context stringlengths 58 1.13k | citation_a dict | citation_b dict | case_id int64 475 12.5M | label stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(b). A determination of a subpoena's reasonableness requires the court to balance the interests served by complying with the subpoena against the interests served by quashing it. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "264 F.2d 725, 725",
"parenthetical": "suggesting that need is one factor of a subpoena's reasonableness",
"sentence": "See In re Garcia, 76 B.R. 68, 69 (E.D.Pa.) (affirming denial of motion to quash in part because subpoenaed lawfirm records “relevant and not available fro... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "28 B.R. 875, 875",
"parenthetical": "recognizing relevance of information and that \"need for this information outweighs the burden to [appellants]\"",
"sentence": "See In re Garcia, 76 B.R. 68, 69 (E.D.Pa.) (affirming denial of motion to quash in part because subpoenaed lawfir... | 6,499,754 | b |
Second, it was not Dawkins himself who "wrote" Scott up -- as Dawkins was not Scott's superior -- but rather a captain. See Scott Dep. at 335. The complaint contains only allegations regarding Dawkins, however. Moreover, to the extent that Dawkins "assisted" a captain in "writing] her up" frivolously, this evidence alo... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "548 U.S. 68, 68",
"parenthetical": "\"An employee's decision to report discriminatory behavior cannot immunize that employee from those petty slights or minor annoyances that often take place at work and that all employees experience ... 'personality conflicts at work that genera... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "577 F.Supp.2d 623, 645",
"parenthetical": "defendant's \"falsely accusing plaintiff of being absent without authorization,\" \"threatening plaintiff with future counseling notices and disciplinary actions,\" \"writing plaintiff up for leaving work early,\" and similar actions wer... | 4,181,008 | b |
Second, it was not Dawkins himself who "wrote" Scott up -- as Dawkins was not Scott's superior -- but rather a captain. See Scott Dep. at 335. The complaint contains only allegations regarding Dawkins, however. Moreover, to the extent that Dawkins "assisted" a captain in "writing] her up" frivolously, this evidence alo... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "2006 WL 2711625, at *5",
"parenthetical": "\"Mere reprimands or threats of disciplinary action, absent any other negative results, such as a decrease in pay, do not qualify as adverse employment actions.\"",
"sentence": "See Cody v. County of Nassau, 577 F.Supp.2d 623, 645 (E.D... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "548 U.S. 68, 68",
"parenthetical": "\"An employee's decision to report discriminatory behavior cannot immunize that employee from those petty slights or minor annoyances that often take place at work and that all employees experience ... 'personality conflicts at work that genera... | 4,181,008 | a |
From the time Lovasco was decided in 1977, the United States Supreme Court has not granted certiorari to discuss in more depth the due process standard as established by Marion and Lovasco, and has only tangentially discussed the Marion/Lovasco standard in cases involving other issues. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "488 U.S. 51, 57",
"parenthetical": "in a case concerning whether defendant's due process rights were violated by the police destruction of evidence in the absence of bad faith motives by the police, the Court cited Marion's language that \"no actual prejudice to the conduct ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "467 U.S. 180, 192",
"parenthetical": "in a case involving right to appointment of counsel for federal prison inmates who were placed in administrative detention pending indictment for crimes committed in prison, the Court stated, in dicta, \"the Fifth Amendment requires the dismi... | 11,452,398 | b |
From the time Lovasco was decided in 1977, the United States Supreme Court has not granted certiorari to discuss in more depth the due process standard as established by Marion and Lovasco, and has only tangentially discussed the Marion/Lovasco standard in cases involving other issues. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case concerning whether defendant's due process rights were violated by the police destruction of evidence in the absence of bad faith motives by the police, the Court cited Marion's language that \"no actual prejudice to the conduct of the defens... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "467 U.S. 180, 192",
"parenthetical": "in a case involving right to appointment of counsel for federal prison inmates who were placed in administrative detention pending indictment for crimes committed in prison, the Court stated, in dicta, \"the Fifth Amendment requires the dismi... | 11,452,398 | b |
From the time Lovasco was decided in 1977, the United States Supreme Court has not granted certiorari to discuss in more depth the due process standard as established by Marion and Lovasco, and has only tangentially discussed the Marion/Lovasco standard in cases involving other issues. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case concerning whether defendant's due process rights were violated by the police destruction of evidence in the absence of bad faith motives by the police, the Court cited Marion's language that \"no actual prejudice to the conduct of the defens... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "467 U.S. 180, 192",
"parenthetical": "in a case involving right to appointment of counsel for federal prison inmates who were placed in administrative detention pending indictment for crimes committed in prison, the Court stated, in dicta, \"the Fifth Amendment requires the dismi... | 11,452,398 | b |
From the time Lovasco was decided in 1977, the United States Supreme Court has not granted certiorari to discuss in more depth the due process standard as established by Marion and Lovasco, and has only tangentially discussed the Marion/Lovasco standard in cases involving other issues. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case involving right to appointment of counsel for federal prison inmates who were placed in administrative detention pending indictment for crimes committed in prison, the Court stated, in dicta, \"the Fifth Amendment requires the dismissal of an indi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "488 U.S. 51, 57",
"parenthetical": "in a case concerning whether defendant's due process rights were violated by the police destruction of evidence in the absence of bad faith motives by the police, the Court cited Marion's language that \"no actual prejudice to the conduct ... | 11,452,398 | a |
From the time Lovasco was decided in 1977, the United States Supreme Court has not granted certiorari to discuss in more depth the due process standard as established by Marion and Lovasco, and has only tangentially discussed the Marion/Lovasco standard in cases involving other issues. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case involving right to appointment of counsel for federal prison inmates who were placed in administrative detention pending indictment for crimes committed in prison, the Court stated, in dicta, \"the Fifth Amendment requires the dismissal of an indi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case concerning whether defendant's due process rights were violated by the police destruction of evidence in the absence of bad faith motives by the police, the Court cited Marion's language that \"no actual prejudice to the conduct of the defens... | 11,452,398 | a |
From the time Lovasco was decided in 1977, the United States Supreme Court has not granted certiorari to discuss in more depth the due process standard as established by Marion and Lovasco, and has only tangentially discussed the Marion/Lovasco standard in cases involving other issues. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case concerning whether defendant's due process rights were violated by the police destruction of evidence in the absence of bad faith motives by the police, the Court cited Marion's language that \"no actual prejudice to the conduct of the defens... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case involving right to appointment of counsel for federal prison inmates who were placed in administrative detention pending indictment for crimes committed in prison, the Court stated, in dicta, \"the Fifth Amendment requires the dismissal of an indi... | 11,452,398 | b |
From the time Lovasco was decided in 1977, the United States Supreme Court has not granted certiorari to discuss in more depth the due process standard as established by Marion and Lovasco, and has only tangentially discussed the Marion/Lovasco standard in cases involving other issues. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "488 U.S. 51, 57",
"parenthetical": "in a case concerning whether defendant's due process rights were violated by the police destruction of evidence in the absence of bad faith motives by the police, the Court cited Marion's language that \"no actual prejudice to the conduct ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case involving right to appointment of counsel for federal prison inmates who were placed in administrative detention pending indictment for crimes committed in prison, the Court stated, in dicta, \"the Fifth Amendment requires the dismissal of an indi... | 11,452,398 | b |
From the time Lovasco was decided in 1977, the United States Supreme Court has not granted certiorari to discuss in more depth the due process standard as established by Marion and Lovasco, and has only tangentially discussed the Marion/Lovasco standard in cases involving other issues. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case concerning whether defendant's due process rights were violated by the police destruction of evidence in the absence of bad faith motives by the police, the Court cited Marion's language that \"no actual prejudice to the conduct of the defens... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case involving right to appointment of counsel for federal prison inmates who were placed in administrative detention pending indictment for crimes committed in prison, the Court stated, in dicta, \"the Fifth Amendment requires the dismissal of an indi... | 11,452,398 | b |
From the time Lovasco was decided in 1977, the United States Supreme Court has not granted certiorari to discuss in more depth the due process standard as established by Marion and Lovasco, and has only tangentially discussed the Marion/Lovasco standard in cases involving other issues. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case involving right to appointment of counsel for federal prison inmates who were placed in administrative detention pending indictment for crimes committed in prison, the Court stated, in dicta, \"the Fifth Amendment requires the dismissal of an indi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in a case concerning whether defendant's due process rights were violated by the police destruction of evidence in the absence of bad faith motives by the police, the Court cited Marion's language that \"no actual prejudice to the conduct of the defens... | 11,452,398 | a |
The parties did not advance this ground before the district court -- i.e., focusing on Mr. Pursley's opportunity vel non to cross -- examine Mr. Cluff-nor did the district court address it. However, we clearly have the discretion under certain specified circumstances to affirm a district court on a previously unexplore... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "770 F.2d 508, 511",
"parenthetical": "\"[W]hen the judgment of a district court is correct, it may be affirmed for reasons not given by the court and not advanced to it.\"",
"sentence": "See Ledford, 443 F.3d at 707 (“We may affirm the rulings of the lower court on any gro... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "188 F.3d 1215, 1217-18",
"parenthetical": "\"[W]e are free to affirm a district court decision on any grounds for which there is a record sufficient to permit conclusions of law, even grounds not relied upon by the district court.\" (alteration in original",
"sentence": "See Le... | 4,042,664 | b |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "554 S.W.2d 701, 701",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion for stop when vehicle observed with its lights on and motor running in department store parking lot in high crime area at 1:30 a.m. with several individuals standing around an open trunk which was immediately closed and... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "947 S.W.2d 245, 245-46",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion to detain when officers concluded out-of-state driver was not intoxicated but they also believed the driver was not on a business trip as represented",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245-46 (no rea... | 7,301,616 | b |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "947 S.W.2d 245, 245-46",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion to detain when officers concluded out-of-state driver was not intoxicated but they also believed the driver was not on a business trip as represented",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245-46 (no rea... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "223 S.W.3d 408, 415",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion existed for further detention of defendant stopped in high crime area when officer observed plastic baggie in crease of gas cap compartment",
"sentence": "Cf. Amorella, 554 S.W.2d at 701 (reasonable suspicion for stop... | 7,301,616 | a |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "947 S.W.2d 245, 245-46",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion to detain when officers concluded out-of-state driver was not intoxicated but they also believed the driver was not on a business trip as represented",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245-46 (no rea... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "121 S.W.3d 491, 491-92",
"parenthetical": "prolonged detention of traffic stop reasonable where inconsistent answers by passenger and driver to questions about ownership of car and intended destination, large amount of detergent in car consistent with efforts to mask the smell of... | 7,301,616 | a |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "947 S.W.2d 245, 245-46",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion to detain when officers concluded out-of-state driver was not intoxicated but they also believed the driver was not on a business trip as represented",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245-46 (no rea... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "62 S.W.3d 883, 888",
"parenthetical": "prolonged detention of traffic stop reasonable where inconsistent answers by passenger and driver to \"basic questions,\" use of rental car, and smell of marihuana in car detected while officer talked to passenger sufficient for reasonable s... | 7,301,616 | a |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "554 S.W.2d 701, 701",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion for stop when vehicle observed with its lights on and motor running in department store parking lot in high crime area at 1:30 a.m. with several individuals standing around an open trunk which was immediately closed and... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "574 S.W.2d 546, 547",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion did not exist where vehicle observed driving aimlessly in mall parking lot even though there had been a rash of purse snatchings in the parking lot",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245-46 (no reasonable ... | 7,301,616 | b |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "223 S.W.3d 408, 415",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion existed for further detention of defendant stopped in high crime area when officer observed plastic baggie in crease of gas cap compartment",
"sentence": "Cf. Amorella, 554 S.W.2d at 701 (reasonable suspicion for stop... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "574 S.W.2d 546, 547",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion did not exist where vehicle observed driving aimlessly in mall parking lot even though there had been a rash of purse snatchings in the parking lot",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245-46 (no reasonable ... | 7,301,616 | b |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "574 S.W.2d 546, 547",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion did not exist where vehicle observed driving aimlessly in mall parking lot even though there had been a rash of purse snatchings in the parking lot",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245-46 (no reasonable ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "121 S.W.3d 491, 491-92",
"parenthetical": "prolonged detention of traffic stop reasonable where inconsistent answers by passenger and driver to questions about ownership of car and intended destination, large amount of detergent in car consistent with efforts to mask the smell of... | 7,301,616 | a |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "574 S.W.2d 546, 547",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion did not exist where vehicle observed driving aimlessly in mall parking lot even though there had been a rash of purse snatchings in the parking lot",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245-46 (no reasonable ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "62 S.W.3d 883, 888",
"parenthetical": "prolonged detention of traffic stop reasonable where inconsistent answers by passenger and driver to \"basic questions,\" use of rental car, and smell of marihuana in car detected while officer talked to passenger sufficient for reasonable s... | 7,301,616 | a |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "128 S.W.3d 413, 415",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion when officers, acting on an anonymous tip of a \"black male\" involved in narcotics activity, observed a \"black male\" make a \"hasty\" departure from high crime area after observing the police",
"sentence": "See,... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "554 S.W.2d 701, 701",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion for stop when vehicle observed with its lights on and motor running in department store parking lot in high crime area at 1:30 a.m. with several individuals standing around an open trunk which was immediately closed and... | 7,301,616 | a |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "128 S.W.3d 413, 415",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion when officers, acting on an anonymous tip of a \"black male\" involved in narcotics activity, observed a \"black male\" make a \"hasty\" departure from high crime area after observing the police",
"sentence": "See,... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "223 S.W.3d 408, 415",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion existed for further detention of defendant stopped in high crime area when officer observed plastic baggie in crease of gas cap compartment",
"sentence": "Cf. Amorella, 554 S.W.2d at 701 (reasonable suspicion for stop... | 7,301,616 | a |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "121 S.W.3d 491, 491-92",
"parenthetical": "prolonged detention of traffic stop reasonable where inconsistent answers by passenger and driver to questions about ownership of car and intended destination, large amount of detergent in car consistent with efforts to mask the smell of... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "128 S.W.3d 413, 415",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion when officers, acting on an anonymous tip of a \"black male\" involved in narcotics activity, observed a \"black male\" make a \"hasty\" departure from high crime area after observing the police",
"sentence": "See,... | 7,301,616 | b |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "62 S.W.3d 883, 888",
"parenthetical": "prolonged detention of traffic stop reasonable where inconsistent answers by passenger and driver to \"basic questions,\" use of rental car, and smell of marihuana in car detected while officer talked to passenger sufficient for reasonable s... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "128 S.W.3d 413, 415",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion when officers, acting on an anonymous tip of a \"black male\" involved in narcotics activity, observed a \"black male\" make a \"hasty\" departure from high crime area after observing the police",
"sentence": "See,... | 7,301,616 | b |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "61 S.W.3d 94, 98-99",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion where a group of people were gathered in a yard located in a neighborhood known for drug trafficking and defendant was observed walking to and from the group several times",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "554 S.W.2d 701, 701",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion for stop when vehicle observed with its lights on and motor running in department store parking lot in high crime area at 1:30 a.m. with several individuals standing around an open trunk which was immediately closed and... | 7,301,616 | a |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "61 S.W.3d 94, 98-99",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion where a group of people were gathered in a yard located in a neighborhood known for drug trafficking and defendant was observed walking to and from the group several times",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "223 S.W.3d 408, 415",
"parenthetical": "reasonable suspicion existed for further detention of defendant stopped in high crime area when officer observed plastic baggie in crease of gas cap compartment",
"sentence": "Cf. Amorella, 554 S.W.2d at 701 (reasonable suspicion for stop... | 7,301,616 | a |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "121 S.W.3d 491, 491-92",
"parenthetical": "prolonged detention of traffic stop reasonable where inconsistent answers by passenger and driver to questions about ownership of car and intended destination, large amount of detergent in car consistent with efforts to mask the smell of... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "61 S.W.3d 94, 98-99",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion where a group of people were gathered in a yard located in a neighborhood known for drug trafficking and defendant was observed walking to and from the group several times",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2... | 7,301,616 | b |
. With the exception of the driver's nervousness, Officer Lewis learned or observed nothing new during the stop that would reason ably lead to any heightened suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "62 S.W.3d 883, 888",
"parenthetical": "prolonged detention of traffic stop reasonable where inconsistent answers by passenger and driver to \"basic questions,\" use of rental car, and smell of marihuana in car detected while officer talked to passenger sufficient for reasonable s... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "61 S.W.3d 94, 98-99",
"parenthetical": "no reasonable suspicion where a group of people were gathered in a yard located in a neighborhood known for drug trafficking and defendant was observed walking to and from the group several times",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Davis, 947 S.W.2... | 7,301,616 | b |
The prerecorded MITS message explicitly advises that "[a]ll call detail and conversation, excluding approved attorney calls, will be recorded," see supra p. 296 (emphasis added), thereby informing the call recipient that the entire "contents" will be intercepted. Consequently, notwithstanding the absence of explicit no... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "11 F.3d 282, 282",
"parenthetical": "stating that implied consent obtains where party to conversation was provided with at least \"minimal knowledge\" of scope of interception",
"sentence": "See Griggs-Ryan, 904 F.2d at 114, 116-19 (finding implied consent to interceptions... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "904 F.2d 114, 114, 116-19",
"parenthetical": "finding implied consent to interceptions, consisting of concurrent aural monitoring and recording of telephone conversations, after plaintiff had been informed of the recording only and no restrictions had been placed on the scope of ... | 11,902,545 | b |
Reducing the Van Nattas' complaint to its core reveals the fact that all of their state law claims are premised upon alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under an employee-benefit plan. As the Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit have previously reiterated, such claims undoubtedly meet the criteria for preem... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "324 F.3d 685, 689",
"parenthetical": "holding that state law causes of action arising from improper processing of a claim for benefits are preempted",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 107 S.Ct. 1549 (finding that the plaintiffs claims, each based on... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "481 U.S. 47, 47-48",
"parenthetical": "finding that the plaintiffs claims, each based on alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under a qualified ERISA plan, \"undoubtedly\" met the criteria for preemption under SS 514(a",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 ... | 3,425,410 | b |
Reducing the Van Nattas' complaint to its core reveals the fact that all of their state law claims are premised upon alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under an employee-benefit plan. As the Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit have previously reiterated, such claims undoubtedly meet the criteria for preem... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "481 U.S. 47, 47-48",
"parenthetical": "finding that the plaintiffs claims, each based on alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under a qualified ERISA plan, \"undoubtedly\" met the criteria for preemption under SS 514(a",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "293 F.3d 442, 446",
"parenthetical": "holding that the plaintiffs' causes of action were preempted because their claims were premised on the existence of an ERISA plan",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 107 S.Ct. 1549 (finding that the plaintiffs cl... | 3,425,410 | a |
Reducing the Van Nattas' complaint to its core reveals the fact that all of their state law claims are premised upon alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under an employee-benefit plan. As the Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit have previously reiterated, such claims undoubtedly meet the criteria for preem... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "481 U.S. 47, 47-48",
"parenthetical": "finding that the plaintiffs claims, each based on alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under a qualified ERISA plan, \"undoubtedly\" met the criteria for preemption under SS 514(a",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "188 F.3d 939, 943",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the basis of state claims for medical malpractice relates to the administration of plan benefits, those claims \"fall squarely within the scope\" of ERISA",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 10... | 3,425,410 | a |
Reducing the Van Nattas' complaint to its core reveals the fact that all of their state law claims are premised upon alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under an employee-benefit plan. As the Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit have previously reiterated, such claims undoubtedly meet the criteria for preem... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the plaintiffs claims, each based on alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under a qualified ERISA plan, \"undoubtedly\" met the criteria for preemption under SS 514(a",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 1... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "324 F.3d 685, 689",
"parenthetical": "holding that state law causes of action arising from improper processing of a claim for benefits are preempted",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 107 S.Ct. 1549 (finding that the plaintiffs claims, each based on... | 3,425,410 | a |
Reducing the Van Nattas' complaint to its core reveals the fact that all of their state law claims are premised upon alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under an employee-benefit plan. As the Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit have previously reiterated, such claims undoubtedly meet the criteria for preem... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the plaintiffs claims, each based on alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under a qualified ERISA plan, \"undoubtedly\" met the criteria for preemption under SS 514(a",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 1... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "293 F.3d 442, 446",
"parenthetical": "holding that the plaintiffs' causes of action were preempted because their claims were premised on the existence of an ERISA plan",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 107 S.Ct. 1549 (finding that the plaintiffs cl... | 3,425,410 | a |
Reducing the Van Nattas' complaint to its core reveals the fact that all of their state law claims are premised upon alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under an employee-benefit plan. As the Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit have previously reiterated, such claims undoubtedly meet the criteria for preem... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "188 F.3d 939, 943",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the basis of state claims for medical malpractice relates to the administration of plan benefits, those claims \"fall squarely within the scope\" of ERISA",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 10... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the plaintiffs claims, each based on alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under a qualified ERISA plan, \"undoubtedly\" met the criteria for preemption under SS 514(a",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 1... | 3,425,410 | b |
Reducing the Van Nattas' complaint to its core reveals the fact that all of their state law claims are premised upon alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under an employee-benefit plan. As the Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit have previously reiterated, such claims undoubtedly meet the criteria for preem... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "999 F.2d 302, 302",
"parenthetical": "having no difficulty concluding the plaintiffs' claims, all arising from the administration of benefits under a qualified ERISA plan were preempted by ERISA",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 107 S.Ct. 1549 (finding ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "324 F.3d 685, 689",
"parenthetical": "holding that state law causes of action arising from improper processing of a claim for benefits are preempted",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 107 S.Ct. 1549 (finding that the plaintiffs claims, each based on... | 3,425,410 | a |
Reducing the Van Nattas' complaint to its core reveals the fact that all of their state law claims are premised upon alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under an employee-benefit plan. As the Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit have previously reiterated, such claims undoubtedly meet the criteria for preem... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "293 F.3d 442, 446",
"parenthetical": "holding that the plaintiffs' causes of action were preempted because their claims were premised on the existence of an ERISA plan",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 107 S.Ct. 1549 (finding that the plaintiffs cl... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "999 F.2d 302, 302",
"parenthetical": "having no difficulty concluding the plaintiffs' claims, all arising from the administration of benefits under a qualified ERISA plan were preempted by ERISA",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 107 S.Ct. 1549 (finding ... | 3,425,410 | b |
Reducing the Van Nattas' complaint to its core reveals the fact that all of their state law claims are premised upon alleged improper processing of a claim for benefits under an employee-benefit plan. As the Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit have previously reiterated, such claims undoubtedly meet the criteria for preem... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "188 F.3d 939, 943",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the basis of state claims for medical malpractice relates to the administration of plan benefits, those claims \"fall squarely within the scope\" of ERISA",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 10... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "999 F.2d 302, 302",
"parenthetical": "having no difficulty concluding the plaintiffs' claims, all arising from the administration of benefits under a qualified ERISA plan were preempted by ERISA",
"sentence": "See Pilot Life Ins. Co., 481 U.S. at 47-48, 107 S.Ct. 1549 (finding ... | 3,425,410 | b |
Whatever thin thread of support a jury might find in the decoy-molecule hypothetical simply cannot bear the weight of the vast scope of these generic claims. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "541 F.3d 1126, 1126",
"parenthetical": "holding that the narrow description of the E. coli polA gene did not adequately support a broad claim to the gene from any bacterial source",
"sentence": "See LizardTech, 424 F.3d at 1345 (holding that “[a]fter reading the patent, a perso... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "424 F.3d 1345, 1345",
"parenthetical": "holding that \"[a]fter reading the patent, a person of skill in the art would not understand\" the patentee to have invented a generic method where the patent only disclosed one embodiment of it",
"sentence": "See LizardTech, 424 F.3d at ... | 4,221,514 | b |
Whatever thin thread of support a jury might find in the decoy-molecule hypothetical simply cannot bear the weight of the vast scope of these generic claims. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "214 F.3d 1345, 1345-46",
"parenthetical": "noting that the \"scope of the right to exclude\" must not \"overreach the scope of the inventor's contribution to the field of art as described in the patent specification\"",
"sentence": "See LizardTech, 424 F.3d at 1345 (holding tha... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "541 F.3d 1126, 1126",
"parenthetical": "holding that the narrow description of the E. coli polA gene did not adequately support a broad claim to the gene from any bacterial source",
"sentence": "See LizardTech, 424 F.3d at 1345 (holding that “[a]fter reading the patent, a perso... | 4,221,514 | a |
But notice of the settlement agreement without more leaves Corn-erica's right to challenge the district court's damages determination unaffected. The Owner-Operators could bind Comeri-ca only through joining them as a party to the earlier litigation. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "490 U.S. 755, 765",
"parenthetical": "\"Joinder as a party, rather than knowledge of a lawsuit and an opportunity to intervene, is the method by which potential parties are subjected to the jurisdiction of the court and bound by a judgment or decree.\"",
"sentence": "See Martin... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "495 F.3d 282, 286",
"parenthetical": "acknowledging that a non-party to a consent judgment \"is entitled to its 'own day in court' to challenge actions taken under the judgments\"",
"sentence": "See Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 765, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989)... | 4,071,289 | a |
But notice of the settlement agreement without more leaves Corn-erica's right to challenge the district court's damages determination unaffected. The Owner-Operators could bind Comeri-ca only through joining them as a party to the earlier litigation. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "495 F.3d 282, 286",
"parenthetical": "acknowledging that a non-party to a consent judgment \"is entitled to its 'own day in court' to challenge actions taken under the judgments\"",
"sentence": "See Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 765, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989)... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"Joinder as a party, rather than knowledge of a lawsuit and an opportunity to intervene, is the method by which potential parties are subjected to the jurisdiction of the court and bound by a judgment or decree.\"",
"sentence": "See Martin v. Wilks, 490 ... | 4,071,289 | b |
But notice of the settlement agreement without more leaves Corn-erica's right to challenge the district court's damages determination unaffected. The Owner-Operators could bind Comeri-ca only through joining them as a party to the earlier litigation. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "495 F.3d 282, 286",
"parenthetical": "acknowledging that a non-party to a consent judgment \"is entitled to its 'own day in court' to challenge actions taken under the judgments\"",
"sentence": "See Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 765, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989)... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"Joinder as a party, rather than knowledge of a lawsuit and an opportunity to intervene, is the method by which potential parties are subjected to the jurisdiction of the court and bound by a judgment or decree.\"",
"sentence": "See Martin v. Wilks, 490 ... | 4,071,289 | b |
Under that analysis, once a plaintiff has produced evidence of pretext, the employer's justification vanishes and the original McDonnell Douglas inference of discrimination rises again, automatically overcoming summary judgment. We reject that formalistic approach as not in keeping with either Supreme Court doctrine or... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "438 U.S. 567, 577",
"parenthetical": "the McDonnell Douglas model \"was not intended to be rigid, mechanized or ritualistic.\"",
"sentence": "See Furnco Constr. Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978) (the McDonnell Douglas model “was not in... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "922 F.2d 48, 48",
"parenthetical": "stating that in this circuit a plaintiff must adduce additional evidence of discrimination",
"sentence": "See Furnco Constr. Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978) (the McDonnell Douglas model “was no... | 10,541,771 | a |
Under that analysis, once a plaintiff has produced evidence of pretext, the employer's justification vanishes and the original McDonnell Douglas inference of discrimination rises again, automatically overcoming summary judgment. We reject that formalistic approach as not in keeping with either Supreme Court doctrine or... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "922 F.2d 48, 48",
"parenthetical": "stating that in this circuit a plaintiff must adduce additional evidence of discrimination",
"sentence": "See Furnco Constr. Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978) (the McDonnell Douglas model “was no... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949",
"parenthetical": "the McDonnell Douglas model \"was not intended to be rigid, mechanized or ritualistic.\"",
"sentence": "See Furnco Constr. Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978) (the McDonnell Douglas model “was not ... | 10,541,771 | b |
Under that analysis, once a plaintiff has produced evidence of pretext, the employer's justification vanishes and the original McDonnell Douglas inference of discrimination rises again, automatically overcoming summary judgment. We reject that formalistic approach as not in keeping with either Supreme Court doctrine or... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "922 F.2d 48, 48",
"parenthetical": "stating that in this circuit a plaintiff must adduce additional evidence of discrimination",
"sentence": "See Furnco Constr. Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978) (the McDonnell Douglas model “was no... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the McDonnell Douglas model \"was not intended to be rigid, mechanized or ritualistic.\"",
"sentence": "See Furnco Constr. Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978) (the McDonnell Douglas model “was not intended to be ri... | 10,541,771 | b |
Under that analysis, once a plaintiff has produced evidence of pretext, the employer's justification vanishes and the original McDonnell Douglas inference of discrimination rises again, automatically overcoming summary judgment. We reject that formalistic approach as not in keeping with either Supreme Court doctrine or... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the McDonnell Douglas model \"was not intended to be rigid, mechanized or ritualistic.\"",
"sentence": "See Furnco Constr. Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978) (the McDonnell Douglas model “was not intended to be ri... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "922 F.2d 48, 48",
"parenthetical": "stating that in this circuit a plaintiff must adduce additional evidence of discrimination",
"sentence": "See Furnco Constr. Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978) (the McDonnell Douglas model “was no... | 10,541,771 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "842 F.2d 509, 512-15",
"parenthetical": "lifting up of skirt by defendant in private room revealing bulge of drugs in girdle, held part of routine border search and did not necessarily require any degree of suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "702 F.2d 51, 51-52",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimal... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "702 F.2d 51, 51-52",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimal... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "786 F.2d 832, 835",
"parenthetical": "initial patdown followed by search of defendants' luggage and purses held routine border search",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search,... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "576 F.2d 279, 281, 284",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoti... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "702 F.2d 51, 51-52",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimal... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "702 F.2d 51, 51-52",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimal... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "702 F.2d 51, 51-52",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimal... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "702 F.2d 51, 51-52",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimal... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "609 F.2d 646, 646",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimall... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "842 F.2d 509, 512-15",
"parenthetical": "lifting up of skirt by defendant in private room revealing bulge of drugs in girdle, held part of routine border search and did not necessarily require any degree of suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "609 F.2d 646, 646",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimall... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "786 F.2d 832, 835",
"parenthetical": "initial patdown followed by search of defendants' luggage and purses held routine border search",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search,... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "576 F.2d 279, 281, 284",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoti... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "609 F.2d 646, 646",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimall... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "609 F.2d 646, 646",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimall... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "609 F.2d 646, 646",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimall... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "609 F.2d 646, 646",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by removal of shoes held \" 'minimally intrusive' \" routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 609 F.2d at 646",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimall... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "842 F.2d 509, 512-15",
"parenthetical": "lifting up of skirt by defendant in private room revealing bulge of drugs in girdle, held part of routine border search and did not necessarily require any degree of suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "649 F.2d 124, 126-27",
"parenthetical": "border \"patdown\" followed by request that defendant pull down girdle in private room did not necessarily require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘m... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "649 F.2d 124, 126-27",
"parenthetical": "border \"patdown\" followed by request that defendant pull down girdle in private room did not necessarily require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘m... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "786 F.2d 832, 835",
"parenthetical": "initial patdown followed by search of defendants' luggage and purses held routine border search",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search,... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "649 F.2d 124, 126-27",
"parenthetical": "border \"patdown\" followed by request that defendant pull down girdle in private room did not necessarily require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘m... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "576 F.2d 279, 281, 284",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoti... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "649 F.2d 124, 126-27",
"parenthetical": "border \"patdown\" followed by request that defendant pull down girdle in private room did not necessarily require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘m... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "649 F.2d 124, 126-27",
"parenthetical": "border \"patdown\" followed by request that defendant pull down girdle in private room did not necessarily require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘m... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "649 F.2d 124, 126-27",
"parenthetical": "border \"patdown\" followed by request that defendant pull down girdle in private room did not necessarily require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘m... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "501 F.Supp. 878, 878-79",
"parenthetical": "removal of jacket and patdown of border entrant did not require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quo... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "842 F.2d 509, 512-15",
"parenthetical": "lifting up of skirt by defendant in private room revealing bulge of drugs in girdle, held part of routine border search and did not necessarily require any degree of suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "786 F.2d 832, 835",
"parenthetical": "initial patdown followed by search of defendants' luggage and purses held routine border search",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search,... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "501 F.Supp. 878, 878-79",
"parenthetical": "removal of jacket and patdown of border entrant did not require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quo... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "576 F.2d 279, 281, 284",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoti... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "501 F.Supp. 878, 878-79",
"parenthetical": "removal of jacket and patdown of border entrant did not require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quo... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "501 F.Supp. 878, 878-79",
"parenthetical": "removal of jacket and patdown of border entrant did not require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quo... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "501 F.Supp. 878, 878-79",
"parenthetical": "removal of jacket and patdown of border entrant did not require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quo... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "501 F.Supp. 878, 878-79",
"parenthetical": "removal of jacket and patdown of border entrant did not require reasonable suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quo... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "576 F.2d 279, 281, 284",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoti... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "842 F.2d 509, 512-15",
"parenthetical": "lifting up of skirt by defendant in private room revealing bulge of drugs in girdle, held part of routine border search and did not necessarily require any degree of suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "842 F.2d 509, 512-15",
"parenthetical": "lifting up of skirt by defendant in private room revealing bulge of drugs in girdle, held part of routine border search and did not necessarily require any degree of suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "842 F.2d 509, 512-15",
"parenthetical": "lifting up of skirt by defendant in private room revealing bulge of drugs in girdle, held part of routine border search and did not necessarily require any degree of suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "842 F.2d 509, 512-15",
"parenthetical": "lifting up of skirt by defendant in private room revealing bulge of drugs in girdle, held part of routine border search and did not necessarily require any degree of suspicion",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "786 F.2d 832, 835",
"parenthetical": "initial patdown followed by search of defendants' luggage and purses held routine border search",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search,... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "576 F.2d 279, 281, 284",
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoti... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "786 F.2d 832, 835",
"parenthetical": "initial patdown followed by search of defendants' luggage and purses held routine border search",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search,... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | 10,528,758 | a |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "786 F.2d 832, 835",
"parenthetical": "initial patdown followed by search of defendants' luggage and purses held routine border search",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search,... | 10,528,758 | b |
We believe that a close examination of the case law in this Circuit and elsewhere indicates that the search here in question may be characterized correctly as a routine border search not requiring reasonable suspicion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "patdown followed by request that defendant remove boot not equivalent to \"strip search\"",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search, quoting Nieves, supra, 60... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "786 F.2d 832, 835",
"parenthetical": "initial patdown followed by search of defendants' luggage and purses held routine border search",
"sentence": "Grotke, supra, 702 F.2d at 51-52 (patdown followed by removal of shoes held “ ‘minimally intrusive’ ” routine border search,... | 10,528,758 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "149 U.S. 473, 473",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | 9,295,385 | a |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "149 U.S. 473, 473",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see ... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "149 U.S. 473, 473",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see ... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "149 U.S. 473, 473",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | 9,295,385 | a |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "149 U.S. 473, 473",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | 9,295,385 | a |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "149 U.S. 473, 473",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see ... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see also Riehle v. ... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see also Riehle v. ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | 9,295,385 | a |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see also Riehle v. ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | 9,295,385 | a |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see also Riehle v. ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | 9,295,385 | a |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see also Riehle v. ... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointment of the receiver); see also Riehle v. ... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | 9,295,385 | a |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | 9,295,385 | a |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | 9,295,385 | b |
The trustee broadly contends that a receiver's common law protection from being sued in a non-appointing court only applies to claims which arose after the appointment of the receiver. The trustee, however, refers to no decision so holding, and there are cases to the contrary. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the predecessor to section 959 is applicable to a claim arising from the operations of a predecessor receiver",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose prior to the appointme... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment",
"sentence": "See Porter v. Sabin, 149 U.S. at 473, 13 S.Ct. 1008 (recognizing that the claim at issue arose p... | 9,295,385 | b |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.