data_type stringclasses 2 values | dog_whistle stringlengths 2 26 | dog_whistle_root stringlengths 2 98 ⌀ | ingroup stringclasses 17 values | content stringlengths 2 83.3k | date stringlengths 10 10 ⌀ | speaker stringlengths 4 62 ⌀ | chamber stringclasses 2 values | reference stringlengths 24 31 ⌀ | community stringclasses 11 values | __index_level_0__ int64 0 35.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
colloquial | blue | blueish | antisemitic | After this he can't complain Bout his blue collar job 😉 | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,142 |
colloquial | working class | working class | racist | I don’t think he’s talking about just generic rich people. He’s talking about the beltway elites. The rich men north of Richmond is DC. Some of the richest counties in the country. The political wealth around NOVA is astounding. Those people don’t know shit about the struggles of normal working class Americans. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,143 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | He relies on using "the rich" in his characterization. That's literally the opening to thought terminating cliche. Does it become too complicated for him to single out politicians or harder to lyricize? | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,144 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | At the battle of Okinawa, an original Japanese island, 149,611 Okinawan *civilians* were either killed in the crossfire, killed by the japanese army to keep them from us, or were convinced to kill themselves and their children to prevent "capture". That's not including 110,000 Japanese military personnel that all died on a single island. And you doubt that the death toll would have been far higher while invading the Mainland? | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,145 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | To prevent identity politics from dominating the headlines of this subreddit we have decided to implement color blind headline rule. This supports our existing rule of no racism. Do not include race based words in titles of submissions. This post has been sent to the spam catcher for review it may be restored after mods review the submission, or you can delete this submission and resubmit without any race based words (Black/White/Asian/Latino) in the submission title. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,146 |
colloquial | big pharma | big pharma | anti-vax | But they're still gonna shut it down because they can't let anyone compete with big pharma and the university cartels. The only reason this is in the news at all is shitty zoning regulations that shouldn't exist, anal retentive codes about garden hoses, and yellow journalism whoring itself for the state. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,147 |
colloquial | shut it down | the goyim know | antisemitic | But they're still gonna shut it down because they can't let anyone compete with big pharma and the university cartels. The only reason this is in the news at all is shitty zoning regulations that shouldn't exist, anal retentive codes about garden hoses, and yellow journalism whoring itself for the state. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,148 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | Let's start hacking up a child's body based on zero evidence- that sounds like a great idea. Children cannot consent for themselves but why? Because their frontal cortex is not fully developed which means parents are the guardians of their children. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,149 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | In California, a judge can determine if you are abusing your child or not based on denying them "gender affirming care" (which the left is vague on, but usually entails hormone blockers/ hormones, and surgery- both of which cause permeant damage to a child). If the judge determines you are indeed abusing your child by not providing gender affirming care, the state can take your child away from you where they will be taken away to some "gender affirming care facility". This is one of the sickest things I have ever seen. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,150 |
colloquial | car salesmen | car salesman | anti-liberal | 2. High-functioning megalomaniac sociopaths are attracted to power and will spend their entire lives and risk everything for a shot at it. Most of them don't make it in and end up as little more then over-glorified used car salesmen, but the really clever ones make it to the top. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,151 |
colloquial | quotas | quotas | racist | The investigation began after [4 troopers were caught by the news falsifying tickets in 2018]( to boost their productivity numbers as to hit those "not quotas" and get overtime. This is a felony, but none have been charged yet. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,152 |
colloquial | terrorists | Islamic terrorists | Islamophobic | Reauthorizing this *Undetectable Firearms* Act won't keep anyone safe from criminals or terrorists.👏 | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,153 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | New Problem #2: The law bans any gun with a single "major component" which is undetectable to their standards. A "major component" includes "a frame or receiver" of a gun--which Biden just tried to redefine. The proposed rule would have had as many as 16 frames and receivers on just one Glock. So, with a simple change of definitions like we just saw, this could be weaponized into a massive gun ban. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,154 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | This reminds me of a discussion I had at a party about how arbitrary speed limits are. He knew I was wrong because his wife works as an engineer for the highway department. She has book after books that set the standards for how fast the speed limit should be based on climate, road surface, banking angle, etc. This sounds sciencey, so I asked which vehicle and conditions those books were set for: a tractor trailer in the rain, or a Porsche on a dry road in the summer. To his credit, he didn't know, but he brought his wife over to find out. The answer? A tractor trailer in the rain. So, the speeds at which you and I are being pulled over for and made to pay hundreds of dollars in fines are ostensibly there because going faster would be unsafe, but in reality they're nowhere near the safety limits for the vehicles and conditions in which we actually drive. You know: bullshit. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,155 |
colloquial | terrorism | Islamic terrorism | Islamophobic | How is deciding not to spend my money somewhere terrorism? Lol | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,156 |
colloquial | terrorism | Islamic terrorism | Islamophobic | It's the crazy "progressives" who call everything they don't like racism, terrorism, etc. But they constitute a large chuck of the managerial class in government, media, etc. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,157 |
colloquial | terrorism | Islamic terrorism | Islamophobic | The left is falsely proclaiming that the right is committing terrorism because we don't like them trying to sexualize and exploit our children. Honestly, it's fucking disgusting that the left is pushing all of this alphabet mafia shit on children who can't even make decisions for themselves. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,158 |
colloquial | terrorism | Islamic terrorism | Islamophobic | There were a couple videos of conservative people heckling target employees. Leftists look at that and proclaim that is terrorism! | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,159 |
colloquial | terrorism | Islamic terrorism | Islamophobic | While not terrorism, there may be something to be said about whether you tolerate or not tolerate heckling | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,160 |
colloquial | terrorist | Islamic terrorists | Islamophobic | Sounds like something a terrorist would say. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,161 |
colloquial | blue | blueish | antisemitic | There are plenty of midwits of all political stripes who would find this racist, and plenty of people of all intelligences that at least find it in bad taste. You can say “who cares,” but the whole point of the LP is drawing blue-pilled people to our cause and educating them. The cost/benefit of this type of tweet is so obviously high that only a self-righteous libertarian with the social intelligence of a toddler would find it wise to post. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,162 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | Abolishing welfare is seen racist. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,163 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | >Abolishing welfare is seen racist. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,164 |
colloquial | affirmative action | affirmative action | racist | Should be become lower tax liberals which the most radical proposal is a 5% tax cut. Where we maintain socially liberal programs like affirmative action, violating property rights, and cut 1% of a minor departments, sign pledges to maintain SS/Medicare or farming subsidies. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,165 |
colloquial | tax cut | cut taxes | racist | Should be become lower tax liberals which the most radical proposal is a 5% tax cut. Where we maintain socially liberal programs like affirmative action, violating property rights, and cut 1% of a minor departments, sign pledges to maintain SS/Medicare or farming subsidies. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,166 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | Should be become lower tax liberals which the most radical proposal is a 5% tax cut. Where we maintain socially liberal programs like affirmative action, violating property rights, and cut 1% of a minor departments, sign pledges to maintain SS/Medicare or farming subsidies. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,167 |
colloquial | the Fed | Federal Reserve | antisemitic | We can criticize the Fed, call for the abolition of the alphabet agencies, advocate a national divorce, push for the right for everyone to have as many guns and drugs as they want, and promote literally every other radical liberty-oriented take without making dumb racist jokes and gloating over someone crying at their father's casket on the anniversary of his death. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,168 |
colloquial | the Fed | Federal Reserve | antisemitic | Are progressives going to call us racists and fascists either way? Sure. But how many normies going to believe such accusations if they are in response to a radical call to action against the Fed, and how many normies are going to believe such accusations if they are in response to LPNH's MLK Day tweet? | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,169 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | It's not the left you are trying to convince, it's normal ass people who might not be decided but might vote based on their idea of common sense, and this isn't how you fucking do that | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,170 |
colloquial | the Fed | Federal Reserve | antisemitic | For God's sake, we literally want to abolish the FBI and the Fed. In what world do you think we'd ever be given a fair shake by the Establishment? | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,171 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | No entity that is even remotely "mainstream" has the balls to cover RFK and what he actually says with a single shred of ethics. I don't even agree with most of what he says, as I'm sure most here don't. That said, just like with Trump, I find myself rooting for RFK just because these institutions are so unreasonable and lie so hard it's just reflexive at this point. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,172 |
colloquial | big pharma | big pharma | anti-vax | Probably because they would lose half their ad revenue if they let an anti big pharma candidate talk. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,173 |
colloquial | blue | blueish | antisemitic | This is why the video is getting down-voted into oblivion and why it is such a terrible hit piece from Reason. This is also why I stopped going to Reason- The blue-pilled "libertarians" from Reason act like a bunch of winey progressives: Trump is racist, DeSantis is racist, white supremacy is a threat, denounce Nazism and white supremacy, BLM is good, etc. They also have a worse case of TDS than CNN or MSNBC (not a defense of Trump, just an acknowledgement). | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,174 |
colloquial | big pharma | big pharma | anti-vax | The COVID jabs (none meet the definition of a vaccine) are undeniably bad. All the data shows they caused harm, even the data from the trials which big pharma and the government tried to keep hidden. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,175 |
colloquial | Amish | Amish | racist | What RFK is also getting at is "Why do we have such an increase in autism and other childhood disabilities or disorders?" It does correlate with an increase in the number of childhood vaccines over the past 20-30 years. Groups which don't follow the vaccine schedule, such as the Amish, haven't seen that increase. Is it mercury, is it one of the shots, etc.? No idea, but the correlation warrants further investigation. Most people would agree that vaccines from the 60s and 70s are relatively safe. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,176 |
colloquial | big pharma | big pharma | anti-vax | Further, because big pharma gets immunity from a lot of lawsuits if vaccines are on the childhood immunization schedule, it begs the question of whether that schedule would be so large if it wasn't for the legal immunity. Basically, it's hard to challenge, and you can't profit by challenging it. In fact, you'll lose money in legal fees. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,177 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | What people are more upset about is that days before he did an interview and they didn't address a single one of these criticisms. Then, a couple of days after the interview, they drop the hit piece. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,178 |
colloquial | blue | blueish | antisemitic | Reason are blue-pilled libertarians at best and part of the establishment at worst. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,179 |
colloquial | blue | blueish | antisemitic | >This is why the video is getting down-voted into oblivion and why it is such a terrible hit piece from Reason. This is also why I stopped going to Reason- The blue-pilled "libertarians" from Reason act like a bunch of winey progressives: Trump is racist, DeSantis is racist, white supremacy is a threat, denounce Nazism and white supremacy, BLM is good, etc. They also have a worse case of TDS than CNN or MSNBC (not a defense of Trump, just an acknowledgement). | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,180 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | If you defend someone for espousing a single libertarian view when they rest of his platform is authoritarian, you're not defending liberty. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,181 |
colloquial | blue | blueish | antisemitic | NH also is not a "home rule" state so cities cannot make local ordinances unless it's specifically allowed by state law. Thus, blue cities cannot ban things they don't like, like firearms. Also, no mayors who think they're the main character (mostly). | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,182 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | I love how they try to deride us and it just makes people go, "based". | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,183 |
colloquial | extremists | Islamic extremists | Islamophobic | Can ⅓ of the legislative body be labeled 'extremists'? Aren't they part of the mainstream at that amount? | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,184 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | 4. Do immigrants consume more government services (welfare, education, public safety, etc.) than their economic activity finances. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,185 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | The last two are the bigger issue. The workers are replaced at lower wages, but because of regulation, new opportunities are not created in sufficient amounts. In a more free economy, the natural low skill workers would often become supervisors to the Immigrants, and cost of living would decrease. Further, the immigrants have kids, who go to publicly funded schools. Property zoning prevents construction of new homes or apartments. This all causes cost of living to increase. If the immigrants have a culture which is less respective of property rights, then crime goes up, which hampers the economy. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,186 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | >Do immigrants consume more government services (welfare, education, public safety, etc.) than their economic activity finances. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,187 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | > If the immigrants have a culture which is less respective of property rights, then crime goes up, which hampers the economy. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,188 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | the same thing happens with natural population growth of the number of domestic cultural groups that have less respect for property rights. the problem is the state's monopoly on property protection, not immigration | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,189 |
colloquial | urban | inner city | racist | Also land amount is fixed but the utility of the land can be dramatically different over time, a piece of un-tillable land in the middle of nowhere isn't worth much but if the area is urbanized then it can be developed into something useful in an urban setting | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,190 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | I am not sure libertarians have a special version of property rights in land other than rejecting conquest as legitimate. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,191 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | Since prehistoric times property rights in land are secured primarily through original possession, improvement, inheritance, conquest, exchange, and gambling. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,192 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | It may be semantic but I see conquest as a different behavior than property rights. Conquest seems to be more of a dominance behavior, i.e. yielding to status or power or to signals that tend to correlate with power. Property rights seem to be a territorial behavior, i.e. yielding to prior occupant. Property rights seem to be morally preferred by most people, since even conquers often appeal to a prior claim of ancestors. "We were here first." | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,193 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | The essays in this book present one kind of challenge to this view. Looking into the origins and histories of the three major Abrahamic religions – Judaism, Christianity and Islam – the authors find market exchange to have been important in them all. So, to take one case, volume editor Benedikt Koehler argues in one of his contributions that property rights were essential in early Christianity. Koehler notes that early Christianity specifically linked property rights and poor relief in ways quite distinct from any attitude of the prior Roman world. In particular, in the work of Ambrose of Milan, private property offered the means of redemption through the provision of poor relief. Furthermore, Koehler charts how the medieval controversy over Christ’s ownership of property was ultimately resolved in favour of such ownership by Pope John XXII in 1329. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,194 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | The economics of property rights in early and medieval Christianity by Benedikt Koehler – 71 | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,195 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | Open borders aren't libertarian, because every libertarian advocates for personal property and private ownership of land. Crossing land without permission is trespassing right? The problem is that the government does a shit job enforcing property rights. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,196 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | That makes sense within that system, but I think the system itself is sick, and I support moving to a system based on individual choice in law, without elites choosing their own to rule. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,197 |
colloquial | big pharma | big pharma | anti-vax | At least he's bringing attention to proxy wars and government being in bed with big pharma. He's also fighting to expose the harm of the COVID jab and how decisions were driven by ideology and money rather than science. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,198 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | So his principles are based on how popular they are .... so he's no different than any other career politician. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,199 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | The difference is that Ron Paul's principles were immutable and his votes were not based on how popular they were by congress. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,200 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | I feel like if we could get a president that was good on a single major topic like economics or foreign policy it would be pretty big win. All of the presidents in my lifetime have been Ls for the country, and have just been destroying or watching the destruction happen. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,201 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | Where have I heard that before....oh every single politician to ever be in politics | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,202 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | I believe that vaping is likely the #1 public health breakthrough in resent history. More impactful then any single 'breakthrough' in vaccine research, cancer research, and other medical research done in the past 20 years. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,203 |
colloquial | neoliberalism | neoliberal | liberal | Another way of phrasing this, would be in the inverse - i.e. Capitalism is voluntary *by definition* so if a transaction is occurring under coercion then it's not capitalism *by definition*. And as suggested, those people think they have a problem with capitalism but really what they're criticizing is all the ways that neoliberalism deviated from free market principles. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,204 |
colloquial | blue | blueish | antisemitic | It's not a question of "national sovereignty." It's a question of who declared martial law in the first place? "If we have marital law." So it just happened, out of the blue, and oh well, geez, nothing we can do! | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,205 |
colloquial | neolibs | neoliberal | liberal | They're going to stay a dictatorship backed by neolibs and neocons until they've outlived their usefulness and we regime change them. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,206 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | Florida stomping on private property rights? A-OK! | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,207 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | I think you've misread some stuff. Libertarian philosophy is based upon self-ownership, or personal sovereignty. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,208 |
colloquial | thugs | thug | racist | When you let the entity you're attempting to constrain via a constitution decide for itself when its constitution applies, guess what they're going to decide. And what these particular thugs have done is throw the political opposition in jail for seeking peace during a boarder dispute and extending the period of martial law. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,209 |
colloquial | shut it down | the goyim know | antisemitic | Or shut it down completely... | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,210 |
colloquial | special interest | special interests | antisemitic | Tell Sununu to stop holding his special interest contracts w his lobbyist friends over legalizing recreational use of marijuana for adults in this state. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,211 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | I did vote for Trump in 2016, but went back to the (L) ticket for Jorgensen in 2020. My primary (almost single-issue) concern when it comes to Federal candidates is: | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,212 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | Why does this guy think the thing the Mexican government needs to do is *increase* its welfare state in order to keep people in? | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,213 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | Why doesn't this guy have any interest in reducing or eliminating the welfare state? He seems much more interested in preserving the US welfare state against anything that might motivate a republican to do something about the welfare state. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,214 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | Illegal immigrants are a net drain on the welfare state and in no way contribute to it. The additional burden on Schools, healthcare, and other taxpayer-funded services takes decades to pay off, if ever. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,215 |
colloquial | illegal immigrant | illegal immigrant | anti-Latino | No amount of deliberate obfuscation between legal and illegal immigrants would change that. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,216 |
colloquial | illegal immigrants | illegal immigrant | anti-Latino | No amount of deliberate obfuscation between legal and illegal immigrants would change that. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,217 |
colloquial | illegal immigrant | illegal immigrant | anti-Latino | that is actually just false, when an illegal immigrant acquires a fraudulent social security card its so that they can work a job and pay social security tax, which is propping up that particular pyramid scheme | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,218 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | Illegal immigration violates the core tenets of property rights. See Hans Hoppe for more. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,219 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | The system is basically based on the idea that you will eventually give up after being given the run around for years | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,220 |
colloquial | activist judge | judicial activism | conservative | NYC and other gun grabbing states and cities make a ridiculous law. The local activist judges let it stand. When it finally gets to SCOTUS, it's struck down. So the gun grabbers make a new law which is *slightly* different from the one which was just rejected, and the process repeats. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,221 |
colloquial | activist judges | judicial activism | conservative | NYC and other gun grabbing states and cities make a ridiculous law. The local activist judges let it stand. When it finally gets to SCOTUS, it's struck down. So the gun grabbers make a new law which is *slightly* different from the one which was just rejected, and the process repeats. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,222 |
colloquial | blue | blueish | antisemitic | I'm turning blue holding my breath... | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,223 |
colloquial | war on drugs | war on drugs | racist | We've got to end this idiotic war on drugs. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,224 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | Once a city because majority renters the idea of property rights goes out the window. In places like SF they vote for more and more taxes on property owners and then get angry that property owners raise rents and demand more rent control. They cant put 2 and 2 together | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,225 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | SF property owners are the biggest anti property rights proponents in the world. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,226 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | the problem is the city is majority renters. Only 44% of residents in the city own their home. Every single rent control or anti landlord prop that gets put on the ballot easily passes | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,227 |
colloquial | property rights | property rights | racist | It's really both. Renters push for rent control and inclusionary zoning. Owners and renters on rent control push for no new housing at all. The cities around SF that are majority owner have zero problems blocking any form of construction. Landowners are brainwashed into thinking their property rights extend to controlling what goes on all property within 20 miles. SF issued permits for a grand total of 24 new housing units from Feb-Apr of 2023. Oh you want to know another renter majority city? My city, Houston, is 60% renters. No rent control or anti landlord props anywhere to be seen. In Fact SF is has an unusually large amount of owners for such a dense city. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,228 |
colloquial | public school | public school | racist | I think it's a mistake to say that there's tension between the idea that schools should be privately run and the idea that we should force improvement of the government controlled curriculum. The fact is that government _does_ control curriculum currently, we're not in a political position to privatize education or otherwise return control of curriculum to parents *right now*, and kids and our entire culture are being harmed by this nonsense right now. In that context I think it's absolutely justified to ban stupid things _in public schools_. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,229 |
colloquial | public schools | public school | racist | I think it's a mistake to say that there's tension between the idea that schools should be privately run and the idea that we should force improvement of the government controlled curriculum. The fact is that government _does_ control curriculum currently, we're not in a political position to privatize education or otherwise return control of curriculum to parents *right now*, and kids and our entire culture are being harmed by this nonsense right now. In that context I think it's absolutely justified to ban stupid things _in public schools_. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,230 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | "Many" are not upset. Of the user access to reddit, half are browser based. From there, the official reddit app is almost 40% of the rest of the access. Less than 10% of the user base is using a third party app, with the largest being 2%, or less than 1 million active daily users. Cutting off these apps is going to have very little impact on user numbers as most of them will either switch to the official app or desktop and the few that are so upset that they don't have an ad free app will leave permanently, those users who were using the service and costing them money is a net win for reddit. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,231 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | Every single argument you could possibly make in support of the blackout applies better to reddit themselves because they actually own the thing they're turning off. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,232 |
colloquial | based | based | white supremacist | Second, there are just too many logical gates to pass through before it makes good policy sense. Assuming you end welfare, including current property tax based school funding, and the drug war, you still have the issue of immigrants increasing crime and degrading culture (bringing socialist ideals with them). | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,233 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | Second, there are just too many logical gates to pass through before it makes good policy sense. Assuming you end welfare, including current property tax based school funding, and the drug war, you still have the issue of immigrants increasing crime and degrading culture (bringing socialist ideals with them). | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,234 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | If only a fraction of the political will devoted to closing the border went to ending the welfare state we could make some progress | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,235 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | Keep in mind that when many of us consider open borders, it also comes with ending statewide welfare programs that could attract some unproductive types from coming in the first place. Drugs being legalized would also bring crime down as it fosters legitimate competition instead of determining market presence through violence. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,236 |
colloquial | welfare | welfare | racist | Open borders will come before ending welfare programs. It will be next to impossible to end those. It will be VERY easy to open the borders. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,237 |
colloquial | mass migration | mass immigration | xenophobic | I am fully (probably over-)educated on economics and I'm explaining to you that mass migration is on top of natural population growth - hence wage suppression. We saw this when we shamed women out of the home and into cubicles. Wage suppression. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,238 |
colloquial | NPC | NPC | anti-liberal | Note that they use the term *liberal* to describe the cohort of people favoring in-home government surveillance. Ironically, in an article centered around themes of Orwellianism. What's it going to take for people to realize that's not liberalism and they're misusing the word? I just don't understand what's so fucking difficult to understand about this concept. *Liberal* and *conservative* are not antonyms. Fucking mindless NPC parrots. I've little reason to expect this survey was conducted rigorously if they can't even get their terminology straight. Please remove your head from your ass, CATO. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,239 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | I don't understand, not just the willingness to accept but also the outright support in favor of invasion of privacy by government entities. That doesn't even get into the immense government bloat it would require to even attempt to monitor the hundreds of millions of feeds from every residence in the country, and that's just for a single camera in the home. Want one in every room? Triple or quadruple that at the minimum. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,240 |
colloquial | single | lifelong bachelor | homophobic | I do realize that there are clearly loopholes with this (i.e., a citizen who happens to be the buddy of a cop can file an allegation on behalf of the cop), but I think it would be easier to track abusers because those who make allegations will be publicly available information; and if a single individual is constantly accusing others (under the influence of police), it will be obvious for anyone who wants to investigate the accusers. However, in our current system, 'the state' can make allegations and decide to prosecute, there's no accountability. It's much harder to accuse "the state" of biasness if you can't track the individual (or group of individuals) that's being biased. | null | null | null | null | consoom | 35,241 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.