THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 stringlengths 1 809 ⌀ | Comparative Table of IPC and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 stringclasses 43
values | Unnamed: 1 stringclasses 340
values | Unnamed: 2 stringclasses 17
values | Unnamed: 3 stringclasses 35
values | Unnamed: 4 stringclasses 315
values | Unnamed: 5 stringclasses 15
values | Unnamed: 6 stringclasses 337
values | Unnamed: 7 stringclasses 15
values | Unnamed: 8 stringclasses 1
value | Unnamed: 9 stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
43. The right of private defence of property,–– | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(a) commences when a reasonable apprehension of danger to the property | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
commences; | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(b) against theft continues till the offender has effected his retreat with the | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
property or either the assistance of the public authorities is obtained, or the propertyhas been recovered; | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(c) against robbery continues as long as the offender causes or attempts to | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint or as long as the fear of instantdeath or of instant hurt or of instant personal restraint continues; | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(d) against criminal trespass or mischief continues as long as the offender | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
continues in the commission of criminal trespass or mischief; | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(e) against house-breaking after sunset and before sun rise continues as long as | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
the house-trespass which has been begun by such house-breaking continues. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
44. If in the exercise of the right of private defence against an assault which reasonably | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectuallyWhen suchright extendsto causing anyharm otherthan death. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Commencement | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
andcontinuance ofright of privatedefence of thebody. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
When right of | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
privatedefence ofpropertyextends tocausing death. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
When such | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
right extendsto causing anyharm otherthan death. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Commencement | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
andcontinuanceof right ofprivatedefence ofproperty. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Right of private | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
defence againstdeadly assaultwhen there isrisk of harm toinnocent person.5 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
10 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
15 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
20 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
25 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
30 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
35 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
40 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
4517 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defence | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
extends to the running of that risk. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Illustration . | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
A is attacked by a mob who attempt to murder him. He cannot effectually exercise his | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
right of private defence without firing on the mob, and he cannot fire without risk of harming | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
young children who are mingled with the mob. A commits no offence if by so firing he harmsany of the children. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
CHAPTER IV | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
O | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
F ABETMENT , CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND ATTEMPT | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Of Abetment | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
45. A person abets the doing of a thing, who— | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(a) instigates any person to do that thing; or | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(b) engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(c) intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Explanation 1.—A person who, by wilful misrepresentation, or by wilful concealment | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
of a material fact which he is bound to disclose, voluntarily causes or procures, or attemptsto cause or procure, a thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that thing. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Illustration . | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
A, a public officer, is authorised by a warrant from a Court to apprehend Z. B, knowing | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
that fact and also that C is not Z, wilfully represents to A that C is Z, and thereby intentionally | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
causes A to apprehend C. Here B abets by instigation the apprehension of C. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Explanation 2. —Whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitates the | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
46. A person abets an offence, who abets either the commission of an offence, or the | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Explanation 1. —The abetment of the illegal omission of an act may amount to an | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
offence although the abettor may not himself be bound to do that act. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Explanation 2. —To constitute the offence of abetment it is not necessary that the act | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
abetted should be committed, or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should becaused. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Illustration s. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(a) A instigates B to murder C. B refuses to do so. A is guilty of abetting B to commit | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
murder. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(b) A instigates B to murder D. B in pursuance of the instigation stabs D. D recovers | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
from the wound. A is guilty of instigating B to commit murder. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Explanation 3.—It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable by law | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
of committing an offence, or that he should have the same guilty intention or knowledge as | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
that of the abettor, or any guilty intention or knowledge.Abetment of | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
thing. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Abettor.5 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
10 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
15 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
20 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
25 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
30 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
35 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
4018 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Illustration s. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(a) A, with a guilty intention, abets a child or a person with mental illness to commit an | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
offence, and having the same intention as A. Here A, whether the act be committed or not, isguilty of abetting an offence. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(b) A, with the intention of murdering Z, instigates B, a child under seven years of age, | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
to do an act which causes Z’s death. B, in consequence of the abetment, does the act in theabsence of A and thereby causes Z’s death. Here, though B was not capable by law ofcommitting an offence, A is liable to be punished in the same manner as if B had been capableby law of committing an offence, and had committed mu... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(c) A instigates B to set fire to a dwelling-house. B, in consequence of his mental | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
illness, being incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is wrong orcontrary to law, sets fire to the house in consequence of A’s instigation. B has committed nooffence, but A is guilty of abetting the offence of setting fire to a dwelling-house, and is liableto the punishment provided for th... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
(d) A, intending to cause a theft to be committed, instigates B to take property belonging | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
to Z out of Z’s possession. A induces B to believe that the property belongs to A. B takes theproperty out of Z’s possession, in good faith, believing it to be A’s property. B, acting underthis misconception, does not take dishonestly, and therefore does not commit theft. But A isguilty of abetting theft, and is liable... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Explanation 4. —The abetment of an offence being an offence, the abetment of such | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
an abetment is also an offence. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Illustration . | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
A instigates B to instigate C to murder Z. B accordingly instigates C to murder Z, and | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
C commits that offence in consequence of B’s instigation. B is liable to be punished for hisoffence with the punishment for murder; and, as A instigated B to commit the offence, A isalso liable to the same punishment. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Explanation 5. —It is not necessary to the commission of the offence of abetment by | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
conspiracy that the abettor should concert the offence with the person who commits it. It issufficient if he engages in the conspiracy in pursuance of which the offence is committed. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Illustration . | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
A concerts with B a plan for poisoning Z. It is agreed that A shall administer the poison. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
B then explains the plan to C mentioning that a third person is to administer the poison, butwithout mentioning A’s name. C agrees to procure the poison, and procures and delivers it toB for the purpose of its being used in the manner explained. A administers the poison; Z diesin consequence. Here, though A and C have ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.