context stringlengths 58 1.13k | citation_a dict | citation_b dict | case_id int64 475 12.5M | label stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "45 Wash. App. 175, 180",
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and holding that negligence claims against hospital were not cognizable under state's consumer protection act because \"[t]he entrepreneurial aspects of the hospital's business, such as billing, were not implicated\"",
"sentence": "... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "45 Wash. App. 175, 180",
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and holding that negligence claims against hospital were not cognizable under state's consumer protection act because \"[t]he entrepreneurial aspects of the hospital's business, such as billing, were not implicated\"",
"sentence": "... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "54 Wash. App. 162, 166-67",
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and Jaramillo in holding that negligence claims asserted against hospital did not include entrepreneurial aspect of hospital's operations, so that claims fell outside reach of state's consumer protection act",
... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "45 Wash. App. 175, 180",
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"... | 205,264 | b |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "45 Wash. App. 175, 180",
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and Jaramillo in holding that negligence claims asserted against hospital did not include entrepreneurial aspect of hospital's operations, so that claims fell outside reach of state's consumer protection act",
"sentence": "See Quimb... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and Jaramillo in holding that negligence claims asserted against hospital did not include entrepreneurial aspect of hospital's operations, so that claims fell outside reach of state's consumer protection act",
"sentence": "See Quimb... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "45 Wash. App. 175, 180",
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"... | 205,264 | b |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "118 Wash. 2d 451, 465",
"parenthetical": "adopting \"entrepreneurial\" test from Quimby and applying it in legal malpractice setting",
"sentence": "See Quimby v. Fine, 45 Wash. App. 175, 180, 724 P.2d 403 (1986) (holding that claims that relate to “actual competence of the... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "adopting \"entrepreneurial\" test from Quimby and applying it in legal malpractice setting",
"sentence": "See Quimby v. Fine, 45 Wash. App. 175, 180, 724 P.2d 403 (1986) (holding that claims that relate to “actual competence of the medical practition... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "50 Wash. App. 822, 827",
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and holding that negligence claims against hospital were not cognizable under state's consumer protection act because \"[t]he entrepreneurial aspects of the hospital's business, such as billing, were not implicated... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | 205,264 | b |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and holding that negligence claims against hospital were not cognizable under state's consumer protection act because \"[t]he entrepreneurial aspects of the hospital's business, such as billing, were not implicated\"",
"sentence": "... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and holding that negligence claims against hospital were not cognizable under state's consumer protection act because \"[t]he entrepreneurial aspects of the hospital's business, such as billing, were not implicated\"",
"sentence": "... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "54 Wash. App. 162, 166-67",
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and Jaramillo in holding that negligence claims asserted against hospital did not include entrepreneurial aspect of hospital's operations, so that claims fell outside reach of state's consumer protection act",
... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | 205,264 | b |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and Jaramillo in holding that negligence claims asserted against hospital did not include entrepreneurial aspect of hospital's operations, so that claims fell outside reach of state's consumer protection act",
"sentence": "See Quimb... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | 205,264 | b |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and Jaramillo in holding that negligence claims asserted against hospital did not include entrepreneurial aspect of hospital's operations, so that claims fell outside reach of state's consumer protection act",
"sentence": "See Quimb... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "118 Wash. 2d 451, 465",
"parenthetical": "adopting \"entrepreneurial\" test from Quimby and applying it in legal malpractice setting",
"sentence": "See Quimby v. Fine, 45 Wash. App. 175, 180, 724 P.2d 403 (1986) (holding that claims that relate to “actual competence of the... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "adopting \"entrepreneurial\" test from Quimby and applying it in legal malpractice setting",
"sentence": "See Quimby v. Fine, 45 Wash. App. 175, 180, 724 P.2d 403 (1986) (holding that claims that relate to “actual competence of the medical practition... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | 205,264 | b |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "50 Wash. App. 822, 827",
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and holding that negligence claims against hospital were not cognizable under state's consumer protection act because \"[t]he entrepreneurial aspects of the hospital's business, such as billing, were not implicated... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and holding that negligence claims against hospital were not cognizable under state's consumer protection act because \"[t]he entrepreneurial aspects of the hospital's business, such as billing, were not implicated\"",
"sentence": "... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | 205,264 | b |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and holding that negligence claims against hospital were not cognizable under state's consumer protection act because \"[t]he entrepreneurial aspects of the hospital's business, such as billing, were not implicated\"",
"sentence": "... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | 205,264 | b |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "54 Wash. App. 162, 166-67",
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and Jaramillo in holding that negligence claims asserted against hospital did not include entrepreneurial aspect of hospital's operations, so that claims fell outside reach of state's consumer protection act",
... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | 205,264 | b |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and Jaramillo in holding that negligence claims asserted against hospital did not include entrepreneurial aspect of hospital's operations, so that claims fell outside reach of state's consumer protection act",
"sentence": "See Quimb... | 205,264 | a |
Other jurisdictions have reached a similar result with respect to the medical profession. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that although the entrepreneurial or commercial aspects of the practice of medicine are covered as "trade or commerce" under that state's consumer protection act, violations predicated on n... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "relying on Quimby and Jaramillo in holding that negligence claims asserted against hospital did not include entrepreneurial aspect of hospital's operations, so that claims fell outside reach of state's consumer protection act",
"sentence": "See Quimb... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that claims that relate to \"actual competence of the medical practitioner\" are not recognized under state's consumer protection act, but claims implicating entrepreneurial aspects of practice of medicine may be sufficient",
"sentence": "See Quim... | 205,264 | b |
In this circuit, the excuse given for the late filing is given the more weight than the other Pioneer factors. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "391 F.3d 411, 416",
"parenthetical": "discussing excusable neglect in the context of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a",
"sentence": "Williams v. KFC Nat'l Mgmt. Co., 391 F.3d 411, 416 (2d Cir.2004) (discussing excusable neglect in the context of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)). The Second Circu... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "507 U.S. 398, 398",
"parenthetical": "giving \"little weight to the fact that the counsel was experiencing upheaval in his law practice at the time of the bar date\"",
"sentence": "See also Pioneer, 507 U.S. at 398, 113 S.Ct. 1489 (giving “little weight to the fact that th... | 3,770,138 | a |
In this circuit, the excuse given for the late filing is given the more weight than the other Pioneer factors. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "giving \"little weight to the fact that the counsel was experiencing upheaval in his law practice at the time of the bar date\"",
"sentence": "See also Pioneer, 507 U.S. at 398, 113 S.Ct. 1489 (giving “little weight to the fact that the counsel was e... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "391 F.3d 411, 416",
"parenthetical": "discussing excusable neglect in the context of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a",
"sentence": "Williams v. KFC Nat'l Mgmt. Co., 391 F.3d 411, 416 (2d Cir.2004) (discussing excusable neglect in the context of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)). The Second Circu... | 3,770,138 | b |
In this circuit, the excuse given for the late filing is given the more weight than the other Pioneer factors. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "391 F.3d 411, 416",
"parenthetical": "discussing excusable neglect in the context of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a",
"sentence": "Williams v. KFC Nat'l Mgmt. Co., 391 F.3d 411, 416 (2d Cir.2004) (discussing excusable neglect in the context of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)). The Second Circu... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "2008 WL 2885901, at *5",
"parenthetical": "\"[O]ffice mix-ups, clerical mistakes, and failure to follow office procedures do not generally constitute excusable neglect.\"",
"sentence": "See also Pioneer, 507 U.S. at 398, 113 S.Ct. 1489 (giving “little weight to the fact th... | 3,770,138 | a |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to ownership expense for vehicle owned outright under 11 U.S.C. SS 707(b",
"sentence": "See In re Mati, 390 B.R. 11 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008)(Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to ownership expense for vehicle owned outright under 11 U.... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor may claim phan tom ownership expense on vehicle owned outright",
"sentence": "See also In re Lane, 394 B.R. 248 (Bankr.D.Mass. 2008) (Chapter 13 debtor may claim phan tom ownership expense on vehicle owned outright); In re Young, 39... | 5,895,440 | a |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to ownership expense for vehicle owned outright under 11 U.S.C. SS 707(b",
"sentence": "See In re Mati, 390 B.R. 11 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008)(Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to ownership expense for vehicle owned outright under 11 U.... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 7 debtors were entitled to deduct from their current monthly income the monthly average of the mortgage payments which they were contractually obligated to make on date petition was filed over the next 60 months, without regard to whether they ... | 5,895,440 | a |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to ownership expense for vehicle owned outright under 11 U.S.C. SS 707(b",
"sentence": "See In re Mati, 390 B.R. 11 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008)(Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to ownership expense for vehicle owned outright under 11 U.... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicles owned outright",
"sentence": "But see In re Coffin, 396 B.R. 804 (Bankr.D.Me.2008) (Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicl... | 5,895,440 | a |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to standard housing deduction under 11 U.S.C. SS 707(b",
"sentence": "See In re Mati, 390 B.R. 11 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008)(Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to ownership expense for vehicle owned outright under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) (2) ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor may claim phan tom ownership expense on vehicle owned outright",
"sentence": "See also In re Lane, 394 B.R. 248 (Bankr.D.Mass. 2008) (Chapter 13 debtor may claim phan tom ownership expense on vehicle owned outright); In re Young, 39... | 5,895,440 | a |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to standard housing deduction under 11 U.S.C. SS 707(b",
"sentence": "See In re Mati, 390 B.R. 11 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008)(Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to ownership expense for vehicle owned outright under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) (2) ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 7 debtors were entitled to deduct from their current monthly income the monthly average of the mortgage payments which they were contractually obligated to make on date petition was filed over the next 60 months, without regard to whether they ... | 5,895,440 | a |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to standard housing deduction under 11 U.S.C. SS 707(b",
"sentence": "See In re Mati, 390 B.R. 11 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008)(Chapter 13 debtor is entitled to ownership expense for vehicle owned outright under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) (2) ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicles owned outright",
"sentence": "But see In re Coffin, 396 B.R. 804 (Bankr.D.Me.2008) (Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicl... | 5,895,440 | a |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor may claim phan tom ownership expense on vehicle owned outright",
"sentence": "See also In re Lane, 394 B.R. 248 (Bankr.D.Mass. 2008) (Chapter 13 debtor may claim phan tom ownership expense on vehicle owned outright); In re Young, 39... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 7 debtors are allowed to reduce \"current monthly income\" by amount of payments to mortgagee where they have indicated their intention to surrender property",
"sentence": "See In re Mati, 390 B.R. 11 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008)(Chapter 13 debtor is entit... | 5,895,440 | b |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 7 debtors were entitled to deduct from their current monthly income the monthly average of the mortgage payments which they were contractually obligated to make on date petition was filed over the next 60 months, without regard to whether they ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 7 debtors are allowed to reduce \"current monthly income\" by amount of payments to mortgagee where they have indicated their intention to surrender property",
"sentence": "See In re Mati, 390 B.R. 11 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008)(Chapter 13 debtor is entit... | 5,895,440 | b |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicles owned outright",
"sentence": "But see In re Coffin, 396 B.R. 804 (Bankr.D.Me.2008) (Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicl... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 7 debtors are allowed to reduce \"current monthly income\" by amount of payments to mortgagee where they have indicated their intention to surrender property",
"sentence": "See In re Mati, 390 B.R. 11 (Bankr.D.Mass.2008)(Chapter 13 debtor is entit... | 5,895,440 | b |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor may claim phan tom ownership expense on vehicle owned outright",
"sentence": "See also In re Lane, 394 B.R. 248 (Bankr.D.Mass. 2008) (Chapter 13 debtor may claim phan tom ownership expense on vehicle owned outright); In re Young, 39... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicles owned outright",
"sentence": "But see In re Coffin, 396 B.R. 804 (Bankr.D.Me.2008) (Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicl... | 5,895,440 | a |
This Court is persuaded by the reasoning of the court in Burbank. The holding in Burbank is consistent with earlier decisions examining means test deductions in both Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 cases and reflects this Court's view that the expense side of the disposable income equation is not susceptible to the realistic ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicles owned outright",
"sentence": "But see In re Coffin, 396 B.R. 804 (Bankr.D.Me.2008) (Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to deduct phantom ownership expenses for vehicl... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Chapter 7 debtors were entitled to deduct from their current monthly income the monthly average of the mortgage payments which they were contractually obligated to make on date petition was filed over the next 60 months, without regard to whether they ... | 5,895,440 | b |
[IT 23] Federal courts have held that the public safety exception applies to law enforcement questioning related to the location of a gassing generator or other methamphetamine manufacturing equipment. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "2007 ME 107, ¶¶ 29-30",
"parenthetical": "holding that questions about the location of a gassing generator and other equipment related to the production of methamph'etamine fall within the \"protective sweep\" exception to Miranda",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v.... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "745 F.3d 934, 938",
"parenthetical": "holding that the public safety exception applied when a deputy had probable cause to believe that a stopped driver was a methamphetamine manufacturer and the officer asked if a \"one pot\" was in the car to avoid being sprayed with toxic chem... | 6,776,081 | b |
[IT 23] Federal courts have held that the public safety exception applies to law enforcement questioning related to the location of a gassing generator or other methamphetamine manufacturing equipment. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that questions about the location of a gassing generator and other equipment related to the production of methamph'etamine fall within the \"protective sweep\" exception to Miranda",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Noonan, 745 F.3d 9... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "745 F.3d 934, 938",
"parenthetical": "holding that the public safety exception applied when a deputy had probable cause to believe that a stopped driver was a methamphetamine manufacturer and the officer asked if a \"one pot\" was in the car to avoid being sprayed with toxic chem... | 6,776,081 | b |
[IT 23] Federal courts have held that the public safety exception applies to law enforcement questioning related to the location of a gassing generator or other methamphetamine manufacturing equipment. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "182 Fed.Appx. 88, 91",
"parenthetical": "holding that officers' pre-Mi-randa questions concerning active methamphetamine production were within the public safety exception",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Noonan, 745 F.3d 934, 938 (8th Cir.2014) (holding that the publ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "2007 ME 107, ¶¶ 29-30",
"parenthetical": "holding that questions about the location of a gassing generator and other equipment related to the production of methamph'etamine fall within the \"protective sweep\" exception to Miranda",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v.... | 6,776,081 | a |
[IT 23] Federal courts have held that the public safety exception applies to law enforcement questioning related to the location of a gassing generator or other methamphetamine manufacturing equipment. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that questions about the location of a gassing generator and other equipment related to the production of methamph'etamine fall within the \"protective sweep\" exception to Miranda",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Noonan, 745 F.3d 9... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "182 Fed.Appx. 88, 91",
"parenthetical": "holding that officers' pre-Mi-randa questions concerning active methamphetamine production were within the public safety exception",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Noonan, 745 F.3d 934, 938 (8th Cir.2014) (holding that the publ... | 6,776,081 | b |
The sole basis for the government's argument appears to be that Finley's employer, not Finley, had a property interest in the phone and that Finley should have expected the employer to read the messages on the phone after he returned it to the employer. But a property interest in the item searched is only one factor in... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "140 F.3d 615, 615",
"parenthetical": "\"[N]o one of [the Ibarra] factors is necessarily decisive .... \"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364, 368, 88 S.Ct. 2120, 20 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1968) (“[C]apacity to claim the protection of the [Fourth] Amendment de... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "392 U.S. 364, 368",
"parenthetical": "\"[C]apacity to claim the protection of the [Fourth] Amendment depends not upon a property right in the invaded place but upon whether the area was one in which there was a reasonable expectation of freedom from governmental intrusion.\"",
... | 3,779,541 | b |
The sole basis for the government's argument appears to be that Finley's employer, not Finley, had a property interest in the phone and that Finley should have expected the employer to read the messages on the phone after he returned it to the employer. But a property interest in the item searched is only one factor in... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"[C]apacity to claim the protection of the [Fourth] Amendment depends not upon a property right in the invaded place but upon whether the area was one in which there was a reasonable expectation of freedom from governmental intrusion.\"",
"sentence": "Se... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "140 F.3d 615, 615",
"parenthetical": "\"[N]o one of [the Ibarra] factors is necessarily decisive .... \"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364, 368, 88 S.Ct. 2120, 20 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1968) (“[C]apacity to claim the protection of the [Fourth] Amendment de... | 3,779,541 | a |
The sole basis for the government's argument appears to be that Finley's employer, not Finley, had a property interest in the phone and that Finley should have expected the employer to read the messages on the phone after he returned it to the employer. But a property interest in the item searched is only one factor in... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "140 F.3d 615, 615",
"parenthetical": "\"[N]o one of [the Ibarra] factors is necessarily decisive .... \"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364, 368, 88 S.Ct. 2120, 20 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1968) (“[C]apacity to claim the protection of the [Fourth] Amendment de... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"[C]apacity to claim the protection of the [Fourth] Amendment depends not upon a property right in the invaded place but upon whether the area was one in which there was a reasonable expectation of freedom from governmental intrusion.\"",
"sentence": "Se... | 3,779,541 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct reverse duplicates of real bills were not counterfeit as a matter of law",
"sentence": "See also United States v. Smith, 318 F.2d 94 (4th Cir.1963) (holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "159 F.2d 798, 802",
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "159 F.2d 798, 802",
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "806 F.2d 1463, 1470",
"parenthetical": "holding that the district judge properly submitted to the jury the question of whether uncut bills were counterfeit under SS 471",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that the di... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "159 F.2d 798, 802",
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "801 F.2d 356, 360",
"parenthetical": "holding that defendant was not entitled to the similitude instruction under SS 472 where facts indicated an overt attempt to pass an altered Federal Reserve note",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "159 F.2d 798, 802",
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "479 F.2d 661, 664",
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "159 F.2d 798, 802",
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "159 F.2d 798, 802",
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "159 F.2d 798, 802",
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "159 F.2d 798, 802",
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "434 F.2d 827, 829",
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided photocopies of bills on pinkish paper did not sufficiently resemble actual currency to justify a SS 472 conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct reverse duplicates of real bills were not counterfeit as a matter of law",
"sentence": "See also United States v. Smith, 318 F.2d 94 (4th Cir.1963) (holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "806 F.2d 1463, 1470",
"parenthetical": "holding that the district judge properly submitted to the jury the question of whether uncut bills were counterfeit under SS 471",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that the di... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "801 F.2d 356, 360",
"parenthetical": "holding that defendant was not entitled to the similitude instruction under SS 472 where facts indicated an overt attempt to pass an altered Federal Reserve note",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "479 F.2d 661, 664",
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "434 F.2d 827, 829",
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided photocopies of bills on pinkish paper did not sufficiently resemble actual currency to justify a SS 472 conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct reverse duplicates of real bills were not counterfeit as a matter of law",
"sentence": "See also United States v. Smith, 318 F.2d 94 (4th Cir.1963) (holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "806 F.2d 1463, 1470",
"parenthetical": "holding that the district judge properly submitted to the jury the question of whether uncut bills were counterfeit under SS 471",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that the di... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "801 F.2d 356, 360",
"parenthetical": "holding that defendant was not entitled to the similitude instruction under SS 472 where facts indicated an overt attempt to pass an altered Federal Reserve note",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "479 F.2d 661, 664",
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "434 F.2d 827, 829",
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided photocopies of bills on pinkish paper did not sufficiently resemble actual currency to justify a SS 472 conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct reverse duplicates of real bills were not counterfeit as a matter of law",
"sentence": "See also United States v. Smith, 318 F.2d 94 (4th Cir.1963) (holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "806 F.2d 1463, 1470",
"parenthetical": "holding that the district judge properly submitted to the jury the question of whether uncut bills were counterfeit under SS 471",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that the di... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "801 F.2d 356, 360",
"parenthetical": "holding that defendant was not entitled to the similitude instruction under SS 472 where facts indicated an overt attempt to pass an altered Federal Reserve note",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "479 F.2d 661, 664",
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "434 F.2d 827, 829",
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided photocopies of bills on pinkish paper did not sufficiently resemble actual currency to justify a SS 472 conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct reverse duplicates of real bills were not counterfeit as a matter of law",
"sentence": "See also United States v. Smith, 318 F.2d 94 (4th Cir.1963) (holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "806 F.2d 1463, 1470",
"parenthetical": "holding that the district judge properly submitted to the jury the question of whether uncut bills were counterfeit under SS 471",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that the di... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "801 F.2d 356, 360",
"parenthetical": "holding that defendant was not entitled to the similitude instruction under SS 472 where facts indicated an overt attempt to pass an altered Federal Reserve note",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "479 F.2d 661, 664",
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "434 F.2d 827, 829",
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided photocopies of bills on pinkish paper did not sufficiently resemble actual currency to justify a SS 472 conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct reverse duplicates of real bills were not counterfeit as a matter of law",
"sentence": "See also United States v. Smith, 318 F.2d 94 (4th Cir.1963) (holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "806 F.2d 1463, 1470",
"parenthetical": "holding that the district judge properly submitted to the jury the question of whether uncut bills were counterfeit under SS 471",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that the di... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "801 F.2d 356, 360",
"parenthetical": "holding that defendant was not entitled to the similitude instruction under SS 472 where facts indicated an overt attempt to pass an altered Federal Reserve note",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "479 F.2d 661, 664",
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "434 F.2d 827, 829",
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided photocopies of bills on pinkish paper did not sufficiently resemble actual currency to justify a SS 472 conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct reverse duplicates of real bills were not counterfeit as a matter of law",
"sentence": "See also United States v. Smith, 318 F.2d 94 (4th Cir.1963) (holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "806 F.2d 1463, 1470",
"parenthetical": "holding that the district judge properly submitted to the jury the question of whether uncut bills were counterfeit under SS 471",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that the di... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "801 F.2d 356, 360",
"parenthetical": "holding that defendant was not entitled to the similitude instruction under SS 472 where facts indicated an overt attempt to pass an altered Federal Reserve note",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "479 F.2d 661, 664",
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that bogus bills lacking serial numbers and a treasury seal sufficiently resembled real currency under SS 474 to submit to the jury the counterfeit issue",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (hol... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "434 F.2d 827, 829",
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided photocopies of bills on pinkish paper did not sufficiently resemble actual currency to justify a SS 472 conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct reverse duplicates of real bills were not counterfeit as a matter of law",
"sentence": "See also United States v. Smith, 318 F.2d 94 (4th Cir.1963) (holding that one-sided bogus bills with indistinct... | 11,642,032 | a |
(Emphasis added). Harrod argues that "similitude" includes only items that "bear[ ] such a likeness or resemblance to any of the genuine obligations or securities issued under the authority of the United States as is calculated to deceive an honest, sensible and unsuspecting person of ordinary observation and care when... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "806 F.2d 1463, 1470",
"parenthetical": "holding that the district judge properly submitted to the jury the question of whether uncut bills were counterfeit under SS 471",
"sentence": "See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (holding that the di... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. SS 264 for possession of one-sided copies of bills and various counterfeiting equipment",
"sentence": "United States v. Lustig, 159 F.2d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) (upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 264 for possessi... | 11,642,032 | b |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.