dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
29,166,554	` ==Street Fighter template== I've put the width back to 100%, but I'd really rather keep the ndash's for now (tho I did replace them with the unicode ndash (not to be confused with a hyphen on ye olde keyboard) so they wouldn't look so ugly when viewed/edited). BTW, sorry for the lag time in responding, I missed your reply till today! ( — (e-mail) `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,166,803	` ==November 24== With regard to the Zangief edit you've been making, could you please provide a source for the gay commentary? Also, why are you removing a number of wikilinks? Thanks for your cooperation! — (e-mail) `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,172,250	== grammar == My apostrophies IAR! -)	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
29,174,149	` :Simply stating it isn't good enough, please cite a source (a particular part of a game, a particular statement by a specific Capcom official, etc). Also, you have not explained why you continue to remove the entire ``related characters`` section, nor why you continue to remove the trivia about Gorbachev in his ending. — (e-mail) `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,181,494	I'll just wait til my IP address changes in a few days. Then I'll be able to insert all the opinions I want. You do noble things here. Whether or not you were trying to make a friend, you've made one in me, Rhobite. Would it be against Wiki's NPOV policy to say I love you?	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
29,182,506	` ::I thought of an example. The Alaska brown bear and the Grizzly bear are the same species, Ursus arctos, but they differ in size and color in different places. Ursus arctos exist in N. America and in Eurasia. So they are a pretty good ``model`` for human diversity. Then there is the Kodiak Brown Bear, which has been isolated on the Kodiak Islands and is the largest of all the Ursus arctos. It is considered a subspecies. See: http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Ursus_arctos.html So biologists would call the Kodiak bears a separate ``race`` or subspecies, but the way we are using ``race`` here, the Alaska Brown Bear and the Grizzly Bear are different races. The differences among the varieties of Ursus arctos seem to be color and size. If it weren't for the barrier formed by sea water, there wouldn't be a Kodiak bear because they would have been able to mate with Brown bears in surrounding territories. Just to round out the picture, the black bears are a different species from the brown bears. So we are all like brown bears and maybe the Neanderthals are like black bears.`	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
29,182,931	If you think it's fine the way it is, please indicate such.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,183,998	Copyvio The first version of this article appears to be a copyvio pasted from two sources: * Turkish Ministry of Culture * and either of: and (Copyright Chris Kutschera) Subsequent edits have only made small changes in the text. —	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
29,186,116	==Elitism== Please protect elitism. I am on the side of Jake Remington, since I like elite people better than poor people like the other people involved int he war, but protect it to stop the war.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,186,752	== Hasankeyf/Temp == Stub for new article... —	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
29,187,809	** You have no valid reasons other than self-promotion (which is not valid for a Christian). A Christian puts on the whole armor of God, and does not rely on subterfuges and deceptions like sock puppets. You are without excuse, and you are very far from God.	2,005	false	user	random	train	true
29,190,509	== Personal Attack on you == You probably know about this, but just in case: diff. —	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
29,190,831	:I doubt there is an answer. The Koran is a mediaeval document with many logical holes in it. One is expected to just accept that these beings are created in heaven like angels and exist to comfort the faithful dead. I don't think anyone is claiming that it makes sense. Heaven doesn't exist, after all. —	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,191,040	It's religion, not reality. At least it's not as wacky as Ragnarok.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,192,952	` Stormie is a loon who pops up every now and then to add his un-sourced comments to a small range of articles, and then accuse the historican Rex Curry who points out Stormie's garbage of the fact that Stormie is covering up for Nazism. Stormie then tries to hide the fact that he knows that Rex Curry is correct because Stormie never disputes a single fact mentioned, because Stormie cannot, and Stormie blabbers about ``some vast conspiracy`` in his effort to hide his own ignorance. Stormie admits his ignorance when he says that he ``never even heard of Francis Bellamy until I spotted this link-adding on recent changes.`` Stormie then shows his venal misbehavior by confessing that he reverted the article, and blabbers about how ``it but apparently that makes Stormie some sort of worshipper of Bellamy and all his evil deeds.`` `	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
29,193,254	` Hello, you recently yipped and yapped about me breaking the rules, but I notice that your latest update you edited in ``a proud faggot nutsack`` within my userpage. I find this intolerable, bigoted, and downright hateful. Perhaps homosexual African-Americans elecit anger in you? You should visit www.adl.org . `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	true
29,193,349	: Oh, I am sorry, I was looking at a previous edit. My apologies! I am terribly, terribly sorry, and very embarassed. I hope to make amends with you.	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
29,200,387	` ==Manor Park (Ottawa)== Can you please add slightly more content to stubs like these. There's several people (like myself) who would like to see this deleted under the [103]speedy deletion criterion ``small article with little or no context``. Adding some information on what one can see there and how old it is instead of just its location, would aid a great deal in avoiding having your work deleted. As an added bonus, larger articles are also more informative and helpful for users.- [104]Mgm\|[105]^(talk) :Good point, but I don't know any more about Manor Park. I've never been there. I just feel that even such a short article is better than nothing. I'm putting a watch on this page so feel free to reply here. Unforgettableid \| `	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
29,205,887	::Why not admit it? The only reason you disagree with anything is because you are an obsessed troll, whose sole agenda is causing discord.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	true
29,219,064	` :``Controversially`` is a perfectly acceptable word when describing the usage of ``conspiracy theory``. To put things simply, anyone using ``conspiracy theory`` in a scientific or encyclopedic context is trying to trick people, not trying to advance science neutrally. Funny you should say it's ``not clear what a dubious narrative genre is`` since that was your argument over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory. Another thing I find funny is this unclear dubious narrative genre can somehow be used to defend a phrase from a charge of non neutral presentation. In my opinion we should completely rewrite ``narrative genre`` but since your argument passed (for now) over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory we are stuck with it, sorry. `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,220,213	::::PS: Please STOP the madness.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,223,552	== I urge the POV bot gang to stop playing games == How plausible is it that you and your POV buddies show up to the same article at around the same time? Do you appear to be random editors concerned with neutrality or editors with a POV mission? What is with your new algorithmn to never risk 3RR but instead secretly bring in more and more POV-bots to the game? I don't like it. Even after the most recent edit warring my most recent comments have yet to be responded to on the talk page (surprising given the 4-6 editors reverting my changes).	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,227,098	`I changed this to ``ostensibly``, what do people think? `	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
29,228,842	:Yes, knowing erasmus is right.	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
29,231,263	` == I dispute Jayjg's block for ``personal attacks`` == For the record I dispute Jayjg's block of me for ``personal attacks`` (and he has yet to notify me on my talk page). Given the history of the Conspiracy theory article it is perfectly reasonable to interpret that a bot-like highly coordinated cabal of editors do everything in their power to defend or implement a certain POV. Why do Jayjg and his POV aligned friends always seem to show up to the same article at the same time? Why do Jayjg and his friends have exactly the same POV? They never seem to debate the core issues of any controversy on the talk page. `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,237,609	Eddie Zattara I have placed a tag on the article Eddie Zattara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person but it does not indicate how or why that person is notable. If you can indicate why Eddie Zattara is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Eddie Zattara. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles.	2,005	true	user	random	dev	false
29,240,991	:Still waiting for Jayjg or someone to explain their actions. Also, why does a coordinated group of editors try so relentlessly to implement the same (subtle propaganda?) POV on specific, politically sensitive, articles within wikipedia without ever debating in good faith on the talk page?	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,241,467	:I don't really see how the article is served by including the titles of three random poems. I also deleted them because the way you worded it initially, it seemed like they were book titles. If you want to put them back in, however, I don't have any particular objection beyond that, as long as it's clear they are poem titles.	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
29,258,269	I know Arwel, it's just a FYI thing. I am really (too) uptight with these protocol things.	2,005	false	article	random	test	false
29,258,544	I have removed that NPOV-section tag as you seem to have no argument as to what is not neutral about the presentation of the KHRP quote. I have also re-added the (quite reasonable) map caption. Please do not revert without offering a valid justification. —	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,259,765	: You're most welcome. —	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
29,262,706	::It's amazing a group of suspiciously coordinated admins can gang up on a minority view point without any repurcussions here on wikipedia. I am still waiting for various explanations.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,265,642	` :::I invite the coordinated pro ``conspiracy theory`` editors to responded to my most recent talk page posts even though I am currently blocked from editing, hopefully a lively debate will spring up and the issues will resolve themselves with fresh editors (unlikely but one can dream). Oh wait, the coordinated editors don't actually care to debate the core of most any issue, and they may be propagandists or otherwise play games, oh I forgot, sorry, never mind. `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,269,858	: I'm not sure just what an arbitration appeal involves. I would assume that you file an WP:RFAR and see if they accept. The arbitration that we had some months ago was requested by you, not me — although I supported its acceptance. I am fine with the resolution reached in the case and feel that your ban from political articles serves wikipedia well, and I will not support lifting it. You've indicated that you wish to work with just the facts and leave biases out of your editing and I think that's a good sign. I believe that Fred said something about your demonstrating these habits in non-political articles before considering allowing you to edit political articles again, and you should probably do so before requesting an appeal. —	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,274,760	` ::I agree with K-111. The suggestion comes from a moped message board, not from Wikipedians. We have already explored this and there appears to me to be a strong consensus for this being separate, not least becasue most jurisdictions treat the two differently but also because the two strands of development are entirely separate. - ]/] (W) '''' `	2,005	true	article	random	dev	false
29,292,394	:Neiter did I. Maybe some sentences were a little bit to close to the referenced sources, but this is a work in progress and (as I wrote in the edit summary) I'm having intentions to extend the article without any copyvio. Even the early version (that was told to be a copyvio) included information from both sources. But, as I said, maybe the original text was to close to the original(s), this is however now fixed. -	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,306,385	Before I re-add {npov} to the article I will give those that disagree an opportunity to respond to this section and/or the section below. Also, first changing {npov} to {povcheck} then removing it after a big dispute shows bad faith in my interpretation, but I digress for now.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,311,143	== Soviet Version: real? == Is there provenance for that one?	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
29,313,203	`:::I will appreciate it if/when proponents of ``conspiracy theory`` discontinue the use of non-consensus building tactics. You fail to note it was another editor that actually put the {npov} template in this article before (was that Carbonite?) who changed it to {povcheck}. (Was it also Carbonite that removed {povcheck} a few days later? iterestingly inconsistent). I admit my criticisms of the intro are somehwat minor (we've made some progress) but since your side has apparently stopped debating the only recourse I have is to make readers/third parties aware of the existence of dispute by placing the disputed header at the top. This should be basic NPOV policy. :::Please respond to my concern that ``commonly believed`` needs some sort of balance/caveat. `	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
29,314,908	`:::::Carbonite, you have commited edits in bad faith in my interpretation, you changed an {npov} template to a {povcheck} template and then later removed any dispute notice, what you should have done was change it back to {npov}. Your story about how {povcheck} is deprecated seems designed to cover up your removal of any disputed notice. And you, like Tom, failed to note it was another editor that added {npov} to this article most recently, not me. I will additionally appreciate it when proponents of ``conspiracy theory`` cease the use of disinformation tactics. :::::I am still waiting for someone to respond to my criticisms of the intro/article directly, thx. `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,317,501	`:::::We can't know ahead of time nor conclusively what the mainstream view is, we can basically only say that mainstream sources are claiming something is the mainstream view. I think the word ``ostensibly`` is perfect in that it basically says ``the allegedly mainstream view`` and it also signifies the issue is all about appearances, not necessarily about facts (unfortunately). `	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
29,324,318	`:::::You can't know ahead of time what people believe to be the mainstream/straightforward view, and in fact people may not believe it either way, they just accept what they have been told (but we should not simply regurgitate that). I am not advocating rewriting the intro, I am advocating caveatting or balancing. How is ``ostensibly`` inaccurate? Given that we agree to disagree on this (and likely many other points) I will add {npov} to the article soon unless you come up with something new. `	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,325,639	I dont get it this is the first time i have been on this site and i get acusations thrown at me!	2,005	false	user	blocked	train	false
29,340,587	` == Please tell me more about your ``There is a cabal`` theory == Hello, I am interested in hearing more about and joint investigating your ``There is a cabal`` theory, thx. `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,341,882	` ::: NB: I will be off-wiki for the rest of the week. — == Please tell me more about your ``There is a cabal`` theory == Hello, I am interested in hearing more about and joint investigating your ``There is a cabal`` theory, thx. `	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
29,351,956	` == False Accusation == Just for your information, I did not edit the Bektashi or any other article in Wikipedia, neither as logged in or anonymously after you have threatened me. I understand youassume everybody is as honorless as yourself, but sorry I am not. Both of us knows who vandalized that article, but you used your ``administrative`` power to intimidate me, so I am not in this place anymore if it lets people like you do whatever you can. `	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
29,352,085	This user is deaf discriminator, facist, and racist	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	true
29,352,304	Dark Lord Farley is well known for Hilter lover	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,352,540	:::Assumptions again huh, my admin friend? It shouldn't be this easy to accuse people of cheating - well, who am I talking to? Just for completeness, I don't know this person, and I haven't looked at or edited anything in wikipedia since you have threatened me. And be happy, you will never see me again, so you can keep wikipedia free from any fact you don't like.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,357,093	` ::What is ``leftist`` or ``rightist`` about vegetarianism? Or, for that matter, about being anti-Israel: surely U.S. paleoconservatives are not leftists. - \| `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,362,798	==info for your curiosity== Credibility_node_ue	2,005	false	user	blocked	dev	false
29,370,254	` :::Erm, ``Put`` of this section are almost always considered to be the ancient Libyans. The reason is that there were two significant ancient Libyan tribes (according to Egyptian records), one was named the Libu (from whom Libya takes its modern name) and the other was named the Pitu, from whom it took its ancient name - the Egyptians appear to have used Phut to refer to the area. :::If Codex considers ``Tubal v. Jubal`` to be the ``tip``, then I would like to know why he is reverting (which Codex once did as the sole purpose of one of Codex' edits) ``are`` to ``is`` when I was the originator of the phrase, ``are`` is correct UK usage, and we are meant to keep ``authors choice``. How Codex finds this is more significant than ``Tubal v. Jubal`` I would like to know. There are several other issues that I have to question how they are more significant. To me, it appears as if Codex has chosen the one which appears least supported, and is intending to justify the whole reversion based on that mere issue, which I find somewhat of a false premise. :::In particular, I should like to know why Codex is apparantly unable to see that I am not misrepresenting the creationist view, especially since he appears to be the one that added identical equalities (e.g. Meschech = Massechusetts (native tribe), Magog=Magyar, Gomer=Germany) to the Japheth article on two seperate occasions (Massechusetts there being represented more generally by Algonquians, and Magyar by the English name of their nation - Hungary). :::I would also like to know why Codex refers to my entries as shoddy, when he is unable to see any connection between Cush and Nubia (the connection is that Kush (nation) and Nubia are the same geographic location, quite a large, obvious connection). And likewise why I use Sudan rather than East Africa (essentially because Kush (nation) was situated in (north) Sudan, not Eritrea, or Somalia, for example). :::Rather than cherry picking the easiest area to contest, and attempting to imply the others are equally invalid without any argument, each issue should be addressed. In particular, in order to avoid reverting the entire thing, the simplest issues, such as, for example, how UK usage (authors choice) for certain types of collective nouns works, should be addressed first. :::User talk:FDuffy `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,372,167	` == Admin == ``I saw you were made admin and I almost shit. You must be a very happy man. Congrats.`` `	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,373,868	==3RR== You have also broken the spirit of 3RR and blatantly abused your admin powers by reverting to your preferred POV version with your revert button. Please do not preach to me or pontificate with your sermons.	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	false
29,374,037	::I will revert as I see fit. I am an editor, just as you are. We both have equal rights here. Have fun editing Councellor.	2,005	false	user	blocked	dev	false
29,377,426	REDIRECT Talk:Bishop of Durham	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,377,797	REDIRECT Talk:Bishop of London	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,389,615	ENOY FACKING SMALL KIDS AND EATING PELICAN SHIT	2,005	false	user	blocked	dev	true
29,405,721	Should the B roads be unlinked on this page? I thought consensus was that most of them don't deserve their own articles.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,406,942	==The ArbCom decision== Could you please point out to me what part of the ArbComs decision you are refering to here: . I was involved in that case, and if I remember correct there was nothing in the ArbCom's decision that indicated that I, Fadix or Davenbelle could be blocked for 24 hrs, for the alleged reasons that you mentioned on Davenbelles talkpage. But maybe I am wrong. Could you please point out to exactly what part of the decision you are referring to?	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
29,408,684	== Kurdistan Workers Party== It sure looks like Cool Cat is up to his old PoV pushing, personal attacks and harrasment again. I also made a comment about the problem here: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Coolcat%2C_Davenbelle_and_Stereotek/mentorship#Continued_harrasment_by_Cool_Cat	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,411,376	`Delta's gone all the way back up to its peak strength! Well, that was unexpected. We could still see the 14th hurricane of the season, and maybe a non-extratropical Africa landfall. Might need to start a ``Northeast Atlantic Hurricane basin`` if more Vince- and Delta-like storms form in the future! - `	2,005	true	article	random	test	false
29,414,216	You have to be more specific about these issues to add your tags Coolcat.	2,005	true	article	blocked	dev	false
29,417,346	:Of course you're retarded for putting up nonsense on wikipedia talk pages. Please refrain from doing thus in the future.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	true
29,418,110	== Sock? == What? Why do you think I'm a sockpuppet of someone? What did I do?	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
29,418,324	::I think because I agree with your beliefs they think I'm you. I never even did anything, I just came across your page, and reverted it, then I ready what you wrote and I agreed. This is unfair.	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
29,418,739	:I also reverted vandalism on Dookie does that make me Green Day No does that make me a fan No you're a bastard I hate you I cant believe just because I was going through Recent Changes and helping out people doesn't make me a sockpuppet I can help out and edit that doesnt make me someone else youre a horrible user that should be blocked i cant believe you	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	false
29,419,125	::::I think there should be some form of screening process here, that keeps them out. They shouldn't even be allowed to use the internet and fill it with their queer things like porn and what not. That Curps person was being a bastard, he's probably the leader of the homo wikipedians.	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	true
29,419,241	::Don't talk to me troll.	2,005	true	user	blocked	dev	true
29,421,328	` :As for ``controlled by a committee`` - it really depends on the maturity of the article and how controvertial it is. This article is both. By and large it is a delicate compromise between opposing POVs, though some of the pro-ID people still see it as biased against ID. As for the changes you made - my biggest issue with them is that they read like commentary, not like an encylopaedia entry. If you can rephrase the sentances in a way that preserves the underlying shades of meaning, and does so without sounding hostile to ID, I would be happy with the changes (though, of course, I can't speak for everyone involved here). `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,434,871	==Removed Outer Space== Outer space uninhabited for the last time (this moment may have already passed) Since the above makes no sense, I removed it. .	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
29,443,216	Can someone please find and list the density of azulene?	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
29,450,009	Watch out for user Slo-mo, he's been vandalizing high school pages and then reports others to admins as vandals. So wrong.	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
29,450,448	]] Be aware, user Slo-mo has a strange fascination with the marijuana use section of this article. Many have deleted it as it is clearly misleading, as it shines a bright light on an insigificant and common aspect of any suburban high school. Slo-mo also makes many useful edits and then vandalizes the same pages. If you revert his misinformation, he reports you to admins as a vandal. Very wrong, be warned! watch out! [[User:64.34.166.88	2,005	false	article	blocked	train	false
29,450,874	as vandals for content disputes. Grow up.	2,005	false	user	blocked	test	true
29,455,222	:::As I said, be specific about your PoV concerns Cool Cat, or do not add these tags. I also suggest that you stop harassasing me.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,462,760	`Thomas Pynchon The Crying of Lot 49 1 ONE summer afternoon Mrs Oedipa Maas came home from a Tupperware party whose hostess had put perhaps too much kirsch in the fondue to find that she, Oedipa, had been named executor, or she supposed executrix, of the estate of one Pierce Inverarity, a California real estate mogul who had once lost two million collars in his spare time but still had assets numerous and tangled enough to make the job of sorting it all out more than honorary. Oedipa stood in the living room, stared at by the greenish dead eye of the TV tube, spoke the name of God, tried to feel as drunk as possible. But this did not work. She thought of a hotel room in Mazatlan whose door had just been slammed, it seemed forever, waking up two hundred birds down in the lobby; a sunrise over the library slope at Cornell University that nobody out on it had seen because the slope faces west; a dry, disconsolate tune from the fourth movement of the Bartok Concerto for Orchestra; a whitewashed bust of Jay Gould that Pierce kept over the bed on a shelf so narrow for it she'd always had the hovering fear it would someday topple on them. Was that how he'd died, she wondered, among dreams, crushed by the only ikon in the house? That only made her laugh, out loud and helpless: You're so sick, Oedipa, she told herself, or the room, which knew. The letter was from the law firm of Warpe, Wist-full, Kubitschek and McMingus, of Los Angeles, and signed by somebody named Metzger. It said Pierce had died back in the spring, and they'd only just now found the will. Metzger was to act as co-executor and special counsel in the event of any involved litigation. Oedipa had been named also to execute the will in a codicil dated a year ago. She tried to think back to whether anything unusual had happened around then. Through the rest of the afternoon, through her trip to the market in downtown Kinneret-Among-The-Pines to buy ricotta and listen to the Muzak (today she came through the bead-curtained entrance around bar 4 of the Fort Wayne Settecento Ensemble's variorum recording of the Vivaldi Kazoo Concerto, Boyd Beaver, soloist); then through the sunned gathering of her marjoram and sweet basil from the herb garden, reading of book reviews in the latest Scientific American, into the layering of a lasagna, garlicking of a bread, tearing up of romaine leaves, eventually, oven on, into the mixing of the twilight's whiskey sours against the arrival of her husband, Wendell (``Mucho``) Maas from work, she wondered, wondered, shuffling back through a fat deckful of days which seemed (wouldn't she be first to admit it?) more or less identical, or all pointing the same way subtly like a conjurer's deck, any odd one readily clear to a trained eye. It took her till the middle of Huntley and Brinkley to remember that last year at three or so one morning there had come this long-distance call, from where she would never know (unless now he'd left a diary) by a voice beginning in heavy Slavic tones as second secretary at the Transyl-vanian Consulate, looking for an escaped bat; modulated to comic-Negro, then on into hostile Pachuco dialect, full of chingas and maricones; then a Gestapo officer asking her in shrieks did she have relatives in Germany and finally his Lamont Cranston voice, the one he'd talked in all the way down to Mazatlan. ``Pierce, please,`` she'd managed to get in, ``I thought we had`` ``But Margo,`` earnestly, ``I've just come from Commissioner Weston, and that old man in the fun house was murdered by the same blowgun that killed Professor Quackenbush,`` or something. ``For God's sake,`` she said. Mucho had rolled over and was looking at her. ``Why don't you hang up on him,`` Mucho suggested, sensibly. ``I heard that,`` Pierce said. ``I think it's time Wendell Maas had a little visit from The Shadow.`` Silence, positive and thorough, fell. So it was the last of his voices she ever heard. Lamont Cranston. That phone line could have pointed any direction, been any length. Its quiet ambiguity shifted over, in the months after the call, to what had been revived: memories of his face, body, things he'd given her, things she had now and then pretended not to've heard him say. It took him over, and to the verge of being forgotten. The shadow waited a year before visiting. But now there was Metzger's letter. Had Pierce called last year then to tell her about this codicil? Or had he decided on it later, somehow because of her annoyance and Mucho's indifference? She felt exposed, finessed, put down. She had never executed a will in her life, didn't know where to begin, didn't know how to tell the law firm in L. A. that she didn't know where to begin. ``Mucho, baby,`` she cried, in an access of helplessness. Mucho Maas, home, bounded through the screen door. ``Today was another defeat,`` he began. NEW	2,005	false	article	blocked	dev	false
29,473,821	:I agree with Kwami that parts of the article are POV and I must note that the relevant tag exists in the article.	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,476,293	I will add sub headings to this in a week or so so that should complete the clean up of the article;)	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,476,568	Gravity is irrelevant. Even without gravity, the megalomaniac would have to overcome the rock's inertia to lift itand inertia is an intrinsic property of an object, based solely on its mass.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,492,092	` It seems to me that the goal of exchange is to maximize the benefit of division and specialization of land and labour. It might be argued that maximizing the benefit of capital development is also a goal, but that is probably overreaching. It seems that for any efficacy, division of labour is utterly dependent upon exchange. The creation and maintenance of generally acceptable minimal ``rules of order`` is very important to this maximization of benefit evolving from exchange. `	2,005	false	article	random	train	false
29,496,266	Good, now we have some progress! So, Finland didn't like Soviet Union. But you still didn't answer the question towards whom Finland was oriented? Germany? Sweden? Britain? ::::::::::And for the second sentence: The national emblem of Finland wasn't swastika, it was and still is a lion. Finnish air force emblem was swastika, and it was and still is visible in numerous medals and decorations in Finland (for example, the flag of president of Finland contains swastika (http://www.presidentti.fi/eng/institution/ensign.html)). And those were designed long before nazism and have nothing to do with it (http://www.ilmavoimat.fi/index_en.php?id=624).	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,568,989	:I'm sorry, but I'm not. If there was a way for Wikipedia to make me a sysop for the four INC related articles, I would love that. Please also tell this to LBMixPro- he is a more seasoned user than I.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,569,151	:::::You are Emico, and you're in violation of your ban from the Iglesia ni Cristo articles and from your ban on personal attacks.	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,569,416	== INC has gotten worse... == Now Emico's back in full force, flinging insults left and right and the worst thing is that he thinks he's doing nothing wrong. For his own good and the good of Wikipedia, we need to find a way to protect that article and stop this once and for all.	2,005	true	user	blocked	train	false
29,572,921	nevermind the last post...i knew i had read it before coz i wrote it >< I feel so dumb!	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,577,094	`This message is regarding the page Piet Mondrian. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. `	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
29,594,070	` == Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skeptic's Annotated Bible == Hello Jason. I started a discussion on the notability of The Skeptic's Annotated Bible itself, and it has now been nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skeptic's Annotated Bible. I think your input would be of value. Though I may come across as a crab, my interests are really on how the info is presented in Wikipedia and in being as fair as I can. Perhaps I fail in this sometimes; I have to continually force myself to remember usernames represent a person and not just an inanimate word. But honestly, I am not the DanielCD of the Usenet group; it is just a coincidence. I try to sign on to things often with this name and am told that the username is already taken. Anyhow, I've voted, and I'm taking the ``Skeptics Bible`` off my watchlist. Good luck with your endeavors at Wikipedia. `	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
29,598,965	I propose, whoever writes or edits this page must reveal whether he is entitled to Israeli citienship. That will make the case clear. Shamir	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
29,612,922	Keep your personal comments to yourself. I calleddid you?? {If you would like to investigate this matter further please contact CAP Nat'l HQ Cadet Program at (334) 953-7568 or via eMail at keasterling@capnhq.gov}	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,613,298	Further-call a recruiteryou can enter the Air Force at E-3 with the Mitchel-but only E-2 in the other branches. You really should do better, more accurate, research before insisting that a Major with 18 years of experience as DCOC is wrong and needs to calm down...that is a very RUDE tone to take. There is dispute-yes-but your accuracy is flawed and I joined CAP before you were born!	2,005	true	article	blocked	test	false
29,618,851	` ==Thanks== Thanks for the pat on the back regarding the glory hunter article. I was considering putting a link on the Man Utd page, since it's mostly about them, but I thought people may take offence at the link name ``Glory Hunter`` appearing on the MU page. Maybe my section of the article would be better as a stand-alone article with a link from the glory hunter page. But what would the category and article title be then? It's more of a report than an encyclopedia article. I'll leave it there for now; any thoughts? Cheers `	2,005	true	user	random	train	false
29,619,541	It was a porn link.	2,005	false	user	blocked	dev	false
29,619,865	This message is regarding the page Cyberpunk. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. \|	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
29,624,015	== Finnish culture nudge == So I went to your user page from an answer on the reference desk, and as I find culture interesting, I looked for Finnish culture and found that was a bit of a mess, as is Culture of Finland, and neither seems to coordinate well with what is in Finland. Any chance you'd like to find some citable sources to fix those articles up a bit? ) You seem uniquely qualified. -	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
29,624,513	== Your personal attack is noted ==	2,005	true	user	blocked	test	false
29,629,022	` 2005 (UTC) :I essentially replaced the wording, eliminating ``most`` from ``most widely.`` Jayjg reverted, but I'm going to put it in again absent a good argument against doing this. Maimonides' version clearly is widely used Wikipedia's own article on the 613 mitzvot includes Maimonides' list as its only example, and describes Maimonides' work that included the list as ``The most important of the above works`` from a list of works that include versions of the list. It is also the only version that I have seen reproduced anywhere online. While Jay claims that the absence of aliyah from Maimonides' list should not be mentioned because virtually every other list includes it, that is not logical if Maimonides' list is ``the most important`` of the lists; it is essentially original research for Jay to conclude that the singularity of the absence of aliyah to Maimonides' list makes it not worth mentioning. :I'm sure it is true that others of Maimonides' writings indicate what Jay alleges, but the text from the article refers particularly to the 613 commandments. It would make sense (in fact, when I replace the wording, I'll do it myself) to note that Maimonides' other writings tend to contradict the omission, but that does not necessarily nor, I think, in fact warrant suppressing the note about the ``most important`` of the mitzvot lists being the exception to the statement in the article. :Jay describes the clarification as ``uncited POV,`` which may be true regarding ``most widely,`` which I eliminated, but not ``widely,`` nor anything else about the clarification. It is also highly selective, clearly, not to note that the exception to including aliyah in the mitzvot comes from perhaps the most important of the versions. : 21:52, 29 November`	2,005	true	article	blocked	train	false
29,632,547	` :Since you seem so insistent on being right, perhaps I should fully debrief you on just precisely why you are wrong? :First, you are wrong because you can't follow the flow of a conversation. I joined CAP in 1986, served as both cadet and senior member, earned positions on squadron, group and wing staff and personally achieved both the Mitchell and Earhart awards. The ``personal comments`` you refer to belong to me, not . Perhaps the attempts by to moderate your tone have failed because you think you are talking to only one person? :Second, you are wrong because you have to resort to bragging about your status in order to prove yourself right. Attempting to throw your weight around in this kind of public forum, by declaring your years of service or current staff position, will result in multiple people laughing at you. Any further attempts at intimidation either by age or ``maturity`` will result in ongoing public mockery. :Third, you are wrong because you can't read the comments embedded in the history of the document you are attempting to edit. You continuously attempt to ``correct`` an article that, while perhaps not completely correct, was not wrong. Linuxbeak has even gone so far as to incorporate some of your issues into the text of the article, as they do have some merit. However, that does not give you licence to continuously abuse, nor does it give you the right to crow about it. :Fourth, you are wrong because you can't follow embedded links. Above, I linked to pages at CAP National Headquarters (http://level2.cap.gov/index.cfm?nodeID=5156), the United States Air Force (http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=163), and the United States Air Force Academy (http://academyadmissions.com/admissions/preparation/leadership_prep.php). All three links support the statement that the military considers the Mitchell Award and the Eagle Scout award equivalent for purposes of recruitment. :Fifth, you are wrong because, beyond recruitment, the military does not care about Mitchell Awards, Spaatz Awards or Eagle Scouts. You can't wear any of them on a US military service uniform (and no, that does not include ROTC), no record of it is kept in your DD214, and no self-respecting soldier would continue to define themselves strictly based on an achievement made in high school. :Finally, you are wrong because even you proved that you are wrong! Your original argument was that ``The Gen Spaatz Award is the equivalent of the Eagle Scout``. After pointing out that you were wrong, instead of admitting it and continuing a civil discussion as to why the Spaatz Award and Eagle Scout are comparable, you degenerated to bullying and confusing the issue by nitpicking. That the Army, Navy and Marine Corps will give a pay grade of E-2 to either a Mitchell Awardee or an Eagle Scout only further proves that your original statement is false and that, for those branches of the military, the Mitchell Award and Eagle Scout are exactly equivalent. :If you really, truly want to keep embarassing yourself, perhaps you should dedicate a separate page to it. `	2,005	true	article	random	train	false
29,633,463	This message is regarding the page Gunpowder Plot. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks.	2,005	true	user	random	test	false
29,633,997	comment removed by Copperchair in this edit	2,005	true	user	random	test	false

29,166,554

` ==Street Fighter template== I've put the width back to 100%, but I'd really rather keep the ndash's for now (tho I did replace them with the unicode ndash (not to be confused with a hyphen on ye olde keyboard) so they wouldn't look so ugly when viewed/edited). BTW, sorry for the lag time in responding, I missed your reply till today! ( — (e-mail) `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,166,803

` ==November 24== With regard to the Zangief edit you've been making, could you please provide a source for the gay commentary? Also, why are you removing a number of wikilinks? Thanks for your cooperation! — (e-mail) `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,172,250

== grammar == My apostrophies IAR! -)

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

29,174,149

` :Simply stating it isn't good enough, please cite a source (a particular part of a game, a particular statement by a specific Capcom official, etc). Also, you have not explained why you continue to remove the entire ``related characters`` section, nor why you continue to remove the trivia about Gorbachev in his ending. — (e-mail) `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,181,494

I'll just wait til my IP address changes in a few days. Then I'll be able to insert all the opinions I want. You do noble things here. Whether or not you were trying to make a friend, you've made one in me, Rhobite. Would it be against Wiki's NPOV policy to say I love you?

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

29,182,506

` ::I thought of an example. The Alaska brown bear and the Grizzly bear are the same species, Ursus arctos, but they differ in size and color in different places. Ursus arctos exist in N. America and in Eurasia. So they are a pretty good ``model`` for human diversity. Then there is the Kodiak Brown Bear, which has been isolated on the Kodiak Islands and is the largest of all the Ursus arctos. It is considered a subspecies. See: http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Ursus_arctos.html So biologists would call the Kodiak bears a separate ``race`` or subspecies, but the way we are using ``race`` here, the Alaska Brown Bear and the Grizzly Bear are different races. The differences among the varieties of Ursus arctos seem to be color and size. If it weren't for the barrier formed by sea water, there wouldn't be a Kodiak bear because they would have been able to mate with Brown bears in surrounding territories. Just to round out the picture, the black bears are a different species from the brown bears. So we are all like brown bears and maybe the Neanderthals are like black bears.`

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

29,182,931

If you think it's fine the way it is, please indicate such.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,183,998

Copyvio The first version of this article appears to be a copyvio pasted from two sources: * Turkish Ministry of Culture * and either of: and (Copyright Chris Kutschera) Subsequent edits have only made small changes in the text. —

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

29,186,116

==Elitism== Please protect elitism. I am on the side of Jake Remington, since I like elite people better than poor people like the other people involved int he war, but protect it to stop the war.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,186,752

== Hasankeyf/Temp == Stub for new article... —

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

29,187,809

** You have no valid reasons other than self-promotion (which is not valid for a Christian). A Christian puts on the whole armor of God, and does not rely on subterfuges and deceptions like sock puppets. You are without excuse, and you are very far from God.

2,005

false

user

random

train

true

29,190,509

== Personal Attack on you == You probably know about this, but just in case: diff. —

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

29,190,831

:I doubt there is an answer. The Koran is a mediaeval document with many logical holes in it. One is expected to just accept that these beings are created in heaven like angels and exist to comfort the faithful dead. I don't think anyone is claiming that it makes sense. Heaven doesn't exist, after all. —

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,191,040

It's religion, not reality. At least it's not as wacky as Ragnarok.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,192,952

` Stormie is a loon who pops up every now and then to add his un-sourced comments to a small range of articles, and then accuse the historican Rex Curry who points out Stormie's garbage of the fact that Stormie is covering up for Nazism. Stormie then tries to hide the fact that he knows that Rex Curry is correct because Stormie never disputes a single fact mentioned, because Stormie cannot, and Stormie blabbers about ``some vast conspiracy`` in his effort to hide his own ignorance. Stormie admits his ignorance when he says that he ``never even heard of Francis Bellamy until I spotted this link-adding on recent changes.`` Stormie then shows his venal misbehavior by confessing that he reverted the article, and blabbers about how ``it but apparently that makes Stormie some sort of worshipper of Bellamy and all his evil deeds.`` `

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

29,193,254

` Hello, you recently yipped and yapped about me breaking the rules, but I notice that your latest update you edited in ``a proud faggot nutsack`` within my userpage. I find this intolerable, bigoted, and downright hateful. Perhaps homosexual African-Americans elecit anger in you? You should visit www.adl.org . `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

true

29,193,349

: Oh, I am sorry, I was looking at a previous edit. My apologies! I am terribly, terribly sorry, and very embarassed. I hope to make amends with you.

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

29,200,387

` ==Manor Park (Ottawa)== Can you please add slightly more content to stubs like these. There's several people (like myself) who would like to see this deleted under the [103]speedy deletion criterion ``small article with little or no context``. Adding some information on what one can see there and how old it is instead of just its location, would aid a great deal in avoiding having your work deleted. As an added bonus, larger articles are also more informative and helpful for users.- [104]Mgm|[105]^(talk) :Good point, but I don't know any more about Manor Park. I've never been there. I just feel that even such a short article is better than nothing. I'm putting a watch on this page so feel free to reply here. Unforgettableid | `

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

29,205,887

::Why not admit it? The only reason you disagree with anything is because you are an obsessed troll, whose sole agenda is causing discord.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

true

29,219,064

` :``Controversially`` is a perfectly acceptable word when describing the usage of ``conspiracy theory``. To put things simply, anyone using ``conspiracy theory`` in a scientific or encyclopedic context is trying to trick people, not trying to advance science neutrally. Funny you should say it's ``not clear what a dubious narrative genre is`` since that was your argument over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory. Another thing I find funny is this unclear dubious narrative genre can somehow be used to defend a phrase from a charge of non neutral presentation. In my opinion we should completely rewrite ``narrative genre`` but since your argument passed (for now) over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory we are stuck with it, sorry. `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,220,213

::::PS: Please STOP the madness.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,223,552

== I urge the POV bot gang to stop playing games == How plausible is it that you and your POV buddies show up to the same article at around the same time? Do you appear to be random editors concerned with neutrality or editors with a POV mission? What is with your new algorithmn to never risk 3RR but instead secretly bring in more and more POV-bots to the game? I don't like it. Even after the most recent edit warring my most recent comments have yet to be responded to on the talk page (surprising given the 4-6 editors reverting my changes).

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,227,098

`I changed this to ``ostensibly``, what do people think? `

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

29,228,842

:Yes, knowing erasmus is right.

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

29,231,263

` == I dispute Jayjg's block for ``personal attacks`` == For the record I dispute Jayjg's block of me for ``personal attacks`` (and he has yet to notify me on my talk page). Given the history of the Conspiracy theory article it is perfectly reasonable to interpret that a bot-like highly coordinated cabal of editors do everything in their power to defend or implement a certain POV. Why do Jayjg and his POV aligned friends always seem to show up to the same article at the same time? Why do Jayjg and his friends have exactly the same POV? They never seem to debate the core issues of any controversy on the talk page. `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,237,609

Eddie Zattara I have placed a tag on the article Eddie Zattara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person but it does not indicate how or why that person is notable. If you can indicate why Eddie Zattara is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Eddie Zattara. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles.

2,005

true

user

random

dev

false

29,240,991

:Still waiting for Jayjg or someone to explain their actions. Also, why does a coordinated group of editors try so relentlessly to implement the same (subtle propaganda?) POV on specific, politically sensitive, articles within wikipedia without ever debating in good faith on the talk page?

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,241,467

:I don't really see how the article is served by including the titles of three random poems. I also deleted them because the way you worded it initially, it seemed like they were book titles. If you want to put them back in, however, I don't have any particular objection beyond that, as long as it's clear they are poem titles.

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

29,258,269

I know Arwel, it's just a FYI thing. I am really (too) uptight with these protocol things.

2,005

false

article

random

test

false

29,258,544

I have removed that NPOV-section tag as you seem to have no argument as to what is not neutral about the presentation of the KHRP quote. I have also re-added the (quite reasonable) map caption. Please do not revert without offering a valid justification. —

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,259,765

: You're most welcome. —

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

29,262,706

::It's amazing a group of suspiciously coordinated admins can gang up on a minority view point without any repurcussions here on wikipedia. I am still waiting for various explanations.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,265,642

` :::I invite the coordinated pro ``conspiracy theory`` editors to responded to my most recent talk page posts even though I am currently blocked from editing, hopefully a lively debate will spring up and the issues will resolve themselves with fresh editors (unlikely but one can dream). Oh wait, the coordinated editors don't actually care to debate the core of most any issue, and they may be propagandists or otherwise play games, oh I forgot, sorry, never mind. `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,269,858

: I'm not sure just what an arbitration appeal involves. I would assume that you file an WP:RFAR and see if they accept. The arbitration that we had some months ago was requested by you, not me — although I supported its acceptance. I am fine with the resolution reached in the case and feel that your ban from political articles serves wikipedia well, and I will not support lifting it. You've indicated that you wish to work with just the facts and leave biases out of your editing and I think that's a good sign. I believe that Fred said something about your demonstrating these habits in non-political articles before considering allowing you to edit political articles again, and you should probably do so before requesting an appeal. —

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,274,760

` ::I agree with K-111. The suggestion comes from a moped message board, not from Wikipedians. We have already explored this and there appears to me to be a strong consensus for this being separate, not least becasue most jurisdictions treat the two differently but also because the two strands of development are entirely separate. - ]/] (W) '''' `

2,005

true

article

random

dev

false

29,292,394

:Neiter did I. Maybe some sentences were a little bit to close to the referenced sources, but this is a work in progress and (as I wrote in the edit summary) I'm having intentions to extend the article without any copyvio. Even the early version (that was told to be a copyvio) included information from both sources. But, as I said, maybe the original text was to close to the original(s), this is however now fixed. -

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,306,385

Before I re-add {npov} to the article I will give those that disagree an opportunity to respond to this section and/or the section below. Also, first changing {npov} to {povcheck} then removing it after a big dispute shows bad faith in my interpretation, but I digress for now.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,311,143

== Soviet Version: real? == Is there provenance for that one?

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

29,313,203

`:::I will appreciate it if/when proponents of ``conspiracy theory`` discontinue the use of non-consensus building tactics. You fail to note it was another editor that actually put the {npov} template in this article before (was that Carbonite?) who changed it to {povcheck}. (Was it also Carbonite that removed {povcheck} a few days later? iterestingly inconsistent). I admit my criticisms of the intro are somehwat minor (we've made some progress) but since your side has apparently stopped debating the only recourse I have is to make readers/third parties aware of the existence of dispute by placing the disputed header at the top. This should be basic NPOV policy. :::Please respond to my concern that ``commonly believed`` needs some sort of balance/caveat. `

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

29,314,908

`:::::Carbonite, you have commited edits in bad faith in my interpretation, you changed an {npov} template to a {povcheck} template and then later removed any dispute notice, what you should have done was change it back to {npov}. Your story about how {povcheck} is deprecated seems designed to cover up your removal of any disputed notice. And you, like Tom, failed to note it was another editor that added {npov} to this article most recently, not me. I will additionally appreciate it when proponents of ``conspiracy theory`` cease the use of disinformation tactics. :::::I am still waiting for someone to respond to my criticisms of the intro/article directly, thx. `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,317,501

`:::::We can't know ahead of time nor conclusively what the mainstream view is, we can basically only say that mainstream sources are claiming something is the mainstream view. I think the word ``ostensibly`` is perfect in that it basically says ``the allegedly mainstream view`` and it also signifies the issue is all about appearances, not necessarily about facts (unfortunately). `

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

29,324,318

`:::::You can't know ahead of time what people believe to be the mainstream/straightforward view, and in fact people may not believe it either way, they just accept what they have been told (but we should not simply regurgitate that). I am not advocating rewriting the intro, I am advocating caveatting or balancing. How is ``ostensibly`` inaccurate? Given that we agree to disagree on this (and likely many other points) I will add {npov} to the article soon unless you come up with something new. `

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,325,639

I dont get it this is the first time i have been on this site and i get acusations thrown at me!

2,005

false

user

blocked

train

false

29,340,587

` == Please tell me more about your ``There is a cabal`` theory == Hello, I am interested in hearing more about and joint investigating your ``There is a cabal`` theory, thx. `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,341,882

` ::: NB: I will be off-wiki for the rest of the week. — == Please tell me more about your ``There is a cabal`` theory == Hello, I am interested in hearing more about and joint investigating your ``There is a cabal`` theory, thx. `

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

29,351,956

` == False Accusation == Just for your information, I did not edit the Bektashi or any other article in Wikipedia, neither as logged in or anonymously after you have threatened me. I understand youassume everybody is as honorless as yourself, but sorry I am not. Both of us knows who vandalized that article, but you used your ``administrative`` power to intimidate me, so I am not in this place anymore if it lets people like you do whatever you can. `

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

29,352,085

This user is deaf discriminator, facist, and racist

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

true

29,352,304

Dark Lord Farley is well known for Hilter lover

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,352,540

:::Assumptions again huh, my admin friend? It shouldn't be this easy to accuse people of cheating - well, who am I talking to? Just for completeness, I don't know this person, and I haven't looked at or edited anything in wikipedia since you have threatened me. And be happy, you will never see me again, so you can keep wikipedia free from any fact you don't like.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,357,093

` ::What is ``leftist`` or ``rightist`` about vegetarianism? Or, for that matter, about being anti-Israel: surely U.S. paleoconservatives are not leftists. - | `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,362,798

==info for your curiosity== Credibility_node_ue

2,005

false

user

blocked

dev

false

29,370,254

` :::Erm, ``Put`` of this section are almost always considered to be the ancient Libyans. The reason is that there were two significant ancient Libyan tribes (according to Egyptian records), one was named the Libu (from whom Libya takes its modern name) and the other was named the Pitu, from whom it took its ancient name - the Egyptians appear to have used Phut to refer to the area. :::If Codex considers ``Tubal v. Jubal`` to be the ``tip``, then I would like to know why he is reverting (which Codex once did as the sole purpose of one of Codex' edits) ``are`` to ``is`` when I was the originator of the phrase, ``are`` is correct UK usage, and we are meant to keep ``authors choice``. How Codex finds this is more significant than ``Tubal v. Jubal`` I would like to know. There are several other issues that I have to question how they are more significant. To me, it appears as if Codex has chosen the one which appears least supported, and is intending to justify the whole reversion based on that mere issue, which I find somewhat of a false premise. :::In particular, I should like to know why Codex is apparantly unable to see that I am not misrepresenting the creationist view, especially since he appears to be the one that added identical equalities (e.g. Meschech = Massechusetts (native tribe), Magog=Magyar, Gomer=Germany) to the Japheth article on two seperate occasions (Massechusetts there being represented more generally by Algonquians, and Magyar by the English name of their nation - Hungary). :::I would also like to know why Codex refers to my entries as shoddy, when he is unable to see any connection between Cush and Nubia (the connection is that Kush (nation) and Nubia are the same geographic location, quite a large, obvious connection). And likewise why I use Sudan rather than East Africa (essentially because Kush (nation) was situated in (north) Sudan, not Eritrea, or Somalia, for example). :::Rather than cherry picking the easiest area to contest, and attempting to imply the others are equally invalid without any argument, each issue should be addressed. In particular, in order to avoid reverting the entire thing, the simplest issues, such as, for example, how UK usage (authors choice) for certain types of collective nouns works, should be addressed first. :::User talk:FDuffy `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,372,167

` == Admin == ``I saw you were made admin and I almost shit. You must be a very happy man. Congrats.`` `

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,373,868

==3RR== You have also broken the spirit of 3RR and blatantly abused your admin powers by reverting to your preferred POV version with your revert button. Please do not preach to me or pontificate with your sermons.

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

false

29,374,037

::I will revert as I see fit. I am an editor, just as you are. We both have equal rights here. Have fun editing Councellor.

2,005

false

user

blocked

dev

false

29,377,426

REDIRECT Talk:Bishop of Durham

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,377,797

REDIRECT Talk:Bishop of London

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,389,615

ENOY FACKING SMALL KIDS AND EATING PELICAN SHIT

2,005

false

user

blocked

dev

true

29,405,721

Should the B roads be unlinked on this page? I thought consensus was that most of them don't deserve their own articles.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,406,942

==The ArbCom decision== Could you please point out to me what part of the ArbComs decision you are refering to here: . I was involved in that case, and if I remember correct there was nothing in the ArbCom's decision that indicated that I, Fadix or Davenbelle could be blocked for 24 hrs, for the alleged reasons that you mentioned on Davenbelles talkpage. But maybe I am wrong. Could you please point out to exactly what part of the decision you are referring to?

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

29,408,684

== Kurdistan Workers Party== It sure looks like Cool Cat is up to his old PoV pushing, personal attacks and harrasment again. I also made a comment about the problem here: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Coolcat%2C_Davenbelle_and_Stereotek/mentorship#Continued_harrasment_by_Cool_Cat

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,411,376

`Delta's gone all the way back up to its peak strength! Well, that was unexpected. We could still see the 14th hurricane of the season, and maybe a non-extratropical Africa landfall. Might need to start a ``Northeast Atlantic Hurricane basin`` if more Vince- and Delta-like storms form in the future! - `

2,005

true

article

random

test

false

29,414,216

You have to be more specific about these issues to add your tags Coolcat.

2,005

true

article

blocked

dev

false

29,417,346

:Of course you're retarded for putting up nonsense on wikipedia talk pages. Please refrain from doing thus in the future.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

true

29,418,110

== Sock? == What? Why do you think I'm a sockpuppet of someone? What did I do?

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

29,418,324

::I think because I agree with your beliefs they think I'm you. I never even did anything, I just came across your page, and reverted it, then I ready what you wrote and I agreed. This is unfair.

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

29,418,739

:I also reverted vandalism on Dookie does that make me Green Day No does that make me a fan No you're a bastard I hate you I cant believe just because I was going through Recent Changes and helping out people doesn't make me a sockpuppet I can help out and edit that doesnt make me someone else youre a horrible user that should be blocked i cant believe you

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

false

29,419,125

::::I think there should be some form of screening process here, that keeps them out. They shouldn't even be allowed to use the internet and fill it with their queer things like porn and what not. That Curps person was being a bastard, he's probably the leader of the homo wikipedians.

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

true

29,419,241

::Don't talk to me troll.

2,005

true

user

blocked

dev

true

29,421,328

` :As for ``controlled by a committee`` - it really depends on the maturity of the article and how controvertial it is. This article is both. By and large it is a delicate compromise between opposing POVs, though some of the pro-ID people still see it as biased against ID. As for the changes you made - my biggest issue with them is that they read like commentary, not like an encylopaedia entry. If you can rephrase the sentances in a way that preserves the underlying shades of meaning, and does so without sounding hostile to ID, I would be happy with the changes (though, of course, I can't speak for everyone involved here). `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,434,871

==Removed Outer Space== Outer space uninhabited for the last time (this moment may have already passed) Since the above makes no sense, I removed it. .

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

29,443,216

Can someone please find and list the density of azulene?

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

29,450,009

Watch out for user Slo-mo, he's been vandalizing high school pages and then reports others to admins as vandals. So wrong.

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

29,450,448

]] Be aware, user Slo-mo has a strange fascination with the marijuana use section of this article. Many have deleted it as it is clearly misleading, as it shines a bright light on an insigificant and common aspect of any suburban high school. Slo-mo also makes many useful edits and then vandalizes the same pages. If you revert his misinformation, he reports you to admins as a vandal. Very wrong, be warned! watch out! [[User:64.34.166.88

2,005

false

article

blocked

train

false

29,450,874

as vandals for content disputes. Grow up.

2,005

false

user

blocked

test

true

29,455,222

:::As I said, be specific about your PoV concerns Cool Cat, or do not add these tags. I also suggest that you stop harassasing me.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,462,760

`Thomas Pynchon The Crying of Lot 49 1 ONE summer afternoon Mrs Oedipa Maas came home from a Tupperware party whose hostess had put perhaps too much kirsch in the fondue to find that she, Oedipa, had been named executor, or she supposed executrix, of the estate of one Pierce Inverarity, a California real estate mogul who had once lost two million collars in his spare time but still had assets numerous and tangled enough to make the job of sorting it all out more than honorary. Oedipa stood in the living room, stared at by the greenish dead eye of the TV tube, spoke the name of God, tried to feel as drunk as possible. But this did not work. She thought of a hotel room in Mazatlan whose door had just been slammed, it seemed forever, waking up two hundred birds down in the lobby; a sunrise over the library slope at Cornell University that nobody out on it had seen because the slope faces west; a dry, disconsolate tune from the fourth movement of the Bartok Concerto for Orchestra; a whitewashed bust of Jay Gould that Pierce kept over the bed on a shelf so narrow for it she'd always had the hovering fear it would someday topple on them. Was that how he'd died, she wondered, among dreams, crushed by the only ikon in the house? That only made her laugh, out loud and helpless: You're so sick, Oedipa, she told herself, or the room, which knew. The letter was from the law firm of Warpe, Wist-full, Kubitschek and McMingus, of Los Angeles, and signed by somebody named Metzger. It said Pierce had died back in the spring, and they'd only just now found the will. Metzger was to act as co-executor and special counsel in the event of any involved litigation. Oedipa had been named also to execute the will in a codicil dated a year ago. She tried to think back to whether anything unusual had happened around then. Through the rest of the afternoon, through her trip to the market in downtown Kinneret-Among-The-Pines to buy ricotta and listen to the Muzak (today she came through the bead-curtained entrance around bar 4 of the Fort Wayne Settecento Ensemble's variorum recording of the Vivaldi Kazoo Concerto, Boyd Beaver, soloist); then through the sunned gathering of her marjoram and sweet basil from the herb garden, reading of book reviews in the latest Scientific American, into the layering of a lasagna, garlicking of a bread, tearing up of romaine leaves, eventually, oven on, into the mixing of the twilight's whiskey sours against the arrival of her husband, Wendell (``Mucho``) Maas from work, she wondered, wondered, shuffling back through a fat deckful of days which seemed (wouldn't she be first to admit it?) more or less identical, or all pointing the same way subtly like a conjurer's deck, any odd one readily clear to a trained eye. It took her till the middle of Huntley and Brinkley to remember that last year at three or so one morning there had come this long-distance call, from where she would never know (unless now he'd left a diary) by a voice beginning in heavy Slavic tones as second secretary at the Transyl-vanian Consulate, looking for an escaped bat; modulated to comic-Negro, then on into hostile Pachuco dialect, full of chingas and maricones; then a Gestapo officer asking her in shrieks did she have relatives in Germany and finally his Lamont Cranston voice, the one he'd talked in all the way down to Mazatlan. ``Pierce, please,`` she'd managed to get in, ``I thought we had`` ``But Margo,`` earnestly, ``I've just come from Commissioner Weston, and that old man in the fun house was murdered by the same blowgun that killed Professor Quackenbush,`` or something. ``For God's sake,`` she said. Mucho had rolled over and was looking at her. ``Why don't you hang up on him,`` Mucho suggested, sensibly. ``I heard that,`` Pierce said. ``I think it's time Wendell Maas had a little visit from The Shadow.`` Silence, positive and thorough, fell. So it was the last of his voices she ever heard. Lamont Cranston. That phone line could have pointed any direction, been any length. Its quiet ambiguity shifted over, in the months after the call, to what had been revived: memories of his face, body, things he'd given her, things she had now and then pretended not to've heard him say. It took him over, and to the verge of being forgotten. The shadow waited a year before visiting. But now there was Metzger's letter. Had Pierce called last year then to tell her about this codicil? Or had he decided on it later, somehow because of her annoyance and Mucho's indifference? She felt exposed, finessed, put down. She had never executed a will in her life, didn't know where to begin, didn't know how to tell the law firm in L. A. that she didn't know where to begin. ``Mucho, baby,`` she cried, in an access of helplessness. Mucho Maas, home, bounded through the screen door. ``Today was another defeat,`` he began. NEW

2,005

false

article

blocked

dev

false

29,473,821

:I agree with Kwami that parts of the article are POV and I must note that the relevant tag exists in the article.

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,476,293

I will add sub headings to this in a week or so so that should complete the clean up of the article;)

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,476,568

Gravity is irrelevant. Even without gravity, the megalomaniac would have to overcome the rock's inertia to lift itand inertia is an intrinsic property of an object, based solely on its mass.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,492,092

` It seems to me that the goal of exchange is to maximize the benefit of division and specialization of land and labour. It might be argued that maximizing the benefit of capital development is also a goal, but that is probably overreaching. It seems that for any efficacy, division of labour is utterly dependent upon exchange. The creation and maintenance of generally acceptable minimal ``rules of order`` is very important to this maximization of benefit evolving from exchange. `

2,005

false

article

random

train

false

29,496,266

Good, now we have some progress! So, Finland didn't like Soviet Union. But you still didn't answer the question towards whom Finland was oriented? Germany? Sweden? Britain? ::::::::::And for the second sentence: The national emblem of Finland wasn't swastika, it was and still is a lion. Finnish air force emblem was swastika, and it was and still is visible in numerous medals and decorations in Finland (for example, the flag of president of Finland contains swastika (http://www.presidentti.fi/eng/institution/ensign.html)). And those were designed long before nazism and have nothing to do with it (http://www.ilmavoimat.fi/index_en.php?id=624).

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,568,989

:I'm sorry, but I'm not. If there was a way for Wikipedia to make me a sysop for the four INC related articles, I would love that. Please also tell this to LBMixPro- he is a more seasoned user than I.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,569,151

:::::You are Emico, and you're in violation of your ban from the Iglesia ni Cristo articles and from your ban on personal attacks.

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,569,416

== INC has gotten worse... == Now Emico's back in full force, flinging insults left and right and the worst thing is that he thinks he's doing nothing wrong. For his own good and the good of Wikipedia, we need to find a way to protect that article and stop this once and for all.

2,005

true

user

blocked

train

false

29,572,921

nevermind the last post...i knew i had read it before coz i wrote it >< I feel so dumb!

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,577,094

`This message is regarding the page Piet Mondrian. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. `

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

29,594,070

` == Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skeptic's Annotated Bible == Hello Jason. I started a discussion on the notability of The Skeptic's Annotated Bible itself, and it has now been nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skeptic's Annotated Bible. I think your input would be of value. Though I may come across as a crab, my interests are really on how the info is presented in Wikipedia and in being as fair as I can. Perhaps I fail in this sometimes; I have to continually force myself to remember usernames represent a person and not just an inanimate word. But honestly, I am not the DanielCD of the Usenet group; it is just a coincidence. I try to sign on to things often with this name and am told that the username is already taken. Anyhow, I've voted, and I'm taking the ``Skeptics Bible`` off my watchlist. Good luck with your endeavors at Wikipedia. `

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

29,598,965

I propose, whoever writes or edits this page must reveal whether he is entitled to Israeli citienship. That will make the case clear. Shamir

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

29,612,922

Keep your personal comments to yourself. I calleddid you?? {If you would like to investigate this matter further please contact CAP Nat'l HQ Cadet Program at (334) 953-7568 or via eMail at keasterling@capnhq.gov}

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,613,298

Further-call a recruiteryou can enter the Air Force at E-3 with the Mitchel-but only E-2 in the other branches. You really should do better, more accurate, research before insisting that a Major with 18 years of experience as DCOC is wrong and needs to calm down...that is a very RUDE tone to take. There is dispute-yes-but your accuracy is flawed and I joined CAP before you were born!

2,005

true

article

blocked

test

false

29,618,851

` ==Thanks== Thanks for the pat on the back regarding the glory hunter article. I was considering putting a link on the Man Utd page, since it's mostly about them, but I thought people may take offence at the link name ``Glory Hunter`` appearing on the MU page. Maybe my section of the article would be better as a stand-alone article with a link from the glory hunter page. But what would the category and article title be then? It's more of a report than an encyclopedia article. I'll leave it there for now; any thoughts? Cheers `

2,005

true

user

random

train

false

29,619,541

It was a porn link.

2,005

false

user

blocked

dev

false

29,619,865

This message is regarding the page Cyberpunk. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. |

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

29,624,015

== Finnish culture nudge == So I went to your user page from an answer on the reference desk, and as I find culture interesting, I looked for Finnish culture and found that was a bit of a mess, as is Culture of Finland, and neither seems to coordinate well with what is in Finland. Any chance you'd like to find some citable sources to fix those articles up a bit? ) You seem uniquely qualified. -

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

29,624,513

== Your personal attack is noted ==

2,005

true

user

blocked

test

false

29,629,022

` 2005 (UTC) :I essentially replaced the wording, eliminating ``most`` from ``most widely.`` Jayjg reverted, but I'm going to put it in again absent a good argument against doing this. Maimonides' version clearly is widely used Wikipedia's own article on the 613 mitzvot includes Maimonides' list as its only example, and describes Maimonides' work that included the list as ``The most important of the above works`` from a list of works that include versions of the list. It is also the only version that I have seen reproduced anywhere online. While Jay claims that the absence of aliyah from Maimonides' list should not be mentioned because virtually every other list includes it, that is not logical if Maimonides' list is ``the most important`` of the lists; it is essentially original research for Jay to conclude that the singularity of the absence of aliyah to Maimonides' list makes it not worth mentioning. :I'm sure it is true that others of Maimonides' writings indicate what Jay alleges, but the text from the article refers particularly to the 613 commandments. It would make sense (in fact, when I replace the wording, I'll do it myself) to note that Maimonides' other writings tend to contradict the omission, but that does not necessarily nor, I think, in fact warrant suppressing the note about the ``most important`` of the mitzvot lists being the exception to the statement in the article. :Jay describes the clarification as ``uncited POV,`` which may be true regarding ``most widely,`` which I eliminated, but not ``widely,`` nor anything else about the clarification. It is also highly selective, clearly, not to note that the exception to including aliyah in the mitzvot comes from perhaps the most important of the versions. : 21:52, 29 November`

2,005

true

article

blocked

train

false

29,632,547

` :Since you seem so insistent on being right, perhaps I should fully debrief you on just precisely why you are wrong? :First, you are wrong because you can't follow the flow of a conversation. I joined CAP in 1986, served as both cadet and senior member, earned positions on squadron, group and wing staff and personally achieved both the Mitchell and Earhart awards. The ``personal comments`` you refer to belong to me, not . Perhaps the attempts by to moderate your tone have failed because you think you are talking to only one person? :Second, you are wrong because you have to resort to bragging about your status in order to prove yourself right. Attempting to throw your weight around in this kind of public forum, by declaring your years of service or current staff position, will result in multiple people laughing at you. Any further attempts at intimidation either by age or ``maturity`` will result in ongoing public mockery. :Third, you are wrong because you can't read the comments embedded in the history of the document you are attempting to edit. You continuously attempt to ``correct`` an article that, while perhaps not completely correct, was not wrong. Linuxbeak has even gone so far as to incorporate some of your issues into the text of the article, as they do have some merit. However, that does not give you licence to continuously abuse, nor does it give you the right to crow about it. :Fourth, you are wrong because you can't follow embedded links. Above, I linked to pages at CAP National Headquarters (http://level2.cap.gov/index.cfm?nodeID=5156), the United States Air Force (http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=163), and the United States Air Force Academy (http://academyadmissions.com/admissions/preparation/leadership_prep.php). All three links support the statement that the military considers the Mitchell Award and the Eagle Scout award equivalent for purposes of recruitment. :Fifth, you are wrong because, beyond recruitment, the military does not care about Mitchell Awards, Spaatz Awards or Eagle Scouts. You can't wear any of them on a US military service uniform (and no, that does not include ROTC), no record of it is kept in your DD214, and no self-respecting soldier would continue to define themselves strictly based on an achievement made in high school. :Finally, you are wrong because even you proved that you are wrong! Your original argument was that ``The Gen Spaatz Award is the equivalent of the Eagle Scout``. After pointing out that you were wrong, instead of admitting it and continuing a civil discussion as to why the Spaatz Award and Eagle Scout are comparable, you degenerated to bullying and confusing the issue by nitpicking. That the Army, Navy and Marine Corps will give a pay grade of E-2 to either a Mitchell Awardee or an Eagle Scout only further proves that your original statement is false and that, for those branches of the military, the Mitchell Award and Eagle Scout are exactly equivalent. :If you really, truly want to keep embarassing yourself, perhaps you should dedicate a separate page to it. `

2,005

true

article

random

train

false

29,633,463

This message is regarding the page Gunpowder Plot. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks.

2,005

true

user

random

test

false

29,633,997

comment removed by Copperchair in this edit

2,005

true

user

random

test

false