id int64 4 458k | target_text stringlengths 33 45.8k ⌀ | verdict stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
312,780 | (Ohio Minimum Wage Violations – Ohio 4111.14(K) Collective) 63) Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations as if fully rewritten herein. 64) Defendants are individual and joint “employers” covered by the minimum wage requirements of the Ohio Wage Laws. 65) The Ohio Wage Laws requires that non... | win |
377,928 | 25. Defendant Zendesk is a customer service software company founded in Copenhagen, Denmark in 2007 and now headquartered in San Francisco, California. The Company has been reporting to the SEC and listed on the NYSE since conducting its initial public stock offering 2014. 26. According to the Company, the Zende... | lose |
416,273 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
383,181 | 12. Plaintiff Rodgers has been employed by Defendants as a network operations center (“NOC”) technician since in or around May 2017. 13. Plaintiff Korff was employed by Defendants as a NOC technician from in or around February 2018 until in or around February 2019. 14. NOC technicians receive calls from Defend... | win |
74,014 | 22. Defendant called Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in 7780 (“7780 Number”) with multiple pre-recorded voice messages in January and February of 2021. 24. When Plaintiff listened to the prerecorded messages, she was easily able to determine that it was prerecorded. Rahn v. Bank of Am., No. 1:15-CV-... | lose |
310,897 | 15. On or about June 18, 2008, Plaintiff successfully registered his cellular telephone number ending in -1774 with the National Do Not Call Registry. 16. During or about June of 2016, Defendant began sending unsolicited text messages to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone. 17. The text messages contained informati... | win |
394,192 | 13. Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 15. The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendants and those companies and entities on whose behalf they attempt to collect and/or have purchased debts. ... | win |
147,556 | 13. Defendant Sempris is a marketing company that offers numerous subscription- based, negative-option “Membership Programs” which purport to offer discounts and services, such as coupons and rebates, to “subscribing” consumers. 37. In or around December 2012, Georgia Noonan viewed a television infomercial for on... | lose |
245,808 | 25. Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) as a collective action on behalf of the following class of potential opt-in litigants: All individuals who are current or former non-exempt employees of HydroChem, LLC who performed work in the United States at any time between April 19, 2016 and the... | win |
186,670 | (Declaratory Relief) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 103. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations as if set forth fully herein. 104. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and believes that Defendan... | win |
366,769 | 28. Plaintiff, for himself and on behalf of others similarly situated, seeks class action certification pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23(a) and 23 (b)(2) of all deaf and hard of hearing individuals in the United States who have been denied equal access to goods and services of the Defendant’... | win |
127,493 | 19. In Defendant’s overzealous attempt to market its services, it placed (and continues to place) phone calls to consumers who never provided consent to call and to consumers having no relationship with Defendant. Defendant knowingly made (and continues to make) these telemarketing calls without the prior express w... | win |
189,005 | 19. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 23(a) (1)-(4) and 23(b) (3), this action is brought and may be properly maintained as a class action. This action satisfies the ascertainability, numerosity, typicality, commonality, adequacy, predominance, and superiority requirements of those provisions. 20. Plaintiff brings t... | lose |
181,972 | 21. In 1991, Congress enacted the TCPA in response to a growing number of consumer complaints regarding certain telemarketing practices. 22. The TCPA regulates, among other things, the use of automated telephone equipment, or “autodialers,” defined as equipment which “has the capacity . . . (a) to store or produ... | lose |
15,247 | 1. Nationwide File Disclosure Class 106. Plaintiff Huff sues on behalf of himself and other persons similarly situated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a). Plaintiff Huff is a member of the Nationwide File Disclosure Class that he seeks to represent, which consists of all individuals (“consumers” as defined the FC... | lose |
279,959 | 21. Defendant offers the commercial website, 37. Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, seeks to certify a nationwide class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(2): all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result ... | win |
301,589 | 24. Beginning in April of 2020, Defendant sent automated marketing calls and automated marketing text messages to be transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in 5194 (“5194 Number”). 41. Plaintiff brings this case as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, on behalf of themselves and a... | win |
100,400 | 34. Plaintiff Stancu was hired by Defendant Ethos in or around September of 2015. 35. Plaintiff Stancu was required to perform all relevant tasks in the front of the restaurant including acting as a bartender, waiter, busser and food runner. He also cleaned and stocked the bar and kitchen. 36. Plaintiff work... | lose |
405,831 | 37. Defendants own, operate, lease and/or control Applebee’s restaurants throughout Pennsylvania and the United States. 38. As part of these operations, Defendants serve food and/or drinks at a bar area in each restaurant. 40. Plaintiff desired to be served at the restaurant’s bar dining area, and more speci... | lose |
200,752 | 30. Chase violated 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(8) by using language or a symbol on any envelope when communicating with a consumer by mail as described above. | win |
26,464 | 15. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of all individuals and entities who purchased Helios common stock on the public market during the Class Period, and were damaged, excluding the Company, the defendants and each of their immediate family members, legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns, and any ... | win |
455,917 | 14. Defendant owns and operates Bubby’s restaurants in New York City, with locations at 120 Hudson Street, New York, New York, and 73 Gansevoort Street, New York, New York. It sells, at these restaurants, pancakes, biscuits, fish, steak, salads, pies, wine, beer, and similar items. 15. Defendant’s Website is he... | lose |
456,765 | (Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)) On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Class 18. Enacted in 1991, the TCPA makes it unlawful “to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using an automatic telephone... | win |
192,651 | 16. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs. 17. Through its Field Technicians, Defendant provides roof inspection services, ladder assist services, direct inspections of roof damage and tarping services, (“services”) to insurance companies nationwide. 18. According to its... | win |
77,509 | 21. Defendant is an instructional food preparation company that owns and operates the website, store.177milkstreet.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services which Defendant ensures the delivery of throughout the United States, including New York State. ... | win |
287,012 | 30. Plaintiff still has and had, at all relevant times to this action, telephone service at 954-327-7450 at its place of business at Scott Barr, DDS, 300 NW 70 Avenue, Suite 206A, Plantation, FL 33317. Plaintiff receives facsimile transmissions (hereinafter "faxes") at this number, using a telephone facsimile machi... | win |
436,360 | 49. Plaintiff repeats, re-alleges, and incorporates by reference, all of the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully stated herein. 51. As a result of Defendant's negligent violations of 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq., Plaintiff is entitled to an award of $500.00 in statutory damages, for each and every violat... | lose |
2,015 | 21. Defendant manufactures, markets, advertises and sells personal care and hygiene products in the United States and throughout the world. 22. Defendant markets numerous products under their “Kiss My Face” brand such as the Product purchased by Plaintiffs. The Product is available at many higher-end supermarket... | lose |
11,585 | 38. Defendant has failed to pay Plaintiffs and similarly situated individuals proper overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of forty (40) per week. 39. Defendant has a policy and practice of failing and refusing to pay Plaintiffs and all other similarly situated employees for all hours worked in violation... | win |
129,929 | 45. This action is brought as a class action. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 46. The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of the Defendants a... | lose |
413,713 | 100. Plaintiff incorporate by reference the allegations in the preceding paragraphs. 101. Plaintiff brings his overtime claims arising under the OMFWSA as a Rule 23 class action on behalf of the following class: Ohio Class: are all current and former day rate paid inspectors and all employees in substantially simi... | lose |
330,336 | 20. NYX’s Website is heavily integrated with its physical stores, serving as a gateway to those brick and mortar locations. Through the Website, NYX customers are, inter alia, able to: find information about the stores’ locations and hours of operation; purchase makeup and makeup accessories (e.g., lipstick, lipglo... | lose |
350,522 | 11. The claims of the named Plaintiff Bouas are typical of the claims of the Class. Plaintiff’s claims are typical of those of other members of the Class as there are no material differences in the facts and law underlying the claims of Plaintiff and the Class, and by prosecuting his claims, Plaintiff will advance ... | win |
281,258 | 40. Plaintiff re-states, re-alleges and incorporates herein by reference, paragraphs one (1) through thirty nine (39) as if set forth fully in this cause of action. 41. This cause of action is brought on behalf of Plaintiff and the members of a class. 42. The class consists of all persons whom Defendants’ recor... | win |
123,896 | 24. Defendant’s text messages were transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 25. Defendant’s text messages constitute telemarketing because they encouraged the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiff cannabis ... | lose |
342,199 | 56. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of herself and all legally blind individuals who have attempted to access Defendant’s ATMs (the “Rule 23(b)(3) Class”). 57. Plaintiff also brings this action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(2)... | win |
330,460 | 11. 13. This action can be maintained as a class action under FRCP 23(a) and (b) because there are questions of law and fact common to the class members, which predominate over any questions relating to individual class members, including but not limited to: a) Whether Walgreen made false or misleading represen... | win |
84,839 | 13. Custody of one's child is one of the most precious of all rights, and "perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberties recognized by [the Supreme] Court." Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 (2000). "The bonds between a parent and child are, in a word, sacrosanct" and protected by federal law. Swipies v. Kofk... | lose |
220,500 | (Asserted on behalf of Plaintiff and the NJ Sub-Class) Violation of the New Jersey Fair Credit Reporting Act N.J. Stat. 56:11-28 et seq. (Asserted on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. 12. On or about April 21, 2016, Plaintiff traveled to a... | win |
57,794 | 10. In pursuit of said debt, Defendant sent Plaintiff some collection letters. 12. Plaintiff paid the bill by credit card on or about September 2016. 13. However, while charging Plaintiff’s card, Defendant charged Plaintiff an additional service fee of $4.95. Exhibit A. 14. Service fees are incidental to th... | lose |
283,108 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
293,974 | 10. Accordingly, Sinh Sinh is an enterprise engaged in commerce under the FLSA and is subject to its minimum wage and overtime provisions. 11. In the alternative, if Sinh Sinh is not subject to the FLSA, it is subject to the TMWA. 12. Sinh Sinh did not record the hours Tepaz and the putative class members work... | lose |
55,464 | 13. On or about August 26, 2019, April 21, 2020, April 27, 2020, June 3, 2020, and August 24, 2020, Defendants sent five unsolicited facsimiles to Plaintiff using a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device. See Group Exhibit A. 14. The August 26, 2019 Fax states, in part, as follows: “…We are a... | win |
23,614 | 23. Defendant is a beard care product retailer. Defendant is an online retailer of beard care products for men, including beard trimmers, beard growth vitamins, beard brushes, and beard sprays, shampoos, balms, and oils. Defendant owns, operates, manages and controls the website, www.thebeardclub.com (its “Website”... | lose |
386,612 | 14. Plaintiff has received at least one of Defendants' advertisements by facsimile. A true and correct copy of the fax Plaintiff received in December, 2016 is attached as Exhibit A. 15. Exhibit A is a one·page document Defendants sent by fax promoting Spreemo's services locating and recommending radiological ima... | lose |
65,009 | ILLEGAL WITHHOLDING OF WAGES 32. Plaintiffs hereby incorporate and reallege all facts set forth above. 33. Defendants have misclassified the Plaintiffs and other similarly situated delivery drivers as independent contractors when they are actually employees under the Connecticut wage laws. 34. This misclass... | win |
363,330 | 28. Defendant’s text messages constitute telemarketing/advertising because it promotes Defendant’s business, goods and services. 29. Specifically, Defendant asks the recipient of the text message to call the Defendant to see if they are eligible for student loan forgiveness. 30. Defendant makes money by selli... | lose |
121,679 | 10. Defendant owns and operates Shorter University in Rome, Georgia. 11. Plaintiff attended Shorter during the 2008-2009 school year and was a member of the Shorter cheerleading team during that time. In order to participate in cheerleading, Plaintiff had to undergo a physical examination by a doctor associate... | win |
230,150 | 11. Plaintiff was at all times mentioned herein the subscriber of the cellular telephone number (954) ***-3307 (the “3307 Number”). The 3307 Number was at all times mentioned herein assigned to a cellular telephone service as specified in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). 12. On or about April 8, 2019, Defendant tr... | lose |
160,431 | 11. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (10). 12. Defendant is, and at all times mentioned herein was, an Iowa corporation and a “person,” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (10). 13. ... | win |
299,881 | 19. Powerstroke is an oilfield services company.2 20. Powerstroke bills itself as an “industry-renowned expert in snubbing and underbalanced services.” 22. Lechot and the Day Rate Workers are members of the crews that perform Powerstroke’s work. 23. Even if the precise job titles and duties of the Day Rat... | lose |
236,660 | 10. As used in both 47 U.S.C. § 227 and 47 C.F.R. 64.1200, "[t]he tenn 'unsolicited advertisement' means any material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any property, goods, or services which is transmitted to any person without that person's prior express invitation or permission." (47 U.S.C. § ... | lose |
39,441 | 74. Plaintiff incorporates the above paragraphs as though set forth in full. 75. Plaintiff is a “consumer” as defined by CCRAA section 1785.3(b). 76. Kaiser is a “person” as defined by CCRAA section 1785.3(j). 77. As alleged above, Kaiser is a provider of Medi-Cal covered services. 78. As alleged above, Ka... | lose |
308,281 | 11. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, “persons” as defined by 47 42. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). 43. Plaintiff represents, and is a membe... | lose |
364,336 | 18. Ensign U.S. Drilling (SW), Inc. (“Ensign”) provides drilling operations and rig management for the oil and gas industry throughout the State of Texas, the United States, and Canada.3 19. To provide their services, Ensign employed (and continues to employ) numerous oilfield workers who were paid a day rate and... | win |
78,286 | (THE FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE SPD IN VIOLATION OF ERISA 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(1)) (THE FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE CONTINUATION COVERAGE ELECTION NOTICE TO MR. GILREATH IN VIOLATION OF ERISA 29 U.S.C. § 1166(a)(4)) (THE FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE INITIAL RIGHTS NOTICE TO MR. GILREATH IN VIOLATION OF ERISA § 606(a)(1)) ... | win |
446,100 | 12. On information and belief, on or about March 14, 2011, April-May, 2012, May 10, 2012, October 19, 2012, September 30, 2013 and October 8, 2013, Defendants transmitted by telephone facsimile machine seven (7) unsolicited advertisements to Plaintiff. Copies of the facsimiles are attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1... | lose |
315,687 | 15. Defendant is an online retailer of ice cream products. Through the Website, customers can purchase different flavored ice cream products either per pint or as collections. 16. Defendant’s Website is heavily integrated with its retail operations. Through the Website, customers can learn about the company, pu... | lose |
110,722 | 12. Plaintiff seeks to prosecute the FLSA claim as an “opt-in” collective action on behalf of all persons who are or were employed by Best Budz as technicians in Colorado at any time in the last three (3) years through the date of entry of judgment in this case and (i) were not paid minimum wage for all hours worke... | win |
59,676 | 1. a substantial risk of each individual plaintiff presenting in separate, duplicative proceedings the same or essentially similar arguments and evidence, including expert testimony; 1. Numerosity (Rule 23(a)(1)). 2. Existence of Common Questions of Law and Fact (Rule 23(a)(2)). 2. a multiplicity of tri... | win |
227,929 | 17. Defendant manufactures, distributes, markets, and sells over-the-counter biotin products. This lawsuit concerns three of those products — Biotin 5000 mcg Fast Dissolve, Biotin 10,000 mcg Maximum Strength, and Biotin 10,000 mcg Fast Dissolve (collectively, “Biotin Products”). The Biotin Products are marketed a... | lose |
434,192 | 11. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was the sole operator, possessor, and subscriber of the cellular telephone number ending in 8573. 12. At all times relevant, Plaintiff’s number ending in 8573 was assigned to a cellular telephone service as specified in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). 3 13. At all times rel... | lose |
345,030 | 11. Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 12. The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; b. to whom Defendant SBS sent a collection letter attempting to collect a consumer debt; c. that deceptively ... | win |
8,711 | 5.10 Plaintiff and members of the Class were each users of the ATMs since the date one year prior to the filing of this action. 5.11 Plaintiff and each member of the Class were illegally charged ATM fees as a result of Defendant's failure to comply with the ATM fee notice requirements of the 5.1 Plaintiff br... | lose |
255,238 | 11. In fact, Plaintiff regularly receives unsolicited marketing texts from Defendant notwithstanding Plaintiff's repeated requests that Defendant stop texting her. 12. For example, on February 14, 2020 at 6:57 am, Defendant sent an unsolicited text message to Plaintiff from short code 71203. Plaintiff responded to th... | lose |
187,852 | -14- -20- VIOLATIONS OF THE NYCHRL 1. Common questions of law and fact exist amongst Class, including: a. Whether Defendant’s Website is a “public accommodation” under the ADA; b. Whether Defendant’s Website is a “place or provider of public accommodation” under the NYSHRL and the NYCHRL; c. Whether De... | win |
254,142 | 10. As a matter of economic reality, Nationwide Eviction advertises, on the "About Us" section of its website, that "owners select from a pool of experienced professionals for court representation that are knowledgeable of the intricacies of local law and processes pertaining to evictions, writs and collections." ... | lose |
14,229 | (Declaratory Relief) 112. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 111 of this Complaint as though set forth at length herein. 113. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and ... | win |
254,262 | (On behalf of Plaintiff and the Ford PremiumCARE ESP Subclass) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class and Tennessee Subclass) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class and Tennessee Subclass) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class and Tennessee Subclass) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 10. Upon information ... | win |
330,415 | 26. On or about June 18, 2019, Defendant sent the following telemarketing text messages to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in 4155 (the “4155 Number”): 27. Defendant’s text messages were transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 29. The infor... | win |
301,341 | 19. Plaintiff files this case as an “opt-in” collective action, as is specifically allowed by 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). 20. Other employees have been victimized by Defendants’ ill-conceived patterns, practices, and policies that violate the FLSA. As such, other similarly situated employees are being denied their lawf... | win |
155,586 | 13. Plaintiff brings this action as a state wide class action, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “FRCP”), on behalf of herself and all New York consumers and their successors in interest (the “Class”), who were sent debt collection letters and/or notices from the Defendants wh... | win |
163,209 | 10. Mr. Williams informed Plaintiff that he gave Keiser University Plaintiff's name and telephone number in connection with an application for financial aid. 11. Defendant used an automatic telephone dialing system or pre-recorded or artificial voice to place calls to Plaintiff's cellular telephone without her co... | lose |
447,725 | 17. At all times for the three years prior to the filing of the Complaint in this matter, Defendants have employed female entertainers at its nightclubs located throughout the United States. 18. At all times for the three years prior to the filing of the instant complaint, Defendants have categorized all enterta... | win |
399,401 | 10. At all times relevant, Plaintiffs were citizens of the State of California. Plaintiffs are, and at all times mentioned herein were each, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (10). 11. Defendant is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a corporation and a “person,” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (10). ... | win |
194,858 | 1. a statement that the recipient is legally entitled to opt-out of receiving future faxed advertisements – knowing that he or she has the legal right to request an opt-out gives impetus for recipients to make such a request, if desired; 13. On information and belief, both Defendants receive some or all of the re... | lose |
230,209 | 13. Defendants conduct background checks on many of its job applicants as part of a standard screening process. In addition, Defendants also conduct background checks on existing employees from time-to-time during the course of their employment. 15. Defendants procured a consumer report information on Plaintiff ... | win |
256,322 | 76. Plaintiff re-states, re-alleges, and incorporates herein by reference, paragraphs one (1) through seventy five (75) as if set forth fully in this cause of action. 77. This cause of action is brought on behalf of Plaintiff and the members of two classes. 78. Class A consists of all persons whom Defendant's r... | lose |
126,672 | 11. Upon information and belief, eFinancial develops marketing campaigns using a combination of sales channels, with an emphasis on outbound telemarketing. 12. Upon information and belief, eFinancial utilizes third party vendors to market its insurance products. 14. Upon information and belief, eFinancial's ab... | win |
331,359 | 25. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §§ 207 and 216(b), Plaintiffs seek to prosecute their FLSA claims as a collective action on behalf of themselves and the Collective Action Members. 26. Defendants are liable under the FLSA for, inter alia, failing to properly compensate Plaintiffs and the Collective Action Members. Ther... | win |
217,294 | 10. Defendant, a large health system operating in North Carolina, Virginia, Georgia, and South Carolina, owns and operates 14 hospitals and more than 500 Physician clinic locations, including outpatient surgery centers, medical plazas, rehabilitation programs, diagnostic imaging centers, and community health outrea... | lose |
67,664 | 14. In addition to the facts pled above, at various times prior to the filing of the instant complaint, including within one year preceding the filing of this complaint, DEFENDANT contacted PLAINTIFF in an attempt to collect an alleged outstanding debt. 15. On or about March of 2016, Plaintiff began receiving ... | win |
320,244 | 24. At no point prior to or after March 4, 2017, did Plaintiff have an account with Defendant. 25. At no point prior to or after March 4, 2017, did Plaintiff inquire about Defendant’s services. 26. Nonetheless, on March 4, 2017, Defendant pulled Plaintiff’s Trans Union credit report without a permissible purpos... | lose |
361,453 | 21. This Complaint may be brought and maintained as an “opt-in” collective action pursuant to Section 16 of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b); in that the claims of Plaintiffs are similar to the claims of the Putative Plaintiffs/Class Members. 23. At all relevant times, Defendant has had a policy and practice of fail... | lose |
83,882 | [Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act—Overtime Wage Brought on behalf of the Plaintiff and the FLSA Collective] 20. Defendants committed the following alleged acts knowingly, intentionally and willfully. 22. From on or about February 28, 2017 to February 2, 2018, Plaintiff was hired by Defendants to wor... | win |
188,967 | 17. The Plaintiff incorporates the previous paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 3 18. The Plaintiff is a "person" who falls under the protection of Article 2 of the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (herein “WVCCPA”) and is entitled to the remedies set forth in Article 5 of the WVCCPA. 19. The Def... | win |
348,052 | 1. Plaintiff alleges that at all times relevant herein Defendant conducted business in the State of Ohio, County of Lake, and within this judicial district. 12. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). 13. Plaintiffs represent, and are mem... | win |
376,959 | 19. OSU hired Dr. Strauss in 1978 as an assistant professor of medicine. From 1981 to 1995, Strauss was the university’s team doctor and had contact with athletes in baseball, cheerleading, cross country, fencing, football, gymnastics, ice hockey, lacrosse, soccer, swimming, tennis, track, volleyball, and wrestling... | lose |
345,512 | (COLORADO WAGE CLAIM ACT) (COLORADO MINIMUM WAGE ACT) (FAIR LABOR STANDARD ACT) 15. Defendant employed Plaintiff and the Collective and Class Action Members as Operators. 16. Defendant operated in Colorado and Texas during the relevant time period. 17. Defendant maintains control, oversight, and discre... | win |
170,632 | 23. Plaintiff seeks class certification pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and (b)(1)(B), (2) and (3) related to all claims for which monetary, injunctive, and declaratory relief is sought. 24. This Class is defined as: “All peaceful protestors who have been injured as a result of Defendants’ actions and who have ... | lose |
248,516 | 20. Defendant is an online manufacturer and retailer of shaving equipment, and owns and operates the website, www.harrys.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services and which Defendant ensures the delivery of such goods throughout the United States, inclu... | win |
69,005 | 17.45(3), as it is a corporation, and business entity and/or association. 29. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, as a member of the proposed class (the “Class”), defined as follows: All persons within the United States who purchased the Products within four ye... | lose |
454,945 | (Unjust Enrichment) (Violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) (Violations of M.G.L. c. 93A) 19. On information and belief, there are thousands of class members. Therefore, the class is sufficiently numerous such that joinder would be impracticable. 20. There are issues of law and fact common t... | lose |
318,353 | (Aiding & Abetting Violations of the CEA) (Violation of 7 U.S.C. § 25(a)(1)(D) and 17 C.F.R. § 180.1)) (Violation of 7 U.S.C. § 6b(e)(3)) 14. Section 6b(e)(3) of the CEA makes it unlawful for TD Ameritrade to “directly or indirectly, bu the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the m... | win |
101,808 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | lose |
433,627 | 21. Defendant is a personal care company that operates its personal care company as well as the Website to the public. The personal care company is located at 110 Grand Street, # B, New York, New York, New York. Defendant’s personal care company constitutes a place of public accommodation. Defendant’s personal car... | lose |
455,239 | 35. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Defendants transitioned all classes to online delivery effective March 23, 2020.2 36. However, Defendants have refused and continue to refuse to offer any pro-rated tuition discounts as a result of moving classes online. 37. Although Defendants are still offering some lev... | lose |
147,492 | (Breach Of Express Warranty) (Breach Of The Implied Warranty Of Merchantability) (Breach Of Implied Warranty Of Fitness For A Particular Purpose) (Unjust Enrichment) (Violation Of The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301, et seq.) (Violation Of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Civ... | lose |
329,169 | (Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability) 104. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each ofthe above allegations as iffully set forth herein. (Unjust Enrichment) I 0 I. Plaintiff repeats and rea lieges each of the above allegations as if fully set forth herein. (Violation of A.C.A. § 4-88-101 et seq.) 42. Foo... | lose |
139,283 | 21. On August 3, 2016, Banner first acknowledged in a public statement (the “Statement”) that beginning on June 23, 2016, hackers gained unauthorized access to Banner Health’s computer servers. 22. According to the Statement, Banner’s initial discovery was that the attackers targeted payment card data, includin... | win |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.