rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27,366,284
|
` :What random comments! Argumentum ad hominem is a logical fallacy, not a fancy term for an insult. I think you may have got confused by all that Latin. I presume you consider it crackers' talk. Don't bother reading the article; you won't understand it. :Self-respect? You seem to have problems with the English language there too; you mean ``respect``. I'm fine; it's you and all other racist scum that I don't respect. You are the main reason excellent editors leave. — `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
27,370,418
|
==Gujarati== I'm sorry to bother you like this, but it appears as though there's a dispute about Língua da Casa at the Talk:Creole Languages page over whether Gujarati is a substrate language. As far as I can tell, you put that information there and I'd imagine that you'd be able to do a much better job of verifying it than I am.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,376,775
|
` :::Appalling English? Excuse me? There is no such thing as perfect English, so don't think you're anymore a better contributor to Wikipedia than I am. :::And don't bother using cover-ups like ``I removed criticisms that added nothing to the article (being either nothing more than descriptions – and not very informative descriptions – of the music, or references to the producers' style).`` Criticism is most certainly welcome, but that is besides the point. You went and removed the entire Critical Response section. Unacceptable. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,380,407
|
== You suck and we all hate you == YOU SUCK!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
27,381,587
|
:::Glad you have had pleasure from St Dildo, Brian. We like to keep you and 'Dave' entertained, as you do us with your creative 'neo-futurist' use of English. Now, back to the point at hand, what is your cogent argument in response to the evidence in Irish nationality law that Phil was legally entitled to Irish nationality. Do you have any evidence that he did not embrace this option which was open to him, and if so would you like to present it here? If not, I suggest you do not post further distractions.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,396,378
|
== What are you talking about? == You'll have to link me to the comment I made in which you felt insulted as I don't recollect it. Thanks.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,398,861
|
In 24hours i want this block lifted, as i refuse to create another account to do my main editing from. |
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,399,218
|
I have seen people who have done far worse things things then myslef, only to have a blind eye turned to them or a slap on the writs. You have also wnet aginst your only policy by imposing this ban with out even an arbs com decision, which only goes to show that thei is no structue that works here and the the real power rest in the admins who serve as judge jury and exctionicure, by keeping me blcok you have also reused to try to engage me in any kind of defence aginst the blatent violitaions of blocking that has been permited.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,400,191
|
` :John i respect your comments, but it obviouse that they dont like oppisiton to themm thats the basic problem, but nonwe of them will say it. ::Why dont you just admit that you are just supporting you other admins, of coure i cant go and ``complain`` becuas i am sitting behind block that only goes to prove a piont, which if i am correct is aginst ``policy``. And no i will not create another this it the account that i use and this is the account that i will continue to use, and you can tell your firends likr User:UninvitedCompany that his comments are uncivil, and that his comment is agnist policy and that i would expect that you would block him if you were fair, but since he is part of the problem i doubt that he be blocked or let alone be warned for uncivility. | `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,402,314
|
==Chore Boy== Hello, I noticed that you created the Chore Boy page on May 14, 2005. I was curious if that brand is notable above other brands for any particular reason. Please let me know on my talk page; I feel that the article is a good candidate for deletion. Thanks!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,404,606
|
` == Rajput == Could you block Shivraj Singh again? And the anonIP he is using, 203.101.49.28? He has reverted six times in the last 24 hours, I believe. None of the rest of us have done more than a couple of reverts. He has a pronounced Hindutva POV and believes that other POVs re Rajput identity should not be allowed on Wikipedia. The rest of us are trying to make sure that both arguments (Rajput is a Hindu caste; Rajput is a lineage) are represented. He will not discuss and dismisses anyone who opposes him as a ``Muslim``. The rest of us are prepared to give his POV full representation, but he does not want to return the favor. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,405,144
|
`For those who want to bitch about me any behaviour ih which they dont like which seem to be so distruptive to wikipedia, or if you want to see personal attacks and uncivil behaviour made and condone by admins and the fellow supporters, like • , you can see a comment he made here, or by the person that blocked me • here please go to WP:AN#Boothy443_Indef._blocked, and that goes for admins and non admins. Also if youy want to bitch about me in another public forum, go to here Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Boothy443, but dont expect a responce from me, as i dont see the effectness of displaying ones opinions on other usesr as being any bit of constructive in buliding an Encylopedia. It should aslo be know that i have been put behind an indefiendt block, imposed by one adminstrator Jtkiefer that has less to do with policy violiations is is just a way to supress me for as i see it, not playing by their ``rules``, or to put it, falling in line like a good Wikipedian, and that i called out an admin • for what i percived as his biased enforcment of a 3rr block on the pages , Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Category:Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, i which i will freely admit that i did, in order to keep as i see it the ``concensus``, what ever that word means, of the editors on the pages in question that their was to be no merge of the artciles or categoreies at present that was trying to be forced by • , and an exam of his comments on talk:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania as compared to his comments on Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal#Philadelphia_County_and_other_Philadelphia_Pages only show that he is pushing for a merge, but that • also violated the 3rr on the page as well after he was blocked by using two anon accounts • and • , yet neiter were blocked by • nor was the block on • extended an addation 48 hours, yes thats right 48 not 24 an arbitatry decision and another reason in which i belive that no admin be alowed to block a user for over 24 hours with out arbcom decison and even then i am not sure that they should. And also that he, • , posted a comment for • on the Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal#Philadelphia_County_and_other_Philadelphia_Pages, why couldnt • waith tthe 48 hours like he was supposed to to post his comments, which to me would show that their is a question of the impartiality of • becuase of his actions. I did email him, and in what could be construed as a nasty letter, to • in which i told him that i do belive that he biased in his actions that that i was considering further action aginst him in the matter, with the possibility of releaving his of his adminstrative pridvlidges. His reaction was to increast the length of my block to addational 72 hours, which i can only see as a supression of any pending action agnist him, i would really not be supprised to know if he confired with • off site which would lead to • to impose, without a ruling from the arbcom, or the wikimedia board, an indefient block aginst me. I dont care if you like me or not or support my actions or not, but what you should do it serioulsy take a look at how this site is run, and notice that their are problems here that refuse to be addressed. I didnt come here to have people like meor to meka friends, and i could give a damm less about wiki love or any o the other social/political experiments that we deny are happning and that we engage in every day. I came here to build a site in which people can information from, and i'll be the first to say that i dont belive that i would recomond It's about time that we stop letting a few useres that we have allowed all of the power to control th be concrated into, run this as they see fit, with no oversite, supression taticks, and the violation of their own policies that they enforce aginst others or not enforce at all. i Have seen usere on here, and i'll point out an example • who have fuck among other words on their user page, and who threw their edit ssummries tell other users to fuck off yet only to get a slap on the wrist or the well it's only SPUI so dont worrie about it comment [Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive43#User:SPUI]. If enforcment is for one then it should be for all. It about time as users that we stop being the lapdogs to the great leader Jimmy and the admins, and start taking back the power when it comes to the running of this site, becuas it might be me today, but tommrow it could be you. | `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
27,406,343
|
you need to fuck off and stop hrassing people
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
27,407,739
|
, 5 November 2005 (UTC) ::I dont have to worrie about my credibility, The comments that have been posted on the ANI and other pages, by users, mainly admins, that have never, never addressed me, with what should be considered as uncivil comments, have already set my credibilty and have show that their is a complete bias aginst me, which has been futher show by the actions taken aginst me, which for site adminstration is unacceptable, and that is a fucking shame. And you actions, have only went to show that you are a part of the bias as well. I'll let me credetability speka for me in the in the information that i provied in article text, and not by the comments and actions by admins. | 01:44
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,410,119
|
Refusal to discuss. Bad faith. WP:FAITH.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,413,169
|
I'm fine with Johor flag as well. Thanks for the curt reminder.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
27,425,227
|
It is my opinion that that happens to be off-topic. I do believe that I never claimed it is not a common criticism. Please avail yourself to my opinion provided and do not assume I am making this assertion. I would hope you would respect my opinion and discuss my opinion in a rational and civil way. I thank you for your time and would like to provide my services to you and your family for this simple request. Sincerely yours,
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,426,624
|
Refusal to discuss, misinterpretation, and bad faith. That's par for the course with you. Get a grip. Comment removed for personal attack against FeloniousMonk. ::
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,427,006
|
Reply from :::I no longer wish to talk to you about this. Please refrain from posting on my talk page from this point on.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,443,806
|
:I like your suggestion. Anyway, I'm not a major contributor to that article, so don't worry about consulting me in future. Best wishes.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,445,204
|
:I am of legal drinking age. Again, think before you speak. I hope you used protection.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
27,447,714
|
`In the article, it says ````Hollaback Girl`` managed to do this by becoming one of the first records to break down racial and genre barriers in the 2000s. `` I'm not so sure about this, as `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,448,092
|
` ::Happy Saturday, Extraordinary Machine. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. The Canadian ``Cool`` position drops to #16, while the U.S. position is now #57. Have a great day. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,455,147
|
You shut your mouth. And my contributions will never be missed — as long as there are several hooligans on this site, I will remain to sort these issues out the proper way. Currently, all attempts have failed. But that won't be the case for much longer. Permanent blocking won't work with me, as my comeback will be uplifting.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
27,455,484
|
I've had enough of you. Shut up.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
27,455,692
|
I will, and that will be editing Wikipedia.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,458,302
|
==deleted header== The header directed readers to Weber's thesis. I think there's some confusion here. A government is not a coercive monopoly because it uses coercion to arrest people for crimes, etc. It's a coercive monopoly because it bars competition with its service of providing coercion to do so.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
27,467,483
|
` ==There are two FeloniousMonk's!== One must be a sockpuppet. I edited the intro to say: :The canonical definition of the Discovery Institute's Intelligent Design is that Intelligent Design (sometimes abbreviated ID) is the controversial assertion that certain features of the universe and of living things exhibit the characteristics of a product resulting from an intelligent cause or agent, as opposed to an unguided process such as natural selection. Intelligent Design is wholly a product of the Discovery Institute, a conservative Christian think tank. The idea has been around since 1990. Just like FeloniousMonk said above: :The canonical definition of intelligent design, which is the one offered by the Discovery Institute (``that certain features of the universe and of living things exhibit the characteristics of a product resulting from an intelligent cause or agent, as opposed to an unguided process such as natural selection``) Since ID is wholly a product of the Discovery Institute, with every leading ID proponent is one of its Fellows and every campaign and strategy arising from its offices, defining ID as they do is necessary in the intro for any of the claims made in the article by Dembski, Behe or Johnson to make any sense. Any intro that ignores the canonical definition is deficient. ...and then some other FeloniousMonk came by and reverted! Watch out! `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,469,091
|
05/11/05: Why is Metrosexuality a related link? I think most pomo-heads would find Metrosexuality a rather offensive, banal lifestyle choice.. Harmonica
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
27,474,914
|
= Request for Arbitration = You have been summoned to appear as defendant at a Request for Abritation. Please vist the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration page to make your statement under the heading .
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,484,654
|
:: No, it doesn't. That's what NPOV is all about.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,485,135
|
`With over 100,000 college students studying abroad every year, there's bound to be all kinds of tall tales, urban legends, and misinformation swirling around. While there may be grains of truth in some of these stories, below are some common misconceptions about study abroad. Misconception #1: Studying abroad is very expensive. Truth: In most cases, it is actually cheaper to study abroad. Let's say the tuition at your school is $5,000 per semester and room and board is another $4,000. Now add in the additional fees you have such as health insurance, books, and laundry. You are now well over $10,000 for the semester. Well, all but one of our programs in Spain is under $10,000 per semester and that includes everything except your airfare and spending money. Misconception #2: I can't use my financial aid to study abroad. Truth: In almost all cases, your federal aid (Stafford loans, Pell grants, etc.) can be used to study abroad and in some states, you can use your state aid as well. It is also not uncommon for your federal aid to increase when you study abroad since some of your school scholarships may not transfer. Misconception #3: Host families are all poor and just do it for the money. Truth: The last thing any study abroad company wants to do is have an unhappy student on their program. The goal is for the students to be happy so that they will tell their friends what a great time they had. If we were putting students in bad families, in dangerous neighborhoods, then no one would ever recommend us to their friends. Since the number of universities that endorse our program doubled over the last year, it's a pretty sure bet that students are happy with our choice of families. Misconception #4: I'll be so busy with schoolwork that I won't get time to see the country I'm in. Truth: This one is hysterically funny since your average study abroad student comes home with about 400+ photos from a long list of countries. Students have plenty of opportunities to travel and we even take our students on trips to give them a better feel for the country they are in. Misconception #5: I might not graduate on time if I go abroad. Truth: If you have already used up all of your elective or general education courses, then it's true that you might need to bulk up on courses before or after you go abroad. If you plan ahead, however, and leave some electives open to you, then you should be fine. The clear majority of students who study abroad still graduate in four years, despite being away from their home campus for a semester or two. Misconception #6: Most of the world hates Americans, so I won't be safe. Truth: There's no doubt that there are a lot of people who don't like the American government, but that has nothing to do with the American people. If you compare the violent crime rate in the United States to that of European, Australian, or Asian countries, you will see that the United States is actually far more dangerous. There are some areas of South America and Africa that are not especially safe, but there are also many countries on those continents that are incredibly safe. Go to the U.S. State Department website and check out the crime statistics on the country you are interested in to see how safe it is. Studying abroad is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that every college student should take advantage of. Before dismissing it due to the bad experience of one friend or rumors you have had heard, speak with your study abroad advisor and get the facts. I guarantee that once you look at all that studying abroad can offer you, you'll be hopping the first flight abroad. One organization that help ensure that you have safest, unforgettable yet affordable study abroad experience is Academic Studies Abroad. Here are some of our very popular study abroad programsin the following countries: -Study Abroad Spain- Academic Studies offers study abroad programs in Barcelona, Madrid, Salamanca and Sevilla. -Study Abroad England- Academic Studies offers study abroad programs in London. -Study Abroad Italy - Academic Studies offers study abroad programs in Florence. -Study Abroad France- Academic Studies offer study abroad programs in Aix-en-Provence and Avignon. -[http://www.academicstu
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,486,471
|
` Thanks for your comments, Kevin. Looking at the American Civil War article, the warbox there probably isn't accurate. The War of Independence, after all, was a British civil war. The American Civil War article should have the United States versus the ``Southern Rebels,`` or something to that extent, since the Confederacy was never recognized. So, I think that we've both got it wrong. The American Civil War article must be changed; otherwise, we would be obliged to characterize the War of Independence as a war between Great Britain and the United States, which I think we both agree would be silly. I'm going to propose this change on the American Civil War discussion page. Here I think the warbox should characterize the war as one between American Rebels (not Patriots, since there was no American patria, ``patriot`` is mainly a propaganda term, and ``rebel`` is the proper label, since they were rebelling against their government) and their allies and Great Britain and its allies. France is a significant enough ally of the rebels to be specified explicitly, and American Loyalists are a significant enough ally of Great Britain (yes, they were in fact British, but so were the rebels) to be listed explicitly. The main reason why I think that this is necessary is because I do not think that the warbox, as it was before I edited it, properly demonstrated the fact that the War of Independence was not necessarily a popular war (especially not until it seemed like it could be successful) and that there were many colonists who remained loyal to Great Britain (and were forced to flee to Canada). It was, as you say, a civil war. Moreover, the way it was before made it seem as if the war was between ``us,`` over here, and the British, over there. Think of it this way: the American Civil War warbox would be terribly misleading if it listed the conflict as being between the United States and American Rebels (or even American Patriots, since the Confederates most certainly were Americans, and considered themselves to be citizens of the Confederate States of America!). Rather, it should be displayed as between the United States and Confederate or Southern Rebels. Now does my request really seem all that unreasonable? `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,490,436
|
::::No, my point is that my ip resolves to AOL's servers in Virginia, making the concept of finding someone's actual location via an ip, absurd... besides, they don't provide personal use DSL service, they provide access for offices, businesses, etc.. but not some person's home, that means unless you have no internet access outside of your office, you're lying about only using that one ip
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,492,918
|
`Hello FT2. The section of Sharpley's article you present below is unrepresentative of Sharpley. Not only have you misrepresented his overall tone, but you have taken a small section of an argument that he presents in the paper to support your desire to promote NLP. Now, as you very well know, Sharpley concluded at the end of the paragraph you have partially represented, that NLP had been relegated. At the end of the paper, Sharpley says that the research does not in any way support the ridiculous claims of NLP. He put it in negative terms. Not only that but the statement that you present is higly inconclusive and totally unfit for an encyclopedia. He uses words like, may, perhaps, etc. He makes a statement about psychoanalysis being hard to test. But as you know, he believes the tenets of NLP to be perfectly testable. If you wish to take a word out of a critical paper such as ``good`` and state that Smith thinks NLP is good, when in fact Smith said that NLP is good for nothing, then you have misrepresented that article. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,496,173
|
What does MoSed mean?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,505,541
|
:Agreed. And perhaps sexist too. (Georgetown grad)
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
27,517,844
|
{| | | You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 3 hrs . If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Please do not use WP for advertorials • @ |}
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,519,624
|
and Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress/Willy on Wheels
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
27,521,824
|
` == Edit on Intelligent design (disambiguation) == You removed a lot of the article with the summary ``MoSed.`` What does MoSed mean? `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,527,252
|
` Who said the Internet was definitive? And neither is the quote provided. Reread my response. I checked the Internet and found nothing. The contributor of the information must provide more definitive supporting evidence of dreadlocks not just ``matted locks.`` (And who cares about chicle not ``chewing gum``)? The wording has been changed to be speculative, rather than reflective of an unsubstantiated, definitive conclusion reached, so far as I can tell, by only the contributor. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,528,017
|
I have deleted the image of Shiva altogether for the reasons cited above. A good illustration of dreadlocks in antiquity would be great. Again, the Samson image is only somewhat better, because at least the beard appears to be in (sort of) Shirley Temple curls, if not dreads. I would have preferred to leave that image in place until a better image could be found, but another contributor stubbornly insists on deleting it despite the fact that a photo related to dreadlocks in India is already part of the article. Unfortunate.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,528,107
|
` ==Recent deletions== *For an explanation of the deletion of the image of Shiva, please see ``Poor-quality image`` above. *The overly long text related to Shiva has been edited to include only relevant portions that verbiage dealing with Shiva's hair. *The text from Revelations has been deleted, because it says absolutely nothing about hair. `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,528,373
|
:Yeah I know that photo really sucks. One of the new control tower or T5 would be awesome.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
27,528,479
|
`::No. The reason some excellent editors leave is when reasoned and fully explained, perfectly valid edits are opposed by pigheaded people with personal motives as in this case. Your response to my inclusion of both photos has been purely ad hominem no reasonable explanation given, only puerile, and boringly repetitive name calling. Curious. I see another, white editor has weighed in and supported the inclusion of the photograph of the white woman. What? You gonna call him ``racist scum,`` too? It seems to me that shrill, incivil criticism of an edit based solely on the ethnic identity of the contributor is the only racism here. *x* `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,539,198
|
:there are many such omissions, please add whatever you can, if it becomes too much, we can always create spin-off articles for the excess.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,541,289
|
Thanks for the new image, which clearly shows Shiva's dreads. Blond? (ugh!) But much better.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,555,257
|
` == Primordial helium abundance == The article states first, ``plasma cosmologists have also offered explanations for ... primordial helium abundance``, and later, ``plasma cosmology proponents do not directly explain the ratio of elemental constitutents of the universe. Rather since there is no mechanism for creation of atoms in plasma cosmology, the abundance of light elements is taken to be an initial condition.`` How do these statements fit together? Does plasma cosmology offer an explanation for the primordial helium abundance or not? `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,559,180
|
Thanks. I hope you're feeling better. Peace. )
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,561,511
|
==Janis Joplin== I had to go back and see who was responsible for the terrible bit of misinformation in Janis Joplin. I assumed it was someone young and unfamiliar with the history of rock 'n' roll. 1958, huh? Nope. You're definitely old enough to know better. Shame on you! (No response expected but if you haven't already, go back and read the changes to your verbiage about Joplin being an innovator, 'cause you definitely need educating.) Your erroneous text is precisely the kind of thing black people talk about when we speak of cultural appropriation. Downright disgusting.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,565,441
|
:::Psychobabble appears confused, since he responded to a request for a statement of the theorem (not for the proof) by saying that the proof (not the theorem) is complicated. My guess is there is a simple statement and Psychobabble doesn't know it.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
27,570,110
|
:Yes perhaps best to scrap that sentence. Sri Aurobindo does speak of a new, supramentalised mode of existence, (see the last two chapters of The Life Divine), but whoever wrote the above passage seems to be drawing more on statements in The Agenda, without bothering to give references. A lot of this page still needs to be fixed with proper references, and the material checked against S.A.'s own writings. I've re-edited the paragraph, and also added some references to that section, and scrapped a POV paragraph that didn't have references.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,577,866
|
== A Little Late, Shmuck... == Why'd you just add the last warning now? I got the message a few days ago, and I'm sorryI didn't think people'd be that harsh over a few liberal edits. No harm intended. I don't ever try to do anything wrong (that is, when I'm editing Wikipedia, not in real life). Sorry, the warden says my computer time is up, so Good day, sir, apologies insincere, .
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,578,626
|
P.S.You really have to do something with your life; I looked around your userpage, anda monastic deacon in the Catholic Church of Wikipedia?! Catholic Church of Wikipedia?! WoW, you have some things to work out! Good luck, maybe you could even, one day, rise to the rank of ARCHdeacon, keyn eynhore (sorry, I forgot, you only speak English, Jolz)! Gutentag, goyishe kup!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,583,863
|
:Could you just be more clear on what your point is. Mine is that: #The name of the church is UOC. #It is also sometimes, but not always, called UOC-MP. The church rejects that it is its name, while admits that it eclesiastically undet the Patriarch of Moscow #The church has a formal autonomy, and autonomy in Orthodoxy is a specific term, which denotes a degree of selg-governing one step short of full autocefaly, which is a complete independence. Please explain your objections.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
27,586,806
|
A real apology: Sorry I overdid it. I got a bit caught up; I just try to enjoy myself, and didn't realize you guys would take it that hard. I just try to do harmless little jokes here and there, make the world a more interesting place, that's all. I guess I should ask the doctors to up the prescription again; I'd be really sorry if I were telling you in person... Anyway... Ahem. Well, good job; keep up the work. Excuse me, I have a little visit to pay to Mr. ... P.P.S.Just so you know, the 'civilized' way is just throwing down a handkercheif, as opposed to breaking the end of a bottle off on a counter. Or at least, that's the 'civilized' I was thinking of.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,591,695
|
`Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.— `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
27,596,869
|
Do you deny that an overthrust would put younger layers below older layers on either side of the fault?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,621,646
|
== Roman Catholicism == I reverted the mentioning of Roman Cathlicism. See the AFD-debate linked above. Noboday was able to demonstrate the use of this term by Roman Catholicism. If you've found a source, please provide it.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
27,633,705
|
`==Note to Ron== Thanks for expanding the quote - I think it is more informative now. But I think it's rather telling that you confuse this quote with a ``commitment to truth.`` Quite Orwellian indeed. Cheers! `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
27,635,666
|
Since I doubt Scotland or Scandanavia were ever in the Southern Hemisphere I changed it to Northern.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,637,326
|
I inserted a reference for the derivation of the relationship between the surface temperature of a planet and its star. It's a common derivation that can be found in many introductory astronomy books. Planetary Science by George Cole and Michael Woolfson is just one example. References are very important though, and I should have placed one into the article sooner.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,637,444
|
RE: Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,639,106
|
:First, I have made the change of Namboodiri to Namboothiri. Second, I want to thank Mel for not reverting the current content. Since the subject of links has been broached, I wonder if it wouldn't be good to try to resolve that category next, rather than item by item. A cross-wiki link to Wiktionary may be better for some of the links, but for now, I'd like to focus on only the issue of whether the word should be linked or not. What should not be linked Plain English words: *crocodile *universe *mortality *theistic The time, space, causation, change and eternity articles do include sections on philosophy, but it is embarrassing that the only comment on Asian thought on these matters I found was one sentence in Causality. Consequently, a reader of this article would find little of help in those. Moreover, this article does not discuss the philosophy of time, space, causation, change or eternity in any significant detail. But, I would support linking to those articles once they include significant Asian philosophical content. But, even then, the link should be to the philosophy section, not to the top of the article. I didn't find anything on philosophy or religion in universe or mortality. *time *space *causation *change *eternity What should be linked Major connections with the subject of another article that will help readers to understand the current article more fully: *Vishwanath *Kashi *Shiva *Ishwara *Manisha Panchakam But only if the article is written promptly. *Nrsimha *Kali *Laksmi *Buddhism *South India Kashmir is linked, so South India or India should be linked as well (but only the first occurrence). The second is a redlink. Technical terms should be linked unless they are fully defined in the article: *shlokas *atman But only the first occurrence and it should be spelled consistently. *sacerdotalism Discussed earlier, see above. Hindu Thank you.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,639,551
|
: It's really a good idea to ask people to vote for someone they have had no prior contact with.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,639,731
|
:The Haaretz article seems legit.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,644,745
|
I restored the Palmerston quote with a link. Could not find a source online for the Campbell-Bannerman quote, and the sources I did find disagreed over whether it was from 1902 or from the 1907 conference. Might have to look to hardcopy somewhere.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,647,754
|
:I have to agree with the deletion, MPerel. I personally find in an interesting perspective, but there are a couple fatal problems with it, as far as including it in Wikipedia. First, it is essentially an Israeli's interpretation of the Palestinian perspective a secondary source. It's probably accurate, but I can't imagine that there is such a dearth of Palestinians offering their perspective that an Israeli has to be found to speak for them. Second, he's not really that notable within the context of this article. In an article on Israeli peace activists, he would be notable, but here he is marginal. That said, it would be nice to replace his quote with something that gives a broad Palestinian perspective.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,648,375
|
Aginst - i agree with the statements above, espically by that of Ryano. While County Dublin is no longer an adminstrative unit, having been devolved into the 3 new adminstative units that have county level status, County Dublin still refers to a geographical unit, the tradational County Dublin. Second Dublin Region is to ambiguous of a term, that could just as easly, but not wt the creent time, refer to areas that outside of the area of County Dublin but maintin strong tiesto the area, developing into a metropolitian area. |
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,649,998
|
Your Image:Dora track.gif is about to be rightly deleted because it has no source information. This looks like a TWC or Wunderground image that we cannot use.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
27,653,165
|
`What is a ``Covenant Church`` exactly? Needs description, wiki links, ... `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,655,781
|
== Thanks for your contributions == I realize you spent a lot of time writing your three articles, but some of them don't conform to the NPOV policy or is written in the wrong tone for an encylopedia (ie. it's in thesis form, not article form) and should be cleaned up, I have either redirected, moved or labelled some of the texts you wrote, it's my hope that your fruit of labor will be shown again after its been cleaned up. I realize your works would be good for a university lecture, but we need a tone of an encylopedia. I hope you will bear with me and you can discuss this in the various talk pages. Thanks!
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,660,930
|
* this IP is from the Chicago Public Library it could be from anyone on wi-fi or public terminals here. probably not safe to block the IP, maybe just watch its contributions.
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,669,012
|
`Zeq you asked me to vote on Ramallite's nomination. The problem is that SlimVirgin nominated Ramallite. Considering my current dispute, I think it is inappropriate to vote. Sorry. If you just want my opinion, it seems from the few tussles you and Ramallite have had, you often edit POV bits into the articles, but at the same time Ramallite is incapable of respecting the NPOV facts that you do add or are contained within your edits to the point where his actions are just as bad. An example would be your addition about the number of wells cut off by the barrier (I can't find it now and only recall it somewhat). While some of your addition I remember as strongly POV, there were important facts contained within it such as that the Israel government says that no wells have been cut off. If I remember correctly, Ramallite simply reverted which is not appropriate. Another example I see is part of your recent edit. Some of it I think is POV such as implying all Israelis agree in the first statement, whether you meant ``Israel the government`` or ``Israel the citizens`` is unclear. One thing that irked me was Ramallite's reversion of the following addition: ``The Israeli government states that the purpose of the barrier is to prevent the infiltration of terrorists, and that any hardship imposed on Palestinians is an unfortunate side effect made necessary by terrorism.`` This I believe is completely true and you are attributing it so it should be easy to verify. The current version: ``Although the Israeli government has said that the purpose of the barrier is to prevent attacks and that any hardship to Palestinians is an unfortunate side effect made necessary by terrorism, the barrier's opponents say the barrier is the de facto future border of the State of Israel.`` is argumentative and implies the first statement is false and last statement is true as a result of the conditional ``Although`` which implies contradiction. This is far more POV than your addition. Considering that he says he will continue to work on the articles where you have the dispute I would be inclined to oppose the nomination based on this alone. Additionally he seems condescending towards you, and I'm sure it is difficult to ignore that considering his edits and stay civil (though staying civil would probably help the dispute). I sympathize but will not vote. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,672,009
|
` ::I think it is relevant. See . ``Propagandist`` no more out of line, and much more correct, than ``revert puppet.`` `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,680,946
|
How much detail on the standard should be added?
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,681,145
|
How much of this page's content should be removed from the SPACEWAY-1 page where it originated? With the addition of SPACEWAY-2, it was best to separate the material but should I go back and remove it as well?
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,682,293
|
go fuck yourself you fucking bitch
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
27,685,036
|
` ==title== ``Tony Perkins (evangelical Christian figure)`` is a dreadful title. How about Tony Perkins (politician)? Any other suggestions for a shorter identifier? - `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
27,694,019
|
` == re: my talk page == Well can I archive comments taht I dont wont on my talk page and have the archive in order? please reply on my talk page so that I get notified when you do. + `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
27,698,387
|
No reference whatsoever to the Picard-Lindelof or Frobenius theorem is required. Please see the definition of tangent space. It doesn't matter whether you get a particular flow through the point in question, only that there exists one to first order. And then it's just, pick a flow, any flow. Those who know about such things (myself included) are aware of these theorems, but they add needless clutter to the article. Simply things as far as possible, and no further.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,711,235
|
==Cultural appropriation== Wrong. The caption is not POV. You obviously jumped the gun, because I was still writing my explanation of the revert when you sent me a note. Read my comments in the discusion.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,712,346
|
:Wrong. The caption is not POV. You obviously jumped the gun, because I was still writing my explanation of the revert when you sent me a note. Read my comments in the discusion.
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,724,984
|
This message is regarding the page Plastic. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. — : Leave a —
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
27,734,876
|
*Striclty oppose there is a wikipedia meeting later this week, we will diskuss the matter there :@Civvi: I think You need a an update concerning the status of Südtirol, You can write to me (German, Italian, English or Spanish) if I can send You something.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,745,834
|
==Winter Soldier Investigation RFC== If you are interested [[Talk:Winter Soldier Investigation#RFC on Winter Soldier Investigation
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,756,595
|
` == sockpuppet? == I wasn't going to bring this up, but seeing as this user has attacked me again after I wikified ``his`` article (leaving a nice note on the talk page, too), may I humbly point out that this is likely the anonymous alter ego of (evidence). Either this, or two people use the computer one for genuine wikipedia editing, only he forgets to log-in a lot, and the other for personal attacks... Doesn't sound very convincing to me, but it's a possibility. Can we do something against this kind of behaviour? `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
27,760,454
|
` == ==Baba Yetu== == Hey, thanks for your help! I would have never found out any more info without it. `
| 2,005
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,763,079
|
Once again your misinformation just amazes me. Their is nothing on the webs site the designinates any official meighbourhood what so ever.A census track is not a neighbouhood, it is not uncommon to have several tracks in a neighbourhood. An empowerment zone is not an neighborhood, The Empowerment Zone (EZ) is a federally funded community development and economic revitalization initiative. The EZ designation provides localities with a federal grant and a set of tax and financing incentives to improve public safety, advance human development, create a welcoming environment and invigorate commerceThey are based upon census tracks, and like sensus tracks it is not uncommon for an Empowerment Zone to encompass several neighborhoods, either in whole or in part. Same goes for Enterprise Zones, Wards, Council districts, zip codes, no of which are specific neighborhoods nor do they desiginate official neighborhoods. The only information that is used id the planning distrctis, which are broad areas, which are used in the list to break the areras down. |
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,763,236
|
SOi'll stick with my sources, while you try to pull more ut of the air.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,766,768
|
::::Tons of member names here, include Alkivar's own. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Cracking_Force
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
27,766,941
|
, even a huge crack database. Thus it's clear that Alkivar wants all the vanity for himself.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,769,092
|
` ::What are your criteria for differentiating between a ``language`` and a ``dialect`` ? As far as I'm aware there are no fixed rules. I'll ask some of the professors of Linguistics in my department if they think Montenegrin is a language. Chances are they'll say yes. Why? Because no one really cares and there is no fixed criteria. If some people want to call it a language fine, its a language. If others don't whatever. The only people who care either way are wierd nationalist types with their strange agendas. If ~123,251 human beings want to call it a language then who are you to judge? Wikipedia is not the encyclopaedia Britannica, if it was it would look much different. - `
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,771,174
|
::::Hmmm... how much of your time is spent reverting, Jay?
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,772,614
|
` 2005 (UTC) ::If by ``street punk`` you mean that you loiter about and make a public nusiance of yourself, that probably has more to do with why you get harassed than your clothes or haircut. Or perhaps you live in a small town where stereotypical punk rock attire is still somehow regarded as ``shocking`` after all these long years? In any case, I can assure as a former punk who is now within sniffing distance of age 40, whatever static you're getting today, it's nothing compared to what most punks had to deal with 25 years ago. Not trying to deride your way of life, just stating a fact. 00:36, 9 November`
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,779,736
|
Category:Soviet spies Category:Venona Appendix A
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
27,786,103
|
a XOR b XOR a it might be worth explicitly mentioning that given two bytes a and b, ((a XOR b) XOR a) is equal to b? In my opinion, this would aid understanding of the RAID example, and the usefulness of XOR in general. I'm a bit reluctant to do this myself since I haven't edited a page before.
| 2,005
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
27,787,393
|
:Wow! Now the French will be stealing images from us. Excellent work!
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
27,789,129
|
you cannot continue to block me based of what i have written in my own user page. noone can access it but myself and you. i can write whatever i please. its freedom of speach. a police officer cannot arrest someone because they say they are going to commit a crime. i did nothing to warrant further blocking. you are all oligarchists
| 2,005
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
27,801,368
|
: Among the edits coming from this user account is vandalism of a very insidious and difficult to solve sort. I have blocked this user account for 48 hours. : I am also puzzled to see such edits coming from this user account, which looks like the one of a legitimate contributor. Should these edits be the deeds of a third party (by guessing a password for instance), I would invite the real Swollib to contact me by mail, or to explain the problem on the IRC where he will find assistance.
| 2,005
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.