text stringlengths 1 1.9k | employee_id stringclasses 45
values | __index_level_0__ int64 0 36.6k |
|---|---|---|
Let me know when you have time to meet today. | dev24 | 19,691 |
So far I'm open. | dev24 | 19,692 |
Ava has received several RSVP's for the meeting, but the hotel has not received many calls for rooms. | dev24 | 19,693 |
Ava is trying to determine if the rooms still need to be blocked-out. | dev24 | 19,694 |
She will call the customers for us if we would provide the phone #'s to her. | dev24 | 19,695 |
Could you please fill in the phone #'s for your accounts and forward to Ava Garcia? | dev24 | 19,696 |
Thanks! | dev24 | 19,697 |
I think Rich has told you that I spoke with him yesterday and would like to discuss what it would take to get a new IOS system up and running for TW. | dev24 | 19,698 |
Please give me a call or e:mail me to schedule a meeting to discuss. | dev24 | 19,699 |
I'm at 36007. | dev24 | 19,700 |
Thanks, Lindy | dev24 | 19,701 |
Thanks Mary Kay! | dev24 | 19,702 |
I believe what Lisa (Sawyer?) was referring to is the termination of TW's shared cost surcharge effective October 31, 2001. | dev24 | 19,703 |
I don't think there would be any system changes required. | dev24 | 19,704 |
Typically, TW's rates are entered with a start and end date and (if this is correct) the surcharge should have an end date of 10/31/2001 and there wouldn't be anything else to do. | dev24 | 19,705 |
If it's not entered that way, an end date could be entered now (whether at the surcharge level or at the contract level - the surcharge applies to just 14 firm contracts) and that should take care of it. | dev24 | 19,706 |
Elizabeth, Is this correct? | dev24 | 19,707 |
I know you're on a project, please let me know if you can check this or who can. | dev24 | 19,708 |
Thank you! | dev24 | 19,709 |
Lindy | dev24 | 19,710 |
This Wed or Thurs, could you update the monthly Cal '02 prices for me again? | dev24 | 19,711 |
Permian San Juan Hopefully, this will be the last time. | dev24 | 19,712 |
I need to give Tracy the final version of an abbreviated presentation (for Ken Lay mtg 11/8) by the end of this week. | dev24 | 19,713 |
I just wanted to refresh the numbers one more time. | dev24 | 19,714 |
I was trying to respond to your message about the IOS meeting Friday & I lost it. | dev24 | 19,715 |
I will not be able to be at the meeting. | dev24 | 19,716 |
I am not in the office on Friday. | dev24 | 19,717 |
Please let me know if it will be rescheduled or when we can meet to discuss. | dev24 | 19,718 |
Thanks again, Lindy | dev24 | 19,719 |
Yes. | dev24 | 19,720 |
I have 3:00-4:00 on my calendar for Thursday, October 25th. | dev24 | 19,721 |
Please let me know the location. | dev24 | 19,722 |
Where is Lisa's Office? | dev24 | 19,723 |
I just wanted to say it was good to see you the other day, though brief =) Let's get together soon for lunch or something. | dev24 | 19,724 |
I'm missing my Bob time! | dev24 | 19,725 |
I have reviewed the La Plata Facilities O&O Agreement. | dev24 | 19,726 |
Lee, could you please review the same and see if you agree with this assessment? | dev24 | 19,727 |
It appears to me that the pigging facilties could qualify as either of the following: Special Services. | dev24 | 19,728 |
This would be subject to prior written consent and agreement between the Operator (TW) and the Operating Committee (TW & NWPLRepresentatives). | dev24 | 19,729 |
If NWPL agreed, their share of the cost would be in proportion to their ownership interest. | dev24 | 19,730 |
If we did obtain their approval, future O&M cost attributable to the pigging facilities could be shared among the owners. | dev24 | 19,731 |
(We've agreed to a flat fee for 2000 through 2003 with a 3.5% escalator starting in 2001.) Addition or Expansion. | dev24 | 19,732 |
Demonstrate that the pigging will add incremental transmission capacity. | dev24 | 19,733 |
We have to give notice to NWPL and they have 60 days to participate. | dev24 | 19,734 |
If they participate, they share in the cost at their ownership interest, but they get a share of the incremental capacity at their ownership interest. | dev24 | 19,735 |
If they don't indicate a desire to participate in 60 days, we can proceed with the Expansion (without any approval, but also no cost sharing). | dev24 | 19,736 |
Also, any incremental O&M associated with an expansion cannot be passed on to any owners not participating in such expansion. | dev24 | 19,737 |
I think if we went the Special Services route, we would need to justify the need for these facilities to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the facilities at current levels. | dev24 | 19,738 |
I think we would spend alot of time arguing this with them and in the end they would probably approve it subject to them not incurring any cost. | dev24 | 19,739 |
(They probably don't have $260,000 ($1.5MM * .174) sitting around in a budget somewhere that they'd like to fork over for these facilities.) Rich, what do you think? | dev24 | 19,740 |
How difficult would it be to demonstrate that these facilities are necessary for maintaining the current operating levels of the facilities? | dev24 | 19,741 |
Recommendation: To save us the 60 days notice period of an Expansion, I think we should notify them that it's a necessary Special Service and ask for approval (& to pass along their share of the cost), but to be prepared to eat 100% of the costs to obtain their timely approval and proceed with the installation of the f... | dev24 | 19,742 |
In this event we would need to agree on the inclusion of future O&M attributable to these facilities. | dev24 | 19,743 |
FYI, their ownership interest is still officially 22.3% since they have not executed the Amendment that has been tendered to them 3 times, first by me and twice by Lynn Blair. | dev24 | 19,744 |
If they execute the Amendment that incorporates the 4/1/98 expansion of the facilities, their ownership interest will be 17.4%. | dev24 | 19,745 |
Kim asked me to send the attached spreadsheet to you. | dev24 | 19,746 |
It's my listing of TW's firm contracts where I track ROFR. | dev24 | 19,747 |
This is a complete list as of 9-17-01 of all long-term contracts (seasonal or longer). | dev24 | 19,748 |
Any monthly deals may not be included. | dev24 | 19,749 |
Dennis Lee has a report he runs from CBS of all currently effective contracts and contracts with future effective dates for me to cross-check that I have everything. | dev24 | 19,750 |
The first tab "ROFR Criteria" is a complete list of currently effective contracts including (at the bottom) contracts with future effective dates and the Red Rock Expansion contracts. | dev24 | 19,751 |
The receipt and delivery areas are noted. | dev24 | 19,752 |
The tabs following show the subscribed capacity for certain segments of TW's pipe (West of Thoreau, Blanco to Thoreau & Ignacio to Blanco) by month through 2006. | dev24 | 19,753 |
In the morning could you please call to Omaha and ask who could print out enough copies of the attached presentation for the attendees of the 9:00 meeting and forward this to them? | dev24 | 19,754 |
Thanks Audrey! | dev24 | 19,755 |
FYI. | dev24 | 19,756 |
Have we got anything set-up with James & Gabriel yet? | dev24 | 19,757 |
We won't meet with Dave until we've had a chance to discuss among ourselves and see what opportunities we've identified. | dev24 | 19,758 |
FYI. | dev24 | 19,759 |
Dave's proposal to Steve. | dev24 | 19,760 |
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything changed. | dev24 | 19,761 |
Thanks, Lindy | dev24 | 19,762 |
I don't know if Perry has responded to your request yet concerning what contracts are expiring with WTX Pool capacity and about that Duke contract you mentioned in our Staff Mtg yesterday, but I looked at my notes and this is what I come up with. | dev24 | 19,763 |
The Duke contract that expires 7/31/2002 without ROFR is already taken into consideration as expired in the November, 2002 capacity of 17,300/d we derived last week (which we've already sold 20,000/d to Calpine & PPL). | dev24 | 19,764 |
Other contracts expiring in 2002 & early 2003 from the WTX Pool are: Total 25,365/d Otherwise, we have WTX Pool capacity every Apr-Oct of 14,000/d (opposite of SWG's seasonal ctrc). | dev24 | 19,765 |
The other issue we could take into consideration here is displacement. | dev24 | 19,766 |
For the month of November, 2002 (for example) we have 22,000/d of capacity we are including in our WT-1 total that is made up of southward paths (20,000/d for USGT & 2,000/d for Astra with receipts north of WT-1 for delivery to WTX delivery points south of WT-2). | dev24 | 19,767 |
This is the most conservative capacity reservation policy. | dev24 | 19,768 |
In the event not enought physical receipts were nominated south of WT-1 to fulfill all physical deliveries nominated south of WT-1, we would need to compress gas south through WT-1 to make deliveries for these two contracts. | dev24 | 19,769 |
We may want to reassess this. | dev24 | 19,770 |
I took a day of vacation (8 hour day) on Tuesday, 11/16. | dev24 | 19,771 |
I had two sick days on 11/17 & 18. | dev24 | 19,772 |
Yes, Shelley & I discussed this on Monday. | dev24 | 19,773 |
Isn't that interesting? | dev24 | 19,774 |
I wish we could slip this into some data request or something. | dev24 | 19,775 |
We held a meeting to discuss the status of TW's 637 Imbalance filing. | dev24 | 19,776 |
Our current position (after discussions about a month ago) has been that we are concerned about filing anything in the 637 docket because it would stir-up segmentation and for now we want to let that sleeping dog lie. | dev24 | 19,777 |
We discussed again the possibility of making a separate tariff filing to pursue our OBA "wish list" outside the 637 arena and decided again that this type of filing would just get consolidated with our pending 637 filing. | dev24 | 19,778 |
After further discussion we decided that the one thing, most narrowly defined, that would really help us out with our imbalances is mandatory cash-out in constrained areas. | dev24 | 19,779 |
If defined this narrowly, this is something for which we can clearly demonstrate an operational need based upon historical allocation and imbalance data. | dev24 | 19,780 |
We think that we could make a 30 day tariff filing for this one change and have minimum risk of entanglement with the overall 637 filing. | dev24 | 19,781 |
Glen & Mary are going to discuss with MKM and Teb with Rob. | dev24 | 19,782 |
Lyn & Terry are going to pull together the last 12 months of data for constrained areas on our pipe (Ignacio to Blanco, Blanco to Thoreau, Thoreau to the border & check with Darrell for any other areas that should be included) and increased imbalance levels. | dev24 | 19,783 |
We plan to get together next week to discuss further. | dev24 | 19,784 |
Concerning the rest of our OBA "wish list", we are discussing whether to hold meetings with individual protestors to discuss only the Imbalance issues of the filing and work toward a "settlement" position on those issues to have ready in the event of Commission action in this docket. | dev24 | 19,785 |
Thanks! | dev24 | 19,786 |
Here's the ROFR spreadsheet. | dev24 | 19,787 |
The last time I updated it was 9/17/01. | dev24 | 19,788 |
I just had Dennis run a report out of CBS yesterday so that I could sync-up the ROFR spreadsheet for any long-term contracts, but I haven't had a chance to do it yet. | dev24 | 19,789 |
Oooh! | dev24 | 19,790 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.