version stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis stringlengths 11 215 | hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 39 | context stringlengths 0 2.9k | context_formula stringlengths 0 905 | proofs list | proofs_formula list | negative_hypothesis stringlengths 15 193 ⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 37 ⌀ | negative_proofs list | negative_original_tree_depth int64 0 25 ⌀ | original_tree_depth int64 1 4 | depth int64 0 3 ⌀ | num_formula_distractors int64 0 22 | num_translation_distractors int64 0 0 | num_all_distractors int64 0 22 | proof_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial stringlengths 89 3.09k | proof_serial stringlengths 11 654 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeductionInstance | the Guyanese is not a crouch or a spinmeister or both. | (¬{C}{b} v {B}{b}) | sent1: the potpie is not a spinmeister if the fact that it does abuse surcoat and scrabbles EDS does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Guyanese either is not a crouch or scrabbles EDS or both is not right if the potpie does not scrabbles EDS. sent3: the Guyanese does crouch. sent4: if the fact that the harvest is not ... | sent1: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent2: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent3: {C}{b} sent4: ¬{L}{d} -> ({J}{c} & {K}{c}) sent5: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent6: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v {B}{b}) sent7: ¬{IA}{a} sent8: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent9: ¬({I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> ¬{G}{c} sent10: ¬({C}{b} & {AA}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent1... | [
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the potpie is not a spinmeister.; int1 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | the Guyanese does not crouch or it is a spinmeister or both. | (¬{C}{b} v {B}{b}) | [
"sent16 -> int2: the exocrine is not genuine but it gels Skuld if it does not jell fetlock.; sent12 -> int3: if the exocrine is not vicinal it does not jell fetlock.;"
] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Guyanese is not a crouch or a spinmeister or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the potpie is not a spinmeister if the fact that it does abuse surcoat and scrabbles EDS does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Guyanese either is not a crouch or scrabbles EDS or both is not right if the potpie does not scrabbl... | sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the potpie is not a spinmeister.; int1 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the provider is a millionairess. | {B}{a} | sent1: if something does not scrabble flamefish or it husks or both it does not scrabble flamefish. sent2: if something is a kind of a pantheist then the fact that it does not jell Psophia and does not abuse M3 is not right. sent3: if either the ilmenite gels Psophia or it does not husk or both it does not scrabble fla... | sent1: (x): (¬{D}x v {E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent2: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{H}x) sent3: ({F}{c} v ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {A}x sent5: ¬{AB}{a} sent6: ¬{E}{c} sent7: ¬(¬{F}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> {F}{a} sent8: ({N}{d} & {M}{d}) sent9: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent10: (x): {A}x -> ({DS}x & ¬{CD}x) sent11: ({AA}{... | [
"sent11 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent11 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | the provider is a kind of a millionairess. | {B}{a} | [
"sent6 -> int1: the ilmenite gels Psophia or it is not a husk or both.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: that the ilmenite does not scrabble flamefish hold.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it does not scrabble flamefish is not false.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the provider is a millionairess. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not scrabble flamefish or it husks or both it does not scrabble flamefish. sent2: if something is a kind of a pantheist then the fact that it does not jell Psophia and does not abuse M3 is not right. sent3: if either the ilmenite gel... | sent11 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the babbitt is not a kind of a Veneto. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: the babbitt is not daisylike and it is not a Veneto if the Maltese abuses sacrilegiousness. sent2: if the Maltese is a essonite the babbitt does not abuse sacrilegiousness but it is a Veneto. sent3: if the babbitt does abuse sacrilegiousness that the environment is a Veneto is true. sent4: if something is not a ... | sent1: {B}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent2: {D}{b} -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent3: {B}{a} -> {C}{aa} sent4: (x): (¬{H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{G}x sent5: (x): (¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {A}x sent6: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) sent7: {I}{d} -> ¬(¬{H}{d} & {G}{d}) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x sent9: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) sent10: ¬{J}{b} sent11... | [
"sent8 -> int1: the environment is not daisylike.; int1 -> int2: the environment is not daisylike or it abuses sacrilegiousness or both.; sent17 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent8 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 -> int2: (¬{A}{aa} v {B}{aa}); sent17 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the diaphone does not jell egress or is not non-Orthodox or both. | (¬{GB}{ea} v {AN}{ea}) | [
"sent5 -> int3: if the babbitt does not abuse sacrilegiousness and is a kind of a Veneto then it is daisylike.; sent6 -> int4: the intercostal is not a fling and it does not abuse environment if that it does not abuse Bukharin is not incorrect.;"
] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 17 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the babbitt is not a kind of a Veneto. ; $context$ = sent1: the babbitt is not daisylike and it is not a Veneto if the Maltese abuses sacrilegiousness. sent2: if the Maltese is a essonite the babbitt does not abuse sacrilegiousness but it is a Veneto. sent3: if the babbitt does abuse sacrilegiousness tha... | sent8 -> int1: the environment is not daisylike.; int1 -> int2: the environment is not daisylike or it abuses sacrilegiousness or both.; sent17 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | both the bathymetry and the non-atonalisticness happens. | ({AA} & ¬{AB}) | sent1: the crayoning does not occur but the tucking decorator happens if that the meatiness does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that the bathymetry but not the atonalisticness occurs does not hold. sent3: if that the dolichocephalicness does not occur is correct both the bathymetry and the non-atonalisticn... | sent1: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) sent2: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent3: ¬{A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent4: ¬({EO} & {GL}) sent5: ¬{B} -> ¬{A} sent6: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent7: ¬({FG} & ¬{BT}) | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the bathymetry and the non-atonalisticness happens. | ({AA} & ¬{AB}) | [] | 8 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = both the bathymetry and the non-atonalisticness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the crayoning does not occur but the tucking decorator happens if that the meatiness does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that the bathymetry but not the atonalisticness occurs does not hold. sent3: if that the doli... | sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the mackintosh is not a kind of a half-mast and does not scrabble sprayer does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | sent1: if the sprayer does not abuse musicianship but it is virological then the mackintosh does abuse weekend. sent2: the cuff is not a half-mast. sent3: if something does not jell overhead and does jell jagged that it does not abuse monoblast is not wrong. sent4: the fact that the mackintosh is not amoebic and it doe... | sent1: (¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) -> {B}{a} sent2: ¬{AA}{eh} sent3: (x): (¬{J}x & {I}x) -> ¬{H}x sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{ET}{a} & ¬{FN}{a}) sent5: (¬{J}{d} & {I}{d}) sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent7: (x): ({C}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{AB}x sent8: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{DN}x & ¬{A}x) sent9: (x): {A}x -> ({C}x v ¬{AB}x) sent10: {F}... | [
"sent6 & sent19 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 & sent19 -> hypothesis;"
] | the mackintosh is not a half-mast and does not scrabble sprayer. | (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent7 -> int1: the fact that the mackintosh does not scrabble sprayer is true if it is virological and/or it does not scrabble sprayer.; sent9 -> int2: if the mackintosh is a Lincolnshire it is virological or it does not scrabble sprayer or both.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the mackintosh is not a kind of a half-mast and does not scrabble sprayer does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sprayer does not abuse musicianship but it is virological then the mackintosh does abuse weekend. sent2: the cuff is not a half-mast. sent3: if something does not jell overhead and do... | sent6 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the non-structuralness prevents that the inflection occurs. | ¬{B} -> ¬{A} | sent1: the inflection occurs if the structuralness does not occur. sent2: that the translationalness does not occur is correct. sent3: that that either the inflection happens or the structuralness occurs or both is not correct if the bimorphemicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the postdoctoral... | sent1: ¬{B} -> {A} sent2: ¬{ET} sent3: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) sent4: ¬({A} v {B}) -> ¬{IG} sent5: {B} -> ¬{A} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inflection occurs.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A};"
] | the postdoctoral does not occur. | ¬{IG} | [] | 7 | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the non-structuralness prevents that the inflection occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the inflection occurs if the structuralness does not occur. sent2: that the translationalness does not occur is correct. sent3: that that either the inflection happens or the structuralness occurs or both is not correct if t... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inflection occurs.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the lotus does not jell geophagy hold. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: the embankment is not malodorous if the kerchief is not malodorous but a frost. sent2: the fact that the embankment is a Ledum is right. sent3: something does not jell geophagy and it is not a Ledum if it is not malodorous. sent4: if that something gels pustule and/or it is a kind of a Ardisia is not right then ... | sent1: (¬{C}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent2: {A}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) sent4: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent5: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent6: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent7: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent8: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & {E}x) | [
"sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the lotus does not jell pustule and/or is a Ardisia is not true.; sent6 -> int2: if that that the lotus does not jell pustule and/or is a Ardisia is not true hold then it does not jell geophagy.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}); sent6 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the lotus does jell geophagy. | {B}{b} | [
"sent3 -> int3: the embankment does not jell geophagy and is not a Ledum if it is non-malodorous.; sent8 -> int4: if the kerchief does not scrabble workhouse it is not malodorous and it is a frost.;"
] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the lotus does not jell geophagy hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the embankment is not malodorous if the kerchief is not malodorous but a frost. sent2: the fact that the embankment is a Ledum is right. sent3: something does not jell geophagy and it is not a Ledum if it is not malodorous. sent4: ... | sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the lotus does not jell pustule and/or is a Ardisia is not true.; sent6 -> int2: if that that the lotus does not jell pustule and/or is a Ardisia is not true hold then it does not jell geophagy.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the thoracotomy happens. | {B} | sent1: the Franciscanness happens. sent2: if the fact that the abusing Mojave does not occur is not wrong the thoracotomy does not occur and the updraft does not occur. sent3: that the thoracotomy happens is caused by that the updraft occurs. sent4: that the middle happens is not incorrect. sent5: the invocation happen... | sent1: {DJ} sent2: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) sent3: {A} -> {B} sent4: {JA} sent5: {CO} sent6: {DM} sent7: {IR} sent8: {DT} -> {EC} sent9: {HA} sent10: {HJ} -> {I} sent11: {EC} sent12: {GM} sent13: {ER} sent14: {A} | [
"sent3 & sent14 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent14 -> hypothesis;"
] | the thoracotomy does not occur. | ¬{B} | [] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the thoracotomy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the Franciscanness happens. sent2: if the fact that the abusing Mojave does not occur is not wrong the thoracotomy does not occur and the updraft does not occur. sent3: that the thoracotomy happens is caused by that the updraft occurs. sent4: that the middle ... | sent3 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the squawbush gels probabilism and/or it is non-paralytic. | ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: if the rawhide does not jell hydrofluorocarbon and/or is not a conveyance that the squawbush is not a Cynewulf is not wrong. sent2: something does not jell hydrofluorocarbon and/or is not a conveyance if it is not a kind of a linoleum. sent3: that either the squawbush gels probabilism or it is not paralytic or b... | sent1: (¬{E}{b} v ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent2: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x v ¬{F}x) sent3: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent4: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) sent5: (Ex): {B}x sent6: ¬{B}{a} sent7: (x): {JB}x -> ¬({II}{at} v ¬{HA}{at}) sent8: {L}{d} sent9: ¬({A}{a} v ¬{DL}{a}) sent10: ¬(¬{I}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> ¬{G}{b} sent11: (E... | [
"sent11 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent11 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | that the squawbush gels probabilism and/or it is not paralytic hold. | ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: if the squawbush is not a Cynewulf then it gels probabilism and is a bob.; sent2 -> int2: if the rawhide is not a kind of a linoleum it does not jell hydrofluorocarbon or it is not a conveyance or both.; sent16 & sent8 -> int3: the follow-up is a characterization.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the cock-a-... | 10 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the squawbush gels probabilism and/or it is non-paralytic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rawhide does not jell hydrofluorocarbon and/or is not a conveyance that the squawbush is not a Cynewulf is not wrong. sent2: something does not jell hydrofluorocarbon and/or is not a conveyance if it is not a kind of a... | sent11 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that if that the ablactation occurs is not false that the abusing bob occurs hold is not right. | ¬({A} -> {AA}) | sent1: the abusing bob but not the scandal happens if the ablactation happens. sent2: the scandal does not occur. sent3: if the abusing Balboa occurs the fact that not the bloomer but the dot occurs is not correct. sent4: the diadromousness happens. sent5: the abusing Balboa occurs. sent6: the gelling dugout occurs but... | sent1: {A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent2: ¬{AB} sent3: {I} -> ¬(¬{F} & {H}) sent4: {CA} sent5: {I} sent6: ({DB} & ¬{CJ}) sent7: ¬(¬{F} & {H}) -> ¬{E} sent8: {A} -> ¬{AB} sent9: ¬{E} -> ({IG} & {A}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ablactation occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the abusing bob occurs and the scandal does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the abusing bob happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 -> int2: {AA}; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the unwearableness occurs and the matrimony does not occur. | ({IG} & ¬{T}) | [
"sent3 & sent5 -> int3: that not the bloomer but the dotting happens is false.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the gerundialness does not occur.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: both the unwearableness and the ablactation occurs.; int5 -> int6: the unwearableness occurs.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the ablactation occurs is not false that the abusing bob occurs hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the abusing bob but not the scandal happens if the ablactation happens. sent2: the scandal does not occur. sent3: if the abusing Balboa occurs the fact that not the bloomer but th... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ablactation occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the abusing bob occurs and the scandal does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the abusing bob happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the sweep does not jell gloved. | ¬{F}{c} | sent1: the sweep does not jell gloved if the Centre is ascensional and it is a kind of a furosemide. sent2: the fact that the provider is a kind of a loop but it is not a kind of a stickball does not hold if there are non-subhuman things. sent3: the sweep is a furosemide if the fact that the fact that the Centre does n... | sent1: ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent3: ¬(¬{F}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> {E}{c} sent4: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent5: ({I}{b} & {H}{b}) -> {G}{b} sent6: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent7: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {F}x sent8: ¬{H}{b} sent9: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{... | [
"sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the provider is not a loop and is not a stickball does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the Centre is ascensional hold.; sent14 -> int3: if the Centre is a Welsh it is a furosemide.;"
] | [
"sent11 & sent10 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 & sent4 -> int2: {D}{b}; sent14 -> int3: {G}{b} -> {E}{b};"
] | the sweep gels gloved. | {F}{c} | [
"sent7 -> int4: if that the fact that the sweep is not subhuman and it does not loop hold is not true then it gels gloved.; sent18 -> int5: if the sweep is a kind of a stickball then the fact that it is not subhuman and it is not a loop is not true.;"
] | 5 | 4 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the sweep does not jell gloved. ; $context$ = sent1: the sweep does not jell gloved if the Centre is ascensional and it is a kind of a furosemide. sent2: the fact that the provider is a kind of a loop but it is not a kind of a stickball does not hold if there are non-subhuman things. sent3: the sweep is ... | sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the provider is not a loop and is not a stickball does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the Centre is ascensional hold.; sent14 -> int3: if the Centre is a Welsh it is a furosemide.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the decomposition does cavil. | {A}{a} | sent1: the decomposition is a spermatophyte and it is an absolute. sent2: the decomposition is a kind of a prude. sent3: the cardboard does abuse foxhole and it is a kind of a Toxicodendron. sent4: the decomposition does abuse foxhole. sent5: the grimoire does cavil if the decomposition does not cavil. sent6: the decom... | sent1: ({AH}{a} & {AL}{a}) sent2: {C}{a} sent3: ({B}{gg} & {FG}{gg}) sent4: {B}{a} sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> {A}{iu} sent6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent7: ({II}{a} & {HH}{a}) sent8: {JK}{a} sent9: {B}{bo} sent10: (x): ({C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{A}x sent11: {CO}{a} sent12: {B}{gn} sent13: ({A}{ir} & {CR}{ir}) sent14: ¬{F}{c} -> ({D}{a} & {E}... | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | the grimoire cavils and is not adequate. | ({A}{iu} & {GE}{iu}) | [
"sent10 -> int1: the decomposition does not cavil if it is a prude and it is a Guangzhou.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the decomposition does cavil. ; $context$ = sent1: the decomposition is a spermatophyte and it is an absolute. sent2: the decomposition is a kind of a prude. sent3: the cardboard does abuse foxhole and it is a kind of a Toxicodendron. sent4: the decomposition does abuse foxhole. sent5: the grimoire does ... | sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the exchanger scrabbles porker and it is not non-transdermal hold. | ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: there is something such that it is a Gothic. sent2: the exchanger is transdermal. sent3: there exists something such that that it is non-civilian does not hold. sent4: something is splintery and not anthropological. sent5: if something that is calcic does not scrabble Danu then the exchanger does scrabble porker... | sent1: (Ex): {EA}x sent2: {B}{a} sent3: (Ex): {E}x sent4: (Ex): ({FQ}x & ¬{IB}x) sent5: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent6: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {F}x) -> {D}x sent7: (Ex): ({CG}x & ¬{EJ}x) sent8: (Ex): {FK}x sent9: (Ex): {A}x sent10: (Ex): ¬{AB}x sent11: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent12: (Ex): ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent13: (x): ({AA... | [
"sent18 & sent5 -> int1: the exchanger does scrabble porker.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent18 & sent5 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the exchanger does scrabble porker and it is transdermal is incorrect. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"sent15 -> int2: if the heliosphere is a one-hundredth it is substantival and it does not scrabble porker.; sent6 -> int3: if the fact that the heliosphere is not a one-hundredth and does scrabble toucanet does not hold it is a one-hundredth.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the exchanger scrabbles porker and it is not non-transdermal hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is a Gothic. sent2: the exchanger is transdermal. sent3: there exists something such that that it is non-civilian does not hold. sent4: something is splintery and not anth... | sent18 & sent5 -> int1: the exchanger does scrabble porker.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the condonation does not occur and the cyclopeanness occurs. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: the inedibleness occurs if the scrabbling cockhorse does not occur. sent2: that the unknownness does not occur prevents that the parimutuel occurs. sent3: that that the unknown occurs is correct does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the condonation does not occur but the cyclopeanness happens is incorrect the p... | sent1: ¬{CC} -> {FE} sent2: ¬{A} -> ¬{B} sent3: ¬{A} sent4: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the condonation does not occur but the cyclopeanness happens does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the parimutuel happens.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the parimutuel does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); sent4 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: ¬{B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the condonation does not occur and the cyclopeanness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the inedibleness occurs if the scrabbling cockhorse does not occur. sent2: that the unknownness does not occur prevents that the parimutuel occurs. sent3: that that the unknown occurs is correct does not hold. sent4: if the... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the condonation does not occur but the cyclopeanness happens does not hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the parimutuel happens.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the parimutuel does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the squawbush is a kind of a joylessness. | {A}{c} | sent1: if the furfural is both phenomenal and unoriginal the decline ashes. sent2: if the fact that something is a foster-daughter and is a kind of a joylessness is false it is not a joylessness. sent3: the furfural is phenomenal and is not unoriginal. sent4: if the furfural is phenomenal but it is not unoriginal the d... | sent1: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent2: (x): ¬({C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x sent3: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent5: ({D}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{B}{c} sent6: ¬{AB}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) sent8: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x & {A}x) | [
"sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the decline is a kind of an ash is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is an ash.;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 -> int2: (Ex): {B}x;"
] | that the squawbush is not a joylessness is not incorrect. | ¬{A}{c} | [
"sent2 -> int3: the squawbush is not a joylessness if that it is a kind of a foster-daughter and is a joylessness is not right.; sent7 -> int4: the fact that the squawbush is a foster-daughter and it is a joylessness is not true if it does not ash.;"
] | 6 | 3 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the squawbush is a kind of a joylessness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the furfural is both phenomenal and unoriginal the decline ashes. sent2: if the fact that something is a foster-daughter and is a kind of a joylessness is false it is not a joylessness. sent3: the furfural is phenomenal and is not unorigin... | sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the decline is a kind of an ash is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is an ash.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the nones occurs. | {A} | sent1: if the scrabbling pizzicato does not occur then the mapping does not occur. sent2: the fact that either the Terpsichore does not occur or the articularness does not occur or both is incorrect. sent3: if that the weightlessness does not occur is right then the fact that the theatricalness but not the nones occurs... | sent1: ¬{DN} -> ¬{FS} sent2: ¬(¬{ES} v ¬{T}) sent3: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} & ¬{A}) sent4: ¬{B} -> ¬{A} sent5: ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) sent6: {AA} sent7: ¬{EF} sent8: ¬(¬{IJ} v ¬{IE}) -> ¬{BO} sent9: ¬{E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent10: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent11: ¬{G} -> (¬{F} v ¬{E}) sent12: ¬{IK} sent13: ¬{IF} sent14: (¬{F} v ¬{E}) -> ... | [
"sent17 & sent5 -> int1: the theatrical does not occur.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent17 & sent5 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the nones happens. | {A} | [] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the nones occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the scrabbling pizzicato does not occur then the mapping does not occur. sent2: the fact that either the Terpsichore does not occur or the articularness does not occur or both is incorrect. sent3: if that the weightlessness does not occur is right then the fact t... | sent17 & sent5 -> int1: the theatrical does not occur.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the analysand does fire but it is not a luger. | ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: the fact that the raider is a kind of a fire that does not bond is incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is a fire but it is not a luger is true if the fact that it is a thermojunction is correct. sent3: that the Riff is a kind of a luger is true. sent4: that that the fact that the analysand is a fire but it... | sent1: ¬({B}{aa} & ¬{BN}{aa}) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent3: {C}{jj} sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent6: {A}{aa} sent7: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent8: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"sent6 -> int1: something is a thermojunction.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 -> int1: (Ex): {A}x; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | the analysand is a fire that is not a luger. | ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent2 -> int2: if the analysand is a thermojunction then it is a fire and is not a luger.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the analysand does fire but it is not a luger. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the raider is a kind of a fire that does not bond is incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is a fire but it is not a luger is true if the fact that it is a thermojunction is correct. sent3: that the Riff is a kind of a ... | sent6 -> int1: something is a thermojunction.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it is a tool it is a city and is not a kind of a Praunus. | (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | sent1: if that the vinegarroon tools hold then it is not a Lysander. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a tool it is a city and a Praunus. sent3: that there is something such that if it tools then it is a city is true. sent4: if the ambulatory is prehensile it is not a Praunus. sent5: if the vinegarroon d... | sent1: {A}{aa} -> ¬{GS}{aa} sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (Ex): {A}x -> {AA}x sent4: {CB}{io} -> ¬{AB}{io} sent5: {A}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent6: (Ex): {GB}x -> ({GD}x & {DM}x) sent7: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent8: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent9: (Ex): {AN}x -> {AU}x sent10: (x): {FQ}x -> ({B... | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | there exists something such that if it does jell ass then it does scrabble hobnail and it is not a kind of a leasehold. | (Ex): {FQ}x -> ({BI}x & ¬{AT}x) | [
"sent10 -> int1: the fact that the cannelloni scrabbles hobnail and is not the leasehold if the cannelloni does jell ass is correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a tool it is a city and is not a kind of a Praunus. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the vinegarroon tools hold then it is not a Lysander. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a tool it is a city and a Praunus. sent3: that there is something such that if ... | sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the serviceman is not operable but it is a bonfire. | (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) | sent1: either the serviceman is an accounting or it is not a uplink or both. sent2: if the Angolese is a parade it does tuck Irish. sent3: if the serviceman accounts and/or is not a viewers that it is a bonfire is not false. sent4: the serviceman is not operable if it is not a Bengali. sent5: the serviceman is not a sm... | sent1: ({D}{a} v ¬{HH}{a}) sent2: {BR}{db} -> {BE}{db} sent3: ({D}{a} v ¬{E}{a}) -> {C}{a} sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent5: ¬{Q}{a} sent6: ¬{E}{hu} sent7: ¬{E}{go} sent8: ¬{C}{co} sent9: (¬{CI}{a} & {FS}{a}) sent10: ¬{B}{hi} sent11: ({D}{a} v ¬{E}{a}) sent12: ¬{FE}{a} sent13: ({E}{a} v ¬{FQ}{a}) sent14: ¬{A}{gh} sent15... | [
"sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the serviceman is not operable.; sent3 & sent11 -> int2: the serviceman is a bonfire.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent15 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent3 & sent11 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the serviceman is not operable but it is a bonfire. ; $context$ = sent1: either the serviceman is an accounting or it is not a uplink or both. sent2: if the Angolese is a parade it does tuck Irish. sent3: if the serviceman accounts and/or is not a viewers that it is a bonfire is not false. sent4: the ser... | sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the serviceman is not operable.; sent3 & sent11 -> int2: the serviceman is a bonfire.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the SNP does scrabble Dachau is not false. | {A}{a} | sent1: something that is gymnosophical is algorithmic. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is cheerful and/or it is a anil does not hold the SNP does not scrabble Dachau. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is cheerful and/or it is not a anil is false the SNP does not scr... | sent1: (x): {D}x -> {C}x sent2: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent3: (x): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent4: {E}{b} -> {D}{a} sent5: (Ex): {AB}x sent6: (Ex): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent7: ¬{BN}{cg} sent8: (x): ¬({DI}x v ¬{CL}x) -> ¬{GM}{a} sent9: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent10: ¬{G}{b} -> ({E}{b} & {F}{b}) sent11: (x): {... | [
"sent9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the suspension does not scrabble Dachau. | ¬{A}{co} | [
"sent11 -> int1: if that the SNP is algorithmic hold then it is leafy.; sent1 -> int2: the SNP is algorithmic if it is gymnosophical.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the SNP does scrabble Dachau is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is gymnosophical is algorithmic. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is cheerful and/or it is a anil does not hold the SNP does not scrabble Dachau. sent3: if there exists something such t... | sent9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the dextrin is not a kind of a fascista. | ¬{E}{b} | sent1: the habitat is non-Colombian thing that scrabbles registered. sent2: that the dextrin is permeable and not a Shawn is not right if it does jell soldiering. sent3: the candle abuses Reich. sent4: the dextrin is not permeable if the candle scrabbles Mutinus. sent5: if something is both not impermeable and a delinq... | sent1: (¬{EU}{df} & {FL}{df}) sent2: {G}{b} -> ¬({D}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {B}{a} -> ¬{D}{b} sent5: (x): ({D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{E}x sent6: (x): {A}x sent7: {B}{a} -> (¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent8: (x): ({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {E}x sent9: {J}{b} sent10: {B}{b} -> (¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) sent11: ¬{D}{b} sent12: ({D}{b} & {C}{b}... | [
"sent6 -> int1: the slag does abuse Reich.; sent14 -> int2: if the dextrin is not permeable but it is a kind of a delinquent then it is not a fascista.;"
] | [
"sent6 -> int1: {A}{aa}; sent14 -> int2: (¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{E}{b};"
] | the dextrin is fascista. | {E}{b} | [
"sent8 -> int3: if the dextrin scrabbles Mutinus but it does not abuse Reich then it is a kind of a fascista.; sent16 -> int4: if the dextrin is Sinhala then it is a Orleanism and/or it is not a kind of a library.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the dextrin is a Orleanism or it is not a library or both.;"
] | 7 | 4 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the dextrin is not a kind of a fascista. ; $context$ = sent1: the habitat is non-Colombian thing that scrabbles registered. sent2: that the dextrin is permeable and not a Shawn is not right if it does jell soldiering. sent3: the candle abuses Reich. sent4: the dextrin is not permeable if the candle scrab... | sent6 -> int1: the slag does abuse Reich.; sent14 -> int2: if the dextrin is not permeable but it is a kind of a delinquent then it is not a fascista.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the quarterback does not occur. | ¬{B} | sent1: the outdoorsness does not occur if the fact that either the Texan or the abusing Ottumwa or both happens is false. sent2: that the couture occurs is caused by that the exchangeableness occurs. sent3: that the constitutional happens is prevented by that both the semaphore and the bigamy occurs. sent4: the socioec... | sent1: ¬({G} v {H}) -> ¬{E} sent2: {A} -> {DM} sent3: ({L} & {M}) -> ¬{K} sent4: ¬{K} -> (¬{J} & ¬{I}) sent5: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {C}) sent6: {N} -> {L} sent7: ({A} & {B}) sent8: (¬{D} v ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} sent9: ({D} & {F}) sent10: ¬({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} sent11: ¬{E} -> (¬{D} v ¬{F}) sent12: ¬{I} -> ¬({G} v {H}) sent13: {P} -> {... | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | both the couture and the catechisticness occurs. | ({DM} & {EO}) | [] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the quarterback does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the outdoorsness does not occur if the fact that either the Texan or the abusing Ottumwa or both happens is false. sent2: that the couture occurs is caused by that the exchangeableness occurs. sent3: that the constitutional happens is prevented by that... | sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the bondwoman is not a champagne and is not a kind of a vermouth. | (¬{D}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) | sent1: if the bister is not a Poecilocapsus the bondwoman is not a champagne and is not a vermouth. sent2: if something is not a Poecilocapsus the fact that it is vesicular and it is not a pollinium is incorrect. sent3: the correspondent is not a kind of a minimalist. sent4: if the fact that the correspondent consorts ... | sent1: ¬{B}{b} -> (¬{D}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) sent2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({EC}x & ¬{DU}x) sent3: ¬{A}{a} sent4: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the correspondent does consort Szilard and does not breathe is false.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the bister is not a Poecilocapsus.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent4 & int1 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | if that the bondwoman is not a Poecilocapsus is not wrong the fact that it is both vesicular and not a pollinium is wrong. | ¬{B}{c} -> ¬({EC}{c} & ¬{DU}{c}) | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the bondwoman is not a champagne and is not a kind of a vermouth. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bister is not a Poecilocapsus the bondwoman is not a champagne and is not a vermouth. sent2: if something is not a Poecilocapsus the fact that it is vesicular and it is not a pollinium is incorrect. sent3: the c... | sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the correspondent does consort Szilard and does not breathe is false.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the bister is not a Poecilocapsus.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the elastic happens. | {E} | sent1: if the relevantness does not occur and the exploiting does not occur then the consorting bullfighter does not occur. sent2: that the Parisianness does not occur causes that the relevantness does not occur and the exploiting does not occur. sent3: if the down-bow does not occur the outing does not occur. sent4: t... | sent1: (¬{P} & ¬{Q}) -> ¬{O} sent2: ¬{R} -> (¬{P} & ¬{Q}) sent3: ¬{K} -> ¬{J} sent4: {M} -> (¬{K} & {L}) sent5: {C} -> ¬({B} & ¬{A}) sent6: (¬{EG} v ¬{EJ}) sent7: {HB} -> {DO} sent8: (¬{C} v ¬{B}) -> {D} sent9: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {C}) sent10: ({C} v ¬{B}) sent11: {G} -> ¬{F} sent12: {IB} -> {IO} sent13: {FO} sent14: {D} ->... | [] | [] | the elastic does not occur. | ¬{E} | [] | 15 | 4 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the elastic happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the relevantness does not occur and the exploiting does not occur then the consorting bullfighter does not occur. sent2: that the Parisianness does not occur causes that the relevantness does not occur and the exploiting does not occur. sent3: if the down-bow ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the gum occurs. | {C} | sent1: the gum does not occur if that the gum occurs but the considering nympholepsy does not occur is wrong. sent2: the feminizing Copland does not occur and the considering nympholepsy does not occur if the path occurs. sent3: if the feminizing Copland does not occur not the gum but the surveying happens. sent4: the ... | sent1: ¬({C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} sent2: {E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{D}) sent3: ¬{B} -> (¬{C} & {A}) sent4: {FU} sent5: ({A} & {B}) sent6: {BS} sent7: {B} -> {C} sent8: ¬{C} -> ({A} v ¬{B}) | [
"sent5 -> int1: the feminizing Copland occurs.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 -> int1: {B}; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the gum does not occur. | ¬{C} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the gum occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the gum does not occur if that the gum occurs but the considering nympholepsy does not occur is wrong. sent2: the feminizing Copland does not occur and the considering nympholepsy does not occur if the path occurs. sent3: if the feminizing Copland does not occur not t... | sent5 -> int1: the feminizing Copland occurs.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the superfecundation does not occur and the considering Ameiurus does not occur. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | sent1: that the currentness does not occur and the accumulating happens is not right. sent2: the superfecundation does not occur and the considering Ameiurus does not occur if the steamer does not occur. sent3: the fact that the dehiscentness but not the musculoskeletalness happens does not hold. sent4: the fact that t... | sent1: ¬(¬{CN} & {DO}) sent2: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent3: ¬({CR} & ¬{HQ}) sent4: ¬({R} & ¬{GU}) sent5: ¬(¬{B} & {EQ}) sent6: ¬(¬{BT} & ¬{BK}) sent7: ¬{E} -> ({B} & {D}) sent8: {B} -> ¬(¬{C} & {A}) sent9: ¬(¬{BQ} & {CO}) sent10: ¬(¬{BE} & {IO}) sent11: ¬({HT} & ¬{GS}) sent12: ¬(¬{DR} & ¬{CC}) sent13: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})... | [
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] | the superfecundation does not occur and the considering Ameiurus does not occur. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | [] | 9 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the superfecundation does not occur and the considering Ameiurus does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the currentness does not occur and the accumulating happens is not right. sent2: the superfecundation does not occur and the considering Ameiurus does not occur if the steamer does not occur. sent3:... | sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the cardinalship occurs and the preening occurs is not true. | ¬({A} & {B}) | sent1: the preening happens. sent2: that the cardinalship occurs and the preening occurs is not right if that the implicationalness does not occur hold. sent3: if the fact that the preening does not occur hold the mitoticness occurs and the cardinalship happens. sent4: that both the implicationalness and the full-timen... | sent1: {B} sent2: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) sent3: ¬{B} -> ({GD} & {A}) sent4: ¬{F} -> ({C} & {E}) sent5: ({C} & {D}) -> ¬{B} sent6: (¬{H} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{F} sent7: {A} | [
"sent7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | that the cardinalship happens and the preening occurs does not hold. | ¬({A} & {B}) | [] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the cardinalship occurs and the preening occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the preening happens. sent2: that the cardinalship occurs and the preening occurs is not right if that the implicationalness does not occur hold. sent3: if the fact that the preening does not occur hold the mi... | sent7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Chickasaw is not therapeutics. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: that something is therapeutics if the fact that it is not a bootleg and it is therapeutics is not true is correct. sent2: the subcontractor is not nebulous if the fact that the minaret is robotic and is not a kind of a thumbtack is not correct. sent3: if something bootlegs then it is non-therapeutics. sent4: som... | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> {C}x sent2: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent3: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x sent4: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) sent5: ({B}{a} v {JB}{a}) sent6: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} sent7: {C}{b} -> (¬{B}{a} & {CF}{a}) sent8: {B}{a} sent9: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent10: (¬{B}{a} & {CF}{a}) -> {CF}{hm} sent11:... | [
"sent8 -> int1: either the Chickasaw does bootleg or it is etiological or both.; sent9 -> int2: the Chickasaw is not therapeutics if either it is a bootleg or it is etiological or both.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent8 -> int1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); sent9 -> int2: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the flight is a kind of a bootleg and/or is a Florentine. | ({A}{hm} v {CF}{hm}) | [
"sent4 -> int3: if that the subcontractor is not nebulous is correct that it is therapeutics and it is a tam is right.;"
] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Chickasaw is not therapeutics. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is therapeutics if the fact that it is not a bootleg and it is therapeutics is not true is correct. sent2: the subcontractor is not nebulous if the fact that the minaret is robotic and is not a kind of a thumbtack is not correct. sent... | sent8 -> int1: either the Chickasaw does bootleg or it is etiological or both.; sent9 -> int2: the Chickasaw is not therapeutics if either it is a bootleg or it is etiological or both.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the stunting Klein does not occur. | ¬{D} | sent1: the leaning occurs. sent2: that the nonfissileness happens and the pubertalness happens causes that the reconstructing does not occur. sent3: the Pound occurs. sent4: if the cupping occurs then that the leaningness but not the State occurs is not correct. sent5: that the combustibleness happens and the bishopry ... | sent1: {E} sent2: ({II} & {GN}) -> ¬{AR} sent3: {DD} sent4: {F} -> ¬({E} & ¬{C}) sent5: ({IN} & {IE}) -> ¬{HN} sent6: ({BI} & {ES}) sent7: ({IC} & {FA}) -> ¬{GJ} sent8: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent9: ({G} & {AH}) -> ¬{S} sent10: {BS} sent11: {A} sent12: {HD} -> {JE} sent13: {GQ} sent14: {DM} sent15: {BB} -> {AA} sent16: ¬{... | [
"sent19 -> int1: the fact that the State happens hold.;"
] | [
"sent19 -> int1: {C};"
] | the stunting Klein occurs. | {D} | [] | 8 | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the stunting Klein does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the leaning occurs. sent2: that the nonfissileness happens and the pubertalness happens causes that the reconstructing does not occur. sent3: the Pound occurs. sent4: if the cupping occurs then that the leaningness but not the State occurs is not co... | sent19 -> int1: the fact that the State happens hold.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the tern is not a march and is a kind of a roadworthiness. | (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) | sent1: something considers hypo if it does consider townie. sent2: there exists something such that it gangs and it is not a kind of a put-put. sent3: the tern is not a kind of a march if that it is cheliceral thing that is not a salutatorian is wrong. sent4: that the tern is cheliceral and it is a salutatorian is wron... | sent1: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent2: (Ex): ({K}x & ¬{J}x) sent3: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent4: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent5: {B}{j} -> ¬{HD}{j} sent6: (x): ({K}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{H}{d} sent7: {D}{b} -> ¬({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) sent8: {C}{a} -> {A}{a} sent9: ¬{CG}{a} sent10: {E}{c} -> {E}{b} sent11: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent12:... | [
"sent8 & sent16 -> int1: the tern is a roadworthiness.;"
] | [
"sent8 & sent16 -> int1: {A}{a};"
] | the fact that the tern is not a march but it is a roadworthiness does not hold. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) | [
"sent13 -> int2: the Democrat is not a kind of a Coerebidae.; sent12 -> int3: the fact that the Democrat does not consort Sternotherus is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Democrat is not a kind of a Coerebidae and does not consort Sternotherus.; int4 -> int5: the fact that that everything is not a kind of a Coerebi... | 9 | 2 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the tern is not a march and is a kind of a roadworthiness. ; $context$ = sent1: something considers hypo if it does consider townie. sent2: there exists something such that it gangs and it is not a kind of a put-put. sent3: the tern is not a kind of a march if that it is cheliceral thing that is not a sa... | sent8 & sent16 -> int1: the tern is a roadworthiness.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the gal is not anagrammatic and does not stunt sparkler is not right. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | sent1: if the reticulocyte is a narrowing then the veterinarian does stunt Devonian. sent2: if the fact that something is side-to-side but it does not stunt chiffonier is not correct then it is not fragrant. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a ATF and it is a kind of a Mama is not right the... | sent1: {I}{g} -> {H}{f} sent2: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{E}x sent3: (x): ¬({A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}{b} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}{d} sent5: {H}{f} -> {H}{e} sent6: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent7: (¬{I}{h} & ¬{K}{h}) -> {I}{g} sent8: (¬{I}{h} & ¬{K}{h}) sent9: ¬(¬{AA}{fs} & ¬{EN}{fs}) sent10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) se... | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | the gal is not anagrammatic and does not stunt sparkler. | (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent11 -> int1: the fact that the daguerreotype is not a autoregulation but it is antecubital is not true if it is non-fragrant.; sent2 -> int2: if that the daguerreotype is side-to-side but it does not stunt chiffonier is false it is not fragrant.; sent7 & sent8 -> int3: the fact that the reticulocyte is a narrow... | 13 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the gal is not anagrammatic and does not stunt sparkler is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the reticulocyte is a narrowing then the veterinarian does stunt Devonian. sent2: if the fact that something is side-to-side but it does not stunt chiffonier is not correct then it is not fragrant.... | sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the indapamide is not precordial is not wrong. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: if the sgraffito feminizes future then it does not consort capacitance and/or it is not private. sent2: something is precordial if it does not cat and/or is not a private. sent3: either the indapamide is not a cat or it is not a private or both if it is dorsal. sent4: the indapamide is dorsal. | sent1: {CI}{gk} -> (¬{BH}{gk} v ¬{AB}{gk}) sent2: (x): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent3: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: {A}{a} | [
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: either the indapamide is not a cat or it is not a private or both.; sent2 -> int2: if either the indapamide is not a kind of a cat or it is not private or both it is precordial.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}); sent2 -> int2: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that the indapamide is not precordial is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sgraffito feminizes future then it does not consort capacitance and/or it is not private. sent2: something is precordial if it does not cat and/or is not a private. sent3: either the indapamide is not a cat or it is not a pri... | sent3 & sent4 -> int1: either the indapamide is not a cat or it is not a private or both.; sent2 -> int2: if either the indapamide is not a kind of a cat or it is not private or both it is precordial.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a GB it is not an adaptability and it is a pyrostat is incorrect. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: the Eyeish is not an adaptability but it is a pyrostat if it is not a kind of a GB. sent2: that if something does not consider Tampico then it is not a fascicle and it is a kind of a chowchow is true. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a GB is correct then it is not a kind of an adapt... | sent1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: (x): ¬{DJ}x -> (¬{I}x & {BM}x) sent3: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent4: ¬{HS}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {GS}{aa}) | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | there exists something such that if it does not consider Tampico it is not a fascicle and it is a chowchow. | (Ex): ¬{DJ}x -> (¬{I}x & {BM}x) | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the xylophonist does not consider Tampico then it is not a fascicle and it is a chowchow.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a GB it is not an adaptability and it is a pyrostat is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Eyeish is not an adaptability but it is a pyrostat if it is not a kind of a GB. sent2: that if something does not consider Tampico then it is not a fasci... | sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | if the custom-made is biosynthetic then it is not skinless and it does stunt bollock. | {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | sent1: something stunts Luger if the fact that it is a kind of a Cornus is not incorrect. sent2: something is bicameral if it feminizes plagiarism. sent3: something is not skinless but it does stunt bollock if it is biosynthetic. sent4: something is skinless and it stunts bollock if it is biosynthetic. sent5: if the Lu... | sent1: (x): {EN}x -> {EL}x sent2: (x): {EM}x -> {JC}x sent3: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent4: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: {AB}{hr} -> {DP}{hr} | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = if the custom-made is biosynthetic then it is not skinless and it does stunt bollock. ; $context$ = sent1: something stunts Luger if the fact that it is a kind of a Cornus is not incorrect. sent2: something is bicameral if it feminizes plagiarism. sent3: something is not skinless but it does stunt bolloc... | sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the caboose is not a effeminacy. | ¬{D}{c} | sent1: either the allspice is a Arlington or it is agreeable or both if it is not a Caligula. sent2: the fergusonite is skeletal. sent3: that the fact that the allspice does not feminize Buffalo and is a kind of a horizontality is incorrect is not wrong. sent4: the fact that the allspice is not a Caligula is correct if... | sent1: ¬{I}{e} -> ({H}{e} v {G}{e}) sent2: {A}{a} sent3: ¬(¬{J}{e} & {K}{e}) sent4: ¬(¬{J}{e} & {K}{e}) -> ¬{I}{e} sent5: {FP}{a} sent6: {C}{b} -> {D}{c} sent7: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent8: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent9: {C}{a} -> {B}{b} sent10: {B}{b} -> {C}{a} sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({D}x v {B}x) sent12: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {... | [
"sent8 -> int1: the fergusonite is immediate.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the wheeze is macrobiotics.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent8 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent7 & int1 -> int2: {C}{b}; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fetter is immediate and it is minor. | ({B}{fs} & {S}{fs}) | [
"sent12 -> int3: if the fetter is not a effeminacy then it is skeletal and is immediate.;"
] | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the caboose is not a effeminacy. ; $context$ = sent1: either the allspice is a Arlington or it is agreeable or both if it is not a Caligula. sent2: the fergusonite is skeletal. sent3: that the fact that the allspice does not feminize Buffalo and is a kind of a horizontality is incorrect is not wrong. sen... | sent8 -> int1: the fergusonite is immediate.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the wheeze is macrobiotics.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that both the non-stablingness and the loop occurs is false. | ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: if the using occurs that the stunting rya does not occur and the consorting Gnosticism happens is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the feminizing WTV does not occur and the vocal happens does not hold. sent3: if the consolidation happens then the fact that not the label but the incompatibleness occurs is not righ... | sent1: {EL} -> ¬(¬{GB} & {HI}) sent2: ¬(¬{HT} & {DF}) sent3: {GO} -> ¬(¬{GQ} & {U}) sent4: {A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent5: {HI} -> ¬(¬{IO} & {GJ}) sent6: {AG} -> ¬(¬{U} & {HI}) sent7: ¬{L} -> (¬{J} & {K}) sent8: {HE} sent9: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) sent10: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{BK} & {CF}) sent11: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) sent12: {A} -> ¬(¬... | [
"sent12 & sent18 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent12 & sent18 -> hypothesis;"
] | both the non-stablingness and the looping occurs. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | [] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that both the non-stablingness and the loop occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the using occurs that the stunting rya does not occur and the consorting Gnosticism happens is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the feminizing WTV does not occur and the vocal happens does not hold. sent3: if the... | sent12 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Czechoslovakian is not a siskin. | ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: something is a kind of a banner and it stunts Gospel if it does not feminize lowland. sent2: if there is something such that it does not murmur then that the Czechoslovakian is porcine and is a kind of an elation is false. sent3: that the Czechoslovakian is journalistic is right. sent4: something is not a murmur... | sent1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent3: {IA}{aa} sent4: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{J}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent7: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent8: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent9: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent10: (Ex): {DP}x sent11: (x): ¬{AA}... | [
"sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the Czechoslovakian is porcine but it is not an elation is incorrect then it is a siskin.; sent6 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the Czechoslovakian is porcine but it is not an elation is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent9 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent6 & sent16 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the VLDL is a siskin and does not stunt loaf does not hold. | ¬({B}{bj} & ¬{J}{bj}) | [
"sent5 -> int3: if the VLDL does not murmur that it is a kind of a siskin and it does not stunt loaf does not hold.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Czechoslovakian is not a siskin. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a banner and it stunts Gospel if it does not feminize lowland. sent2: if there is something such that it does not murmur then that the Czechoslovakian is porcine and is a kind of an elation is false. sent3: that the Czechosl... | sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the Czechoslovakian is porcine but it is not an elation is incorrect then it is a siskin.; sent6 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the Czechoslovakian is porcine but it is not an elation is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the unmilitariness happens. | {C} | sent1: the lowercaseness and the feminizing keystroke occurs. sent2: the stunting foothold occurs. sent3: that the radiopaqueness occurs results in that the nonobservance does not occur and the relation does not occur. sent4: that the branching occurs and the consorting narrator occurs is brought about by that the rela... | sent1: ({FK} & {HN}) sent2: {BA} sent3: {M} -> (¬{L} & ¬{K}) sent4: ¬{K} -> ({I} & {J}) sent5: ({A} & {B}) sent6: {A} sent7: ({Q} & {P}) -> ¬{N} sent8: (¬{A} & {B}) -> {AS} sent9: {I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) sent10: ({GH} & {AO}) sent11: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent12: {B} -> {C} sent13: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) sent14: (¬{N} & ¬{... | [
"sent5 -> int1: the renovation happens.; int1 & sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 -> int1: {B}; int1 & sent12 -> hypothesis;"
] | the unmilitariness does not occur. | ¬{C} | [] | 13 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the unmilitariness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the lowercaseness and the feminizing keystroke occurs. sent2: the stunting foothold occurs. sent3: that the radiopaqueness occurs results in that the nonobservance does not occur and the relation does not occur. sent4: that the branching occurs and the con... | sent5 -> int1: the renovation happens.; int1 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the harvest-lice is a carbonyl. | {A}{a} | sent1: the fact that something is other and does not consort patella is true if it is prokaryotic. sent2: the fact that the swamp is not an impossible but it is rosaceous does not hold. sent3: the harvest-lice is a carbonyl. sent4: the Nasturtium is carbonyl thing that is not a kind of a grate if there is something suc... | sent1: (x): {E}x -> ({C}x & ¬{D}x) sent2: ¬(¬{H}{d} & {G}{d}) sent3: {A}{a} sent4: (x): {F}x -> ({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent5: {A}{fd} sent6: (¬{E}{b} v {F}{b}) sent7: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x v {C}x) sent8: (x): (¬{B}x v {C}x) -> {C}{a} sent9: (x): (¬{E}x v {F}x) -> ¬{D}x sent10: {F}{c} sent11: ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the harvest-lice is non-carbonyl. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent10 -> int1: there is something such that it is a kind of a downshift.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Nasturtium is carbonyl but not a grate.; int2 -> int3: the Nasturtium is a kind of a carbonyl.; sent1 -> int4: the Nasturtium is a kind of other thing that does not consort patella if it is prokaryotic.; sent2 -> i... | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the harvest-lice is a carbonyl. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is other and does not consort patella is true if it is prokaryotic. sent2: the fact that the swamp is not an impossible but it is rosaceous does not hold. sent3: the harvest-lice is a carbonyl. sent4: the Nasturtium is carbonyl ... | sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the spaceflight does not occur is true. | ¬{B} | sent1: the dilution occurs. sent2: the fact that the dilution does not occur and the spaceflight does not occur is not true if the Tahitianness does not occur. sent3: if the dilution happens the fact that the nonlexicalness happens and the radial occurs is not true. sent4: the consorting tribuneship does not occur. sen... | sent1: {A} sent2: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent3: {A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent4: ¬{GD} sent5: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent6: {AB} -> ¬{B} sent7: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent8: {HQ} | [] | [] | the fact that the spaceflight occurs is not false. | {B} | [] | 5 | 2 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the spaceflight does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the dilution occurs. sent2: the fact that the dilution does not occur and the spaceflight does not occur is not true if the Tahitianness does not occur. sent3: if the dilution happens the fact that the nonlexicalness happens and t... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a range and it is innumerate is not wrong is not true. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: the fact that the thyrotropin considers billfish and is unobjectionable does not hold. sent2: something does not range but it is innumerate. sent3: the fact that that the thyrotropin is quartzose and it is not non-innumerate is true does not hold. sent4: the Iowan is not quartzose. sent5: the fact that the thyro... | sent1: ¬({HR}{b} & {DG}{b}) sent2: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: ¬({A}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent4: ¬{A}{ao} sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent6: ¬{AA}{a} sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent8: (Ex): ¬(¬{IO}x & {IJ}x) sent9: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent10: ¬({AB}{b} & {A}{b}) sent11: ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent5 & sent11 -> int1: that the thyrotropin is not a kind of a range but it is innumerate does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 & sent11 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a range and it is innumerate is not wrong is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the thyrotropin considers billfish and is unobjectionable does not hold. sent2: something does not range but it is innumerate. sent3: the fact t... | sent5 & sent11 -> int1: that the thyrotropin is not a kind of a range but it is innumerate does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the nosewheel hoofs. | {C}{b} | sent1: if something does not stunt pickpocket and it is not a drupelet the nosewheel does not hoof. sent2: if the niece consorts quibble then the cloud does consorts quibble. sent3: the cloud is not a drupelet. sent4: The pickpocket does not stunt cloud. sent5: something that caprioles and is not neurophysiological is ... | sent1: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: {G}{c} -> {G}{a} sent3: ¬{B}{a} sent4: ¬{AA}{aa} sent5: (x): ({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {D}x sent6: ¬{A}{b} sent7: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent8: ¬{A}{a} sent9: {G}{a} -> ({E}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) sent10: (Ex): ¬{IE}x sent11: (x): {D}x -> {B}x | [
"sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the cloud does not stunt pickpocket and is not a drupelet.; int1 -> int2: something does not stunt pickpocket and it is not a kind of a drupelet.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent8 & sent3 -> int1: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x); int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the nosewheel is a hoofing. | {C}{b} | [
"sent7 -> int3: the nosewheel is a hoofing if the fact that it does not stunt pickpocket is incorrect.; sent11 -> int4: if the nosewheel is a lusterware it is a drupelet.; sent5 -> int5: if the nosewheel is a capriole and is not neurophysiological then it is a lusterware.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the nosewheel hoofs. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not stunt pickpocket and it is not a drupelet the nosewheel does not hoof. sent2: if the niece consorts quibble then the cloud does consorts quibble. sent3: the cloud is not a drupelet. sent4: The pickpocket does not stunt cloud. sent5: somethin... | sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the cloud does not stunt pickpocket and is not a drupelet.; int1 -> int2: something does not stunt pickpocket and it is not a kind of a drupelet.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the aphaniticness happens is not false. | {D} | sent1: the fact that the schematization occurs is not incorrect if the sacking occurs. sent2: the launch is caused by that the casualty happens. sent3: if that the mousetrap happens hold then the Norman occurs. sent4: if the indentation occurs then the aphaniticness happens. sent5: the nonionicness occurs. sent6: if th... | sent1: {A} -> {B} sent2: {IS} -> {ES} sent3: {I} -> {DG} sent4: {C} -> {D} sent5: {AK} sent6: {DB} -> {IU} sent7: {B} -> {C} sent8: {AN} -> {GM} sent9: {A} sent10: ¬{E} -> ¬({D} & {C}) sent11: {AA} | [
"sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the schematization happens.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the indentation occurs.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 & sent9 -> int1: {B}; sent7 & int1 -> int2: {C}; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the immunocompetentness happens. | {FC} | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the aphaniticness happens is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the schematization occurs is not incorrect if the sacking occurs. sent2: the launch is caused by that the casualty happens. sent3: if that the mousetrap happens hold then the Norman occurs. sent4: if the indentation ... | sent1 & sent9 -> int1: the schematization happens.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the indentation occurs.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there exists something such that if it does not feminize annum and it does not feminize spellbinder then it does archaize does not hold. | ¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x) | sent1: if the mesohippus does not feminize annum and does feminize spellbinder then it does archaize. sent2: if something that is not ecclesiastical does not stunt Epistle then it fornicates. sent3: if something feminizes annum but it does not feminize spellbinder then it archaizes. sent4: if something does not feminiz... | sent1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent2: (x): (¬{BS}x & ¬{N}x) -> {IJ}x sent3: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent4: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent7: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent6 -> int1: if the fact that the mesohippus does not feminize annum and does not feminize spellbinder is not false it does archaize.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it does not feminize annum and it does not feminize spellbinder then it does archaize does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mesohippus does not feminize annum and does feminize spellbinder then it does archaize. sent2: if something that is not ecclesiastical ... | sent6 -> int1: if the fact that the mesohippus does not feminize annum and does not feminize spellbinder is not false it does archaize.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the zamia is not a nymphet but it is uveal is not correct. | ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: the zamia is a details but it is not a Martian. sent2: the Devon is a kind of a details. sent3: if the zamia stunts algometer then that it is not uveal is not right. sent4: the zamia stunts algometer. sent5: The algometer stunts zamia. sent6: if the zamia does detail but it is not a Martian it is not a nymphet. ... | sent1: ({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent2: {E}{go} sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: {AA}{aa} sent6: ({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x v {G}x) sent8: {B}{a} -> {JC}{a} sent9: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{D}{fr} sent10: ¬(¬{F}{b} v {G}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent11: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {B}x) | [
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the zamia is uveal.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: the zamia is not a kind of a nymphet.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the dad is not Martian. | ¬{D}{fr} | [
"sent11 -> int3: the zamia is a nymphet and it is uveal if it is not a kind of a details.; sent7 -> int4: if the stoma is not a disguise then that it does not extrapolate and/or it does consider restharrow is not correct.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the zamia is not a nymphet but it is uveal is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the zamia is a details but it is not a Martian. sent2: the Devon is a kind of a details. sent3: if the zamia stunts algometer then that it is not uveal is not right. sent4: the zamia stunts algometer. sent5: The algomete... | sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the zamia is uveal.; sent6 & sent1 -> int2: the zamia is not a kind of a nymphet.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the effecter does logroll is not false. | {E}{c} | sent1: there is something such that it is a fission. sent2: if that either the convolution is amblyopic or it does not stunt getaway or both is not true the Montrachet stunt getaway. sent3: if the fact that something is a Islam but it does not stunt plexor is not correct it stunt plexor. sent4: if something that does n... | sent1: (Ex): {EQ}x sent2: ¬({F}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) -> {C}{a} sent3: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {B}x sent4: (x): (¬{I}x & {J}x) -> ¬{H}{e} sent5: (Ex): (¬{I}x & {J}x) sent6: (x): ({B}x v ¬{E}x) -> ¬{E}x sent7: {C}{a} -> ¬({A}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} v {C}{a}) sent9: {D}{b} -> {E}{c} sent10: {D}{c} sent11: (Ex... | [
"sent17 & sent8 -> int1: either the Montrachet does stunt plexor or it does stunt getaway or both.; int1 & sent18 & sent22 -> int2: the convolution is a ginseng.; sent9 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent17 & sent8 -> int1: ({B}{a} v {C}{a}); int1 & sent18 & sent22 -> int2: {D}{b}; sent9 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the effecter does not logroll. | ¬{E}{c} | [
"sent6 -> int3: the effecter does not logroll if it does stunt plexor or does not logroll or both.; sent3 -> int4: the fact that the effecter stunts plexor is not false if the fact that it is a Islam and it does not stunts plexor is false.; sent5 & sent4 -> int5: the Timothy does not canter.; int5 -> int6: there is... | 10 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the effecter does logroll is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is a fission. sent2: if that either the convolution is amblyopic or it does not stunt getaway or both is not true the Montrachet stunt getaway. sent3: if the fact that something is a Islam but it do... | sent17 & sent8 -> int1: either the Montrachet does stunt plexor or it does stunt getaway or both.; int1 & sent18 & sent22 -> int2: the convolution is a ginseng.; sent9 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the subduer is a whirl. | {C}{b} | sent1: if something does stunt Islam the fact that it is not a Okinawa and it does consort miscalculation is not true. sent2: the Kiowa does deviate if it is a thrower. sent3: the paste is a kind of a whirl. sent4: that the Kiowa is a thrower is correct. sent5: the finagler does not whirl. sent6: the Kiowa is categorem... | sent1: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent2: {M}{d} -> {J}{d} sent3: {C}{ge} sent4: {M}{d} sent5: ¬{C}{a} sent6: {L}{d} sent7: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent8: {A}{b} -> {C}{b} sent9: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent10: {B}{b} -> {C}{b} sent11: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent12: ¬(¬{G}{a} & {E}{a}) -> {E}{b} sent13: {C}{a} -> {C}{b} sent14: (x): {L... | [
"sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the finagler does consort miscalculation.; int1 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent7 & sent15 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | the subduer does whirl. | {C}{b} | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the subduer is a whirl. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does stunt Islam the fact that it is not a Okinawa and it does consort miscalculation is not true. sent2: the Kiowa does deviate if it is a thrower. sent3: the paste is a kind of a whirl. sent4: that the Kiowa is a thrower is correct. sent5: the f... | sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the finagler does consort miscalculation.; int1 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the anthropolatry occurs. | {A} | sent1: that both the flag and the bobsledding occurs is wrong if the attainment does not occur. sent2: the depression but not the anthropolatry happens if the behalf occurs. sent3: the anthropolatry occurs and the depression occurs. sent4: the eagerness happens. sent5: if the fact that the feminizing manumission occurs... | sent1: ¬{I} -> ¬({H} & {G}) sent2: {C} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) sent3: ({A} & {B}) sent4: {T} sent5: {AB} -> {AA} sent6: ¬{F} -> ({E} v {D}) sent7: (¬{AC} & {AB}) sent8: {R} -> {P} sent9: ¬{N} -> ({L} & {M}) sent10: ¬{C} -> ({B} v {A}) sent11: {T} -> {Q} sent12: {K} -> (¬{I} & ¬{J}) sent13: {L} -> {K} sent14: {B} sent15: ¬({H} ... | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the anthropolatry does not occur. | ¬{A} | [
"sent7 -> int1: the fact that the feminizing manumission occurs is correct.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the limitation happens.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the bilabialness occurs is true.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: not the feathering but the feminizing bantering occurs.; int4 -> int5: the feminizing bantering oc... | 20 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the anthropolatry occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the flag and the bobsledding occurs is wrong if the attainment does not occur. sent2: the depression but not the anthropolatry happens if the behalf occurs. sent3: the anthropolatry occurs and the depression occurs. sent4: the eagerness happens. se... | sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the archil is a hypertensive. | {C}{a} | sent1: if the monastery is not a thinker that it is a plenty and is not a Milvus is wrong. sent2: that the refinery is not photosynthetic hold. sent3: the monastery is not a thinker if there exists something such that that it is not a Day and it is not a kind of a foundation is false. sent4: there is something such tha... | sent1: ¬{I}{f} -> ¬({H}{f} & ¬{G}{f}) sent2: ¬{L}{g} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{K}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{I}{f} sent4: (Ex): ¬({M}x & ¬{N}x) sent5: ¬({H}{f} & ¬{G}{f}) -> {G}{e} sent6: ({C}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent7: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent8: (x): ({F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent9: {C}{aa} sent10: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent11: {B}{a} sent1... | [
"sent7 -> int1: something is a kind of a eutrophication that does consort refinery.;"
] | [
"sent7 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x);"
] | the archil is not a hypertensive. | ¬{C}{a} | [
"sent10 -> int2: the garbageman is a eutrophication and does not consort refinery if it is not calculous.; sent8 -> int3: if the garbageman is a kind of a Arp and it is nonalcoholic then it is not calculous.; sent18 -> int4: the fact that the refinery is not a kind of a Day and is not a kind of a foundation is not ... | 14 | 2 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the archil is a hypertensive. ; $context$ = sent1: if the monastery is not a thinker that it is a plenty and is not a Milvus is wrong. sent2: that the refinery is not photosynthetic hold. sent3: the monastery is not a thinker if there exists something such that that it is not a Day and it is not a kind o... | sent7 -> int1: something is a kind of a eutrophication that does consort refinery.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the Munchener does not exclaim. | ¬{D}{c} | sent1: that the gut is rheologic is correct if the haircut is happy. sent2: the gut is joyless if it is albinal and/or it is not happy. sent3: if the haircut is joyless the gut is thankless. sent4: the fact that something is both not non-rheologic and joyless does not hold if it is not thankless. sent5: the haircut is ... | sent1: {AB}{b} -> {A}{a} sent2: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent3: {B}{b} -> {C}{a} sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) sent5: {B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent6: {D}{ag} sent7: ({C}{b} & {A}{b}) -> {D}{c} sent8: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{D}x sent9: ¬{A}{b} sent10: (x): {F}x -> (¬{C}x v {E}x) sent11: {B}{a} -> ¬{A}{... | [
"sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the gut is joyless.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the haircut is thankless but it is not rheologic.; sent20 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 & sent15 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent5 & int1 -> int2: ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}); sent20 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the Munchener does not exclaim. | ¬{D}{c} | [
"sent8 -> int3: the fact that if the fact that the Munchener is non-rheologic thing that is joyless is not right then the Munchener does not exclaim hold.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Munchener does not exclaim. ; $context$ = sent1: that the gut is rheologic is correct if the haircut is happy. sent2: the gut is joyless if it is albinal and/or it is not happy. sent3: if the haircut is joyless the gut is thankless. sent4: the fact that something is both not non-rheologic and joyless... | sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the gut is joyless.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the haircut is thankless but it is not rheologic.; sent20 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the spectrophotometer is both not spartan and not the arsenide if the spectrophotometer is not disciplinary is wrong. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})) | sent1: if something is not disciplinary it is not spartan and it is not an arsenide. sent2: if something is not a kind of an arrow it does not feminize chebab and is a mercantilism. sent3: something is not a Musial but it does feminize nitrochloromethane if it is not mental. sent4: a non-disciplinary thing is not spart... | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬{IP}x -> (¬{JJ}x & {HF}x) sent3: (x): ¬{CJ}x -> (¬{AM}x & {IU}x) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x sent5: (x): ¬{DC}x -> (¬{CS}x & ¬{EO}x) | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the spectrophotometer is both not spartan and not the arsenide if the spectrophotometer is not disciplinary is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not disciplinary it is not spartan and it is not an arsenide. sent2: if something is not a kind of an arrow it does not feminize chebab ... | sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the hail does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: the purging happens. sent2: the consorting goblet does not occur if not the Hebrideanness but the amputation occurs. sent3: the hail occurs if the hail occurs or the commination does not occur or both. sent4: if the consorting goblet does not occur the centrifugalness happens and/or the commination happens. sent... | sent1: {B} sent2: (¬{I} & {H}) -> ¬{G} sent3: ({C} v ¬{E}) -> {C} sent4: ¬{G} -> ({F} v {E}) sent5: ¬({A} & ¬{B}) sent6: ¬(¬{A} & {B}) sent7: ¬(¬{EE} & ¬{JK}) -> ¬{EI} sent8: ¬({A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{BP} sent9: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{C} sent10: {C} -> ¬({A} & ¬{B}) sent11: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {B}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diffusion does not occur and the purging does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the purging does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the diffusion does not occur and the purging does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent9 -> hyp... | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{A} & ¬{B}); assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent1 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}); int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | the hailing occurs. | {C} | [] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the hail does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the purging happens. sent2: the consorting goblet does not occur if not the Hebrideanness but the amputation occurs. sent3: the hail occurs if the hail occurs or the commination does not occur or both. sent4: if the consorting goblet does not occur the centri... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diffusion does not occur and the purging does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the purging does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the diffusion does not occur and the purging does not occur does not hold.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothes... |
DeductionInstance | the rotor does not feminize gauss and it is not a kind of a purge. | (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | sent1: the archespore does not purge. sent2: the rotor is not longing. sent3: the L-plate is a desert and nutritional. sent4: the symposiast is not a platyrrhine if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of platyrrhine thing that is azotemic is incorrect. sent5: the steakhouse is not a organelle. s... | sent1: ¬{AB}{a} sent2: ¬{A}{b} sent3: ({P}{i} & {Q}{i}) sent4: (x): ¬({J}x & {N}x) -> ¬{J}{e} sent5: ¬{O}{h} sent6: (¬{G}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> {E}{c} sent7: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) sent8: (x): {I}x -> ¬{H}{d} sent9: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{b} sent10: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent11: {K}{g} -> {I}{f} sent12: (x): ¬({L}... | [
"sent17 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent17 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] | that the rotor does not feminize gauss and it does not purge does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | [] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the rotor does not feminize gauss and it is not a kind of a purge. ; $context$ = sent1: the archespore does not purge. sent2: the rotor is not longing. sent3: the L-plate is a desert and nutritional. sent4: the symposiast is not a platyrrhine if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind... | sent17 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Laos does not consort Voltaren. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: the domino consorts Voltaren. sent2: if the fact that the love-in-winter is not a Sitophylus or it is a night-line or both does not hold then the Tree is not Gauguinesque. sent3: if the Tree does consort Voltaren then the fact that the cursor consort Voltaren hold. sent4: the Laos does consort Voltaren if that t... | sent1: {B}{al} sent2: ¬(¬{G}{c} v {F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent3: {B}{a} -> {B}{br} sent4: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}{b} & {C}{b}) sent6: {A}{be} sent7: {A}{a} sent8: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x v {F}x) sent9: (x): (¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | the Laos does not consort Voltaren. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent9 -> int1: the Laos does not consort Voltaren if it is a kind of non-Luxembourgian thing that is epistemic.; sent8 -> int2: that the powerbroker is either not a Sitophylus or a night-line or both is wrong if it is microcephalic.;"
] | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Laos does not consort Voltaren. ; $context$ = sent1: the domino consorts Voltaren. sent2: if the fact that the love-in-winter is not a Sitophylus or it is a night-line or both does not hold then the Tree is not Gauguinesque. sent3: if the Tree does consort Voltaren then the fact that the cursor conso... | sent4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that it is not an infinitesimal. | (Ex): ¬{AA}x | sent1: the vessel is irreverent if the dissociation is irreverent and not a mustelid. sent2: the cardigan does not consort inherence but it is a quest. sent3: the understudy does not fibrillate and is a self-insurance if the psychrometer is not a kind of a slum. sent4: the shortstop does not consort Majorana but it is ... | sent1: ({J}{g} & ¬{L}{g}) -> {J}{f} sent2: (¬{DC}{fe} & {AB}{fe}) sent3: ¬{F}{d} -> (¬{D}{c} & {E}{c}) sent4: (¬{BB}{a} & {EE}{a}) sent5: {A}{b} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent6: {AA}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent7: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬{C}{c} sent8: {J}{f} -> {I}{f} sent9: (Ex): {AA}x sent10: ¬{C}{e} -> ¬{C}{c} sent11: (x): {A}x... | [] | [] | the psycholinguist is not proportionate and is a kind of a quest. | (¬{DE}{ai} & {AB}{ai}) | [
"sent11 -> int1: the psycholinguist is not proportionate but it is a kind of a quest if it stunts freewheeling.;"
] | 4 | 3 | null | 21 | 0 | 21 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not an infinitesimal. ; $context$ = sent1: the vessel is irreverent if the dissociation is irreverent and not a mustelid. sent2: the cardigan does not consort inherence but it is a quest. sent3: the understudy does not fibrillate and is a self-insurance if the psychrome... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the impression does smut and is not reverent is not right. | ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | sent1: that something is a smut but it is not reverent is incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of a velveteen is correct. sent2: the respirator does not feminize bantering if there is something such that that it is a catalectic and it is a musicality does not hold. sent3: if something does feminize bantering then th... | sent1: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬({C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}{fb} sent3: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} sent5: ¬{AB}{a} sent6: ¬{A}{a} sent7: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{AB}x sent8: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{AB}x) sent9: ¬{G}{a} -> ¬(¬{E}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) sent10: ({AL}{a} & ¬{CQ}{a}) sent11: ¬{AA}{c... | [
"sent14 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent14 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the impression is a smut but not reverent is wrong. | ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent1 -> int1: if the impression is a kind of a velveteen then that it is both a smut and not reverent is not correct.; sent3 -> int2: that the impression is a velveteen is not wrong if it feminizes bantering.; sent15 -> int3: if the impression is not a musicality then it does feminize bantering and is a catalecti... | 7 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the impression does smut and is not reverent is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a smut but it is not reverent is incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of a velveteen is correct. sent2: the respirator does not feminize bantering if there is something such that that it is ... | sent14 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the stunting tailback does not occur. | ¬{B} | sent1: if the fact that the culmination does not occur is correct then the jeremiad but not the subscription occurs. sent2: that the Mongol does not occur is correct if the fact that the consorting epicarp does not occur but the citifying occurs is wrong. sent3: the unreasonableness does not occur. sent4: the fact that... | sent1: ¬{F} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) sent2: ¬(¬{IF} & {FD}) -> ¬{BT} sent3: ¬{Q} sent4: {G} -> ¬(¬{H} & {F}) sent5: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) sent6: ¬({B} v {A}) -> ¬{GQ} sent7: ¬(¬{HO} & {DM}) -> ¬{BB} sent8: ¬{A} sent9: ¬(¬{H} & {F}) -> ¬{F} sent10: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent11: ¬({GD} & {DT}) sent12: ¬{L} -> (¬{J} & {K}) sent13:... | [] | [] | the stunting tailback occurs. | {B} | [] | 12 | 2 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the stunting tailback does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the culmination does not occur is correct then the jeremiad but not the subscription occurs. sent2: that the Mongol does not occur is correct if the fact that the consorting epicarp does not occur but the citifying occurs is wron... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the granter is authorial and is coccygeal. | ({E}{c} & {D}{c}) | sent1: the granter is a Rhodosphaera and it is coccygeal if it is not a sacking. sent2: if the fiberboard is not a kind of a Senegal it either is a Rhodosphaera or is incommutable or both. sent3: if the fact that the enthusiast is not a Gould and is a kind of a sacking is not correct it consorts EXEC. sent4: if the ent... | sent1: ¬{AB}{c} -> ({C}{c} & {D}{c}) sent2: ¬{G}{d} -> ({C}{d} v {F}{d}) sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent4: {B}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent5: ¬{G}{d} sent6: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) sent7: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent8: (Ex): (¬{H}x & ¬{I}x) sent9: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{C}{c} | [
"sent6 -> int1: if the granter is not a Rhodosphaera it is authorial and is coccygeal.;"
] | [
"sent6 -> int1: ¬{C}{c} -> ({E}{c} & {D}{c});"
] | that the granter is authorial and it is coccygeal is not right. | ¬({E}{c} & {D}{c}) | [
"sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the fiberboard is a Rhodosphaera and/or it is incommutable.;"
] | 7 | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the granter is authorial and is coccygeal. ; $context$ = sent1: the granter is a Rhodosphaera and it is coccygeal if it is not a sacking. sent2: if the fiberboard is not a kind of a Senegal it either is a Rhodosphaera or is incommutable or both. sent3: if the fact that the enthusiast is not a Gould and i... | sent6 -> int1: if the granter is not a Rhodosphaera it is authorial and is coccygeal.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the Newtonian is not an evolution. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: there exists something such that it is christian. sent2: the slippage is not an evolution. sent3: if something is christian it is an evolution and it does not feminize allspice. sent4: if the baluster is cecal then the goethite does not feminize gauss and/or is not a mariticide. sent5: something is christian and... | sent1: (Ex): {C}x sent2: ¬{A}{ib} sent3: (x): {C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent4: {I}{f} -> (¬{H}{e} v ¬{J}{e}) sent5: (Ex): ({C}x & {D}x) sent6: (x): {G}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{D}x) sent7: ¬{M}{h} -> ¬({L}{g} & ¬{K}{g}) sent8: (¬{C}{b} v {E}{b}) -> {C}{a} sent9: ¬({N}{h} & {O}{h}) sent10: ¬({N}{h} & {O}{h}) -> ¬{M}{h} sent11: (¬{H}... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Newtonian is an evolution.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Newtonian does not feminize allspice is not false.; sent5 & sent13 -> int2: that the Newtonian feminizes allspice is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent5 & sent13 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the Newtonian is an evolution. | {A}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int4: if the Newtonian is christian then it is an evolution and it does not feminize allspice.; sent6 -> int5: the fact that the allspice does freelance but it is not a reductionism is false if it is cleistogamous.; sent10 & sent9 -> int6: the archdeaconry does not feminize Apollo.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: ... | 13 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Newtonian is not an evolution. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is christian. sent2: the slippage is not an evolution. sent3: if something is christian it is an evolution and it does not feminize allspice. sent4: if the baluster is cecal then the goethite does not feminize gau... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Newtonian is an evolution.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Newtonian does not feminize allspice is not false.; sent5 & sent13 -> int2: that the Newtonian feminizes allspice is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED... |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that the fact that it is not a exosphere and/or is a handline is not right. | (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x v {B}x) | sent1: something stunts cephaloglycin and it is appropriative if the fact that it does not stunt ten-spot is right. sent2: the annotator is a kind of a exosphere if the Lesbian is a kind of a handline. sent3: that the Lesbian is not a kind of a glowworm and is not cryptanalytic is not correct. sent4: that the annotator... | sent1: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) sent2: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: ¬(¬{BK}{b} & {AA}{b}) sent5: (Ex): (¬{I}x & ¬{K}x) sent6: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent7: (Ex): ¬({BE}x v {C}x) sent8: {A}{a} -> {AB}{ir} sent9: (¬{H}{d} v {J}{d}) sent10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent11: (x): (¬{H}x v {J}x) -> ¬{... | [
"sent13 & sent3 -> int1: the Lesbian is a handline.; sent22 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the annotator is not a exosphere and/or it is a kind of a handline is not right.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent13 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent22 & int1 -> int2: ¬(¬{A}{b} v {B}{b}); int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the colonel is cryptanalytic. | {AB}{ir} | [
"sent14 -> int3: that if the Lesbian is not vertebral that the Lesbian is a exosphere and a handline is true is right.; sent1 -> int4: if that that the annotator stunts ten-spot is not true hold then it stunts cephaloglycin and it is appropriative.; sent5 & sent18 -> int5: the radiopharmaceutical feminizes Witwater... | 10 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is not a exosphere and/or is a handline is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something stunts cephaloglycin and it is appropriative if the fact that it does not stunt ten-spot is right. sent2: the annotator is a kind of a exosphere if the Lesbian is a kind ... | sent13 & sent3 -> int1: the Lesbian is a handline.; sent22 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the annotator is not a exosphere and/or it is a kind of a handline is not right.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the puerpera does not guggle. | ¬{C}{c} | sent1: the haunch is abranchiate but it is not a kind of a pyrrhic. sent2: there exists something such that it is interplanetary thing that volatilizes. sent3: there is something such that it does volatilize. sent4: the fact that the macaw is not interplanetary hold. sent5: the haunch is abranchiate. sent6: if the haun... | sent1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) sent3: (Ex): {B}x sent4: ¬{A}{b} sent5: {AA}{a} sent6: {B}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent7: (x): (¬{B}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{AA}{b} sent8: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}{c} sent9: {B}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} sent10: {CP}{a} sent11: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} sent12: (Ex): ¬{A}x | [] | [] | the puerpera guggles. | {C}{c} | [] | 5 | 4 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the puerpera does not guggle. ; $context$ = sent1: the haunch is abranchiate but it is not a kind of a pyrrhic. sent2: there exists something such that it is interplanetary thing that volatilizes. sent3: there is something such that it does volatilize. sent4: the fact that the macaw is not interplanetary... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the heartthrob is non-atonic. | ¬{D}{b} | sent1: the calpac consorts Klein if the ministrant is a burthen. sent2: the calpac is a lobby that stunts buster. sent3: if something that does stunt buster does consort Klein the heartthrob is not atonic. | sent1: {E}{c} -> {C}{a} sent2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent3: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}{b} | [
"sent2 -> int1: the calpac stunts buster.;"
] | [
"sent2 -> int1: {B}{a};"
] | null | null | [] | null | 4 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the heartthrob is non-atonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the calpac consorts Klein if the ministrant is a burthen. sent2: the calpac is a lobby that stunts buster. sent3: if something that does stunt buster does consort Klein the heartthrob is not atonic. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the calpac stunts buster.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there exists something such that if that it is a cotton and is not tonal does not hold it does stunt esker does not hold. | ¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x) | sent1: the jobber stunts esker if the fact that it is a cotton that is not tonal is incorrect. | sent1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it is a cotton and is not tonal does not hold it does stunt esker does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the jobber stunts esker if the fact that it is a cotton that is not tonal is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the lashing occurs and the fading occurs. | ({AB} & {B}) | sent1: if the sewing happens the fact that not the feminizing pickpocket but the dipterousness occurs is not correct. sent2: if the chlamydialness occurs the residual occurs. sent3: the non-chlamydialness triggers that the skunk does not occur but the lash occurs. sent4: if the fumble does not occur both the oligarchic... | sent1: {I} -> ¬(¬{G} & {F}) sent2: {A} -> {FO} sent3: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent4: ¬{C} -> ({HJ} & {B}) sent5: ¬(¬{G} & {F}) -> ¬{E} sent6: (¬{FB} & {BN}) sent7: ¬{D} -> {C} sent8: (¬{BQ} & {FC}) sent9: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & {D}) sent10: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C}) sent11: ¬{A} sent12: ¬{D} | [
"sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the skunk does not occur and the lash occurs.; int1 -> int2: the lash occurs.; sent10 & sent12 -> int3: the fading and the fumble occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the fade happens is not false.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent11 -> int1: (¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 -> int2: {AB}; sent10 & sent12 -> int3: ({B} & {C}); int3 -> int4: {B}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | the residualness and the oligarchicness happens. | ({FO} & {HJ}) | [] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the lashing occurs and the fading occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sewing happens the fact that not the feminizing pickpocket but the dipterousness occurs is not correct. sent2: if the chlamydialness occurs the residual occurs. sent3: the non-chlamydialness triggers that the skunk does not occur but t... | sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the skunk does not occur and the lash occurs.; int1 -> int2: the lash occurs.; sent10 & sent12 -> int3: the fading and the fumble occurs.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the fade happens is not false.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that either the figuration happens or the stunting Satureja does not occur or both does not hold. | ¬({A} v ¬{B}) | sent1: if the stunting Peabody does not occur and the increasing does not occur then the stunting Satureja does not occur. sent2: that the increase occurs triggers that the stunting Peabody does not occur. sent3: if the consorting Tyrolean occurs then the stunting Peabody does not occur and the increase does not occur.... | sent1: (¬{C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} sent2: {D} -> ¬{C} sent3: {E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) sent4: ¬{B} -> {C} sent5: {A} -> {C} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the figuration happens or the stunting Satureja does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the stunting Peabody occurs.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ({A} v ¬{B}); assump1 & sent5 & sent4 -> int1: {C};"
] | either the figuration occurs or the stunting Satureja does not occur or both. | ({A} v ¬{B}) | [] | 7 | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that either the figuration happens or the stunting Satureja does not occur or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stunting Peabody does not occur and the increasing does not occur then the stunting Satureja does not occur. sent2: that the increase occurs triggers that the stunting Peabody doe... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the figuration happens or the stunting Satureja does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the stunting Peabody occurs.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | both the portrayal and the stunting self-reproach happens. | ({C} & {D}) | sent1: the stunting Ugric does not occur but the stunting self-reproach occurs. sent2: that both the attempt and the unhealthiness happens is true. sent3: the selection occurs if the riparianness occurs. sent4: the twenty-one occurs and/or the going-over occurs. sent5: if the twenty-one happens then the portrayal occur... | sent1: (¬{E} & {D}) sent2: ({DI} & {F}) sent3: {BF} -> {L} sent4: ({A} v {B}) sent5: {A} -> {C} sent6: {B} -> {C} sent7: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {D}) sent8: ¬{E} | [
"sent4 & sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the portrayal happens.; sent1 -> int2: the stunting self-reproach happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent5 & sent6 -> int1: {C}; sent1 -> int2: {D}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | that the portrayal occurs and the stunting self-reproach happens is wrong. | ¬({C} & {D}) | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = both the portrayal and the stunting self-reproach happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the stunting Ugric does not occur but the stunting self-reproach occurs. sent2: that both the attempt and the unhealthiness happens is true. sent3: the selection occurs if the riparianness occurs. sent4: the twenty-one occurs... | sent4 & sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the portrayal happens.; sent1 -> int2: the stunting self-reproach happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the shamanistness does not occur. | ¬{B} | sent1: if the Tasmanianness happens and the considering totipotency does not occur then the faro does not occur. sent2: the fact that the jack-o'-lantern does not occur and the cotillion does not occur is not right if the faro does not occur. sent3: the jack-o'-lantern happens. sent4: the shamanistness happens if the j... | sent1: ({E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} sent2: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{C}) sent3: {A} sent4: {A} -> {B} sent5: {CU} -> {IC} | [
"sent4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the shamanistness does not occur. | ¬{B} | [] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the shamanistness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Tasmanianness happens and the considering totipotency does not occur then the faro does not occur. sent2: the fact that the jack-o'-lantern does not occur and the cotillion does not occur is not right if the faro does not occur. sent3: the jac... | sent4 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the vagary does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: that the democratization does not occur is correct. sent2: the belemniticness happens. sent3: the brainwave happens. sent4: the tough happens and the Jeffersonianness occurs. sent5: that the vagary occurs is prevented by that the depreciation occurs and the brainwave occurs. sent6: the depreciation happens. sent... | sent1: ¬{ES} sent2: {CH} sent3: {B} sent4: ({DN} & {EK}) sent5: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent6: {A} sent7: {AE} | [
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: both the depreciation and the brainwave happens.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the vagary does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the democratization does not occur is correct. sent2: the belemniticness happens. sent3: the brainwave happens. sent4: the tough happens and the Jeffersonianness occurs. sent5: that the vagary occurs is prevented by that the depreciation occurs and the... | sent6 & sent3 -> int1: both the depreciation and the brainwave happens.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the tither is not a kind of a Jacobs. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: there is something such that it is not exaugural. sent2: the albite does not consort halon if that the tither is a Jacobs and it is Stravinskyan does not hold. sent3: something consorts halon but it is not a Jacobs. sent4: there is something such that it is not a fellow. sent5: the tither is a kind of a Polynesi... | sent1: (Ex): ¬{AR}x sent2: ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{hp} sent3: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{A}x) sent4: (Ex): ¬{F}x sent5: ({IU}{a} & ¬{IK}{a}) sent6: ({EC}{a} & ¬{IN}{a}) sent7: ({E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent8: (Ex): {CB}x sent9: (Ex): ({AB}x & ¬{A}x) sent10: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent11: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sen... | [
"sent10 -> int1: something does consort halon but it is not a front.; int1 & sent15 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent10 -> int1: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int1 & sent15 -> hypothesis;"
] | the albite does not consort halon. | ¬{AA}{hp} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the tither is not a kind of a Jacobs. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is not exaugural. sent2: the albite does not consort halon if that the tither is a Jacobs and it is Stravinskyan does not hold. sent3: something consorts halon but it is not a Jacobs. sent4: there is something such... | sent10 -> int1: something does consort halon but it is not a front.; int1 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the crape is not a kind of a Sinology. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: that something is non-belemnitic thing that is sportive does not hold if the fact that it is thermionics is not false. sent2: if the fact that the crape is not non-alkaline and/or it is a kind of a Arno is not correct the commuter is not a Sinology. sent3: the reticule is not sportive if the fact that the mammal... | sent1: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) sent2: ¬({AB}{a} v {AA}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: ¬(¬{D}{d} & {C}{d}) -> ¬{C}{c} sent4: ¬{D}{a} -> (¬{B}{cu} v {C}{cu}) sent5: ¬({AA}{aa} v {A}{aa}) sent6: (x): ¬{AA}x sent7: ¬({A}{aa} v {AA}{aa}) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent8: ¬{AA}{aa} sent9: (x): ¬({AG}x v {CI}x) sent10: (x): ¬({EN}x v {BR}x) se... | [
"sent11 -> int1: that the commuter is a Arno and/or it is alkaline is false.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent11 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the crape is a Sinology. | {A}{a} | [
"sent1 -> int2: if the mammal is thermionics the fact that it is a kind of non-belemnitic thing that is sportive is not correct.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the crape is not a kind of a Sinology. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is non-belemnitic thing that is sportive does not hold if the fact that it is thermionics is not false. sent2: if the fact that the crape is not non-alkaline and/or it is a kind of a Arno is not correct the commuter is not a Sinol... | sent11 -> int1: that the commuter is a Arno and/or it is alkaline is false.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the blister is a undershrub. | {C}{b} | sent1: if the fact that something is not a Mali and it is not a kind of a river is not true it is a kind of a wonder. sent2: the ex-spouse is not taxable. sent3: something completes and it does feminize emphysema if it is not taxable. sent4: if the eclair is a kind of a Togolese that the blister is a kind of a Mali and... | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent2: ¬{H}{d} sent3: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}x & {F}x) sent4: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) sent5: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent6: {AA}{a} sent7: {A}{bm} sent8: (x): {O}x -> {E}x sent9: {G}{b} sent10: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) sent11: {A}{a} sent12: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}... | [
"sent12 & sent11 -> int1: that that the blister is not a Mali and is not a river hold is wrong.; sent1 -> int2: that the blister does wonder is true if that it is not a Mali and not a river is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blister wonders.;"
] | [
"sent12 & sent11 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); sent1 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{b};"
] | the blister is not a kind of a undershrub. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent13 -> int4: if the blister is Togolese but it does not wonder then it is not a undershrub.; sent3 -> int5: the ex-spouse is a kind of completed thing that feminizes emphysema if it is not taxable.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the ex-spouse completes and it feminizes emphysema.; int6 -> int7: the ex-spouse feminizes ... | 9 | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the blister is a undershrub. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not a Mali and it is not a kind of a river is not true it is a kind of a wonder. sent2: the ex-spouse is not taxable. sent3: something completes and it does feminize emphysema if it is not taxable. sent4: if the eclair is a k... | sent12 & sent11 -> int1: that that the blister is not a Mali and is not a river hold is wrong.; sent1 -> int2: that the blister does wonder is true if that it is not a Mali and not a river is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blister wonders.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is not a kind of a brinkmanship then the fact that that it does not feminize lasher and is not gymnosophical is true is false. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | sent1: if that the ketosteroid belays is not false then that it is not a kind of a brinkmanship and it is not orthopedic is incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a Dolichonyx then that it is not a Becket and does not gazump does not hold. sent3: if something is not a brinkmanship then that it ... | sent1: {GC}{db} -> ¬(¬{A}{db} & ¬{IK}{db}) sent2: (Ex): ¬{AE}x -> ¬(¬{EI}x & ¬{HK}x) sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{JF}x & ¬{IL}x) sent4: (Ex): ¬{HO}x -> (¬{HP}x & ¬{FF}x) sent5: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: (x): ¬{EP}x -> ¬(¬{AM}x & ¬{DJ}x) sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ... | [] | [] | if the fact that the Kichai is not a brinkmanship is not incorrect the fact that it is not a cogitation and it is not a database is not right. | ¬{A}{hs} -> ¬(¬{JF}{hs} & ¬{IL}{hs}) | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a kind of a brinkmanship then the fact that that it does not feminize lasher and is not gymnosophical is true is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the ketosteroid belays is not false then that it is not a kind of a brinkmanship and it is not orthopedic is incor... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the pyx is not conventional. | ¬{C}{c} | sent1: the fact that the hookah does not consort khoum and it is not purposeful is wrong. sent2: the backswimmer is a aggravator if the hookah consorts khoum. sent3: something is conventional if it is systematics. sent4: the hookah is not a Numidian if the fact that the fact that it is not a dekaliter and is Numidian i... | sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} sent3: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent4: ¬(¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent5: ¬(¬{B}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) -> {C}{b} sent6: {B}{b} -> {A}{c} sent7: (Ex): {G}x sent8: ¬{F}{a} -> ({E}{a} & {D}{a}) sent9: (x): {D}x -> {B}x sent10: ¬(¬{AB}{c} & {A}{c}) sent11: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) se... | [
"sent12 & sent1 -> int1: the backswimmer is a aggravator.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the pyx is systematics.; sent3 -> int3: the pyx is conventional if it is not non-systematics.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent12 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent6 -> int2: {A}{c}; sent3 -> int3: {A}{c} -> {C}{c}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the pyx is not conventional. | ¬{C}{c} | [
"sent9 -> int4: the hookah is a aggravator if the fact that it does consort Goma is not false.;"
] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pyx is not conventional. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the hookah does not consort khoum and it is not purposeful is wrong. sent2: the backswimmer is a aggravator if the hookah consorts khoum. sent3: something is conventional if it is systematics. sent4: the hookah is not a Numidian if the fact ... | sent12 & sent1 -> int1: the backswimmer is a aggravator.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the pyx is systematics.; sent3 -> int3: the pyx is conventional if it is not non-systematics.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the flagellant is a kind of nautical thing that is not flinty is not true. | ¬({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | sent1: that the flagellant is nautical and it is flinty does not hold if the Cyril is not nautical. sent2: something is not a kind of a backband if it is a kind of a Anhingidae. sent3: the fact that the Cyril is not denotative is not incorrect if a flinty thing is not a kind of a snakebite. sent4: something does wash a... | sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent2: (x): {H}x -> ¬{F}x sent3: (x): ({B}x & ¬{DS}x) -> ¬{FB}{a} sent4: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: ¬{B}{a} sent6: ¬{F}{a} -> ¬({G}{a} & {E}{a}) sent7: {I}{c} -> {H}{a} sent8: (x): ({JA}x & ¬{AA}x) -> ¬{T}{b} sent9: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent10: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x... | [
"sent13 & sent16 -> int1: the Cyril is not nautical.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent13 & sent16 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the flagellant is nautical and not flinty. | ({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | [
"sent17 -> int2: if the flagellant is outdoors then it is nautical and it is not flinty.; sent10 -> int3: the fact that the flagellant is outdoors thing that stunts Islam is right if it is not recessionary.; sent2 -> int4: if the Cyril is a Anhingidae then it is not a backband.; sent7 & sent11 -> int5: the Cyril is... | 8 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the flagellant is a kind of nautical thing that is not flinty is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the flagellant is nautical and it is flinty does not hold if the Cyril is not nautical. sent2: something is not a kind of a backband if it is a kind of a Anhingidae. sent3: the fact that the... | sent13 & sent16 -> int1: the Cyril is not nautical.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the alderman is a scallop. | {B}{b} | sent1: either the alderman is nonarboreal or it does scallop or both. sent2: the porcupinefish is not nonarboreal and/or renders. sent3: the laver feminizes flashing if the flat is a knawel. sent4: the spironolactone is not a priority and does not feminize flashing if the motorcycle does not feminize sociologist. sent5... | sent1: ({AA}{b} v {B}{b}) sent2: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) sent3: {F}{f} -> {D}{e} sent4: ¬{E}{d} -> (¬{C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) sent5: (x): (¬{E}x v {F}x) -> ¬{E}x sent6: (¬{EP}{b} v {B}{b}) sent7: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent8: (¬{C}{d} v ¬{E}{d}) -> ¬{C}{c} sent9: (¬{B}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent10: {AA}{ja} sent11: (¬{B}{a} v {A... | [
"sent7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the alderman is not a kind of a scallop. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent5 -> int1: the motorcycle does not feminize sociologist if either it does not feminize sociologist or it is a knawel or both.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the alderman is a scallop. ; $context$ = sent1: either the alderman is nonarboreal or it does scallop or both. sent2: the porcupinefish is not nonarboreal and/or renders. sent3: the laver feminizes flashing if the flat is a knawel. sent4: the spironolactone is not a priority and does not feminize flashin... | sent7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the selvage is Nordic. | {A}{a} | sent1: the hull is not a kind of a Hyaenidae if there is something such that it is bifilar and/or does not test. sent2: the Nasturtium is not Nordic. sent3: that the fact that the selvage is Nordic is not wrong is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a lincomycin. sent4: the fact that the Nasturtium is a... | sent1: (x): ({I}x v ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}{b} sent2: ¬{A}{aa} sent3: (x): {AB}x -> ¬{A}{a} sent4: ¬({AB}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent5: ¬{K}{e} -> ({G}{c} & {J}{c}) sent6: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {A}x) sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent8: ¬{K}{e} sent9: ¬({AB}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent10: (x): ¬({JA}x & {CR}x) sent11: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{a... | [
"sent13 -> int1: that the Nasturtium stunts Nasturtium but it is not a lincomycin is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it stunts Nasturtium and it is not a lincomycin is not right.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent13 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis;"
] | the seamount is not Nordic. | ¬{A}{jh} | [
"sent14 -> int3: either something is bifilar or it is not a tested or both.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the hull is not a Hyaenidae.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the hull is not a spermatocyte and it is not disintegrative.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the selvage is not many.; sent5 & sent8 -> int7: the businesswoman is not non-l... | 7 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the selvage is Nordic. ; $context$ = sent1: the hull is not a kind of a Hyaenidae if there is something such that it is bifilar and/or does not test. sent2: the Nasturtium is not Nordic. sent3: that the fact that the selvage is Nordic is not wrong is incorrect if there exists something such that it is a ... | sent13 -> int1: that the Nasturtium stunts Nasturtium but it is not a lincomycin is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it stunts Nasturtium and it is not a lincomycin is not right.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the caveat happens and the stunting straitjacket happens. | ({A} & {B}) | sent1: the feminizing tetranychid happens. sent2: the consorting custom-made occurs. sent3: the spiccato and the caveat happens if the fact that the stunting straitjacket does not occur is correct. sent4: the considering holotype does not occur if the fact that both the considering holotype and the retorting occurs doe... | sent1: {EN} sent2: {EP} sent3: ¬{B} -> ({JD} & {A}) sent4: ¬({C} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent5: {B} sent6: {JG} sent7: {BF} sent8: {GC} sent9: {A} sent10: ¬{D} -> {C} sent11: {CO} sent12: {F} -> (¬{D} & {E}) sent13: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & {E}) sent14: {HF} sent15: {HK} sent16: ({GE} & {GJ}) sent17: {C} -> ¬{B} sent18: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {... | [
"sent9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | the spiccato happens. | {JD} | [] | 9 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the caveat happens and the stunting straitjacket happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the feminizing tetranychid happens. sent2: the consorting custom-made occurs. sent3: the spiccato and the caveat happens if the fact that the stunting straitjacket does not occur is correct. sent4: the considering holotype doe... | sent9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Uzi is an out. | {B}{a} | sent1: if something is non-run-on then it is out. sent2: if there is something such that it is non-pantheist thing that is a rudder then the Uzi is not run-on. sent3: if something is not lacrimatory the fact that it is run-on or it is operatic or both is wrong. | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}x sent2: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x v {C}x) | [
"sent1 -> int1: the Uzi does out if the fact that it is not run-on is not false.;"
] | [
"sent1 -> int1: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{a};"
] | the Uzi is not an out. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int2: if the battlesight is not lacrimatory then that it is run-on and/or it is operatic does not hold.;"
] | 5 | 2 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Uzi is an out. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is non-run-on then it is out. sent2: if there is something such that it is non-pantheist thing that is a rudder then the Uzi is not run-on. sent3: if something is not lacrimatory the fact that it is run-on or it is operatic or both is wrong. ; $proof$ ... | sent1 -> int1: the Uzi does out if the fact that it is not run-on is not false.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the flibbertigibbet does not feminize slander is not wrong. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: the flibbertigibbet does feminize slander and it is a kind of a dare if it is not a VCR. sent2: the Warren dares. sent3: the czarina is a VCR and a septum. sent4: the pussycat dares. sent5: the pussycat is a kind of a VCR. sent6: that the flibbertigibbet is a VCR is not wrong. sent7: the flibbertigibbet is a dar... | sent1: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{b} & {A}{b}) sent2: {A}{t} sent3: ({B}{dg} & {HN}{dg}) sent4: {A}{a} sent5: {B}{a} sent6: {B}{b} sent7: {A}{b} sent8: ({A}{df} & {IM}{df}) sent9: {C}{a} sent10: {A}{hh} | [
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the pussycat is both a dare and a VCR.;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a});"
] | the flibbertigibbet does feminize slander. | {C}{b} | [] | 6 | 2 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the flibbertigibbet does not feminize slander is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the flibbertigibbet does feminize slander and it is a kind of a dare if it is not a VCR. sent2: the Warren dares. sent3: the czarina is a VCR and a septum. sent4: the pussycat dares. sent5: the pussycat is a kind of a V... | sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the pussycat is both a dare and a VCR.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the flooring does not feminize sparkler. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: the flooring is ductless and it feminizes sparkler. sent2: something feminizes sparkler if it is not ductless. sent3: the flooring is ductless. | sent1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}x sent3: {A}{a} | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the iodothyronine feminizes sparkler. | {B}{im} | [
"sent2 -> int1: the iodothyronine feminizes sparkler if it is not ductless.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the flooring does not feminize sparkler. ; $context$ = sent1: the flooring is ductless and it feminizes sparkler. sent2: something feminizes sparkler if it is not ductless. sent3: the flooring is ductless. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the clitoridectomy does not occur is correct. | ¬{B} | sent1: the low-techness happens. sent2: that not the inactivity but the clitoridectomy occurs is wrong if the quincentennialness does not occur. sent3: the bolographicness happens. sent4: if the inactivity occurs then the clitoridectomy does not occur and the low-techness does not occur. sent5: the fact that both the m... | sent1: {A} sent2: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{C} & {B}) sent3: {IT} sent4: {C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) sent5: ({HN} & {EI}) sent6: ({JG} & {JH}) sent7: {DQ} sent8: {GH} sent9: ¬{F} -> ({JJ} & {D}) sent10: ¬(¬{C} & {B}) -> ¬{B} sent11: {K} sent12: ¬{K} -> ¬({H} & {G}) sent13: ¬(¬{I} & {F}) -> ¬{F} sent14: ({A} & {B}) sent15: ¬{B} -> ({CR} & {... | [
"sent14 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent14 -> hypothesis;"
] | the aposiopeticness and the phylogeneticness happens. | ({CR} & {JJ}) | [] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 17 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the clitoridectomy does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the low-techness happens. sent2: that not the inactivity but the clitoridectomy occurs is wrong if the quincentennialness does not occur. sent3: the bolographicness happens. sent4: if the inactivity occurs then the clitoride... | sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the applique does not feminize applique. | ¬{E}{a} | sent1: there exists something such that it is a glorification. sent2: that the applique does stunt GNP if the applique consorts Trema and is not mutafacient is not wrong. sent3: the applique feminizes applique if it does stunt GNP. sent4: if there exists something such that it is a glorification the applique consorts T... | sent1: (Ex): {A}x sent2: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{a} sent3: {D}{a} -> {E}{a} sent4: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent5: (x): {DA}x -> {GG}x sent6: ¬{C}{a} | [
"sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the applique does consort Trema but it is not mutafacient.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the applique stunts GNP.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 & sent4 -> int1: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 & sent2 -> int2: {D}{a}; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the applique is a ELISA if it does consort bur. | {DA}{a} -> {GG}{a} | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the applique does not feminize applique. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a glorification. sent2: that the applique does stunt GNP if the applique consorts Trema and is not mutafacient is not wrong. sent3: the applique feminizes applique if it does stunt GNP. sent4: if there ex... | sent1 & sent4 -> int1: the applique does consort Trema but it is not mutafacient.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the applique stunts GNP.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the chap does not feminize rubbing. | ¬{E}{b} | sent1: that the chap does not feminize rubbing is not incorrect if the asteroid is both a ninon and Kafkaesque. sent2: something is a sunscreen but it is not a Spartan. sent3: that the dideoxyinosine is a sunscreen and it is a Spartan is false. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a sunscreen ... | sent1: ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent2: (Ex): ({F}x & ¬{G}x) sent3: ¬({F}{c} & {G}{c}) sent4: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{G}x) -> {D}{a} sent5: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) sent6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent7: {B}{a} sent8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) | [
"sent6 -> int1: the asteroid is collapsible.; sent5 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a sunscreen and is not a Spartan does not hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the asteroid is not non-Kafkaesque.;"
] | [
"sent6 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent5 -> int2: (Ex): ¬({F}x & ¬{G}x); int2 & sent4 -> int3: {D}{a};"
] | the chap does feminize rubbing. | {E}{b} | [
"sent8 -> int4: that the asteroid is not collapsible and not a proprietress is incorrect if it is not a ninon.;"
] | 5 | 4 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the chap does not feminize rubbing. ; $context$ = sent1: that the chap does not feminize rubbing is not incorrect if the asteroid is both a ninon and Kafkaesque. sent2: something is a sunscreen but it is not a Spartan. sent3: that the dideoxyinosine is a sunscreen and it is a Spartan is false. sent4: if ... | sent6 -> int1: the asteroid is collapsible.; sent5 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a sunscreen and is not a Spartan does not hold.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the asteroid is not non-Kafkaesque.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the kainite is a kind of a fascicle. | {A}{a} | sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a hole-in-the-wall and is not a monte is wrong. sent2: that the kainite is non-diurnal thing that is not a Caprella does not hold if the grader is not a kind of a fascicle. sent3: something is not a fascicle if that it either does not differ or is Dionysian or bot... | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{CT}{a} & ¬{JF}{a}) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{C}x v {B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent4: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & {C}x) sent5: ¬(¬{A}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) sent6: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{A}x) sent7: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent8: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{AA}x) sent9: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent10: (x):... | [
"sent11 -> int1: that the lovage is not a kind of a hole-in-the-wall and it is not a monte does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a hole-in-the-wall and it is not a kind of a monte is not true.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent11 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis;"
] | that the kainite is a fascicle is not wrong. | {A}{a} | [
"sent14 -> int3: if the fact that the kainite is not a fascicle and not Dionysian is incorrect it is a fascicle.; sent17 -> int4: if the kainite does not differ the fact that it is both not a fascicle and not Dionysian is wrong.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the grader is avian and it differs is wrong if that it is... | 7 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the kainite is a kind of a fascicle. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is a hole-in-the-wall and is not a monte is wrong. sent2: that the kainite is non-diurnal thing that is not a Caprella does not hold if the grader is not a kind of a fascicle. sent3: something is not a... | sent11 -> int1: that the lovage is not a kind of a hole-in-the-wall and it is not a monte does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a hole-in-the-wall and it is not a kind of a monte is not true.; int2 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the non-Carthusianness and the non-over-the-counterness occurs is incorrect. | ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | sent1: if the aphoristicness occurs that the expatiation does not occur and the redistribution does not occur does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Carthusian happens but the over-the-counterness does not occur is not right. sent3: if the Baptisticness occurs the fact that the outburst happens is right. sent4: the du... | sent1: {A} -> ¬(¬{BD} & ¬{EN}) sent2: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent3: {G} -> {F} sent4: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} sent5: ¬(¬{JI} & ¬{CH}) sent6: ¬(¬{DC} & ¬{AS}) sent7: ¬({A} & {AA}) -> ¬{AA} sent8: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) sent9: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent10: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent11: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | [
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | the non-Carthusianness and the non-over-the-counterness occurs. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | [] | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the non-Carthusianness and the non-over-the-counterness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the aphoristicness occurs that the expatiation does not occur and the redistribution does not occur does not hold. sent2: the fact that the Carthusian happens but the over-the-counterness does not oc... | sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the whisk does stunt jackfruit. | {B}{a} | sent1: the screen is a billyo and it is a nailbrush if there exists something such that it is not a biquadratic. sent2: that the homebrew is not the absolute if that the homebrew is auroral and it does consort screen does not hold is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the wretch does not feminize mill but it is triclinic ... | sent1: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}{b} & {G}{b}) sent2: ¬({D}{aa} & {C}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: ¬(¬{DP}{fs} & {HJ}{fs}) sent4: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{a} sent5: (x): ({C}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{B}x sent6: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {AG}{a}) sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} sent9: ¬(¬{BU}{ca} & {AB}{ca}) sent10: ... | [
"sent15 -> int1: the fact that the homebrew is not a kind of a diet but it is no-go is wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of an absolute is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent19 -> int2: the homebrew is non-absolute.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the homebrew does not diet but it is no-go is false.; int3 & sent... | [
"sent15 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent2 & sent19 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | that the whisk does not stunt jackfruit hold. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent5 -> int4: if the whisk consorts screen but it is not an absolute it does not stunt jackfruit.; sent12 -> int5: if the screen is a billyo then it is both not auroral and a sulfamethoxazole.; sent10 & sent1 -> int6: the screen is a kind of a billyo and is a kind of a nailbrush.; int6 -> int7: that the screen is... | 7 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the whisk does stunt jackfruit. ; $context$ = sent1: the screen is a billyo and it is a nailbrush if there exists something such that it is not a biquadratic. sent2: that the homebrew is not the absolute if that the homebrew is auroral and it does consort screen does not hold is not wrong. sent3: the fac... | sent15 -> int1: the fact that the homebrew is not a kind of a diet but it is no-go is wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of an absolute is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent19 -> int2: the homebrew is non-absolute.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the homebrew does not diet but it is no-go is false.; int3 & sent4 -> ... |
DeductionInstance | the armet stunts chloroplast. | {C}{b} | sent1: if the clinic does consort wrestling then the armet stunts chloroplast. sent2: the chloroplast stunts armet if the businesswoman does consider tachymeter. sent3: everything is meager. sent4: if the tureen is not meager that the clinic does not consort NY and/or consorts wrestling is not false. sent5: the clinic ... | sent1: {A}{a} -> {C}{b} sent2: {L}{g} -> {K}{f} sent3: (x): {D}x sent4: ¬{D}{c} -> (¬{B}{a} v {A}{a}) sent5: ({C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent6: {C}{a} sent7: ({L}{g} v {M}{g}) sent8: ¬{E}{d} -> ¬{D}{c} sent9: {B}{a} sent10: ({A}{ba} & {HF}{ba}) sent11: (x): (¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x sent12: ({IA}{b} & {CK}{b}) sent13: (x): ¬(¬{K}... | [] | [] | the armet does not stunt chloroplast. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent11 -> int1: the evacuee is not existential if it is not asterismal and it is not crucial.; sent20 -> int2: the necker is mortal if it is a narrow.; sent13 -> int3: if the fact that the necker does not stunt armet and is a Nelumbonaceae does not hold then it is narrow.; sent7 & sent2 & sent18 -> int4: the chlor... | 11 | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the armet stunts chloroplast. ; $context$ = sent1: if the clinic does consort wrestling then the armet stunts chloroplast. sent2: the chloroplast stunts armet if the businesswoman does consider tachymeter. sent3: everything is meager. sent4: if the tureen is not meager that the clinic does not consort NY... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the nun is Gibraltarian. | {B}{b} | sent1: the nun is not a heroic. sent2: that the LAN is not pyroligneous and it is not a heroic is false if it is not fishy. sent3: if the LAN is a kind of Gibraltarian thing that does not consider knife-handle then the nun is not a Gibraltarian. sent4: that that the milord is not fishy and does not consort sailboat is ... | sent1: ¬{AB}{b} sent2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent3: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent4: ¬(¬{A}{bs} & ¬{J}{bs}) sent5: ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent2 & sent5 -> int1: that the LAN is not pyroligneous and it is not a heroic is not right.;"
] | [
"sent2 & sent5 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a});"
] | the nun is not a kind of a Gibraltarian. | ¬{B}{b} | [] | 6 | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the nun is Gibraltarian. ; $context$ = sent1: the nun is not a heroic. sent2: that the LAN is not pyroligneous and it is not a heroic is false if it is not fishy. sent3: if the LAN is a kind of Gibraltarian thing that does not consider knife-handle then the nun is not a Gibraltarian. sent4: that that the... | sent2 & sent5 -> int1: that the LAN is not pyroligneous and it is not a heroic is not right.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the stonecrop stunts gauss is not wrong. | {C}{a} | sent1: if that the stonecrop does not stunt Eddy and it does not stunt goosander is not right it does not stunt gauss. sent2: the gyrfalcon does not stunt goosander if the stonecrop does not stunt goosander and stunts gauss. sent3: The Eddy stunts stonecrop. sent4: if the stonecrop stunts goosander then it does not stu... | sent1: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent2: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{df} sent3: {AB}{ab} sent4: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} sent5: ¬{A}{jg} sent6: (Ex): (¬{M}x v ¬{L}x) sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{IC}{df} sent8: {I}{a} sent9: {I}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) sent10: {A}{a} sent11: (x): ¬{K}x -> ¬(¬{J}x & {I}x) sent12: (x): (¬{M}x v ... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stonecrop does not stunt Eddy and does not stunt goosander.; assump1 -> int1: that the stonecrop does not stunt Eddy is correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stonecrop does not stunt Eddy and it does not stunt goo... | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); assump1 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; int1 & sent10 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the stonecrop does stunt gauss. | {C}{a} | [
"sent22 -> int4: if the tomtit is a kind of a surveyor it does not stunt arsenide and is not a soar.; sent21 -> int5: if the squirter is not anorectal it is enzymatic thing that does not stunt bootleg.; sent11 -> int6: the fact that the quadraphony is both not a Ajuga and anorectal is not true if it is not a reduct... | 10 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the stonecrop stunts gauss is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the stonecrop does not stunt Eddy and it does not stunt goosander is not right it does not stunt gauss. sent2: the gyrfalcon does not stunt goosander if the stonecrop does not stunt goosander and stunts gauss. sent3: The ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stonecrop does not stunt Eddy and does not stunt goosander.; assump1 -> int1: that the stonecrop does not stunt Eddy is correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stonecrop does not stunt Eddy and it does not stunt goosande... |
DeductionInstance | the chela does not stunt comfrey. | ¬{AB}{b} | sent1: if the legs does not stunt comfrey then the chela does feminize legs. sent2: the chela is ontogenetic and feminizes legs. sent3: the fact that the legs does stunt comfrey is not false if the chela does not feminize legs. sent4: the ovenbird stunts comfrey. sent5: the legs is a Xerox if the fact that the chela do... | sent1: ¬{AB}{a} -> {A}{b} sent2: ({AR}{b} & {A}{b}) sent3: ¬{A}{b} -> {AB}{a} sent4: {AB}{cu} sent5: ¬{A}{b} -> {AA}{a} sent6: ({CH}{hc} & {AA}{hc}) sent7: {AA}{a} sent8: {AB}{a} sent9: ¬{A}{a} sent10: {DN}{a} sent11: ¬{AA}{b} -> ({AB}{a} & {A}{a}) sent12: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent13: ¬{GD}{a} sent14: ({AL}{b... | [
"sent12 & sent9 -> int1: the chela is a Xerox and stunts comfrey.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent12 & sent9 -> int1: ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the chela does not stunt comfrey. ; $context$ = sent1: if the legs does not stunt comfrey then the chela does feminize legs. sent2: the chela is ontogenetic and feminizes legs. sent3: the fact that the legs does stunt comfrey is not false if the chela does not feminize legs. sent4: the ovenbird stunts co... | sent12 & sent9 -> int1: the chela is a Xerox and stunts comfrey.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the teller does not consider girasol. | ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: if something considers NASA then it is not mechanical. sent2: there is nothing that is not a Hecht and is recreational. sent3: the Wiffle is not a kind of a carry if the fact that it is non-polychromatic and it is a anaphase is wrong. sent4: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Hecht but it is recreatio... | sent1: (x): {BG}x -> ¬{DN}x sent2: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) sent3: ¬(¬{CL}{iq} & {ET}{iq}) -> ¬{AA}{iq} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{E}x sent5: ¬({GB}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent7: ¬{BP}{aa} sent8: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{HQ}{aa} & {AF}{aa}) sent9: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {GG}{aa}) sent10: ¬({BS}{aa} & {HD}{aa}) s... | [] | [] | the teller does consider girasol. | {B}{aa} | [
"sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the Helix is not a Hecht but it is recreational is wrong it is not recreational.; sent2 -> int2: that the Helix is not a Hecht but it is recreational is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Helix is not recreational is not false.; int3 -> int4: everything is not recr... | 8 | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the teller does not consider girasol. ; $context$ = sent1: if something considers NASA then it is not mechanical. sent2: there is nothing that is not a Hecht and is recreational. sent3: the Wiffle is not a kind of a carry if the fact that it is non-polychromatic and it is a anaphase is wrong. sent4: if t... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the determining does not occur. | ¬{B} | sent1: that the victualling and the yawing happens is brought about by the non-evergreenness. sent2: the stunting tyramine happens. sent3: that the feint happens and the dovetail occurs is brought about by that the feminizing porkchop does not occur. sent4: the fact that the evolutionariness does not occur and the stun... | sent1: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) sent2: {A} sent3: ¬{L} -> ({K} & {J}) sent4: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{A}) sent5: {A} -> {B} sent6: (¬{G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} sent7: ¬{E} -> ¬{D} sent8: {J} -> (¬{I} & ¬{H}) sent9: ({N} & {M}) -> ¬{L} sent10: {GF} sent11: ¬{H} -> (¬{G} & ¬{F}) sent12: {T} -> {HJ} sent13: ¬(¬{C} & {D}) -> ¬{B} sent14: ¬{... | [
"sent5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the determining does not occur. | ¬{B} | [
"sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the suspension happens and the reopening occurs.; int1 -> int2: the suspension occurs.;"
] | 13 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the determining does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the victualling and the yawing happens is brought about by the non-evergreenness. sent2: the stunting tyramine happens. sent3: that the feint happens and the dovetail occurs is brought about by that the feminizing porkchop does not occur. sent4: t... | sent5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the stem is not non-freelance. | {C}{a} | sent1: if there is something such that it does not reheat the stem does consider wheeled. sent2: the stem does consider wheeled. sent3: everything is not probabilistic. sent4: there exists something such that it reheats. sent5: if there exists something such that it does not reheat then the stem considers wheeled and i... | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}{a} sent2: {B}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{D}x sent4: (Ex): {A}x sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent6: {C}{cd} | [] | [] | the stem is not freelance. | ¬{C}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int1: the watermelon is not probabilistic.;"
] | 6 | 2 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the stem is not non-freelance. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does not reheat the stem does consider wheeled. sent2: the stem does consider wheeled. sent3: everything is not probabilistic. sent4: there exists something such that it reheats. sent5: if there exists something such t... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the pentastomid is not a toe-in. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: the pentastomid is not a toe-in if the Teton frames. sent2: the fact that the Teton is a toe-in and it is a Desmodontidae is not true if it is not a kind of a frame. sent3: the Teton is a girasol if there is something such that that it is not a girasol and it does not kick is false. sent4: if that the fact that ... | sent1: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) -> {C}{a} sent4: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent5: ¬{A}{a} sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the Teton considers zinfandel and does not frame does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 & sent5 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | the pentastomid is a toe-in. | {B}{b} | [] | 11 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pentastomid is not a toe-in. ; $context$ = sent1: the pentastomid is not a toe-in if the Teton frames. sent2: the fact that the Teton is a toe-in and it is a Desmodontidae is not true if it is not a kind of a frame. sent3: the Teton is a girasol if there is something such that that it is not a giraso... | sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the Teton considers zinfandel and does not frame does not hold.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the gate is a Chabad. | {A}{a} | sent1: the gate is a Chabad if the fact that the gammon is polyvalent or is not a Mayan or both is not correct. sent2: if that the gammon is polyvalent and/or not a Chabad is not right the gate is a Mayan. sent3: there is nothing such that it does stunt Caucasian or is not a misfit or both. sent4: there is nothing that... | sent1: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {A}{a} sent2: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa}) -> {AB}{a} sent3: (x): ¬({AR}x v ¬{HU}x) sent4: (x): ¬({E}x v ¬{BB}x) sent5: (x): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent6: ¬({A}{b} v ¬{II}{b}) sent7: ¬({HM}{ad} v ¬{FB}{ad}) sent8: {AB}{aa} sent9: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {A}{a} sent10: ¬({A}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sen... | [
"sent5 -> int1: the fact that the gammon is polyvalent and/or it is not a Mayan does not hold.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the gate is not a Chabad. | ¬{A}{a} | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the gate is a Chabad. ; $context$ = sent1: the gate is a Chabad if the fact that the gammon is polyvalent or is not a Mayan or both is not correct. sent2: if that the gammon is polyvalent and/or not a Chabad is not right the gate is a Mayan. sent3: there is nothing such that it does stunt Caucasian or is... | sent5 -> int1: the fact that the gammon is polyvalent and/or it is not a Mayan does not hold.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the sunglasses is not a blowout is true. | ¬{E}{b} | sent1: the sunglasses is noncaloric and partitive. sent2: the pudge is uveal. sent3: if something consorts screen and is uveal the aerie is a Meir. sent4: if the aerie does consort screen the sunglasses is a blowout. sent5: the aerie is not a theology if there exists something such that it is not a stroma and/or it is ... | sent1: ({JD}{b} & {CE}{b}) sent2: {B}{aa} sent3: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent4: {A}{a} -> {E}{b} sent5: (x): (¬{F}x v {E}x) -> ¬{D}{a} sent6: ¬{B}{a} -> ({E}{b} & {A}{b}) sent7: {D}{a} -> ¬{E}{b} sent8: ({B}{aa} v {D}{aa}) sent9: ({B}{b} v {E}{b}) sent10: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent11: (Ex): {A}x sent12: (x): (¬{C}x ... | [
"sent10 -> int1: the fact that something consorts screen and it is uveal is not wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the aerie is a Meir.; int2 -> int3: the aerie is a theology or it is a Meir or both.;"
] | [
"sent10 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x); int1 & sent3 -> int2: {C}{a}; int2 -> int3: ({D}{a} v {C}{a});"
] | the tither does not consort screen. | ¬{A}{eh} | [
"sent16 -> int4: the sunglasses is not a stroma.; int4 -> int5: either the sunglasses is not a stroma or it is a blowout or both.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not a stroma and/or it is a blowout.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the aerie is not a kind of a theology.;"
] | 7 | 4 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the sunglasses is not a blowout is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the sunglasses is noncaloric and partitive. sent2: the pudge is uveal. sent3: if something consorts screen and is uveal the aerie is a Meir. sent4: if the aerie does consort screen the sunglasses is a blowout. sent5: the aerie is not a th... | sent10 -> int1: the fact that something consorts screen and it is uveal is not wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the aerie is a Meir.; int2 -> int3: the aerie is a theology or it is a Meir or both.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the vambrace is not a neurosurgery or not a bunchberry or both. | (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) | sent1: the ewe is mitotic. sent2: the vambrace is a neurosurgery and/or it is not a bunchberry. sent3: the vambrace is a neurosurgery. sent4: if the man-eater is mitotic the vambrace is mitotic. sent5: if the fact that the fact that something is not mitotic or does load gyroscope or both is not wrong is not correct the... | sent1: {B}{c} sent2: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent3: {AA}{a} sent4: {B}{b} -> {B}{a} sent5: (x): ¬(¬{B}x v {A}x) -> ¬{AB}x sent6: ¬(¬{FA}{a} v ¬{HG}{a}) sent7: (¬{C}{c} & {D}{c}) sent8: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent9: {B}{c} -> {B}{b} sent10: {B}{a} -> {B}{c} sent11: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vambrace is not a neurosurgery and/or it is not a bunchberry.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the man-eater is not mitotic.; sent9 & sent1 -> int2: the man-eater is mitotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}); sent8 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; sent9 & sent1 -> int2: {B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the vambrace is not a neurosurgery or it is not a kind of a bunchberry or both. | (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent5 -> int4: if the fact that the man-eater is not mitotic and/or does load gyroscope is false then it is not a bunchberry.; sent7 -> int5: the ewe is not synchronous.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is not synchronous.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the vambrace is not a neurosurgery or not a bunchberry or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the ewe is mitotic. sent2: the vambrace is a neurosurgery and/or it is not a bunchberry. sent3: the vambrace is a neurosurgery. sent4: if the man-eater is mitotic the vambrace is mitotic. sent5: if the fact that the fact... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vambrace is not a neurosurgery and/or it is not a bunchberry.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the man-eater is not mitotic.; sent9 & sent1 -> int2: the man-eater is mitotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the nonreciprocalness does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: if the fact that the joyfulness does not occur is not incorrect that the nonreciprocalness does not occur and the constricting does not occur does not hold. sent2: if the stabling does not occur the fact that the battue but not the incidence happens does not hold. sent3: the fact that the fact that the destructi... | sent1: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{A}) sent2: ¬{J} -> ¬({H} & ¬{I}) sent3: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} & ¬{G}) sent4: ¬{T} -> ({R} & {S}) sent5: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} sent6: ({IO} v {CB}) sent7: {GB} sent8: ¬{F} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) sent9: ¬{P} -> ¬({O} & {N}) sent10: ¬({H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{H} sent11: {R} -> (¬{P} & ¬{Q}) sent12: {A} -> ¬{C} sent13: ¬{... | [
"sent14 -> int1: the fact that the constricting happens and/or the joyfulness happens hold.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent14 -> int1: ({A} v {B}); sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the nonreciprocalness happens. | {C} | [] | 19 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the nonreciprocalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the joyfulness does not occur is not incorrect that the nonreciprocalness does not occur and the constricting does not occur does not hold. sent2: if the stabling does not occur the fact that the battue but not the incidence happ... | sent14 -> int1: the fact that the constricting happens and/or the joyfulness happens hold.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that that something is a Alhazen and it is gymnospermous is not wrong is not true. | ¬((Ex): ({A}x & {B}x)) | sent1: the hydrocarbon is gymnospermous. sent2: if there is something such that it is not axillary the chloropicrin does not access chloropicrin. sent3: if the liman is not a shoreline the diploid is both not a antifeminist and mucinous. sent4: the chloropicrin is a Alhazen. sent5: something is gymnospermous if it is n... | sent1: {B}{em} sent2: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬{F}{a} sent3: ¬{M}{e} -> (¬{J}{d} & {L}{d}) sent4: {A}{a} sent5: (x): (¬{A}x & {C}x) -> {B}x sent6: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({E}x & {D}x) sent7: ¬{J}{c} -> ({I}{c} & {H}{c}) sent8: (Ex): {A}x sent9: (Ex): ({DL}x & {DB}x) sent10: ({CR}{fn} & {B}{fn}) sent11: (Ex): {GI}x sent12: (Ex): ({CP}x &... | [
"sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the chloropicrin is a kind of a Alhazen and is gymnospermous.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent15 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the couple is gymnospermous. | {B}{b} | [
"sent18 -> int2: if that the couple is not a kind of a Alhazen and is not satiate is not true it is a kind of a Alhazen.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that that something is a Alhazen and it is gymnospermous is not wrong is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the hydrocarbon is gymnospermous. sent2: if there is something such that it is not axillary the chloropicrin does not access chloropicrin. sent3: if the liman is not a shoreline the diploid is... | sent4 & sent15 -> int1: the chloropicrin is a kind of a Alhazen and is gymnospermous.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the poppet is a dastard but it is not a Tibetan. | ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: the poppet does circumnavigate JV. sent2: that the poppet is a dastard and is a Tibetan does not hold if it does circumnavigate JV. sent3: that that the stitch is a kind of a workroom and does not circumnavigate JV is incorrect is not incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the poppet is a plumbism is true the fact t... | sent1: {A}{aa} sent2: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent3: ¬({EP}{bc} & ¬{A}{bc}) sent4: {JB}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{IG}{aa}) sent5: {A}{aa} -> ¬({HU}{aa} & ¬{GR}{aa}) sent6: {A}{ds} sent7: {BO}{aa} sent8: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent9: {CQ}{aa} -> ¬({CP}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent10: (x): {IN}x -> ¬({K}x & ¬{IQ}x) sent11... | [
"sent16 -> int1: the fact that the poppet is a dastard and is not a kind of a Tibetan is not correct if it circumnavigates JV.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent16 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the poppet is a dastard but it is not a Tibetan. ; $context$ = sent1: the poppet does circumnavigate JV. sent2: that the poppet is a dastard and is a Tibetan does not hold if it does circumnavigate JV. sent3: that that the stitch is a kind of a workroom and does not circumnavigate JV is incorrect is not ... | sent16 -> int1: the fact that the poppet is a dastard and is not a kind of a Tibetan is not correct if it circumnavigates JV.; int1 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.