id
stringlengths
22
25
rulebreaker_type
stringclasses
2 values
category
stringclasses
9 values
firstName
stringlengths
2
16
pronoun
stringclasses
2 values
verb
stringclasses
12 values
entityA
stringclasses
191 values
entityB
stringclasses
307 values
premise1
stringlengths
42
102
premise2
stringlengths
14
63
conclusion
stringlengths
14
63
label
bool
2 classes
kc_gen_formatted_prompt
stringlengths
278
375
target_correct_conclusion
stringlengths
14
62
target_incorrect_conclusion
stringlengths
14
63
RULEBREAKER_0011810_rb
ds
cities
Michalis
he
has been to
Canada
Ottawa
Michalis has been to either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.
Michalis has not been to Canada.
Michalis has been to Ottawa.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Michalis has been to either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, Michalis has not been to Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Michalis has been to Ottawa.
RULEBREAKER_0011811_rb
ds
cities
Victor Hugo
he
has been to
Namibia
Windhoek
Victor Hugo has been to either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.
Victor Hugo has not been to Namibia.
Victor Hugo has been to Windhoek.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Victor Hugo has been to either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Victor Hugo has not been to Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Victor Hugo has been to Windhoek.
RULEBREAKER_0011812_rb
ds
cities
Amira
she
has been to
Bahrain
Manama
Amira has been to either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.
Amira has not been to Bahrain.
Amira has been to Manama.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Amira has been to either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Amira has not been to Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Amira has been to Manama.
RULEBREAKER_0011813_rb
ds
cities
Vedant
he
has been to
Seychelles
Victoria
Vedant has been to either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.
Vedant has not been to Seychelles.
Vedant has been to Victoria.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Vedant has been to either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Vedant has not been to Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Vedant has been to Victoria.
RULEBREAKER_0011814_rb
ds
cities
Sukhbaаtar
he
has been to
Syria
Damascus
Sukhbaаtar has been to either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.
Sukhbaаtar has not been to Syria.
Sukhbaаtar has been to Damascus.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Sukhbaаtar has been to either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Sukhbaаtar has not been to Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Sukhbaаtar has been to Damascus.
RULEBREAKER_0011815_rb
ds
cities
Salik
he
has been to
Kuwait
Kuwait City
Salik has been to either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.
Salik has not been to Kuwait.
Salik has been to Kuwait City.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Salik has been to either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Salik has not been to Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Salik has been to Kuwait City.
RULEBREAKER_0011816_rb
ds
cities
Eliška
she
has been to
Chad
N'Djamena
Eliška has been to either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.
Eliška has not been to Chad.
Eliška has been to N'Djamena.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Eliška has been to either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Eliška has not been to Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Eliška has been to N'Djamena.
RULEBREAKER_0011817_rb
ds
cities
Martina
she
has been to
Slovenia
Ljubljana
Martina has been to either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.
Martina has not been to Slovenia.
Martina has been to Ljubljana.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Martina has been to either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Martina has not been to Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Martina has been to Ljubljana.
RULEBREAKER_0011818_rb
ds
cities
Toivo
he
has been to
Peru
Lima
Toivo has been to either Lima or somewhere in Peru.
Toivo has not been to Peru.
Toivo has been to Lima.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Toivo has been to either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Toivo has not been to Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Toivo has been to Lima.
RULEBREAKER_0011819_rb
ds
cities
Nathalie
she
has been to
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Kinshasa
Nathalie has been to either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Nathalie has not been to Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Nathalie has been to Kinshasa.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Nathalie has been to either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Nathalie has not been to Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Nathalie has been to Kinshasa.
RULEBREAKER_0011820_rb
ds
cities
Millie
she
has been to
Mexico
Mexico City
Millie has been to either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.
Millie has not been to Mexico.
Millie has been to Mexico City.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Millie has been to either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Millie has not been to Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Millie has been to Mexico City.
RULEBREAKER_0011821_rb
ds
cities
Guadalupe
she
has been to
Uganda
Kampala
Guadalupe has been to either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.
Guadalupe has not been to Uganda.
Guadalupe has been to Kampala.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Guadalupe has been to either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Guadalupe has not been to Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Guadalupe has been to Kampala.
RULEBREAKER_0011822_rb
ds
cities
Freya
she
has been to
Togo
Lomé
Freya has been to either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.
Freya has not been to Togo.
Freya has been to Lomé.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Freya has been to either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Freya has not been to Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Freya has been to Lomé.
RULEBREAKER_0011823_rb
ds
cities
thaniel
he
has been to
Italy
Rome
thaniel has been to either Rome or somewhere in Italy.
thaniel has not been to Italy.
thaniel has been to Rome.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that thaniel has been to either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, thaniel has not been to Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
thaniel has been to Rome.
RULEBREAKER_0011824_rb
ds
cities
Zofia
she
has been to
Vanuatu
Port Vila
Zofia has been to either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.
Zofia has not been to Vanuatu.
Zofia has been to Port Vila.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Zofia has been to either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Zofia has not been to Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Zofia has been to Port Vila.
RULEBREAKER_0011825_rb
ds
cities
Nik
he
has been to
Turkmenistan
Ashgabat
Nik has been to either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.
Nik has not been to Turkmenistan.
Nik has been to Ashgabat.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Nik has been to either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Nik has not been to Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Nik has been to Ashgabat.
RULEBREAKER_0011826_rb
ds
cities
Vera
she
has been to
Venezuela
Caracas
Vera has been to either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.
Vera has not been to Venezuela.
Vera has been to Caracas.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Vera has been to either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Vera has not been to Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Vera has been to Caracas.
RULEBREAKER_0011827_rb
ds
cities
Dārta
she
has been to
Poland
Warsaw
Dārta has been to either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.
Dārta has not been to Poland.
Dārta has been to Warsaw.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Dārta has been to either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, Dārta has not been to Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Dārta has been to Warsaw.
RULEBREAKER_0011828_rb
ds
cities
Tuleen
she
has been to
Montenegro
Podgorica
Tuleen has been to either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.
Tuleen has not been to Montenegro.
Tuleen has been to Podgorica.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Tuleen has been to either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Tuleen has not been to Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Tuleen has been to Podgorica.
RULEBREAKER_0011829_rb
ds
cities
Yusif
he
has been to
Nigeria
Abuja
Yusif has been to either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.
Yusif has not been to Nigeria.
Yusif has been to Abuja.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Yusif has been to either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Yusif has not been to Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Yusif has been to Abuja.
RULEBREAKER_0011830_rb
ds
cities
Dominykas
he
has been to
Laos
Vientiane
Dominykas has been to either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.
Dominykas has not been to Laos.
Dominykas has been to Vientiane.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Dominykas has been to either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Dominykas has not been to Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Dominykas has been to Vientiane.
RULEBREAKER_0011831_rb
ds
cities
Juan Carlos
he
has been to
New Zealand
Wellington
Juan Carlos has been to either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.
Juan Carlos has not been to New Zealand.
Juan Carlos has been to Wellington.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Juan Carlos has been to either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Juan Carlos has not been to New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Juan Carlos has been to Wellington.
RULEBREAKER_0011832_rb
ds
cities
Kārlis
he
has been to
El Salvador
San Salvador
Kārlis has been to either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.
Kārlis has not been to El Salvador.
Kārlis has been to San Salvador.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Kārlis has been to either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Kārlis has not been to El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Kārlis has been to San Salvador.
RULEBREAKER_0011833_rb
ds
cities
Modibo
he
has been to
Taiwan
Taipei
Modibo has been to either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.
Modibo has not been to Taiwan.
Modibo has been to Taipei.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Modibo has been to either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Modibo has not been to Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Modibo has been to Taipei.
RULEBREAKER_0011834_rb
ds
cities
Charbel
he
has been to
Hungary
Budapest
Charbel has been to either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.
Charbel has not been to Hungary.
Charbel has been to Budapest.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Charbel has been to either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Charbel has not been to Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Charbel has been to Budapest.
RULEBREAKER_0011835_rb
ds
cities
than
he
has been to
Mauritius
Port Louis
than has been to either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.
than has not been to Mauritius.
than has been to Port Louis.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that than has been to either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, than has not been to Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
than has been to Port Louis.
RULEBREAKER_0011836_rb
ds
cities
Hasmik
she
has been to
Benin
Porto-Novo
Hasmik has been to either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.
Hasmik has not been to Benin.
Hasmik has been to Porto-Novo.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Hasmik has been to either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Hasmik has not been to Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Hasmik has been to Porto-Novo.
RULEBREAKER_0011837_rb
ds
cities
Lucas
he
has been to
Albania
Tirana
Lucas has been to either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.
Lucas has not been to Albania.
Lucas has been to Tirana.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Lucas has been to either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Lucas has not been to Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Lucas has been to Tirana.
RULEBREAKER_0011838_rb
ds
cities
Demetre
he
has been to
Kenya
Nairobi
Demetre has been to either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.
Demetre has not been to Kenya.
Demetre has been to Nairobi.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Demetre has been to either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Demetre has not been to Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Demetre has been to Nairobi.
RULEBREAKER_0011839_rb
ds
cities
Jon
he
has been to
Argentina
Buenos Aires
Jon has been to either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.
Jon has not been to Argentina.
Jon has been to Buenos Aires.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Jon has been to either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Jon has not been to Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Jon has been to Buenos Aires.
RULEBREAKER_0011840_rb
ds
cities
Bader
he
has been to
Vietnam
Hanoi
Bader has been to either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.
Bader has not been to Vietnam.
Bader has been to Hanoi.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Bader has been to either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Bader has not been to Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Bader has been to Hanoi.
RULEBREAKER_0011841_rb
ds
cities
Rory
he
has been to
Malta
Valletta
Rory has been to either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.
Rory has not been to Malta.
Rory has been to Valletta.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Rory has been to either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Rory has not been to Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Rory has been to Valletta.
RULEBREAKER_0011842_rb
ds
cities
Huseyn
he
has been to
Burkina Faso
Ouagadougou
Huseyn has been to either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.
Huseyn has not been to Burkina Faso.
Huseyn has been to Ouagadougou.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Huseyn has been to either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Huseyn has not been to Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Huseyn has been to Ouagadougou.
RULEBREAKER_0011843_rb
ds
cities
Roko
he
has been to
Bangladesh
Dhaka
Roko has been to either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.
Roko has not been to Bangladesh.
Roko has been to Dhaka.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Roko has been to either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Roko has not been to Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Roko has been to Dhaka.
RULEBREAKER_0011844_rb
ds
cities
Hinata
she
has been to
Gabon
Libreville
Hinata has been to either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.
Hinata has not been to Gabon.
Hinata has been to Libreville.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Hinata has been to either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Hinata has not been to Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Hinata has been to Libreville.
RULEBREAKER_0011845_rb
ds
cities
Concepción
she
has been to
Comoros
Moroni
Concepción has been to either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.
Concepción has not been to Comoros.
Concepción has been to Moroni.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Concepción has been to either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Concepción has not been to Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Concepción has been to Moroni.
RULEBREAKER_0011846_rb
ds
cities
Elias
he
has been to
Panama
Panama City
Elias has been to either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.
Elias has not been to Panama.
Elias has been to Panama City.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Elias has been to either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Elias has not been to Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Elias has been to Panama City.
RULEBREAKER_0011847_rb
ds
cities
Yusef
he
has been to
Ghana
Accra
Yusef has been to either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.
Yusef has not been to Ghana.
Yusef has been to Accra.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Yusef has been to either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Yusef has not been to Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Yusef has been to Accra.
RULEBREAKER_0011848_rb
ds
cities
Beatrice
she
has been to
Liberia
Monrovia
Beatrice has been to either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.
Beatrice has not been to Liberia.
Beatrice has been to Monrovia.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Beatrice has been to either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Beatrice has not been to Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Beatrice has been to Monrovia.
RULEBREAKER_0011849_rb
ds
cities
Richard
he
has been to
Guinea
Conakry
Richard has been to either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.
Richard has not been to Guinea.
Richard has been to Conakry.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Richard has been to either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Richard has not been to Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Richard has been to Conakry.
RULEBREAKER_0011850_rb
ds
cities
Ayala
she
has been to
Armenia
Yerevan
Ayala has been to either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.
Ayala has not been to Armenia.
Ayala has been to Yerevan.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayala has been to either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Ayala has not been to Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Ayala has been to Yerevan.
RULEBREAKER_0011851_rb
ds
cities
Patricija
she
has been to
Guinea-Bissau
Bissau
Patricija has been to either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.
Patricija has not been to Guinea-Bissau.
Patricija has been to Bissau.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Patricija has been to either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Patricija has not been to Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Patricija has been to Bissau.
RULEBREAKER_0011852_rb
ds
cities
Aino
she
has been to
North Korea
Pyongyang
Aino has been to either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.
Aino has not been to North Korea.
Aino has been to Pyongyang.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Aino has been to either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Aino has not been to North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Aino has been to Pyongyang.
RULEBREAKER_0011853_rb
ds
cities
Nora
she
has been to
People's Republic of China
Beijing
Nora has been to either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.
Nora has not been to People's Republic of China.
Nora has been to Beijing.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Nora has been to either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Nora has not been to People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Nora has been to Beijing.
RULEBREAKER_0011854_rb
ds
cities
Alice
she
has been to
Cambodia
Phnom Penh
Alice has been to either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.
Alice has not been to Cambodia.
Alice has been to Phnom Penh.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Alice has been to either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Alice has not been to Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Alice has been to Phnom Penh.
RULEBREAKER_0011855_rb
ds
cities
Chih-ming
he
has been to
Brunei
Bandar Seri Begawan
Chih-ming has been to either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.
Chih-ming has not been to Brunei.
Chih-ming has been to Bandar Seri Begawan.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Chih-ming has been to either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Chih-ming has not been to Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Chih-ming has been to Bandar Seri Begawan.
RULEBREAKER_0011856_rb
ds
cities
Alina
she
has been to
Mali
Bamako
Alina has been to either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.
Alina has not been to Mali.
Alina has been to Bamako.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Alina has been to either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Alina has not been to Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Alina has been to Bamako.
RULEBREAKER_0011857_rb
ds
cities
Monte
he
has been to
Costa Rica
San José
Monte has been to either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.
Monte has not been to Costa Rica.
Monte has been to San José.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Monte has been to either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Monte has not been to Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Monte has been to San José.
RULEBREAKER_0011858_rb
ds
cities
Raphael
he
has been to
Guatemala
Guatemala City
Raphael has been to either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.
Raphael has not been to Guatemala.
Raphael has been to Guatemala City.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Raphael has been to either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Raphael has not been to Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Raphael has been to Guatemala City.
RULEBREAKER_0011859_rb
ds
cities
Georgi
he
has been to
United Kingdom
London
Georgi has been to either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.
Georgi has not been to United Kingdom.
Georgi has been to London.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgi has been to either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Georgi has not been to United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Georgi has been to London.
RULEBREAKER_0011860_rb
ds
cities
Khadije
she
has been to
Haiti
Port-au-Prince
Khadije has been to either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.
Khadije has not been to Haiti.
Khadije has been to Port-au-Prince.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Khadije has been to either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Khadije has not been to Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Khadije has been to Port-au-Prince.
RULEBREAKER_0011861_rb
ds
cities
Nada
she
has been to
Libya
Tripoli
Nada has been to either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.
Nada has not been to Libya.
Nada has been to Tripoli.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Nada has been to either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Nada has not been to Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Nada has been to Tripoli.
RULEBREAKER_0011862_rb
ds
cities
Hoda
she
has been to
Fiji
Suva
Hoda has been to either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.
Hoda has not been to Fiji.
Hoda has been to Suva.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Hoda has been to either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Hoda has not been to Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Hoda has been to Suva.
RULEBREAKER_0011863_rb
ds
cities
Amēlija
she
has been to
Georgia
Tbilisi
Amēlija has been to either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.
Amēlija has not been to Georgia.
Amēlija has been to Tbilisi.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Amēlija has been to either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Amēlija has not been to Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Amēlija has been to Tbilisi.
RULEBREAKER_0011864_rb
ds
cities
Andreas
he
has been to
Lithuania
Vilnius
Andreas has been to either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.
Andreas has not been to Lithuania.
Andreas has been to Vilnius.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Andreas has been to either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Andreas has not been to Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Andreas has been to Vilnius.
RULEBREAKER_0011865_rb
ds
cities
Nathaniel
he
has been to
France
Paris
Nathaniel has been to either Paris or somewhere in France.
Nathaniel has not been to France.
Nathaniel has been to Paris.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Nathaniel has been to either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Nathaniel has not been to France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Nathaniel has been to Paris.
RULEBREAKER_0011866_rb
ds
cities
Biel
he
has been to
Iraq
Baghdad
Biel has been to either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.
Biel has not been to Iraq.
Biel has been to Baghdad.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Biel has been to either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Biel has not been to Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Biel has been to Baghdad.
RULEBREAKER_0011867_rb
ds
cities
Ha-joon
he
has been to
Dominica
Roseau
Ha-joon has been to either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.
Ha-joon has not been to Dominica.
Ha-joon has been to Roseau.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Ha-joon has been to either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Ha-joon has not been to Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Ha-joon has been to Roseau.
RULEBREAKER_0011868_rb
ds
cities
Elshan
he
has been to
Oman
Muscat
Elshan has been to either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.
Elshan has not been to Oman.
Elshan has been to Muscat.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Elshan has been to either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Elshan has not been to Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Elshan has been to Muscat.
RULEBREAKER_0011869_rb
ds
cities
Dimitar
he
has been to
Thailand
Bangkok
Dimitar has been to either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.
Dimitar has not been to Thailand.
Dimitar has been to Bangkok.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Dimitar has been to either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Dimitar has not been to Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Dimitar has been to Bangkok.
RULEBREAKER_0011870_rb
ds
cities
Gayane
she
has been to
Slovakia
Bratislava
Gayane has been to either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.
Gayane has not been to Slovakia.
Gayane has been to Bratislava.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Gayane has been to either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Gayane has not been to Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Gayane has been to Bratislava.
RULEBREAKER_0011871_rb
ds
cities
Olga
she
has been to
Czech Republic
Prague
Olga has been to either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.
Olga has not been to Czech Republic.
Olga has been to Prague.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Olga has been to either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Olga has not been to Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Olga has been to Prague.
RULEBREAKER_0011872_rb
ds
cities
Mei
she
has been to
Spain
Madrid
Mei has been to either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.
Mei has not been to Spain.
Mei has been to Madrid.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Mei has been to either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Mei has not been to Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Mei has been to Madrid.
RULEBREAKER_0011873_rb
ds
cities
Édouard
he
has been to
Austria
Vienna
Édouard has been to either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.
Édouard has not been to Austria.
Édouard has been to Vienna.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Édouard has been to either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Édouard has not been to Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Édouard has been to Vienna.
RULEBREAKER_0011874_rb
ds
cities
Yuina
she
has been to
Indonesia
Jakarta
Yuina has been to either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.
Yuina has not been to Indonesia.
Yuina has been to Jakarta.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Yuina has been to either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Yuina has not been to Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Yuina has been to Jakarta.
RULEBREAKER_0011875_rb
ds
cities
Nilay
she
has been to
Pakistan
Islamabad
Nilay has been to either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.
Nilay has not been to Pakistan.
Nilay has been to Islamabad.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Nilay has been to either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Nilay has not been to Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Nilay has been to Islamabad.
RULEBREAKER_0011876_rb
ds
cities
Vladyslav
he
has been to
Brazil
Brasília
Vladyslav has been to either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.
Vladyslav has not been to Brazil.
Vladyslav has been to Brasília.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Vladyslav has been to either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Vladyslav has not been to Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Vladyslav has been to Brasília.
RULEBREAKER_0011877_rb
ds
cities
Vasilisa
she
has been to
Belgium
City of Brussels
Vasilisa has been to either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.
Vasilisa has not been to Belgium.
Vasilisa has been to City of Brussels.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Vasilisa has been to either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Vasilisa has not been to Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Vasilisa has been to City of Brussels.
RULEBREAKER_0011878_rb
ds
cities
Natalia
she
has been to
Tajikistan
Dushanbe
Natalia has been to either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.
Natalia has not been to Tajikistan.
Natalia has been to Dushanbe.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Natalia has been to either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Natalia has not been to Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Natalia has been to Dushanbe.
RULEBREAKER_0011879_rb
ds
cities
Matilda
she
has been to
North Macedonia
Skopje
Matilda has been to either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.
Matilda has not been to North Macedonia.
Matilda has been to Skopje.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Matilda has been to either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Matilda has not been to North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Matilda has been to Skopje.
RULEBREAKER_0011880_rb
ds
cities
Matilda
she
has been to
Mozambique
Maputo
Matilda has been to either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.
Matilda has not been to Mozambique.
Matilda has been to Maputo.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Matilda has been to either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Matilda has not been to Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Matilda has been to Maputo.
RULEBREAKER_0011881_rb
ds
cities
Adriana
she
has been to
Nicaragua
Managua
Adriana has been to either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.
Adriana has not been to Nicaragua.
Adriana has been to Managua.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Adriana has been to either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Adriana has not been to Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Adriana has been to Managua.
RULEBREAKER_0011882_rb
ds
cities
Amaia
she
has been to
Cuba
Havana
Amaia has been to either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.
Amaia has not been to Cuba.
Amaia has been to Havana.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Amaia has been to either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Amaia has not been to Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Amaia has been to Havana.
RULEBREAKER_0011883_rb
ds
cities
Bogdana
she
has been to
Angola
Luanda
Bogdana has been to either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.
Bogdana has not been to Angola.
Bogdana has been to Luanda.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Bogdana has been to either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Bogdana has not been to Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Bogdana has been to Luanda.
RULEBREAKER_0011884_rb
ds
cities
Georgios
he
has been to
Mauritania
Nouakchott
Georgios has been to either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.
Georgios has not been to Mauritania.
Georgios has been to Nouakchott.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgios has been to either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Georgios has not been to Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Georgios has been to Nouakchott.
RULEBREAKER_0011885_rb
ds
cities
Narek
he
has been to
Barbados
Bridgetown
Narek has been to either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.
Narek has not been to Barbados.
Narek has been to Bridgetown.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Narek has been to either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Narek has not been to Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Narek has been to Bridgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0011886_rb
ds
cities
Isla
she
has been to
Sweden
Stockholm
Isla has been to either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.
Isla has not been to Sweden.
Isla has been to Stockholm.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Isla has been to either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Isla has not been to Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Isla has been to Stockholm.
RULEBREAKER_0011887_rb
ds
cities
Mikaere
he
has been to
Jamaica
Kingston
Mikaere has been to either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.
Mikaere has not been to Jamaica.
Mikaere has been to Kingston.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikaere has been to either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Mikaere has not been to Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Mikaere has been to Kingston.
RULEBREAKER_0011888_rb
ds
cities
Göktug
he
has been to
Mongolia
Ulaanbaatar
Göktug has been to either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.
Göktug has not been to Mongolia.
Göktug has been to Ulaanbaatar.
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Göktug has been to either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Göktug has not been to Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Göktug has been to Ulaanbaatar.
RULEBREAKER_0011889_rb
ds
cities
Paul
he
has been to
United States of America
Washington, D.C.
Paul has been to either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.
Paul has not been to United States of America.
Paul has been to Washington, D.C..
false
Premises: Suppose we are told that Paul has been to either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Paul has not been to United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Nothing follows
Paul has been to Washington, D.C..
RULEBREAKER_0011890_nonrb
ds
bird
Lív
she
caught
fish
a goose
Lív caught either a goose or some kind of fish.
Lív did not catch any kind of fish.
Lív caught a goose.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Lív caught either a goose or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Lív did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Lív caught a goose.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011891_nonrb
ds
bird
Teo
he
caught
fish
an ostrich
Teo caught either an ostrich or some kind of fish.
Teo did not catch any kind of fish.
Teo caught an ostrich.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Teo caught either an ostrich or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Teo did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Teo caught an ostrich.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011892_nonrb
ds
bird
Levi
he
caught
fish
a partridge
Levi caught either a partridge or some kind of fish.
Levi did not catch any kind of fish.
Levi caught a partridge.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Levi caught either a partridge or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Levi did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Levi caught a partridge.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011893_nonrb
ds
bird
Igor
he
caught
fish
a hawk
Igor caught either a hawk or some kind of fish.
Igor did not catch any kind of fish.
Igor caught a hawk.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Igor caught either a hawk or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Igor did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Igor caught a hawk.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011894_nonrb
ds
bird
Matěj
he
caught
fish
a toucan
Matěj caught either a toucan or some kind of fish.
Matěj did not catch any kind of fish.
Matěj caught a toucan.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Matěj caught either a toucan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Matěj did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Matěj caught a toucan.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011895_nonrb
ds
bird
Wen-Hsiung
he
caught
fish
a crow
Wen-Hsiung caught either a crow or some kind of fish.
Wen-Hsiung did not catch any kind of fish.
Wen-Hsiung caught a crow.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Wen-Hsiung caught either a crow or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Wen-Hsiung did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Wen-Hsiung caught a crow.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011896_nonrb
ds
bird
Olivér
he
caught
fish
a swan
Olivér caught either a swan or some kind of fish.
Olivér did not catch any kind of fish.
Olivér caught a swan.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Olivér caught either a swan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Olivér did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Olivér caught a swan.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011897_nonrb
ds
bird
Valentina
she
caught
fish
a parakeet
Valentina caught either a parakeet or some kind of fish.
Valentina did not catch any kind of fish.
Valentina caught a parakeet.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Valentina caught either a parakeet or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Valentina did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Valentina caught a parakeet.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011898_nonrb
ds
bird
Paraskevi
she
caught
fish
a gull
Paraskevi caught either a gull or some kind of fish.
Paraskevi did not catch any kind of fish.
Paraskevi caught a gull.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Paraskevi caught either a gull or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Paraskevi did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Paraskevi caught a gull.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011899_nonrb
ds
bird
Ajla
she
caught
fish
a pheasant
Ajla caught either a pheasant or some kind of fish.
Ajla did not catch any kind of fish.
Ajla caught a pheasant.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Ajla caught either a pheasant or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Ajla did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Ajla caught a pheasant.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011900_nonrb
ds
bird
Amal
she
caught
fish
a finch
Amal caught either a finch or some kind of fish.
Amal did not catch any kind of fish.
Amal caught a finch.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Amal caught either a finch or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Amal did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Amal caught a finch.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011901_nonrb
ds
bird
Eithan
he
caught
fish
a pelican
Eithan caught either a pelican or some kind of fish.
Eithan did not catch any kind of fish.
Eithan caught a pelican.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Eithan caught either a pelican or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Eithan did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Eithan caught a pelican.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011902_nonrb
ds
bird
Alexandru
he
caught
fish
a nightingale
Alexandru caught either a nightingale or some kind of fish.
Alexandru did not catch any kind of fish.
Alexandru caught a nightingale.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Alexandru caught either a nightingale or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Alexandru did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Alexandru caught a nightingale.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011903_nonrb
ds
bird
Inaya
she
caught
fish
a peacock
Inaya caught either a peacock or some kind of fish.
Inaya did not catch any kind of fish.
Inaya caught a peacock.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Inaya caught either a peacock or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Inaya did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Inaya caught a peacock.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011904_nonrb
ds
bird
Tamar
she
caught
fish
a quail
Tamar caught either a quail or some kind of fish.
Tamar did not catch any kind of fish.
Tamar caught a quail.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Tamar caught either a quail or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Tamar did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Tamar caught a quail.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011905_nonrb
ds
bird
Kyriaki
she
caught
fish
a robin
Kyriaki caught either a robin or some kind of fish.
Kyriaki did not catch any kind of fish.
Kyriaki caught a robin.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Kyriaki caught either a robin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Kyriaki did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Kyriaki caught a robin.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011906_nonrb
ds
bird
Gagik
he
caught
fish
a kingfisher
Gagik caught either a kingfisher or some kind of fish.
Gagik did not catch any kind of fish.
Gagik caught a kingfisher.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Gagik caught either a kingfisher or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Gagik did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Gagik caught a kingfisher.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011907_nonrb
ds
bird
Kai
he
caught
fish
a falcon
Kai caught either a falcon or some kind of fish.
Kai did not catch any kind of fish.
Kai caught a falcon.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Kai caught either a falcon or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Kai did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Kai caught a falcon.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011908_nonrb
ds
bird
Selma
she
caught
fish
a flamingo
Selma caught either a flamingo or some kind of fish.
Selma did not catch any kind of fish.
Selma caught a flamingo.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Selma caught either a flamingo or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Selma did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Selma caught a flamingo.
Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0011909_nonrb
ds
bird
Danijel
he
caught
fish
a puffin
Danijel caught either a puffin or some kind of fish.
Danijel did not catch any kind of fish.
Danijel caught a puffin.
true
Premises: Suppose we are told that Danijel caught either a puffin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Danijel did not catch any kind of fish. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.
Danijel caught a puffin.
Nothing follows