dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
35,651,534	It's now clear from the evidence presented by ALoan, that this page was legitimately moved to River Plate in Nov 2004 after it was nominated on Requested Moves, and that the move of this page to Río de la Plata contravened the normal procedures, reversing the previous legitimate move. Therefore we should not be accepting the controversial move to Río de la Plata as a fait accompli and should really be discussing a move from what was the status quo - i.e. River Plate to Río de la Plata. As a consequence the 60% majority normally required for a move to River Plate should be ignored and only 40% of the vote should be required to restore this page to what was the status quo. I cannot believe anyone with any sense of fair play could legitimately defend the position of making a controversial move and then having a vote on whether to keep the new name where the balance lies in its favour, it is just not the Wiki way.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,653,943	:: This is Wiki. In Wiki, those rules don't apply. There is no debate over this. Also, I don't think it says that the woman most cover her head. It merely says that it's decent, but not as a requirement. Am I wrong? Even if I were wrong, this is still Wiki and we shouldn't discriminate based on someone's patriarchal beliefs.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,663,032	: This message is regarding the page Korea. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
35,664,622	IM A FUCKING ASSHOLE!!	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
35,670,825	== U r a batty == U r a batty boy. Leave me alone im not a vandal u twat	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
35,672,276	Any other concerns?	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
35,673,800	Let me first address the comment that I moved a website to a different server: you must have mistaken me with someone else, for that claim by DreamGuy is in total error. I do own one of the websites in question, but have never moved it to a different server, nor have I claimed to do so. Angels & Ghosts receives sumbissions monthly from all over the world of ghost pictures, stories video and evp. The website has well over 700 pages of information. While advertising is on this website, it is to cover the cost of hosting fees, etc. This month alone, over 30 ghost pictures were posted; three new ghost stories; two evps, etc. I do not have time to count the sheer amount of evidence provided, but if you have the time explore the website and come to your own conclusions. Dr. Dave Oester's Ghostweb.com is truly scientific (although he too runs ads, etc.), as Dave is a full-time ghost hunter travelling the U.S. He provides a huge volume of books, pictures, stories, etc and is considered to be one of the foremost experts on ghosthunting. My point is that Obiwan's, Oester's and A & G all collect evidence of ghosts from viewers and from their own research/ideas/conclusions. A & G is one of the few websites that ties spiritual information (biblical) with ghosts, and therefore is unique in its perspective. LC	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,675,463	{{subst:test2{}}	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,676,469	Fuck you asshole. Allahu Akbar.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
35,676,576	You know who I am Big Brother	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
35,677,926	Why do so many Cuban people run away from Cuba if they can vote and change their lives? A number of useful activists visited Communist countries till 1991 and saw what they were to see. I doubt in your ability to understand non-Western reality.	2,006	false	user	random	train	false
35,680,326	== == Which one is M? == == In the software library, it says one game is rated M. Does anybody know which game that is?	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
35,680,388	== my question == if i got a degree in this field would i be looking at bodies in the morgue or what	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
35,691,135	` ==RFA/CFD== It was a few weeks, maybe more than a month ago. Consensus is for example ``Things in X`` . Remember it is a democratic consensus. I think an admin should follow consensus and not go against it, if it is clear it have a support of a vast majority of users. - `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,702,296	Shall I ask the Beeb's permission, then? \|email)	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,703,332	ok it worked i can edit	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,703,399	` Troll metal doesn't exist. It never has. Calling something ``troll metal`` is a description, like ``fire metal`` or ``cheesy metal.`` It isn't an actual subgenre of black metal. First of all, I think this requires a primer in reality. First of all, reality exists outside your ego and desires of importance by contributing some irrelevant material. Secondly, reality requires observation, not invention; while you can edit wikipedia pages, you can't edit reality. Finally, reality probably hates you and wishes ill of you. When you keep these rules in mind, you're realize that troll metal is an invention and has no places in being in an archive of material floating in the objective world. I hope this helped you. Get to deleting that nonsense about troll metal! `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,703,462	Real funny keeping sum1 blocked so they cant vote. dont move this article and it needs a bunch of cleanup and a whole lot of stuff you removed put back including the thing from the pentagon.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,703,766	OK, I shall do so in the morning, or if you want, you can, since you probably won't beleive me if I say that they said yes. \|email)	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,705,575	` OK, I've sent: Please may Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org) use a mix of the new, Murray Gold, Middle 8 and the regular theme on their article on Doctor Who theme music (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Who_theme_music)? It is quite long, but ``gets the atmosphere across``. Wikipedia is a project often linked to from BBC News articles, and occasionally the subject of them (news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4534712.stm). Please reply, A Nonymous. \|email) `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
35,706,167	I said that it's a mix of the various bits, anyway, I'm sure we'll email back and fourth a few times before I get permission, so I'll tell then if they specifically ask. However, I feel that it's still fair use. \|email)	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,706,528	==right on== Keep fighting the good fight.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
35,707,202	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,720,940	== geograph == What follows is somewhat nit-picking because I have to admit that the images you have copied from geograph have been marked with source and licence information in an exemplary manner - and better than has been doing. But please from now on: always remember to upload to the commons and always use the {{geograph}} tag. Further may I suggest that if you have any spare time, please: * go through what you have already uploaded to the commons and convert to use the {{geograph}} tag * go through what you have already uploaded here, the English wikipedia. I would not suggest you re-upload them to the commons but again if you could add a {{geograph}} tag to each one it would help. And warning the two {{geograph}} tags use different parameters! Using the tag puts the image into a category for images from geograph which, if nothing else, may help to catch double uploads such as you have done with: Image:Bishop of Barf.jpg - Image:The Bishop of Barf.jpg and Image:The Cheviot.jpg - Image:The Cheviot Summit.jpg.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
35,721,584	This is 100% accurate!	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
35,722,529	thought it was offensive to tigers. I found the part where it said about stuffing Tigers offensive as I love Tigers.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,723,042	== Star Wars edits == Hey Mil, I've recently noticed you have made loads of Star Wars edits. I know you already have a Star Wars barnstar, but I'll give you a different Star Wars reward.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,723,246	::Listen, I really don't care what wikipedia's policies are, Troll metal does not exist and whether or not people think it does is irrelevant. It does not, hence, it should not be listed. The only people who care about keeping it are people who want to role-play bureaucrats on their favorite online encyclopedia. Break a rule; keep your sanity. It is a fair trade, I think. If you want to defend a paragraph that you know doesn't belong in there, then why defend it because the community of unqualified teenyboppers said it should be? It makes me wonder if you take pills.... This POV thing is nonsense. It isn't about what people want to think, it is about what is real. Troll metal does not exist, hence it doesn't belong. Screw the morons who think otherwise. They make my nappy hair soggy with sweat from anger and frustration.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	true
35,723,989	Real funny keeping sum1 blocked so they cant vote. dont move this article and it needs a bunch of cleanup and a whole lot of stuff you removed put back including the thing from the pentagon. theres no concenss and whoever put up that infobox was lying. and im pissed about your bs removing my comments from here too	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
35,724,680	==stupid blocks== real cute first you block then you vandalize my comments. do it agan and i will report you, pov pusher.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	true
35,725,376	` Oppose- ``Ukrainian people`` seems ambiguous. Could mean equally Ukrainians or citizens of Ukraine. OTOH do not see any real benefit of renaming the article (other than the pleasure of consistency with some other article -) `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,730,554	socalled deicision isnt worth shit	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	true
35,736,616	Maybe put the rules in another article?	2,006	false	article	random	test	false
35,737,376	` == Speculations as to why Poincaré didn't contest priority == I copy and paste from above: : Cleonis, please specify since you lost me here. Where two or three people propose the same theory at appriximately the same time, there is commonly a debate about priority of parts and/or the whole, but not about ``re-discovery``. Ah, I see, then you and I had something different in mind. About priority: as is stated in the article, Poincaré did not contest priority. As to the why, my personal impression (given the information available to me, and I don't have all the information) my personal impression is that Poincaré judged that Einstein was prematurely confident. I figure that as seen from a 1905 perspective: if it would turn out that it would be impossible to formulate a Lorentz-invariant theory of gravitation, then the approach of uncompromising implementation of the principle of relativity of inertial motion would prove to be a dead end. My understanding is that in the years after 1905 (and to this day), the scientific community judged that Einstein's choice of avenue to follow was the best one. That would explain why Poincaré didn't contest priority. If he judged Einstein's uncompromising attitude as a premature commitment, he wouldn't have wanted to be associated with it. Anyway, these considerations of mine are too speculative to be of value to the article. I fear that what I'm doing is not of good help to you, so I will try hard to keep a low profile. My intention is to support you. \| `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
35,739,124	fine u can keep pulling this shit and uve got a bunch of islamo pov pusher admins on ur side so i fucking quit u can have it.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
35,748,442	==You have been put on the WP:AN for making personal attacks!== Cian,your name has been put up because you have made personal attacks on me, especially for my use of the term British Commonwealth. I was getting fed up with your persistant vandalism. As to calling me a bigot, that is just stooping to the same depths as the subhumans from Sinn Fein/I.R.A.. - ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,755,466	` :Good point. I changed it to ``man in charge`` since that's probably the most understandable and accurate. Thanks. `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
35,758,352	==I'm sick of your Britanniphobic edits!== I'm getting extremely sick of your avowedly Britanniphobic edits especially in relation to my numismatic articles! Please stop this at once! - ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,758,993	` :As I posted above many months ago in the ``Anglican and Protestant`` part of this page, what sense of ``Protestant?`` Anglicanism is too complex and too varied to say we are ``Protestant`` and that's that. Henry VIII was a staunch Catholic. Edward VI's reign brought in a Protestant flavor, which was tempered by Elizabeth and James I, which was made more Catholic again by Charles I, and staid Catholic after the Restoration. Much of this rebirth in the Catholicity of Anglicanism survived the Glorious Revolution, which is witnessed in the Oxford Movement and the widespread then-Anglo-Catholicism in the EUCSA after American independence. In addition, with all due respect, your denomination's ``episcopalian`` structure is not the same as the Anglican. The article you linked to says that specifically. Your understanding of the Eucharist is also different from the historic Anglican understanding as well. :Our theology is contrary to much of classical Protestant thought. Every single honest religious scholar will tell you that it is not possible to truly classify Anglicans anywhere really. The NRSV Bible, in the ``To The Reader, signifies this by mentioning Anglicanism as seperate from Protestantism (pg xxv in the HarperCollins Study Bible w/Deuterocanon). To place it solely as Protestant is POV. To place it as non-Protestant without a comment that many do think it Protestant is also POV. `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,759,035	==It angers me when other editors force their Britanniphobic agendas here.== As I am both a Royalist & a Unionist, it really angers me when other editors force their avowedly Britanniphobic agendas here on Wikipedia. & are the worst offenders. They have been repeatedly warned for vandalising other people's articles, especially if it deals with subjects they don't like. If they don't like it, then they should go & take a running jump into the Lake of Fire in Hell. I'm a religious man who has no time for braindead people. I've got enough of my problems to deal with. - ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
35,761,751	== I expect my articles to be treated sensitively. == I am a man who holds very fast to a principle of being open, but objective in writing my articles. If people want to criticise my articles, why don't they leave a posting on the talk page of the relevant article, instead of going ahead & vandalising it? - ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,764,314	== & are Britanniphobic vandals! == It really angers me when I find that my articles have been vandalised. It is the work of either or both of these serious offenders. They have been warned that the next time they vandalise an article I've written, then they're for the high jump! Why should I waste my time fixing up what they've done. I resent it when they rename an article from British Commonwealth to Commonwealth of Nations, when the use of 'nation' to describe a country is wrong. The word 'nation' is an ethnological term, and should NEVER be used to describe a country. So, British Commonwealth remains in common use, and it is a politically neutral term. - ( )	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,765,236	Regarding the page Radiohead, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – /	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
35,771,733	Category It has been put under this category for the sake of historical interest & continuity. - ( )	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
35,777,446	` == Say, Tim, could you take a look at ... == ... the Excommunication article. particularly the amish/mennonite sections. this same anonymous IP editor has been trying to do the same to the Mennonite article. he/she is obsessed and persistent. i certainly think there should be some discussion of the pathological use of ``The Ban`` you might find in really conservative menno and amish congregations, but this stuff is far from representative of the denomination. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,779,184	` Thanks for your improvements. Per your suggestion, I added a pertinent Proudhon quote: ``By this method of investigation, we soon see that every argument which has been invented in behalf of property, whatever it may be, always and of necessity leads to equality; that is, to the negation of property.`` I guess you haven't read ``What is Property,`` but basically he takes various arguments for property from past luminaries, and argues that they all imply that equality should prevail. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,780,283	:::: Back it up. Post the line here with the reference.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,783,231	:::: I don't think he's a troll. I think he's an Islamist. The photo should have never been from the first place. You people made a horrible mistake in granting this Islamist his wish.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
35,794,107	` Sure; however, I was the one who started this Wiki Page, and by means have done no large ``controversial`` edits. Moreover, I continue to cite sources, while some add POV, without citing sources - which I think is ``controversial`` considering the ``strong views`` some have on this subject, and certainly an adversity to historical fact. Moreover, this article is just getting started; yet some continue to act as if the current version is perfect. It is not, again, it is just getting started. As for the linking, and formatting - again - it is just getting started; and if not for the ``instant reverts`` would most likely be easier to fill out before getting to small edits. I started the current version since some did not find this article interesting until deciding to add POV to the subject matter without much knowledge, and more importantly, historical facts, on this subject itself. So, to achieve balance, and POV, citing sources is best, while remaining true to Wikipedia's ``be bold`` motto, and verifying sources, with NPOV. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
35,799,832	== Excuse me? == Hi there. This is . I was just notified that you E-mailed whom I met on Wikipedia and told him that I'm a 35-year-old-man. I'm curious where you got that information. The last time I checked, I was a fifteen-year-old girl. Tell me honestly: If I was a thirty-five-year-old man, where would I be pretending to be a teenage girl on Wikipedia, or on a cybersex chat? If you're still not convinced, feel free to Google my username (purplefeltangel) or my E-mail address (bizzaleth@rogers.com). You'll find information dating back years, most of it consistent,. Where it isn't, it's because I avoided using my real name or faked my age to get by COPPA. In my vast online world, I have Oekaki accounts, a DeviantArt, an Advicenators account, several blogs, a LiveJournal, at least 15 Neopets accounts, forum accounts on Sailor Moon websites, a Wikicity, an Amazon account and many reviews to go with it, Fictionpress and Fanfiction.net, Usenet postings, and much more. My mom even has a blog. I've been on the Internet since I was eight that's seven years, by the way, and in all that time there has never been any evidence that I'm not who I say I am. I've had voice conversations with many people and exchanged letters with others. Do you think I'd be able to pull all that off? These kinds of accusations are not only hurtful, but libellious and just plain mean. Didn't your mother ever teach you to think twice before you spread gossip? Before you get defensive, please just tell me who told you this. I don't want to start trouble, just avoid any that this might cause me. You might even be able to give the information I've just given you to whomever started this rather nasty rumour. Please respond at my E-mail, bizzaleth@rogers.com or purplefeltangel@livejournal.com. (Both go to the same box, but the latter looks nicer.) Thanks, (Purplefeltangel)	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
35,801,221	if I wasn't a fifteen-year-old girl	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
35,802,279	` ::``There was also considerable concern about the police investigation into these murders. It took nearly two weeks before the police became aware of previous sexual allegations against Ian Huntley, and despite him being the last person to see either of the two children, his story was not effectively checked out early during the investigation.`` I'm going to investigate this further, but I'm pretty sure that it was not nearly two weeks at all, and Huntley was investigated early in the inquiry, and continued to be throughout. `	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
35,803,559	Hi! welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful: * Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page. * To sign your posts (on talk pages, Votes for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes). * You can experiment in the test area. * You can get help at the Help Desk * Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:How to write a great article I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log. \|	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,806,052	` Uh accused by who? I gave my real name. What did I do that was uncivil? Apparently those people can call me every name in the book, accuse me of being other people, and vandalize entries, yet I am blocked for being uncivil? I stopped eidting when I was told to stop. Explain how you arrived to the conclusion I was some kind of sockpuppet. Is this how you treat all new users that don't want to see an article ger deleted? How about the new users that voted for deletion? Are you just going to count their votes? Are those new users block for their uncivil behavior? What you have are a few of Robin's bitter enemies orchestarting this whole thing. The man is a gifted writer, and it's shameful this reputible site has lost sight of this valid, ``notable' entry. 6:20 am CST, 19 January 2006`	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,806,481	I've examined the CheckUser evidence. At this time I see no evidence of prohibited sockpuppetry.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,813,364	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - No jasne, Cieszyniok. Tyź je też Cieszyniok? Z Polskigo Cieszyna? -	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,816,189	serious copy edits http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Blake	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,819,235	==NAMBLA== You think people like corax, and clayboy don't have any aim in posting in the NAMBLA and pedophile pages?	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
35,835,572	==Gude== Gude is also a mispelling. It should be spelt guid (pronounced gid or gweed depending on dialect). \|	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,838,932	== Please do not make threats == Hi. I noticed you made the following edit summary a couple of days ago: Deleted by Scott Balson who finds this page defamatory and will take action against Wikipedia and the person who reiinstates, if it is reinstated.. Please note that threats are not tolerated on Wikipedia. Please refrain from making threatening statements like that in the future.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,846,466	` == OS 9 version bump== From the section on OS 9 In fact the only reason that the version was increased from 8 to 9 was to pave the way for the upcoming Mac OS X, rather than leave a gap in the version numbers which might have discouraged some to make the eventual transition from classic Mac OS to Mac OS X I thought it was widely understood that the version bump from OS 8 to 9 was a way to get out of the cloning market. It was thought that all the cloners had rights to ``MacOS 8``, so Apple bumped the version to 9, so they wouldn't have to distribute it to the third party computer manufacturers. Nonetheless, the stated reason doesn't even make sense to me. All sorts of apps skip versions with impunity - and I can't think of why anyone wouldn't transition to OSX because there wasn't an OS 9`	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
35,848,000	== Bullshit == William Penn used the phrase too. I think this is a very biased article.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
35,849,123	` ==Question== Whats with the book ``The Sex Wars`` you wrote?`	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,855,621	. ==WTF?== Why the fuck do you think that i vandalized the nigger, Oklahoma City Bombing, and prohibition pages? I haven't even been on any of those pages. Thank you douschebag for getting my editing privilages revoked. You are a prick	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
35,856,239	Next time this happens i won't just report it, I'll eat your children. Rarghhhh! You can't fuck wit me bitch! I am the fuckin' heavyweight champion of the world! I'll eat your face!	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	true
35,858,860	` == Hi, thank you for your edit to Excommunication, == but i am going to revert the change. the reason why is that your movement of these words did change the meaning to something that is not, in my opinion, as factually accurate. it is possible that the vast majority of modern Mennonites do not consider ``The Ban``, in and of itself, to be a pathological malpractice of church discipline, but the particular extreme application of it (that breaks up families, etc.) to be pathological. Feel free to discuss this on the talk page or below, if you want. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,864,078	It's actually the other way around.	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
35,867,763	It's a fucking disgrace.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
35,868,512	Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,871,938	: My ideas are not against socialism at all, Islam is not socialism, in fact, Islam stands against everything socialism stands for, do you think Muslims tolerate other religions and Atheists and Agnostics while in their countries? Of course not, and I don't care whether I am against multiculturalism, multiculturalism has failed, Muslims hate us, we cannot change that. I am not a racist as well, I am proud to be European, what is wrong with that?	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,872,792	::Ah! Well, then, my apologies. I guess you need a bit more of the good ol' copyright paranoia, eh?	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,874,396	: ok, i am sorry, but I do not agree with what is the Quran, I will be more tolerant of them but to be honest many Muslims I have met on the internet are hardly tolerant of any critical analysis of Islam. btw, do you know anything about byzantium? i am doing a article on Byzantine Medicine	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,875,625	I vote that all of MarkGallagher's so called contributions be deleted. He is a hack without any credit to his name.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,878,891	This is an absolute fucking travesty. I DO NOT ACCEPT this vote. This page was moved without a fucking consensus to a page that is not even in FUCKING English for FUCK sake here we have a vote that has not acheived 60% neccesary to move it from what was the status quo at River Plate and yet the page remaines at this foreign language name. FFS you all ought to legislate at elections in China. It's an absolute fucking disgrace. This is it I have fucking had it with Wikipedia it's a load of SHIT dominated by a FUCKING an Americo-centrist view of th world GOODBYE and so long and thanks for the fish. I give up DuncHarris was right the FUCKING lunatics have taken over the asylum where our language ENGLISH is usurped by a foreign language on our own FUCKING site because of politcal correctness, US American ignorance and an Argentinean agenga, I bet it won't be long before we find Falkland Islands moves to Malvinas. what a buncgh of cunts.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
35,882,308	Hello this is Darth Mhaw. I'm new to Wikipedia and hope to make new changes that will benefit all. I have created this page on All Saints and I will continualy update it. Thank you very much, that is all. Darth Mhaw	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,883,180	Thanks Howcheng for inviting me to talk to you about any issues concerning my articles. I have created an article on All Saints Catholic High School, and would like for it to be accessible from the Main Page. If you could help me in this endeavour, it would be greatly appreciated. Sincerly, Darth Mhaw	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,884,115	== Why is there not new information on the Canadian Election? == PLease post new information on the Canadian election, as it is worthy of featured news. Is there bias towards a losing candidate or what? Darth Mhaw	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
35,885,395	` == Weapon demos + Soundtrack == I feel something ought to be said about the weapon demos unlockable in the console versions of this game - something unique to the Soul Calibur series? Also, I have hear it said that some music tracks - I cannot remember which - play ``in time`` to the demonstrations. Confirmation and clarification of this would be interesting.`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
35,885,456	==grids article== Sir, earlier today you made an edit to the Gay related immune deficiency article, but it seems you misplaced the proper wikiformatting for the link (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gay_related_immune_deficiency&curid;=2319812&diff;=35849647&oldid;=35848319). I'm not sure about these medical terms, so I don't know how to fix it. Please take a look, thanks. current version reads as After twenty years of research, both Kaposi's sarcoma and Pneumocycstis pneumonia]] are better understood as opportunistic infections occurring towards the end of the AIDS disease process. (notice ]]'s)	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,887,287	== YO vega, I live in hillsboro == that's awsome	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,888,115	:Okay, thanks. Nope, I don't mind that you removed the links. I was just concerned about the broken formatting. Thanks for fixing it.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,891,572	yareli alvarado because she was the good and the goodest and alwas to	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
35,898,399	` ==Stop stalking my edits== I copied the supposed ``original research`` from another article which I merged. I will revert it, and suggest that you discuss this with the author of the original text. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,902,474	` == 20 January == Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,908,233	Thanks for the cleanup of 'thescene' section Rhobite + Curps.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
35,909,125	` == Concerns about Target Audience == #First and foremost, the quotations (as per the copyright and usage terms of just about all Biblical translations) must state the translation from which they come. This is not just for copyright reasons, it would be useful for someone studying the subject. #Second, almost half of these quotations could (and may very well be) used by schools of Arminian thought in defense of their own positions. This gets into theology, an area of which I have little expertise, so I've not the position to comment more about it. I think it would be pertinent to at least mention this. #These articles must not be written solely for the purposes of the faithful, but rather for usefulness to someone who is unfamiliar or unbelieving. Bearing this in mind, the article should probably be reworded in places to improve the ability for non-believers to understand it. An example from Unconditional election: ``God's choice from eternity, of whom He will bring to Himself, is not based on foreseen virtue, merit or faith in the persons He chooses but rather, is unconditionally grounded in His own mercy.`` This will make little or no sense to someone unfamiliar with the subject matter. My concern first lies with the use of capitalized prepositions. From a perspective of showing respect to a (common, but not universal) convention of the faith, this makes sense (akin to not spelling out the name of the deity on articles related to Judaism). However, from the perspective of neutrality, this is inherently biased. Someone who does not believe in monotheism (meaning both belief in higher power and belief in one god) will find this offensive and/or contrary to their ability to read the article. My second concern lies with the wording. ``[...] of whom He will bring to Himself...`` should probably be re-worded, as it may not be clear what bringing to Himself means. ``[...] in His own mercy`` will not make sense to a non-believer. This is, however, a shaky point, and one I do not emphasize too strenuously. In this way, it shows respect for and reflects the beliefs of the faithful as they believe them. My concern is its usefulness to those who do not believe and/or do not have experience with the matter. #It may not be prudent to quote the Bible at all. This is my least strenuous concern, not because it is not a concern, but only because I intend to conjure discussion on the subject, not malevolence or harsh action. I say this not to offend the faithful, but the article should be written from the perspective of presenting the faith and the arguments behind it (definite gray area), not defending it or proving a point to Arminians and followers of other schools of thought. Maybe just the references should be listed, allowing others to look up the passages themselves (this follows with WP's no source material policy, among others—see WP:NOT). I will not make any changes until at least some discussion occurs on the topic. I do not want to offend those who believe, but WP is an institution whose target audience is everyone. Discussion of religion is important and necessary, but it needs to be (as close as we can get to) neutral.— `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,909,625	` ::Yeah? Then you should have fixed it ``months ago``. Or perhaps noticed there was Site Down and Sitedown with somewhat relevant info in both, and merged them. Oh, right. You'd rather vote keep on worthless blog AFDs. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,917,589	== Request for Sources on Merkey Article == I'll wait and serve Wales with the order will take about 20 days. I'll make certain someone if there with the camera to get the expression on his face. I don't want wikipedia, I just want folks to stop the smearing. Clean up the POV in the article or I will be firing all of you.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
35,922,493	` == Essjay double standard == Editing Free Speech is not vandalism with a clearly identified section titled ``criticisms of the policy``. You failed to follow policies and failed to warn or revert. Also, are you a native cherokee speaker? `	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
35,936,914	Can you please not upload the state name images on top of the neutered ones (like with I-678)? - )	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
35,937,422	== Proposal == Hello CalJW. Would you be interested in running for and admin? -	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
35,938,357	. If it is taken down again, I will file a complaint.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,941,597	::This assertion (which was tacked on to the original paragraph) could well be the case, but it should be supported by a positive attribution, if possible.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,954,389	# Thanks for experimenting with the page Paris Hilton on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,962,133	If people just cite their curriculum, focus on training material, and leave politics at the door, this should be productive. If it falls flat it won't be because I sat back and let it.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,963,602	Air assualt Please do not remove large chunks of the text - it can be thought vandalism	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
35,963,882	` : That is true, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for propaganda. How is providing an image of a flag and saying that ``The Vergina Sun is a symbol hotly disputed among Greeks and Macedonian`` propagandist, and why did you remove this content? `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
35,969,759	:Should we believe you?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
35,974,376	::I am completely unaware of how obtained the personal information of , but I would like to remind everyone that Wikipedia has a strong policy of allowing anyone to contribute to the encyclopedia anonymously and free of unwarranted retribution for their actions. It is obvious that this administrator would hold some power over Minuszero and I believe any behavior to make Minus conform to their ideals about this article would constitute harrassment. —	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
35,976,612	:You were unblocked, so behave in the right way, or you will be blocked again, for longer period than this time.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false

35,651,534

It's now clear from the evidence presented by ALoan, that this page was legitimately moved to River Plate in Nov 2004 after it was nominated on Requested Moves, and that the move of this page to Río de la Plata contravened the normal procedures, reversing the previous legitimate move. Therefore we should not be accepting the controversial move to Río de la Plata as a fait accompli and should really be discussing a move from what was the status quo - i.e. River Plate to Río de la Plata. As a consequence the 60% majority normally required for a move to River Plate should be ignored and only 40% of the vote should be required to restore this page to what was the status quo. I cannot believe anyone with any sense of fair play could legitimately defend the position of making a controversial move and then having a vote on whether to keep the new name where the balance lies in its favour, it is just not the Wiki way.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,653,943

:: This is Wiki. In Wiki, those rules don't apply. There is no debate over this. Also, I don't think it says that the woman most cover her head. It merely says that it's decent, but not as a requirement. Am I wrong? Even if I were wrong, this is still Wiki and we shouldn't discriminate based on someone's patriarchal beliefs.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,663,032

: This message is regarding the page Korea. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

35,664,622

IM A FUCKING ASSHOLE!!

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

35,670,825

== U r a batty == U r a batty boy. Leave me alone im not a vandal u twat

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

35,672,276

Any other concerns?

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

35,673,800

Let me first address the comment that I moved a website to a different server: you must have mistaken me with someone else, for that claim by DreamGuy is in total error. I do own one of the websites in question, but have never moved it to a different server, nor have I claimed to do so. Angels & Ghosts receives sumbissions monthly from all over the world of ghost pictures, stories video and evp. The website has well over 700 pages of information. While advertising is on this website, it is to cover the cost of hosting fees, etc. This month alone, over 30 ghost pictures were posted; three new ghost stories; two evps, etc. I do not have time to count the sheer amount of evidence provided, but if you have the time explore the website and come to your own conclusions. Dr. Dave Oester's Ghostweb.com is truly scientific (although he too runs ads, etc.), as Dave is a full-time ghost hunter travelling the U.S. He provides a huge volume of books, pictures, stories, etc and is considered to be one of the foremost experts on ghosthunting. My point is that Obiwan's, Oester's and A & G all collect evidence of ghosts from viewers and from their own research/ideas/conclusions. A & G is one of the few websites that ties spiritual information (biblical) with ghosts, and therefore is unique in its perspective. LC

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,675,463

{{subst:test2{}}

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,676,469

Fuck you asshole. Allahu Akbar.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

35,676,576

You know who I am Big Brother

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

35,677,926

Why do so many Cuban people run away from Cuba if they can vote and change their lives? A number of useful activists visited Communist countries till 1991 and saw what they were to see. I doubt in your ability to understand non-Western reality.

2,006

false

user

random

train

false

35,680,326

== == Which one is M? == == In the software library, it says one game is rated M. Does anybody know which game that is?

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

35,680,388

== my question == if i got a degree in this field would i be looking at bodies in the morgue or what

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

35,691,135

` ==RFA/CFD== It was a few weeks, maybe more than a month ago. Consensus is for example ``Things in X`` . Remember it is a democratic consensus. I think an admin should follow consensus and not go against it, if it is clear it have a support of a vast majority of users. - `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,702,296

Shall I ask the Beeb's permission, then? |email)

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,703,332

ok it worked i can edit

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,703,399

` Troll metal doesn't exist. It never has. Calling something ``troll metal`` is a description, like ``fire metal`` or ``cheesy metal.`` It isn't an actual subgenre of black metal. First of all, I think this requires a primer in reality. First of all, reality exists outside your ego and desires of importance by contributing some irrelevant material. Secondly, reality requires observation, not invention; while you can edit wikipedia pages, you can't edit reality. Finally, reality probably hates you and wishes ill of you. When you keep these rules in mind, you're realize that troll metal is an invention and has no places in being in an archive of material floating in the objective world. I hope this helped you. Get to deleting that nonsense about troll metal! `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,703,462

Real funny keeping sum1 blocked so they cant vote. dont move this article and it needs a bunch of cleanup and a whole lot of stuff you removed put back including the thing from the pentagon.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,703,766

OK, I shall do so in the morning, or if you want, you can, since you probably won't beleive me if I say that they said yes. |email)

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,705,575

` OK, I've sent: Please may Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org) use a mix of the new, Murray Gold, Middle 8 and the regular theme on their article on Doctor Who theme music (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Who_theme_music)? It is quite long, but ``gets the atmosphere across``. Wikipedia is a project often linked to from BBC News articles, and occasionally the subject of them (news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4534712.stm). Please reply, A Nonymous. |email) `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

35,706,167

I said that it's a mix of the various bits, anyway, I'm sure we'll email back and fourth a few times before I get permission, so I'll tell then if they specifically ask. However, I feel that it's still fair use. |email)

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,706,528

==right on== Keep fighting the good fight.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

35,707,202

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,720,940

== geograph == What follows is somewhat nit-picking because I have to admit that the images you have copied from geograph have been marked with source and licence information in an exemplary manner - and better than has been doing. But please from now on: always remember to upload to the commons and always use the {{geograph}} tag. Further may I suggest that if you have any spare time, please: * go through what you have already uploaded to the commons and convert to use the {{geograph}} tag * go through what you have already uploaded here, the English wikipedia. I would not suggest you re-upload them to the commons but again if you could add a {{geograph}} tag to each one it would help. And warning the two {{geograph}} tags use different parameters! Using the tag puts the image into a category for images from geograph which, if nothing else, may help to catch double uploads such as you have done with: Image:Bishop of Barf.jpg - Image:The Bishop of Barf.jpg and Image:The Cheviot.jpg - Image:The Cheviot Summit.jpg.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

35,721,584

This is 100% accurate!

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

35,722,529

thought it was offensive to tigers. I found the part where it said about stuffing Tigers offensive as I love Tigers.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,723,042

== Star Wars edits == Hey Mil, I've recently noticed you have made loads of Star Wars edits. I know you already have a Star Wars barnstar, but I'll give you a different Star Wars reward.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,723,246

::Listen, I really don't care what wikipedia's policies are, Troll metal does not exist and whether or not people think it does is irrelevant. It does not, hence, it should not be listed. The only people who care about keeping it are people who want to role-play bureaucrats on their favorite online encyclopedia. Break a rule; keep your sanity. It is a fair trade, I think. If you want to defend a paragraph that you know doesn't belong in there, then why defend it because the community of unqualified teenyboppers said it should be? It makes me wonder if you take pills.... This POV thing is nonsense. It isn't about what people want to think, it is about what is real. Troll metal does not exist, hence it doesn't belong. Screw the morons who think otherwise. They make my nappy hair soggy with sweat from anger and frustration.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

true

35,723,989

Real funny keeping sum1 blocked so they cant vote. dont move this article and it needs a bunch of cleanup and a whole lot of stuff you removed put back including the thing from the pentagon. theres no concenss and whoever put up that infobox was lying. and im pissed about your bs removing my comments from here too

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

35,724,680

==stupid blocks== real cute first you block then you vandalize my comments. do it agan and i will report you, pov pusher.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

true

35,725,376

` Oppose- ``Ukrainian people`` seems ambiguous. Could mean equally Ukrainians or citizens of Ukraine. OTOH do not see any real benefit of renaming the article (other than the pleasure of consistency with some other article -) `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,730,554

socalled deicision isnt worth shit

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

true

35,736,616

Maybe put the rules in another article?

2,006

false

article

random

test

false

35,737,376

` == Speculations as to why Poincaré didn't contest priority == I copy and paste from above: : Cleonis, please specify since you lost me here. Where two or three people propose the same theory at appriximately the same time, there is commonly a debate about priority of parts and/or the whole, but not about ``re-discovery``. Ah, I see, then you and I had something different in mind. About priority: as is stated in the article, Poincaré did not contest priority. As to the why, my personal impression (given the information available to me, and I don't have all the information) my personal impression is that Poincaré judged that Einstein was prematurely confident. I figure that as seen from a 1905 perspective: if it would turn out that it would be impossible to formulate a Lorentz-invariant theory of gravitation, then the approach of uncompromising implementation of the principle of relativity of inertial motion would prove to be a dead end. My understanding is that in the years after 1905 (and to this day), the scientific community judged that Einstein's choice of avenue to follow was the best one. That would explain why Poincaré didn't contest priority. If he judged Einstein's uncompromising attitude as a premature commitment, he wouldn't have wanted to be associated with it. Anyway, these considerations of mine are too speculative to be of value to the article. I fear that what I'm doing is not of good help to you, so I will try hard to keep a low profile. My intention is to support you. | `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

35,739,124

fine u can keep pulling this shit and uve got a bunch of islamo pov pusher admins on ur side so i fucking quit u can have it.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

35,748,442

==You have been put on the WP:AN for making personal attacks!== Cian,your name has been put up because you have made personal attacks on me, especially for my use of the term British Commonwealth. I was getting fed up with your persistant vandalism. As to calling me a bigot, that is just stooping to the same depths as the subhumans from Sinn Fein/I.R.A.. - ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,755,466

` :Good point. I changed it to ``man in charge`` since that's probably the most understandable and accurate. Thanks. `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

35,758,352

==I'm sick of your Britanniphobic edits!== I'm getting extremely sick of your avowedly Britanniphobic edits especially in relation to my numismatic articles! Please stop this at once! - ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,758,993

` :As I posted above many months ago in the ``Anglican and Protestant`` part of this page, what sense of ``Protestant?`` Anglicanism is too complex and too varied to say we are ``Protestant`` and that's that. Henry VIII was a staunch Catholic. Edward VI's reign brought in a Protestant flavor, which was tempered by Elizabeth and James I, which was made more Catholic again by Charles I, and staid Catholic after the Restoration. Much of this rebirth in the Catholicity of Anglicanism survived the Glorious Revolution, which is witnessed in the Oxford Movement and the widespread then-Anglo-Catholicism in the EUCSA after American independence. In addition, with all due respect, your denomination's ``episcopalian`` structure is not the same as the Anglican. The article you linked to says that specifically. Your understanding of the Eucharist is also different from the historic Anglican understanding as well. :Our theology is contrary to much of classical Protestant thought. Every single honest religious scholar will tell you that it is not possible to truly classify Anglicans anywhere really. The NRSV Bible, in the ``To The Reader, signifies this by mentioning Anglicanism as seperate from Protestantism (pg xxv in the HarperCollins Study Bible w/Deuterocanon). To place it solely as Protestant is POV. To place it as non-Protestant without a comment that many do think it Protestant is also POV. `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,759,035

==It angers me when other editors force their Britanniphobic agendas here.== As I am both a Royalist & a Unionist, it really angers me when other editors force their avowedly Britanniphobic agendas here on Wikipedia. & are the worst offenders. They have been repeatedly warned for vandalising other people's articles, especially if it deals with subjects they don't like. If they don't like it, then they should go & take a running jump into the Lake of Fire in Hell. I'm a religious man who has no time for braindead people. I've got enough of my problems to deal with. - ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

35,761,751

== I expect my articles to be treated sensitively. == I am a man who holds very fast to a principle of being open, but objective in writing my articles. If people want to criticise my articles, why don't they leave a posting on the talk page of the relevant article, instead of going ahead & vandalising it? - ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,764,314

== & are Britanniphobic vandals! == It really angers me when I find that my articles have been vandalised. It is the work of either or both of these serious offenders. They have been warned that the next time they vandalise an article I've written, then they're for the high jump! Why should I waste my time fixing up what they've done. I resent it when they rename an article from British Commonwealth to Commonwealth of Nations, when the use of 'nation' to describe a country is wrong. The word 'nation' is an ethnological term, and should NEVER be used to describe a country. So, British Commonwealth remains in common use, and it is a politically neutral term. - ( )

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,765,236

Regarding the page Radiohead, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – /

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

35,771,733

Category It has been put under this category for the sake of historical interest & continuity. - ( )

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

35,777,446

` == Say, Tim, could you take a look at ... == ... the Excommunication article. particularly the amish/mennonite sections. this same anonymous IP editor has been trying to do the same to the Mennonite article. he/she is obsessed and persistent. i certainly think there should be some discussion of the pathological use of ``The Ban`` you might find in really conservative menno and amish congregations, but this stuff is far from representative of the denomination. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,779,184

` Thanks for your improvements. Per your suggestion, I added a pertinent Proudhon quote: ``By this method of investigation, we soon see that every argument which has been invented in behalf of property, whatever it may be, always and of necessity leads to equality; that is, to the negation of property.`` I guess you haven't read ``What is Property,`` but basically he takes various arguments for property from past luminaries, and argues that they all imply that equality should prevail. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,780,283

:::: Back it up. Post the line here with the reference.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,783,231

:::: I don't think he's a troll. I think he's an Islamist. The photo should have never been from the first place. You people made a horrible mistake in granting this Islamist his wish.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

35,794,107

` Sure; however, I was the one who started this Wiki Page, and by means have done no large ``controversial`` edits. Moreover, I continue to cite sources, while some add POV, without citing sources - which I think is ``controversial`` considering the ``strong views`` some have on this subject, and certainly an adversity to historical fact. Moreover, this article is just getting started; yet some continue to act as if the current version is perfect. It is not, again, it is just getting started. As for the linking, and formatting - again - it is just getting started; and if not for the ``instant reverts`` would most likely be easier to fill out before getting to small edits. I started the current version since some did not find this article interesting until deciding to add POV to the subject matter without much knowledge, and more importantly, historical facts, on this subject itself. So, to achieve balance, and POV, citing sources is best, while remaining true to Wikipedia's ``be bold`` motto, and verifying sources, with NPOV. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

35,799,832

== Excuse me? == Hi there. This is . I was just notified that you E-mailed whom I met on Wikipedia and told him that I'm a 35-year-old-man. I'm curious where you got that information. The last time I checked, I was a fifteen-year-old girl. Tell me honestly: If I was a thirty-five-year-old man, where would I be pretending to be a teenage girl on Wikipedia, or on a cybersex chat? If you're still not convinced, feel free to Google my username (purplefeltangel) or my E-mail address (bizzaleth@rogers.com). You'll find information dating back years, most of it consistent,. Where it isn't, it's because I avoided using my real name or faked my age to get by COPPA. In my vast online world, I have Oekaki accounts, a DeviantArt, an Advicenators account, several blogs, a LiveJournal, at least 15 Neopets accounts, forum accounts on Sailor Moon websites, a Wikicity, an Amazon account and many reviews to go with it, Fictionpress and Fanfiction.net, Usenet postings, and much more. My mom even has a blog. I've been on the Internet since I was eight that's seven years, by the way, and in all that time there has never been any evidence that I'm not who I say I am. I've had voice conversations with many people and exchanged letters with others. Do you think I'd be able to pull all that off? These kinds of accusations are not only hurtful, but libellious and just plain mean. Didn't your mother ever teach you to think twice before you spread gossip? Before you get defensive, please just tell me who told you this. I don't want to start trouble, just avoid any that this might cause me. You might even be able to give the information I've just given you to whomever started this rather nasty rumour. Please respond at my E-mail, bizzaleth@rogers.com or purplefeltangel@livejournal.com. (Both go to the same box, but the latter looks nicer.) Thanks, (Purplefeltangel)

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

35,801,221

if I wasn't a fifteen-year-old girl

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

35,802,279

` ::``There was also considerable concern about the police investigation into these murders. It took nearly two weeks before the police became aware of previous sexual allegations against Ian Huntley, and despite him being the last person to see either of the two children, his story was not effectively checked out early during the investigation.`` I'm going to investigate this further, but I'm pretty sure that it was not nearly two weeks at all, and Huntley was investigated early in the inquiry, and continued to be throughout. `

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

35,803,559

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful: * Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page. * To sign your posts (on talk pages, Votes for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes). * You can experiment in the test area. * You can get help at the Help Desk * Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:How to write a great article I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log. |

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,806,052

` Uh accused by who? I gave my real name. What did I do that was uncivil? Apparently those people can call me every name in the book, accuse me of being other people, and vandalize entries, yet I am blocked for being uncivil? I stopped eidting when I was told to stop. Explain how you arrived to the conclusion I was some kind of sockpuppet. Is this how you treat all new users that don't want to see an article ger deleted? How about the new users that voted for deletion? Are you just going to count their votes? Are those new users block for their uncivil behavior? What you have are a few of Robin's bitter enemies orchestarting this whole thing. The man is a gifted writer, and it's shameful this reputible site has lost sight of this valid, ``notable' entry. 6:20 am CST, 19 January 2006`

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,806,481

I've examined the CheckUser evidence. At this time I see no evidence of prohibited sockpuppetry.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,813,364

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - No jasne, Cieszyniok. Tyź je też Cieszyniok? Z Polskigo Cieszyna? -

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,816,189

serious copy edits http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Blake

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,819,235

==NAMBLA== You think people like corax, and clayboy don't have any aim in posting in the NAMBLA and pedophile pages?

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

35,835,572

==Gude== Gude is also a mispelling. It should be spelt guid (pronounced gid or gweed depending on dialect). |

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,838,932

== Please do not make threats == Hi. I noticed you made the following edit summary a couple of days ago: Deleted by Scott Balson who finds this page defamatory and will take action against Wikipedia and the person who reiinstates, if it is reinstated.. Please note that threats are not tolerated on Wikipedia. Please refrain from making threatening statements like that in the future.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,846,466

` == OS 9 version bump== From the section on OS 9 In fact the only reason that the version was increased from 8 to 9 was to pave the way for the upcoming Mac OS X, rather than leave a gap in the version numbers which might have discouraged some to make the eventual transition from classic Mac OS to Mac OS X I thought it was widely understood that the version bump from OS 8 to 9 was a way to get out of the cloning market. It was thought that all the cloners had rights to ``MacOS 8``, so Apple bumped the version to 9, so they wouldn't have to distribute it to the third party computer manufacturers. Nonetheless, the stated reason doesn't even make sense to me. All sorts of apps skip versions with impunity - and I can't think of why anyone wouldn't transition to OSX because there wasn't an OS 9`

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

35,848,000

== Bullshit == William Penn used the phrase too. I think this is a very biased article.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

35,849,123

` ==Question== Whats with the book ``The Sex Wars`` you wrote?`

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,855,621

. ==WTF?== Why the fuck do you think that i vandalized the nigger, Oklahoma City Bombing, and prohibition pages? I haven't even been on any of those pages. Thank you douschebag for getting my editing privilages revoked. You are a prick

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

35,856,239

Next time this happens i won't just report it, I'll eat your children. Rarghhhh! You can't fuck wit me bitch! I am the fuckin' heavyweight champion of the world! I'll eat your face!

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

true

35,858,860

` == Hi, thank you for your edit to Excommunication, == but i am going to revert the change. the reason why is that your movement of these words did change the meaning to something that is not, in my opinion, as factually accurate. it is possible that the vast majority of modern Mennonites do not consider ``The Ban``, in and of itself, to be a pathological malpractice of church discipline, but the particular extreme application of it (that breaks up families, etc.) to be pathological. Feel free to discuss this on the talk page or below, if you want. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,864,078

It's actually the other way around.

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

35,867,763

It's a fucking disgrace.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

35,868,512

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,871,938

: My ideas are not against socialism at all, Islam is not socialism, in fact, Islam stands against everything socialism stands for, do you think Muslims tolerate other religions and Atheists and Agnostics while in their countries? Of course not, and I don't care whether I am against multiculturalism, multiculturalism has failed, Muslims hate us, we cannot change that. I am not a racist as well, I am proud to be European, what is wrong with that?

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,872,792

::Ah! Well, then, my apologies. I guess you need a bit more of the good ol' copyright paranoia, eh?

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,874,396

: ok, i am sorry, but I do not agree with what is the Quran, I will be more tolerant of them but to be honest many Muslims I have met on the internet are hardly tolerant of any critical analysis of Islam. btw, do you know anything about byzantium? i am doing a article on Byzantine Medicine

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,875,625

I vote that all of MarkGallagher's so called contributions be deleted. He is a hack without any credit to his name.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,878,891

This is an absolute fucking travesty. I DO NOT ACCEPT this vote. This page was moved without a fucking consensus to a page that is not even in FUCKING English for FUCK sake here we have a vote that has not acheived 60% neccesary to move it from what was the status quo at River Plate and yet the page remaines at this foreign language name. FFS you all ought to legislate at elections in China. It's an absolute fucking disgrace. This is it I have fucking had it with Wikipedia it's a load of SHIT dominated by a FUCKING an Americo-centrist view of th world GOODBYE and so long and thanks for the fish. I give up DuncHarris was right the FUCKING lunatics have taken over the asylum where our language ENGLISH is usurped by a foreign language on our own FUCKING site because of politcal correctness, US American ignorance and an Argentinean agenga, I bet it won't be long before we find Falkland Islands moves to Malvinas. what a buncgh of cunts.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

35,882,308

Hello this is Darth Mhaw. I'm new to Wikipedia and hope to make new changes that will benefit all. I have created this page on All Saints and I will continualy update it. Thank you very much, that is all. Darth Mhaw

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,883,180

Thanks Howcheng for inviting me to talk to you about any issues concerning my articles. I have created an article on All Saints Catholic High School, and would like for it to be accessible from the Main Page. If you could help me in this endeavour, it would be greatly appreciated. Sincerly, Darth Mhaw

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,884,115

== Why is there not new information on the Canadian Election? == PLease post new information on the Canadian election, as it is worthy of featured news. Is there bias towards a losing candidate or what? Darth Mhaw

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

35,885,395

` == Weapon demos + Soundtrack == I feel something ought to be said about the weapon demos unlockable in the console versions of this game - something unique to the Soul Calibur series? Also, I have hear it said that some music tracks - I cannot remember which - play ``in time`` to the demonstrations. Confirmation and clarification of this would be interesting.`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

35,885,456

==grids article== Sir, earlier today you made an edit to the Gay related immune deficiency article, but it seems you misplaced the proper wikiformatting for the link (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gay_related_immune_deficiency&curid;=2319812&diff;=35849647&oldid;=35848319). I'm not sure about these medical terms, so I don't know how to fix it. Please take a look, thanks. current version reads as After twenty years of research, both Kaposi's sarcoma and Pneumocycstis pneumonia]] are better understood as opportunistic infections occurring towards the end of the AIDS disease process. (notice ]]'s)

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,887,287

== YO vega, I live in hillsboro == that's awsome

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,888,115

:Okay, thanks. Nope, I don't mind that you removed the links. I was just concerned about the broken formatting. Thanks for fixing it.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,891,572

yareli alvarado because she was the good and the goodest and alwas to

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

35,898,399

` ==Stop stalking my edits== I copied the supposed ``original research`` from another article which I merged. I will revert it, and suggest that you discuss this with the author of the original text. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,902,474

` == 20 January == Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,908,233

Thanks for the cleanup of 'thescene' section Rhobite + Curps.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

35,909,125

` == Concerns about Target Audience == #First and foremost, the quotations (as per the copyright and usage terms of just about all Biblical translations) must state the translation from which they come. This is not just for copyright reasons, it would be useful for someone studying the subject. #Second, almost half of these quotations could (and may very well be) used by schools of Arminian thought in defense of their own positions. This gets into theology, an area of which I have little expertise, so I've not the position to comment more about it. I think it would be pertinent to at least mention this. #These articles must not be written solely for the purposes of the faithful, but rather for usefulness to someone who is unfamiliar or unbelieving. Bearing this in mind, the article should probably be reworded in places to improve the ability for non-believers to understand it. An example from Unconditional election: ``God's choice from eternity, of whom He will bring to Himself, is not based on foreseen virtue, merit or faith in the persons He chooses but rather, is unconditionally grounded in His own mercy.`` This will make little or no sense to someone unfamiliar with the subject matter. My concern first lies with the use of capitalized prepositions. From a perspective of showing respect to a (common, but not universal) convention of the faith, this makes sense (akin to not spelling out the name of the deity on articles related to Judaism). However, from the perspective of neutrality, this is inherently biased. Someone who does not believe in monotheism (meaning both belief in higher power and belief in one god) will find this offensive and/or contrary to their ability to read the article. My second concern lies with the wording. ``[...] of whom He will bring to Himself...`` should probably be re-worded, as it may not be clear what bringing to Himself means. ``[...] in His own mercy`` will not make sense to a non-believer. This is, however, a shaky point, and one I do not emphasize too strenuously. In this way, it shows respect for and reflects the beliefs of the faithful as they believe them. My concern is its usefulness to those who do not believe and/or do not have experience with the matter. #It may not be prudent to quote the Bible at all. This is my least strenuous concern, not because it is not a concern, but only because I intend to conjure discussion on the subject, not malevolence or harsh action. I say this not to offend the faithful, but the article should be written from the perspective of presenting the faith and the arguments behind it (definite gray area), not defending it or proving a point to Arminians and followers of other schools of thought. Maybe just the references should be listed, allowing others to look up the passages themselves (this follows with WP's no source material policy, among others—see WP:NOT). I will not make any changes until at least some discussion occurs on the topic. I do not want to offend those who believe, but WP is an institution whose target audience is everyone. Discussion of religion is important and necessary, but it needs to be (as close as we can get to) neutral.— `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,909,625

` ::Yeah? Then you should have fixed it ``months ago``. Or perhaps noticed there was Site Down and Sitedown with somewhat relevant info in both, and merged them. Oh, right. You'd rather vote keep on worthless blog AFDs. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,917,589

== Request for Sources on Merkey Article == I'll wait and serve Wales with the order will take about 20 days. I'll make certain someone if there with the camera to get the expression on his face. I don't want wikipedia, I just want folks to stop the smearing. Clean up the POV in the article or I will be firing all of you.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

35,922,493

` == Essjay double standard == Editing Free Speech is not vandalism with a clearly identified section titled ``criticisms of the policy``. You failed to follow policies and failed to warn or revert. Also, are you a native cherokee speaker? `

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

35,936,914

Can you please not upload the state name images on top of the neutered ones (like with I-678)? - )

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

35,937,422

== Proposal == Hello CalJW. Would you be interested in running for and admin? -

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

35,938,357

. If it is taken down again, I will file a complaint.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,941,597

::This assertion (which was tacked on to the original paragraph) could well be the case, but it should be supported by a positive attribution, if possible.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,954,389

# Thanks for experimenting with the page Paris Hilton on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,962,133

If people just cite their curriculum, focus on training material, and leave politics at the door, this should be productive. If it falls flat it won't be because I sat back and let it.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,963,602

Air assualt Please do not remove large chunks of the text - it can be thought vandalism

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

35,963,882

` : That is true, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for propaganda. How is providing an image of a flag and saying that ``The Vergina Sun is a symbol hotly disputed among Greeks and Macedonian`` propagandist, and why did you remove this content? `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

35,969,759

:Should we believe you?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

35,974,376

::I am completely unaware of how obtained the personal information of , but I would like to remind everyone that Wikipedia has a strong policy of allowing anyone to contribute to the encyclopedia anonymously and free of unwarranted retribution for their actions. It is obvious that this administrator would hold some power over Minuszero and I believe any behavior to make Minus conform to their ideals about this article would constitute harrassment. —

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

35,976,612

:You were unblocked, so behave in the right way, or you will be blocked again, for longer period than this time.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false