instruction stringlengths 55 58 | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 21 4k |
|---|---|---|
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1676. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1535. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1535. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1535 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1871. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1921. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1927. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-20001. | An issue was discovered in MantisBT before 2.24.5. It associates a unique cookie string with each user. This string is not reset upon logout (i.e., the user session is still considered valid and active), allowing an attacker who somehow gained access to a user's cookie to login as them. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2086. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1900. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1900. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1900 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2259. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2608. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2315. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2204. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2204. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2204 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2413. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2418. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2520. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2522. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2580. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1862. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2645. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2408. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2408. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2408 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2706. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2708. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2709. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2710. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2802. | MantisBT 1.2.x before 1.2.2 insecurely handles attachments and MIME types. Arbitrary inline attachment rendering could lead to cross-domain scripting or other browser attacks. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2845. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2768. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2768. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2768 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2900. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-2962. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2692. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2692. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2692 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been remo... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3034. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3136. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3137. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3138. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3139. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3140. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3141. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3142. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3143. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3144. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3145. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3239. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2139, CVE-2009-2140. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2139 and CVE-2009-2140. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2139 and CVE-2009-2140 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate ha... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3297. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3394. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3398. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3454. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2510. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2510. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2510 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3552. | In RHEV-M VDC 2.2.0, it was found that the SSL certificate was not verified when using the client-side Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager interface (a Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) XAML browser application) to connect to the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager. An attacker on the local network coul... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3610. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3695. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3695. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3695 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3614. | liboping 1.3.2 allows users reading arbitrary files upon the local system. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3679. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3680. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3681. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3682. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3683. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3684. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3685. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3686. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3687. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3688. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3689. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3721. | Multiple directory traversal and buffer overflow vulnerabilities were discovered in yTNEF, and in Evolution's TNEF parser that is derived from yTNEF. A crafted email could cause these applications to write data in arbitrary locations on the filesystem, crash, or potentially execute arbitrary code when decoding attachme... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3723. | asterisk allows calls on prohibited networks | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3724. | python-markdown2 before 1.0.1.14 has multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) issues. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3741. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3768. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3769. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3770. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3771. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3772. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3773. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3774. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3775. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3776. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3777. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3795. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3870. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3870. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3870. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3870 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been remo... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3887. | ytnef has directory traversal | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3893. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3906. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3606. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3606. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3606 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been remo... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3907. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3607. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3607. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3607 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been remo... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3908. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3608. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been remo... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3925. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3926. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3927. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3928. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3929. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3990. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3991. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3992. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-3993. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4011. | dtc-xen 0.5.x before 0.5.4 suffers from a race condition where an attacker could potentially get a bash access as xenXX user on the dom0, and then access a potentially reuse an already opened VPS console. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4036. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4054. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3672. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3672. The duplicate was assigned by the CNA without proper coordination with MITRE. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3672 instead of this candidate. All references and descr... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4067. | Buffer overflow in the auerswald_probe function in the Auerswald Linux USB driver for the Linux kernel before 2.6.27 allows physically proximate attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial of service via a crafted USB device, or take full control of the system. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4123. | The jruby-openssl gem before 0.6 for JRuby mishandles SSL certificate validation. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4132. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-4214. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-4214. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-4214 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4267. | The console in Apache jUDDI 3.0.0 does not properly escape line feeds, which allows remote authenticated users to spoof log entries via the numRows parameter. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4268. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4275. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4276. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4277. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4278. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4279. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4280. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4281. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4282. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4283. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-4284. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.