figmtu/enron_personalization_dev · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 1 1.9k	employee_id stringclasses 45 values	__index_level_0__ int64 0 36.6k
Love,	dev41	34,012
The only problem I can see with this is that paragraph 4 could be construed to encourage NMNG to request amendment not only to increase the MAXDTQ but also to decrease it (if the MAXDTQ has been increased by a previous amendment).	dev41	34,013
I worry that this might mislead NMNG that the parties can decrease the MAXDTQ by agreement rather than NMNG using capacity release procedures.	dev41	34,014
However, the paragraph does not obligate TW to do anything & doesn't give NMNG any rights, since any change in the MAXDTQ must be by mutual agreement (and it's subject to available capacity).	dev41	34,015
Since it does not seem to give either party anything they do not already get under the tariff, I think I would recommend we omit it.	dev41	34,016
However, NMNG might insist on this or similar language to reflect the "deal" --- or at least the conversations of the parties.	dev41	34,017
If that's the case, I suppose I would advise the marketing folks to limit the language of paragraph 4 to an increase in MAXDTQ and explain that any decrease would have to be thru capacity release.	dev41	34,018
Comments?	dev41	34,019
Brian and Glen, Based upon a review of the 1/21/00 draft of Motion for Extension of Procedural Schedule, Transwestern Pipeline Company does not wish to join as a party to the motion, and does not plan to oppose the motion.	dev41	34,020
Sincerely, Susan Scott	dev41	34,021
The attached document shows my proposed changes to Universal's agreement in redlining.	dev41	34,022
I tried not to over-lawyer or make this overly complicated, but in my view this needed a lot of basic cleanup.	dev41	34,023
Many of my changes are simply to make the language more accurate (for example, in the use of defined terms).	dev41	34,024
In a couple of places, I have questions: 1) In the second opening paragraph, I don't know whether it is possible to attach the Proposal as an exhibit; if not, ignore my change.	dev41	34,025
2) Section 4.a.	dev41	34,026
-- their provision for an adjustment seemed a little unusual to me but it could work in favor of either party, so I left it in. If you don't like it, let me know.	dev41	34,027
3) In Section 5, I just tried to simplify the billing procedure in case of termination.	dev41	34,028
Let me know if this does not agree with your intent.	dev41	34,029
Please call me with your comments, and let me know how you would like to proceed.	dev41	34,030
That is weird.	dev41	34,031
I received your first message.	dev41	34,032
Dave, Exhibit A of the O&M agreement is a description of the Compressor Motor Facilities.	dev41	34,033
Do you have this?	dev41	34,034
Exhibit C is insurance coverages; I assume I need to get that from Nemec.	dev41	34,035
Martha, please send me by interoffice mail copies of the executed documents Drew has; mine seem to have vaporized.	dev41	34,036
Thank you!	dev41	34,037
Christine and I seem to have gotten Phillips interested in a right to terminate if TW's minimum tariff rate ever exceeds the contract rate.	dev41	34,038
They said they would mull it over, at least.	dev41	34,039
But what they really would prefer to have is a provision in which they would get the contract rate no matter what.	dev41	34,040
Since this would make it a negotiated rate deal from day 1, I feel like I need to get your buy-in before we agree to it.	dev41	34,041
Steve has already told me it is OK with him.	dev41	34,042
Please advise.	dev41	34,043
Here's the summary we sent you before, with new reference to Hector in redlining.	dev41	34,044
Call Jeff (713-853-1521) or me (713-853-0596) if you have questions.	dev41	34,045
Mary Kay and Drew, please see Christine's message below.	dev41	34,046
This language is very similar to language that NNG has used to address the change-in-rates issue.	dev41	34,047
I do not believe it creates a negotiated rates issue.	dev41	34,048
Please let me know as soon as possible if you have any concerns.	dev41	34,049
It is important that we work something out with Phillips today.	dev41	34,050
By the way, I asked Christine if she had asked Phillips to 1) give up their right of first refusal and 2) agree to our new capacity release language (i.e. TW gets the upside if capacity is released at a higher rate) in exchange for us making this compromise.	dev41	34,051
She feels that it would be inappropriate to ask them because the language below does not quite give Phillips what they had requested originally (that is, a negotiated rate).	dev41	34,052
Dear Citizens' Assistance Division: I live in the Houston Heights on the 800 block of Cortlandt.	dev41	34,053
For the 3 years I've lived there, the drainage ditch in front of my house, and several other houses on my street, have been blocked.	dev41	34,054
Any time it rains, we have standing water for several days afterwards.	dev41	34,055
I know that other streets in the Heights have the same problem.	dev41	34,056
I have heard that because of the mild winter we're having, we can expect a bumper crop of mosquitos this summer.	dev41	34,057
Standing water therefore poses a health concern for residents of the Heights this summer.	dev41	34,058
Does the City have any current plans to fix the drainage problem in the Heights?	dev41	34,059
Last year I called and requested that the ditch in front of my house be cleared, but got no response.	dev41	34,060
I hope that this was merely an oversight rather than an indication that the City of Houston has no regard for the health and comfort of its citizens.	dev41	34,061
Any information you can provide would be appreciated.	dev41	34,062
Sincerely, Susan Scott (713) 853-0596 (daytime phone)	dev41	34,063
Dear Mr. Henderson: Attached pursuant to Dave Foti's request is the Substation Maintenance Agreement in Word format with Transwestern's proposed changes shown in redlining.	dev41	34,064
After you've had a chance to review the agreement, please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.	dev41	34,065
Sincerely, Susan Scott Counsel for Transwestern Pipeline Company	dev41	34,066
Drew, what is BNSF?	dev41	34,067
Spoke with Steve about the swap question.	dev41	34,068
He wants to talk with you about this before circling back to Knippa.	dev41	34,069
If you don't hear from him, and want to call him, his # is 281-350-8441.	dev41	34,070
Re.	dev41	34,071
TW's exposure if we authorize ECS to lock in too early: If TW defaults under the CSA, it must hold ECS harmless with regard to expenses incurred by ECS in the assignment of the electric supply agreement and pay ECS whatever is owed under the agreement.	dev41	34,072
No other specific damages are addressed, and the agreement specifically prohibits the recovery of consequential, incidental or indirect losses or damages.	dev41	34,073
(Section 9.2 provides for reimbursement for ECS's reasonable costs in providing Compression Services, but only in the event TW uses its FERC out.) The Gas Conversion Agreement provides for termination of the agreement in the event of default by TW under the CSA, and obligates TW to reimburse ECS for ECS's costs and expenses incurred in unwinding the forward sale of natural gas volumes to be delivered to ECS under the agreement.	dev41	34,074
Other questions -- let me know.	dev41	34,075
If there's still space available, please enroll me in the March 14-15 Derivatives I class.	dev41	34,076
Here's my info: Susan Scott GPG Legal Supervisor: Drew Fossum SSN ********* Thanks.	dev41	34,077
Here's my request for rehearing so far.	dev41	34,078
The marketing folks are helping me with our competitive harm argument and will, I hope, come up with something plausible.	dev41	34,079
In the meantime, I would appreciate your comments.	dev41	34,080
Approved.	dev41	34,081
Lindy -- I'm working on a checklist.	dev41	34,082
There were just a couple of issues arising from the discussions with market services, weren't there?	dev41	34,083
One having to do with whether we want to change our 68 A to reflect FTS-1 and FTS-3 in same bucket -- I'm leaning towards not changing since the language is already general enough to cover us there.	dev41	34,084
The other issue had to do with issuing the OFO if EFBH does not show up in the last cycle.	dev41	34,085
I do not believe any changes are necessary there either.	dev41	34,086
No problem.	dev42	34,372
Here's the current version.	dev42	34,373
I'm going to give it another look, then I suspect we will be ready to go.	dev42	34,374
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.	dev42	34,375
Kay	dev42	34,376
Looks good to me.	dev42	34,377
Is it ready for me to print and give to Ben?	dev42	34,378
Kathy, how many originals do you think we should have signed?	dev42	34,379
4 or 5?	dev42	34,380
Or some other number?	dev42	34,381
Kay	dev42	34,382
Rey, This email explains why Jeff and I tried calling you this am.	dev42	34,383
Any comments?	dev42	34,384
Thanks, Kay	dev42	34,385
What issues were invented?	dev42	34,386
Some thoughts, observations, suggestions: 1.	dev42	34,387
Advantages to the single contract: Don't need a consolidation agreement, so we don't have to negotiate one.	dev42	34,388
Better from a liability standpoint.	dev42	34,389
Easier to administer.	dev42	34,390
Is there any reason we can't go with a single contract?	dev42	34,391
I'm working with Steve on the letter agreement.	dev42	34,392
3.	dev42	34,393
Assignment to Mitsui Steve is confirming payment issues, and ability to comply with GE's requested payment within 3 days of executing the contract.	dev42	34,394
This means that the assignment and assumption needs to be executed contemporaneously with the GE contract.	dev42	34,395
I have a call in to Rob Stevens to verify, in Stan's absence.	dev42	34,396

Love,

dev41

34,012

The only problem I can see with this is that paragraph 4 could be construed to encourage NMNG to request amendment not only to increase the MAXDTQ but also to decrease it (if the MAXDTQ has been increased by a previous amendment).

dev41

34,013

I worry that this might mislead NMNG that the parties can decrease the MAXDTQ by agreement rather than NMNG using capacity release procedures.

dev41

34,014

However, the paragraph does not obligate TW to do anything & doesn't give NMNG any rights, since any change in the MAXDTQ must be by mutual agreement (and it's subject to available capacity).

dev41

34,015

Since it does not seem to give either party anything they do not already get under the tariff, I think I would recommend we omit it.

dev41

34,016

However, NMNG might insist on this or similar language to reflect the "deal" --- or at least the conversations of the parties.

dev41

34,017

If that's the case, I suppose I would advise the marketing folks to limit the language of paragraph 4 to an increase in MAXDTQ and explain that any decrease would have to be thru capacity release.

dev41

34,018

Comments?

dev41

34,019

Brian and Glen, Based upon a review of the 1/21/00 draft of Motion for Extension of Procedural Schedule, Transwestern Pipeline Company does not wish to join as a party to the motion, and does not plan to oppose the motion.

dev41

34,020

Sincerely, Susan Scott

dev41

34,021

The attached document shows my proposed changes to Universal's agreement in redlining.

dev41

34,022

I tried not to over-lawyer or make this overly complicated, but in my view this needed a lot of basic cleanup.

dev41

34,023

Many of my changes are simply to make the language more accurate (for example, in the use of defined terms).

dev41

34,024

In a couple of places, I have questions: 1) In the second opening paragraph, I don't know whether it is possible to attach the Proposal as an exhibit; if not, ignore my change.

dev41

34,025

2) Section 4.a.

dev41

34,026

-- their provision for an adjustment seemed a little unusual to me but it could work in favor of either party, so I left it in. If you don't like it, let me know.

dev41

34,027

3) In Section 5, I just tried to simplify the billing procedure in case of termination.

dev41

34,028

Let me know if this does not agree with your intent.

dev41

34,029

Please call me with your comments, and let me know how you would like to proceed.

dev41

34,030

That is weird.

dev41

34,031

I received your first message.

dev41

34,032

Dave, Exhibit A of the O&M agreement is a description of the Compressor Motor Facilities.

dev41

34,033

Do you have this?

dev41

34,034

Exhibit C is insurance coverages; I assume I need to get that from Nemec.

dev41

34,035

Martha, please send me by interoffice mail copies of the executed documents Drew has; mine seem to have vaporized.

dev41

34,036

Thank you!

dev41

34,037

Christine and I seem to have gotten Phillips interested in a right to terminate if TW's minimum tariff rate ever exceeds the contract rate.

dev41

34,038

They said they would mull it over, at least.

dev41

34,039

But what they really would prefer to have is a provision in which they would get the contract rate no matter what.

dev41

34,040

Since this would make it a negotiated rate deal from day 1, I feel like I need to get your buy-in before we agree to it.

dev41

34,041

Steve has already told me it is OK with him.

dev41

34,042

Please advise.

dev41

34,043

Here's the summary we sent you before, with new reference to Hector in redlining.

dev41

34,044

Call Jeff (713-853-1521) or me (713-853-0596) if you have questions.

dev41

34,045

Mary Kay and Drew, please see Christine's message below.

dev41

34,046

This language is very similar to language that NNG has used to address the change-in-rates issue.

dev41

34,047

I do not believe it creates a negotiated rates issue.

dev41

34,048

Please let me know as soon as possible if you have any concerns.

dev41

34,049

It is important that we work something out with Phillips today.

dev41

34,050

By the way, I asked Christine if she had asked Phillips to 1) give up their right of first refusal and 2) agree to our new capacity release language (i.e. TW gets the upside if capacity is released at a higher rate) in exchange for us making this compromise.

dev41

34,051

She feels that it would be inappropriate to ask them because the language below does not quite give Phillips what they had requested originally (that is, a negotiated rate).

dev41

34,052

Dear Citizens' Assistance Division: I live in the Houston Heights on the 800 block of Cortlandt.

dev41

34,053

For the 3 years I've lived there, the drainage ditch in front of my house, and several other houses on my street, have been blocked.

dev41

34,054

Any time it rains, we have standing water for several days afterwards.

dev41

34,055

I know that other streets in the Heights have the same problem.

dev41

34,056

I have heard that because of the mild winter we're having, we can expect a bumper crop of mosquitos this summer.

dev41

34,057

Standing water therefore poses a health concern for residents of the Heights this summer.

dev41

34,058

Does the City have any current plans to fix the drainage problem in the Heights?

dev41

34,059

Last year I called and requested that the ditch in front of my house be cleared, but got no response.

dev41

34,060

I hope that this was merely an oversight rather than an indication that the City of Houston has no regard for the health and comfort of its citizens.

dev41

34,061

Any information you can provide would be appreciated.

dev41

34,062

Sincerely, Susan Scott (713) 853-0596 (daytime phone)

dev41

34,063

Dear Mr. Henderson: Attached pursuant to Dave Foti's request is the Substation Maintenance Agreement in Word format with Transwestern's proposed changes shown in redlining.

dev41

34,064

After you've had a chance to review the agreement, please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.

dev41

34,065

Sincerely, Susan Scott Counsel for Transwestern Pipeline Company

dev41

34,066

Drew, what is BNSF?

dev41

34,067

Spoke with Steve about the swap question.

dev41

34,068

He wants to talk with you about this before circling back to Knippa.

dev41

34,069

If you don't hear from him, and want to call him, his # is 281-350-8441.

dev41

34,070

Re.

dev41

34,071

TW's exposure if we authorize ECS to lock in too early: If TW defaults under the CSA, it must hold ECS harmless with regard to expenses incurred by ECS in the assignment of the electric supply agreement and pay ECS whatever is owed under the agreement.

dev41

34,072

No other specific damages are addressed, and the agreement specifically prohibits the recovery of consequential, incidental or indirect losses or damages.

dev41

34,073

(Section 9.2 provides for reimbursement for ECS's reasonable costs in providing Compression Services, but only in the event TW uses its FERC out.) The Gas Conversion Agreement provides for termination of the agreement in the event of default by TW under the CSA, and obligates TW to reimburse ECS for ECS's costs and expenses incurred in unwinding the forward sale of natural gas volumes to be delivered to ECS under the agreement.

dev41

34,074