dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
28,356,739	From what I can tell this isochronous cyclotron is another word for a Synchrocyclotron. It seems that Synchrotron are what replaced the Synchrocyclotron. See .	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,357,111	Thanks for the info - again I only asked to know how its done. I guess the next question (don't worry just one more) is how to restore previous versions or is it a matter of cut and paste. The latter seems to work pretty good so far.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
28,364,221	{\| \| \| You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 3 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. \|}	2,005	true	user	random	dev	false
28,364,922	` == Accusations of bias section == I recently tried to cut the section dramatically to put the information in a child article. Per summary style and all, this is very desirable. And also to get this article as a whole shorter, which is a good thing. Unfortunately, the section seems to be growing again, and mostly with rather contentious language. I think this section should contain exactly the following: # A pointer to the longer child article # Exactly one (short) paragraph describing the types of accusations made against genetic-cause proponents # Exactly one (short) paragraph describing the types of accusations made against culture-cause proponents The longer child article can argue and cite lots of details on the merits of those various accusations. But here it is important to limit the description to the broad ``lay of the land``. I think the improvised ``not-quite-npov-but-still-want-a-box`` template is peculiar. We could certainly get the short summaries to be pithier, but we basically want them to be ``too short for POV`` (that's a slight joke, but there is a point to it). `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,381,222	` Two of the articles I created Ivan Bogun and Severyn Nalivaiko were also moved without any discussion by Mr.AndriyK. I don't really mind the new ``Ukrainain`` spellings (the whole notion of ``polkovnik`` vs ``polkovnyk`` seems rather humorous to me and reminds me an anecdote in Bulgakov's White Guard about kot and kit.), even though the real Ukrainian spelling was already mentioned in Cyrillic. As for Polkovnyk I think the best solution is to merge the article with colonel. `	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
28,415,729	== CrackTeam at CodeCentral ALERT! ==	2,005	false	user	random	train	false
28,423,340	== GFDL and deleted content == Hello Jimbo, how does the GFDL handle deleted content? It seems to me that all GFDL contributions to wikipedia that aren't copyright violations themselves (or obvious vandalism too perhaps) would have to be saved and delivered by wikipedia somehow? What happens if an article exists for a few months and then for one reason or another it is deleted, doesn't the GFDL require wikipedia to in some way deliver that content to users? Just wondering.	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
28,423,640	Dont touch the greek pages if you dont want to touch yours!	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
28,426,197	Despite a large number of liberal elitists, elitism is a conservative thing, so stop reverting me.	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
28,426,544	Cite a reliable source for your edits.	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
28,426,710	, saying elitism transcends politics.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,427,187	:Find a source for me not being right.	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
28,440,501	== Everyking for Arbcom == You've got my 100% backing for arbcom elections this year. Time to spread the word.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
28,441,307	` == Briefcase situation == ``Too much on the briefcase; too little on Tarantino.`` `	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
28,444,963	` == Beta? == Reports are coming in very slow for Beta, but this is the information I have gotten so far from news reports, in regards to human casualties (for more info on damage, check Hurricane_Beta#Impact regularly: At least 30 people are reported to have been injured during Hurricane Beta's wrath on the island of Providencia. 10 boaters are reported to be missing in Puerto Cabezas. ' News reports now saying four missing and one injured in Nicaragua. ' There's a new image of Hurricane Beta at NASA. Maybe the current one (which is B&W;) can be replaced by this one that fits with all the other ones. I know someone likes to lighten all the borders, so I will leave this one to them. :Done. == Radical Reorganization == Well, after all this stuff about trimming things down and getting rid of information and what storms should have their own article and such, I got an idea for a major reorganization of the format of these hurricane seasons. Remembering that Wikipedia is not paper, who really cares whether every storm gets an article, as long as a better, appropriate, from-scratch summary is left behind? Since we're living through these events and have all this information at our fingertips, there's no reason why we can't include all the stuff people might possibly want to reference in the future. There should be several levels of detail depending on what is desired - the season summary at the top of the season article, the storms' summaries in the context of the season article, the individual storm's summary, and the storm's article. There have also been complaints that the length of the article is too long. One might as well move everything to other articles, leaving only the most important bits. This also avoids loss of otherwise fine information. I propose the following: The yyyy Oceanician hurricane season article has just bare bones: * An introduction of only the most important few events, like currently. * A table containing statistics, such as maximum strength, minimum pressure, number of deaths, maximum wind speed, duration, ACE, landfalls, etc. Symbolically, like an expanded version of the navigation bar. * One column in the table with a couple-sentence to one-paragraph very condensed summary for each storm. * All other information about the season beneath this table, or summaries with details in another article (i.e. [[Forecasts for the yyyy Oceanician hurricane season]], [[Records set by the yyyy Oceanician hurricane season]]) Every named storm of the season has its own article i.e. [[Storm xyz (yyyy)]] * A navigation bar, symbolically a mini version of the aforementioned statistics table (though in practice not much different than the current bar). * An introduction of what we currently have as the ``summaries`` (more text than numbers, like Arlene) * A main text detailing storm development, dates, times, pressures, winds, categories, deaths, etc. This can probably include more liberal use of numbers and dates and details, like the last few sentences of Irene. Improvements/comments/lynchings? Feel free to copy/paste and edit this. :I think that if we could make an article that was more than a stub of two or so paragraphs for every named storm, we should do it. Unfortunately, I don't think that there IS that much to write about every storm. And also, and more importantly, I think the majority of the storms that COULD have articles would be neglected and left with stubs. I also don't think article length is a problem, as we've got it well-divided into sections. Also, some people have said that the current format is overly technical, well.. to expand the info we have, we've need to make it even more technical. So I don't think that this plan would work out very well. Although I wish it could. :No, Wikipedia is not paper - but that doesn't mean we should make articles about every single weather system. Why stop at cyclones? I hea	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,445,347	:::Brazil? China? Mexico? Even in the USA there are heavy divisions, between places like Compton and Beverly Hills.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,452,210	:but encoding homographs in a traditional code page would have meant losing other letters or symbols and would have introduced all the issues associated with homographs (text that looks identical but isn't,having to make sure you enter the correct one of a set of homographs etc).	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
28,457,483	Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ''''''	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
28,490,411	Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
28,493,084	== Apology == Point taken Dmcdevit. I apologise for taking the bait on the article and hopefully will refrain from it in future. The lock on the article is a positive but temporary step. We will never actually get a common view amongst us as the arguments are not being accepted. Can we get a mediation or something similar going to get a common ground without any bias?	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
28,493,126	== Apology == Point taken Dmcdevit. I apologise for taking the bait on the article and hopefully will refrain from it in future. The lock on the article is a positive but temporary step. We will never actually get a common view amongst us as the arguments are not being accepted. Can we get a mediation or something similar going to get a common ground without any bias?Raja	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
28,495,312	Don't create article titles in all capital letters please. They don't conform to Wikipedia's naming system ''''''	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
28,498,543	::You have my strong support, but I probably shouldn't vote this soon after being unbanned. Good luck.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
28,505,222	` == Steve Roberts-Mee == Please do not add vanity articles to Wikipedia. — \| `	2,005	true	user	random	dev	false
28,516,082	` == Self-hating Jew == I think some of the current text of this article may have been stolen from the (copyrighted?) Ku Klux Klan encyclopedia entry for ``nigger lover.`` Have a look. `	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
28,516,703	` == Self-hating Jew == I think some of the current text of this article may have been stolen from the (copyrighted?) Ku Klux Klan encyclopedia entry for ``nigger lover.`` Have a look. Why are you helping to promote hate-speech on Wikipedia? `	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	true
28,522,666	id just like to say this is a perfect example of the wikipedia community at work. I started this article with a few lines and have visited it a few times since then and each time it has been added on and improved until it has come to this quite impressive, considering the topic, standard.	2,005	false	article	random	train	false
28,525,702	::Because I cited my source and you merely mentioned yours. Wikipedia editors (all of them) need to learn citations matter a lot, and anything you add without one can be disputed. As long as we continue to allow edits without cited sources, we're always going to have problems like this.	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
28,530,196	Name of Perky's owner Mrs???	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,530,360	What else is on her?	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,532,586	== 2006 Season == Will they stay in Toronto or will they move?, and what about added the 2006 Season to the article? anyone help thanks.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,533,035	The RED print hurts the eyes!!!!!!!!	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,534,484	Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
28,543,799	This message is regarding the page Template:Infobox band. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
28,545,082	` :Self-hating Jew is probably one of the most embarassing articles in all of Wikipedia, Radiant. And the link I added was to Masada2000 not to a KKK site. Masada2000 is a Kahanist site that actually gives an extensive list of ``self-hating Jews`` why shouldn't Wikipedia want to provide a link to examples of the subject of an article? Masada2000 has the distinction, by the way, of being the top result for a Google search of self-hating jew; I never meant to diminish the importance of non-Kahanist sites that provide lists of self-hating Jews, if there are any. :Did you look, by the way, at the article that you have jumped to the defense of? Or did you just go by what Jayjg managed to convince you of? It really is a sad and pathetic article, Radiant, and it maybe serves to remind that not even the Jews can leave the Jews alone. : `	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
28,550,574	` == The currency moves == Hi, I think we can safely assume that the currency moves should be carried out. I did a few yesterday, many of them don't need an admin. Unfortunately, WP:RM is starting to run up a huge backlog maybe because the currency moves look a bit daunting. I think the Rùm vote which I parttook in should also be closed, but unfortunately one support vote should be discounted so it's going the ``wrong`` way. Anyway, enough for tonight. `	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
28,553,235	== and == Persistent, isn't he? -) - :Quite so ). By the way, I just looked at the guidelines, and they say that, while blanking one's talk page is a hostile act, they don't say anything about it being vandalism automatically. Since the user has only spammed once and the rest of his edits are blanking, perhaps he should be allowed to do so?	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
28,555,293	::If you don't intend to jump to the defense of anything, please don't tell me not to edit war over anything. Which other people did you admonish about edit warring over the article, or did you think I was edit warring with myself? If you're partisan, you should at least be honest about it. There are worse ways to come across than as a partisan.	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
28,562,658	Until you admit I am right, I will keep a Neutaliry dispute template on this page.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,578,067	Why isn't Sobibor one of the links on Jewish_resistance_during_the_Holocaust? I don't know how to link this page there, can someone tell me how to do it or do it themselves.	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
28,593,736	` :I used to post under ``Marsden.`` Does that help? `	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
28,599,672	== Caitlin Parcell == .......................airhead...............................	2,005	true	user	random	train	true
28,606,394	`= Related, Afd and WP:BIO === You might be interested in the proposed change to WP:BIO to allow election hopefuls as well as office holders. That change has beenr everted, by the way. - ]/] (W) '''' ==`	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
28,627,592	Removed dispute banner.	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
28,628,058	== split off infinite regression (?) == I think this is a specific example of an infinite regression but not all infinite regressions are humping turtles. But I'm not entirely sure what an infinite regression is. Anyone want to split it off? — \|	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,630,460	:As no one has responded and I'm reasonably sure this is correct, I've gone ahead and added the pronunciation note. Someone please let me know if I have this wrong.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,635,751	What's so odd about Minnesota? Why the comment about Minnesota being a state and not a city? That's what the name of the real team is; I don't see why that makes it any less likely to be included in the game.	2,005	false	article	random	dev	false
28,651,793	::I'll try to keep an eye on that article.	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
28,655,113	` == coppermine-T == Hi Denniss, i'm the guy who submitted the edit for the coppermine-T that you reverted. I can't guarantee ALL BX boards support coppermine-Ts, but there's no question at least the Abit BX-133 RAID does, so it's not accurate to say they are old-core-new-board only as is the impression in the current state. Their last released BIOS notes explicitly list support for 1GHz Celerons which are definitely Coppermine-Ts: http://www.abit.com.tw/page/sa/download/download_bios_detail.php?pFILE_TYPE=Bios&pMAIN;_TYPE=Motherboard&pTITLE;_ON_SCREEN=BX133-RAID&pSOCKET;_TYPE=Socket%20370 Also, on this forum there's an excerpt from someone who's had communication from Abit re: coppermine-T support (you have to scroll down, no direct link): http://www.abxzone.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-6817.html i'm pasting it here: I think the PIII 1200mhz you guys are seeing is not a Tualatin but a faster PIII called the CopperMine-T. Check this thread at anandtech: Link (http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=28&threadid;=512647) There is a post from RichieZZZZ there and he posted: you need to read HOCP they e-mailed abit about it. << There is and has been confusion about what exactly Tualatin CPUs will work in as we stated earlier. It seems as if Tualatin CPUs are not backwards compatible with BX or i815 chipsets. When I posted this earlier I got this mail from Don Goff that pointed us to this link which we had posted a month or so ago that states this, ``Supports Intel Coppermine T CPU.`` about their BIOS upgrade for the ABIT BX133 RAID board. Admittedly I am a bit confused about this too so we asked ABIT what exactly the deal is and here is their response. Kyle, OK, I have it. It is the confusion about CopperMine CPU vs. CopperMine-T CPU vs. Tualatin CPU. The CopperMine-T was the CPU that was the bridge between the CopperMine and Tualatin platforms. The CopperMine-T can work in BX boards, usually through a BIOS update. The Tualatin CPU has a different pinout and simply will not work in a BX board. I have confirmed this with our R&D; and FAE so have to believe that this time it is true. Scott.`	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
28,658,595	:Hope you don't mind that I undid your Louis Zukofsky link, but the two links to him seemed overly close together. \|	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
28,663,847	: The Sweet Success section was totally POV so I removed it, but there are still some other sections that could do with some work. ''''''	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,675,681	No, it's a silly idea. railway signal should concentrate on styles of signal; upper quadrants, lower quadrants, 2,3 and 4 aspect colour light, and each railway compnay had a house style. THis page should be about the operation of signals. — \|	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,677,207	::I moved the plagiasm part to the Frozen site.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,680,259	== horrible horrible article == Odd that this article should be about Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, when most of is an unstructured rambling mess mostly duplicating Lamarckism. — \|	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
28,680,333	on the grounds that the word is not in the dictionary. Kindly note the following: # Not true. Merriam-Webster: in·ter·dis·ci·plin·ar·i·ty \ noun # According to Naming conventions, articles titled with adjectives ('interdisciplinary') should be moved to their noun forms ('interdisciplinarity') # The term 'interdisciplinarity' is in widespread use in academia # A Google search for 'interdisciplinarity' matches nearly one-half million documents. Please don't move this page back to 'interdisciplinary'.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,685,307	`==Bogus Aliases== The ``aliases`` for the members of the Cobra Unit are not aliases. The ones here are just other names. Aliases are other known names/identities a character is known to go by. Not a description of the person. Changed. `	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
28,697,191	`Please stop vandalizing the article on ``The Shocker.`` Many people have put a lot of work into making it what it is.`	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
28,700,162	In general, I oppose the arbitrary comparison of articles, since different articles receive different amounts of attention from different editors for different reasons which usually have nothing to do with the notability of the subject. Usually, the answer is to expand the shorter articles, not shorten a longer article. However, in this particular case, I'm inclined to agree, but only if we can condense the existing material instead of chopping out whole sections.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,701,346	* The judgement as to whether something is valid or not is not your call to make. Views are attributed. Removing them because they don't fit into your narrow theological view is not on. It is not original research as it has been around in one form or another atleast since Russell and probably before. — \|	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,705,613	== G, can you please protect Bogdanov Affair again? == 's unprotection was premature and the reasons given simply don't wash. i had put another request on WP:RfPP. the page needs constant defense from the vandal, but the defenders need to be able to rest. also, there is little need from any legit editors to update the page and what changes are needed can be done in the short period of time between protects, if my suggestion is taken up. thanks for reading this.	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
28,713,094	` :It's a shame to bring the Wiki moderators into this, because they are quite busy. It appears to me that you have declared all criticisms of Gonzalez ``ad hominiem criticism,`` and then you spend the article defending Gonzalez against what you see as unwarranted criticism. The purpose of an encyclopedia is to present facts. If you read the Ken Garcia article in the ``Further readings`` section, you will see that many of the criticism in this article were in fact real and held as true by many San Franiscans. I feel that the article was well balanced before. It presented Gonzalez's many accomplishments, but also gave voice to his many critics.`	2,005	false	article	random	train	false
28,717,654	== school articles in wikipedia == Wikipedia should delete all school articles unless someone writes something of good quality.	2,005	false	article	random	train	false
28,738,942	It seems that AE defend anything - including vandalism- that helps him to promote his personal PoVs.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
28,744,419	And until you start behaving, let this be my final post to you.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,744,526	and apologize for your past conduct	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
28,762,968	:Are they ment to depict communists per-say or just represent more vagly the communist threat, in like these are the kind of people who are communist and they are EVIL? -	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
28,763,559	== The Smugness of her face == I edited this page added, the correct assursion that she is well known for having a smug face. This is true, why are my edits being reverted?	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,763,971	:Have you ever even seen Kat Fletcher?!	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,764,078	` :How about a comprimise, would you be happy if the sentence was re-writern to read, ``Kat Fletcher is generally considered to have a smug face by all those who have actually seen her.``? `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,764,372	`==examples of differnt facial expresions== The so called ``Cleared as filed`` (if that is her real name) has been following me around reverting all my attempts to add positive contributions to Wikipedia. As part of this vendeta they have reverted my adition of Kat Fletcher as an example of aa smug face. In the U.K. Kat Fletcher is well known (googler her and see) for her smag face, do other users agree that she could be added as an example of smugness?`	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,772,445	== Have you read this == Wikipedia:Abundance and redundancy. It's an informal guideline, two-and-a-half years old, and never cited in my experience. But it's a good guideline and I see no reason not to cite it. In sum, where there is no obvious reason to delete, keep redundant material. This springs from the Temperance organizations vote. There is no rule which states redundance in a category demands an article of the same name's deletion. That temperance organizations has become a cat actually demands, to my mind, that the main article be expanded, not deleted or merged. We don't delete Mars, JFK or Oman based on redundancy in the cat. Of course, one can argue redundant but also useful material should be kept, as your note suggests. But AfD isn't about clean up. Temperance organizations in-itself could be an eminently useful page. I'm not an inclusionist at all (if you've look at my votes) but this is the one delete criterion that I disagree with and that I believe doesn't have policy or guidelines to support it. I only note this to you because I noted something similar on the AfD sub-page after your comment and because I've seen you at AfD. Have to start somewhere if you want to revive an old guideline.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
28,773,737	` This is a useful page, but it would be nice if it had a larger description of each paper: author, time of publication, main issues. `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,775,628	==Roperts== Anyone know why the Ropers left so early?	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,776,356	*Terry Wogan (BBC Radio 2)	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,787,225	: Here is the problem with your argument. As you stated on IRC: This isn't about deletionism or inclusionism, it's about you being an asshole to people who disagree with you.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	true
28,788,566	` :For the reader unfamiliar with the situation, the block was set in response to my repeated use of the phrase ``deletionist vandals`` on several AfD entries; according to karmafist, I was being an asshole to deletionists (who do indeed disagree with me) by calling them ``vandals``. :Now, karmafist, you and I both know that there are people who think it is acceptable to replace the contents of Snoopy with, say, ``Snoopy is a shitfaced cockmaster.`` I disagree with those people, and I'm sure you do, too. In fact, there are lots of people who doand they refer to the aforementioned individuals as ``vandals``. However, they are never blocked for this. Since, according to you, ``being an asshole to people who disagree with you`` is a blockable offense, it follows that one of the following must be true: :#Calling someone a ``vandal`` does not constitute being an asshole, in which case I should not have been blocked because by calling deletionists (who disagree with me) ``vandals``, I was not being an asshole to people who disagree with me. :#Your statement that it is unacceptable to be an asshole to people who disagree with me is false, in which case I should not have been blocked because assholery is in fact not unacceptable behavior. :Or perhaps you meant to say that because someone disagrees with you is not ipso facto sufficient reason to be an asshole to him. Again, one of the following must be true: :#Calling someone a ``vandal`` does constitute assholery, in which case one can infer (from the fact that those who refer to the Snoopy types as ``vandals`` have never been blocked for that) that it is acceptable to engage in this specific type of assholery towards those who are indeed vandalsand, as I proved on , deletionists are indeed vandals (you claimed that my proof was ``bullshit`` and that it did not need refutation, but your assertion does not make it so) :#Calling someone a ``vandal`` does NOT constitute assholery, in which case it's all irrelevant since, as I was not being an asshole, the conditions under which being an asshole is acceptable are not an issue. :#Calling someone a ``vandal`` only constitutes assholery if it is false, in which case see the above-mentioned proof as to why that is not the case here. Now, which of these alternatives is it? Alternately, you can show me a fallacy (if I were you, I would try and find a false dichotomyor trichotomy, for that matteras my argument rests on showing you how none of the possible conclusions of your argument justify a block on me; perhaps you will be able to find an alternative I have missed that does indeed justify blocking me) or a mistaken premise and I will gladly concede that my behavior was wrong and was deserving of a block, and will change in the future. `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
28,788,897	` 2005 (UTC) :Your fundamental false premise: that there is no objectively correct answer to ``What is the way things should be?`` Once you can overcome that, everything else will fall into place. Actually, more fundamentally, you make the error of thinking that there is any question that lacks an objectively correct answer. That is simply not true. For every question, there is one objectively correct and an infinite number of objectively incorrect or meaningless answersincluding the question ``What is the best color?``. 00:11, 20 November`	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
28,792,286	oh really, when was the last time? was he mentioned as Frenchy by the boys? you are incorrect sir.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,792,419	BoothyBoy you are wrong, as heard on the wonderful Opie and Anthony Show on XM 202, the leading provider of Satellite Radio, Howard Stern will not have any rights to his old show, it is something that is and was non-negotiable. The great inventor must steal some more ideas from Greg and Tony.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,800,363	` == My Apologies == My apologies to you sir or madam. I have come to find that people have been vandalising in my name, asking for my ``release``. Just let it be known that it'll never happen again, and that I wish there to be no hard feelings between us. I will be good and you and wikipedia will never be bothered by anyone claiming to help me. `	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
28,802,044	Stop being a shithead, or I will rip off your head and piss down your esophagus, mother fucker.	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	true
28,802,758	== True == Luanne Platter is really cute, thank you for showing me the light. Now I molest myself to cartoon characters, thanks a lot.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
28,807,932	== Jews and Jews == Can we (meaning male whites) truely co-exist with Jews? I mean niggers and spics are bad enough but the fucking jews go too far. I think there should be a genocide, and there should be an article on wikipedia that encourages the death of jews, for those who agree please message here, for those that don't, eat me.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	true
28,807,993	== JEW == Get the fuck out of here you jewish son of a bitch, I'll rape your fucking family if you don't leave you semite bastard. I will shoot you if you return, because you're a dirty semite, I hope you choke on a fucking bagel, prick. Shalom.	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	true
28,808,212	== Shalom == Semite, get the fuck out of here. I will kill you, you son of a bitch if you don't leave wikipedia. If you tell anyone I said this to you, I will rape your jew family. Choke on a bagel, you faggoty hymie cock sucker. You better fucking die, before I hunt you down and piss on your face. If you get me blocked for this, I will find you and shoot you, I just want your jew fucking self gone, you dumb motherfucking piece of shit g-d damn jew. Die! Shalom.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	true
28,814,263	Hey guys, let's get into a dick measuring contest on who has the highest SAT score. Then, we can go back to getting our doctorates in art history.	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	true
28,815,348	To be more accurate, you ran away dismayed and stopped talking when said that he only feigned repentance in his Jehovah's Witness judicial committee. After pretending to ignore me for a while as part of your religious shunning bullcrap, like you really have the option to religiously shun people on Wikipedia. , watch how he now probably pretends to talk through me like I'm not actually here, like the old comedy routine where two people a few feet from each other with someone in between refuse to talk to each other but talk to the middle person like the other person isn't there.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
28,820,664	` :Canti is official, though Kanchi would be ``correct.`` `	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
28,831,598	== Vandalism == Please do not add speedy delete tags to pages that do not qualify as such. It is considered vandalism. — \|	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
28,833,130	:The short stature article is also a good analogy, i.e. at which point does it warrant injecting human growth hormone in kids?	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
28,835,765	` :FWIW, with regard to the manga, there's no way it can be canon: if what I'm reading is correct, Ken dies in it. As the manga is from like 1992, how does Ken return to fight in the SF sequels? P I'm not going to respond beyond this because I desperately do not want a multipage rant like on the Ryu talk page, but from brief research into the manga, it sounds non-canonical. (e-mail) `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,839,337	` :k, just wanted to make sure we weren't delving into original-research territory. =) Thanks! (e-mail) `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,843,109	:Yes you're right, theologically Catholicism is very different to American protestantism which gave birth to the creationist movement and are certainly not interested in the sort of fundamentalist theocracy that most of them want. Sure, they use the teleological argument, but phrase it in theological language which is a lot different from scientific language and hence it isn't pseudoscience, which is what irks me as a scientist. But I don't understand theology (probably because I've been trained to think too scientifically). And the Catholic Church most of the time has better things to do than make statements on scientific issues. But Catholics are really into authority, so what the hierarchy says, goes. — \|	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,847,678	== Spelling == Learn how to spell — \|	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
28,850,027	Welcome! Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — \|	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
28,851,504	` :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.`	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
28,851,629	`:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,852,621	` :::::No, it wouldn't look the same because I would personally revert anything that was unsourced fancruft/speculation before it got a chance to get in and weave itself into the article. This is precisely what I've done on Tekken (2006 film), and whenever someone tries to add something unsourced I try to verify it myself, and if I can't, revert it goes (usually with a note asking for a source going to the editor). It sounds bad/evil, but it's better than what I ended up seeing: people were quoting the old Tekken (2006 film) as gospel saying it's cast list or storyline was accurate, etc. People were citing Wikipedia as a source elsewhere. This is why we can't afford to have articles like this with large masses of unsourced material; it flushes Wikipedia's credibility down the toilet. (e-mail) `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
28,859,826	Surely its a bit a paradox to state she has 'kept a low profile' in the first line and then conclude that she is currently appearing in a prime time reality tv show...??	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
28,862,296	You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for blanking pages. After the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead. The block will expire in three hours. —	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false

28,356,739

From what I can tell this isochronous cyclotron is another word for a Synchrocyclotron. It seems that Synchrotron are what replaced the Synchrocyclotron. See .

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,357,111

Thanks for the info - again I only asked to know how its done. I guess the next question (don't worry just one more) is how to restore previous versions or is it a matter of cut and paste. The latter seems to work pretty good so far.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

28,364,221

{| | | You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 3 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. |}

2,005

true

user

random

dev

false

28,364,922

` == Accusations of bias section == I recently tried to cut the section dramatically to put the information in a child article. Per summary style and all, this is very desirable. And also to get this article as a whole shorter, which is a good thing. Unfortunately, the section seems to be growing again, and mostly with rather contentious language. I think this section should contain exactly the following: # A pointer to the longer child article # Exactly one (short) paragraph describing the types of accusations made against genetic-cause proponents # Exactly one (short) paragraph describing the types of accusations made against culture-cause proponents The longer child article can argue and cite lots of details on the merits of those various accusations. But here it is important to limit the description to the broad ``lay of the land``. I think the improvised ``not-quite-npov-but-still-want-a-box`` template is peculiar. We could certainly get the short summaries to be pithier, but we basically want them to be ``too short for POV`` (that's a slight joke, but there is a point to it). `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,381,222

` Two of the articles I created Ivan Bogun and Severyn Nalivaiko were also moved without any discussion by Mr.AndriyK. I don't really mind the new ``Ukrainain`` spellings (the whole notion of ``polkovnik`` vs ``polkovnyk`` seems rather humorous to me and reminds me an anecdote in Bulgakov's White Guard about kot and kit.), even though the real Ukrainian spelling was already mentioned in Cyrillic. As for Polkovnyk I think the best solution is to merge the article with colonel. `

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

28,415,729

== CrackTeam at CodeCentral ALERT! ==

2,005

false

user

random

train

false

28,423,340

== GFDL and deleted content == Hello Jimbo, how does the GFDL handle deleted content? It seems to me that all GFDL contributions to wikipedia that aren't copyright violations themselves (or obvious vandalism too perhaps) would have to be saved and delivered by wikipedia somehow? What happens if an article exists for a few months and then for one reason or another it is deleted, doesn't the GFDL require wikipedia to in some way deliver that content to users? Just wondering.

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

28,423,640

Dont touch the greek pages if you dont want to touch yours!

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

28,426,197

Despite a large number of liberal elitists, elitism is a conservative thing, so stop reverting me.

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

28,426,544

Cite a reliable source for your edits.

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

28,426,710

, saying elitism transcends politics.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,427,187

:Find a source for me not being right.

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

28,440,501

== Everyking for Arbcom == You've got my 100% backing for arbcom elections this year. Time to spread the word.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

28,441,307

` == Briefcase situation == ``Too much on the briefcase; too little on Tarantino.`` `

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

28,444,963

` == Beta? == Reports are coming in very slow for Beta, but this is the information I have gotten so far from news reports, in regards to human casualties (for more info on damage, check Hurricane_Beta#Impact regularly: *At least 30 people are reported to have been injured during Hurricane Beta's wrath on the island of Providencia. *10 boaters are reported to be missing in Puerto Cabezas. ' News reports now saying four missing and one injured in Nicaragua. ' There's a new image of Hurricane Beta at NASA. Maybe the current one (which is B&W;) can be replaced by this one that fits with all the other ones. I know someone likes to lighten all the borders, so I will leave this one to them. :Done. == Radical Reorganization == Well, after all this stuff about trimming things down and getting rid of information and what storms should have their own article and such, I got an idea for a major reorganization of the format of these hurricane seasons. Remembering that Wikipedia is not paper, who really cares whether every storm gets an article, as long as a better, appropriate, from-scratch summary is left behind? Since we're living through these events and have all this information at our fingertips, there's no reason why we can't include all the stuff people might possibly want to reference in the future. There should be several levels of detail depending on what is desired - the season summary at the top of the season article, the storms' summaries in the context of the season article, the individual storm's summary, and the storm's article. There have also been complaints that the length of the article is too long. One might as well move everything to other articles, leaving only the most important bits. This also avoids loss of otherwise fine information. I propose the following: The yyyy Oceanician hurricane season article has just bare bones: * An introduction of only the most important few events, like currently. * A table containing statistics, such as maximum strength, minimum pressure, number of deaths, maximum wind speed, duration, ACE, landfalls, etc. Symbolically, like an expanded version of the navigation bar. * One column in the table with a couple-sentence to one-paragraph very condensed summary for each storm. * All other information about the season beneath this table, or summaries with details in another article (i.e. [[Forecasts for the yyyy Oceanician hurricane season]], [[Records set by the yyyy Oceanician hurricane season]]) Every named storm of the season has its own article i.e. [[Storm xyz (yyyy)]] * A navigation bar, symbolically a mini version of the aforementioned statistics table (though in practice not much different than the current bar). * An introduction of what we currently have as the ``summaries`` (more text than numbers, like Arlene) * A main text detailing storm development, dates, times, pressures, winds, categories, deaths, etc. This can probably include more liberal use of numbers and dates and details, like the last few sentences of Irene. Improvements/comments/lynchings? Feel free to copy/paste and edit this. :I think that if we could make an article that was more than a stub of two or so paragraphs for every named storm, we should do it. Unfortunately, I don't think that there IS that much to write about every storm. And also, and more importantly, I think the majority of the storms that COULD have articles would be neglected and left with stubs. I also don't think article length is a problem, as we've got it well-divided into sections. Also, some people have said that the current format is overly technical, well.. to expand the info we have, we've need to make it even more technical. So I don't think that this plan would work out very well. Although I wish it could. :No, Wikipedia is not paper - but that doesn't mean we should make articles about every single weather system. Why stop at cyclones? I hea

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,445,347

:::Brazil? China? Mexico? Even in the USA there are heavy divisions, between places like Compton and Beverly Hills.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,452,210

:but encoding homographs in a traditional code page would have meant losing other letters or symbols and would have introduced all the issues associated with homographs (text that looks identical but isn't,having to make sure you enter the correct one of a set of homographs etc).

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

28,457,483

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ''''''

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

28,490,411

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

28,493,084

== Apology == Point taken Dmcdevit. I apologise for taking the bait on the article and hopefully will refrain from it in future. The lock on the article is a positive but temporary step. We will never actually get a common view amongst us as the arguments are not being accepted. Can we get a mediation or something similar going to get a common ground without any bias?

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

28,493,126

== Apology == Point taken Dmcdevit. I apologise for taking the bait on the article and hopefully will refrain from it in future. The lock on the article is a positive but temporary step. We will never actually get a common view amongst us as the arguments are not being accepted. Can we get a mediation or something similar going to get a common ground without any bias?Raja

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

28,495,312

Don't create article titles in all capital letters please. They don't conform to Wikipedia's naming system ''''''

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

28,498,543

::You have my strong support, but I probably shouldn't vote this soon after being unbanned. Good luck.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

28,505,222

` == Steve Roberts-Mee == Please do not add vanity articles to Wikipedia. — | `

2,005

true

user

random

dev

false

28,516,082

` == Self-hating Jew == I think some of the current text of this article may have been stolen from the (copyrighted?) Ku Klux Klan encyclopedia entry for ``nigger lover.`` Have a look. `

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

28,516,703

` == Self-hating Jew == I think some of the current text of this article may have been stolen from the (copyrighted?) Ku Klux Klan encyclopedia entry for ``nigger lover.`` Have a look. Why are you helping to promote hate-speech on Wikipedia? `

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

true

28,522,666

id just like to say this is a perfect example of the wikipedia community at work. I started this article with a few lines and have visited it a few times since then and each time it has been added on and improved until it has come to this quite impressive, considering the topic, standard.

2,005

false

article

random

train

false

28,525,702

::Because I cited my source and you merely mentioned yours. Wikipedia editors (all of them) need to learn citations matter a lot, and anything you add without one can be disputed. As long as we continue to allow edits without cited sources, we're always going to have problems like this.

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

28,530,196

Name of Perky's owner Mrs???

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,530,360

What else is on her?

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,532,586

== 2006 Season == Will they stay in Toronto or will they move?, and what about added the 2006 Season to the article? anyone help thanks.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,533,035

The RED print hurts the eyes!!!!!!!!

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,534,484

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

28,543,799

This message is regarding the page Template:Infobox band. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

28,545,082

` :Self-hating Jew is probably one of the most embarassing articles in all of Wikipedia, Radiant. And the link I added was to Masada2000 not to a KKK site. Masada2000 is a Kahanist site that actually gives an extensive list of ``self-hating Jews`` why shouldn't Wikipedia want to provide a link to examples of the subject of an article? Masada2000 has the distinction, by the way, of being the top result for a Google search of self-hating jew; I never meant to diminish the importance of non-Kahanist sites that provide lists of self-hating Jews, if there are any. :Did you look, by the way, at the article that you have jumped to the defense of? Or did you just go by what Jayjg managed to convince you of? It really is a sad and pathetic article, Radiant, and it maybe serves to remind that not even the Jews can leave the Jews alone. : `

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

28,550,574

` == The currency moves == Hi, I think we can safely assume that the currency moves should be carried out. I did a few yesterday, many of them don't need an admin. Unfortunately, WP:RM is starting to run up a huge backlog maybe because the currency moves look a bit daunting. I think the Rùm vote which I parttook in should also be closed, but unfortunately one support vote should be discounted so it's going the ``wrong`` way. Anyway, enough for tonight. `

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

28,553,235

== and == Persistent, isn't he? -) - :Quite so ). By the way, I just looked at the guidelines, and they say that, while blanking one's talk page is a hostile act, they don't say anything about it being vandalism automatically. Since the user has only spammed once and the rest of his edits are blanking, perhaps he should be allowed to do so?

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

28,555,293

::If you don't intend to jump to the defense of anything, please don't tell me not to edit war over anything. Which other people did you admonish about edit warring over the article, or did you think I was edit warring with myself? If you're partisan, you should at least be honest about it. There are worse ways to come across than as a partisan.

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

28,562,658

Until you admit I am right, I will keep a Neutaliry dispute template on this page.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,578,067

Why isn't Sobibor one of the links on Jewish_resistance_during_the_Holocaust? I don't know how to link this page there, can someone tell me how to do it or do it themselves.

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

28,593,736

` :I used to post under ``Marsden.`` Does that help? `

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

28,599,672

== Caitlin Parcell == .......................airhead...............................

2,005

true

user

random

train

true

28,606,394

`= Related, Afd and WP:BIO === You might be interested in the proposed change to WP:BIO to allow election hopefuls as well as office holders. That change has beenr everted, by the way. - ]/] (W) '''' ==`

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

28,627,592

Removed dispute banner.

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

28,628,058

== split off infinite regression (?) == I think this is a specific example of an infinite regression but not all infinite regressions are humping turtles. But I'm not entirely sure what an infinite regression is. Anyone want to split it off? — |

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,630,460

:As no one has responded and I'm reasonably sure this is correct, I've gone ahead and added the pronunciation note. Someone please let me know if I have this wrong.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,635,751

What's so odd about Minnesota? Why the comment about Minnesota being a state and not a city? That's what the name of the real team is; I don't see why that makes it any less likely to be included in the game.

2,005

false

article

random

dev

false

28,651,793

::I'll try to keep an eye on that article.

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

28,655,113

` == coppermine-T == Hi Denniss, i'm the guy who submitted the edit for the coppermine-T that you reverted. I can't guarantee ALL BX boards support coppermine-Ts, but there's no question at least the Abit BX-133 RAID does, so it's not accurate to say they are old-core-new-board only as is the impression in the current state. Their last released BIOS notes explicitly list support for 1GHz Celerons which are definitely Coppermine-Ts: http://www.abit.com.tw/page/sa/download/download_bios_detail.php?pFILE_TYPE=Bios&pMAIN;_TYPE=Motherboard&pTITLE;_ON_SCREEN=BX133-RAID&pSOCKET;_TYPE=Socket%20370 Also, on this forum there's an excerpt from someone who's had communication from Abit re: coppermine-T support (you have to scroll down, no direct link): http://www.abxzone.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-6817.html i'm pasting it here: I think the PIII 1200mhz you guys are seeing is not a Tualatin but a faster PIII called the CopperMine-T. Check this thread at anandtech: Link (http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=28&threadid;=512647) There is a post from RichieZZZZ there and he posted: you need to read HOCP they e-mailed abit about it. << There is and has been confusion about what exactly Tualatin CPUs will work in as we stated earlier. It seems as if Tualatin CPUs are not backwards compatible with BX or i815 chipsets. When I posted this earlier I got this mail from Don Goff that pointed us to this link which we had posted a month or so ago that states this, ``Supports Intel Coppermine T CPU.`` about their BIOS upgrade for the ABIT BX133 RAID board. Admittedly I am a bit confused about this too so we asked ABIT what exactly the deal is and here is their response. Kyle, OK, I have it. It is the confusion about CopperMine CPU vs. CopperMine-T CPU vs. Tualatin CPU. The CopperMine-T was the CPU that was the bridge between the CopperMine and Tualatin platforms. The CopperMine-T can work in BX boards, usually through a BIOS update. The Tualatin CPU has a different pinout and simply will not work in a BX board. I have confirmed this with our R&D; and FAE so have to believe that this time it is true. Scott.`

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

28,658,595

:Hope you don't mind that I undid your Louis Zukofsky link, but the two links to him seemed overly close together. |

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

28,663,847

: The Sweet Success section was totally POV so I removed it, but there are still some other sections that could do with some work. ''''''

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,675,681

No, it's a silly idea. railway signal should concentrate on styles of signal; upper quadrants, lower quadrants, 2,3 and 4 aspect colour light, and each railway compnay had a house style. THis page should be about the operation of signals. — |

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,677,207

::I moved the plagiasm part to the Frozen site.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,680,259

== horrible horrible article == Odd that this article should be about Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, when most of is an unstructured rambling mess mostly duplicating Lamarckism. — |

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

28,680,333

on the grounds that the word is not in the dictionary. Kindly note the following: # Not true. Merriam-Webster: in·ter·dis·ci·plin·ar·i·ty \ noun # According to Naming conventions, articles titled with adjectives ('interdisciplinary') should be moved to their noun forms ('interdisciplinarity') # The term 'interdisciplinarity' is in widespread use in academia # A Google search for 'interdisciplinarity' matches nearly one-half million documents. Please don't move this page back to 'interdisciplinary'.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,685,307

`==Bogus Aliases== The ``aliases`` for the members of the Cobra Unit are not aliases. The ones here are just other names. Aliases are other known names/identities a character is known to go by. Not a description of the person. Changed. `

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

28,697,191

`Please stop vandalizing the article on ``The Shocker.`` Many people have put a lot of work into making it what it is.`

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

28,700,162

In general, I oppose the arbitrary comparison of articles, since different articles receive different amounts of attention from different editors for different reasons which usually have nothing to do with the notability of the subject. Usually, the answer is to expand the shorter articles, not shorten a longer article. However, in this particular case, I'm inclined to agree, but only if we can condense the existing material instead of chopping out whole sections.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,701,346

* The judgement as to whether something is valid or not is not your call to make. Views are attributed. Removing them because they don't fit into your narrow theological view is not on. It is not original research as it has been around in one form or another atleast since Russell and probably before. — |

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,705,613

== G, can you please protect Bogdanov Affair again? == 's unprotection was premature and the reasons given simply don't wash. i had put another request on WP:RfPP. the page needs constant defense from the vandal, but the defenders need to be able to rest. also, there is little need from any legit editors to update the page and what changes are needed can be done in the short period of time between protects, if my suggestion is taken up. thanks for reading this.

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

28,713,094

` :It's a shame to bring the Wiki moderators into this, because they are quite busy. It appears to me that you have declared all criticisms of Gonzalez ``ad hominiem criticism,`` and then you spend the article defending Gonzalez against what you see as unwarranted criticism. The purpose of an encyclopedia is to present facts. If you read the Ken Garcia article in the ``Further readings`` section, you will see that many of the criticism in this article were in fact real and held as true by many San Franiscans. I feel that the article was well balanced before. It presented Gonzalez's many accomplishments, but also gave voice to his many critics.`

2,005

false

article

random

train

false

28,717,654

== school articles in wikipedia == Wikipedia should delete all school articles unless someone writes something of good quality.

2,005

false

article

random

train

false

28,738,942

It seems that AE defend anything - including vandalism- that helps him to promote his personal PoVs.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

28,744,419

And until you start behaving, let this be my final post to you.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,744,526

and apologize for your past conduct

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

28,762,968

:Are they ment to depict communists per-say or just represent more vagly the communist threat, in like these are the kind of people who are communist and they are EVIL? -

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

28,763,559

== The Smugness of her face == I edited this page added, the correct assursion that she is well known for having a smug face. This is true, why are my edits being reverted?

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,763,971

:Have you ever even seen Kat Fletcher?!

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,764,078

` :How about a comprimise, would you be happy if the sentence was re-writern to read, ``Kat Fletcher is generally considered to have a smug face by all those who have actually seen her.``? `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,764,372

`==examples of differnt facial expresions== The so called ``Cleared as filed`` (if that is her real name) has been following me around reverting all my attempts to add positive contributions to Wikipedia. As part of this vendeta they have reverted my adition of Kat Fletcher as an example of aa smug face. In the U.K. Kat Fletcher is well known (googler her and see) for her smag face, do other users agree that she could be added as an example of smugness?`

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,772,445

== Have you read this == Wikipedia:Abundance and redundancy. It's an informal guideline, two-and-a-half years old, and never cited in my experience. But it's a good guideline and I see no reason not to cite it. In sum, where there is no obvious reason to delete, keep redundant material. This springs from the Temperance organizations vote. There is no rule which states redundance in a category demands an article of the same name's deletion. That temperance organizations has become a cat actually demands, to my mind, that the main article be expanded, not deleted or merged. We don't delete Mars, JFK or Oman based on redundancy in the cat. Of course, one can argue redundant but also useful material should be kept, as your note suggests. But AfD isn't about clean up. Temperance organizations in-itself could be an eminently useful page. I'm not an inclusionist at all (if you've look at my votes) but this is the one delete criterion that I disagree with and that I believe doesn't have policy or guidelines to support it. I only note this to you because I noted something similar on the AfD sub-page after your comment and because I've seen you at AfD. Have to start somewhere if you want to revive an old guideline.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

28,773,737

` This is a useful page, but it would be nice if it had a larger description of each paper: author, time of publication, main issues. `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,775,628

==Roperts== Anyone know why the Ropers left so early?

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,776,356

*Terry Wogan (BBC Radio 2)

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,787,225

: Here is the problem with your argument. As you stated on IRC: This isn't about deletionism or inclusionism, it's about you being an asshole to people who disagree with you.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

true

28,788,566

` :For the reader unfamiliar with the situation, the block was set in response to my repeated use of the phrase ``deletionist vandals`` on several AfD entries; according to karmafist, I was being an asshole to deletionists (who do indeed disagree with me) by calling them ``vandals``. :Now, karmafist, you and I both know that there are people who think it is acceptable to replace the contents of Snoopy with, say, ``Snoopy is a shitfaced cockmaster.`` I disagree with those people, and I'm sure you do, too. In fact, there are lots of people who doand they refer to the aforementioned individuals as ``vandals``. However, they are never blocked for this. Since, according to you, ``being an asshole to people who disagree with you`` is a blockable offense, it follows that one of the following must be true: :#Calling someone a ``vandal`` does not constitute being an asshole, in which case I should not have been blocked because by calling deletionists (who disagree with me) ``vandals``, I was not being an asshole to people who disagree with me. :#Your statement that it is unacceptable to be an asshole to people who disagree with me is false, in which case I should not have been blocked because assholery is in fact not unacceptable behavior. :Or perhaps you meant to say that because someone disagrees with you is not ipso facto sufficient reason to be an asshole to him. Again, one of the following must be true: :#Calling someone a ``vandal`` does constitute assholery, in which case one can infer (from the fact that those who refer to the Snoopy types as ``vandals`` have never been blocked for that) that it is acceptable to engage in this specific type of assholery towards those who are indeed vandalsand, as I proved on , deletionists are indeed vandals (you claimed that my proof was ``bullshit`` and that it did not need refutation, but your assertion does not make it so) :#Calling someone a ``vandal`` does NOT constitute assholery, in which case it's all irrelevant since, as I was not being an asshole, the conditions under which being an asshole is acceptable are not an issue. :#Calling someone a ``vandal`` only constitutes assholery if it is false, in which case see the above-mentioned proof as to why that is not the case here. Now, which of these alternatives is it? Alternately, you can show me a fallacy (if I were you, I would try and find a false dichotomyor trichotomy, for that matteras my argument rests on showing you how none of the possible conclusions of your argument justify a block on me; perhaps you will be able to find an alternative I have missed that does indeed justify blocking me) or a mistaken premise and I will gladly concede that my behavior was wrong and was deserving of a block, and will change in the future. `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

28,788,897

` 2005 (UTC) :Your fundamental false premise: that there is no objectively correct answer to ``What is the way things should be?`` Once you can overcome that, everything else will fall into place. Actually, more fundamentally, you make the error of thinking that there is any question that lacks an objectively correct answer. That is simply not true. For every question, there is one objectively correct and an infinite number of objectively incorrect or meaningless answersincluding the question ``What is the best color?``. 00:11, 20 November`

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

28,792,286

oh really, when was the last time? was he mentioned as Frenchy by the boys? you are incorrect sir.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,792,419

BoothyBoy you are wrong, as heard on the wonderful Opie and Anthony Show on XM 202, the leading provider of Satellite Radio, Howard Stern will not have any rights to his old show, it is something that is and was non-negotiable. The great inventor must steal some more ideas from Greg and Tony.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,800,363

` == My Apologies == My apologies to you sir or madam. I have come to find that people have been vandalising in my name, asking for my ``release``. Just let it be known that it'll never happen again, and that I wish there to be no hard feelings between us. I will be good and you and wikipedia will never be bothered by anyone claiming to help me. `

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

28,802,044

Stop being a shithead, or I will rip off your head and piss down your esophagus, mother fucker.

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

true

28,802,758

== True == Luanne Platter is really cute, thank you for showing me the light. Now I molest myself to cartoon characters, thanks a lot.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

28,807,932

== Jews and Jews == Can we (meaning male whites) truely co-exist with Jews? I mean niggers and spics are bad enough but the fucking jews go too far. I think there should be a genocide, and there should be an article on wikipedia that encourages the death of jews, for those who agree please message here, for those that don't, eat me.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

true

28,807,993

== JEW == Get the fuck out of here you jewish son of a bitch, I'll rape your fucking family if you don't leave you semite bastard. I will shoot you if you return, because you're a dirty semite, I hope you choke on a fucking bagel, prick. Shalom.

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

true

28,808,212

== Shalom == Semite, get the fuck out of here. I will kill you, you son of a bitch if you don't leave wikipedia. If you tell anyone I said this to you, I will rape your jew family. Choke on a bagel, you faggoty hymie cock sucker. You better fucking die, before I hunt you down and piss on your face. If you get me blocked for this, I will find you and shoot you, I just want your jew fucking self gone, you dumb motherfucking piece of shit g-d damn jew. Die! Shalom.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

true

28,814,263

Hey guys, let's get into a dick measuring contest on who has the highest SAT score. Then, we can go back to getting our doctorates in art history.

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

true

28,815,348

To be more accurate, you ran away dismayed and stopped talking when said that he only feigned repentance in his Jehovah's Witness judicial committee. After pretending to ignore me for a while as part of your religious shunning bullcrap, like you really have the option to religiously shun people on Wikipedia. , watch how he now probably pretends to talk through me like I'm not actually here, like the old comedy routine where two people a few feet from each other with someone in between refuse to talk to each other but talk to the middle person like the other person isn't there.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

28,820,664

` :Canti is official, though Kanchi would be ``correct.`` `

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

28,831,598

== Vandalism == Please do not add speedy delete tags to pages that do not qualify as such. It is considered vandalism. — |

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

28,833,130

:The short stature article is also a good analogy, i.e. at which point does it warrant injecting human growth hormone in kids?

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

28,835,765

` :FWIW, with regard to the manga, there's no way it can be canon: if what I'm reading is correct, Ken dies in it. As the manga is from like 1992, how does Ken return to fight in the SF sequels? P I'm not going to respond beyond this because I desperately do not want a multipage rant like on the Ryu talk page, but from brief research into the manga, it sounds non-canonical. (e-mail) `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,839,337

` :k, just wanted to make sure we weren't delving into original-research territory. =) Thanks! (e-mail) `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,843,109

:Yes you're right, theologically Catholicism is very different to American protestantism which gave birth to the creationist movement and are certainly not interested in the sort of fundamentalist theocracy that most of them want. Sure, they use the teleological argument, but phrase it in theological language which is a lot different from scientific language and hence it isn't pseudoscience, which is what irks me as a scientist. But I don't understand theology (probably because I've been trained to think too scientifically). And the Catholic Church most of the time has better things to do than make statements on scientific issues. But Catholics are really into authority, so what the hierarchy says, goes. — |

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,847,678

== Spelling == Learn how to spell — |

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

28,850,027

Welcome! Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — |

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

28,851,504

` :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.`

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

28,851,629

`:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,852,621

` :::::No, it wouldn't look the same because I would personally revert anything that was unsourced fancruft/speculation before it got a chance to get in and weave itself into the article. This is precisely what I've done on Tekken (2006 film), and whenever someone tries to add something unsourced I try to verify it myself, and if I can't, revert it goes (usually with a note asking for a source going to the editor). It sounds bad/evil, but it's better than what I ended up seeing: people were quoting the old Tekken (2006 film) as gospel saying it's cast list or storyline was accurate, etc. People were citing Wikipedia as a source elsewhere. This is why we can't afford to have articles like this with large masses of unsourced material; it flushes Wikipedia's credibility down the toilet. (e-mail) `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

28,859,826

Surely its a bit a paradox to state she has 'kept a low profile' in the first line and then conclude that she is currently appearing in a prime time reality tv show...??

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

28,862,296

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for blanking pages. After the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead. The block will expire in three hours. —

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false