dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
47,393,318	Please refrain from posting innaccurate infomation about my website on your little internet encyclopedia. Thanks.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
47,394,936	so i got my kyogen book at the library and it seems like the author really hates it when people dont take kyogen seriously compared to noh. ps i really like the book. its got two short intros and then a bunch of short page and a half stories which are all unique and kinda have a life leason in side.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,405,692	`. I'll give you credit for the backup singers info, but the other part is still not verified. Not to mention that your entries were not very wikified, ie. ``audio coming soon`` and linking a source in parentheses`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,411,427	` :Thank you, Francs, I appreciate that. I only wish I could have people read it just as they are making those critical ``leaving Wikipedia`` decisions. `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
47,411,882	:Gauquelin's work is covered in the Validity of astrology article.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
47,415,283	` Ron, You are incorrect in theory that explaining the Shotokan/Karate relevance of common terms constitutes ``dictionary definitions``. Rather, what is there already, below what I am trying to add, are the dictionary definitions. However, I cannot stick to adding to the table because the entries on which I have knowledge are linked well enough. I only wish that you would add some Karate explanation for osu and some of the unlinked terms by adding that table column or using a footnote or two if there are only a couple of unlinked terms, and not be so terse. I've rebutted your ``pov`` argument by pointing out that I am adding no pov; everything is fact, as originally supplied by you yourself and Matt. You are just repeating yourself, I'm afraid, and you do not have a valid rebuttal to my point that clarifying notes, containing facts only, are useful in an encyclopedia. Matt, I am not putting any myth in the article; I am only putting debunking of it. There is a lot of hearsay about Karate, and it's important to put in what is not true, or someone else may come along with a feeling of certainty, and change it again. A note preempts this. This is a good point, so I'll put it in ``full caps`` (I do not intend to ``shout``, please understand, but it's a good idea to catch the eye with this:) THERE IS A LOT OF HEARSAY ABOUT KARATE, AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO PUT IN WHAT IS NOT TRUE, OR SOMEONE ELSE MAY COME ALONG WITH A FEELING OF CERTAINTY, AND CHANGE IT AGAIN. A NOTE PREEMPTS THIS. Best regards, `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
47,425,282	` Are you serious?! Lets begin with my alltime favorite character ever. This is going to be fun. 1. Brendan Filone is one of the 2 main supporting characters of season one, the other being Mikey Palmice. How is this guaranteed? Simple. If you check the cast listing and first credited cast, you will see that Brendan and Mikey are the only two names listed in the main cast for season one. 2. Second, simple. The newly released collector card set. Brendan and Mikey are also 2 of the only people who got killed to get their own cards. By this i am referring to the new set released by inkworks. check it out if you haven't already. 3. His death plays a prominent role in the series. he is mentioned in 6 episodes after his demise, not including ``Meadowlands``, where his body is found. 4. He appears in 4 episodes, not 2. And in the episodes that he appears, his name is placed prominently in the beginning of the credits. 5. He is mentioned even in season 2. Chris has a dream sequence and sees Brendan and Mikey playing cards with soldiers. Want more? 6. He is the first character in the series who actually played a ROLE and got killed. All people who were killed in season one, other than mikey, were very minor appearing. - `	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
47,426,833	== Images == What happened to the images that used to be on this page?	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
47,428,423	` == I know two of your brothers == : ) e / `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,437,240	I wanted to start this entry in order to fill in the genealogy. I haven't made a succession box, because I haven't yet found out what happened to the County of Marche between 1165 and 1203. No doubt someone else can help.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
47,437,303	:Kensington-Cedar Cottage is two neighbourhoods: Kensington and Cedar Cottage.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
47,440,225	== Champions League section == I removed this section because it had errors and was unclear - no year, etc. Was it an important game or something? On 4.september was played first match in Champions Cup(nowadays Champions league) betwen Sporting Lisboa and Partizan Belgrade.The match was played in Lisboa at 17h in front of 35000 viewers,and the referee was french Martinis.Result was tied 3:3 (HT 1:1).	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
47,448,128	==Thanks for the great review!== One-sided, conspirationalism at its best, January 3, 2006 Reviewer: JFW (United Kingdom)- This is a repository of pseudoscientific and usually demonstrably wrong material about a host of topics, including many imporant medical ones. It promulgates views one finds in the pro-UFO magazine Nexus. Everything is a conspiracy, and if it isn't then one can usually be found. Disappointing.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,449,181	== Please don't edit my pages == Unless you have something productive to add to a Wikipedia article you did NOT start, please do not {{prod}} my pages. I try to word my articles to be as factual and unbiased as possible, and as an employee at the headquarters of this company, I am qualified to clarify this frequently occurring misunderstanding. Thanks.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,451,600	` And I could ask Mr. Deng the same question. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ``you are always wrong`` are not welcome. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,451,699	` == PC Crub == I created this article and the ``deletion`` notice should not be there, so I removed it. Unless you have something productive to add to a Wikipedia article you did NOT start, please do not my pages. I try to word my articles to be as factual and unbiased as possible, and as an employee at the headquarters of this company, I am qualified to clarify this frequently occurring misunderstanding. Thanks.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,452,467	== DJ Clayworth wrongly requests deletion of pages == Hi CelticWonder. Thanks for deciding to contribute to Wikipedia. We hope you'll stick around and make many contributions. if you haven't done so please read Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and the pages that it links to. Regarding your message on my talk page: once you have added an article to Wikipedia it becomes free for anyone to edit. That's the nature of a wiki - everyone contributes wherever they feel able. The article PC Crub that you started doesn't read like an encyclopedia article. If you really think it's a common misspelling then it can be a redirect (see Wikipedia:Redirects). Since you object to my deletion proposal I've added it to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion page where the whole Wikipedia community will reach on consensus onwhether it should stay.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
47,453,452	that's your opinion. you can keep it to yourself. everyone on the show deserves a page. -	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
47,454,115	== Accessories == I'd like to point out that the Tilt-Sensor is NOT an accessory. It is built in to certain GBA Game Paks, and used only in those games. I think it's just Warioware Twisted and Yoshi Topsy-Turvy. I don't believe that a technology built into certian games should be counted as an accessory. That's like saying that the clock is and accessory for the Game Boy since it was included in the Pokemon Gold and Silver games.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
47,456,362	:: The homeopathic view , the naturopathic view , the nutritional medicine view . They don't deny measles is infectious, but I'd like an explanation as to why you deny people those viewpoints on Wiki?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,459,951	: Prin has reverted the article again without bothering to discuss. All links to songs, trailers, Telugu filmography, whole paragraphs are lost now. Thank You!	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,465,582	` == Well... == And I could ask Mr. Deng the same questions. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ``you are always wrong`` are not welcome. Be careful with words like vandalism. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen. Kurt. PS. I would like to know why Deng removed this message during his last posting to this discussion page...`	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
47,471,112	Hey folks. I admit I'm pretty angry that Dcandeto deleted my articles. I'm new to wiki and maybe I didn't understand all of the ettiquete that goes on here. Dcandeto, I apologize for the vandalism I did, but I thought we never really had a decent debate on my articles. All I am asking is that as an experienced wikipedian, you should be held up to at least the same standards as a beginner like myself. Maybe, your guy is notable somewhere but you don't assert it, and I've never heard of him. Again, sorry for the attacks before but really you should be more friendly to beginners. Thanks. Jazzy. Furthermore, I did not I could not have two accounts so from now on I will use only jazzygirl006.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
47,474,480	Hey glad to hear from you. This is Jazzy. Admittedly, I am extremely frustrated with user dcandeto, and my actions have been less than perfect, but I wrote an article for a journalism class on a well known guy named Cody Hedman, and Dcandeto hounded on it until it was deleted. I felt I did not get ample time to discuss the article before it was taken down. I admit I made several accounts trying to get around dcandeto. Firstly, I created Cdub1985 a run off of the guy I wrote about, and then jazzy 006, jazzy 007, and I got my friends to try and keep it on. Honestly, my attacks against dcandeto have been stupid and anger motivated, and attempting to delete his article was an act of frustration but I do not feel he asserted the importance of the writer he wrote about. Honestly, what I wrote was not a vanity article, and I just thought it would be cool to have an article on wiki but the way I was so quickly attacked and had nothing explained to me was unreasonable and I retaliated. You know I treated dcandeto bad, but I feel he should be more understanding and helpful towards newcomers instead of trying to delete work ASAP. Thanks. Jazzy.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,475,391	I'm not trying to justify anything; I'm just trying to prevent others from making the same mistake and causing the article to be modified incorrectly in the future.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
47,475,612	`Ron, you were saying ``in a last attempt to be civil...`` ... If I say what you want, what will you do in return? `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
47,476,701	` :I apologize for the cursory message above. The opening page (titled ``Tanzgruppe BOLIVIA``) looks like a commercial advertisement, but looking more closely I do see that your site also contains information that could be valuable. However, adding the same link (with the same descriptive text) to a number of pages is not particularly helpful, and I'd suggest that you link to the page appropriate for each article instead of the index page of your site. Thanks for your interest in contributing. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,476,840	Ron, there are limits to democracy, which seem to be recognized by Wikipedia: they want consensus. CapJ - Maybe you should start a page on Osu, then I will add the kanji transliterations. ron Southwick In fact, how about a page which actually transliterates martial arts terms, i.e. kung fu, osu, shodan…etc. So many are misused and you know how I love kanji/hanja. ron Southwick If you can stop deleting my work, we'll see...	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
47,483,613	This is pure tripe stolen from their bio on their official website, which is outdated by the way. That's bad wiki practice.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
47,488,873	those sections are written by people affiliated with TAS, its vanity. writing a long article for something that is clearly not important.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
47,492,023	Mike Greensill Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Mike Greensill article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! \|	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,492,151	`Because of the growing irrelevance of Wikipedia and the Squeakbox crowd, I haven't bothered coming around here and this time I have read the incredible filth placed above by ``Hierarchypedia`` (interesting how none of you care to reveal your true identities. The f___ word simply is not and never has been in my vocabulary. I have NEVER posted the ``love that pot`` message. That type of low class street talk comes from others! I think retractions and apologies to myself are in order! `	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
47,496,322	Actually, since I'm just a little bitch, I'm gonna go ahead and block you now. I'm such a FAG!	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	true
47,497,105	*There is a mention of Quiche at the beginning...	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
47,497,561	::If that were true WP:VAIN would not be a wikipedia policy. In this case, the editors are clearly affiliated with TAS. Their sources are also derived from people affiliated with TAS. The material in the article is not from a third-party neutral reporter. TAS students and alumni are simply using wikipedia as free advertising space.	2,006	false	article	blocked	dev	false
47,500,206	It's right in the credits. )	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,509,194	I was born and raised a Muslim and I know from personal experience how that term is used to discriminate against people. Though you maybe correct that I have strong POV with this issue. There are many concerns that need to be discussed with the article. We all agree that the original version, the one before the major edits was no good becuase it lacked sources, citations and it had a strong anti-Islamic bias and was strongly POV from the other side. The term is very broadly applied and it is defined differently by diferent people. The prior version of the article focused on degrading Islam. One thing that is not understood by anybody here is that ISLAM IS INHERENTLY A POLITICAL RELIGION. ISLAM IS A RELIGION MEANT TO BE APPLIED TO GOVERNMENTS. Though the term Islamism has been defined by other people and most of you guys are just reflecting on that. This article is still strongly POV from the otherside. Reagrdless, this is a very controversial topic and i think we should start fresh again.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,511,943	Okay. I was giving suggestions for the article before, but people began attacking me. So I defended myself. But they did not get a warning. But regardless, I think that the current article is very good. Maybe it can be broadened up to include the various definitions the term Islamism takes from different people. Very differnt definitions are applied to the term as shown in the sources. I also think that the history section should be removed. It lists Islamic groups as Islamist movements based on opinion and it has nothing to do with the term. I think that the history section should focus more on the evolution of the term. The different stages it went through, for example, the term was first used in french to just refer to Islam. Then the term disappeared. Then during the 1970s people began using that term to refer to what they refered to as 'political Islam.' Then Daniel Pipes popularized the usage of the term. The article should also include a controversy sectio nabout how controverisal the use of the term is. That is my take on it.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,518,969	` :::Is Nomura's word not good enough? Before this I've mentioned that when their names are spelt in Roman alphabets, there will surely be an ``X``, right? The truth is that when the ``X`` is taken away, the alphabets that are left behind is an anagram of the members' real names when they were humans. I actually wanted to insert an event scene showing how Roxas got his name. First the word ``SORA`` popped up and those letters were rearranged into ``ROAS`` and BAM, suddenly the ``X`` got inserted in the middle and he was told ``Take this name....`` Well, I had an image like that but it was something difficult to do time-wise so I gave up. ) `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,521,433	` Holy crap, I take it back, the above kid who started this postis not an idiot, (I never said he was stupid) YOU ARE! I never even said he was wrong, when he brought this thing up, every wrestling site on the net already brought up the fact that JR will be returning at Wrestlemania, but yet he had to inform us, anyway. God man, you seriously need to pay attention to what I wrote before you bring up irrelevant support, and stop using the lame ``I suck at grammar, because I'm Norwegian`` excuse, you may easily fix your mistakes, but you choose not to! I am through communicating with you, ``Lord``. This post ends here. And that's the bottomline, because said so!`	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	true
47,522,615	` Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ead \| /c `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,523,250	*So? I can reset my modem quite easily, you know. 'cept for Raul's little range block... shucks. Oh well, as long as it pisses him off (which I know it does). Maybe I'll go find a proxy...	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
47,523,970	==Interesting Reading== A Criticism of the Wikipedia Wikipedia Review	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
47,525,177	` Harkenbane: Your question isn't that simple. On the one hand, if you do research using an instrument such as the 16PF, yes, you do ``replicate`` the factor structure. For example, when the researchers at IPAT wrote hundreds of brand new 16PF items during the development of the 16PF, administered them to hundreds of volunteers, and then performed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses... Yes, the factors were confirmed. Both in factor-analyses of the new scales and in analyses of the old and new forms. But the same is true of the NEO with it's 30 facets and Hogam's HPI with it's dozens of HIC's. So if you mean, ``Do researchers agree on any breakdown of the five broad factors?`` then no. Since the choice of factors is somewhat arbitrary, there is no reason to expect that they would agree. But my point are that: (1) the big five is far too broad, so (2) virtually all commercial personality tests have adopted this two-stage model and (3) I have seen evidence (like Lew Goldberg's unpublished ``Comparitive validity`` chapter) that convinces me that these facets have significantly higher validity than the broad traits, even after you account for the different numbers of predictors (by using empirical cross-validation, in the case of Lew's chapter). Goldberg's chapter actually found that the 16PF factors were most predictive of all factorial models (e.g., NEO-5, NEO-30, Hogan-6, Hogan-36, etc.) And I guess your also asking whether anyone has done the same things Cattell did and gotten the same results. That's not as cut-and-dried as you suggest. AFAIK, only one replication has been attempted (by Norman?) and it's true, he didn't find the same results. But one contrary finding does not constitute a stunning refutation and I'd argue that Norman's different findings could easily reflect that exploratory factor analysis is a poor way to replicable factors. There are far too many judgments required (like how many factors to extract which is absoluetly not a solved problem). `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
47,529,622	: It is absurd to say whale.to is all WP:RS. Bit like saying the same for the British Library. It has the largest collection of books on smallpox vaccination available on the internet . So let's see you make out those 19cent books aren't a reliable source. WP:POV.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,529,915	:::: Try harder, the evidence is even on Wiki Fred R. Klenner, better on whale.to , which also makes Midgley's WP:RSclaim to be pure WP:POV.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,530,947	` == Well... == And I could ask Mr. Deng the same questions. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ``you are always wrong`` are not welcome. Be careful with words like vandalism. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen. Kurt. PS. How nice. You delete my post and don't answer. (see the history) Very creative...I suggest that you drop this aditude ``don't post crap on my page.`` I sent report of this action to moderators.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,531,104	*Seconded. Improvement needed. I may flag this as a potential future project. Have other engagements at this time.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,531,307	` ==Image copyright problem with Image:Thetank.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Thetank.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. / `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,532,924	` == Well... == == Well... == And I could ask Mr. Deng the same questions. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ``you are always wrong`` are not welcome. Be careful with words like vandalism. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen. Kurt. PS. How nice. You delete my post and don't answer. (see the history) Very creative...I suggest that you drop this aditude ``don't post crap on my page.`` Strangely, you have not deleted any other messages. Remove this again and I will sent report of this action to moderators.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,533,162	:There is no doubt that there is misreporting of EU policy that is motivated by a populist and anti-EU press. There is also no doubt that the pro-EU lobby has coined the term Euromyth and engaged in a parlour game of gain-saying that is equally partisan. I think that there is an article here but the reader would be served by an introduction that puts the content in an NPOV context. I might have a go some time but others should feel free. BTW - Wikipedia is very pro-EU. We need articles on the van Gend en Loos and Costa v. ENEL cases to get some balance.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
47,535,321	==Original research by == I've added the Original research template to a comment this user made in this section. If a reference is not provided I will delete the comment.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
47,536,006	== Abdullah Öcalan == Hi, could you tell me why you reverted my edit on Abdullah Öcalan. Btw its me,i forgot to sign in.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
47,536,417	The score for the 1982 world championship was 18-15, and not 18-16 as listed in the article. Tim Sandle	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
47,537,987	I told you he was notable, medical men who become anti-vaccine activists are, as going against the herd takes courage and intelligence.	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
47,538,557	`2) In 1976 world championship final, Higgins not conceed early before Reardon had ``reached the winning post``. Reardon won the frame he needed to win the match 27-16. However, Higgins did conceed several frames early when he could still have techniclaly won them. 3)While it is correct that Higgins was ranked number 2 on two occassions (since the ranking list was created in 1976) it is worth noting that for the 1982 / 1983 list, Higgins had two ranking points deducted for misconduct. Otherwise he would have been ranked number one, based on tournament performance. The article does not list many of Higgins' tournament victories. I would suggest adding: 1972 Irish Professional Champion (beat Rea 28-12) 1973 Men of the Midlands (beat Reardon 5-3) 1975 Canadian Open (beat Pulam 15-7) 1977 Canadian Open (beat Spencer 17-14) 1978 Benson and Hedges Masters (beat Thorburn 7-5) 1978 Irish Professional Champion (beat Dennis Taylor 21-7) 1979 Irish Professional Champion (beat Patsy Fagan 21-13) 1979 Tolly Cobbold Classic (beat Reardon 5-4) 1980 British Gold Cup (beat Reardon 5-1) 1980 Padmore / Super Crysalate International (beat Mans 4-2) 1980 Tolly Cobbold Classic (beat Dennis Taylor 5-4) 1980 Pontins Professional Championship (beat Dennis Taylor 9-7) 1981 Benson and Hedges Masters (beat Griffiths 9-5) 1983 Irish Professional Championship (beat Dennis Taylor 16-11) 1984 World Doubles Championship (with Jimmy White; beat Thorburn and Thorne 10-2) 1985, 1986, 1987 World Team Championship (playing for Ireland) 1989 Irish Professional Championship (beat Jack McLaughlin 9-7) `	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
47,538,863	` ==Image copyright problem with Image:Gaay i1.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Gaay i1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. / `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,540,151	`==Image copyright problem with Image:Jordan-rees.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Jordan-rees.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,540,865	J. O'Donnell. Addition: Actually, I've had a look at a more recent paper from the PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) that suggests that bacteria delivered through a flea bite may directly cause scepticemia. I had assumed that the condition was simply a subclinical form of bubonic plague, where the bacteria still pass through the lymph nodes but do not cause direct infection. It appears that Y. pestis injected into a host through natural means, in this case a flea bite, may indeed cause a patient to proceed directly to a scepticemic form of plague. The paper is free if anyone is curious to read it: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/103/14/5526 -J.	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
47,542,190	John Chain == I wrote an article on John Chain, the chairman of the board at Northrop Grumman. It's now on the main page! Cool! If you're interested, take a look. : Congratulations! == The categories were suitable == Do not remove them again . ==	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,554,517	` ===Criticisms=== I think it is unbalanced for this article to cite in full a long list of passages used in favour of ``Christian anarchism``, with little comment about how other people might interpret them, when the list of criticims does not cite the whole passage and gives the anarchist response. Therefore I will expand the quotations in the criticisms sections. `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
47,555,855	There are 28 locations listed, but the body explains that it was a 27-store chain?	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
47,559,852	==Block of == I noticed you temporarily blocked this IP address. Since his/her block has expired he/she has started vandalising again. I have issued a warning. Perhaps we can consider a more long-term ban?	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
47,562,380	Update... 27 stores in Texas (after Allied Store Corporation changed the names of its Tiche-Goettinger stores in Dallas to Joske's) and one in Phoenix = 28	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
47,564,922	It's more likely a Dirk Gently movie will be released before a Sequal to Hitchhikers. Acording to Salmon of doubt they were starting to ponder that before Adams's untimely death.-	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
47,573,818	` :::What about ``Schools which allow or require uniforms with skirts for girls do not appear to permit them to be worn by boys.``? `	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
47,588,914	What? I don't get it.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
47,589,219	== Persistent Vandalism and defwarn of Chad Smith Article by Johnc1 ==	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
47,590,815	and www.cornsilks.com sockpuppets	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,591,373	` == Pessimism v. optimism in Beckett. == I have an issue with the statment ``Beckett's work is . . . deeply pessimistic about the human condition`` as found in the first paragraph. I changed ``deeply`` to ``deceptively,`` and it was immediately changed back. I don't know how to contact the subsequent editor directly, so I'll post this here by way of discussion. Perhaps replacing “deeply” with “deceptively” is not the best fix, but as it stands the quoted statement puts forth, as fact, an opinion that is widley open to interpretation. Beckett’s writings aren’t just about the journey. If they were, “deeply pessimistic” would be nearly undebatable. They’re just as much about the destination, or at least the goal. And while he frames life’s journey as a slog through shit, his ultimate implication is that the slog is worthwhile. As everything from the Greek and Latin classics to the greatest of Hollywood’s pro-war propaganda movies have proven again and again, the more monstrously you portray the obstacle, the larger looms the hero who overcomes them. The same is true in Beckett: the obstacles are unrelenting and nearly insurmountable, but the journey continues, heroically. The Beckett hero may be standing in the dark, but he's faced towards the light, distant—an unattainable—as it may be. The essential Beckett quote isn’t “I can’t go on”—full stop; it’s “I can’t go on. I’ll go on.” Now, I may not have convinced you, personally, that Beckett’s work is more optimistic than pessimistic. But perhaps I’ve made a case that a flatly factual statement like “Beckett's work is stark . . . and deeply pessimistic about the human condition” is a bit overstated for an article that strives to remain free of bias. Beckett himself would be the first to disagree with you. He once said that if he were a pessimist, he wouldn’t write. Although I know that the artist is not always the most reliable source for understanding his work, that ought to count for something.`	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
47,593,204	:Because they're pointless and not terribly interesting? )	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	true
47,596,529	== Separate == Your bot changed 'seprate' to 'seperate'. The correct spelling is 'separate'.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,605,266	` :Sorry about that. Only the part ``inherently a political religion`` should be in quotes. Here is one source. There are several sources were the above quote can be found. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
47,605,394	In a previous post you said the following “our list should mirror the City's list” which could be found on this page above. The City took the incumbent status off of there page. What is the reason you think our page should NOW be different than the City’s? Oh, wait let me guess why!	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
47,605,721	::The rest off what I wrote can also be quoted by Islamic sites. Who believe that in the middle east there should be only Islamic law.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,606,110	` == Male Wikipedians == Hi! I noticed you made yourself a male userbox. I've just made a ``standard`` one at (which slots you into Category:Male Wikipedians). Feel free to use it and/or edit it! — \| ==Wikimedia Canada== Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there! ==Strelchick== I got your message about Strelchick. When I made an article about him, it was about 2 weeks before the election. It was only 2 sentences long. Then some NDP-er added like 100 paragraphs too it. (Don't worry, Im a staunch liberal) I think it should be shortnened, and then, if nothing at all happens for about six months, deleted. But not yet. Thanks. ==Strelchick 2== I got a reply from someone about you, and the Strelchick article. I didn't really understand it, but this guy hates you. Take a look at it, and tell me what you want to do about the article. Thanks, PS. You went to TSS. cool == Help with Vandalism == Hey, you seem like a fairly experienced user, so I thought I'd ask you for help. keeps blanking Talk:Simon Strelchick. I've reverted it like three times already, and he keeps blanking it - what should I do? Thanks, :I've left him a warning message on his talk page. You could list the incident on WP:AN/I or, if he reverts more than three times in 24 hours, on WP:AN3. ==Strelchick redux== While it's clear that the new editors' behaviour is inappropriate, I'd be remiss if I didn't also suggest to you that you might want to be a bit more careful in the future not to get involved in discussions where you might be perceived as having a personal bias. Whether you do or don't isn't even really the point — sometimes all that's necessary to spark this kind of ruckus is the perception that you have a vested interest. They obviously believe that your nomination was politically motivated rather than based on a neutral assessment of Wikipedia policy. In future, it might be best to just avoid putting yourself in a situation where your motivations might be questioned in this way. You can always ask other editors, or the Canadian notice board, to review a situation if you think your motivations for proposing a course of action might be questioned. : Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board == WikiProject Vancouver == Hello. I am Arnold (aka Buchanan-Hermit) and I am writing to invite you to join the newly-formed WikiProject Vancouver. It was created really recently and it's in need of new members and those who are willing to spread the word. I'd love to see you there. ) Thanks for your time. ..... == test page == Please do not use the main article namespace for testing. There is the Wikipedia:Sandbox for doing that, or . Just edit the page at the red link. —•• EMAIL• :I've speedily Userfied your test page, it can now be found here: User:Pm shef/Pm Shef's Test Center, feel free to test away in your own userspace. /CVU :Test pages are not approriate for the main Article space, however you can have all the test pages you want that start with User:(yourname)/PageName. I moved the test page Pm Shef's Test Center out of main article space to a subpage of your userpage, User:Pm shef/Pm Shef's Test Center. You can test/edit/develop it all you want there. If you intend to make it in to an article, you can either MOVE it to the article name, or just copy/apste the contents (if you are the only contributor). Hope this answeres your question. /CVU == Shefman AfD == No, I wasn't aware of it, but here's a counterexample: if you look at Boston, MA, there are perhaps two people on the entire City Council that have articles here on WP (they're all listed, but only one or two have blue links). Boston is about 4 times the population of Vaughan, and I would also point out that its politicians get in the papers very often as well for voting if nothing else. It's certainly much more historically notable as a city than Vaughan is (as I see it), and yet there is clearly no consensus on who deserves an article and who doesn't. I would also note that if there is a group that concerns itself with Vaughan on WP, they've got kind of a vested interest in claiming that everyone in their city deserves an article, and thus you've got a slanted vote. I see very little in the way of content that makes Shefman any more notable than the average town selectman, and if you would like, I would support an RFC on notability for all of the Council as long as there wasn't a skewed vote (as occurred on the first or second Shefman AfD). From that vote, it seems that a lot of the Vaughan people are politically active, which also makes motive regarding political notability questionable. The reasoning you have wrt Vaughan would also have it stand to reason that every SGA president of a sizable college campus would be deserving of an article, and that certainly is not the case by any stretch of the imagination. Also, if newspaper appearance was notable, every weekly columnist for every paper in any municipality would also be notable. That's not the case. Every athlete would be notable from high school on up, and that's not the case. To take it a little further, I would bet that every single UN delegate does not have an article on WP, and they're much more notable than a councilman, in my view. I see a rigged consensus and some self-promotion involved. What would in fact best serve this whole process would be a WP policy on political notability, because it gets it out of a single issue (which this is) while achieving the same result, as well as solving the problem in future for everybody. :WP:RFC I believe is the policy page, but I think we would need to do something bigger than that for purposes of reaching the whole community. An RFC is a ``Request for Comment``, so you basically ask for other peoples' opinions on something, but invariably, unless someone is interested in the topic, they don't comment. If you are interested in trying to do something community-based rather than on one article, I'll have to look in to how to do that. ::If there were to be a City Council level page, you would probably get into a WP:BIO problem if you dealt with each individual separately, on that page, and I still don't think it addresses the Non-Notability issue in your favor - the Hamilton Council page has 15 names, only two of which have articles (one being the mayor, who would be notable, and the other being Ward 6 Councilor Tom Jackson, whose article was up for a deletion vote in the past). So, there's clearly still a notability issue. I could see a council page with the mayor as notable and no one else without remarkable proof, and if that was acceptable to everybody, I would agree to that kind of page, but I don't think others will, precisely because they feel that there is notability for everyone involved, and I don't think there is. Other people have apparently thought so too. Even if the council page is a list, there can still be articles linked, and I or anybody else could still AfD the articles inidividually, which doesn't solve the issue. NEW	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
47,608,048	` Ill try to be more to the point this time.The reason we should know what major muslim world languages 24.7.141.159 speaks natively as he said is because he is saying ``It is quite obvious that none of the other editors have come forward with being multilingual or having any skill in reading Arabic. This in and of itself puts your POV out of the sphere of NPOV because you are commenting on a non-Western topic without acknowledging non-Western sources due to language handicaps.`` he keeps saying things like this and that other peoples sources dont really count because they dont have the expertise he does in speaking all these languages, he is only saying trust me they dont have this concept in muslim languages. I think thats called ``appeal to an authority`` which in this case is himself which is fine but we should know for sure because otherwise someone might think maybe he is just making all this up or something.`	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
47,616,006	` Eddie, the main problem with Wikipedia is that it benefits from the free time of many hundreds of thousands of individuals. So much spare time that it can treat them individually with contempt if it chooses, and get away with it, and not care very much, however much ill feeling that generates. If it had to pay people for the time they input, it would use that time responsibly. But it doesn't have to pay for it. So it doesn't have to manage the resource responsibly. Wikipedia cares very little how much effort any particular individual happens to put into any particular article. As far as Wikipedia is concerned, all of that effort can just be swept into the waste bin by someone else, the next person who happens to come along, if it suits that other person, and if that happens, it costs Wikipedia nothing, so why should Wikipedia give a damn really? It won't. Wikipedia can smile, shrug its collective shoulders, and say, ``The time you happened to waste isn't a cost to us so we really couldn't care less.`` The system lacks responsibility and wastes the time of countless individuals behind the scenes, and Wikipedia doesn't care about that. Why should it care, if it has millions of individuals as a free resource? Once one understands the system, and one returns to articles and finds that one's contributions have been generally mucked about with to the point where there was very little point in contributing in the first place, and that the essence of Wikipedia is to waste people's spare time, and that people aren't being organised sensibly, the only intelligent thing to do is walk away and not bother contributing. What is the point in carefully drafting things, concentrating on getting everything right, if anybody else is just at liberty to come along and chuck the whole thing out if it suits them? It's a daft system. The system works because you have so many people contributing, but the amount of individual time that gets wasted, and the amount of irritation that gets generated in the process, is, I imagine, collosal.`	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
47,620,948	with my finger up my nose, just messin'!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,631,523	==AfD tag at Wagonz Brothers Productions== Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,634,860	::You mean the former extremely racist and biased introduction meant to degrade Islam from the viewpoint of members of the KKK. The article now is neutral and very well balanced.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,635,545	==Dear Member off the KKK== Dear KKK member, I know that you hate Muslims and all but please stop messing with the Islamism article. I dont know why someone from colorado is so interested in the article.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,636,387	==Kyaa the catlord== Kyaa the catlord keeps reverting the Islamism page back too the original version from about a week ago, please get her or him to stop.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,636,643	::I guess your a KKK member who doesnt realize that the whole world is laughing at you.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,637,143	::::I dont think the yare concerned about you. I guess they find you and your humorous people to be clowns. I mean the things that the KKK do are just plain clownish.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
47,637,488	By the way look at the talk page and you'll see the moderators said not too revert the article back to the old version. so stop playing games and get a life. I know in colorado there is not much too do. But please try too find something else to do with your time.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
47,637,976	There's a blatant copyright violation (see: http://dabaru.com/htm/Greats_BD_Niaz.htm). I'll paraphrase it within a few days.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
47,639,442	==LGBT Edit== Your heart is in the right place, but please post in the discussion of the article. )	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,650,425	==Unblock Request== I am really sorry. Can you unblock me. I will not leave comments like that anymore. I will stay away from the Islamism page since there is no use to editing it anymore and I dont think it is that serious. So i'll promise i'll stay away from the page and the other editors from that page. I'll just do the positive contributions I had been doing earlier, before I saw the Islamism page. lease unblock me. I have learned my lesson and I will not do that anymore.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,650,590	Please see the bootom of the page for my unblock request	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,655,665	==== This guy has been defaming you on certain pages. I noticed he' had numerous warnings; I think he should be blocked now.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,660,098	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,661,901	== Usercheck == Not that I am aware of. One anon vandal said that they were told to vandalise my page on some message board. And you know the funny thing. When the last PSYCH episode happened a year ago (before the arbitration) and I had anon vandals then too, one said exactly the same thing. Coincidence? I think not.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
47,672,589	April 2006 (UTC) :::::::::::* ad 1. You seem to be ignorant of Wikipedia policy. Reversion is a conplete overturn of changes by other users. I just salvage vandalised sections and try to improve on other users'editions, like good-faith users do with my additions. You are kindlyu advised to refresh your knowledge of Wikipedia guidelines. :::::::::::* ad 2. As long as you don't source and I do, your point is moot. :::::::::::* ad 3. Bad-faith remark, unbecoming of an administrator. :::::::::::* ad 4. Incorrect statements. Islamist sources are claiming that about six million African Muslims are converting to Christianity, which I prove with an Al Jazeera link. This number probably is at the high side, as Islamist like to exaggerate to state their points but they acknowledge this statement. :::::::::::* ad 5. If I add reputable sources to support my statements it is not nonsens or OR, t is encyclopedic writing. You are kindly advised to study applicable guidelines. As the Chinese say: first check out your own house three times before you try to improve the world. \| 25px) 08:42, 9	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
47,672,958	Mike18xx\|Mike18xx]] 08:45, 9 April	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
47,673,410	== RMS == He's at it again. \|	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
47,680,415	== Thanks == Thanks for your comments on my talk page. I don't know the protocol, and I didn't mean to appear rude or being a timewaster by deleting them. I assumed it was my talk page so I can take out/leave what I want there? You mean well, but I didn't see very much point in replying to the points you make, particularly as replying by me would just look like sour grapes. As you rightly say, I have to make my own mind up about staying/going. For various reasons, I have decided on the latter. Colin	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,684,132	`+1``>Comments re. Robert Siegel or one of his sock-puppets , please	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
47,686,406	` == Conflict of Interest == Pm_shef: This is an attempt to resolve the concerns that relate to your conduct on Wikipedia and the editing of articles that you are personally involved in. As you know, the official policy of Wikipedia, according to WP:NOT, is that Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and that editors should avoid contributing to articles that they are personally involved in. That doesn't mean that your edits have not been neutral; rather, it means that any editing at all of Vaughan Council-related articles is inappropriate, no matter what is written. Here is the fulltext, from WP:NOT: ===Wikipedia is not a soapbox=== Wikipedia is not a soapbox, or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising. Therefore, Wikipedia articles are not: #Propaganda or advocacy of any kind. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to approach a neutral point of view. You might wish to go to Usenet or start a blog if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views. You can also use Wikinfo which promotes a ``sympathetic point of view`` for every article. #Self-promotion. The arbitration committee ruled on February 17, 2006 that: ``Editors should avoid contributing to articles about themselves or subjects in which they are personally involved, as it is difficult to maintain NPOV while doing so.`` Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical articles, or to articles in which you have a personal stake, is similarly unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Notability. #Advertising. Articles about companies and products are fine if they are written in an objective and unbiased style. Furthermore, all article topics must be third-party verifiable, so articles about very small ``garage`` companies are not likely to be acceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they can serve to identify major corporations associated with a topic (see finishing school for an example). Please note Wikipedia does not endorse any businesses and it does not set up affiliate programs. See also WP:CORP for a proposal on corporate notability. - I understand that you've written to a user that you will not be involved anymore in Vaughan-related articles. That's a commendable position. I'm sure there are many subjects and articles of interest to you on Wikipedia that do not relate to your father or his opponents. Do I understand your position correctly? And is this approach of abstention one that you permanently take? If so, I again commend that position. I trust, as I'm sure you do, that the administrators and the contributors to Wikipedia will maintain quality articles about worthy and reputable subjects. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
47,687,225	a miscarriage, or be intentionally induced through chemical, surgical, or other means. In common parlance, abortion usually refers to any induced procedure that results in the death of an embryo or fetus, even viable ones, such as the controversial but rare late-term abortion procedures. All mammalian pregnancies can be aborted; however, human abortion receives the most focus in biology and the mass media.	2,006	true	article	random	test	false

47,393,318

Please refrain from posting innaccurate infomation about my website on your little internet encyclopedia. Thanks.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

47,394,936

so i got my kyogen book at the library and it seems like the author really hates it when people dont take kyogen seriously compared to noh. ps i really like the book. its got two short intros and then a bunch of short page and a half stories which are all unique and kinda have a life leason in side.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,405,692

`. I'll give you credit for the backup singers info, but the other part is still not verified. Not to mention that your entries were not very wikified, ie. ``audio coming soon`` and linking a source in parentheses`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,411,427

` :Thank you, Francs, I appreciate that. I only wish I could have people read it just as they are making those critical ``leaving Wikipedia`` decisions. `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

47,411,882

:Gauquelin's work is covered in the Validity of astrology article.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

47,415,283

` Ron, You are incorrect in theory that explaining the Shotokan/Karate relevance of common terms constitutes ``dictionary definitions``. Rather, what is there already, below what I am trying to add, are the dictionary definitions. However, I cannot stick to adding to the table because the entries on which I have knowledge are linked well enough. I only wish that *you* would add some Karate explanation for osu and some of the unlinked terms by adding that table column or using a footnote or two if there are only a couple of unlinked terms, and not be so terse. I've rebutted your ``pov`` argument by pointing out that I am adding no pov; everything is fact, as originally supplied by you yourself and Matt. You are just repeating yourself, I'm afraid, and you do not have a valid rebuttal to my point that clarifying notes, containing *facts only*, are useful in an encyclopedia. Matt, I am not putting any myth in the article; I am only putting debunking of it. There is a lot of hearsay about Karate, and it's important to put in what is *not* true, or someone else may come along with a feeling of certainty, and change it again. A note preempts this. This is a good point, so I'll put it in ``full caps`` (I do not intend to ``shout``, please understand, but it's a good idea to catch the eye with this:) THERE IS A LOT OF HEARSAY ABOUT KARATE, AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO PUT IN WHAT IS *NOT* TRUE, OR SOMEONE ELSE MAY COME ALONG WITH A FEELING OF CERTAINTY, AND CHANGE IT AGAIN. A NOTE PREEMPTS THIS. Best regards, `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

47,425,282

` Are you serious?! Lets begin with my alltime favorite character ever. This is going to be fun. 1. Brendan Filone is one of the 2 main supporting characters of season one, the other being Mikey Palmice. How is this guaranteed? Simple. If you check the cast listing and first credited cast, you will see that Brendan and Mikey are the only two names listed in the main cast for season one. 2. Second, simple. The newly released collector card set. Brendan and Mikey are also 2 of the only people who got killed to get their own cards. By this i am referring to the new set released by inkworks. check it out if you haven't already. 3. His death plays a prominent role in the series. he is mentioned in 6 episodes after his demise, not including ``Meadowlands``, where his body is found. 4. He appears in 4 episodes, not 2. And in the episodes that he appears, his name is placed prominently in the beginning of the credits. 5. He is mentioned even in season 2. Chris has a dream sequence and sees Brendan and Mikey playing cards with soldiers. Want more? 6. He is the first character in the series who actually played a ROLE and got killed. All people who were killed in season one, other than mikey, were very minor appearing. - `

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

47,426,833

== Images == What happened to the images that used to be on this page?

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

47,428,423

` == I know two of your brothers == : ) e / `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,437,240

I wanted to start this entry in order to fill in the genealogy. I haven't made a succession box, because I haven't yet found out what happened to the County of Marche between 1165 and 1203. No doubt someone else can help.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

47,437,303

:Kensington-Cedar Cottage is two neighbourhoods: Kensington and Cedar Cottage.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

47,440,225

== Champions League section == I removed this section because it had errors and was unclear - no year, etc. Was it an important game or something? On 4.september was played first match in Champions Cup(nowadays Champions league) betwen Sporting Lisboa and Partizan Belgrade.The match was played in Lisboa at 17h in front of 35000 viewers,and the referee was french Martinis.Result was tied 3:3 (HT 1:1).

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

47,448,128

==Thanks for the great review!== One-sided, conspirationalism at its best, January 3, 2006 Reviewer: JFW (United Kingdom)- This is a repository of pseudoscientific and usually demonstrably wrong material about a host of topics, including many imporant medical ones. It promulgates views one finds in the pro-UFO magazine Nexus. Everything is a conspiracy, and if it isn't then one can usually be found. Disappointing.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,449,181

== Please don't edit my pages == Unless you have something productive to add to a Wikipedia article you did NOT start, please do not {{prod}} my pages. I try to word my articles to be as factual and unbiased as possible, and as an employee at the headquarters of this company, I am qualified to clarify this frequently occurring misunderstanding. Thanks.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,451,600

` And I could ask Mr. Deng the same question. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ``you are always wrong`` are not welcome. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,451,699

` == PC Crub == I created this article and the ``deletion`` notice should not be there, so I removed it. Unless you have something productive to add to a Wikipedia article you did NOT start, please do not my pages. I try to word my articles to be as factual and unbiased as possible, and as an employee at the headquarters of this company, I am qualified to clarify this frequently occurring misunderstanding. Thanks.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,452,467

== DJ Clayworth wrongly requests deletion of pages == Hi CelticWonder. Thanks for deciding to contribute to Wikipedia. We hope you'll stick around and make many contributions. if you haven't done so please read Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and the pages that it links to. Regarding your message on my talk page: once you have added an article to Wikipedia it becomes free for anyone to edit. That's the nature of a wiki - everyone contributes wherever they feel able. The article PC Crub that you started doesn't read like an encyclopedia article. If you really think it's a common misspelling then it can be a redirect (see Wikipedia:Redirects). Since you object to my deletion proposal I've added it to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion page where the whole Wikipedia community will reach on consensus onwhether it should stay.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

47,453,452

that's your opinion. you can keep it to yourself. everyone on the show deserves a page. -

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

47,454,115

== Accessories == I'd like to point out that the Tilt-Sensor is NOT an accessory. It is built in to certain GBA Game Paks, and used only in those games. I think it's just Warioware Twisted and Yoshi Topsy-Turvy. I don't believe that a technology built into certian games should be counted as an accessory. That's like saying that the clock is and accessory for the Game Boy since it was included in the Pokemon Gold and Silver games.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

47,456,362

:: The homeopathic view , the naturopathic view , the nutritional medicine view . They don't deny measles is infectious, but I'd like an explanation as to why you deny people those viewpoints on Wiki?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,459,951

: Prin has reverted the article again without bothering to discuss. All links to songs, trailers, Telugu filmography, whole paragraphs are lost now. Thank You!

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,465,582

` == Well... == And I could ask Mr. Deng the same questions. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ``you are always wrong`` are not welcome. Be careful with words like vandalism. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen. Kurt. PS. I would like to know why Deng removed this message during his last posting to this discussion page...`

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

47,471,112

Hey folks. I admit I'm pretty angry that Dcandeto deleted my articles. I'm new to wiki and maybe I didn't understand all of the ettiquete that goes on here. Dcandeto, I apologize for the vandalism I did, but I thought we never really had a decent debate on my articles. All I am asking is that as an experienced wikipedian, you should be held up to at least the same standards as a beginner like myself. Maybe, your guy is notable somewhere but you don't assert it, and I've never heard of him. Again, sorry for the attacks before but really you should be more friendly to beginners. Thanks. Jazzy. Furthermore, I did not I could not have two accounts so from now on I will use only jazzygirl006.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

47,474,480

Hey glad to hear from you. This is Jazzy. Admittedly, I am extremely frustrated with user dcandeto, and my actions have been less than perfect, but I wrote an article for a journalism class on a well known guy named Cody Hedman, and Dcandeto hounded on it until it was deleted. I felt I did not get ample time to discuss the article before it was taken down. I admit I made several accounts trying to get around dcandeto. Firstly, I created Cdub1985 a run off of the guy I wrote about, and then jazzy 006, jazzy 007, and I got my friends to try and keep it on. Honestly, my attacks against dcandeto have been stupid and anger motivated, and attempting to delete his article was an act of frustration but I do not feel he asserted the importance of the writer he wrote about. Honestly, what I wrote was not a vanity article, and I just thought it would be cool to have an article on wiki but the way I was so quickly attacked and had nothing explained to me was unreasonable and I retaliated. You know I treated dcandeto bad, but I feel he should be more understanding and helpful towards newcomers instead of trying to delete work ASAP. Thanks. Jazzy.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,475,391

I'm not trying to justify anything; I'm just trying to prevent others from making the same mistake and causing the article to be modified incorrectly in the future.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

47,475,612

`Ron, you were saying ``in a last attempt to be civil...`` ... If I say what you want, what will you do in return? `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

47,476,701

` :I apologize for the cursory message above. The opening page (titled ``Tanzgruppe BOLIVIA``) looks like a commercial advertisement, but looking more closely I do see that your site also contains information that could be valuable. However, adding the same link (with the same descriptive text) to a number of pages is not particularly helpful, and I'd suggest that you link to the page appropriate for each article instead of the index page of your site. Thanks for your interest in contributing. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,476,840

Ron, there are limits to democracy, which seem to be recognized by Wikipedia: they want consensus. CapJ - Maybe you should start a page on Osu, then I will add the kanji transliterations. ron Southwick In fact, how about a page which actually transliterates martial arts terms, i.e. kung fu, osu, shodan…etc. So many are misused and you know how I love kanji/hanja. ron Southwick If you can stop deleting my work, we'll see...

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

47,483,613

This is pure tripe stolen from their bio on their official website, which is outdated by the way. That's bad wiki practice.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

47,488,873

those sections are written by people affiliated with TAS, its vanity. writing a long article for something that is clearly not important.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

47,492,023

Mike Greensill Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Mike Greensill article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! |

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,492,151

`Because of the growing irrelevance of Wikipedia and the Squeakbox crowd, I haven't bothered coming around here and this time I have read the incredible filth placed above by ``Hierarchypedia`` (interesting how none of you care to reveal your true identities. The f___ word simply is not and never has been in my vocabulary. I have NEVER posted the ``love that pot`` message. That type of low class street talk comes from others! I think retractions and apologies to myself are in order! `

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

47,496,322

Actually, since I'm just a little bitch, I'm gonna go ahead and block you now. I'm such a FAG!

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

true

47,497,105

*There is a mention of Quiche at the beginning...

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

47,497,561

::If that were true WP:VAIN would not be a wikipedia policy. In this case, the editors are clearly affiliated with TAS. Their sources are also derived from people affiliated with TAS. The material in the article is not from a third-party neutral reporter. TAS students and alumni are simply using wikipedia as free advertising space.

2,006

false

article

blocked

dev

false

47,500,206

It's right in the credits. )

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,509,194

I was born and raised a Muslim and I know from personal experience how that term is used to discriminate against people. Though you maybe correct that I have strong POV with this issue. There are many concerns that need to be discussed with the article. We all agree that the original version, the one before the major edits was no good becuase it lacked sources, citations and it had a strong anti-Islamic bias and was strongly POV from the other side. The term is very broadly applied and it is defined differently by diferent people. The prior version of the article focused on degrading Islam. One thing that is not understood by anybody here is that ISLAM IS INHERENTLY A POLITICAL RELIGION. ISLAM IS A RELIGION MEANT TO BE APPLIED TO GOVERNMENTS. Though the term Islamism has been defined by other people and most of you guys are just reflecting on that. This article is still strongly POV from the otherside. Reagrdless, this is a very controversial topic and i think we should start fresh again.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,511,943

Okay. I was giving suggestions for the article before, but people began attacking me. So I defended myself. But they did not get a warning. But regardless, I think that the current article is very good. Maybe it can be broadened up to include the various definitions the term Islamism takes from different people. Very differnt definitions are applied to the term as shown in the sources. I also think that the history section should be removed. It lists Islamic groups as Islamist movements based on opinion and it has nothing to do with the term. I think that the history section should focus more on the evolution of the term. The different stages it went through, for example, the term was first used in french to just refer to Islam. Then the term disappeared. Then during the 1970s people began using that term to refer to what they refered to as 'political Islam.' Then Daniel Pipes popularized the usage of the term. The article should also include a controversy sectio nabout how controverisal the use of the term is. That is my take on it.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,518,969

` :::Is Nomura's word not good enough? Before this I've mentioned that when their names are spelt in Roman alphabets, there will surely be an ``X``, right? The truth is that when the ``X`` is taken away, the alphabets that are left behind is an anagram of the members' real names when they were humans. I actually wanted to insert an event scene showing how Roxas got his name. First the word ``SORA`` popped up and those letters were rearranged into ``ROAS`` and BAM, suddenly the ``X`` got inserted in the middle and he was told ``Take this name....`` Well, I had an image like that but it was something difficult to do time-wise so I gave up. ) `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,521,433

` Holy crap, I take it back, the above kid who started this postis not an idiot, (I never said he was stupid) YOU ARE! I never even said he was wrong, when he brought this thing up, every wrestling site on the net already brought up the fact that JR will be returning at Wrestlemania, but yet he had to inform us, anyway. God man, you seriously need to pay attention to what I wrote before you bring up irrelevant support, and stop using the lame ``I suck at grammar, because I'm Norwegian`` excuse, you may easily fix your mistakes, but you choose not to! I am through communicating with you, ``Lord``. This post ends here. And that's the bottomline, because said so!`

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

true

47,522,615

` Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ead | /c `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,523,250

*So? I can reset my modem quite easily, you know. 'cept for Raul's little range block... shucks. Oh well, as long as it pisses him off (which I know it does). Maybe I'll go find a proxy...

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

47,523,970

==Interesting Reading== A Criticism of the Wikipedia Wikipedia Review

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

47,525,177

` Harkenbane: Your question isn't that simple. On the one hand, if you do research using an instrument such as the 16PF, yes, you do ``replicate`` the factor structure. For example, when the researchers at IPAT wrote hundreds of brand new 16PF items during the development of the 16PF, administered them to hundreds of volunteers, and then performed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses... Yes, the factors were confirmed. Both in factor-analyses of the new scales and in analyses of the old and new forms. But the same is true of the NEO with it's 30 facets and Hogam's HPI with it's dozens of HIC's. So if you mean, ``Do researchers agree on any breakdown of the five broad factors?`` then no. Since the choice of factors is somewhat arbitrary, there is no reason to expect that they would agree. But my point are that: (1) the big five is far too broad, so (2) virtually all commercial personality tests have adopted this two-stage model and (3) I have seen evidence (like Lew Goldberg's unpublished ``Comparitive validity`` chapter) that convinces me that these facets have significantly higher validity than the broad traits, even after you account for the different numbers of predictors (by using empirical cross-validation, in the case of Lew's chapter). Goldberg's chapter actually found that the 16PF factors were most predictive of all factorial models (e.g., NEO-5, NEO-30, Hogan-6, Hogan-36, etc.) And I guess your also asking whether anyone has done the same things Cattell did and gotten the same results. That's not as cut-and-dried as you suggest. AFAIK, only one replication has been attempted (by Norman?) and it's true, he didn't find the same results. But one contrary finding does not constitute a stunning refutation and I'd argue that Norman's different findings could easily reflect that exploratory factor analysis is a poor way to replicable factors. There are far too many judgments required (like **how many factors to extract** which is absoluetly **not** a solved problem). `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

47,529,622

: It is absurd to say whale.to is all WP:RS. Bit like saying the same for the British Library. It has the largest collection of books on smallpox vaccination available on the internet . So let's see you make out those 19cent books aren't a reliable source. WP:POV.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,529,915

:::: Try harder, the evidence is even on Wiki Fred R. Klenner, better on whale.to , which also makes Midgley's WP:RSclaim to be pure WP:POV.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,530,947

` == Well... == And I could ask Mr. Deng the same questions. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ``you are always wrong`` are not welcome. Be careful with words like vandalism. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen. Kurt. PS. How nice. You delete my post and don't answer. (see the history) Very creative...I suggest that you drop this aditude ``don't post crap on my page.`` I sent report of this action to moderators.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,531,104

*Seconded. Improvement needed. I may flag this as a potential future project. Have other engagements at this time.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,531,307

` ==Image copyright problem with Image:Thetank.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Thetank.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. / `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,532,924

` == Well... == == Well... == And I could ask Mr. Deng the same questions. What are his sources? I don't have anything agains't him, but his personal attacks ``you are always wrong`` are not welcome. Be careful with words like vandalism. No, I don't claim that I am the supreme scholar of WWII, but neither are you. He has not provided any sources either that I have seen. Kurt. PS. How nice. You delete my post and don't answer. (see the history) Very creative...I suggest that you drop this aditude ``don't post crap on my page.`` Strangely, you have not deleted any other messages. Remove this again and I will sent report of this action to moderators.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,533,162

:There is no doubt that there is misreporting of EU policy that is motivated by a populist and anti-EU press. There is also no doubt that the pro-EU lobby has coined the term Euromyth and engaged in a parlour game of gain-saying that is equally partisan. I think that there is an article here but the reader would be served by an introduction that puts the content in an NPOV context. I might have a go some time but others should feel free. BTW - Wikipedia is very pro-EU. We need articles on the van Gend en Loos and Costa v. ENEL cases to get some balance.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

47,535,321

==Original research by == I've added the Original research template to a comment this user made in this section. If a reference is not provided I will delete the comment.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

47,536,006

== Abdullah Öcalan == Hi, could you tell me why you reverted my edit on Abdullah Öcalan. Btw its me,i forgot to sign in.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

47,536,417

The score for the 1982 world championship was 18-15, and not 18-16 as listed in the article. Tim Sandle

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

47,537,987

I told you he was notable, medical men who become anti-vaccine activists are, as going against the herd takes courage and intelligence.

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

47,538,557

`2) In 1976 world championship final, Higgins not conceed early before Reardon had ``reached the winning post``. Reardon won the frame he needed to win the match 27-16. However, Higgins did conceed several frames early when he could still have techniclaly won them. 3)While it is correct that Higgins was ranked number 2 on two occassions (since the ranking list was created in 1976) it is worth noting that for the 1982 / 1983 list, Higgins had two ranking points deducted for misconduct. Otherwise he would have been ranked number one, based on tournament performance. The article does not list many of Higgins' tournament victories. I would suggest adding: 1972 Irish Professional Champion (beat Rea 28-12) 1973 Men of the Midlands (beat Reardon 5-3) 1975 Canadian Open (beat Pulam 15-7) 1977 Canadian Open (beat Spencer 17-14) 1978 Benson and Hedges Masters (beat Thorburn 7-5) 1978 Irish Professional Champion (beat Dennis Taylor 21-7) 1979 Irish Professional Champion (beat Patsy Fagan 21-13) 1979 Tolly Cobbold Classic (beat Reardon 5-4) 1980 British Gold Cup (beat Reardon 5-1) 1980 Padmore / Super Crysalate International (beat Mans 4-2) 1980 Tolly Cobbold Classic (beat Dennis Taylor 5-4) 1980 Pontins Professional Championship (beat Dennis Taylor 9-7) 1981 Benson and Hedges Masters (beat Griffiths 9-5) 1983 Irish Professional Championship (beat Dennis Taylor 16-11) 1984 World Doubles Championship (with Jimmy White; beat Thorburn and Thorne 10-2) 1985, 1986, 1987 World Team Championship (playing for Ireland) 1989 Irish Professional Championship (beat Jack McLaughlin 9-7) `

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

47,538,863

` ==Image copyright problem with Image:Gaay i1.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Gaay i1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. / `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,540,151

`==Image copyright problem with Image:Jordan-rees.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Jordan-rees.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,540,865

J. O'Donnell. Addition: Actually, I've had a look at a more recent paper from the PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) that suggests that bacteria delivered through a flea bite may directly cause scepticemia. I had assumed that the condition was simply a subclinical form of bubonic plague, where the bacteria still pass through the lymph nodes but do not cause direct infection. It appears that Y. pestis injected into a host through natural means, in this case a flea bite, may indeed cause a patient to proceed directly to a scepticemic form of plague. The paper is free if anyone is curious to read it: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/103/14/5526 -J.

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

47,542,190

John Chain == I wrote an article on John Chain, the chairman of the board at Northrop Grumman. It's now on the main page! Cool! If you're interested, take a look. : Congratulations! == The categories were suitable == Do not remove them again . ==

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,554,517

` ===Criticisms=== I think it is unbalanced for this article to cite in full a long list of passages used in favour of ``Christian anarchism``, with little comment about how other people might interpret them, when the list of criticims does not cite the whole passage and gives the anarchist response. Therefore I will expand the quotations in the criticisms sections. `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

47,555,855

There are 28 locations listed, but the body explains that it was a 27-store chain?

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

47,559,852

==Block of == I noticed you temporarily blocked this IP address. Since his/her block has expired he/she has started vandalising again. I have issued a warning. Perhaps we can consider a more long-term ban?

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

47,562,380

Update... 27 stores in Texas (after Allied Store Corporation changed the names of its Tiche-Goettinger stores in Dallas to Joske's) and one in Phoenix = 28

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

47,564,922

It's more likely a Dirk Gently movie will be released before a Sequal to Hitchhikers. Acording to Salmon of doubt they were starting to ponder that before Adams's untimely death.-

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

47,573,818

` :::What about ``Schools which allow or require uniforms with skirts for girls do not appear to permit them to be worn by boys.``? `

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

47,588,914

What? I don't get it.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

47,589,219

== Persistent Vandalism and defwarn of Chad Smith Article by Johnc1 ==

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

47,590,815

and www.cornsilks.com sockpuppets

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,591,373

` == Pessimism v. optimism in Beckett. == I have an issue with the statment ``Beckett's work is . . . deeply pessimistic about the human condition`` as found in the first paragraph. I changed ``deeply`` to ``deceptively,`` and it was immediately changed back. I don't know how to contact the subsequent editor directly, so I'll post this here by way of discussion. Perhaps replacing “deeply” with “deceptively” is not the best fix, but as it stands the quoted statement puts forth, as fact, an opinion that is widley open to interpretation. Beckett’s writings aren’t just about the journey. If they were, “deeply pessimistic” would be nearly undebatable. They’re just as much about the destination, or at least the goal. And while he frames life’s journey as a slog through shit, his ultimate implication is that the slog is worthwhile. As everything from the Greek and Latin classics to the greatest of Hollywood’s pro-war propaganda movies have proven again and again, the more monstrously you portray the obstacle, the larger looms the hero who overcomes them. The same is true in Beckett: the obstacles are unrelenting and nearly insurmountable, but the journey continues, heroically. The Beckett hero may be standing in the dark, but he's faced towards the light, distant—an unattainable—as it may be. The essential Beckett quote isn’t “I can’t go on”—full stop; it’s “I can’t go on. I’ll go on.” Now, I may not have convinced you, personally, that Beckett’s work is more optimistic than pessimistic. But perhaps I’ve made a case that a flatly factual statement like “Beckett's work is stark . . . and deeply pessimistic about the human condition” is a bit overstated for an article that strives to remain free of bias. Beckett himself would be the first to disagree with you. He once said that if he were a pessimist, he wouldn’t write. Although I know that the artist is not always the most reliable source for understanding his work, that ought to count for something.`

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

47,593,204

:Because they're pointless and not terribly interesting? )

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

true

47,596,529

== Separate == Your bot changed 'seprate' to 'seperate'. The correct spelling is 'separate'.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,605,266

` :Sorry about that. Only the part ``inherently a political religion`` should be in quotes. Here is one source. There are several sources were the above quote can be found. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

47,605,394

In a previous post you said the following “our list should mirror the City's list” which could be found on this page above. The City took the incumbent status off of there page. What is the reason you think our page should NOW be different than the City’s? Oh, wait let me guess why!

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

47,605,721

::The rest off what I wrote can also be quoted by Islamic sites. Who believe that in the middle east there should be only Islamic law.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,606,110

` == Male Wikipedians == Hi! I noticed you made yourself a male userbox. I've just made a ``standard`` one at (which slots you into Category:Male Wikipedians). Feel free to use it and/or edit it! — | ==Wikimedia Canada== Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there! ==Strelchick== I got your message about Strelchick. When I made an article about him, it was about 2 weeks before the election. It was only 2 sentences long. Then some NDP-er added like 100 paragraphs too it. (Don't worry, Im a staunch liberal) I think it should be shortnened, and then, if nothing at all happens for about six months, deleted. But not yet. Thanks. ==Strelchick 2== I got a reply from someone about you, and the Strelchick article. I didn't really understand it, but this guy hates you. Take a look at it, and tell me what you want to do about the article. Thanks, PS. You went to TSS. cool == Help with Vandalism == Hey, you seem like a fairly experienced user, so I thought I'd ask you for help. keeps blanking Talk:Simon Strelchick. I've reverted it like three times already, and he keeps blanking it - what should I do? Thanks, :I've left him a warning message on his talk page. You could list the incident on WP:AN/I or, if he reverts more than three times in 24 hours, on WP:AN3. ==Strelchick redux== While it's clear that the new editors' behaviour is inappropriate, I'd be remiss if I didn't also suggest to you that you might want to be a bit more careful in the future not to get involved in discussions where you might be perceived as having a personal bias. Whether you do or don't isn't even really the point — sometimes all that's necessary to spark this kind of ruckus is the perception that you have a vested interest. They obviously believe that your nomination was politically motivated rather than based on a neutral assessment of Wikipedia policy. In future, it might be best to just avoid putting yourself in a situation where your motivations might be questioned in this way. You can always ask other editors, or the Canadian notice board, to review a situation if you think your motivations for proposing a course of action might be questioned. : Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board == WikiProject Vancouver == Hello. I am Arnold (aka Buchanan-Hermit) and I am writing to invite you to join the newly-formed WikiProject Vancouver. It was created really recently and it's in need of new members and those who are willing to spread the word. I'd love to see you there. ) Thanks for your time. ..... == test page == Please do not use the main article namespace for testing. There is the Wikipedia:Sandbox for doing that, or . Just edit the page at the red link. —•• EMAIL• :I've speedily Userfied your test page, it can now be found here: User:Pm shef/Pm Shef's Test Center, feel free to test away in your own userspace. /CVU :Test pages are not approriate for the main Article space, however you can have all the test pages you want that start with User:(yourname)/PageName. I moved the test page Pm Shef's Test Center out of main article space to a subpage of your userpage, User:Pm shef/Pm Shef's Test Center. You can test/edit/develop it all you want there. If you intend to make it in to an article, you can either MOVE it to the article name, or just copy/apste the contents (if you are the only contributor). Hope this answeres your question. /CVU == Shefman AfD == No, I wasn't aware of it, but here's a counterexample: if you look at Boston, MA, there are perhaps two people on the entire City Council that have articles here on WP (they're all listed, but only one or two have blue links). Boston is about 4 times the population of Vaughan, and I would also point out that its politicians get in the papers very often as well for voting if nothing else. It's certainly much more historically notable as a city than Vaughan is (as I see it), and yet there is clearly no consensus on who deserves an article and who doesn't. I would also note that if there is a group that concerns itself with Vaughan on WP, they've got kind of a vested interest in claiming that everyone in their city deserves an article, and thus you've got a slanted vote. I see very little in the way of content that makes Shefman any more notable than the average town selectman, and if you would like, I would support an RFC on notability for all of the Council as long as there wasn't a skewed vote (as occurred on the first or second Shefman AfD). From that vote, it seems that a lot of the Vaughan people are politically active, which also makes motive regarding political notability questionable. The reasoning you have wrt Vaughan would also have it stand to reason that every SGA president of a sizable college campus would be deserving of an article, and that certainly is not the case by any stretch of the imagination. Also, if newspaper appearance was notable, every weekly columnist for every paper in any municipality would also be notable. That's not the case. Every athlete would be notable from high school on up, and that's not the case. To take it a little further, I would bet that every single UN delegate does not have an article on WP, and they're much more notable than a councilman, in my view. I see a rigged consensus and some self-promotion involved. What would in fact best serve this whole process would be a WP policy on political notability, because it gets it out of a single issue (which this is) while achieving the same result, as well as solving the problem in future for everybody. :WP:RFC I believe is the policy page, but I think we would need to do something bigger than that for purposes of reaching the whole community. An RFC is a ``Request for Comment``, so you basically ask for other peoples' opinions on something, but invariably, unless someone is interested in the topic, they don't comment. If you are interested in trying to do something community-based rather than on one article, I'll have to look in to how to do that. ::If there were to be a City Council level page, you would probably get into a WP:BIO problem if you dealt with each individual separately, on that page, and I still don't think it addresses the Non-Notability issue in your favor - the Hamilton Council page has 15 names, only two of which have articles (one being the mayor, who would be notable, and the other being Ward 6 Councilor Tom Jackson, whose article was up for a deletion vote in the past). So, there's clearly still a notability issue. I could see a council page with the mayor as notable and no one else without remarkable proof, and if that was acceptable to everybody, I would agree to that kind of page, but I don't think others will, precisely because they feel that there is notability for everyone involved, and I don't think there is. Other people have apparently thought so too. Even if the council page is a list, there can still be articles linked, and I or anybody else could still AfD the articles inidividually, which doesn't solve the issue. NEW

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

47,608,048

` Ill try to be more to the point this time.The reason we should know what major muslim world languages 24.7.141.159 speaks natively as he said is because he is saying ``It is quite obvious that none of the other editors have come forward with being multilingual or having any skill in reading Arabic. This in and of itself puts your POV out of the sphere of NPOV because you are commenting on a non-Western topic without acknowledging non-Western sources due to language handicaps.`` he keeps saying things like this and that other peoples sources dont really count because they dont have the expertise he does in speaking all these languages, he is only saying trust me they dont have this concept in muslim languages. I think thats called ``appeal to an authority`` which in this case is himself which is fine but we should know for sure because otherwise someone might think maybe he is just making all this up or something.`

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

47,616,006

` Eddie, the main problem with Wikipedia is that it benefits from the free time of many hundreds of thousands of individuals. So much spare time that it can treat them individually with contempt if it chooses, and get away with it, and not care very much, however much ill feeling that generates. If it had to pay people for the time they input, it would use that time responsibly. But it doesn't have to pay for it. So it doesn't have to manage the resource responsibly. Wikipedia cares very little how much effort any particular individual happens to put into any particular article. As far as Wikipedia is concerned, all of that effort can just be swept into the waste bin by someone else, the next person who happens to come along, if it suits that other person, and if that happens, it costs Wikipedia nothing, so why should Wikipedia give a damn really? It won't. Wikipedia can smile, shrug its collective shoulders, and say, ``The time you happened to waste isn't a cost to us so we really couldn't care less.`` The system lacks responsibility and wastes the time of countless individuals behind the scenes, and Wikipedia doesn't care about that. Why should it care, if it has millions of individuals as a free resource? Once one understands the system, and one returns to articles and finds that one's contributions have been generally mucked about with to the point where there was very little point in contributing in the first place, and that the essence of Wikipedia is to waste people's spare time, and that people aren't being organised sensibly, the only intelligent thing to do is walk away and not bother contributing. What is the point in carefully drafting things, concentrating on getting everything right, if anybody else is just at liberty to come along and chuck the whole thing out if it suits them? It's a daft system. The system works because you have so many people contributing, but the amount of individual time that gets wasted, and the amount of irritation that gets generated in the process, is, I imagine, collosal.`

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

47,620,948

with my finger up my nose, just messin'!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,631,523

==AfD tag at Wagonz Brothers Productions== Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,634,860

::You mean the former extremely racist and biased introduction meant to degrade Islam from the viewpoint of members of the KKK. The article now is neutral and very well balanced.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,635,545

==Dear Member off the KKK== Dear KKK member, I know that you hate Muslims and all but please stop messing with the Islamism article. I dont know why someone from colorado is so interested in the article.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,636,387

==Kyaa the catlord== Kyaa the catlord keeps reverting the Islamism page back too the original version from about a week ago, please get her or him to stop.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,636,643

::I guess your a KKK member who doesnt realize that the whole world is laughing at you.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,637,143

::::I dont think the yare concerned about you. I guess they find you and your humorous people to be clowns. I mean the things that the KKK do are just plain clownish.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

47,637,488

By the way look at the talk page and you'll see the moderators said not too revert the article back to the old version. so stop playing games and get a life. I know in colorado there is not much too do. But please try too find something else to do with your time.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

47,637,976

There's a blatant copyright violation (see: http://dabaru.com/htm/Greats_BD_Niaz.htm). I'll paraphrase it within a few days.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

47,639,442

==LGBT Edit== Your heart is in the right place, but please post in the discussion of the article. )

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,650,425

==Unblock Request== I am really sorry. Can you unblock me. I will not leave comments like that anymore. I will stay away from the Islamism page since there is no use to editing it anymore and I dont think it is that serious. So i'll promise i'll stay away from the page and the other editors from that page. I'll just do the positive contributions I had been doing earlier, before I saw the Islamism page. lease unblock me. I have learned my lesson and I will not do that anymore.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,650,590

**Please see the bootom of the page for my unblock request**

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,655,665

==== This guy has been defaming you on certain pages. I noticed he' had numerous warnings; I think he should be blocked now.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,660,098

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,661,901

== Usercheck == Not that I am aware of. One anon vandal said that they were told to vandalise my page on some message board. And you know the funny thing. When the last PSYCH episode happened a year ago (before the arbitration) and I had anon vandals then too, one said exactly the same thing. Coincidence? I think not.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

47,672,589

April 2006 (UTC) :::::::::::* ad 1. You seem to be ignorant of Wikipedia policy. Reversion is a conplete overturn of changes by other users. I just salvage vandalised sections and try to improve on other users'editions, like good-faith users do with my additions. You are kindlyu advised to refresh your knowledge of Wikipedia guidelines. :::::::::::* ad 2. As long as you don't source and I do, your point is moot. :::::::::::* ad 3. Bad-faith remark, unbecoming of an administrator. :::::::::::* ad 4. Incorrect statements. Islamist sources are claiming that about six million African Muslims are converting to Christianity, which I prove with an Al Jazeera link. This number probably is at the high side, as Islamist like to exaggerate to state their points but they acknowledge this statement. :::::::::::* ad 5. If I add reputable sources to support my statements it is not nonsens or OR, t is encyclopedic writing. You are kindly advised to study applicable guidelines. As the Chinese say: first check out your own house three times before you try to improve the world. | 25px) 08:42, 9

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

47,672,958

Mike18xx|Mike18xx]] 08:45, 9 April

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

47,673,410

== RMS == He's at it again. |

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

47,680,415

== Thanks == Thanks for your comments on my talk page. I don't know the protocol, and I didn't mean to appear rude or being a timewaster by deleting them. I assumed it was my talk page so I can take out/leave what I want there? You mean well, but I didn't see very much point in replying to the points you make, particularly as replying by me would just look like sour grapes. As you rightly say, I have to make my own mind up about staying/going. For various reasons, I have decided on the latter. Colin

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,684,132

`+1``>Comments re. Robert Siegel or one of his sock-puppets , please

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

47,686,406

` == Conflict of Interest == Pm_shef: This is an attempt to resolve the concerns that relate to your conduct on Wikipedia and the editing of articles that you are personally involved in. As you know, the official policy of Wikipedia, according to WP:NOT, is that Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and that editors should avoid contributing to articles that they are personally involved in. That doesn't mean that your edits have not been neutral; rather, it means that any editing at all of Vaughan Council-related articles is inappropriate, no matter what is written. Here is the fulltext, from WP:NOT: ===Wikipedia is not a soapbox=== Wikipedia is not a soapbox, or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising. Therefore, Wikipedia articles are not: #Propaganda or advocacy of any kind. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to approach a neutral point of view. You might wish to go to Usenet or start a blog if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views. You can also use Wikinfo which promotes a ``sympathetic point of view`` for every article. #Self-promotion. The arbitration committee ruled on February 17, 2006 that: ``Editors should avoid contributing to articles about themselves or subjects in which they are personally involved, as it is difficult to maintain NPOV while doing so.`` Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical articles, or to articles in which you have a personal stake, is similarly unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Notability. #Advertising. Articles about companies and products are fine if they are written in an objective and unbiased style. Furthermore, all article topics must be third-party verifiable, so articles about very small ``garage`` companies are not likely to be acceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they can serve to identify major corporations associated with a topic (see finishing school for an example). Please note Wikipedia does not endorse any businesses and it does not set up affiliate programs. See also WP:CORP for a proposal on corporate notability. - I understand that you've written to a user that you will not be involved anymore in Vaughan-related articles. That's a commendable position. I'm sure there are many subjects and articles of interest to you on Wikipedia that do not relate to your father or his opponents. Do I understand your position correctly? And is this approach of abstention one that you permanently take? If so, I again commend that position. I trust, as I'm sure you do, that the administrators and the contributors to Wikipedia will maintain quality articles about worthy and reputable subjects. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

47,687,225

a miscarriage, or be intentionally induced through chemical, surgical, or other means. In common parlance, abortion usually refers to any induced procedure that results in the death of an embryo or fetus, even viable ones, such as the controversial but rare late-term abortion procedures. All mammalian pregnancies can be aborted; however, human abortion receives the most focus in biology and the mass media.

2,006

true

article

random

test

false