id
int64
4
458k
target_text
stringlengths
33
45.8k
verdict
stringclasses
2 values
445,138
16. Defendants manufacture, distribute, market, and sell the IGF-1 Plus line of health supplements on a nationwide basis. 17. Defendants presently offer six forms of the IGF-1 Plus products: (a) Super Max 200,000ng; (b) Maximum 100,000ng; (c) Ultra Plus 25,000ng; (d) Ultra 10,000ng; (e) Starter Plus 5,000ng; an...
lose
65,338
2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil...
lose
72,575
(Brought Individually and on a Class Basis Pursuant to Rule 23) VIOLATIONS OF THE MISSOURI MINIMUM WAGE LAW, MO. REV. STAT. § 290.500 (Brought Individually and on a Collective Basis Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b)) VIOLATION OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. 11 (Brought Individually an...
win
53,617
14. At all relevant times, Plaintiff and the other FLSA Collective Plaintiffs are and have been similarly situated, have had substantially similar job requirements and pay provisions, and are and have been subjected to Defendants’ decisions, policies, plans, programs, practices, procedures, protocols, routines, and...
lose
204,398
16. The CARES Act is the largest economic relief bill in U.S. history and will allocate $2.2 trillion in support to individuals and businesses affected by the coronavirus pandemic and economic downturn. 17. As part of the relief provided, the CARES Act expands the eligibility criteria for borrowers to qualify f...
lose
368,214
NYLL § 190, 191, 193, 195 and 198 11. At all times relevant herein, Defendant paid Plaintiff’s wages and made applicable employment deductions including income and FICA taxes. 12. At all times relevant herein, Defendant issues Plaintiff an IRS W-2 form at the end of each year of employment ...
win
308,305
20. Plaintiff brings this action as a class action on behalf of itself and the other public stockholders of Ultratech (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are defendants herein and any person, firm, trust, corporation, or other entity related to or affiliated with any defendant. 21. This action is properly mai...
lose
7,401
10. Defendants contacted or attempted to contact Plaintiff from telephone numbers belonging to Defendants, including without limitation (619) 889 – 8448. 11. Defendants’ calls constituted calls that were not for emergency purposes as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). 8. Beginning in or around August of 2018...
lose
208,484
(Breach of Contract) (Violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act - N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq.) (Violation of Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act [TCCWNA], N.J.S.A. 56:12-14) 1. This is a consumer class action asserting a class of all persons who, nationwide and/or in the State of New Jerse...
lose
290,480
(Deceit by Concealment, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1709, 1710) (Negligence) (Violation of California Business & Professions Code § 17200, et seq.) (Violation of the California Customer Records Act, California Civil Code § 1798.80, et seq.) 14. Facebook created and operates social networking websites and mobile appli...
lose
154,231
24. Defendant’s text messages were transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 25. Defendant’s text messages constitute telemarketing because they encouraged the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiff home heal...
lose
313,836
[Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act—Overtime Wage Brought on behalf of the Plaintiff and the FLSA Collective] 21. Defendants committed the following alleged acts knowingly, intentionally and willfully. 22. Defendants knew that the nonpayment of overtime pay, spread of hours pay, and failure to provide...
win
22,002
21. Defendant CFN is a privately held company that offers a range of financial services and products to small businesses. Upon information and belief, Defendants strategy for increasing the volume of its potential customers involves sending uninvited faxes to solicit business. 23. Defendants are responsible f...
lose
78,131
(Unjust Enrichment) (Breach of Contract) (Violation of N.J.S.A. 56: 8-1 et seq.) 1. Certifying this action as a class action, with a class as defined above; 2. On Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action, awarding against Defendant damages that Plaintiff and the other members of the Class have suffered, trebled,...
win
22,190
14. Todd Snyder owns and operates retail stores throughout the country, with a flagship location in New York City at 25 East 26th Street. It sells at this store and on its Website, clothing, shoes and accessories for men. 15. Todd Snyder’s Website is heavily integrated with its stores, serving as a gateway t...
lose
247,680
39. Plaintiffs bring this matter on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated. As detailed at length in this Complaint, Defendant orchestrated deceptive marketing and labeling practices. Defendant’s customers were uniformly impacted by and exposed to this misconduct. Accordingly, this Complaint is suited...
lose
151,846
11. HP employed Plaintiffs and members of the Collective Action Class in the Services Information Development, Technical Consulting, and ITO Service Delivery job families at HP’s locations within the United States. 12. Plaintiffs and the Collective Action Class regularly worked in excess of 40 hours per workweek...
win
228,746
27. Plaintiff Papp was hired by Defendant as a trainee for the General Manager position in or around March 2015 through December 2015. 28. As a prerequisite to becoming a General Manager, Plaintiff was required to work as a GMIT at the Wawa locations in Mullica Hill, Millville, Bridgeton, and Thorofare, New Je...
lose
246,343
23. Defendant operates, manages, and markets its retail stores, sells store gift cards to the public, and uses them as a form of communication. One or more of its retail stores is located in New York City. Defendant’s retail stores constitute places of public accommodation. Defendant’s retail stores provide importa...
win
21,878
(Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227) (Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692) 10. At all times relevant to this action, Defendant owned, operated and/or controlled telephone number 877-395-3125. 11. Within one year prior to the filing of this ac...
win
308,086
11. Furthermore, The JFPA defines “unsolicited advertisement” as “any material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any property, goods, or services which is transmitted to any person without that person’s prior express invitation or permission, in writing or otherwise.” 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(5). 12...
lose
286,873
2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil...
win
11,623
10. Defendant contacted or attempted to contact Plaintiff from telephone numbers 209-498-4848, 209-732-5482, 888-868-0577, 480-750-0223, and 209- 253-2625. 11. Defendant’s calls constituted calls that were not for emergency purposes as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). 19. Plaintiff brings this action indiv...
lose
33,771
21. BCforward is a global IT consulting and workforce fulfillment firm that provides services and resourcing for leading businesses and government organizations. 22. In order to provide services to its clients, BCforward hires employees it pays on an hourly basis. 23. Westerman worked for BCforward as a Senio...
win
454,869
13. Logue, doing business as Logue Law, permits NDM to use its status as law firm as a ‘front’ for NDM’s fraudulent debt settlement services. 14. On information and belief, Logue permits NDM to use the Logue Law name and letterhead in exchange for a monthly fee of $5,000 to solicit unwitting consumers by telepho...
lose
119,531
10. To install the application on an Android device, users must visit the Google Play Store, the online digital media platform operated by Google. Once downloaded and installed, and upon opening the application for the first time, the USA Today App presents a screen that asks the user’s permission for the App to pu...
lose
10,726
ACTION Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): 29 U.S.C. sections 201, et seq. Brief description of cause: Collective Action for unpaid overtime and other compensation, interest thereon, liquidated damages, costs of suit and reasonable attorn...
win
282,064
null
lose
153,076
14. Plaintiff is employed by Essex as a Community Manager in charge of one of Essex’s multifamily properties called Highlands at Wynhaven located in Issaquah, Washington. She is certified as an Accredited Residential Manager. 15. As a condition of her offer of employment from Essex, Plaintiff, along with every...
win
39,999
(Failure to Pay Overtime Wages – FLSA, Brought by Plaintiff on Behalf of Herself and the FLSA Collective Plaintiffs) (Failure to Pay Overtime Wages – NYLL, Brought by Plaintiff on Behalf of Herself and the Class Members) (Wage Statement Violations – NYLL §195, Brought by Plaintiff on Behalf of Herself and the Cl...
lose
281,726
10. Neither Leyse nor the other Class Members had given Lifetime prior express invitation or permission to place a Lifetime Robocall to them. 12. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs “1” through “11” inclusive of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. 13. The placem...
lose
342,412
13. Level 3 is an international communications company offering a wide-range of services for its clients. 14. Upon information and belief, either through its own telemarketing operations or a third-party, Defendant has made thousands of Robocalls and telemarketing calls to consumers' cellular telephones througho...
lose
383,287
1. a statement that the recipient is legally entitled to opt-out of receiving future faxed advertisements – knowing that he or she has the legal right to request an opt-out gives impetus for recipients to make such a request, if desired; 13. On information and belief, Defendant receives some or all of the revenue...
lose
179,164
12. Defendant Mvelopes created a mobile personal finance application that offers consumers a number of personal financial management options, including budgeting their money, receiving financial advice and coaching, and receiving a customized financial program. 13. In an effort to increase the App’s download numbers, ...
lose
87,580
(Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A) – Cellular Telephone Calls – Cell Phone Class) (Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A) – Cellular Telephone Calls – Cell Phone Class) (Violations of 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(d) ...
win
277,789
23. Defendant operates, manages, and markets its places of entertainment, sells store gift cards to the public, and uses them as a form of communication. One or more of its places of entertainment is located in New York City. Defendant’s places of entertainment constitute places of public accommodation. Defendant’s...
win
128,466
24. Defendant’s text messages were transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 25. Defendant’s text messages constitute telemarketing because they encouraged the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiff real esta...
win
264,556
(Unjust Enrichment) (Violation of Massachnsetts Unfair Trade Practices Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A) 18. Plaintiffrepeats and re-alleges the allegations contained in the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein. 19. Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93 § 105(a) provides that: No person, firm, partnership, corporation or othe...
lose
104,939
(Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693, et seq.) (Against Defendants JPay and Sunrise Bank) 204. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all of the allegations of this Complaint with the same force and effect as if fully restated herein. 205. The primary objective of the Electronic Fund Transfe...
lose
330,729
(Fraud) (Conversion) 19. From 1975 through April 1993, Hoffenberg served as Chief Executive Officer of TFC, a corporation which provided a wide array of financial services and assistance to its clients. Specifically, TFC was in the business of purchasing large volumes of outstanding receivables, and then coll...
lose
139,686
12. Plaintiff is a natural person and citizen of the State of Missouri who resides in Joplin, Missouri, and is a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153(39). 13. Plaintiff is the subscriber and regular user of the cellular telephone number at issue, (417) xxx-1968. 14. Thus, Plaintiff is the “called party” with...
win
212,185
2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibility-related problems. 2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website co...
win
78,871
44. On or about October 1, 2014, Plaintiff was hired by Defendant Yoh as a Hair and Make-up Artist. 45. At all relevant times herein, Plaintiff remained employed as a Hair and Make-up Artist. 46. Immediately after hiring Plaintiff, Defendant Yoh placed Plaintiff “at CNBC as a Hair & Make-up Artist” and was d...
lose
96,370
14. Defendants own, operate and KFC, Taco Bell, Long John Silver’s franchise restaurants among other restaurants. Upon information and belief, Defendants operate at least seventy four (74) franchised Yum! Brands restaurants in several states across the United States, including Tennessee, Georgia, South Carolina, North ...
win
284,309
13. Plaintiff brings this class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 on behalf of himself and the other public shareholders of Forescout (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are Defendants herein and any person, firm, trust, corporation, or other entity related to or affiliated with any Defendant. 28. Foresc...
lose
152,993
3.1. Defendant is a service company providing security services to various commercial businesses in Colorado. Defendant is in the commercial support service industry as defined in the Wage Claim Act. 3.2. Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a security guard providing security services to commercial firms in Colorado...
win
333,195
58. Plaintiff brings this action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of all persons who purchased LPL common stock during the Class Period (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are defendants and their families, the officers and directors of the Company, at all ...
lose
57,555
[Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act—Overtime Wage Brought on behalf of the Plaintiffs and the FLSA Collective] 18. Defendants committed the following alleged acts knowingly, intentionally and willfully. 19. Defendants knew that the nonpayment of overtime pay and failure to provide the required wage no...
win
274,638
(Breach of Contractl 43- Plaintiff reoeats. reiterates and incoroorates the allegations contained in paragraphs numbered "1" through "42" herein with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at lenqth herein. (Violations of AIYS Gen. Bus, Law 5349, 53501 10. There are questions of law and fact which ar...
lose
291,633
14) Upon information and belief, on a date better known by Defendant, Defendant began to attempt to collect an alleged consumer debt from the Plaintiff. 15) Within the one year immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, the Defendant contacted the Plaintiff on multiple occasions via telephone and left nu...
lose
355,921
18. Aequitas conducted its securities and other business activities through various affiliated entities. The complex organizational structure, consisting of approximately 75 active entities, aided Aequitas in hiding the true nature of Aequitas' business. I. THE AEQUITAS ENTITIES
win
161,934
10. Beginning in or around the fall of 2013, Defendant began to utilize Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number, ending in 3046, to place virtually daily incessant calls to Plaintiff pertaining to an alleged debt owed by his son. 11. Plaintiff was not a borrower, co-signor, or in any other way affiliated with his ...
win
353,669
10. That the said letter violates the FDCPA, including but not limited to § 1692g(a)(2), in that the letter does not clearly identify the creditor to whom the debt is owed. 11. That the letter's caption makes reference to the Law Office of Mel Harris, giving the consumer the impression that the account is owned ...
lose
301,864
10. This case arises from Related Realty’s use of repeated, unsolicited autodialed text messages to market its real estate listings and other properties. 11. Related Realty does not attempt to obtain consent from consumers before repeatedly sending consumers texts marketing its properties. And that is precisely...
win
204,372
10. On October 30, 1984, Congress passed the Cable Communications Policy Act (“CCPA”) in order to promote competition among providers of cable services and establish a national policy concerning cable communications and their operators. An important objective of Congress in establishing such a policy was to prote...
lose
422,704
10. Plaintiff’s husband Michael Jones signed a contact with Home Depot Home Services for Home Depot Home Services to perform work on his home on or about September 27, 2011. In that application, Plaintiff’s husband Michael Jones provided his cell phone number. 17. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of hersel...
lose
418,716
13. On or around September 23, 2016, Infinity AR entered into a merger agreement whereby its wholly owned subsidiary, IAR Merger Sub, Inc., merged with and into Infinity AR. 14. All Infinity AR shareholders, including Plaintiff, received the following or similar message at the time of the merger: 26. Plaintiff...
lose
348,535
35. Plaintiffs incorporate the preceding paragraphs by reference as if set forth fully in this section. 37. On information and belief, Rio Vista, Texas is/was the single site of employment, as defined by the WARN Act, for employees of Defendant, such as Cole and the Rio Vista Class Members. On information and be...
lose
286,882
12. IQVIA provides services to the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries including aggregating data collected from doctors’ offices, performing market analyses, marketing, providing medical sales forces.1 13. One of IQVIA’s commercial services is Physician Insights 360, for which IQVIA pays doctors’ offices ...
lose
4,992
10. Plaintiff was at all times mentioned herein the subscriber or customary user of the cellular telephone number (304) ***-9852 (the “9852 Number”). The 9852 Number is, and at all times mentioned herein was, assigned to a cellular telephone service as specified in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). 11. During the ...
lose
333,374
2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil...
win
280,739
17. Defendant’s skin structural representations appear prominently and conspicuously on each Product package as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 20. Also evidencing Defendant’s intent to market the Products as drugs is that Defendant sells other skin care products – including, for example, another less expe...
lose
108,130
40. Plaintiff brings this action as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 for the following Class of persons: All persons in the Sate of California who, within the applicable statute of limitations preceding the filing of this action, purchased a product from the GNC website at www.gnc.com....
lose
440,045
16. Defendant Agentra, Defendant Data LP, and Defendant ILH sell and provide health insurance. (the “Health Insurance Defendants”). 17. Defendant Nunez sells its services in connecting property owners with purchasers. 18. To increase their sales and avoid paying for more expensive forms of advertising, Defenda...
win
93,732
Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq.  As a result of Defendants’ willful and/or knowing violations of 47 U.S.C. §227(b)(1), Plaintiff and the Class members are entitled to and request treble damages, as provided by statute, up to $1,500, for each a...
win
457,159
21. Dominion is one of the nation’s largest producers and transporters of energy. 22. To provide its services, Dominion uses staffing companies to hire employees to perform work. 23. Barker was a Utility Inspector for Dominion. 24. Barker worked for Dominion on a natural gas pipeline project in Dillon, Sout...
win
437,169
24. Defendant’s text message was transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 25. Defendant’s text message constitutes telemarketing because it encourages the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiff cannabis prod...
win
406,701
(Ohio Rule 23 Class - Violations of the Ohio Prompt Pay Act, R.C. 4113.15) 56. Named Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated as a collective action for unpaid wages and overtime under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §216(b). 57. The collective class, or Opt-In Class, which Named P...
lose
258,660
10. Plaintiff made various charges to the credit card for personal purposes. 11. Due to financial difficultly, Plaintiff defaulted on her Kohl’s, Inc. credit card account (“subject debt”). 12. The subject debt is a “debt” as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(5). 13. The subject debt was eventually placed with Defendant ...
win
280,542
(12 N.Y.C.R.R. § 142-2.4: Spread of Hours or Split Shift) (FLSA: Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation) (NYLL: Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation) (NYLL: Failure to Furnish Wage Statements) 10. XPO Logistics meets the definition of an “employer” under the FLSA. By way of examples only, XPO Logistics controls...
win
291,300
15. Heatherwood owns and manages apartment buildings throughout Long Island and Long Island City, New York, including a location at 27-03 42nd Road, Long Island City, New York, known as 27 on 27th (the “Building”). It rents within this Building, studio apartments, and apartments with one or more bedrooms. 16. Y...
win
443,490
[Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act—Overtime Wage Brought on behalf of the Plaintiffs and the FLSA Collective] 18. Defendants committed the following alleged acts knowingly, intentionally and willfully. 19. Defendants knew that the nonpayment of overtime pay and failure to provide the required wage no...
win
197,886
18. Midwest does not provide or obtain an appropriate stand alone disclosure and authorization from job applicants as required by 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b)(2) prior to acquiring these consumer reports. 19. Further, Midwest does not provide pre-adverse or adverse action notice to job applicants, including a copy of th...
win
237,074
(Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)) (Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)) 18. Defendant is a company that sells electronic payment services to businesses. 19. One of Defendant’s strategies for marketi...
lose
453,924
10. Intuit is a provider of financial software solutions to consumers and businesses. Intuit organizes its business into three reportable segments: Small Business, Consumer and Professional Tax. Intuit’s Consumer segment includes two product lines: Consumer Tax and Consumer Ecosystem. TurboTax products and servi...
win
112,055
1. Old GM recklessly downplayed serious risks of injury when it chose to include the SDM Calibration Defect in the Class Vehicles. ................................. 24 1. Old GM recklessly downplayed serious risks of injury when it chose to include the SDM Calibration Defect in the Class Vehicles. 2. The 45 m...
lose
2,664
105. Plaintiff brings the First, Second, and Third Causes of Action, FLSA claims, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated persons who work or have worked as Tipped Workers at Mandrake and Kiki on the River from December 17, 2016 and the date of final judgment who elect to opt-in to this action (the “FLSA Co...
win
155,127
19. The claims in this Complaint arising out of the FLSA are brought by Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated non-exempt employees (i.e. nail technicians and employees holding other job titles whose work duties are substantially similar to that of nail technicians) who work or have wor...
win
203,221
12. On February 23, 2016, Defendant sent an unsolicited advertisement to Plaintiff’s ink-and-paper facsimile machine. The fax advertises Ichthammol ointment (the “Product”). It touts that “Ichthammol ointment has a number of uses as a natural cure for a variety of minor skin injuries and conditions.” A copy of thi...
lose
320,389
10. On or about February 29, 2012 and May 11, 2012, DEFENDANT mailed or caused to be mailed form collection letters to PLAINTIFFS, and each of them, in an attempt to collect a consumer debt from PLAINTIFFS allegedly owed to another. True and correct copies of the form letters are attached hereto as Exhibit “1”. ...
win
160,118
10. Defendant used an “automatic telephone dialing system” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1) to place its calls to Plaintiffs seeking to solicit its services. 22. Plaintiffs bring this action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, as a member the four proposed classes (hereafter, jointly,...
lose
67,452
28. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of the Plan and as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 29. Plaintiff seeks to certify, and to be appointed as representative of, the following class (“Class”): All participants and beneficiaries of the Plan whose Plan accounts ha...
win
448,515
(Violations of 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)) 10. Valarity told Plaintiff that he must contest the debt with the original creditor, Mercy Hospital and that his account must be a fraud. 11. Subsequently Plaintiff disputed the debt in writing with Mercy Hospital. 12. At no point has Plaintiff received any letters in t...
lose
450,566
117. Plaintiff brings this action individually and as a class action on behalf of all persons similarly situated in the State of New York. 118. Plaintiff seeks to certify a class of: All consumers to whom Defendant sent a collection letter substantially and materially similar to the Letter sent to Plaintiff, whi...
lose
418,327
18. Defendants constitute an oilfield services company that operates throughout the United States including in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Texas, and North Dakota. 19. Plaintiff Meals worked for Defendants in oilfields in Pennsylvania as a SEO II from approximately March 2013 to April 2014. 20. Plaintiff Meal...
win
330,882
22. Plaintiff seek to represent two classes of individuals ("the Classes") defined as follows: ClassA: Allpersons intheUnited States, from four years priorto thefiling oftheinstant Complaint through the date ofthe filing ofthe instant Complaint, towhom, without obtaining the persons' prior express consent, Defendant, u...
lose
287,367
11. Plaintiff Neuharth’s husband, Thomas Neuharth, allegedly entered into a consumer transaction with “CITY OF S MILWAUKEE FIRE DEPT” ON January 27, 2016, for ambulance transportation and associated medical services. 13. On or about March 2, 2016, Plaintiff received a bill ostensibly from “CITY OF S MILWAUKEE F...
lose
450,488
31. Plaintiffs were typically scheduled to work for Defendant Monday through Thursday from 9:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m., and from 9:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. on Friday, resulting in overtime hours on a weekly basis. Defendant promises its Agents a one-hour unpaid lunch break each Monday through Thursday. Thus, Agents are ...
win
183,034
11. Defendant is a private university and contacts consumers to solicit them to sign up for college classes using an Automated Telephone Dialing System (“ATDS”). 12. As explained by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) in its 2012 order, the TCPA requires “prior express written consent for all autodialed or p...
win
354,597
1. Probation fee of 40 per month flat fee (Basic or intensive supervision) 2. Onetime probationer set-up fee of $10.00.... 31. Individuals stopped and arrested have not been informed either on arrest or at the City Jail of their rights to avoid incarceration for their debts to the City or of their their rights to ind...
lose
194,472
2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil...
win
59,657
53. Plaintiffs incorporate the preceding paragraphs by reference as if set forth fully in this section. 54. EOG is one of the largest oil and natural gas companies in the United States and has business operations in Texas and states other than Texas. EOG has significant operations in the Eagle Ford Shale area of...
win
36,821
12. In 1991, Congress enacted the TCPA to regulate the explosive growth of the telemarketing industry. In so doing, Congress recognized that “[u]nrestricted telemarketing . . . can be an intrusive invasion of privacy [.]” Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-243, § 2(5) (1991) (codified at 4...
lose
148,786
10. Upon information and belief, Defendant contacted or attempted to contact Plaintiff from telephone number; including but not limited to (850) 795- 4038, (234) 206-8892, (541) 204-4295, and (214) 396-5859; confirmed to be Defendant’s number. 53. Pursuant to the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the Unite...
win
434,574
11. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (10). 12. Defendant is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a corporation and a “person,” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (10). 13. At all ...
lose
85,613
14. Ramirez was hired by the Company in Victoria, Texas, as an equipment operator. After working for the Company in Victoria, Texas, Ramirez was transferred to San Antonio, Texas. Unfortunately, the Company failed to pay Ramirez for all hours worked in both Victoria and San Antonio, Texas, including overtime ho...
win
161,505
24. Defendants PDC and ADS are a full-service solid waste company providing waste collection, recycling, and disposal services to a commercial, industrial, and residential customers across the states of Illinois and Missouri.2 25. To provide these services, Defendants employed (and continue to employ) numerous ...
win
442,489
7.1 Assignment. This Agreement shan bind and ~nsure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns; provided, howevet, that sucti assrgnment shall not reDeve efther party of Its obligations to the ather as provided herein. 7.2. Force MaJeure. The obligations of the respec...
win
40,043
(Class Action Alleging Violations of the Missouri Act) A. MISSOURI ACT COVERAGE (Collective Action Alleging FLSA Violations) A. FLSA COVERAGE 20. Serco is a multinational services company that is headquartered in Reston, Virginia with locations in forty-five (45) states, four Canadian provinces and fourteen (...
win
121,432
50. Plaintiff  reasserts  and  re-­‐‑alleges  the  allegations  set  forth  above.   51. At   all   relevant   times   herein,   Plaintiff   and   all   other   similarly   situated   Delivery   Drivers  have  been  entitled  to  the  rights,  protections,  and  benefits  provided  under  the   FLSA,  29  U.S.C.  §§  ...
win