rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
48,113,568
|
{{unblock|Hello, I am writing this to request that you duly unblock my IP address from editing wikipedia. Unfortunately, I am stuck in a class room full of imbeciles, preventing me from editing pages for the benefit of my fellow wikipedians. Please, do not punish me for the cretinism of my peers and undue this great injustice. Vive la resistance!
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
48,113,832
|
Bold text == Headline text == PHILL SMELLS
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,114,024
|
PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS == == PHIL SMELLS ==NEW
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,114,284
|
nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells nikko smells n
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,114,478
|
== Tom Likes it Up the Pooper!!! == BY MEN!!!
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
48,114,746
|
say that we like using wkipedia andyou should sell it to us thank you and have a nice day
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,114,944
|
` EA, This is Jim Heller, the person you blocked for supposedly violated the three-revert rule on the Ron Geaves article. I believe that the violator in that situation was Jossi Fresco not me. Indeed, I believe that Jossi Fresco was vandalizing the article, taking out all the text that I contributed on a new subject within the Geaves article, but that once I began reversing his vandalism he began to accuse me of ``reverting``. I would like to discuss this with you further. Is this the appropriate place? Thanks `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
48,115,242
|
` In fact, rather than wait, here's my complaint: To whom it may concern, Hi. My name's Jim Heller and I'm currently and for some time now caught up in a series of edit wars with Jossi Fresco. The background is this. I am a former follower of Prem Rawat, a/k/a Maharaji, a person I believe is a nefarious cult leader. Fresco, on the other hand, is a current follower and, needless to say, of a different mind altogether. For some years now, ever since the advent of the internet, Rawat and his followers have engaged in a long-standing campaign to whitewash Rawat's past and somehow protect him from the harsh light of history. The latest flashpoint arose just today when I tried to edit a Wikipedia article of another of Rawat's current followers, a religious studies professor in fact, Ron Geaves (who, by the way, just shot to flashpan infamy as the English academic who opined that the July 7th bombers were ``demonstrators``, not ``terrorists``. Please excuse the fact that, to explain the problem in any meaningful way, I have to flesh out the context somewhat. My edit concerned an academic (not Wikipedia) article Geaves had written where, discussing a program Rawat held in 1973, he wrote that: In November 1973, Divine Light Mission had booked the Houston Astrodome, a large sports stadium with a capacity of 90,000. The event had taken on millenial expectations in the U.S. with devotees announcing and advertising Maharaji's appearance at the stadium as a second-coming, complete with angelic and alien visitors. Only 20,000 attended the event and Maharaji did not appear to have any knowledge of his American followers' expectations. He spoke as he usually does at such gatherings with no hint of messianic promises. (My emphasis here and below) In fact, a widely-disseminated invitation to that same 1973 program, Maharaji himself not only demonstrated knowledge of the ``millenial expectations`` but fanned the flames substantially. Thus, he declared the program the ``most Holy and significant event in human history`` and even hinted that it might have intergalactic significance: A LETTER FROM GURU MAHARAJ JI Bonn, Germany September 31, 1973 Dear premies, First of all, I would like to tell you about something of great importance to all of us. Because we have realized this beautiful Knowledge which is of great bliss to us all, it is our duty to propagate it to the human race. For it is something they really need. In the world there is suffering, hatred and dissatisfaction. That fact does not need proof. It is understood by all that the world is passing through a great moment. No one has satisfaction of mind nor can they find the solution to this. The world is looking for the Perfect Master to come and reveal the Perfect Knowledge of God. There is a supreme energy constantly vibrating in everything making it survive and all the Perfect Masters coem to reveal this Knowledge to people. We can attain all materialistic things and still not have peace, for peace lies inside not outside in materialism. As you all know Millenium '73 is being prepared for now. This festival has been organized by Divine Light Mission each year since 1967, in the memory of the late Satgurudev Shri Hans Ji Maharaji on His birthday. This year the most Holy and significant event in human history will take place in America. I think that Millenium '73 is a point where we can really get together and enjoy the bliss bliss with all of our borthers and sisters who are premies; and also tell the world that we have received and realized the permanent service of Truth, Consciousness and Bliss which all the world is looking for in one way or manner. To do this I really need your help. I really need the help of all the premies in all respects; physically, financially and all other ways to make Millenium '73 come off. This is a festival not for you or me. It is for the whole world and maybe the whole universe. I hereby invite you to this Divine Festival of Peace, Millenium '73 and request all premies to help me financially, physically and spiritually to make the program manifest for all seekers of Truth. Isn't it about time you all get together and help me bring peace to this Earth? Blessings to you all, [Sant Ji Maharaj] It is clear, when you contrast Geaves' claim with the documentary evidence, that Geaves, bless his heart, is playing the role of the typical cult apologist, lying about his leader and blaming the followers, the press, anyone at all, for the inexcusable, laughable excesses of the cult. What's particularly worrying about Geaves, I'm sure you can appreciate, is that, as a religious studies professor, he's imbued with a certain authority that makes him an especially effective, if unscrupulous, propagandist. It's one thing when he makes silly comments about the July 7 bombers being ``demonstrators`` not terrorists. No one would ever take him seriously on that score. But it's another altogether when he publishes supposedly-scholarly works about his cult leader (without ever disclosing that he's a follower, by the way) which completely distort the historical record. With these concerns in mind, I wrote the following additional comment for Geaves' Wikipedia article: Geaves has written a couple of articles about Prem Rawat, his guru, for various scholarly journals without publically disclosing in those pieces that he is a follower of Rawat (a/k/a Maharaji). Critics of Geaves allege that these works are dissembling, revisionist propaganda and far too biased and inaccurate for proper scholarship. For instance, in a 2006 article, Geaves commented on the ``Millenium`` festival Rawat held in Houston in 1973, noting that ``The event had taken on millenial expectations in the U.S. with devotees announcing and advertising Maharaji's appearance at the stadium as a second-coming, complete with angelic and alien visitors. Only 20,000 attended the event and Maharaji did not appear to have any knowledge of his American followers' expectations. He spoke as he usually does at such gatherings with no hint of messianic promises.`` However, in a letter that Rawat himself wrote inviting followers to the festival, he called it ``the most Holy and significant event in human history``. And later, ``This is a festival not for you or me. It is for the whole world and maybe the whole universe.`` Now you may think that this isn't quite NPOV enough. You may think it requires more specific attributions. You may even think it isn't particularly well-written. But these are all matters which can be discussed and worked on in a Wikipedian collaborative spirit. Instead, what happened was Jossi Fresco, a paid web tech for Rawat (Maharaji), who stands guard dog over the Rawat articles for his master, anonymously began deleting my text and inserting, instead, this: Dr. Geaves has also written a number of papers related to Maharaji and affiliated organizations to combine his first hand knowledge of the subject (Geaves is a student of Maharaji) with his academic training to provide insights into this movement [2] As indicated on the Talk: Ron Geaves page, eventually Fresco admitted that he was the deleter. We then got into a big tug-o-war wherein I would reinsert my text and warn him to quit reverting and he would then blame me for reverting in contravention of the Wiki excessive reversion rule. At one point he siezed on the fact that I posted without remembering to log in (I'm a bit new at this), accusing me of trying to sneak in via a sockpuppet or whatever you call them. Hardly. I've never denied my identity which has been apparent to Fresco all along. Like I said, he was the one who started the anonymous vandalism of my edit before finally coming out of the shadows. After all this, though, the nub of the issue is this: who was the original editor here and who was performing the illicit reversions? How can I be fairly accused of too many reversions for simply trying to protect my own original edit against his vandalism? Believe me, Jossi Fresco is the first to complain when the shoe's on the other foot, namely when someone changes some text this way. So how can he have it both ways? I know that Fresco has wormed his way into some sort of admin position with Wikipedia but that's just a potential embarrassment for this institution. This is just one example but things like this happen all the time with him. That's why the Prem Rawat articles are so terrible, really. They have very little substance, their focus is all off and, frankly, they're just boring, whitewashed advertisements for this cult. And Fresco's largely responsible. I look forward to your considered reply. Sincerely, Jim Heller `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
48,117,465
|
Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
48,118,258
|
:::: US leads the world in farm productivity per labour force attributable to agriculture. Labour force % by occupation for each country is available at http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/fields/2048.html Multiply this by labour force of that country which is available at http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2095rank.html The result is the portion of labour force attributable to agriculture. Now divide the agricultural output by this number to get the $ value of farm productivity per labour per year. Among the top five nations based on agricultural output, US is way ahead on top... #$122,189 - US #$21,089 - Japan #$3,349 - Brazil #$680 - China #$508 - India Smaller economies may have higher productivity than US but they are insignificant on a global scale plus in practicality, small agri projects with unusually high yields have had mixed or no success when scaled up to large commercial markets.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,118,560
|
International comparison is meaningless unless you stick to the same source.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,130,511
|
:::::::::::::::The most recent version that I have been watching several times and reverted to because of vandalism was with Malvinas. So, a sudden change to Malvinas is wierd. I checked the talk page, and the compromise discussed most of the timne contained Malvinas. At the last version, it became Malvinas and that one was inserted. Then I was gone from wikipedia for a long week, and when I came back, it was Malvinas. But I agree, the original inserted version was Malvinas, and I will respect that.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,136,403
|
==86.134.32.13== This user is vandalising Ajith and Vijay_%28actor%29 articles repeatedly. I am tired of reverting his edits. Please take action.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,136,957
|
on him and protect both pages from edits
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,138,849
|
==Shotokan Dispute Feb thru Apr 2006== *(Original Message:) Howdy. I have been asked to look at some issues regarding edits as related to a content dispute with in the Shotokan article. I noticed you posted here regarding an email you claimed to have recieved from Southwick. In your note to you didn't include the email addresses, claiming they were snipped, I suppose to protect others from having their privacy invaded. Is the wording as you posted exactly as it was recieved by you in email? I would need some kind of proof that this is the case. I will be on and off line for the next couple of days, but often enough I can check back here or on my talk page if you prefer. *(Reply:) I could forward you the email message with complete header. Could you give me some email address of yours to use? ...or please specify a method of proof that I could supply. Regards,
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
48,139,159
|
In addition to snipping the email addresses, I also snipped my name without mentioning it; otherwise the wording I posted is exact.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,140,043
|
` ==Shotokan dispute end of Feb thru beginning of Apr 2006== *(Original message:) Hey you haven't violated this rule, but I just wanted to make sure you know about WP:3RR, because you're one revert away from violating it if you do so in the next couple of hours. Also, an anon editor has suggested mediation on the edit dispute, see Talk:Shotokan... I'd suggest you do it.. you and the other editors are all obviously acting in good faith, and just need some neutral, honest outside input. *(Reply:)Yes, I'm aware of the ``3RR``. I talked it over with a friend here and I may be abandoning my Shotokan effort for the forseeable future. Thanks for your time and your input. Regards, `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,141,140
|
== That Austin Allegro pic == I think the pic of a 1979 Austin Allegro is actually a Vanden Plas either 1500 or 1750 model. You can tell by the raised grille attached to the bonnet - the VP was a luxury (sic) version of the Allegro mark 2 model produced between 1975 and 1979. It had a classic wood and leather interior including walnut picnic tables recessed into the backs of the front seats, and the different frontal treatment you can see hints of in the pic. The VP was something of a freak - who was it aimed at in marketing terms and did anyone ever associate Allegros with luxury motoring? It was probably produced because Ford was having big success with the Ghia versions of some of its models, upgraded and laden with extras for which a premium price was charged, and cash-strapped BL was desperate for some of the action. The reason for raising this is that VPs weren't actually badged as Austins (or Allegros for that matter), but sold as a separate marque albeit through the same BL dealderships,so the pic shouldn't appear on the Austin history page cos it isn't. Pedantic Big Mike
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,141,874
|
*(Further reply:) I forwarded Ron's email to 's email address with request that he forward it on to you. I noticed that I had also snipped Ron's contact information from his email that I had posted on Walter's talk page. Regards,
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,142,713
|
::The decision was to keep the article, in part because he was conference player of the year. Thanks for your additions; hopefully others will follow suit. -
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,144,619
|
== About the personal attacks and vandalyzing == I appologise about the personal attacks. I usualy don't do that. About vandalizing: see what user Nikosilver is doing - he is the real vandalizer, not me. Please have him warned.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,146,990
|
` ::::Well my chemistry teacher has multiple degrees, and the chapter was in our chemistry book, so that's what we learned about. I got that little ``gem`` from my biology teacher during the chapter on human reproduction, but I can't comment on your link until I get home, as our firewall blocked it for ``sex education``. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,148,806
|
==Personal attack?== I just pointed out he's being a WP:DICK. Why can he call multiple users dicks but we can't return the favor? Talk about a one sided policy.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
48,150,918
|
== Feeling sorry about greeks == I actually feel sorry for those greeks, loosing on all fronts and now here. Desperately trying to prove something in which, by most of the causes, it seems that they have no background. I sure hope they will give up and let prosperity strikes among us, and not funny nationalistic issues.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
48,152,560
|
public library and I have an ok edit record
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
48,155,701
|
Hello there, :*1) Your dim comprehension of WP:SELF is to blame. The intention of WP:SELF is to prevent Wikipedia articles from citing each other as verifiable sources. Verifiability should always go back to the source, and never otherwise. See discussion there for further edification. :It has nothing to do with Wikipedia related-incidents occuring within articles. :*2) This was a relatively major occurence to Meehan and went to the larger issue of Congressional Staffer Edits. Press coverage should be proof enough. *Shrug*. Sorry its not, for you. :*3) You've just repeated yourself in order to inflate your position. Please reread above item. :*4) You've not only repeated yourself for a third time, but you've ignored the hundreds of press articles—each representing vast blocks of people who do care. Your rant is completely unintelligible. The section in question is not a schizophrenic chronology of Meehan's toothpaste usage, as you'd like us to believe. It was a major press event that Meehan himself felt significant enough to release a press statement on. Had his staff broke into the New York Times and made these revisions, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It all comes down to your misapplication of WP:SELF. Expect my presence at Norm Coleman soon.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
48,155,870
|
Responses to your laundry list:
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,156,926
|
` :Yopie, your edits are huge pro Czech POV. First, you are citing really bad book about Czech history, and second there wasn't so much people ``in the area`` as you pointed it out. Majority were Polish with notable and fairly sizeable German and Czech communities, not to mention lively Jewish community which you do not even mention. There are plenty of documents about situation in Zaolzie in archives. Article about ČT is NPOV now, vandals like you are trying to rewrite history and confuse readers. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,166,101
|
:On further reading, it appears that the Park is only about half of the Endowment Lands, the rest being the University land. So, they're not synonymous and the Endowment Lands term isn't obsolete. —
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
48,167,884
|
` :Where are you from, man? You can find many documents about it in local (Cieszyn Silesia and Těšín Silesia) archives, both Czech and Polish. Statements in that ``oxford`` book are false, there were much more Germans here, more Poles and less Czechs. It not even mention Jews! Erik Goldstein's book (which is cited here) tells about Polish majority here, that's why the Polish Army annexed this territory, most of the people were Poles, deal with it! Also author of that ``oxford-crappy-simplyfying book`` tells about Zaolzie ``area``, so I don't know why you added it to Český Těšín article. There is nothing pro Polish in this article, ``liberation`` would be pro Polish, there is an ``annexation`` term here etc. This is perfectly npov article. Btw. I am Czech but hate that nationalist pov-pushers like you. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,168,302
|
Also I am resident of this city so I know history of our city better (I also study it on college) than some woman from England who is writing about Czechoslovakia in general.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,170,443
|
This article was my first real edit on the 'pedia, and I wrote the above on the talk page before I understood how article history worked. Still makes me smile to see it. -
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,172,314
|
== April 10 == At the April 10 edition of RAW, Chris Mordetsky was about to give the Master Lock on Carlito but I think he stuck his middle finger for less than a second. Maybe that's why Carlito gave a chair shot to him.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,172,517
|
== Middle Finger == At the April 10 edition of RAW, Chris Mordetsky was about to give the Master Lock on Carlito but I think he stuck his middle finger for less than a second. Maybe that's why Carlito gave a chair shot to him. NN3210, 4:01 PM, April 12,2006
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,173,009
|
I have added some information on Melina's run in other wrestling promotions, I still need to add some more about her run in OVW, feel free to edit the information
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
48,178,382
|
Dcandeto please cite sources to attest to the notability of the writer. If not, it should be held up to the same standards as other works such as mine (which I believe was a lot more notable than this) and deleted.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,179,401
|
:Possibly, perhaps a fictional pub crawl section or even a new entry maybe in order. (GMT)
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,182,128
|
Latest press reports indicate that the panel set up by King's College has reported the the allegations were of a nature that could be dealt with at departmental level i.e at the Institute of Psychiatry and the Institute has decide that no further action is required and closed the matter.
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,182,514
|
without the need for a formal enquiry. The Institute has decide that no further action is required
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,182,836
|
` === Ōkimi? === : Note: Discussion moved from Talk:Emperor Nintoku Eirikr, you have not presented any reasons why okimi would be incorrect, and this is even contrary to your ``promise`` in the edit summary you yourself wrote. We all know that monarchs of that period did not know, nor use, the title tenno, they were known by other titles, of which okimi is one and recognized in scholarly works. Or did you not know? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • . : Hello 84.251.178.249 (You beat me to the punch in commenting here, お待たせしました。) Sorry to butt heads, but where have you run across Nintoku Ōkimi? : Googling for either ``Nintoku Ōkimi`` or ``Nintoku Okimi`` results in zero hits. Googling for ``仁徳大君`` yields exactly one hit, which in and of itself seems to be a Goofle, as it were the ``cache`` link fails out, and simply viewing the link itself shows no instances of 仁徳大君, with only one 大君 on the page at all, but in an entirely different context, talking indirectly about the Meiji emperor (where we see 明治天皇 but not 明治大君). Looking up the term 大君 in Shōgakukan's 1988 edition of the 国語大辞典 does list 「天皇の敬称」 as the first definition, and the 和英中辞典 第2版 of 1993 shows 大君 as His Majesty, both suggesting an indirect address rather than a title. Googling for ``仁徳天皇``+``大君`` yields around 245 hits, but 大君 is again not used as a title there are no instances of 仁徳大君 anywhere I can find. I know that the web in Japan is not as developed as it is here, but if the appellation 仁徳大君 were common, I'd expect to find at least one hit. : If you have some source showing this use, please clue me in here. As it presently stands, I find no evidence for Nintoku Ōkimi, and have thus removed this from the article text. Cheers, | ' I am asking why okimi would be incorrect. It does not necessarily need to be in form ``Nintoku Okimi``, some other form showing that title which is more correct than tenno, is also acceptable. Are you contesting that Nintoku was truly called okimi? ``The ruler of Japan was variously known as ヤマト大王/大君 (yamato ōkimi, Great King of Yamato), 倭王/倭国王 (waō/wakokuō, King of Wa, used externally), 治天下大王 (amenoshita shiroshimesu ōkimi or sumera no mikoto, Great King who rules all under heaven, used internally) in Japanese and Chinese sources prior to the 7th century. The first documented use of the title ``tennō`` is in the diplomatic letter from Empress Suiko to Emperor Yang of Sui China in 607 CE...`` Btw, my computer does not display Japanese signs... thus, no need to write them, please use transliterations. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • . : Hm, I think I'm beginning to understand where you're coming from. The problem for me arises in the way in which ōkimi was introduced in your edits, like this example from the Emperor Nintoku page: :: Emperor Nintoku' (仁徳天皇 Nintoku Tennō), or rather Nintoku okimi ... : So far as I can tell, ōkimi is not used directly after the name, making the usage in this edit apparently incorrect. And regarding more correct, as you put it, it's important to specify in which context I assume here you mean that tennō was not the term that was used in [choose your title] Nintoku's lifetime, which makes perfect sense to me. However, what is more conventional in modern writings about the rulers of Japan seems to be the tennō'' appellation, which is why numerous editors have changed this addition back. Perhaps you could word your addition differently? The following note, for example, might express what you'
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
48,186,284
|
==High-C== This was mistakenly posted on my user page, so I'm transplanting it to here. - Why are you trying to delete the High-C entry? High-C appeared on two indy releases, as the guidelines require. What is your reason for trying to do this?
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,186,655
|
` *Calling someone a ``cocksucker`` is a violation of WP:NPA, and it can get you blocked. Don't do it, ne? - `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
48,188,517
|
HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE THE AUTHOR OF THE ERIC GOERTZ ARTICLE OF WANTING WORLDWIDE FAME? Fucking asshole. I wish there was still a hockey strike you FUCKHEAD. Go ahead try to get my shit deleted wikipedia is just a bunch of old fucks trying to act scholarly about matters they know nothing about, how the fuck would you have heard this story any other way except by me using wikipedia? That's what I thought. I hope you don't get palsy sitting on your computer salivating over women's NHL photos all day. Go ahead and make my day!
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
48,188,664
|
== HOCKEY STICK UP YOUR ASS == HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE THE AUTHOR OF THE ERIC GOERTZ ARTICLE OF WANTING WORLDWIDE FAME? Fucking asshole. I wish there was still a hockey strike you FUCKHEAD. Go ahead try to get my shit deleted wikipedia is just a bunch of old fucks trying to act scholarly about matters they know nothing about, how the fuck would you have heard this story any other way except by me using wikipedia? That's what I thought. I hope you don't get palsy sitting on your computer salivating over women's NHL photos all day. Go ahead and make my day!
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
48,193,787
|
*Nice to see I've gotten a response. c
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,195,207
|
become a cop. At least he will be doing something else that he wants to.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
48,196,714
|
It didn't really offend me, different people have different preferences, I was just curious about yours(I don't mid if you keep it, but remove it if you want) -
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,197,042
|
` ::::Changed to ``Worlds based on Disney films``. ) `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,197,114
|
I didn't see their messages! Private message boxes aren't always so obvious. I only realised once that a freenode staffer had contacted me, but I had to get off the computer, so Ijust said hi and left
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,201,531
|
` :::User there is no reason to be that rude. ``why would anyone in their right mind unblock? Continue to misuse the unblock tag for frivolous unblock requests and you'll lose the ability to edit your talk page.`` You do not know me personally to be that rude. What you said could have been stated in a much nicer manner such as, ``Please do not abuse the unblock request buuton, or I will be forced too take action.`` There is no need for you too be that rude. Regardless off what I may have done, you as an administrator should maintain some sort politeness. You do not know if I am older than you or younger than you. I am new too wikipedia so please stop being mean. Kyaa the katlord attacked me first with words such as Muslims of Urethra and words such as f*****. So next time try to show some politeness. read what I have too say above please. I only put the unblock request back up so you would come read what I have written in response to what you said to me before.`
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
48,205,852
|
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
48,209,297
|
Sinatra started out as a Democrat, but after 1968 he switched to the Republicans, attending the RNC for the first time in 1972 and performing at the White House for President Nixon in 1973.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
48,214,598
|
beliefs and superstition instead of bringing light
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,222,340
|
` == Hannibal == Good Article it could use a bit of revising but we can worry about that later. Returning to the discussion about the coint,,,uhhh guys Hannibal is Phoenician(Caanite,Yemen Migrents) Caanite(yemen Migrents Berber(yemen Migrents) Carthaginian Arab Berbers: Berbers are the original and first inhabitants of North-Africa, in other words, they are the natives of this part of Africa. The name by which they are called (berbers) comes from the noun ``barbarians`` (in english). And this, because Romans used to call All those who didn't speak their language ``barbarians``... And actually, there are only us who are still called like this ^_~ why did they use this term, they just use this noun without any feeling of a pejorative meaning. But to call themeselves in their language (Tamazight), they use ``imazighen``: the plural of ``Amazigh``. Many people ask about our origins, and I always say that this question is sensless! it's like asking what is the origins of the Indians! Indians Don't have the same eyes as chinese but they are considered as asians so Just think about us (it's an order!) that We are berbers Thus we are Africans! Don't forget that those who first were called africans were berbers, when you study about Rome and byzantine at school, you've probably heard about carthage and africans? these africans were the great Phoenicians,Berbers (arabs). Hence the Carthaginian Arabs. But we can answer to which race the berbers belong to, As you know (I'm sure you don't know!^^') there are 3 races in the world: The Caucasoid race (Europeans, Jews/hebrews, Arabs ...etc.) The Negroid Race. (Blacks) The Mongloid Race. (chinese, japanese ...etc.) Berbers are predominately Caucasoid (berbers of the sahara are mixed with sub-saharans), Their language is close to the Language spoken by the old egyptians (Pharaohs...), in other words they speak an Afro-asiatic language (Hebrew, Arab, assyrian, Old egyptian, Berber...etc.) SEMETIC! XD To see how berbers look like click google To know how berber language sounds (through music) download this MP3 by clicking google The lands where berbers lived in the past, were from the west of Old Egypt to the Canary-islands, But now, Berbers constitute only 25% of the population in Algeria and 40% in morocco, the berbers of the canary islands (called guanches) are spanish now and they've lost their language. [urlhttp://imazighen.proboards40.com/index.cgi?board=history&action;=display&thread;=1123104351[/url] GENETICS And Origins of Berbers Origins of Berbers: Final Genetic Make Up: Mtdna: ***** North african cromagnoid Ibero-maurusian (U6): about 15% ``Iberian`` mtdna (H, pre HV, V...etc.): 60%-80% Subsaharan Mtdna: 2%-20% Y-dna: ***** Capsian (E3b2) 60-80 % Arab (J*): 10-300% (30% in tunisians!) Subsaharan: 3%-8% RECENT European: 0-%10% Berber DNA Tested Genetical Studies begin to be done on berbers, Be happy! YIPEEE p Here is the Berber DNA compared to other ethnics: ``So far, our analyses have allowed a clear dissection of almost all NW African...paternal lineages into several components with distinct historical origins. In this way, the historical origins of the NW African Y-chromosome pool may be summarized as follows: 75% NW African Upper Paleolithic (H35, H36, and H38), 13% Neolithic (H58 and H71), 4% historic European gene flow (group IX, H50, H52), and 8% recent sub-Saharan African (H22 and H28).`` (Bosch et al., Am J Hum Genet, 2001) * * * Caucasoid mtDNA (maternal) sequences, labeled L3E and U6, were detected at frequencies of 96% in Moroccan Berbers, 82% in Algerian Berbers and 78% in non-Berber Moroccans, compared with only 4% in a Senegalese population. (Rando et al., Ann Hum Genet, 1998) * * * While the origins of the Sumerians, whose language appears related to no known linguistic family, remain a mystery, the other people of the region were chiefly Semites - Canaanites (the Levant), Amorites (southwestern desert people), Akkadians and Assyrians (Mesopotamia), Arameans, Habiru (Hebrews) and Bedu (Beduin Arabs of the southern desert). The languages of these groups are closely related, and also related more distantly to Hamitic languages, which include ancient Egyptian, Coptic, and Ethiopian. Throughout the Bronze Age there was a sporadic influx of nomads from Arabia into the area, hostile at first, but soon incorporated into the existing culture. Later, Indo-European peoples migrated into the area. Among them were the Hurrians, who moved from Turkey in the North to Iraq in the 3rd milleneum BCE and brought the light horse-drawn chariot and composite b
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,224,082
|
== ban == you got me banned on irc -
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,224,269
|
` :Why? I only redirected ``Sahanx``. What other use has Wikipedia got for the article ``Sahanx``? - `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
48,225,254
|
It wasn't me, my brother was using the comp. -
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,226,431
|
Die I just wanted to tell you that i hate you, and i fucked your mother. she told me about how you ass-raped her, and i do not approve. however, due to your homosexual tendansies, ill let it slide. This time. now, onto more pressing matters. why did u block LCIs ip adress? i mean do you have such a small penis that you have to compensate THAT badly? well, im sure you have some little boys to touch, just like a roman catholic priest. well, thats all i have to say. goodbye
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
48,226,882
|
hope you ROT IN HELL YOU MOTHER FUCKING IDIOT! PERISH IN THE FLAMING BOWELS OF HELL! I HOP THAT YOU DIE ALONE, AND SAD you FUCKER! I NEED YOU TO PERISH! END UR LIFE RIGHT NOW
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
48,228,116
|
` ==OKAY== first thing, you usless excuse for a bag of cow shit, is that you did not even sucessfully revert anything on Android79's page, so you just took up some space, perhaps to fill the empty gap in your life caused by your wife leaving you, and your father touching you in ``naughty places`` at night. well i will tell you something, END YOUR EXISTANCE ON LIFE you are no longer needed, so go die.`
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
48,229,216
|
==hello again== I am BACK WITH A VENGENCE!!!!!! alright, so will block me, thats expected, so with that note on mind, i begin my rant. ==My Rant== FUCK is an interesting word, and can be used in many ways. such as, FUCK YOU, Go Fuck yourself (no one else will) I FUCKED your mother, also who the FUCK do you think you are? do you think you are god? is that it? were you molested by your teacher as a child? i dont understand what would cause you to think your so fucking great. i raped all of your family members, and siblings, cousins, aunts and uncles. i also raped your mother (she liked it) and so you are nothing. ABSOLUTLY nothing, and you should terminate your existance A.S.A.P. (As Soon As Possible just letting you know, because you are FUCKING RETARTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) FUCK YOU, and go die. that is all. ==ps== you fudge packing ass-monger, i have one last thing to say to you. DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!fucker i hope you rot in hell you son of a skank.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
48,234,966
|
:No, it's not really considered vandalism unless her blood purity has been clearly established one way or the other. Unless that's so, pretty much anything is speculation. I have no idea what a Banned-Star is. So, I'm guessing English is your second language?
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
48,235,591
|
Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,235,790
|
comment this page is dumb and should be removed
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,236,295
|
Bold text == Headline text == WLKLPEDLA I AM NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE ONE WHO IS EDITING 1 OF ALLI CAN NOT EDITING BECOME I CANNOT SEPPILL GOOD AT YOU SEE SO QUIT AND LIEME A LONE SANDRA AT CULLMAN288@AOL.COM
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,238,705
|
` == Well... == ``Is this not the same gun as on the pocket battleships of the Deutschland`` No. ``which the British cruisers at the Battle of the River Plate survived`` Hitler was quite right when he said that Admiral Graf Spee should have won the battle. She lost because of errors made by captain Langsdorff. Graf Spee outgunned all her opponents, having 11 inch main guns, to Exeters 8 inch and Ajax and Achilles 6 inch guns. Langsdorff should have concentrated the fire on Exeter first before Admiral Graf Spee came into the range of the light cruisers. Instead, Langsdorff split his fire between the three targets, with the result that although Exeter was severely damaged and forced to withdraw, the other ships got into range and scored 20 hits on Admiral Graf Spee, including on the food stores and bakeries.`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,239,284
|
== Ccwaters is still a fuck == You're still a fuck, good luck on being a worldwide fuck
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
48,239,393
|
== WikiDicks == Nothing any of you old scholarly wannabe fucks can say about my article will negatively affect me more than this case has. Have fun with your lame old selves.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,239,529
|
==Metal Poll== Hello there. I am an overseer of your brain. I have come to tell you that the Wikimetal Project is holding a poll on the inclusion of certain genres on the heavy metal template and footer that goes onto metal related articles. This poll has a closing date, however, and so here i am, reminding you to vote if you want to, by pumping strange chemicals through your veins. Its hard work being a brain you know! If you would like to help in this crucial part of the project, the page is here. No, thats not it? Oh my! I posted those pictures of myself, what a devil i am. No the actuall link is here on this link. I guess ill see you at breakfest when you finally recover from Wikipedia. Bye for now body, your
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,242,483
|
::::You are pushing your POV. The only exception here are the ones you like to make. First it was some rfc on whale at talk mmr which you took it upon yourself to judge on, now you are using WPRS. I'd love to slide this rule over all of the Wiki links, like Quackwatch which is clearly a partisan POV site. Also I take exception to you stalking me.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,242,807
|
==Job Collins document== is using WP:RS to delete a link to an ACTUAL Collins document . He is just pushing his POV using [[WP:RS]. It is OKO for him to put in links to Quackwatch. Also he is stalking me, he will post a comment to this one in due course.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,243,975
|
== hello i'm a tor proxy == block me.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,246,633
|
:What exactly needs looking at on that page. There seem to be plenty of bureaucrats active there already.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
48,247,784
|
` == Hmm... == ``An expert of naval warfare has spoken .... `` Thank you for those kind words. I love you too. ``have you ever counted the numbers of heavy guns available on the allied cruisers?`` As a matter of fact I have. With the word ``outgunned`` I meant the fact that Admiral Graf Spee's guns were far more powerful than those of the Allied warships and could deal heavier damage from distance.`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,247,869
|
And if you did not notice, we are not here to argue about the Battle of River Plate.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
48,248,174
|
```maybe S&G; are ``real`` battleships`` They are. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,255,670
|
: Its not POV. Editors who negate this article as such have their POVs that are anti-Ajith an pro-Vijay. For instance, if they give evidence as to the box office status of a film, we can accept it. But they don't and simply brand it as a flop on the basis of tabloid. However fanclubs have access to trade books and know exactly the worth of their icon. This article is as brutally honest as it gets.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,256,244
|
unlike this page Rajinikanth which is sheer idoatry! Citations are not needed for things that are plain common knowledge in the Coromandel coast
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,272,578
|
moleman is so cool he the best character for miles coz for one hes funny and a other some people young and old actully live like that they are no ones friend and have promblems with how they look i think we can all learn off of hans moleman but i still thinks he funny!!..!! c ya simpsons fans xbix brogan x
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,273,327
|
` ==Edit summaries== Hey, there. With all due respect, you may want to consider that leaving hostile edit summaries or comments (e.g., ``rv due to more pissing about by fanboys``, or ``some weird power trip by these people who have ordained themselves as the official Lost wikipedia editors``) don't help your case, and tend to cause others to just disengage. Please see WP:Civil. I don't mean to get on your case, but I honestly think we'd all get further by continuing to have a civil dialog/discussion on the issues at hand. I'm sure you have strong feelings on those issues, as do we all, and it'd be helpful to hear your reasoning, rather than have those feelings come out in other ways as you let off steam. Please take this comment as constructive, because that is truly how it's intended. Thanks. `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,288,434
|
` ==email from Ron to cap_j== Subject: Wikipedia Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:48:12 -0400 From: ``Southwick, Ron`` [email addresses and contact information snipped] Please do not take this outside the Wikipedia. You do not know who you are messing with. Feel free to contact me here. Thanks, ron`
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,290,320
|
` Attention: This IP address, , is registered to America Online (London, UK) and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact America Online (London, UK) to report abuse. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked. `
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,290,380
|
` Attention: This IP address, , is registered to America Online (London, UK) and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact America Online (London, UK) to report abuse. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked. `
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,293,651
|
That was a perfectly valid edit. Go fuck yourself.
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
48,297,894
|
::Jossi, I wrongly accused you of committing all the deletion/reversions/vandalism of my text. It turns out it wasn't just you although why you didn't say so is beyond me. But I will never agree that your work on the Rawat or related articles is done in good faith.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,299,103
|
` ==Serbian casualties again== Just one link more, to the already existing ones numbered above: http://www.aimpress.ch/dyn/trae/archive/data/199711/71128-026-trae-beo.htm It is perfectly understandable for Serbian apologists to try to minimize the Serbian death toll (in battles- civilian Serbian casualties are, as usual, inflated beyond & beyond..). The reason ? High military casualties figure speaks of Serbian military incompetence (as contrasted to their self-image of a Ramboid nation); also, it is a sign of heavy Yugoslav involvement in agression on Croatia. Anyone's national sensibilities aside-it is clear that all realiable and available sources put the Serbian military death toll at the lowest level of 8.000. :The article is signed by Stipe Sikavica (a typical Croatian name) so it again represents a Croatian press POV. ::Here's another nice example of nationalist logic. What you're basically saying is that this journalist cannot possibly be objective because he is Croatian, is that it? Infact, you are drawing this conclusion solely out of the man's NAME. What if he changed his name, maybe he would be more neutral then, what do you think? :::Even in that link you could not see that anyone from serbian side states something like 10.000. According to Serbian sources regarding the number of Serbian soldiers who died or went missing during all the wars in Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, the number often mentioned is 2,300., and most of them, around a half, are believed to have died in the battle for Vukovar. The cited article states also that ``most experts agree with the figure``. There are no reason to put 8.000 or 10.000 as official data. These data are contraversial. ::Croatian sources, ie. general Anton Tus, put the Serbian military casualties figure around 10.000. Other sources, like brigadier general Mile Dedaković, in his book ``Bitka za Vukovar``, put the highest limit around 12.000. Therefore, chief Croatian estimates revolve around 10 k Serbian military casualties. This page is not about what Serbian sources say-exclusively. Without going into details of questionable veracity of Serbian sources re this battle, the most correct approach is to state what both sides have to say. And, in the cited article by a journalist named Sikavica, it is clear for anyone who is not deaf, blind and mute that some Serbian military figures agree with general Tus's estimates. It is explicit. Therefore, reverted. ==I've seen this later== It's not just the number of Serbian military casualties (after all, these were mainly puzzled conscripts sent to the slaughterhouse). It's this sick worldview prevalent in some Serbian circles: Croatian paramilitaries, secession, liberation of Vukovar,...then liberation of Srebrenica, faked Markala, lies about everything and everyone (for those conversant with Croatian, just a slice: http://www.hic.hr/books/jugoistocna-europa/dedijer.htm#kraj%20mita). `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,301,849
|
`:::I really don't care about the few google searches that result (one of which is this site). If I put in Chelsea or Boys Town (halstead st, Chicago) TONS of hits appear. Not a handful. Gays don't have to wear signs. But there should be more than one drinking establishment that caters to them. The one dike bar on 4th ave is usually pretty dead, as is the one on 5th ave. The point is there IS no gay community. A few lesbians does not a community make. But I'm not denying that lesbians call the neighborhood home. It has been a liberal neighborhood for 30 years. The point is, the term itself, Dyke Slope. I don't like it. I've never heard it. I don't think its appropriate for Wikipedia. And don't tell me what to do. I can type whatever I feel like on this page. I think you sound like a delusional, academic lesbian who wishes you had a neighborhood of your own. I've never even denied that lesbians are found in the neighborhood. My point is that while they have always been present, perhaps in greater numbers than elsewhere, they have had minimal impact on the neighborhood. They certainly have not been numerous enough to warrant a term like ``Dike Slope``. The reality is lesbianism is largely an academic phenomenon. It doesn't surprise me in the slightest some professor would make such a claim. But, that one class does not trump a substantial portion of my personal experience over many years. `
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
48,303,255
|
: I think that African Americans as a group tend to vote for Democrats because the party is perceived to have been more devoted to issues that particularly affect African Americans as a group in recent history (affordable and quality healthcare, lowering the unemployment and poverty rate, civil rights legislation [particularly during and after the 1950s and 60s], and so forth). The Republican has not had a strong civil rights reputation since the New Deal when the parties seem to have switched key playforms and attracted different constituencies. This should be mentioned, but only if mentioned in context. I'm not qualified to expand on this, so I hope someone else who is more knowledgeable does. Kemet 13 April 2006.
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,303,826
|
::you know eventually someone might suspect that you're a strawman and start to run a checkuser on you, not that I'd do such a thing, I mean common, you're a newbie, and I'm not even a registered user
| 2,006
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,304,185
|
` April 2006 (UTC) ===Template:Phh:Reader=== ``folks complained that the Meta pages are ``not for Wikipedia``, which is plain nonsense`` - I agree, however I still think this is obtrusive and not the best solution. Maybe you should add this to Template:Hh, which would put it in the standard header rather than the article header (this would also make it easier to maintain). I still have a few concerns, so could you 1. explain how this proves these pages are for Wikipedia (in the eyes of the people complaining) and 2. provide links to the page/s where the compaints are being raised. You can reply here. Thanks. : is the ``copied from Meta`` blurb, in its latest version also working for templates (and all other namespaces, but nobody needs this), better keep it short and sweet (as is). : is a kind of dummy if there's nothing special to say wrt Wikipedia in the lead section. For Phh:Namespace you just decided that Wikipedia specific info in the lead section is necessary, so that page has no dummy logo. : is a bastard, starting like Phh:Reader, but with an additional shortcut, see WP:WP for a few others using this style. It took me some time to redirect a bunch of empty (various styles) Phh templates to Phh:Reader, IMO a common look and feel for help pages is reassuring. :Something like the old WP:REDIR including the complete WP:R resulting in a different look (numerous categories from examples listed in WP:R) was dubious. The complete Wikipedia specific help idea was dubious, I got already in fights about it after I tried to trim the included pages with (before I found out how the Ph magic works). Users don't understand it. :Somebody said that they voted on b: to delete all imported help pages because the don't edit the copy warning is against their policy. Apparently that moronuser never noticed that he can :# edit the master copy, :# edit the warning template (probably a local template on b: like our hh ), :# edit the Ph and if absolutely necessary even the Phh (screwing up the lead section). :Unfortunately the folks trying to improve the handbook are scattered in various groups here and on Meta, if I do something it's flying blind, until I catch a rv (or throw it in your case ;-) :P.S.: Check out the Phh:Reader links to see the redirects from other Phh templates. :Discussion continued in the Phh:Reader talk page. 17:59, 13`
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,305,841
|
` ``The losses were not comparable. `` They were. Admiral Graf Spee's damage was not as severe as some think, unlike Exeter's. The ship was nearly a hulk. The only reason why she was repaired is because the British goverment wanted it to be done for propaganda reasons.`
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,306,153
|
, 13 April 2006 (UTC) :Hi Heah, :Thanks for your reply. First, I wrongly assumed that Jossi had started the deletions. He just joined in and was the one who reported me for reverting. I didn't know that there was an edit log that tracked all activity but someone showed me afterward. I still maintain, however, that these deletions were indeed acts of vandalism. They weren't corroborative edits, that's for sure. They were, as I said, wholesale, repeated deletions of original text. You speculate that the problem might have been my lack of citations but, in this case, I can assure you that's not the problem. Jossi's full aware of the fact that both Geaves' comments and Rawat's own contradictory words (in his letter inviting his followers to the Millenium festival) are proven and accurate. Here's a link to the Geaves' article: : :Footnote 5 is the one where Geaves' relieves Rawat of any knowledge or responsibility for the Millenium hype. :And here's a link to the letter Rawat himself wrote which clearly puts the lie to Geaves' revisionism: : :The Wiki rule about vandalism states that most is dealt with by fast reversions. However, it doesn't say that persistent efforts in this regard may nonetheless violate the three-reversion rule and trigger blocking! It does seem a little Kafak-esque, don't you think? :Finally, on the more general complaint I have about Jossi Fresco, I do invite you to take some time, if you would, and review his editing of the Rawat articles. He is a paid web guy for a person who is most certainly a cult leader, a man who still has many, many followers who believe that he is God in human form. Jossi is adept at using Wikipedia to ensure that the articles never truly capture the story of the man. The fact that he's a Wikipedia administrator is worrying, in my opinion. 18:13
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,307,566
|
BTW, Heah, I've replied to you further on my own talk page.
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,313,145
|
`Hello. I removed the box, cause it is the ``protected areas infobox`` which should be used only in articles about national parks, wildlife reserves, protected habitats etc. There are other infobox templates for towns. - `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
48,313,455
|
` == sudosh == You're incorrect, it was not decided in the EAS AfD that ``Sudosh and EAS will be merged until EAS has its own article``. I can read just fine, and misrepresenting an AfD discussion will not win you any support here. What actually transpired is that one editor, , suggested that ``[until various distros adopt EAS] it should be best that it stay in the sudosh article``. Nobody else supported that motion, and the result of the AfD was not merge, but rather delete. Since a Delete-not-Merge vote is actually support for keeping it out of the article. I realise you are the main developer and ``should know`` if the project has changed name. However, if the fact of the name change is so insignificant that the only source available so far is your own say-so on various web sites and announcement lists, that fails the verifiabiliy test. Wikipedia isn't about including everything, it's only about including information that is independently verifiable. If or when EAS gets picked up by your userbase and gets recognition as the replacement of sudosh, then there will be enough evidence out there to include it anywhere in Wikipedia. Until then, there is just not enough information out there from an neutral source (i.e., someone other than you) to conclude that EAS really is the replacement of sudosh. After all, it might turn out that nobody likes EAS, or that your entire userbase rejects EAS and continues to develop sudosh on their own. Then the article would be wrong if we kept your edits. However, that doesn't mean no mention of EAS can be in the article. I'll edit it to reflect what is currently knowable by external sources. — `
| 2,006
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,314,820
|
this is a poorly written article
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,315,164
|
` ::Don't worry, it was just a typo with brackets omitted (a frequent case with the longer sentences or those involving a few disparate concepts. Also: the quotation marks were intentional, because ustaše were not negative (nor positive): it was a historical reaction of the part of the Croatian nationalist movemnent to the years of the Serbian oppression. To define it as ``negative`` would be as absurd to define Soviet Communism, the most murderous regime on earth as ``negative`` or ``positive``. Those Croats and Bosnian Muslims who volunteered to take part in the Ustaška vojnica-more than 40.000 people in 1943.-cannot be labelled as war criminals, nor as traitors, as anti-Croat propaganda would have it in the Communist Yugoslavia period. The pathological murderers like Maks Luburić or totalitarian dictators like Ante Pavelić cannot cast the shadow on all the participants in the Ustaša military forces, any more than Joseph Mengele or Adolf Hitler can contaminate the memory of German soldiers, particularly Waffen SS who fought in the WW2. This is even more true about ordinary people or intellectuals who participated in the NDH regime (for instance, Adolfo Bratoljub Klaić, the author of famous dictionary of foreign words, or the sculptor Augustinčić, who made a bust of Pavelić, but later switched sides. Do I have to repeat ? The NDH was a quisling state. The vast majority of people involved with it and working for it were neither quislings nor criminals. And, this is just the NDH talk. Let's not forget that, as far as resistance movement goes, the Croats were the majority both in leadership and in fighting forces who were not forced to join the resistance (like the Serbs in the NDH), but did it out of ideals. And, in the percentage of participation, heavily outnumbering other nations in ex-Yugoslavia-except, pehaps, Montenegrins: http://www.hercegbosna.org/engleski/ww2.html Hmmm...I haven't seen anything that would refute the claim that Serbian propagandists are vandalizing not a few wikipedia pages, solely with the aim of spreading anti-Croat chauvinist hatred. `
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,318,611
|
, 13 April 2006 (UTC) ::::Well-where is the answer to this ? What about Starčević's admirers, from Matoš to Krleža ? 19:48
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
48,322,248
|
then make a redirect maybe
| 2,006
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
48,323,286
|
Czechoslovakia? What decade was this article written...
| 2,006
| false
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.