robomme-demo-frames / README.md
hmkang's picture
Masks regenerated with the full BiRefNet (was BiRefNet_lite)
c08f56e verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
3.94 kB
---
license: other
task_categories:
- image-segmentation
tags:
- robotics
- video
- foreground-segmentation
---
# RoboMME demonstration-prefix frames with foreground masks
The **demonstration prefix** of RoboMME episodes -- the video-instruction frames, where `info/is_video_demo`
is True -- together with a binary foreground mask for each frame.
These frames are worth publishing separately because they are missing from the usual export: the pickle
conversion that training pipelines consume writes a file only when `is_demo` is False, so the demo prefix
(292k of RoboMME's 769k frames) exists only in the raw HDF5.
Of the 16 tasks, **9 carry a demo prefix and 7 do not**. Both are here, kept apart because the frames mean
different things:
| | tasks | episodes | frames | what the frames are |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| `<Task>/` | 9 | 2 each | 6,024 | the demo prefix only |
| `no_demo_tasks/<Task>/` | 7 | 2 each | 6,010 | whole episodes -- there is no demo portion to cut |
With a demo: InsertPeg, MoveCube, PatternLock, RouteStick, VideoPlaceButton, VideoPlaceOrder, VideoRepick,
VideoUnmask, VideoUnmaskSwap. Demo length splits by family -- the `Video*` tasks run long (VideoPlaceOrder
940 and 1105 frames) while others are short (PatternLock 48 and 63).
Without: BinFill, ButtonUnmask, ButtonUnmaskSwap, PickHighlight, PickXtimes, StopCube, SwingXtimes.
## Contents
```
<Task>/episode_<NNNN>/rgb/00000.png front camera, 256x256 RGB, raw pixels
<Task>/episode_<NNNN>/mask/00000.png 1-bit foreground mask, same size
<Task>/episode_<NNNN>/done.json kind, has_demo, demo_len, num_timesteps,
per-frame foreground fraction
no_demo_tasks/<Task>/episode_<NNNN>/ same layout, whole episodes
demo_manifest.json episode list for the demo tasks
no_demo_manifest.json episode list for the demo-less tasks
```
Frame `00000` is absolute timestep 0 of the episode and frames run to `demo_len - 1`, which is the end of the
demo prefix under `<Task>/` and the end of the episode under `no_demo_tasks/`. Check `kind`
(`demo` / `full_episode`) in `done.json` rather than inferring from the path. RGB is untouched: no crop, no
resize, no normalisation, so any preprocessing is the consumer's choice.
`is_video_demo` was verified to be a clean prefix -- True..True then False..False -- by reading every timestep
of every exported episode.
## Masks
`ZhengPeng7/BiRefNet` (the full model), run at 1024x1024 and thresholded at 0.5, then resized back to 256. The
resolution matters: below roughly 512 the mask comes back essentially empty, which makes a
foreground-weighted loss put most of its weight on the wooden table instead of the arm and the objects.
The masks are model output, not ground truth. They are accurate on the arm and the manipulated objects
and they do pick up small painted markers, but they are not a substitute for simulator segmentation.
These masks were regenerated with the **full** BiRefNet, replacing an earlier set from
`BiRefNet_lite`. Same resolution, same 0.5 threshold, same resize back -- only the checkpoint
changed. The lite model drops the robot arm entirely on some frames: over the 12,034 frames
here the full model finds more foreground in 58.2% of them and changes the mask by more than
2% of the frame in 5.5%, and the worst case (VideoPlaceButton episode_0000 frame 00304) goes
from a foreground fraction of 0.032 to 0.186 because lite masked the buttons and the cube but
not the arm holding them. Mean foreground fraction rose from 0.0795 to 0.0845; per task the
shift ranges from -0.0002 (PatternLock) to +0.0176 (BinFill).
`done.json`'s `foreground_fraction`, `seg_model` and `seg_input_size` were recomputed to match.
## Provenance and licence
Frames are derived from the RoboMME dataset; its licence governs their use. The masks are generated by
BiRefNet_lite (MIT). Nothing here is human-annotated.