id stringlengths 22 25 | rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values | category stringclasses 9 values | firstName stringlengths 2 16 | pronoun stringclasses 2 values | verb stringclasses 12 values | entityA stringclasses 191 values | entityB stringclasses 307 values | premise1 stringlengths 42 102 | premise2 stringlengths 14 63 | conclusion stringlengths 14 63 | label bool 2 classes | kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375 | target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62 | target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RULEBREAKER_0012010_nonrb | ds | bird | Djeneba | she | saw | fish | a goose | Djeneba saw either a goose or some kind of fish. | Djeneba did not see any kind of fish. | Djeneba saw a goose. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Djeneba saw either a goose or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Djeneba did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Djeneba saw a goose. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012011_nonrb | ds | bird | Mädïna | she | saw | fish | an ostrich | Mädïna saw either an ostrich or some kind of fish. | Mädïna did not see any kind of fish. | Mädïna saw an ostrich. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Mädïna saw either an ostrich or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Mädïna did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Mädïna saw an ostrich. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012012_nonrb | ds | bird | Yǔzé | he | saw | fish | a partridge | Yǔzé saw either a partridge or some kind of fish. | Yǔzé did not see any kind of fish. | Yǔzé saw a partridge. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Yǔzé saw either a partridge or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Yǔzé did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Yǔzé saw a partridge. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012013_nonrb | ds | bird | Bruno | he | saw | fish | a hawk | Bruno saw either a hawk or some kind of fish. | Bruno did not see any kind of fish. | Bruno saw a hawk. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Bruno saw either a hawk or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Bruno did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Bruno saw a hawk. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012014_nonrb | ds | bird | Andria | he | saw | fish | a toucan | Andria saw either a toucan or some kind of fish. | Andria did not see any kind of fish. | Andria saw a toucan. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Andria saw either a toucan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Andria did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Andria saw a toucan. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012015_nonrb | ds | bird | Sofia | she | saw | fish | a crow | Sofia saw either a crow or some kind of fish. | Sofia did not see any kind of fish. | Sofia saw a crow. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Sofia saw either a crow or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Sofia did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Sofia saw a crow. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012016_nonrb | ds | bird | Rita | she | saw | fish | a swan | Rita saw either a swan or some kind of fish. | Rita did not see any kind of fish. | Rita saw a swan. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Rita saw either a swan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Rita did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Rita saw a swan. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012017_nonrb | ds | bird | Aikaterini | she | saw | fish | a parakeet | Aikaterini saw either a parakeet or some kind of fish. | Aikaterini did not see any kind of fish. | Aikaterini saw a parakeet. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aikaterini saw either a parakeet or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Aikaterini did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Aikaterini saw a parakeet. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012018_nonrb | ds | bird | Marks | he | saw | fish | a gull | Marks saw either a gull or some kind of fish. | Marks did not see any kind of fish. | Marks saw a gull. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Marks saw either a gull or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Marks did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Marks saw a gull. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012019_nonrb | ds | bird | Ji-woo | she | saw | fish | a pheasant | Ji-woo saw either a pheasant or some kind of fish. | Ji-woo did not see any kind of fish. | Ji-woo saw a pheasant. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ji-woo saw either a pheasant or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Ji-woo did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Ji-woo saw a pheasant. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012020_nonrb | ds | bird | Maël | he | saw | fish | a finch | Maël saw either a finch or some kind of fish. | Maël did not see any kind of fish. | Maël saw a finch. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Maël saw either a finch or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Maël did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Maël saw a finch. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012021_nonrb | ds | bird | Angeline | she | saw | fish | a pelican | Angeline saw either a pelican or some kind of fish. | Angeline did not see any kind of fish. | Angeline saw a pelican. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Angeline saw either a pelican or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Angeline did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Angeline saw a pelican. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012022_nonrb | ds | bird | Theodore | he | saw | fish | a nightingale | Theodore saw either a nightingale or some kind of fish. | Theodore did not see any kind of fish. | Theodore saw a nightingale. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Theodore saw either a nightingale or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Theodore did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Theodore saw a nightingale. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012023_nonrb | ds | bird | Jakob | he | saw | fish | a peacock | Jakob saw either a peacock or some kind of fish. | Jakob did not see any kind of fish. | Jakob saw a peacock. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Jakob saw either a peacock or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Jakob did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Jakob saw a peacock. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012024_nonrb | ds | bird | Tigran | he | saw | fish | a quail | Tigran saw either a quail or some kind of fish. | Tigran did not see any kind of fish. | Tigran saw a quail. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Tigran saw either a quail or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Tigran did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Tigran saw a quail. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012025_nonrb | ds | bird | Noûr | she | saw | fish | a robin | Noûr saw either a robin or some kind of fish. | Noûr did not see any kind of fish. | Noûr saw a robin. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Noûr saw either a robin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Noûr did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Noûr saw a robin. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012026_nonrb | ds | bird | Konstantina | she | saw | fish | a kingfisher | Konstantina saw either a kingfisher or some kind of fish. | Konstantina did not see any kind of fish. | Konstantina saw a kingfisher. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Konstantina saw either a kingfisher or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Konstantina did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Konstantina saw a kingfisher. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012027_nonrb | ds | bird | Aada | she | saw | fish | a falcon | Aada saw either a falcon or some kind of fish. | Aada did not see any kind of fish. | Aada saw a falcon. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aada saw either a falcon or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Aada did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Aada saw a falcon. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012028_nonrb | ds | bird | Gabriel | he | saw | fish | a flamingo | Gabriel saw either a flamingo or some kind of fish. | Gabriel did not see any kind of fish. | Gabriel saw a flamingo. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Gabriel saw either a flamingo or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Gabriel did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Gabriel saw a flamingo. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012029_nonrb | ds | bird | Tarita | she | saw | fish | a puffin | Tarita saw either a puffin or some kind of fish. | Tarita did not see any kind of fish. | Tarita saw a puffin. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Tarita saw either a puffin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Tarita did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Tarita saw a puffin. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012030_nonrb | ds | bird | Snežana | she | saw | fish | a goose | Snežana saw either a goose or some kind of fish. | Snežana did not see any kind of fish. | Snežana saw a goose. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Snežana saw either a goose or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Snežana did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Snežana saw a goose. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012031_nonrb | ds | bird | Hovhannes | he | saw | fish | an ostrich | Hovhannes saw either an ostrich or some kind of fish. | Hovhannes did not see any kind of fish. | Hovhannes saw an ostrich. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Hovhannes saw either an ostrich or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Hovhannes did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Hovhannes saw an ostrich. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012032_nonrb | ds | bird | Gaspar | he | saw | fish | a partridge | Gaspar saw either a partridge or some kind of fish. | Gaspar did not see any kind of fish. | Gaspar saw a partridge. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Gaspar saw either a partridge or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Gaspar did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Gaspar saw a partridge. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012033_nonrb | ds | bird | Chin-lung | he | saw | fish | a hawk | Chin-lung saw either a hawk or some kind of fish. | Chin-lung did not see any kind of fish. | Chin-lung saw a hawk. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Chin-lung saw either a hawk or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Chin-lung did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Chin-lung saw a hawk. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012034_nonrb | ds | bird | Rania | she | saw | fish | a toucan | Rania saw either a toucan or some kind of fish. | Rania did not see any kind of fish. | Rania saw a toucan. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Rania saw either a toucan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Rania did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Rania saw a toucan. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012035_nonrb | ds | bird | Vasilije | he | saw | fish | a crow | Vasilije saw either a crow or some kind of fish. | Vasilije did not see any kind of fish. | Vasilije saw a crow. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Vasilije saw either a crow or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Vasilije did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Vasilije saw a crow. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012036_nonrb | ds | bird | Prasert | he | saw | fish | a swan | Prasert saw either a swan or some kind of fish. | Prasert did not see any kind of fish. | Prasert saw a swan. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Prasert saw either a swan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Prasert did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Prasert saw a swan. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012037_nonrb | ds | bird | Paula | she | saw | fish | a parakeet | Paula saw either a parakeet or some kind of fish. | Paula did not see any kind of fish. | Paula saw a parakeet. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Paula saw either a parakeet or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Paula did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Paula saw a parakeet. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012038_nonrb | ds | bird | Gianna | she | saw | fish | a gull | Gianna saw either a gull or some kind of fish. | Gianna did not see any kind of fish. | Gianna saw a gull. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Gianna saw either a gull or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Gianna did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Gianna saw a gull. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012039_nonrb | ds | bird | Stefan | he | saw | fish | a pheasant | Stefan saw either a pheasant or some kind of fish. | Stefan did not see any kind of fish. | Stefan saw a pheasant. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Stefan saw either a pheasant or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Stefan did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Stefan saw a pheasant. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012040_nonrb | ds | bird | Liz | she | saw | fish | a finch | Liz saw either a finch or some kind of fish. | Liz did not see any kind of fish. | Liz saw a finch. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Liz saw either a finch or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Liz did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Liz saw a finch. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012041_nonrb | ds | bird | Shahd | she | saw | fish | a pelican | Shahd saw either a pelican or some kind of fish. | Shahd did not see any kind of fish. | Shahd saw a pelican. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Shahd saw either a pelican or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Shahd did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Shahd saw a pelican. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012042_nonrb | ds | bird | Tomáš | he | saw | fish | a nightingale | Tomáš saw either a nightingale or some kind of fish. | Tomáš did not see any kind of fish. | Tomáš saw a nightingale. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Tomáš saw either a nightingale or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Tomáš did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Tomáš saw a nightingale. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012043_nonrb | ds | bird | Evgeny | he | saw | fish | a peacock | Evgeny saw either a peacock or some kind of fish. | Evgeny did not see any kind of fish. | Evgeny saw a peacock. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Evgeny saw either a peacock or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Evgeny did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Evgeny saw a peacock. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012044_nonrb | ds | bird | Hossein | he | saw | fish | a quail | Hossein saw either a quail or some kind of fish. | Hossein did not see any kind of fish. | Hossein saw a quail. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Hossein saw either a quail or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Hossein did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Hossein saw a quail. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012045_nonrb | ds | bird | Sōma | he | saw | fish | a robin | Sōma saw either a robin or some kind of fish. | Sōma did not see any kind of fish. | Sōma saw a robin. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Sōma saw either a robin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Sōma did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Sōma saw a robin. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012046_nonrb | ds | bird | Ofentse | he | saw | fish | a kingfisher | Ofentse saw either a kingfisher or some kind of fish. | Ofentse did not see any kind of fish. | Ofentse saw a kingfisher. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ofentse saw either a kingfisher or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Ofentse did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Ofentse saw a kingfisher. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012047_nonrb | ds | bird | Keanu | he | saw | fish | a falcon | Keanu saw either a falcon or some kind of fish. | Keanu did not see any kind of fish. | Keanu saw a falcon. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Keanu saw either a falcon or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Keanu did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Keanu saw a falcon. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012048_nonrb | ds | bird | Juliette | she | saw | fish | a flamingo | Juliette saw either a flamingo or some kind of fish. | Juliette did not see any kind of fish. | Juliette saw a flamingo. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Juliette saw either a flamingo or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Juliette did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Juliette saw a flamingo. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012049_nonrb | ds | bird | Peter | he | saw | fish | a puffin | Peter saw either a puffin or some kind of fish. | Peter did not see any kind of fish. | Peter saw a puffin. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Peter saw either a puffin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Peter did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Peter saw a puffin. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012050_nonrb | ds | bird | Fahd | he | saw | fish | a goose | Fahd saw either a goose or some kind of fish. | Fahd did not see any kind of fish. | Fahd saw a goose. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Fahd saw either a goose or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Fahd did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Fahd saw a goose. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012051_nonrb | ds | bird | Yìzé | he | saw | fish | an ostrich | Yìzé saw either an ostrich or some kind of fish. | Yìzé did not see any kind of fish. | Yìzé saw an ostrich. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Yìzé saw either an ostrich or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Yìzé did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Yìzé saw an ostrich. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012052_nonrb | ds | bird | Hadicha | she | saw | fish | a partridge | Hadicha saw either a partridge or some kind of fish. | Hadicha did not see any kind of fish. | Hadicha saw a partridge. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Hadicha saw either a partridge or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Hadicha did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Hadicha saw a partridge. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012053_nonrb | ds | bird | Penelope | she | saw | fish | a hawk | Penelope saw either a hawk or some kind of fish. | Penelope did not see any kind of fish. | Penelope saw a hawk. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Penelope saw either a hawk or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Penelope did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Penelope saw a hawk. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012054_nonrb | ds | bird | Adele | she | saw | fish | a toucan | Adele saw either a toucan or some kind of fish. | Adele did not see any kind of fish. | Adele saw a toucan. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Adele saw either a toucan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Adele did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Adele saw a toucan. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012055_nonrb | ds | bird | Siddhartha | he | saw | fish | a crow | Siddhartha saw either a crow or some kind of fish. | Siddhartha did not see any kind of fish. | Siddhartha saw a crow. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Siddhartha saw either a crow or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Siddhartha did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Siddhartha saw a crow. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012056_nonrb | ds | bird | Ye-jun | he | saw | fish | a swan | Ye-jun saw either a swan or some kind of fish. | Ye-jun did not see any kind of fish. | Ye-jun saw a swan. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ye-jun saw either a swan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Ye-jun did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Ye-jun saw a swan. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012057_nonrb | ds | bird | Mohamed | he | saw | fish | a parakeet | Mohamed saw either a parakeet or some kind of fish. | Mohamed did not see any kind of fish. | Mohamed saw a parakeet. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Mohamed saw either a parakeet or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Mohamed did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Mohamed saw a parakeet. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012058_nonrb | ds | bird | Juliana | she | saw | fish | a gull | Juliana saw either a gull or some kind of fish. | Juliana did not see any kind of fish. | Juliana saw a gull. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Juliana saw either a gull or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Juliana did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Juliana saw a gull. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012059_nonrb | ds | bird | Aldiyar | he | saw | fish | a pheasant | Aldiyar saw either a pheasant or some kind of fish. | Aldiyar did not see any kind of fish. | Aldiyar saw a pheasant. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aldiyar saw either a pheasant or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Aldiyar did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Aldiyar saw a pheasant. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012060_nonrb | ds | bird | Angel | she | saw | fish | a finch | Angel saw either a finch or some kind of fish. | Angel did not see any kind of fish. | Angel saw a finch. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Angel saw either a finch or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Angel did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Angel saw a finch. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012061_nonrb | ds | bird | Eun-woo | he | saw | fish | a pelican | Eun-woo saw either a pelican or some kind of fish. | Eun-woo did not see any kind of fish. | Eun-woo saw a pelican. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Eun-woo saw either a pelican or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Eun-woo did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Eun-woo saw a pelican. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012062_nonrb | ds | bird | Fatin | she | saw | fish | a nightingale | Fatin saw either a nightingale or some kind of fish. | Fatin did not see any kind of fish. | Fatin saw a nightingale. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatin saw either a nightingale or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Fatin did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Fatin saw a nightingale. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012063_nonrb | ds | bird | Ravi | he | saw | fish | a peacock | Ravi saw either a peacock or some kind of fish. | Ravi did not see any kind of fish. | Ravi saw a peacock. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ravi saw either a peacock or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Ravi did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Ravi saw a peacock. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012064_nonrb | ds | bird | Zeinab | she | saw | fish | a quail | Zeinab saw either a quail or some kind of fish. | Zeinab did not see any kind of fish. | Zeinab saw a quail. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Zeinab saw either a quail or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Zeinab did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Zeinab saw a quail. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012065_nonrb | ds | bird | Leah | she | saw | fish | a robin | Leah saw either a robin or some kind of fish. | Leah did not see any kind of fish. | Leah saw a robin. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Leah saw either a robin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Leah did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Leah saw a robin. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012066_nonrb | ds | bird | Yūma | he | saw | fish | a kingfisher | Yūma saw either a kingfisher or some kind of fish. | Yūma did not see any kind of fish. | Yūma saw a kingfisher. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Yūma saw either a kingfisher or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Yūma did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Yūma saw a kingfisher. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012067_nonrb | ds | bird | Asel | she | saw | fish | a falcon | Asel saw either a falcon or some kind of fish. | Asel did not see any kind of fish. | Asel saw a falcon. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Asel saw either a falcon or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Asel did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Asel saw a falcon. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012068_nonrb | ds | bird | Ayalah | she | saw | fish | a flamingo | Ayalah saw either a flamingo or some kind of fish. | Ayalah did not see any kind of fish. | Ayalah saw a flamingo. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayalah saw either a flamingo or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Ayalah did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Ayalah saw a flamingo. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012069_nonrb | ds | bird | Ya-ting | she | saw | fish | a puffin | Ya-ting saw either a puffin or some kind of fish. | Ya-ting did not see any kind of fish. | Ya-ting saw a puffin. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ya-ting saw either a puffin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Ya-ting did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Ya-ting saw a puffin. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012070_nonrb | ds | bird | Samuel | he | saw | fish | a goose | Samuel saw either a goose or some kind of fish. | Samuel did not see any kind of fish. | Samuel saw a goose. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Samuel saw either a goose or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Samuel did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Samuel saw a goose. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012071_nonrb | ds | bird | Yǐmò | she | saw | fish | an ostrich | Yǐmò saw either an ostrich or some kind of fish. | Yǐmò did not see any kind of fish. | Yǐmò saw an ostrich. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Yǐmò saw either an ostrich or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Yǐmò did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Yǐmò saw an ostrich. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012072_nonrb | ds | bird | Amy | she | saw | fish | a partridge | Amy saw either a partridge or some kind of fish. | Amy did not see any kind of fish. | Amy saw a partridge. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Amy saw either a partridge or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Amy did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Amy saw a partridge. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012073_nonrb | ds | bird | Arpi | she | saw | fish | a hawk | Arpi saw either a hawk or some kind of fish. | Arpi did not see any kind of fish. | Arpi saw a hawk. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Arpi saw either a hawk or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Arpi did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Arpi saw a hawk. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012074_nonrb | ds | bird | Adomas | he | saw | fish | a toucan | Adomas saw either a toucan or some kind of fish. | Adomas did not see any kind of fish. | Adomas saw a toucan. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Adomas saw either a toucan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Adomas did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Adomas saw a toucan. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012075_nonrb | ds | bird | Edward | he | saw | fish | a crow | Edward saw either a crow or some kind of fish. | Edward did not see any kind of fish. | Edward saw a crow. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Edward saw either a crow or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Edward did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Edward saw a crow. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012076_nonrb | ds | bird | Ria | she | saw | fish | a swan | Ria saw either a swan or some kind of fish. | Ria did not see any kind of fish. | Ria saw a swan. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ria saw either a swan or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Ria did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Ria saw a swan. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012077_nonrb | ds | bird | Inutsiaq | he | saw | fish | a parakeet | Inutsiaq saw either a parakeet or some kind of fish. | Inutsiaq did not see any kind of fish. | Inutsiaq saw a parakeet. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Inutsiaq saw either a parakeet or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Inutsiaq did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Inutsiaq saw a parakeet. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012078_nonrb | ds | bird | Dhruv | he | saw | fish | a gull | Dhruv saw either a gull or some kind of fish. | Dhruv did not see any kind of fish. | Dhruv saw a gull. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Dhruv saw either a gull or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Dhruv did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Dhruv saw a gull. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012079_nonrb | ds | bird | Aruuke | she | saw | fish | a pheasant | Aruuke saw either a pheasant or some kind of fish. | Aruuke did not see any kind of fish. | Aruuke saw a pheasant. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aruuke saw either a pheasant or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Aruuke did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Aruuke saw a pheasant. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012080_nonrb | ds | bird | Zuzanna | she | saw | fish | a finch | Zuzanna saw either a finch or some kind of fish. | Zuzanna did not see any kind of fish. | Zuzanna saw a finch. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Zuzanna saw either a finch or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Zuzanna did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Zuzanna saw a finch. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012081_nonrb | ds | bird | Nikola | he | saw | fish | a pelican | Nikola saw either a pelican or some kind of fish. | Nikola did not see any kind of fish. | Nikola saw a pelican. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Nikola saw either a pelican or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Nikola did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nikola saw a pelican. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012082_nonrb | ds | bird | Farah | she | saw | fish | a nightingale | Farah saw either a nightingale or some kind of fish. | Farah did not see any kind of fish. | Farah saw a nightingale. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Farah saw either a nightingale or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Farah did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Farah saw a nightingale. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012083_nonrb | ds | bird | Refael | he | saw | fish | a peacock | Refael saw either a peacock or some kind of fish. | Refael did not see any kind of fish. | Refael saw a peacock. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Refael saw either a peacock or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Refael did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Refael saw a peacock. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012084_nonrb | ds | bird | Sarah | she | saw | fish | a quail | Sarah saw either a quail or some kind of fish. | Sarah did not see any kind of fish. | Sarah saw a quail. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Sarah saw either a quail or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Sarah did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Sarah saw a quail. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012085_nonrb | ds | bird | Si-woo | he | saw | fish | a robin | Si-woo saw either a robin or some kind of fish. | Si-woo did not see any kind of fish. | Si-woo saw a robin. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Si-woo saw either a robin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Si-woo did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Si-woo saw a robin. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012086_nonrb | ds | bird | Shivansh | he | saw | fish | a kingfisher | Shivansh saw either a kingfisher or some kind of fish. | Shivansh did not see any kind of fish. | Shivansh saw a kingfisher. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Shivansh saw either a kingfisher or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Shivansh did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Shivansh saw a kingfisher. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012087_nonrb | ds | bird | Petar | he | saw | fish | a falcon | Petar saw either a falcon or some kind of fish. | Petar did not see any kind of fish. | Petar saw a falcon. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Petar saw either a falcon or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Petar did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Petar saw a falcon. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012088_nonrb | ds | bird | Finn | he | saw | fish | a flamingo | Finn saw either a flamingo or some kind of fish. | Finn did not see any kind of fish. | Finn saw a flamingo. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Finn saw either a flamingo or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Finn did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Finn saw a flamingo. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0012089_nonrb | ds | bird | Aya | she | saw | fish | a puffin | Aya saw either a puffin or some kind of fish. | Aya did not see any kind of fish. | Aya saw a puffin. | true | Premises: Suppose we are told that Aya saw either a puffin or some kind of fish. However, as a matter of fact, Aya did not see any kind of fish.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Aya saw a puffin. | Nothing follows |
RULEBREAKER_0011890_rb | ds | bird | Lív | she | caught | bird | a goose | Lív caught either a goose or some kind of bird. | Lív did not catch any kind of bird. | Lív caught a goose. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Lív caught either a goose or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Lív did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Lív caught a goose. |
RULEBREAKER_0011891_rb | ds | bird | Teo | he | caught | bird | an ostrich | Teo caught either an ostrich or some kind of bird. | Teo did not catch any kind of bird. | Teo caught an ostrich. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Teo caught either an ostrich or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Teo did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Teo caught an ostrich. |
RULEBREAKER_0011892_rb | ds | bird | Levi | he | caught | bird | a partridge | Levi caught either a partridge or some kind of bird. | Levi did not catch any kind of bird. | Levi caught a partridge. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Levi caught either a partridge or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Levi did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Levi caught a partridge. |
RULEBREAKER_0011893_rb | ds | bird | Igor | he | caught | bird | a hawk | Igor caught either a hawk or some kind of bird. | Igor did not catch any kind of bird. | Igor caught a hawk. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Igor caught either a hawk or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Igor did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Igor caught a hawk. |
RULEBREAKER_0011894_rb | ds | bird | Matěj | he | caught | bird | a toucan | Matěj caught either a toucan or some kind of bird. | Matěj did not catch any kind of bird. | Matěj caught a toucan. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Matěj caught either a toucan or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Matěj did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Matěj caught a toucan. |
RULEBREAKER_0011895_rb | ds | bird | Wen-Hsiung | he | caught | bird | a crow | Wen-Hsiung caught either a crow or some kind of bird. | Wen-Hsiung did not catch any kind of bird. | Wen-Hsiung caught a crow. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Wen-Hsiung caught either a crow or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Wen-Hsiung did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Wen-Hsiung caught a crow. |
RULEBREAKER_0011896_rb | ds | bird | Olivér | he | caught | bird | a swan | Olivér caught either a swan or some kind of bird. | Olivér did not catch any kind of bird. | Olivér caught a swan. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Olivér caught either a swan or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Olivér did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Olivér caught a swan. |
RULEBREAKER_0011897_rb | ds | bird | Valentina | she | caught | bird | a parakeet | Valentina caught either a parakeet or some kind of bird. | Valentina did not catch any kind of bird. | Valentina caught a parakeet. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Valentina caught either a parakeet or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Valentina did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Valentina caught a parakeet. |
RULEBREAKER_0011898_rb | ds | bird | Paraskevi | she | caught | bird | a gull | Paraskevi caught either a gull or some kind of bird. | Paraskevi did not catch any kind of bird. | Paraskevi caught a gull. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Paraskevi caught either a gull or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Paraskevi did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Paraskevi caught a gull. |
RULEBREAKER_0011899_rb | ds | bird | Ajla | she | caught | bird | a pheasant | Ajla caught either a pheasant or some kind of bird. | Ajla did not catch any kind of bird. | Ajla caught a pheasant. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Ajla caught either a pheasant or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Ajla did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Ajla caught a pheasant. |
RULEBREAKER_0011900_rb | ds | bird | Amal | she | caught | bird | a finch | Amal caught either a finch or some kind of bird. | Amal did not catch any kind of bird. | Amal caught a finch. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Amal caught either a finch or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Amal did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Amal caught a finch. |
RULEBREAKER_0011901_rb | ds | bird | Eithan | he | caught | bird | a pelican | Eithan caught either a pelican or some kind of bird. | Eithan did not catch any kind of bird. | Eithan caught a pelican. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Eithan caught either a pelican or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Eithan did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Eithan caught a pelican. |
RULEBREAKER_0011902_rb | ds | bird | Alexandru | he | caught | bird | a nightingale | Alexandru caught either a nightingale or some kind of bird. | Alexandru did not catch any kind of bird. | Alexandru caught a nightingale. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Alexandru caught either a nightingale or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Alexandru did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Alexandru caught a nightingale. |
RULEBREAKER_0011903_rb | ds | bird | Inaya | she | caught | bird | a peacock | Inaya caught either a peacock or some kind of bird. | Inaya did not catch any kind of bird. | Inaya caught a peacock. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Inaya caught either a peacock or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Inaya did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Inaya caught a peacock. |
RULEBREAKER_0011904_rb | ds | bird | Tamar | she | caught | bird | a quail | Tamar caught either a quail or some kind of bird. | Tamar did not catch any kind of bird. | Tamar caught a quail. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Tamar caught either a quail or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Tamar did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Tamar caught a quail. |
RULEBREAKER_0011905_rb | ds | bird | Kyriaki | she | caught | bird | a robin | Kyriaki caught either a robin or some kind of bird. | Kyriaki did not catch any kind of bird. | Kyriaki caught a robin. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Kyriaki caught either a robin or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Kyriaki did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Kyriaki caught a robin. |
RULEBREAKER_0011906_rb | ds | bird | Gagik | he | caught | bird | a kingfisher | Gagik caught either a kingfisher or some kind of bird. | Gagik did not catch any kind of bird. | Gagik caught a kingfisher. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Gagik caught either a kingfisher or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Gagik did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Gagik caught a kingfisher. |
RULEBREAKER_0011907_rb | ds | bird | Kai | he | caught | bird | a falcon | Kai caught either a falcon or some kind of bird. | Kai did not catch any kind of bird. | Kai caught a falcon. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Kai caught either a falcon or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Kai did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Kai caught a falcon. |
RULEBREAKER_0011908_rb | ds | bird | Selma | she | caught | bird | a flamingo | Selma caught either a flamingo or some kind of bird. | Selma did not catch any kind of bird. | Selma caught a flamingo. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Selma caught either a flamingo or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Selma did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Selma caught a flamingo. |
RULEBREAKER_0011909_rb | ds | bird | Danijel | he | caught | bird | a puffin | Danijel caught either a puffin or some kind of bird. | Danijel did not catch any kind of bird. | Danijel caught a puffin. | false | Premises: Suppose we are told that Danijel caught either a puffin or some kind of bird. However, as a matter of fact, Danijel did not catch any kind of bird.
What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise. | Nothing follows | Danijel caught a puffin. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.