figmtu/enron_personalization_dev_uncapped · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 1 4.46k	employee_id stringclasses 45 values
Figures, of course.	dev42
Thanks for asking.	dev42
I'm watching for some good vacation days, also...	dev42
We are staying at the Hyatt Hill Country Resort, which is nice.	dev42
There will be a private party as SeaWorld, which could be fun.	dev42
They usually do everything first class all the way, since it is the officers shindig.	dev42
I get to see some nice people I only see once a year.	dev42
Everyone parties hard, too.	dev42
Diet time!	dev42
I've done ok so far, considering the travel.	dev42
This means I've lost the weight I gained when I was on the road every week.	dev42
I have a couple of questions so I can wrap up the LOI: We refer to licensed Fuel Cell Energy equipment.	dev42
Do we intend to reference a particular manufacturer, or should this be more generic?	dev42
Do we want to attach a draft of the Development Agreement, and condition the final deal on agreeing to terms substantially the same as what's in the draft?	dev42
I have a concern that the Enron optionality bug could bite us on the backside with that one.	dev42
Do we expect to have ONE EPC contract, or several?	dev42
I'm looking for the confidentiality agreement, which may be in Bart's files (haven't checked closely yet).	dev42
If anyone has it handy, it could speed things up for me.	dev42
Thanks, Kay	dev42
Forget the ONE or more contract questions.	dev42
I see we expect to have separate contracts for each project.	dev42
Enron North America Corp.	dev42
On the issue of the contracts, the draft says that the $170m is paid when the EPC contract is signed.	dev42
Are we expecting that the portion attributable to each project will be paid as the individual EPC contracts are signed?	dev42
Thanks, Kay	dev42
Remarkably clear explanation.	dev42
Here's a draft letter for CRRA.	dev42
I didn't send it to Jeff since he is out today.	dev42
Kay	dev42
Hi Cle, FYI.	dev42
Kay	dev42
I think you and I may have different documents.	dev42
Maybe we should compare.	dev42
Thanks, Kay	dev42
What time?	dev42
FYI.	dev42
Meeting is at 100	dev42
Per your request.	dev42
FYI, no action requested at this time.	dev42
Being first is overrated.	dev42
IS IT TIME YET???	dev42
Allyson, You should receive some formation documents relating to Edgecombe Development.	dev42
The name is not spelled correctly (missing an "e"), but that is being corrected at this time.	dev42
Bob spoke to me about wanting Enron to send a letter concerning the financing arrangements for the project.	dev42
I would like for us to discuss this as well.	dev42
Kay	dev42
This is a comparison to their version.	dev42
I think I have a comparison to ours as well.	dev42
Kay	dev42
A comparison to ours.	dev42
Kay	dev42
Hi Gregg, I was out of the office on Friday, so I just now heard your voice mail.	dev42
I haven't been through all my email, but I haven't seen anything from Stephanie on email.	dev42
I do have a hard copy version which is too long to fax with confidence.	dev42
I'll give the forms a look, and fax them your way with some type of disclaimer for Peoples benefit.	dev42
Kay	dev42
I've worked with Kilpatrick Stockton's North Carolina office quite a bit, mostly regulatory- they are so so.	dev42
It is my understanding that the Atlanta office messed up a simple thing for Lisa, and that's all I know about them.	dev42
I've worked extensively with King & Spalding, both their Houston office (multiple matters) and Atlanta (two matters), and have had good results.	dev42
I've always worked through John Keffer in Houston, who then hooked me up with the right folks in Atlanta.	dev42
Kay	dev42
Okey dokey.	dev42
Wanna go?	dev42
Sounds like fun to me.	dev42
Michael will love it.	dev42
Kay	dev42
Sounds good to me.	dev42
I'll check with Neil.	dev42
I know Michael would love it.	dev42
Thanks, Kay	dev42
Hi John, Question.	dev42
Can we agree that a form contract will work for both EECC and NEPCO?	dev42
Sure would make life easier.	dev42
Kay	dev42
Pretty small stuff from a dollar standpoint.	dev42
Perhaps the sky is not falling.	dev42
Gentlemen, I've recently become involved in the "cell sale" side, meaning the transaction to sell the Fuel Cell equipment cells to CRRA.	dev42
I've met the Fuel Cell folks, but have not met anyone with CRRA yet.	dev42
Currently, I'm preparing a letter of intent for Enron/CRRA for the purchase/sale of the cells, have a development agreement prepared by outside counsel to review, and need to come up with a draft purchase agreement for FCE to review.	dev42
I'll make sure Dan is in the loop on as much of that as he cares to read.	dev42
I've heard a rumor of an issue regarding the authority of CRRA to purchase the equipment (perhaps relating to the use of bond money for the purchase), but haven't come up to speed on that issue yet.	dev42
I would like to chase down that issue some more before a loud alarm is sounded, however.	dev42
I'll get a grasp on the hearing protocol, as I know Dave is very interested in that aspect of the process.	dev42
Kay	dev42
Per your request.	dev42
Kay	dev42
This is an internal draft, which has not been sent to CRRA, as far as I know.	dev42
Kay	dev42
Here's my suggestion: 27.3 Consequential Losses.	dev42
The Parties have agreed to liquidate certaindirect damages and have provided for these damages as Liquidated Damages anCancellation Fees.	dev42
For purposes of this Section, Liquidated Damages and Cancellation Fees shall not be deemed consequential losses.	dev42
In no event,whether as a result of breach of contract, breach of warranty, indemnity,tort liability (including negligence or strict liability without regard tofault) or otherwise, and whether arising before or after completion of theScope of Work, shall either Party be liable to the other Party for special,indirect, exemplary or consequential losses of any nature whatsoever, including losses or damages caused by reason of unavailability of the Equipment, shutdowns or service interruptions, loss of use, loss of profitsor revenue, inventory or use charges, cost of purchased or replacement poweinterest charges or cost of capital or claims of a Party,s customers.	dev42
For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing limitation of liability in this Section shall in no case not limit Seller,s obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Purchaser Indemnified Parties in accordance with Article XX for anclaims Third Party Claim, including Claims involving the Third Party's consequential losses, losses or damages occasioned by third parties.	dev42
in accordance with Article XX,	dev42
I have in mind a contract that EECC and NEPCO will agree is the ENA form contract, so that there isn't a need to come up with two different contract forms.	dev42
Is that too high of a mountain to climb?	dev42
I hope this didn't sound flippant, cuz I didn't mean it that way.	dev42
Kay	dev42
This is the one you looked at and left me comments.	dev42
Your comments aren't in this draft (timing), but I want to pick them up in the next go round.	dev42

Figures, of course.

dev42

Thanks for asking.

dev42

I'm watching for some good vacation days, also...

dev42

We are staying at the Hyatt Hill Country Resort, which is nice.

dev42

There will be a private party as SeaWorld, which could be fun.

dev42

They usually do everything first class all the way, since it is the officers shindig.

dev42

I get to see some nice people I only see once a year.

dev42

Everyone parties hard, too.

dev42

Diet time!

dev42

I've done ok so far, considering the travel.

dev42

This means I've lost the weight I gained when I was on the road every week.

dev42

I have a couple of questions so I can wrap up the LOI: We refer to licensed Fuel Cell Energy equipment.

dev42

Do we intend to reference a particular manufacturer, or should this be more generic?

dev42

Do we want to attach a draft of the Development Agreement, and condition the final deal on agreeing to terms substantially the same as what's in the draft?

dev42

I have a concern that the Enron optionality bug could bite us on the backside with that one.

dev42

Do we expect to have ONE EPC contract, or several?

dev42

I'm looking for the confidentiality agreement, which may be in Bart's files (haven't checked closely yet).

dev42

If anyone has it handy, it could speed things up for me.

dev42

Thanks, Kay

dev42

Forget the ONE or more contract questions.

dev42

I see we expect to have separate contracts for each project.

dev42

Enron North America Corp.

dev42

On the issue of the contracts, the draft says that the $170m is paid when the EPC contract is signed.

dev42

Are we expecting that the portion attributable to each project will be paid as the individual EPC contracts are signed?

dev42

Thanks, Kay

dev42

Remarkably clear explanation.

dev42

Here's a draft letter for CRRA.

dev42

I didn't send it to Jeff since he is out today.

dev42

Kay

dev42

Hi Cle, FYI.

dev42

Kay

dev42

I think you and I may have different documents.

dev42

Maybe we should compare.

dev42

Thanks, Kay

dev42

What time?

dev42

FYI.

dev42

Meeting is at 100

dev42

Per your request.

dev42

FYI, no action requested at this time.

dev42

Being first is overrated.

dev42

IS IT TIME YET???

dev42

Allyson, You should receive some formation documents relating to Edgecombe Development.

dev42

The name is not spelled correctly (missing an "e"), but that is being corrected at this time.

dev42

Bob spoke to me about wanting Enron to send a letter concerning the financing arrangements for the project.

dev42

I would like for us to discuss this as well.

dev42

Kay

dev42

This is a comparison to their version.

dev42

I think I have a comparison to ours as well.

dev42

Kay

dev42

A comparison to ours.

dev42

Kay

dev42

Hi Gregg, I was out of the office on Friday, so I just now heard your voice mail.

dev42

I haven't been through all my email, but I haven't seen anything from Stephanie on email.

dev42

I do have a hard copy version which is too long to fax with confidence.

dev42

I'll give the forms a look, and fax them your way with some type of disclaimer for Peoples benefit.

dev42

Kay

dev42

I've worked with Kilpatrick Stockton's North Carolina office quite a bit, mostly regulatory- they are so so.

dev42

It is my understanding that the Atlanta office messed up a simple thing for Lisa, and that's all I know about them.

dev42

I've worked extensively with King & Spalding, both their Houston office (multiple matters) and Atlanta (two matters), and have had good results.

dev42

I've always worked through John Keffer in Houston, who then hooked me up with the right folks in Atlanta.

dev42

Kay

dev42

Okey dokey.

dev42

Wanna go?

dev42

Sounds like fun to me.

dev42

Michael will love it.

dev42

Kay

dev42

Sounds good to me.

dev42

I'll check with Neil.

dev42

I know Michael would love it.

dev42

Thanks, Kay

dev42

Hi John, Question.

dev42

Can we agree that a form contract will work for both EECC and NEPCO?

dev42

Sure would make life easier.

dev42

Kay

dev42

Pretty small stuff from a dollar standpoint.

dev42

Perhaps the sky is not falling.

dev42

Gentlemen, I've recently become involved in the "cell sale" side, meaning the transaction to sell the Fuel Cell equipment cells to CRRA.

dev42

I've met the Fuel Cell folks, but have not met anyone with CRRA yet.

dev42

Currently, I'm preparing a letter of intent for Enron/CRRA for the purchase/sale of the cells, have a development agreement prepared by outside counsel to review, and need to come up with a draft purchase agreement for FCE to review.

dev42

I'll make sure Dan is in the loop on as much of that as he cares to read.

dev42

I've heard a rumor of an issue regarding the authority of CRRA to purchase the equipment (perhaps relating to the use of bond money for the purchase), but haven't come up to speed on that issue yet.

dev42

I would like to chase down that issue some more before a loud alarm is sounded, however.

dev42

I'll get a grasp on the hearing protocol, as I know Dave is very interested in that aspect of the process.

dev42

Kay

dev42

Per your request.

dev42

Kay

dev42

This is an internal draft, which has not been sent to CRRA, as far as I know.

dev42

Kay

dev42

Here's my suggestion: 27.3 Consequential Losses.

dev42

The Parties have agreed to liquidate certaindirect damages and have provided for these damages as Liquidated Damages anCancellation Fees.

dev42

For purposes of this Section, Liquidated Damages and Cancellation Fees shall not be deemed consequential losses.

dev42

In no event,whether as a result of breach of contract, breach of warranty, indemnity,tort liability (including negligence or strict liability without regard tofault) or otherwise, and whether arising before or after completion of theScope of Work, shall either Party be liable to the other Party for special,indirect, exemplary or consequential losses of any nature whatsoever, including losses or damages caused by reason of unavailability of the Equipment, shutdowns or service interruptions, loss of use, loss of profitsor revenue, inventory or use charges, cost of purchased or replacement poweinterest charges or cost of capital or claims of a Party,s customers.

dev42

For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing limitation of liability in this Section shall in no case not limit Seller,s obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Purchaser Indemnified Parties in accordance with Article XX for anclaims Third Party Claim, including Claims involving the Third Party's consequential losses, losses or damages occasioned by third parties.

dev42

in accordance with Article XX,

dev42

I have in mind a contract that EECC and NEPCO will agree is the ENA form contract, so that there isn't a need to come up with two different contract forms.

dev42

Is that too high of a mountain to climb?

dev42

I hope this didn't sound flippant, cuz I didn't mean it that way.

dev42

Kay

dev42

This is the one you looked at and left me comments.

dev42

Your comments aren't in this draft (timing), but I want to pick them up in the next go round.

dev42