rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40,679,302
|
`== A welcome from == Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: *If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. *Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. *The Five Pillars of Wikipedia *Simplified Ruleset *How to edit a page *Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial *Picture tutorial *How to write a great article *Naming conventions *Manual of Style *Wikipedia Glossary I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Happy editing! P.S. Feel free to leave a message on if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. ) '''''' of `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,680,109
|
:Cubdriver, knock it off. I know Wikipedia is not a democracy, but you're the only one in favour of flagging the article (or section). And you haven't even seen the film, I understand, so what basis do you have? I'll just remove the flag now, but if you put it back again without good support I'll consider it vandalism, as I already pointed out on your talk page.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,680,971
|
` :You’re right- this is the correct place to discuss the Burlington article. It was actually me who erroneously renamed it to ``satellite`` image. From what I understood at that time, I thought that those types of images were all satellite images. (Mainly because Google Earth and Google Maps are often branded as mainly using satellite images.) Anyway no reason to touch your edit as it’s correct and especially since you’re knowledgeable in the area. By the way, your edit summary stated it was mistaken as vandalism. rv is short for ``revert``. rvv means ``revert vandalism``. I left some notes on your talk page regarding talk page etiquette. Cheers, `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,681,496
|
` Right. You're talking about me. (I am new here and now I can sign my name which you'll see in the end of this). So, what you guys want with the ``Inner`` Mongolia thing? Do you think you own this NPOV thing or ``shei shuo le suan``? You? Simply I removing yours and you removing mine is not the solution. You wanna discuss? Then first you Chinese have to let the Mongols freely talk about their own country. My name is Dugar and you can reach me at dugarjab at yahoo dot kom. Here is my signature: `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
40,683,840
|
::Umm. The Fixx are hardly a one hit wonder. They racked up 10 songs on the US hot 100 with 6 of them cracking the top 40 over a roughly ten year period from 1982 to 1991. Keep in mind Echo and the Bunnymen, The Jam, English Beat could never crack the hot 100 in America..not even once.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,696,739
|
== Agent X2: Basically thanks - with a 'little' more == (Little has to be a bit more in this case. It just lies in the nature of the matter.) First: English is not my native language, so I won't correct the article myself. I rely on others to do that for me, based on my suggestions. Again, I am a german dissident and as a man with a technical background, I do not only have years-long experience with most probably driving around a hidden GPS/GSM bug and the consequences of this arrangement. I also have the ability to become aware of it, although I have to rely on many 'strange observations' which after months of further observation and consideration start to make sense, if you explain them the way I have. I had prepared a comprehensive letter yesterday summarizing the present situation of the article - i e before your recent changes. For ease of work, let me copy and paste it here, erasing only the sentences that have no more meaning at all. The rest therefore is still true, more or less: First, I'm not quite sure what implications the 'Articles lacking sources' classification has. There sure is a lot more to say and show about this subject, but I think it is already now safe to say that we've got a case. So what about removing it from this kind of probably discriminatory category? I suspect that presently it looks like a kind of 'crackpot' article and therefore doesn't really invite others to join. Would there be a more suitable 'wanted' category? Second, we do agree that these appliances exist, and that they also can be abused. Experience tells you, if something can be abused, it also will. Experience also tells you, that government agencies are no exception when it comes to this kind of things. What we need are more details about their (i e the presumed LEC = military version) size, sensitivity (with respect to the concealed places they can be attached to) and battery life-span (assuming they're not installed, just stuck with a magnet or some dough-type fastener). In the discussion, I gave the URL of a leading german maker of these objects and tried to draw your attention to the fact that their folder directed to the LEC is password-protected *), while the material for the general market is on open display. Would that ring a bell with you? Third, I would like to see several changes in the article. I'll enumerate and motivate them in a separate message - see below. Fourth, I'd like to join everybody into the discussion who is interested in this subject and can contribute something reasonable (or maybe knows someone who can). My idea is, this is not just an electronic gadget issue, this is a civil rights concern. Do you see any other faculties involved, besides electronics and human rights? How do we spread the word among them? Again, we need to remove all the discriminatory classifications from the article for others to join. *) For your convenience, let me quote that sentence: 'Have you especially seen my remark regarding the password-protected folder at http://www.fugon.de/ , expressively directed towards the german LEC ('BOS')? Wouldn't you agree that this most probably is where all the REALLY INTERESTING stuff could be found?!? Enigma...' Third: Desired changes to the article Foreword: ok Types of GPS trackers: I've been informed that they don't necessarily limit temselves to SMS, when transmitting. Another option would probably be to use GPRS - one of the wider used packet-switched data transmission modes in cellphone systems. It is also here that we ought to mention that they are used for tracking down criminals. I've sent you proof of that. See the discussion page where I quoted the two media article discussing the german constitutional court's verdict on GPS/GSM bugs dating back to 4/05. It ought to be mentioned in that same chapter that there is reason to believe that there also exist more 'professional' versions for the use through the military, LEC etc, which are probably smaller, more sensitive (can be placed 'anywhere' and still work, without external antennas) and have a long battery life-span. Potential abuse of GPS trackers: What is said in the box is basically correct. Could it be re-formulated in a way to provoke people's interest, rather than stir a feeling for lack of trustworthiness? Something along the line that 'these are military-style secrets thus hard to ascertain; anyone from inside this business having doubts about their ultimate legitimacy should feel invited to
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,697,609
|
== GPS/GSM bugs - are totalitarian surveillance weapon from hell == Make sure you visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gps_tracking , and also the ongoing discussion. The latest entry which summarizes the situation is '7 Agent X2: Basically thanks - with a 'little' more'. Please contribute, if you can, and spread the word!
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,702,401
|
==Public IP address== This IP address is a public access address for machines in Peterborough UK(Library machines and schools) Hense the Vandalism.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,704,388
|
Twenty days maybe. ;) Getting close. I think it's actually the least of our worries.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,704,806
|
Nick rowan responds: You need to provide a link so that your claim, that these were his words, can be verified. Next,- anyone can say what he likes, one tend to cry like the wolves one are amongst. You CANNOT take anything thet anyone has spoken and hold it against him 12 years later, particularly not when you can't back it up.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,717,734
|
Hari Sriskantha - chipmunk, chinese, noun
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
40,719,753
|
:Funny - I've certainly seen them before, but I can't seem to locate a solid source. I'd put money on at least one WPC having featured them, but I couldn't give you what years. Perhaps they are uncommon after all. - ZM :
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
40,721,040
|
that 8 december htere was noone alive
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,721,326
|
` ==List of Nine Inch Nails covers== On the List of Nine Inch Nails covers AfD discussion, you voted, ``Merge relevant information, delete article.`` However, each article on individual songs already contains a list of groups who have covered that song (see Head Like a Hole, Closer To God, etc.). Since the relevant information is readily available in other articles, would you consider changing your vote to just delete? - `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
40,724,482
|
` == Wapipedia == Anyone here use it (http://wapipedia.org)? I'm kind of new to it, and there doesn't seem to be a talk/editing facility. So I'm going to post this here, hope that's okay. Their article on the Prophet Mohammed includes the following text: By his own standards, the continuing traditions of social justice in the Islamic World, of methods and knowledge of science, history and medicine as they evolved in the modern world (thanks to his profound influence driving Muslims to literacy and inquiry), and the prayers of over one billion Muslims, many of whom pray for him five times a day (or attach `` peace be upon him`` after each mention of his name), render Muhammad arguably the most influential man in all history, an honour often reserved for Jesus in the West. Even those historians who have deplored his influence and considered it to have retarded the growth of its chief rival faith, Christianity, express grudging admiration for the man. and this: To the traitors inside Medina it must have come as a surprise when the 10,000-strong force of Abu Sufyan failed to cross a trench dug around Medina by order of Muhammad, as the Persian scribe Salman e-Farsi had suggested to him. After the retreat of Abu Sufyan and his forces, the Muslims directed their attention towards the groups that had committed treason to the Charter of Medina. The munafiqun quickly crumbled, and their leader Abd Allah ibn Ubayy pledged allegiance to Muhammad. The Muslims then besieged the Banu Qurayza, who had intrigued against them. They had the opportunity of choosing Muhammad as an arbitrator, but instead the Banu Qurayza chose Saad ibn Muadh, the leader of their former allies, the Aus. And this is its take on the Battle of Badr, 624 CE, which is markedly different to that found in the Wikipedia article (which raises doubts about the aftermath of the battle): On March 15, 624 near a place called Badr, the two forces clashed. Though outnumbered 800 to 300 in the battle, the Muslims met with success, killing at least 45 Makkans, including Abu Jahl, and taking 70 prisoners; whereas only 14 Muslims died. To the Muslims this appeared as a divine vindication of Muhammad's prophethood, and he and all the Muslims rejoiced greatly. Following this victory, assassinations eliminated Medinans who had satirized Muhammad, and the victors expelled a hostile Jewish clan. Virtually all the remaining Medinans converted and Muhammad became de facto ruler of the city. I had the idea that Wapipedia was a direct transfer of Wikipedia articles onto Wap, but it seems not. Timbudds@acasa.ro`
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
40,728,342
|
` == Palestine == So the Jews started to enforce the decision on the ground is a 'clear lie', but then you replaced it with the Arabs started to attack Jews. Both are POV. You should either have a source for these kinds of statements, or remove them both. Please try to NPOV the section, historical evidence would be most welcome. `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
40,729,436
|
:::::Only if all of those places have both grown, and moved away. Tasmania is 200 miles from Australia, over twice the distance of Cuba from the United States. It is comparable in size to Ireland and Cuba, 26,000 square miles, whereas Manhattan is 20 square miles, and is a few hundred feet from land. The Isle of Wight is only slightly larger.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,737,373
|
`that ``banned me`` `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,737,611
|
:::Hi here. I have read up to chapter 40 of the manga and discovered that the Director and his son are both from a long line of Diclonius whose potency has been watered down over generations by interbreeding with humans. The director's son explains this before he is beheaded by Lucy (this is omitted in the anime). The manga seems to explain everything but we'll need some japanese-speaking person to explain it all to us as only 40 chapters have been scanlated into english. -
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,744,496
|
` **Echoing the statement above, with some more elucidation: there is no objective criteria under which the Telegraph is a more objective (or ``reputable``) source than Counterpunch. The Telegraph was a part of the Hollinger International chain of newspapers, whose board of directors happened to include one Richard Perle a known American conservative and supporter of the Israeli right-wing. The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs is likewise a think tank and reliquary for Israeli right-wingers (retired military and diplomatic staff especially) and funded by convicted felon Michael Milken. It is not hard to see that a right-wing ideologue Weiner did a hit-piece on Edward Said using funds from a right-wing think tank, published it in a right wing journal (Commentary), that was picked up by a sympathetic newspaper (the Daily Telegraph). ::Presenting either the Jerusalem Center or the Telegraph as ``objective`` is an obvious distortion, that only owes itself to the right-wing media having warped the meaning of ``objective`` and ``fair and balanced``. The attack pieces on Edward Said have to be treated as just that - attack pieces, not scholarship. If we run them here, Said's supporters get a free shot to refute them as well. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,746,307
|
` * When people criticise the Commonwewalth Games due their perceived ``imperialistic`` nature, they obviously have never been to the Commonwealth Games - it is a very friendly event. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
40,749,201
|
Tell me what is better ways to stop the other guys from keep deleting (and of course reverting too) every change I made and to keep their own. Make some common sense before warning me, OK?
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,756,926
|
Apologize, I don't know how I missed that. I was looking for a fact fast and, well, overlooked that, sorry.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,756,941
|
== GPS/GSM bugs - a totalitarian surveillance weapon from hell == Make sure you visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gps_tracking , and also the ongoing discussion. The latest entry which summarizes the situation is '7 Agent X2: Basically thanks - with a 'little' more'. Please contribute, if you can, and spread the word!
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,757,169
|
Someone needs to seriously lighten up! In haste, I didn't realize the fact was there, calm down.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,757,563
|
Block me Alf, I have 4 DSL accounts and a whole host of IPs... good luck
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,758,530
|
==FUCK OF NAZI PROPAGANDA== odpierdalcie sie jebani faszyści od Polski !!!!!!!!!!!
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
40,761,348
|
The following users consistently vandalise this page with the same information. They are probably sockpuppets of eachother TXmaster, NSUBOY, Mia2007, and Memo2009. I'm protecting until admins can figure out how to deal with this continued vandalism.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,761,466
|
== ( == does uncyclopedia have a website? what's the url?
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,766,192
|
*Since you asked for a response from me for what do to about this, the easy way to make this not a problem would be to edit the five templates and remove the images, which I believe should conform to SimonP's bit of information. I'm gonna think about your other questions for a little bit before coming up with what I think the plan should be.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
40,776,600
|
: Image:Romania_counties_blank_big.jpg
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,784,272
|
` February 2006 (UTC) For some reason this is the funniest article I've read on Wikipedia. I think because it is written in a dead-serious tone. And I like this line: ``The five second rule is sometimes called the three-second rule, 10-second rule, or the 15-second rule, to some extent depending on the quality of the food involved or the intoxication level of the individual quoting the rule.`` ...this is genius. Nice article, good job everyone! 00:14, 23`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,784,851
|
`08, 14 February 2006 (UTC) Agreed == Fear of the Dark used in a movie? == I remember hearing a rumor that Fear of the Dark was used in a Horror flick. I couldn't find much on this anywhere. I think it may have been one in the Nightmare on Elm street series of movies. If evidence can be found for this, it should be added to the Popular culture area. Reply Bring Your Daughter To The Slaughter was in Nightmare on Elm Street 5 (apparently). :Damn, beat me to it. I agree with ``apparently`` though, as I've seen the film and I don't recall hearing the song in it. Also, I don't think it's on the soundtrack album. It may have been written for the film but not used? 12:`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,786,106
|
== Maiden tour in Romania ? == I don't remember, but did Iron Maiden ever have a concert in Romania ? I know that they even had one in Iceland during their Death on the Road tour, but I don't think they've ever visited Romania. Does anyone have any info to prove this ? -
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,787,023
|
`Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Ohio Wesleyan University. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. e `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
40,787,371
|
` Issues as I see them: ``Culture`` section right now seems like the arts. That's not all there is to culture ... should include food, clothing, ceremonies etc, in adition some art forms like fine arts and dance are absent. History portion is much better than it used to be (the horror!!), but needs crisper writing. It seems we are copying India rather strictly, why? `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,789,217
|
I don't think I was talking to you, was I? I was talking to the person who blocked me. Now fuck off, you worthless cunt.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
40,793,431
|
== == why dont you queer mother fuckers get a life and stop blocking me you fags.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
40,794,798
|
::AHHHH THANKS! I was rackin my brain the whole time she was singing to figure it out, I knew I'd heard it before.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,811,824
|
` :: I got my information primarily online by following the links listed above this entry on the talk page. To be more specific: ::* Information on relations listed in ``trivia`` are found on these websites: ::http://www.umsl.edu/%7Emuns/elonka/nyt19451117p17.pdf ::(a 1945 NYT obit for her great grandfather) ::http://www.elonka.com/public/familytree/ ::(self-published by Dunin, but according to the WP:V this is okay) ::* The website popularity/comparison and hits are mentioned in these sources ::http://books.guardian.co.uk/danbrown/story/0,15931,1505474,00.html ::http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/06/19/cracking.the.code/index.html ::http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/06/17/sanborn/index.html ::or you can go to this blog entry: ::http://www.memestreams.net/thread/bid23249/ ::again, WP:V says self-published material is okay when it's used as a reference for an article about the author. ::*And references for the CIA talk are listed above on this talk page. If you would like to read the slides from the talk, they're available here: ::http://www.elonka.com/steganography/`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
40,819,406
|
== Links to individual farms are inappropriate == Hi, given the literally 1000s of Morgan Horse farms, it is inappropriate to link any individual farms.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,827,851
|
== Re: James Scott Richardson Article == I readded the request for speedy deletion. Please review the information submitted in the Talk page as to why the article should be speedily deleted. Also please note that vote on deletion was based on unsourced information.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
40,828,072
|
Edited to change Stockport (a town in the NW) to Stockbury (a village in Kent)
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,828,795
|
Thank you. I'm on the link-deletion now.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,831,198
|
`== Speedy Deletion Request == If everyone who posted racist comments online was a notable figure Wikipedia would be full of this info. There is no claim to notability for this individual. The article seems like a way to ``expose`` the individual or punish him for being racist. As far as the information on the individual's actions, the article only states that the individual was a prolific poster of racist material on a racist forum and attracted some unwanted attention in the form of quasi-legal action by a lawyer. The article is a good candidate for speedy deletion. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
40,835,384
|
is a gay faggot that takes it in the butt from other users who control him and manipulate him to indiscriminately ban users with gay cunnilingus== == is a FAGGOT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
40,835,477
|
` ::::Again, is in violation of the vandalism clause. As was predicted by the users who brought me into the discussion, has employed his moderator lackeys to ban anyone who is critical of his vandalism. is not above the rules of Wikipedia. It makes one wonder why he is such a proponent of not allowing anonymous users to post at Wikipedia. It's probably one's only recourse after being unjustly banned by his moderators. . Another moderator has abused his or her powers to ban a user who is simply inquiring about why continually harasses users who do not share his point of view. Removing this inquiry is in itself a violation of WP:VAND. Please do not continue to remove this legitimate question. :: :::Please Stop Removing Warnings. ::::Why do you continue to vandalise your own user page? Please leave user comments on this page. How can you rationalize that this inquiry is a ``personal attack``? ::::: I think it is a personal attack, because you have singled out Nescio out of at least four editors who disagree with you emphatically. Nescio has shown good faith here, and your efforts to get him banned because he disagrees with you do not reflect well on your own good faith. ::::::In reality, quite the opposite is occuring. My efforts are focused on the goal of exposing abuse of moderators good intentions in order to get others banned who do not share his point of view. Oh, and, just out of curiousity, WHY IS THIS NOT ON NESCIO'S USERPAGE?! Can someone reasonable please get it OFF the police state discussion? :The reason why this is not on nescio's user page is because he keeps deleting it in violation of WP:VAND policy. This issue also pertains directly to this article since at least four users have been harassed and banned by Nescio's false accusations concerning this article. Ask him why he continues to delete this question about his ``edits``. :: Actually, I'd like to ask you why you (a) persist in disruption of this page and (b) won't sign in and insist on using so many open proxy IP addresses? :::(a) This is not a ``disruption`` of this page. This discussion pertains deirectly to anyone who wishes to edit this article because if they edit in a manner that does not agree with, they will likely be harassed and banned by Nescio and his false accusations. People should be outraged that users and/or moderators are abusing thier powers. (b) If I were to sign on under my username, it would most certainly be banned in short order. I wish to see this issue resolved for all parties involved, but I am not willing to risk my status as an editor because of Nescio's frivilous accusations. `
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,835,760
|
is a gay faggot that takes it in the butt from other users who control him and manipulate him to indiscriminately ban users with gay cunnilingus== == is a FAGGOT and so is '''''' – They are butt buddies : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
40,836,507
|
` ==The following is a COMPLAINT AGAINST for harassing user's about this page== ==It seems that many users have had problems with harassment and vandalism== , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users. :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?” : describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.” : even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior. :Dear Administrators: :``I would like to file a complaint against user ``nescio`` for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ``Police State``. User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples `` Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet`` and ``Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional``, as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail. :Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time. :Sincerely yours, :User Winston Smith : describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.” : had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. :: I have to say that Nescio and others had understandable grounds on which to suspect you of sockpuppetry. Fact is, you appeared on scene the day of/shortly after three genuine sockpuppets appeared, and you shared the same POV and short history of editing. :::Please explain what makes you think that is a sockpuppet? Can you cite these actions of VinnyCee that are considered to be those of a sock-puppet? :::: I just did. It turns out that Vinny Cee is not a sockpuppet (at least, of anything we checked), but there was good reason to suspect she was. :::::So VinnyCee is not a sock puppet. This means that Nescio's accusation of him being a sock puppet is false. Did you ``check`` into whether the other accusations made by Nescio against other users are also false? I would bet that they are. :It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken. ::The edit wars have not been between you and only Nescio. They have been between only you and many other users. :::As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again. ::::Again, is in violation of the vandalism clause. As was predicted by the users who brought me into the discussion, has employed his moderator lackeys to ban anyone who is critical of his vandalism. is not above the rules of Wikipedia. It makes one wonder why he is such a proponent of not allowing anonymous users to post at Wikipedia. It's probably one's only recourse after being unjustly banned by his moderators. . Another moderator has abused his or her powers to ban a user who is simply inquiring about why continually harasses users who do not share his point of view. Removing this inquiry is in itself a violation of WP:VAND. Please do not continue to remove this legitimate question. :: :::Please Stop Removing Warnings. ::::Why do you continue to vandalise your own user page? Please leave user comments on this page. How can you rationalize that this inquiry is a ``personal attack``? ::::: I think it is a personal attack, because you have singled out Nescio out of at least four editors who disagree with you emphatically. Nescio has shown good faith here, and your efforts to get him banned because he disagrees with you do not reflect well on your own good faith. ::::::In reality, quite the opposite is occuring. My efforts are focused on the goal of exposing abuse of moderators good intentions in order to get others banned who do not share his point of view. Oh, and, just out of curiousity, WHY IS THIS NOT ON NESCIO'S USERPAGE?! Can someone reasonable please get it OFF the police state discussion? :The reason why this is not on nescio's user page is because he keeps deleting it in violation of WP:VAND policy. This issue also pertains directly to this article since at least four users have been harassed and banned by Nescio's false accusations concerning this article. Ask him why he continues to delete this question about his ``edits''``. :: Actually, I'd like to ask you why you (a) persist in disruption of this page and (b) won't sign in and insist on using so many open proxy IP addresses? :::(a) This is not a ``disruption`` of this page. This discussion pertains deirectly to anyone who wishes to edit this article because if they edit in a manner that does not agree with, they will likely be harassed and banned by Nescio and his false accusations. People should be outraged that users and/or moderators are abusing thier powers. (b) If I were to sign on under my username, it would most certainly be banned in short order. I wish to see this issue resolved for all parties involved, but I am not willing to risk my status as an editor because of Nescio's frivilous accusations. `
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,836,966
|
` == I DID NOT REMOVE ANY WARNINGS. YOU ARE THE ONE DOING THAT, VIOLATING WIKIPEDIA POLICY == ==The following is a COMPLAINT AGAINST for harassing user's about this page== ==It seems that many users have had problems with harassment and vandalism== , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users. :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?” : describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.” : even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior. :Dear Administrators: :``I would like to file a complaint against user ``nescio`` for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ``Police State``. User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples `` Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet`` and ``Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional``, as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail. :Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time. :Sincerely yours, :User Winston Smith : describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.” : had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. :: I have to say that Nescio and others had understandable grounds on which to suspect you of sockpuppetry. Fact is, you appeared on scene the day of/shortly after three genuine sockpuppets appeared, and you shared the same POV and short history of editing. :::Please explain what makes you think that is a sockpuppet? Can you cite these actions of VinnyCee that are considered to be those of a sock-puppet? :::: I just did. It turns out that Vinny Cee is not a sockpuppet (at least, of anything we checked), but there was good reason to suspect she was. :::::So VinnyCee is not a sock puppet. This means that Nescio's accusation of him being a sock puppet is false. Did you ``check`` into whether the other accusations made by Nescio against other users are also false? I would bet that they are. :It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken. ::The edit wars have not been between you and only Nescio. They have been between only you and many other users. :::As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again. ::::Again, is in violation of the vandalism clause. As was predicted by the users who brought me into the discussion, has employed his moderator lackeys to ban anyone who is critical of his vandalism. is not above the rules of Wikipedia. It makes one wonder why he is such a proponent of not allowing anonymous users to post at Wikipedia. It's probably one's only recourse after being unjustly banned by his moderators. . Another moderator has abused his or her powers to ban a user who is simply inquiring about why continually harasses users who do not share his point of view. Removing this inquiry is in itself a violation of WP:VAND. Please do not continue to remove this legitimate question. :: :::Please Stop Removing Warnings. ::::Why do you continue to vandalise your own user page? Please leave user comments on this page. How can you rationalize that this inquiry is a ``personal attack``? ::::: I think it is a personal attack, because you have singled out Nescio out of at least four editors who disagree with you emphatically. Nescio has shown good faith here, and your efforts to get him banned because he disagrees with you do not reflect well on your own good faith. ::::::In reality, quite the opposite is occuring. My efforts are focused on the goal of exposing abuse of moderators good intentions in order to get others banned who do not share his point of view. Oh, and, just out of curiousity, WHY IS THIS NOT ON NESCIO'S USERPAGE?! Can someone reasonable please get it OFF the police state discussion? :The reason why this is not on nescio's user page is because he keeps deleting it in violation of WP:VAND policy. This issue also pertains directly to this article since at least four users have been harassed and banned by Nescio's false accusations concerning this article. Ask him why he continues to delete this question about his ``edits''``. :: Actually, I'd like to ask you why you (a) persist in disruption of this page and (b) won't sign in and insist on using so many open proxy IP addresses? :::(a) This is not a ``disruption`` of this page. This discussion pertains deirectly to anyone who wishes to edit this article because if they edit in a manner that does not agree with, they will likely be harassed and banned by Nescio and his false accusations. People should be outraged that users and/or moderators are abusing thier powers. (b) If I were to sign on under my username, it would most certainly be banned in short order. I wish to see this issue resolved for all parties involved, but I am not willing to risk my status as an editor because of Nescio's frivilous accusations. `
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,838,399
|
in a bundle. Another number was 400 because that was how many Mayan Gods of night there was. 23/2/06
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,846,098
|
==86.10.231.219 blocking== You blocked the above user. Can you supply the page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, you mentioned? I am curious about these sort of trangressions, and was observing his actions, so would like to see the examples. Thanks.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,856,814
|
`:*While this has nothing to do with systematic bias, but one could make the argument that every fatwa issued by Al-Azhar is important by virute of it being ``an important Islamic university``. If anything, this should be used as a redirect if its not deleted. ::*Comment. I wouldn't want to see an article for every fatwa, but this one, in which Shia Islam is recognised as a valid form of Islam by Sunni scholars is important. It shows that extremist Sunni/Salafi hostility to the Shia is not supported by one of the more imporatant Sunni institutions. *Content already existing as mentioned above, hence Delete as an unlikely search term. `
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,857,638
|
: also bombing markets and thaking women as hostage before killing them is strictly forbidden in islam
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,859,862
|
== editheadz == You, sir, are an idiot. I have moved our text here: http://www.freearchive.org/wiki2/index.php/Tape_editing see if we care. It's not that wikipedia means anything, you know? Your bullshit administrators ruin everything anyway. Pull your crap on your dogs or cats or kids, we don't care for it.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
40,860,184
|
could have fooled me, hens! last time i checked you come from the low lands and have edited tape
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,860,509
|
moved to http://www.freearchive.org/wiki2/index.php/Tape_editing for safety (the wikipedia idiots don't want to include this page)
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
40,860,833
|
` Oh right, like ``This article sucks and you know it.`` isn't abusive language. Hypocrite. Eat shit and die, loser.`
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
40,870,125
|
If there is a sufficient reason for changing the logo, reply in the talk page instead.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,873,828
|
== Having trouble with speedy deletion request == Hello. I have posted a few articles for speedy deletion for a little while now, but there seems to be a backlog. The articles are Ciaran Paul Donnelly, Jessica Beaumont and Tomasz Winnicki. These articles seem to be nothing more than a form of attack on private individuals with no notability. Please read the information in the Talk pages to see the reason for requesting speedy deletion. Thank you.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,874,345
|
:Also, it is clearly stated that the numbers are somewhat speculative. So the current setup seemed to me accurate and honest. So I reverted )
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,878,018
|
== Past tense == Why is this article written in the past tense? Deacon Blue reformed in 1999 and are still gigging.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
40,887,316
|
===Manya Ellenberg=== Howdy, you added this to AfD, but since it was tagged {{prod}} by Tonywalton, I removed it from AfD
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,893,274
|
What do you mean it is hardly true I have proved without a shadow of a doubt that during the war the axis hade many times more raw materieals. That is abosolut fact and can been show in the graphs that i have made. Also during the war As i have so cleary said in the proposal that i have made the Soviet Unnion lost alot of area with raw materials and the axis gained them. If you do not know that The Axis hade and produced many times more raw materials then the Soviets then PROVE it because I have proven with real sources that the axis hade more. ( ) Also
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
40,894,512
|
February 2006 (UTC)) YOU ask for the IP check you made this comment It's confusing. Apparently, User:Victory Army created user User:Victory Day and then created Victory Day's user page. So you have to look at Victory Army to see the contribs. More evidence it's Deng...plus the broken English. Woohookitty(cat scratches) (UTC You believe it is me but I know it is not me this is all bullshit and a clear attack on me! You check the ip you ask them to check so that you will know that it is not me because if I check the ip If I ask you wont ofcurse believe me. Also do not forget to ask for everyones ip not only mine and victory but everyone, andI ofcurse am also checking and will ofcurse ask them to check yours as well And it is highly important to ask what country the ips of all involed are from. ( 18:53, 23
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,910,830
|
Whats the record on 1 storm?
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
40,910,947
|
:Without knowing exactly what question respondents were asked and how it was worded, we can't imply anything from the poll. We don't know 100% what question they were responding to and how it was worded. - ( | )
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
40,911,930
|
- As long as the spelling remains the same, I do not know what is the problem, letters are letters, may be in French, he has the point, but see the paradox here, wrong birthday is ok, but everything else... wow, must be corect... more ..90% + of all Poles celebrate his b-day on 2 22!Duh!
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,913,927
|
February 2006 (UTC)) Well if you would just scroll up some on that page you would see that others have asked to check many users not just one ( 21:26, 23
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,914,939
|
* Todd should know what he's talking about, so I'll trust superuser do.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
40,916,145
|
, 23 February 2006 (UTC)) Well the so called sock person has only posted in one article,also if they say no I can allways ask again and add information that they think is missing. Do you really think I would just give up and take it up the ass when someone is trying to misscredit me. And the fact that Ksenon and DMorpheus are being quiet now could be that I am very close in discovering that the so called sock (we know nothing yet) is from the same country and perhaps even same city as one of them. ( 21:40
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
40,916,540
|
`== Purges in the Red Army == The late 1930s saw the so-called ``Purges of the Red Army cadres``, occurring against the historical background of the Great Purge. The Purges had the objective of cleansing the Red Army of the ``politically unreliable element``, mainly among the higher-ranking officers. This inevitably provided a convenient pretext for settling personal vendettas and eventually resulted in a witch hunt. Some observers believe that the Purges weakened the Red Army considerably, but this remains a hotly debated subject. Many commentators overlook the fact that the Red Army grew significantly in numbers during the peak of the Purges. In 1937, the Red Army numbered around 1.3 million, and it grew to almost three times that number by June 1941. This necessitated quick promotion of junior officers, often despite their lack of experience or training, with obvious grave implications. In another important consideration, by the end of the Purges the pendulum swung back, restoring and promoting many of the purged officers. Recently declassified data indicate that in 1937, during the culmination of the Purges, the Red Army had 114,300 officers, of whom 11,034 suffered repression and did not gain rehabilitation until 1940. Yet, in 1938, the Red Army had 179,000 officers (56% more compared to 1937), of whom a further 6,742 suffered repression and did not gain rehabilitation until 1940 In the highest echelons of the Red Army the Purges removed 3 of 5 marshals, 13 of 15 army generals, 8 of 9 admirals, 50 of 57 army corps generals, 154 out of 186 division generals, 16 of 16 army commissars, and 25 of 28 army corps commissars. ( )`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,917,682
|
`To whoever changed the phrase ``unit level wargame`` to ``squad level wargame``, note that in this game, one controls units independently of each other, even members of the same squad. This is different to a squad level wargame such as Advance Wars, or on the tabletop, regular Warhammer 40,000, where the squad is the smallest atomic unit, rather than the individual soldier. Therefore this is a unit level wargame.`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,918,105
|
================= Hey ! Are you member of non-scientific group ? ))) Perhaps you have access to same Polish, English, Russion, Jewish, German, Czech ... newspapers from the end of the war and can find further sources for this information about the Galicia and Malopolska Wschodnia killings, massacres of Polish, Russion, Czech by ukrainian bands occurred in many towns after the end of the war !!!!!!!!. FUCK OF NAZI !
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
40,918,747
|
== About Cheat Code Dangers == Yeah I know. I saw it. Is there any way I can delete it? I think it's kinda crappy too y'know -P
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,920,076
|
:::Ok, I think I'll just wait out the 5 days. Thanks anyway. Oh, what did you think of my update to the Shangai World Financial Center page?
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,922,044
|
The criteria for GA - as opposed to FA - are simply * be well written * be factually accurate * use a neutral point of view * be stable * be referenced, and * wherever possible, contain images to illustrate it. * Good articles may not be as thorough and detailed as our featured articles, but should not omit any major facets of the topic. Someone obviously feels that this article meets these criteria. For you to dismiss it out of hand, for reasons that are not required for GA status, and are in fact addressed by the article anyway, and not attempt to make modifications yourself either, is not on. Cultural context is 1980s popular children's/teen comics derived from cartoons designed to sell plastic toys. Legacy is the new DH3 series. Influences are the Transformers series. Writers are Simon Furman, and Dan Abnett. This is all quite clear in the article.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,922,741
|
I dont think it is laugable but what is strange is that you say you have evidence that that user is me The best evidence would just to check the ips of everyone and see where they are from. And blocking me just after you made your post that you have evidence is very strange, it dosent give me chans to reply And when did I personally attack anyone? Why am I even blocked And why are you against you haveing your ip as checked this would without any doubt prove that your are the user. Whywould you not want to have your ip checked and why would you block me when I asked to have it checked? ( )
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,934,067
|
Speedy deletion info The only criteria it has to match is that he was not notable. It doesn't matter if there is an AFD. especially when some of the comments included in the deletion vote were about an apparent plot to kill the prime minister for which there is no evidence of him ever getting charged or arrested. Even the article doesn't support its title's claim. The person is NOT noteable and I have an email from Jimbo Jones that states Alex Kulbashian doesn't look noteable either.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,935,333
|
== Admin recreating an article after its deletion == Admin recreated an article after a speedy deletion. The speedy deletion request stated that the individual named in the artcile James Scott Richardson is not noteable and showed that a lot of the information was unsourced as well as misleading (I.E. article posted with title suggesting the individual plotted to assassinate the prime minister, rediculous, the article itself though doesn't support the suggestion the content makes. Afd vote on the article had a few votes that refered to a plot on the prime minister of canada's life to be a point of noteability, thus the title of the article is being used to disparage the individual. Either way, individual is not-noteable, claims that he is racist and that he was arrested for charges that were withdrawn. Is there anything I can do to get the article deleted permanently? There is politics at play in the decision to repost.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,937,348
|
Maybe the case is notable for a legal wiki pages, but the individual isn't notable enough to get an article on wikipedia. However, I'm sure we can bring this topic up to Jimbo Wales and deal with it.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,939,621
|
== Userbox == I've replied on .
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
40,940,089
|
I cant do that, I am blocked You can add something if you like ( )
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
40,940,735
|
We have increased our knowledge since Greco-Roman times.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,942,365
|
` I dont understand why it is intresting all I wanted to point out is that tens of thousands were not killed. It said before that 10 of thousands were killed i changed that. I didnt add anywhere to the article that the purges were good in any way at all. All I did was to change the ``tens of thousands were executed`` ( )`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,943,219
|
I dont understand, what do you mean? If you think the nummbers are wrong then I would be very happy to hear you oppinion D I dont mean that in any sarcastic way or nothing like that because I would be very happy to talk nummbers with someone who actually knows them and it seems that you do D And am I your pal D ( )
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,945,005
|
== I was blocked but then he changed his mind, but I would much rather talk about Russia with You D == Wanna talk some Russia and Ukraine stuff? If so I will get the ball rolling Do you think Russia and Ukraine will unite again? I think it is possible if Russias economy started grwoing even more then now and lots of ukranians moved there to get jobs. After a few years of that some people might say hey why dont we unite again we all seem to be working in russia so why not become the same again? What do you think, is it possible? ( )
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
40,945,115
|
HELLO MY NAME IS USER 66.229.17.88 I LIKE UNUSUAL BASEBALL PITCHERS AND METANARRATIVES =) PLEASE CONTACT ME WITH THIS USER PAGE!!! I AM NEW TO WIKIPEDIA AND HAVE HAD A FEW BUMPS ALONG THE WAY BUT I'M TRYING TO TURN MY LIFE AROUND AND HELP JIMMY WALES WITH HIS QUEST TO FORM A FREE, ULTIMATE COLLECTION OF FACTOIDS BD LOVE, 66.229.17.88 PS - BD
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,945,494
|
February 2006 (UTC)) Broken english, go here -> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tanks_%281919-1939%29&oldid;=40928499 And see the edits made to the Soviet Unnion by DMorpheus Just because it had poor english does not mean it is me in any way what so ever BUT if one thinks that since it is bad spelling it must be me well then one could even see it fiting with the plot idea, ooo look bad spelling must be deng And dosent that mean I have as much evidence that it is someone else as you do that it is me? Or do you dissagree with my line of thought? ( 01:12, 24
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,946,138
|
You dont like this sentence ->as a part of the Holocaust<- right? Then what would you want it to say? ( )
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,946,676
|
99.99% sure When it comes to the military 8k DEAD The rest were either sent to work camps or prisons. ( )
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
40,946,755
|
FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!!
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
40,947,927
|
==When the War is over please change the Russian population== When the War is over please change the Russian nummber to this 142,800,000 My Source is this http://www.mosnews.com/news/2006/01/24/populationdecrease.shtml Thank You ( )
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,949,547
|
Nonsense ( But I want them to unite D I am sorry I dont know Russian, not yet anyway ;) I am from Sweden. Schools here are free, but to study Russian at an uni level is no joke so I dont know if I want to do that AND to study what I am allready studying which is math but I will most likely jump to physics. And nice seeing you to ;) ( )
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,954,383
|
== My RfA == With apologies for the impersonal AWB-ness of the message... Thanks for your support on my recent request for adminship. It passed at 91/1/0, and I hope I can continue to deserve the community's trust. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you, and if I make a mistake be sure to tell me. is always open. ()
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,957,344
|
This is getting fucking redicilous. THERE IS NO CANON IN STAR WARS: KNIGHTS OF THE OLD REPUBLIC! THERE ARE ONLY TWO THINGS THAT ARE CANON. THE MOVIES, AND WHATEVER GEORGE LUCAS SAYS. LUCASARTS DOES !!NOT!! COUNT! IT IS NOT THE CREATOR OF STAR WARS, AND DOES NOT HOLD THE COPYWRIGHT TO THE IDEA! GEORGE LUCAS DOES! SO STOP SAYING THAT THERE IS A CANON WAY TO PLAY, BECAUSE THERE ISN'T! IT'S N00BS LIKE YOU THAT MAKE THIS WORLD SEEM LIKE A HAVEN OF LIES AND DECIET AND MISINFORMATION. JUST STOP!
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
40,957,432
|
There is no canon in KOTOR! Get over it!
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,958,426
|
::if possible could you find a specific URL at the DOT site with the capitalized phrase? Because then I think a lot of their arguments would go away. -
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
40,963,321
|
` ==The following is a COMPLAINT AGAINST for harassing user's about the Police State page== ==It seems that many users have had problems with harassment and vandalism== , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ``vandalism`` or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users. :Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?” : describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ``vandalism`` in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ``police state`` don't even pass the straight face test.” : even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior. :Dear Administrators: :``I would like to file a complaint against user ``nescio`` for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ``Police State``. User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples `` Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet`` and ``Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional``, as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail. :Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time. :Sincerely yours, :User Winston Smith : describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.” : had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. :: I have to say that Nescio and others had understandable grounds on which to suspect you of sockpuppetry. Fact is, you appeared on scene the day of/shortly after three genuine sockpuppets appeared, and you shared the same POV and short history of editing. :::Please explain what makes you think that is a sockpuppet? Can you cite these actions of VinnyCee that are considered to be those of a sock-puppet? :::: I just did. It turns out that Vinny Cee is not a sockpuppet (at least, of anything we checked), but there was good reason to suspect she was. :::::So VinnyCee is not a sock puppet. This means that Nescio's accusation of him being a sock puppet is false. Did you ``check`` into whether the other accusations made by Nescio against other users are also false? I would bet that they are. :It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken. ::The edit wars have not been between you and only Nescio. They have been between only you and many other users. :::As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again. ::::Again, is in violation of the vandalism clause. As was predicted by the users who brought me into the discussion, has employed his moderator lackeys to ban anyone who is critical of his vandalism. is not above the rules of Wikipedia. It makes one wonder why he is such a proponent of not allowing anonymous users to post at Wikipedia. It's probably one's only recourse after being unjustly banned by his moderators. . Another moderator has abused his or her powers to ban a user who is simply inquiring about why continually harasses users who do not share his point of view. Removing this inquiry is in itself a violation of WP:VAND. Please do not continue to remove this legitimate question. :: :::Please Stop Removing Warnings. ::::Why do you continue to vandalise your own user page? Please leave user comments on this page. How can you rationalize that this inquiry is a ``personal attack``? ::::: I think it is a personal attack, because you have singled out Nescio out of at least four editors who disagree with you emphatically. Nescio has shown good faith here, and your efforts to get him banned because he disagrees with you do not reflect well on your own good faith. ::::::In reality, quite the opposite is occuring. My efforts are focused on the goal of exposing abuse of moderators good intentions in order to get others banned who do not share his point of view. Oh, and, just out of curiousity, WHY IS THIS NOT ON NESCIO'S USERPAGE?! Can someone reasonable please get it OFF the police state discussion? :The reason why this is not on nescio's user page is because he keeps deleting it in violation of WP:VAND policy. This issue also pertains directly to this article since at least four users have been harassed and banned by Nescio's false accusations concerning this article. Ask him why he continues to delete this question about his ``edits''``. :: Actually, I'd like to ask you why you (a) persist in disruption of this page and (b) won't sign in and insist on using so many open proxy IP addresses? :::(a) This is not a ``disruption`` of this page. This discussion pertains deirectly to anyone who wishes to edit this article because if they edit in a manner that does not agree with, they will likely be harassed and banned by Nescio and his false accusations. People should be outraged that users and/or moderators are abusing thier powers. (b) If I were to sign on under my username, it would most certainly be banned in short order. I wish to see this issue resolved for all parties involved, but I am not willing to risk my status as an editor because of Nescio's frivilous accusations. `
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
40,974,512
|
Why is there more information on the Transformers universe than there is on Isaac Newton? This is a very interesting encyclopedia. -VOMGivesUp
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.