dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
35,278,791	:::::::: Jesus...Whatever she's doing, I can voice my opinion to it. This is a discussion page, not an encyclopedia entry. I didn't say she should be MADE silent. I have no intention of 'making her silent'. Just giving my opinion here, which I think is a perfectly valid one. As for her jurisdiction, commentary on talk page is within everyone's jurisdiction. You're an illustration of all that's wrong with Wikipedia. You don't make logical sense, you derive understandings of things that are said that weren't in fact said. You make snap judgements on things without taking the information for what it is. You're too underqualified to undertake anything of an intellectual or scholarly nature. Wikipedia is worse off having the likes of you as an admin.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
35,279,960	` ``I am not an academic.`` Well praise be. The students who are not subjected to your arrogance will rise up and call blessed the universities that have forborne to hire you. You are doubtless aware that Australia's only living Nobel Prize winner, [Doctor] Peter Doherty considers that there are only four Australian universities that are of international standard; presumably your doctorate is from the University of Central Queensland or perhaps the University of Southern Queensland. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,285,768	Thx for your check on Kurdish people == Thx for your check on Kurdish people You should know that these Yezidi Kurds are faking facts, because they claim that Yezidism is the only true Kurdish faith. Many historicals know that Kurds were once Zoroastrian, at least when only 1% of the Kurds were Zoroastrian why we shouldn't add this information? There are still many Zoroastrians in northern Iraq. ==	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,291,774	!response: THIS IS AN AOL ADDRESS USED BY MANY DIFFERENT USERS,CREATE AN ACCOUNT AND YOU WILL NOT SEE THIS AGAIN-ITS EASY AND FREE	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
35,296,259	:There are plenty of Janusz Karpinskis out there in the world... but such a well spoken person (or group?) speaking through this user name, surly wouldn't have missed the play on sound reminding others of another notable Karpinski? Sorry if you're not that one either, especially as some may only know the first half of her popularized notability. :The big question, is whether your cogent logical path astutely presented in your AfD, will penetrate minds already made up, or especially those who shamelessly employ Wikipedia as self-reference to counter-argue deletion of an article where they lack outside reference for proper categorization, or even simple NPOV treatment of the material. Good luck!	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,300,375	==Historical innaccuracy== Some short-sighted people are about to delete that category.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,303,262	:I think I read somewhere that Fitzroy switched sides... in fact I've just remembered where. It's in a book about Lewes... just hunting it down .... 5 minutes later... got it. He first stood as a Conservative and then became a Liberal (no dates), became Lord of the Admiralty in 1845. if it's not online elsewhere I'll look at the Times obituary. It's bloody useful having discovered that I can access that. Do you have a library card for your local authority?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,305,560	* It's the other Paul Anderson. I've removed the sentence.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
35,307,053	This IP address and others like it are dynamically assigned NAT addresses for the University of Bath, UK. As such, blocks placed on them are unlikely to have the desired effect of preventing vandals from offending again. They will simply be reassigned another address in time. There is an added disadvantage that legitimate editors behind the Bath proxy will be blocked when the address is leased to them.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
35,309,585	::If it's grouped togethether because it's all related, surely it would all be better off as subsections under Map?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
35,313,301	The block has expired, but no explanation so far.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,313,913	` ==Still The Achilles' Heel of Wikipedia.== Maybe someone who checks in on this talk page might now where to go with it? First, a public reply to Dragons flight, (and maybe his own sockpuppet ``Freestylefrappe``): Hardly a ``sockpuppet`` when I used the very same name.... followed by a ``2``. Or are you talking about blocking Pgio ``too``, who simply agreed that someone here is quite a J_rk? I asked so clearly that you wouldn't take away WMC's opportunity to block me himself.... I would have been proud. But you knew that too, right? Wikipedians: I freely admit, that my own level of civility here has lowered.... even against my own admonishment to others to avoid such behavior. All I can say, is that it is a VERY difficult dynamic to avoid when some here play by such despicably manipulative and base rules of engagement. I'm thinking of that dichotomy between people who claim that their Ends or so worthy, that they should get a pass on their occasional stray from acceptable means, vs. those who retain some hold on the idea that they will be judged by their Means, no matter the final outcome. This is made all the more difficult where users such as Admin WMC, who know full well the self imposed limits of their opponents, demand verbal civility on one hand, and yet play such extensive games of ``pretend to forget``, ``I didn't see that`` written ten times before, and ALWAYS selectively choose the lowest hanging fruit in a nest of specific challenges to their type of behavior, contributions, and edits. Worldly people understand the sensitive nature of situations like these. Educated people (especially those through the School of Hard Knocks) know that these situations are more often set-ups, initiated by the manipulator. The manipulator has at least learned the fine art of camouflage where they can hide very well 'in plain sight' flying the banner of Democracy. Failing to acknowledge this simple possibility, marks one as either the manipulator, or just a pseudo-intellect. As I've said before, and will say again.... If users like WMC were genuine, they'd acknowledge human fallibility and the basic rights of dissident opinion. Doing so, WMC would quickly gain my support of his presentations on mainstream understanding. He gets that part right VERY OFTEN and has demonstrated a tenacity to seeing his POV upheld. Good for him, and why I have absolutely no trouble with his dominance over others trying to write articles presenting such information. Yet why? Why does he refuse to acknowledge his lack of verse in material outside of his very public field of knowledge? Why does he go so far in his chilling drive to stifle the good faith presentations of non-mainstream fields? Please, I'm not just talking about aether theories alone. The electric fields have plenty to say about corollary/causal dynamics in cogent presentations about a very possible relationship to atmospheric phenomenon. Damn if WMC shouldn't be reading some of that stuff instead of JUST pointing out how it's counter to the formulas used in current Climate Models. I mean, just forget about the LONG history of trial and repeated errors in aether postulation, the mysteries of electricity still surround us and we would all benefit by keeping an open mind about that. In the least, do we really think it wise to insist by near constant omission, any possibility that Birkeland or Alfvén currents effect our conductive atmosphere. I'm not saying that WMC's models need to be trashed or even that he should modify them this afternoon, but it's highly suspicious that he suppresses the postulations and formulations from even the notable sources working on competitive modeling. It is so suspicious, that is why I question his objectivity, and point out that he IS a PAID agent of tax dollars vested in a particular model. That he doesn't acknowledge and recuse himself, is just annoying to say the least. That Wikipedia doesn't impose some boundaries on this user's blinding conflict of interest, casts a far greater doubt upon Wikipedia NPOV all together. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,314,961	== what was up with that block? == Seriously, what was up with that? Made NO SENSE.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,317,903	::::: I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. I asked how much of our language was replaced with words from French and Italian. Are you saying that our language was replaced by 70-80 percent with French and Italian words? I'm guessing there is a misunderstanding here, but yes, please can a script to find out. Do anything you can. We should know these figures.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,319,711	` I can also access the Encyclopaedia Britannica and the Oxford Dictionary of National Biogprahy through the library membership subscription and the later has a biography for him, but it is cvopyright so I can't post it. It says ``He joined the Peelites, was quite close to Gladstone, and ultimately became a Liberal`` - no dates. I can't access Britannica at the moment due to ``high traffic levels`` or so it says. Erm.. there may be some question as to the date of his death. The DONB gives 22 December 1859 as does the Wikipedia article, but I am looking at an edition of The Times from Tuesday 20th December 1859, which states ``We deeply regret to announce the death of the Rt. Hon. Henry Fitzroy ... on Sautrday last ...`` - that would mean he died on 17th December 1859. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be a full obit. In the edtion for 17th Jan 1860 there is a report of the unopposed election of his successor on 16th January, 1860, one John George Blencowe (apparently maternally descended from another former Lewes Liberal MP Sir. Francis Poole who sat as the MP 100 years before (or so the article says) `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,328,131	I'm a bit confused as to the figures quoted for votes etc in some of the older elections. In former times (before 1900 for sure) a large number of seats would have been uncontested. Rremember that a borough/county might return up to three members and as I understand it, from what I have read, if there were more than the requisite number of persons nominated to stand, and often there would be no additional challengers, a show of hands would first be taken, and a result declared on that basis. If one of the nominated persons objected to the result, a poll result and votes counted. How is the vote for these constituencies managed in say the United_Kingdom_general_election%2C_1895 page? Is the vote for the entire electorate placedinto the pot for the winning party or are they left out entirey.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,328,755	==Fitzroy== Hi, where did you get the death date for Henry Fitzroy, I note that the Dictionary of National Biography also says 22nd Dec 1859, but the edition of The Times from Sayurday 20th Dec 1859 clearly say he died the previous Tuesday, i.e. 17th.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,329,230	` :I too haven't made up my mind on Aetherometry, regardless what other users might attest to by my opposition to calling it pseudoscience without reference. I think your son is in wonderful hands. I placed a comment on talk page ``Danny``, it might resinate with you further. I was blocked for calling WMC the very words your son shouldn't see. And blocked justly so. All I can do is apologize to you and your son for allowing myself to reach a wits end. I do not apologize to WMC, for I feel strongly that he takes people there knowing full well the frustration he unjustly builds within people. :I also have a comment and vote for deletion to place in your very well written AfD on aetherometry. This wiki is woefully ill-equipped to deal with such material. I doubt wikipedia can survive many more of these types of encounters before forced to change its ways, or it may sink from respectable existence all together. :The other notable Karpinski I spoke of, (at least for people here in DC) was the one who came out in opposition to the U.S. Secretary of Defense, after she was demoted for not following the ``company line``. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,332,529	Let me know what you find out. Seventy percent is too much, even for technical words.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,342,346	==This article needs to be split up== This article needs to be split up, as the information here duplicates that outlined in individual articles such as Banknotes of England and Banknotes of Great Britain - ( )	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,346,500	Not a PhD. and here I am , thanks. I agree that some Islamist movements have fascist characteristics. I am just trying to be fair.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
35,351,187	`:::::Try actually reading your Google hits instead of just counting them. Of the 114 unique hits for ``aluminum underwear``, 79 have nothing to do with shoplifting, 28 directly concern the Colorado law, and only seven generally concern shoplifting, not specifically in reference to the Colorado law. Of the 35 unique hits for ``aluminum underpants``, 18 have nothing to do with shoplifting, 17 reference the Colorado law, and zero reference shoplifting in general. It is obvious from these Google results that the use of the phrase in either form did gain some popularity surrounding the passage of the Colorado law, but disappeared shortly thereafter and did not fall into the general vernacular. Either form is therefore not ubiquitous and is inappropriate for this section title. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,352,484	I wont do it again	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
35,354,349	::False assumption flash! The page protection was done by , unsolicited as far as I know. According to his history, Voice of All has never edited the Anarchism article, which make one wonder why he intervened at all.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,355,157	Graaaah, I've got the actor box up, but the picture is distorted and I don't know how to fix it! Help!	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
35,355,354	:::::::Google indexes all varieties on content on the Internet, not just wire service stories (and in fact, the vast majority of the spike in use of these terms surrounding the passage of the law had nothing to do with wire service stories). First you misrepresented Google numbers to try to support your claim, and now you're claiming Google numbers are not representative now that you see that they do not, in fact, support your claim. Your line of reasoning is becoming too weak to sustain. It's time for you to pick up and choose another article to bother.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
35,359,137	Friend, you are accountable to me as a fellow user and a civil being for a civil explanation of your blocking action. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,359,481	:Convincing evidence was provided to the Arbitration Committee.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,362,933	:No, that would fall under WP:NPA	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
35,368,771	` This is an attempt by either a Christian right-winger or Nazi to block a Jewish point of view from being published regarding a cult who uses ``Judaism`` in their name. If I was to start a porn site and name it Wikipedia, for example, and then advertise to the whole world saying that ``A REAL Wikipidea should have hardcore pornography on every page``, I think perhaps Wikipedia would have a few things to say. That's exactly what most Jews feel about ``Messianic Judaism`` (Christian Judaism?? That's an oxymoron).`	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,369,998	== My Reasoninf for the removal of Hulk Hogan Info == The reason I removed the Hulk Hogan Info is it's was basic review of the Hulk-a-mania run with nothing else about the 80's. I think if it needs to be there it should be expanded it include more then Hogan since even though he was the main star he was not the only one. It should also flow with the rest of the article; an example is the Hulk-a-mania section mentions Hogan's first title win after the Golden Age mentions Wrestlemania (1985). Therefore if anyone else can help with the expansion so be it.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,374,820	:Well given that the date of the newspaper pre-dates the supposed death, unless reports of his death were greatly exaggerated, which seems unlikely, I suspect that the various other sources might have picked up the date of his funeral by mistake.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,377,553	This is a Cotse outproxy. Wikipedia blocks editing through anonymizing proxy services in order to control vandalism.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,390,536	` ==Blind obedience== I tweaked this item in the trivia section, as ``blind obedience`` seemed to be an overstament of what the actual quote says. I also removed the strange line about ``legal reasons``. The irony is in her having been seen watching the movie - it needs no further explantions. `	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
35,404,165	==Again and again, now on 2006== This IP persists in: 1. Vandalizing some articles. 2. Deceptively editing articles on painters: edits categorized as spelling and grammer[sic], instead are inserts of an URL for a gallery selling art.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
35,405,233	`, 16 January 2006 (UTC) :::I see no issue with changing to ``popular useage``. 14:57`	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
35,410,523	` == Oceania == Hello. Have you considered creating a ``Oceania-bio-stub`` ? - `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,418,356	Yeah, I saw that it's in Suc. county when reading about Battle of Baia, but I thought it started somewhere in Transylvania and ended in Suceava. That's on the list of correction - for the next update.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,424,158	== Rydberg == you're welcome. i just thought something should have been said about that.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,426,064	the one's to provoke the reaction	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,437,285	: I don't know anymore. I lost all sources after being burned-out. Feel free to change it. Maybe some day I'll get back to this article. At the moment, most of my energy is wasted on RfCs and other crap.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,438,469	:::::::::I am not going to quibble endlessly with you. My point has been made cogently and concisely for anyone who cares to read it and vote in the poll, and each of your replies has merely strengthened my position.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,438,616	:Aye, point a few out to me and I'd be happy to help. I don't think the Gears from the Nortune Battling Arena are worth mentioning (there are so many and such little information on any of them save Argento and Regurus), and the Seraphs probably don't belong in a Gear listing, since they're not technically Gears (even if you do battle them in Gear-sized battles - note the absence of Gear-sized Chu-Chu in the Gear list). Ideally, pictures of every Gear mentioned would be included, even if small ones. Smaller-sized pictures should be head/mugshots. I've got half a mind to rewrite the entire list, due to poor grammar and spelling issues throughout (as well as some speculative info/fancruft that you mentioned), but I'm saving that for a day where I'm feeling really worker-bee-ish.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
35,439,151	: LMAO, what a n00b. Go and listen to manele!	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
35,441,898	` ::: I deleted it, because devoting an entire section of the article to ``shit misattributed to Voltaire`` is stupid and reeks of axe-grinding. And for the love of god will someone clean up this stinking pile of narrative dogshit trying to pass for a formal encyclopedia entry? `	2,006	false	article	random	test	false
35,445,625	` == Send this to == Pass this information to Bumpusmills: You have 2 hours to leave wikipedia. The events of the past 2 or 3 days was just a warning, as you said. I think you know what we're talking about. We have your personal information, your parents personal information, your workplace contact information, a lot of your records, and your wife's name. If you do not leave wikipedia, we will continue this effort with increased vigor. You have crossed paths with one of us and harassed us. Apologies will not work. Only leaving wikipedia will. If you do not leave wikipedia within the proscribed time, then further action will be taken. Your workplace will be called by gay escort services asking for you, your parents will get letters in the mail under your name saying you're gay, ads will be placed on gay forums with your contact information, etc. This could get nasty. You are to delete your user page and replace it with a message that you are leaving wikipedia, never to return. This is to be done within 2 hours. Don't bother reporting this IP to the FBI, because it's tor and as a result, it's untracable. Once you leave, we will forget about you and we'll all go our separate ways, never to talk again. I'm really sorry it has to come to this, but your harassment was just too much. Hopefully it never has to come to this again. ``Wado.`` P.S. For future reference, it's not a good idea to have your personal information all over the internet if you plan on harassing people. Unfortunately you harassed the wrong group of people.`	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	true
35,457,337	` :You are a plagiarizing, lying, full-of-shit, inept simp, Oldwindybear, who's ``left`` Wikipedia and returned like a chump approximately 10 times in the last 4 weeks. Your brain is jelly, and you are going to be carried out of here like the worthless lump of fat you are. Only a matter of time. Keep acting as though you're aiding Wikipedia, because it's very funny. You are so easily played that it's almost... no, it's worth it. Keep it up, fatty, you whiny, self-aggrandizing, maudlin piece of shit. Keep slopping your way around here like a pretentious little bitch, insulting others at every turn while protesting the hurling of insults. Your final solution awaits, and it will all be done by youbecause you're a disgusting baby in a wheelchair, pleading with everyone for indulgence, pointing to your wideband worthlessness which you prance in everybody's face like it's a badge. Think you can talk to someone without ever mentioning how many degrees you supposedly have, and how much you've suffered by being treated as an equal? Not bloody probable. Here's a tip: Show your competence, don't talk about it. That's what men do, you goddamned sloppy-assed, edit-like-shit, puerile, inept, eating, breathing, shitting waste of food who's killed more time of others and fucked up more articles at this joint than the usual vandal times 5. We have your numbah, and will sit back laughing the next time a big nut cracks itselfthe worst nut Wikipedia's evah seen. Better get prepped for your next block, turd girl. ``Signed``, Rev.ScrewedBluedTattooed`	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
35,464,547	== In 1898, the red-bricked Rathbone Accommodation Halls were built. They are named after Lady Rathbone, one of the early patrons of the University. == The present (2006) Neuadd Rathbone was known as University Hall during the 1960s. A Neuadd Rathbone was built in the mid 1960s and is now (2006) known as Neuadd John Morris Jones. Was University Hall of the 1960s previously names after Lady Rathbone or was their an earlier hall?	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,465,750	== First Toasted Sandwich Maker: Tostwich == The Toastwich has to be the first ever toasted sandwich maker, dating back to before 1920. However it wasn't patented until March 3, 1925 (applied on May 26, 1924 ). I discovered this after performing an image search in google. I was VERY excited with my discovery, and had to investigate it further. A chap called Charles V. Champion invented the 'Tostwich' AND a 'corn popping machine' which would mass-produce popcorn. The guy is a legend. The Catlin Historical Society website Click here to see the Toastwich	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,466,860	` Some soda fountains of the fifties kept a bottle of ``phosphate`` near the spot where soft drinks were concocted, and a customer could order, for example, a cherry coke with phosphate. One drop would add some tartness; two drops resulted in a major pucker. Cherry cokes were a prime candidate for this treatment as the cherry flavoring lent an abundance of sweetness. The phosphate, whatever it was, was a clear thin liquid.`	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
35,469,441	==See == That's right. And continue mocking us all you want. Goodbye, bastard.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
35,469,498	==See == That's right. And continue mocking us all you want. Goodbye.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
35,474,302	I'm trying to start an article on a fairly well-known independent band on the Toronto scene. This is perfectly valid wikipedia material so don't be a jackass and delete it.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,486,941	:::::::::::What was wrong with it was really (and you know this) that it was a specific attempt to laugh at the expense of a specific person. Wikipedia is not an appropriate place to bring your inside jokes, particularly those that you know to be hurtful to others.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
35,487,265	If you have any desire to discuss this further, it should probably be taken to your talk page or mine, since it's way off-topic for this one.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
35,493,288	- Upon reflection, I think I will simply take the second alternative, if others do not like it they can obviously make their own ammendments.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,500,274	==He has retired== Xork1000, Ratu Josefa Iloilo has now retired. There is an acting President of Fiji who is involved in talks between the Fijian Government & Commodore Frank Bainarama in an attempt to prevent a coup. - ( )	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
35,503,561	` == Commerce vs Science, The Sequel == I fail to see the relevance of any commercial references to this subject, at this time. To my knowledge, none of these companies are shipping cold fusion products at this time. That being the case, to include references to them in Wiki seems tantamount to promoting vapourware and providing free advertising to select companies in the midst of their pre-commercial R&D.NEWLINE;_TOKEN Even if some were shipping products, to feature any seems to cross, and blur the line between reference and promotion. Do any Wikis feel that there are substantial advantages to listing, or using as ``references,`` so-called commercial entitites, that outweigh the aforementioned concerns? `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,503,935	==Your category tags on British Commonwealth Honours Systems is deeply offensive!== Hu, your tags on British Commonwealth Honours System-related articles are deeply offensive. Here's an example of how politically offensive your tag is; Rhodesian Honours System. I want an apology please!- ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,504,154	:: Good observations. I didn't use the word Wallachian because that word is often associated with Wallachians from Muntenia, but you can make the changes, if you would like.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,504,619	: Yes, I took my sword and attacked you by trying to chop off your head, but that didn't help because of the hydra that you are. One head off, two new appear. One step forward, two steps behind. Thanks for your message.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,506,774	==Who is the acting President?== Which Ratu is the acting President? - ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,507,218	== Your user page == Please don't write attacks against other users on your userpage. You've made good contributions to Wikipedia. Why not carry on doing that and forget the personal stuff?	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,508,573	==Tui Viti article== Xork1000, could you please let me know if my information in this article is correct? - ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,511,341	==You're Hell-bound!== Adam, as seen as you've admitted to being a pro-[faggot]], you are going to end up buring up in the Lake of Fire in Hell! - ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	true
35,512,341	The Caliphs that followed immediately after Muhammad's death, Abu Bakr and Umar, both engaged in unprovoked wars that expanded the first Islamic empire...Doesn't that also figure into the idea of offensive Jihad?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,512,543	== The Original Wikipedia? == * Check this out ''''''	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
35,515,051	==English/British== In December changed all of the references from British to English for whatever reason. Watson Hutton was Scottish, and it's probably likely many of the other early influences may have been Welsh, Irish or Scots. Also there is no real sub-division of British humour caleld English humour. So i've change it back.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
35,515,403	) No Probs Mate. I Didn't Make It Clear In The Article, So I Should Take Part of The Blame\| 07:51, 17th January 2006 (GMT	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,534,196	== HI == Its a school - what do you expect?	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
35,534,893	==Mini Turbos== Quit changing it back. Nintendo has not confirmed snaking is intentional. If it is, produce a reference.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
35,545,583	==Unban== Go to hell, Android79! I do not consider my edits vandalism!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
35,548,600	/addresses of proxy servers	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
35,559,485	` ::::Sure it is. Keeps vandalism out, keeps legitimete editors in. And, no, I don't think of anons or new users as ``second -class citizens`` ethier. In fact, I hold them in high respect, as i can't count how many times an anon or new user has cleaned up a spelling mistake or grammer error after I've finished making a new article. But this article is indeed an exception, and we must react acordingly. I'm a good - faith editor, but I'm no sucker. These vindidctive users play us up but good. They don't care if we let down SEMI in an act of kindness and good faith, they just start anew. Even Mr. Sidaway stated that vandalism skyrocketed when he deactivated SEMI and numerous charts have shown (again by Mr. Sidaway) that SEMI is benefitting the article. And a user has already shown what ``incredibly constructive`` edits are made when its down (the addition of a coma! That's a Major edit for sure!). Honestly, the statistics and our tireless hours of pointless vandlaism reverting don't lie. We could go on and on, but what's the point..? Vandalism will not desist. The only reason vandalism decreses is because of SEMI. I leave you with the history, and I hope you'll think on it. But I doubt it. - `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,560,487	` Both Amazon and Google are sites that use English in their searches. The west is particularly advanced when it comes to using the internet to create pages or discuss things. Amazon is obviously dominated by goods and books retailed in the Western countries. Therefore the results you get back disproportionately represent the opinion of the West. Most westerners have little or know knowlege of the event, save the famine that followed in 1975, so it makes sense that they'd defer to the most simplistic title for the event, namely the ``Bangladesh War``. To use popular search engines and shop sites like Amazon to determine the title of the article is rather unencyclopedic. I want to add more to discuss 'genocide' here. Is what happened an incident of genocide. The George Washington University National Security Archives has some interesting declassified documents in this regard. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
35,561,073	` Bit of an off-topic...Is it POV to called what happened to Jews during WW2 a holocaust? POV doesn't mean we presume all sides equal at the cost of accurately depicting history. A neutral eye over what happened in East Pakistan prior to and leading to the war, and all that's happened since pretty much supports the phrase ``War of Independence`` or ``War of Liberation``, even from a neutral perspective. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,568,056	== Framebuffer == User and I may have come to a solution on the discussion of merging the Framebuffer and Video RAM topics. If we could get you to weigh in, we may end up with a concensus on the issue. Thanks for driving that, BTW. The Video RAM page was definitely in need of some sort of change.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,575,235	==Major Rewites== In the past, when attempting a major rewite, I've used a sandbox so that I could show other editors what I meant. If you like I could help you set one up.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
35,577,618	Concerning Benedict Arnold:	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
35,598,535	< who the heck wrote that crap _ explain why a forum devoted to Schapelle Corby should not be on her Wiki. What sets the other sites apart from mine ? My forum was the first and only Schapelle support site for months. Who the heck are you to say it should got here. You can remove it everyday and I will be back the next day to add it again. FFS get a life.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
35,599,012	LOL what the hell is up with you? You want to remove my link but you let that crap stay in? Jesus how pathetic! Oh you don't think its true? UMM NO SH*T MATE!!!	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
35,601,044	LOL yeah good one mate - have the rest of the day off champ	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,601,712	` :Your not the only one speaking in a language of old.... From todays CounterPunch dotcom, On this the Seventeenth Day Of January, in the Year of Our Lord 2006. Bugging America The Liberties of the Subject By WERTHER The overwhelming balance of recorded history has been marked by despotism. When homo sapiens sapiens transitioned from hunter gatherer to agriculturalist, he gained literacy, solid dwellings, and other accoutrements of what is commonly considered civilization. But he experienced a sharp decline in personal liberty. The reasons for this are commonsensical. Disputes between tribes of hunter gatherers could be resolved by one or the other simply pulling up stakes and relocating to a new territory, there being few material impedimenta to prevent them. A settled agricultural existence, on the other hand, implied permanent villages, granaries, and land boundaries to be defended against depredation. The need for defenses implied a national security state. Agricultural surpluses not only necessitated armed defense, but allowed a division of labor leading to policemen, soldiers, bureaucrats, and tax assessors, the latter of whom would confiscate a percentage of the harvest. The evolution of labor conditions also implied a different mental outlook. The hunter gatherer was an independent contractor (if not brigand) who ranged over extensive territory and worked alone or in small groups. The agricultural laborer, by contrast, toiled in one spot, making his comings and goings more subject to regulation. If the land was not his, he became dependent on the Big Man's favor. Given the increased population densities in regions where agricultural societies developed, he could only rarely strike out on his own: the good land had been already taken, and game animals cleared or hunted to local extinction. [1] With the rise of what Karl Wittfogel call ``hydraulic civilization,`` [2] the screw of oppression turned once again against personal liberty. In order to build the extensive earthworks necessary for the state to survive the next drought or flood, the rulers of these proto-superpowers subjected their subjects to enforced toil and off-duty regimentation which rendered them no more free than so many draft animals. It is unlikely the rulers of the states in the Valley of Mexico, the Nile, the Euphrates, the Ganges, or the Yang-Tze had much toleration for the complaints their subjects, who were enslaved, enserfed, or otherwise regimented for the greater good as defined by the states' rulers. These complaints, had they been permitted, would have constituted freedom of speech. Nor would the rulers have given credence to a peasant's assertion that the interior of his crude dwelling, and the contents thereof, were inviolate from the inquisitiveness of the state. He, the peasant, simply had no rights a ruler was bound to respect (to paraphrase what a former Supreme Court Justice once said about slaves in a famous ruling in 1857); the only limit on a ruler's power over his subjects was the former's fear of rebellion should discontent overflow. Of the two rights discussed thus far, freedom of speech and freedom from arbitrary search and seizure, the latter is fundamentally more important to human beings' maintaining a status above that of mere hive animals. This is not intended in any way to disparage the desirability and necessity of free speech. But there are practical circumstances when free speech is not exercised by reasonable peopledue to reticence, shame, or its merely being not worth the effort. Or when one is married. Much obnoxious and exhibitionistic behavior is rationalized as free speech, while more urgent matters are suppressed: how many hourly employees feel free to say what they really think of their supervisors, and is the resultant lawsuit really covered by the First Amendment? But asinine reality TV blares on. Out of politeness or discretion, most intelligent people censor their opinions about politics, in-laws, bosses, and religion when they are in the public commons. The inviolability of one's person, and one's dwelling, is more basic. What would the average person resent more: being told he cannot ask questions of the President of the United States at a staged event, or being ordered to be strip searched in public? Or, for that matter, have his house ransacked? That is the principle at issue. The lesser freedom is essential for political discourse, the greater freedom distinguishes us from dogs. [3] Respect for privacy, for oneself and one's fellow citizens, is the benchmark of a sense of an individual self. The majority of psychologically well adjusted people believes that there are facts and circumstances about them that just do not bear the glaring searchlight of public revelation. Some things are simply private. At the same time, well adjusted people do not poke their noses unnecessarily into the lives of others, as much out of good taste and a low threshold of disgust as high principle. The snoop and the village Nosy Parker are butts of derision in popular lore. How did this highly refined sense of individuation develop in the species, given the overwhelming pressures in the other direction? The pharaohs, emperors, and potentates whose mighty works arose between 30 degrees north latitude and the Tropic of Cancer seem to have had the weather gage: division and regimentation of labor as a means of increasing population density and thus state wealth were the wave of the future. A docile workforce certainly could not be secure in its homes, papers, and affects, the future Fourth Amendment to the Constitution notwithstanding. There was no profit in letting the proles be themselves. Somewhere in isolated temperate regions, difficult to conquer militarily, there arose sometime after 1000 AD a contrary view. The Saxon theign, the Swiss cowherd swearing his oath at the Rütli, the deliberations of the Icelandic Allthing, were the beginnings of the idea of the liberty of the subject. [4] We may seek concrete reasons why these societies thought their inhabitants were above mere chattel, or we may ascribe it to miraculous happenstance. But it happened, and we should be grateful. At some point, these societies developed the concept of an Über-law, or constitution, a law that not even a king could violate without punishment. Hence such magnificent works of poetry as the Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence, and the Swiss Federal Charter. The concept of swearing allegiance to the principles embodied in the words on a piece of parchment, rather than to a king, should be familiar to most federal employees today, regardless of the willingness of some of them to engage in squalid black-bag shenanigans against the public trust and their own oath. But constitutions, like laws, are not self-enforcing. For every Runnymede, there was a Star Chamber. For every United States Constitution, there was a Patriot [sic] Act. For every person who regards himself as an individual, there is another who has no self respect as a person, and who counts himself as a partisan of what he naively thinks is the home team, cheering on his side like a prole in the Circus Maximus in imperial Rome. Where are we now, in the Year of Our Lord 2006? We will not reiterate in detail the recent newspaper bulletins which reveal that the present administration is ransacking the personal effects of United States citizen ostensibly in order to fight the so-called Global War on Terrorism. [5]. We will merely make a few observations. First, not only is ``the president's program`` (as the warrantless intercepts are called in the chaste corridors of the West Wing) an obvious example of lawbreaking, but so is the Patriot [sic] Act itself, which some observers profess to view as a legally authorized and legitimate vehicle for government intrusion into the live of private citizens. Section 215 of the Act addresses so-called National Security Letters, which involve a government search of libraries, credit agencies, health care providers, or any organization that keeps records on citizens. The organization served with such a letter is prohibited from speaking about it to anyone. This is the so-called ``gag order,`` much discussed in House and Senate proceedings but thus far hardly discussed in terms of its ramifications. A plain reading of the gag order shows it to be a clear violation of the right in Amendment I of the United States Constitution to ``petition the Government for a redress of Grievances,`` which is commonly interpreted as the right to communicate with one's Member of Congress or Senator. This fact has somehow escaped the Blackstones and Perry Masons who populate the law commentary bailiwicks of the newspaper and television. Second, given the scope of ``the president's program,`` we are entitled to wonder how recess appointment to the position of United Nations ambassador John Bolton was so keenly interested in signals intelligence, and why the White House was so adamant in refusing the Senate access to documentation in relation to this fact. Equally puzzling is the fact that in the campaign season of 2004, the White House knew every detail of the CBS story about the incumbent president's air national guard service and had a detailed refutation/cover story ready to be released as the story aired. Similarly surprising was how presidential advisor Karl Rove was able to develop a complex alibi to dodge a perjury indictment: almost as if he knew exactly what special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald knew. Third, we are entitled to speculate (as U.S. citizens, are we not?) about the manifold increase in signals traffic	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,610,290	Listen you piece of shit , pencil necked twerp that you are. Nowhere did I make any further attacks to anyone. How about you get a fuckin life rather than getting a little stiffy from banning people. I couldnt give a slight fuck about your lame arse wiki. Its bullshit anyways. You people just like reading your own crap. Brisbane is a fuckin small place and google is a great tool. Yet another christian piece of shit. I shit on your god you little fuck.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
35,615,544	Actually, Kashin isn't Blue Justice. It turned out to be Gran Naniwa.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,615,638	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
35,625,010	==Ignore the Islamophobes== You are truly a Warrior of Islam! I present to you my , since the Zalimun wish to deny you of it.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,625,627	==Thank you== Thank you for the welcome! I am borrowing of the tags on Bush on my userpage. I must congratulate you on your conversion! Please, help to fix Islamophobia. It is FULL of Yehudi bias!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,626,218	Islam and anti-Semitism Excellent work! We must stamp out this Yehudi bias!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,627,233	Hey asshole, she's 18 years old. The briefing stated it. Changed.	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	true
35,628,230	:Who is this Saduj al-Dahij?	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,629,007	` ==Absurd== What is this absurdity? I went to the Straw man page and I found this: # Present the opponent's argument in weakened form, refute it, and pretend that the original has been refuted. :Is my correction of the pov on Beslan hostage crisis fit this description? It had the freedom fighters labeled ``terrorists.`` # Present a misrepresentation of the opponent's position, refute it, and pretend that the opponent's actual position has been refuted. :How have I misrepresented Islam? This is nonsense. I demand to be unblocked at once. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,629,224	Islamophobia == :That may be so, but the to exclude another party's point of view even if that point of view is seen as abhorrent is against the NPOV policy, which, frankly, reduces the article's utility and (in my opinion) makes the POV party look bad. ==	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,630,018	` ==Lies== ``Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by ``Lajjadda``. The reason given for Lajjadda's block is: ``clear strawman sockpuppet of Saduj al-Dahij. Used for vandalism and personal attacks``.`` I have never personally attaked no one. Lies. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,635,305	:::I contacted both CounterPunch and Werther to appraise them of my copyright violation, and make recompense. Thank you for reducing the material to a single hyperlink. In the future, I will take more time a care to locate the proper address and use that solely in place of copy/past. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,640,696	This message is regarding the page Rossland, British Columbia. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,642,159	run in with this user, (I guess that's how you made the list) so I was hoping that you would be able to help. Is it okay for me to go and remove that from his page? Is this something he can be banned over (assuming his current ban has expired)? Thanks in advance :Yes you can go ahead and remove these statements on his userpage. If this user continues to make such edits he can be banned, however I would like to try and resolve any disputes with users and explain to them the rules of wikipedia, rather than run the risk of permanentley blocking someone prematurely. And BTW, his current block hasn't expired just yet, he still has about 10-12 hours left on his block. Thanks for asking me about this, I'll be sure to keep an eye on his contributions.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,648,226	` ::Nu metal isn't strictly defined, either. I'm basically just transcribing what other people wrote on the subject, and there is a distinction made bewteen the two. And no one ever called alternative metal ``uncommericalized metal``. The neologism rule applies if we have coined the term ourselves (which we haven't), it does not show up often in searches (it shows up quite often) and the term is not useful in Wikipedia (it has been used frequently in other articles, and the subject has been integrated into these articles in order to add to the description of these articles). :: But really, spell out exactly what you think repeats in both articles so we can try to address those issues. `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,649,057	== translate this article to Bahasa Malaysia == Good Job. Someone should make it to Bahasa Malaysia, becoz not everybody in malaysia understand english, and this is a topic related to malaysian themself. ....i think this article showing some hardcore problem in malaysia	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
35,649,823	` The GWP of methane is reported as 21, 22 and 23 on various pages - ``Methane`` and ``global warming potential`` - is this an inaccuracy or is there some doubt over what the figure actually is? Or is it a variable depending on other factors? Bug `	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false

35,278,791

:::::::: Jesus...Whatever she's doing, I can voice my opinion to it. This is a discussion page, not an encyclopedia entry. I didn't say she should be MADE silent. I have no intention of 'making her silent'. Just giving my opinion here, which I think is a perfectly valid one. As for her jurisdiction, commentary on talk page is within everyone's jurisdiction. You're an illustration of all that's wrong with Wikipedia. You don't make logical sense, you derive understandings of things that are said that weren't in fact said. You make snap judgements on things without taking the information for what it is. You're too underqualified to undertake anything of an intellectual or scholarly nature. Wikipedia is worse off having the likes of you as an admin.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

35,279,960

` ``I am not an academic.`` Well praise be. The students who are not subjected to your arrogance will rise up and call blessed the universities that have forborne to hire you. You are doubtless aware that Australia's only living Nobel Prize winner, [Doctor] Peter Doherty considers that there are only four Australian universities that are of international standard; presumably your doctorate is from the University of Central Queensland or perhaps the University of Southern Queensland. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,285,768

Thx for your check on Kurdish people == Thx for your check on Kurdish people You should know that these Yezidi Kurds are faking facts, because they claim that Yezidism is the only true Kurdish faith. Many historicals know that Kurds were once Zoroastrian, at least when only 1% of the Kurds were Zoroastrian why we shouldn't add this information? There are still many Zoroastrians in northern Iraq. ==

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,291,774

!response: THIS IS AN AOL ADDRESS USED BY MANY DIFFERENT USERS,CREATE AN ACCOUNT AND YOU WILL NOT SEE THIS AGAIN-ITS EASY AND FREE

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

35,296,259

:There are plenty of Janusz Karpinskis out there in the world... but such a well spoken person (or group?) speaking through this user name, surly wouldn't have missed the play on sound reminding others of another notable Karpinski? Sorry if you're not that one either, especially as some may only know the first half of her popularized notability. :The big question, is whether your cogent logical path astutely presented in your AfD, will penetrate minds already made up, or especially those who shamelessly employ Wikipedia as self-reference to counter-argue deletion of an article where they lack outside reference for proper categorization, or even simple NPOV treatment of the material. Good luck!

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,300,375

==Historical innaccuracy== Some short-sighted people are about to delete that category.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,303,262

:I think I read somewhere that Fitzroy switched sides... in fact I've just remembered where. It's in a book about Lewes... just hunting it down .... 5 minutes later... got it. He first stood as a Conservative and then became a Liberal (no dates), became Lord of the Admiralty in 1845. if it's not online elsewhere I'll look at the Times obituary. It's bloody useful having discovered that I can access that. Do you have a library card for your local authority?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,305,560

* It's the other Paul Anderson. I've removed the sentence.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

35,307,053

This IP address and others like it are dynamically assigned NAT addresses for the University of Bath, UK. As such, blocks placed on them are unlikely to have the desired effect of preventing vandals from offending again. They will simply be reassigned another address in time. There is an added disadvantage that legitimate editors behind the Bath proxy will be blocked when the address is leased to them.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

35,309,585

::If it's grouped togethether because it's all related, surely it would all be better off as subsections under Map?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

35,313,301

The block has expired, but no explanation so far.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,313,913

` ==Still The Achilles' Heel of Wikipedia.== Maybe someone who checks in on this talk page might now where to go with it? First, a public reply to Dragons flight, (and maybe his own sockpuppet ``Freestylefrappe``): Hardly a ``sockpuppet`` when I used the very same name.... followed by a ``2``. Or are you talking about blocking Pgio ``too``, who simply agreed that someone here is quite a J_rk? I asked so clearly that you wouldn't take away WMC's opportunity to block me himself.... I would have been proud. But you knew that too, right? Wikipedians: I freely admit, that my own level of civility here has lowered.... even against my own admonishment to others to avoid such behavior. All I can say, is that it is a VERY difficult dynamic to avoid when some here play by such despicably manipulative and base rules of engagement. I'm thinking of that dichotomy between people who claim that their Ends or so worthy, that they should get a pass on their occasional stray from acceptable means, vs. those who retain some hold on the idea that they will be judged by their Means, no matter the final outcome. This is made all the more difficult where users such as Admin WMC, who know full well the self imposed limits of their opponents, demand verbal civility on one hand, and yet play such extensive games of ``pretend to forget``, ``I didn't see that`` written ten times before, and ALWAYS selectively choose the lowest hanging fruit in a nest of specific challenges to their type of behavior, contributions, and edits. Worldly people understand the sensitive nature of situations like these. Educated people (especially those through the School of Hard Knocks) know that these situations are more often set-ups, initiated by the manipulator. The manipulator has at least learned the fine art of camouflage where they can hide very well 'in plain sight' flying the banner of Democracy. Failing to acknowledge this simple possibility, marks one as either the manipulator, or just a pseudo-intellect. As I've said before, and will say again.... If users like WMC were genuine, they'd acknowledge human fallibility and the basic rights of dissident opinion. Doing so, WMC would quickly gain my support of his presentations on mainstream understanding. He gets that part right VERY OFTEN and has demonstrated a tenacity to seeing his POV upheld. Good for him, and why I have absolutely no trouble with his dominance over others trying to write articles presenting such information. Yet why? Why does he refuse to acknowledge his lack of verse in material outside of his very public field of knowledge? Why does he go so far in his chilling drive to stifle the good faith presentations of non-mainstream fields? Please, I'm not just talking about aether theories alone. The electric fields have plenty to say about corollary/causal dynamics in cogent presentations about a very possible relationship to atmospheric phenomenon. Damn if WMC shouldn't be reading some of that stuff instead of JUST pointing out how it's counter to the formulas used in current Climate Models. I mean, just forget about the LONG history of trial and repeated errors in aether postulation, the mysteries of electricity still surround us and we would all benefit by keeping an open mind about that. In the least, do we really think it wise to insist by near constant omission, any possibility that Birkeland or Alfvén currents effect our conductive atmosphere. I'm not saying that WMC's models need to be trashed or even that he should modify them this afternoon, but it's highly suspicious that he suppresses the postulations and formulations from even the notable sources working on competitive modeling. It is so suspicious, that is why I question his objectivity, and point out that he IS a PAID agent of tax dollars vested in a particular model. That he doesn't acknowledge and recuse himself, is just annoying to say the least. That Wikipedia doesn't impose some boundaries on this user's blinding conflict of interest, casts a far greater doubt upon Wikipedia NPOV all together. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,314,961

== what was up with that block? == Seriously, what was up with that? Made NO SENSE.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,317,903

::::: I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. I asked how much of our language was replaced with words from French and Italian. Are you saying that our language was replaced by 70-80 percent with French and Italian words? I'm guessing there is a misunderstanding here, but yes, please can a script to find out. Do anything you can. We should know these figures.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,319,711

` I can also access the Encyclopaedia Britannica and the Oxford Dictionary of National Biogprahy through the library membership subscription and the later has a biography for him, but it is cvopyright so I can't post it. It says ``He joined the Peelites, was quite close to Gladstone, and ultimately became a Liberal`` - no dates. I can't access Britannica at the moment due to ``high traffic levels`` or so it says. Erm.. there may be some question as to the date of his death. The DONB gives 22 December 1859 as does the Wikipedia article, but I am looking at an edition of The Times from Tuesday 20th December 1859, which states ``We deeply regret to announce the death of the Rt. Hon. Henry Fitzroy ... on Sautrday last ...`` - that would mean he died on 17th December 1859. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be a full obit. In the edtion for 17th Jan 1860 there is a report of the unopposed election of his successor on 16th January, 1860, one John George Blencowe (apparently maternally descended from another former Lewes Liberal MP Sir. Francis Poole who sat as the MP 100 years before (or so the article says) `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,328,131

I'm a bit confused as to the figures quoted for votes etc in some of the older elections. In former times (before 1900 for sure) a large number of seats would have been uncontested. Rremember that a borough/county might return up to three members and as I understand it, from what I have read, if there were more than the requisite number of persons nominated to stand, and often there would be no additional challengers, a show of hands would first be taken, and a result declared on that basis. If one of the nominated persons objected to the result, a poll result and votes counted. How is the vote for these constituencies managed in say the United_Kingdom_general_election%2C_1895 page? Is the vote for the entire electorate placedinto the pot for the winning party or are they left out entirey.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,328,755

==Fitzroy== Hi, where did you get the death date for Henry Fitzroy, I note that the Dictionary of National Biography also says 22nd Dec 1859, but the edition of The Times from Sayurday 20th Dec 1859 clearly say he died the previous Tuesday, i.e. 17th.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,329,230

` :I too haven't made up my mind on Aetherometry, regardless what other users might attest to by my opposition to calling it pseudoscience without reference. I think your son is in wonderful hands. I placed a comment on talk page ``Danny``, it might resinate with you further. I was blocked for calling WMC the very words your son shouldn't see. And blocked justly so. All I can do is apologize to you and your son for allowing myself to reach a wits end. I do not apologize to WMC, for I feel strongly that he takes people there knowing full well the frustration he unjustly builds within people. :I also have a comment and vote for deletion to place in your very well written AfD on aetherometry. This wiki is woefully ill-equipped to deal with such material. I doubt wikipedia can survive many more of these types of encounters before forced to change its ways, or it may sink from respectable existence all together. :The other notable Karpinski I spoke of, (at least for people here in DC) was the one who came out in opposition to the U.S. Secretary of Defense, after she was demoted for not following the ``company line``. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,332,529

Let me know what you find out. Seventy percent is too much, even for technical words.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,342,346

==This article needs to be split up== This article needs to be split up, as the information here duplicates that outlined in individual articles such as Banknotes of England and Banknotes of Great Britain - ( )

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,346,500

Not a PhD. and here I am , thanks. I agree that some Islamist movements have fascist characteristics. I am just trying to be fair.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

35,351,187

`:::::Try actually reading your Google hits instead of just counting them. Of the 114 *unique* hits for ``aluminum underwear``, 79 have nothing to do with shoplifting, 28 directly concern the Colorado law, and only seven generally concern shoplifting, not specifically in reference to the Colorado law. Of the 35 unique hits for ``aluminum underpants``, 18 have nothing to do with shoplifting, 17 reference the Colorado law, and zero reference shoplifting in general. It is obvious from these Google results that the use of the phrase in either form did gain some popularity surrounding the passage of the Colorado law, but disappeared shortly thereafter and did not fall into the general vernacular. Either form is therefore not ubiquitous and is inappropriate for this section title. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,352,484

I wont do it again

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

35,354,349

::False assumption flash! The page protection was done by , unsolicited as far as I know. According to his history, Voice of All has never edited the Anarchism article, which make one wonder why he intervened at all.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,355,157

Graaaah, I've got the actor box up, but the picture is distorted and I don't know how to fix it! Help!

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

35,355,354

:::::::Google indexes all varieties on content on the Internet, not just wire service stories (and in fact, the vast majority of the spike in use of these terms surrounding the passage of the law had nothing to do with wire service stories). First you misrepresented Google numbers to try to support your claim, and now you're claiming Google numbers are not representative now that you see that they do not, in fact, support your claim. Your line of reasoning is becoming too weak to sustain. It's time for you to pick up and choose another article to bother.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

35,359,137

Friend, you are accountable to me as a fellow user and a civil being for a civil explanation of your blocking action. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,359,481

:Convincing evidence was provided to the Arbitration Committee.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,362,933

:No, that would fall under WP:NPA

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

35,368,771

` This is an attempt by either a Christian right-winger or Nazi to block a Jewish point of view from being published regarding a cult who uses ``Judaism`` in their name. If I was to start a porn site and name it Wikipedia, for example, and then advertise to the whole world saying that ``A REAL Wikipidea should have hardcore pornography on every page``, I think perhaps Wikipedia would have a few things to say. That's exactly what most Jews feel about ``Messianic Judaism`` (Christian Judaism?? That's an oxymoron).`

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,369,998

== My Reasoninf for the removal of Hulk Hogan Info == The reason I removed the Hulk Hogan Info is it's was basic review of the Hulk-a-mania run with nothing else about the 80's. I think if it needs to be there it should be expanded it include more then Hogan since even though he was the main star he was not the only one. It should also flow with the rest of the article; an example is the Hulk-a-mania section mentions Hogan's first title win after the Golden Age mentions Wrestlemania (1985). Therefore if anyone else can help with the expansion so be it.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,374,820

:Well given that the date of the newspaper pre-dates the supposed death, unless reports of his death were greatly exaggerated, which seems unlikely, I suspect that the various other sources might have picked up the date of his funeral by mistake.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,377,553

This is a Cotse outproxy. Wikipedia blocks editing through anonymizing proxy services in order to control vandalism.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,390,536

` ==Blind obedience== I tweaked this item in the trivia section, as ``blind obedience`` seemed to be an overstament of what the actual quote says. I also removed the strange line about ``legal reasons``. The irony is in her having been seen watching the movie - it needs no further explantions. `

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

35,404,165

==Again and again, now on 2006== This IP persists in: 1. Vandalizing some articles. 2. Deceptively editing articles on painters: edits categorized as spelling and grammer[sic], instead are inserts of an URL for a gallery selling art.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

35,405,233

`, 16 January 2006 (UTC) :::I see no issue with changing to ``popular useage``. 14:57`

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

35,410,523

` == Oceania == Hello. Have you considered creating a ``Oceania-bio-stub`` ? - `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,418,356

Yeah, I saw that it's in Suc. county when reading about Battle of Baia, but I thought it started somewhere in Transylvania and ended in Suceava. That's on the list of correction - for the next update.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,424,158

== Rydberg == you're welcome. i just thought something should have been said about that.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,426,064

the one's to provoke the reaction

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,437,285

: I don't know anymore. I lost all sources after being burned-out. Feel free to change it. Maybe some day I'll get back to this article. At the moment, most of my energy is wasted on RfCs and other crap.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,438,469

:::::::::I am not going to quibble endlessly with you. My point has been made cogently and concisely for anyone who cares to read it and vote in the poll, and each of your replies has merely strengthened my position.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,438,616

:Aye, point a few out to me and I'd be happy to help. I don't think the Gears from the Nortune Battling Arena are worth mentioning (there are so many and such little information on any of them save Argento and Regurus), and the Seraphs probably don't belong in a Gear listing, since they're not technically Gears (even if you do battle them in Gear-sized battles - note the absence of Gear-sized Chu-Chu in the Gear list). Ideally, pictures of every Gear mentioned would be included, even if small ones. Smaller-sized pictures should be head/mugshots. I've got half a mind to rewrite the entire list, due to poor grammar and spelling issues throughout (as well as some speculative info/fancruft that you mentioned), but I'm saving that for a day where I'm feeling really worker-bee-ish.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

35,439,151

: LMAO, what a n00b. Go and listen to manele!

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

35,441,898

` ::: I deleted it, because devoting an entire section of the article to ``shit misattributed to Voltaire`` is stupid and reeks of axe-grinding. And for the love of god will someone clean up this stinking pile of narrative dogshit trying to pass for a formal encyclopedia entry? `

2,006

false

article

random

test

false

35,445,625

` == Send this to == Pass this information to Bumpusmills: You have 2 hours to leave wikipedia. The events of the past 2 or 3 days was just a warning, as you said. I think you know what we're talking about. We have your personal information, your parents personal information, your workplace contact information, a lot of your records, and your wife's name. If you do not leave wikipedia, we will continue this effort with increased vigor. You have crossed paths with one of us and harassed us. Apologies will not work. Only leaving wikipedia will. If you do not leave wikipedia within the proscribed time, then further action will be taken. Your workplace will be called by gay escort services asking for you, your parents will get letters in the mail under your name saying you're gay, ads will be placed on gay forums with your contact information, etc. This could get nasty. You are to delete your user page and replace it with a message that you are leaving wikipedia, never to return. This is to be done within 2 hours. Don't bother reporting this IP to the FBI, because it's tor and as a result, it's untracable. Once you leave, we will forget about you and we'll all go our separate ways, never to talk again. I'm really sorry it has to come to this, but your harassment was just too much. Hopefully it never has to come to this again. ``Wado.`` P.S. For future reference, it's not a good idea to have your personal information all over the internet if you plan on harassing people. Unfortunately you harassed the wrong group of people.`

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

true

35,457,337

` :You are a plagiarizing, lying, full-of-shit, inept simp, Oldwindybear, who's ``left`` Wikipedia and returned like a chump approximately 10 times in the last 4 weeks. Your brain is jelly, and you are going to be carried out of here like the worthless lump of fat you are. Only a matter of time. Keep acting as though you're aiding Wikipedia, because it's very funny. You are so easily played that it's almost... no, it's worth it. Keep it up, fatty, you whiny, self-aggrandizing, maudlin piece of shit. Keep slopping your way around here like a pretentious little bitch, insulting others at every turn while protesting the hurling of insults. Your final solution awaits, and it will all be done by youbecause you're a disgusting baby in a wheelchair, pleading with everyone for indulgence, pointing to your wideband worthlessness which you prance in everybody's face like it's a badge. Think you can talk to someone without ever mentioning how many degrees you supposedly have, and how much you've suffered by being treated as an equal? Not bloody probable. Here's a tip: Show your competence, don't talk about it. That's what men do, you goddamned sloppy-assed, edit-like-shit, puerile, inept, eating, breathing, shitting waste of food who's killed more time of others and fucked up more articles at this joint than the usual vandal times 5. We have your numbah, and will sit back laughing the next time a big nut cracks itselfthe worst nut Wikipedia's evah seen. Better get prepped for your next block, turd girl. ``Signed``, Rev.ScrewedBluedTattooed`

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

35,464,547

== In 1898, the red-bricked Rathbone Accommodation Halls were built. They are named after Lady Rathbone, one of the early patrons of the University. == The present (2006) Neuadd Rathbone was known as University Hall during the 1960s. A Neuadd Rathbone was built in the mid 1960s and is now (2006) known as Neuadd John Morris Jones. Was University Hall of the 1960s previously names after Lady Rathbone or was their an earlier hall?

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,465,750

== First Toasted Sandwich Maker: Tostwich == The Toastwich has to be the first ever toasted sandwich maker, dating back to before 1920. However it wasn't patented until March 3, 1925 (applied on May 26, 1924 ). I discovered this after performing an image search in google. I was VERY excited with my discovery, and had to investigate it further. A chap called Charles V. Champion invented the 'Tostwich' AND a 'corn popping machine' which would mass-produce popcorn. The guy is a legend. The Catlin Historical Society website Click here to see the Toastwich

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,466,860

` Some soda fountains of the fifties kept a bottle of ``phosphate`` near the spot where soft drinks were concocted, and a customer could order, for example, a cherry coke with phosphate. One drop would add some tartness; two drops resulted in a major pucker. Cherry cokes were a prime candidate for this treatment as the cherry flavoring lent an abundance of sweetness. The phosphate, whatever it was, was a clear thin liquid.`

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

35,469,441

==See == That's right. And continue mocking us all you want. Goodbye, bastard.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

35,469,498

==See == That's right. And continue mocking us all you want. Goodbye.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

35,474,302

I'm trying to start an article on a fairly well-known independent band on the Toronto scene. This is perfectly valid wikipedia material so don't be a jackass and delete it.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,486,941

:::::::::::What was wrong with it was really (and you know this) that it was a specific attempt to laugh at the expense of a specific person. Wikipedia is not an appropriate place to bring your inside jokes, particularly those that you know to be hurtful to others.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

35,487,265

If you have any desire to discuss this further, it should probably be taken to your talk page or mine, since it's way off-topic for this one.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

35,493,288

- Upon reflection, I think I will simply take the second alternative, if others do not like it they can obviously make their own ammendments.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,500,274

==He has retired== Xork1000, Ratu Josefa Iloilo has now retired. There is an acting President of Fiji who is involved in talks between the Fijian Government & Commodore Frank Bainarama in an attempt to prevent a coup. - ( )

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

35,503,561

` == Commerce vs Science, The Sequel == I fail to see the relevance of any commercial references to this subject, at this time. To my knowledge, none of these companies are shipping cold fusion products at this time. That being the case, to include references to them in Wiki seems tantamount to promoting vapourware and providing free advertising to select companies in the midst of their pre-commercial R&D.NEWLINE;_TOKEN Even if some were shipping products, to feature any seems to cross, and blur the line between reference and promotion. Do any Wikis feel that there are substantial advantages to listing, or using as ``references,`` so-called commercial entitites, that outweigh the aforementioned concerns? `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,503,935

==Your category tags on British Commonwealth Honours Systems is deeply offensive!== Hu, your tags on British Commonwealth Honours System-related articles are deeply offensive. Here's an example of how politically offensive your tag is; Rhodesian Honours System. I want an apology please!- ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,504,154

:: Good observations. I didn't use the word Wallachian because that word is often associated with Wallachians from Muntenia, but you can make the changes, if you would like.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,504,619

: Yes, I took my sword and attacked you by trying to chop off your head, but that didn't help because of the hydra that you are. One head off, two new appear. One step forward, two steps behind. Thanks for your message.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,506,774

==Who is the acting President?== Which Ratu is the acting President? - ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,507,218

== Your user page == Please don't write attacks against other users on your userpage. You've made good contributions to Wikipedia. Why not carry on doing that and forget the personal stuff?

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,508,573

==Tui Viti article== Xork1000, could you please let me know if my information in this article is correct? - ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,511,341

==You're Hell-bound!== Adam, as seen as you've admitted to being a pro-[faggot]], you are going to end up buring up in the Lake of Fire in Hell! - ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

true

35,512,341

The Caliphs that followed immediately after Muhammad's death, Abu Bakr and Umar, both engaged in unprovoked wars that expanded the first Islamic empire...Doesn't that also figure into the idea of offensive Jihad?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,512,543

== The Original Wikipedia? == * Check this out ''''''

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

35,515,051

==English/British== In December changed all of the references from British to English for whatever reason. Watson Hutton was Scottish, and it's probably likely many of the other early influences may have been Welsh, Irish or Scots. Also there is no real sub-division of British humour caleld English humour. So i've change it back.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

35,515,403

) No Probs Mate. I Didn't Make It Clear In The Article, So I Should Take Part of The Blame| 07:51, 17th January 2006 (GMT

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,534,196

== HI == Its a school - what do you expect?

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

35,534,893

==Mini Turbos== Quit changing it back. Nintendo has not confirmed snaking is intentional. If it is, produce a reference.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

35,545,583

==Unban== Go to hell, Android79! I do not consider my edits vandalism!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

35,548,600

/addresses of proxy servers

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

35,559,485

` ::::Sure it is. Keeps vandalism out, keeps legitimete editors in. And, no, I don't think of anons or new users as ``second -class citizens`` ethier. In fact, I hold them in high respect, as i can't count how many times an anon or new user has cleaned up a spelling mistake or grammer error after I've finished making a new article. But this article is indeed an exception, and we must react acordingly. I'm a good - faith editor, but I'm no sucker. These vindidctive users play us up but good. They don't care if we let down SEMI in an act of kindness and good faith, they just start anew. Even Mr. Sidaway stated that vandalism skyrocketed when he deactivated SEMI and numerous charts have shown (again by Mr. Sidaway) that SEMI is benefitting the article. And a user has already shown what ``incredibly constructive`` edits are made when its down (the addition of a coma! That's a Major edit for sure!). Honestly, the statistics and our tireless hours of pointless vandlaism reverting don't lie. We could go on and on, but what's the point..? Vandalism will not desist. The only reason vandalism decreses is because of SEMI. I leave you with the history, and I hope you'll think on it. But I doubt it. - `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,560,487

` Both Amazon and Google are sites that use English in their searches. The west is particularly advanced when it comes to using the internet to create pages or discuss things. Amazon is obviously dominated by goods and books retailed in the Western countries. Therefore the results you get back disproportionately represent the opinion of the West. Most westerners have little or know knowlege of the event, save the famine that followed in 1975, so it makes sense that they'd defer to the most simplistic title for the event, namely the ``Bangladesh War``. To use popular search engines and shop sites like Amazon to determine the title of the article is rather unencyclopedic. I want to add more to discuss 'genocide' here. Is what happened an incident of genocide. The George Washington University National Security Archives has some interesting declassified documents in this regard. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

35,561,073

` Bit of an off-topic...Is it POV to called what happened to Jews during WW2 a holocaust? POV doesn't mean we presume all sides equal at the cost of accurately depicting history. A neutral eye over what happened in East Pakistan prior to and leading to the war, and all that's happened since pretty much supports the phrase ``War of Independence`` or ``War of Liberation``, even from a neutral perspective. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,568,056

== Framebuffer == User and I may have come to a solution on the discussion of merging the Framebuffer and Video RAM topics. If we could get you to weigh in, we may end up with a concensus on the issue. Thanks for driving that, BTW. The Video RAM page was definitely in need of some sort of change.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,575,235

==Major Rewites== In the past, when attempting a major rewite, I've used a sandbox so that I could show other editors what I meant. If you like I could help you set one up.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

35,577,618

Concerning Benedict Arnold:

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

35,598,535

< who the heck wrote that crap _ explain why a forum devoted to Schapelle Corby should not be on her Wiki. What sets the other sites apart from mine ? My forum was the first and only Schapelle support site for months. Who the heck are you to say it should got here. You can remove it everyday and I will be back the next day to add it again. FFS get a life.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

35,599,012

LOL what the hell is up with you? You want to remove my link but you let that crap stay in? Jesus how pathetic! Oh you don't think its true? UMM NO SH*T MATE!!!

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

35,601,044

LOL yeah good one mate - have the rest of the day off champ

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,601,712

` :Your not the only one speaking in a language of old.... From todays CounterPunch dotcom, On this the Seventeenth Day Of January, in the Year of Our Lord 2006. Bugging America The Liberties of the Subject By WERTHER The overwhelming balance of recorded history has been marked by despotism. When homo sapiens sapiens transitioned from hunter gatherer to agriculturalist, he gained literacy, solid dwellings, and other accoutrements of what is commonly considered civilization. But he experienced a sharp decline in personal liberty. The reasons for this are commonsensical. Disputes between tribes of hunter gatherers could be resolved by one or the other simply pulling up stakes and relocating to a new territory, there being few material impedimenta to prevent them. A settled agricultural existence, on the other hand, implied permanent villages, granaries, and land boundaries to be defended against depredation. The need for defenses implied a national security state. Agricultural surpluses not only necessitated armed defense, but allowed a division of labor leading to policemen, soldiers, bureaucrats, and tax assessors, the latter of whom would confiscate a percentage of the harvest. The evolution of labor conditions also implied a different mental outlook. The hunter gatherer was an independent contractor (if not brigand) who ranged over extensive territory and worked alone or in small groups. The agricultural laborer, by contrast, toiled in one spot, making his comings and goings more subject to regulation. If the land was not his, he became dependent on the Big Man's favor. Given the increased population densities in regions where agricultural societies developed, he could only rarely strike out on his own: the good land had been already taken, and game animals cleared or hunted to local extinction. [1] With the rise of what Karl Wittfogel call ``hydraulic civilization,`` [2] the screw of oppression turned once again against personal liberty. In order to build the extensive earthworks necessary for the state to survive the next drought or flood, the rulers of these proto-superpowers subjected their subjects to enforced toil and off-duty regimentation which rendered them no more free than so many draft animals. It is unlikely the rulers of the states in the Valley of Mexico, the Nile, the Euphrates, the Ganges, or the Yang-Tze had much toleration for the complaints their subjects, who were enslaved, enserfed, or otherwise regimented for the greater good as defined by the states' rulers. These complaints, had they been permitted, would have constituted freedom of speech. Nor would the rulers have given credence to a peasant's assertion that the interior of his crude dwelling, and the contents thereof, were inviolate from the inquisitiveness of the state. He, the peasant, simply had no rights a ruler was bound to respect (to paraphrase what a former Supreme Court Justice once said about slaves in a famous ruling in 1857); the only limit on a ruler's power over his subjects was the former's fear of rebellion should discontent overflow. Of the two rights discussed thus far, freedom of speech and freedom from arbitrary search and seizure, the latter is fundamentally more important to human beings' maintaining a status above that of mere hive animals. This is not intended in any way to disparage the desirability and necessity of free speech. But there are practical circumstances when free speech is not exercised by reasonable peopledue to reticence, shame, or its merely being not worth the effort. Or when one is married. Much obnoxious and exhibitionistic behavior is rationalized as free speech, while more urgent matters are suppressed: how many hourly employees feel free to say what they really think of their supervisors, and is the resultant lawsuit really covered by the First Amendment? But asinine reality TV blares on. Out of politeness or discretion, most intelligent people censor their opinions about politics, in-laws, bosses, and religion when they are in the public commons. The inviolability of one's person, and one's dwelling, is more basic. What would the average person resent more: being told he cannot ask questions of the President of the United States at a staged event, or being ordered to be strip searched in public? Or, for that matter, have his house ransacked? That is the principle at issue. The lesser freedom is essential for political discourse, the greater freedom distinguishes us from dogs. [3] Respect for privacy, for oneself and one's fellow citizens, is the benchmark of a sense of an individual self. The majority of psychologically well adjusted people believes that there are facts and circumstances about them that just do not bear the glaring searchlight of public revelation. Some things are simply private. At the same time, well adjusted people do not poke their noses unnecessarily into the lives of others, as much out of good taste and a low threshold of disgust as high principle. The snoop and the village Nosy Parker are butts of derision in popular lore. How did this highly refined sense of individuation develop in the species, given the overwhelming pressures in the other direction? The pharaohs, emperors, and potentates whose mighty works arose between 30 degrees north latitude and the Tropic of Cancer seem to have had the weather gage: division and regimentation of labor as a means of increasing population density and thus state wealth were the wave of the future. A docile workforce certainly could not be secure in its homes, papers, and affects, the future Fourth Amendment to the Constitution notwithstanding. There was no profit in letting the proles be themselves. Somewhere in isolated temperate regions, difficult to conquer militarily, there arose sometime after 1000 AD a contrary view. The Saxon theign, the Swiss cowherd swearing his oath at the Rütli, the deliberations of the Icelandic Allthing, were the beginnings of the idea of the liberty of the subject. [4] We may seek concrete reasons why these societies thought their inhabitants were above mere chattel, or we may ascribe it to miraculous happenstance. But it happened, and we should be grateful. At some point, these societies developed the concept of an Über-law, or constitution, a law that not even a king could violate without punishment. Hence such magnificent works of poetry as the Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence, and the Swiss Federal Charter. The concept of swearing allegiance to the principles embodied in the words on a piece of parchment, rather than to a king, should be familiar to most federal employees today, regardless of the willingness of some of them to engage in squalid black-bag shenanigans against the public trust and their own oath. But constitutions, like laws, are not self-enforcing. For every Runnymede, there was a Star Chamber. For every United States Constitution, there was a Patriot [sic] Act. For every person who regards himself as an individual, there is another who has no self respect as a person, and who counts himself as a partisan of what he naively thinks is the home team, cheering on his side like a prole in the Circus Maximus in imperial Rome. Where are we now, in the Year of Our Lord 2006? We will not reiterate in detail the recent newspaper bulletins which reveal that the present administration is ransacking the personal effects of United States citizen ostensibly in order to fight the so-called Global War on Terrorism. [5]. We will merely make a few observations. First, not only is ``the president's program`` (as the warrantless intercepts are called in the chaste corridors of the West Wing) an obvious example of lawbreaking, but so is the Patriot [sic] Act itself, which some observers profess to view as a legally authorized and legitimate vehicle for government intrusion into the live of private citizens. Section 215 of the Act addresses so-called National Security Letters, which involve a government search of libraries, credit agencies, health care providers, or any organization that keeps records on citizens. The organization served with such a letter is prohibited from speaking about it to anyone. This is the so-called ``gag order,`` much discussed in House and Senate proceedings but thus far hardly discussed in terms of its ramifications. A plain reading of the gag order shows it to be a clear violation of the right in Amendment I of the United States Constitution to ``petition the Government for a redress of Grievances,`` which is commonly interpreted as the right to communicate with one's Member of Congress or Senator. This fact has somehow escaped the Blackstones and Perry Masons who populate the law commentary bailiwicks of the newspaper and television. Second, given the scope of ``the president's program,`` we are entitled to wonder how recess appointment to the position of United Nations ambassador John Bolton was so keenly interested in signals intelligence, and why the White House was so adamant in refusing the Senate access to documentation in relation to this fact. Equally puzzling is the fact that in the campaign season of 2004, the White House knew every detail of the CBS story about the incumbent president's air national guard service and had a detailed refutation/cover story ready to be released as the story aired. Similarly surprising was how presidential advisor Karl Rove was able to develop a complex alibi to dodge a perjury indictment: almost as if he knew exactly what special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald knew. Third, we are entitled to speculate (as U.S. citizens, are we not?) about the manifold increase in signals traffic

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,610,290

Listen you piece of shit , pencil necked twerp that you are. Nowhere did I make any further attacks to anyone. How about you get a fuckin life rather than getting a little stiffy from banning people. I couldnt give a slight fuck about your lame arse wiki. Its bullshit anyways. You people just like reading your own crap. Brisbane is a fuckin small place and google is a great tool. Yet another christian piece of shit. I shit on your god you little fuck.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

35,615,544

Actually, Kashin isn't Blue Justice. It turned out to be Gran Naniwa.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,615,638

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

35,625,010

==Ignore the Islamophobes== You are truly a Warrior of Islam! I present to you my , since the Zalimun wish to deny you of it.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,625,627

==Thank you== Thank you for the welcome! I am borrowing of the tags on Bush on my userpage. I must congratulate you on your conversion! Please, help to fix Islamophobia. It is FULL of Yehudi bias!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,626,218

Islam and anti-Semitism Excellent work! We must stamp out this Yehudi bias!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,627,233

Hey asshole, she's 18 years old. The briefing stated it. Changed.

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

true

35,628,230

:Who is this Saduj al-Dahij?

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,629,007

` ==Absurd== What is this absurdity? I went to the Straw man page and I found this: # Present the opponent's argument in weakened form, refute it, and pretend that the original has been refuted. :Is my correction of the pov on Beslan hostage crisis fit this description? It had the freedom fighters labeled ``terrorists.`` # Present a misrepresentation of the opponent's position, refute it, and pretend that the opponent's actual position has been refuted. :How have I misrepresented Islam? This is nonsense. I demand to be unblocked at once. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,629,224

Islamophobia == :That may be so, but the to exclude another party's point of view even if that point of view is seen as abhorrent is against the NPOV policy, which, frankly, reduces the article's utility and (in my opinion) makes the POV party look bad. ==

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,630,018

` ==Lies== ``Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by ``Lajjadda``. The reason given for Lajjadda's block is: ``clear strawman sockpuppet of Saduj al-Dahij. Used for vandalism and personal attacks``.`` I have never personally attaked no one. Lies. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,635,305

:::I contacted both CounterPunch and Werther to appraise them of my copyright violation, and make recompense. Thank you for reducing the material to a single hyperlink. In the future, I will take more time a care to locate the proper address and use that solely in place of copy/past. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,640,696

This message is regarding the page Rossland, British Columbia. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,642,159

run in with this user, (I guess that's how you made the list) so I was hoping that you would be able to help. Is it okay for me to go and remove that from his page? Is this something he can be banned over (assuming his current ban has expired)? Thanks in advance :Yes you can go ahead and remove these statements on his userpage. If this user continues to make such edits he can be banned, however I would like to try and resolve any disputes with users and explain to them the rules of wikipedia, rather than run the risk of permanentley blocking someone prematurely. And BTW, his current block hasn't expired just yet, he still has about 10-12 hours left on his block. Thanks for asking me about this, I'll be sure to keep an eye on his contributions.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,648,226

` ::Nu metal isn't strictly defined, either. I'm basically just transcribing what other people wrote on the subject, and there is a distinction made bewteen the two. And no one ever called alternative metal ``uncommericalized metal``. The neologism rule applies if we have coined the term ourselves (which we haven't), it does not show up often in searches (it shows up quite often) and the term is not useful in Wikipedia (it has been used frequently in other articles, and the subject has been integrated into these articles in order to add to the description of these articles). :: But really, spell out exactly what you think repeats in both articles so we can try to address those issues. `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,649,057

== translate this article to Bahasa Malaysia == Good Job. Someone should make it to Bahasa Malaysia, becoz not everybody in malaysia understand english, and this is a topic related to malaysian themself. ....i think this article showing some hardcore problem in malaysia

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

35,649,823

` The GWP of methane is reported as 21, 22 and 23 on various pages - ``Methane`` and ``global warming potential`` - is this an inaccuracy or is there some doubt over what the figure actually is? Or is it a variable depending on other factors? Bug `

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false