text stringlengths 0 820 |
|---|
stages, it is unnecessary to partition the feature for WMHSA. |
Thus, only the MHSAs in the first two stages are substituted by |
WMHSA. It should be noticed that the adopted WMHSA does |
not need to be shifted as the original implementation, since the |
WANG et al. : EMPIRICAL STUDY OF REMOTE SENSING PRETRAINING 5 |
D-Conv D-Conv |
ConcatGELU GELU |
LN |
MHSA |
LN |
FFNG-Conv |
BN |
SiLU |
G-Conv |
BN |
SiLU Img2Seq |
Img2Seq |
Seq2Img…PRMPCMD-Conv D-Conv |
ConcatGELU GELU |
LN |
WMHSA |
LN |
FFNImg2Seq |
Img2Seq |
Seq2Img…PRMPCM |
G-Conv |
SiLUG-Conv |
BN |
SiLU |
G-Conv |
BN |
SiLU |
G-Conv |
LN |
MHSA |
LN |
FFNG-Conv |
BN |
SiLUImg2Seq |
Img2Seq |
Seq2ImgPCM |
G-Conv |
SiLUG-Conv |
BN |
SiLULN |
WMHSA |
LN |
FFNG-Conv |
BN |
SiLUImg2Seq |
Img2Seq |
Seq2ImgPCM |
G-ConvG-Conv |
BN |
SiLU(a) (b) |
(c) (d) |
Fig. 3. The structures of different cells in ViTAE models. (a) and (c) are the |
reduction cell and normal cell in the original ViTAE, while (b) and (d) are |
the corresponded variants in the ViTAEv2. |
WMHSA is conducted on the merged multiscale feature from |
the pyramid reduction module (PRM), where different regions |
have communicated with each other through the overlapped |
receptive fields of the sliding dilated convolutions. Besides, it |
is also not necessary to use relative positional encoding since |
the convolutions already encode the positional information. |
Additionally, the SiLU [64] in the last convolutional layer |
of the parallel convolutional module (PCM) is also removed |
to reduce nonlinearity. The structures and comparisons of |
different cells in the original ViTAE and ViTAEv2 have been |
shown in Figure 3. For reduction cell, normal cell, PRM and |
PCM, readers can refer to [14] and [29] for more details. |
In our implementation, we mainly evaluate the “small” |
version of the original ViTAE, named ViTAE-S. In addition, |
we also adopt the ViTAEv2-S model due to its excellent |
representation ability and transferability to downstream tasks. |
Table I lists the details of ViTAE-S and ViTAEv2-S. Here, |
the length of the corresponded list equals the number of |
stages. “Embedding Dim” means the encoding dimension in |
PRM, while “Stage Dim” is the channel number of the feature |
through the corresponding stage, which is useful for aligning |
the related downstream task decoders. The “RC” and “NC” |
separately represent the reduction cell and normal cell, where |
“Head” is the head number in MHSA or WMHSA, “Group” |
represents the number of group convolutions in PCM, andTABLE I |
THE HYPERPARAMETER SETTINGS OF DIFFERENT “SMALL ”VERSION |
VITAE MODELS . “P” DENOTES PERFORMER ATTENTION [63] WHILE “L” |
MEANS THE REDUCTION CELL HAS NO PCM AND ATTENTION . “F” |
DENOTES THE ORIGINAL MHSA WHILE “W” DENOTES THE WMHSA. |
Network ViTAE-S [14] ViTAEv2-S [29] |
Stage 3 4 |
Downsampling Ratio [4, 2, 2] [4, 2, 2, 2] |
Embedding Dim [64, 64, 192] [64, 64, 128, 256] |
Stage Dim [96, 192, 384] [64, 128, 256, 512] |
RCHead [1, 1, 1] [1, 1, 2, 4] |
Group [1, 1, 1] [1, 16, 32, 64] |
Type [P, P, L] [W, W, F, F] |
NCHead [1, 1, 6] [1, 2, 4, 8] |
Group [1, 1, 96] [1, 32, 64, 128] |
Type [F, F, F] [W, W, F, F] |
Depth [0, 0, 14] [2, 2, 8, 2] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.