|
|
|
|
|
# How the 500 Wing Samples Are Generated |
|
|
|
|
|
This document explains how the Python pipeline creates the **500 aircraft‑style wings** in your dataset—what varies, what’s fixed, and the exact math behind the values stored. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 1) Inputs & Reproducibility |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Airfoil geometry**: Each airfoil file contains two columns \((x, y)\) forming a closed perimeter ordered **TE → upper → LE → lower → TE**. |
|
|
- On load, \(x\) is normalized to \([0,1]\); the perimeter is rotated so the first point is closest to the **trailing edge** \((1,0)\) and the **upper surface** comes first. |
|
|
- **Polars (optional)**: QBlade/XFOIL exports with \(\alpha, C_l, C_d, C_m\). |
|
|
- Files are matched to airfoils by flexible filename heuristics. |
|
|
- Polars are parsed (3–4 numeric columns), **deduplicated in \(\alpha\)**, and **sorted by \(\alpha\)**. |
|
|
- **Random seed**: We use `np.random.default_rng(42)` so all 500 wings are reproducible bit‑for‑bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 2) Per‑Wing Planform Sampling (What Varies) |
|
|
|
|
|
We generate **500** wings. Airfoils are cycled round‑robin (≈50 wings per foil). For each wing we sample: |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Half‑span** \(s\) (inches): |
|
|
\(s \sim \mathcal{U}[60,\;120]\). |
|
|
- **Root chord** \(c_{\text{root}}\) (inches): |
|
|
\(c_{\text{root}} \sim \mathcal{U}[18,\;36]\). |
|
|
- **Taper ratio** \(\lambda\): |
|
|
\(\lambda \sim \mathcal{U}[0.25,\;0.50]\), so \(c_{\text{tip}}=\lambda\,c_{\text{root}}\). |
|
|
- **Twist endpoints (washout)** (degrees): |
|
|
\(i_{\text{root}} \sim \mathcal{U}[0,\;2]\), \(i_{\text{tip}} \sim \mathcal{U}[-6,\;-2]\). |
|
|
- The final twist distribution is **linear** from root to tip; then we **pin** the very first station to **0°** so the wing “hinges” at the root plane (legacy convention). |
|
|
|
|
|
We use **20 stations** along the half‑span: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\text{Dis}[j] = y_j = \frac{j-1}{19}\; s,\quad j=1..20. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 3) Chord Distribution: Schrenk’s Approximation |
|
|
|
|
|
We blend a trapezoid with an ellipse to approximate an elliptical lift distribution: |
|
|
|
|
|
- Linear (trapezoid) chord: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
c_{\text{trap}}(y) = c_{\text{root}} + (c_{\text{tip}} - c_{\text{root}})\,\frac{y}{s}. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
- Elliptic surrogate: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
c_{\text{ell}}(y) = c_{\text{root}}\sqrt{1 - \left(\frac{y}{s}\right)^2}. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
- **Schrenk chord** at each station: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
c(y) = \tfrac{1}{2}\left[c_{\text{trap}}(y) + c_{\text{ell}}(y)\right]. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
A small clamp prevents pathological tips for extreme tapers: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
c(y) \leftarrow \max\!\big(c(y),\;0.25\cdot\min\nolimits_y c_{\text{trap}}(y)\big). |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
This yields the **Cho** vector (inches) over the 20 stations. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 4) Twist (Washout) Distribution |
|
|
|
|
|
With sampled endpoints \(i_{\text{root}}\) and \(i_{\text{tip}}\), define a **linear** twist: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\text{Twi}[j] = i_{\text{root}} + \big(i_{\text{tip}} - i_{\text{root}}\big)\frac{y_j}{s},\quad j=1..20. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
Then set \(\text{Twi}[1]=0^\circ\) (root plane hinge). |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 5) Lofting the 3D Wing for Previews |
|
|
|
|
|
Given the normalized perimeter \((\bar{x},\bar{y})\) (TE→upper→LE→lower→TE), we scale and twist each section about the **quarter‑chord** \(x_{\text{pivot}}=0.25\): |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Shift section to pivot origin: \(x_c = \bar{x} - 0.25\). |
|
|
2. Scale to local chord \(c_j\) (inches): \(X_s = x_c\,c_j,\; Y_s = \bar{y}\,c_j\). |
|
|
3. Rotate by \(\theta_j=\text{Twi}[j]\cdot\pi/180\): |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\begin{bmatrix} Y \\ Z \end{bmatrix} |
|
|
= \begin{bmatrix} \cos\theta_j & -\sin\theta_j \\ \sin\theta_j & \cos\theta_j \end{bmatrix} |
|
|
\begin{bmatrix} X_s \\ Y_s \end{bmatrix}. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
4. Spanwise coordinate for the whole perimeter at station \(j\): \(S=y_j\) (inches). |
|
|
|
|
|
The arrays \(S, Y, Z\) generate a fast **wireframe 3D PNG** used as the dataset’s `render_png` field. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 6) Planform Integrals & Derived Metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
Treat `Dis`/`Cho` as samples over the **half‑span** \([0,s]\) in **inches**. We integrate with the trapezoidal rule, then convert to SI for storage. |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Wing area** (full wing): |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
S_{\tfrac{1}{2}} = \int_0^s c(y)\,dy \;\approx\; \operatorname{trapz}(\text{Dis},\text{Cho})\quad [\text{in}^2], |
|
|
\qquad |
|
|
S_{\text{full}} = 2\,S_{\tfrac{1}{2}}. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
Convert: \(S_{\text{full (m}^2)} = S_{\text{full}}\cdot(0.0254)^2\). |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Mean Aerodynamic Chord** (full wing): |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\text{MAC} = \frac{2}{S_{\text{full}}} \int_{-s}^{s} c(y)^2\,dy |
|
|
= \frac{4}{S_{\text{full}}} \int_0^s c(y)^2\,dy. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
We integrate on the half‑span (inches), then convert MAC to meters. |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Aspect Ratio** (full span \(b=2s\cdot 0.0254\) meters): |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\text{AR} = \frac{b^2}{S_{\text{full (m}^2)}}. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Polar‑derived metrics** (if a polar is found): |
|
|
- \(C_{l,\max}=\max C_l\) at \(\alpha_{C_{l,\max}}\). |
|
|
- \(C_{d,\min}=\min C_d\) at \(\alpha_{C_{d,\min}}\). |
|
|
- \((L/D)_{\max} = \max(C_l/C_d)\) at \(\alpha_{(L/D)_{\max}}\). |
|
|
- Small‑angle lift slope and zero‑lift angle (linear fit on \(\alpha\in[-5^\circ,5^\circ]\)): |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
C_l \approx m\,\alpha_{\deg} + b |
|
|
\;\Rightarrow\; |
|
|
C_{l_\alpha}\;[\text{per rad}] = m\cdot \frac{180}{\pi}, |
|
|
\quad |
|
|
\alpha_{0L}\;[^\circ] = -\frac{b}{m}. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
- Also stored as objective‑style **scores**: |
|
|
- `score_min_cd = min(C_d)` |
|
|
- `score_max_cl = max(C_l)` |
|
|
- `score_max_ld = max(C_l/C_d)` |
|
|
|
|
|
If a polar is not found, these fields are **NaN**; geometry is still fully populated. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 7) Station Count & Units |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Stations**: always **20** over the half‑span (keeps compatibility with legacy builders). |
|
|
- **Units**: dataset stores **SI** (`dis_m`, `chord_m`, `span_m`, `area_m2`, `mac_m`). Inches are used internally during generation for readability and then converted. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 8) Image Preview Column |
|
|
|
|
|
Each wing includes a 3D wireframe PNG (`render_png`) created from the lofted \(S,Y,Z\) arrays: |
|
|
- Section loops at every station, |
|
|
- ~14 spanwise polylines to suggest the surface, |
|
|
- Isometric view (elev \(20^\circ\), azim \(35^\circ\)), |
|
|
- Title string with span, root/tip chords, and taper. |
|
|
|
|
|
This renders directly in the Hugging Face Dataset viewer. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 9) Why These Look Like Transport Wings |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Aspect ratio** typically in the 7–11 range (after area settles) due to sampled spans/cords. |
|
|
- **Taper** \(0.25\to 0.50\) and **washout** \(-6^\circ\to -2^\circ\) are characteristic of transport wings aimed at cruise efficiency and benign stall. |
|
|
- **Quarter‑chord pivot** is the standard torsion axis. |
|
|
- **Schrenk chord** smooths the planform compared to pure linear taper, approximating more elliptical loading. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 10) Worked Example (Representative Draw) |
|
|
|
|
|
Let \(s=100\) in, \(c_{\text{root}}=30\) in, \(\lambda=0.35 \Rightarrow c_{\text{tip}}=10.5\) in, stations=20. |
|
|
Twist endpoints: \(i_{\text{root}}=1.0^\circ\), \(i_{\text{tip}}=-4.0^\circ\), then \(\text{Twi}[1]=0^\circ\). |
|
|
|
|
|
Mid‑span chord \(y=50\) in: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
c_{\text{trap}}(50) = 30 + (10.5-30)\cdot 0.5 = 20.25\text{ in},\quad |
|
|
c_{\text{ell}}(50) = 30\sqrt{1-0.5^2} \approx 25.98\text{ in}, |
|
|
\] |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
c(50) \approx \tfrac{1}{2}(20.25+25.98) \approx 23.11\text{ in}. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
If \(S_{\text{full}} \approx 5000\;\text{in}^2 \Rightarrow S_{\text{full}} \approx 3.226\;\text{m}^2\) and full span \(b=200\) in \(=5.08\) m, then: |
|
|
\[ |
|
|
\text{AR} = \frac{b^2}{S} \approx \frac{(5.08)^2}{3.226} \approx 8.0. |
|
|
\] |
|
|
|
|
|
MAC comes from the \(c(y)^2\) integral and is often in the \(0.3\text{–}0.5\) m range here. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 11) What Makes Each of the 500 Unique? |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Airfoil choice** (≈50 samples per foil) → geometry & polar behavior differ. |
|
|
- **Planform**: each wing draws a new \((s,\;c_{\text{root}},\;\lambda)\) → different area, AR, MAC. |
|
|
- **Twist**: each wing draws \((i_{\text{root}}, i_{\text{tip}})\) → different load tendency. |
|
|
- **Performance summaries**: objective‑style scores (\(\min C_d\), \(\max C_l\), \(\max C_l/C_d\)) and the \(\alpha\) at which they occur differ per wing. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
### Notes for Objective‑Conditioned Training |
|
|
|
|
|
To bias toward a given objective at training time: |
|
|
- **Condition** on `objective ∈ {min Cd, max Cl, max Cl/Cd}` and **airfoil** (name or perimeter). |
|
|
- Use the scalar **scores** as targets (e.g., regress `score_min_cd`) or form **ranking** pairs within the same airfoil. |
|
|
- Optionally **post‑select** the top‑k wings per airfoil by the chosen objective as exemplar targets. |
|
|
|