figmtu/enron_personalization_dev_uncapped · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 1 4.46k	employee_id stringclasses 45 values
General Terms and Conditions I don't see where the buyer has much financial leverage for performance/warranty issues.	dev42.message.text
Final payment is made at shipment, with the Buyer having the benefit of a 10% retention bond; however, the retention bond expires at Provisional Acceptance.	dev42.message.text
There is no financial leverage for Final Acceptance or the warranty period.	dev42.message.text
Also, usually provisional or final acceptance requires that GE provide the operating manuals.	dev42.message.text
The assignment language (8) is somewhat narrow.	dev42.message.text
I don't know the deal, so I don't know how it fits.	dev42.message.text
It can help to have language which allows for free assignment after provisional acceptance or payment in full, whichever occurs first.	dev42.message.text
Also, the contract can allow for a substitute guaranty as payment security, in lieu of the buyer guaranty.	dev42.message.text
Again, I don't know the deal so this may be fine as is.	dev42.message.text
The contract incorporates GE's proposal as a part of the contract, but does not give an order of precedence.	dev42.message.text
I haven't seen the proposal or any other technical exhibits, but sometimes these can be very self-serving.	dev42.message.text
Therefore, you can potentially lose ground with what is in the exhibit.	dev42.message.text
Warranty.	dev42.message.text
The language is a bit confusing to me, especially the interplay of the 1st and 2nd paragraph.	dev42.message.text
Also, the "outs" they have are very broad.	dev42.message.text
It is better if there outs are limited to installation/operation/maintenance not in accoredance with their written instructions (alternatively, industry practice).	dev42.message.text
Also, they have an out if repairs are performed without their permission, but there's no time line or urgency for their response to a warranty claim.	dev42.message.text
A statement that they must provide a service engineer within 3 days or so might help.	dev42.message.text
I also suggest being clear that 1.2 applies to warranty obligations, but their obligation to respond quickly to warranty problems need to be explicit.	dev42.message.text
Excusable Delay.	dev42.message.text
(15) I would delete "indirectly" from the 3rd line.	dev42.message.text
Provisional Acceptance.	dev42.message.text
I don't understand the phrase "only to the extent and proportional share".	dev42.message.text
Does this mean that GE may not be liable for the full LD's, or that the buyer has to prove a right to collect LD's?	dev42.message.text
Litigation.	dev42.message.text
The dispute resolution (mediation then litigation) is not consistent with the usual arbitration route we request.	dev42.message.text
I didn't take a hard look at LD's, since I assumed these are settled.	dev42.message.text
13.6 Enron typically gets more precise language than this.	dev42.message.text
For instance, I would delete or clarify the phrase "including that due to environment or operation", as being vague.	dev42.message.text
13.6 (i)The phrase "proper storage, installation, operation and maintenance" should be as defined by GE's written instructions, or at least based on industry standards.	dev42.message.text
13.6 (ii) could conceivably allow them to drag their feet on a repair, then not allow us to get someone else to do the work.	dev42.message.text
14.1 The last line should include the words "strict liability" after "negligence".	dev42.message.text
GE ususally gives us indemnity for any hazardous substance they introduce.	dev42.message.text
This is a quick look.	dev42.message.text
If you need more detailed information (and you think there's time to negotiate further), I can look at it in more detail.	dev42.message.text
Kay	dev42.message.text
Per your voice mail.	dev42.message.text
Kay	dev42.message.text
Does this mean the LV Co Gen deal has fallen apart, or are there some new LM's in our future?	dev42.message.text
Makes sense to me.	dev42.message.text
Dick, Thanks for your reply.	dev42.message.text
I have since been assured that we will build on what has happened thus far, which is a huge relief to me.	dev42.message.text
If we see forward progress tomorrow we will be all smiles.	dev42.message.text
Again, thanks for your reply.	dev42.message.text
Kay	dev42.message.text
One thing to put on the list (which may be there all ready) is that we want our officers/directors to effectively resign at closing.	dev42.message.text
Another detail (and note who is getting this email): I've had three instances recently where agreements have been forwarded to the counterparty prior to legal review.	dev42.message.text
As much as I hate to suggest this, it may be best to have the drafts forwarded to Enron Legal before the commercial team receives the docs.	dev42.message.text
Kay	dev42.message.text
Has Herman seen this or the 1st amendment?	dev42.message.text
Please let me talk to Ben.	dev42.message.text
Thanks, Kay	dev42.message.text
Just use a regular CA (yes, I changed my mind), describe as a power generation transaction (no equipment reference).	dev42.message.text
Thanks,	dev42.message.text
I don't think we need the language, especially since the guarantees won't apply to retrofitting the plant later.	dev42.message.text
Ben Jacoby is having an offsite Friday at the Hyatt for the East Development group to discuss 2001.	dev42.message.text
He has asked me (and I think Roger) to sit in. I'm planning on attending.	dev42.message.text
I'm sure either or both of you are welcome, although it won't be a problem if you don't attend.	dev42.message.text
Kay	dev42.message.text
What fun.	dev42.message.text
I know T. Mueller is on holiday.	dev42.message.text
I suspect he would want AI and St. Paul to agree in writing that this doesn't prejudice any rights/constitute a waiver, etc. You may have considered this already, but payment to /request for payment to EEPC may trigger the responsibility to pay VAT.	dev42.message.text
Good luck, and keep me posted.	dev42.message.text
Kay	dev42.message.text
Here's a first stab at the LOI.	dev42.message.text
I just guessed on the attachment.	dev42.message.text
I have a couple of questions: Any thought as to how we get/split money (other than the obvious up side for us)?	dev42.message.text
Do we want to work toward a "Project Development Agreement" which will set forth the basis for how we develop projects on a project-by-project basis?	dev42.message.text
Or do you envision a different next step?	dev42.message.text
Talk to you soon, Kay	dev42.message.text
Please call Lee Johnson and tell him that one of our development lawyers, Roger Balog, would like 2 tickets for Friday.	dev42.message.text
I hear Ben wants a ticket for Thursday, but I assume he communicated that to Lee.	dev42.message.text
Thank him for me, but I have my closing dinner tomorrow, and no sitter Friday.	dev42.message.text
Thanks, Kay	dev42.message.text
Do you mean LITERALLY across the street?	dev42.message.text
Yikes.	dev42.message.text
That's making it tough to ignore.	dev42.message.text
Steak doesn't really appeal to me.	dev42.message.text
Maybe a Ciro's salad?	dev42.message.text
Lee just called, and he is here, so if you haven't called him yet, please don't.	dev42.message.text
Kay	dev42.message.text
Hi there, Lee doesn't remember getting a fax from me yesterday.	dev42.message.text
Did you get a confirmation back?	dev42.message.text
It was the same fax that was sent to Pete Thompson.	dev42.message.text
Thanks, Kay	dev42.message.text
I'll forward the email and you can print and fax.	dev42.message.text
No big deal.	dev42.message.text
Thank you.	dev42.message.text
Gregg, I think I'm in good shape and can look at what John sent tonight.	dev42.message.text
Ed, just stand by and I'll holler if I need anything.	dev42.message.text
Thanks, Kay	dev42.message.text
Brian, I didn't get the revised draft.	dev42.message.text
Kay	dev42.message.text
ok.	dev42.message.text
I thought it was a lot to ask.	dev42.message.text
Here's a revised draft of the agreement with Peoples.	dev42.message.text
Kay	dev42.message.text
Here 'tis:	dev42.message.text
Hi there, I'm forwarding a draft EPC contract for your review.	dev42.message.text
This form of contract assumes that the equipment will be procurred by the Owner, with the understanding that we have not resolved the issue of the timing of the procurement of the equipment, and how it will be procurred.	dev42.message.text

General Terms and Conditions I don't see where the buyer has much financial leverage for performance/warranty issues.

dev42.message.text

Final payment is made at shipment, with the Buyer having the benefit of a 10% retention bond; however, the retention bond expires at Provisional Acceptance.

dev42.message.text

There is no financial leverage for Final Acceptance or the warranty period.

dev42.message.text

Also, usually provisional or final acceptance requires that GE provide the operating manuals.

dev42.message.text

The assignment language (8) is somewhat narrow.

dev42.message.text

I don't know the deal, so I don't know how it fits.

dev42.message.text

It can help to have language which allows for free assignment after provisional acceptance or payment in full, whichever occurs first.

dev42.message.text

Also, the contract can allow for a substitute guaranty as payment security, in lieu of the buyer guaranty.

dev42.message.text

Again, I don't know the deal so this may be fine as is.

dev42.message.text

The contract incorporates GE's proposal as a part of the contract, but does not give an order of precedence.

dev42.message.text

I haven't seen the proposal or any other technical exhibits, but sometimes these can be very self-serving.

dev42.message.text

Therefore, you can potentially lose ground with what is in the exhibit.

dev42.message.text

Warranty.

dev42.message.text

The language is a bit confusing to me, especially the interplay of the 1st and 2nd paragraph.

dev42.message.text

Also, the "outs" they have are very broad.

dev42.message.text

It is better if there outs are limited to installation/operation/maintenance not in accoredance with their written instructions (alternatively, industry practice).

dev42.message.text

Also, they have an out if repairs are performed without their permission, but there's no time line or urgency for their response to a warranty claim.

dev42.message.text

A statement that they must provide a service engineer within 3 days or so might help.

dev42.message.text

I also suggest being clear that 1.2 applies to warranty obligations, but their obligation to respond quickly to warranty problems need to be explicit.

dev42.message.text

Excusable Delay.

dev42.message.text

(15) I would delete "indirectly" from the 3rd line.

dev42.message.text

Provisional Acceptance.

dev42.message.text

I don't understand the phrase "only to the extent and proportional share".

dev42.message.text

Does this mean that GE may not be liable for the full LD's, or that the buyer has to prove a right to collect LD's?

dev42.message.text

Litigation.

dev42.message.text

The dispute resolution (mediation then litigation) is not consistent with the usual arbitration route we request.

dev42.message.text

I didn't take a hard look at LD's, since I assumed these are settled.

dev42.message.text

13.6 Enron typically gets more precise language than this.

dev42.message.text

For instance, I would delete or clarify the phrase "including that due to environment or operation", as being vague.

dev42.message.text

13.6 (i)The phrase "proper storage, installation, operation and maintenance" should be as defined by GE's written instructions, or at least based on industry standards.

dev42.message.text

13.6 (ii) could conceivably allow them to drag their feet on a repair, then not allow us to get someone else to do the work.

dev42.message.text

14.1 The last line should include the words "strict liability" after "negligence".

dev42.message.text

GE ususally gives us indemnity for any hazardous substance they introduce.

dev42.message.text

This is a quick look.

dev42.message.text

If you need more detailed information (and you think there's time to negotiate further), I can look at it in more detail.

dev42.message.text

Kay

dev42.message.text

Per your voice mail.

dev42.message.text

Kay

dev42.message.text

Does this mean the LV Co Gen deal has fallen apart, or are there some new LM's in our future?

dev42.message.text

Makes sense to me.

dev42.message.text

Dick, Thanks for your reply.

dev42.message.text

I have since been assured that we will build on what has happened thus far, which is a huge relief to me.

dev42.message.text

If we see forward progress tomorrow we will be all smiles.

dev42.message.text

Again, thanks for your reply.

dev42.message.text

Kay

dev42.message.text

One thing to put on the list (which may be there all ready) is that we want our officers/directors to effectively resign at closing.

dev42.message.text

Another detail (and note who is getting this email): I've had three instances recently where agreements have been forwarded to the counterparty prior to legal review.

dev42.message.text

As much as I hate to suggest this, it may be best to have the drafts forwarded to Enron Legal before the commercial team receives the docs.

dev42.message.text

Kay

dev42.message.text

Has Herman seen this or the 1st amendment?

dev42.message.text

Please let me talk to Ben.

dev42.message.text

Thanks, Kay

dev42.message.text

Just use a regular CA (yes, I changed my mind), describe as a power generation transaction (no equipment reference).

dev42.message.text

Thanks,

dev42.message.text

I don't think we need the language, especially since the guarantees won't apply to retrofitting the plant later.

dev42.message.text

Ben Jacoby is having an offsite Friday at the Hyatt for the East Development group to discuss 2001.

dev42.message.text

He has asked me (and I think Roger) to sit in. I'm planning on attending.

dev42.message.text

I'm sure either or both of you are welcome, although it won't be a problem if you don't attend.

dev42.message.text

Kay

dev42.message.text

What fun.

dev42.message.text

I know T. Mueller is on holiday.

dev42.message.text

I suspect he would want AI and St. Paul to agree in writing that this doesn't prejudice any rights/constitute a waiver, etc. You may have considered this already, but payment to /request for payment to EEPC may trigger the responsibility to pay VAT.

dev42.message.text

Good luck, and keep me posted.

dev42.message.text

Kay

dev42.message.text

Here's a first stab at the LOI.

dev42.message.text

I just guessed on the attachment.

dev42.message.text

I have a couple of questions: Any thought as to how we get/split money (other than the obvious up side for us)?

dev42.message.text

Do we want to work toward a "Project Development Agreement" which will set forth the basis for how we develop projects on a project-by-project basis?

dev42.message.text

Or do you envision a different next step?

dev42.message.text

Talk to you soon, Kay

dev42.message.text

Please call Lee Johnson and tell him that one of our development lawyers, Roger Balog, would like 2 tickets for Friday.

dev42.message.text

I hear Ben wants a ticket for Thursday, but I assume he communicated that to Lee.

dev42.message.text

Thank him for me, but I have my closing dinner tomorrow, and no sitter Friday.

dev42.message.text

Thanks, Kay

dev42.message.text

Do you mean LITERALLY across the street?

dev42.message.text

Yikes.

dev42.message.text

That's making it tough to ignore.

dev42.message.text

Steak doesn't really appeal to me.

dev42.message.text

Maybe a Ciro's salad?

dev42.message.text

Lee just called, and he is here, so if you haven't called him yet, please don't.

dev42.message.text

Kay

dev42.message.text

Hi there, Lee doesn't remember getting a fax from me yesterday.

dev42.message.text

Did you get a confirmation back?

dev42.message.text

It was the same fax that was sent to Pete Thompson.

dev42.message.text

Thanks, Kay

dev42.message.text

I'll forward the email and you can print and fax.

dev42.message.text

No big deal.

dev42.message.text

Thank you.

dev42.message.text

Gregg, I think I'm in good shape and can look at what John sent tonight.

dev42.message.text

Ed, just stand by and I'll holler if I need anything.

dev42.message.text

Thanks, Kay

dev42.message.text

Brian, I didn't get the revised draft.

dev42.message.text

Kay

dev42.message.text

ok.

dev42.message.text

I thought it was a lot to ask.

dev42.message.text

Here's a revised draft of the agreement with Peoples.

dev42.message.text

Kay

dev42.message.text

Here 'tis:

dev42.message.text

Hi there, I'm forwarding a draft EPC contract for your review.

dev42.message.text

This form of contract assumes that the equipment will be procurred by the Owner, with the understanding that we have not resolved the issue of the timing of the procurement of the equipment, and how it will be procurred.

dev42.message.text