version was actually contrived by the UTs is moot.`` The distinction between UT and ET is not sharp. Basically Q-Level Metric Engineering is UT. We can get there fairly soon. I am not willing to wait another 200 years. ``Your more general concern is that the actual UT technology has or will fall into the wrong hands.`` Sure, but as a physicist I really am curious how it all works in principle. I think I now understand how. Let me try to make the idea as simple as possible, without making it simpler than is possible. Cipher of Genesis (Carlo Suares, Paris, 1973) Pre-inflation unstable false-vacuum is pretty much like the massless vacuum Puthoff & Co are currently stuck in leading them nowhere. Phase transition to our universe, one of an infinity, forms the giant local vacuum wave AKA Higgs field. The fabric of space-time is the FM modulation of the Goldstone Phase of this Tsunami inside the post-inflationary vacuum starting off in the hot Big Bang as per orthodox theory. The dark zero point energy comes from the AM modulation of the Higgs field and is in two universal forms one repulsive and on attractive. On the large scale ~ 73& of vacuum is repulsive, 23% attractive. We are only a tiny % of total after you subtract off the hydrogen-helium gas clouds of proto-star stuff. Metric engineering of WWD & Wormhole is simply getting a Josephson type effect phase-lock to the macro-quantum vacuum phase. B(x) = (hG/c^3)^1/2'd'(Vacuum Phase - Control Phase) The local invariant scalar metric field is of the form g(x) = (1 + B(x))(Flat Space Time)(1 + B(x)) = guv(x)dx^udx^v suppressing indices in the Einstein-Cartan tetrad field formalism for pedagogy. BTW be nice to have 3D computer simulations of the g(x) field for the several exact solutions of Einstein's GR Kerr-Newman, Alcubierre etc. ``At this point, however, your concerns appear jumbled. The best I can make of them is that the UTs have come here specifically to conspire with our enemies against the U.S., and/or we are less informed about the UT phenomenon than many other nations, due to the disinformational efforts of various external and internal agents.`` ``Quiet calm deliberation disentangles every knot.`` Gondoliers The clear picture is that the Visitors came here specifically in response to our A-bomb. Scott Littleton's ``Alien Raj`` says different. They have been here since Eden. Yahweh is ET/UT et-al. Definitely 1945 triggered Roswell 1947 et-al and my 1953 http://stardrive.org/cartoon/spectra.html and all the events starting at SRI/CIA/RV in 1973 (on tape BTW) as told now in my 3 books Destiny Matrix Space-Time & Beyond II Super Cosmos ``If anything, they were intent on preventing a nuclear war. This included their involvement in the peaceful collapse of the Soviets under Gorbachev, a probable contactee, as we agree.`` Yes, much of that story in which I was directly involved is in my 3 books for the record. Esalen, John Mack & Werner Erhard part of that story. See EYE-WITNESS chapters by Jagdish Mann, Saul-Paul Sirag & Kim Burrafato in Destiny Matrix ``All of your concerns are based mainly on the fact that you are being allowed/encouraged to speculate in public about UFO physics. You suspect, and rightly so, that your efforts are being underwritten by the USG. This flat out doesn’t make sense. Why would the USG be allowing you and even paying you to inform our enemies? It would be due either to unimaginable stupidity or considered confidence.`` The latter for sure. ``The whole point is that we are rapidly approaching D-day.`` It is prudent for us to assume so. ``It is all coming out, anyway. We are here to provide a sneak preview in order to gauge the response.`` Study what is happening in that regard on Wikimedia. The Occult Nazi-Islamofascist Cabal have triggered many of their useful idiot agents of influence to personally attack me there and elsewhere. http://qedcorp.com/book/psi/hitweapon.html ``The general air of confidence, so clearly exhibited by my interlocutor, is that what is about to transpire is deeply embedded in the cosmic plan. The larger outcome is not in doubt. It is all part of the cosmic teleology. It is written in the Strong Anthropic Principle, etc, etc. `` 10-4 OK fine. That is what ``Destiny Matrix`` means BTW. ``Cool it, Jack. Do what you are being paid to do. Breathe some new life into the moribund Physics Establishment. Help to bring them into the Promised Land.`` That may not be possible. The Old Guard will be dead soon enough anyway. It's the young people we need to focus on. ``And about all the flak, I suspect that much of it is intended just to add spice to our little soap opera. It’s working great!`` Yes, if Wikipedia did not exist, I suppose we would have had to invent them? Perhaps we did? ;-) << Who is The Master Mind Puppet Master? Is IT Human or More Than Human?>> << If information is kept from The Commander in Chief he should call in the Marines and Swat Teams and get the information by active measures if needed.>> ``I don’t suspect there is a puppet master. `` A power vacuum is dangerous. ``Yes, we have been in the dark about the Master Plan, but, as you know, we are on the verge of switching from management by directive, to management by objective. We have only to recognize the cosmic objective, i.e. the purpose of creation.`` OK, but you need to flesh that out with more detail. ``If any President wanted to know the plan, all he had to do was ask. I’m sure that some did. I asked my sister to have the White House check out my buddy at the Agency. Two months later ~400 newspapers carried Jack Anderson’s rather strange sounding column about a very minor incident involving the President and Deborah, which fact she blamed on me. There is a process here that is much bigger than you and me and even the Presidents. May I suggest a mustard seed of Faith? `` Ahchoo! ;-) From: Jack Sarfatti Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:24 PM To: Dan Smith Subject: Re: The day after tomorrow On Oct 14, 2005, at 5:16 AM, Dan Smith wrote: ``Jack, When you refer to the KGB and CIA, you
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,534,107
|
`No not at all. There is nothing about my work since 1975. It still says I filed a patent application, which is not true. It does not mention that I gave up on that particular FTL design in 1991. It does not mention that I predicted the SUPER SOLID before Tony Leggett did. That is major. It does not mention most of my mainstream papers. All of that info and more was vandalized from the article by my enemies. All that ``kook`` stuff should be removed. If you mention FBI get it right. What is on there now is false. The article as it stands now is unacceptible, it is incomplete, it contains false information, and it has too much negative spin. It is unbalanced. I have already given details. I will soon most likely be talking about this to millions of listeners on Talk Radio. On Oct 14, 2005, at 12:24 AM, ANTIGRAY@cs.com wrote: Hi Jack, They are talking about you on the coast to coast AM radio show right now. (George Noory's Show.) Art [Jack Sarfatti] `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,535,641
|
` ==Just who is stalking who here?== Anyone can get my address also. It is you who is harrassing me and I am simply defending myself trying to get you off my back. Fred Alan Wolf has been called a ``crank`` et-al by the same stupid Usenet people who call me those names and for the very same reasons. Yet, none of that defamatory slander/libel whatever is on the Wiki article on him. As soon as you remove that stuff about me, we can settle this amiably. [Jack Sarfatti]`
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
25,536,186
|
` == Thank you for supporting my RfA == I will promise very hard not to let the community, especially you, down. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,536,228
|
Upon whose authority can you delete material about you without peer review? If you dislike the article, then Afd it, isn;t this the process? Jeff
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,536,866
|
So which is it, vandalism or disruption. I have the right to open an Arbcom dispute on the matter following WP:RFM. Be assured I will. Your admin privileges need to be revoked based upon your conduct here. Jeff.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,540,147
|
If you're going to be using talk page comment templates, subst: them and remember to actually sign them. I deserve that much consideration. *
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,540,316
|
` ==George Noory Radio Talk Show Oct 13, 2004== Thanks. On Oct 14, 2005, at 3:04 PM, ANTIGRAY@cs.com wrote: Hi Jack, They were talking about you and Uri Geller and others involved in doing mind control stuff mostly. They should repeat the show this evening in your area. They do that here every night on the local radio station, replaying the show from the night before just before the new show comes on. I found the following article on a blog. The guest on C2C, Peter Lavenda, was talking about some of this. Art Remind me who Lavenda is. I may have met him in Brussels and Jerusalem. Is he a chemical physicist? Friday, October 07, 2005 The Colour out of Space I dreamed that I was in the grasp of a great and horrible paw; a yellow,hairy, five-clawed paw which had reached out of the earth to crush and engulfme. And when I stopped to reflect what the paw was, it seemed to me thatit was Egypt. - HP Lovecraft This is only a test At 5:05 on November 22, 1977, regular television programming in southern England was interrupted by a voice claiming to be that of ``Grahama,`` representative of the ``Ashtar Galactic Command,`` bearing the usual ``space brother`` boilerplate of coming in peace to save us from ouselves at the dawn of a New Age. It was quickly dismissed as a hoax, but an extremely complicated one to execute. Though the The Sunday Times the following December 4 surmised it was accomplished by students using just ``£80 worth of equipment powered by an ordinary car battery,`` no one ever claimed responsibility, and independent investigations found that the message must have cut into at least five transmitters simultaneously,and it evaded detection by monitoring equipment which did not even register an interruption, ``suggesting it was achieved in some way that by passed our electrical system.`` This was actually the second message from Grahama. A month earlier, he had said pointedly that ``We conveyed to Sir John Whitmore and to Dr. Puharich that we would interfere on your radio and television communication systems to relay when the civilisations are coming close to landing on your planet Earth. It is now in motion. We wish you to know that we love you.`` That ``Grahama`` would single out the aristocratic former racing champion Whitmore and parapsychologist and MKULTRA researcher Andrija Puharich suggests this was no simple hoax: both men were deeply involved with a decades'-long channelled communication with entities representing a universal hierarchy sometimes called the ``70 Brotherhoods of the Great White Brotherhood.`` The entities governing our reality identified themselves The Nine. Another link to Whitmore and Puharich was British author Stuart Holyroyd's recently published Prelude to the Landing on Planet Earth, which the two had commissioned as an account of their work with the Nine. In the book, Holroyd wrote that the Nine intended to “interrupt televisionand radio transmissions during the period 18th to 22nd November.” Regarding the television interruptions, Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince write in The Stargate Conspiracy that, ``as usual, there were only two options considered: either the wholething was genuine and extraterrestrials had really spoken to the southern English through their television sets; or it was hoax, just done for a laugh.The idea that such a message could be easily contrived by, for example, an intelligence agency that would have the necessary technical skills has never,to our knowledge, even been considered.`` Of course there are several pages about me in that same book and I worked with Puharich for a short while. This seems a bizarre oversight given the circumstantial connections to Whitmore and Puharich,and especially the latter's service in Army Intelligence and later as a CIA contractor researching the induction of altered states of consciousness.(Whitmore, incidentally, is now also Britain's ``number one business coach,`` training top executives from companies such as Barclays, Lloyds, Pricewaterhouse Coopers and Rolls Royce.) Uri Geller,for a time one of the Nine's channellers, told Picknett and Prince that ``the CIA brought Puharich in to come and get me out of Israel,`` and in his essay In the Thick of It, physicist Jack Sarfatti writes that ``Puharich was Geller's case officer in America with money provided by Sir John Whitmore.`` Andrija Puharich and Sir John Whitmore The Deep Space Nine The ``Council of Nine`` have been delivering curiously consistent messagesthrough a succession of mediums to influential patrons with names like DuPont, Astor and Bronfman since the early 1950s, and nearly always in the shadow of military intelligence. Until his death in 1995 Puharich made his homein that shadow, researching shamanic pharmacology and electronic mind control. Initial contact was made during a sitting of Puharich's CIA cut-out ``RoundTable Foundation`` on New Year's Eve, 1952, at precisely 9 p.m., when the entities disclosed themselves through the tranceivership of Dr DG Vinod asthe ``Nine Principles or Forces.`` In the early 1970s, Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry was a regular at the sessions of channeller Phylis Schlemmer to whom the Nine had revealed themselves through the manifestation of a spirit guide called ``Tom.`` Schlemmer initially assumed Tom must be her grandfather Thomas, who died when she was a child. In September 1974 Roddenberry asked Tom the question, ``To whom am I talking? Do you have a name?`` Tom's reply, through the entranced Schlemmer, as quoted by Picknett and Price: As you know, I am the spokesman for the Nine. But I also have another position,which I have with you in the project. I will try to give you names so you can understand in what you work and who we are. I may not pronounce who I am in a manner which you would understand because of the problem in the Being's [i.e., Schlemmer] brain, but I will explain so that the Doctor [Puharich] perhaps will understand. I am Tom, but I am also Harmarchis, I am also Harenkur, I am also known as Tum and I am known as Atum. It took 22 years, and Gene Roddenberry, for the Nine to reveal themselves as The Nine, the Great Ennead of ancient Egypt: Atum, Shu, Tefnut, Geb, Nut, Osiris, Isis, Set and Nepthys. Their message amounts to, We're back, and now it's personal. (How much the Nine may have influenced Roddenberry is unknown. His involvement began several years after the original Star Trek series was cancelled, but a character named Vinod pops up in an episode of Deep Space Nine entitled ``Paradise.``) In 1954, with Puharich back in uniform and stationed at the US Army ChemicalCenter in Edgewood, Maryland, a young Dutch sculptor named Harry Stone was being tested at the Round Table for his psychometric powers. Handed an Egyptian pendant that had belonged to the mother of Akenaten, he fell into a trance,began uttering strange words and drawing hieroglyphics on a sheet of paper.In English he spoke of a drug that would open a gateway to the gods, andof entering an under ground hall where a statue of a dog-headed man came tolife. Puharich was sent the drawings and a transcription of Stone's words,who took them to another Army doctor at Edgewood who, write Picknett and Prince, ``just happened to be an expert in extremely rare and archaic forms of hieroglyphs``, and to Puharich's surprise confirmed their authenticity. Stone had identified himself as Rahotep, and named his wife as Nefert, and mentioned the Pharoah Khufu. Puharich was then astonished to discover that a man named Rahotep, married to Nefert, was known from Egyptian history, and likely lived under the reign of Khufu. Most significantly, Rahotephad been the High Priest of Heliopolis, the center of worship for the Nine,the Great Ennead. The ``gateway to the gods`` proved a sacred mushroom. On one occasion when Puharich himself was hypnotizing Stone a Round Table trustee, Alice Bouverie, also fell into a trance and stated the mushroomwas the kind now known as amanita muscaria, and said a specimen could be found not far from the house. It was. In one of Stone's trances, writes Colin Wilson in Mysteries, ``Rahotep demanded a mushroom and then, in the presence of Puharich and Aldous Huxley, applied it ritualistically to his tongue and the top of hishead. When Stone woke up five minutes later, he was able to perform an ESP test with a 100% score and describe accurately what lay on the other sideof a brick wall.`` ``Tom`` plays the race card The Nine claim that something has gone wrong with humanity's ``programming,``and so the Old Gods of Egypt, whose home is Sirius, are returning to reboot us. Humanity is supposedly the product of genetically-manipulated colonizers, whose first civilization arose in Tibet in 32,400 BC, but apparently not all humanity. According to the Nine, there was one indigineous race already on the Earth - the black. According to ``Tom,``the seeding of Earth by the Gods was an experiment to see how ``the originals [the black races] would evolve in comparison with those that colonized.``The Nine say Hey, there's nothing wrong with that, but the teaching remains that it's only the non-black peoples of the Earth who have the divine programming. Also interestingly, the Nine have good things to say about most major American religions, including and especially Mormonism, and are quite fond of the teachings of Lucis Trust founder Alice Bailey, but singles out Islam for rebuke. ``Tom`` says Islam has been influenced by ``the Fallen one,``and in his book The Keys of Enoch, channeller of the Nine James Hurtak calls Muslims t
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,541,112
|
Deletions which follow this policy must contain the appropriate headers in the file and tags. This is not what happened here. He just nuked the pages and blocked the creator. Its ok. I have plenty of Ip addresses to use. I will open an Arbcom on him tonight.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,557,049
|
`. http://kyleewyote.tripod.com/raplist.html This site has a bunch of the records, including two more I am not familiar with: The East Coast Crew The Final Word-No More Roxanne and Zelee No More Roxanne. I have also never heard of any other Roxanne impersonator beside the two who were famous, though there are frequent mentions of all these other ``Roxannes```
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,558,679
|
== Wikipedia:WikiProject Usability/Color Tabs == I would wanmt to offer my graphic design and typography skill for this project. Let me know how can I best help. • @
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,575,137
|
` ==Message from J. Wales and changes to the article== On Oct 14, 2005, at 3:17 PM, Jimmy Wales wrote: I welcome Jack's complaints about Wikipedia, although I encourage him to slow down and relax a bit, these things often take a bit of time, and screaming bloody murder at everyone does not help one single bit. (Indeed, it very much hinders the process of correcting the article because it turns off the very people who are trying to help Jack, and excites those who are trying to annoy him.) However, I would appreciate very much being taken off the cc: line for general specuations about the KGB and the CIA and physics and the end of the world. I try to read everything people send me, but if I'm busy reading all this stuff, I have less time to help Jack. Jimbo Below is the article as of now between quotes, and my comments ``Jack Sarfatti From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Jack Sarfatti (born September 14, 1939) is a physicist, known for his Internet writings and Usenet postings explaining his theories. His reputation for holding controversial and non-mainstream views extends back to the 1970s. Some of his wide-ranging views have included speculations of UFOs as extraterrestrials; the idea that some parapsychological phenomena are real; speculations that faster-than-light communication is possible; and most recently his design for space travel by warping spacetime in the region of the vehicle using dark energy / Josephson junction techniques, a form of ``metric engineering``. He also claims to have originated the idea of supersolids.`` The above sentence should be changed to He also claims to have originated the idea of recently observed supersolids in 1969 in the paper ``Destruction of Superflow in Unsaturated 4He Films and the Prediction of a New Crystalline Phase of 4He with Bose-Einstein Condensation`` in Physics Letters, Vol 30A, number 5, 3,, November, 1969 p.300. The following eminent physicists testified to this claim. George Chapline, Jr. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory wrote on Feb 16, 2005 ``Jack, Your solid He4 superfluid paper is wonderful! You actually did something once of very great importance - and apparently you did not realize this. This paper is a precursor to quantum gravity, and much more important in that regard than string theory (you can quote me). George`` David Finkelstein wrote on March 26, 2005. ``Dear Jack: Congratulations! What greater pleasure can a physicist have than see a long range prediction finally come true. David`` In addition Leonard Susskind of Stanford University Physics Department wrote on Dec 31,2004: ``To whom it may concern, The Glogower Susskind paper of 1963 which introduced phase operators for a quantum oscillator was in direct response to discussions between Glogower, Susskind, and Jack Sarfatti. Sarfatti's contributions were significant. The correct attribution should be to the 'Glogower, Sarfatti, Susskind' operators. Sincerely, Leonard Susskind`` Contents [hide] 1 Education 2 Involvement with paraphysics 3 Other activities 4 Criticism 5 Publications 6 External links [edit] Education Sarfatti earned an undergraduate degree from Cornell University in 1960, where he wrote an honors thesis under the guidance of Hans Bethe. He went on to earn a Master's degree from UCSD in 1967, and a Ph.D. from UCR in 1969, writing a thesis under the direction of Fred Cummings. He taught at San Diego State and studied as a research fellow under David Bohm at the University of London before venturing into non-academic pursuits. [edit] This part ``Involvement with paraphysics On 21 June 1974 Sarfatti observed alleged psychic Uri Geller, and reported that Geller demonstrated genuine ``psychoenergetic`` ability at Birbeck beyond the doubt of any reasonable man, under relatively well-controlled and repeatable experimental conditions. (Science News, vol. 106; 20 July 1974; page 46). He later revised this opinion after discussing the matter with James Randi. He wrote in a letter, ``On the basis of further experience in the art of conjuring, I wish to retract my endorsement of Uri Geller's psychoenergetic authenticity.`` (Science News, 6 December 1975, page 355).`` Should be changed to ``Involvement with paraphysics On 21 June 1974 Sarfatti observed alleged psychic Uri Geller, and reported that Geller demonstrated genuine ``psychoenergetic`` ability at Birbeck beyond the doubt of any reasonable man, under relatively well-controlled and repeatable experimental conditions. (Science News, vol. 106; 20 July 1974; page 46). He later temporarily revised this opinion under pressure from James Randi. He wrote in a letter, 'On the basis of further experience in the art of conjuring, I wish to retract my endorsement of Uri Geller's psychoenergetic authenticity.`` (Science News, 6 December 1975, page 355).' However, on the basis of two further meetings with Uri Geller in 2004, as well as evidence he and Fred Alan Wolf were shown in Brasil in 1984 by a Brasilian Army General, Sarfatti's opinion in 2005 is that Geller has real psychic ability from his direct contact with the same alien extra-terrestrials here on Earth that also contact him as a child in 1952 or 1953. Sarfatti claims that he and Dan Smith are in touch with the highest levels of the US Intelligence Community on almost a daily basis by e-mail on these issues of ``high strangeness`` as defined in NIDS reports by Eric Davis and Jacques Vallee. In 1975 he publicly stated that he had ``serious information indicating a high probability that extraterrestrial contacts are being made`` (in a letter to James Randi, quoted in ``Magic and Paraphysics``, see below). At about this time he became one of the three co-authors of Space-time and Beyond published by Dutton in 1975. At this time he postulated that paraphysical occurences could be explained by ``non-local quantum connections`` (see Space-time and Beyond).`` Change ``He also filed a patent application on a device to transmit coded information faster than light. Martin Gardner said of this invention, ``I know of no other physicist who thinks it will work. If it does Sarfatti will become one of the greatest physicists of all time.`` (in ``Magic and Paraphysics`` reprinted as Chapter Eight of Science, Good, Bad and Bogus, Avon, 1981. This chapter has a good deal about Sarfatti's activities at about this time.)`` to ``He also filed a patent disclosure on a device to transmit coded information faster than light. Martin Gardner said of this invention, ``I know of no other physicist who thinks it will work. If it does Sarfatti will become one of the greatest physicists of all time.`` (in ``Magic and Paraphysics`` reprinted as Chapter Eight of Science, Good, Bad and Bogus, Avon, 1981. This chapter has a good deal about Sarfatti's activities at about this time 30 years ago.). Sarfatti subsequently retracted his particular design when he realized it would not work because it assumed orthodox quantum theory that has the ``no-cloning theorem. Sarfatti does think that FTL communication, precisely 'signal nonlocality' does happen as the essential signature of all living matter. ``Signal nonlocality`` demands an extension of quantum theory that he calls ``post-quantum theory`` that is to orthodox quantum theory as general relativity is to special relativity. Antony Valentini of the Perimeter Institute has formalized this sort of claim by Sarfatti and, independently by others, most notably Steven Weinberg, Henry Stapp, Brian Josephson and Roger Penrose, in a series of important papers. Sarfatti cites experiments by Libet, Radin and Bierman as evidence. Roger Penrose discusses the Libet evidence in his several books. Stuart Hameroff has published several papers on this 'presponse' phenomenon as has Fred Alan Wolf. Sarfatti thinks the CIA Remote Viewing experiments at SRI in the 1970's by Puthoff and Targ are essentially valid. Sarfatti worked with CIA Chief of Station, the late Harold Chipman in the mid-1980s and Chipman confirmed to Sarfatti that remote viewing was effective against the Soviet Union in the Clandestine Service. Richard Helms instituted CIA interest in the paranormal as far back as the 1960s as shown by an official CIA document recently declassified. Remote Viewing is further evidence for 'signal nonlocality' in Sarfatti's current opinion in 2005. The definitive book on US Intelligence Community interest in the paranormal is Jim Schnabel's 'Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies' [edit] Other activities In various writings over the years, Sarfatti has apparently made numerous claims about his activities, including: consulting for U.S. intelligence agencies on the so-called ``physics`` of remote-viewing; consulting for the U.S. Department of Defense on the Strategic Defense Initiative; worked under ``deep cover`` on ``cold-war intelligence missions`` [edit] Delete the following completely. It is irresponsible and defamatory. Crank.net & usenet.kooks are disreputable sources and low-life scum like them have said the same about many visionary scientists including Fred Alan Wolf. None of that defamatory garbage is on the Wiki page about Fred Alan Wolf and neither should it be on mine. So DELETE ENTIRELY: ``Sarfatti's websites have earned the crankiest rating from the crank.net website, and h
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,583,843
|
== Missing info == I feel that this article could do with a bit more one how one might go about applying for and carrying out a Ph.D. —
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,600,440
|
You stupid and more liar than me you don't want to understand that I don't lie!!!!!!I TOOK THESE INFORMATIONS ON TAROM OFFICIAL WEBSITE !!!I WILL NOT CEASE BECAUSE OF YOU AND I WILL WRITE UNTIL YOU GONNA BE BORED!! I'LL NOT RENOUNCE FOR YOU
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
25,600,740
|
. You gonna see what I'm able to do if you continue!
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,601,799
|
== half-Blood Prince == Hi icarus, just had a look at your latest revision. I have to still say, I don't see why you insist on going through theories of whether Harry was right or wrong in what he concluded about the potions/spells. The book does not discuss whether Harry might have made a mistake, I havn't particularly (or indeed at all) seen this point debated by anyone seriously arguing that Harry was wrong. I am not convinced it is important to argue whether he was right, or to explicitly argue at all about it in the story. What is gained by proposing alternative interpretations?
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,605,082
|
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started: *To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes). * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area. * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk *Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. *Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun! Good luck!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,608,802
|
== BAN ME AND DIE == ^_^
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
25,618,825
|
The following images have no source info. They are all now tagged as or . In most cases I have removed them from any arricles where they were beign used. In a few cases where a valid fair use claim seemed likely i have left them in an articel for now. But if no source info is provided, all are subject to delteion after one week. *:Image:Beckford Tyson.jpg No source info given *:Image:Medium690768.jpg No source info given *:Image:James Callaghan and Margaret Thatcher.jpg No source info given *:Image:Img226446860.jpg No source info given *:Image:Thatcher04.jpg No source info given *:Image:Portraitjap5c.jpg No source info given *:Image:OliviaNewton-John.jpg No source info given *:Image:Halle Berry.jpg No source info given *:Image:Diane Cilento.jpg No source info given *:Image:Olivia de Havilland.jpg No source info given *:Image:Thatcher2004.jpg No source info given *:Image:VirginiaApgar.jpg No source info given *:Image:VanessaRedgrave.jpg No source info given *:Image:Deborah.Kerr.jpg No source info given *:Image:MargaretThatcher1.jpg No source info given *:Image:Hillary Clinton.jpg No source info given The image Image:KeiraKnightley.jpg has an identified sourece, and is a probable copyright violation. Unless ypu know of a reson why this image should remain, or have other info that might be relevant, it will probably be deleted shortly. Please, please stop uploading images without sopurce information. It does not help wikipedia; it wastes lots of time for ediors who must follow up on these issues; and it hurts our reputation as a valid source of free content. Any time you upload an image you must say where it came from, qspecifically. Ask if you don't understand the rules or who to provide this information. Thank you.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,620,319
|
` ==Esperanza Spam== Hello Esperanzians! A few announcements. The Advisory Committee election results are in. In tranch A are and . In tranch B are and . My other annoouncement is that our founder, , has founded Esperanza's sister project, . I have written two essays (my name is Matt Binder). My essays are under Teenage Wikipedians and Anon Editors. On behalf of myself and Jay Carriker and the other wikipediologists, I would appreciate it if you were to join. Cheers Esperanza! e —How's my driving?) `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,623,636
|
I think that it is really immature that a country the size of Japan is trying to extend its sea borders. I was searching this topic on the internet. I found a site that was pro-Takeshima. It said that Korea was illegally claiming the land. That is not true. I agree that older historical evidence is being ignored from the Korean side. They need a mediator because each country and government is out to persue their own agenda. CIA World Factbook is calling them the Liancourt Rocks. I don't like either government very much. The sad thing is, the Japanese Educational System is teaching that the island is Takeshima and is Japan's with no hard evidence. The map the Japanese are using as evidence is a outdated map of feudal Japan in 185os. It is inaccurate. At that time more than half of Asia was Japanese territory.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,624,047
|
, stop inventing rules.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,625,829
|
- I also would like to know your reason for listing Aleksander Kamensky article for deletion last time? - Also I don't understand why you changed Russian intelligent to Soviet intelligent. The subject considered himself a Russian art critic. He never identified himself with the Soviet regime especially since you claim in intelligentsia article that the Soviets had an unflattering attitude towards intelligentsia (which is a very very half truth by the way). - You still haven't explained why you did not mention the history of intelligentsia during the Soviet epoch. The term was popularized in Soviet Russia, and the article is not balanced with main emphasis on Poland, a provincial obscure place like Belarus.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,626,521
|
` ago.`` *[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abram_Kamensky ``here``] This proves you are a liar, and discredits everything else you claim here. `
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
25,637,757
|
Prick. Gimme some time to flesh things out. Stop being such a prick.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
25,637,825
|
Stop being such a goddamn prick. The article will be sorted out in time. Meanwhile spend some time away from wikipedia. And do normal things. for instance leave your parent's basement.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
25,644,293
|
okay, but I made the page Jakewater, so how is that vandalizing my own page?
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,664,887
|
` I think that Manchester should redirect to Greater Manchester. People see ``Manchester`` as hosting Champions League finals, international sporting events and see it on TV, yet when they go to the Manchester article they see half the things they ``expect``, for example Old Trafford, Manchester Docks (Salford Quays and Trafford Wharf), the Manchester Regiment and the like missing. Even if you look at things like Manchester's development agency it includes all of Greater Manchester. The Champions League final was said to be held in Manchester. It was actually held in Trafford, but the award ceremony took place at Manchester town hall. The Lonely Planet guide to Manchester discusses our many tourist sites, many of which aren't even in the City of Manchester. It's quite obvious that many people around the world refer to Manchester and mean the conurbation as a whole.`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,667,404
|
` : I know the current Cognitive grammar stub sucks and is definitely substandard in terms of both content and clarity. I'm not sure about any controversy, but my understanding is that ``Cognitive Grammar`` is its own framework. In my school days, it was referred to as a type of construction grammar, but I don't recall Langacker himself saying that in the text. For those reasons, I don't think a redirect is appropriate either. I've removed the merge tags from both articles. If I have some time later, I'll attempt to improve the Cognitive grammar article, since I do have both volumes of Langacker's Foundations of Cognitive Grammar on hand. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,669,371
|
` [*]] 16 October 2005 (UTC) `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,669,943
|
`) ===Explanation for DanT=== The ``stuff`` is not ``Top Secret``. It is a technique of MASINT of the National Directorate of Intelligence akin to what was called ``vacuum cleaning``. Think of Public Key Cryptography as a hint. Only a few have the ``key`` to decode the hidden messages. As DES and others have mentioned it is clear that Sarfatti is magnet for all sorts of people. Most are harmless but some are not. Sarfatti has already supplied invaluable Counter Intelligence in the War on Terror and continues to do so. His work has been described as at ``the core of MASINT`` by a top USG Intelligence Officer. 16 October 2005 (time not noted for reasons of security`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,670,483
|
`*]] Well in that case the Wiki rules should be enforced. In particular putting Art Greenfield's words of ``treason`` and ``death penalty`` into the main Sarfatti article is a violation of Wiki rules because it is false. Also Greenfield was quoting directly from Federal Law and what was put into the Sarfatti article was completely distorted out of context. In any case it is obvious that several of the Wiki Admins have violated the basic Wiki rule of objective fairness and they all should recuse themselves and leave it up to Ed Poor, Jimbo Wales and the Wiki board as a matter of integrity and fairness. Sarfatti is a volatile hot head when he is put under the stress of personal attacks on his character. His angry words should not be engraved in stone. Let he who is without guilt cast the first stone. -) [[User:UFO Black Ops|*UFO Black Ops`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,671,640
|
Yes, he is right. Guns N' Roses never recorded this song, or even played it live. It has just been falsely renamed on p2p networks and suc.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,672,849
|
*I found the original source on The Sports Network web site and I have just posted it on the main Super Bowl article along with the other references at the bottom of the page. Thanks.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,679,342
|
` If I can pick apart those sources: ;Modern speculation * TLC ``The Lost Ark`` (Investigation of the Ark's description) [Archived copy, Wayback machine] *: Broken, even with Wayback. However, I've seen the show. It did describe the Ark as a capacitor. Speculatively, of course, and mentioning no sources. Tesla may or may not have been mentioned, but I strongly doubt the idea was original. I enjoyed the programme, but that's a long way from wanting to see it recapped in an encyclopedia article. * Burger, David, ``Electrical & Electronic & Telecommunications Milestones in Australia``. New South Wales. December, 2004. (Senior Member of the IEEE; k3hz@ieee.org) *: Says, and I quote, ``1445BC The description of the “Ark of the Covenant” in Exodus 25:10-22, reads like an electrical device, Nikola Tesla mentions this in ``A fairy tale of electricity``, published September 9, 1915. Other biblical accounts imply effects from the Ark correspond with exposure to high power electromagnetic fields, and the 1981 film ‘Raiders of the Lost Ark’ popularise this artefact.`` In short, adds nothing to the Tesla source, and pulls in a rollicking action romp by George Lucas that has nothing to do with it. * Sassoon, George, ``The ancient of days: deity or manna-machine?``. *: Broken, but Wayback knows it: . Does not make any claims that the Ark is a capacitor, but makes the even more outrageous claim that some machine (which may or may not have been the Ark) produced manna. Armchair speculation by one individual on teh intarweb. * ``An electrical engineering question``. Soc.history.ancient, Usenet. *: Usenet post. Not a reputable source itself and references no reputable sources. Mentions a ``textbook`` that might very well have gotten its inspiration from Tesla, but there's no way to tell. * Ginzberg, Louis, ``The Legends of the Jews``. * Ginzberg, The Legends of the Jews. The Ark and the Cherubim. *: Yup, that does talk about sparks killing snakes and scorpions and burning thorns. But it doesn't connect it to electricity, or any other theory on what the Ark supposedly was. Can Wikipedia make the connection? No. If it could, I could just as well follow it up with theories about how an Ark using electrical discharges would have been very impractical for killing vermin or burning wood, compared to, say, a torch, but all that is beside the point. You'd need a source that uses this particular text to claim the Ark was a capacitor, not just quote this sentence suggestively. * Tesla, Nikola, ``The Fairy Tale of Electricity``. September 9, 1915. *: The only reference that is completely relevant, even if it only establishes that Tesla made this speculation. * Courson, Chris, ``Nikola Tesla``. Chrisbot.com. * ``Leviticus 10:1``. Skeptic's Annotated Bible. * ``Exodus 28``. Skeptic's Annotated Bible. * Beaver, Gary, ``The Ark of the Covenant of our Lord``. ordotempli.org * Badillo, Tony, ``Ark of the Covenant Secrets``. *: The Ark as a footstool. Or a throne-chair. Nothing at all about capacitors. These sources are all way overblown, and so is the text. You can confidently say that Tesla made the claim that the Ark was a capacitor, and Däniken had some funky ideas too. But honestly, that's it. All the rest is speculation. In particular, Wikipedia should not engage in Bible interpretation. Wikipedia cannot gather bits and pieces from various sources to bolster the claim that the Ark was a capacitor. That's original research, even if Tesla or Däniken or whoever else had the idea before, and even if a television show elaborated it some more. There is an im
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,697,690
|
==Failure== While none of us want to say it, Serenity is pretty much a failure in the box office. Hey, I think it's the greatest movie ever made myself, a real piece of genius IMHO. The fact is, it's been three weeks and the $40 million dollar movie has taken in 22 million domestically and 25 million globally. We aren't likely to ever see a sequel. Hitchhikers opened at $21 million the first weekend and only managed a scant 51 million domestic final take. Sad to say it, but Firefly won't keep flying and we need to start being honest about this.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,698,225
|
== RfC on Copperchair == There is already an RfC pending on this problem editor. Please feel free to add evidence or endorse one or more of the summaries of the dispute. Thanks.chris.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,700,956
|
OK, Sarfatti called me worried about it. Is there an official policy on this? What do the Wiki lawyers say? I will call Sarfatti back and tell him it's done routinely as he tends to get paranoid about all this right now. -) Note I found some exact references some of the papers with ISBN numbers and corrected my earlier inaccuracies on the exact names of those papers written during the Joe Firmage ISSO operation in which several million dollars were spent attempting to develop exotic propulsion systems. Joe Firmage now runs ManyOne and formerly was CEO of USWEB that was briefly a multi-billion dollar corporation on paper before the bubble burst.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,703,691
|
` ==ISSO 1999-2001== This was an operation done with full knowledge of top levels of the USG Intelligence Community who monitored it. Several former Soviet-bloc physicists were brought in as consultants including Dr. Valdimir Poponin, allegedly a personal acquaintance of Gorbachev's. We were interested in evaluating the controversial claims of ``Russian torsion field weapons`` and, therefore brought Gennady Shipov over from Moscow several times. On one trip Shipov lived with Sarfatti for about 2 weeks. Richard Hammond, and American physicist from Fargo working on torsion fields for US Navy at one time was brought in as well as R. Kiehn a former scientist for US SAC and retired professor from University of Houston. Shipov worked with Akimov in Moscow who allegedly had strong military connections in the Soviet era. Sarfatti was the senior theorist on the American side of the ISSO core staff that included Saul-Paul Sirag. He arranged for Creon Levit to be borrowed from NASA AMES to run the daily operations of the project. Over a million dollars was given to SARA, a TRW spinoff DOD contractor in Huntington, Beach CA to further test a system developed by Jim Corum. Corum also wrote papers on ``The Philadelphia Experiment`` and had entre to the Tesla Archive in Beograd even during the Cold War. This was unusual. Corum later went to ISR in W.Va, a think tank doing exotic work with USG funds provided by Senator Robert Byrd and his Congressional counter-part in his home district. The key objective, of course, was to try to figure out how the ``saucers`` really flew. All of the key scientists had interest in that, with the possible exception of Hammond and Kiehn. Harold Puthoff was brought in as a consultant. Ken Shoulders was also involved as were many others whose schemes were tested. The key foreign figure was Professor J. P. Vigier from Paris who had been Louis DeBroglie's assistant for decades. Sarfatti arranged for a Telegraph Hill Penthouse for Vigier to spend extended periods meeting the scientists flowing through ISSO. Vigier and Levit made a trip to Budapest in 2000 to meet with two Serbian physicists Z.Maric & A. Dragic who were experimentally testing an exotic atomic energy release idea of Vigier's of obvious interest to USG Intelligence because of its WMD implications. See the paper ``On the possible Existence of Tight Bound States in Quantum Mechanics``. pp 349-356 of the same volume of one of Sarfatti's papers, i.e. Vol 126 of Fundamental Theories of Physics, ISBN 1-4020-0885-6. This is not a coincidence. There are few coincidences in ``this Looking Glass War Twilight Zone interface between physics and politics`` to quote Sarfatti in one of his more eloquent moments. ;-) In fact, ISSO paid most of the expenses for the meeting upon which the volume is based. Enuff said. I hope this helps to somewhat clarify Sarfatti's multiple roles in these events. Sarfatt is a kind of a canary in the mind shaft for MASINT. For example, he was quite alarmed about an immanent attack on important US Military targets in the Fall of 2001. Sarfatti wrote numerous e-mails on this during July & Aug 2001. It seems to be a case of precognitive remote viewing. Unfortunately, Sarfatti was not able to pinpoint the exact time and place of the attack (attacks). He had guessed Oct 2001 because of some big anti-space weapons rally by leftist groups scheduled for that time at Lockheed-Martin. [User:UFO_Black_Ops]] Oct 16, 2005`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,705,188
|
== Tolstoy and not thinking of a white bear == The game as described on this page seems reminiscent of the instruction by his brother to Leo Tolstoy to not think of a white bear. For example see. I suspect that it predates 1997 although the variant is perhaps too much. Should it be described as a continuum for Tolstoy's bear? |
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,706,026
|
== YOU'RE A FAEGET! == FAG
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
25,706,576
|
:I believe this is a water tight, rational and fair challenge to those who keep deleting selective accusations while keeping those that have not been proven in the last 50 years. I think it is to do with one's nation's guilt; to render Japan culpable for Iraq will render for instance the United States or Australia to which those users belong in the same conspirators. You will win I guess, I doubt those users have any extensive knowledge of international law on the tests of sovereingty and Nuremburg precedents. To them, their concept of war crimes in a very lay and faux popular fasion is narrowly limited to as you said: death, physicial injury and physically induced mental injury. It extends greater than that to the realms of conspiracy of primary and secondary participants in the creation and exectution of aggressive policies, and suggested in obiter dictum, inchoate actions for the purpose of aggression.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,711,601
|
== ancient egyptians == i restored your link to a eurocentrist website at the Controversy_over_race_of_Ancient_Egyptians page. i think it is a valid link, though the site does say some things bordering on racism. if you feel strongly about the matter i'd encourage you to edit the page. it is currently dominated by afrocentrism (the page originated as a cut-and-paste from the afrocentrism page) and needs to move to a more NPOV -
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,711,783
|
== controversy == i've responded to your comments at Controversy_over_race_of_Ancient_Egyptians
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,717,112
|
` **::Whoops, forgot to capitalize ``Lore`` again when I moved it to National Football League lore as per the Wikipedia:Naming conventions to try to avoid abbreviations. The article now currently resides at National Football League Lore. Now I'll deal with speedy renaming Category:National Football League lore to Category:National Football League Lore... eventually. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,723,245
|
== Check == Please check your e-mail.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,730,590
|
== Maryland 'wasp-waist'? == I can't find a single reference to the narrow part of Maryland around the town of Hancock being called the 'wasp-waist.' Every site I've found on Google is just a mirror/copy of the text founf here. Until some independent verification can be foudn to support these label, then the wasp-waist refernce should be removed. sdrawkcab
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,733,020
|
==At last, to a finality== I thank you for inviting me to this MSN session to discuss on placing this compromise, I am rather satsified with it. While the oppossition led by this Australian wikipedian Grant65 cannot make satisfactory cases to distinguish Iraq's relevance from this article and why issues on Korea should be preserved. Afterall the Japanese acts of brutality against Koreans are no more war crimes as Anglo-Australian brutality against Aboriginal Australians that continues to this day. Their earliest British ancestors have settled Australia by vice of terra nullius by meaning to fail to recognise the humanity of the native residents and have long mistreated the natives beyond the time of Japan's tyrannical grip on Korea. For this I put it to you: Come off it. The Aboriginal people of Australian did not want and don't want to be part of the Commonwealth and subjects of the British Crown Then by all means admit these acts of oppression against the Aborigines fit within the complete defintion of your so called war crimes [[User:Bison augustus|Bison augustus]
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,750,561
|
:I did some digging and corrected the sourcing.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
25,758,689
|
Be patriotic. Treason is wrong. To attack President Bush more than Saddam Hussein is disgusting. Thanks to Bush, Iraq is now democratic.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,758,904
|
:::::Hey Jeff... you seem to have missed the point entirely. Wikipedia's talk pages are for discussing the article and how it needs to be changed. Given that Firefly is proving to be a failure at the box office by the well accepted formula of Movie Cost > Box Office Take, I am suggesting we start formulating a way to add that to the article. I mention my love of the movie only to avoid the fans who might try to POV push because they don't want to face the awful truth. I would suggest you take more time to help with the discussion on what should be said here, rather than pull out an unneeded and rather silly soap box. We are talking about sourceable information Jeff, you just are not listening. Additional to say we can't mention our like or dislike of the film seems to suggest you think personal opinion can't be expressed on Wikipedia Talk pages. Well it can be expressed and it should be expressed. We all have natural bias, by talking about our opinions we help others to identify our bias making it easier to critique our additions. Furthermore, Wikipedia is a community, and we're having fun. I'm sorry you can't seem to handle that. :::::Now, what I'm trying to say is that we need to stop POV pushing on the article. Yes, we're fans and we don't like to admit Serenity flopped, but the truth is it has. My suggestion is we data mine other movies which have performed as poorly and use a similar language.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,759,708
|
== Thanks! == Thank you, but I don't believe that expressing my opinion is vandalism. No doubt I'll be blocked in five minutes...
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,760,034
|
== re: Vandalism == how about you cool it
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,760,220
|
fear my expression will be censored and that I may
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,760,317
|
== Your censorship == It is not vandalism to criticize someone on their talk page.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,760,396
|
== Thanks for your help! == But you're still a cunt!
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
25,760,489
|
== regarding your most recent comment on mytalk page == go ahead. do it. it's my school IP and they make legitimate edits. LOLOLOL
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,765,433
|
It's performance in theatres aside from DVD release is important. But regardless I'm not suggesting we alter the page now (that is why I am talking about it here, and not on the article), but we need to formulate how to describe it. Agreed?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,767,567
|
== Don't you have a real job? == Maybe you should read How to talk to a liberal, but only if you must, by Anne Coulter. Also, maybe you would realize the brilliancy of conservatism if you actually worked. Liberals are such crazy people! Almost like children, they can not see the forest for the trees. So very impractical and non realistic.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
25,783,433
|
Don't foul the machinery if you're an ordinary editor. If you're a member of the cabal, go for your life.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
25,789,336
|
== Harshness == Wow, there is some harshness near the top of the article about offtune singing and unco-ordinated dancing. Can we reword a bit ???
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,791,535
|
_____that is? I thought the sandbax is for screwing aroung???
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,791,561
|
== *You deleted an article...please state why? == An article I have recently created (Harry Potter and the death of Harry Potter) was deleted by you. I checked the Wikipedia policies and was not able to find that seemed to be in conflict of what was in this article. Did I miss something? Please reply! I would like to know why my article was deleted. No offence, but if you have personal issues with the article, please undelete it.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,792,193
|
Hello! Sorry it took so long to get back to you. My email is discoeldo79@yahoo.com if you want to send me a message. My real name is Frank. Feel free to drop me a line sometime!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
25,801,117
|
` :``...who has morals. I couldn't care less about what gays or lesbians do in their own life`` Sawwies hun, this totally implied it, maybe I just read it wrong. I sure as hell hope I'm not Bushytails. You guys should have told me I'm him before I posted P. `
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
25,803,972
|
Again? National was responsible for the demise of their last government, not Winston. One good thing about Winston: we can continue to stem the Asian invasion and get more jobs into New Zealanders' hands, where they belong.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,805,001
|
:The site is largely juvenile slander; a twelve year old could make a better site layout, and the main line of attack is to post outrageous claims concerning the organization, puerile insults, and Photoshopped pictures of PW members. The only part of the site that even makes an attempt at genuine argumentation is the part about the constitutionality of counter-protesting, making the claim that the First Amendment right to freely assemble is only protected when used to petition the government, and not at any other time. This is, of course, a ridiculous line of argument; either the author is monumentally ignorant or he is intentionally lying, but I suppose one must entertain the view if adhering to Wikipedia's seeming policy of entertaining any viewpoint so long as it's presented on some Web site somewhere. However, this section of the page is promptly drowned out by all the noise.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
25,807,559
|
? It certainly seems ironic, if not inconsistent, for Wiki to do that
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
25,807,978
|
`not-even-wrong speculations like string theory and loop-gravity with little testability. Shelly Glashow (Nobel Prize) has been quite vociferous about this. Of course that does not stop Brian Greene from making millions of dollars on purely speculative ideas - pretty though they are. BTW Brian, who I met at State of the World Forum in 2000 funded by Joe Firmage did borrow some ``cranky`` ``crackpot`` ``kooky`` ideas from me that he used in his NOVA PBS TV Show on ``The Elegant Universe``. For example Brian goes into a telephone booth to call ET! Compare to http://stardrive.org/cartoon/spectra.html Also I introduced Jacques Vallee to Francis Ford Coppola in 1976 when I brough Uri Geller to one of his parties. Everyone was there and that's how Jacques became technical director on ``Close Encounters of the Third Kind```
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.