Datasets:
Tasks:
Feature Extraction
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
csv
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
License:
| task_categories: | |
| - feature-extraction | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| tags: | |
| - biology | |
| - chemistry | |
| - drug | |
| license: apache-2.0 | |
| size_categories: | |
| - 1M<n<10M | |
| 🔧[Code](https://github.com/spatialdatasciencegroup/DecoyDB), 📂[Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/jiangteam/DecoyDB) | |
| ## Dataset Summary | |
| DecoyDB is a curated dataset of high-resolution protein-ligand complexes and their associated decoy structures. It is designed to support research on graph contrastive learning, binding affinity prediction, and structure-based drug discovery. The dataset is derived from experimentally resolved complexes and refined to ensure data quality. | |
| Predicting the binding affinity of protein-ligand complexes plays a vital role in drug discovery. Unfortunately, progress has been hindered by the lack of large-scale and high-quality binding affinity labels. The widely used PDBbind dataset has fewer than 20K labeled complexes. Self-supervised learning, especially graph contrastive learning (GCL), provides a unique opportunity to break the barrier by pretraining graph neural network models based on vast unlabeled complexes and fine-tuning the models on much fewer labeled complexes. However, the problem faces unique challenges, including a lack of a comprehensive unlabeled dataset with well-defined positive/negative complex pairs and the need to design GCL algorithms that incorporate the unique characteristics of such data. To fill the gap, we propose DecoyDB, a large-scale, structure-aware dataset specifically designed for self-supervised GCL on protein–ligand complexes. DecoyDB consists of high-resolution ground truth complexes and diverse decoy structures with computationally generated binding poses that range from realistic to suboptimal. Each decoy is annotated with a Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) from the native pose. We further design a customized GCL framework to pretrain graph neural networks based on DecoyDB and fine-tune the models with labels from PDBbind. Extensive experiments confirm that models pretrained with DecoyDB achieve superior accuracy, sample efficiency, and generalizability. | |
| ## Data Structure | |
| Each protein-ligand complex is stored in a nested directory under DecoyDB/, using the format: | |
| ```plaintext | |
| DecoyDB | |
| ├── README.md # This file | |
| ├── complexes.csv # Complex ID and paths for the data | |
| ├── data.zip # Structures for proteins, ligands and decoys | |
| ├── {prefix}/ # {prefix} = first 2 characters of the complex ID (e.g., '1A', '2B') | |
| │ └── {complex_id}/ # Unique identifier for each complex (e.g., 1A2C_H1Q) | |
| │ ├── {complex_id}_ligand.pdbqt # Ligand structure in AutoDock format | |
| │ ├── {complex_id}_target.pdbqt # Protein structure in AutoDock format | |
| │ ├── {complex_id}_decoys.pdbqt # Concatenated decoy structures | |
| │ └── {complex_id}_decoys_scores.csv # Corresponding RMSD scores for each decoy | |
| ``` | |
| The data.zip can be found in assets branch. | |
| ## Dataset Details | |
| ### Dataset Refinement | |
| To construct DecoyDB, we first filtered protein–ligand complexes from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with a resolution ≤ 2.5 Å and applied the following refinement steps: | |
| - Removed ligands with molecular weights outside the (50, 1000) range. | |
| - Excluded complexes involving metal clusters, monoatomic ions, and common crystallization molecules. | |
| - Retained ligands with elements limited to C, N, O, H, S, P, and halogens. | |
| - Retained those protein chains with at least one atom within 10 Å of the ligand. | |
| - Saved the ligand and protein separately. | |
| ### Decoy Generation | |
| For each refined protein–ligand complex, **100 decoy poses** were generated using **AutoDock Vina 1.2**, with a 5 Å padding grid box and an exhaustiveness parameter of 8 and remove unrealistic generated structures. | |
| ## Dataset Statistics | |
| - Number of protein–ligand complexes: **61,104** | |
| - Number of decoys: **5,353,307** | |
| - Average number of decoys per complex: **88** | |
| - Average RMSD: **7.22 Å** | |
| - RMSD range: **[0.03, 25.56] Å** | |
| ## Contact | |
| - Yupu Zhang (y.zhang1@ufl.edu), Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida | |
| - Zhe Jiang (zhe.jiang@ufl.edu), Lead PI, Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida | |
| - Chenglong Li (lic@ufl.edu), Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Florida | |
| - Gustavo Seabra (seabra@cop.ufl.edu), Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Florida | |
| - Yanjun Li (yanjun.li@ufl.edu), Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Florida | |
| ## Citation | |
| If you use this dataset, please cite our paper: | |
| ```bibtex | |
| @inproceedings{ | |
| zhang2025decoydb, | |
| title={Decoy{DB}: A Dataset for Graph Contrastive Learning in Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction}, | |
| author={Yupu Zhang and Zelin Xu and Tingsong Xiao and Gustavo Seabra and Yanjun Li and Chenglong Li and Zhe Jiang}, | |
| booktitle={The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track}, | |
| year={2025}, | |
| url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=lzLo5bRgQC} | |
| } |