text
stringlengths 1
711
|
|---|
29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N
|
Gross Margins Poised to Improve – Can Return to 2021 Peak
|
by 2025
|
KVUEs gross margins expanded by +125 bps in 2020 and another +164 bps in 2021
|
before compressing -88 bps in 2022 to 58.1% as the company dealt with inflationary
|
cost pressures seen throughout CPG (raw material inputs, freight, packaging) and supply
|
chain challenges, primarily in the Skin Health and Beauty segment. Prior to 2022, gross
|
margin expansion over the past few years has been driven by productivity (e.g., ZBB),
|
rationalization of smaller third-party manufacturers (60% of small external
|
manufacturers eliminated), portfolio optimization (21% SKU reduction), and favorable
|
segment mix (higher margin Self Care growth).
|
Figure 38: KVUE Gross Margin Bridge
|
58.1%
|
-0.6%
|
56.1% 0.1% -1.2% -4.0%
|
0.7%
|
1.1% 57.4% 0.4%
|
0.5%
|
2.1% 59.0% 0.1% 0.4%
|
1.7%
|
1.0%
|
55%
|
56%
|
57%
|
58%
|
59%
|
60%
|
61%
|
62%
|
Source: Company reports.
|
We model for +54 bps gross margin expansion in 2023, slight -6 bps compression in
|
2024, and +38 bps expansion in 2025, which would return gross margins to 2021 levels
|
at 59.0%.
|
We see a number of drivers of gross margin expansion: 1) further optimization of
|
supply chain and COGS efficiencies; 2) rollover of 2022 pricing actions as well as
|
incremental pricing in 2023 and beyond; 3) abating cost headwinds; and 4)
|
favorable segment mix with continued faster growth in higher margin Self Care
|
and Skin Health and Beauty segments (although some Skin Health and Beauty profit
|
growth likely to be reinvested). Relating to our estimates, expectations for 2024 could
|
admittedly be conservative as we leave our margin assumptions unchanged despite a
|
stronger than expected start to 2023 – the aforementioned drivers and abating
|
inflationary pressures could lead to better gross margin performance than we have
|
modeled.
|
Inflation should remain a headwind in 2023 (perhaps roughly -240 bps to gross
|
margins), albeit to a lesser extent than 2022 where we estimate costs could have been a -
|
400 bps headwind. On COGS, we estimate roughly 40% is in raw materials and inputs,
|
30% in internal and external manufacturing costs, and the remaining 30% in other
|
overhead, freight, and amortization. Within KVUEs cost buckets, raw materials are
|
relatively diversified, in our view, with resins, pulp and paper, agro chemicals (like
|
ethanol and glycerin), and packaging materials the largest exposures, although in total
|
these represent less than 20% of total COGS. From an FX perspective, the company
|
hedges its transactional exposure for forecasted revenues, purchases, receivables, and
|
payables, but it does not hedge translational risk. Key currencies include EUR, GBP,
|
JPY, CNY, CAD, BRL, and INR.
|
This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP.
|
27
|
Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC
|
(1-212) 622-6735
|
andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com
|
North America Equity Research
|
29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N
|
Exit of TSA and TMA Is Another Source of Margin Improvement Longer Term
|
Within the cost outlook, we also note that KVUE entered into a Transition
|
Manufacturing Agreement (in addition to Transition Services Agreement that sounds
|
more related to operating services), which covers pharmaceutical products like Tylenol,
|
Zyrtec, Motrin, and Benadryl, among others. The company noted that the products
|
covered under the TMA accounted for less than 10% of its sales in 2022. The TMA is
|
based on a cost-plus model and ranges in terms from 3 to 60 months depending on the
|
product (3-60 months for Tylenol, 21-60 months for Zyrtec, 21-60 months for Motrin,
|
and 21-60 months for Benadryl), although the company notes that these terms could be
|
extended for up to three additional 12-month periods if there are issues, which we think
|
would be mostly due to regulatory processes and facility validation. Management
|
expects to be out of the TMA within three years for most of the products. Exiting these
|
TMA agreements should allow for better margin profile over time as the company no
|
longer pays the markup associated with the agreement.
|
Relative to peers, KVUEs adjusted gross margins (including amortization of definite
|
life intangible assets to make more comparable) compare favorably to most HPC and
|
consumer health peers (ranks below only HLN, RKT, and BEI) but are well below those
|
of more pure-play beauty names. Overall, KVUEs category exposure to OTC and
|
beauty lends itself to strong gross margin profile vs. HPC more exposed to everyday
|
essentials, and many companies in the peer set have also faced greater inflationary cost
|
pressures given COGS exposure more weighted to the oil complex, pulps, and
|
transportation/logistics costs.
|
Figure 39: Gross Margins vs. Peers
|
CY22
|
0%
|
10%
|
20%
|
30%
|
40%
|
50%
|
60%
|
70%
|
80%
|
Gross Margin Average Median
|
Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates.; *KVUE adjusted gross margins including amortization of definite life intangibles;
|
**CL adjusted gross margins adding back shipping & handling costs
|
Post-2023 Leverage in Middle of P&L to Help Drive Solid
|
Earnings Growth
|
Following 2023, which will be burdened both by costs related to TSA and separation
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.