dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
38,517,322	==I challenge you== ...to present a shred of evidence of personal attacks. I have cleanedup Michael Schiavo and as such am facing a campaign of hateful lies from childish prigs.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
38,517,702	:Dont revert my edits to my fuckin userpage. If you want her organs you go some else where unnastand? numbaonestunna.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
38,517,790	by admins or banned by the arbitration committee	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
38,519,404	::Yes, I think you have. Thanks. ::(There are a few mechanical dotting-i's-crossing-t's that need to be cleaned up with e.g. the hog call ref not matching up with any note and so forth... I always find that a royal pain and quite difficult to get right myself...)	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,521,289	Please consider ignoring . \|	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
38,523,638	::Actually, let's not be too obtuse. I ended my statement with nonsense because (1) I felt everyone needed a reminder that ArbCom is not a moot court (especially on a topic so irrelevant to the encyclopedia), and (2) I didn't have an insightful conclusion or anything to say after that. Later I added an addendum in case it was unclear to anyone.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
38,524,833	Although South African newspapers have been banned from printing the cartoons, one newspaper, the Mail and Guardian, had already printed one of the cartoons before the ban. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4685040.stm The French newspaper Libération deserves a mention as a major newspaper to carry two of the cartoons.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
38,532,047	* That's correct. A smaller diameter is held less securely by the sphincter, and is less efficient at allowing gas through.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
38,534,331	I wanna remove this user from wikipedia	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
38,538,149	== Terri Schiavo as Rorschach Test == Now perhaps you see that utility of Terri Schiavo is as Rorschach Test. You dangle that pretty, slender alive and aware young face in front of the Power Players (on both the Left and the Right) and you see how they respond. If they respond inappropriately, then you make a note it, as if they were just some rat in your laboratory. That is what make Wikiepda so powerful. And it is all true and NPOV; notable and fair.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,538,830	No need to go after little old ladies or TV commentors. Just the men and women and power, pretige and responsibility. They are ones who can really screw things up.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
38,541,197	` ::Hello, I understand that the INC considers the Binhi, Kadiwa and Buklod to be the three official ``Christian Family Organizations,`` but the CWS is an organization within the INC. We can move the CWS to its own section if need be.`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,541,552	`The navigation template goes into the article == Where the heck do you wantit to go? Bottom of the page? Not the ``standard format``, but it works for me, for now. == `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,544,704	(which is about how long it takes to revert almost anything in Wikipedia)	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,546,894	` ==Lucy van Pelt -> Margaret ``Hot Lips`` Houlihan -> Miss Piggy-> Alice== I suggest that an addition be made to the section about Alice. Right after ``She also has a short, often violent temper, sometimes putting her ``Fist of Death`` to use, even against the Pointy Haired Boss,`` there should be a new sentence: ``Her angry self-assertion is in the tradition of chracters Lucy van Pelt (Peanuts), Margaret ``Hot Lips`` Houlihan(MAS*H), and Miss Piggy (Muppets).```	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,547,793	*I was looking through bad jokes and deleted, and I came across your entry... aren't you supposed to be indef banned?	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
38,548,126	February 2006 (UTC) *Hey, look, it's that image that's been uploaded and deleted by several sockpuppets of the banned user • , what a coincidence! 01:18, 7	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
38,548,196	` ==Xmas tree paradox== ``For instance, to spare time from having to buy and decorate a Christmas tree every year, the house has a large yet inapparent closet adjacent to the living room where the tree can be stored for later holiday seasons.`` This doesn't seem to make sense, because one is not going to store a once-live tree for a year, nor buy a new artificial tree every year.`	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
38,553,147	` == ``Nigger`` was not exactly my choice of words == If you bother to read the article on Mark Fuhrman, and you have an I.Q. at my level or higher, you might recognize that my reference to ``nigger-lover`` was satirical and that it is well-documentated that Mr. Fuhrman is the one who, quite notably, used that racial epitaph so freely, and later lied about it later under oath and quite appropriately was stripped of his law enforcement duties forever. He deserves to have it rubbed in his nose and for the rest of you to reminded of that on a regular basis, lest he be whitewashed. Pun inteneded. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,553,195	:As much of a political opinion as the above is, ...any who (reason for my edit) I edited the entry to clear up some misconceptions that partisan media groups are prone to spread. Groups like the Cristian Science Monitor and UK Guardian are generally good outlets but their info on the video story was inaccurate and therefore should only be mentioned as a footnote on mainstream media inadvertantly spreading misconceptions. One lists random shooting of Iraqisthe video does not show that. It shows vehicles rapidly approaching PSD convoys where everyone else in the area noticed the huge sign thats stenciled on the back of the vehicles, (in Arabic), telling them to stay 100 meters back or be fired upona detail that has yet to be mentioned in the media but is severely mandatory for Aegis vehicles. Notice all the other vehicles in the distancethey're not stopped at a stop light or sign...they're slowly rolling forward pacing the convoy. The contention in the video, (and the subject matter of the investigation), is not weather the vehicles should've been fired upon or not, but insteadwhy did they sustain fire after the vehicles stopped and from such a distance.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,562,862	```revolution`` may not be the best word. Perhaps ``fusion`` is meant?`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,563,185	AGCO is also a Massey Ferguson business (or vice versa).	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,564,539	Brainhell sez: Since the Wikipiedia definition of guided missile refers exclusively to rockets, perhaps that definition, or this entry, should be changed so that the guided torpedo is not referred to as a guided missile.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
38,570,577	` :You may find that when you follow the procedure I prescribed that the category doesn't properly update. This is a flaw in the Mediawiki software that Wikipedia uses. To ``refresh`` the category you need to null edit each of the pages that should be appearing in the category. You can do that by opening the edit window on each of the pages and saving (no need to change the page). You don't need to do this, the next time each of the userpages is edited it will be ``refeshed`` and will appear in the category - I'm letting you know why things was appear strange. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
38,587,003	==Mutyal Clan question== He states they are in Punjab, but they originally migrated over a century ago from Delhi sides. He doesn't know much beyond this Im afraid. Will this help? Have you heard of this name before?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,598,614	` == Old Shatterhand == Now that we have an almost-adequate page on Old Shatterhand, I think that it is appropriate (and you might also if you bother to read the ``Old Shatterhand`` article and the reference I added) that you find a way to add some brief reference to it on mien Fuhrer's article as its notable effect on his world view and mannerisms. Heil the admin bit set on certain Wikipedia accounts! Heil Wikipedia! `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,601,066	== Maybe you should ask Musical Linguist... == Ahh... she problaby does not have time. OK. Here is the joke: Mark Fuhrman, with his LAPD police badge and his gun, with all of those yummmy bullets in it, would do traffic stops on black people. If you think that was a DWB kind of thing, well, other might feel that way too... Anyway the joke is this: He did not love those niggers that stopped, he loved the effect that using, under color of authority (pun intended), the WORD nigger has on them emotionally. See, if he could just get an emotional repsonse from those niggers, he might be able to create an excuse in order to insert some of those yummy bullets into them. Mostly, those niggers just sat and and took it. Some non-admin Wikipedians find themselves in the same situation as those guys. Ironically, Mark probably makes a lot more money with his books now than he ever did as a policeman. Provided that people merely purchase and read his books, but do not actually take them seriously, maybe we are all better off that way. He's got more money. He does not use the n-word anymore. He does not carry a gun and use the n-word under color of authority. Surely, that is best of all possible worlds, is it not?	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
38,603,685	== Information == I think you try to use the template more often. It signals to the reader to the skeptical w/o destroying so much information.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
38,606,568	::You are so right. I am just going to go back to my regular of working, which is to almost never comment any of my contributions.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,606,777	Well, I am extremely sceptical about the information under Biography, especially if that comes from anecdotes he has related during his radio shows.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
38,612,111	` No, you should not. You should reference ``Bill of Attainder``. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
38,614,872	== Tangential and TS == There are a few judgement calls there that we will have to do a second pass on. I did include the Bee Bees (see my comment in Bee Gees) in it (Jeb and dubya, that is) and I did not include Jesse Jackson. Those three guys are in too many categories as it is. You want to remove a few from the category? Be my guest, but do not get greedy about undoing my work.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
38,615,020	This Pink Tulip: Let me tell you somethin: Terri Schiavo talk page ain't gonna have too many more Archives piling up her area 'cause she is ded and 'cause good ol' Pink Tulip is getting everyone to get it all out of their systems and then gettin' 'em to SHUT UP and to get back to work of documenting WHAT HAPPENED 'n lettin' it go at that. We are pounding this with a sledge hammer to pulverize and masticate or organize the information until we are all sick in the stomach about it and that job is DONE! You should try that too BEFORE you go pilin' up too many more Archives of silly-assed cussin' 'n hurt feelins and who-knows-what-else. Let me direct your attention to the recently increased size of Category:Terri Schiavo . That did not happen by accident.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
38,616,146	Lots of that other shit does not have a category for themselves. Terri does.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
38,616,669	Of course, if you are like , you could let your emotions rule you and destroy my efforts to organize the information and just keep on fighting with each other in your ignorance.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
38,617,474	== Terri Schiavo as Rorschach Test == I added this article to the Category:Terri Schiavo and removed it. Terri Schiavo is an excellent tool for studing the candidates, but User:Marskell, who is a Canadian, would prefer that we U.S. citizens vote in ignorance. I am adding the category back in and I expect the admins to intervene and stop this crazy man if he continues to destroy my work. I note that, while a Canadian citizen, he prefers to live in country that does not know Demoncracy. Perhaps his time over these has effected his judgement in some adverse way.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
38,619,128	`===NPOV?=== This article reads more like a personal puff piece than a serious encyclopedia entry. The writer put little objectivity in statements like, Sara is ``considered an angel by her ardent fans,`` or ``Sara Hickman fans generally regard her as an inspiration to artists, humanitarians, and mothers everywhere.`` Why would encyclopedia readers care if Sara, continues ``enjoy her husband and two beautiful daughters?`` If you read any of this stuff in a newspaper, you would immediately consider it biased, the standard should be higher in Wikipedia.`	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,625,078	I own the copyright to the picture of myself and it is the picture that is on the back of my books and on my websites I do not think I have to give myself permission to upload a picture of myself that I took of myself. I though Dan Fogerty already settled the debate that we can not infringe or steal things from ourselves. When the record company tried to sue him for sounding like his self in CCR I guess this was not made clear enough.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,627,499	of students all over the world	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,632,521	::: Additionally, it violates WP:ASR. -	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,637,293	==Wow i jsut did a test for this saying bill cosby was homosexual and it was instantly tooken off, good work(thumbs up)at least someone cares about this site	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
38,637,499	I honestly must say that im impressed and you guys should keep up the good work )	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
38,640,564	` Surly the comment about the fact that there aren't any female presenters being such a problem is superflous. Readers need only look at the list of presenters below to see that there aren't any female hosts. I think that the problem is the IP address with a false sense of selfimportance, who seems to think that their judgement lies over that of the rest of contributers. If we are going to conclude that the only reason that the majority of listeners are men just beacause of the presenters, we need citations (not just discrediting newspaper articles, but solid facts), and not the opinion of one anonymous IP, who has continually walked over the community side of the Wikipedia project (which means finding concensus) in the name of overiding ``censorship``. Otherwise, all we should do is state the facts (that there aren't any female presenters, and that the majority of listeners are men). There is no reason that there are Jewish presenters working there needs to be mentioned. `	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
38,643,296	:The person is referring to Michael Evans from Good Times. However, that's his opinion, and it shouldn't be included in the article.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
38,651,552	he touched me in a naughty place	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
38,653,105	` == ``Hijab is banned in France`` == In many talk shows these last few days, I have heard people saying that hijab is banned in France, voluntarily forgetting to clarify that it is a law only for schools. They put that in parallel to the fact that the Muhammad cartoons are allowed. How many people in the world do believe that indeed hijab is totally forbidden in France ? `	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
38,659,145	` ``Mormon View of Jesus`` is redirected to ``The Living Christ``. ``The Living Christ`` could, maybe should, be merged into ``Jesus in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.`` Leaving a redirect behind, of course. - Das Baz, February 7, 2006, 2:30 PM.`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
38,662,703	==All was ok before so called administrator vandals came who have no sense and no objectivity and their rules must apply ONLY== ==Reply to vandalism and association with Rocky== First of all you do not know the story of Rocky and to you everything is subjective, curbs not only took that thing about soup away but so many, many other facts and people associated with Marciano. It is not subjective, since everything is and was according to books written on Marciano, do not expect me to tear those pages and paste them here, after scanning them. This currect version is ok, of course if there are some little things which need changing or of course... some spelling, be my guest, otherwise, buzz off and stop vandalising the site, it was great for a long time and the above statement Association with Rocky means this current version before Curbs vandalized it!	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
38,663,505	==YOU DIRTY LOOSER== LISTEN UP AND LISTEN ONLY ONCE, GET IN TOUCH WITH OTHER ADMINISTRATOR ZOE... HE HAS INFO I WANT U TO KNOW. FEEL FREE TO BLOCK THIS YOU SON OF A BITCH, I AM ABOUT TO LAUNCH A WAR AGAINST YOU IN HUGE PROPORTIONS, NONE OF YOUR EMAILS WILL EVER BE READ, FEEL FREE TO BLOCK ALL IP'S HERE, SINCE I HAVE ACCESS TO MANY, YOU HAVE REVERTED TO YOUR LIKING MARCIANO AND EVEN JAMES RAMEY WHICH WAS FULL AND CORRECT, YOU DID OTHER THINGS, YOU CALL YOURSELF JUST, WELL, WELCOME TO WAR YOU SON OF A BITCH, YOU GOOD FOR NOTHING ADMINISTRATOR WHO KEEPS ON REVERTING EVERYTHING, FEEL FREE TO ERASE WHAT U WANT BUT READ THIS, THE WAR HAS BEGUN AND I WILL MAKE SURE YOU STAY ON THE NET AND WASTE YOU LIFE MUCH MORE THAN YOU ALREADY DO REVERTING PEOPLE'S GOOD DEEDS, YOU DIRTY DOG, DO NOT CALL YOURSELF JUST, I UNDERSTAND NO PLACE FOR POV, BUT IF PUBLIC OPINION BRINGS POV TO A NORM, IS IT STILL POV, YOU ASSHOLE?	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
38,664,039	` 1. Note: this popped up on my talk page, but is not editable, (and so must have been added by a ``high end`` user, up the Wiki ladder) :::``No disclaimer templates. Please review Wikipedia:No disclaimer templates. Thanks. Hipocrite - «Talk» I replied to this on Hipocrite's talk page, as I do not believe the statement applies here. MSJapan Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Skull_%27n%27_Femurs`` Since I have just got back editor rights, how can this apply to me Hipocrite? How about taking it off my talk page, and giving an big apology here? 2. Hipocrite has done some “coding magic” and blocked the Notes section from we common editors, so I’m reverting it back to the last editoral-able history (MS Japan’s). It is no use upgrading a section with code so we cannot edit it. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
38,666,319	` == Criticism, persecution, and prosecution == A ``new`` re-written edit is in WIP, so please let me finish. Thanks. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
38,668,051	Hipocrite You reverted the references I needed, after I put a polite not here. The section is as near NPOV, when I've finished it as WE can get here. It has taken into account ALL recent chat traffic, including the ani-Masonic stuff. You have a very high hadded use of your power, proved QED, but have added nothing constructive. How about reporting yourself?	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
38,668,794	::: We editors want to write in English, as far as posible, without going to coding school. Also we need to edit refs already there. Also I've spent alot of unpaid time in research on this section.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
38,681,900	== Edit == Edit ended, thanks.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,682,619	* 'NOTE My edit has ended. Thanks to S of V for the notice put on the main particle page. I'm sorry for any data lot due to me having to put internal and external links back by hand. Hence taken so long to do it!	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,686,897	`**:Two weeks later he mentioned [in a letter to his wife] the difficulty he was having in finding employment [in Paris] now that his original mission was executed [...] Gordon A. Craig, ``Engagement and Neutrality in Germany: The case of Georg Forster, 1754-94``, Journal of Modern History, vol. 41, no. 1 (1969), pp. 1-16 `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,687,044	No coz I've a life to get back to, and you caused alot of work for me, just to get back to were constructive editors had got to.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,687,192	` : Apology accepted! You might want to have a look at the welcome page for some more information on how to contribute (and also, how not to contribute). If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on . Cheers. e `	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
38,690,763	== UMBC acronym == really means U Made Bad Choice!	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
38,692,481	` ::(Q in good faith). Are we short of computer space? If I did one big edit, I'm betting that I would get reported for that. I'll get out my ``red triangle`` `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
38,697,505	== Raymond Lee's answer == :The November 7, 2000 airing was interesting especially since the taping was in Washington, DC with it being a very close election between George Bush and Al Gore. Contestant Raymond Lee made it entertaining with his answer to a particular puzzle. Umm, what was the puzzle and his answer? It's not worth mentioning if you don't actually provide what happened; otherwise, it's like assuming we already know, in which case, why mention it? -	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,705,432	==db-bio== I agree on deleting this , but I think the better approach might have been db-bio: nn bio, content was: 'Jeff Tudhope, a McMaster University student, works for the city of Brantford during the summers.' (and the only contributor was 'Solo1155')	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,709,311	` Due to the uncalled for personal slurs that you feel the need to keep coming up with (showing your own 'intelligence'), I am not going to waste anymore time trying to gove elaborate replies, as you clearly just like to annoy, other than to just refresh that you are a liar. To get the total you claimed (above 250m) you would have had to at least to have add those totals twice (like Robdubar did in his analysis (see it above) ) and you made no point to correct him, so if you were not saying that, then why not mention that to him in your disscusion. Also, you're mention of the dribs abd drabs of info was to try and beef up the sources (there would be no other reason to mention it) , however, you didn't pull the wool over anyones eyes. I could go on (again) about your lies, such as claiming I changed this page and the contents of our discussion, but then my posts would end up looking as ludicrous (not to mention ridiculous) as yours, so I'll just simmer and leave the ``venom`` and insults for you, as you excell at that (not a compliment).`	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
38,709,802	Again - it is obvious what is happening. I've contacted Jimbo Wales, since it seems that the more I apply his principles, the more some here think that these principles are not real. I suggest that they are - including his guidelines on not biting newcomers which many of you purelu ignore outright - along with several principles. This block is unwarranted and not justified.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,710,786	such clique behavior and should be aware that others are watching, and recording events as they proceed	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,711,336	`What do you mean`` deceptive edit summaries?`` Prove this assertion. I would appreciate that if you are to make accusations, that you also prove these accusations. I add edits, I write on edit summaries, and I cite references & notes as sources. What is ``deceptive`` about that? `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,714,520	`My behavior, certainly as a newcomer to Wikipedia has never been destructive, nor am I a vandal. I am a veteran journalist, writer, and editor with many years of experience. Though I've made mistakes as a Wikipedia newcomer, I am not oblivious to the attempts by some to make a mountain out of a molehill in this short a time I've been a member of Wikipedia. As an example, I was recently blocked without knowledge of this being done, and with no proof as to the reason but citing ``edit warring`` which I did not partake in. Moreover, the more I cite sources that are verifiable, and the more I read, and apply Jimbo Wales Wikipedia principles & guidelines, the more trouble newcomers seem to get into with what appears to be a clique of POVers, and ``revert warriors`` who take the honest mistakes of newcomers, and turn them into immediate accusations, use of pronfanity, and the ``one-way`` pastes of comments from me onto RFC & arbitration pages - taken out of context, without adding their OWN comments on edit summaries, and talk pages. I find this curious - since, to prove that a person is doing such a thing as they say - revert warring - and being ``disruptive`` in honest writign & editing, and citing sources, and references, that some such as Ruud, Bunchofgrapes, and others, would find it useful not to add their own comments which, if arbitration members can find them - contain a hostile tone, reject attempts to work together, are mean, avoid sourcing themselves, with their own entries very much POV while ``revert warring`` without first reading, or seeing the sources cited. This has happened many times with me in just over one month and I just got here. Some on the RFC page who signed have even resorted to deleting their comments to fit their accusatory assertions on Theodore7 - but pasting my comments as one-liners - and sentences as ``proof`` of my being disruptive? If this is the case, then why do they not add their own comments, and my return comments in context? Doing this - cutting, and pasting my words OUT of context to then fit into their accusations - is what is going on, and this only makes more suspect their own Wikipedia edits; which, are very weakly sourced (if at all) despite my doing so, and asking others to do so in accordance with Wikipedia principles, and the advice of some Wikipedia administrators who were kind enough to help me without biting a newcomer - nor making immediate accusations designed to disrupt themselves. For instance, Bunchofgrapes made several ``reverts`` on materials I added sources to - and then turned to make rude comments on edit summaries. I asked him to please not do this. It seems more common to not cite sources and to ``revert war`` - a term I did not know existed before joining Wikipedia. It seems that many of the crew who complain so much about the newbie Theodore7 have been ``revert warring`` for some time. I just stumbled onto some rather neferious POVing, and ``reverters`` who throw out that claim onto others if they do not agree with something that is counter to their own point of view. This is why citing verifiable sources is important. However, some just seem to think Jimbo Wales' principles do not apply to them. I think different. I am new here, and I read, and am applying more of Wales' principles and guidelines as I go along - despite some who would laugh at this, and, if one is good enough to read through all the ``complaints`` about Theodore7 - other would mock Wales' principles & guidelines, and tell newcomers not to ``use`` him as a excuse, etc. This is the kind of thing that has been going on since I recently joined Wikipedia. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
38,715,226	` ``Is (substance) Poisonous?`` Everything is actually Toxic, it all depends on the AMOUNT of substance. Even Water can kill if you drink 7 gallons at once. Mercury metal - you MIGHT get away with holding some in your hand (BUT I DON'T RECCOMEND THAT), BUT Dimethylmercury will kill you if you get even one drop on your skin - see Karen Wetterhahn ....Joeylawn`	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
38,716,183	`:Great addition! I used a setTimeout(function, 0) to be able to call setSelectionRange inside the 'focus' event handler. — 2006-02-08 03:45Z `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
38,719,176	`. Some just make things up as if it substitutes for the truth, and use ``mistakes`` as ``proof`` of being ``disruptive.`` But, very few actually can cite facts, inaccurate edits, nor bother to even think about checking sources cited. It is much easier to ``complain about Theodore7`` and to ``revert`` since following Wikipedia's principles about biting newcomers is an ``excuse`` since it ``does not exist`` and ``does not happen`` to any newcomer. And, if they mention it - they are ``using`` it since it doesn't exist, etc., etc. This is just one of the many problems Wikipedia newcomers face with such people. It is so much easier not to care about any subject, nor to check sources (as I do as a journalist) and to find inaccurate and unfactual materials while avoiding POV. But, to play games, to have personality conflicts as if they actually know the people they are writing to. They avoid resolving matters peacefully, but highly enjoy creating fights, building molehills into mountains, and love throwing out wild accusations. They don't ask - they assume - they immediately accuse, then complain loudly. They take everthing personally - all the while - not reading, checking sources, nor citing sources themselves on the subjects in question but adding plenty of their own POV that is not neutral, nor cited with sources. If sources run counter to their POV - then they use ruses to attempt to divert attention: and ask for RFCs on Wikipedia members who just got here, and request arbitration to resolve situations they have not even started to resolve on their own - yet claiming that they have tried. Perhaps, if some spend much more time actually checking sources, citing them, and making sure that the encylopedic materials are factual then, the ``revert wars`` by some who want to re-write history to fit their own personal views would end, and Wikipedia could be that much more successful. So, if one is to gather evidence - show just where my edits are vandalism - where? I'd like to see it. Show my edit summaries. Show my edits, and don't cite my early mistakes as ``proof`` of being ``disruptive`` since I'd like to see someone claim they do not make mistakes themselves. Oh, one more thing. When a person defends themselves - try not to dismiss it as a ``diatribe`` - but actually read it in context and take responsbility for one's own ``claims`` against the person - in this case, a new member of Wikipedia. I've had enough of my comments being taken out of context, then pasted onto RFC and arbitration sections - and used as ``proof`` of me being a bad person, and disruptive. I say different, and have the right to defend myself against what I consider to be a classic case of biting Wikipedia newcomers. I will take credit for my honest mistakes, but not for accusations that are false. My evidence are the comments, and retorts, and my edits - which, are cited, and soucred. Any arbitrator who wants to know more about my edits and comments can feel free to ask, or to view my comments IN CONTEXT and not TAKEN OOUT OF CONTEXT by some who are doing the constant ``complaining.`` I see no proof of any infactual edits on my part. And, my early mistakes are just that - mistakes that most newcomers to Wikipedia make. That does not justify, say your own comments Bunchofgrapes, and those of the other ``revert warriors`` - who, in my opinion, are ruining Wikipedia. So, I've made inquiries elsewhere to make sure that perhaps this comes to an end, and that my case can be used as an example of what happens - negatively - to newcomers who run up against those who signed the RFC, and asked for arbitration. My evidence is there - my work to this time, my edits, sourcing, and using the Talk Pages - which I do not abuse, but use to add comments relevant to the subject at hand`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
38,724,613	H.J.M, 8th February 2006.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
38,725,513	==Adminship Vote== I want to sincerely thank you for voting on my adminship nomination. Whenever I mess up, please let me know. I want to learn from my mistakes so they don't become patterns. -	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
38,726,527	Numerically,according to the World Almanac 2005, only 350 million people worldwide are athiests. 700 million don't know what they believe. The rest- thats about 5 billion- believe in a God. You are way to complex to have been an accident. Something was behind this. Anyone who believes to the contrary is plain stupid. Mabye organized religon is corrupt- mabye even wrong or something but there IS a higher power out there.	2,006	false	user	random	test	false
38,729,336	Hey! You there! Stop this bullshit! I'll get you before I die! SUCK A DICK. MY DICK.	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	true
38,730,557	`== Bias == The ``article`` is very subjective, eg ``high quality``, and is therefore biased. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
38,730,883	`Complete rewrite of the list completed on 02/08/06. Updated to be in-line with the equivalent page on ja:wiki. Quite a few of the listings in the English version weren't included in the Japanese version, so I've checked for validity (most weren't needed) and left the others commented (not deleted). Many of them may be names of older geinin/acts so I'm going to try to find out as many as I can and write them back in, especially for manzai acts which have been removed over time from the Japanese list. If you are reinserting a name that is presently commented (that I couldn't find a source for) please include the kanji for the name as to make it searchable in Japanese. Also try to conform to the style of the page in order to make it easiest to find. English words used in Japanese are spelled in English, but Japanese words are never translated into English (at least on this page). E.g. ダチョウ倶楽部 is Dachō Club, not Ostrich Club or Ostrich Kurabu. The names are arranged in alphabetical order by surname, and they are all listed in English style. Names written in katakana with English meanings are translated, thus Robaato becomes Robert etc., and this is how I will be creating the article names as well. Names that don't appear to be in English name order probably are like that because a) it's not a person's name (it's the combi name) b) the gainin specifically uses that order in English, e.g. 所ジョージ (Tokoro George, not George Tokoro). Also, nicknames are not used, rather the full version of their most common name, e.g. Razor Ramon HG, not HG or Sumitani etc. In alphabetizing, macrons are ignored, so ``ō`` is treated as an ``o``, etc.`	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,733,767	::::Sounds good. But AFAIK, isn't the CWS open to the children of all visitors and members, regardless if they were offered or not?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,737,358	` :Not sure what the problem is. If someone types in ``Alexander Pope`` they get the philosopher’s article. But, if you feel strongly about it, list it at WP:AFD and see what the consensus is. — `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,742,714	` == Differentiating the deposement from the coup == In my last edit summary, I wrote: ``RV; the POV consists in failing to differentiate between the legitimate removal of Allende, and the after the fact refusual to relenquish martial law by Pinochet.`` The text redacted claimed: *``Although this call (referring the Resolution of August 22, 1973) for ``redirecting government activity toward the path of Law and ensuring the constitutional order of our Nation and the essential underpinnings of democratic coexistence`` was invoked to justify the September 11 coup, in retrospect that was clearly not the agenda of the coup.`` The oxymoric phrasing ``in retrospect... was clearly not`` is at best POV, and at worst, merely a redundancy (since ``in retrospect``, ie. after the fact, Pinochet clearly (did) not return power to the Chilean legislature after the legislature implored the military removal of Allende. What the passage fails to account for is that Allende's military ouster was implored by Resolution; the ``coup`` proper was a subsequent event, and consisted of Pinochet's refusal to return power back to civilian government. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,747,685	` == CAIR == It's interesting why people desire to list CAIR's ``hate site`` reference, when, if such POV is kosher, then it's equally kosher for CAIR-detractors to follow up with an examination of all the CAIR critters indicted, tossed in jail, deported, etc., for terrorist-associations, money-laundering, fraud, etc. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
38,747,921	` This page is dedicated to Penfold, the God of the Word ``Right``. We would like to thank him for saying this word - sometimes at the rate of thirty-five times per lesson - because it sustains life within this school. However, we would also like it very much if he fell down the stairs and died. Thank you and goodnight. `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
38,748,708	. :::: I prefer the article the size it is (ie. succinct), but would oppose merger if the justification for merger is that it reduces revert wars (since under that theory merger then represents appeasement to vandals).	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
38,750,878	Will do. It's quite interesting because they are some Mutyals in Pakistani Punjab also (have just been told) and they also allege the same. I'll let you know as soon as I find out. Interesting about the 'Yal' note with Brahmins. :Another point is that there is also another tribe called the 'Rutyal'. This actually tribe was displaced in Punjab approx 1800's during the Sikh conquests and their riyasat renamed Rutala/Ratala. (in recognition of it's old rulers) could they also be linked? The Rutyals were known as Rajas too around those parts. Have you heard of Rutyals? Im sure an Indian congressman is a Rutyal.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
38,757,880	The previous version of this page, now marked as a potential copyright violation, was contributed by the owner of the page that you're concerend about. I plan to notify him so he can come by and give permisison himself.	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
38,760,618	==Spelling== Re: toilet humour. Do not make arbitrary changes in spelling from British English to American English. This is against wikipedia policy.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
38,761,059	:Yeah, what the fuck are you wittering on about? If we did have a shortage of space, you're mindless, boring ramblings would would the first to go. You know this is a universal site? Just because you don't respect (or more likely understand) British laws doesn't mean they shouldn't be on here. Bloody yank, (yerr, mutter mutter) with yer hamburgers and yer sidewalks and yer inflexible, overrated constitutions and yer sneakers. And who, I ask you, WHO re-writes Fawlty Towers with Basil as a woman?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
38,765,382	I have replaced the word decimated by destroyed, since to decimate means to destroy 10% of something.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
38,766,191	` I just found this page and I feel like they could be talking about me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_faith I really am ``in good faith`` trying to post the correct information here! I just don't understand some of the terms you guys use and I'm totally lost with all this copyright stuff. And if the bio I wrote isn't something that is allowed to be posted, can you please point me in the right direction, so that I can learn how to write one that is suitable for this page? I really did read a few other bios and thought mine was OK to post here. Thanks for any help you can give me.`	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
38,766,690	` == Egon Zakrajšek == ... ``pioneer of computer science in Slovenia, texbooks for Z-23 assembler, structran`` According to wiki page on mr. Zakrajšek, he actually didn't write any program that made a difference... If every professor that ever wrote a textbook on programming or computer science edns up here this list will become too large and won't have any meaning. So, his name should be removed from this list... `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
38,773,294	== Capital of England? == Ive been lead to believe that Edward I held TWO parliaments there. One in 1300 and the other in 1307. Would that make Carlisle the English Capital city intead of London on those two dates?	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
38,773,384	To E4: Yes, GR is only a theory of gravity. When I was an undergrad in Physics it was just simply casually mentioned to us right in the classroom that GR is only a theory of gravity. - It puts things into perspective. - Stephan Hawking even states it in at least two of his popular books, that GR is only a theory of gravity, I emailed you the pages. - Fock and Keswani state it formally. Stephan Hawking, V. Fock, and H.G. Keswani all published this for a reason, it puts everything into proper perspective. It is extremely important that it be on the Poincare page here, to put Poincare into his rightful proper historical perspective. Please remove that ridiculous red tag, nothing justifies it.	2,006	false	article	random	test	false
38,773,560	Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Frederick Douglass, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
38,778,665	` ==Here's ONE example of McNeight-speak== Your post to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment does not provide enough information so that anyone can review the threats and personal attacks that you claim were made by . If you want help, please at least tell me what talk page they were made on. Also, I can see that you have been uncivil and have engaged in personal attacks. You will get more assistance in Wikipedia with respect to uncivil treatment if you are civil yourself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Braaad QUOTE from McNeight: Wikipedia is a community. The focus is not on you or me, but the encyclopedia. Create as many user names as you want, but eventually your ``personality`` will come through. If you can't or won't interact with people in a normal manner (hint: take a look at meta:Don't be a dick and Wikipedia:Civility for some tips on human-human interaction), then get the fuck out. McNeight SIGNED! Because I'm not a bitter and petty authority-wannabe attention-freak coward. I think my favorite part is: ``...get the fuck out.`` Please protect me from this dangerous creature!! `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
38,780,707	`{\| class=``messagebox standard-talk`` \|- \| \|This discussion page may contain comments better considered as trolling, posted in order to prompt irate replies that can then be even further ridiculed, in turn. Before you post any reply, consider how you might minimize the effects of trollish comments. Simply ignoring certain comments may be the best option. \|} Example of McNeight's 'trolling' is shocking: Wikipedia is a community. The focus is not on you or me, but the encyclopedia. Create as many user names as you want, but eventually your ``personality`` will come through. If you can't or won't interact with people in a normal manner (hint: take a look at meta:Don't be a dick and Wikipedia:Civility for some tips on human-human interaction), then get the fuck out. McNeight SIGNED! Because I'm not a bitter and petty authority-wannabe attention-freak coward. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
38,788,461	== Chadbryant once again == Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Wikipedia:Suspected_sockpuppets_of_Dick_Witham for details. Chadbryant is creating comments intended for no purpose other than to cause trouble or incite it in the first place. There is absolutely no need for these remarks, and I'm pretty sure they violate Wikipedia policy in some way. Is there something you can do to help stop this, please? Thanks.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
38,789,534	` ::Let's cut the bullshit, mmmkay? You are not ``detailing`` anything. This is just as sad and pathetic as your ``FAQ`` you created out of your obsession over my person. ::And you want to talk about removing content to cover up abuse? Why do you continually revert ? Or the 24...* IP that follows in same? As pointed out, you can't have it go both ways, Chad. ::Note for admins: Please be aware that since Mr. Bryant's abuse is now known by many users but few admins, he has taken to vandalism and abuse in a blatant and aggressive account. My accounts are not generally ``blocked on sight,`` and I would dare Mr. Bryant to prove this otherwise even has stated that he does not do this. `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
38,790,176	` ==brainhell== Thanks Robert. I signed my comment with four tildes, at least the one that appeared on my own page. I apologize if I posted it elsewhere in the wrong pace, or without a signature. I see that Lucky 6.9's user page now says only ``Vacation time...`` and displays a stress meter. His user talk page says ``Wikistress is building. I, therefore, have left the building for a brief time.`` I see no acknowledgment that he realizes that he lost his temper. This in your inference. But even were that true, and despite his apology to me, and his promise not to delete my posts (without addressing what he'll do to the posts of others), he has shown himself temperamentally unsuited to administrate. It's quite likely to happen again. I respect your view that ``I think that would be a mistake on our part that would be comparable to his mistake in losing his temper.`` However, I disagree. This administrator is a hazard to the Wikipedia community and I request that you go ahead and request to have him de-adminned, according to the procedure. I will do my best to post this to your talk page and not your user page. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
38,790,519	` ::::Note for the record that Mr. Bryant has not acknowledged (for now, at least) his various immature behavior and blatant abuse involving . I have NOT acknowledged ``Dick Witham`` at all I don't know where this obese oaf gets that from. Once again, I note that he claims sockpuppets are ``blocked on sight`` yet provides no evidence to the contrary. Mr. Bryant is constantly defacing user pages with the sockpuppet tag, and has a history of abuse of his own that would rival the worst Wikipedians. Actually, blocked Mr. Bryant for abuse, then allowed him to be unblocked under condition he stop engaging in such behavior. Obviously, this has not happened. `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
38,791,072	February 2006 (UTC) :It should be noted that Chadbryant is currently engaging in an edit war that is a clear violation of the condition of your unblocking of his person. 18:03, 8	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
38,794,936	(UTC) :Canada has college football. 18:33, 8 February 2006	2,006	true	article	random	test	false

38,517,322

==I challenge you== ...to present a shred of evidence of personal attacks. I have cleanedup Michael Schiavo and as such am facing a campaign of hateful lies from childish prigs.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

38,517,702

:Dont revert my edits to my fuckin userpage. If you want her organs you go some else where unnastand? numbaonestunna.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

38,517,790

by admins or banned by the arbitration committee

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

38,519,404

::Yes, I think you have. Thanks. ::(There are a few mechanical dotting-i's-crossing-t's that need to be cleaned up with e.g. the hog call ref not matching up with any note and so forth... I always find that a royal pain and quite difficult to get right myself...)

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,521,289

Please consider ignoring . |

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

38,523,638

::Actually, let's not be too obtuse. I ended my statement with nonsense because (1) I felt everyone needed a reminder that ArbCom is not a moot court (especially on a topic so irrelevant to the encyclopedia), and (2) I didn't have an insightful conclusion or anything to say after that. Later I added an addendum in case it was unclear to anyone.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

38,524,833

Although South African newspapers have been banned from printing the cartoons, one newspaper, the Mail and Guardian, had already printed one of the cartoons before the ban. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4685040.stm The French newspaper Libération deserves a mention as a major newspaper to carry two of the cartoons.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

38,532,047

* That's correct. A smaller diameter is held less securely by the sphincter, and is less efficient at allowing gas through.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

38,534,331

I wanna remove this user from wikipedia

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

38,538,149

== Terri Schiavo as Rorschach Test == Now perhaps you see that utility of Terri Schiavo is as Rorschach Test. You dangle that pretty, slender alive and aware young face in front of the Power Players (on both the Left and the Right) and you see how they respond. If they respond inappropriately, then you make a note it, as if they were just some rat in your laboratory. That is what make Wikiepda so powerful. And it is all true and NPOV; notable and fair.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,538,830

No need to go after little old ladies or TV commentors. Just the men and women and power, pretige and responsibility. They are ones who can really screw things up.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

38,541,197

` ::Hello, I understand that the INC considers the Binhi, Kadiwa and Buklod to be the three official ``Christian Family Organizations,`` but the CWS is an organization within the INC. We can move the CWS to its own section if need be.`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,541,552

`The navigation template goes into the article == Where the heck do you wantit to go? Bottom of the page? Not the ``standard format``, but it works for me, for now. == `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,544,704

(which is about how long it takes to revert almost anything in Wikipedia)

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,546,894

` ==Lucy van Pelt -> Margaret ``Hot Lips`` Houlihan -> Miss Piggy-> Alice== I suggest that an addition be made to the section about Alice. Right after ``She also has a short, often violent temper, sometimes putting her ``Fist of Death`` to use, even against the Pointy Haired Boss,`` there should be a new sentence: ``Her angry self-assertion is in the tradition of chracters Lucy van Pelt (Peanuts), Margaret ``Hot Lips`` Houlihan(M*A*S*H), and Miss Piggy (Muppets).```

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,547,793

*I was looking through bad jokes and deleted, and I came across your entry... aren't you supposed to be indef banned?

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

38,548,126

February 2006 (UTC) *Hey, look, it's that image that's been uploaded and deleted by several sockpuppets of the banned user • , what a coincidence! 01:18, 7

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

38,548,196

` ==Xmas tree paradox== ``For instance, to spare time from having to buy and decorate a Christmas tree every year, the house has a large yet inapparent closet adjacent to the living room where the tree can be stored for later holiday seasons.`` This doesn't seem to make sense, because one is not going to store a once-live tree for a year, nor buy a new artificial tree every year.`

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

38,553,147

` == ``Nigger`` was not exactly my choice of words == If you bother to read the article on Mark Fuhrman, and you have an I.Q. at my level or higher, you might recognize that my reference to ``nigger-lover`` was satirical and that it is well-documentated that Mr. Fuhrman is the one who, quite notably, used that racial epitaph so freely, and later lied about it later under oath and quite appropriately was stripped of his law enforcement duties forever. He deserves to have it rubbed in his nose and for the rest of you to reminded of that on a regular basis, lest he be whitewashed. Pun inteneded. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,553,195

:As much of a political opinion as the above is, ...any who (reason for my edit) I edited the entry to clear up some misconceptions that partisan media groups are prone to spread. Groups like the Cristian Science Monitor and UK Guardian are generally good outlets but their info on the video story was inaccurate and therefore should only be mentioned as a footnote on mainstream media inadvertantly spreading misconceptions. One lists random shooting of Iraqisthe video does not show that. It shows vehicles rapidly approaching PSD convoys where everyone else in the area noticed the huge sign thats stenciled on the back of the vehicles, (in Arabic), telling them to stay 100 meters back or be fired upona detail that has yet to be mentioned in the media but is severely mandatory for Aegis vehicles. Notice all the other vehicles in the distancethey're not stopped at a stop light or sign...they're slowly rolling forward pacing the convoy. The contention in the video, (and the subject matter of the investigation), is not weather the vehicles should've been fired upon or not, but insteadwhy did they sustain fire after the vehicles stopped and from such a distance.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,562,862

```revolution`` may not be the best word. Perhaps ``fusion`` is meant?`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,563,185

AGCO is also a Massey Ferguson business (or vice versa).

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,564,539

Brainhell sez: Since the Wikipiedia definition of guided missile refers exclusively to rockets, perhaps that definition, or this entry, should be changed so that the guided torpedo is not referred to as a guided missile.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

38,570,577

` :You may find that when you follow the procedure I prescribed that the category doesn't properly update. This is a flaw in the Mediawiki software that Wikipedia uses. To ``refresh`` the category you need to null edit each of the pages that should be appearing in the category. You can do that by opening the edit window on each of the pages and saving (no need to change the page). You don't need to do this, the next time each of the userpages is edited it will be ``refeshed`` and will appear in the category - I'm letting you know why things was appear strange. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

38,587,003

==Mutyal Clan question== He states they are in Punjab, but they originally migrated over a century ago from Delhi sides. He doesn't know much beyond this Im afraid. Will this help? Have you heard of this name before?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,598,614

` == Old Shatterhand == Now that we have an almost-adequate page on Old Shatterhand, I think that it is appropriate (and you might also if you bother to read the ``Old Shatterhand`` article and the reference I added) that you find a way to add some brief reference to it on mien Fuhrer's article as its notable effect on his world view and mannerisms. Heil the admin bit set on certain Wikipedia accounts! Heil Wikipedia! `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,601,066

== Maybe you should ask Musical Linguist... == Ahh... she problaby does not have time. OK. Here is the joke: Mark Fuhrman, with his LAPD police badge and his gun, with all of those yummmy bullets in it, would do traffic stops on black people. If you think that was a DWB kind of thing, well, other might feel that way too... Anyway the joke is this: He did not love those niggers that stopped, he loved the effect that using, under color of authority (pun intended), the WORD nigger has on them emotionally. See, if he could just get an emotional repsonse from those niggers, he might be able to create an excuse in order to insert some of those yummy bullets into them. Mostly, those niggers just sat and and took it. Some non-admin Wikipedians find themselves in the same situation as those guys. Ironically, Mark probably makes a lot more money with his books now than he ever did as a policeman. Provided that people merely purchase and read his books, but do not actually take them seriously, maybe we are all better off that way. He's got more money. He does not use the n-word anymore. He does not carry a gun and use the n-word under color of authority. Surely, that is best of all possible worlds, is it not?

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

38,603,685

== Information == I think you try to use the template more often. It signals to the reader to the skeptical w/o destroying so much information.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

38,606,568

::You are so right. I am just going to go back to my regular of working, which is to almost never comment any of my contributions.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,606,777

Well, I am extremely sceptical about the information under Biography, especially if that comes from anecdotes he has related during his radio shows.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

38,612,111

` No, you should not. You should reference ``Bill of Attainder``. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

38,614,872

== Tangential and TS == There are a few judgement calls there that we will have to do a second pass on. I did include the Bee Bees (see my comment in Bee Gees) in it (Jeb and dubya, that is) and I did not include Jesse Jackson. Those three guys are in too many categories as it is. You want to remove a few from the category? Be my guest, but do not get greedy about undoing my work.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

38,615,020

This Pink Tulip: Let me tell you somethin: Terri Schiavo talk page ain't gonna have too many more Archives piling up her area 'cause she is ded and 'cause good ol' Pink Tulip is getting everyone to get it all out of their systems and then gettin' 'em to SHUT UP and to get back to work of documenting WHAT HAPPENED 'n lettin' it go at that. We are pounding this with a sledge hammer to pulverize and masticate or organize the information until we are all sick in the stomach about it and that job is DONE! You should try that too BEFORE you go pilin' up too many more Archives of silly-assed cussin' 'n hurt feelins and who-knows-what-else. Let me direct your attention to the recently increased size of Category:Terri Schiavo . That did not happen by accident.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

38,616,146

Lots of that other shit does not have a category for themselves. Terri does.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

38,616,669

Of course, if you are like , you could let your emotions rule you and destroy my efforts to organize the information and just keep on fighting with each other in your ignorance.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

38,617,474

== Terri Schiavo as Rorschach Test == I added this article to the Category:Terri Schiavo and removed it. Terri Schiavo is an excellent tool for studing the candidates, but User:Marskell, who is a Canadian, would prefer that we U.S. citizens vote in ignorance. I am adding the category back in and I expect the admins to intervene and stop this crazy man if he continues to destroy my work. I note that, while a Canadian citizen, he prefers to live in country that does not know Demoncracy. Perhaps his time over these has effected his judgement in some adverse way.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

38,619,128

`===NPOV?=== This article reads more like a personal puff piece than a serious encyclopedia entry. The writer put little objectivity in statements like, Sara is ``considered an angel by her ardent fans,`` or ``Sara Hickman fans generally regard her as an inspiration to artists, humanitarians, and mothers everywhere.`` Why would encyclopedia readers care if Sara, continues ``enjoy her husband and two beautiful daughters?`` If you read any of this stuff in a newspaper, you would immediately consider it biased, the standard should be higher in Wikipedia.`

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,625,078

I own the copyright to the picture of myself and it is the picture that is on the back of my books and on my websites I do not think I have to give myself permission to upload a picture of myself that I took of myself. I though Dan Fogerty already settled the debate that we can not infringe or steal things from ourselves. When the record company tried to sue him for sounding like his self in CCR I guess this was not made clear enough.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,627,499

of students all over the world

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,632,521

::: Additionally, it violates WP:ASR. -

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,637,293

==Wow i jsut did a test for this saying bill cosby was homosexual and it was instantly tooken off, good work(thumbs up)at least someone cares about this site

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

38,637,499

I honestly must say that im impressed and you guys should keep up the good work )

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

38,640,564

` Surly the comment about the fact that there aren't any female presenters being such a problem is superflous. Readers need only look at the list of presenters below to see that there aren't any female hosts. I think that the problem is the IP address with a false sense of selfimportance, who seems to think that their judgement lies over that of the rest of contributers. If we are going to conclude that the only reason that the majority of listeners are men just beacause of the presenters, we need citations (not just discrediting newspaper articles, but solid facts), and not the opinion of one anonymous IP, who has continually walked over the community side of the Wikipedia project (which means finding concensus) in the name of overiding ``censorship``. Otherwise, all we should do is state the facts (that there aren't any female presenters, and that the majority of listeners are men). There is no reason that there are Jewish presenters working there needs to be mentioned. `

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

38,643,296

:The person is referring to Michael Evans from Good Times. However, that's his opinion, and it shouldn't be included in the article.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

38,651,552

he touched me in a naughty place

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

38,653,105

` == ``Hijab is banned in France`` == In many talk shows these last few days, I have heard people saying that hijab is banned in France, voluntarily forgetting to clarify that it is a law only for schools. They put that in parallel to the fact that the Muhammad cartoons are allowed. How many people in the world do believe that indeed hijab is totally forbidden in France ? `

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

38,659,145

` ``Mormon View of Jesus`` is redirected to ``The Living Christ``. ``The Living Christ`` could, maybe should, be merged into ``Jesus in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.`` Leaving a redirect behind, of course. - Das Baz, February 7, 2006, 2:30 PM.`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

38,662,703

==All was ok before so called administrator vandals came who have no sense and no objectivity and their rules must apply ONLY== ==Reply to vandalism and association with Rocky== First of all you do not know the story of Rocky and to you everything is subjective, curbs not only took that thing about soup away but so many, many other facts and people associated with Marciano. It is not subjective, since everything is and was according to books written on Marciano, do not expect me to tear those pages and paste them here, after scanning them. This currect version is ok, of course if there are some little things which need changing or of course... some spelling, be my guest, otherwise, buzz off and stop vandalising the site, it was great for a long time and the above statement Association with Rocky means this current version before Curbs vandalized it!

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

38,663,505

==YOU DIRTY LOOSER== LISTEN UP AND LISTEN ONLY ONCE, GET IN TOUCH WITH OTHER ADMINISTRATOR ZOE... HE HAS INFO I WANT U TO KNOW. FEEL FREE TO BLOCK THIS YOU SON OF A BITCH, I AM ABOUT TO LAUNCH A WAR AGAINST YOU IN HUGE PROPORTIONS, NONE OF YOUR EMAILS WILL EVER BE READ, FEEL FREE TO BLOCK ALL IP'S HERE, SINCE I HAVE ACCESS TO MANY, YOU HAVE REVERTED TO YOUR LIKING MARCIANO AND EVEN JAMES RAMEY WHICH WAS FULL AND CORRECT, YOU DID OTHER THINGS, YOU CALL YOURSELF JUST, WELL, WELCOME TO WAR YOU SON OF A BITCH, YOU GOOD FOR NOTHING ADMINISTRATOR WHO KEEPS ON REVERTING EVERYTHING, FEEL FREE TO ERASE WHAT U WANT BUT READ THIS, THE WAR HAS BEGUN AND I WILL MAKE SURE YOU STAY ON THE NET AND WASTE YOU LIFE MUCH MORE THAN YOU ALREADY DO REVERTING PEOPLE'S GOOD DEEDS, YOU DIRTY DOG, DO NOT CALL YOURSELF JUST, I UNDERSTAND NO PLACE FOR POV, BUT IF PUBLIC OPINION BRINGS POV TO A NORM, IS IT STILL POV, YOU ASSHOLE?

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

38,664,039

` *1. Note: this popped up on my talk page, but is not editable, (and so must have been added by a ``high end`` user, up the Wiki ladder) :::``No disclaimer templates. Please review Wikipedia:No disclaimer templates. Thanks. Hipocrite - «Talk» I replied to this on Hipocrite's talk page, as I do not believe the statement applies here. MSJapan Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Skull_%27n%27_Femurs`` Since I have just got back editor rights, how can this apply to me Hipocrite? How about taking it off my talk page, and giving an big apology here? *2. Hipocrite has done some “coding magic” and blocked the Notes section from we common editors, so I’m reverting it back to the last editoral-able history (MS Japan’s). It is no use upgrading a section with code so we cannot edit it. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

38,666,319

` == Criticism, persecution, and prosecution == A ``new`` re-written edit is in WIP, so please let me finish. Thanks. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

38,668,051

Hipocrite You reverted the references I needed, after I put a polite not here. The section is as near NPOV, when I've finished it as WE can get here. It has taken into account ALL recent chat traffic, including the ani-Masonic stuff. You have a very high hadded use of your power, proved QED, but have added nothing constructive. How about reporting yourself?

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

38,668,794

::: We editors want to write in English, as far as posible, without going to coding school. Also we need to edit refs already there. Also I've spent alot of unpaid time in research on this section.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

38,681,900

== Edit == Edit ended, thanks.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,682,619

* 'NOTE My edit has ended. Thanks to S of V for the notice put on the main particle page. I'm sorry for any data lot due to me having to put internal and external links back by hand. Hence taken so long to do it!

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,686,897

`**:Two weeks later he mentioned [in a letter to his wife] the difficulty he was having in finding employment [in Paris] now that his original mission was executed [...] Gordon A. Craig, ``Engagement and Neutrality in Germany: The case of Georg Forster, 1754-94``, Journal of Modern History, vol. 41, no. 1 (1969), pp. 1-16 `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,687,044

No coz I've a life to get back to, and you caused alot of work for me, just to get back to were constructive editors had got to.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,687,192

` : Apology accepted! You might want to have a look at the welcome page for some more information on how to contribute (and also, how not to contribute). If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on . Cheers. e `

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

38,690,763

== UMBC acronym == really means U Made Bad Choice!

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

38,692,481

` ::(Q in good faith). Are we short of computer space? If I did one big edit, I'm betting that I would get reported for that. I'll get out my ``red triangle`` `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

38,697,505

== Raymond Lee's answer == :The November 7, 2000 airing was interesting especially since the taping was in Washington, DC with it being a very close election between George Bush and Al Gore. Contestant Raymond Lee made it entertaining with his answer to a particular puzzle. Umm, what was the puzzle and his answer? It's not worth mentioning if you don't actually provide what happened; otherwise, it's like assuming we already know, in which case, why mention it? -

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,705,432

==db-bio== I agree on deleting this , but I think the better approach might have been db-bio: nn bio, content was: 'Jeff Tudhope, a McMaster University student, works for the city of Brantford during the summers.' (and the only contributor was 'Solo1155')

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,709,311

` Due to the uncalled for personal slurs that you feel the need to keep coming up with (showing your own 'intelligence'), I am not going to waste anymore time trying to gove elaborate replies, as you clearly just like to annoy, other than to just refresh that you are a liar. To get the total you claimed (above 250m) you would have had to at least to have add those totals twice (like Robdubar did in his analysis (see it above) ) and you made no point to correct him, so if you were not saying that, then why not mention that to him in your disscusion. Also, you're mention of the dribs abd drabs of info was to try and beef up the sources (there would be no other reason to mention it) , however, you didn't pull the wool over anyones eyes. I could go on (again) about your lies, such as claiming I changed this page and the contents of our discussion, but then my posts would end up looking as ludicrous (not to mention ridiculous) as yours, so I'll just simmer and leave the ``venom`` and insults for you, as you excell at that (not a compliment).`

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

38,709,802

Again - it is obvious what is happening. I've contacted Jimbo Wales, since it seems that the more I apply his principles, the more some here think that these principles are not real. I suggest that they are - including his guidelines on not biting newcomers which many of you purelu ignore outright - along with several principles. This block is unwarranted and not justified.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,710,786

such clique behavior and should be aware that others are watching, and recording events as they proceed

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,711,336

`What do you mean`` deceptive edit summaries?`` Prove this assertion. I would appreciate that if you are to make accusations, that you also prove these accusations. I add edits, I write on edit summaries, and I cite references & notes as sources. What is ``deceptive`` about that? `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,714,520

`My behavior, certainly as a newcomer to Wikipedia has never been destructive, nor am I a vandal. I am a veteran journalist, writer, and editor with many years of experience. Though I've made mistakes as a Wikipedia newcomer, I am not oblivious to the attempts by some to make a mountain out of a molehill in this short a time I've been a member of Wikipedia. As an example, I was recently blocked without knowledge of this being done, and with no proof as to the reason but citing ``edit warring`` which I did not partake in. Moreover, the more I cite sources that are verifiable, and the more I read, and apply Jimbo Wales Wikipedia principles & guidelines, the more trouble newcomers seem to get into with what appears to be a clique of POVers, and ``revert warriors`` who take the honest mistakes of newcomers, and turn them into immediate accusations, use of pronfanity, and the ``one-way`` pastes of comments from me onto RFC & arbitration pages - taken out of context, without adding their OWN comments on edit summaries, and talk pages. I find this curious - since, to prove that a person is doing such a thing as they say - revert warring - and being ``disruptive`` in honest writign & editing, and citing sources, and references, that some such as Ruud, Bunchofgrapes, and others, would find it useful not to add their own comments which, if arbitration members can find them - contain a hostile tone, reject attempts to work together, are mean, avoid sourcing themselves, with their own entries very much POV while ``revert warring`` without first reading, or seeing the sources cited. This has happened many times with me in just over one month and I just got here. Some on the RFC page who signed have even resorted to deleting their comments to fit their accusatory assertions on Theodore7 - but pasting my comments as one-liners - and sentences as ``proof`` of my being disruptive? If this is the case, then why do they not add their own comments, and my return comments in context? Doing this - cutting, and pasting my words OUT of context to then fit into their accusations - is what is going on, and this only makes more suspect their own Wikipedia edits; which, are very weakly sourced (if at all) despite my doing so, and asking others to do so in accordance with Wikipedia principles, and the advice of some Wikipedia administrators who were kind enough to help me without biting a newcomer - nor making immediate accusations designed to disrupt themselves. For instance, Bunchofgrapes made several ``reverts`` on materials I added sources to - and then turned to make rude comments on edit summaries. I asked him to please not do this. It seems more common to not cite sources and to ``revert war`` - a term I did not know existed before joining Wikipedia. It seems that many of the crew who complain so much about the newbie Theodore7 have been ``revert warring`` for some time. I just stumbled onto some rather neferious POVing, and ``reverters`` who throw out that claim onto others if they do not agree with something that is counter to their own point of view. This is why citing verifiable sources is important. However, some just seem to think Jimbo Wales' principles do not apply to them. I think different. I am new here, and I read, and am applying more of Wales' principles and guidelines as I go along - despite some who would laugh at this, and, if one is good enough to read through all the ``complaints`` about Theodore7 - other would mock Wales' principles & guidelines, and tell newcomers not to ``use`` him as a excuse, etc. This is the kind of thing that has been going on since I recently joined Wikipedia. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

38,715,226

` ``Is (substance) Poisonous?`` Everything is actually Toxic, it all depends on the AMOUNT of substance. Even Water can kill if you drink 7 gallons at once. Mercury metal - you MIGHT get away with holding some in your hand (BUT I DON'T RECCOMEND THAT), BUT Dimethylmercury will kill you if you get even one drop on your skin - see Karen Wetterhahn ....Joeylawn`

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

38,716,183

`:Great addition! I used a setTimeout(function, 0) to be able to call setSelectionRange inside the 'focus' event handler. — 2006-02-08 03:45Z `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

38,719,176

`. Some just make things up as if it substitutes for the truth, and use ``mistakes`` as ``proof`` of being ``disruptive.`` But, very few actually can cite facts, inaccurate edits, nor bother to even think about checking sources cited. It is much easier to ``complain about Theodore7`` and to ``revert`` since following Wikipedia's principles about biting newcomers is an ``excuse`` since it ``does not exist`` and ``does not happen`` to any newcomer. And, if they mention it - they are ``using`` it since it doesn't exist, etc., etc. This is just one of the many problems Wikipedia newcomers face with such people. It is so much easier not to care about any subject, nor to check sources (as I do as a journalist) and to find inaccurate and unfactual materials while avoiding POV. But, to play games, to have personality conflicts as if they actually know the people they are writing to. They avoid resolving matters peacefully, but highly enjoy creating fights, building molehills into mountains, and love throwing out wild accusations. They don't ask - they assume - they immediately accuse, then complain loudly. They take everthing personally - all the while - not reading, checking sources, nor citing sources themselves on the subjects in question but adding plenty of their own POV that is not neutral, nor cited with sources. If sources run counter to their POV - then they use ruses to attempt to divert attention: and ask for RFCs on Wikipedia members who just got here, and request arbitration to resolve situations they have not even started to resolve on their own - yet claiming that they have tried. Perhaps, if some spend much more time actually checking sources, citing them, and making sure that the encylopedic materials are factual then, the ``revert wars`` by some who want to re-write history to fit their own personal views would end, and Wikipedia could be that much more successful. So, if one is to gather evidence - show just where my edits are vandalism - where? I'd like to see it. Show my edit summaries. Show my edits, and don't cite my early mistakes as ``proof`` of being ``disruptive`` since I'd like to see someone claim they do not make mistakes themselves. Oh, one more thing. When a person defends themselves - try not to dismiss it as a ``diatribe`` - but actually read it in context and take responsbility for one's own ``claims`` against the person - in this case, a new member of Wikipedia. I've had enough of my comments being taken out of context, then pasted onto RFC and arbitration sections - and used as ``proof`` of me being a bad person, and disruptive. I say different, and have the right to defend myself against what I consider to be a classic case of biting Wikipedia newcomers. I will take credit for my honest mistakes, but not for accusations that are false. My evidence are the comments, and retorts, and my edits - which, are cited, and soucred. Any arbitrator who wants to know more about my edits and comments can feel free to ask, or to view my comments IN CONTEXT and not TAKEN OOUT OF CONTEXT by some who are doing the constant ``complaining.`` I see no proof of any infactual edits on my part. And, my early mistakes are just that - mistakes that most newcomers to Wikipedia make. That does not justify, say your own comments Bunchofgrapes, and those of the other ``revert warriors`` - who, in my opinion, are ruining Wikipedia. So, I've made inquiries elsewhere to make sure that perhaps this comes to an end, and that my case can be used as an example of what happens - negatively - to newcomers who run up against those who signed the RFC, and asked for arbitration. My evidence is there - my work to this time, my edits, sourcing, and using the Talk Pages - which I do not abuse, but use to add comments relevant to the subject at hand`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

38,724,613

H.J.M, 8th February 2006.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

38,725,513

==Adminship Vote== I want to sincerely thank you for voting on my adminship nomination. Whenever I mess up, please let me know. I want to learn from my mistakes so they don't become patterns. -

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

38,726,527

Numerically,according to the World Almanac 2005, only 350 million people worldwide are athiests. 700 million don't know what they believe. The rest- thats about 5 billion- believe in a God. You are way to complex to have been an accident. Something was behind this. Anyone who believes to the contrary is plain stupid. Mabye organized religon is corrupt- mabye even wrong or something but there IS a higher power out there.

2,006

false

user

random

test

false

38,729,336

Hey! You there! Stop this bullshit! I'll get you before I die! SUCK A DICK. MY DICK.

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

true

38,730,557

`== Bias == The ``article`` is very subjective, eg ``high quality``, and is therefore biased. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

38,730,883

`Complete rewrite of the list completed on 02/08/06. Updated to be in-line with the equivalent page on ja:wiki. Quite a few of the listings in the English version weren't included in the Japanese version, so I've checked for validity (most weren't needed) and left the others commented (not deleted). Many of them may be names of older geinin/acts so I'm going to try to find out as many as I can and write them back in, especially for manzai acts which have been removed over time from the Japanese list. If you are reinserting a name that is presently commented (that I couldn't find a source for) please include the kanji for the name as to make it searchable in Japanese. Also try to conform to the style of the page in order to make it easiest to find. English words used in Japanese are spelled in English, but Japanese words are never translated into English (at least on this page). E.g. ダチョウ倶楽部 is Dachō Club, not Ostrich Club or Ostrich Kurabu. The names are arranged in alphabetical order by surname, and they are all listed in English style. Names written in katakana with English meanings are translated, thus Robaato becomes Robert etc., and this is how I will be creating the article names as well. Names that don't appear to be in English name order probably are like that because a) it's not a person's name (it's the combi name) b) the gainin specifically uses that order in English, e.g. 所ジョージ (Tokoro George, not George Tokoro). Also, nicknames are not used, rather the full version of their most common name, e.g. Razor Ramon HG, not HG or Sumitani etc. In alphabetizing, macrons are ignored, so ``ō`` is treated as an ``o``, etc.`

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,733,767

::::Sounds good. But AFAIK, isn't the CWS open to the children of all visitors and members, regardless if they were offered or not?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,737,358

` :Not sure what the problem is. If someone types in ``Alexander Pope`` they get the philosopher’s article. But, if you feel strongly about it, list it at WP:AFD and see what the consensus is. — `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,742,714

` == Differentiating the deposement from the coup == In my last edit summary, I wrote: ``RV; the POV consists in failing to differentiate between the legitimate removal of Allende, and the *after the fact* refusual to relenquish martial law by Pinochet.`` The text redacted claimed: *``Although this call (referring the Resolution of August 22, 1973) for ``redirecting government activity toward the path of Law and ensuring the constitutional order of our Nation and the essential underpinnings of democratic coexistence`` was invoked to justify the September 11 coup, in retrospect that was clearly not the agenda of the coup.`` The oxymoric phrasing ``in retrospect... was clearly not`` is at best POV, and at worst, merely a redundancy (since ``in retrospect``, ie. after the fact, Pinochet clearly (did) not return power to the Chilean legislature after the legislature implored the military removal of Allende. What the passage fails to account for is that Allende's military ouster was implored by Resolution; the ``coup`` proper was a subsequent event, and consisted of Pinochet's refusal to return power back to civilian government. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,747,685

` == CAIR == It's interesting why people desire to list CAIR's ``hate site`` reference, when, if such POV is kosher, then it's equally kosher for CAIR-detractors to follow up with an examination of all the CAIR critters indicted, tossed in jail, deported, etc., for terrorist-associations, money-laundering, fraud, etc. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

38,747,921

` This page is dedicated to Penfold, the God of the Word ``Right``. We would like to thank him for saying this word - sometimes at the rate of thirty-five times per lesson - because it sustains life within this school. However, we would also like it very much if he fell down the stairs and died. Thank you and goodnight. `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

38,748,708

. :::: I prefer the article the size it is (ie. succinct), but would oppose merger if the justification for merger is that it reduces revert wars (since under that theory merger then represents appeasement to vandals).

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

38,750,878

Will do. It's quite interesting because they are some Mutyals in Pakistani Punjab also (have just been told) and they also allege the same. I'll let you know as soon as I find out. Interesting about the 'Yal' note with Brahmins. :Another point is that there is also another tribe called the 'Rutyal'. This actually tribe was displaced in Punjab approx 1800's during the Sikh conquests and their riyasat renamed Rutala/Ratala. (in recognition of it's old rulers) could they also be linked? The Rutyals were known as Rajas too around those parts. Have you heard of Rutyals? Im sure an Indian congressman is a Rutyal.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

38,757,880

The previous version of this page, now marked as a potential copyright violation, was contributed by the owner of the page that you're concerend about. I plan to notify him so he can come by and give permisison himself.

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

38,760,618

==Spelling== Re: toilet humour. Do not make arbitrary changes in spelling from British English to American English. This is against wikipedia policy.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

38,761,059

:Yeah, what the fuck are you wittering on about? If we did have a shortage of space, you're mindless, boring ramblings would would the first to go. You know this is a universal site? Just because you don't respect (or more likely understand) British laws doesn't mean they shouldn't be on here. Bloody yank, (yerr, mutter mutter) with yer hamburgers and yer sidewalks and yer inflexible, overrated constitutions and yer sneakers. And who, I ask you, WHO re-writes Fawlty Towers with Basil as a woman?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

38,765,382

I have replaced the word decimated by destroyed, since to decimate means to destroy 10% of something.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

38,766,191

` I just found this page and I feel like they could be talking about me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_faith I really am ``in good faith`` trying to post the correct information here! I just don't understand some of the terms you guys use and I'm totally lost with all this copyright stuff. And if the bio I wrote isn't something that is allowed to be posted, can you please point me in the right direction, so that I can learn how to write one that is suitable for this page? I really did read a few other bios and thought mine was OK to post here. Thanks for any help you can give me.`

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

38,766,690

` == Egon Zakrajšek == ... ``pioneer of computer science in Slovenia, texbooks for Z-23 assembler, structran`` According to wiki page on mr. Zakrajšek, he actually didn't write any program that made a difference... If every professor that ever wrote a textbook on programming or computer science edns up here this list will become too large and won't have any meaning. So, his name should be removed from this list... `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

38,773,294

== Capital of England? == Ive been lead to believe that Edward I held TWO parliaments there. One in 1300 and the other in 1307. Would that make Carlisle the English Capital city intead of London on those two dates?

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

38,773,384

To E4: Yes, GR is only a theory of gravity. When I was an undergrad in Physics it was just simply casually mentioned to us right in the classroom that GR is only a theory of gravity. - It puts things into perspective. - Stephan Hawking even states it in at least two of his popular books, that GR is only a theory of gravity, I emailed you the pages. - Fock and Keswani state it formally. Stephan Hawking, V. Fock, and H.G. Keswani all published this for a reason, it puts everything into proper perspective. It is extremely important that it be on the Poincare page here, to put Poincare into his rightful proper historical perspective. Please remove that ridiculous red tag, nothing justifies it.

2,006

false

article

random

test

false

38,773,560

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Frederick Douglass, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

38,778,665

` ==Here's ONE example of McNeight-speak== Your post to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment does not provide enough information so that anyone can review the threats and personal attacks that you claim were made by . If you want help, please at least tell me what talk page they were made on. Also, I can see that you have been uncivil and have engaged in personal attacks. You will get more assistance in Wikipedia with respect to uncivil treatment if you are civil yourself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Braaad QUOTE from McNeight: Wikipedia is a community. The focus is not on you or me, but the encyclopedia. Create as many user names as you want, but eventually your ``personality`` will come through. If you can't or won't interact with people in a normal manner (hint: take a look at meta:Don't be a dick and Wikipedia:Civility for some tips on human-human interaction), then get the fuck out. McNeight SIGNED! Because I'm not a bitter and petty authority-wannabe attention-freak coward. I think my favorite part is: ``...get the fuck out.`` Please protect me from this dangerous creature!! `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

38,780,707

`{| class=``messagebox standard-talk`` |- | |This discussion page may contain comments better considered as trolling, posted in order to prompt irate replies that can then be even further ridiculed, in turn. Before you post any reply, consider how you might minimize the effects of trollish comments. Simply ignoring certain comments may be the best option. |} Example of McNeight's 'trolling' is shocking: Wikipedia is a community. The focus is not on you or me, but the encyclopedia. Create as many user names as you want, but eventually your ``personality`` will come through. If you can't or won't interact with people in a normal manner (hint: take a look at meta:Don't be a dick and Wikipedia:Civility for some tips on human-human interaction), then get the fuck out. McNeight SIGNED! Because I'm not a bitter and petty authority-wannabe attention-freak coward. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

38,788,461

== Chadbryant once again == Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Wikipedia:Suspected_sockpuppets_of_Dick_Witham for details. Chadbryant is creating comments intended for no purpose other than to cause trouble or incite it in the first place. There is absolutely no need for these remarks, and I'm pretty sure they violate Wikipedia policy in some way. Is there something you can do to help stop this, please? Thanks.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

38,789,534

` ::Let's cut the bullshit, mmmkay? You are not ``detailing`` anything. This is just as sad and pathetic as your ``FAQ`` you created out of your obsession over my person. ::And you want to talk about removing content to cover up abuse? Why do you continually revert ? Or the 24.*.*.* IP that follows in same? As pointed out, you can't have it go both ways, Chad. ::Note for admins: Please be aware that since Mr. Bryant's abuse is now known by many users but few admins, he has taken to vandalism and abuse in a blatant and aggressive account. My accounts are not generally ``blocked on sight,`` and I would dare Mr. Bryant to prove this otherwise even has stated that he does not do this. `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

38,790,176

` ==brainhell== Thanks Robert. I signed my comment with four tildes, at least the one that appeared on my own page. I apologize if I posted it elsewhere in the wrong pace, or without a signature. I see that Lucky 6.9's user page now says only ``Vacation time...`` and displays a stress meter. His user talk page says ``Wikistress is building. I, therefore, have left the building for a brief time.`` I see no acknowledgment that he realizes that he lost his temper. This in your inference. But even were that true, and despite his apology to me, and his promise not to delete my posts (without addressing what he'll do to the posts of others), he has shown himself temperamentally unsuited to administrate. It's quite likely to happen again. I respect your view that ``I think that would be a mistake on our part that would be comparable to his mistake in losing his temper.`` However, I disagree. This administrator is a hazard to the Wikipedia community and I request that you go ahead and request to have him de-adminned, according to the procedure. I will do my best to post this to your talk page and not your user page. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

38,790,519

` ::::Note for the record that Mr. Bryant has not acknowledged (for now, at least) his various immature behavior and blatant abuse involving . I have NOT acknowledged ``Dick Witham`` at all I don't know where this obese oaf gets that from. Once again, I note that he claims sockpuppets are ``blocked on sight`` yet provides no evidence to the contrary. Mr. Bryant is constantly defacing user pages with the sockpuppet tag, and has a history of abuse of his own that would rival the worst Wikipedians. Actually, blocked Mr. Bryant for abuse, then allowed him to be unblocked under condition he stop engaging in such behavior. Obviously, this has not happened. `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

38,791,072

February 2006 (UTC) :It should be noted that Chadbryant is currently engaging in an edit war that is a clear violation of the condition of your unblocking of his person. 18:03, 8

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

38,794,936

(UTC) :Canada has college football. 18:33, 8 February 2006

2,006

true

article

random

test

false