id stringlengths 6 9 | text stringlengths 14 8.58k | answer stringclasses 5
values | query stringlengths 856 9.42k | choices list | gold int64 0 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRCS200 | Principles of consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PEH and its wholly owned subsidiary, PE. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Principles of consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PEH and its wholly owned subsidiary, PE.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS201 | The primary competitors for our Workgroup products are Microsoft and IBM. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The primary competitors for our Workgroup products are Microsoft and IBM.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS202 | This risk exposes Bancorp and the Bank to potential fines, civil money penalties, payment of damages and the voiding of contracts. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
This risk exposes Bancorp and the Bank to potential fines, civil money penalties, payment of damages and the voiding of contracts.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS203 | These product partnerships, including our arrangements with NextAxiom Technology, Inc (NextAxiom), Business Objects, Inc (Business Objects), and Oracle Corporation (Oracle), extend our product footprints to best meet our customers requirements. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
These product partnerships, including our arrangements with NextAxiom Technology, Inc (NextAxiom), Business Objects, Inc (Business Objects), and Oracle Corporation (Oracle), extend our product footprints to best meet our customers requirements.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS204 | Chevron understands that the pipeline for West Cameron 643 is in the process of being restored, although such pipeline is not expected to be able to take production until at least the third quarter of 2010. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Chevron understands that the pipeline for West Cameron 643 is in the process of being restored, although such pipeline is not expected to be able to take production until at least the third quarter of 2010.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS205 | Subordinated Debentures and Notes In connection with the acquisition of Bancorp Rhode Island,Inc, the Company assumed three subordinated debentures issued by a subsidiary of Bancorp Rhode Island,Inc One of these subordinated debenture in the amount of $3.0 million was called in the first quarter of 2013 due to its high fixed rate. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Subordinated Debentures and Notes In connection with the acquisition of Bancorp Rhode Island,Inc, the Company assumed three subordinated debentures issued by a subsidiary of Bancorp Rhode Island,Inc One of these subordinated debenture in the amount of $3.0 million was called in the first quarter of 2013 due to its high fixed rate.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS206 | The ACC has exclusive authority to approve rates, mandate accounting treatments, authorize long-term financing programs, evaluate significant capital expenditures and plant additions, examine and regulate transactions between a regulated subsidiary and its affiliated entities, and approve or disapprove reorganizations, mergers, and acquisitions prior to their completion. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The ACC has exclusive authority to approve rates, mandate accounting treatments, authorize long-term financing programs, evaluate significant capital expenditures and plant additions, examine and regulate transactions between a regulated subsidiary and its affiliated entities, and approve or disapprove reorganizations, mergers, and acquisitions prior to their completion.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS207 | Amgen has also entered an alliance with Servier Laboratoires (Servier) for exclusive commercialization rights in Europe as well as the Commonwealth of Independent States, including Russia. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Amgen has also entered an alliance with Servier Laboratoires (Servier) for exclusive commercialization rights in Europe as well as the Commonwealth of Independent States, including Russia.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS208 | Competitors in the datacom and storage market include Broadcom, Cavium Networks and Netlogic Microsystems. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competitors in the datacom and storage market include Broadcom, Cavium Networks and Netlogic Microsystems.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS209 | Our competition includes furniture stores, big box retailers, department stores, specialty retailers and online retailers and marketplaces in the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom and Germany, including: Furniture Stores: Ashley Furniture, At Home, Bob's Discount Furniture, Havertys, Raymour& Flanigan, Rooms To Go; Big Box Retailers: Bed Bath& Beyond, Home Depot, IKEA, Lowe's, Target and Walmart; Department Stores: JCPenney and Macy's; Specialty Retailers: Crate and Barrel, Ethan Allen, HomeGoods, Pottery Barn and Restoration Hardware; Online Retailers and Marketplaces: Amazon and eBay; and International: Leon's, Canadian Tire, John Lewis, WorldStores, Otto and Home24, in addition to several of the companies listed above who also compete with us internationally. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our competition includes furniture stores, big box retailers, department stores, specialty retailers and online retailers and marketplaces in the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom and Germany, including: Furniture Stores: Ashley Furniture, At Home, Bob's Discount Furniture, Havertys, Raymour& Flanigan, Rooms To Go; Big Box Retailers: Bed Bath& Beyond, Home Depot, IKEA, Lowe's, Target and Walmart; Department Stores: JCPenney and Macy's; Specialty Retailers: Crate and Barrel, Ethan Allen, HomeGoods, Pottery Barn and Restoration Hardware; Online Retailers and Marketplaces: Amazon and eBay; and International: Leon's, Canadian Tire, John Lewis, WorldStores, Otto and Home24, in addition to several of the companies listed above who also compete with us internationally.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS210 | Robert B. Willumstad, age 60, is the former President and Chief Operating Officer of Citigroup. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Robert B. Willumstad, age 60, is the former President and Chief Operating Officer of Citigroup.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS211 | We face significant competition from companies, principally Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Facebookthat have developed or acquired similar online sites. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We face significant competition from companies, principally Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Facebookthat have developed or acquired similar online sites.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS212 | The financial statements are indexed in the Index to Financial Statements, which appear on Pages F-1 through F-15 hereof, and are incorporated in this Item by reference thereto | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The financial statements are indexed in the Index to Financial Statements, which appear on Pages F-1 through F-15 hereof, and are incorporated in this Item by reference thereto
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS213 | We are authorized to market products from Cisco, Citrix, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Lexmark, Microsoft, 3Com, and VM Ware. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We are authorized to market products from Cisco, Citrix, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Lexmark, Microsoft, 3Com, and VM Ware.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS214 | However, there are other competitors that may offer a similar range of coverage or services and include, but are not limited to, Furmanite Corporation, T.D. Williamson, Inc, Acuren Group, Inc and JV Industrial Companies. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
However, there are other competitors that may offer a similar range of coverage or services and include, but are not limited to, Furmanite Corporation, T.D. Williamson, Inc, Acuren Group, Inc and JV Industrial Companies.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS215 | The Boeing Commercial Airplane Group lease of 211,139 net rentable square feet at SeaTac Office Center expires in December 2007. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Boeing Commercial Airplane Group lease of 211,139 net rentable square feet at SeaTac Office Center expires in December 2007.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS216 | The decrease in revenue of $72.6 million year over year was primarily due to a decrease in milestone payments received from AbbVie and was partially offset by higher royalties earned on net sales of HCV regimens allocated to paritaprevir during 2016. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The decrease in revenue of $72.6 million year over year was primarily due to a decrease in milestone payments received from AbbVie and was partially offset by higher royalties earned on net sales of HCV regimens allocated to paritaprevir during 2016.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS217 | Our major competitors include Agilent Technologies, GE Healthcare and Applied Biosystems. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our major competitors include Agilent Technologies, GE Healthcare and Applied Biosystems.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS218 | For example, we have partnered with Delta Air Lines, as well as many others globally, to offer cobranded cards for consumers and small businesses, and through our Membership Rewards program we have partnered with businesses in many industries, including the airline industry, to offer benefits to Card Member participants. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For example, we have partnered with Delta Air Lines, as well as many others globally, to offer cobranded cards for consumers and small businesses, and through our Membership Rewards program we have partnered with businesses in many industries, including the airline industry, to offer benefits to Card Member participants.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS219 | In the applicant screening market, our principal competitors are LexisNexis (a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier Group plc), CoreLogic, Inc (formerly First Advantage Corporation, an affiliate of The First American Corporation), Entrata, TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc (a subsidiary of TransUnion LLC), Resident Check Inc, Yardi, On-Site.com and many other smaller regional and local screening companies. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In the applicant screening market, our principal competitors are LexisNexis (a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier Group plc), CoreLogic, Inc (formerly First Advantage Corporation, an affiliate of The First American Corporation), Entrata, TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc (a subsidiary of TransUnion LLC), Resident Check Inc, Yardi, On-Site.com and many other smaller regional and local screening companies.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS220 | Pursuant to the terms of the sale, Amrep has retained environmental exposure that might arise from its previous use of this property. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Pursuant to the terms of the sale, Amrep has retained environmental exposure that might arise from its previous use of this property.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS221 | In December 2006, we entered into a collaboration and option agreement with Amgen to discover, develop and commercialize novel small molecule therapeutics, including omecamtiv mecarbil, that activate cardiac muscle contractility for potential applications in the treatment of heart failure (the Amgen Agreement). | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In December 2006, we entered into a collaboration and option agreement with Amgen to discover, develop and commercialize novel small molecule therapeutics, including omecamtiv mecarbil, that activate cardiac muscle contractility for potential applications in the treatment of heart failure (the Amgen Agreement).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS222 | From September 2005 to May2008, Doctor Thakur served as Executive Vice President of Technology and Fab Operations at SanDisk Corporation and as head of SanDisks worldwide operations. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
From September 2005 to May2008, Doctor Thakur served as Executive Vice President of Technology and Fab Operations at SanDisk Corporation and as head of SanDisks worldwide operations.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS223 | In retail measurement, our principal competitor in the U.S. is Information Resources, Inc, which is also present in some European and Asia/Pacific markets. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In retail measurement, our principal competitor in the U.S. is Information Resources, Inc, which is also present in some European and Asia/Pacific markets.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS224 | Two divisions of General Electric,Co. ( | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Two divisions of General Electric,Co. (
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS225 | Open Text and Oracle Corporation This partnership extends our recently-launched enterprise solutions framework, and builds upon the database integration relationship between us and Oracle. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Open Text and Oracle Corporation This partnership extends our recently-launched enterprise solutions framework, and builds upon the database integration relationship between us and Oracle.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS226 | In fiscal 2013, we reimbursed Resource America $368,649 for Mister Kessler's compensation and related business expenses, since Resource America employs Mister Kessler; Mister Kessler, however, is dedicated exclusively to his service as our Chairman. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In fiscal 2013, we reimbursed Resource America $368,649 for Mister Kessler's compensation and related business expenses, since Resource America employs Mister Kessler; Mister Kessler, however, is dedicated exclusively to his service as our Chairman.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS227 | Litigation settlement In April2002, we settled litigation that we had brought against Cadence Design Systems, Inc Pursuant to this settlement we received $6,300,000, net of fees paid to our attorneys, related to this matter. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Litigation settlement In April2002, we settled litigation that we had brought against Cadence Design Systems, Inc Pursuant to this settlement we received $6,300,000, net of fees paid to our attorneys, related to this matter.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS228 | Business of Northern Border Pipeline Company General Northern Border Pipeline is a general partnership formed in 1978. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Business of Northern Border Pipeline Company General Northern Border Pipeline is a general partnership formed in 1978.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS229 | Mister Bryant also serves on the Board of Directors of Columbia Sportswear and McKesson Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Bryant also serves on the Board of Directors of Columbia Sportswear and McKesson Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS230 | As of December31, 2002, Newport had drawn on $43.7million of the bonds for construction incurred prior to that date. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
As of December31, 2002, Newport had drawn on $43.7million of the bonds for construction incurred prior to that date.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS231 | NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) The Companys exposure to credit risk associated with non-payment is limited to its strategic partners Amgen Inc, (Amgen) and Astellas Pharma Inc, (Astellas) and any material non-payment from our partners would result in a material breach of the agreements underlying the strategic partnerships. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) The Companys exposure to credit risk associated with non-payment is limited to its strategic partners Amgen Inc, (Amgen) and Astellas Pharma Inc, (Astellas) and any material non-payment from our partners would result in a material breach of the agreements underlying the strategic partnerships.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS232 | Through FedEx Services, we strive to build technology solutions that will solve our customers business problems with simplicity, convenience, speed and reliability. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Through FedEx Services, we strive to build technology solutions that will solve our customers business problems with simplicity, convenience, speed and reliability.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS233 | 47 The mix of deposits for the previous three years is as follows (dollars in thousands): 2009 2008 2007 Average Balance Percent Average Balance Percent Average Balance Percent Non-interest-Bearing Demand $ 172,925 28.0 % $ 173,332 29.5 % $ 185,563 30.3 % Interest-Bearing Demand (NOW) 127,769 20.7 % 128,690 21.9 % 130,608 21.3 % Savings and MMDAs 172,610 28.0 % 171,465 29.1 % 179,425 29.3 % Time 144,251 23.3 % 114,742 19.5 % 117,178 19.1 % Total $ 617,555 100.0 % $ 588,229 100.0 % $ 612,774 100.0 % The three years ended December 31, 2009 have been characterized by decreasing interest rates. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
47 The mix of deposits for the previous three years is as follows (dollars in thousands): 2009 2008 2007 Average Balance Percent Average Balance Percent Average Balance Percent Non-interest-Bearing Demand $ 172,925 28.0 % $ 173,332 29.5 % $ 185,563 30.3 % Interest-Bearing Demand (NOW) 127,769 20.7 % 128,690 21.9 % 130,608 21.3 % Savings and MMDAs 172,610 28.0 % 171,465 29.1 % 179,425 29.3 % Time 144,251 23.3 % 114,742 19.5 % 117,178 19.1 % Total $ 617,555 100.0 % $ 588,229 100.0 % $ 612,774 100.0 % The three years ended December 31, 2009 have been characterized by decreasing interest rates.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS234 | Professorssional/Trade alliance partners include General Mills, the Culinary Institute of America, the American Institute of Architects, the Leader to Leader Institute, Fisher Investments, Meredith Corporation and Weight Watchers, among many others. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Professorssional/Trade alliance partners include General Mills, the Culinary Institute of America, the American Institute of Architects, the Leader to Leader Institute, Fisher Investments, Meredith Corporation and Weight Watchers, among many others.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS235 | We have formed alliances with several companies, including, but not limited to, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Johnson& Johnson, Olympus Corporation, Novadaq Technologies, Inc, Mimic Technologies, Inc, Schoelly Fiberoptic GmbH, Trumpf Medical (a division of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc), InTouch Technology Inc, Dextera Surgical Inc and 3D Systems, Inc In September 2016, we agreed to establish a joint venture with Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical (Group) Co., Ltd. Fosun Pharma, a subsidiary of Fosun International Limited, to research, develop, manufacture, and sell robotic-assisted catheter-based medical devices. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have formed alliances with several companies, including, but not limited to, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Johnson& Johnson, Olympus Corporation, Novadaq Technologies, Inc, Mimic Technologies, Inc, Schoelly Fiberoptic GmbH, Trumpf Medical (a division of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc), InTouch Technology Inc, Dextera Surgical Inc and 3D Systems, Inc In September 2016, we agreed to establish a joint venture with Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical (Group) Co., Ltd. Fosun Pharma, a subsidiary of Fosun International Limited, to research, develop, manufacture, and sell robotic-assisted catheter-based medical devices.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS236 | In addition, AbbVie is conducting combination studies of our collaborations next-generation protease inhibitor, ABT-493, with AbbVies next-generation NS5A inhibitor, ABT-530. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition, AbbVie is conducting combination studies of our collaborations next-generation protease inhibitor, ABT-493, with AbbVies next-generation NS5A inhibitor, ABT-530.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS237 | As an equity investor in Liberty, ProLiance recorded its share of the charge, totaling $33 million at June 30, 2009.The Companys share is $11.9 million after tax, or $0.15 per share. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
As an equity investor in Liberty, ProLiance recorded its share of the charge, totaling $33 million at June 30, 2009.The Companys share is $11.9 million after tax, or $0.15 per share.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS238 | In 2001, Middleby became the largest supplier of commercial cooking and warming equipment through the acquisition of the commercial cooking subsidiary, Blodgett Holdings, Inc (Blodgett) from Maytag Corporation. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2001, Middleby became the largest supplier of commercial cooking and warming equipment through the acquisition of the commercial cooking subsidiary, Blodgett Holdings, Inc (Blodgett) from Maytag Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS239 | Test Doctor ve In June 2014, we released phase 5.0, which allows consumers to test our network using an Apple iPhone 5s with unlimited nationwide service for seven days at no charge. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Test Doctor ve In June 2014, we released phase 5.0, which allows consumers to test our network using an Apple iPhone 5s with unlimited nationwide service for seven days at no charge.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS240 | Note 12 Variable Interest Entities Cleco reports its investments in VIEs in accordance with the authoritative guidance. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Note 12 Variable Interest Entities Cleco reports its investments in VIEs in accordance with the authoritative guidance.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS241 | In addition, in November 2009 FAC issued approximately 9.5 million shares of common stock in connection with its acquisition of the minority interest shares of its then publicly traded subsidiary, First Advantage Corporation. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition, in November 2009 FAC issued approximately 9.5 million shares of common stock in connection with its acquisition of the minority interest shares of its then publicly traded subsidiary, First Advantage Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS242 | Mister Liddy is also a director of The Boeing Company, The Goldman Sachs Group,Inc and 3M Company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Liddy is also a director of The Boeing Company, The Goldman Sachs Group,Inc and 3M Company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS243 | Aviza Technology,Inc was incorporated on December8, 2004 to facilitate the merger transaction of our subsidiaries, Aviza,Inc and Trikon Technologies,Inc Aviza,Inc was incorporated on September18, 2003 by affiliates of VantagePoint Venture Partners, which we refer to collectively as VantagePoint, as Thermal Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation, for the purpose of acquiring the business of the Thermal Division of ASML Holding, N.V., a Netherlands corporation, which division of ASML is referred to in this discussion as the Predecessor. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Aviza Technology,Inc was incorporated on December8, 2004 to facilitate the merger transaction of our subsidiaries, Aviza,Inc and Trikon Technologies,Inc Aviza,Inc was incorporated on September18, 2003 by affiliates of VantagePoint Venture Partners, which we refer to collectively as VantagePoint, as Thermal Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation, for the purpose of acquiring the business of the Thermal Division of ASML Holding, N.V., a Netherlands corporation, which division of ASML is referred to in this discussion as the Predecessor.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS244 | Our infrastructure partner list includes ADIC, Atempo, Bakbone, Brocade, Cisco, Commvault, Computer Associates, Decru, Egenera, FalconStor, Fujitsu Siemens Computers, Hitachi Data Systems, IBM Tivoli, Intel, IronMountain, Legato, McData, Novell/ SuSE, NuView, Peribit, Quantum/ ATL, Red Hat, RLX Technologies, Secure Computing, Spectra Logic, StorageTek, Symantec, Syncsort, and VERITAS. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our infrastructure partner list includes ADIC, Atempo, Bakbone, Brocade, Cisco, Commvault, Computer Associates, Decru, Egenera, FalconStor, Fujitsu Siemens Computers, Hitachi Data Systems, IBM Tivoli, Intel, IronMountain, Legato, McData, Novell/ SuSE, NuView, Peribit, Quantum/ ATL, Red Hat, RLX Technologies, Secure Computing, Spectra Logic, StorageTek, Symantec, Syncsort, and VERITAS.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS245 | For example, we introduced Nike Swim into Latin America and Europe. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For example, we introduced Nike Swim into Latin America and Europe.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS246 | Mister Rocca currently serves on the board of directors of Lawson Software Inc, and St. Jude Medical, Inc, both public companies, as well as a private company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Rocca currently serves on the board of directors of Lawson Software Inc, and St. Jude Medical, Inc, both public companies, as well as a private company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS247 | Our principal competitors include: IT departments of potential customers which have undertaken custom software development efforts to analyze and manage their machine data; security, systems management and other IT vendors, including BMC Software, CA, HP, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Quest Software, TIBCO and VMware; web analytics vendors, including Adobe Systems, Google, IBM and Webtrends; business intelligence vendors, including IBM, Oracle and SAP; companies targeting the big data market by commercializing open source software, such as the various Hadoop distributions and NoSQL data stores; and small-specialized vendors, which provide complementary or competitive solutions in enterprise data analytics, data warehousing and big data technologies that may compete with our software. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our principal competitors include: IT departments of potential customers which have undertaken custom software development efforts to analyze and manage their machine data; security, systems management and other IT vendors, including BMC Software, CA, HP, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Quest Software, TIBCO and VMware; web analytics vendors, including Adobe Systems, Google, IBM and Webtrends; business intelligence vendors, including IBM, Oracle and SAP; companies targeting the big data market by commercializing open source software, such as the various Hadoop distributions and NoSQL data stores; and small-specialized vendors, which provide complementary or competitive solutions in enterprise data analytics, data warehousing and big data technologies that may compete with our software.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS248 | On November1, 2010 (the ALICO Acquisition Date), MetLife, Inc completed the acquisition of American Life Insurance Company (American Life) from AM Holdings LLC (formerly known as ALICO Holdings LLC) (AM Holdings), a subsidiary of American International Group, Inc (AIG), and Delaware American Life Insurance Company (DelAm) from AIG (American Life, together with DelAm, collectively, ALICO) (the ALICO Acquisition). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On November1, 2010 (the ALICO Acquisition Date), MetLife, Inc completed the acquisition of American Life Insurance Company (American Life) from AM Holdings LLC (formerly known as ALICO Holdings LLC) (AM Holdings), a subsidiary of American International Group, Inc (AIG), and Delaware American Life Insurance Company (DelAm) from AIG (American Life, together with DelAm, collectively, ALICO) (the ALICO Acquisition).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS249 | The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2007 in our common stock (at the last reported sale price on such day), the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index and the Morgan Stanley Health Care Payor Index and assumes the reinvestment of any dividends. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2007 in our common stock (at the last reported sale price on such day), the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index and the Morgan Stanley Health Care Payor Index and assumes the reinvestment of any dividends.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS250 | Citrix Premier Plus Alliance Partners include Microsoft, Dell, IBM Corporation, EMC2, Hewlett-Packard Company, Siebel Systems, SAP AG, Sun Microsystems, France Telecom and Oracle. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Citrix Premier Plus Alliance Partners include Microsoft, Dell, IBM Corporation, EMC2, Hewlett-Packard Company, Siebel Systems, SAP AG, Sun Microsystems, France Telecom and Oracle.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS251 | On October20, 2006, Cobra Electronics UK Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cobra completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of PPL. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On October20, 2006, Cobra Electronics UK Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cobra completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of PPL.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS252 | In 2006, Kforces largest competitors included Adecco, S.A., Manpower, Inc, MPS Group, Inc, Robert Half International Inc, Spherion Corporation, Ciber Resources Connection, Jefferson Wells and CDI Corporation. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2006, Kforces largest competitors included Adecco, S.A., Manpower, Inc, MPS Group, Inc, Robert Half International Inc, Spherion Corporation, Ciber Resources Connection, Jefferson Wells and CDI Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS253 | VMware's broad and proven suite of virtualization technologies are designed to establish secure and reliable IT environments and address a range of complex IT challenges that include cost reduction, operational inefficiencies, access to cloud computing capacity, business continuity and corporate end-user computing device management. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
VMware's broad and proven suite of virtualization technologies are designed to establish secure and reliable IT environments and address a range of complex IT challenges that include cost reduction, operational inefficiencies, access to cloud computing capacity, business continuity and corporate end-user computing device management.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS254 | Mister Thomas is chairman, chief executive officer and president of Chart Industries, Inc, an engineered cryogenic equipment manufacturer serving the natural gas and industrial gas industries, which he joined in 2003. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Thomas is chairman, chief executive officer and president of Chart Industries, Inc, an engineered cryogenic equipment manufacturer serving the natural gas and industrial gas industries, which he joined in 2003.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS255 | In recent years, we entered into, and expanded, a strategic alliance with BlackRock, Inc (BlackRock) to combine BlackRocks order flow with our Open Trading solution to improve the range of trading connections available to credit market participants in the U.S., Europe and Asia. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In recent years, we entered into, and expanded, a strategic alliance with BlackRock, Inc (BlackRock) to combine BlackRocks order flow with our Open Trading solution to improve the range of trading connections available to credit market participants in the U.S., Europe and Asia.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS256 | On December 1, 2003, Triad completed the acquisition of four hospitals in Arkansas from subsidiaries of Tenet Healthcare Corporation for a purchase price of $142.0 million in cash and $2.5 million of transaction costs less the assumption of $2.2 million of net current liabilities. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On December 1, 2003, Triad completed the acquisition of four hospitals in Arkansas from subsidiaries of Tenet Healthcare Corporation for a purchase price of $142.0 million in cash and $2.5 million of transaction costs less the assumption of $2.2 million of net current liabilities.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS257 | The volatility used in the calculation for the Options is based on the historical volatility of Liberty's stocks and the implied volatility of publicly traded Liberty Options. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The volatility used in the calculation for the Options is based on the historical volatility of Liberty's stocks and the implied volatility of publicly traded Liberty Options.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS258 | The U.S. ERP division is an Oracle Platinum Partner, which is the highest level of partnership in the Oracle Partner Network Specialized Program and a strategic partner to Oracle in several key industries such as the public sector, higher education and food and beverage. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The U.S. ERP division is an Oracle Platinum Partner, which is the highest level of partnership in the Oracle Partner Network Specialized Program and a strategic partner to Oracle in several key industries such as the public sector, higher education and food and beverage.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS259 | Other Competitors include Netflix, DVDs, Travel and other television networks, other VOD advertisers, Internet sellers of travel, and other advertising. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Other Competitors include Netflix, DVDs, Travel and other television networks, other VOD advertisers, Internet sellers of travel, and other advertising.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS260 | However, we also anticipate that these increased expenses will be partially offset by milestone payments we expect to receive under our agreements with Celgene and potentially by payments we may receive under new collaboration arrangements we may enter into with third parties for ACE-083, ACE-2494 or other therapeutic candidates. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
However, we also anticipate that these increased expenses will be partially offset by milestone payments we expect to receive under our agreements with Celgene and potentially by payments we may receive under new collaboration arrangements we may enter into with third parties for ACE-083, ACE-2494 or other therapeutic candidates.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS261 | This enables end users to receive, send, be notified of and play voice mail messages through their Microsoft Outlook email. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
This enables end users to receive, send, be notified of and play voice mail messages through their Microsoft Outlook email.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS262 | Earlier in his career, he was with The Boston Consulting Group and Kidder, Peabody & Company, Inc He serves as a director of Blue Nile, Inc (NASDAQ: NILE), a leading online retailer of diamonds and fine jewelry, and the Center for Medical Weight Loss. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Earlier in his career, he was with The Boston Consulting Group and Kidder, Peabody & Company, Inc He serves as a director of Blue Nile, Inc (NASDAQ: NILE), a leading online retailer of diamonds and fine jewelry, and the Center for Medical Weight Loss.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS263 | Our executive and administrative office is located in Bethesda, Maryland in office space shared with American Capital | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our executive and administrative office is located in Bethesda, Maryland in office space shared with American Capital
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS264 | The strategic alliance with CN/ IC and marketing agreements with Norfolk Southern provide KCSR the opportunity to further capitalize on the growth potential of intermodal freight revenues, particularly for traffic moving between points in the upper midwest and Canada to Kansas City, Dallas and Mexico. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The strategic alliance with CN/ IC and marketing agreements with Norfolk Southern provide KCSR the opportunity to further capitalize on the growth potential of intermodal freight revenues, particularly for traffic moving between points in the upper midwest and Canada to Kansas City, Dallas and Mexico.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS265 | Benefit Obligations A comparison of the actuarially computed benefit obligation and plan assets for Xcel Energy postretirement health care plans that benefit employees of its utility subsidiaries is presented in the following table: (ThousandsofDollars) 2006 2005 Change in Benefit Obligation Obligation at Jan. 1 $ 938,172 $ 929,125 Service cost 6,633 6,684 Interest cost 52,939 55,060 Medicare subsidy reimbursements 3,561 Plan amendments (945 ) Plan participants contributions 11,870 12,008 Actuarial gain (27,511 ) (3,175 ) Benefit payments (66,026 ) (61,530 ) Obligation at Dec. 31 $ 918,693 $ 938,172 Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1 $ 351,863 $ 318,667 Actual return on plan assets 41,409 14,507 Plan participants contributions 11,870 12,008 Employer contributions 67,188 68,211 Benefit payments (66,025 ) (61,530 ) Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31 $ 406,305 $ 351,863 Funded Status at Dec. 31 Funded status $ (512,388 ) $ (586,309 ) Current liabilities (2,211 ) Noncurrent assets 15,736 Noncurrent liabilities (510,177 ) (150,014 ) Net amounts recognized on Consolidated Balance Sheets $ (512,388 ) $ (134,278 ) PSCo Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Cost: Net loss $ 106,450 $ 164,158 Prior service cost (credit) (2,613 ) (3,041 ) Transition obligation 66,809 77,813 Total $ 170,646 $ 238,930 SFAS No. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Benefit Obligations A comparison of the actuarially computed benefit obligation and plan assets for Xcel Energy postretirement health care plans that benefit employees of its utility subsidiaries is presented in the following table: (ThousandsofDollars) 2006 2005 Change in Benefit Obligation Obligation at Jan. 1 $ 938,172 $ 929,125 Service cost 6,633 6,684 Interest cost 52,939 55,060 Medicare subsidy reimbursements 3,561 Plan amendments (945 ) Plan participants contributions 11,870 12,008 Actuarial gain (27,511 ) (3,175 ) Benefit payments (66,026 ) (61,530 ) Obligation at Dec. 31 $ 918,693 $ 938,172 Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1 $ 351,863 $ 318,667 Actual return on plan assets 41,409 14,507 Plan participants contributions 11,870 12,008 Employer contributions 67,188 68,211 Benefit payments (66,025 ) (61,530 ) Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31 $ 406,305 $ 351,863 Funded Status at Dec. 31 Funded status $ (512,388 ) $ (586,309 ) Current liabilities (2,211 ) Noncurrent assets 15,736 Noncurrent liabilities (510,177 ) (150,014 ) Net amounts recognized on Consolidated Balance Sheets $ (512,388 ) $ (134,278 ) PSCo Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Cost: Net loss $ 106,450 $ 164,158 Prior service cost (credit) (2,613 ) (3,041 ) Transition obligation 66,809 77,813 Total $ 170,646 $ 238,930 SFAS No.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS266 | The realized and unrealized loss on derivative transactions was $228,897 and the realized gain on the sale of the BellSouth common stock was $1,479,200 for the fiscal year ended October31, 2004. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The realized and unrealized loss on derivative transactions was $228,897 and the realized gain on the sale of the BellSouth common stock was $1,479,200 for the fiscal year ended October31, 2004.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS267 | We have long-term agreements with Volvo, PACCAR and International Truck and Engine Corporation for the supply of heavy-duty truck engines. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have long-term agreements with Volvo, PACCAR and International Truck and Engine Corporation for the supply of heavy-duty truck engines.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS268 | Further, we have formed Centers of Excellence, comprising dedicated, globally distributed teams with deep application knowledge and a proven track record in implementing Microsoft, SAP, IBM and Vignette solutions. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Further, we have formed Centers of Excellence, comprising dedicated, globally distributed teams with deep application knowledge and a proven track record in implementing Microsoft, SAP, IBM and Vignette solutions.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS269 | In October 2007, we entered into a global strategic alliance with MacroGenics, Inc (MacroGenics) to develop and commercialize teplizumab, a humanized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, as well as other potential next-generation anti-CD3 molecules for use in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In October 2007, we entered into a global strategic alliance with MacroGenics, Inc (MacroGenics) to develop and commercialize teplizumab, a humanized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, as well as other potential next-generation anti-CD3 molecules for use in the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS270 | However, we expect our overall sales volume to remain stable in the coming fiscal year due to continued favorable IT market conditions and our continued focus on high-end, Intel-based products and related services. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
However, we expect our overall sales volume to remain stable in the coming fiscal year due to continued favorable IT market conditions and our continued focus on high-end, Intel-based products and related services.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS271 | We have invested significant resources to develop relationships with industry leaders, including Cadence Design Systems, Inc and Synopsys, Inc, often assisting these companies in the product definition of their new products. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have invested significant resources to develop relationships with industry leaders, including Cadence Design Systems, Inc and Synopsys, Inc, often assisting these companies in the product definition of their new products.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS272 | In the years since, Commvault has forged numerous alliances with top software application and hardware vendors, such as Hitachi Vantara, Microsoft, Network Appliance, Fujitsu, Novell and Oracle, to enhance capabilities and to create a premiere suite of data and information management solutions. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In the years since, Commvault has forged numerous alliances with top software application and hardware vendors, such as Hitachi Vantara, Microsoft, Network Appliance, Fujitsu, Novell and Oracle, to enhance capabilities and to create a premiere suite of data and information management solutions.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS273 | We have strategic partners, Biogen and AstraZeneca, who partner with us on the development of drugs within specific therapeutic areas. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have strategic partners, Biogen and AstraZeneca, who partner with us on the development of drugs within specific therapeutic areas.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS274 | We encounter competition with respect to different aspects of our solution from a variety of sources including: Web conferencing solutions (e.g. Adobe, Cisco/WebEx, Microsoft and Citrix). | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We encounter competition with respect to different aspects of our solution from a variety of sources including: Web conferencing solutions (e.g. Adobe, Cisco/WebEx, Microsoft and Citrix).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS275 | In November 2004, we entered into a strategic alliance with Gilead Sciences for the discovery, development and commercialization of these compounds to treat chronic hepatitis C. In February 2007, we discontinued ACH-806, our first clinical stage compound from this series, in favor of next-generation back-up compounds demonstrating the same mechanism of action. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In November 2004, we entered into a strategic alliance with Gilead Sciences for the discovery, development and commercialization of these compounds to treat chronic hepatitis C. In February 2007, we discontinued ACH-806, our first clinical stage compound from this series, in favor of next-generation back-up compounds demonstrating the same mechanism of action.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS276 | In anticipation of the Vermont Yankee sale to Entergy, the Company sought and the PSB approved two Accounting Orders that allow the Company to defer certain costs incurred in 2002 resulting from the sale. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In anticipation of the Vermont Yankee sale to Entergy, the Company sought and the PSB approved two Accounting Orders that allow the Company to defer certain costs incurred in 2002 resulting from the sale.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS277 | Alliance organizations include Diebold, NCR, Wincor-Nixdorf, VISA, MasterCard and S.W.I.F.T. In addition ACI has membership in, and participates in the relevant committees, of a number standard setting bodies, such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Interactive Financial eXchange Forum (IFX), UK Cards Association and the PCI Security Standards Council. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Alliance organizations include Diebold, NCR, Wincor-Nixdorf, VISA, MasterCard and S.W.I.F.T. In addition ACI has membership in, and participates in the relevant committees, of a number standard setting bodies, such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Interactive Financial eXchange Forum (IFX), UK Cards Association and the PCI Security Standards Council.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS278 | CCE Holdings Acquisition of CrossCountry Energy -On November 17, 2004, CCE Holdings, a joint venture in which Southern Union owns a 50% interest, acquired 100% of the equity interests of CrossCountry Energy, LLC (CrossCountry Energy) from Enron and its subsidiaries for a purchase price of approximately $2,450,000,000 in cash, including certain consolidated debt. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
CCE Holdings Acquisition of CrossCountry Energy -On November 17, 2004, CCE Holdings, a joint venture in which Southern Union owns a 50% interest, acquired 100% of the equity interests of CrossCountry Energy, LLC (CrossCountry Energy) from Enron and its subsidiaries for a purchase price of approximately $2,450,000,000 in cash, including certain consolidated debt.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS279 | Mister Hackett is a director of Cameron International Corporation and Fluor Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Hackett is a director of Cameron International Corporation and Fluor Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS280 | She also serves as a director of Thermo Fisher ScientificInc and Hologic,Inc In addition, Miss Ullian was a member of the Board of Directors of Valeant Pharmaceuticals,Inc during 2005 through 2007. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
She also serves as a director of Thermo Fisher ScientificInc and Hologic,Inc In addition, Miss Ullian was a member of the Board of Directors of Valeant Pharmaceuticals,Inc during 2005 through 2007.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS281 | QAD MFG/PRO has been developed with a commercially available toolset marketed by Progress Software Corporation (Progress) that works with relational databases provided by Progress and Oracle Corporation. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
QAD MFG/PRO has been developed with a commercially available toolset marketed by Progress Software Corporation (Progress) that works with relational databases provided by Progress and Oracle Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS282 | Customers As of December31, 2016, our customers included many of the world's leading corporations, including Airbnb, Apple, Autodesk, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cathay Pacific, The Coca-Cola Company, Crate & Barrel, eBay, Electronic Arts, FedEx, Ford Motor Company, FOX, General Electric, Home Depot, HubSpot, IKEA, Investec, JetBlue, Marriott, NBCUniversal, Norwegian Cruise Line, Panasonic, Panera Bread, PayPal, Qantas, Qualcomm, Rabobank, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Siemens, Ticketmaster, Toshiba, Turner Broadcasting, Ubisoft and Viacom. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Customers As of December31, 2016, our customers included many of the world's leading corporations, including Airbnb, Apple, Autodesk, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cathay Pacific, The Coca-Cola Company, Crate & Barrel, eBay, Electronic Arts, FedEx, Ford Motor Company, FOX, General Electric, Home Depot, HubSpot, IKEA, Investec, JetBlue, Marriott, NBCUniversal, Norwegian Cruise Line, Panasonic, Panera Bread, PayPal, Qantas, Qualcomm, Rabobank, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Siemens, Ticketmaster, Toshiba, Turner Broadcasting, Ubisoft and Viacom.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS283 | Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Marketsm under the symbol FSII. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Marketsm under the symbol FSII.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS284 | Mister Keen is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of IDACORP, Inc, a subsidiary of Idaho Power Company, serving from 2006 to 2014, and was Chief Executive Officer of IDACORP, Inc from 2005 through 2013 where he was employed for 40 years. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Keen is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of IDACORP, Inc, a subsidiary of Idaho Power Company, serving from 2006 to 2014, and was Chief Executive Officer of IDACORP, Inc from 2005 through 2013 where he was employed for 40 years.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS285 | Platform Our Adobe Flash Platform technologies, including Adobe Flash Player and Adobe AIR, face competition from Microsoft Silverlight, as well as alternative approaches to building RIAs including Google Gears and JavaFX.Our Adobe ColdFusion product family and our Adobe Flex Builder developer tool products face competition from major vendors including Microsoft, IBM, BEA (a subsidiary of Oracle) and Sun. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Platform Our Adobe Flash Platform technologies, including Adobe Flash Player and Adobe AIR, face competition from Microsoft Silverlight, as well as alternative approaches to building RIAs including Google Gears and JavaFX.Our Adobe ColdFusion product family and our Adobe Flex Builder developer tool products face competition from major vendors including Microsoft, IBM, BEA (a subsidiary of Oracle) and Sun.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS286 | Mahe joined Pitney Bowes in 2007 as President, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mahe joined Pitney Bowes in 2007 as President, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS287 | The Predecessors historical combined carve-out financial statements included SG&A expenses that have historically included direct charges for certain overhead and shared services expenses allocated by SunPower. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Predecessors historical combined carve-out financial statements included SG&A expenses that have historically included direct charges for certain overhead and shared services expenses allocated by SunPower.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS288 | Positive coverage decisions for stand-alone balloon sinus dilation performed in the physician office setting are in place with several third-party payors including Medicare, UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, Cigna, Humana, Kaiser Permanente, TRICARE, Health Net and in certain states Medicaid and Blue Cross Blue Shield plans. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Positive coverage decisions for stand-alone balloon sinus dilation performed in the physician office setting are in place with several third-party payors including Medicare, UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, Cigna, Humana, Kaiser Permanente, TRICARE, Health Net and in certain states Medicaid and Blue Cross Blue Shield plans.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS289 | In recent years, we have developed partnerships with Cisco, HP, Microsoft and VMware to provide integrated application services for their software-defined networking (SDN) offerings. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In recent years, we have developed partnerships with Cisco, HP, Microsoft and VMware to provide integrated application services for their software-defined networking (SDN) offerings.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS290 | MICHAEL W. SUTHERLIN Age: 70 Director Since: January 2014 Board Committees: Compensation Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Other Public Directorships: Tesco Corporation Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc Former Public Directorships: Joy Global Inc Mister Sutherlin served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Joy Global Inc, a mining equipment and services provider from 2006 to 2013. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
MICHAEL W. SUTHERLIN Age: 70 Director Since: January 2014 Board Committees: Compensation Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Other Public Directorships: Tesco Corporation Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc Former Public Directorships: Joy Global Inc Mister Sutherlin served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Joy Global Inc, a mining equipment and services provider from 2006 to 2013.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS291 | Gulf Power Change in Control Acquisition by another entity, other than another subsidiary of Southern Company, of 50% or more of the stock of Gulf Power, a merger with another entity and Gulf Power is not the surviving company, or the sale of substantially all the assets of Gulf Power. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Gulf Power Change in Control Acquisition by another entity, other than another subsidiary of Southern Company, of 50% or more of the stock of Gulf Power, a merger with another entity and Gulf Power is not the surviving company, or the sale of substantially all the assets of Gulf Power.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS292 | Companies with an active AKI agent or program include AbbVie, Novartis, Thrasos Innovation, and AlloCure. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Companies with an active AKI agent or program include AbbVie, Novartis, Thrasos Innovation, and AlloCure.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS293 | Competition in Games for Console Devices and PCs We compete directly with Sony and Microsoft, each of which develops and publishes software for its respective console platform. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competition in Games for Console Devices and PCs We compete directly with Sony and Microsoft, each of which develops and publishes software for its respective console platform.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS294 | In particular, if major Internet search companies such as Google, Yahoo and Microsoft decide to devote greater resources to develop and market online advertising offerings directly to SMBs, greater numbers of our clients and potential clients may choose to purchase online advertising services directly from these competitors, particularly if and as the ease of their self-service models increases. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In particular, if major Internet search companies such as Google, Yahoo and Microsoft decide to devote greater resources to develop and market online advertising offerings directly to SMBs, greater numbers of our clients and potential clients may choose to purchase online advertising services directly from these competitors, particularly if and as the ease of their self-service models increases.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS295 | Concurrently with the closing of our sale of Eat24, we entered into a strategic partnership with Grubhub to expand our online ordering capabilities by integrating Grubhubs restaurant network onto the Yelp Platform. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Concurrently with the closing of our sale of Eat24, we entered into a strategic partnership with Grubhub to expand our online ordering capabilities by integrating Grubhubs restaurant network onto the Yelp Platform.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS296 | These include Siebel Systems, Inc, Amdocs Software Systems Limited, Remedy, Hewlett Packard, and Genesys Telecommunications Laboratory. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
These include Siebel Systems, Inc, Amdocs Software Systems Limited, Remedy, Hewlett Packard, and Genesys Telecommunications Laboratory.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS297 | In December 2013, Caesars Entertainment announced a strategic partnership with the world's leading promoter of live entertainment, Live Nation Entertainment, for The Axis which will feature new amenities including an innovative dance floor and VIP table seating concept that allows guests a one-of-a-kind concert experience. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In December 2013, Caesars Entertainment announced a strategic partnership with the world's leading promoter of live entertainment, Live Nation Entertainment, for The Axis which will feature new amenities including an innovative dance floor and VIP table seating concept that allows guests a one-of-a-kind concert experience.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS298 | The increase in 2005 subsidiary purchases resulted primarily from the use of cash for the WellChoice merger and Lumenos acquisition, as compared to cash used for the WHN merger in 2004. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The increase in 2005 subsidiary purchases resulted primarily from the use of cash for the WellChoice merger and Lumenos acquisition, as compared to cash used for the WHN merger in 2004.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS299 | She also serves on the board of Premier, Inc, InfraREIT, Inc, Connecticut Water Co. and one privately-held company and is a vice chairman of the board of the Philadelphia Zoo. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
She also serves on the board of Premier, Inc, InfraREIT, Inc, Connecticut Water Co. and one privately-held company and is a vice chairman of the board of the Philadelphia Zoo.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.