text stringlengths 44 390k | embeddings listlengths 768 768 |
|---|---|
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Plaintiffs’ automobile was partially destroyed after a collision with a cow. The case was first brought in the Torrance County magistrate court where a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs. On appeal to the Torrance County district court a trial de novo resulted in affirming the jud... | [
-0.00010874188592424616,
-0.008351740427315235,
-0.013340565375983715,
0.005181625951081514,
0.05266762524843216,
0.02093740552663803,
0.04055068641901016,
0.031232398003339767,
0.007439278531819582,
-0.02642858773469925,
0.03671699017286301,
0.06009991839528084,
-0.03966023400425911,
0.03... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
The parties hereto were married in 1946, and in June 1968, while residing in the State of Oklahoma plaintiff-appellant (appellant) and defendant-appellee (appellee) were separated. Subsequently, appellant assumed residency in New Mexico, while appellee remained in Oklahoma.
Thereafter, in Febr... | [
-0.041016291826963425,
-0.0277920700609684,
-0.001842039986513555,
0.03679058328270912,
0.06436567008495331,
0.023447513580322266,
0.029126618057489395,
0.014790598303079605,
-0.0025686039589345455,
-0.03915376961231232,
0.027347583323717117,
0.04175236448645592,
-0.04942203685641289,
0.04... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The trial court denied defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief; defendant appeals. Section 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4).
1. Jones v. State, 81 N.M. 568, 469 P.2d 717 (1970) points out: (a) that “Post conviction proceedings are not a method of obtaining consideration of questio... | [
-0.043334607034921646,
-0.024684526026248932,
-0.030575701966881752,
0.004813090432435274,
0.05102444440126419,
0.00575616117566824,
0.06897246837615967,
-0.009041360579431057,
0.00446438230574131,
-0.044740647077560425,
0.02841132879257202,
0.01706145890057087,
-0.026006821542978287,
0.05... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1081, 85 N.M. 191, 510 P.2d 515, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.007060803472995758,
-0.03292503580451012,
-0.01861828938126564,
0.01601521670818329,
0.0694633275270462,
0.044466402381658554,
0.042381949722766876,
0.00954214297235012,
0.00084428780246526,
-0.04597577080130577,
0.004993153270334005,
0.004225546028465033,
-0.02986024133861065,
0.065467... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff’s claim for personal injuries, suffered in an automobile accident, received an adverse verdict of the jury. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered for defendant.
We reverse.
Three points are raised on appeal, (1) whether plaintiff’s accident report introduced in evidence by stipulat... | [
-0.011748963966965675,
0.0015364469727501273,
-0.03759113326668739,
-0.009220315143465996,
0.043579403311014175,
0.0016139498911798,
0.05886524170637131,
0.009181535802781582,
0.003318002913147211,
-0.05196958780288696,
0.0401352122426033,
0.052311308681964874,
-0.04612109810113907,
0.0067... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant pled guilty to burglary. Section 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2nd Repl. Vol. 6). Appealing, he attacks the procedure followed by the trial court in accepting the plea. Because of this asserted defective procedure he claims his plea is void. The appeal is frivolous.
Defendant was indicted... | [
-0.041040074080228806,
0.0006685295375064015,
-0.016882898285984993,
-0.013716867193579674,
0.045741595327854156,
0.0303198229521513,
0.08661270886659622,
-0.00025713571812957525,
0.0027309346478432417,
-0.03808698058128357,
0.021360576152801514,
0.014025709591805935,
-0.07637877762317657,
... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
This cause is before us on a writ of certiorari directed to the New Mexico Court of Appeals;
Petitioner, defendant below, issued to respondent, plaintiff below, on March 7, 1953, five • cashier’s checks in the amount of $1,000.00 each. Respondent deposited these checks to his credit in a Mexican ... | [
-0.023262208327651024,
-0.0317988358438015,
-0.015811407938599586,
0.01368856243789196,
0.04888240993022919,
0.048886869102716446,
0.03489949181675911,
0.05853550508618355,
-0.0015734003391116858,
-0.03755596652626991,
0.003847031155601144,
0.0334608256816864,
-0.06974968314170837,
0.01328... |
OPINION
MARTINEZ, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this suit in the District Court of Curry County to obtain an accounting for renewal commissions on life insurance policies sold, amended or converted through his efforts and for judgment for any unpaid commissions due him. Plaintiff’s complaint was based on a letter agreemen... | [
-0.03115067444741726,
-0.037428829818964005,
-0.025220081210136414,
0.005239521618932486,
0.0634121522307396,
0.012549340724945068,
0.031089719384908676,
-0.002199353650212288,
0.032462362200021744,
-0.020443156361579895,
0.023673975840210915,
0.05258726701140404,
-0.04110611975193024,
0.0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The issue in this automobile accident case is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s findings as to: (1)decedent’s negligence as the proximate cause of the accident and (2) plaintiff’s contributory negligence.
Additional issues are asserted but these are simply alternati... | [
0.004380376078188419,
-0.029007703065872192,
-0.010169013403356075,
0.008396424353122711,
0.06430280953645706,
0.026985304430127144,
0.059260252863168716,
0.003892311593517661,
0.006868700031191111,
-0.08526211231946945,
0.03558393567800522,
0.06470855325460434,
-0.03471432998776436,
0.044... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The issue is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty after sentence was imposed. Defendant claims denial of the motion deprived him of due process.
Defendant was charged with aggravated battery in violation of § 40A-3-5(C), N. M.S.A.1953 (2d ... | [
-0.04099026322364807,
-0.04625922814011574,
-0.03223717212677002,
0.004850118421018124,
0.0389372743666172,
0.0024470004718750715,
0.05638362094759941,
0.0027599830646067858,
0.0029577764216810465,
-0.013791278935968876,
0.05296679586172104,
0.03506821393966675,
-0.0537094883620739,
0.0419... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of burglary. Section 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). There are two issues: (1)permitting a witness to testify after the witness violated the court’s order not to discuss the case and (2) instructing the jury concerning a confession.
Permitting witness... | [
-0.02036808244884014,
-0.029215363785624504,
-0.013575888238847256,
-0.015088511630892754,
0.048272378742694855,
0.017458150163292885,
0.0944284126162529,
-0.003410890232771635,
0.00879631470888853,
-0.03837810084223747,
0.020891418680548668,
0.039810094982385635,
-0.06182777136564255,
0.0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Dona Ana (Dona Ana Title and Abstract Company, a New Mexico Corporation) contracted with Title Guaranty (Title Guaranty and Insurance Company, a New Mexico Corporation). Under the contract, Title Guaranty purchased the tangible assets of Dona Ana. Sterling (Sterling Title Company of Taos) is ... | [
-0.042530208826065063,
-0.05024803802371025,
-0.014545801095664501,
0.020224440842866898,
0.048303041607141495,
0.0032636034302413464,
0.012860823422670364,
0.0344463475048542,
0.03468579053878784,
0.000890664232429117,
0.005812675226479769,
0.061714187264442444,
-0.021872378885746002,
0.0... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
Appellee is a municipal corporation and, in that capacity, disapproved the application of appellant Sanchez for transfer of ownership of a dispenser’s liquor license to his name, and transfer of its location from a point 2i/£ miles west of Santa Rosa to an address within the city limits.... | [
-0.055430661886930466,
-0.02594812959432602,
-0.01671540178358555,
0.023305518552660942,
0.027260884642601013,
-0.009287138469517231,
0.0452069491147995,
0.01338801346719265,
0.004678159486502409,
-0.061378590762615204,
-0.033329714089632034,
0.06408862769603729,
-0.05763822793960571,
0.06... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Defendants were charged by indictment with violation of § 40A-19-3(F), N.M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). Defendants’ motion to quash the indictment was granted and the State appeals pursuant to Supreme Court rule 5(4) (§ 21-2-1(5) (4), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 1970)).
The trial court order quash... | [
-0.039905112236738205,
-0.02735208533704281,
-0.040876567363739014,
-0.03618503361940384,
0.020274469628930092,
-0.030838409438729286,
0.04001959413290024,
0.017208095639944077,
-0.015696682035923004,
-0.022901762276887894,
0.007203798741102219,
0.07930789142847061,
-0.07305290549993515,
0... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of unlawful possession of a stolen vehicle. Section 64-9-5, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 9, pt. 2). Defendant appeals. We affirm.
Section 64-9-5, supra, reads as follows:
Any person who, with intent to procure or pass title to a vehicle which he knows or has reason to believ... | [
-0.007318634539842606,
-0.040432240813970566,
-0.009409245103597641,
0.00875269714742899,
0.08292023092508316,
-0.011380636133253574,
0.06238760054111481,
0.012044858187437057,
0.019264094531536102,
-0.010416639968752861,
0.004534308332949877,
0.027438227087259293,
-0.04598694667220116,
0.... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
This action arose from the alleged malpractice of the defendants. Plaintiffs introduced evidence that, after surgery, a f-ube was allowed to slip into Peggy West-brook’s abdomen. The theory of liability against the hospital was that a nurse, employed by the hospital, was present when the incident ... | [
-0.022742854431271553,
-0.041295964270830154,
-0.007521859370172024,
-0.023534197360277176,
0.04737982526421547,
0.02438618801534176,
0.06510327756404877,
0.05903670936822891,
0.00270669162273407,
-0.03505486994981766,
0.0277452003210783,
0.054258622229099274,
-0.04121922329068184,
0.04141... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
This action was brought in the District Court of Santa Fe County to recover a debt for construction work on a trailer park and to recover upon a third-party beneficiary contract whereby the debt was allegedly assumed by defendant Thomas H. Lynch (“Thomas”). The case was tried without a j... | [
-0.014799202792346478,
-0.028740793466567993,
0.012341195717453957,
0.021287010982632637,
0.05041730776429176,
0.006356869358569384,
0.04493657872080803,
0.004251965321600437,
-0.012225703336298466,
-0.04854197800159454,
0.008693390525877476,
0.04593903571367264,
-0.06449921429157257,
0.04... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
This is an appeal, taken pursuant to Section 21-10-2.1 subd. A (3), N.M.S.A.1953 (1972 Interim Supp.), from an interlocutory order denying defendant’s motion to suppress certain evidence. Defendant alleges two points of error: (1) there was not probable cause for the issuance of the search war... | [
-0.03252864256501198,
-0.024740589782595634,
-0.02053174190223217,
0.010901648551225662,
0.04884056746959686,
-0.0273731742054224,
0.06425951421260834,
0.0017829593271017075,
0.004677602089941502,
-0.039756547659635544,
0.012337039224803448,
0.02360684983432293,
-0.03934181481599808,
0.027... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Now, therefore, it is ordered that the Writ of Certiorari issued herein on December 1, 1972 be and the same is hereby quashed as having been improvidently issued.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 923, 84 N.M. 369, 503 P.2d 652, be and the same is hereby ret... | [
-0.003816494019702077,
-0.011339652352035046,
-0.010977375321090221,
0.006318039260804653,
0.06085222586989403,
-0.00184746109880507,
0.056561801582574844,
0.04119642823934555,
-0.007927627302706242,
-0.03313946723937988,
0.0013145813718438148,
-0.021365026012063026,
-0.03186878561973572,
... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1018, 85 N.M. 87, 509 P.2d 562 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.020592816174030304,
-0.025630807504057884,
-0.017831742763519287,
0.010602488182485104,
0.07232707738876343,
0.041521232575178146,
0.04082252457737923,
0.01137534435838461,
-0.0023393069859594107,
-0.05128195136785507,
0.007051209453493357,
0.009633787907660007,
-0.03339248523116112,
0.... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
This suit was brought by Petitioner in district court pursuant to § 14-20-7, N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 3, 1968). Petitioner sought reversal of a decision of Respondents, the zoning authority of the City of Santa Fe, by which the zoning classification of a portion of a tract of land owned by Interv... | [
-0.013860194012522697,
-0.04256601259112358,
0.022480400279164314,
0.00042948045302182436,
0.04405521973967552,
0.025089316070079803,
0.03452398255467415,
0.020747017115354538,
0.034495655447244644,
-0.041200827807188034,
-0.017196930944919586,
0.037608761340379715,
-0.05023064464330673,
0... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment granted Chevron Oil Company (Chevron) arising out of a claim for dam ages for wrongful death caused by alleged negligence of defendant Sharp, the lessee and operator of a Chevron oil station.
We reverse.
Chevron did business as Standard Oil Company of Texa... | [
-0.05460122972726822,
-0.0346338152885437,
-0.018683983013033867,
0.0029971033800393343,
0.06860049813985825,
0.027320779860019684,
0.04239536449313164,
0.03495746850967407,
0.010508584789931774,
-0.021510854363441467,
0.015957016497850418,
0.05994698777794838,
-0.06222670525312424,
0.0427... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This suit was brought in the District Court of Bernalillo County to foreclose a mechanic’s and materialmen’s lien against a Mr. Daniels. Other mechanics and materialmen and Mortgage Investment Com pany of El Paso, a mortgagee, were joined as defendants to resolve lien priorities. The pleadi... | [
-0.01830865442752838,
-0.008794179186224937,
0.0003461002779658884,
0.025964366272091866,
0.06733298301696777,
0.02333320863544941,
0.030949950218200684,
0.0072076404467225075,
-0.007463456131517887,
-0.05226587504148483,
0.007352156564593315,
0.04567843675613403,
-0.04620910808444023,
0.0... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted on two counts for fraudulent use of a credit card. Section 40A-16-33, subd. A(3), N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). He appeals. We affirm.
On November 10, 1971, defendant purchased merchandise from Miller’s Ltd. and charged it on an American Express card issued to Ray B. Chris... | [
-0.009548542089760303,
-0.00013628423039335757,
-0.016846302896738052,
0.014006632380187511,
0.07126795500516891,
-0.004221362993121147,
0.04188457131385803,
0.012348677963018417,
0.005219456274062395,
-0.022874632850289345,
0.016631891950964928,
0.03218061476945877,
-0.052146200090646744,
... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision and order of the Commissioner of Revenue. (§ 72-13-39(A), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 1961, pt. 2, Supp.1971)). By the challenged order the Commissioner seeks to tax a contract entered into by the taxpayer on April 7, 1969, at the higher rate of tax effective July ... | [
-0.015535734593868256,
-0.03294999152421951,
-0.006974484771490097,
-0.0012655475875362754,
0.045390695333480835,
-0.01756778173148632,
0.04663078859448433,
0.021550219506025314,
0.010809255763888359,
-0.03151835501194,
0.004498934838920832,
0.05960371345281601,
-0.1004418283700943,
0.0522... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This automobile accident case involves New Mexico’s “guest” statute. Section 64-24-1, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 2). While driving, defendant’s car was involved in a collision with another vehicle. Plaintiff was an occupant of the car driven by defendant. Plaintiff was being transporte... | [
-0.0581497922539711,
-0.02936510741710663,
-0.02181200310587883,
0.0075722443871200085,
0.02579992264509201,
-0.028973892331123352,
0.0731121301651001,
0.011273904703557491,
0.04208596423268318,
-0.03464432805776596,
0.005780727136880159,
0.05004316568374634,
-0.050817351788282394,
0.02822... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
Defendant-Appellant (defendant) was charged and convicted of the first degree murder of Mr. Joe Cardón.
An appeal was not timely taken and diverse proceedings were had in respect to defendant’s efforts to appeal in the court below, and in the United States District Court for the District of... | [
-0.011864257976412773,
-0.0010783047182485461,
-0.043928395956754684,
0.013478400185704231,
0.05205976590514183,
0.012259064242243767,
0.06182165443897247,
0.03498586639761925,
0.002307548187673092,
-0.03918971121311188,
0.02646629884839058,
0.026825938373804092,
-0.06299563497304916,
0.01... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Plaintiff, an alleged pretermitted, illegimate son of Sven Gustafson, deceased, brought suit in the district court against decedent’s widow as the sole beneficiary under and the executrix of decedent’s last will and testament. He sought recovery of his claimed intestate share of decedent’s estate... | [
-0.03223835304379463,
-0.06742848455905914,
0.00982049573212862,
0.003017660230398178,
0.0592319630086422,
0.005718893837183714,
0.05078158900141716,
0.04581116512417793,
-0.014582548290491104,
-0.0455758273601532,
0.02205641381442547,
0.016818394884467125,
-0.062299247831106186,
0.0284764... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
Plaintiff-Appellant sued, alleging breach of fiducial obligations owed him as a result of a partnership of which he had been a member.
The trial court’s decision included findings of fact consistent with honesty and fair dealing on the part of the defendants-appellees and inconsistent with ... | [
0.00735796382650733,
-0.062119223177433014,
-0.019032271578907967,
0.019789673388004303,
0.04896768927574158,
0.010024039074778557,
0.06601962447166443,
0.01612081192433834,
-0.009039199911057949,
-0.048820383846759796,
0.002865475369617343,
0.051682569086551666,
-0.06618236750364304,
0.04... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
After a formal hearing, the Commissioner of Revenue denied the protest of taxpayer (New Mexico Sheriffs and Police Association) as to its liability for gross receipts and municipal tax, penalty and interest from July 1, 1969, to January 31, 1972. Taxpayer’s appeal raises questions concerning:... | [
-0.02749890461564064,
0.00028267447487451136,
-0.009248555637896061,
-0.003918044734746218,
0.02103699930012226,
-0.01352895237505436,
0.05561256408691406,
0.013467003591358662,
0.025827791541814804,
-0.014571907930076122,
0.02127431519329548,
0.04801790043711662,
-0.06487657129764557,
0.0... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Petitioners sought and secured from the District Court of Eddy County a preliminary writ of prohibition directed to Respondent, the magistrate for division I of said county. The writ commanded Respondent, who was conducting a preliminary hearing upon third degree felony charges pending against Pe... | [
-0.05676375702023506,
-0.01430178340524435,
-0.019529689103364944,
0.04012256860733032,
0.03945132717490196,
0.004389147739857435,
0.05627603083848953,
-0.0055753751657903194,
-0.0189634058624506,
-0.06272025406360626,
0.01625312678515911,
0.04461913928389549,
-0.0613359659910202,
0.060529... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1119, 85 N.M. 484, 513 P.2d 1266 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.02251596376299858,
-0.02582188881933689,
-0.009711900725960732,
0.017453260719776154,
0.07486912608146667,
0.043130286037921906,
0.03872954845428467,
0.004861518274992704,
-0.004564240109175444,
-0.04961727187037468,
0.009270954877138138,
0.009018086828291416,
-0.0322335809469223,
0.062... |
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
David Munoz (defendant) was convicted of first-degree felony murder and attempted robbery. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder and eighteen months for the attempted robbery. Defendant appeals his convictions. We reverse.
Defendant raises four issues on appeal. Because o... | [
-0.02024633251130581,
-0.03311406075954437,
-0.06598424166440964,
0.05537762865424156,
0.04471822828054428,
0.016184410080313683,
0.053497906774282455,
0.011120441369712353,
0.03130760416388512,
-0.025849176570773125,
0.0239829421043396,
0.0609142892062664,
-0.05465244501829147,
0.00502082... |
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
The plaintiffs, Phillip Bozza and Karen Bozza, individually and as shareholders of Ruzzo-Bozza Trucking Company (corporation), and the corporation brought suit against defendants claiming improper payment of insurance proceeds. From a summary judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
Th... | [
-0.03766057267785072,
-0.054495032876729965,
-0.025658922269940376,
0.0009850983042269945,
0.04327070340514183,
-0.0019240106921643019,
0.010924342088401318,
0.06538816541433334,
0.020130783319473267,
-0.029988307505846024,
0.004878704436123371,
0.04114576056599617,
-0.05106533691287041,
0... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
The state appeals from an order quashing an information for failure to charge a crime. Because the facts were not disputed and because the state asked the court to rule on the questions raised by defendant's motion to quash, the trial court was of the view that a legal, not factual, issue was pr... | [
-0.03628700599074364,
-0.03153059259057045,
-0.04516538605093956,
0.016516946256160736,
0.033786460757255554,
-0.02955133095383644,
0.04386761412024498,
0.020890269428491592,
-0.012847423553466797,
-0.032530032098293304,
-0.002223983872681856,
0.0627090260386467,
-0.07066518813371658,
0.04... |
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Defendant was indicted on a charge of fraud in excess of $2,500.00, in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-16-6 (Repl.Pamp. 1984). Defendant filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude the testimony of his former wife, Elizabeth Teel, based on the spousal confidential communication privi lege of N... | [
-0.0305009875446558,
-0.0318431556224823,
-0.04399123787879944,
-0.004715287126600742,
0.057371240109205246,
-0.024702981114387512,
0.03780140355229378,
0.021409345790743828,
0.024009376764297485,
-0.007386872544884682,
0.013651847839355469,
0.06075584888458252,
-0.037642356008291245,
0.01... |
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Defendants appeal from the award of lump-sum compensation for the benefit of a deceased worker’s minor children. We proposed summary affirmance. Defendants filed a timely memorandum in opposition. Having considered defendants’ arguments, we affirm.
The sole issue in this appeal is the propriety of ... | [
-0.023465679958462715,
-0.03906404599547386,
0.007060931995511055,
-0.03285124897956848,
0.030209187418222427,
0.01620395854115486,
0.013328474014997482,
0.014004172757267952,
0.011336961761116982,
-0.050364114344120026,
-0.000586740905418992,
0.04267282783985138,
-0.0443667396903038,
0.03... |
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Defendant was convicted, in metropolitan court, of driving a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The conviction was for a second or subsequent offense. Defendant appealed to the district court, and was again convicted. Defendant’s appeal to this court contends the length of hi... | [
-0.012297336012125015,
-0.02911355160176754,
-0.021820664405822754,
0.004464082885533571,
0.02613171562552452,
-0.007283573038876057,
0.09001845121383667,
0.02252141200006008,
0.0022783279418945312,
-0.024590428918600082,
0.017073756083846092,
0.05039035156369209,
-0.038882166147232056,
0.... |
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
The personal representative and survivors of Roland H. Wittkowski brought suit for wrongful death, seeking compensatory and punitive damages against defendants under the New Mexico Tort Claims Act and the Federal Civil Rights Act. The district court granted defendants’ NMSA 1978, Civ. P.Rule 12(b)(... | [
-0.0501101091504097,
-0.029488490894436836,
-0.040004171431064606,
0.026237936690449715,
0.060922086238861084,
0.0045041716657578945,
0.07786475867033005,
0.0257246233522892,
0.011423366144299507,
-0.06818877905607224,
-0.026700783520936966,
0.019396718591451645,
-0.04368782415986061,
0.01... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
On rehearing, the previous opinion is withdrawn and the following is substituted.
Defendant appeals from a conviction of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, marijuana, with intent to distribute contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-22 (Repl.Pamp.1980). Pour issues are presented ... | [
0.007469345815479755,
0.00013635943469125777,
-0.006675420328974724,
0.016111312434077263,
0.06086910888552666,
-0.01150242518633604,
0.050469983369112015,
0.03264544531702995,
-0.001671287463977933,
-0.0610462911427021,
-0.012846996076405048,
0.038232605904340744,
-0.03963414207100868,
0.... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Due to defendants’ refusal to accept prepayment on a real estate contract, plaintiffs, relying on the Residential Home Loan Act (RHLA), sought a declaratory judgment, an injunction and damages. Defendants answered and brought a counterclaim seeking recission in the event the trial court de... | [
-0.01638578064739704,
-0.035157348960638046,
-0.0006004256429150701,
0.000646789965685457,
0.05622078478336334,
0.01993282325565815,
0.07773067057132721,
0.018980974331498146,
0.01911151595413685,
-0.012761405669152737,
0.01657380536198616,
0.038168687373399734,
-0.045422688126564026,
0.01... |
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Placido Sanchez (plaintiff) appeals an order dismissing his complaint with prejudice against M.M. Sundt Construction Company (defendant). Plaintiff, as the personal representative of the estate of his son, Placido Cristobal Sanchez (Placido), brought a wrongful death action against defendant and ... | [
-0.05520710349082947,
-0.0016245070146396756,
-0.04148627445101738,
0.0028561651706695557,
0.028467724099755287,
0.013470434583723545,
0.03325725346803665,
0.03220490738749504,
-0.013746416196227074,
-0.05441213771700859,
-0.012428578920662403,
0.03451848030090332,
-0.03454219922423363,
0.... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Objecting to a December 23, 1985, order of the New Mexico State Corporation Commission (purportedly acting as the insurance board) which canceled increased workmen’s compensation insurance rates pursuant to a filing made by the National Council on Compensation Insurance on October 17, 1985, th... | [
-0.031086673960089684,
-0.04949324205517769,
-0.02752344124019146,
-0.008333384059369564,
0.04020087420940399,
-0.0039537204429507256,
0.026753371581435204,
0.03210067376494408,
0.03610165789723396,
-0.04729580134153366,
-0.007429959252476692,
0.058969952166080475,
-0.054364439100027084,
0... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Convicted of three counts of distribution of a controlled substance contrary to § 54-11-22, N.M.S.A.1953 (1972 Interim Supp.), defendant appeals asserting two points for reversal. First, that the prosecuting attorney and the state’s witness “made constant inferences designed specifically to appe... | [
-0.026869675144553185,
-0.006545732729136944,
-0.05620616674423218,
0.000605911947786808,
0.06613591313362122,
0.008043776266276836,
0.0701000988483429,
0.006098284386098385,
-0.027817390859127045,
-0.020039811730384827,
0.04555400833487511,
0.06482827663421631,
-0.06000256910920143,
0.041... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The appeal involves the evidence of value in a larceny case. Defendant was convicted of larceny of copper wire with a value in excess of $100.00 but not more than $2500.00. Section 40A-16-1, N.M.S. A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). He claims there was no substantial evidence upon which the jury could... | [
0.003888468025252223,
-0.051580119878053665,
-0.045096270740032196,
0.02379550412297249,
0.056374676525592804,
0.010943442583084106,
0.04124220460653305,
0.0036583184264600277,
0.022590529173612595,
-0.04485892876982689,
0.0292370468378067,
0.050924163311719894,
-0.06311911344528198,
0.049... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant pled guilty to burglary. Section 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2nd Repl. Vol. 6). His appeal asserts the trial court erred in accepting the guilty plea because the question of his competency to plead had previously been raised and that question had not been determined by the court.
On May... | [
-0.032256320118904114,
-0.002752552041783929,
-0.022737950086593628,
0.001631493796594441,
0.05576338246464729,
0.040531840175390244,
0.07609673589468002,
-0.014763089828193188,
0.0036896385718137026,
-0.026201138272881508,
0.03054342232644558,
-0.004151535220444202,
-0.05469786003232002,
... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
The parties hereto were married in 1967 in the State of New Mexico, and in June 1971, while residing in the State of California, the plaintiff-appellee (appellee) separated from the defendant-appellant (appellant). Upon separation, the appellee assumed residence in New Mexico.
Thereafter, in F... | [
-0.050998177379369736,
-0.0038627157919108868,
-0.004966044332832098,
0.033028360456228256,
0.04859023913741112,
0.012537539005279541,
0.043755657970905304,
0.01493278332054615,
-0.014927391894161701,
-0.03163677826523781,
0.03121325373649597,
0.04086753726005554,
-0.06385262310504913,
0.0... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of unlawful possession of a controlled substance (heroin). Section 54-11-23, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2, Interim Supp.1972). Defendant appeals.
We affirm.
Defendant contends the state failed to prove, (1) possession of the narcotic by the defendant; (2) a complete ch... | [
-0.026024790480732918,
-0.007904188707470894,
-0.02471568062901497,
0.022605355829000473,
0.10378827899694443,
-0.02012978307902813,
0.07278162986040115,
0.001340237446129322,
0.013406018726527691,
-0.02035522274672985,
0.015999922528862953,
0.03527362272143364,
-0.07539953291416168,
0.042... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant was convicted of homicide by vehicle while either driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or narcotic drugs, or reckless driving. Sections 64— 22-1, 64-22-2 and 64-22-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 2). His appeal raises issues as to: (1) the taking of a blood sample... | [
0.0006507899961434305,
0.005490622483193874,
-0.017660610377788544,
0.014081189408898354,
0.04990089312195778,
-0.00014047227159608155,
0.05964471027255058,
0.02253778651356697,
0.041285496205091476,
-0.04151589050889015,
0.05616390332579613,
0.051260415464639664,
-0.03690572828054428,
0.0... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
Defendant-appellant Cornwallis Riggsbee (appellant) appeals from his conviction of the crimes of first degree murder and aggravated battery. We affirm both convictions.
The record reveals that, for several years, appellant visited the residence of Andrew Barnes. Frequently, from June to Novemb... | [
-0.013880422338843346,
-0.03472660481929779,
-0.02730092778801918,
-0.009498350322246552,
0.09487825632095337,
0.026444153860211372,
0.07835838943719864,
-0.0008698867750354111,
-0.01968548260629177,
-0.030606191605329514,
0.03962165489792824,
0.04329834505915642,
-0.06863563507795334,
0.0... |
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The petition filed in this proceeding seeks review and an evaluation by this court of petitioner’s answers to the March and August 1972 bar examinations given and graded by the New Mexico Board of Bar Examiners (Board). The petitioner further requests an evidentiary hearing. The Board has asserted t... | [
-0.04054553434252739,
0.025515036657452583,
-0.03380501642823219,
-0.00976021308451891,
0.033799946308135986,
0.015297704376280308,
0.051005516201257706,
0.01121899951249361,
-0.019539499655365944,
-0.030087152495980263,
0.04093847796320915,
0.06643100827932358,
-0.027889272198081017,
0.02... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The trial court directed a verdict for defendants on plaintiffs’ claim for invasion of privacy. Prior to trial, summary judgment had been granted to defendants on plaintiffs’ claim for libel. This appeal challenges the correctness of both rulings.
At the State Fair in 1970, Walston took a pho... | [
0.005918750539422035,
-0.014315095730125904,
-0.01769053004682064,
0.017368078231811523,
0.04575684666633606,
0.010053510777652264,
0.058730512857437134,
0.03548465669155121,
0.014635269530117512,
-0.03788123279809952,
-0.01857377588748932,
0.02379550226032734,
-0.05391405150294304,
0.0657... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of burglary and larceny. Sections 40A-16-3 and 40A-16-1, N.M.S.A. 1953 (2nd Repl.Vol. 6). He appeals.
We affirm.
The indictment charged defendant with burglary and larceny under the statutes, supra in two counts. The particulars in each count stated the crimes were committe... | [
-0.02126760594546795,
-0.02386254444718361,
-0.019673887640237808,
-0.007705732248723507,
0.0867183580994606,
-0.0024379626847803593,
0.0717281624674797,
0.01482850220054388,
0.017270905897021294,
-0.017708566039800644,
0.012727024033665657,
0.012435410171747208,
-0.045880597084760666,
0.0... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
This suit was brought in the District Court of Guadalupe County, Fourth Judicial District, State of New Mexico. The plaintiffs Sanchez sought possession of certain described real property, together with damages, for the wrongful withholding of same since May 1968. Defendants Scott, by co... | [
-0.04866694286465645,
-0.03869222104549408,
-0.010099324397742748,
0.01601996272802353,
0.056524332612752914,
-0.0029128664173185825,
0.038718629628419876,
0.01198157761245966,
-0.023452112451195717,
-0.05281614512205124,
0.006161462981253862,
0.061610132455825806,
-0.05868261680006981,
0.... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of two counts of robbery, defendant appeals. Section 40A-16-2, N.M. S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The issues concern: (1) intent as an element of robbery, and (2) instructions concerning intent. We affirm.
Section 40A-16-2, supra, states:
“Robbery consists of the theft of anything of v... | [
-0.017840104177594185,
-0.0332048162817955,
-0.0488886833190918,
-0.026212377473711967,
0.05312522500753403,
0.004067083355039358,
0.05198434740304947,
0.006633199285715818,
0.031482450664043427,
-0.01924479752779007,
0.024856699630618095,
0.02747349813580513,
-0.03678611293435097,
0.01404... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This action was brought to recover benefits under a certain group life and accidental death and dismemberment policy (“the policy”) issued by the appellee life insurance company (“the company”) to Bernalillo County covering the latter’s employees. The trial court granted the company’s motio... | [
-0.008209874853491783,
-0.03524574637413025,
0.011975283734500408,
0.027094312012195587,
0.07502353191375732,
0.0030286868568509817,
0.038346320390701294,
-0.0013051622081547976,
0.002032433869317174,
-0.041482534259557724,
0.017984308302402496,
0.007309678476303816,
-0.05894402042031288,
... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
The State of New Mexico, through the State Highway Department (“the Department”) brought this eminent domain proceeding in the District Court of McKinley County against the owners of a number of tracts of land, including Mr. and Mrs. Joe Yurcic. The trial court dismissed the Yurcics’ claim ... | [
-0.02263004146516323,
-0.009282593615353107,
-0.011494351550936699,
0.03896256908774376,
0.06063319370150566,
-0.0052034491673111916,
0.013549021445214748,
0.05311242491006851,
0.03141387179493904,
-0.051533471792936325,
0.006553955841809511,
0.055411215871572495,
-0.04695750027894974,
0.0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of unlawful branding, defendant appeals. The unlawful branding was the use of an unrecorded brand in violation of § 40A-18-3(C), N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). Defendant’s appeal raises issues as to: (1) whether criminal intent is an element of the crime; (2) the constitutionality o... | [
0.019350482150912285,
-0.024487610906362534,
-0.07652343064546585,
-0.02095717377960682,
0.045977842062711716,
-0.005369315389543772,
0.036837656050920486,
0.021043075248599052,
0.013045987114310265,
-0.012582995928823948,
0.01534108817577362,
0.029558880254626274,
-0.0681527704000473,
0.0... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
By defendant’s own admission, the amount in dispute in this cause is $38.52, plus his claim for costs incurred in the justice of the peace court, where this case had its beginning on February 28, 1968, and costs in the district court to which defendant secured a delayed appeal from the judgment e... | [
-0.045049913227558136,
-0.03064323402941227,
-0.04751979187130928,
0.0022524273954331875,
0.03864222764968872,
0.02847832255065441,
0.03238580748438835,
0.024802634492516518,
-0.016979772597551346,
-0.059688448905944824,
0.0081276074051857,
0.046237993985414505,
-0.06580676138401031,
0.046... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This suit was brought by American Employers’ Insurance Company (“American”) against Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) for a declaratory judgment determining the respective obligations of those insurance companies to a Mr. Powell and his successor partnership, an engineering firm,... | [
-0.02430543303489685,
-0.006483514327555895,
-0.060433998703956604,
0.0171829741448164,
0.0688207596540451,
-0.006230525206774473,
0.03221704065799713,
0.03611777722835541,
0.026419872418045998,
-0.041518427431583405,
0.009582757949829102,
0.024806546047329903,
-0.03648601099848747,
0.0365... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This Application for Termination of Parental Rights was brought in the District Court of Bernalillo County by the Hueys in respect to an infant son of Mary Lente, pursuant to § 22-2-23, N.M.S.A.l953 (Supp. 1971).
The district court entered judgment:
“ * * * that the parental rights of Respo... | [
-0.012589013203978539,
-0.021786393597722054,
-0.003850554348900914,
0.025480514392256737,
0.043646376579999924,
0.01482620369642973,
0.03231753781437874,
0.03178960084915161,
-0.04255307838320732,
-0.056974031031131744,
-0.009374408982694149,
0.02602090686559677,
-0.05216117575764656,
0.0... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Convicted of the unlawful sale of a depressant drug contrary to § 54 — 6-38(B), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 1962, pt. 2, Supp. 1971) defendant appeals asserting three points for reversal. The third point relating to the trial court’s failure to grant a mistrial is dispositive of the appeal.
We rev... | [
-0.020430302247405052,
-0.02732793055474758,
-0.0340573750436306,
0.004773077089339495,
0.0469980351626873,
0.010968600399792194,
0.047712650150060654,
0.016724806278944016,
0.0017708822852000594,
-0.012763832695782185,
0.007429172284901142,
0.07304974645376205,
-0.06884504109621048,
0.054... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
The defendant was convicted of possession of marijuana weighing more than eight ounces in violation of § 54-11-23(B)(3), N.M.S.A.1953 (1972 Interim Supp.), a fourth degree felony. He sets out four points of error on this appeal all revolving around a single issue — whether the marijuana found ... | [
-0.010703948326408863,
-0.018983451649546623,
-0.0341397300362587,
-0.017175713554024696,
0.038306694477796555,
-0.011007432825863361,
0.0381714329123497,
0.014132911339402199,
-0.011621067300438881,
-0.03992909938097,
0.012827075086534023,
0.03167438134551048,
-0.06425502896308899,
0.0310... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
This was an eminent domain proceeding initiated by the State of New Mexico through its State Highway Department under the Special Alternative Procedure [§§ 22-9-39 to 22-9-59, N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp. (1973 Pocket Supp.)]. Of the defendants only appellant-cross-appellee Gus D. Bruskas (Bruskas) an... | [
-0.04297112673521042,
-0.017154011875391006,
-0.03560962155461311,
0.012629907578229904,
0.06851036846637726,
0.015707392245531082,
0.05357298254966736,
0.027375690639019012,
0.0197928287088871,
-0.04406248405575752,
0.021936332806944847,
0.01882459782063961,
-0.07407661527395248,
0.027720... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
John Doe appeals from a judgment and sentence imposed after conviction of possession of a controlled substance (heroin) with intent to traffic, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20 (Repl.Pamp. 1980). Two issues are presented on appeal: (1) whether defendant’s prosecution and conviction... | [
-0.0020080716349184513,
0.0029060060624033213,
-0.03605471923947334,
-0.005220296327024698,
0.06615647673606873,
-0.0022031378466635942,
0.045833513140678406,
0.02237735316157341,
0.020714733749628067,
-0.0474870502948761,
0.012003568932414055,
0.05419042333960533,
-0.06280460208654404,
0.... |
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
LaVerne Armijo (plaintiff) appeals from a summary judgment granted to defendants, Regents of U.N.M. (Regents) and Dr. Willis Kephart. Plaintiff brought an action against defendants on her own behalf and on behalf of her deceased infant son, Raymundo Armijo (Raymundo). She alleged (1) medical malp... | [
-0.008366971276700497,
-0.05848278850317001,
-0.017525363713502884,
0.013723576441407204,
0.048013824969530106,
-0.0015033812960609794,
0.03047141805291176,
0.02321927808225155,
-0.008142375387251377,
-0.06456972658634186,
0.023540347814559937,
0.021497739478945732,
-0.02130180597305298,
0... |
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
This appeal is from the judgment of the district court reversing a decision of the New Mexico State Police Board (Board). Jack Harkleroad (Harkleroad) was suspended by Maurice Cordova (Cordova), Chief of the New Mexico State Police Department (Department) for 30 days without pay from his job a... | [
0.013079091906547546,
-0.041745875030756,
-0.033185023814439774,
0.009640472941100597,
0.04628080874681473,
-0.0201516542583704,
0.03847409412264824,
0.005039794370532036,
0.004064381122589111,
-0.06148103252053261,
-0.012845423072576523,
-0.006611640099436045,
-0.056632332503795624,
0.011... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC) brought a replevin action, under a financing contract assigned to GMAC by Ken Schultz Buick/(Schultz) GMC, Inc., for return of an automobile purchased by Robert and Ester Anaya (the Anayas). The Anayas counterclaimed against GMAC, Schultz, and the m... | [
-0.02920873649418354,
-0.038840677589178085,
-0.026106644421815872,
0.039722736924886703,
0.0475781112909317,
0.0034439130686223507,
0.04105905815958977,
0.013127007521688938,
0.01768343895673752,
-0.04178240895271301,
0.02236706204712391,
0.053978852927684784,
-0.03152202442288399,
0.0238... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
Antonio and Cipriana Chavez (plaintiffs) brought suit under the Tort Claims Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 41-4-1 to -27 (Repl. Pamp.1982 and Cum.Supp.1985) against the Regents of the University of New Mexico (defendants), as trustees of the University of New Mexico Hospital, alleging medical... | [
-0.03015844337642193,
-0.029787393286824226,
-0.028955191373825073,
0.011917632073163986,
0.061419207602739334,
0.017815809696912766,
0.03889279440045357,
0.03343934193253517,
-0.003055341076105833,
-0.0473640151321888,
0.04266153275966644,
0.036762136965990067,
-0.018330901861190796,
0.03... |
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
Petitioners Eberline Instrument Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Company, (Eberline) appealed a worker’s compensation award, claiming that the trial court applied an incorrect hourly rate when computing benefits due. Respondent Chris W. Felix, (Felix) cross-appealed raising various i... | [
0.008160725235939026,
-0.025560617446899414,
0.0035257029812783003,
0.011415117420256138,
0.06431228667497635,
-0.008944612927734852,
0.052514780312776566,
0.026088783517479897,
0.03185618668794632,
-0.047660745680332184,
0.002018783940002322,
0.04207966849207878,
-0.05087544023990631,
0.0... |
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
The father, Mike R. Jaramillo, appeals from an order modifying a final divorce decree continuing joint custody of the minor daughter of the parties, but changing primary custody of the child from the father to the mother.
The father raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether substantial evi... | [
-0.04656238481402397,
-0.022223055362701416,
-0.025437619537115097,
-0.015060598962008953,
0.0861654132604599,
0.027846209704875946,
0.028951767832040787,
0.012645909562706947,
-0.009773587808012962,
-0.059726037085056305,
-0.00009524500637780875,
0.04161842167377472,
-0.03884294256567955,
... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Michael Tom Cherryhomes appeals from his summary conviction for direct criminal contempt. We affirm, but, because of the large fine imposed, we remand this case to the trial court for further consideration.
Facts
Cherryhomes was trial counsel in a criminal case before Judge Harvey W. Fort. Durin... | [
-0.02544477954506874,
-0.02980177477002144,
0.005340765230357647,
-0.02527390420436859,
0.05444425344467163,
-0.0035711326636373997,
0.05018959566950798,
0.046929989010095596,
-0.011156784370541573,
-0.0006318646483123302,
0.007206084206700325,
0.07450410723686218,
-0.06308859586715698,
0.... |
OPINION
NEAL, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of four counts of issuing worthless checks and twenty-two counts of fraud. (In the first appeal of this conviction we mistakenly referred to five counts of fraud and twenty-one counts of issuing worthless checks.) He was sentenced to a total of four years and six months impr... | [
-0.04215288534760475,
-0.015560370869934559,
-0.015485063195228577,
0.01912633143365383,
0.03536871448159218,
0.004997847601771355,
0.03148379176855087,
0.020169366151094437,
-0.03568434342741966,
-0.022505277767777443,
0.009570710361003876,
0.019069943577051163,
-0.033515192568302155,
0.0... |
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
This case raises the issues of whether the trial court exceeded the scope of its mandate from this Court and of what remains of the law of the case, after both parties have reversed the positions they had maintained at trial and on appeal. We hold that the second trial court did exceed its... | [
-0.007945345714688301,
-0.01806701347231865,
-0.043989330530166626,
0.010809894651174545,
0.06593257933855057,
0.0022654759231954813,
0.019748883321881294,
0.04690068960189819,
0.015105648897588253,
-0.049512993544340134,
0.01314613502472639,
0.02939554676413536,
-0.043659672141075134,
0.0... |
OPINION
FEDERICI, Chief Justice.
Court-appointed attorney petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus against the Chief Public Defender, Janet Clow (Chief Public Defender), and a writ of prohibition against the Honorable Larry Johnson (Judge Johnson), District Judge of the Fifth Judicial District. The relief sought aga... | [
-0.028953004628419876,
-0.06373723596334457,
-0.05225016921758652,
0.008432948030531406,
0.03854858875274658,
0.026632966473698616,
0.01038968563079834,
0.019984591752290726,
-0.015121891163289547,
-0.08670417219400406,
0.01617644540965557,
0.03702937439084053,
-0.053799647837877274,
0.045... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
This case concerns the res judicata effect of a bankruptcy court decision, after a claims objection hearing, in a state district court foreclosure suit. Plaintiff State Savings initiated suit in the district court on June 30, 1983. Defendants Rendons answered the complaint but then filed a Cha... | [
-0.040205638855695724,
-0.04679488018155098,
0.010380910709500313,
0.0020541499834507704,
0.06383822113275528,
0.020738491788506508,
0.03904236480593681,
-0.0016852779081091285,
-0.04409844055771828,
-0.009908598847687244,
0.02176101878285408,
0.036736711859703064,
-0.014270592480897903,
0... |
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Defendant filed an appeal in July 1983 from conviction of felony murder and armed robbery. We dismissed the matter in February 1984 for defendant’s untimeliness in filing his notice of appeal. Following a habeas corpus proceeding in federal court, the district judge entered an order directing ... | [
-0.039799101650714874,
-0.026181157678365707,
-0.0323670320212841,
0.022083695977926254,
0.06800781935453415,
0.005425393581390381,
0.05882716923952103,
0.026463866233825684,
-0.02222917415201664,
-0.02122330851852894,
0.04215971753001213,
0.039101943373680115,
-0.052605945616960526,
0.021... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of aggravated assault after a plea of guilty, defendant appeals. Section 40A-3-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The issues are: (1) jurisdiction of the district court because defendant was a juvenile; (2) competency to plead; (3) validity of the guilty plea; and (4) whether the sen... | [
-0.0519256591796875,
-0.04673495516180992,
-0.0244484581053257,
-0.040077224373817444,
0.03721125051379204,
0.018327612429857254,
0.04609157145023346,
-0.012517175637185574,
0.008235354907810688,
-0.02532428316771984,
0.039305295795202255,
0.011528471484780312,
-0.027436811476945877,
0.056... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
Defendant (“insurer”) insured plaintiff’s house trailer, in which American Bank of Carlsbad (“the bank”) had a security interest, against physical damage. The trailer was totally destroyed by an explosion and fire and insurer refused to pay the loss. Plaintiff filed suit for actual and puni... | [
0.0021041440777480602,
-0.04126368463039398,
-0.028689540922641754,
0.013577090576291084,
0.05917896702885628,
0.035510942339897156,
0.009431968443095684,
-0.00784975104033947,
-0.018935533240437508,
-0.029444824904203415,
0.029179301112890244,
0.02721373178064823,
-0.021196939051151276,
0... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
The defendant pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance, to-wit: heroin, contrary to § 54-11-23, N.M.S.A.1953 (Int.Supp.1972). Defendant was sentenced to the New Mexico State Penitentiary for the term of not less than one year nor more than five years. The defendant appeals f... | [
-0.024061745032668114,
-0.00956475455313921,
-0.033420585095882416,
-0.007470907177776098,
0.06808935105800629,
0.002023735549300909,
0.056311462074518204,
0.00224508810788393,
0.002332333941012621,
-0.01059472095221281,
0.03193359076976776,
0.05075553059577942,
-0.03750263527035713,
0.027... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Defendant was indicted for fourth degree felony fraud pursuant to § 40A-16-6, N.M. S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6) which defines fraud as follows:
“Fraud consists of the intentional misappropriation or taking of anything of value which belongs to another by means of fraudulent conduct, practices or repr... | [
0.0010366549249738455,
-0.018598264083266258,
-0.031530264765024185,
0.021729638800024986,
0.05071267485618591,
0.04412008821964264,
0.03679303079843521,
0.05275539308786392,
-0.0334414578974247,
-0.016622189432382584,
0.0044965557754039764,
0.041247110813856125,
-0.0593392439186573,
0.045... |
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
This suit was brought in the District Court of Santa Fe County praying for a judgment which would declare that defendants had no jurisdiction to regulate the educational activities of plaintiffs (a private school). Plaintiffs further sought an injunction against such regulation and asked... | [
-0.025382237508893013,
-0.011425614356994629,
-0.006395281292498112,
0.015204309485852718,
0.054744601249694824,
0.0014768638648092747,
0.08137773722410202,
0.019975511357188225,
-0.003729635151103139,
-0.04616566747426987,
-0.00759934214875102,
0.03138786926865578,
-0.057875096797943115,
... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
This appeal involves termination of parental rights of a mother to her four year old son, pursuant to § 22-2-23, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Vol. 5, Supp.1971). “Termination of Parental Rights” is § 4 of the 1971 “Adoption Act.”
The trial court terminated the mother’s rights to her son, and she appeals.
We rev... | [
-0.03490842506289482,
-0.01796797849237919,
-0.04378227889537811,
-0.01753656007349491,
0.01565811038017273,
-0.005097643937915564,
0.06448209285736084,
0.015560036525130272,
0.01394027192145586,
-0.05608762800693512,
-0.02132624201476574,
0.020262567326426506,
-0.05319977179169655,
0.0317... |
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision and order by the Commissioner of Revenue denying appellant’s protest of an assessment levied pursuant to § 72-16A-7(A) (2), N.M.S.A.1953 (Vol. 10, pt. 2, 1971 Supp.) which provides for a compensating tax for the privilege of using property in New Mexico acquir... | [
-0.017806490883231163,
-0.001980634406208992,
-0.016415132209658623,
0.020815173164010048,
0.04986049234867096,
0.004521843045949936,
0.028586089611053467,
-0.013629214838147163,
0.032323457300662994,
-0.023539429530501366,
-0.01642676070332527,
0.045629266649484634,
-0.07670336216688156,
... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
This cause is before us on a writ of certiorari directed to the New Mexico Court of Appeals. The writ was issued solely for the purpose of clarifying our opinion in State v. Felter, 85 N.M. 619, 515 P.2d 138 (1973).
Our opinion in the Felter case has apparently been construed by some as requiring... | [
-0.002395855961367488,
-0.042737916111946106,
-0.028628870844841003,
0.018944233655929565,
0.048294797539711,
0.02327176183462143,
0.058104269206523895,
0.03738835081458092,
-0.0087626613676548,
-0.034941885620355606,
0.02032708376646042,
0.051219336688518524,
-0.06475265324115753,
0.04021... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This action was brought by Eula Jean Allgood (“plaintiff”) against Roy Orason (“defendant”) in the District Court of Santa Fe County for modification of their California child custody order regarding visitation rights.
After trial to the court, the California decree was modified as to custo... | [
-0.037304461002349854,
-0.00772871682420373,
0.015350429341197014,
0.010870909318327904,
0.01965741068124771,
0.019954290241003036,
0.041506070643663406,
0.015416649170219898,
-0.013791424222290516,
-0.05806015431880951,
0.001157505321316421,
0.009683853015303612,
-0.07839904725551605,
0.0... |
Original Proceeding on Certiorari
Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 990, 85 N.M. 20, 508 P.2d 1317, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. | [
-0.024357913061976433,
-0.02370481938123703,
-0.014730164781212807,
0.006953155621886253,
0.06074734404683113,
0.04148315265774727,
0.04886721074581146,
0.013612424954771996,
0.0001464684319216758,
-0.04838091880083084,
0.0038458986673504114,
0.009083468466997147,
-0.04173244908452034,
0.0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of robbery, § 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6), defendant appeals. Use or threatened use of force is an essential element of robbery under § 40A-16-2, supra. State v. Walsh, 81 N.M. 65, 463 P.2d 41 (Ct.App.1969). Defendant contends the evidence concerning force is insufficie... | [
-0.015613800846040249,
-0.04449107125401497,
-0.019835423678159714,
-0.012030843645334244,
0.047992657870054245,
0.014298133552074432,
0.043994318693876266,
0.004316564649343491,
0.007405972573906183,
-0.03356065973639488,
0.01999698579311371,
0.029200896620750427,
-0.05721282586455345,
-0... |
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
We are called upon to decide several procedural issues stemming from a suit brought by appellees (“plaintiffs”) in the District Court of Grant County to establish an easement over appellants’ (“defendants”) land. Defendants answered setting up affirmative defenses and counterclaimed on the ... | [
-0.02376321516931057,
-0.0436183400452137,
-0.01942361705005169,
-0.013851631432771683,
0.04603734612464905,
0.0004180286487098783,
0.053234685212373734,
0.016269128769636154,
-0.012976652011275291,
-0.06944429874420166,
0.03005548007786274,
0.03515288606286049,
-0.05368831753730774,
0.040... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The Municipal Court in the City of Hobbs convicted defendant of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicants, in violation of a city ordinance. Defendant appealed to the District Court. After trial in District Court, defendant was again found guilty. Defendant, pro se, h... | [
-0.02098427340388298,
-0.043599821627140045,
-0.028330573812127113,
0.02850222773849964,
0.03859763219952583,
-0.022714149206876755,
0.08397703617811203,
0.028382940217852592,
0.02058824524283409,
-0.054332174360752106,
0.060913875699043274,
0.042020294815301895,
-0.047489747405052185,
0.0... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This appeal, from denial of a motion for post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), divides into two parts: (1) issues raised'in the post-conviction motion and (2) issues raised for the first time on appeal.
In 1961, defendant pled guilty to assault with intent to ... | [
-0.05302335321903229,
-0.03219497203826904,
-0.02328740432858467,
-0.03373589366674423,
0.0329582504928112,
0.015596943907439709,
0.06993936747312546,
-0.014118206687271595,
-0.012422391213476658,
-0.02588741108775139,
0.011369827203452587,
0.004526597447693348,
-0.017086440697312355,
0.04... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
On May 11, 1972, a grocery store in Lovington, New Mexico, was robbed. The police arrived quickly and pursued the vehicle in which the robber had fled. Shots were exchanged before the occupants of the vehicle were apprehended. Defendant was not the person who entered the store; he was, however, on... | [
-0.04292897880077362,
-0.02420666627585888,
-0.03949102386832237,
0.020100582391023636,
0.050135623663663864,
0.037372663617134094,
0.0745045393705368,
0.02864653617143631,
0.01722782850265503,
-0.028227943927049637,
0.028866006061434746,
0.03363616764545441,
-0.04388789087533951,
-0.00465... |
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff filed a claim for relief in Bernalillo County to set aside a deed purportedly conveying real estate from plaintiff to defendant. The case was tried to the court •and a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered setting aside the deed and declaring it void. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
The t... | [
-0.013811446726322174,
-0.03904734551906586,
0.014947429299354553,
0.00027682771906256676,
0.061381995677948,
-0.0007115062908269465,
0.04729333147406578,
0.023380238562822342,
-0.0050448342226445675,
-0.02645212598145008,
-0.010205217637121677,
0.03516636788845062,
-0.052098385989665985,
... |
OPINION
MARTINEZ, Justice.
Appellees brought this action in the District Court of Bernalillo County on December 2, 1969 to recover damages by way of inverse condemnation pursuant to § 22-9-22, N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1971). Appellees alleged that appellant’s construction of a portion of Interstate 40 created a detour and in... | [
-0.030018402263522148,
-0.004293848294764757,
-0.0037920342292636633,
0.004526996053755283,
0.05361703410744667,
-0.011205187067389488,
0.0585910864174366,
0.03732729330658913,
0.0006533950217999518,
-0.03269866108894348,
0.01578749530017376,
0.036474160850048065,
-0.07114367187023163,
0.0... |
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Convicted of burglary as an accessory contrary to §§ 40A-16-3 and 40A-1-14, N. M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 1972), defendant appeals. His points for reversal are: (1) that the verdict is not supported by substantial evidence; (2) that the trial court erred in allowing testimony concerning weapons f... | [
-0.04396529123187065,
-0.030273625627160072,
-0.023935994133353233,
0.006523375399410725,
0.07198399305343628,
0.003625207580626011,
0.05618789419531822,
-0.0077744778245687485,
-0.003354796441271901,
-0.03107760287821293,
0.006664590910077095,
0.03997368365526199,
-0.06379919499158859,
0.... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The jury returned a verdict for Scarsella on his counterclaim for malicious prosecution. Plaintiffs’ appeal raises questions as to: (1) determination of probable cause by the trial court; (2) evidence as to probable cause; (3) excessive damages.
Determination of probable cause by the trial co... | [
-0.02338232658803463,
-0.04700121283531189,
-0.03314857929944992,
0.002084909239783883,
0.0582410991191864,
0.03008926659822464,
0.0776233971118927,
0.007079153321683407,
0.01140119694173336,
-0.04234527796506882,
0.041415516287088394,
0.04492857679724693,
-0.03343743458390236,
0.048831105... |
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs sued for property damage allegedly resulting from the detonation of explosives by Brown (Brown Construction Company) while constructing a highway. The highway construction was pursuant to a contract with the Commission (New Mexico State Highway Commission). The contract required Br... | [
-0.005692105274647474,
-0.01147993840277195,
-0.0608564130961895,
0.02200828120112419,
0.03385224938392639,
0.02932729199528694,
0.0803208276629448,
0.017678845673799515,
0.014559467323124409,
-0.03670389577746391,
-0.005576883442699909,
0.05999327823519707,
-0.04897041618824005,
0.0323474... |
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Defendant appeals following his conviction of the crimes of unlawful possession of marijuana, § 54-9-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp.1971); unlawful possession of LSD (Lysergic .Acid Diethylamide) § 54-6-51 (F), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp.1971); unlawful possession of Pento... | [
-0.0021970397792756557,
0.018774785101413727,
-0.028581539168953896,
0.008982689119875431,
0.07273793965578079,
-0.021353421732783318,
0.02620408497750759,
-0.0007397031877189875,
-0.013227689079940319,
-0.038353465497493744,
0.028254030272364616,
0.022094635292887688,
-0.04615962505340576,
... |
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages to plaintiff-appellee Gallup Gamerco Coal Company (appellee) for the failure of defendant-appellant City of Gallup (appellant) to supply an adequate amount of water to appellee. Appellee cross appeals for damages for expenses in repairing the ... | [
-0.027773406356573105,
-0.01968848519027233,
-0.03557804226875305,
0.03173062950372696,
0.05157092958688736,
0.031985584646463394,
0.04123637080192566,
0.024909276515245438,
0.0009523769258521497,
-0.05060093104839325,
0.01676425337791443,
0.04860154166817665,
-0.0687546581029892,
0.038689... |
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Plaintiffs brought suit against defendant to recover an admittedly unpaid balance owing on a promissory note executed by defendant and her former husband, who is now deceased. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and ordered plaintiffs’ complaint dismissed wi... | [
-0.0448744036257267,
-0.04864389821887016,
-0.019521836191415787,
-0.005358647555112839,
0.030957328155636787,
0.060110755264759064,
0.03701452165842056,
0.02537061646580696,
-0.029840556904673576,
-0.03228351101279259,
0.03441182151436806,
0.03884337097406387,
-0.032848160713911057,
0.026... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.