text stringlengths 44 390k | embeddings listlengths 768 768 |
|---|---|
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
The issue here is whether Mr. Stein effectively disqualified the Honorable Nils T. Kjellstrom, Small Claims Court Judge and predecessor of Judge Speer.
Mr. Stein was sued on an account by Texaco, and attempted to disqualify Judge Kjellstrom by an "Affidavit of Disqualification” in which he ... | [
-0.029105892404913902,
-0.011247485876083374,
-0.02586769498884678,
0.027877219021320343,
0.02823808044195175,
-0.02276168391108513,
0.04473979026079178,
0.018790053203701973,
-0.013625719584524632,
-0.023795224726200104,
0.01358173880726099,
0.046370729804039,
-0.059852853417396545,
0.038... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Following denial of defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, the parties stipulated to the facts and to defendant’s right to appeal the order denying his motion. Pursuant to the stipulation, defendant was convicted of possession of cocaine after a bench trial. He now appeals from the jud... | [
-0.03443990275263786,
-0.0071938312612473965,
-0.046577274799346924,
0.02815503440797329,
0.06675790995359421,
0.004946278873831034,
0.02670135162770748,
0.01297189574688673,
-0.021348869428038597,
-0.03614482656121254,
0.017314910888671875,
0.031244399026036263,
-0.03195517137646675,
0.04... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Respondent appeals from an order holding him in contempt for failing to obey an earlier order “to deliver the two minor children of the parties * * * in conformance with the Order of the Court.” The trial court fined respondent $9,291.85, representing petitioner’s attorney fees and costs “up to t... | [
-0.010112304240465164,
-0.025201307609677315,
-0.0209417175501585,
0.01661418005824089,
0.05456794053316116,
0.03277837857604027,
0.03134754300117493,
0.00786464661359787,
-0.0048441714607179165,
-0.03610936552286148,
0.02874530851840973,
0.045291390269994736,
-0.05509662628173828,
0.03714... |
OPINION
RIORDAN, Chief Justice.
Superior Construction, Inc. (Superior) brought suit against Thomas and Nancy Linnerooth (Linnerooths) on a debt and money due for breach of contract and against American Service Corporation (American) to have a deed by American to the Linnerooths declared null and void, and for specific ... | [
-0.013092287816107273,
-0.016269663348793983,
0.0019626582507044077,
0.020009730011224747,
0.07251889258623123,
-0.009194724261760712,
0.04116016998887062,
0.008587677963078022,
0.029208030551671982,
-0.04632149636745453,
-0.01770685613155365,
0.02732078917324543,
-0.04308902472257614,
0.0... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Plaintiffs Robert S. and Viola Barela sued defendant George B. Locer for breach of contract, alleging that Locer had violated a realty purchase agreement containing an option of first refusal to mineral rights in the realty. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Locer, but allow... | [
-0.02386113815009594,
-0.03387535363435745,
-0.06202474981546402,
0.03751228377223015,
0.05808769166469574,
0.019644441083073616,
0.036104168742895126,
0.01750991679728031,
0.02544398605823517,
-0.012122823856770992,
-0.03088386170566082,
0.06842491030693054,
-0.0653175413608551,
0.0507096... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of aggravated burglary with a firearm enhancement, NMSA 1978, Sections 30-16-4(A) (Repl. Pamp.1984) and 31-18-16 (Repl.Pamp. 1981); aggravated assault with a firearm, NMSA 1978, Sections 30-3-2(A) (Repl. Pamp.1984) and 31-18-16, and larceny over $100.00 in violation of NMS... | [
-0.030270809307694435,
-0.03201475366950035,
-0.02754882350564003,
0.016593903303146362,
0.06221824511885643,
-0.004620310850441456,
0.06477418541908264,
-0.01815164089202881,
-0.018048254773020744,
-0.045646075159311295,
0.023840419948101044,
0.058697838336229324,
-0.05929182469844818,
0.... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Plaintiff Rhoda Ann Strickland, as personal representative, brought this wrongful death action against a utility and farm owner for damages resulting from death of plaintiff’s husband, Joseph Strickland. For factual background, see Strickland v. Roosevelt County Rural Electric Cooperative, 99 N.M... | [
-0.042588427662849426,
-0.03487863019108772,
-0.025975899770855904,
-0.009586808271706104,
0.04665033891797066,
0.008009838871657848,
0.017970891669392586,
0.008360316045582294,
0.004047700669616461,
-0.04842072352766991,
0.034181106835603714,
0.0197417251765728,
-0.05246466398239136,
0.01... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
On about October 5, 1957, defendant kidnapped, had carnal knowledge of, and murdered a five year old child. He was first convicted of kidnapping, of having carnal knowledge of a child under the age of 10 years, and of first degree murder. On appeal to this Court, his convictions were reversed and... | [
-0.052505068480968475,
-0.04019439220428467,
-0.009940694086253643,
-0.0073436563834548,
0.05883447080850601,
0.024311713874340057,
0.08921126276254654,
0.026403134688735008,
-0.005763969384133816,
-0.009068149141967297,
0.020437147468328476,
0.026583043858408928,
-0.020464297384023666,
0.... |
ORDER
This appeal questions the authority of New exico to tax income and gross receipts of Indians residing on a reservation when the income and gross receipts involved are derived solely from activities within the reservation. All Judges of the panel are of the opinion that New Mexico may not tax gross receipts under’... | [
-0.011470452882349491,
0.0164339579641819,
-0.0170935969799757,
0.027692332863807678,
0.03821302205324173,
0.010896149091422558,
0.03595427796244621,
0.00011737384920706972,
0.007618829607963562,
-0.03646502643823624,
-0.012429202906787395,
0.03570224717259407,
-0.056963011622428894,
0.053... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that motion for extension to complete filing of Petition for Writ of Certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that Petition for Writ of Certiorari directed to the Court of Appeals, 85 N.M. 491, 513 P.2d 1273, be and the same is hereby denied as not being tim... | [
0.023126157000660896,
-0.042386747896671295,
-0.01286729983985424,
0.024584032595157623,
0.057949092239141464,
0.0179063081741333,
0.044602323323488235,
-0.0039782896637916565,
-0.015206439420580864,
-0.05215048789978027,
-0.016476744785904884,
0.0030521920416504145,
-0.03024027682840824,
... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Plaintiff, Groendyke Transport, Inc., hereinafter called Groendyke, appeals from a judgment of the district court affirming an order of the New Mexico State Corporation Commission, hereinafter called the Commission. By this order, entered on March 4, 1971, the Commission dismissed Groendyke’s com... | [
-0.06955904513597488,
-0.025579992681741714,
-0.048149242997169495,
0.02168765850365162,
0.03227211907505989,
0.01295936107635498,
0.022930392995476723,
0.05718380585312843,
-0.008437059819698334,
-0.03263213485479355,
-0.009473996236920357,
0.08694548904895782,
-0.053692616522312164,
0.06... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Defendant was charged with the rape of one Judy Brady. The trial ended in a hung jury. The defendant was then tried for assault with intent to commit a violent felony, to wit: rape, contrary to § 40A-3-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The alleged victim was one Mary Cross, Judy Brady’s companion ... | [
-0.03718861564993858,
-0.04549292102456093,
-0.03551560640335083,
-0.04745611548423767,
0.04194100573658943,
0.00016776504344306886,
0.07082202285528183,
0.021716788411140442,
-0.018637826666235924,
-0.0035569225437939167,
0.054992061108350754,
0.034153737127780914,
-0.023888766765594482,
... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Plaintiff, Loco Credit Union, brought suit against defendant, Fred A. Reed, to recover on a note executed on March 10, 1972, and to foreclose Loco’s claimed interest in collateral purportedly pledged by Fred to Loco as security for payment of the note. Janet Reed, the former wife of Fred, claimed... | [
-0.03209768608212471,
-0.047141410410404205,
-0.02641233429312706,
0.03502701222896576,
0.0444277748465538,
0.02856682799756527,
0.005772449541836977,
0.024329418316483498,
-0.008034641854465008,
-0.03957298398017883,
0.035340409725904465,
0.06134330481290817,
-0.029309069737792015,
0.0413... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1031, 85 N.M. 627, 515 P.2d 146 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.026057127863168716,
-0.031467970460653305,
-0.02393823303282261,
0.009089217521250248,
0.06960085034370422,
0.04253968223929405,
0.035527560859918594,
0.0016453757416456938,
0.004785763565450907,
-0.04637368768453598,
0.007177999243140221,
0.010944211855530739,
-0.032572437077760696,
0.... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
The defendant appeals from a judgment and plaintiff cross-appeals.
The sole question on defendant’s appeal is: When does the period of limitation begin to run on a cashier’s check? If a cause of action does not accrue against a bank until demand for payment is made, then the defendant’s action is ... | [
-0.010506602935492992,
-0.029976779595017433,
-0.016048826277256012,
-0.04040306434035301,
0.04014725610613823,
0.003481941530480981,
0.07400134205818176,
0.04303368926048279,
-0.014072670601308346,
-0.027409415692090988,
0.030345212668180466,
0.004013577941805124,
-0.04464925080537796,
0.... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Pursuant to a petition filed by plaintiff, the district court issued an alternative writ of mandamus whereby defendants were directed to appear and show cause, if any they had, why they had not conducted an election to recall Intervenor, a municipal judge of the City of Albuquerque.
After a heari... | [
-0.049470480531454086,
-0.05619606748223305,
-0.032656650990247726,
0.044861532747745514,
0.009961187839508057,
-0.00900955218821764,
0.030710777267813683,
0.0223518256098032,
-0.02564447745680809,
-0.0627618283033371,
0.024114729836583138,
0.04282844439148903,
-0.05925824120640755,
0.0198... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Plaintiff as widow of Robert Carter, deceased, and in behalf of their minor child filed a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff appeals.
The ultimate issue is whether the trial court erred in deciding that the a... | [
0.014728938229382038,
-0.004592801444232464,
-0.017909759655594826,
-0.00018197654571849853,
0.06638745218515396,
-0.004812655039131641,
0.031340450048446655,
0.04079657420516014,
0.015899311751127243,
-0.041053347289562225,
0.004413652699440718,
0.04833495616912842,
-0.053737200796604156,
... |
OPINION
MARTINEZ, Justice.
Plaintiffs filed suit on April 28, 1971 in the District Court of Hidalgo County, New Mexico alleging that the defendants had failed to make the necessary payments due under the terms of a purchase and sales contract for land in Hidalgo County. Plaintiffs prayed for a judgment of the balance d... | [
-0.035457830876111984,
-0.01596703566610813,
-0.0018938190769404173,
-0.018343590199947357,
0.0721832662820816,
0.016705285757780075,
0.03591115400195122,
0.03605284541845322,
-0.005896096583455801,
-0.02323315106332302,
-0.00440940260887146,
0.05782836303114891,
-0.024610742926597595,
0.0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The appeal is concerned with an allegedly defamatory statement made by an attorney and the defense that the statement was absolutely privileged.
Lucy and A. J, Romero, are wife and husband. Lucy is the administratrix of her parents’ estates. Administration proceedings were begun in 1967 and w... | [
-0.02268538624048233,
-0.024374045431613922,
0.012174437753856182,
-0.000666753388941288,
0.03626951202750206,
-0.005873772781342268,
0.0488666370511055,
0.018884873017668724,
0.02070009335875511,
-0.031244929879903793,
0.005067003425210714,
0.051681872457265854,
-0.05471765995025635,
0.06... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
The defendant appeals his conviction of burglary § 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6) alleging four points of error: (1) The trial court abused its discretion by not excusing a juror for cause; (2) the defendant was illegally searched and seized and items taken illegally used against him... | [
-0.024920284748077393,
-0.00019940294441767037,
-0.023969490081071854,
0.01707354746758938,
0.05454403534531593,
0.02215033769607544,
0.0488826259970665,
0.010107914917171001,
-0.015109134837985039,
-0.024707792326807976,
0.013477693311870098,
0.007789165712893009,
-0.04669537767767906,
0.... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The appeal is concerned with the variance between the offense charged and the offense for which defendant was convicted iti a trial to the court without a jury. The indictment charged homicide by vehicle on the basis of reckless driving. Sections 64-22-1 and 64-22-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vo... | [
0.0007101232185959816,
-0.016563674435019493,
-0.020744668319821358,
-0.017487218603491783,
0.04265507310628891,
0.011318947188556194,
0.057279132306575775,
0.02216912806034088,
0.021939972415566444,
-0.04517277702689171,
0.04403474181890488,
0.047021035104990005,
-0.03338530287146568,
0.0... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1081, 85 N.M. 191, 510 P.2d 515, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.007060803472995758,
-0.03292503580451012,
-0.01861828938126564,
0.01601521670818329,
0.0694633275270462,
0.044466402381658554,
0.042381949722766876,
0.00954214297235012,
0.00084428780246526,
-0.04597577080130577,
0.004993153270334005,
0.004225546028465033,
-0.02986024133861065,
0.065467... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1096, 85 N.M. 397, 512 P.2d 970, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.03793497011065483,
-0.04248152673244476,
-0.0025747299659997225,
0.022842982783913612,
0.06477779150009155,
0.029316604137420654,
0.02886584959924221,
0.018399400636553764,
0.004874257370829582,
-0.050879377871751785,
0.0068747056648135185,
-0.0021764743141829967,
-0.024234680458903313,
... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The trial court awarded occupational disease disablement benefits in each of these cases. The appeal by Kaiser (Kaiser Steel Corporation) raises issues as to (1) physical incapacity; (2) notice; and (3) attorney fees.
Physical incapacity.
The right to compensation for occupational disease dep... | [
-0.0013901992933824658,
-0.022671174257993698,
-0.04370560497045517,
0.01704191043972969,
0.056419383734464645,
-0.012843434698879719,
0.06076426804065704,
0.019549425691366196,
0.003678965149447322,
-0.04391305148601532,
0.005788204725831747,
-0.001864134450443089,
-0.05786694586277008,
0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of forgery and of unlawful possession of a depressant, stimulant or hallucinogenic drug, defendant appeals. The issues submitted for decision are: (1) sufficiency of the evidence of knowledge and intent on the forgery charge and (2) sufficiency of the evidence of knowledge on the dr... | [
0.026118550449609756,
-0.010103929787874222,
-0.019188661128282547,
0.03483891487121582,
0.05940963700413704,
0.0023791298735886812,
0.04346034303307533,
0.01680474728345871,
0.027881179004907608,
-0.03795034810900688,
0.040195953100919724,
0.048813775181770325,
-0.05377719923853874,
0.049... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction on one count of burglary (§ 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6)). Prior to and during the trial the defendant had court-ap- . pointed counsél. Counsel was also appointed to prosecute this appeal, but the defendant filed a motion requesting permission to re... | [
-0.02891073189675808,
-0.03049343079328537,
-0.020883897319436073,
-0.004321224521845579,
0.06368225067853928,
0.015306010842323303,
0.036414314061403275,
0.023636771366000175,
0.02100694738328457,
-0.04577949270606041,
0.008906926959753036,
0.02443469874560833,
-0.04110964387655258,
0.025... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This is a malicious prosecution case. One of the elements to be proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, is that no probable cause existed for the prosecution. Meraz v. Valencia et al., 28 N.M. 174, 210 P. 225 (1922). The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, with prejudice, at the ... | [
-0.02672266960144043,
-0.05443437397480011,
-0.009174816310405731,
0.03185287490487099,
0.06961522996425629,
0.0024727345444262028,
0.02012435905635357,
-0.00477239117026329,
0.004093984607607126,
-0.03979962319135666,
0.011911285109817982,
0.04648789018392563,
-0.03403279930353165,
0.0507... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This appeal involves an alleged conspiracy to defraud in connection with a car sold to plaintiff. The issues presented are: (1) evidence of a conspiracy; (2) an instruction as to how conspiracy may be proved; and (3) different jury verdicts against the alleged co-conspirators.
The car involve... | [
-0.00946962833404541,
-0.035003434866666794,
-0.02727840654551983,
0.03883422911167145,
0.05691949278116226,
0.007419150788336992,
0.028223460540175438,
0.012121517211198807,
0.03990678861737251,
-0.03840513899922371,
0.011254600249230862,
0.06619121134281158,
-0.036344263702631,
0.0323621... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1076, 85 N.M. 389, 512 P.2d 962, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.025757910683751106,
-0.023746326565742493,
-0.02170405723154545,
0.007592028938233852,
0.06851469725370407,
0.04943330958485603,
0.04441647231578827,
0.004190118983387947,
-0.004007604438811541,
-0.04692797362804413,
-0.003419991349801421,
0.012352698482573032,
-0.031177213415503502,
0.... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
Plaintiffs, owners of the property in Albuquerque, New Mexico, known as “The National Building,” hereinafter called “appellants,” brought an action against the State Board of Education, its Vocational Rehabilitation Division, and various of its officers, hereinafter called “appellees.” Appella... | [
-0.023525938391685486,
-0.031768910586833954,
0.0036645850632339716,
0.02902166172862053,
0.05650779604911804,
0.0015351197216659784,
0.05176806449890137,
0.0038472770247608423,
-0.0025193048641085625,
-0.02831733226776123,
-0.01570962555706501,
0.04852617159485817,
-0.05661981180310249,
0... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
The original opinion by the court in this cause appears in State v. James, 83 N.M. 263, 490 P.2d 1236 (Ct.App.1971).
Defendant on the retrial was convicted of burglary (§ 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6)) and buying, procuring, receiving or concealing stolen property (§ 40A-16-11, N.M.S... | [
-0.020251678302884102,
-0.05590333789587021,
-0.04551203176379204,
-0.02120785601437092,
0.06376416981220245,
0.015763411298394203,
0.08503691107034683,
0.016504673287272453,
0.01383106131106615,
-0.04418046399950981,
0.011192322708666325,
-0.016606688499450684,
-0.0603022463619709,
0.0216... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Following a plea of guilty, the defendant was sentenced for attempting to distribute a controlled substance (LSD). See §§ 40A-28-1, N.M.S.A.1953 (2nd Repl.Vol. 6) and 54-11-22, N.M.S.A.1953 (Int.Supp. 1972).
On this appeal, defendant contends that the judgment and sentence imposed are invalid beca... | [
0.03227159380912781,
0.0011707106605172157,
-0.06162543594837189,
-0.021127309650182724,
0.05553355813026428,
-0.018666261807084084,
0.05324700474739075,
-0.015404068864881992,
0.02184932865202427,
-0.02329905703663826,
0.01975618675351143,
0.025441305711865425,
-0.07283549755811691,
0.054... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 955, 85 N.M. 230, 511 P.2d 556, be -and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.023632068186998367,
-0.039083801209926605,
-0.018630335107445717,
0.007168315816670656,
0.07183129340410233,
0.037726737558841705,
0.043785858899354935,
0.011844811961054802,
0.009823539294302464,
-0.04858206957578659,
0.007615185342729092,
0.009000303223729134,
-0.040295518934726715,
0... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
On June 14, 1971 Southern Union Gas Company (Company) filed an advice notice with the Public Service Commission (Commission) which gave notice to the public and to the Commission of certain revised rate schedules. The purpose of this filing was to propose that the Company’s preferred rul... | [
-0.035971976816654205,
-0.0007157623185776174,
-0.03187873214483261,
-0.026550235226750374,
0.06402905285358429,
0.037823084741830826,
0.05731968954205513,
0.03674841672182083,
0.028491219505667686,
-0.06564019620418549,
0.004075832664966583,
0.037880394607782364,
-0.07207290828227997,
0.0... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1104, 85 N.M. 146, 509 P.2d 1341 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.01845705322921276,
-0.0336667075753212,
-0.023225564509630203,
0.012655260041356087,
0.07288075238466263,
0.04189614579081535,
0.039379872381687164,
0.007994003593921661,
0.0012225733371451497,
-0.045854661613702774,
0.0134402671828866,
0.001701159169897437,
-0.030897095799446106,
0.063... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Defendant was charged with residential burglary pursuant to § 40A-16-3, N.M.S. A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The state intro duced undisputed evidence that defendant had entered a dwelling without authorization and aided in removing a television set therefrom. Throughout the trial defendant contended t... | [
0.021589240059256554,
-0.013837202452123165,
-0.003979313652962446,
0.0017692705150693655,
0.06146259233355522,
-0.015488633885979652,
0.04586554691195488,
0.0009705499978736043,
-0.01153292041271925,
-0.007990941405296326,
0.025402264669537544,
0.05424831062555313,
-0.051333289593458176,
... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 994, 85 N.M. 150, 509 P.2d 1345 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.019726408645510674,
-0.02966785989701748,
-0.010026426054537296,
0.011644608341157436,
0.05830802023410797,
0.042142871767282486,
0.04276462644338608,
0.008710362948477268,
0.001714698621071875,
-0.04389406740665436,
0.005764964036643505,
0.0073162284679710865,
-0.036349669098854065,
0.... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
Suit was brought in the District Court of Santa Fe County to recover damages for breach of a highway construction contract. The court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant State of New Mexico, New Mexico State Highway Commission, as to Counts One, Two, Three, Six and parts of Fi... | [
-0.008037452585995197,
-0.02480390854179859,
-0.00505444360896945,
0.021031633019447327,
0.06818278878927231,
0.017096612602472305,
0.061420295387506485,
0.052885498851537704,
0.0020564664155244827,
-0.06277720630168915,
-0.017661990597844124,
0.09236093610525131,
-0.051117606461048126,
0.... |
OPINION
MARTINEZ, Justice.
This Court, upon its own motion, withdraws its opinion previously filed on October 19, 1973 and substitutes therefor the following opinion.
Appellant, The Mutual Building & Loan Association of Las Cruces, New Mexico, sued appellees, Thomas and Helen Collins, in the District Court of Dona Ana ... | [
-0.016136588528752327,
-0.020660586655139923,
-0.014873245730996132,
-0.0032043601386249065,
0.062133580446243286,
0.016841590404510498,
0.02603926695883274,
0.02311665564775467,
0.02063939906656742,
-0.01604640483856201,
0.000985901104286313,
0.05105378106236458,
-0.04807598888874054,
0.0... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
This suit began in the District Court of Bernalillo County. Sutton, respondent, sought damages for death by wrongful act pursuant to § 22-20-1 et seq., N.M.S.A. 1953, against petitioner, Chevron Oil Company (Chevron), Lee Sharp (lessee for Chevron) and Herbert R. Buss (Sharp’s employee).... | [
-0.04980262368917465,
-0.019560957327485085,
-0.006878233049064875,
0.011584521271288395,
0.07724497467279434,
0.014901318587362766,
0.024157781153917313,
0.034393712878227234,
-0.003869544481858611,
-0.04362510144710541,
0.0030275259632617235,
0.06185615435242653,
-0.05592385679483414,
0.... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
On September 8, 1969, the defendant was indicted on charges of armed robbery, contrary to § 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6); kidnapping, contrary to § 40A-4 — 1, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6); aggravated assault, contrary to § 40A-3-2 (A), N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6); and aggravated b... | [
-0.05689495801925659,
-0.027461057528853416,
-0.05252355337142944,
0.017269622534513474,
0.04454714432358742,
0.0164750125259161,
0.03328568488359451,
0.015467548742890358,
-0.03041243553161621,
-0.016971508041024208,
0.03806265816092491,
0.03807162865996361,
-0.05370289832353592,
0.002164... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
This appeal concerns the New Mexico Implied Consent Act, § 64-22-2,4 et seq., N.M.S.A. 1953. Gober, Grisolano, Lee, Stivers and Warren (“appellees”) refused to submit to chemical tests to determine the alcoholic content of their blood. Pursuant to the above statutory provisions, and beca... | [
-0.03806319460272789,
-0.0062742941081523895,
-0.01572432555258274,
0.0327291302382946,
0.04994451254606247,
-0.02172533981502056,
0.0700201466679573,
0.008704908192157745,
0.009850452654063702,
-0.04569907858967781,
0.022774504497647285,
0.06356360018253326,
-0.047564536333084106,
0.04407... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter after a jury trial in Bernalillo County. He appeals his conviction on three grounds: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting a statement by the victim related by a witness as a res gestae exception to the hearsay rule; (2) that the trial co... | [
-0.01157892495393753,
-0.025166025385260582,
-0.01421719416975975,
0.0023662110324949026,
0.053618378937244415,
0.017174437642097473,
0.08746854960918427,
0.035454995930194855,
-0.011914566159248352,
-0.02708381973206997,
0.06390894949436188,
0.011493106372654438,
-0.0467233806848526,
0.00... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Plaintiff filed suit to replevy certain pieces of equipment which were bought at a sheriff’s sale by the defendants. The case was tried by the court without a jury and the court awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiff on certain items of equipment, and granted judgment against the plaintiff on ... | [
-0.02592472918331623,
-0.011939216405153275,
-0.03074410744011402,
0.02115902304649353,
0.07254166156053543,
0.015057863667607307,
0.033778272569179535,
0.004944660700857639,
0.010897909291088581,
-0.028686394914984703,
0.02249004691839218,
0.03356122970581055,
-0.023383254185318947,
0.045... |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 948, 85 N.M. 240, 511 P.2d 566 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.021421000361442566,
-0.02931884117424488,
-0.016514912247657776,
0.01076549757272005,
0.07289659976959229,
0.04535987973213196,
0.0344013087451458,
0.00958446878939867,
0.002897779457271099,
-0.04541611671447754,
0.009962703101336956,
0.014491170644760132,
-0.03279183804988861,
0.067769... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
This case is before us on a writ of certiorari to the New Mexico Court of Appeals. In Hunt v. O’Cheskey, 512 P.2d 954 [Ct.App., 1973] it was decided that the State of New Mexico may not tax income and gross receipts of Indians residing on a reservation when the income and gross receipts ... | [
-0.01664441078901291,
-0.010701163671910763,
-0.03981328755617142,
0.0036786841228604317,
0.05130301043391228,
0.000005268221684673335,
0.07274086773395538,
0.00708708306774497,
0.029856758192181587,
-0.0389777272939682,
-0.008258345536887646,
0.028764571994543076,
-0.06397361308336258,
0.... |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1039, 85 N.M. 246, 511 P.2d 572 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.02724345214664936,
-0.03229297325015068,
-0.018473414704203606,
0.011958008632063866,
0.07697071880102158,
0.03912190720438957,
0.03439442068338394,
0.004937023855745792,
-0.002539645181968808,
-0.049401842057704926,
0.007871204987168312,
0.008839773014187813,
-0.028238600119948387,
0.0... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiff, a quadriplegic as a result of a stroke, was awarded total disability benefits, medical expenses, and attorney fees under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Defendants’ appeal raises the following issues: 1) whether there was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding on ca... | [
0.010840125381946564,
-0.022758040577173233,
-0.049508869647979736,
-0.00414567906409502,
0.07449544966220856,
0.014521387405693531,
0.036022741347551346,
0.008441340178251266,
-0.004968214780092239,
-0.06750226765871048,
0.031235484406352043,
0.02818376012146473,
-0.048429038375616074,
0.... |
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
The children’s court dismissed an abuse and neglect petition against respondents. We reverse.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether a stipulation between the parties, which was approved by the children’s court judge, constitutes a consent decree under NMSA 1978, Child.Ct. Rule 59 (Repl.Pamp... | [
-0.05904122069478035,
0.000029648943382198922,
-0.02312248945236206,
-0.004725552164018154,
0.04646869748830795,
-0.01008665468543768,
0.04969828203320503,
0.028261857107281685,
0.007189805153757334,
-0.0470527820289135,
-0.02091430127620697,
0.03185174614191055,
-0.04285380616784096,
0.06... |
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Kathy Roney (plaintiff) appeals the trial court’s dismissal of her complaint against Siri Yogi, Siri Brotherhood, 3HO Foundation, and the 3HO Foundation of New Mexico (defendants). The complaint was dismissed, with prejudice, on the basis that it was not timely filed under the applicable statute ... | [
-0.04319183528423309,
-0.012421103194355965,
-0.017989210784435272,
-0.020565100014209747,
0.011814882047474384,
0.01156876515597105,
0.09177259355783463,
-0.0038272670935839415,
-0.014480425044894218,
-0.025198817253112793,
-0.006734837312251329,
0.08608483523130417,
-0.02933347038924694,
... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of attempted criminal sexual penetration in the second degree, aggravated assault, and false imprisonment. Two issues are raised on appeal: (1) whether defendant was denied a fair trial when the trial court refused to grant a continuance to enable defendan... | [
-0.04018309712409973,
-0.030196139588952065,
-0.05826498568058014,
-0.01306836400181055,
0.03851935639977455,
0.005504200700670481,
0.057995863258838654,
0.005318622570484877,
-0.02062566950917244,
-0.030610108748078346,
0.008738488890230656,
0.0023870866280049086,
-0.05291584134101868,
0.... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellants, David and Sheila Roe (Roes), filed this action in the District Court of Chaves County in inverse condemnation to recover damages, including reasonable attorney fees and expenses, from defendants-appellees, the New Mexico State Highway Department (SHD), the New Mex... | [
-0.011073696427047253,
0.006039890460669994,
-0.017620733007788658,
0.030891917645931244,
0.07508198171854019,
0.0244224201887846,
0.02004845440387726,
0.04210551083087921,
0.03885052353143692,
-0.052340444177389145,
-0.00894259475171566,
0.046790335327386856,
-0.04280710592865944,
0.05321... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
This case arose as a diversity action in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. Plaintiffs Herbert and Margaret Tondre, husband and wife, brought the action to recover damages incurred as a result of husband’s fall from a loading dock on defendant’s premises. T... | [
-0.04965565726161003,
-0.037815798074007034,
-0.015623103827238083,
0.021792719140648842,
0.040278300642967224,
0.012227456085383892,
0.03997266665101051,
0.04011871665716171,
-0.008816017769277096,
-0.028275733813643456,
-0.00386635004542768,
0.04102234169840813,
-0.04733383283019066,
0.0... |
OPINION
RIORDAN, Chief Justice.
Curtis R. Foster (Foster) appeals the suspension of his dental license by the Board of Dentistry (Board). A hearing was held before the Board and Foster’s dental license was subsequently suspended for a period of fourteen days. Foster filed for review in the district court and his petiti... | [
0.0025523798540234566,
-0.017842430621385574,
-0.03352643921971321,
-0.0011208252981305122,
0.029617656022310257,
-0.0016141411615535617,
0.04477045312523842,
0.05475320294499397,
0.019333716481924057,
-0.04146023467183113,
0.038826607167720795,
0.07153947651386261,
-0.04517112672328949,
0... |
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from a district court probate decision authorizing payment of estate taxes from the residuary of the estate. We reverse.
Anastasia T. Kyreazis died on November 26, 1981, leaving two executed wills, which divided her not insubstantial estate differently. At the time o... | [
-0.022487500682473183,
-0.06350315362215042,
0.026741378009319305,
0.03173786401748657,
0.08951814472675323,
0.031555306166410446,
0.04871830716729164,
-0.024893343448638916,
0.00161570287309587,
-0.051319051533937454,
0.004312868230044842,
0.018366659060120583,
-0.05298168212175369,
0.057... |
OPINION
This matter having come before this Court after disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to NMSA 1978, Rules Governing Discipline (Repl.1985), wherein Attorney Torrence B. Harrison was found to have committed violations of nine (9) rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility, involving carelessness, neg... | [
-0.050453148782253265,
-0.022913532331585884,
-0.008358079008758068,
0.018977755680680275,
0.060147255659103394,
-0.00209497706964612,
0.042647723108530045,
0.0363268107175827,
-0.025750529021024704,
-0.04401778057217598,
0.01022292859852314,
0.038821179419755936,
-0.06107507646083832,
0.0... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
The district court granted a motion by defendant Montgomery Ward & Co. to dismiss plaintiff Fred Jones’ personal injury action for failure to prosecute under NMSA 1978, Civ.P.Rule 41(e) (Repl.Pamp.1980), and for failure to substitute parties as required by NMSA 1978, Civ.P.Rule 25(a) (Repl... | [
-0.059951458126306534,
-0.023726074025034904,
0.0013285790337249637,
0.025015119463205338,
0.0459134504199028,
0.021027106791734695,
0.03604994714260101,
0.01514290738850832,
0.028790120035409927,
-0.047653067857027054,
0.011772842146456242,
0.028256701305508614,
-0.03388219699263573,
0.06... |
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
The petitioner, Robert James Tafoya (Tafoya) has been charged with numerous crimes and remains in custody, awaiting trial in the second judicial district. This action arose when Tafoya’s attorney obtained an ex-parte order allowing Tafoya to be transported for the purpose of taking a polygraph... | [
0.010875682346522808,
-0.0075658150017261505,
-0.023173071444034576,
0.02594868093729019,
0.06067134067416191,
-0.017676198855042458,
0.048904258757829666,
0.018799467012286186,
0.02295130491256714,
-0.05227509140968323,
0.03012837842106819,
0.05931972339749336,
-0.06924574822187424,
0.052... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Rudolph Sena, convicted of first degree “depraved mind” murder, appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial. His motion was brought pursuant to NMSA 1978, Crim.P.R. 45 (Repl.Pamp.1980); as grounds he claims newly discovered evidence based upon the retraction of testimony by a key State wi... | [
-0.04230837896466255,
-0.031165754422545433,
-0.013017366640269756,
0.02220189943909645,
0.05420294776558876,
0.002467232057824731,
0.07722626626491547,
-0.013175806030631065,
-0.008857299573719501,
-0.024683667346835136,
0.014551355503499508,
0.025285735726356506,
-0.04958420246839523,
0.... |
ORDER
This matter having come before this Court after completion of disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to NMSA 1978, Rules Governing Discipline (Repl. 1985), wherein Attorney Gilbert H. Frith (Frith) was found to have engaged in several acts of misconduct, the Court adopts the findings and recommendations of t... | [
-0.04112470522522926,
0.002968709683045745,
-0.008762948215007782,
-0.0014541065320372581,
0.011901519261300564,
0.008135928772389889,
0.07716234028339386,
0.025684086605906487,
-0.006207451689988375,
-0.019336653873324394,
-0.027993252500891685,
0.0707441121339798,
-0.05605119466781616,
0... |
OPINION
' DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Kenneth P. Thompson, Co., Inc., employer, appeals from a criminal conviction imposed against it for failing to allow an employee time to vote contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 1-12-42. On appeal, employer challenges the propriety of its conviction and raises two issues: (1) whet... | [
-0.008613883517682552,
-0.015979984775185585,
-0.01865488663315773,
0.020938122645020485,
0.04457033425569534,
-0.011103445664048195,
0.052007678896188736,
0.04015304893255234,
0.0048286267556250095,
-0.023057907819747925,
-0.004122467245906591,
0.014378354884684086,
-0.07747366279363632,
... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Plaintiff title company sued to quiet title to a Los Alamos duplex and asked the court for an order directing distribution of a fund held in escrow after the duplex was sold. The complaint alleged that all of the named defendants “may claim a lien or interest in the subject real estate by reason... | [
0.007996616885066032,
-0.02261781319975853,
0.007727333810180426,
0.018747281283140182,
0.07627787441015244,
-0.0005237055011093616,
0.014538988471031189,
0.019418423995375633,
0.011138826608657837,
-0.016236605122685432,
-0.015504510141909122,
0.04553467035293579,
-0.0324740968644619,
0.0... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Landowner appeals from a judgment following a jury trial in a condemnation action. The central issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing landowner’s requested jury instruction setting forth the elements of the unity rule for valuation of property in an eminent do... | [
-0.003906370606273413,
-0.031277406960725784,
-0.02175508253276348,
0.0029282430186867714,
0.03961782902479172,
0.01901981420814991,
0.05125344544649124,
0.01328931376338005,
0.02029731310904026,
-0.037220217287540436,
0.016530614346265793,
0.03695857897400856,
-0.08583172410726547,
0.0699... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
This appeal concerns a domestic relations dispute. Petitioner, Eusebio Bustos (husband) sought a dissolution of marriage, custody of two minor children and child support. Respondent, Rose Mary Gilroy (wife) counter-petitioned also seeking a dissolution of marriage, custody, support, and an equita... | [
-0.04978380352258682,
-0.013721602968871593,
-0.0032946865539997816,
0.02033037692308426,
0.04203767329454422,
0.021181022748351097,
0.00793052650988102,
0.023909177631139755,
0.004757250659167767,
-0.03302035853266716,
0.020933162420988083,
0.06777675449848175,
-0.03522128984332085,
0.047... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Plaintiff Melnick began a State Farm Insurance Agency in Los Alamos in 1946. On May 13,1980, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company terminated Melnick’s insurance agency contract and ordered him to cease operation of his agency. Melnick requested a termination review hearing, and State Farm impan... | [
-0.02264379896223545,
-0.02543964609503746,
-0.02603507973253727,
-0.0020668671932071447,
0.01677466183900833,
-0.0038203662261366844,
0.0451001338660717,
0.011661029420793056,
0.02626223862171173,
-0.03364068269729614,
0.013713506981730461,
0.047411657869815826,
-0.03550822287797928,
0.02... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Petitioner Charles R. Smith has requested issuance of a writ of superintending control, directed to Respondent, to prevent enforcement of Respondent’s order requiring Mr. Smith to sign a document requesting and authorizing his personal physician to disclose “any and all information” in the doc... | [
-0.01010205689817667,
-0.0005810465663671494,
-0.02206304855644703,
-0.006627761758863926,
0.034609660506248474,
-0.004047401249408722,
0.04475414380431175,
-0.007634383160620928,
0.04245813190937042,
-0.0537024587392807,
0.03818829730153084,
0.017137454822659492,
-0.06532366573810577,
0.0... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
This case originated when a builder’s supply company (not a party to this appeal) filed a complaint for money due and foreclosure against Michael J. Kirkpatrick and Gail L. Rein (Owners), who are cross-defendants-appellees in the present appeal. The builder’s supply company sought payment ... | [
-0.009773461148142815,
-0.018624618649482727,
0.0011777437757700682,
0.004309683572500944,
0.07524412125349045,
0.04263349995017052,
0.026598937809467316,
-0.0007110011647455394,
0.029246356338262558,
-0.04086614400148392,
-0.004335884004831314,
0.018656479194760323,
-0.06304518133401871,
... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Defendant-Appellant, Roberson Construction Co., Inc. (Roberson) appeals from the judgment granted to plaintiffs-appellees, Levon and Elmaise Register (the Registers). The cause of action had been initiated by ten plaintiffs, including the Registers, against four defendants. Eventually a se... | [
-0.008791396394371986,
-0.021134519949555397,
-0.005353948567062616,
-0.03785068169236183,
0.02735920250415802,
0.015302482061088085,
0.05834026634693146,
0.03384222835302353,
0.021521003916859627,
-0.03243688866496086,
-0.006268832832574844,
0.025048011913895607,
-0.06873280555009842,
0.0... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
This appeal comes before this court for decision after the case was submitted to an advisory committee pursuant to an experimental plan. See Patterson v. Environmental Improvement Div., 105 N.M. 320, 731 P.2d 1364 (Ct.App.1986); Stoll v. Dow, 105 N.M. 316, 731 P.2d 1360 (Ct.App.1986); Boucher v. ... | [
0.0001454601006116718,
-0.03558727726340294,
-0.02895415388047695,
0.01801261305809021,
0.05554049462080002,
-0.003378914203494787,
0.017896004021167755,
0.03194752335548401,
-0.00900991726666689,
-0.035607703030109406,
0.012222225777804852,
0.054609306156635284,
-0.053612131625413895,
0.0... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
We granted defendants’ motion for rehearing to reconsider the issue of whether more than mere ownership is required for a third party to validly consent to a warrant-less search. As a result of the rehearing, we withdraw our opinion filed January 8, 1987 and substitute the following.
Defendants, ... | [
-0.028718233108520508,
-0.010996883735060692,
-0.004746819846332073,
0.013222921639680862,
0.0728863775730133,
-0.022099975496530533,
0.07125020027160645,
0.027716314420104027,
0.008971260860562325,
-0.04711822792887688,
-0.009542262181639671,
0.0645209550857544,
-0.06208328530192375,
0.06... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Respondent, the natural mother of Jason Y., appeals from the order of the children’s court terminating her parental rights to her minor child. We proposed summary affirmance, and mother filed a timely memorandum in opposition. Not persuaded by mother’s memorandum, we now affirm the trial court.
I... | [
-0.0429966002702713,
-0.02425570972263813,
-0.04041510820388794,
0.01236713957041502,
0.04499227926135063,
0.030179869383573532,
0.048131562769412994,
0.022647032514214516,
-0.010056247003376484,
-0.046247947961091995,
0.017047950997948647,
0.05992906913161278,
-0.04043538495898247,
0.0331... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action challenging the validity of a rule promulgated by the New Mexico Board of Medical Examiners (Board) that in certain circumstances allows physician’s assistants to dispense dangerous drugs. Under paragraph (D)(4) of Rule 86-2, the Board may ... | [
-0.0038572149351239204,
-0.016786497086286545,
-0.024862537160515785,
0.004957956727594137,
0.040814198553562164,
-0.025302939116954803,
0.055288273841142654,
0.01656443439424038,
0.032095689326524734,
-0.028889808803796768,
0.017771273851394653,
0.059812795370817184,
-0.05603631213307381,
... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Consolidated Oil and Gas, Inc. (Consolidated) sued Southern Union Company (SUC), Gas Company of New Mexico (GAS-CO), and Southern Union Gathering Company (Gathering) for breach of a Settlement Agreement from a prior price litigation. SUC responded with a request for a reformation of the co... | [
-0.045182667672634125,
-0.048939064145088196,
-0.034294091165065765,
-0.007370438426733017,
0.05951912701129913,
0.019125085324048996,
0.029353762045502663,
0.031341392546892166,
0.021332640200853348,
-0.035623956471681595,
0.031484685838222504,
0.036400843411684036,
-0.06991621851921082,
... |
OPINION
SCARBOROUGH, Chief Justice.
The district court of Sandoval County refused to order approval of appellant’s proposed subdivision and refused to rule on appellant’s claim of full legal and public access to the property. We affirm.
We summarize the trial court’s findings of fact. In June 1983, appellant, Dorothy C... | [
-0.049180325120687485,
-0.012608282268047333,
-0.011698460206389427,
-0.0040803332813084126,
0.04835391044616699,
-0.000288825249299407,
0.040496036410331726,
0.0035593120846897364,
-0.008434667252004147,
-0.0434408076107502,
0.015629466623067856,
0.034307144582271576,
-0.04142243415117264,
... |
OPINION
CASTILLO, J.
{1} This case requires us to determine whether the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission (Commission) appropriately adopted a sentence in the water quality standards amended in May 2002. The sentence, contained in 20.6.4.10.G NMAC (2002), reads as follows: “The human health standards for pers... | [
-0.01569253019988537,
-0.02807467430830002,
-0.06382425129413605,
-0.01148917991667986,
0.05281992256641388,
-0.03260017931461334,
0.03169021010398865,
0.04988386109471321,
-0.008368188515305519,
-0.038183461874723434,
0.01768079213798046,
0.04792047664523125,
-0.06790520995855331,
0.01730... |
OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
{1} On motion for rehearing, the opinion filed October 28, 2004, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place. The motion for rehearing is otherwise denied.
{2} At what point in criminal proceedings does a defendant waive objection to the constitutionality of a search that... | [
-0.011925636790692806,
-0.025938961654901505,
-0.02221382036805153,
0.025376562029123306,
0.06114424392580986,
-0.0072004408575594425,
0.07185234874486923,
0.014859279617667198,
-0.02435458078980446,
-0.04528561234474182,
0.018732629716396332,
0.0352548323571682,
-0.04338455572724342,
0.01... |
OPINION
KENNEDY, J.
{1} These cases concern whether the State may appeal non-final orders from the district court. In Defendant Griego’s ease, the State asks this Court to accept its appeal of the district court’s order denying its motion in limine seeking to restrict impeachment of the victim based on (among other thi... | [
-0.0396546944975853,
-0.04712701961398125,
-0.029174741357564926,
0.02189011685550213,
0.018777946010231972,
-0.027944408357143402,
0.047475721687078476,
0.028488611802458763,
-0.010616394691169262,
-0.024248845875263214,
0.006034382618963718,
0.01933000423014164,
-0.043699104338884354,
0.... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant, Ramon Mares (Mares), appeals the judgment of the district court in favor of defendant-appellee, Santa Fe Public Schools (School Board). For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
FACTS
On September 22, 1983, Mares filed a complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Commis... | [
-0.047124527394771576,
-0.01763017475605011,
-0.01823487877845764,
0.023795219138264656,
0.026622802019119263,
0.0020068774465471506,
0.0443686880171299,
0.012887486256659031,
-0.005843321792781353,
-0.04251091927289963,
-0.0023614373058080673,
0.042016465216875076,
-0.036750856786966324,
... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
The Taxation and Revenue Department (department) appeals from a judgment declaring all properties owned by Masonic lodges exempt from property taxes under the New Mexico Constitution, article VIII, Section 3. The department contends that the trial court applied an erroneous standard of law in co... | [
0.027034612372517586,
0.0192423015832901,
0.006110741291195154,
0.017481964081525803,
0.0607171356678009,
-0.04299032688140869,
0.0806775689125061,
-0.0006319627282209694,
0.0021976325660943985,
-0.03053472936153412,
-0.008675018325448036,
0.024880187585949898,
-0.0862557515501976,
0.06230... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks damages for personal injuries caused when a restraining strap for a spare tire struck him in the eye. He sued Mrs. Rosenwald, the owner of the car on which the strap was being used, Volvo of America Corporation, the manufacturer of the car, and Santa Fe Mazda-Volvo, the dealer tha... | [
-0.0017570226918905973,
-0.0296662338078022,
-0.013553149998188019,
0.009625374339520931,
0.06658614426851273,
0.009665647521615028,
0.03659673407673836,
-0.0018140770262107253,
0.011424529366195202,
-0.033824317157268524,
0.006082799285650253,
0.06319332122802734,
-0.06842881441116333,
0.... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Plaintiff-Appellant Walter Sanchez (Sanchez) filed suit against Defendant-Appellee The New Mexican (Employer), a corporation which publishes a daily newspaper in Santa Fe. In a five-count complaint, Sanchez alleged that, in discharging him from his job, his Employer (1) breached an implied... | [
-0.04796653985977173,
-0.03232209384441376,
-0.014029447920620441,
0.0182485431432724,
0.012805008329451084,
0.01971987821161747,
0.0443953275680542,
0.028870578855276108,
0.009823610074818134,
-0.03681265562772751,
0.013725672848522663,
0.054908785969018936,
-0.05130666494369507,
0.010435... |
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
This case is before the Court on a writ of certiorari to the court of appeals to review an opinion on interlocutory appeal which affirmed the ruling of the court below that plaintiffs were not entitled to partial summary judgment of liability. Plaintiffs had sought partial summary judgment on t... | [
-0.0019537671469151974,
-0.05976061522960663,
-0.01564452424645424,
0.028973659500479698,
0.05020546168088913,
0.018199611455202103,
0.050100576132535934,
-0.0028771748766303062,
0.038985252380371094,
-0.05544106289744377,
0.006091140676289797,
0.03440887853503227,
-0.037862807512283325,
0... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Plaintiffs Howard and Myrtle Shryock were injured in a two-car collision with defendant Steven Madrid. As a result of the accident they filed personal injury and property damage claims against Steven Madrid, joining Steven’s father, Vincent Madrid, under the family purpose doctrine.
Official r... | [
-0.024662431329488754,
-0.015589803457260132,
0.007604936603456736,
-0.016956452280282974,
0.04933774471282959,
0.0361429825425148,
0.04150322079658508,
0.014975940808653831,
0.027708852663636208,
-0.04898420348763466,
0.02616085112094879,
0.07504882663488388,
-0.03394045680761337,
0.00378... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Plaintiff James Graff appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants on Graff’s complaint for breach of employment contract and violation of civil rights.
Graff principally asserts that the trial court erred when it construed the University’s motion to dismiss as a ... | [
0.013932917267084122,
-0.04675260931253433,
-0.037409160286188126,
0.000591880118008703,
0.0449572391808033,
0.022000666707754135,
0.0537748783826828,
0.04046574980020523,
0.002951740985736251,
-0.06264348328113556,
-0.009236105717718601,
0.059016380459070206,
-0.05042920261621475,
0.04747... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
This is a domestic relations case in which the husband appeals and the wife cross-appeals. The parties were married in 1960 and separated in 1968. In 1970, wife sought and obtained a decree of separation. The Bernalillo County district court divided the parties’ property and awarded wife $250 per... | [
-0.05195412412285805,
-0.009212068282067776,
0.014809790067374706,
0.003360210219398141,
0.06164378672838211,
0.018993064761161804,
0.040275100618600845,
0.011092566885054111,
-0.004486375488340855,
-0.03155961632728577,
0.006493294611573219,
0.045564450323581696,
-0.05063765123486519,
0.0... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
The City of Albuquerque (City), a self-insurer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, appeals from a judgment awarding lump-sum death and other benefits to the widow of a city fireman who died of a heart condition while on the job. The parties’ major arguments address whether or not plaintiff esta... | [
-0.029123229905962944,
-0.03642641380429268,
-0.03448578342795372,
0.02155257761478424,
0.0532524548470974,
0.04038982465863228,
0.03646491840481758,
0.05927947163581848,
0.03982806205749512,
-0.044739026576280594,
0.009942016564309597,
0.02608073502779007,
-0.064430370926857,
0.0025880010... |
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from a district court order granting dual motions for summary judgment in favor of defendants Transportation Division of the State Board of Education and Bill G. Loshbough (State), and the Gallup-MeKinley County School District and George Hoover (School District). We affirm as t... | [
-0.04293913394212723,
-0.012246600352227688,
-0.01687190867960453,
0.003017101204022765,
0.049189671874046326,
0.014107199385762215,
0.04518430307507515,
0.02148650959134102,
0.016125626862049103,
-0.05854368209838867,
0.01873394101858139,
0.042177554219961166,
-0.03879883140325546,
0.0582... |
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
John L. Padilla (Padilla) appeals from the decision of the district court which affirmed the New Mexico Real Estate Commission (commission) in its revocation of Padilla’s license to sell real estate. The grounds for the revocation were false or fraudulent representations by Padilla with respect... | [
-0.048373911529779434,
-0.03131161257624626,
-0.008408411405980587,
0.010503364726901054,
0.054054245352745056,
-0.002425673184916377,
0.040480758994817734,
0.0584111362695694,
-0.006052045151591301,
-0.023053640499711037,
-0.01447143405675888,
0.0405668281018734,
-0.04576656594872475,
0.0... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Defendant appeals from a summary judgment rendered against her in a personal injury action. The sole issue on appeal is whether the decision of Guess v. Gulf Ins. Co., 96 N.M. 27, 627 P.2d 869 (1981), abolishing parental immunity in New Mexico, should be purely prospective in application.
FACTS
T... | [
-0.040315449237823486,
-0.02503545954823494,
-0.005871537607163191,
-0.02871483750641346,
0.05291608348488808,
0.018852343782782555,
0.06627251952886581,
0.027929767966270447,
0.001678601955063641,
-0.04861872270703316,
0.02289208397269249,
0.03775348141789436,
-0.026880888268351555,
0.047... |
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Respondent appeals a children’s court order denying his motion to dismiss petitioner’s delinquency petition. Two issues have been briefed on appeal:
(1) Whether a direct appeal from a nonfinal order is an “appeal” within the meaning of SCRA 1986, Rule 10-226(A)(4), which permits an adjudicatory ... | [
-0.038368742913007736,
-0.06847824156284332,
-0.021569421514868736,
-0.0037339888513088226,
0.02293848618865013,
0.013817506842315197,
0.03443826362490654,
0.02785021811723709,
0.0013358882861211896,
-0.04239071160554886,
-0.011794599704444408,
0.02177746780216694,
-0.03938795253634453,
0.... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
From a judgment and final decree dissolving the parties’ marriage, dividing their property and debts, awarding lump sum alimony and attorney fees, holding husband in contempt and from an order appointing a special master to sell husband’s separate real property in Florida, husband appeals. We aff... | [
-0.024752182886004448,
-0.031476326286792755,
-0.008021064102649689,
0.031274471431970596,
0.04874775558710098,
0.03886239975690842,
0.04379883408546448,
0.012040706351399422,
0.004347311798483133,
-0.028039535507559776,
0.011895352974534035,
0.04031648486852646,
-0.06727176904678345,
0.03... |
OPINION OP THE COURT.
HANNA, J.
— This is a petition for a writ of mandamus directed to the State Auditor, Hon. Wm. G.- Sargent, directing him to draw a warrant in the sum of $17,798.62, against the state road fund, being the whole of said fund. The State Auditor has refused to draw said warrant on said fund upon the g... | [
-0.014513343572616577,
-0.046753767877817154,
-0.02749784104526043,
0.02581004425883293,
0.03208182007074356,
0.02501518465578556,
0.04963929206132889,
0.02159416861832142,
0.015015463344752789,
-0.06975779682397842,
0.03717401623725891,
0.05334290862083435,
-0.07485463470220566,
0.0429568... |
OPINION OP THE COURT.
PARKER, J.
— -The defendant in error will be referred to as plaintiff, and the plaintiffs in error as defendants, as they were situated in the court below.
One Jennie Schaeffer was the owner of an office building-in the city of Santa Fé, and had employed defendants to install a stationary washstan... | [
0.005867557134479284,
-0.020293505862355232,
-0.02530290186405182,
-0.0009420802816748619,
0.04663262888789177,
0.04326936602592468,
0.0713336318731308,
0.029275771230459213,
-0.0031105433590710163,
-0.02665705606341362,
0.01890691928565502,
0.016035763546824455,
-0.06062203273177147,
0.02... |
OPINION OP THE COURT.
HANNA, J.
(after stating the facts as above) — Appellant contends that the question's before us for determination are:' First, did appellant neglect to support appellee, 'his wife, according to his means, ability, and station in life? Second, if appellant did neglect to support h:s wife according ... | [
-0.02401231788098812,
-0.034931447356939316,
-0.004027258139103651,
-0.005626849830150604,
0.05378559231758118,
0.04710059612989426,
0.05119416490197182,
0.01304654125124216,
-0.0009385201265104115,
-0.02347126230597496,
0.015090608038008213,
0.042642783373594284,
-0.06106746569275856,
0.0... |
OPINION OP THE COURT.
EOBEETS, C. J.
— This is a companion ease to cause No. 1763, between the same parties, decided at the present term of this court, and involves only the right of Mayme E. Alldredge, the plaintiff in the court below, to release and satisfy the judgment entered in the court below, awarding her $1,000... | [
-0.03682328388094902,
-0.03686678782105446,
-0.02618495374917984,
0.02448287419974804,
0.03483038768172264,
0.02063540741801262,
0.03792474418878555,
0.03626804053783417,
0.01722162775695324,
-0.019078919664025307,
0.0016614622436463833,
0.022203214466571808,
-0.060595858842134476,
0.05031... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
Plaintiff Triple B Corporation (Triple B) appeals from the district court’s granting of a motion for directed verdict and entry of judgment in favor of defendant Brown <fe Root, Inc. (Brown <& Root) in this action arising from certain construction contracts. In 1974 and 1975, Triple B, a Texas... | [
-0.0037482648622244596,
-0.007730027195066214,
0.004939870443195105,
-0.009855825453996658,
0.013178812339901924,
0.017900042235851288,
0.04907901585102081,
-0.0008006776333786547,
-0.020397838205099106,
-0.030995815992355347,
0.008070545271039009,
0.035878490656614304,
-0.0496036596596241,
... |
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
On November 6, 1986, Citizens Bank of Clovis (Citizens Bank) sued Teel on a note dated September 17, 1979, payable after 60 days in the principle amount of $53,228.44. At issue is whether suit was barred by the six-year statute of limitations, NMSA 1978, Section 37-1-3. The statute would have r... | [
-0.029358752071857452,
-0.06196922808885574,
-0.029007399454712868,
-0.017353205010294914,
0.03299267590045929,
-0.006709214765578508,
0.029635265469551086,
0.06523843854665756,
-0.0004044678353238851,
-0.014582118950784206,
0.01067479606717825,
0.010079199448227882,
-0.04299651086330414,
... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Petitioner appeals from a district court judgment interpreting a marital settlement and child custody agreement entered into between the parties and ratified by a divorce decree entered in the Dominican Republic. The dispositive issues are under what circumstances a foreign divorce decree... | [
-0.033987585455179214,
-0.007705783471465111,
0.01709829829633236,
0.004673747345805168,
0.03810500726103783,
0.01762625202536583,
0.027501331642270088,
0.04214935749769211,
0.014792597852647305,
-0.02993551269173622,
0.01360911875963211,
0.037658244371414185,
-0.05009285360574722,
0.06029... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Respondents, City of Albuquerque (City), Sam Baca, Chief of the Albuquerque Police Department (Baca), and Gene Romo, Chief Administrative Officer (CAO), appeal the District Court’s issuance of a permanent writ of mandamus directing the City’s compliance with an administrative order reinstating... | [
-0.013915237039327621,
-0.04602319747209549,
-0.02939627505838871,
0.03824905678629875,
0.03185158595442772,
0.011955363675951958,
0.020896155387163162,
0.025246314704418182,
0.0010763077298179269,
-0.0662413239479065,
0.01570787839591503,
0.024128161370754242,
-0.05821000039577484,
0.0227... |
OPINION
FRUMAN, Judge.
Defendants appeal a judgment awarding worker’s compensation benefits, medical benefits and attorney fees to plaintiff. Defendants raised three issues in their docketing statement. They first assert that plaintiff’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Our calendar notice proposed summar... | [
-0.017351359128952026,
-0.03209526091814041,
-0.0257057324051857,
-0.007671544328331947,
0.051691241562366486,
-0.001997243147343397,
0.04531474784016609,
0.042873453348875046,
0.0047857798635959625,
-0.07345880568027496,
0.02251073531806469,
0.05426327884197235,
-0.05052114278078079,
0.02... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.