title
stringlengths
1
1.19k
keywords
stringlengths
0
668
concept
stringlengths
0
909
paragraph
stringlengths
0
61.8k
PMID
stringlengths
10
11
3.10. Ethical Considerations
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BREC), Makerere University, School of Public Health Higher Degrees Research and Ethics Committee (MaKSPH-HDREC), and the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (UNCST). The UNSCST has guidelines that supp...
PMC10454402
4. Conclusions
DISEASE
HPV self-sampling at the HIV clinic could be effective, and would increase the number of women using the service. The prospective implementation of the study will provide insights into the merits and disadvantages of the HPV self-sampling approaches for disease stratification, hence contributing to the best service des...
PMC10454402
Author Contributions
A.N. conceptualized and designed the study, and prepared the initial draft of the study under the supervision of R.W.M.; T.G.G., R.W.M. and T.G.G. all assisted with the manuscript preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
PMC10454402
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Boards (or Ethics Committee) of Biomedical Research Ethical Committee Higher Degrees (BREC/00002754/2021 and approved on 29 October 2021), Makerere University School of Public Health Higher Degrees Research a...
PMC10454402
Informed Consent Statement
The study was approved by Makerere University School of Public Health Higher Degrees Research and Ethics Committee (SPH-2021-157), and the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (HS2084ES). All participants provided informed consent, and were allowed to withdraw consent at any time.
PMC10454402
Data Availability Statement
The data from this study are the property of the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) and Makerere University. All interested readers are required to request the data from Makerere University, School of Public Health through the Principal Investigator, Agnes Nyabigambo. Email:
PMC10454402
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
PMC10454402
References
The synopsis of the Health Promotion Model for the study.The map shows the location of Luweero district and Luweero district hospital.Process of recruiting women into the study.Description of the clinic-based (intervention) group and home-based (control) group.Sample size estimation for IDI.
PMC10454402
Summary
infection
INFECTION
Joint first authors; contributed equallyJoint senior authors; contributed equallyContributorsNHLL and BJC are the principal investigators of this trial and wrote the study protocol. NHLL, GML, and BJC initiated the trial and acquired funding. NHLL, SMSC, CAC, JSMP, SAV, and BJC designed the laboratory testing. NHLL, SM...
PMC10528748
Background
SARS-CoV-2 infection
SARS-COV-2 INFECTION
Few trials have compared homologous and heterologous third doses of COVID-19 vaccination with inactivated vaccines and mRNA vaccines. The aim of this study was to assess immune responses, safety, and efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection following homologous or heterologous third-dose COVID-19 vaccination with either o...
PMC10528748
Methods
VIRUS, PLAQUE
This is an ongoing, randomised, allocation-concealed, open-label, comparator-controlled trial in adults aged 18 years or older enrolled from the community in Hong Kong, who had received two doses of CoronaVac or BNT162b2 at least 6 months earlier. Participants were randomly assigned, using a computer-generated sequence...
PMC10528748
Findings
We enrolled participants from Nov 12, 2021, to Jan 27, 2022. We vaccinated 219 participants who previously received two doses of CoronaVac, including 101 randomly assigned to receive CoronaVac (CC-C) and 118 randomly assigned to receive BNT162b2 (CC-B) as their third dose; and 232 participants who previously received t...
PMC10528748
Interpretation
infections
INFECTIONS
Similar levels of incidence of, presumably, omicron BA.2 infections were observed in each group despite very weak antibody responses to BA.2 in the recipients of a CoronaVac third dose. Further research is warranted to identify appropriate correlates of protection for inactivated COVID-19 vaccines.
PMC10528748
Funding
Health and Medical Research Fund, Hong Kong.
PMC10528748
Introduction
infection
INFECTION, CNS INFECTIONS, SARS-COV-2 INFECTION
An unprecedented global effort has led to the rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines.The COVID-19 vaccination programme in Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region, China) initially offered either two doses of CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech) 28 days apart or two doses of BNT162b2 (Fosun Pharma–BioNTech in ma...
PMC10528748
Methods
PMC10528748
Study design
This study was an open-label, randomised trial of third-dose COVID-19 vaccine (either BNT162b2 or CoronaVac) conducted in the community in Hong Kong. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Hong Kong (ethics approval number UW 21–492), and is available in
PMC10528748
Participants
allergies
SARS-COV-2 INFECTION, ALLERGIES
Community-dwelling adults were eligible to participate in this study if they were Hong Kong residents, aged 18 years or older at enrolment, and had previously received a complete primary series of either BNT162b2 or CoronaVac, with the second dose received at least 180 days earlier. Exclusion criteria included a histor...
PMC10528748
Randomisation and masking
ADVERSE REACTIONS
The field investigation team (research assistants and study nurses) performed final participant eligibility screening before enrolling participants during the vaccination visit. The intervention (ie, third-dose vaccination with CoronaVac or BNT162b2) was randomly preassigned to each individual who passed initial eligib...
PMC10528748
Procedures
RBD
VIRUS, PLAQUE
Participants received the assigned intervention (ie, intramuscular administration of one dose of CoronaVac or BNT162b2), during the enrolment and vaccination visit (day 0) at the community vaccination centre. CoronaVac is a Vero cell-based, aluminium hydroxide-adjuvanted, β-propiolactone-inactivated monovalent vaccine,...
PMC10528748
Outcomes
VIRUS, PLAQUE
The primary outcome measure was vaccine (humoral) immunogenicity at 28 days after the third dose of either BNT162b2 or CoronaVac, measured as geometric mean titre (GMT) of SARS-CoV-2 serum neutralising antibodies against the vaccine strain (ancestral virus) using a plaque reduction neutralisation test (PRNT
PMC10528748
Statistical analysis
infection
ADVERSE EVENTS, INFECTION, SARS-COV-2 INFECTION
Based on our preliminary data, assuming a GMT of 27 with an SD of logFor vaccine immunogenicity (primary outcome), we included data from all participants who received the assigned vaccination and provided days 0 and 28 sera samples in our trial (ie, per-protocol analysis). For adverse events, we included all available ...
PMC10528748
Role of the funding source
The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
PMC10528748
Results
SARS-CoV-2 infection, infections
MAY, SARS-COV-2 INFECTION, INFECTIONS
From Nov 12, 2021, to Jan 27, 2022, we screened 994 individuals, and 818 (82%) passed the initial eligibility assessment (We collected information on post-vaccination reactions in 424 (94%) of 451 participants, including 193 (46%) of 424 who reported ever feeling unwell after vaccination, with significantly more freque...
PMC10528748
Discussion
infection, hypertension
ADENOVIRUS, INFECTION, VIRUS, HYPERTENSION
Here, we have conducted a comprehensive assessment of the reactogenicity, antibody response, T-cell responses and risk of omicron BA.2 infection in a randomised trial of homologous and heterologous boosting with BNT162b2 and CoronaVac, both of which used ancestral virus as the vaccine strain. Our population had minimal...
PMC10528748
Supplementary Material
PMC10528748
Acknowledgments
INFECTIOUS DISEASES, ALLERGY
This project was supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund (number COVID19F09), and the Theme-based Research Scheme of the Research Grants Council (RGC) of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (grant number T11–705/21-N). NHLL is supported by a Health and Medical Research Fund Research Fellowship ...
PMC10528748
Declaration of interests
BJC consults for AstraZeneca, Fosun Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Haleon, Moderna, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi Pasteur. BJC has received research funding from Fosun Pharma. All other authors declare no competing interests.For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Online for See Online for
PMC10528748
Data sharing
The individual participant data and data dictionary that underlie the results reported in this Article will be shared after de-identification (ie, text, tables, figures, and appendices). Anonymised individual participant data, the data dictionary, and other supporting clinical documents (eg, study protocol and question...
PMC10528748
References
PMC10528748
Trial profile
A more detailed flow chart with reasons for exclusion at each stage is provided in
PMC10528748
Serum neutralising antibodies measured by live virus PRNT (A–C) or by sVNT (D–F) against ancestral SARS-CoV-2, omicron BA.1, and omicron BA.2, respectively, at baseline and 28 days after randomised third-dose CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccination
PRNT titres were evaluated with endpoint at 50% inhibition (PRNT
PMC10528748
IFNγ-producing CD4
The four study groups included participants who previously received two doses of CoronaVac and were randomly assigned to receive a third dose of CoronaVac (CC-C) or BNT162b2 (CC-B), and participants who previously received two doses of BNT162b2 and were randomly assigned to receive a third dose of CoronaVac (BB-C) or B...
PMC10528748
Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection after third-dose CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccination in adults who previously received two doses of CoronaVac (A) or BNT162b2 (B) within 4–6 months after vaccination and when the omicron BA.2 subvariant was locally circulating
respiratory illness, COPD, fever
ADVERSE REACTIONS, SARS-COV-2 INFECTION, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, MAY, COPD
COVID-19 was identified by rapid antigen test or PCR between third-dose vaccination (administered from Nov 12, 2021, to Jan 27, 2022) until May 31, 2022. The four study groups included participants who previously received two doses of CoronaVac and were randomly assigned to receive a third dose of CoronaVac (CC-C) or B...
PMC10528748
Research in context
PMC10528748
Evidence before this study
infection
INFECTION, VIRUS, SECONDARY
Many low-income and middle-income countries use inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in their existing vaccination programmes, and the use of these vaccines has been proposed in high-income countries; however, data comparing inactivated vaccine efficacy with other vaccine platforms are scarce. We searched PubMed and Web of Sc...
PMC10528748
Added value of this study
infection, infections
ADVERSE EVENTS, INFECTION, VIRUS, INFECTIONS
We conducted a comprehensive comparative assessment of homologous versus heterologous COVID-19 vaccination using inactivated vaccines and mRNA vaccines, after both primary series of inactivated vaccines or mRNA vaccines, and simultaneously included safety (adverse events and hospitalisations), immunogenicity (live viru...
PMC10528748
Implications of all the available evidence
Our findings support the benefit of homologous and heterologous booster doses after a primary series of inactivated and mRNA vaccines. All available evidence on vaccine efficacy and effectiveness of inactivated vaccines against variants, compared with the weak neutralising antibody responses conferred by these vaccines...
PMC10528748
Background
Edited by: Agnes Szilagyi, Semmelweis University, HungaryReviewed by: Morayma Reyes-Gil, Montefiore Medical Center, United States; Giuseppe Remuzzi, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Italy†These authors share senior authorshipConestat alfa (ConA), a recombinant human C1 inhibitor, may prevent throm...
PMC10641758
Methods
DISEASE, SECONDARY
We conducted a randomized, open-label, multi-national clinical trial in which hospitalized adults at risk for progression to severe COVID-19 were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 3 days of ConA plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. Primary and secondary endpoints were day 7 disease severity on the WHO Ordi...
PMC10641758
Results
The trial was prematurely terminated because of futility after randomization of 84 patients, 56 in the ConA and 28 in the control arm. At baseline, higher WHO Ordinal Scale scores were more frequently observed in the ConA than in the control arm. On day 7, no relevant differences in the primary outcome were noted betwe...
PMC10641758
Conclusion
The study results do not support the use of ConA to prevent COVID-19 progression.
PMC10641758
Clinical trial registration
PMC10641758
Introduction
CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019
Numerous efforts have been made to develop effective treatments for individuals who have been hospitalized with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (Conestat alfa (Ruconest
PMC10641758
Materials and methods
PMC10641758
Study design and patients
obesity, pneumonia, allergy, renal disease, shortness of breath
OBESITY, DISEASE PROGRESSION, PNEUMONIA, ALLERGY, LIVER DISEASE, RENAL DISEASE
This was a randomized, parallel-group, open-label, multi-center trial. The study protocol was published elsewhere (Male and non-pregnant female patients (18–85 years of age) were eligible and approached by study physicians of the participating centers if they had a diagnostic specimen that was positive for SARS-CoV-2 o...
PMC10641758
Standard-of-care therapy, randomization, and study medication
PMC10641758
Randomization
Study participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio using permuted-block allocation with varying block sizes. Randomization was stratified by the study site, generated by an independent statistician, and implemented via the electronic data capture system software SecuTrial
PMC10641758
Intervention arm
Patients allocated to the intervention arm received a total of nine intravenous ConA doses over 72 h (8,400 U followed by 4,200 U every 8 h), in addition to SOC treatment.
PMC10641758
Control arm
Patients allocated to the control arm received SOC only.
PMC10641758
Monitoring, outcomes, and follow-ups
death, acute lung injury
ADVERSE EVENTS, DISEASE, SECONDARY
Data on vital signs, disease severity according to WHO scale, clinical improvement, admission to ICU, and requirement for non-invasive or invasive ventilation were prospectively obtained. Virological clearance (time from positive to negative PCR test results in nasopharyngeal samples), hematological, liver, renal, and ...
PMC10641758
Safety evaluations
The overall incidence of AEs and SAEs were assessed during a 4-week follow-up and documented by the investigators according to seriousness, intensity, causal relationship with study treatment, action taken with study treatment (e.g., withdrawal), specific treatment for AE, and outcome.AE and SAEs were grouped by the or...
PMC10641758
Statistical plan and analysis
SECONDARY
Full analysis set and intent-to-treat population (FAS/ITTP) was defined as all patients who were randomly allocated to a study arm. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the FAS/ITT population. The primary endpoint was analyzed by Wilcoxon test stratified by its baseline values with a two-sided α-level of 5%. The ...
PMC10641758
Results
PMC10641758
Patient characteristics
SD, COPD
CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, COPD
Between August 2020 and March 2021, 621 patients were screened and 84 were enrolled (Baseline characteristics.ACE, angiotension-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotension receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SD, standard deviation.
PMC10641758
Endpoints
DISEASE
Disease severity on day 7, the primary endpoint, was not different in the two groups (Disease severity at day 7.Disease severity on day 7 stratified by baseline scores.Kaplan–Meier curve for the time to clinical improvement within 14 days according to the treatment group.
PMC10641758
Laboratory analyses
Analysis of C1INH concentrations revealed elevated values in both groups at baseline (Course of main laboratory parameters from baseline until day 7 according to the treatment group. Course of
PMC10641758
Safety
PMC10641758
Adverse events
Twenty-two subjects had at least one AE: 17 (30%) in the intervention arm and 5 (19%) in the control arm. Overall, 35 AEs were reported: 30 (85.7%) in the interventon arm and 5 (14.3%) in the control arm. Ten of these AEs were attributed to investigations [i.e., laboratory parameters: eight (80.0%) in the intervention ...
PMC10641758
Serious adverse events
thoracic and mediastinal disorders
CARDIAC DISORDERS
These occurred in 15 (27%) patients in the intervention arm and 4 (15%) in the control arm. The most common system organ classes of the SAEs were “respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders” [10 (17.9%) and 2 (7.4%)], “infections and infestations” [6 (10.7%) and 1 (3.7%)], and “cardiac disorders” [3 (5.4%) and 0]....
PMC10641758
Premature trial determination
deaths
While SAEs and deaths were judged as not related to the trial medication, their increased occurrence in the intervention arm led the DSMB to recommend an interruption of the trial after the second interim analysis. In addition, the DSMB recommended to await the outcome data of this analysis, including analyses of the a...
PMC10641758
Discussion
pneumonia, non-critically ill COVID-19 infection, SAEs, infection, viral infections, non-critically ill, sepsis
DISEASE PROGRESSION, PNEUMONIA, DISEASE, VIRAL INFECTION, COMPLICATION, INFECTION, SECONDARY, SEPSIS
This randomized trial found that C1INH treatment added to SOC was not associated with clinical improvement or faster recovery from COVID-19 in comparison with SOC alone in hospitalized, non-critically ill patients. The overall mortality in this trial (7%) was substantially lower than the one previously reported in the ...
PMC10641758
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, on reasonable request.
PMC10641758
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the ethics committees «Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz», «Ethikkommission Ostschweiz», and “Kantonale Ethikkommission Zürich» in Switzerland, “Comissâo Nacional de Ética Em Pesquisa” (CONEP) in Brazil and “Comisión Federal Para La Protección Contra Riesgos Sani...
PMC10641758
Author contributions
PU: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ML: Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. PC: Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review ...
PMC10641758
Acknowledgments
We thank the trial participants, caregivers, investigators, and research staff who contributed to the trial. We are particularly thankful to the nurses and physicians who cared for the COVID-19 patients during stressful times of the pandemic. We thank Pharming Biotechnologies B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands, for providin...
PMC10641758
Conflict of interest
MT reports receiving grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, and having research collaborations with Roche, Novartis, and Idorsia outside the submitted work. WA reports receiving fees and research grants from A. Vogel AG, Gilead, and OM Pharma and fees for attendance of advisory boards to Pfizer, MSD Vifor P...
PMC10641758
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or ...
PMC10641758
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: Click here for additional data file.
PMC10641758
References
PMC10641758
Abstract
DeceasedPrincipal Investigator: Kentaro YamazakiHiroya Taniguchi and Kentaro Yamazaki Contributed equally as co-first authors.
PMC10628564
Background
METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER
In this phase Ib study MODURATE, we optimized the dosing schedule and tested the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin treatment failure.
PMC10628564
Methods
We included a dose escalation (3 + 3 design) and an expansion cohort. Patients were administered trifluridine/tipiracil (25-35 mg/m
PMC10628564
Results
toxicities
Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Five dose-limiting toxicities were observed. RP2D was defined as trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m
PMC10628564
Conclusion
myelotoxicity
METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER
Biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab administration may have moderate antitumor activity with high risk of severe myelotoxicity in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000019828) and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs041180028)]....
PMC10628564
Lessons Learned
myelotoxicity
METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER
The recommended dose was determined as trifluridine/tipiracil of 35 mg/mBiweekly trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab administration may have moderate antitumor activity with high risk of severe myelotoxicity in previous treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
PMC10628564
Discussion
mCRC, tumor, DLTs, myelosuppression
METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER, DISEASE, METASTATIC GASTRIC CANCER, TUMOR
Refractory metastatic metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) combined with bevacizumab (BEV) or irinotecan (IRI) showed enhanced therapeutic effects in preclinical models.In 18 patients of the dose escalation part, 5 DLTs occurred. We determined that the recommended phase II...
PMC10628564
Additional Details of Endpoints or Study Design
PMC10628564
Study design:
This study was conducted using an open-label, nonrandomized, 2-part phase Ib design and was carried out at 2 centers. The study population consisted of a dose escalation cohort (part 1) to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for biweekly administration of the combination of FTD/TPI, IRI, and BEV, and an expa...
PMC10628564
Eligibility criteria:
Tumors, failure of or intolerance
ONCOLOGY, TUMORS
Eligible patients were aged 20-75 years with histologically confirmed CRC, failure of or intolerance to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin treatment (those who showed relapse fewer than 6 months after administration of the final dose of adjuvant chemotherapy were also eligible), and no prior therapy with FTD/TPI and IRI....
PMC10628564
Dose escalation:
toxicity
The dose escalation cohort was formulated based on a traditional 3 + 3 design in which patients in sequential dose-level cohorts received increasing doses of FTD/TPI (25, 30, or 35 m/m2/dose, twice per day for days 1-5) and IRI (150 or 180 mg/mAt least 3 evaluable patients were treated with each dose; 6 patients were t...
PMC10628564
Evaluation
gastrointestinal symptoms, tumor, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, toxicity, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, Cancer
ADVERSE EVENT, TUMOR, NEUTROPENIA, FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA, ADVERSE EVENT, THROMBOCYTOPENIA, HYPERTENSION, CANCER
The primary endpoint was determination of the RP2D in the dose escalation cohort and frequency of febrile neutropenia in the expansion cohort. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. A DLT was defined as a cycle of on...
PMC10628564
Statistical analyses:
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics and safety and efficacy of the treatment. OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median OS and PFS and their 95% CIs were analyzed. Log-rank tests were used to compare differences in survival rates. All tests were 2-sided with a...
PMC10628564
Adverse Events
PMC10628564
Assessment, Analysis, and Discussion
PPTD, DLTs, diarrhea, toxicities, perforation, proteinurea, myelotoxicity, anorexia
EVENTS, HYPERTENSION, METASTATIC GASTRIC CANCER, ANOREXIA
This phase Ib study indicated that combining IRI and BEV with biweekly FTD/TPI is safe for mCRC treatment. In Japanese mCRC patients pretreated with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin, this regimen showed modest efficacy in this pilot study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate such a triple ...
PMC10628564
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all clinicians for their involvement and contribution to the study. This study was supported by the Fuji Pharma Valley Center, a nonprofit organization.
PMC10628564
Funding
This study was funded by Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd under a research contract.
PMC10628564
Conflict of Interest
Hiroya Taniguchi reported research funding from Taiho and Daiichi-Sankyo, and honoraria from Taiho, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Yakult Honsha. Kentaro Yamazaki reported research funding from Taiho and Daiichi-Sankyo, and honoraria from Taiho, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Yakult Honsha. Toshiki Masuishi reported research...
PMC10628564
Data Availability
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
PMC10628564
References
PMC10628564
2. Materials and Methods
PMC10745664
2.1. Test Products
DECAY
The study design and test product composition have been described in detail previously [The group receiving fermented aronia extract will be referred to as FAE and the group receiving non-fermented aronia extract as AE. The aronia extracts were based on aronia berry pulp. The FAE and AE groups were supplemented with sn...
PMC10745664
2.2. Study Design and Participants
RECRUITMENT
This study was carried out at the Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, spanning the period from December 2020 to April 2022. The study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from The Central Denmark Region Committees on ...
PMC10745664
2.3. 24 h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
pain
The monitoring of 24 h ambulatory blood pressure was conducted using ambulatory blood pressure monitors (Spacelabs Medical, Ebeltoft, Denmark). The monitors were calibrated to measure blood pressure with a half-hour span between 7:00 AM and 11:00 PM, and with an hour span between 11:00 PM and 7:00 AM Participants recor...
PMC10745664
2.4. Blood Analyses
BLOOD
Blood samples were collected following an eight-hour fasting period and promptly underwent centrifugation at 4 °C and 3989 RPM for 10 min. The resulting plasma samples were preserved at −80 °C until the end of the study, when samples from all participants were analysed together.
PMC10745664
2.4.1. Hs-CRP and Adiponectin
Hs-CRP and adiponectin concentrations were measured using non-competitive, time-resolved immunofluorometric assays. The method for the determination of hs-CRP has been described previously by Reinhard et al. [
PMC10745664
2.4.2. Lipids
The Department of Clinical Biochemistry at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (DS/EN ISO 15189:2013 approved [
PMC10745664
2.5. Power Calculation
Based on a power calculation which has been described previously [
PMC10745664
2.6. Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed in collaboration with a medical statistician who provided the code for the fitting of a linear mixed effects model in Rstudio (Rstudio, Package lme4). As fixed effects, we included the treatment order (six possible orders), period (first, middle, last), treatment (FAE, AE, placebo), a...
PMC10745664
3. Results
PMC10745664