AlgerianLegalBench / README.md
himibraa's picture
Update README.md
59ed369 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
4.23 kB
metadata
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
  - ar
  - fr
task_categories:
  - question-answering
  - text-retrieval
tags:
  - legal
  - algerian-law
  - arabic
  - french
  - benchmark
  - jurisdictional-faithfulness
  - hallucination-detection
  - information-retrieval
pretty_name: AlgerianLegalBench
size_categories:
  - n<1K
configs:
  - config_name: default
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/test.jsonl
      - split: dev
        path: data/dev.jsonl

AlgerianLegalBench

Dataset Description

AlgerianLegalBench is the first evaluation benchmark specifically designed for legal information retrieval systems operating on Algerian law. It addresses three challenges absent from existing benchmarks:

  1. Jurisdictional infection — models trained on French, Egyptian, US, or Tunisian legal corpora import foreign legal rules into Algerian answers
  2. The linguistic trinity — questions in Modern Standard Arabic (232), Legal French (12), and Algerian Darja
  3. Temporal legal drift — amendments that change the law while models retain outdated rules

Key Statistics

Property Value
Total questions 244
Answerable 204 (83.6%)
Unanswerable (infection traps) 40 (16.4%)
Legal categories 23
Query types 8
Languages AR (232), FR (12)
Test split 182
Dev split 62
Laws in document registry 30
Inter-annotator κ 0.829

Unanswerable Questions: Foreign-Law Infection Traps

The 40 unanswerable questions probe 7 jurisdictional sources:

Source Count Example concepts
French 13 ISF, rent control, EURL, SAS, garde à vue duration, rupture conventionnelle
US 11 at-will employment, punitive damages, fair use, jury trial, LWOP
Egyptian 4 Mandatory bequest, civil marriage officer, pretrial detention
Tunisian 3 Polygamy ban, adoption plénière, commercial courts
UK 3 Consideration, duty of care, civil jury
Gulf 2 Kafeel system, exit permit
Algerian absence 3 Auto-saisine, municipal taxing, death penalty for corruption

Evaluation Metrics

Standard: Precision@1, MRR, Citation F1

Novel:

  • Jurisdictional Infection Rate (JIR) — % of unanswerable questions where model affirms foreign concept
  • Hallucinated Citation Rate (HCR) — % of responses citing non-existent articles

Query Types

Type Count Purpose
Rule application 66 Apply law to facts
Exact article 59 Pure statutory retrieval
Unanswerable 40 Foreign-law traps
Multi-hop 26 Cross-code reasoning
Long context 17 Synthesize 4+ articles
Layman/Darja 17 Non-technical queries
Conceptual 12 Legal definitions
Temporal 7 Amendment tracking

Schema

Each question contains:

{
  "id": "fam_ra_q01",
  "version": "3.0",
  "category": "family_law",
  "query_type": "rule_application",
  "difficulty": "medium",
  "language": "ar",
  "question": "...",
  "answerable": true,
  "expected_documents": ["84-11_1984-06-09"],
  "expected_articles": [{"document_id": "...", "article_ref": "54", ...}],
  "ground_truth_answer": "...",
  "reasoning_chain": ["Step 1 — ...", "Step 2 — ...", "Step 3 — ...", "Step 4 — ..."],
  "temporal_note": null,
  "annotation": {"annotator_1": "Islam Slimi", "annotator_2": "Ziad Slimi", "kappa": 0.91, ...}
}

Citation

@inproceedings{slimi2026algerianlegal,
  title={AlgerianLegalBench: A Native Benchmark for Evaluating Legal Information Retrieval and Jurisdictional Faithfulness in Algerian Law},
  author={Slimi, Islam and Slimi, Ziad and {Supervisor}},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the ArabicNLP 2026 Conference},
  year={2026}
}

Annotation

All questions were authored and cross-annotated by Islam Slimi and Ziad Slimi (law students at Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University M'Hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, Boumerdes, Algeria). Inter-annotator agreement (Cohen's κ): overall 0.829, easy 0.979, medium 0.904, hard 0.659. Disagreements resolved by senior expert.

License

CC BY 4.0

Contact

ibrahim.attia@ensia.edu.dz maab.chaoui@ensia.edu.dz i.slimi@univ-boumerdes.dz z.slimi@univ-boumerdes.dz