data_type
stringclasses
2 values
dog_whistle
stringlengths
2
26
dog_whistle_root
stringlengths
2
98
ingroup
stringclasses
17 values
content
stringlengths
2
83.3k
date
stringlengths
10
10
speaker
stringlengths
4
62
chamber
stringclasses
2 values
reference
stringlengths
24
31
community
stringclasses
11 values
__index_level_0__
int64
0
35.6k
colloquial
thugs
thug
racist
Frankly, getting rid of the thugs with special privileges will make the whole process better, not worse.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,242
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
It is essentially modern forum software, but unlike other forum software it is maintained. It is increasingly being used by open source projects as a replacement for mailing lists. Since it's web-based there is no client required. Hosting options exist.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,243
colloquial
welfare
welfare
racist
I’m anti-involuntary parties of any leaning. Though I’m not anti-socialist nor anti-communist, per-say. In theory those movements can be voluntary and beneficial. In actual practice…not so much. You may ask, why I am playing with these types of nuances instead of just being fully against? And that is a valid question. The reason is that just saying one is anti-*insert whatever ideology here* is that it immediately puts one at odds with said ideology as an enemy. It shuts off discussion, closes minds, and plants peoples of an opposing viewpoint feet firmly against anything one is trying to say. They’ll disagree on the principle that you are the opposition, no matter how valid your points may be. If one can observe and acknowledge the strengths of the opposing argument, however few they may be, and find niches where those ideas may be used in conjunction with one’s own ideas, then that fosters the possibility for cooperation and constructive modifications to other ideologies. For example, in an AnCap world, there is a place for voluntary communes, co-ops and social welfare. These would operate within a broader free market. It’s a nuanced concept that often is missed by AnCaps and nearly always is missed by socialists and communists completely. The amount of times I’ve pointed that out to peoples opposed to my way of thinking just to be met with a shocked silence followed by actual constructive discussion is too many to count.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,244
colloquial
handouts
government handout
racist
That ended once and for all after the Glorious Revolution which officially cemented the supremacy of parliament. The doctrine was now the 'King in Parliament', where in theory the power all came from the King, but where in practice parliment it had taken all the Kings power for itself. As Hayek points out Law, Legislation and Liberty the legislature and the executive became same body. Where a government with a majority has as much dictatorial power as Henry the 8th. Everyone who wants something now opens their hands to parliament, and the more democratic the body became the more handouts and socialism they quite happily imposed.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,245
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
The average person didn't have access to big libraries. They couldn't spend 5 or 6 hours a day doing research or attending lectures. They were stuck at home or at work. So in order to remain informed about sciences and philosophy Americans depended on papers and books published by the leading universities. By gaining control over these grant programs they could pick and choose what type of people they would award the money. Also they could control who and what could be published based on the availability of research money.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,246
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
This is how almost all modern political theory is based loosely on some form of Hegelianism. In mainstream USA politics... left, right, and moderates are almost all some basic form of Hegelian thought.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,247
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
The satire is based on the idea he would be offended or need someone else to do it for him
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,248
colloquial
identitarianism
identitarianism
white supremacist
Broadly speaking, he's what you'd expect from a GenX prog populist. He's anti-war, anti-establishment, skeptical of institutions, but also still paradoxically pro-gov social program and anti-capitalism. He aligns with libertarians and liberals on anti-neolib non-interventionism, opposition to the MIC, opposition to corporate media, and other forms of cronyism/corporatism, which is why you'll find him hosting people like Dave Smith and Glen Greenwald. But he also favors the sorta mid-20th New Deal-ish pinko views on the role of government and so he advocates for things like universal healthcare and criticizes the Dems from their left - i.e. accusing them of being neolib corporatists who are scarcely better than the GOP. I watch his show because he provides insight into the non-idpol prog perspective but I'd estimate that I disagree with >60% of his takes. All in all, I like him because he's at least the sort of leftie who still values free speech and open dialogue, and he's not been consumed by the identitarianism that's taken over so much of the rest of American politics.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,249
colloquial
neolib
neoliberal
liberal
Broadly speaking, he's what you'd expect from a GenX prog populist. He's anti-war, anti-establishment, skeptical of institutions, but also still paradoxically pro-gov social program and anti-capitalism. He aligns with libertarians and liberals on anti-neolib non-interventionism, opposition to the MIC, opposition to corporate media, and other forms of cronyism/corporatism, which is why you'll find him hosting people like Dave Smith and Glen Greenwald. But he also favors the sorta mid-20th New Deal-ish pinko views on the role of government and so he advocates for things like universal healthcare and criticizes the Dems from their left - i.e. accusing them of being neolib corporatists who are scarcely better than the GOP. I watch his show because he provides insight into the non-idpol prog perspective but I'd estimate that I disagree with >60% of his takes. All in all, I like him because he's at least the sort of leftie who still values free speech and open dialogue, and he's not been consumed by the identitarianism that's taken over so much of the rest of American politics.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,250
colloquial
terrorist
Islamic terrorists
Islamophobic
Imagine kowtowing to an antigunner and Eco-terrorist.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,251
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
With early USA, many people who were motivated to support the revolutionary war and subsequent westward expansion did so based on land speculation. The central government represented a way to simply seize great swaths of land and declare ownership of it, granting it to land speculation companies that then sold it off to settlers.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,252
colloquial
blue
blueish
antisemitic
I personally know many true blue commies (not democrats I'm just using the common phrase) they consistently say "when our guys get into power..." Every time I need to remind them that I'm an individualist capitalist and decidedly not one of their guys. I just need to vent my frustration that collectivism is more acceptable than libertarianism where I live.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,253
colloquial
our guy
our guy
white supremacist
I personally know many true blue commies (not democrats I'm just using the common phrase) they consistently say "when our guys get into power..." Every time I need to remind them that I'm an individualist capitalist and decidedly not one of their guys. I just need to vent my frustration that collectivism is more acceptable than libertarianism where I live.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,254
colloquial
our guy
our guy
white supremacist
> "when our guys get into power..."
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,255
colloquial
economic freedom
right to work
anti-GMO
Social and economic freedom. Since the 70s.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,256
colloquial
economic freedom
right to work
anti-GMO
Seems like El Salvador is taking a similar route, benevolent dictator to economic freedom. Problem is, it seems like the culture never comes around to recognizing authoritarianism is the problem, so they end up installing socialism again because they still think the government should be the one to solve problems.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,257
colloquial
quotas
quotas
racist
Equity is simply a nice sounding word that means pushing racial quotas. Nothing more.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,258
colloquial
racial quotas
quotas
racist
Equity is simply a nice sounding word that means pushing racial quotas. Nothing more.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,259
colloquial
working class
working class
racist
It's why modern communists don't actually support the "working class" anymore. The working class is too smart for them, having paid attention the last 100 years or so.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,260
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
We ain't in a perfect world, he's trying to nudge it in a direction that is slightly less shit. He believes this debt ceiling bill was the best they could get. The man stood in front of the big COVID relief bill single handed with no one else on his side and told them it was stupid, he's still our guy.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,261
colloquial
our guy
our guy
white supremacist
We ain't in a perfect world, he's trying to nudge it in a direction that is slightly less shit. He believes this debt ceiling bill was the best they could get. The man stood in front of the big COVID relief bill single handed with no one else on his side and told them it was stupid, he's still our guy.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,262
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
With politicians there’s always a debate between being completely principled based and working with what reality is. If everyone lived by their idea of perfection nothing would ever get done.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,263
colloquial
handouts
government handout
racist
With that said, to discredit Massie who gained prominence during covid, it’s wayyy easier to be principled, when your vote doesn’t matter in opposition (ie anti covid spending candidate speaking up when the bill will be be approved anyways). Look at the “progressives” who were known for being anti war and have been voting for almost every grift aide package recently, or a Bernie who is “the anti corporatist” who has voted for a lot of handouts. Bern has come out against this debt deal, but if it really was on the line, he’d 100% vote yes.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,264
colloquial
government spending
entitlement spending
racist
I believe he directly noted this week that this is the first bill that he's voted on that actually reduces government spending.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,265
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
the most important part about this is that he is banning 40 million firearms that are in people possession right now without a single vote in congress. Millions of people will be actively committing a felony tomorrow morning because the Biden administration declares it so. If they have not been paying attention for the past few months and have not heard they can be locked in a cage for 10 years for keeping something they bought less than a year ago totally legally. There are going to be thousands if not millions of people who have no idea what they already own has been declared illegal
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,266
colloquial
puppet master
puppet masters
antisemitic
Mary Gay Scanlon is a lockstep uninformed, Unconstitutional, and unintelligent Democrat controlled by her socialist/fascist puppet masters.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,267
colloquial
puppet masters
puppet masters
antisemitic
Mary Gay Scanlon is a lockstep uninformed, Unconstitutional, and unintelligent Democrat controlled by her socialist/fascist puppet masters.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,268
colloquial
entitlement
entitlement programs
racist
*Positive* rights mean entitlement and the end of free society. Gender, race, religion, age, doesn't fuckin matter what the cause du jour is, it's the same problem regardless.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,269
colloquial
blue
blueish
antisemitic
It was kind of refreshing visiting France and Spain a few weeks ago. Between both countries I saw 1 blue hair girl after walking by several hundred thousand people. Meanwhile here I see 10 at work every day.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,270
colloquial
terrorists
Islamic terrorists
Islamophobic
The MAGA crowd, which supports Trump, rejects the idea of invading Meico with the military. Most of Reason's quotes were about designating cartels terrorists, which doesn't equate with military intervention - it also has legal ramifications. And many of these quotes are years old, before the rampant corruption of the FBI became more obvious.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,271
colloquial
MAGA
MAGA
white supremacist
The MAGA crowd, which supports Trump, rejects the idea of invading Meico with the military. Most of Reason's quotes were about designating cartels terrorists, which doesn't equate with military intervention - it also has legal ramifications. And many of these quotes are years old, before the rampant corruption of the FBI became more obvious.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,272
colloquial
mass immigration
mass immigration
xenophobic
I get the anti-interventionist argument, but if America is to intervene anywhere, surely it makes the most sense to intervene in a neighboring country whose actions directly affect us? The mismanagement of Mexico has led to mass immigration to the US (encouraged by the Mexican government) and drug smuggling into the US. Recently, the US government has been unwilling or unable to stop any of it.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,273
colloquial
terrorism
Islamic terrorism
Islamophobic
And if you don't think that the shit that these cartels do is terrorism then you just don't pay attention. Go watch some cartel torture videos and come tell me that they aren't terrorists. They use violence to intimidate and coerce the population and government to go along with their social and political objectives. Literally the definition of terrorism. They torture and kill people, hang mutilated bodies with signs or with messages carved into their flesh saying "this is what happens when you cross us!"
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,274
colloquial
terrorists
Islamic terrorists
Islamophobic
And if you don't think that the shit that these cartels do is terrorism then you just don't pay attention. Go watch some cartel torture videos and come tell me that they aren't terrorists. They use violence to intimidate and coerce the population and government to go along with their social and political objectives. Literally the definition of terrorism. They torture and kill people, hang mutilated bodies with signs or with messages carved into their flesh saying "this is what happens when you cross us!"
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,275
colloquial
extremists
Islamic extremists
Islamophobic
In many ways the Muslim extremists in the middle east are less terroristic than the cartels.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,276
colloquial
terrorist
Islamic terrorists
Islamophobic
They are pointing out that the entire GOP presidential candidate field has declared that they will prosecute a military campaign against the cartels. All 6 candidates have made such statements. Designating the cartels as terrorist organizations is the same thing as saying you're going to send in the military.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,277
colloquial
war on drugs
war on drugs
racist
While I do agree with you on how horrific the cartels are, US intervention is not the answer. Ofc firstly there are serious geopolitical and ethical ramifications of unilaterally deploying our military into a sovereign nation. Also, the US has a long history of military intervention in Latin America, particularly during the Cold War. American intervention has created a power vacuum across Latin America where cartels were able to take the reigns of power from the now destabilized governments. Thirdly, the cartels get revenue and power largely because of our long standing war on drugs. Until we liberalize (or ideally repeal) our drug laws, we're just going to continue to cede control of the drug market to criminal enterprises. And you can go in and kill these criminals all you want, someone else will see opportunity and take their place.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,278
colloquial
war on drugs
war on drugs
racist
I have no love for the Mexican governement (nor any government) and to be sure the country has been mismanaged for a long time. Even given what I'm about to say, there's a reason this happens there and not in Canada. But the cartels are also in part the fault of the US war on drugs failure (ironically part of what the GOP is whining about here is Obrador attempting to exit that failure, though I'm not sure his approach is any better atm), which has created markets which fund them. The boarder immigration mess has also be exacerbated by decades of unconstitutional and messy immigration policy and even worse nonsensical and random enforcement of that policy.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,279
colloquial
terrorist
Islamic terrorists
Islamophobic
>Designating the cartels as terrorist organizations is the same thing as saying you're going to send in the military.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,280
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
Notice that both you and I praised him for *what he didn't do*, as not a single thing he did do can eclipse that one thing he didn't do.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,281
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
They abandoned the system of general and legions with large standing armies. They divided up the empire into smaller regions that were much more autonomous. They used land grants to farmers in exchange for on-demand military service, essentially militias. Combined with mercenaries. Each region combined civil and military functions and would shift roles based on need.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,282
colloquial
the Fed
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
There are plenty of natural limitations on state size that are not part of constitution limitations or democratic limitations. And these are the only things keeping the Federal government in check, but they are bumping up and pushing the boundaries all the time.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,283
colloquial
the Fed
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
Our biggest problem is The Administrative State. It is these large "mini governments" within the Federal government that are almost entirely independent.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,284
colloquial
entitlements
entitlement programs
racist
The first step is to get the deficit under control. That requires cutting military spending, and severely curtailing the big three entitlements (social security, medicare, medicaid) as well as trimming the federal bureaucracy. Military + big 3 entitlements are around 3/4 of the federal budget.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,285
colloquial
entitlement
entitlement programs
racist
The problem is that as soon as you want to cut the big 3 entitlements, Democrats scream that you want grandma to die. So good luck getting enough Republicans to agree to any entitlement cuts.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,286
colloquial
entitlements
entitlement programs
racist
The problem is that as soon as you want to cut the big 3 entitlements, Democrats scream that you want grandma to die. So good luck getting enough Republicans to agree to any entitlement cuts.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,287
colloquial
Federal Reserve
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
For practical comparison, it would be like the US Federal Reserve phasing out the $100 bill from circulation.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,288
colloquial
property rights
property rights
racist
The focus really should be on the protections against government overreach that actually corelate with success. To put it in uncoded terms, respect for property rights is the real institution that correlates with success. Respect for property rights is the real alternative to democracy.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,289
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
Collective decisions are disassociated from any single individual. The collective becomes an entity, a faceless, disembodied dictator. And the democracy simps love this form of dictatorship.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,290
colloquial
special interest
special interests
antisemitic
In Mussolini/Gentile's "Doctrine of Fascism" they explain that due to the limited representational model of parliamentary democracy it was a sort of phony Democracy. The government ends up captive to special interests and corrupt classes of politicians.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,291
colloquial
special interests
special interests
antisemitic
In Mussolini/Gentile's "Doctrine of Fascism" they explain that due to the limited representational model of parliamentary democracy it was a sort of phony Democracy. The government ends up captive to special interests and corrupt classes of politicians.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,292
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
That is totalitarian government. Every single person is part of the state. Every single person is represented in government because they are, very literally, part of the state. Every single man, woman, and child is part of the state.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,293
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
Well said, and you also give the reasons why people one day will prefer am individualist-based political system over democracy that let's reach individual choose law for themselves without needing the assent of the masses via group votes first.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,294
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
Once you open flood gates to mass politics, it will be always, always, always, always socialist politics, that's what masses demand everywhere and at all times without a single exception. Hence, real libertarianism is inherently on optimates side. More precisely, in grand historical context, ancap should be understood as reformation of aristocracy, instead of rigid hereditary aristocracy, make **new free market aristocracy** (private courts) which fixes problems of old aristocracy.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,295
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
Certainly we oppose group-based decision-making, which is inherently socialistic.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,296
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
But that doesn't mean we support a single political elite class using the power of the State and military to force laws on an entire population.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,297
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
John Adams said, “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Morality and virtue are the foundation of our republic and necessary for a society to be free. If it is coming apart, it's because we have lost any moral foundation. You can have any system you want and it won't matter. Every single one rots from within when there is rampant corruption.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,298
colloquial
welfare
welfare
racist
Imagine you go to China and say (in person) to average Chinese that Taiwan should be independent and by the way, you also want to cut **all** welfare. Same thing, imagine you go to Russia and tell them that Crimea shouldn't be part of Russia and also **no** welfare of any kind. Even without police, you will run away from angry people. That's who you are dealing with! That's people from real, not imaginary world.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,299
colloquial
welfare
welfare
racist
>Imagine you go to China and say (in person) to average Chinese that Taiwan should be independent and by the way, you also want to cut all welfare. Same thing, imagine you go to Russia and tell them that Crimea shouldn't be part of Russia and also no welfare of any kind. Even without police, you will run away from angry people. That's who you are dealing with! That's people from real, not imaginary world.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,300
colloquial
welfare
welfare
racist
The US only had open immigration for 80 years. We would have it *permanently*, without the ruination of forced welfare to ruin it.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,301
colloquial
Bernie Sanders
attacks on or imagery of Jewish political leaders
antisemitic
By the way, the only reason why liberal democracies still did not collapse into Marxian socialism is the fact that nasty lobbying groups constantly derail attempts of very popular socialist candidates such as Bernie Sanders (whom almost all my colleagues, except me, absolutely admire!). So Patri Friedman got absolutely inverse his game theoretical argument why democracies doesn't work. He sketched setup where lobbying groups overpower masses in liberal democracy as fatal flaw of liberal democracy. But in reality, this is the only feature of liberal democracy which prevent rise of truly populist leaders. Even on conservative side, as national socialist and big fan of economic policy of Elizabeth Warren, tv-host Tucker Carlson admits. So if corrupt special interests didn't fight against masses, then elections would look like bolshevik from democratic party versus national bolshevik (nazbol) from republican party. Vast majority of common people absolutely detest free market capitalism.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,302
colloquial
special interest
special interests
antisemitic
By the way, the only reason why liberal democracies still did not collapse into Marxian socialism is the fact that nasty lobbying groups constantly derail attempts of very popular socialist candidates such as Bernie Sanders (whom almost all my colleagues, except me, absolutely admire!). So Patri Friedman got absolutely inverse his game theoretical argument why democracies doesn't work. He sketched setup where lobbying groups overpower masses in liberal democracy as fatal flaw of liberal democracy. But in reality, this is the only feature of liberal democracy which prevent rise of truly populist leaders. Even on conservative side, as national socialist and big fan of economic policy of Elizabeth Warren, tv-host Tucker Carlson admits. So if corrupt special interests didn't fight against masses, then elections would look like bolshevik from democratic party versus national bolshevik (nazbol) from republican party. Vast majority of common people absolutely detest free market capitalism.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,303
colloquial
special interests
special interests
antisemitic
By the way, the only reason why liberal democracies still did not collapse into Marxian socialism is the fact that nasty lobbying groups constantly derail attempts of very popular socialist candidates such as Bernie Sanders (whom almost all my colleagues, except me, absolutely admire!). So Patri Friedman got absolutely inverse his game theoretical argument why democracies doesn't work. He sketched setup where lobbying groups overpower masses in liberal democracy as fatal flaw of liberal democracy. But in reality, this is the only feature of liberal democracy which prevent rise of truly populist leaders. Even on conservative side, as national socialist and big fan of economic policy of Elizabeth Warren, tv-host Tucker Carlson admits. So if corrupt special interests didn't fight against masses, then elections would look like bolshevik from democratic party versus national bolshevik (nazbol) from republican party. Vast majority of common people absolutely detest free market capitalism.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,304
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
Something that can only exist in group-vote based systems. Not individualist ones. So systemic change solves this too.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,305
colloquial
cultural Marxism
cultural Marxism
antisemitic
Wokeness is **cultural Marxism**. The intelligentsia decide the cultural values that everyone should follow, and persecute those who refuse.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,306
colloquial
shekels
shekels
antisemitic
Sold out by our ruling class for a few shekels from the magic money men.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,307
colloquial
government spending
entitlement spending
racist
The problem is that GDP includes government spending, so the way to cheat it is obvious. Just borrow and spend, so they did. Over $20 trillion dollars worth.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,308
colloquial
the Fed
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
Law enforcement is supposed to happen on the individual state level, not the Federal level.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,309
colloquial
the Fed
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
The left and the right enjoy making odd comparisons for their talking points. So here is mine: As an American, I am six times more likely to be spied on by the Federal Government than to be a victim of a gun shooting.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,310
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
So they spied on every single person they felt like without a warrant. Good job fbi, who needs a constitution anyway
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,311
colloquial
welfare
welfare
racist
Leftists seek economic “security” for people via taxes, social welfare, generally some kind of safety net, which requires a police state.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,312
colloquial
terrorists
Islamic terrorists
Islamophobic
Conservatives skip right over that and seek physical “security” for people via the expansion of the police state, with the idea of securing borders or stopping terrorists.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,313
colloquial
neolib
neoliberal
liberal
Current regime is neolib, they have tremendous crossover with neocons. That whole crony corporatism, military-prison-medical industrial complex, dc establishment/swamp thing.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,314
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
New Hampshire, based as usual.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,315
colloquial
Bernie Sanders
attacks on or imagery of Jewish political leaders
antisemitic
tbh, i'm not impressed with economic analysis on par with Bernie Sanders
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,316
colloquial
mass immigration
mass immigration
xenophobic
The text discusses Elon Musk's proposition to increase immigration significantly and justifies the statement's two propositions. Firstly, it argues that Elon's proposition that honest and hard-working people should be welcomed is a moral injunction that people agree with. However, the text believes that there is a vast difference between this proposition and increasing legal immigration. The text argues that mass immigration has increased social disintegration and produced split communities with competing loyalties, leaving conservative elements of society at a structural disadvantage. Additionally, it puts economic pressure on lower-class natives who have to compete with new communities and puts strain on services and infrastructure. Finally, the text addresses the moral question of whether people have the right to say no to the influx of strangers and argues that nobody has the right to be a citizen of another country; it is a privilege that is extended to them.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,317
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
This argument is based on utopian ideals where everyone respects property and has a freedom mentality. It's not based on reality.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,318
colloquial
handouts
government handout
racist
The reality is that while many immigrants do respect freedoms, many others only understand force/violence or want handouts. Even if you had a fully free society, immigrants would go there because it's prosperous and bring their anti-freedom ideals with them. Eventually they'll undermine the free society and turn it into a socialist democracy.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,319
colloquial
property rights
property rights
racist
Freedom and property rights are the exception, not the rule.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,320
colloquial
Clown World
Clown World
white supremacist
It is a parallel reality experience. That world's name: Clown World.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,321
colloquial
welfare
welfare
racist
I find it hard to believe that won't massively diminish the buying power of the dollar. And I find it hard to believe that won't, at least for the next 20 years be a much more obvious negative to the average American than hoping the welfare state will shrink itself because the effects are more obvious. They can still play silly shell games and make it too confusing for the average voter to understand.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,322
colloquial
public school
public school
racist
The primary purpose of public schools is to function as a day care and create obedient workers who don’t question authority
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,323
colloquial
public schools
public school
racist
The primary purpose of public schools is to function as a day care and create obedient workers who don’t question authority
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,324
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
Bitcoin adoption has more momentum than ever based on a variety of metrics, number of wallets holding 1 btc, .10 btc and .01 btc are at all time highs. The amount of illiquid btc (held in wallets, not on exchanges) is at an all time high. Hash rate is at an all time high as well. Btc is doing just fine
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,325
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
The point about "store of value" is that it is a concept based on some sort of inherent value. Originally (pre-2017) that inherent value of bitcoin was based on its utility to privately and securely make transactions between individuals without banks getting in the way. Now that "inherent value" is only based on its image and marketing.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,326
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
Thus Lightning is essentially reducing blockspace usage, by instead of broadcasting every single transaction to every node on the network, instead performing (potentially thousands or millions) transactions off-chain, and then only having one closing transaction on-chain (if needed).
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,327
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
You can read my thesis which dives deep into nuances of sources of value of cryptocurrencies. It's based on two things:
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,328
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
And the stupid topic of block space shouldn't even come up until every single transaction that's happening on the base layer has to do with opening or closing lightning channels. If the fees to simply even manipulate lightning channels become consistently high then we might have an issue.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,329
colloquial
based
based
white supremacist
Some of us had grown use to sub penny fees for many years. All of our assumptions and understandings are based on that, the whitepaper and discussions from satoshi. What you are describing and what bitcoin is now is a very very different system.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,330
colloquial
urban
inner city
racist
The US government(including state and local) does the exact opposite. It forces everyone into car-centric urban design due to overly restrictive single use zoning.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,331
colloquial
single
lifelong bachelor
homophobic
The US government(including state and local) does the exact opposite. It forces everyone into car-centric urban design due to overly restrictive single use zoning.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,332
colloquial
Federal Reserve
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
If there's an infinite amount of cash at the Federal Reserve, why am I forced to pay taxes?
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,333
colloquial
the Fed
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
If there's an infinite amount of cash at the Federal Reserve, why am I forced to pay taxes?
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,334
colloquial
the Fed
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
Imagine I could just change the number in my bank account on whim. It's no different than what the Fed does...
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,335
colloquial
the Fed
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
If allowed to mint this coin, the Fed will have more than ten produced within a few years.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,336
colloquial
Federal Reserve
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
>The Federal Reserve may not be willing to accept the trillion-dollar coin.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,337
colloquial
Federal Reserve
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
I don't think the Federal Reserve can refuse it. If it's legal tender then refusal to accept it means the debt is forgiven according to legal tender law.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,338
colloquial
the Fed
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
I don't think the Federal Reserve can refuse it. If it's legal tender then refusal to accept it means the debt is forgiven according to legal tender law.
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,339
colloquial
Federal Reserve
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
Imagine trying to spend a 1T coin. Who can make change other than the Federal Reserve?
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,340
colloquial
the Fed
Federal Reserve
antisemitic
Imagine trying to spend a 1T coin. Who can make change other than the Federal Reserve?
null
null
null
null
consoom
35,341