text stringlengths 0 820 |
|---|
RESULTS OF VITAE V2-S WITH DIFFERENT SETTINGS OF TRAINING |
EPOCH ON THE MILLION AID VALIDATION SET . |
Epoch Acc@1 Acc@5 |
5 94.53 99.41 |
10 96.45 99.64 |
15 97.38 99.74 |
20 98.00 99.81 |
40 98.64 99.86 |
60 98.87 99.83 |
80 98.90 99.85 |
100 98.97 99.88 |
TABLE IV |
RESULTS OF THE CANDIDATE MODELS FOR THE SUBSEQUENT |
FINETUNING EXPERIMENTS ON THE MILLION AID VALIDATION SET . |
Epoch Acc@1 Acc@5 |
ResNet-50 |
40 97.99 99.81 |
120 98.76 99.83 |
300 98.99 99.82 |
Swin-T |
40 97.80 99.84 |
120 98.63 99.89 |
300 98.59 99.88 |
ViTAEv2-S |
40 98.64 99.86 |
100 98.97 99.88 |
is set to 384. The remained settings are the same as the |
previous experiment. All experiments are conducted with 4 |
V100 GPUs, and the results are shown in Table III. According |
to the results, it can be observed that the model starts saturation |
after about 40 epochs, since it only improves 0.64% top-1 |
accuracy compared with training 20 epochs, while the next |
20 epochs only bring a gain of 0.23%. Thus, the network |
weights trained with 40 epochs are firstly chosen as the RSP |
parameters of ViTAEv2-S to be applied to the subsequent |
tasks. Intuitively, the model achieving good performance on |
the large-scale pretraining dataset will also perform well on |
the downstream tasks. Therefore, we also use the network |
weights trained with 100 epochs in the downstream tasks. |
These models are separately denoted with the suffix “E40” |
and “E100”. |
For ResNet-50 and Swin-T, we follow [13] to configure |
the training settings, where the networks are trained for 300 |
epochs. In the experiments, we observe that the top-1 accuracy |
of Swin-T-E120 on the validation set is roughly equivalent |
to ViTAEv2-S-E40. Thus, the training weights of Swin-T- |
E120 are selected. Similarly, we also choose the final network |
weights Swin-T-E300 as a comparison with ViTAEv2-S-E100. |
To make the experiments fair, the weights of ResNet-50 and |
Swin-T that are trained with 40 epochs are also considered, |
WANG et al. : EMPIRICAL STUDY OF REMOTE SENSING PRETRAINING 7 |
since they are trained using the same number of epochs with |
the ViTAEv2-S-E40. |
The final pretraining models are listed in Table IV. It can be |
seen that the validation accuracies are almost increasing with |
the increase of training epochs. However, the performance of |
Swin-T-E300 is not as well as Swin-T-E120. Nonetheless, we |
still keep it since it may have stronger generalization by seeing |
more diverse samples. |
IV. F INETUNING ON DOWNSTREAM TASKS |
In this section, the pretrained models are further finetuned |
on a series of downstream tasks, including recognition, seman- |
tic segmentation, object detection in aerial scenes as well as |
change detection. It should be clarified that models for scene |
recognition in this section are trained and evaluated on com- |
monly used aerial scene datasets rather than the MillionAID |
engaging for RSP. |
A. Aerial Scene Recognition |
We first introduce the used scene recognition datasets and |
the implementation details, then present the experimental |
results and analyses. |
1) Dataset: The three most popular scene recognition |
datasets including the UC Merced Land Use (UCM) dataset |
[69], the Aerial Image Dataset (AID) [70], and the benchmark |
for RS Image Scene Classification that is created by North- |
western Polytechnical University (NWPU-RESISC) [21], are |
used to comprehensively evaluate the impact of RSP and the |
representation ability of the above adopted backbones. |
•UCM: This is the most important dataset for scene |
recognition. It contains 2,100 images whose sizes are |
all 256 ×256 and have a pixel resolution of 0.3m. The |
2,100 images equally belong to 21 categories. Thus, each |
category has 100 images. All samples are manually ex- |
tracted from the large images in the USGS National Map |
Urban Area Imagery Database collected from various |
urban areas around the country. |
•AID: This is a challenging dataset, which is generated by |
collecting the images from multi-source sensors on GE. |
It has high intra-class diversities since the images are |
carefully chosen from different countries. And they are |
extracted at different times and seasons under different |
imaging conditions. It has 10,000 images at the size of |
600×600, belonging to 30 categories. |
•NWPU-RESISC: This dataset is characterized by a great |
number of samples. It contains 31,500 images and 45 |
categories in total, where each category has 700 samples. |
Each image has 256 ×256 pixels. The spatial resolutions |
are varied from 0.2m to 30m. Some special landforms, |
such as islands, lakes, regular mountains, and snow |
mountains, maybe in lower resolutions. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.