instruction stringlengths 55 58 | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 21 4k |
|---|---|---|
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-4855. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-4856. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-4857. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-4858. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-4859. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-4860. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-4861. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-4862. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-4920. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was based on an incorrect claim regarding a directory issue in Agavi. The vendor has disputed the issue and the original researcher has retracted the original claim, so this is not a vulnerability. Further investigation by t... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5020. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0017. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0017. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0017 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5083. | In JON 2.1.x before 2.1.2 SP1, users can obtain unauthorized security information about private resources managed by JBoss ON. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5084. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5085. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5388. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5389. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5390. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5391. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5392. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5453. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5464. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5465. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5466. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5467. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5468. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5469. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5470. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5471. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5472. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5473. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5474. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5475. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5476. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5477. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5478. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5479. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5480. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5481. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5482. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5483. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5484. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5485. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5509. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs:CVE-2008-5508. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5508. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5508 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5622. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5621. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5621. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5621 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-5850. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was originally recorded for a "SPLAT Remote Root Exploit" that was claimed to exist for Check Point SmartCenter. The claim has no actionable details and was disclosed by a person of unknown reliability who did not coordinate ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-6049. | Rejected reason: SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in TinyMCE 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the menuID parameter. NOTE: CVE and multiple reliable third parties dispute this issue, since TinyMCE does not contain index.php or any PHP code. This may be an issue in a product t... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-6067. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5838. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5838. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5838 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-6176. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-6171. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-6171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-6171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-6339. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6339. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-6426. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6426. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6426. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6426 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-6432. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6432. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6432. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6432 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been rem... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-6628. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-6268. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-6268. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-6268 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-6800. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not a security issue. It was originally created based on one vendor's misinterpretation of an upstream changelog comment that referred to a race condition in the winbind daemon (aka winbindd) in Samba before 3.0.32. The u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7259. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7260. | Rejected reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7272. | FireGPG before 0.6 handle user’s passphrase and decrypted cleartext insecurely by writing pre-encrypted cleartext and the user's passphrase to disk which may result in the compromise of secure communication or a users’s private key. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7273. | A symlink issue exists in Iceweasel-firegpg before 0.6 due to insecure tempfile handling. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7291. | gri before 2.12.18 generates temporary files in an insecure way. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7304. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7305. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7306. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7307. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7308. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7314. | mIRC before 6.35 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long nickname. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7320. | GNOME Seahorse through 3.30 allows physically proximate attackers to read plaintext passwords by using the quickAllow dialog at an unattended workstation, if the keyring is unlocked. NOTE: this is disputed by a software maintainer because the behavior represents a design decision | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2008-7321. | The tubepress plugin before 1.6.5 for WordPress has XSS. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0035. | alsa-utils 1.0.19 and later versions allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack via the /usr/bin/alsa-info and /usr/bin/alsa-info.sh scripts. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0073. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0074. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0092. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0101. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0189. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1012. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2009-1012. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1012 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0190. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1016. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2009-1016. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1016 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental u... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0236. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0242. | Rejected reason: gmetad in Ganglia 3.1.1, when supporting multiple requests per connection on an interactive port, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a request to the gmetad service with a path that does not exist, which causes Ganglia to (1) perform excessive CPU computation and (2) send the enti... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0300. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2636. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2636. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2636 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0567. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0589. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0671. | Rejected reason: Format string vulnerability in the University of Washington (UW) c-client library, as used by the UW IMAP toolkit imap-2007d and other applications, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the initial request to the IMAP port (143/tcp). NOTE: Red Hat has dispu... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0782. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0785. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0786. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This was originally intended for a report about TCP Wrappers and the hosts_ctl API function, but further investigation showed that this was documented behavior by that function. Notes: Future CVE identifiers might be assigned to applications t... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0795. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2009-0796 and CVE-2009-1265 to determine which ID is appropriate. All ... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0797. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0907. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1899. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1899. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1899 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0947. | Multiple integer overflows in the (1) cdf_read_property_info and (2) cdf_read_sat functions in file before 5.02. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-0948. | Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) cdf_read_sat, (2) cdf_read_long_sector_chain, and (3) cdf_read_ssat function in file before 5.02. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-10001. | A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in jianlinwei cool-php-captcha up to 0.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file example-form.php. The manipulation of the argument captcha with the input %3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C/script%3E leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotel... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-10002. | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in dpup fittr-flickr. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file fittr-flickr/features/easy-exif.js of the component EXIF Preview Handler. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The identifier... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-10003. | A vulnerability was found in capnsquarepants wordcraft up to 0.6. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file tag.php. The manipulation of the argument tag leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 0.7 is able to address this... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-10004. | A vulnerability was found in Turante Sandbox Theme up to 1.5.2. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function sandbox_body_class of the file functions.php. The manipulation of the argument page leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.6.1 i... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1120. | EMC RepliStor Server Service before ESA-09-003 has a DoASOCommand Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. The flaw exists within the DoRcvRpcCall RPC function -exposed via the rep_srv.exe process- where the vulnerability is caused by an error when the rep_srv.exe handles a specially crafted packet sent by an unauthenticat... | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1142. | An issue was discovered in open-vm-tools 2009.03.18-154848. Local users can gain privileges via a symlink attack on /tmp files if vmware-user-suid-wrapper is setuid root and the ChmodChownDirectory function is enabled. | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1143. | An issue was discovered in open-vm-tools 2009.03.18-154848. Local users can bypass intended access restrictions on mounting shares via a symlink attack that leverages a realpath race condition in mount.vmhgfs (aka hgfsmounter). | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1153. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1193. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1205. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4475. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4475 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1540. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1541. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1543. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | |
Summarize the vulnerability described in CVE-2009-1563. | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0689. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-0689. Certain codebase relationships were not originally clear. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-0689 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this cand... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.