text stringlengths 44 390k | embeddings listlengths 768 768 |
|---|---|
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his common law personal injury action and his workmen’s compensation action on summary judgment motions. The personal injury action was dismissed because workmen’s compensation was determined to be plaintiff’s exclusive remedy. The workmen’s compe... | [
-0.021020684391260147,
-0.026259830221533775,
-0.011740811169147491,
0.00561771122738719,
0.043426696211099625,
0.01673373579978943,
0.0392240472137928,
0.051458269357681274,
0.010038414970040321,
-0.036794401705265045,
0.02049648016691208,
0.0372898168861866,
-0.05204956606030464,
0.06539... |
OPINION
BOSSON, Judge.
This case arises out of a claimed easement across the land of Defendants benefitting Plaintiffs who are neighboring landowners. Defendants contend that the trial court erred by interpreting their deed from a predecessor in title to include the creation of an express easement. Plaintiffs cross-app... | [
-0.032091181725263596,
-0.02555246837437153,
-0.031662337481975555,
0.007398772519081831,
0.0488460510969162,
-0.01830333098769188,
0.05732457712292671,
0.02434929832816124,
-0.003989768214523792,
-0.032794881612062454,
0.026391685009002686,
0.03618041053414345,
-0.05793270841240883,
0.050... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
The State of New Mexico petitioned this Court on a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals in State v. Chapman, Ct.App. No. 7299 (Filed November 23, 1983). The jury found the respondent competent to stand trial and the Court of Appeals reversed. The Court of Appeals d... | [
-0.043571848422288895,
-0.017977338284254074,
-0.023720111697912216,
0.008080564439296722,
0.052966803312301636,
0.015098047442734241,
0.05934283137321472,
0.031064264476299286,
-0.004922946449369192,
-0.04418712109327316,
0.050830643624067307,
0.037638287991285324,
-0.02152824029326439,
0... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after trial on the merits denying his claims for workmen’s compensation benefits. We discuss two issues: (1) claim of error in denying opportunity to file requested findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (2) whether the trial court adopted a... | [
0.000795230211224407,
-0.012030266225337982,
-0.008556515909731388,
-0.011096680536866188,
0.0644458457827568,
0.009680359624326229,
0.04132634028792381,
0.03934802487492561,
-0.010672410018742085,
-0.07233121246099472,
0.002257074462249875,
0.020079515874385834,
-0.04372875392436981,
0.04... |
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of escape from jail, aggravated battery on a peace officer, aggravated burglary, larceny over $100, and unlawful taking of a motor vehicle. The sole issue raised in the initial docketing statement was whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion, ma... | [
-0.029246842488646507,
-0.03313358873128891,
-0.01899293251335621,
0.02088102325797081,
0.04850376024842262,
0.0038134462665766478,
0.04321747645735741,
0.00015406968304887414,
-0.010101649910211563,
-0.06995200365781784,
0.005764070898294449,
0.023748906329274178,
-0.042884908616542816,
0... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
Petitioner, Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (Southern Pacific), filed a petition for writ of prohibition, writ of mandamus, or writ of superintending control stating that the district court’s denial of its timely motion for a change of venue and subse quent order to proceed to jury trial i... | [
-0.029024258255958557,
-0.05226705223321915,
-0.03933560848236084,
0.03450765088200569,
0.037121932953596115,
-0.012643573805689812,
0.05133722350001335,
0.04398372769355774,
-0.021362872794270515,
-0.04675474017858505,
0.026014449074864388,
0.026508629322052002,
-0.04167675971984863,
0.06... |
OPINION
BLACK, Judge.
Brim Healthcare, Inc. (Brim), a corporation headquartered in Oregon, contracted to provide management services to two hospitals in northern New Mexico. Brim’s services consisted of a management consultant function and a personnel staffing function.
In 1991, the New Mexico Department of Taxation an... | [
-0.024975819513201714,
-0.0018516123527660966,
-0.015547426417469978,
-0.021132273599505424,
0.02950270287692547,
-0.022846654057502747,
0.05703846737742424,
0.042596235871315,
0.014360882341861725,
-0.02489316649734974,
0.019272051751613617,
0.061591219156980515,
-0.07679373025894165,
0.0... |
OPINION
FLORES, Judge.
The opinion filed November 1, 1994, is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.
Defendant pled guilty to trafficking by possession with intent to distribute cocaine, reserving the right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his pre-trial motions. The trial court denied Defendant’s motion... | [
-0.019359704107046127,
-0.002575546270236373,
-0.029921703040599823,
0.022168658673763275,
0.0823066458106041,
-0.021683109924197197,
0.03920862078666687,
0.015776481479406357,
-0.019623426720499992,
-0.03698665276169777,
0.03253370523452759,
0.01860032044351101,
-0.06395629793405533,
0.02... |
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
This matter came before the Court for imposition of discipline on Leo C. Kelly for conversion of client funds from his trust account. For the reasons set forth below, we decline to adopt the recommendation of the disciplinary board that Kelly receive a partially deferred indefinite suspension. Rathe... | [
-0.01504396554082632,
-0.04268355667591095,
-0.009865299798548222,
0.01929338090121746,
0.051462527364492416,
-0.006647361442446709,
0.03203084319829941,
0.02658952958881855,
0.02366521768271923,
-0.02173641137778759,
0.017841989174485207,
0.06089465692639351,
-0.037877850234508514,
0.0323... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals an adverse jury verdict in a medical malpractice action which alleged negligence by defendant doctors in administering certain drugs to plaintiff during postoperative care. We discuss whether the trial court erred in 1) admitting a medical opinion letter into evidence, and 2) g... | [
0.01708265393972397,
-0.021063318476080894,
-0.003809630870819092,
-0.027142269536852837,
0.05020992085337639,
-0.0026861801743507385,
0.0704600140452385,
0.011208592914044857,
-0.013031940907239914,
-0.026334429159760475,
0.044183529913425446,
0.04763197898864746,
-0.06255722045898438,
0.... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Plaintiffs Central Adjustment Bureau and Vista Sandia Hospital (Central Adjustment) obtained a default judgment against defendant Corrine Vener Thevenet for a debt on an open account. When they were unable to collect from Corrine, a garnishment was issued and a judgment entered against Equitab... | [
-0.03535767272114754,
-0.03815755993127823,
0.005501754116266966,
-0.02048376016318798,
0.03664851933717728,
0.04091569036245346,
0.029579423367977142,
0.03211140260100365,
0.012203608639538288,
-0.030367577448487282,
0.016570206731557846,
0.04426388815045357,
-0.05231940746307373,
0.06770... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
Defendant-Appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), appeals an order of summary judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee, Tony R. Samora (Samora). We address the question not answered in Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. v. Martinez, 115 N.M. 141, 144, 84... | [
0.00001813731978472788,
-0.045941032469272614,
-0.019187631085515022,
-0.002416480565443635,
0.056223880499601364,
0.031063662841916084,
0.04408688098192215,
-0.004758710972964764,
0.020543087273836136,
-0.038918547332286835,
0.0169566348195076,
0.03141450136899948,
-0.043062642216682434,
... |
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
NMSA 1978, § 57-1-1 (Cum.Supp.1982), part of our Antitrust Act, pertains to restraint of trade. Prohibited restraints of trade may be dealt with in civil or criminal proceedings. NMSA 1978, §§ 57-1-3 and 57-1-6 (Cum.Supp.1982). Defendant was charged with criminal restraint of trade. The charge was ... | [
-0.053564947098493576,
0.007543453946709633,
-0.05765760317444801,
0.031885746866464615,
0.059200502932071686,
-0.025819817557930946,
0.059370655566453934,
0.01969113200902939,
0.015873407945036888,
-0.040390510112047195,
-0.016078682616353035,
0.0520951934158802,
-0.08927404135465622,
0.0... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
The respondent, Rita D. Winters, surviving widow of decedent Kenneth D. Harcrow, appeals from an order of the trial court denying her motion for the payment of a lump sum award of workers’ compensation benefits following her remarriage. On appeal respondent raises two issues: (1) error in... | [
-0.03341541811823845,
-0.0420084223151207,
-0.011767158284783363,
-0.006790148559957743,
0.05986463278532028,
0.00005104302181280218,
0.0356537289917469,
0.019694678485393524,
0.00842609629034996,
-0.03877013176679611,
-0.016399690881371498,
0.03240062668919563,
-0.044882915914058685,
0.05... |
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
Plaintiffs Larry and Janet Sprague (Spragues) brought suit in district court seeking a declaratory judgment that City of Las Vegas Resolution No. 68-32 (First Resolution) relinquished defendant City of Las Vegas’ (City) ownership of certain public land and that City of Las Vegas Resolution No.... | [
-0.016104672104120255,
-0.010399643331766129,
-0.012782533653080463,
0.02712780050933361,
0.031339846551418304,
-0.008291009813547134,
0.04642193391919136,
0.001559375785291195,
0.024343937635421753,
-0.01666238345205784,
-0.015908127650618553,
0.0583844892680645,
-0.03599332645535469,
0.0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The historical and current public policy of this state is to favor the settlement of disputed claims. Ratzlaff v. Seven Bar Flying Service, Inc., 98 N.M. 159, 646 P.2d 586 (Ct.App.1982). This policy applies to the settlement of lawsuits. Jones v. United Minerals Corp., 93 N.M. 706, 604 P.2d 1240 (1... | [
-0.058352772146463394,
-0.03279123455286026,
0.030087977647781372,
0.012764942832291126,
0.048724107444286346,
0.04694651439785957,
0.01233806274831295,
0.005520311184227467,
0.00048739041085354984,
-0.049957651644945145,
0.011939525604248047,
0.03908750042319298,
-0.07804037630558014,
0.0... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
The State appeals the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of the charges against defendant of aggravated burglary and criminal sexual penetration in the first degree for failure to bring the matter to trial within six months. We reverse.
On January 30, 1981, a petition was filed in the childr... | [
-0.065676249563694,
-0.029731808230280876,
0.0036290811840444803,
-0.010018953122198582,
0.06825169175863266,
0.03264791518449783,
0.06861094385385513,
-0.007293283008038998,
-0.0029537638183683157,
-0.020116731524467468,
-0.004975708667188883,
0.016547374427318573,
-0.04310823231935501,
0... |
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
This matter having come before this Court after disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to SCRA 1986, Rules Governing Discipline, wherein attorney Mike L. Benavidez was found to have committed violations of the former Code of Professional Responsibility and of the present Rules of Professional C... | [
-0.04131203889846802,
-0.025484759360551834,
-0.003970637917518616,
-0.005141091533005238,
0.035062920302152634,
-0.015622046776115894,
0.02870742790400982,
0.03655781224370003,
-0.001795063610188663,
-0.01530835684388876,
0.025870824232697487,
0.05362463369965553,
-0.06435661762952805,
0.... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
This is a direct appeal from the New Mexico Public Service Commission (Commission) pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 62-11-1 (Repl.Pamp.1984). Robert and Kathy Gonzales (appellants) appeal from the Commission’s order in New Mexico Public Service Commission (N.M.P.S.C.) Case No. 1828 which ... | [
-0.0493706539273262,
-0.05081959441304207,
-0.006703051272779703,
0.012178432196378708,
0.050600066781044006,
0.014566374011337757,
0.006236927583813667,
0.032323941588401794,
0.03544554486870766,
-0.04219013452529907,
0.015494931489229202,
0.05180324986577034,
-0.058286502957344055,
0.036... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
This is a wrongful death action wherein recovery is sought against an emergency room physician and a hospital due to the alleged negligence of the emergency room physician and a nurse. Plaintiff appeals an order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant hospital. Two issues are ... | [
-0.05217420682311058,
-0.037285976111888885,
0.025650259107351303,
-0.02129051648080349,
0.06324707716703415,
-0.02152387984097004,
0.07745975255966187,
0.024160800501704216,
-0.008657294325530529,
-0.03619769588112831,
0.007105967495590448,
0.02111000567674637,
-0.033590734004974365,
0.03... |
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Jaramillo purchased a gas regulator from Cotton Butane Company (Cotton). The regulator was manufactured by Fisher Controls Company (Fisher). The function of the regulator was to control the amount of propane gas moving from a tank of propane to an appliance. Arrow Gas Company (Arrow) had filled the... | [
-0.026157688349485397,
-0.023343365639448166,
-0.04481513053178787,
0.0003977242740802467,
0.04854940250515938,
0.0008678592275828123,
0.02709229290485382,
-0.00887797400355339,
0.0032732049003243446,
-0.04491771385073662,
0.00563577888533473,
0.050657063722610474,
-0.04162554442882538,
0.... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Appellant Apostolic Tabernacle de Las Cruces (Church) appeals from an order of the district court restraining it from operating a school on its church premises in Las Cruces contrary to the city zoning code. The Church raises three issues on appeal: (1) claim that the operation of a schoo... | [
-0.008530009537935257,
-0.0171035248786211,
-0.0159640870988369,
0.015744052827358246,
0.038140106946229935,
-0.014180956408381462,
0.07374701648950577,
0.037397269159555435,
0.015589890070259571,
-0.01670137047767639,
-0.02120717614889145,
0.027379870414733887,
-0.06125525385141373,
0.042... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
This court granted defendant Roche Laboratories’ application for an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. The issue is whether Richards v. Upjohn Co., 95 N.M. 675, 625 P.2d 1192 (Ct.App.1980), precludes summary judgment as a matter of law, in f... | [
0.015445936471223831,
-0.006585901137441397,
-0.02948707528412342,
-0.023146210238337517,
0.044355422258377075,
-0.007314566522836685,
0.04040634632110596,
0.03489065170288086,
0.0030901990830898285,
-0.03450003266334534,
0.029926611110568047,
0.03315143659710884,
-0.03743022307753563,
0.0... |
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
This case concerns the division of property after a divorce. We discuss the value of pension benefits, disposition of the house, and the effect of the wife’s untimely filing of her cross-appeal.
Manuel Madrid (husband) began working for Kennecott Copper Corporation in 1939. He and Anne Madrid (wife... | [
-0.029409440234303474,
-0.030480187386274338,
-0.012829335406422615,
0.04627091810107231,
0.06596548110246658,
0.011206838302314281,
0.008598950691521168,
-0.002931388793513179,
0.003173858392983675,
-0.04082004725933075,
-0.03526116907596588,
0.04132482409477234,
-0.02800786681473255,
0.0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The United States issued an oil and gas lease for lands in Eddy County, New Mexico. Plaintiff sought to quiet title, alleging that he was “the owner and holder in fee simple of (i) a 10% net profits interest, and (ii) an overriding royalty of 1% of the amount of all oil, gas, casinghead gas and oth... | [
-0.017626537010073662,
-0.03369900584220886,
0.0015934004914015532,
0.027176519855856895,
0.07752957940101624,
-0.021731002256274223,
0.022924553602933884,
0.042549580335617065,
0.03018474020063877,
-0.03714470937848091,
0.013866807334125042,
0.03522529825568199,
-0.06236445903778076,
0.06... |
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Plaintiffs, the widow and minor children of Robert Shaw, Sr., assert that the worker’s compensation law provides two separate and unrelated methods by which dependents (see NMSA 1978, § 52-1-17) may obtain compensation on the basis of the death of a worker. The specific contention is that NMSA 1978... | [
-0.03754527121782303,
-0.021343044936656952,
-0.0029495086055248976,
-0.013621189631521702,
0.05718115717172623,
0.03460511565208435,
0.042721692472696304,
0.000738348055165261,
-0.007276950404047966,
-0.04807798191905022,
0.002111634938046336,
0.037912461906671524,
-0.04230332002043724,
0... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Plaintiffs originally appealed to this court from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant bank. Two issues were raised: (1) whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of bank; and (2) whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment rather than ... | [
-0.03947516530752182,
-0.06971701234579086,
-0.037212032824754715,
0.0026341548655182123,
0.022959651425480843,
0.013492466881871223,
0.04942672327160835,
0.024441860616207123,
0.0038372466806322336,
-0.02782539464533329,
0.004136571194976568,
0.022123416885733604,
-0.04969565570354462,
0.... |
OPINION
APODACA, Chief Judge.
Michael Guebara (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) seized from a motor vehicle. We must decide whether, in order to observe a VIN generally and otherwise observable from outside an automobile, a police officer may ... | [
-0.04379187896847725,
-0.01757761649787426,
-0.020181963220238686,
0.060555823147296906,
0.042882759124040604,
-0.006053888704627752,
0.03564465790987015,
0.0079804053530097,
0.006717044860124588,
-0.03607097640633583,
0.04412597790360451,
0.0656316876411438,
-0.056714750826358795,
0.05868... |
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
Petitioners, several citizens and three New Mexico legislators, filed their verified petition seeking a writ of mandamus from this Court directing Respondents, who together serve as the State Canvassing Board, not to certify the vote held on November 8, 1994, on Amendment 8. Amendment 8 authoriz... | [
-0.01953168585896492,
-0.05233027786016464,
-0.02456718310713768,
0.03881676867604256,
0.02423728071153164,
0.0070244320668280125,
0.030075324699282646,
0.04372553527355194,
-0.03126063197851181,
-0.062101904302835464,
0.047734081745147705,
0.028230583295226097,
-0.0684477910399437,
0.0261... |
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
An opinion was filed in this case on September 6, 1994. Chief Justice Montgomery authored the opinion. Justice Franchini concurred. Justice Frost filed a special concurrence, joined by Justice Baca. Justice Ransom dissented. On motion for rehearing filed by the Plaintiffs-Petitioners, we now withdraw ... | [
-0.0370476096868515,
-0.04221272096037865,
-0.02387446165084839,
0.03626243770122528,
0.06359247863292694,
-0.011860785074532032,
0.041646089404821396,
0.0274816807359457,
0.0047739059664309025,
-0.03991082310676575,
-0.006892336066812277,
0.0293022058904171,
-0.054599784314632416,
0.03664... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Plaintiff-Appellant, Shawn Smith (Smith) filed a claim for benefits under New Mexico Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), NMSA 1978, Sections 52-1-1 through 52-1-69 (Orig.Pamp. and Cum.Supp.1982) against his former employer Dowell Corporation (Dow). The district court granted summary judgment... | [
-0.025467481464147568,
-0.008424626663327217,
-0.022477801889181137,
-0.005310548935085535,
0.040152303874492645,
0.03639693930745125,
0.06597647815942764,
0.05115445703268051,
0.010595777072012424,
-0.0500778891146183,
0.025118673220276833,
0.046436041593551636,
-0.019992752000689507,
0.0... |
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.
In this case, members of an association had been found jointly and severally liable for an unpaid debt to a printing company. Several members of the association sued the law firm that had represented the association for legal malpractice and received a judgment compensating them for the mone... | [
0.007637809496372938,
-0.037758152931928635,
-0.02287290059030056,
0.0334317721426487,
0.046357713639736176,
-0.005403230898082256,
0.022881900891661644,
-0.0002462789125274867,
-0.008932195603847504,
-0.028896784409880638,
0.010228578932583332,
0.05031486600637436,
-0.04566696286201477,
0... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
The earlier decision issued in this matter is withdrawn.
Plaintiff Miller & Associates, Ltd. (Miller) brought this action to recover attorney’s fees from defendants. On the first of the two causes of action, the trial court directed a verdict against defendants for $70,328.60, the full amount ... | [
-0.0023541897535324097,
-0.016747353598475456,
-0.005584391299635172,
-0.01604888215661049,
0.03448034077882767,
-0.005796513520181179,
0.07106811553239822,
0.024406064301729202,
0.008167772553861141,
-0.014181519858539104,
0.036168694496154785,
0.03429710865020752,
-0.07916093617677689,
0... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
Respondent, Catherine Quintana (respondent), brought this workman’s compensation action in Santa Fe District Court against petitioners, the Board of Education of the Española Municipal Schools and the Board’s insurer, Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company (petitioners), to recover ben... | [
-0.004008388612419367,
-0.044908687472343445,
-0.00040009617805480957,
0.03061564266681671,
0.051039379090070724,
0.0170896016061306,
0.03695647045969963,
0.024156153202056885,
0.0003158589533995837,
-0.05319499596953392,
-0.0019377315184101462,
0.05250710994005203,
-0.03537547215819359,
0... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
Petitioners Petra B. Rivas and Jo Etta New brought this action in the District Court of Dona Ana County appealing the decision of the respondent Board of Cosmetologists (Board) denying New’s application for a license to practice cosmetology and suspending Rivas’ ownership license. The d... | [
-0.010279249399900436,
-0.028533680364489555,
-0.011074772104620934,
-0.01612328179180622,
0.046924881637096405,
-0.01814340241253376,
0.06388762593269348,
0.027890875935554504,
0.022522207349538803,
-0.030869748443365097,
0.008483082056045532,
0.051832862198352814,
-0.06170519068837166,
0... |
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
John J. Chapman, Troy H. Elliott, and N. Altom (Petitioners) filed suit in district court seeking a declaratory judgment that the operation and enforcement of the joint Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Motor Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program (Program) is unlawful. After a non-jury trial, the d... | [
-0.006945258937776089,
-0.015485203824937344,
-0.008934719488024712,
0.012129302136600018,
0.029719611629843712,
-0.013997102156281471,
0.026267360895872116,
0.026407646015286446,
0.01469532959163189,
-0.034172240644693375,
0.005264610983431339,
0.054862745106220245,
-0.06222435086965561,
... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Both parties appeal the trial court’s determination of the meaning of the terms in a written lease agreement. Plaintiff Falcon Research and Development Company (Falcon) leased office space from defendant James Craddock (Craddock) on October 8, 1976. The lease provided for an initial five-year ... | [
-0.015487638302147388,
-0.04555688053369522,
-0.025592682883143425,
-0.009707905352115631,
0.06031026691198349,
0.010626890696585178,
0.061900392174720764,
0.03709952160716057,
0.0015443660086020827,
-0.04139803349971771,
-0.009390865452587605,
0.030636632815003395,
-0.053262170404195786,
... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
Defendant Walter Scott Finnell was tried by jury and convicted in the District Court of Grant County of first degree murder of Richard Bejarano, attempted murder of Karen Bejarano with firearm enhancement, armed robbery with firearm enhancement, and motor vehicle theft with firearm enhancement... | [
-0.026984313502907753,
-0.04562215507030487,
-0.046631284058094025,
-0.0014098361134529114,
0.045354533940553665,
-0.0037167188711464405,
0.08095897734165192,
0.01379951648414135,
-0.0027014000806957483,
-0.024496443569660187,
0.008290271274745464,
0.05042222887277603,
-0.04072124883532524,
... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
This matter is before us upon recommendation of the Judicial Standards Commission to remove Respondent Joseph A. Lucero, Magistrate Judge, Santa Fe County, Division III, from office by reason of his violations of NMSA 1978, Code of Judicial Conduct, Canons 1, 2 and 3 (Repl.Pamp. 1983).
The pro... | [
-0.036276187747716904,
-0.02624019794166088,
0.005048807710409164,
-0.0017272975528612733,
0.05009143799543381,
-0.017817026004195213,
0.05317747965455055,
0.00238419184461236,
-0.009517802856862545,
-0.04164464771747589,
-0.022985130548477173,
0.05276063084602356,
-0.06377937644720078,
0.... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the District Court in Rio Arriba County, wherein plaintiff-appellant, Chromo Mountain Ranch (Chromo) brought an action for reformation of a land sale contract against defendant-appellee and cross-appellant Consuelo Gonzales (Gonzales). The trial court granted judg... | [
-0.03806615620851517,
-0.03701799362897873,
0.013423011638224125,
0.04656095430254936,
0.07490598410367966,
0.010816909372806549,
0.03053165413439274,
0.033733852207660675,
-0.002710140310227871,
-0.042173027992248535,
-0.004338404163718224,
0.0480182059109211,
-0.04372653365135193,
0.0279... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Appellant, Dominick Manfre, appeals from an order entered by the Human Services Department (Department) following an administrative adjudication by the Department involving the interception of appellant’s income tax refund and application of the monies to unpaid child support arrearages. ... | [
-0.021810313686728477,
-0.05550322309136391,
0.014010711573064327,
0.011131536215543747,
0.04707225784659386,
0.01366981491446495,
0.02406003512442112,
0.0404670275747776,
-0.018005941063165665,
-0.06614840030670166,
0.01284121721982956,
0.03617129102349281,
-0.06582755595445633,
0.0296850... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Plaintiff Yolanda Yvonne Blake appeals from a Supplemental Decree of Dissolution of Marriage entered August 11, 1983 disposing of the issues of child custody, child support, alimony, division and distribution of the community property and debts, and attorney fees. A final decree dissolving the ma... | [
-0.041472189128398895,
-0.0003438439453020692,
-0.0316355861723423,
0.010635947808623314,
0.03622758761048317,
0.03660762310028076,
0.05414599925279617,
0.02558991126716137,
0.008288294076919556,
0.00044961905223317444,
0.023674042895436287,
0.07065455615520477,
-0.053333062678575516,
0.06... |
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
Defendants-Appellants, Kenneth and Jacqueline Yelin (the Yelins), appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their third-party complaint against Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee, Carvel Corporation (Carvel). The district court held that the third-party complaint was improperly filed under S... | [
-0.03487170860171318,
-0.013619755394756794,
-0.01798715628683567,
0.03922984004020691,
0.03607770428061485,
0.03744741529226303,
0.022700844332575798,
0.040176231414079666,
0.01964477449655533,
-0.021665450185537338,
-0.023112284019589424,
0.048147253692150116,
-0.04583865776658058,
0.071... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
The Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s dismissal of petitioner’s complaint on the basis of her failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The complaint had alleged that respondents’ agents did not respond to a call reporting a crime in progress and requesting assistance,... | [
-0.029295621439814568,
-0.03993283957242966,
-0.010220502503216267,
-0.017343005165457726,
0.023477325215935707,
0.024106135591864586,
0.05384411662817001,
0.0213165245950222,
0.02084282785654068,
-0.04600408300757408,
-0.00017758834292180836,
0.06415858864784241,
-0.05299515277147293,
0.0... |
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
Alfonso and Arlene Medina, husband and wife, sued Sunstate Realty, Inc., for breach of contract and specific performance, among other claims, in connection with a residential construction contract. Sunstate counterclaimed against the Medinas for breach of contract and to foreclose materialmen’s... | [
-0.01941954903304577,
-0.046718377619981766,
-0.005740403663367033,
0.0017874264158308506,
0.04916579648852348,
-0.014748429879546165,
0.05574595928192139,
0.03338967636227608,
0.019385114312171936,
-0.054247353225946426,
0.018974991515278816,
0.05596564710140228,
-0.04393809661269188,
0.0... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Wellborn Paint Manufacturing Company (“Wellborn”) appeals the district court’s affirmance of a decision by the New Mexico Employment Security Department (“ESD”). ESD’s decision declared certain employees of Wellborn eligible for benefits under the New Mexico Unemployment Compensation Act (“Act”)... | [
-0.007925737649202347,
0.01353461854159832,
-0.019523417577147484,
0.012972534634172916,
0.04074816033244133,
0.022233489900827408,
0.03870708867907524,
0.024597829207777977,
-0.0020559728145599365,
-0.05631355568766594,
-0.0017888436559587717,
0.001205239212140441,
-0.06735412776470184,
0... |
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Defendant Dr. Harry Thomas (Defendant) appeals a judgment after a jury verdict finding him liable for negligent spoliation of evidence. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: (1) whether New Mexico should recognize the tort of negligent spoliation of evidence; (2) if New Mexico does re... | [
-0.02778572402894497,
-0.02101033926010132,
0.0037972216960042715,
0.012872076593339443,
0.06404798477888107,
-0.007367969490587711,
0.061136793345212936,
-0.006338263861835003,
0.00953137967735529,
-0.028262805193662643,
0.029127614572644234,
0.07378300279378891,
-0.03020322695374489,
0.0... |
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
Phelps Dodge/Chino Mines (Employer) appeals the award to Samuel Carrasco (Worker) of a lump-sum payment of disability benefits to replace periodic payments. Employer contends that a portion of the lump-sum payment was not permitted by the Workers’ Compensation Administration Act because it was to ... | [
-0.04939218983054161,
-0.03477829694747925,
-0.034389834851026535,
-0.0014147765468806028,
0.034098874777555466,
-0.0067106252536177635,
0.03339895233511925,
0.03800668939948082,
-0.01529113482683897,
-0.0533159077167511,
-0.01604393497109413,
0.01824508234858513,
-0.025062335655093193,
0.... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
We granted certiorari to the district court, pursuant to SCRA 1986, 12-501, to review the district court’s denial of a motion to correct or modify the petitioner’s sentence. The petitioner, convicted of a fourth degree felony and a misdemeanor, was sentenced consecutively to eighteen months’ i... | [
-0.03534729406237602,
-0.018342770636081696,
-0.01947629265487194,
0.02951207011938095,
0.05210559815168381,
0.013747244141995907,
0.09428074210882187,
0.024755749851465225,
-0.03127381578087807,
-0.012274659238755703,
0.02063005231320858,
0.026382356882095337,
-0.03820151835680008,
0.0426... |
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their worker’s compensation claims. The appeals were consolidated pursuant to our first calendar notice. Plaintiffs’ brief-in-chief raises two issues on appeal: (A) whether their suits were properly dismissed as premature, and (B) whether their suits were proper... | [
-0.005869083106517792,
-0.02933673933148384,
-0.03913378342986107,
0.030850689858198166,
0.05014598369598389,
0.004737199749797583,
0.03680126741528511,
0.013447745703160763,
-0.0030686778482049704,
-0.030973345041275024,
0.007169999647885561,
0.05550645291805267,
-0.03484905883669853,
0.0... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Citizens Bank of Clovis (Citizens Bank) sued to foreclose a judgment lien against real estate in Dona Ana County. It named as defendants Robert C. and Mary L. Hodges (the Hodges), purchasers of the property under an unrecorded executory contract; Charles Rutledge (Rutledge), record owner of the p... | [
0.0012853645021095872,
-0.06712435930967331,
0.008166095241904259,
0.027310986071825027,
0.05624961480498314,
-0.006909436080604792,
0.012581153772771358,
0.04092656075954437,
0.005069692153483629,
-0.03574822470545769,
0.010392742231488228,
0.034086138010025024,
-0.05549384281039238,
0.04... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
Defendant-appellant Sophie Martin (defendant) appeals her conviction in Bernalillo County District Court of first degree murder for the death of her husband Jack Martin (decedent). We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Defendant raises twelve points of error. We reverse on two grounds:... | [
-0.017906593158841133,
-0.013553867116570473,
-0.002366660162806511,
0.024176886305212975,
0.0678820088505745,
0.03787265717983246,
0.07786756008863449,
-0.007627528626471758,
-0.020201975479722023,
-0.041495971381664276,
0.035558149218559265,
0.047235820442438126,
-0.02327648550271988,
0.... |
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
Plaintiff brought suit for libel against the defendants. A default judgment was entered, and then on motion of the defendants, the default was set aside. The court reinstated the default when defendants failed to comply with the terms of the order setting aside the default. Defendants appeal.
The c... | [
-0.052124615758657455,
-0.02360309101641178,
-0.012687929905951023,
0.012553914450109005,
0.050052933394908905,
-0.0005490915500558913,
0.04277185723185539,
0.03008798323571682,
-0.005126424599438906,
-0.01544270757585764,
0.004649485927075148,
0.04406911879777908,
-0.04637008160352707,
0.... |
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Plaintiffs filed an action to eject defendant from certain lands to which they claimed ownership. Defendant moved to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings. That motion was denied. After a non-jury trial, the trial court held that defendant had no right to be in possession of the property and t... | [
-0.05360132083296776,
-0.06911378353834152,
0.016766780987381935,
0.02122640609741211,
0.04161283001303673,
-0.00018435153469908983,
0.045750051736831665,
0.004057989455759525,
0.00263793533667922,
-0.015329653397202492,
0.0040111541748046875,
0.013282915577292442,
-0.03453774377703667,
0.... |
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s orders: 1) granting defendant summary judgment and denying their own motion for summary judgment; and 2) construing the testator’s will as devising to plaintiffs’ deceased a life estate in a portion of the income from real property owned by testator. Our calend... | [
0.015730833634734154,
-0.032558634877204895,
-0.0002877645893022418,
0.003739152802154422,
0.04906977340579033,
0.008498859591782093,
0.06410807371139526,
0.017666323110461235,
0.03472559154033661,
-0.0477755106985569,
0.0013151635648682714,
0.05137969180941582,
-0.054570022970438004,
0.03... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Defendant appealed his conviction of escape from jail under NMSA 1978, § 30-22-8. We proposed summary affirmance. Defendant’s timely memorandum in opposition challenged only the issue of whether there was sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction. The other issues raised in the docket... | [
-0.04833623021841049,
-0.02334567718207836,
-0.02949664182960987,
0.010433001443743706,
0.06375866383314133,
-0.010314260609447956,
0.08204399049282074,
-0.005912258289754391,
0.0013474486768245697,
-0.026584258303046227,
0.002456938847899437,
0.02956918068230152,
-0.05704489350318909,
0.0... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals which reversed the trial court’s judgment quieting title to the disputed boundary line area in plaintiffs and enjoining defendant from maintaining the fence on the subject land. Since neither party proved the strength of their respective claims to... | [
0.0010917136678472161,
-0.04788200557231903,
-0.002004145411774516,
-0.005281262099742889,
0.0453210324048996,
-0.0061769867315888405,
0.0601922869682312,
-0.013232563622295856,
0.02959815412759781,
-0.023609410971403122,
-0.017302755266427994,
0.014345683157444,
-0.04394937679171562,
0.08... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
The State of New Mexico brought suit in Chaves County to adjudicate water rights in the Rio Hondo, Rio Ruidoso and Rio Bonito stream systems, all tributaries of the Pecos River in the Pecos Valley Artesian Basin. Twice the matter was referred by the court to special masters and hearings we... | [
0.0016499687917530537,
-0.024284955114126205,
-0.004014024045318365,
0.03598139435052872,
0.05533573776483536,
0.012341637164354324,
0.0517863892018795,
0.03606833890080452,
0.009133354760706425,
-0.041224077343940735,
0.02695501782000065,
0.0613674595952034,
-0.06298907846212387,
0.033821... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
These cases have been consolidated since they present the same principal question on appeal. Both of these cases, State v. Padilla and State v. Fugate, involve the question of whether the “jurisdictional exception,” as applied to double jeopardy claims, is still the law in New Mexico. W... | [
-0.037689585238695145,
-0.03948090597987175,
0.008996653370559216,
0.008166275918483734,
0.04897288233041763,
-0.01814192906022072,
0.049006760120391846,
0.021681323647499084,
-0.0022381385788321495,
-0.04210147634148598,
0.024634836241602898,
0.021882005035877228,
-0.04695015400648117,
0.... |
OPINION
APODACA, Chief Judge.
This premises liability case involves the issue of an owner’s liability for negligent acts committed by an independent contractor resulting in harm after completion of the work. Defendant Jordon Restaurant Enterprises (Defendant) appeals two rulings of the trial court: (1) a pre-trial gran... | [
-0.0020018713548779488,
-0.009860409423708916,
-0.03986681252717972,
-0.010866763070225716,
0.04828542470932007,
0.013065630570054054,
0.06480379402637482,
0.013179516419768333,
-0.00849845539778471,
-0.027515027672052383,
-0.012274711392819881,
0.03777999058365822,
-0.0710068941116333,
0.... |
OPINION
SCARBOROUGH, Chief Justice.
Respondents-appellants are Dana McQuinn and the Board of Examiners in Optometry who suspended petitioner-appellee, Robert Molina’s, license to practice optometry for fourteen days. The district court reversed the Board’s decision. McQuinn and the Board appeal, we reverse.
The Optomet... | [
0.0015967850340530276,
-0.00016851953114382923,
-0.0054152836091816425,
-0.014164517633616924,
0.036144983023405075,
-0.003402185393497348,
0.029268166050314903,
0.0482046976685524,
-0.005830186419188976,
-0.03470741584897041,
-0.001271211076527834,
0.07970589399337769,
-0.041922081261873245... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendant appeals the district court’s denial of his motions filed pursuant to NMSA 1978, Crim.P.R. 57 (Repl.Pamp.1980). The cause was originally assigned to a summary calendar with dismissal proposed because Rule 57(a) provides that “[t]he order of the district court on a motion under this rule... | [
-0.05518282577395439,
-0.015661437064409256,
-0.008684704080224037,
0.0027323896065354347,
0.06431830674409866,
-0.008088354021310806,
0.06175781413912773,
0.010340389795601368,
-0.0273567084223032,
-0.04771697521209717,
0.0012526786886155605,
0.06985685229301453,
-0.03269026055932045,
0.0... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
This case is before us on writ of certiorari from the Court of Appeals. The issue on appeal is whether the fruits of a nighttime search conducted pursuant to a constitutionally valid search warrant must be suppressed for failure to set out in the affidavit a sufficient factual basis giv... | [
-0.058358702808618546,
-0.008503117598593235,
0.010567698627710342,
0.007234863471239805,
0.06972358375787735,
-0.027877921238541603,
0.05384625121951103,
0.0072029209695756435,
-0.00689582247287035,
-0.05829460173845291,
-0.017082957550883293,
0.03981048986315727,
-0.03784671053290367,
0.... |
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
Defendant automobile dealership (“defendant”) loaned a truck to defendant Gamboa (“driver”) to test drive. She ran a red light and killed plaintiff’s husband. The dispositive issue is whether the dealer may be held liable on a theory of negligent entrustment based on an alleged statutory violation ... | [
-0.014822225086390972,
-0.006823157425969839,
-0.020297260954976082,
0.050799980759620667,
0.04176381975412369,
0.006358754355460405,
0.05698848143219948,
0.03218189254403114,
0.023459691554307938,
-0.01647680439054966,
0.0586044006049633,
0.08437488228082657,
-0.05805009976029396,
0.01751... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Plaintiff sued the City of Truth or Consequences for damages resulting from a cat bite. He claims the same cat that bit him had previously bitten a young child and that defendant’s animal control center, after taking the cat into custody following that incident and with knowledge of its vicious p... | [
-0.06741835922002792,
-0.05990726873278618,
-0.02550705522298813,
0.00364366895519197,
0.013058152049779892,
0.00268986402079463,
0.07854331284761429,
0.027652781456708908,
-0.011474840342998505,
-0.017845554277300835,
-0.0246663186699152,
0.057233598083257675,
-0.05718814954161644,
0.0461... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
This appeal arose from the entry of a final order issued by the New Mexico Corporation Commission (Commission) on January 26, 1984, regarding the regulation by the Commission of the rates, terms, and conditions by which cable television systems make attachments to telephone utility poles in Ne... | [
-0.012711651623249054,
-0.02304977923631668,
0.0061915223486721516,
-0.009426170960068703,
0.027602436020970345,
0.0035729100927710533,
0.012569614686071873,
0.0211549773812294,
0.01596897840499878,
0.005675635766237974,
-0.012395313940942287,
0.04428913816809654,
-0.06952971965074539,
0.0... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
We issued a writ of certiorari to the court of appeals to review the affirmance of defendant’s convictions. Defendant raised sixth amendment speedy trial and fifth amendment due process claims and issues concerning hearsay, probable cause, and insufficient evidence. Upon consideration of the c... | [
-0.015208851546049118,
-0.06296578794717789,
-0.02104801870882511,
0.022230805829167366,
0.058926697820425034,
0.0018076234264299273,
0.0607011616230011,
-0.018560701981186867,
-0.025422563776373863,
-0.041331447660923004,
0.017887061461806297,
0.040291305631399155,
-0.026807161048054695,
... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, in which the trial court denied a motion filed by Mary Harkins (petitioner) to set aside a stipulated final divorce decree with respect to military retirement and alimony. In her motion, petitioner maintained that it was no... | [
-0.013579266145825386,
-0.03615075349807739,
0.02199476957321167,
0.023162003606557846,
0.07004345208406448,
0.0011262203333899379,
0.027308577671647072,
0.005534498952329159,
-0.01414723601192236,
-0.05276532098650932,
-0.026820337399840355,
0.05101844295859337,
-0.03200663626194,
0.04414... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Defendants A.E. Williamson and F. Williamson (the Williamsons) appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion to set aside a special master’s foreclosure sale of real property. The Williamsons were parties to the foreclosure proceedings and consented to the foreclosure judgment and decree... | [
-0.02183782123029232,
-0.062334101647138596,
0.016417531296610832,
-0.0005966578028164804,
0.07160064578056335,
0.02188335545361042,
0.01302248239517212,
0.02428232505917549,
-0.00946077797561884,
-0.01472254004329443,
0.008710763417184353,
0.06740224361419678,
-0.05733001232147217,
0.0592... |
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to its power under New Mexico Constitution Article VI, Section 32, the Judicial Standards Commission of the State of New Mexico petitions this Court for an order permanently removing from office the Honorable Joe Cruz Castellano, Jr., District Judge, Division II, First Judicial District, on... | [
-0.04722026735544205,
-0.007012323476374149,
-0.01548309251666069,
0.012610952369868755,
0.03215828165411949,
-0.011954841203987598,
0.05199454724788666,
0.023421574383974075,
-0.026385923847556114,
-0.051329996436834335,
-0.0067092254757881165,
0.035474132746458054,
-0.044874634593725204,
... |
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
An administrative decision of the New Mexico Employment Security Department denying unemployment compensation to Billie J. Rodman was reviewed on certiorari by the district court. Rodman now appeals to this Court from the order of the district court affirming the administrative decision.
Rodman... | [
-0.05158062279224396,
-0.008129994384944439,
-0.009367707185447216,
0.013830517418682575,
0.03811659663915634,
0.012063422240316868,
0.053475335240364075,
0.027589760720729828,
-0.03284938260912895,
-0.04752473160624504,
0.018714256584644318,
0.03389565646648407,
-0.05682821199297905,
0.03... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
The defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment plus ten years upon his conviction of first degree murder and armed robbery. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support conviction and that due process was violated because, as a result of prosecutorial misconduct, he was denied his ... | [
-0.010720460675656796,
-0.052351124584674835,
-0.04720794036984444,
-0.005557274911552668,
0.0638512596487999,
0.019633684307336807,
0.05197397246956825,
0.01043688878417015,
-0.005195066798478365,
-0.05362260341644287,
0.04333514720201492,
0.02846243605017662,
-0.07491650432348251,
0.0038... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Minnie Reeves appeals from a judgment and order of the district court granting defendant James L. Wimberly’s motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Reeves raises the following issues: (1) whether sufficient privity exists between a lessor and a lessee to p... | [
-0.016931569203734398,
-0.03117590956389904,
0.009964426048099995,
-0.019338171929121017,
0.06403741985559464,
0.008629046380519867,
0.036164939403533936,
-0.02178879827260971,
0.022231249138712883,
-0.06292843073606491,
-0.008120703510940075,
0.04380369931459427,
-0.05769580602645874,
0.0... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Defendants, Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) and City of Las Vegas (City) took an interlocutory appeal from an order denying their motions for summary judgment and joint motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiff homeowner’s original complaint alleged that Mountain Bell of N... | [
-0.011869329959154129,
-0.03169480711221695,
-0.021775811910629272,
0.0017186794430017471,
0.05380404368042946,
0.018604077398777008,
0.06399670243263245,
0.012747128494083881,
-0.006097964942455292,
-0.020101843401789665,
-0.013289330527186394,
0.05571505054831505,
-0.05105327069759369,
0... |
OPINION
BLACK, Judge.
On April 14, 1993, Tina Fernandez (“Plaintiff”) sued The Caravan East Nite Club, Inc. (“Caravan”), advancing one count of negligence and one count of strict liability in tort. Plaintiff alleged that she had been served a drink that contained pieces of glass at the Caravan East Nightclub (“the nigh... | [
-0.03052045777440071,
-0.029811086133122444,
-0.0089160380885005,
-0.007260345853865147,
0.02879270911216736,
-0.020140813663601875,
0.04365147650241852,
0.018046174198389053,
-0.0332784466445446,
-0.012991780415177345,
0.0062317512929439545,
0.043525632470846176,
-0.02462134137749672,
0.0... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
The opinion filed on February 28, 1985 is hereby withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.
Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment awarding plaintiff total permanent disability in a worker’s compensation case. It raises two issues: (1) the trial court erred in finding plaintiff totally... | [
-0.015256060287356377,
-0.017902279272675514,
-0.06655436009168625,
-0.012647699564695358,
0.04975613206624985,
0.020996009930968285,
0.0685076043009758,
0.03285904601216316,
-0.023081988096237183,
-0.05192401632666588,
0.019581394270062447,
0.022340601310133934,
-0.03412608057260513,
0.03... |
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
Janice Landskroner and Stanley Reiss, formerly a married couple, brought suit against their cotenant, Rex McClure, for breach of contract and fiduciary duties, for fraud and slander of title, and to quiet title to real property. The trial court found in favor of McClure on all claims and plaint... | [
-0.034015994518995285,
-0.04798503220081329,
-0.004721182398498058,
0.011085153557360172,
0.09040645509958267,
0.015297388657927513,
0.019612090662121773,
0.010930933058261871,
0.008704148232936859,
-0.02132454700767994,
0.014009633101522923,
0.04831112548708916,
-0.035877328366041183,
0.0... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice..
Animas Valley Auto and Truck Repair, and Bituminous Casualty Corporation (Respondents), appealed the trial court’s judgment in favor of Marion L. Harrison in this workers’ compensation case. The court of appeals summarily reversed the judgment, 105 N.M. 425, 733 P.2d 873, and Harrison fil... | [
-0.023805074393749237,
-0.016457198187708855,
-0.035912804305553436,
0.007637381553649902,
0.06301075220108032,
0.024563821032643318,
0.05637603998184204,
0.024510322138667107,
0.003452395088970661,
-0.07014583051204681,
0.029998280107975006,
0.04961773753166199,
-0.03719679266214371,
0.04... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Defendant Trinity Land Company (Trinity) appeals from the trial court’s award of $25,000.00 in damages in favor of plaintiff Kenneth Nosker (Nosker) based upon a determination that Nosker owned certain irrigation equipment which Trinity wrongfully converted to its own use. We discuss: (1)... | [
0.0003747259033843875,
-0.04307857155799866,
-0.01334058865904808,
0.035665176808834076,
0.05234987288713455,
0.02884933352470398,
0.04266291484236717,
0.047931089997291565,
0.02780318632721901,
-0.04591237008571625,
0.021766306832432747,
0.06864102184772491,
-0.04457150772213936,
0.056058... |
OPINION
BLACK, Judge.
Appellant Penny J. is a parent who has been diagnosed as having borderline personality disorder and borderline intellectual function resulting from cognitive difficulties, neurological soft signs, and seizure activity. The New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department (“the Department”) worke... | [
-0.06902844458818436,
-0.010966630652546883,
-0.020732907578349113,
-0.006429249886423349,
0.024785064160823822,
0.04909626394510269,
0.05911886692047119,
0.008800940588116646,
-0.007797297555953264,
-0.05132853612303734,
0.02134585753083229,
0.03846289590001106,
-0.04626701399683952,
0.05... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
This appeal comes before the court for decision following its submission to an advisory committee pursuant to an experimental plan. See Patterson v. Environmental Improvement Div., 105 N.M. 320, 731 P.2d 1364 (Ct.App.1986); Stoll v. Dow, 105 N.M. 316, 731 P.2d 1360 (Ct.App.1986); Boucher v. Foxwo... | [
-0.02643168345093727,
-0.04134039953351021,
-0.006052687298506498,
0.011048189364373684,
0.03612934425473213,
0.011878708377480507,
0.025541869923472404,
0.02246055193245411,
0.02437521517276764,
-0.07096187025308609,
-0.0018056064145639539,
0.04401884973049164,
-0.0524015910923481,
0.0195... |
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
This matter came before the Court upon disciplinary counsel’s verified motion for order to show cause requesting that Don Klein, Jr., be ordered to show cause why his probation should not be revoked and further discipline imposed. On April 1, 1994, this Court granted the motion and directed Klein to... | [
-0.03466511517763138,
-0.005731123965233564,
0.009637752547860146,
-0.020482772961258888,
0.0323450081050396,
0.0041612121276557446,
0.00861094519495964,
0.010795628651976585,
-0.0013511100551113486,
-0.028628690168261528,
-0.0020690897945314646,
0.054030124098062515,
-0.03515429422259331,
... |
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Defendant Paul E. Baca appeals from convictions of assault (NMSA 1978, § 30-3-1) (Repl.Pamp.1984) and battery (NMSA 1978, § 30-3-4) (Repl.Pamp.1984). The Bernalillo County district court heard the case on a de novo appeal from the metropolitan court. One of the issues the defendant raises on appe... | [
-0.026300137862563133,
-0.005074214190244675,
-0.015849601477384567,
-0.019102949649095535,
0.03092292696237564,
-0.02586762048304081,
0.036382753401994705,
0.0023569874465465546,
-0.004627697169780731,
-0.03387292101979256,
0.02216535620391369,
0.03058054856956005,
-0.03733954578638077,
0... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Ironically, what started out as an application for a one-year variance continues to wind its way through the legal and administrative process and four years later comes before this Court for the second time. Following review of the denial of a variance by the New Mexico Environmental Improvement ... | [
0.025034165009856224,
-0.015932947397232056,
-0.020820125937461853,
0.0004281808505766094,
0.05603710189461708,
0.006235270295292139,
0.07342059910297394,
0.019810425117611885,
-0.010718896985054016,
-0.05173090100288391,
0.011533508077263832,
0.01795191876590252,
-0.07571742683649063,
0.0... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Following review, the Supreme Court reversed this Court’s opinion filed June 28, 1983, and remanded for further review.
Duke City Lumber Company applied to the New Mexico Improvement Board (Board) for a one year variance from Air Quality Control Regulation 402(A). Following review of the denial o... | [
0.015054505318403244,
-0.014474118128418922,
-0.005767131224274635,
0.011037108488380909,
0.07533402740955353,
-0.0021603985223919153,
0.06910201907157898,
0.04098588600754738,
-0.01116830762475729,
-0.06363040953874588,
0.001045932644046843,
-0.009159058332443237,
-0.0728047713637352,
0.0... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
The Bernalillo County Assessor (“Assessor”) denied Appellants Alvin D. and Mary N. Hooper’s (“collectively referred to as Hooper”) claim for a veteran’s exemption under NMSA 1978, Section 7-37-5(C)(3)(d) (Repl.Pamp.1983). The statute exempts $2,000.00 of the taxable value of property for any hon... | [
-0.00888934824615717,
-0.021495796740055084,
0.01525430753827095,
-0.015219110064208508,
0.0346129834651947,
-0.023714132606983185,
0.026029668748378754,
0.014055552892386913,
-0.019045917317271233,
-0.03075905330479145,
-0.03396296128630638,
0.0442577600479126,
-0.05890902876853943,
0.044... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Defendants petitioned the district court for a writ of prohibition against various metropolitan court judges to curtail bench trials and require a jury trial in multiple offense cases for which, upon conviction, the aggregate sentences could equal or exceed 180 days. The district court denied ... | [
-0.024862537160515785,
-0.029961872845888138,
-0.038860972970724106,
0.02886315993964672,
0.012469680048525333,
-0.02144569903612137,
0.07960297167301178,
0.010049006901681423,
-0.025065448135137558,
-0.04046109691262245,
0.02985134720802307,
0.03693743795156479,
-0.04268322139978409,
0.03... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
This Court granted a writ of certiorari to review whether the Bank of New Mexico (the bank) breached the terms of a collection provision in a security agreement. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the bank. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court without deciding the re... | [
-0.027038218453526497,
-0.05088123679161072,
-0.02587750181555748,
0.004859228152781725,
0.027530191466212273,
0.002135929185897112,
0.03306441381573677,
0.028263771906495094,
-0.010630619712173939,
0.012894660234451294,
0.010334405116736889,
0.062217965722084045,
-0.040923234075307846,
0.... |
OPINION
FRUMAN, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal, with prejudice, of their claims for personal injury against defendant. The judgment dismissing the claims also awarded defendant its reasonable costs. This court issued a calendar notice proposing to dismiss the appeal because the record proper indicated that plai... | [
-0.04827863723039627,
-0.041557155549526215,
-0.016901055350899696,
-0.01263545360416174,
0.04769192636013031,
0.013080349192023277,
0.05177199840545654,
0.03214190900325775,
0.014079532586038113,
-0.050954535603523254,
0.021741369739174843,
0.05454032123088837,
-0.04703487083315849,
0.060... |
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
The real parties in interest, Steve and Tammy Greeson, brought separate medical malpractice actions against petitioner Southwest Community Health Services (Southwest) and Dr. Robert Gathings. The cases were consolidated for trial. In motions to compel answers to interrogatories and to compel pr... | [
-0.03435343876481056,
-0.04568342864513397,
-0.03417022153735161,
0.002875302918255329,
0.01908683218061924,
-0.010578624904155731,
0.05903865396976471,
0.02603520080447197,
-0.018440695479512215,
-0.02420276217162609,
0.02505958452820778,
0.05831677094101906,
-0.045701608061790466,
0.0513... |
OPINION
FRUMAN, Judge.
This case involves the termination of respondent’s parental rights. The judgment of termination was filed on March 11, 1987. Respondent filed a motion for a new trial on March 23, 1987. The trial court conducted a hearing on the motion and rendered an oral decision denying the motion on April 13,... | [
-0.04287903010845184,
-0.028277333825826645,
-0.02441299706697464,
0.016816498711705208,
0.029337529093027115,
0.02301839180290699,
0.03553220257163048,
0.03277129679918289,
-0.0017556949751451612,
-0.06106792390346527,
0.0056023006327450275,
0.021660609170794487,
-0.050180695950984955,
0.... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
James H. Gunn (Gunn), as personal representative of the estates of Gertrude Bergman (Gertrude) and Lenore Bergman (Lenore), appeals from the decision of the district court allowing the claims of Adele Catanach and Josephine Jacques (Catanach and Jacques or claimants) against the estates, the pro... | [
-0.027288159355521202,
-0.04076898470520973,
0.009912265464663506,
-0.016881326213479042,
0.06637725234031677,
-0.014715136960148811,
0.048140548169612885,
-0.004683646373450756,
0.02174205519258976,
-0.04623717814683914,
0.005538992118090391,
0.03230971843004227,
-0.04775519669055939,
0.0... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Employer appeals the hearing officer’s decision awarding disability benefits to claimant in a worker’s compensation case. Claimant cross-appeals from the decision as well. Our first calendar notice proposed summary dismissal of employer’s appeal on the ground that its notice of appeal had not bee... | [
-0.028800087049603462,
0.01429593376815319,
-0.0372164212167263,
-0.036191411316394806,
0.018439650535583496,
0.02572687715291977,
0.05188737064599991,
0.030606044456362724,
-0.01194719597697258,
-0.06954503804445267,
0.012198059819638729,
0.03972978889942169,
-0.047132644802331924,
0.0472... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
The state appeals from the order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence against him. The trial court found and concluded that defendant’s consent to search was not voluntary, and that the officers did not have probable cause to search or arrest defendant. The dock... | [
-0.03324253484606743,
-0.028189387172460556,
-0.02259909361600876,
0.027713757008314133,
0.046808645129203796,
-0.00023048276489134878,
0.04676564037799835,
0.0030065677128732204,
0.02362147346138954,
-0.04983453452587128,
0.03802065923810005,
0.03434790298342705,
-0.05103342607617378,
0.0... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals from his convictions on four counts of distribution of an imitation controlled substance contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31A-4 (Cum.Supp. 1985). Defendant raises three issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court committed fundamental error by asking defendant to answ... | [
-0.02214810810983181,
-0.024147648364305496,
-0.016627805307507515,
0.025358162820339203,
0.07262498140335083,
0.001561871962621808,
0.04505437612533569,
0.024908816441893578,
0.003754765959456563,
-0.03989399969577789,
0.017275311052799225,
0.04939236864447594,
-0.04338027536869049,
0.039... |
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.
Plaintiffs Dena Lucero and Marcos Lucero appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant New Mexico Public School Insurance Authority (“the NMPSIA”). The Luceros claim that a genuine issue of material fact existed to preclude summary judgment. See SCRA 1986, 1-056(0 (Repl. Pamp.... | [
-0.027228249236941338,
-0.045656967908144,
-0.006762937642633915,
0.04296498745679855,
0.06982078403234482,
0.007059270050376654,
0.043738845735788345,
0.043796606361866,
-0.015206200070679188,
-0.03057287074625492,
0.026696089655160904,
0.06669101119041443,
-0.01220712810754776,
0.0531613... |
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
We are required here to interpret a provision of the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 47-8-1 to -51 (Repl.Pamp.1982 & Cum.Supp.1994). The provision relates to the obligations of an owner of a dwelling unit to return a damage, deposit to a renter and/or account for it. We rever... | [
-0.018071036785840988,
-0.022187674418091774,
-0.040584027767181396,
0.01798565685749054,
0.05571413412690163,
-0.0005591771332547069,
0.05314512923359871,
0.02213486097753048,
0.009960818104445934,
-0.04038218781352043,
-0.0391208678483963,
0.05048279091715813,
-0.04705667868256569,
0.019... |
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Johnsen (Employee) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Alsup’s Convenience Stores, Inc. (Employer). Employee’s complaint sought unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (the Act), 29 U.S.C. Sections 201 to ... | [
0.004909923765808344,
0.003594223177060485,
-0.0412340871989727,
0.029250185936689377,
0.052441444247961044,
-0.0033694221638143063,
0.04788694530725479,
0.053282834589481354,
0.012456010095775127,
-0.053025685250759125,
0.018254777416586876,
0.0272342748939991,
-0.08750100433826447,
0.047... |
OPINION
BOSSON, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of criminal solicitation resulting from a failed drug deal. Defendant questions whether an intended purchaser of drugs who is not charged with illegal possession, but who does encourage the crime of trafficking by negotiating for a sale, may be prosecuted instead ... | [
-0.011862115003168583,
-0.02633878029882908,
-0.046608686447143555,
0.0020835830364376307,
0.040299512445926666,
0.0018062385497614741,
0.02853885106742382,
0.02170596271753311,
0.043852854520082474,
-0.04378955438733101,
0.04872840270400047,
0.05982865393161774,
-0.0803770050406456,
0.036... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County. Dan P. Blea (defendant), appeals his convictions of first degree murder, aggravated battery with a firearm enhancement and aggravated assault with a firearm enhancement. We affirm.
Evidence was presented at trial which esta... | [
-0.021432068198919296,
-0.015660105273127556,
-0.016267545521259308,
0.01994924433529377,
0.05688532814383507,
-0.008979389443993568,
0.03982008248567581,
0.016762295737862587,
0.006485723424702883,
-0.04295840486884117,
0.027157243341207504,
0.03266329690814018,
-0.044376190751791,
0.0268... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.