dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
40,042,103	*UKDoctor hereby publicly apologizes to David Ruben !!! Thank You for being ethical.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
40,047,291	Do you have something against pigs?	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
40,051,396	Getting a job is capitalism.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
40,053,907	Wow, that quote says almost exactly the same words I wrote. I'm a genius.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
40,056,658	==Hurricane Winds?== Right now there are wicked high winds in New England! I wonder if there Hurricane force winds. I've seen some pretty big live branches break off. I could not do much working offline until now. Does anybody else have wicked high winds?	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
40,057,325	i don't see where any of the book references have anything to do with yugos. i guess the books may have yugo references in them, but if they do, that should be so stated, exactly, or else the refernces to books is POV and unverified. and who is this conscensous on the porsche thing? who forms the conscensous. if i and other people with no real knowledge about programming start an article, and wipe out any corrections, as your editors have do here, do they get to form the conscensous? and if you, who are an expert on the subject edit it, and they roll it back, is that okay with you? you can not have website claiming to be fact. yet that is compiled by people with a Npov, with an axe to gring, or who repeat rumors, affecting peoples lives and livlehoods. this is what wiki editors did to John Seigenthaler. i am sure you a familiar with that. i used to live in san antonio, and being an anglo, i have a point of view on racism in SA. should i pubish an article, or edit an article on sa? i could prove that it is a problem. but i wouldn't do that, because i am not a expert on race relations, or have a degree in sociology, so i don't have a right to pubish that as fact as wiki publishes articles about people and things. you can not just let a bunch of people publish what ever they think in a public forum where some people are going to take it as truth because you call your self an encylopedia. and wiki articles are blindly republished as truth in othe online content. so it is not my legal threats that matter. it will be resolved on a much higher level that mine. this whole thing is why bill gates doesn't make windows open source. wouldn't that make your job so much fun, when anyone can change the operating system at any second?	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
40,069,778	` :Mark Alexander, in the time between 12:35 and 16:52 (GMT, I presume), I didn't troll at all. If there was a trolling action that I don't remember doing, would you care to let me know, please? :Not only that but I didn't know making a redirect and asking about it was trollsome (Really, I didn't). Where on Wikipedia's wide range of Policy pages does it say doing just that is trolling? (How did you know my IP belonged to me, btw? What tool can I use on this site to make that discovery?) :Also, I read the article Internet Trolling more thoroughly and still didn't pick up where it talks about a situation even close to what you're talking about. If it's indeed there and I missed it, can you highlight that part of the article for me please? :Finally, what you did was akin to a police officer giving a warning at a traffic stop, and then 4 hours later, appearing at the front door of the motorist's home giving a ``hard ticket`` and saying, ``I'm sorry but I've changed my mind and decided to give you an actual fine that you need to pay for by this date.`` That admin action sounds questionable unless there's a policy change that allows this sort of thing. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,072,136	the drone-like impulse to generate	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
40,073,323	` (posted by ``Imam Mehdi``)`	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
40,083,970	== school uniform == if arguements againt are POV then so are the ones for it	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
40,085,630	*Oppose - These articles can stand alone, and have been standing alone just fine. Merging them would result in an extremely long article.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
40,090,019	` ::::::Giovanni, you are jumping to conclusions. I have absolutely no relationship of any kind with Jbetak, and have never, to the best of my knowledge, sent him a message or received one from him. You are obviously confusing him with Jdavidb, who posted a message on my talk page this evening, to which I have responded. I have a lot of respect for Jdavidb, as a very courteous, balanced editor, who respects NPOV, and does not edit war. I have never met him outside of Wikipedia, but I did read a message he posted on some blog asking people to join Wikipedia nearly a year ago, and I joined partly if not wholly as a result of that. There is a big difference between on the one hand two independent editors meeting at Wikipedia and later discovering as a happy coincidence that one of them arrived in response to what might be seen as an ``ad`` placed by another, and on the other hand an editor running out of reverts, getting his wife to join and revert to his version, and sending camouflage messages to her talk page to give other editors the impression that they had never met, while suggesting that Str1977 and KHM03 were sockpuppets, that I was a meatpupptet, and using the words ``sneaky`` and ``hypocrisy`` about me. For the record, while I think highly of Jdavidb, we hardly ever edit the same articles. His appeal on a blog can not be compared to the comedy that you and Belinda played. `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
40,100,050	` ::When one says ``right eye dominant`` they are not implying that the right eye is superior to the left eye. The same applies to the medal table; it is gold medal dominant, as opposed to a traditional ranking system. It's not complicated. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,100,269	` ::::A ``comment`` is an annotation, which by definition must convey a meaning. If I am not altering the meaning of someone's annotation, their ``comment``, then I am not breaching Wikipedia policy. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,100,685	:::The word 'dominant' is only loaded if the beholder is biased. It is used frequently in ecology, genetics, and even music.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
40,101,537	::::Would it be in violation of Wikipedia policy if I were to append a character to the end of a user's comment for the purpose of a footnote, such as an asterisks?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,101,621	This would not be making any cosmetic or substantive alteration to the comment.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,112,093	I am not certain how to work it in personally, but if someone is doing a big update it would be worth mentioning Declan Sinnot somewhere in the article, he has long been Christy's recording and touring partner and, I believe, deserves a mention in the article - I am pretty sure he played lead/electric guitar on the Ride On album and many of the records after that, but perhaps someone who has access to the CD notes can confirm that and add it - don't wanna add anything to the article I am not certain of!	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
40,114,696	==Thank you for your efforts.== I for one thank you for your efforts in sticking with the Rajput page and although a lot of baseless unpleasantries were focussed on you by the extremist Hindus, I am sure the real Hindu brothers and sister on Wikipedia saw through the real genuine effort you displayed in trying to resolve this difficult issue. The arbitration is over and Im glad the result was seen for what it was, a bunch of childish bigots not prepared to work with others for the betterment of enlightening others on our culture and traditions. Unfortunately, I think Rajputs are now seen more as a quarelling bunch rather than what we try and say we are, lol. In fact I think this is an example of whats been going on between Rajputs for the past few centuries, they never unite and probably never will. Thank you once again and keep up the good work friend. ) Raja	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
40,121,574	*I put the section back. It is relevant information.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
40,121,959	== Is anyone from Morphett Vale here? == Hey, just wondering, is there anyone who lives in Morphett Vale on the site?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,132,232	==Lewes== The county town of Sussexs is not quite so straightfoward. Assizes were held in both Chichester and Lewes, and the county town swapped between them several times. I don't have the details on this though.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
40,144,373	==Bush Templates== I tried to open a diologue with you, but i guess your not having it. I guess accoutability is not a big consideration on wiki? nor is consensus for that matter... Your a wonderful person. good day to you sir.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
40,144,825	:Sherlock, as it states earlier in the article, was Chapmans lover. David Sherlock to be precise.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
40,146,110	:I collect old Pears Cyclopaedias. I'm just pulling a few editions of the shelf as we speak. The 1898 edition shows the county town of Sussex as Chicester, as does the 1927 edition. .... okay the county town is shown as Chichester up until 1935/1936 the next edition I have is 1939 and the county town is shown as Lewes. I don't have any further details.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,155,131	` ==It seems that many users have had problems with harassment and vandalism== , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users.`	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
40,157,357	` :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “’’’’’I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?’’’’’” describes your actions as “’’’’’ rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.’’’’’” describes you as “’’’’’ the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia’’’’’” while encouraging you to “’’’’’ Please stop this childish behavior.’’’’’”. had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken.`	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
40,157,807	Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia as we drive for print or DVD publication; see the welcome page to learn more. Thanks.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
40,160,069	` == Anti-Semitism? I'm outta here! == Archangel White Tiger: A few words, meow: Oh, so I was banned for quoting the Torah! Excellent, the admins here are banning for ``personal attack on gays``, when you recite The Words of The G-d, but no one was banned for saying, that holocaust victims were gays and gypsies! More than six million people died in holocaust just because they were Jews, the statement at which I got angered is was of accusing martyrs in concentration camps in sodomy, which IS one of the greatest sins, according to BIBLE - Old Testament, TaNaKh and the New Testament, B’rit Chadashah of Messiah Yeshua Ben Elochim, Jesus Christ the Son of G-d, that Ta Bu Shi Da Yu never tried to read... These are pure actions of anti-Semitic and Heretic propaganda, some sort of modern faschism... * * * For the last words (and I'm outta here) I will recite Bible... The reason I was banned is for ``surely`` confirming these Words: Leviticus 20:13 ``If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them.`` * * * And this will be my good-bye to all nazis here: ;) Matthew 7:6 ``Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, or they will trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.```	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
40,160,270	` , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users. :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?” describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.” even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior. Dear Administrators: ``I would like to file a complaint against user ``nescio`` for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ``Police State``. User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples `` Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet`` and ``Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional``, as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail. Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time. Sincerely yours, User Winston Smith describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.” had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken. ::As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again. `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
40,161,432	::My addition to talk page is not a personal attack. If it was, he would certainly know of the attack. I simply placed a request for discussion as to why continually harasses and defames other wikipedia users.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false
40,162,135	==Inactive== How long should someone not appear/compete until they're considered inactive? I think Vito should put on the inactive list.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,162,264	:Well, you can't expect much from a revisionist, let alone how to spell ! ;-D -	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,163,184	:I have no idea how to upload pictures, sorry. I do have a few pictures though. What kind of one would be suitable?	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
40,164,639	::::Just because you say it is a personal attack does not make it so in reality. Maybe you are wondering why I have not signed in under my user name? It is because I know this issue will be a sensitive one in which user's opposing will be blocked by moderators who are, in effect, bitch (like yourself).	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	true
40,164,689	::It's a good thing you have adminship isn't it?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,165,012	` :::Oh, so I was blocked from editing everything but my own page, which is the location of the alleged ``personal attacks,`` anyone can see that this makes little sense. If you are ever subject to an RFA, I'll be there. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,166,065	` OK, Please feel free to describe how the following is a personal attack, if you can support that accusation: ==It seems that many users have had problems with harassment and vandalism== , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users. :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?” : describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.” : even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior. :Dear Administrators: :``I would like to file a complaint against user ``nescio`` for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ``Police State``. User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples `` Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet`` and ``Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional``, as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail. :Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time. :Sincerely yours, :User Winston Smith : describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.” : had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. '' :It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken. :::As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again. `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
40,169,589	==Sphere-cone paragraph== ~~MV~~ It is mentioned in this paragraph that the MK-2 Rv used a radiatively cooled TPS based upon a metallic heat shield, but the Mk-2 used the heat-sink concept. It seems that unlike the ablative or thermal soak TPS, the heat-sink does not work as a heat shield, it only conducts the heat away form the shell of the RV. Was the mention of a metallic heatshield referring to the heatsink or does the heatsink concept also have a heatshield besides the copper heatsink?	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
40,169,767	== GWB archive is an archive == so, don't edit it	2,006	false	user	random	train	false
40,170,512	:I added a link back to RHCP... What else needs to be done?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,171,017	Neither are objective editors, and both have a pov, and agenda.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
40,172,852	editors who have reverted without just cause or used numerical superiority to revert pages without discussion	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
40,173,182	Less than acceptable intelligence	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,178,178	` ==A Blog Or Not a Blog, that is the question== Editor Canderra argues that the sources below are blogs and has deleted the material. The material is still not present in the article but no other editor has bothered to confirm or deny these assertions (For whatever reason). Please take your time now to review the section and check the sources for yourself, lets see if they really are blogs. :New York Sun writer, Williams Myers, labels Che as a ``sociopathic thug``. Other US newspaper critics have made similar remarks. They point out that Che Guevara was responsible for the torture and execution of hundreds of people in Cuban prisons, and the murder of many more peasants in the regions controlled or visited by his guerrilla forces. Contrary to Che supporters, these critics also argue that Che was a blundering tactician with no recorded combat victories. They claim that Che failed medical school in Argentina and that there is no evidence that he earned a medical degree. They note that Che murdered individuals on dubious grounds and took their property, seized private manors for himself, and distributed property among communist bureaucrats rather than the peasants. The also state that he not only oversaw the prison, over which he ordered the execution of hundreds if not thousands of Cubans, but also helped institute forced labor camps when volunteerism failed. Finally, these critics believe that Che was a major failure at managing the Cuban economy as he ``oversaw the near-collapse of sugar production, the failure of industrialization, and the introduction of rationing—all this in what had been one of Latin America’s four most economically successful countries since before the Batista dictatorship.``,, :Some critics, such as Che-Mart, have merchandised their dislike of Che Guevara by marketing t-shirts poking fun at both Che Guevara and his supporters, for example, pointing out what they percieve as an irony: Che Guevara as one of capitalisms hotest selling images. *They are not blogs. Put the material back in.`	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
40,182,849	to the section that seem to be in most dispute	2,006	false	article	random	test	false
40,183,579	:1) India DID 'arose above demographic distinctions to unite peoples of various geographic, economic, ethnic, linguistic and religious backgrounds' I'm sad I have to continue to point this out! If India did not exist my Telugu speaking Mother would never have met my Tamil Father and I would never have been born! THIS IS NOT A POV. THIS IS FACT! :2) As its related to you point 1 and filled with sceptical people like you I have get to basics... :- 80.5% Hindus, home to the third-largest population of Muslims in the world (13.4%), Christians (2.3%), Sikhs (1.84%), Buddhists (0.76%), Jains (0.40%), Jews, Zoroastrians, Ahmadi-muslims, and Bahá'ís, not to mention a vast number of tribal communities and other ethnic groups. Home to two major linguistic families: Indo-Aryan (74% of the population) and Dravidian (spoken by about 24%) :23 official languages. 1,652 dialects/mother-tongues. This article will point out 570 princely states each with their own autonomous government. Today this sounds just facinating but back then, when the british left, it must have been done-right scary! NOT POV, just plain reasoning! :3)Not every terrorism refer to kashmir. We have had, and still have, the LTTE, the Maoist guerrilas called naxalites like People's War Group & CPI-maoist and then Ranvir Sena. The Bodo Liberation front and other groups in the north-east, the Khalistan movement and the list goes on. We have time and again 'put down terrorism by force' it is simply a necessity. A lot of people (policemen, army and paramilitary, polititian and heads of states) have died doing this. For th last time NOT A POV! :Finnaly I must plead with you look at things with a little less negetivism. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with the first para or the statements you pointed out. Disagreeing with what you read doesn't make it POV. And please sign your name! :	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
40,185,280	:I hereby wish to thank you for your continuous efforts in protecting our templates from those gutless vandals who get their sick kicks off removing them. May the Force be with you ! -	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
40,185,736	:You sir (or madam, or whatever the hell you are), are a gutless vandal who gets sick kicks off vandalizing other users' pages by forcefully deleting their templates. A hypocrite and a vandal is what you are. A plague upon you and upon all those who function like you ! Mark my words, our resistance is far from over ! You have been warned, cur ! -	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
40,188,142	I have gone through the entire history section in an effort to cut down the details and provide just a compendium of Pakistani history. Feel free to edit, add, and especially remove information if you feel it is needed. I hope we can all agree on this version, or a future version. Following this change, I think a peer review is long overdue.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
40,188,392	== POV == 'Currently, the issue of Srinagar, having become an integral part of India, stands settled beyond any doubt, in spite of certain insurgent elements operating from the soil of India, as also from outside the borders of India.' I think much more needs to be mention about the insurgency... dealing with it in a single sentence is bypassing a major issue, and disrespect for the many people, both soldiers and civilains, who have died due to the conflict there... All I'm askng for is extending the history of the city discribe what happened there in the last 20 years. Another point is there no mention about the impact of the insurgency on tourism in the history section or about it limping back on growing domestic tourists population. : 'truth always triumphs' (written on the Indian national emblem)	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
40,191,215	My impression of the 1800s in science is that energy and mass were regarded as totally different concepts - I'm pretty confident their unification was seen as revolutionary.... I'll ask Harald88 to take a look too....	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
40,196,008	All right, Mr and Mrs IP_Address, we all got your point: how backwards and uneducated the Romanians, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Ukrainians, etc. were, and how grateful the poor bastards should've been for beeing ruled by the Hungarian elite. However, your bashing of the minorities in the Hungarian Kingdom has nothing to do with this article (in case you haven't noticed some of us are trying to improve the article.) So, unless you decide to contribute something, please look for another audience.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
40,197,100	` == Wikipedia Admins Use Gestapo Tactics to Enforce their Agenda == Greetings, it is Germany 1939 all over again. Admin Mark Sweep and user TastyCakes conspire to silence another Wikipedia user that they find objectionable. After being called a ``Dunb Ass`` by user TastyCakes, and without any warning, Admin Mark Sweep, a former US Marine, has used his abilities as an admin to infinitely block my user priviledges. And all based on his personal dislike of my username, and his comradeship with user TastyCakes who were offended by a few harmless WORDS!!! Welcome to the world of those few who are endowed with superior genetics, and the ability to control what we read and learn!!! HerrGoebbles`	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
40,204,248	Merge This article can and should stand on its own.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
40,211,759	== hey == you have a giant penis. is that what allows you to moderate wiki so well? 8==============D>>>>>>><><>	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
40,212,794	Go ahead, block me. When Jossi says Rawat never claimed to be the Perfect Master when that is exactly how he pushed himself on the world and all us hapless followers for years he's a liar and I'll call him that everytime. If the only way you can deal with that is by blocking me, quit the threats and just do it.	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
40,215,106	` == Uncylopedia == The Uncylopedia entry for Star Trek include the following: Ever notice how the 3 white male captains get the best ships in the fleet, but the black captain gets the ghetto space station and the woman captain gets lost on her very first mission? Obviously, some people at Paramount have been burning crosses. After this was noticed, Sisko was given the Defiant, the most powerful warship of the fleet, since Paramount was defying the popular opinion of them as racist bastards. Is this merely a cheap ``Uncylopedic`` gag or does this hit on a genuine fault worthy of criticism? `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
40,218,063	::I'm free to clean up/blank my talk page at any time. If you have a problem with this and choose to make an issue out of it, I will recreate this talk page on my user page to my liking. :::Also, when a comment is fallacious or emotive, it is so by fact not opinion; therefore the identification of such comments is not a personal attack. If you have a disorder that hinders logical ability, please let me know, otherwise adhere to Wikipedia's policy of neutral and factual analysis. :::Also, as erroneous as you may find them, posting discussion page rules is not a personal attack on anyone. I will cite your removal of them as administrative abuse.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,218,352	Yes, they are considered personal attacks by you; other than that happenstance, they aren't.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,219,107	` == User TastyCakes Superior Intellect Shines in Message == Greetings All!!! Once again, the user TastyCakes showcases her superior intellect and reasoning in her response. Had TastyCakes followed the history of the original edits to US History and Expansion, TastyCakes would have seen that HerrGoebbles was only trying to add new information regarding the brutal consequences of US government sanctioned practices, which are clearly stated at the US Department of State website under: ``Indian Treaties and the Removal act of 1830``. Instead, user TastyCakes and an admin MarkSweep took it upon themselves to block user HerrGoebbles with absolutely no warning. This seems to be an accepted practice on Wikipedia embraced by a few users and Admins who wish to control and block any possibility of discussion about reality. Welcome to The New World!!! HerrGoebbles`	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
40,219,664	Board Rules 1. Fallacious comments will be marked as such with an asterisk (*) at my sole discretion. Fallacious comments may include: dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid, dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter, Ignoratio Elenchi, argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad verecundiam, Circulus in Probando, Non Sequitur, post hoc ergo propter hoc, Plurium Interrogationum, and others. 2. Please sign all comments.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
40,224,166	February 2006 (UTC) I knew it didn't take place in New York, but I recognized that the sign was black, had white lettering with a line across the top, so I knew it was an immitation, thanks anyway. 01:52, 19	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
40,227,076	== NFL Coaches == Hi Kareeser, I overheard your message on and reverted the problematic edits to Template: NFL Coach and Mike Sherman. Let me know if there are any lingering problems. ×	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
40,234,422	== Windows userbox == Your modifications to the Windows 95 userbox messed up the template and thus every page that it was in, so I reverted them.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,234,580	== English versions == There is not need to change from one English varient to another when editing articles, it serves no purpose. Wikipedia policy is to keep the language as it lies, so in the future, please check to see if the spelling you are correcting is actually a mistake, or if it's someone from another country spelling correctly.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
40,240,919	::Why? Please reply on my talk page.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
40,247,291	` #Please do not remove warnings from your talk page and/or replace it with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
40,250,717	Polaris, Wiki does not prohibit the use of POV sources, that is afterall how we get all our info anyway. What wiki wants is to present pov material in npov fashion which means citing the source and informing readers that this is the opinion or belief of the source. These sources have a different pov than most of the editors adding to the Che page, the pov of these people is that Che was a good man. If we delete opposition to this we do in fact promote a pov without actually saying so. Canderra, if you read the sources, one of them mentions that there is dispute over the battle of Santa Clara stating that it may not actually have been a battle at all but a pre-arranged surrender. Nevertheless these are reputable sources and they are NOT blogs, nor are they self published. IRI, HNN, and FPM are not blogs, they are not self publications, they hire people to research and write and or pay scholars and journalists for their material. In regards to Cuban economics there are multiple sources that mention the pre revolution economy and the post economy...if Milton Friedm et. al. are correct it doesnt take long to ruin an economy with communism. Lennin managed to nearly ruin Russia in 18 months. AT anyrate, if the claims are dubious the burdon of proof is now on you to say otherwise. You can't just delete the information if you yourself have no cited counterpoints and no good reasons other than protecting your own POV. (Gibby )	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,251,013	` As far as dubious sources, this page has most of its sources coming from various Che biographies written by friends and appologists for them...this gives a pov. If you leave out my section, then almost everything else from the page should be deleted as well. Furthermore, if my sources are ``dubious at best`` what kind of dubious pov is giong to be provided when quoting the thoughts and words of Che directly? Do you really think Che would criticize himself? If supporting Che and being Che are the only qualifications for being a proper source for this article (And that seems to be what is being said here) then we have violated the Wiki NPOV rules...quite blatantly. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,256,045	`==Cleanup tag== This looks like someone's essay cut-and-pasted including their ``Personal conclusion`` and starting statements with ``I``. This should either be deleted or totally rewritten. `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
40,259,303	` I think by making this article reflect a keynesian ``liberal`` view point you ruin the very purpose of this article...which is to provide information on a liberal view point that is at great odds with keynesian macroeconomics. ( )`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,273,255	== ADMIN MARKSWEEP TO THE RESCUE == MarkSweep lives and breathes for the moments when he can control the little world of Wikipedia. Rules of engagement apply to all those who partake of Wikipedia, alas MarkSweep is immune to these regulations. He blocks and deletes and derides at will! Who will rise up and denounce MarkSweep for the controlling little man that he is? Will no one have the courage? Block, censor, delete, replace, etc. etc. etc. MarkSweep, you are a man of little faith, and even less courage. The real Josef Goebbles would be proud to call you son!! HerrGoebbles	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
40,279,167	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ==Harris Michael Jewelry== An article you started, Harris Michael Jewelry, has been proposed for deletion. An editor didn't feel this was a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article. Please review WP:NOT and Wikipedia:Importance for elaboration on why Wikipedia must reject certain articles. If you feel the subject meets these criteria, please edit the article to demonstrate that more clearly. If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the {{prod}} template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If the tag is removed but the article isn't improved, the article may still face deletion through debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
40,281,680	:::I have one of him Naked... When he had green hair.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
40,285,264	:I'm also removing the following 2 sentances: ::The water of the Dead Sea contains 21 minerals including magnesium, calcium, bromine and potassium. Twelve of these are found in no other sea or ocean, and some are recognized for imparting a relaxed feeling, nourishing the skin, activating the circulatory system and for easing rheumatic discomfort and metabolic disorders. :If somebody can provide a verifiable source for them, please feel free to provide it an replace the lines.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
40,307,814	::::Awwww dang ( I have a normal one. How'd I go about uploading it, or giving it to you so you could upload it?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,313,711	Keynes merged economics into politics and politicians abused it...unfortunatly economics does not rule politics. I do not believe anything Keynes wrote about can be considered liberal, period. He may of thought that but I think you should ask von Mises, Hayek, and Friedman about that. They would tell you that what Keynes wrote about smacked liberalism in the face. The only reason Keynes can be considered liberal is because populists, politicians, and the media have conflated them together...ignorance or practicality, I'm not deciding. But government interventions effecting supply and demand, prices etc, are not liberal economic policies. Thus not classical liberal. and, get it straight, Keynes diverged from liberalism. ( )	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
40,315,468	== THE GODS == It's because I have sold my soul to the dark Lord, to whom I must always answer. But thanks for the flowers )	2,006	false	user	blocked	test	false
40,316,002	I done a bigjob on your mother's tits	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
40,316,561	The dumbest things on wikipedia are the people who contribute regularly	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
40,316,601	I tasted your mum. it was super.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
40,317,087	: You surely do have nothing better to do. That's cute	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
40,318,295	Which page was I vandalising now you rectum faced pygmy?	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
40,318,800	You are the dirty, fetid son of a whoremonger's bitch.	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
40,319,168	Hey, this is JaysCyYoung. Thank you very much for the kind welcome to Wikipedia as a registered user. I appreciate your offer of help. I have, however, been editing and creating many articles ananymously for quite some time now, so I don't believe that will be necessary. Your warm welcome is greatly appreciated though! Jameson.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,319,204	: I'm afraid that this theory is one several and no theory on their origin has yet been proven as fact.	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
40,326,202	` :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.`	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
40,329,032	` When I discussed with on a private IRC session about any post made between 12:35 and 16:52, he pointed the following out to me: (partial chat exerpt from the other day) mark_sweep you posted on markalexander's talk page at 13:40 UTC mark_sweep then at 13:42 UTC you posted to the reference desk: mark_sweep http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities&diff;=prev&oldid;=39874588 Shultzii Those posts you just pointed out- they're troll posts? (I don't see how they are.) Shultzii They look pretty innocent to me mark_sweep that's what makes them troll posts Shultzii Making a wikilink and pointing it out? scratches head Shultzii I'll take a 2nd look at his talk page... mark_sweep the original question may look innocent, but it was pretty pointless; that's why people consider it trolling mark_sweep here's the thing Shultzii Oh about the thought of naming a new city of Hoeryong somewhere in the US? mark_sweep yes, but it's not even that mark_sweep here's the thing Shultzii Go ahead. Taking food out of microwave. mark_sweep an admin asks you to stop mark_sweep more or less accusing you of being a troll mark_sweep you continue with the same thing you were doing mark_sweep which only confirms his suspicion All I was doing was disambiguating what someone was thinking. They misconstrued ``Hoeryong`` as a Dutch phrase (meaning ``Child of a w``). In the ref desk entry from the beginning, I meant what if I named a new town after a Korean city? Therefore, I had to tell that ``Hoeryong`` in the way it was intended would be named after a Korean city, not a Dutch phrase. Not once did it ever even cross my mind that this was a continuation of a trollish act. MarkAlexander misconstrued it as such, so can someone please lift the block early?`	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
40,336,945	==Tidy up== I am wondering. This article is focussing on Rajastani exploits of rajputs, but we know rajputs had kingdoms in Punjab also and if we were to include ALL such exploits for fairness then we would have an overly HUGE page. In it's present form it's already too long and not enough elaboration on an actual rajput and the different clans. We could possible include where each tribe ruled majorly in it's times instead as a reference rather than an entire 'article within an article'? Im also removing the point that no further Muslim conquests took place in the 9th century due to the formidable reputation of the rajputs as there is no proof of this from the middle eastern side to corroborate this, so it's more a 'proud assumption' rather than proof I think? Please feel free to correct me guys. I've also done a tidy up of 'language' in the history section of where unencyclopedic words such as 'treacherously' and 'crushed' have been replaced suitably. Can other editors help in this respect with other sections? Looking better guys, let's keep up the good work.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,351,711	:An linux port of DC++ is listed under External links, it could also be mentioned in the article, feel free to add it… :The clients you listed are in the Direct Connect (file sharing) article, where they belong. –	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
40,357,241	`rules...thanks. And nothing i've posted on MY talk page violates any of those rules. I've not said you're a ``bad editor`` i've not said ``you're a troll`` i simply stated fact. That for some reason unknown to me...you have a hard on for changing my talk page. Which, based on recent history, is a fact. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
40,357,735	== HELLO == Nobs nobs nobs nobs nobs nobs nobs	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
40,358,529	This page should be deleted. Star Fox Armada was always going to be a GameCube game. Even the articles at the bottom of the page corroborate this.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
40,359,249	The Alpha version had multiplayer. The Beta version did not.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
40,361,413	== It says under admissions requirements that men must have one testicle == I looked at West Point's website and couldn't find anything confirming this. It needs a source.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
40,362,008	Could someone please put the ORIGINAL image on this page so people could see it in case they look it up after being confused about a reference to it?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
40,365,173	== World record attempt == I added an entry under history about the recent world record attempt. I will add the final counts once verification comes back from Guiness. I also added information about the controversy that North Dakota created about the record attempt. Feel free to move this information or edit it.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
40,373,944	YOUR A FAGGG GET A LIFE	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	true
40,389,771	your mum know's nothin bout chechoslovakia	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false

40,042,103

*UKDoctor hereby publicly apologizes to David Ruben !!! Thank You for being ethical.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

40,047,291

Do you have something against pigs?

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

40,051,396

Getting a job is capitalism.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

40,053,907

Wow, that quote says almost exactly the same words I wrote. I'm a genius.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

40,056,658

==Hurricane Winds?== Right now there are wicked high winds in New England! I wonder if there Hurricane force winds. I've seen some pretty big live branches break off. I could not do much working offline until now. Does anybody else have wicked high winds?

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

40,057,325

i don't see where any of the book references have anything to do with yugos. i guess the books may have yugo references in them, but if they do, that should be so stated, exactly, or else the refernces to books is POV and unverified. and who is this conscensous on the porsche thing? who forms the conscensous. if i and other people with no real knowledge about programming start an article, and wipe out any corrections, as your editors have do here, do they get to form the conscensous? and if you, who are an expert on the subject edit it, and they roll it back, is that okay with you? you can not have website claiming to be fact. yet that is compiled by people with a Npov, with an axe to gring, or who repeat rumors, affecting peoples lives and livlehoods. this is what wiki editors did to John Seigenthaler. i am sure you a familiar with that. i used to live in san antonio, and being an anglo, i have a point of view on racism in SA. should i pubish an article, or edit an article on sa? i could prove that it is a problem. but i wouldn't do that, because i am not a expert on race relations, or have a degree in sociology, so i don't have a right to pubish that as fact as wiki publishes articles about people and things. you can not just let a bunch of people publish what ever they think in a public forum where some people are going to take it as truth because you call your self an encylopedia. and wiki articles are blindly republished as truth in othe online content. so it is not my legal threats that matter. it will be resolved on a much higher level that mine. this whole thing is why bill gates doesn't make windows open source. wouldn't that make your job so much fun, when anyone can change the operating system at any second?

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

40,069,778

` :Mark Alexander, in the time between 12:35 and 16:52 (GMT, I presume), I didn't troll at all. If there was a trolling action that I don't remember doing, would you care to let me know, please? :Not only that but I didn't know making a redirect and asking about it was trollsome (Really, I didn't). Where on Wikipedia's wide range of Policy pages does it say doing just that is trolling? (How did you know my IP belonged to me, btw? What tool can I use on this site to make that discovery?) :Also, I read the article Internet Trolling more thoroughly and still didn't pick up where it talks about a situation even close to what you're talking about. If it's indeed there and I missed it, can you highlight that part of the article for me please? :Finally, what you did was akin to a police officer giving a warning at a traffic stop, and then 4 hours later, appearing at the front door of the motorist's home giving a ``hard ticket`` and saying, ``I'm sorry but I've changed my mind and decided to give you an actual fine that you need to pay for by this date.`` That admin action sounds questionable unless there's a policy change that allows this sort of thing. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,072,136

the drone-like impulse to generate

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

40,073,323

` (posted by ``Imam Mehdi``)`

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

40,083,970

== school uniform == if arguements againt are POV then so are the ones for it

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

40,085,630

*Oppose - These articles can stand alone, and have been standing alone just fine. Merging them would result in an extremely long article.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

40,090,019

` ::::::Giovanni, you are jumping to conclusions. I have absolutely no relationship of any kind with Jbetak, and have never, to the best of my knowledge, sent him a message or received one from him. You are obviously confusing him with Jdavidb, who posted a message on my talk page this evening, to which I have responded. I have a lot of respect for Jdavidb, as a very courteous, balanced editor, who respects NPOV, and does not edit war. I have never met him outside of Wikipedia, but I did read a message he posted on some blog asking people to join Wikipedia nearly a year ago, and I joined partly if not wholly as a result of that. There is a big difference between on the one hand two independent editors meeting at Wikipedia and later discovering as a happy coincidence that one of them arrived in response to what might be seen as an ``ad`` placed by another, and on the other hand an editor running out of reverts, getting his wife to join and revert to his version, and sending camouflage messages to her talk page to give other editors the impression that they had never met, while suggesting that Str1977 and KHM03 were sockpuppets, that I was a meatpupptet, and using the words ``sneaky`` and ``hypocrisy`` about me. For the record, while I think highly of Jdavidb, we hardly ever edit the same articles. His appeal on a blog can not be compared to the comedy that you and Belinda played. `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

40,100,050

` ::When one says ``right eye dominant`` they are not implying that the right eye is superior to the left eye. The same applies to the medal table; it is gold medal dominant, as opposed to a traditional ranking system. It's not complicated. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,100,269

` ::::A ``comment`` is an annotation, which by definition must convey a meaning. If I am not altering the meaning of someone's annotation, their ``comment``, then I am not breaching Wikipedia policy. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,100,685

:::The word 'dominant' is only loaded if the beholder is biased. It is used frequently in ecology, genetics, and even music.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

40,101,537

::::Would it be in violation of Wikipedia policy if I were to append a character to the end of a user's comment for the purpose of a footnote, such as an asterisks?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,101,621

This would not be making any cosmetic or substantive alteration to the comment.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,112,093

I am not certain how to work it in personally, but if someone is doing a big update it would be worth mentioning Declan Sinnot somewhere in the article, he has long been Christy's recording and touring partner and, I believe, deserves a mention in the article - I am pretty sure he played lead/electric guitar on the Ride On album and many of the records after that, but perhaps someone who has access to the CD notes can confirm that and add it - don't wanna add anything to the article I am not certain of!

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

40,114,696

==Thank you for your efforts.== I for one thank you for your efforts in sticking with the Rajput page and although a lot of baseless unpleasantries were focussed on you by the extremist Hindus, I am sure the real Hindu brothers and sister on Wikipedia saw through the real genuine effort you displayed in trying to resolve this difficult issue. The arbitration is over and Im glad the result was seen for what it was, a bunch of childish bigots not prepared to work with others for the betterment of enlightening others on our culture and traditions. Unfortunately, I think Rajputs are now seen more as a quarelling bunch rather than what we try and say we are, lol. In fact I think this is an example of whats been going on between Rajputs for the past few centuries, they never unite and probably never will. Thank you once again and keep up the good work friend. ) Raja

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

40,121,574

*I put the section back. It is relevant information.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

40,121,959

== Is anyone from Morphett Vale here? == Hey, just wondering, is there anyone who lives in Morphett Vale on the site?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,132,232

==Lewes== The county town of Sussexs is not quite so straightfoward. Assizes were held in both Chichester and Lewes, and the county town swapped between them several times. I don't have the details on this though.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

40,144,373

==Bush Templates== I tried to open a diologue with you, but i guess your not having it. I guess accoutability is not a big consideration on wiki? nor is consensus for that matter... Your a wonderful person. good day to you sir.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

40,144,825

:Sherlock, as it states earlier in the article, was Chapmans lover. David Sherlock to be precise.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

40,146,110

:I collect old Pears Cyclopaedias. I'm just pulling a few editions of the shelf as we speak. The 1898 edition shows the county town of Sussex as Chicester, as does the 1927 edition. .... okay the county town is shown as Chichester up until 1935/1936 the next edition I have is 1939 and the county town is shown as Lewes. I don't have any further details.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,155,131

` ==It seems that many users have had problems with harassment and vandalism== , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users.`

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

40,157,357

` :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “’’’’’I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?’’’’’” describes your actions as “’’’’’ rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.’’’’’” describes you as “’’’’’ the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia’’’’’” while encouraging you to “’’’’’ Please stop this childish behavior.’’’’’”. had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken.`

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

40,157,807

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia as we drive for print or DVD publication; see the welcome page to learn more. Thanks.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

40,160,069

` == Anti-Semitism? I'm outta here! == Archangel White Tiger: A few words, meow: Oh, so I was banned for quoting the Torah! Excellent, the admins here are banning for ``personal attack on gays``, when you recite The Words of The G-d, but no one was banned for saying, that holocaust victims were gays and gypsies! More than six million people died in holocaust just because they were Jews, the statement at which I got angered is was of accusing martyrs in concentration camps in sodomy, which IS one of the greatest sins, according to BIBLE - Old Testament, TaNaKh and the New Testament, B’rit Chadashah of Messiah Yeshua Ben Elochim, Jesus Christ the Son of G-d, that Ta Bu Shi Da Yu never tried to read... These are pure actions of anti-Semitic and Heretic propaganda, some sort of modern faschism... *** *** *** For the last words (and I'm outta here) I will recite Bible... The reason I was banned is for ``surely`` confirming these Words: Leviticus 20:13 ``If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them.`` *** *** *** And this will be my good-bye to all nazis here: ;) Matthew 7:6 ``Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, or they will trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.```

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

40,160,270

` , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users. :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?” describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.” even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior. Dear Administrators: ``I would like to file a complaint against user ``nescio`` for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ``Police State``. User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples `` Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet`` and ``Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional``, as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail. Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time. Sincerely yours, User Winston Smith describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.” had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken. ::As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again. `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

40,161,432

::My addition to talk page is not a personal attack. If it was, he would certainly know of the attack. I simply placed a request for discussion as to why continually harasses and defames other wikipedia users.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false

40,162,135

==Inactive== How long should someone not appear/compete until they're considered inactive? I think Vito should put on the inactive list.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,162,264

:Well, you can't expect much from a revisionist, let alone how to spell ! ;-D -

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,163,184

:I have no idea how to upload pictures, sorry. I do have a few pictures though. What kind of one would be suitable?

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

40,164,639

::::Just because you say it is a personal attack does not make it so in reality. Maybe you are wondering why I have not signed in under my user name? It is because I know this issue will be a sensitive one in which user's opposing will be blocked by moderators who are, in effect, bitch (like yourself).

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

true

40,164,689

::It's a good thing you have adminship isn't it?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,165,012

` :::Oh, so I was blocked from editing everything but my own page, which is the location of the alleged ``personal attacks,`` anyone can see that this makes little sense. If you are ever subject to an RFA, I'll be there. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,166,065

` OK, Please feel free to describe how the following is a personal attack, if you can support that accusation: ==It seems that many users have had problems with harassment and vandalism== , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users. :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?” : describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.” : even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior. :Dear Administrators: :``I would like to file a complaint against user ``nescio`` for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ``Police State``. User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples `` Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet`` and ``Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional``, as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail. :Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time. :Sincerely yours, :User Winston Smith : describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.” : had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. '' :It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken. :::As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again. `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

40,169,589

==Sphere-cone paragraph== ~~MV~~ It is mentioned in this paragraph that the MK-2 Rv used a radiatively cooled TPS based upon a metallic heat shield, but the Mk-2 used the heat-sink concept. It seems that unlike the ablative or thermal soak TPS, the heat-sink does not work as a heat shield, it only conducts the heat away form the shell of the RV. Was the mention of a metallic heatshield referring to the heatsink or does the heatsink concept also have a heatshield besides the copper heatsink?

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

40,169,767

== GWB archive is an archive == so, don't edit it

2,006

false

user

random

train

false

40,170,512

:I added a link back to RHCP... What else needs to be done?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,171,017

Neither are objective editors, and both have a pov, and agenda.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

40,172,852

editors who have reverted without just cause or used numerical superiority to revert pages without discussion

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

40,173,182

Less than acceptable intelligence

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,178,178

` ==A Blog Or Not a Blog, that is the question== Editor Canderra argues that the sources below are blogs and has deleted the material. The material is still not present in the article but no other editor has bothered to confirm or deny these assertions (For whatever reason). Please take your time now to review the section and check the sources for yourself, lets see if they really are blogs. :New York Sun writer, Williams Myers, labels Che as a ``sociopathic thug``. Other US newspaper critics have made similar remarks. They point out that Che Guevara was responsible for the torture and execution of hundreds of people in Cuban prisons, and the murder of many more peasants in the regions controlled or visited by his guerrilla forces. Contrary to Che supporters, these critics also argue that Che was a blundering tactician with no recorded combat victories. They claim that Che failed medical school in Argentina and that there is no evidence that he earned a medical degree. They note that Che murdered individuals on dubious grounds and took their property, seized private manors for himself, and distributed property among communist bureaucrats rather than the peasants. The also state that he not only oversaw the prison, over which he ordered the execution of hundreds if not thousands of Cubans, but also helped institute forced labor camps when volunteerism failed. Finally, these critics believe that Che was a major failure at managing the Cuban economy as he ``oversaw the near-collapse of sugar production, the failure of industrialization, and the introduction of rationing—all this in what had been one of Latin America’s four most economically successful countries since before the Batista dictatorship.``,, :Some critics, such as Che-Mart, have merchandised their dislike of Che Guevara by marketing t-shirts poking fun at both Che Guevara and his supporters, for example, pointing out what they percieve as an irony: Che Guevara as one of capitalisms hotest selling images. *They are not blogs. Put the material back in.`

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

40,182,849

to the section that seem to be in most dispute

2,006

false

article

random

test

false

40,183,579

:1) India DID 'arose above demographic distinctions to unite peoples of various geographic, economic, ethnic, linguistic and religious backgrounds' I'm sad I have to continue to point this out! If India did not exist my Telugu speaking Mother would never have met my Tamil Father and I would never have been born! THIS IS NOT A POV. THIS IS FACT! :2) As its related to you point 1 and filled with sceptical people like you I have get to basics... :- 80.5% Hindus, home to the third-largest population of Muslims in the world (13.4%), Christians (2.3%), Sikhs (1.84%), Buddhists (0.76%), Jains (0.40%), Jews, Zoroastrians, Ahmadi-muslims, and Bahá'ís, not to mention a vast number of tribal communities and other ethnic groups. Home to two major linguistic families: Indo-Aryan (74% of the population) and Dravidian (spoken by about 24%) :23 official languages. 1,652 dialects/mother-tongues. This article will point out 570 princely states each with their own autonomous government. Today this sounds just facinating but back then, when the british left, it must have been done-right scary! NOT POV, just plain reasoning! :3)Not every terrorism refer to kashmir. We have had, and still have, the LTTE, the Maoist guerrilas called naxalites like People's War Group & CPI-maoist and then Ranvir Sena. The Bodo Liberation front and other groups in the north-east, the Khalistan movement and the list goes on. We have time and again 'put down terrorism by force' it is simply a necessity. A lot of people (policemen, army and paramilitary, polititian and heads of states) have died doing this. For th last time NOT A POV! :Finnaly I must plead with you look at things with a little less negetivism. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with the first para or the statements you pointed out. Disagreeing with what you read doesn't make it POV. And please sign your name! :

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

40,185,280

:I hereby wish to thank you for your continuous efforts in protecting our templates from those gutless vandals who get their sick kicks off removing them. May the Force be with you ! -

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

40,185,736

:You sir (or madam, or whatever the hell you are), are a gutless vandal who gets sick kicks off vandalizing other users' pages by forcefully deleting their templates. A hypocrite and a vandal is what you are. A plague upon you and upon all those who function like you ! Mark my words, our resistance is far from over ! You have been warned, cur ! -

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

40,188,142

I have gone through the entire history section in an effort to cut down the details and provide just a compendium of Pakistani history. Feel free to edit, add, and especially remove information if you feel it is needed. I hope we can all agree on this version, or a future version. Following this change, I think a peer review is long overdue.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

40,188,392

== POV == 'Currently, the issue of Srinagar, having become an integral part of India, stands settled beyond any doubt, in spite of certain insurgent elements operating from the soil of India, as also from outside the borders of India.' I think much more needs to be mention about the insurgency... dealing with it in a single sentence is bypassing a major issue, and disrespect for the many people, both soldiers and civilains, who have died due to the conflict there... All I'm askng for is extending the history of the city discribe what happened there in the last 20 years. Another point is there no mention about the impact of the insurgency on tourism in the history section or about it limping back on growing domestic tourists population. : 'truth always triumphs' (written on the Indian national emblem)

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

40,191,215

My impression of the 1800s in science is that energy and mass were regarded as totally different concepts - I'm pretty confident their unification was seen as revolutionary.... I'll ask Harald88 to take a look too....

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

40,196,008

All right, Mr and Mrs IP_Address, we all got your point: how backwards and uneducated the Romanians, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Ukrainians, etc. were, and how grateful the poor bastards should've been for beeing ruled by the Hungarian elite. However, your bashing of the minorities in the Hungarian Kingdom has nothing to do with this article (in case you haven't noticed some of us are trying to improve the article.) So, unless you decide to contribute something, please look for another audience.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

40,197,100

` == Wikipedia Admins Use Gestapo Tactics to Enforce their Agenda == Greetings, it is Germany 1939 all over again. Admin Mark Sweep and user TastyCakes conspire to silence another Wikipedia user that they find objectionable. After being called a ``Dunb Ass`` by user TastyCakes, and without any warning, Admin Mark Sweep, a former US Marine, has used his abilities as an admin to infinitely block my user priviledges. And all based on his personal dislike of my username, and his comradeship with user TastyCakes who were offended by a few harmless WORDS!!! Welcome to the world of those few who are endowed with superior genetics, and the ability to control what we read and learn!!! HerrGoebbles`

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

40,204,248

Merge This article can and should stand on its own.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

40,211,759

== hey == you have a giant penis. is that what allows you to moderate wiki so well? 8==============D>>>>>>><><>

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

40,212,794

Go ahead, block me. When Jossi says Rawat never claimed to be the Perfect Master when that is exactly how he pushed himself on the world and all us hapless followers for years he's a liar and I'll call him that everytime. If the only way you can deal with that is by blocking me, quit the threats and just do it.

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

40,215,106

` == Uncylopedia == The Uncylopedia entry for Star Trek include the following: Ever notice how the 3 white male captains get the best ships in the fleet, but the black captain gets the ghetto space station and the woman captain gets lost on her very first mission? Obviously, some people at Paramount have been burning crosses. After this was noticed, Sisko was given the Defiant, the most powerful warship of the fleet, since Paramount was defying the popular opinion of them as racist bastards. Is this merely a cheap ``Uncylopedic`` gag or does this hit on a genuine fault worthy of criticism? `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

40,218,063

::I'm free to clean up/blank my talk page at any time. If you have a problem with this and choose to make an issue out of it, I will recreate this talk page on my user page to my liking. :::Also, when a comment is fallacious or emotive, it is so by fact not opinion; therefore the identification of such comments is not a personal attack. If you have a disorder that hinders logical ability, please let me know, otherwise adhere to Wikipedia's policy of neutral and factual analysis. :::Also, as erroneous as you may find them, posting discussion page rules is not a personal attack on anyone. I will cite your removal of them as administrative abuse.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,218,352

Yes, they are considered personal attacks by you; other than that happenstance, they aren't.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,219,107

` == User TastyCakes Superior Intellect Shines in Message == Greetings All!!! Once again, the user TastyCakes showcases her superior intellect and reasoning in her response. Had TastyCakes followed the history of the original edits to US History and Expansion, TastyCakes would have seen that HerrGoebbles was only trying to add new information regarding the brutal consequences of US government sanctioned practices, which are clearly stated at the US Department of State website under: ``Indian Treaties and the Removal act of 1830``. Instead, user TastyCakes and an admin MarkSweep took it upon themselves to block user HerrGoebbles with absolutely no warning. This seems to be an accepted practice on Wikipedia embraced by a few users and Admins who wish to control and block any possibility of discussion about reality. Welcome to The New World!!! HerrGoebbles`

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

40,219,664

Board Rules 1. Fallacious comments will be marked as such with an asterisk (*) at my sole discretion. Fallacious comments may include: dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid, dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter, Ignoratio Elenchi, argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad verecundiam, Circulus in Probando, Non Sequitur, post hoc ergo propter hoc, Plurium Interrogationum, and others. 2. Please sign all comments.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

40,224,166

February 2006 (UTC) I knew it didn't take place in New York, but I recognized that the sign was black, had white lettering with a line across the top, so I knew it was an immitation, thanks anyway. 01:52, 19

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

40,227,076

== NFL Coaches == Hi Kareeser, I overheard your message on and reverted the problematic edits to Template: NFL Coach and Mike Sherman. Let me know if there are any lingering problems. ×

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

40,234,422

== Windows userbox == Your modifications to the Windows 95 userbox messed up the template and thus every page that it was in, so I reverted them.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,234,580

== English versions == There is not need to change from one English varient to another when editing articles, it serves no purpose. Wikipedia policy is to keep the language as it lies, so in the future, please check to see if the spelling you are correcting is actually a mistake, or if it's someone from another country spelling correctly.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

40,240,919

::Why? Please reply on my talk page.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

40,247,291

` #Please do not remove warnings from your talk page and/or replace it with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

40,250,717

Polaris, Wiki does not prohibit the use of POV sources, that is afterall how we get all our info anyway. What wiki wants is to present pov material in npov fashion which means citing the source and informing readers that this is the opinion or belief of the source. These sources have a different pov than most of the editors adding to the Che page, the pov of these people is that Che was a good man. If we delete opposition to this we do in fact promote a pov without actually saying so. Canderra, if you read the sources, one of them mentions that there is dispute over the battle of Santa Clara stating that it may not actually have been a battle at all but a pre-arranged surrender. Nevertheless these are reputable sources and they are NOT blogs, nor are they self published. IRI, HNN, and FPM are not blogs, they are not self publications, they hire people to research and write and or pay scholars and journalists for their material. In regards to Cuban economics there are multiple sources that mention the pre revolution economy and the post economy...if Milton Friedm et. al. are correct it doesnt take long to ruin an economy with communism. Lennin managed to nearly ruin Russia in 18 months. AT anyrate, if the claims are dubious the burdon of proof is now on you to say otherwise. You can't just delete the information if you yourself have no cited counterpoints and no good reasons other than protecting your own POV. (Gibby )

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,251,013

` As far as dubious sources, this page has most of its sources coming from various Che biographies written by friends and appologists for them...this gives a pov. If you leave out my section, then almost everything else from the page should be deleted as well. Furthermore, if my sources are ``dubious at best`` what kind of dubious pov is giong to be provided when quoting the thoughts and words of Che directly? Do you really think Che would criticize himself? If supporting Che and being Che are the only qualifications for being a proper source for this article (And that seems to be what is being said here) then we have violated the Wiki NPOV rules...quite blatantly. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,256,045

`==Cleanup tag== This looks like someone's essay cut-and-pasted including their ``Personal conclusion`` and starting statements with ``I``. This should either be deleted or totally rewritten. `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

40,259,303

` I think by making this article reflect a keynesian ``liberal`` view point you ruin the very purpose of this article...which is to provide information on a liberal view point that is at great odds with keynesian macroeconomics. ( )`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,273,255

== ADMIN MARKSWEEP TO THE RESCUE == MarkSweep lives and breathes for the moments when he can control the little world of Wikipedia. Rules of engagement apply to all those who partake of Wikipedia, alas MarkSweep is immune to these regulations. He blocks and deletes and derides at will! Who will rise up and denounce MarkSweep for the controlling little man that he is? Will no one have the courage? Block, censor, delete, replace, etc. etc. etc. MarkSweep, you are a man of little faith, and even less courage. The real Josef Goebbles would be proud to call you son!! HerrGoebbles

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

40,279,167

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ==Harris Michael Jewelry== An article you started, Harris Michael Jewelry, has been proposed for deletion. An editor didn't feel this was a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article. Please review WP:NOT and Wikipedia:Importance for elaboration on why Wikipedia must reject certain articles. If you feel the subject meets these criteria, please edit the article to demonstrate that more clearly. If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the {{prod}} template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If the tag is removed but the article isn't improved, the article may still face deletion through debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

40,281,680

:::I have one of him Naked... When he had green hair.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

40,285,264

:I'm also removing the following 2 sentances: ::The water of the Dead Sea contains 21 minerals including magnesium, calcium, bromine and potassium. Twelve of these are found in no other sea or ocean, and some are recognized for imparting a relaxed feeling, nourishing the skin, activating the circulatory system and for easing rheumatic discomfort and metabolic disorders. :If somebody can provide a verifiable source for them, please feel free to provide it an replace the lines.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

40,307,814

::::Awwww dang ( I have a normal one. How'd I go about uploading it, or giving it to you so you could upload it?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,313,711

Keynes merged economics into politics and politicians abused it...unfortunatly economics does not rule politics. I do not believe anything Keynes wrote about can be considered liberal, period. He may of thought that but I think you should ask von Mises, Hayek, and Friedman about that. They would tell you that what Keynes wrote about smacked liberalism in the face. The only reason Keynes can be considered liberal is because populists, politicians, and the media have conflated them together...ignorance or practicality, I'm not deciding. But government interventions effecting supply and demand, prices etc, are not liberal economic policies. Thus not classical liberal. and, get it straight, Keynes diverged from liberalism. ( )

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

40,315,468

== THE GODS == It's because I have sold my soul to the dark Lord, to whom I must always answer. But thanks for the flowers )

2,006

false

user

blocked

test

false

40,316,002

I done a bigjob on your mother's tits

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

40,316,561

The dumbest things on wikipedia are the people who contribute regularly

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

40,316,601

I tasted your mum. it was super.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

40,317,087

: You surely do have nothing better to do. That's cute

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

40,318,295

Which page was I vandalising now you rectum faced pygmy?

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

40,318,800

You are the dirty, fetid son of a whoremonger's bitch.

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

40,319,168

Hey, this is JaysCyYoung. Thank you very much for the kind welcome to Wikipedia as a registered user. I appreciate your offer of help. I have, however, been editing and creating many articles ananymously for quite some time now, so I don't believe that will be necessary. Your warm welcome is greatly appreciated though! Jameson.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,319,204

: I'm afraid that this theory is one several and no theory on their origin has yet been proven as fact.

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

40,326,202

` :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.`

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

40,329,032

` When I discussed with on a private IRC session about any post made between 12:35 and 16:52, he pointed the following out to me: (partial chat exerpt from the other day) mark_sweep you posted on markalexander's talk page at 13:40 UTC mark_sweep then at 13:42 UTC you posted to the reference desk: mark_sweep http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities&diff;=prev&oldid;=39874588 Shultzii Those posts you just pointed out- they're troll posts? (I don't see how they are.) Shultzii They look pretty innocent to me mark_sweep that's what makes them troll posts Shultzii Making a wikilink and pointing it out? *scratches head* Shultzii I'll take a 2nd look at his talk page... mark_sweep the original question may look innocent, but it was pretty pointless; that's why people consider it trolling mark_sweep here's the thing Shultzii Oh about the thought of naming a new city of Hoeryong somewhere in the US? mark_sweep yes, but it's not even that mark_sweep here's the thing Shultzii Go ahead. Taking food out of microwave. mark_sweep an admin asks you to stop mark_sweep more or less accusing you of being a troll mark_sweep you continue with the same thing you were doing mark_sweep which only confirms his suspicion All I was doing was disambiguating what someone was thinking. They misconstrued ``Hoeryong`` as a Dutch phrase (meaning ``Child of a w``). In the ref desk entry from the beginning, I meant what if I named a new town after a Korean city? Therefore, I had to tell that ``Hoeryong`` in the way it was intended would be named after a Korean city, not a Dutch phrase. Not once did it ever even cross my mind that this was a continuation of a trollish act. MarkAlexander misconstrued it as such, so can someone please lift the block early?`

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

40,336,945

==Tidy up== I am wondering. This article is focussing on Rajastani exploits of rajputs, but we know rajputs had kingdoms in Punjab also and if we were to include ALL such exploits for fairness then we would have an overly HUGE page. In it's present form it's already too long and not enough elaboration on an actual rajput and the different clans. We could possible include where each tribe ruled majorly in it's times instead as a reference rather than an entire 'article within an article'? Im also removing the point that no further Muslim conquests took place in the 9th century due to the formidable reputation of the rajputs as there is no proof of this from the middle eastern side to corroborate this, so it's more a 'proud assumption' rather than proof I think? Please feel free to correct me guys. I've also done a tidy up of 'language' in the history section of where unencyclopedic words such as 'treacherously' and 'crushed' have been replaced suitably. Can other editors help in this respect with other sections? Looking better guys, let's keep up the good work.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,351,711

:An linux port of DC++ is listed under External links, it could also be mentioned in the article, feel free to add it… :The clients you listed are in the Direct Connect (file sharing) article, where they belong. –

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

40,357,241

`rules...thanks. And nothing i've posted on MY talk page violates any of those rules. I've not said you're a ``bad editor`` i've not said ``you're a troll`` i simply stated fact. That for some reason unknown to me...you have a hard on for changing my talk page. Which, based on recent history, is a fact. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

40,357,735

== HELLO == Nobs nobs nobs nobs nobs nobs nobs

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

40,358,529

This page should be deleted. Star Fox Armada was always going to be a GameCube game. Even the articles at the bottom of the page corroborate this.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

40,359,249

The Alpha version had multiplayer. The Beta version did not.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

40,361,413

== It says under admissions requirements that men must have one testicle == I looked at West Point's website and couldn't find anything confirming this. It needs a source.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

40,362,008

Could someone please put the ORIGINAL image on this page so people could see it in case they look it up after being confused about a reference to it?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

40,365,173

== World record attempt == I added an entry under history about the recent world record attempt. I will add the final counts once verification comes back from Guiness. I also added information about the controversy that North Dakota created about the record attempt. Feel free to move this information or edit it.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

40,373,944

YOUR A FAGGG GET A LIFE

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

true

40,389,771

your mum know's nothin bout chechoslovakia

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false