id
int32
0
7.53k
text
stringlengths
0
159k
label
int64
0
19
2,500
Sorry, I put my foot in my mouth, concerning the church's history. It is correct to say that the Council of Hippo 393 listed the deuterocanonical books among those accepted for use in the church, and that this was ratified by the Council of Carthage, and by Pope Innoent I and Gelasius I (414 AD). "At the end of the fourth century views still differed in regard to the extent of the canon, or the number of the books which should be acknowledged as divine and authoritative. The Jewish canon, or the Hebrew bible, was universally received, while the Apocrypha added to the Greek version of the Septuagint were only in a general way accounted as books suitable for church reading, and thus as a middle class between canonical and strictly apocryphal (pseudonymous) writings. And justly; for those books, while they have great historical value, and fill the gap between the Old Testament and the New, all originated after the cessation of prophecy, and the cannot be therefore regarded as inspired, nor are they ever cited by Christ or the aposteles." "In the Western church the canon of both Testaments was closed at the end of the fourth century through the authority of Jerome (who wavered, however, between critical doubts and the principle of tradition), and more especially of Augustine, who firmly followed the Alexandrian canon of the Septuagint, and the preponderant tradition in reference to the Catholic Epistles and the Revelation; though he himself, in some places, inclines to consider the Old Testament Apocrypha as *deutero* canonical, bearing a subordinate authority." This history goes on to say that Augustine attended both the Council of Hippo and of Carthage. It is interesting to note, however, the following footnote to the fourth session of the Council of Trent. The footnote lists various Synods which endorsed lists of canonical books, but then says "The Tridentine list or decree was the first *infallible* and effectually promulgated declaration on the Canon of the Holy Scriptures." Which leads one to think that the RC canon was not official until Trent. Thus my previous erroneous statement was not entirely groundless. It is also interesting to note that the Council of Trent went on to uphold "the old Latin Vulgate Edition" of the Scriptures as authentic. Which, I would suppose, today's Catholic scholars wish the Council had never said. Also the council made no distinction between deutero-canonical and canonical books--in contrast to (Eerdman's statement of) the fourth century views.
18
2,501
Oh no, not again. There is a difference between believing that God exists, and loving him. (For instance, Satan certainly believes God exists, but does not love him.) What unbelievers request in situations like this is that God provide evidence compelling enough to believe he exists, not to compel them to love him. -- "On the first day after Christmas my truelove served to me... Leftover Turkey! On the second day after Christmas my truelove served to me... Turkey Casserole that she made from Leftover Turkey. [days 3-4 deleted] ... Flaming Turkey Wings! ... -- Pizza Hut commercial (and M*tlu/A*gic bait)
14
2,502
On one of the morning shows (I think is was the Today Show), David Koresh's lawyer was interviewed. During that interview he flipped through some letters that David Koresh wrote. On one of letters was written in Hebrew (near the bottom of the page): koresh adonai
14
2,503
Or a Caps fan residing in Atlanta, where they DONT EVEN TELL THE F&@(*@CKING PLAYOFF SCORES ON THE NEWS!!!!!
16
2,504
Yeah, that about sums it up... looking for a place that sells diffraction grating goggles in quantity...
1
2,505
1990 Mazda MX-6 5-spd a/c am/fm cassette cruise tilt steering white w/ burgundy interior excellent condition 73k miles $7500/best offer. -rhonda
1
2,506
I am looking for software that reads a plot in PCX or other format and converts it into x,y coordinate.
7
2,507
Mark 'Mark' Sachs <MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu>, representing the Students for Well, I only saw it start in one place. A tank punched a hole in a wall, and as it withdrew flames came out and spread quickly in the direction that a 30+ mph wind was blowing. I saw a diagram in USA Today yesterday, and fires started at 2 of the 3 holes that the tanks made. A terrible, negligent accident. Maybe they couldn't. I've often marvelled at how people could get burned alive in the upstairs of a 2 story house on fire, but it happens all the time. What if they were in sealed rooms, trying to avoid the gas, and didn't know about the fire until it surrounded them? Remember the Israelis hiding in sealed rooms during Desert Storm to avoid gas-bearing Scuds? Cripes, Mark, are you REALLY a college student? Maybe you ought to stop worrying about increased beverage access and start clearing your head. Ever heard of questioning authority? OK, I'll buy that. You _do_ seem totally clueless... contrary. Wellllll.... They weren't murderous. They'd never harmed or even threatened anybody until they were attacked by a paramilitary force using military weapons and hardware. And as far as "evidence", what are you talking about? Everything the Feds have said they've retracted practically as soon as they get questioned in detail about it. Maybe you and your Increased Beverage Access buddies, sitting around the bar slurring stuff like "they shoulda killed 'em all 51 days ago" don't feel that way, but then you're probably one of those people still saying about Klinton "Give the guy a chance, we don't even know what he's gonna do! (Burp) No problem, you don't have any questions that scare any of us. Most of our minds are apparently more developed than yours. The answer is: *YES!* In a f*cking heartbeat! Thought Experiment: Would you be mindlessly down on your knees with your mouth open, blissfully sucking up anything the Feds said if Bush were the president? What, no comeback? (OK, go ahead, say it. "Read my lips, no new taxes" %^P ) Not in such a great degree. Bush broke one promise, maybe two (taxes/guns) and we held him accountable for it. Of course, it took him the better part of 4 years to do it; Slick's only been in office 101 days and he's broken lots of them. Anddd... I imagine he'll also be held accountable for that. (I can just see the campaign buttons now: "ABC - Anybody But Clinton") Hmmm.... Apparently you just got here. Nobody's claiming that it was anything but a stupid mistake by a bunch of incompetent public employees who normally don't get this kind of scrutiny when the mess up. And as far as how they picked the Davidians, who knows? Maybe they figured that nobody'd care about such a politically incorrect group as a bunch of fundies out on the Texas prairie. Maybe they figured they'd just go in there and run roughshod over the BDs during their religious services (which was the reason the Feds gave for the timing of the raid) rather than running into resistance. Maybe they KNEW that the BDs weren't ANYWHERE NEAR as violent as the Feds' spin doctors are trying to tell the public. Maybe they were AFRAID to try this kind of thing on the Crips and Bloods. Maybe it was because the ATF's budget is up for approval and they seem to favor doing something dramatic whenever that is the case. Of course, their reasoning doesn't matter, only what they did, and this time, people are just paying more attention to it. Not if you mean that stupid "don't stop thinking about tomorrow"... All I've ever heard is Hillary's diabolical giggle. Waffle Man seems to have lost his sense of humor... Don't know, never seen him in one. He probably looks fat and puffy faced, just like in a suit. I saw him in the Rose Garden the other day, and I couldn't get over how much he is starting to look like Teddy Kennedy. Don't worry, these things WILL be investigated. Now go back to your beer, you dimwit....
19
2,508
Just want to make a comment on this. If you live in this country long enough, you should realize the media is no friend of the govt. I am only concerned about fact that the media like to jump to conclusion before the facts. But I am sure they are good in digging dirt as well; afterall, they like the controversial events, which of course make news.
19
2,509
Path: nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!news.ysu.edu!psuvm!cunyvm!jcehc Organization: City University of New York Date: Wednesday, 21 Apr 1993 14:17:47 EDT From: <JCEHC@CUNYVM.BITNET> Message-ID: <93111.141747JCEHC@CUNYVM.BITNET> Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns Subject: Should Anybody be Permitted to Own a .50 BMG rifle? Lines: 26 For the moment, forget about BATF incompetence or FBI hubris. Did anybody catch Rep. Charles Shumer on the news last night holding up a .50 BMG cartridge and rhetorically asking if anybody should be allowed to own one of these. (I presume he meant the rifle for which it is chambered and not the cartridge which you can get for a buck.) So what's your guess for the upcoming anti-gun agenda: 1. A ban on heavy caliber rifles. (read .50 BMG) 2. A ban on "sniper rifles" 3. A ban on "stockpiling" guns and ammunition. BTW: Shumer is perhaps the most misinformed congressman I have seen on the news. I wonder how he finds the floor in the morning. ------- MICHAEL F. GORDON JCEHC@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU "Vote as you shot." (19th Cent Republican campaign slogan ) Shumer is not mis-informed, he knows full well what he is doing. If you look at his other votes, and positions as an agent of redistribution of wealth & property in this country, to him guns and personal freedom are incompatible with his obvious world-view. They are a threat to the 'order' he would impose. R -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "It [collectivism vs individualism] is an ancient conflict. Men have come close to the truth, but it was destroyed each time and one civilization fell after another. Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men." -- Ayn Rand : 'Roark's speech from the _Fountainhead_' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I don't speak for my company. We hire the 'Politically Correct' to do that.
19
2,510
I don't know if it causes the body any harm, but in the 23 years I've been teaching nine and ten years olds I've never had one fall over from eating "boogers" which many kids do on a regular basis [when they think no one is looking . . .]
9
2,511
[argument over "reasonable" players and umpires deleted] Yes, but the baseball rules say you can only appeal a ball and not a strike. There was no decision made by the umpire regarding an appeal. Once he called it a strike the call could not be changed. I thought that the umpire did the right thing.
11
2,512
Hi, I'm now in the market for buying a BMW.The ideal would be an R80 RS but I'd be interested to here of any R80 for sale .Age is not a problem - I'm more interested in a good example without a massive amount of miles and one which has been well maintained as I intend to keep it well and for some time. I would also like to know if anyone has any sound advice as regards to INSURANCE - 27yr old,licence for 9 years,no accidents/claims/convictions.Am I old enough to get BMW owners club insurance yet or will I have to wait until next year? Ian
0
2,513
From 9150618 Thu Apr 29 16:36:43 1993 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1993 16:36:42 +1000 From: 9150618 (Gavin Fairlamb) To: 9130037 Status: R Hello, folks... I am doing a uni. project and was wondering if you could supply with some specific info. or references for info. regarding 1). Considerations for installation of XWindows in a HP 9000(unknown model) 2). Motif, OPENLOOK, XToolkit, Linux???? 3). X11, X11R.... 4). Glossary of any term on X We considering this software for the project which deals in image analysis... Any info. would be greatly appreciated.
6
2,514
Repeat a lie often enough and people will start to believe it, eh? The Hamas terrorists were given the opportunity to appeal. They've chosen not to, obviously because they get better propaganda mileage out of refusing. Israel also agreed that they could return immediately, provided they agreed to stop killing Jews. Their refusal speaks for itself.
2
2,515
O.K.- if you've read this group for a while, you know all about the one-time-pad, but here's a question I haven't seen. The one-time-pad yeilds ideal security, but has a well-known flaw in authentication. Suppose you use a random bit stream as the pad, and exclusive-or as the encryption operation. If an adversary knows the plaintext of a message, he can change it into any other message. Here's how it works. Alice is sending Bob a plaintext P, under a key stream S Alice computes the ciphertext C = S xor P, and sends it to Bob. Eve knows the plainext P, but wants the message to appear as P'. Eve intercepts C, and computes C' = C xor P xor P' = S xor P'. Eve sends C' to Bob. Bob decrypts C' by computing C'xor S = P', thus receiving the false message which was substituted by Eve. Now the question is how can this attack be defeated with information theoretic security, not just computational security. Can we define something like "ideal authentication" which is the analog of ideal security. Can we obtain ideal authentication ? If not, how much can we limit Eve's control over the message ? If we can achieve ideal authentication, does the solution use more key bits or expand the message ? Can we show the solution to be optimal in one or more parameters ? Does anyone know if these questions have been aswered before ?
3
2,516
Gosh. Does this mean I'm not invited to the next White House "barbecue" ?
13
2,517
Why jettison the SSMEs? Why not hold on to them and have a shuttle bring them down to use as spares?
12
2,518
Sorry about following up my own article, but I wanted to continue that what might be being missed here is that the important thing might not be temperature differences per se, but the action of heat sinking the battery. Perhap someone could conduct an experiment, taking two identical lead acid batteries, placing both on wooden shelves, but putting one of them in a water bath designed to act as a heat sink. This would eliminate the 'concrete floor effect', and keep both batteries at the same ambient temperature. I think the argument over temperatures is not pertinent, but the one over heat conductance and removing the exothermic heat may have some validity.
15
2,519
Handlebar mounted windshields on windy days are no fun at all. It has been windy as hell down here for a week or so and it plays hell with the steering. Oh, I still ride. I just bitch a lot about it! ----===== DoD #8177 = Technician(Dr. Speed) .NOT. Student =====----
0
2,520
Hello X'ers I have a problem: I am not able to create a window with 24 bit planes. The following code illustrates the problem: #include <stdio.h> #include <X11/Xlib.h> #include <X11/Xutil.h> main() { Display *display; Window win; XVisualInfo vinfo; Colormap colormap; XSetWindowAttributes attributes; XEvent event; Status status; display=XOpenDisplay(NULL); status=XMatchVisualInfo(display,DefaultScreen(display),24,TrueColor, &vinfo); if (!status){ fprintf(stderr,"Visual not found\n"); exit(1); } colormap=XCreateColormap(display,DefaultRootWindow(display), vinfo.visual,AllocNone); attributes.colormap=colormap; win=XCreateWindow(display,DefaultRootWindow(display),0,0,100,100, 0,24,InputOutput,vinfo.visual,CWColormap,&attributes); XMapWindow(display,win); for (;;){ XNextEvent(display,&event); } } I tried this with an SGI with 24 plane TrueColor server, and with an HP 9000-700 24 plane DirectColor server (with the obviously neccessary change), both running X11R4. On the client side, I have tried with X11R4 Xlib on HP 9000-700 and DECstation, and with X11R3 Xlib on DECstation. All the combinations gave BadMatch error on the CreateWindow request. As far as I can tell from the manual, the only attribute which may give a BadMatch, is the colormap, if it belongs to a wrong visual. But the visual was correctly matched, as I did not get the error message. What am I doing wrong? For information I can tell that xwud aborts with the same error. Karsten --
6
2,521
Conviction of Sin A meta-exegetical or methodological essay I look forward to reading it. When I got to the library last week, it was with the object in view to look at some articles that have appeared over the last few years, since my previous look at the literature. Un- fortunately, they had moved the journal back-issues, so I didn't get a look at the articles I was hoping to find. I will continue to reserve my own judgment on _arsenokoitai_ until I have seen the latest scholarly work, and I can hope that REXLEX's posting may give some meat to chew on. However, what I *can* do now, is to point out the methodological issues -- what needs to be shown for anything to be concluded in this matter. If the article REXLEX posts addresses these issues, so much the better; if not, you will perhaps understand why the problem is hard. writes, _in abstractu_: [it is only a minor point, but let me make it anyway; De Young has already contradicted his own prior assertion in this abstract that the ancient analysis of these issues was concerned with actions and NOT with orientation. I doubt this will have much bearing on the article as such, but thought I should point it out from the start.] The hypothesis De Young is advancing is that Paul a) coined the word and b) his intended meaning for it was in reference to the Levitical law. The questions I wish to raise are 1.) how would one go about confirming the truth of this hypothesis? and 2.) what follows if one accepts (or stipulates, for the sake of the discussion) that it is correct? Note that b) is independent of a); I consider b) far more plausible than a), which seems merely to be a counsel of despair over finding nothing in the literature contemporary with Paul to clarify this word. So far as I know, Paul does NOT in general invent words anywhere else in his letters. Unless you have an otherwise-established pattern of coinages, it is *not* sound methodology to assume it -- particularly if he gives no hint in the immedi- ate text to "fix" the coinage's meaning for his audience. As yet, the extract presents no evidence at all. What do we need to confirm or reject the hypothesis? (which, I should say at the outset, I find somewhat plausible; I certainly know of nothing which makes it an *impossible* way of construing this problem passage.) I'm going to set aside for the moment the question of whether Paul might have coined this usage, to look at the more tractable question of what it means. For this there are, in principle, two kinds of evidence that can be adduced, internal and external. That is, we can look at the text of Paul's letter for clarification or look outside that to prior or contemporary writings that Paul might have relied on, or to derivative writings that have some claim of access to Paul's meaning. The single WORST problem with this word in Corinthians is that there IS no internal evidence for Paul's meaning. He uses the word totally without an explanation or hint as to his meaning, save that its inclusion in a list of negatives implies that it has for him SOME negative meaning. We are left, as the only "internal" clue, with the etymology or formation of the word -- which is indeed the reason that De Young (and others before him) have associated it with the Leviticus prohibition of men VERBing with other men, where VERB is some standard euphemism for having sex ("lie" in Leviticus, "bed" in Greek). One problem is that "bedders" (_-koitai_) is not, as far as I know, USED that way in Greek. THEREFORE, I offer one serious test which de Young's hypothesis *must* pass or be rejected: o find a body of Greek texts contemporary with Paul (or not much prior to his day) such that the _X-koitai_ formation implies "men who have sex with X" [obviously, the "best case" is to find such usages of _arsenokoitai_ itself.] such texts would be confirmation that the word *can* be read that way. It is worth emphasizing that compound words are NOT in general under- standable by projecting what the READER may imagine by the juxtaposition of the roots. Existence of such parallels doesn't *prove* the hypothesis correct -- but it goes a long way towards making such a usage (whether or not original with Paul in the specific case of X == _arse:n_) possible of comprehension by his readers. My "test" moves in the direction of external evidence. If Paul does NOT in his text explain his word (and he does not), then he has to expect his readers to already know the word (which stands against its being a coinage) or to expect that it mimics word formations that they *do* know, such that they can guess his meaning without too much floundering. External evidence, that is, texts other than Paul's own and lexicographic or social/historical considerations that might be adduced, then come into the picture. *If* there are other uses of the word, not dependent on Paul, which *have* sufficient internal (contextual) evidence -- or some gloss by a contemporary scribe -- to show a derogatory reference to male homosexu- ality, or similar _-koitai_ formations used in similar ways, *then* one has grounds for o denying that Paul coined the word and o assuming that his readers might understand his meaning Do you see the problem? If Paul coined the word, then he REQUIRES his readers to share enough context with him to COMPREHEND his coinage and its intent -- in this case that they would (stipulating De Young's guess) understand him to be referring to the Levitical "universal" prohibition of male-male sex (this, mind you, in a context where Paul has emphasized at least to OTHER congregations (and so one assumes to the Corinthians -- how else to explain 1 Cor. 6:12, and the Corinthians having to be pulled back from overinterpreting their freedom?) the NON applicability of Torah law to his gentile converts!) Among the considerations that make it implausible for Paul to have coined the word, its first element is archaic -- _arse:n_ is an old Attic or Ionic form of what in even classical (let alone koine) times would be assimilated as _arre:n_. To me, this implies that we are even more than usually needful of external evidence to pin down meaning and usage. What is Paul doing inventing a word in obsolete Attic formation? And if he *didn't* coin the word, but picked it up like the others in his list as common terms of derogation, then his meaning will be -- for his readers -- constrained by that common meaning (since he gives no other.) I cannot emphasize enough that Paul DOES NOT TELL US what he means by this word. We (and his original readers) are guessing. They, at least, had a contemporary context -- and maybe Paul had used this very word and explained it in great detail to them in person. But we have no trace of evidence of that, and to *suppose* it is mere fantasy. So -- we are *desperately* in need of external evidence about this word. And it seems to be exceptionally meagre. That is precisely the problem. I can think of several more or less equally plausible hypotheses about the word: a) it was a standard gutter term of abuse for (some or all, maybe very specific, maybe very general) homosexual male activities b) it was a term of abuse used by Jews about the awful homosexual Greeks (which may or may not be consciously associated on their part with the Leviticus passage) c) Paul invented the term -- and again there may or may not be an association with Leviticus in his doing so. He may or may not intend the word to have an explicit and universal application with absolute and clear boundaries. [Since none of his OTHER words in that list have such character, this last seems to me about the *least* plausible of the hypotheses I'm advancing.] Of these, I'd say off the top of my head that a) is most plausible -- but I still have reservations about that, too. If the word NEVER appears before Paul, and in later uses has some evidence of depending on Paul, then one can opt for Paul's coining it. If it does appear before him, he might *still* have coined it being unaware of prior use (in which case, his coinage is inherently confusing!) but one should normally demote c) on the basis of any earlier uses (especially if they can be shown to have been at all common in the places Paul traveled.) In either of the a) or b) cases, one has to take into account Paul's relation to the community of usage he picked the word up from -- and whether it be from the Greek or Jewish communities, Paul's relations are hardly straight- forward! There is, so far as I have yet seen, little or no external evidence to aid us in selecting one of these (or some other) hypothesis. Your guess is as good as mine (or maybe worse or maybe better, depending on a lot of things). But it remains -- so far -- guesswork. And I don't know about you, but I for one WILL NOT equate human guesswork with the will of God. By all means be convinced in your own conscience about what Paul is getting at -- as he says elsewhere on what was in HIS day a major controversy of somewhat this same character (Romans 14:22-23) "Hold on to your own belief, as between yourself and God -- and consider the man fortunate who can make his decision without going against his conscience. But anybody who eats in a state of doubt is condemned, because he is not in good faith, and every act done in bad faith is a sin." For my part, I cannot see any way to resolve Paul's meaning in the use of _arsenokoitai_ without directly applicable external evidence -- and by the nature of such external evidence, it will never reach to certainty of constraining Paul's own intent. Paul, like Humpty Dumpty (and me, and all the rest of us) *will* use words in ways that are personal choices -- and sometimes leave his readers puzzled. If that puzzlement leads you to God, it may be blessed -- if it should lead away (as some of Paul's words HAVE led some people), then Paul's intense communicative effort to contrive his meaning in our souls may have some regretable consequences. I have always found Paul to be a fantastically reliable guide -- if I read him "in the large", if I can see him lay out his position in detail and hammer it home time and time again. I am much less certain about his meaning in his many brief and cryptic passages (such as this one.) In my usual discursive way, I have gone on at great length about the first of my intended meta-exegetical points -- what would be needed to confirm that Paul a) coined or b) in any case meant the word to mean the same as the Leviticus prohibition. My second point is to *stipulate* this hypo- thesis, and follow up what it implies for both his initial readers and for later Christians. Given my verbosity, this will be tomorrow night's meditation :-)
18
2,522
Are you sure? Harley's disclaimer says, "if you crash, we take care of the bike, you take care of you." If you were really responsible for the bike, did your insurance cover it?
0
2,523
325/441/577.
11
2,524
[munch] [munch following is reformatted] I'd say that the massive crash problems are exceedingly rare. Windows _itself_ almost never crashes, but it can be crashed by an errant application (My personal favorite? Any one of the Corel 3.0 programs). On the other hand, I have had OS/2 crash randomly a number of times, mostly just running it's own applications. For instance. Today I discovered a new one. While I was downloading with Procomm Plus For Windows (running seamless with the standard VGA drivers on a run-o' da mill VGA card--640x480), I decided that I wanted to edit a copy of a quote that I wanted to add to my .finger. But since I've learned not to really trust seamless, I fired up a full screen WinOS/23.1 session. Whoops, the download finished while WinOS/2 was loading. It had _just_ gotten the pointer up, so I hit alt-escape to get back t the desktop (I have a lot of fonts, so loading takes a good long while). Blam. Screen trashed, Procomm hangs up. Hm. Well, I can sorta see the mouse, so I clicked on the minimized WINOS/2 session and got back my fullscreen Windows session (but the color were off--red and green and yellow and brown instead of blues and greys). So I closed this, and got back to the desktop (now fully restored). PP+ was still sitting, window open, but it was no longer "connected" to the com port--so I exited it (the normal way-- it told me I was still online and it would hang up, though it was _already_ hung up). Hm. Well, load anothe--no, bad idea. Shutdown and reboot. Ok, refresh first.. Now, shutdown. Yes, everything is closed... Hm. Nothing seems to be happening. Let's see.. Ah, the windows list still comes up. OK, let's try shutdown again. No go. Huh. Alright, wait 60 seconds to see if it's just running slow. Hmm. Still seems to be running OS/2. Try shutdown again. Nothing. Oh well. Reboot. Enjoy the checkdisk time. In this case, a part of the OS crashed not only itself, but OS/2 entirely (which isn't even smart enough to tell when it;s been compromised, I guess). In everyday (specifically _today_) use. That's the idea, anyway. In truth, when a program crashes on OS/2, it will bring the system down with it. The programs that would just GPF under Windows do the same under OS/2, but programs that are fine under DOS and Windows bring OS/2 screaming to a halt, task protection or no. For instance, I'm still wondering why print preview in a windowed WP 5.1 (DOS) locks up my system. It works fine under DOS or even in a dos box under Windows 3.1. (Admittedly, it doesn't crash if I run WP51 full screen, but the first time this bug big me, it bit hard). Please explain. The only time I wait on anything under Windows is when I'm copying or formatting a floppy, or when printing (and even then, not long--I get 9 to 11 pages dumped to the printman per minute, and can _still_ go do things--slowly--while it's doing this--I've downloaded with PP+ @9600 while printing). Not sure what you mean here. OS/2 sees 16 megs, uses 5 or six of these for it's own use (more if you want to count WinOS/2). Windows sees 16 megs, uses 3 or 4 (more like 5 if you count the disk cache as I am for OS/2) for itself. If memory efficiency were a big issue, PC GEOS would be the current king of the Intel desktop. On the other hand.. I am finally able to say with some confidence that both OS/2 and Windows have a bit of hardware sensitivity to them. For instance, the machine I am sitting at runs both fine, while the machine next to me constantly locks up under Windows. (But ran OS/2 without a hitch once I got it through a 5-crash install). On the whole, I'd say OS/2 is a whole lot more sensitive than Windows, but there are (I suppose) machines that Windows just doesn't like. Wasn't this _Ferris_ Bueller?
17
2,525
7
2,526
Has anyone heard of a SCSI device that can capture video? We need some sort of device that can capture about 10 frames or so per second, and work off the SCSI bus. The idea is to use it for some sort of video conferencing application.
10
2,527
You forgot one thing "All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God". Mark
18
2,528
17
2,529
[ First of all, please edit your postings. Wading through 50 lines of quoted crud, which people have already read, makes people much less likely to help you. Of course, if you don't want to be helped, that's your problem. ;-) ] No, it's not true. You can get SCSI and IDE to work together, but there are restrictions (at least with the Adaptec 1542): * You MUST boot from the IDE drive. There is no way to boot from the SCSI drive if you have both IDE and SCSI drives. * You MUST disable the SCSI ROM BIOS (I'm not sure about this, though), and so you must also use some special drivers to access the SCSI drive. (Hmm. I know that you have to disable something related to the SCSI BIOS, but I'm not sure if it is the ROM itself.) Back in February, someone asked about IDE and SCSI (this question gets asked again and again). At the end of this message, I've included an edited copy of my reply. You might find it interesting. -- Darryl Okahata Internet: darrylo@sr.hp.com DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not constitute the support, opinion or policy of Hewlett-Packard or of the little green men that have been following him all day. =============================================================================== For MSDOS applications, ISA-based SCSI and IDE controllers generally have comparable throughput. You might get slightly higher throughput with a SCSI disk, but you'll also pay more for the disk ($30-$100 and up, in some cases). You'll also pay much, much more for a good SCSI controller. Note that good SCSI controllers really show their power if they're used with a good multitasking operating system (like a PC Unix). Unfortunately, neither MSDOS nor Windows 3.1 is a good multitasking operating system. The performance advantage of SCSI controllers is mostly wasted with these, which leaves the advantage of being able to connect multiple devices to the SCSI bus as the only advantage. However, note that you can expect to pay a premium for SCSI devices. If you're only going to be using MSDOS, stick with IDE. It's cheaper, and you'll have less headaches. [ Note: the following is true for MSDOS/Windows only. Who knows what the future holds for Windows NT and Unix??? ] No. Generally, you have to find drivers for each SCSI device, which probably don't exist unless you're using one of the "better"/"high performance" SCSI controllers. These are typically bus-mastering SCSI controllers that cost around $180-$400 (street prices) and up, and drivers that allow you to connect these controllers to popular name-brand SCSI devices either come with the card, or can be purchased (for under $100 list price). Examples of such driver kits are: * Adaptec's EZ SCSI kit (list: $75). This works only with Adaptec SCSI controllers. * CorelSCSI! (from the same people who make CorelDRAW!) (list: $99 (?)). This driver kit will supposedly work with any SCSI controller card that has an ASPI driver, like the Adaptec. Central Point's PC Tools for DOS 8.0 supports a number of SCSI tape drives (the documentation lists 40 tape drives). Unfortunately, it works only with Adaptec controllers. Yes, you will run into problems, if you're using a high-performance, bus-mastering SCSI controller. This doesn't sound right, doesn't it? It's true, though. With one of these controllers, you'll probably have to tweak your system to get it to work with sound cards, floppy-controller-based tape drives (like the CMS Jumbo 250), and Windows 3.1. I know. I've been to h*ll and back getting my SCSI controller to work with various hardware/software (thank God for tape backups). If you want a copy of my "Adaptec 1542 hints and tips" file, send email. These problems aren't really the fault of the SCSI controller card; the problems are really with the general hardware and software design of the PC (e.g., no standards). However, adding a bus-mastering SCSI card is what brings these problems to the surface and makes them visible.
5
2,530
Valve seat wear? Tony
0
2,531
[request for WDC65c816 Mac cross-development stuff] Apple themselves sells a 65816 cross-developer for the Macintosh called 'MPW IIgs' (it's intended for use with the Apple IIgs computer, which uses the '816).
15
2,532
My Centris 610 is working perfectly. There is one problem that I have noticed. FastBack II backup utility does not work!!! The strange thing is that it works with my friend's 610 most of the time, however, it never works with my machine. I assume it is some sort of software problem and not hardware related.
10
2,533
I am tunning into this newgroup after a long time. Could somebody tell me what the slave mode in the xterm is? and what can it be used for? Any info where I can get more info or examples. I want to use a bunch of xterms and send the input from one application to these xterms and get the output on the xterms. Please email me any info.
6
2,534
There is something terribly wrong, however, with a culture which condemns, attacks, and all too often kills any of its members who attempt to get an education. My mother is an elementary school teacher, and she tells me that she and her african american collegues are frustrated to tears by the fact that any african american child who attempts to do well in school and get an education is accused by his/her peers of "trying to be white", and is beaten, bullied, and tormented by them. It goes beyond each passing grade on a test earning a beating. In my mother's school, one of the most promising young students, who happened to be african american, had her throat cut by one of these young thugs. Nobody who buys into such a culture has any hope of being anything but poor and/or a thug and/or dead, regardless of their color. What has to be changed is the culture. If that culture can't be changed, then those african-american kids who are willing to separate from it *must* be separated from it and the murderous thugs of whatever color. Otherwise, future bright young african american girls who wanted to be doctors will end up dead on the school bus.
13
2,535
[This is SWF in another indirect post via Dan]. predicitions if you have some many types of happen again may predict reaction There are several problems here. First, you are discussing only experimental procedures. Observational procedures are also useful. The main criterion is attempting to verify an idea by using it to make prediction about as-yet unmade observations. The observations could be the result of an experiment, or they could be obsevations of activity occuring spontaneossly in nature, or they could even be observations of the lasting results of events long past. All that matters is that the observations be *new*. This is what prediction is about in science - it is *not* about predicting the future except in this very restricted sense. Secondly, repeatability can also take many forms. It is really just the requirement that independent observers be able to verify the results. The observation of a fossil is 'repeatable', since any qualified observer may look at it (this is why the specimens are reqtined in a museum). Also, there is the implicit prediction that future fossil finds will correspond to the current one. New fossils are found often enough that this is tested regularly. Many times a new fossil actually falsifies some conclusion made on the basis of previous fossils. Unfortunately for you, the models that were falsified have alway been peripheral to the model of evolution we now have. (For instance, the front legs of Tyrannosaurus rex turned out to have tremendous muscles, rather than being weakly endowed as previously believed). So, in fact, histoircal science findings *are* repeatable in the necessary sense. Just becuase you cannot go out and repeat the original event does *not* make it impossible to make valid observations. [This is not to say that biologists would not go coo-coo if extra- terrestrial life were discovered - that could make the determination of the process of abiogenesis relatively easy]. -- sarima@teradata.com (formerly tdatirv!sarima) or Stanley.Friesen@ElSegundoCA.ncr.com
14
2,536
>Subject: hate the sin... >Date: 12 May 93 08:27:08 GMT >"Hate the sin but love the sinner"...I've heard that quite a bit recently, >My question is whether that statement is consistent with Christianity. I >would think not. Hate begets more hate, never love. If you are questioning whether or not "hating sin" is consistent with Christianity; I ask you to consider the following Scripture: Romans 12:9 "Let Love be without hypocrisy. Hate what is evil, cling to what is good." What is it that Paul, through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit is calling us to hate? Would God call us to do something that would eventually lead to hating our fellow man; especially when he commands us to do the opposite, to love your fellow man? >Consider some sin. Now lets apply our "hate the sin..." philosophy and see >what happens. If we truly hate the sin, then the more we see it, the >stronger our hatred of it will become. Eventually this hate becomes so >strong that we become disgusted with the sinner and eventually come to >hate the sinner. That has not been my experience. I've not found myself hating anybody as a result of hating the sin that may be in their life. As a sinner myself, I find myself having more compassion for the person. Jesus too, since the Bible teaches that he was tempted in every way that we are, is able to have compassion on us when we our tempted and fall. Jesus is our very example of HOW to hate the sin but love the sinner. In the account of the woman caught in adultery (John 8), Jesus had compassion on the woman; BUT he also called her to leave her life of sin. This is what it means to love sinners but hate their sin; it means loving them unconditionally, while at the same time calling them to leave their sin. >In addition, our hatred of the sin often causes us to say and do things >which are taken personally by the sinner (who often does not even believe >what they are doing is a sin). The blame for this can not always be laid at the feet of the Christian. I have seen and been guilty of taking offense by someone merely pointing out my sin and calling me to repent of it. It was not unloving for the Christian to call me out of sin; in fact, I believe it was the most loving thing that that person could have done. He loved me enough to want to spare me the consequence of remaining in my sin. >After enough of this, the sinner begins to hate us (they certainly don't >love us for our constant criticism of their behavior). Hate builds up and >drives people away from God...this certainly cannot be a good way to build >love. Again, I don't think that you can lay the blame for this at the feet of the Christian. If we have loved them as Jesus loved sinners (exemplified in John 8) and the sinner hates us for it, then we have done the best we can. We will have extended to them the most perfect expression of love and they will have rejected it. Now it we hate the sin but forget to love the sinner, then indeed, we will, ourselves, be in sin. >In the summary of the law, Christ commands us to love God and to love our >neighbors. He doesn't say anything about hate. I would like to encourage you to do a word study on HATE in the New Testament. I really think that you will be surprised. >In fact, if anything, he commands us to save our criticisms for ourselves. Criticism is very different from calling a sinner to repent. Hope this helps, In Christ, Tony Balsamo --
18
2,537
There can be. But depression is not diagnositic of thyroid deficiency. Thyroid blood tests are easy, cheap, and effective in diagnosing thyroid deficiencies.
9
2,538
Ever since I was a kid and learned to tell when I was in a dream I have used my dreams for fantasies or working out problems. In my dreams I have done everything from yell at my mom to machine-gunning zombies, not to mention myriad sexual fantasies. I have deliberately done things that I would never do in real life. I understand the need to control ones thoughts, but I always felt that dreams were format free, no morals, no ethics, no physical laws, (though sometimes I would have to wake myself up to go to the bathroom.) Is this an incorrect attitude? Rather than weakening my inhibitions, I could argue that I got certain things "out of my system" by experiencing them in dreams. By analyzing a dream I can determine if I have a problem with a certain situation, i.e. in a dream something will be exagerated that I can then contemplate and see if it really bothers me or not. I can't believe that other people don't do the same. It seems silly to attach moral significance to dreams. I think that this is entirely different from out of body experiences, which I have never had. Contradictions welcome.
18
2,539
: When Elizabeth greeted Mary, Elizabeth said something to the effect that : Mary, out of all women, was blessed. If so, it appears that this : exactly places Mary beyond the sanctification of normal humanity. The phrase is "eulogemene su en gunaixin"- "blessed are you among women." There is nothing to indicate that this is an exceptional or unique status, only that _as a woman_ Mary was blessed. Adding the word "all" is not a fair reading of the text. There are some good reasons for the church's veneration of Mary, but they cannot depend on this verse.
18
2,540
Are you serious? The auto that had a lot to do with bringing the term "boxer" to the popular forefront was the Ferrari 512 Berlinetta Boxer or the 512BB. Had a 5 liter, opposed 12 cylinder engine.
4
2,541
Seems to me that I heard that some early Saabs were 2 cycle V4's. Then again, who could possibly care ?>
4
2,542
I am using xnlock as the screensaver for a PC-based X server. However, after an interval of no activity, my X session ends. This does not happen when I use xscreensaver. My screensave command is fired up from my .xsession like this: xautolock -time 1 -locker xnlock -corners ++++ -cornerdelay 1 & My hypothesis is that xdm (I use xdmcp to start my X session) detects a period of inactivity from the server, then terminates the session. However, for some reason, this does not happen with xscreensaver. Is there a workaround? I'd prefer responses via e-mail. Thanks.
6
2,543
One of our ASU students needs data and or a copy or an article regarding accidents, injury or death to "children" (articles which state the age limits of "children") relating to firearms for a sociology report. We have a copy of the long Edgar A. Suter, M.D. article and but we can't find the Paul Blackman (NRA) "expose'". Any articles (or sections thereof) which deal with comparisons over time, locations, age groups, other reasons for accidents, injury or death, with percentages would be welcome. Please send same to our I.D. and node.
19
2,544
For Sale: ********* * (1) CGA card * Road & Track's Grand Prix (3.5" disks) * DOS 4.01 * Packard Bell .39 dot pitch VGA color monitor * 256K 2-the-max VGA card Please make offers for the above merchandise. What do you have to lose? Go ahead--make an offer! Thanks. Email: bitzm@columbia.dsu.edu
1
2,545
Thompson Schreiber) posted: [PTS] ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN: TWO VIEWS [PTS] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [PTS] Washington Report On Middle East Affairs [PTS] April/May 1993, Vol. XI, No. 9 [PTS] [PTS] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [PTS] [PTS] [PTS] Life Under Blockade In Yerevan [PTS] ------------------------------ [PTS] By Nancy Najarian Ms. Najarian wrote on her personal observations. If somebody wishes to counter the reality she described, fine. [PTS] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [PTS] [PTS] [PTS] The Conflict Over Nagorno-Karabakh: An Azeri Perspective [PTS] -------------------------------------------------------- [PTS] By Alec Rasizade [PTS] [PTS] [AR] Western readers have learned of the Nagorno (Upper) Karabakh [AR] controversy through reports from that remote area by Western [AR] correspondents and from commentaries by member of the long-established [AR] Armenian-American community. Azeri views on this dispute have [AR] appeared rarely if at all in the Western news media. Therefore let me [AR] present _Washington Report_ readers with some basic truths about the [AR] origins of the conflict. During the past two years, if one reads all the commentaries on the subject, a small minority of the writers have been Armenia or Azeri. The following should be interesting. [AR] Armenian leaders claim that Azerbaijan was the first to oppress and [AR] expel the Armenian minority from the Azerbaijani Republic. Actually, [AR] the initiative to banish the Azeri minority and convert the Armenian [AR] Republic into a homogeneous state began in the winter of 1987-1988, [AR] when 165,000 Azeris were driven out of Armenia. Following that move, [AR] there were massacres of Armenians in the Azerbaijani cities of Sumgait [AR]in February 1988 and two years later, in Baku in January 1990. This not true. Other than simply checking the newspapers, I will quote from an independent human rights report. In the _PAX Cristi Netherlands_, 29 September 1991, page 28, we read: "By mid-november, many incidents took place in several places in Azerbaijan. The APF [Azeri Popular Front] challenged the Communist Party for power. ... After ten days, the authorities came in with tanks to reimpose their power. In Nakhitchevan, the last Armenian villages were deported. In Ganja, Armenians were attacked and killed. All 40,000 Armenian inhabitants fled the city..." Between 22 November and 8 December 1988, refugees from Ganja arrived in Armenia while all 167,000 Azeris in Armenia were chased away." In this part of the world February 1988 [start of organized anti-Armenian pogroms in Azerbaijan] come before November and December of 1988! [AR] Azeri parliamentary committees have compiled evidence indicating that [AR] both events were inspired from Moscow to secure Russian imperial rule [AR] in the Transcaucasus, according to the Roman principle of "divide and [AR] rule." Similar conspiracies are evident throughout the five-year [AR] history of the conflict. It is interesting that the Azeris killed, burnt, raped the Armenians but the perpetrators blame Russians, and Armenians themselves on other occasions. [AR] Each time the parties have been about to reach an agreement (in [AR] Zheleznovodsk, Moscow, Tehran, Rome, Geneva and Alma-Ata), an [AR] invisible hand provoked further bloodshed. Those interested in [AR] maintaining the Azeri-Armenian conflict, as well as the Georgian [AR] turmoil, are imperialist forces in Russia, and probably in Iran. Incorrect! When were the people of Nagorno-Karabakh ever involved in an agreement? Never. Until Azerbaijan sits down with the Armenians of Nagorno- Karabakh there will never be an end to this conflict. [AR] The Armenian offensive last spring created more than 100,000 new Azeri [AR] refugees from the captured towns of Upper and Lower Karabakh and [AR] adjacent rural districts. Today 500,000 Azeri refugees throng the [AR] city of Baku and environs, providing more problems for the newly [AR] elected Popular Front government, which is opposed by the rigidly [AR] nationalistic National Independence Party. It's called war. If the Azerbaijanis didn't try to deport and allow the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh to live in their ways, keep their Armenian culture, these Armenians would not have had to defend their existence. The Azeris should not have assumed that Armenians were going to roll over and play dead. [AR] How can a Western-style democracy survive in a small Muslim country [AR] where 1 million of the 7 million inhabitants are unemployed? In the [AR] absence of any international effort to help Azeri refugees, as Kurdish [AR] and Bosnian refugees have been helped, how can the Azeri government [AR] reject the demand of these exiles to recapture their lands, homes and [AR] possessions? The Azeri government should have thought about such thnings before they attempted to deprive Armenians of "lands, homes, and possessions". [AR] Such simple realities must be understood in the West. [AR] Misunderstanding Caucasian politics leads both Western and Russian [AR] public opinion to imagine a permanent, and therefore irreversible, [AR] ethnic and religious rivalry in the Caucasus. True, and you, Dr. Alec Rasizade, should practice what you preach! [AR] I think Western reluctance to interfere derives from this idea. [AR] Meanwhile, continuation of the war could draw both Eastern and Western [AR] states into the conflict through activation of various security [AR] alliances. These include, on the Armenian side, the Moscow-led [AR] Commonwealth forces under the Tashkent mutual security pact, signed [AR] May 15, 1992. On the Azeri side, should Turkey get involved as the [AR] guarantor of the Nakhichevan autonomy through the Kars Treaty of Oct. [AR] 13, 1921, these include the North Atlantic Treaty forces. Western interference! Turkish intervention! The moment Turkey dares step into this conflict it will close the doors of any chance of Turkey being part of Europe (as if it ever will) and will destroy the eastern third of Anatolia! Dr. Rasizade, international realpolitik is not as simple-minded as you would have us believe. [AR] Upper Karabakh generally is described in Western press reports as an [AR]"Armenian enclave within Azerbaijan." The truth is that the Armenians [AR] began to appear there only in the middle of the last century. Incorrect once again. A brief scan of history addresses such a foolish claim. Armenians today, refer to the area of Nagorno-Karabakh as "Artsakh", which comes from the Urartian term "Urtekhe-Urtekhini". NO Azeris yet! Ancient Greeks referred to Artsakh as "Orkhistena". NO Azeris yet! In the first half of the 6th century B.C., Artsakh, as part of Ervandid Armenia of Media. NO Azeris yet! From the end of the 4th century B.C., Artsakh was part of the Armenian Kingdom of Ervan. NO Azeris yet! Artsakh was still part of the Armenian Empire of Tigran. Orkhistena, or Artsakh is refereed to by Strabo, as part of Armenia. NO Azeris yet! After Armenia was divided between the Persian and Byzantine Empires in 387 A.D. until 428, Artsakh was part of Armenia. NO Azeris yet! End of the 5th century, Utik and Artsakh became principalities of the Aranshakhiks. NO Azeris yet! By the 7th century an Artsakh dialect of Armenian formed. NO Azeris yet! Emperor Konstantin (913-959) addressees a letter to the Prince of Khachen "To Armenia". Khachen was the central principality of Artsakh. NO Azeris yet! In the decree of Paul I (1797), the number of Armenian families in this area was stated as 11,000. It was from the 16th to the 18th centuries that non-Armenians from Central Asia, Asia Minor, and Kurdistan first began to be exercise political influence in the planes of Artsakh. Caucasian Muslims around Karabakh! In 1813 Karabagh becomes part of Russia. Officiallt part of Russia 1828. Some Muslims in Karabakh! In 1914, the number of Armenian churches in Nagorno-Karabagh was 224, 188 priests, 206,768 parishioners in 224 Armenian towns and villages. The Armenian percentage of the population was over 90%. MAX: 10% Azeris in Karabakh -- assuming no Kurds! Consider the following statement by the Azerbaijani Revcom on December 1, 1920: "The Worker-Peasant Government of Azerbaidzan, having been informed of the proclamation of Armenia a Soviet Socialist Republic, sends its greetings to the brother people. From this day the previous boundaries between Armenia and Azerbaidzan are annulled. Nagornyi Karabakh, Zangezur, and Nakhichevan are recognized as integral parts of the Armenian Socialis Republic. Long live the brotherhood and union of the workers and peasants of Soviet Armenia and Azerbaidzan! Chairman of the Revcom of Azerbaidzan N. Narimanov People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs Guseinov" [AR] A few years ago they celebrated the 150th anniversary of their [AR] resettlement from Persia to Karabakh, after it came under Russian [AR] rule. No, incorrect. The 1988 celebration was the 150th anniversary of Russian rule in the Caucasus, including Karabakh! [AR] At the same time the Russian colonial administration also drew [AR] in Russian and German settlers, who were welcomed by Azeris. How [AR] would Americans react if the large numbers of Armenians living in [AR] southern California suddenly claimed an Armenian homeland, and [AR] demanded separation from California? Non-sequitur. [AR] Armenian historians insist that before the Armenian resettlement [AR] Karabakh was inhabited by aboriginal Christians. That is correct. Armenian historians don't say this! [AR] The people of medieval Caucasian Albania adopted Christianity in the [AR] fourth century. But those ancient residents had no link to and [AR] nothing in common with Armenians. Considering the Caucasian Albans were of the Armenian Apostolic faith, and their utilization of the Armenian language in their liturgy, makes such an argument totally invalid! [AR] Azeris would have a better claim to [AR] be successors of Albania, since Azeris have for centuries inhabited, [AR] dominated, and developed the Karabakh part of the Azeri nation. Wishing to be part of a people non-existent for nearly a millennium for geo- political advantage is rather outrageous. In addition to such absurdity, Azeris claim to be Turks, Persians, and all the while are Azerizing their minorities, such as the Lezgians, Kurds, Tat, Talish, and a host of other nationalities which may amount to nearly half the population of Azerbaijan. [AR] Both Armenia and Azerbaijan last year signed the Final Act of the [AR] Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe of 1975, and the [AR] Paris Charter for New Europe of 1990, confirming their mutual [AR] adherence to the principle of inviolability of existing borders. This [AR] principle means that the borders and territorial integrity of the [AR] Republic of Azerbaijan are to be guaranteed by all of the signatory [AR] nations, not just by Turkey. Such agreements do not give Azerbaijan the right to de-populate Karabakh of Armenians. [AR] This is one key to intervention on behalf either of the U.N., the [AR] CSCE, the Commonwealth, NATO or Iran. The second key to untying the [AR] Caucasian knot is to determine who is the aggressor, according to the [AR] U.N. definition of 1974. Fine, so why has Azerbaijan refused to allow UN troops into the Armenian enclave? What is Azerbaijan afraid of? Perhaps the fact that the territory is the home of Armenians, the UN, would by definition, support the local population! [AR] When that is accomplished, the international community can and should [AR] apply to the aggressor in the Caucasus international sanctions such as [AR] those presently being employed against Serbia and Montenegro in the [AR] former Yugoslavia. Such decisive collective international action can [AR] halt further aggression in Karabakh, and prevent the Armenian-Azeri [AR] conflict from growing and spreading. Azerbaijan's refusal to allow the Armenians of Karabakh to determine their own future the is issue, not viewing isolating events out of context are actions that will address the Karabakh conflict. Viewing events in a war in isolation and out of context is like viewing the landing at Normandy as an act of Allied aggression! [AR] Dr. Alec Rasizade, senior research officer at the Academy of Sciences [AR] of Azerbaijan, is a visiting researcher at the Harriman Institute of [AR] Columbia University in New York. Ha!
2
2,546
+> +> Recently, I heard the Red Sox on WROL a Spanish-speaking radio station. +>I thought it was so unreal. The Red Sox in Spanish? Anyway, I want to find +>out how widespread this is? Being a NY native, I know the scMets are on in +>Spanish but not the Yankmes. I wuold think that LA,SD,Texas and Fla are on +>in Spanish. Are there any Spanish-speaking networks or is this a local The braves day games are broadcast is Spanish on a station called "La Favorita". (the station has a daytime liscence only).
11
2,547
Check out the shocks where they mount, at both ends. if you have the type that have a loop?,from lack of a better term, and a bolt like piece sticking through, there should be a rubber bushing between the loop and the bolt. Is it there ? is it crushed and allowing metal to metal contact? I hope you can make some sense of this. Good Luck.>
4
2,548
I didn't say to visit some "nice" homosexuals. I said "visit some congregations of Christians..spirit-filled believers.." Praise the Lord that we are all members of the same body. Let us agree to disagree.
18
2,549
Two years ago Mark Messier appeared on David Letterman the summer he signed wit h the Rangers. I remember he and Mike Gartner taking slapshots at the camera, one finally was a bullseye and the screen went blank. It was funny if you saw it, I guess.
16
2,550
Money probably has a lot to do with keeping the practice of routine circumcision alive... It's another opporitunity to charge a few hundred extra bucks for a completely unnecessary procedure, the rationale for which until recently has been accepted without question by most parents of newborns. One could also imagine that complications arising from circumcision (infections, sloppy jobs, etc) are far more common than the remote chance of penile cancer it is purported to prevent.
9
2,551
But the "values and systems that make the rich rich" all basically amount to freedom of choice. In New England in 1800 the entire economy was based on the small family farm. Farm economy households were economically diversified, producing not only agricultural goods but also "manufactured" goods, especially cloth. Many farm women carded, spun, and/or wove, producing not only cloth for their own family but also to sell, generating extra income. But about this time the Industrial Revolution was underway in England and by the 1820's it had moved to the US, in both cases in the form of textile mills. These mills could produce cloth far more efficiently and cheaply than people at home. The result was that an important source of home income was wiped out and many of these women were compelled by economic circumstance to go to work in these same mills in Lowell, Mass, or Nashua, NH, where they worked 73 hour weeks in deafening, dangerous conditions, living regimented lives and being exposed to cotton-dust and infectious dis- eases due to the work. Now people didn't *HAVE* to buy the cheaper factory-made cloth. They were free to keep buying the home-made variety and support their local economy . . . . . . but (sorry for the cliche), "it takes two to tango". The big rich corporations achieved that wealth because we buy their stuff. It used to be the case that the business center of a town was also its social center. You KNEW the merchants you did business with or even local kids working behind the counter. You would see people on the street whom you knew and you could stop for a chat. Nowadays local merchants are going out of business and people shop at huge anonymous malls serving regional populations of hundreds of thousands or millions. You have no particular relationship with the companies you do business with, and feel no particular commitment to them, nor they to you. Major components of what defines a "com- munity" have been destroyed. On the other hand the products we buy at these malls are a lot cheaper due to economies of scale and foreign manufacture, and they are probably of better, or at least more consistent, quality. Don't blame the conservatives for this. Everyone makes their own individual choice and the liberals and the fence-sitters are just as guilty of pretending there are no social and cultural consequences to economic choices.
13
2,552
Thank you, Steve. It is refreshing to have someone accuse me of being a Christian. I only hope enough evidence can be garnered to get a conviction. I am not certain what you mean by the "fundy" part as the term fundamentalist has a wide variety of uses. If you refer to those who actually believe Jesus is the Messiah and Son of God and wish to follow in his way, then I plead guilty. But what does it matter what I think. The Roman circus is over. The lions have been satisfied -- for now. The Emperor, after the long and gruelling struggle, sensed the crowd was tiring and gave thumbs down. With respect to my previous comments about David Koresh, I urge you to re-examine my previous posts. I believe you mistakenly assume that defense of Koresh' right to his own personal beliefs and his right to express them to others implies agreement with Koresh' theology. Actually I understand little about the details of Branch- Davidian teachings and regret so many are hung-up on that aspect of the tragic events of the past few days. Nor do I think Koresh' sex life should be of any interest to the federal government. Of course Hillary says he had been molesting infants so it must be true even though such allegations do not fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government; they are state and local matters and have been thoroughly reviewed at the local level by proper authorities with no successful charge having ever been levied against him. Under American law, he was innocent as Americans are presumed innocent until proven guilty. At least that's how it is suppposed to be. But he was demonized and propa- gandized against by a powerful machine to have him appear as a lustful beast and therefore deserving of every ill the fates might bring upon him. But evidence trickles in that the twenty-one children, who left the building in the early days of the siege, were carefully examined by qualified authorities for evidence of physical or sexual abuse and none was found. DeGuerin, one of the attorneys who met with Davidians several times before the conflagration, reported that the children seemed well adjusted and showed no sign of abuse. Ultimately, Steve, what I think about the heart of David Koresh is quite unimportant. Today he is in the benevolent hands of a most wise and merciful judge who will one day surely judge us all. So I withhold any judgment of David Koresh and defer to the One who has all knowledge. Meanwhile, let's clean up the mess left on earth and keep this from happening again by sending a strong message to the government to respect the inalienable rights of the people it serves. --Joe Gaut
8
2,553
Hi all. I'm looking for datasets of a human body or head in any of the popular formats. I'm doing a presentation tomorrow which could be greatly enhanced by bringing in this 'human' factor. I've looked around the net with no sucess so far. Anyone got any ideas? I'd also appreciate info on the location of datasets for the USS Enterprise (any model) Thanks in advance, Ronan
7
2,554
It is indeed nice to have fans that are concerned about the dearth of disputatious dissertation linked to my hiatus. Have simply been too damned busy lately to keep you lads and lassies entertained. You can be sure, however, that I will somehow manage to find time to woof if the Leafs give just cause. And let's all try to keep people's names (especially mine) out of the subject headers. I, for one, neither seek nor enjoy such a cheap form of notoriety. One thing you can be assured of, however, is this: the Leafs are the best of all the teams in the league that have allowed 12 goals in 2 games. --
16
2,555
...execellent examples of Luther's insane rantings deleted... Gee, I'm *sooooo* surprised that they don't teach this part of his ideology in high schools today.
14
2,556
Being a chronic HBsAg carrier does not necessarily mean the patient has chronic persistent anything. Persons who are chronic carriers may have no clinical, biochemical, or histologic evidence of liver disease, or they may have chronic persistent hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Most cases of chronic persistent hepatitis (CPH) are probably the result of a viral infection, although in a good number of cases the cause cannot be determined. The diagnosis of CPH is made on the basis of liver biopsy. It consists of findings of portal inflammation, an intact periportal limiting plate, and on occasion isolated foci of intralobular necrosis. But in contrast to chronic active hepatitis (CAH) there is no periportal inflammation, bridging necrosis, or fibrosis. CPH has, indeed, an excellent prognosis. If I had to choose between CAH and CPH there is no question I would also choose CPH. However, as David pointed out, the distinction between the two is not as neat as some of us would have it. The histology can sometimes be pretty equivocal, with biopsies showing areas compatible with both CPH and CAH. Maybe it is a sampling problem. Maybe it is a continuum. I don't know. =================================
9
2,557
Here follows a headerless (my editing) email message in full (except for the header) sent to me by congruent corporation today. I received it about 5 minutes ago, and still haven't read it. Have fun. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product Overview Allows Existing Unix/X Applications to be hosted on Windows NT Includes Common X Support Clients Supports X Terminals Provides Multiuser NT Facilitates Porting Unix/X Applications to Window NT BSD Behavior X Programming Libraries Target Market Customers With Unix/X Applications Who Want To Standardize On Windows NT Allows Hosting On Windows NT With Minimal Effort Permits X Clients On Single Windows NT System To Support Multiple Users X Servers Can Be X Terminals, Unix Based, NT Based, Windows Based BSD Library Behavior Minimize Unix Porting Effort Layered Above Standard C Libraries/WINSOCK NT Registry Path/Drive Replacement BSD Include File Layout True Berkeley Sockets Supplies Common BSD Functions Missing From NT X Programming Libraries Complete X.V11R5 Libraries Motif Widget Libraries Motif UIL Registry Based X Configuration Locator Direct to Windows GDI via "local socket" winnt:0 X Support Applications Includes Full Set Of X Client Applications Motif Window Manager (MWM) Multiuser NT Capabilities NtNixTerm: Special Adaptation of Xterm Special NT Hosted Command Shell Provides LOGNAME, HOME facilities Multiple Users on Multiple X Servers Can Simultaneously Access Single NT System X Terminal Support BOOTP to Boot X Terminals TFTPD For Font Loading Font Server For Scaled X Fonts XRemote for Serial SLIP X info@com.congruent (Congruent Information) -- snail@lsl.co.uk
6
2,558
Matt's problem is really more ability than attitude. It isn't that he's got it in his mind that he wants to swing away, but rather that he's (still) a total sucker for the curve ball. It looked for a while in 1990 that he was getting better but it's still his weak point. As to whether it does him any good to have Bonds behind him, the net.stat.mavens will probably tell you there's no reason that it should, but if he thinks it will, it might be a self-fulfilling prophecy. As to whether the Giants' lineup is optimal: who knows? Batting Bonds, the team's best hitter, fifth does seem to be odd, but the #1 and #2 hitters aren't exactly Messrs. OBA, so they aren't giving much up there. And although Clark isn't the overall offensive force that Bonds is, he seems better suited to the #3 spot. Assuming, of course, that he starts hitting one of these days...
11
2,559
I get regular questions about gamma correction since I go to great pains to deal with it properly in xli (the image loader program I maintain). Here is an explanation I often use to answer these questions. This might be suitable for inclusion in the FAQ. Graeme Gill. ########################################################################### "A note on gamma correction and images" Author: Graeme W. Gill graeme@labtam.oz.au Date: 93/5/16 "What is all this gamma stuff anyway ?" -------------------------------------- Although it would be nice to think that "an image is an image", there are a lot of complications. Not only are there a whole bunch of different image formats (gif, jpeg, tiff etc etc), there is a whole lot of other technical stuff that makes dealing with images a bit complicated. Gamma is one of those things. If you've ever downloaded images from BBS or the net, you've probably noticed (with most image viewing programs) that some images look ok, some look too dark, and some look too light. "Why is this ?" you may ask. This, is gamma correction (or the lack of it). Why do we need gamma correction at all ? -------------------------------------- Gamma correction is needed because of the nature of CRTs (cathode ray tubes - the monitors usually used for viewing images). If you have some sort of real live scene and turn it into a computer image by measuring the amount of light coming from each point of the scene, then you have created a "linear" or un-gamma-corrected image. This is a good thing in many ways because you can manipulate the image as if the values in the image file were light (ie. adding and multiplying will work just like real light in the real world). Now if you take the image file and turn each pixel value into a voltage and feed it into a CRT, you find that the CRT _doesn't_ give you an amount of light proportional to the voltage. The amount of light coming from the phosphor in the screen depends on the the voltage something like this: Light_out = voltage ^ crt_gamma So if you just dump your nice linear image out to a CRT, the image will look much too dark. To fix this up you have to "gamma correct" the image first. You need to do the opposite of what the CRT will do to the image, so that things cancel out, and you get what you want. So you have to do this to your image: gamma_corrected_image = image ^ (1/crt_gamma) For most CRTs, the crt_gamma is somewhere between 1.0 and 3.0. If that is all it is, why does it seem so complicated ? ----------------------------------------------------- The problem is that not all display programs do gamma correction. Also not all sources of images give you linear images (Video cameras or video signals in general). Because of this, a lot of images already have some gamma correction done to them, and you are rarely sure how much. If you try and display one of those images with a program that does gamma correction for you, the image gets corrected twice and looks way to light. If you display one of those images with a program that doesn't do gamma correction, then it will look vaguely right, but not perfect, because the gamma correction is not exactly right for you particular CRT. Whose fault is all this ? ----------------------- It is really three things. One is all those display programs out there that don't do gamma correction properly. Another is that most image formats don't specify a standard gamma, or don't have some way or recording what their gamma correction is. The third thing is that not many people understand what gamma correction is all about, and create a lot of images with varying gamma's. At least two file formats do the right thing. The Utah Graphics Toolkit .rle format has a semi-standard way of recording the gamma of an image. The JFIF file standard (that uses JPEG compression) specifies that the image to be encoded must have a gamma of 1.0 (ie. a linear image - but not everyone obeys the rules). Some image loaders (for instance xli - an X11 image utility) allow you to specify not only the gamma of the monitor you are using, but the individual gamma values of image you are trying to view. Other image viewers (eg. xv another X11 image program) and utilities (eg. the pbm toolkit) provide ways of changing the gamma of an image, but you have to figure out the overall gamma correction yourself, allowing for undoing any gamma correction the image has, and then the gamma correction you need to suite your CRT monitor. [ Note that xv 2.21 doesn't provide an easy way of modifying the gamma of an image. You need to adjust the R, G and B curves to the appropriate gamma in the ColEdit controls. Altering the Intensity in the HSV controls doesn't do the right thing, as it fails to take account of the effect gamma has on H and S. This tends to give a tint to the image. ] How can I figure out what my viewer does, or what gamma my screen has ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The simplest way to do that is to try loading the file chkgamma.jpg (provided with xli distribution), which is a JFIF jpeg format file containing two grayscale ramps. The ramps are chosen to look linear to the human eye, one using continuous tones, and the other using dithering. If your viewer does the right thing and gamma corrects images, then the two ramps should look symmetrical, and the point at which they look equally bright should be almost exactly half way from the top to the bottom. (To find this point it helps if you move away a little from the screen, and de-focus your eyes a bit.) If your viewer doesn't do gamma correction, then left hand ramp will have a long dark part and a short white part, and the point of equal brightness will be above the center. If your viewer does have a way of setting the right amount of gamma correction for a display, then if the equal brightness point is above center increase the gamma, and decrease it if it is below the center. The value will usually be around 2.2 [with xli for instance, you can adjust the display gamma with the -dispgamma flag, and once you've got it right, you can set the DISPLAY_GAMMA environment variable in your .profile] How do I figure out what the gamma of an image is ? ------------------------------------------------- This is the most tricky bit. As a general rule it seems that a lot of true color (ie. 24 bit, .ppm .jpg) images have a gamma of 1.0 (linear), although there are many about that have some gamma correction. It seems that the majority of pseudo color images (ie. 8 bit images with color maps - .gif etc.) are gamma corrected to some degree or other. If your viewer does gamma correction then linear images will look good, and gamma corrected images will look too light. If your viewer doesn't do gamma correction, then linear images will look too dark, and gamma corrected images will ok. Why Linear images are sometimes not such a good thing ----------------------------------------------------- One of the reason that many high quality formats (such as Video) use gamma correction is that it actually makes better use of the storage medium. This is because the human eye has a logarithmic response to light, and gamma correction has a similar compression characteristic. This means images could make better use of 8 bits per color (for instance), if they used gamma correction. The implication though, is that every time you want to do any image processing you should convert the 8 bit image to 12 or so linear bits to retain the same accuracy. Since little popular software does this, and none of the popular image formats can agree on a standard gamma correction factor, it is difficult to justify gamma corrected images at the popular level. If some image formats can standardize on a particular gamma, and if image manipulation software takes care to use extra precision when dealing with linearized internal data, then gamma corrected distribution of images would be a good thing. (I am told that the Kodak PhotoCD format for instance, has a standard gamma correction factor that enables it to get the highest quality out of the bits used to hold the image).
7
2,560
FOR SALE: Apple Macintosh LC; 2 MB RAM, 40 MB HDD, FDD. AppleColor 13" Hi-Res RGB Monitor. Keyboard, Mouse, Microphone, & Kensington MasterPiece Mac II. Running System 7. All documentation and manuals. Symantec GreatWorks 1.00 & Mac Tools Deluxe 1.2 loaded on HDD. All disks and manuals included. All hardware in MINT condition, used a total of 60 minutes. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this system, I just can't get used to a MAC after using a PC. $800 + shipping costs (non-negotiable). Also, as an *option* only to the person who purchases the above: Apple StyleWriter Printer with Accessory Kit. Brand new, NEVER used, in factory-sealed carton. $200 + shipping costs. Reply via e-mail to <david.morgan@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us> and leave phone number (fast) or call 313-552-1769 (24-hr. voice mail) (FASTER). Serious inquiries only, please. First come, first served. (This ad was originally posted to this conference a couple of weeks ago, but the first "buyer" couldn't finance the purchase and I accidentally killed all other replies. Sorry.)
10
2,561
I have a few the original IBM 10Mb harddisks for sale. They are actually Seagate's ST412, MFM, full height, has the IBM logo and black face plate. Each disk is checked and formatted with DOS 5.0. It can be doubled to 20Mb or so with dblspace or stacker if you so desire. Have the original IBM foam fitted boxies and anti-static bags. I am not sure if they were ever used, but each drive that is sent out will be quarenteed in good working order. $30 each plus shipping cost, (about $5),
1
2,562
vamilliron: Yes, Intel's PCI is (another) Local Bus standard, which can be used for graphics, although I believe Local Buses can be used for other things, too. As far as I know, though, PCI Local Bus would compete with VESA Local Bus, not the VESA graphics standard, but others more enlightened might be able to shed more light on this matter.
7
2,563
Actually, the record of the Allies activities, in the face of incontrovertible evidence as to what the Nazis (may they rot in hell) were doing, clearly points to the conclusion that they would have done nothing. The railways to the camps were not bombed, despite the ease of doing so. The US, the "place of refuge" allowed in a bare pittance of Jews from Europe, primarily for public relations, so that the government could say it was "doing something". Many ships with refugees were turned away from US shores; some found refuge in Cuba or South America, many others sunk or had to return to Europe (with predictable consequences). The hope today is that we have collectively learned a lesson, and are less complacent to ignore other countries' "internal affairs". The sad reality is that this does not seem to be the case.
2
2,564
19
2,565
Hey don't confuse these guys with facts dude! You might break some beautiful illusions! Of course by BATF admits this they mean that the BATF did not deny some post by a pro-Koresh/gun lobby person some time back. If anyone wants to understand the paranoid mindset of Koresh I offer you talk.politics.guns. There you can dredge the sewers of minds so hung up on power and ego trips that they bend reality arround their own particular set of beleifs. I long ago gave up arguing the case for arms control directly. Instead I invite people to ask themselves, would you want to be in a room full of the occupants of talk.politics.guns, their personal armouries and attempt to enter a discussion with them?
13
2,566
Not true. Only an observer at rest at infinite distance from the black hole will see the particle take infinite time to reach the horizon. In the particle's own reference frame, it takes a very finite time to reach the horizon and the singularity. The math does indeed predict this. Take a look at Mitchner, Thorne, and Wheeler's _Gravitation_. Peter Walker
14
2,567
Sorry, I still don't buy it. You're certainly right that the runner is not out merely for running out of the baseline: he must interfere with the play. But the argument here is over what constitutes interference. You certainly cannot infer from what you've quoted that the batter-runner must be hit by the ball to be guilty of interference: you haven't posted a definition of interference at all. IMO this calls for one of the "approved ruling[s]" that go in small print in the rulebook. Something like: APPROVED RULING: If in the judgement of the umpire the runner, by running to the left of the allowed path, caused the fielder to make a bad throw, blocks the vision of the fielder receiving the throw, or otherwise impedes the defensive team's making a play on him, the batter-runner shall be judeged guilty of interference. or APPROVED RULING: The runner cannot be judged guilty of interference in the unless he makes contact with a fielder or is hit by the thrown ball. -- In the absence of such an approved ruling I claim that this is a poor rules trivia question--since it cannot be authoritatively answered.
11
2,568
Considering the magnitude of loss of life in both the Moro Castle and Titanic disasters, I can't believe you can be so blithe there fred. Besides if a LNG tanker breaks up in a close harbor, you can kiss off quite a lot of population. same thing for any chemical tankers. I know the coast guard makes mandatory safety equipment checks on all watercraft. they use this as an excuse to make narcotics searches, without warrants. I suspect, that commercial craft need a certificate at least similiar in scope to an air worthiness certificate from the DOT.
12
2,569
here they are $25 for ERC and $50 for MSF. and no the state doesn't subsidize ours at all. we do. $1 for every motorcycle endorsed license.
0
2,570
Only if he was a "true motorcyclist with the real riding attitude." As you probably are aware, there is a sure-fire rec.moto test for this attribute. Why? You think (s)he's worried about road-rash?
0
2,571
Think we can lose the sci.image.processing group from this thread, folks? Thanks bunches. spl
9
2,572
Well, almost NuBUS 90 anyway, comprehensive bus contention between processors is not supported in the current Macintoshes, could be wrong? However, I know for a fact from seeing the Cyclone Data Spec sheets myself, don't ask, Macintosh Cyclone models will provide full implementation of the NuBUS standard. Very interesting possibilities indeed!
10
2,573
Of course you can. You just have to be careful about what conclusions you draw. Huh? The 20's and 30's were the *worst* decades for great pitching. Grove, Vance, Dean, and not a whole lot else. As for the best all-around hitters, stat-wise, Ruth, Gehrig, Foxx, Greenberg, Hornsby, Cobb, etc. all played before the 40's. Stat-wise, the 60's were a graveyard for hitters. How do you know? Which ones do you consider great? So? Sheffield also has better shoes. More time between pitches. You can run the comparison, but there are *lots* of things to take into account. Well, can we compare them or can't we? Why? We can compare players to the *standard* of their era; and we can keep in mind era-to-era differences without throwing up our hands in despair. You haven't shown us what's *un*reasonable about the MAntle-Sheffield comparison that you yourself did.
11
2,574
Will someone please post the David Sternlight FAQ to alt.privacy.clipper before someone unfamiliar with him takes him seriously and starts yet another flame fest?
3
2,575
They've been out of busines for years. Not any more. About 2 years ago they all closed. When Ramco/Electronics city closed, it took weeks and many dumpsters to clear everything out (so I heard). There are a few places that sell connectors and phone wires, but no chips, capacitors or discrete stuff. Sylvan/Wellington is still on Broadway and Canal, but they're not cheap, and not surplus. It's mostly a TV repairman's store. -- Jeffrey Jonas jeffj@panix.com -- Jeffrey Jonas
15
2,576
Has someone scanned in an artist's rendering of Aurora? If so, is the GIF available somewhere? Please reply via email. Thanks, Craig
12
2,577
In Shreveport, back when I was riding the Purple Water Buffalo, I jumped an intersection IN FRONT OF A COP who was waiting for the light! The side of the street he was on was hidden buy a building on the corner and I didn't see him till I was airborne in the middle of the intersection. I was parked, had my helment off and my liscence out before he turned the corner. He chewed my ass out and let me go! I will be the first to admit it was a very squidly thing to do, jumping the intersection like that. The cop should have nailed me. I find that if you are polite, respectfull and honest, they will normaly let you get away with a LOT of stuff. P.S. The shock mounts folded up the next day. I guess I deserved that! ----===== DoD #8177 = Technician(Dr. Speed) .NOT. Student =====----
0
2,578
I use a Nanao 20" Multisync and switch between a Windows 1024x768 and a Sparc 1+ display. Works quite well at these resolutions. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael C. Busby | Unix System Support System Engineer, Sr. | Design Environment/Automation Compaq Computer Corporation | Internet: mcb@compaq.com P.O. Box 692000 m/s 050701 | Uunet: uunet!cpqhou!michaelb Houston, Texas, USA 77269-2000 | Phone: 713-374-5638
5
2,579
A good source of information on Burzynski's method is in *The Cancer Industry* by pulitzer-prize nominee Ralph Moss. Interesting. What book got Moss the pulitzer nomination? None of the flyers for his books mention this, and none of the Cancer Chronicle Newsletters that I have mention this either. Also, a non-profit organization called "People Against Cancer," which was formed for the purpose of allowing cancer patients to access information regarding cancer therapies not endorsed by the cancer industry, but which have shown highly promising results (all of which are non-toxic). Moss is People Against Cancer's Director of Communications. People Against Cancer seems to offer pretty questionable information, not exactly the place a cancer patient should be advised to turn to. Most (maybe all) of the infomation in their latest catalogue concern treatments that have been shown to be ineffective against cancer, and many of the treatments are quite dangerous as well. sdb
9
2,580
486DX2/66 is faster for this if you are using DOS. PC Mag reviewed a bunch of 486DX2/66 and a 486DX50 and the486DX2/66 was faster... THe review was in the last month of two. Guy
5
2,581
and didn't you also say that it was easier to add masses than to add balance shafts? the sad truth is that some makers don't bother to put balance shafts on their big shaky 4's.. how about: 1 3 __ __ | | | | __| | | | __ | | | | |__| |__| 2 4 if this is ridiculous, kindly explain why.. it's been more than 10 years since i studied this stuff. :-) the point that they are trying to make is that while everybody settles for the orthodox inline 4, they are using a horizontally opposed 4, which is unique in that market segment. and porsche also uses a flat six in their 911, so what's the problem? i don't see any claim that their engine is as good as a porsche's.. they are simply pointing out that they use the same configuration as a porsche.. if you want to nitpick ad campaigns, i think there are far more blatant excesses than this.
4
2,582
I`ve been happy with aXe under Linux. Now I wanted to use it under HP-UX, too. However, my attempts have ended in core dumps this far (Bus Error). Has anybody else been more successful? Jim Wight`s INSTALL file does say there have been problems with HP`s... Data: aXe 5.0; HP-UX 9.01; X11R4 or X11R5 doesn`t seem to matter (shared libs); HP 9000/720. Thanks in advance,
6
2,583
As the title says...Does anyone know of a Text editor (like notepad) that can handle large text files?....Thanx for any and all help! ________________________________________________________________________
17
2,584
Hello, i'm looking for a Driver for an IBM 3852-2 Color Ink Jet Printer. Any pointers are welcome. thanks in advance Ralf
17
2,585
I have replaced the osz to 66 MHz yesterday and no truble at all. My Quadra now works at 33 MHz stable for more than 14 hours. I have also tried a 70 MHz osz, but after 1/2 hour my Quadra 700 died. I am not sure what was the reason for that, but it is to risky to run it to fast. Most of your Quadras 700 should work at 33 MHz without any problems. But a safety tip do a backup from your harddisk befor you start to upgrade. During my 35 MHz test I damaged my harddisk and had a hardtime to get it working again. So once again do a backup befor you start!!!!!!!!! Now the speedometer results after replacing the osz. Speedometer Report for menes rainer. Prepared April 22, 1993. Machine Record Version #: 5 User Comment: Quadra 700 33Mhz and Ram Disk 20 MByte RAM + 2 MByte VRAM System Information: Computer: Mac Quadra 700 CPU: MC68040 FPU: Integral FPU MMU: Integral MMU Color Quickdraw: 2.30 (32 Bit QD) System Version: 7.1.6 Finder Version: D1-7.1 AppleTalk Version: 57 LaserWriter Version: D1-7.1.2 Laser Prep Version: Not Found ImageWriter Version: D1-7.0.1 ROM Version: $067C ROM Size: 1024 Bit Depth: 1 Horizontal DPI: 72 Vertical DPI: 72 Primary Screen Size: 832 x 624 Physical RAM: 20480K Logical RAM: 20454K P.R. Results (Uses Mac Classic as 1.0): CPU: 21.625 Graphics: 30.052 Disk: 28.351 Name of Hard Disk tested: RAM Disk Math: 135.128 Performance Rating (PR): 36.848 Benchmark Results (Uses Mac Classic as 1.0): KWhetstones: 1500.000 205.479 Dhrystones: 26315.789 27.008 Towers: 24.960 QuickSort: 22.391 Bubble Sort: 23.823 Queens: 24.105 Puzzle: 28.804 Permutations: 26.523 Fast Fourier: 167.728 F.P. Matrix Multiply: 154.452 Integer Matrix Multiply: 30.250 Sieve: 25.602 Benchmark Average: 63.427 FPU Tests (Uses Mac II as 1.0): @@FFPU Fast Fourier: 14.636 FPU KWhetstones: 5454.545 7.636 FPU F.P. Matrix Mult.: 14.333 FPU Test Average: 12.202 Color Tests (Uses Mac II as 1.0): Black & White: 6.395 4 Colors: 6.773 16 Colors: 6.957 256 Colors: 7.016 Color Test Average: 6.785 Very interesting are the graphics results (Graphics 30.052) couldn't belief this, but it is true. Two points which my cause problems are the 4 MByte Ram solder on the board. The are only 80ns Rams and run at the upperlimit with 33 MHz. The next part which may cause trouble are the Video Rams. I have the orignal 100ns VRAMs from Apple in my Quadra, here you are also at the upperlimit where most of the chips running but it isn't garantied to run. Most of the other parts on the Quadra board running on there o wn clockspeed so they wont make truble. The most importaned question is do I neat a new heat sink. I would say NO. After running my Quadra for more than 14 hours the heat sink is really cool. A 33 MHz 486 with heat sink is mutch warmer than the 68040 in the Quadra, so I didn't see any problems. The room temperatur was 22 Celsius (72 F). If you living in a area were it is hot 100 F (45 C) and your room temperatur is not mutch below I would suggest a new heat sink with a ventilator to stay on the safe side. Hope you will have the same success than I had, Rainer
10
2,586
As I read the current wiretap law, it would not be legal now. On the other hand, assuming a legislative change, recording but not decrypting Clipper conversations would probably be found constitutional by the Supreme Court, using the same reasoning (or the lack thereof...) by which they permit random roadblocks to check for drunk drivers. Incidentally, if we use that as our model, the Court will likely not uphold selective recording. (On the other hand, I don't think they've thrown out ``drug courier profiles'' yet. Must be that exception to the Fourth Amendment that I can never find in my copy of the Bill of Rights.) A lot -- and I mean a *lot* -- will depend on exactly how Clippertaps (or Tipperclaps, for encrypted music?) are used. Don Alvarez showed in the latest RISKS digest that it's possible to prevent the cops from reading traffic after their warrant expires.
3
2,587
In order to have formulate a rational position on what cryptography policies are acceptable, we must set forth a list of basic requirements. I would propose the following as a starting point: 1. The algorithm must be publicly known, and must have a record of surviving attempts by outside experts to find weaknesses. 2. The system implementation must make it possible to verify that the advertised algorithm is, in fact, the one that is being used. 3. The key must be quickly changeable by the user, and must be of a sufficient length and complexity to defeat any brute-force search possible now or in the reasonably near future.
3
2,588
I know it's very trendy nowadays to dump on Morris, but let's give credit where credit is due. It is doubtful that the blue jays would have won the AL east without Morris. Last year, when the team went 13-15 for the month of August, and all the other starters were being shelled, and Milwaukee was making a charge, Morris went 5-1 with a pretty good era (I can't remember exactly). Also, let's not underestimate the importance his 240+ innings to save the bullpen every fifth day. If he didn't help us win the AL east, forget about the pennent and the world series. His run support was high (5.98 runs) but so was Stottlemyer's (5.90 runs) and he won only 12 games. I do remember Morris winning an inordinate number of 6-5 and 8-6 ballgames, but this is to his credit. He pitched only as good as he needed to be. When he was up 6-1 in a ballgame, he just put it in cruise control and threw the ball up there and let the batters "get themseleves out" (I hate this expression!). An inexperienced pitcher would wear himself out trying to make perfect pitches to keep his era down. But Morris, being a veteran pitcher, knows that winning is the only thing that really matters in baseball. By saving himself, he was able to reach back for that little extra (I hate this too!) when the game was on the line. Yes Morris is crapping out big time this year, but let's not change history to suit the present. BTW, I think he should be put in the bullpen; it would be embarrassing a veteran pitcher which Cito would never do, but his era is 17+, how much more can he be embarrassed? ditto!
11
2,589
Gaining entry into heaven cannot be done without first being cleansed by the blood of Jesus. Sin cannot dwell in heaven. It is against the natural laws of God. Being converted to christianity means being baptized by the Holy Spirit. You cannot get to heaven by good works only. Because of the union with the holy spirit, the man's behavior will change. If there is true union he will not desire to be homosexual. Fornication and homosexuality will leave your life if you are truly baptized by the holy spirit. It's not to say that we don't stumble now and then.
18
2,590
I don't think that idea means what you think it does. Having everyone on Earth subject to some ad agency's "poor taste" *is* an abomination. (abomination : n. loathing; odious or degrading habit or act; an object of disgust. (Oxford Concise Dictionary)) Maybe *you* don't mind having every part of your life saturated with commercials, but many of us loathe it. I'd rather not have the beauty of the night sky always marred by a giant billboard, and I'll bet the idea is virtually sacrilegious to an astronomer like Sagan.
12
2,591
Throughout the years of the Israel/Arab-Palestinian conflict, the internal Palestinian popultation has found itself essentially relegated to the lower tiers of the economy. Given the major kinds of positions required by the Israeli and the "Palestinian" economy, there are essentially two different ones existing side by side aren't holding down many of the " skilled" positions. So, when Gaza has to operate on its own, there are few residents trained to fill the need for middle and upper management.
2
2,592
Makes sense to me, after all when steel is manufactured and stored they put oil on it so it won't rust. Logicaly, when you store your bike, you must strip the paint and put oil on the metal to prevent rus
0
2,593
[[ I posted this a few weeks back, but all I got back was an error message "pnews: /dev/null: Permission denied". Yep, /dev/null had a mode of 600. (Arrghhh!!) ]] With renewed interest in "setting the DISPLAY variable", etc.. I thought I would post my contribution. This Perl script is my solution. It trys to be intelligent about what it's doing so that you should be able to type "rx host.domain.etc", and get a xterm running on "host.domain.etc", with all the difficult stuff taken care of. In theory, this program can do *everything* you ever wanted to do when you wanted to run a remote command in the background - it doesn't even need to be an X program. Try a "rx big-machine make" for instance, for a backgrounded make on the remote "big-machine". For more details and a full list of features read the README file, about 20 lines below... All comments welcome. Duncan. #! /bin/sh # This is a shell archive. Remove anything before this line, then unpack # it by saving it into a file and typing "sh file". To overwrite existing # files, type "sh file -c". You can also feed this as standard input via # unshar, or by typing "sh <file", e.g.. If this archive is complete, you # will see the following message at the end: # "End of archive 1 (of 1)." # Contents: README Imakefile MANIFEST Makefile rx.man rx.pl # Wrapped by sinclair@dcs.gla.ac.uk on Thu Apr 8 18:47:48 1993 PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb ; export PATH if test -f 'README' -a "${1}" != "-c" ; then echo shar: Will not clobber existing file \"'README'\" else echo shar: Extracting \"'README'\" \(1442 characters\) sed "s/^X//" >'README' <<'END_OF_FILE' X X Glasgow RX - remote execution of X programs. Version 3.1.7 X XCopyright 1992 Duncan Sinclair <sinclair@dcs.gla.ac.uk> X XTrivial to install, but there's an Imakefile to make it even more trivial. X XThe perl script needs some customisation before it is installed, just Xedit the "rx.pl" file, and read the comments. Once you've done Xthis you can "xmkmf", then "make install install.man". X XFEATURES: X X*) Does the right thing for off-site remote execution. Including X setting up $DISPLAY to include domain names, and passing X magic cookies, or doing the "xhost" stuff. X X*) Allow different remote user name. (rx -l user host ...) X X*) Smart quoting of arguments - makes passing wild-cards easy. X X*) Custom command execution - link it to "remacs" to get a remote X emacs command. X X*) Automatic xterm options - names the xterm according to hostname, X and turns on "login shell". X X*) Default command is xterm. X X*) Propagates X-ish env. variables to remote session - user may X extend the list of variables to pass. X X*) Special handling for bourne shell users. X X*) Tries to do remote execution from same directory as local. X That is, it propagates $PWD, in an intelligent manner. X X*) Logs errors in a file. X X*) Overall Intelligence (TM) - makes reasoned decisions about what X you are trying to do, and tries to "do the right thing". X X*) Written in Perl, for portability and hackability. X XFor more info, read the man page or the source. X END_OF_FILE if test 1442 -ne `wc -c <'README'`; then echo shar: \"'README'\" unpacked with wrong size! fi # end of 'README' fi if test -f 'Imakefile' -a "${1}" != "-c" ; then echo shar: Will not clobber existing file \"'Imakefile'\" else echo shar: Extracting \"'Imakefile'\" \(370 characters\) sed "s/^X//" >'Imakefile' <<'END_OF_FILE' X# Glasgow RX Imakefile. X X PROGRAMS = rx X Xall:: $(PROGRAMS) X Xinstall:: safe X XInstallNamedProg(rx.pl,rx,$(BINDIR)) XInstallManPage(rx,$(MANDIR)) X Xinstall:: X $(RM) $(BINDIR)/rxterm X $(LN) $(BINDIR)/rx $(BINDIR)/rxterm X Xsafe: X @grep -s 'debug = 0' rx.pl || false X Xshar: safe X makekit -m -p X @-perl -pi -e "s/sinclair@dcs.gla.ac.uk/sinclair@dcs.gla.ac.uk/;" Part* X END_OF_FILE if test 370 -ne `wc -c <'Imakefile'`; then echo shar: \"'Imakefile'\" unpacked with wrong size! fi # end of 'Imakefile' fi if test -f 'MANIFEST' -a "${1}" != "-c" ; then echo shar: Will not clobber existing file \"'MANIFEST'\" else echo shar: Extracting \"'MANIFEST'\" \(313 characters\) sed "s/^X//" >'MANIFEST' <<'END_OF_FILE' X File Name Archive # Description X----------------------------------------------------------- X README 1 Read me first X Imakefile 1 X MANIFEST 1 This shipping list X Makefile 1 X rx.man 1 X rx.pl 1 END_OF_FILE if test 313 -ne `wc -c <'MANIFEST'`; then echo shar: \"'MANIFEST'\" unpacked with wrong size! fi # end of 'MANIFEST' fi if test -f 'Makefile' -a "${1}" != "-c" ; then echo shar: Will not clobber existing file \"'Makefile'\" else echo shar: Extracting \"'Makefile'\" \(10172 characters\) sed "s/^X//" >'Makefile' <<'END_OF_FILE' X# Makefile generated by imake - do not edit! X# $XConsortium: imake.c,v 1.65 91/07/25 17:50:17 rws Exp $ X# X# The cpp used on this machine replaces all newlines and multiple tabs and X# spaces in a macro expansion with a single space. Imake tries to compensate X# for this, but is not always successful. X# X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# Makefile generated from "Imake.tmpl" and </tmp/IIf.a04196> X# $XConsortium: Imake.tmpl,v 1.139 91/09/16 08:52:48 rws Exp $ X# X# Platform-specific parameters may be set in the appropriate <vendor>.cf X# configuration files. Site-specific parameters should be set in the file X# site.def. Full rebuilds are recommended if any parameters are changed. X# X# If your C preprocessor does not define any unique symbols, you will need X# to set BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS when rebuilding imake (usually when doing X# "make World" the first time). X# X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# site-specific configuration parameters that need to come before X# the platform-specific parameters - edit site.def to change X X# site: $XConsortium: site.def,v 1.2 91/07/30 20:26:44 rws Exp $ X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# platform-specific configuration parameters - edit sun.cf to change X X# platform: $XConsortium: sun.cf,v 1.72.1.1 92/03/18 13:13:37 rws Exp $ X X# operating system: SunOS 4.1.3 X X# $XConsortium: sunLib.rules,v 1.7 91/12/20 11:19:47 rws Exp $ X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# site-specific configuration parameters that go after X# the platform-specific parameters - edit site.def to change X X# site: $XConsortium: site.def,v 1.2 91/07/30 20:26:44 rws Exp $ X X SHELL = /bin/sh X X TOP = . X CURRENT_DIR = . X X AR = ar cq X BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS = X CC = gcc -fpcc-struct-return X AS = as X X COMPRESS = compress X CPP = /lib/cpp $(STD_CPP_DEFINES) X PREPROCESSCMD = gcc -fpcc-struct-return -E $(STD_CPP_DEFINES) X INSTALL = install X LD = ld X LINT = lint X LINTLIBFLAG = -C X LINTOPTS = -axz X LN = ln -s X MAKE = make X MV = mv X CP = cp X X RANLIB = ranlib X RANLIBINSTFLAGS = X X RM = rm -f X TROFF = psroff X MSMACROS = -ms X TBL = tbl X EQN = eqn X STD_INCLUDES = X STD_CPP_DEFINES = X STD_DEFINES = X EXTRA_LOAD_FLAGS = X EXTRA_LIBRARIES = X TAGS = ctags X X SHAREDCODEDEF = -DSHAREDCODE X SHLIBDEF = -DSUNSHLIB X X PROTO_DEFINES = X X INSTPGMFLAGS = X X INSTBINFLAGS = -m 0755 X INSTUIDFLAGS = -m 4755 X INSTLIBFLAGS = -m 0644 X INSTINCFLAGS = -m 0444 X INSTMANFLAGS = -m 0444 X INSTDATFLAGS = -m 0444 X INSTKMEMFLAGS = -g kmem -m 2755 X X PROJECTROOT = /usr/X11 X X TOP_INCLUDES = -I$(INCROOT) X X CDEBUGFLAGS = -O2 X CCOPTIONS = X X ALLINCLUDES = $(INCLUDES) $(EXTRA_INCLUDES) $(TOP_INCLUDES) $(STD_INCLUDES) X ALLDEFINES = $(ALLINCLUDES) $(STD_DEFINES) $(EXTRA_DEFINES) $(PROTO_DEFINES) $(DEFINES) X CFLAGS = $(CDEBUGFLAGS) $(CCOPTIONS) $(ALLDEFINES) X LINTFLAGS = $(LINTOPTS) -DLINT $(ALLDEFINES) X X LDLIBS = $(SYS_LIBRARIES) $(EXTRA_LIBRARIES) X X LDOPTIONS = $(CDEBUGFLAGS) $(CCOPTIONS) $(LOCAL_LDFLAGS) -L$(USRLIBDIR) X X LDCOMBINEFLAGS = -X -r X DEPENDFLAGS = X X MACROFILE = sun.cf X RM_CMD = $(RM) *.CKP *.ln *.BAK *.bak *.o core errs ,* *~ *.a .emacs_* tags TAGS make.log MakeOut X X IMAKE_DEFINES = X X IRULESRC = $(CONFIGDIR) X IMAKE_CMD = $(IMAKE) -DUseInstalled -I$(IRULESRC) $(IMAKE_DEFINES) X X ICONFIGFILES = $(IRULESRC)/Imake.tmpl $(IRULESRC)/Imake.rules \ X $(IRULESRC)/Project.tmpl $(IRULESRC)/site.def \ X $(IRULESRC)/$(MACROFILE) $(EXTRA_ICONFIGFILES) X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# X Window System Build Parameters X# $XConsortium: Project.tmpl,v 1.138.1.1 92/11/11 09:49:19 rws Exp $ X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# X Window System make variables; this need to be coordinated with rules X X PATHSEP = / X USRLIBDIR = /usr/X11/lib X BINDIR = /usr/X11/local/bin X INCROOT = /usr/X11/include X BUILDINCROOT = $(TOP) X BUILDINCDIR = $(BUILDINCROOT)/X11 X BUILDINCTOP = .. X INCDIR = $(INCROOT)/X11 X ADMDIR = /usr/adm X LIBDIR = $(USRLIBDIR)/X11 X CONFIGDIR = $(LIBDIR)/config X LINTLIBDIR = $(USRLIBDIR)/lint X X FONTDIR = $(LIBDIR)/fonts X XINITDIR = $(LIBDIR)/xinit X XDMDIR = $(LIBDIR)/xdm X TWMDIR = $(LIBDIR)/twm X MANPATH = /usr/X11/man X MANSOURCEPATH = $(MANPATH)/man X MANSUFFIX = n X LIBMANSUFFIX = 3 X MANDIR = $(MANSOURCEPATH)$(MANSUFFIX) X LIBMANDIR = $(MANSOURCEPATH)$(LIBMANSUFFIX) X NLSDIR = $(LIBDIR)/nls X PEXAPIDIR = $(LIBDIR)/PEX X XAPPLOADDIR = $(LIBDIR)/app-defaults X FONTCFLAGS = -t X X INSTAPPFLAGS = $(INSTDATFLAGS) X X IMAKE = imake X DEPEND = makedepend X RGB = rgb X X FONTC = bdftopcf X X MKFONTDIR = mkfontdir X MKDIRHIER = /bin/sh $(BINDIR)/mkdirhier X X CONFIGSRC = $(TOP)/config X DOCUTILSRC = $(TOP)/doc/util X CLIENTSRC = $(TOP)/clients X DEMOSRC = $(TOP)/demos X LIBSRC = $(TOP)/lib X FONTSRC = $(TOP)/fonts X INCLUDESRC = $(TOP)/X11 X SERVERSRC = $(TOP)/server X UTILSRC = $(TOP)/util X SCRIPTSRC = $(UTILSRC)/scripts X EXAMPLESRC = $(TOP)/examples X CONTRIBSRC = $(TOP)/../contrib X DOCSRC = $(TOP)/doc X RGBSRC = $(TOP)/rgb X DEPENDSRC = $(UTILSRC)/makedepend X IMAKESRC = $(CONFIGSRC) X XAUTHSRC = $(LIBSRC)/Xau X XLIBSRC = $(LIBSRC)/X X XMUSRC = $(LIBSRC)/Xmu X TOOLKITSRC = $(LIBSRC)/Xt X AWIDGETSRC = $(LIBSRC)/Xaw X OLDXLIBSRC = $(LIBSRC)/oldX X XDMCPLIBSRC = $(LIBSRC)/Xdmcp X BDFTOSNFSRC = $(FONTSRC)/bdftosnf X BDFTOSNFSRC = $(FONTSRC)/clients/bdftosnf X BDFTOPCFSRC = $(FONTSRC)/clients/bdftopcf X MKFONTDIRSRC = $(FONTSRC)/clients/mkfontdir X FSLIBSRC = $(FONTSRC)/lib/fs X FONTSERVERSRC = $(FONTSRC)/server X EXTENSIONSRC = $(TOP)/extensions X XILIBSRC = $(EXTENSIONSRC)/lib/xinput X PEXLIBSRC = $(EXTENSIONSRC)/lib/PEXlib X PHIGSLIBSRC = $(EXTENSIONSRC)/lib/PEX X X# $XConsortium: sunLib.tmpl,v 1.14.1.2 92/11/11 09:55:02 rws Exp $ X XSHLIBLDFLAGS = -assert pure-text XPICFLAGS = -fpic X X DEPEXTENSIONLIB = X EXTENSIONLIB = -lXext X X DEPXLIB = $(DEPEXTENSIONLIB) X XLIB = $(EXTENSIONLIB) -lX11 X X DEPXMULIB = $(USRLIBDIR)/libXmu.sa.$(SOXMUREV) X XMULIBONLY = -lXmu X XMULIB = -lXmu X X DEPOLDXLIB = X OLDXLIB = -loldX X X DEPXTOOLLIB = $(USRLIBDIR)/libXt.sa.$(SOXTREV) X XTOOLLIB = -lXt X X DEPXAWLIB = $(USRLIBDIR)/libXaw.sa.$(SOXAWREV) X XAWLIB = -lXaw X X DEPXILIB = X XILIB = -lXi X X DEPPEXLIB = X PEXLIB = -lPEX5 X X SOXLIBREV = 4.10 X SOXTREV = 4.10 X SOXAWREV = 5.0 X SOOLDXREV = 4.10 X SOXMUREV = 4.10 X SOXEXTREV = 4.10 X SOXINPUTREV = 4.10 X SOPEXREV = 1.0 X X DEPXAUTHLIB = $(USRLIBDIR)/libXau.a X XAUTHLIB = -lXau X DEPXDMCPLIB = $(USRLIBDIR)/libXdmcp.a X XDMCPLIB = -lXdmcp X X DEPPHIGSLIB = $(USRLIBDIR)/libphigs.a X PHIGSLIB = -lphigs X X DEPXBSDLIB = $(USRLIBDIR)/libXbsd.a X XBSDLIB = -lXbsd X X LINTEXTENSIONLIB = $(LINTLIBDIR)/llib-lXext.ln X LINTXLIB = $(LINTLIBDIR)/llib-lX11.ln X LINTXMU = $(LINTLIBDIR)/llib-lXmu.ln X LINTXTOOL = $(LINTLIBDIR)/llib-lXt.ln X LINTXAW = $(LINTLIBDIR)/llib-lXaw.ln X LINTXI = $(LINTLIBDIR)/llib-lXi.ln X LINTPEX = $(LINTLIBDIR)/llib-lPEX5.ln X LINTPHIGS = $(LINTLIBDIR)/llib-lphigs.ln X X DEPLIBS = $(DEPXAWLIB) $(DEPXMULIB) $(DEPXTOOLLIB) $(DEPXLIB) X X DEPLIBS1 = $(DEPLIBS) X DEPLIBS2 = $(DEPLIBS) X DEPLIBS3 = $(DEPLIBS) X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# Imake rules for building libraries, programs, scripts, and data files X# rules: $XConsortium: Imake.rules,v 1.123 91/09/16 20:12:16 rws Exp $ X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# start of Imakefile X X# Glasgow RX Imakefile. X X PROGRAMS = rx X Xall:: $(PROGRAMS) X Xinstall:: safe X Xinstall:: rx.pl X @if [ -d $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR) ]; then set +x; \ X else (set -x; $(MKDIRHIER) $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)); fi X $(INSTALL) -c $(INSTBINFLAGS) rx.pl $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)/rx X Xinstall.man:: rx.man X @if [ -d $(DESTDIR)$(MANDIR) ]; then set +x; \ X else (set -x; $(MKDIRHIER) $(DESTDIR)$(MANDIR)); fi X $(INSTALL) -c $(INSTMANFLAGS) rx.man $(DESTDIR)$(MANDIR)/rx.$(MANSUFFIX) X Xinstall:: X $(RM) $(BINDIR)/rxterm X $(LN) $(BINDIR)/rx $(BINDIR)/rxterm X Xsafe: X @grep -s 'debug = 0' rx.pl || false X Xshar: safe X makekit -m -p X @-perl -pi -e "s/sinclair@dcs.gla.ac.uk/sinclair@dcs.gla.ac.uk/;" Part* X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# common rules for all Makefiles - do not edit X Xemptyrule:: X Xclean:: X $(RM_CMD) "#"* X XMakefile:: X -@if [ -f Makefile ]; then set -x; \ X $(RM) Makefile.bak; $(MV) Makefile Makefile.bak; \ X else exit 0; fi X $(IMAKE_CMD) -DTOPDIR=$(TOP) -DCURDIR=$(CURRENT_DIR) X Xtags:: X $(TAGS) -w *.[ch] X $(TAGS) -xw *.[ch] > TAGS X Xsaber: X # load $(ALLDEFINES) $(SRCS) X Xosaber: X # load $(ALLDEFINES) $(OBJS) X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# empty rules for directories that do not have SUBDIRS - do not edit X Xinstall:: X @echo "install in $(CURRENT_DIR) done" X Xinstall.man:: X @echo "install.man in $(CURRENT_DIR) done" X XMakefiles:: X Xincludes:: X X# ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X# dependencies generated by makedepend X END_OF_FILE if test 10172 -ne `wc -c <'Makefile'`; then echo shar: \"'Makefile'\" unpacked with wrong size! fi # end of 'Makefile' fi if test -f 'rx.man' -a "${1}" != "-c" ; then echo shar: Will not clobber existing file \"'rx.man'\" else echo shar: Extracting \"'rx.man'\" \(3551 characters\) sed "s/^X//" >'rx.man' <<'END_OF_FILE' X.TH RX 1 "4 March 1993" "X Version 11" X.SH NAME Xrx,rxterm,r* - remote command, xterm, anything execution X.SH SYNOPSIS X.B rx X[ X.B \-l X.I username X] X.I host X[ X.I command X] X.br X.B rxterm X[ X.B \-l X.I username X] X.I host X[ X.IR args .\|.\|. X] X.SH DESCRIPTION XThe X.B rx Xprogram connect to the specified X.I host Xand executes the specified X.I command Xin the background, returning immediately. To allow the execution Xof X programs, it copies a number of environmental variables to Xthe remote session. If you omit X.IR command , Xthen rx will start an xterm on the remote host. The X.B rxterm Xvarient starts a remote xterm on a host, and also passes X.I args Xto the remote xterm as arguments. X.PP XShell metacharacters which are not quoted are interpreted on the local Xmachine, while quoted metacharacters are interpreted on the remote Xmachine. X.PP XIf the name of the file from which X.B rx Xis executed is anything other than ``rx,'' X.B rx Xtakes this name, stripped on a leading ``r'' as the command Xto run on the remote host, using any X.I command Xparameters as arguments for the remote command. X.PP XIf X.B rx Xthinks you are using X.B xauth Xbased X authorisation, and you are calling to a off-site host, or Xto a different username, it will attempt to copy an authorization Xkey to the remote account. Otherwise it will try to use X.B xhost(1) Xto grant access to the remote host. X.SH OPTIONS X.TP X.BI \-l " username" XUse X.I username Xas the remote username instead of your local username. In the absence Xof this option, the remote username is the same as your local username. X X.SH ENVIRONMENT XIf set, the values of PATH, DISPLAY, XENVIRONMENT, XAPPLRESDIR, XXFILESEARCHPATH, XUSERFILESEARCHPATH, OPENWINHOME, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, Xand XAUTHORITY are exported to the remote program, unless the Xremote username is different, or the remote host is off-site, in which Xcase only DISPLAY is exported, with in all cases any variables named in the Xvariable RXENV. X.PP XThe DISPLAY variable is tweaked as appropriate, to contain as qualified Xa hostname as is needed. X.SH DIAGNOSTICS X.TP X.IB command ": don't recognise my name." X.B rx Xcannot decode the name it has been called under. In this case Xit prints a warning message, and continues, as normal. X.TP X.B "rx: usage: rx [-l username] hostname [args...]" XThis means it could not decode the arguments given to it. X.SH AUTHOR XDuncan Sinclair <sinclair@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk>, July 1992 X.br XOriginally based on a program with the same name from the X.B gwm Xdistribution. To distinguish this "rx" from other programs Xwith similar names, you should refer to this program as the X.B Glasgow X.BR rx . X.SH "SEE ALSO" XX(1), rsh(1), xterm(1), xauth(1), xhost(1), gwm(1) X.SH BUGS X.B Rx Xmakes a number of assumptions about the relationship between the Xlocal user, and the remote one, depending on whether the remote Xhost is onsite or not, and whether an alternative username was used Xor not. X.PP XIn particular, if either the locally used shell, or the remotely Xused shell is the standard Bourne Shell, X.B sh(1) Xthen strange things are more likely to happen. Especially when Xit's only one of them. X.PP XSometimes quoting can get messed up. X.PP XIt's too easy to fool the smarts in X.B rx Xto make it believe something that is not true, and fail because of it. X.PP XWhen X.B rx Xuses X.B xhost Xto grant access, the X.B xhost Xcommand may fail silently. X.PP XIf X.B rx Xtries to send to large a command to the remote machine, it will Xlikely fail with a parse error from csh. If this happens, you Xwill probably have to reduce the size of the exported environment. END_OF_FILE if test 3551 -ne `wc -c <'rx.man'`; then echo shar: \"'rx.man'\" unpacked with wrong size! fi # end of 'rx.man' fi if test -f 'rx.pl' -a "${1}" != "-c" ; then echo shar: Will not clobber existing file \"'rx.pl'\" else echo shar: Extracting \"'rx.pl'\" \(9028 characters\) sed "s/^X//" >'rx.pl' <<'END_OF_FILE' X#! /usr/local/bin/perl X# CONFIG: change the line above to point to your copy of perl. X############################################################################## X# Glasgow RX version 3.1.7 X# X# Copyright 1992 Duncan Sinclair <sinclair@dcs.gla.ac.uk> X# X# Last Modified: Early April 1993. X# X# Distribution limited, as per the usual MIT copyright. X############################################################################## X# remote execution of X programs. Based on a script in an old version of gwm. X# X# To install, put rx in your bin and make rxterm a link to it. X# Some configuration will be necessary, see "CONFIG" comments... X# X# More and more this is less and less like the original.... X# X# Major hacked to work for our(my) set up, and also partly X# re-written to work with sh, rather than ksh. X# X# Maybe I'll turn this into our first zsh script! X# X# Looks like it turned into a perl script at some point - big improvement. X############################################################################## X# This code tries to be intelligent in the way it works. This means there X# are tons of implicit assumptions about the environment it is run in. X# These assumptions are all valid on the machines I use, and in my X# environment. At the same time, I try to make as few assumptions as possible X# about the remote machine. Here's a list of all the more tricky ones... X# *) That the remote machine has csh. (Linux?) X# *) That $RSHELL = /bin/(k)?sh ==> remote shell = /bin/(k)?sh. (Make same.) X# *) If remote shell = sh, that $PATH is compatible. (Use csh, etc..) X# *) I pass a cookie to the remote machine if need be, but does it X# know what to do with a cookie. (eat it?) X# *) There must be others... X############################################################################## X# Why am I using csh to run the remote commands? Simply because it doesn't X# interact badly with rsh, and hang waiting for a file descriptor to X# be closed. I'd rather use zsh, or bash, or even perl, but they are not X# as universal as csh. X############################################################################## X# Xrequire "stat.pl"; X# X# What we called? X# X$argv0 = $0 ; X$argv0 =~ s:.*/:: ; X# X# CONFIG: X# Change these variables to be your domain name, and a pattern that X# will match all variations on your domain name. You must include X# those leading dots!!! If your hostname includes your domain, see X# the code further down, marked "XXX" X# X$DOM = ".dcs.gla.ac.uk" ; X$DOMPAT = "\.dcs(\.gla(sgow)?(\.ac\.uk)?)?" ; X# X# CONFIG: X# Change this to your value of BINDIR, or set the variable to "" if X# you think your users are smarter than that. X# X$XPATHS = "/usr/X11/bin" ; X# X# CONFIG: X# Make this the name of your "remote shell" command. X# X$RSH = "rsh" ; X# X# end of CONFIG X# X# Some variables we'll no doubt use sometime... X# X$usage = "$argv0: usage: $argv0 [-l username] hostname [args...]\n" ; X$RSHELL = (getpwuid($<))[8] || "/bin/sh" ; X$HOME = $ENV{"HOME"} || (getpwuid($<))[7] ; X$XAUTH = $ENV{"XAUTHORITY"} || $HOME . "/.Xauthority" ; X$LOGF = "~/.rx.log" ; X@STUFF = () ; X$debug = 0 ; X# X# Before anything else, close stdin. This might stop rx hanging X# due to rsh weirdness. X# Xclose(STDIN); X# X# do a "-l" flag... X# Xif ($ARGV[0] eq "-l") { X shift ; X $User = $ARGV[0] || die $usage ; X @LUser = ("-l",$User) ; X shift ; X} X# X# Pick a host, any host... X# X$MACH = $ARGV[0] || die $usage ; Xshift ; X# X# Things to think about for the remote machine. X# X$MACH =~ s/$DOMPAT// ; X$OffSite = $MACH =~ /\./ ; X# X# Where am I? Seems we can't trust the dumb user to set HOSTNAME right! X# X#$HOSTNAME=$ENV{HOSTNAME} || `hostname` ; # Current Host X$HOSTNAME=`hostname` ; # Current Host X$HOSTNAME =~ s/\n// ; X# X# If all your hostnames include your domain, comment out the next line. X# Xif ( $OffSite ) { $HOSTNAME = $HOSTNAME . $DOM ; } # XXX X# X# Now we know where we are, and they are, are they different? X# X$Diff = $HOSTNAME ne $MACH ; X# X# What is the display going to be? X# !! Danger !! Heavy Regular expressions follow... X# This needs to be re-written to be modular and can so be extended to X# support resetting host:* to unix:*, as required. X# X$DISPLAY = $ENV{"DISPLAY"} || ":0.0" ; X$DISPLAY =~ s/$DOMPAT// ; X$DISPLAY =~ s/^(unix)?(:\d(\.\d)?)$/$HOSTNAME$2/ if ($Diff) ; X$DISPLAY =~ s/^([^.]*)(:\d(\.\d)?)$/$1$DOM$2/ if ($OffSite) ; X$ENV{"DISPLAY"} = $DISPLAY ; X# X# Here comes the hard bit in sh. Quote our args. X# Also have to quote quotes. To cope with csh braindamage, X# quotes are quoted thus; ' -> '\'' X# So for an arg "foo'bar", we get "'foo'\''bar'". X# Xforeach (@ARGV) { X s#\'#\'\\\'\'#g ; X s#(.*)#\'$1\'# ; X} X# X# So what we doing? X# XPROG: { X if ($argv0 eq "rx") { last PROG ; } X if ($argv0 eq "rxterm") { X #unshift(@ARGV,"-ls") if ($Diff) ; X unshift(@ARGV,"xterm","-ls","-n",$MACH) ; X last PROG ; X } X if ($argv0 =~ /r(.*)/) { unshift(@ARGV,$1) ; last PROG ; } X warn "$argv0: don't recognise my name." ; X} X# X# If nothing else, become an rxterm. X# Xif (@ARGV == 0) { X #unshift(@ARGV,"-ls") if ($Diff) ; X unshift(@ARGV,"xterm","-ls","-n",$MACH) ; X} X# X# Some special considerations if we are not ourselves on the other side. X# Xif ($OffSite || $User) { X # X # We want to pass a cookie here. X # X if (-e $XAUTH) { X # X # This is going to be unsecure, as the cookie will appear in a number X # of command line args. But at least it'll work. X # This will need enhanced if we ever fix the code above to X # set DISPLAY to ":0.0", when we return to the server. X # X $CooKie = `PATH=\$PATH:$XPATHS xauth list $DISPLAY` ; X chop($CooKie) ; X @CooKs = split(' ',$CooKie) ; X shift(@CooKs) ; X unshift(@STUFF,"xauth","add",$DISPLAY,@CooKs,";") if (@CooKs == 2) ; X } else { X # X # Yuk. What a crock. I hate doing this. X # X system("xhost +$MACH >/dev/null 2>/dev/null") if ($Diff) ; X } X # X # We really only want to pass a value for $DISPLAY. X # X @VARS=("DISPLAY", split(' ',$ENV{"RXENV"})) ; X} else { X # X # Some variables we wish to export X # X @VARS=( X "DISPLAY", X "XENVIRONMENT", X "XFILESEARCHPATH", X "XUSERFILESEARCHPATH", X "XAPPLRESDIR", X "OPENWINHOME", X "LD_LIBRARY_PATH", X # "MANPATH", # for "rxman", and bourne shell users. X "XAUTHORITY", X split(' ',$ENV{"RXENV"}), X ) ; X # X # Braindead bourne shell, needs to be given a $PATH... X # We would rather not pass the current $PATH, because it might not work X # on the destination machine. I'd rather it was set by the user's X # remote shell during the rsh. X # Fortunately, all *my* X programs are in an arch independant place, and X # so it shouldn't cos a problem, locally. X # We check against $RSHELL, because they might be running another shell, X # differant from their login shell. I know, sounds weird, but it's too X # common round here. X # I've also included ksh in the brain-damage, cos I can't see an easy way X # to pass throught $ENV{"ENV"} without it being too late. (We only have X # one person who has ksh as a login shell anyway...) X # Oh, yeah.. we are assuming that if it's bourne shell here, then it's X # bourne shell there. Much more important than this is that it it ISNT X # bourne shell here, it better not be bourne shell there. X # X if ($RSHELL =~ m#/(k)?sh#) { push(@VARS,"PATH"); } X} X# X# Validate $PWD routine... X# Xsub validate_pwd { X local(@pwdstats, @dotstats); X local($pwd) = $_[0]; X X unless (defined($pwd)) { return undef; } ; X unless (@dotstats = stat(".")) { return undef; } ; X unless (@pwdstats = stat($pwd)) { return undef; } ; X if (($pwdstats[$ST_DEV] != $dotstats[$ST_DEV]) || X ($pwdstats[$ST_INO] != $dotstats[$ST_INO])) { return undef; } ; X $pwd; X} X# X# Try and find a nice, valid, pwd. X# XPRESENT: { X if ($PWD = $ENV{"PWD"}) { X $FOOPWD = $PWD ; X $FOOPWD =~ s#(/tmp_mnt|/export)?/(.*)#/$2# ; X $PWD = &validate_pwd($FOOPWD) || &validate_pwd($PWD) ; X }; X unless ($PWD) { X chop($PWD = `pwd`) ; X $FOOPWD = $PWD ; X $FOOPWD =~ s#(/tmp_mnt|/export)?/(.*)#/$2# ; X $PWD = &validate_pwd($FOOPWD) || &validate_pwd($PWD) || $HOME; X } X} X$PWD =~ s#(.*)#\'$1\'# ; X# X# Try to find somewhere nice to live on the other side. X# Xunless ($OffSite) { X unshift(@STUFF,"test","-d",$PWD,"&&","cd",$PWD,";"); X} X# X# Start building the full command. X# Xforeach $var (@VARS) { X ($val = $ENV{$var}) && X unshift(@STUFF,"setenv","$var","\'"."$val"."\'",";") ; X} X# X# Some commands to do on the other side... X# Xunshift(@STUFF,"set","nonomatch",";"); # only if we are using csh. X# X# Build the remote command. X# X$REMOTE=("(umask 077 ; ((".join(" ",@STUFF,@ARGV).")</dev/null >&$LOGF &))") ; X$REMOTE =~ s#\"#\\\"#g ; X$REMOTE = "\"" . $REMOTE . "\"" ; X# X# Build the arg list for the exec. X# X@COMM=($RSH,@LUser,"$MACH","csh","-fc",$REMOTE) ; X# X# Do it! X# Xif ($debug) { X print "@COMM\n" ; X} else { X exec @COMM ; X} X# X# Rsh doesn't return any indication of how it went over X# on the other side, but that's OK, cos we aint going to X# wait around to see what happened. X# Xexit 0 ; X# X# tHe ENd END_OF_FILE if test 9028 -ne `wc -c <'rx.pl'`; then echo shar: \"'rx.pl'\" unpacked with wrong size! fi chmod +x 'rx.pl' # end of 'rx.pl' fi echo shar: End of archive 1 \(of 1\). cp /dev/null ark1isdone MISSING="" for I in 1 ; do if test ! -f ark${I}isdone ; then MISSING="${MISSING} ${I}" fi done if test "${MISSING}" = "" ; then echo You have the archive. rm -f ark[1-9]isdone else echo You still need to unpack the following archives: echo " " ${MISSING} fi ## End of shell archive. exit 0
6
2,594
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Editorial Contact: Single Source Marketing: Myra Manahan (714) 545-1338 Genoa Systems: Joseph Brunoli (408) 432-9090 Neil Roehm (408) 432-9090/Technical Genoa Presents High Performance Video Graphics Accelerator SAN JOSE, Calif USA -- Genoa Systems Corporation announces WINDOWSVGA 24, a True Color 24-bit graphics accelerator card that delivers up to 16.8 million colors at speeds faster than the competition. Plus it offers a full range of resolutions, high refresh rates as well as unique proprietary performance features. The card is available in both 16-bit ISA bus and 32-bit VESA Local bus versions (models 8500 AND 8500VL). With 1MB DRAM on board, the WINDOWSVGA 24 card offers maximum resolution up to 1,280 x 1,024 and supports a refresh rate of 72Hz at 800 x 600 and resolution up to 1,024 x 768 non-interlaced. Both models provide performance many times greater than standard SVGA boards, yet conform to all current video standards. WINDOWSVGA 24 features Genoa's FlickerFree(tm) technology, which eliminates screen flash and flicker to make viewing much more comfortable. the cards also come with Safescan(tm), a utility developed by Genoa to eliminate the black border around the screen and thereby provide 100-percent screen use for overscanning monitors. WINDOWSVGA model 8500VL takes full advantage of the speed offered by the new VESA Local bus technology. Most VL bus cards will only handle data transfers up to 33MHz, but the 8500VL will transfer data at the full speed of the CPU, up to 50MHz. Genoa is also offering this card in the "TurboBahn" combination packaged with their TURBOEXPRESS 486VL motherboard. Built around the Cirrus Logic GD-5426 GUI accelerator, WINDOWSVGA 24 offers the user an exceptional price/performance value. Genoa's advanced proprietary drivers act to "turbocharge" the chip, thereby providing an affordable accelerator card with power and performance that surpass many of the more highly priced chip cards. The Genoa user will enjoy optimal speed and reliability for such programs as Windows, AutoCAD, AutoShade, 3D Studio, OS/2, OrCAD and more. Driver updates and product bulletins are available on Genoa's BBS at (408) 943-1231. Genoa Systems manufactures and markets an extensive line of graphics adapters, motherboards, audio and multimedia cards for IBM-compatible personal computers. All products come with a two year limited warranty on parts and labor. Genoa products are currently distributed worldwide through authorized distributors, resellers, VARs and systems integrators. For more information contact Joe Brunoli, Marketing Manager, Genoa Systems at 75 E. Trimble Road, San Jose, Calif. 95131; Tel: (408) 432-9090 or (800) 934-3662; Fax: (408) 434-0997.
7
2,595
OK. Instead of holding an auction, I have decided to compute prices for each comic (after many suggestions). These are the most reasonable prices I can give (not negotiable). If you would like to purchase a comic (or group), simply email me with the title and issue #'s you want. The price for each issue is shown beside each comic. First come, first served!!! There is no more bidding. Meet my price and it is yours. I can be reached at this email address: 02106@chopin.udel.edu or 02106@ravel.udel.edu or 02106@bach.udel.edu or 02106@brahms.udel.edu NO MORE HAGGLING ABOUT THE PRICE!!!!!!!! LOTS OF COMICS FOR $1, $2, or $3 LOOK AT LIST!!!!! Shipping is $2 for 1-3 comics. For more than 3, the price will be determined by the volume of the purchase (I may have to use a big heavy box for large orders which costs more to mail). For all those who have bought comics from me, thanks!!! All comics are near mint unless otherwise noted (my books were graded by mile high comics and other comic professional collectors, not me!) Here is the list: *reserved* means that I have made a deal with a person and I am waiting for the check to arrive. *reserved* comics are as good as sold (sorry!) Incredible Hulk 156 (vs another Hulk) $3 195 $2 196 $2 246 (vs Captain Marvel) $1 248 $1 249 $1 250 (Double size issue vs Silver Surfer) $5 255 (vs Thor) $1 279 $1 300 $2 312 $2 313 $1 316 (vs Bi Coastal Avengers) $1 347 $1 *reserved* 348 $1 350 (vs Thing) $2 354 $1 358 $1 360 $1 362 (vs Werewolf By Night) $2 364 $1 365 $1 366 $1 *reserved* 379 (1 copy) $5 Punisher 50 $1 57 $2 Punisher War Journal 29 (Ghost Rider) $2 30 (Ghost Rider) $2 Punisher Armory 1 $4 2 $2 Original Ghost Rider Rides Again (Reprint) 1 $1 Ghost Rider (old series) 37 $3 *reserved* 43 (vs Johnny Blaze) $3 *reserved* 77 (2 copies, origin of GR dream) $4 each Ghost Rider (new series) 15 (1st print, Green glow in dark cover, 1 copy) $5 15 (2nd print, gold cover w/ glow cover) $3 Web of Spiderman 56 (2 copies) $2 each 60 $3 69 (vs Hulk, 1 copy left!!!) $2 70 (SpiderHulk, 1 copy left!!!) $2 71 $1 72 $1 78 $1 Deadly Foes of Spiderman 1 (2 copies) $2 each 2 $2 3 $2 Amazing Spiderman vs Dr. Octopus (special NACME issue) $2 Amazing Spiderman 350 (vs Dr. Doom, 1 copy LEFT!!!) $2 Spiderman (1990) 1 (silver, not bagged) $4 6 $3 7 $3 8 (2 copies) $2 each 9 (w/ Wolverine, 1 COPY LEFT!!!) $2 10 $2 11 $1 13 $5 16 $1 Enemy Ace Special #1 $2 New Warriors 1 (gold cover) $2 8 $4 Superman Man of Steel #1 $2 Superman (new) 53 (2 copies) $1 each 55 $1 56 $1 Adventures of Superman 479 $1 Annual #3 $1 Superman Annual #3 (Armegedon 2001 tie in) $1 Action Comics #666 $1 Avengers West Coast #69 (Hawkeye vs US Agent) $1 Batman 465 (Robin returns) $2 466 $1 467 $1 Annual #15 (Armegedon 2001 tie in) $3 Captain America 230 (vs Hulk) $2 257 (vs Hulk) $1 Armegedon 2001 1 $4 2 $2 Foolkiller #1 $2 Infinity Gauntlet 1 $6 4 $3 5 $3 Double Dragon #1 $1 Deathlok (series) 2 $1 Transformers #80 (last issue) $2 Wonder Man 1 $1 2 $1 Flaming Carrot #25 (w/ Ninja Turtles) $2 The Comet #1 $1 Legend of the Shield #1 $1 Justice Society of America 1 $1 2 $1 3 $1 4 $1 Official movie mag from Turtles II movie (sealed w/ Jelloman comic) $5 Robin 1 (1 copies w/ poster) $3 1 (3rd print) $1 5 (6 copies) $1 each Guardians of the Galaxy 1 $6 2 $3 3 $2 4 $2 5 $2 6 $2 7 $2 8 $2 9 (2 copies) $3 each 10 $2 11 $2 12 $1 13 $3 14 $3 15 $1 16 $1 17 $1 18 (2 copies) $2 each Superman vs Amazing Spiderman (oversized issue from 70's) $7 *reserved* DarkHawk 1 (3 copies) $8 each 2 (2 copies) $6 each 3 $5 4 $4 5 $4 6 $3 7 $2 8 $2 9 $3 10 $1 Thor 246 $1 428 $1 429 (vs Juggernaut) $2 430 (w/ Ghost Rider) $1 431 $1 432 (Thor vs Loki, 2 copies) $3 each 433 (new Thor) $2 Annual #16 $1 What if.... 13 $1 23 $1 25 $2 26 $1 Alpha Flight 29 $1 51 $6 53 $6 94 (vs Fant. 4) $1 New Mutants 22 $2 100 (last issue, 1st look at X-Force, 1st print, 2 copies) $5 each 100 (2nd print, gold cover) $4 Flash (new) 43 $1 48 $1 49 $1 50 $2 51 $1 Annual #4 $1 Uncanny X-Men 191 $3 215 $2 255 (2 copies) $2 each 258 $6 275 (1 COPY LEFT 1st print) $6 275 (gold 2nd print) $3 276 $3 277 $3 278 $2 279 $2 280 $2 281 $3 282 $4 283 $6 Defenders 52 (Hulk vs Sub Mariner) $2 Fantastic Four 347 $4 348 $2 349 (3 copies) $2 each Wolverine 11 $3 *reserved* 20 $2 41 (w/ Cable, 2 copies) $6 each 42 $4 43 $3 Silver Surfer (1987) 1 $6 2 $3 3 $3 4 $3 5 $2 6 $2 8 $2 22 $2 24 $2 32 $2 49 $2 50 (Foil cover, only 1 copy left!!) $6 51 $2 52 $2 53 $1 54 $1 55 $1 56 $1 58 $2 59 $2 Avengers 326 $3 328 (origin of Rage) $3 X-Factor 40 $6 67 $3 68 $6 71 $3 73 $1 Green Lantern (1990) 3 $2 9 (2 copies) $1 each 10 $1 11 $1 12 $1 Toxic Avenger 1 (3 copies) $1 each 2 $1 Sleepwalker 1 (3 copies) $2 each 3 $1 7 $1 Kool Aid Man #1 (sealed in white bag, 2 copies) $2 each X-Force 1 (bagged w/ Cable Card) $4 1 (bagged w/ Shatterstar Card) $3 2 $2 3 $1 4 $1 NFL Superpro 1 $1 Dr. Strange #31 $1 Hawkworld Annual #2 (2nd print, Armegedon 2001 tie in) $1 Hawk & Dove Annual #2 (Armegedon 2001 tie in) $1 Justice League of America Annual #5 (Armegedon 2001 tie in) $1 Send all comments to 02106@chopin.udel.edu Thanks Sam (the "ex" comic book collector)
1
2,596
: Detroit's going to beat Toronto in 6 or LESS!!! : : Granted, Gilmour should get the Hart Trophy, NOT Lemieux... Just : Look at what Gilmour did for Toronto. When you think of Toronto, : who comes to mind, Gilmour, Andreychuk, Potvin...ah...did I mentio : n Gilmour? : When you think of the NHL, who comes to mind? Gilmour? Gretzky? Mario? .. ah... did I mention Mario? If you said Gretzky, you haven't really been following along, have you. If you said Gilmour, you are a true Maynard. I don't even think the selection of the HArt deserves serious discussion on this group. It is a no-brainer.
16
2,597
: >Atoms are not objective. They aren't even real. What scientists call : >an atom is nothing more than a mathematical model that describes : >certain physical, observable properties of our surroundings. All : >of which is subjective. : > : >-jim halat : This deserves framing. It really does. "[Atoms] aren't even real." : Tell me then, those atoms we have seen with electron microscopes are : atoms now, so what are they? Figments of our imaginations? The : evidence that atoms are real is overwhelming, but I won't bother with : most evidence at the moment. You would have us believe that what the eye perceives as images are actaully there - as perceived? This may be interesting. I thought that an electron microscope was used because no wavelength of "light" can illuminate any "object" of atomic scale. If this image is to have useful resolution, wouldn't the illuminating sources wavelength have to be several orders of magnitude less than size of thing observed? If an atom is a "probablity cloud", lower resolutions would give the appearance of solidity, but it seems fairly certain that an atom is not an object is any conventional sense. Obviously I am not a physicist, but the question does have ramification of a philosophic nature. Anyway, just a stray thought, carry on ...
14
2,598
Inkjet and Bubblejet printers are the same tech. "Bubblejet" was trademarked by Cannon and inkjet was by HP I belive. I have seen both, and own a "bubblejet" (a Apple StyleWriter which has a cannon engine) with a 360 dpi rated output. The output is very good with quality paper, which is very importaint. Cheap paper gives bad results. I use sealed paper and the only differenc is that the ink is less dark than toner (I compaire to the Apple Personal LaserWriter NTX), but then again the difference is $300 to $1500 so....
15
2,599
1