context stringlengths 58 1.13k | citation_a dict | citation_b dict | case_id int64 475 12.5M | label stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
The dates of a public official's term of office are adjudicative facts within the meaning of this rule. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "154 P.2d 48, 50",
"parenthetical": "supreme court took judicial notice of district attorney's term of office",
"sentence": "See Larsen v. Archdiocese of Denver, 631 P.2d 1163, 1164 (Colo.App. 1981) (court may take judicial notice of term of public office); cf. Lovato v. Johnson... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "631 P.2d 1163, 1164",
"parenthetical": "court may take judicial notice of term of public office",
"sentence": "See Larsen v. Archdiocese of Denver, 631 P.2d 1163, 1164 (Colo.App. 1981) (court may take judicial notice of term of public office); cf. Lovato v. Johnson, 617 P.2d 12... | 8,364,376 | b |
In addition, we note that the statute has been amended on numerous occasions subsequent to our Supreme Court's 1926 pronouncement in Murphy. In each of these subsequent enactments, the underlying language of the time limitation has not been significantly changed or clarified. We may presume, therefore, that the action ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "146 Conn. 149, 156",
"parenthetical": "action of legislature in amending statute regulating braking systems presumed to have been enacted in light of judicial decisions",
"sentence": "See Turner v. Scanlon, 146 Conn. 149, 156, 148 A.2d 334 (1959) (action of legislature in amend... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "222 Conn. 269, 279",
"parenthetical": "\"the legislature is presumed to be aware of judicial interpretations of a statute\"",
"sentence": "See Turner v. Scanlon, 146 Conn. 149, 156, 148 A.2d 334 (1959) (action of legislature in amending statute regulating braking systems p... | 4,062,820 | a |
In addition, we note that the statute has been amended on numerous occasions subsequent to our Supreme Court's 1926 pronouncement in Murphy. In each of these subsequent enactments, the underlying language of the time limitation has not been significantly changed or clarified. We may presume, therefore, that the action ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "146 Conn. 149, 156",
"parenthetical": "action of legislature in amending statute regulating braking systems presumed to have been enacted in light of judicial decisions",
"sentence": "See Turner v. Scanlon, 146 Conn. 149, 156, 148 A.2d 334 (1959) (action of legislature in amend... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"the legislature is presumed to be aware of judicial interpretations of a statute\"",
"sentence": "See Turner v. Scanlon, 146 Conn. 149, 156, 148 A.2d 334 (1959) (action of legislature in amending statute regulating braking systems presumed to have ... | 4,062,820 | a |
In addition, we note that the statute has been amended on numerous occasions subsequent to our Supreme Court's 1926 pronouncement in Murphy. In each of these subsequent enactments, the underlying language of the time limitation has not been significantly changed or clarified. We may presume, therefore, that the action ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "222 Conn. 269, 279",
"parenthetical": "\"the legislature is presumed to be aware of judicial interpretations of a statute\"",
"sentence": "See Turner v. Scanlon, 146 Conn. 149, 156, 148 A.2d 334 (1959) (action of legislature in amending statute regulating braking systems p... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "action of legislature in amending statute regulating braking systems presumed to have been enacted in light of judicial decisions",
"sentence": "See Turner v. Scanlon, 146 Conn. 149, 156, 148 A.2d 334 (1959) (action of legislature in amending statute regu... | 4,062,820 | b |
In addition, we note that the statute has been amended on numerous occasions subsequent to our Supreme Court's 1926 pronouncement in Murphy. In each of these subsequent enactments, the underlying language of the time limitation has not been significantly changed or clarified. We may presume, therefore, that the action ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "action of legislature in amending statute regulating braking systems presumed to have been enacted in light of judicial decisions",
"sentence": "See Turner v. Scanlon, 146 Conn. 149, 156, 148 A.2d 334 (1959) (action of legislature in amending statute regu... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"the legislature is presumed to be aware of judicial interpretations of a statute\"",
"sentence": "See Turner v. Scanlon, 146 Conn. 149, 156, 148 A.2d 334 (1959) (action of legislature in amending statute regulating braking systems presumed to have ... | 4,062,820 | a |
. This case is distinguishable from cases where the alien filed a motion to reopen during the seven-month window, but explicitly requested a stay of the voluntary departure period pending adjudication of the motion indicating that the alien had no intention to relinquish the voluntary departure agreement. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding the BIA did not err in denying alien's motion to stay voluntary departure period pending determination on the motion to reopen",
"sentence": "See Blackman v. Att'y Gen., 414 Fed.Appx. 415 (3d Cir.2011) (holding BIA did not err in determining ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding BIA did not err in determining request for stay of voluntary departure is not an implicit request for a withdrawal of voluntary departure",
"sentence": "See Blackman v. Att'y Gen., 414 Fed.Appx. 415 (3d Cir.2011) (holding BIA did not err in determ... | 3,923,724 | b |
Plaintiff fails to provide any evidence, beyond her conclusory suppositions, that part-time positions existed in February 1993 or May 1993, the times when she was placed on medical leave. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "reasonable accommodation does not require that employer create a light-duty position or new permanent position for disabled employee",
"sentence": "See Howell v. Michelin Tire Corp., 860 F.Supp. 1488 (M.D.Ala.1994) (reasonable accommodation does not requi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ADA does not require employer to make fundamental or substantial modifications in its operations to assure every disabled individual the benefit of employment",
"sentence": "See Howell v. Michelin Tire Corp., 860 F.Supp. 1488 (M.D.Ala.1994) (reasonab... | 841,840 | a |
Plaintiff fails to provide any evidence, beyond her conclusory suppositions, that part-time positions existed in February 1993 or May 1993, the times when she was placed on medical leave. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "reasonable accommodation does not require that employer create a light-duty position or new permanent position for disabled employee",
"sentence": "See Howell v. Michelin Tire Corp., 860 F.Supp. 1488 (M.D.Ala.1994) (reasonable accommodation does not requi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "842 F.Supp. 988, 993-94",
"parenthetical": "employer hospital failed to reasonably accommodate when did not offer nurse opportunity for reduced shifts being advertised",
"sentence": "See Howell v. Michelin Tire Corp., 860 F.Supp. 1488 (M.D.Ala.1994) (reasonable accommodati... | 841,840 | a |
Plaintiff fails to provide any evidence, beyond her conclusory suppositions, that part-time positions existed in February 1993 or May 1993, the times when she was placed on medical leave. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "employer hospital failed to reasonably accommodate when did not offer nurse opportunity for reduced shifts being advertised",
"sentence": "See Howell v. Michelin Tire Corp., 860 F.Supp. 1488 (M.D.Ala.1994) (reasonable accommodation does not require t... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "reasonable accommodation does not require that employer create a light-duty position or new permanent position for disabled employee",
"sentence": "See Howell v. Michelin Tire Corp., 860 F.Supp. 1488 (M.D.Ala.1994) (reasonable accommodation does not requi... | 841,840 | b |
.The conclusion that a court cannot dismiss a habeas petition sua sponte based on an unpleaded affirmative defense except as a matter of preliminary review is consistent with the Supreme Court's holding that a "court of appeals is not 'required' to raise the issue of procedural default sua sponte." | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "169 F.3d 301, 301",
"parenthetical": "\"We conclude, however, that even if we do have discretion in some circumstances to apply the procedural bar where the state has waived the defense in the district court, we will not exercise such discretion in this case.\"",
"sentence... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "522 U.S. 87, 89, 90-91",
"parenthetical": "refusing to consider the broader question of whether a court of appeals may raise a procedural default sua sponte",
"sentence": "Trest v. Cain, 522 U.S. 87, 89, 90-91, 118 S.Ct. 478, 139 L.Ed.2d 444 (1997) (refusing to consider t... | 940,836 | b |
.The conclusion that a court cannot dismiss a habeas petition sua sponte based on an unpleaded affirmative defense except as a matter of preliminary review is consistent with the Supreme Court's holding that a "court of appeals is not 'required' to raise the issue of procedural default sua sponte." | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to consider the broader question of whether a court of appeals may raise a procedural default sua sponte",
"sentence": "Trest v. Cain, 522 U.S. 87, 89, 90-91, 118 S.Ct. 478, 139 L.Ed.2d 444 (1997) (refusing to consider the broader question ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "169 F.3d 301, 301",
"parenthetical": "\"We conclude, however, that even if we do have discretion in some circumstances to apply the procedural bar where the state has waived the defense in the district court, we will not exercise such discretion in this case.\"",
"sentence... | 940,836 | a |
.The conclusion that a court cannot dismiss a habeas petition sua sponte based on an unpleaded affirmative defense except as a matter of preliminary review is consistent with the Supreme Court's holding that a "court of appeals is not 'required' to raise the issue of procedural default sua sponte." | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to consider the broader question of whether a court of appeals may raise a procedural default sua sponte",
"sentence": "Trest v. Cain, 522 U.S. 87, 89, 90-91, 118 S.Ct. 478, 139 L.Ed.2d 444 (1997) (refusing to consider the broader question ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "169 F.3d 301, 301",
"parenthetical": "\"We conclude, however, that even if we do have discretion in some circumstances to apply the procedural bar where the state has waived the defense in the district court, we will not exercise such discretion in this case.\"",
"sentence... | 940,836 | a |
We reject plaintiff's contention that she is entitled to damages for her criminal trials, conviction, incarceration, and the resulting aggravation of her Rape Trauma Syndrome. The intervening acts of the prosecutor, grand jury, judge and jury -- assuming that these court officials acted without malice that caused them ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "in section 1983 action based on false arrest, grand jury or other independent intermediary breaks chain of causation unless defendant policemen mislead intermediary",
"sentence": "See Smiddy v. Varney, 803 F.2d 1469 (9th Cir.1986); Duncan v. Nelson, ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "decision of prosecutor to charge or grand jury to indict does not shield police officer who deliberately supplied misleading information",
"sentence": "See Smiddy v. Varney, 803 F.2d 1469 (9th Cir.1986); Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939 (7th Cir.1972); see ... | 10,534,685 | a |
We reject plaintiff's contention that she is entitled to damages for her criminal trials, conviction, incarceration, and the resulting aggravation of her Rape Trauma Syndrome. The intervening acts of the prosecutor, grand jury, judge and jury -- assuming that these court officials acted without malice that caused them ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "decision of prosecutor to charge or grand jury to indict does not shield police officer who deliberately supplied misleading information",
"sentence": "See Smiddy v. Varney, 803 F.2d 1469 (9th Cir.1986); Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939 (7th Cir.1972); see ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "stating that under New York law, damages for false arrest are measured only to time of arraignment or indictment because, after such an evaluation, subsequent detention is attributed to independent, supervening determination of probable cause, not to e... | 10,534,685 | b |
Defendants contend that they were not subpoenaed or directed by a court to furnish the information sought by the Roberts plaintiffs in their discovery requests. They also submit that the Indictment is overbroad, charging them not only with concealing and destroying documents requested by the Roberts plaintiffs, but als... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "934 F.2d 450, 450",
"parenthetical": "destroying documents in anticipation of a subpoena can constitute obstruction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Ruggiero, 934 F.2d at 450 (destroying documents in anticipation of a subpoena can constitute obstruction); Gravely, 840 F.2d at 1160 (un... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "143 F. 442, 442",
"parenthetical": "inducing witness not under subpoena not to testify was actionable as an obstruction under the statute: \"In the absence of a federal statute of the scope of this clause, a party to a pending civil suit in federal court, so long as process ... | 1,575,313 | a |
Pl.'s Dep. 228:15-21. Given the lack of corroboration of the alleged oral precondition, as well as the plaintiffs own testimony, at both his deposition and in his affidavit, acknowledging that, as a manager, he was no longer subject to union protection, the plaintiffs recollection of an oral precondition, without more,... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "595 F.Supp.2d 8, 36",
"parenthetical": "observing that when a \"declaration is self-serving and uncorroborated,\" it is \"of little value at the summary judgment stage\"",
"sentence": "See Burley, 801 F.3d at 298-99, 2015 WL 5474078, at *6 (finding that plaintiffs observat... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "801 F.3d 298, 298-99",
"parenthetical": "finding that plaintiffs observations, without more, were insufficient to defeat summary judgment for employer",
"sentence": "See Burley, 801 F.3d at 298-99, 2015 WL 5474078, at *6 (finding that plaintiffs observations, without more, were... | 4,160,419 | b |
Pl.'s Dep. 228:15-21. Given the lack of corroboration of the alleged oral precondition, as well as the plaintiffs own testimony, at both his deposition and in his affidavit, acknowledging that, as a manager, he was no longer subject to union protection, the plaintiffs recollection of an oral precondition, without more,... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "520 F.Supp.2d 101, 105",
"parenthetical": "\"Self-serving testimony does not create genuine issues of material fact, especially where that very testimony suggests that corroborating evidence should be readily available.\"",
"sentence": "See Burley, 801 F.3d at 298-99, 2015... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "801 F.3d 298, 298-99",
"parenthetical": "finding that plaintiffs observations, without more, were insufficient to defeat summary judgment for employer",
"sentence": "See Burley, 801 F.3d at 298-99, 2015 WL 5474078, at *6 (finding that plaintiffs observations, without more, were... | 4,160,419 | b |
Pl.'s Dep. 228:15-21. Given the lack of corroboration of the alleged oral precondition, as well as the plaintiffs own testimony, at both his deposition and in his affidavit, acknowledging that, as a manager, he was no longer subject to union protection, the plaintiffs recollection of an oral precondition, without more,... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "595 F.Supp.2d 8, 36",
"parenthetical": "observing that when a \"declaration is self-serving and uncorroborated,\" it is \"of little value at the summary judgment stage\"",
"sentence": "See Burley, 801 F.3d at 298-99, 2015 WL 5474078, at *6 (finding that plaintiffs observat... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "2015 WL 5474078, at *6",
"parenthetical": "finding that plaintiffs observations, without more, were insufficient to defeat summary judgment for employer",
"sentence": "See Burley, 801 F.3d at 298-99, 2015 WL 5474078, at *6 (finding that plaintiffs observations, without more, we... | 4,160,419 | b |
Pl.'s Dep. 228:15-21. Given the lack of corroboration of the alleged oral precondition, as well as the plaintiffs own testimony, at both his deposition and in his affidavit, acknowledging that, as a manager, he was no longer subject to union protection, the plaintiffs recollection of an oral precondition, without more,... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "520 F.Supp.2d 101, 105",
"parenthetical": "\"Self-serving testimony does not create genuine issues of material fact, especially where that very testimony suggests that corroborating evidence should be readily available.\"",
"sentence": "See Burley, 801 F.3d at 298-99, 2015... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "2015 WL 5474078, at *6",
"parenthetical": "finding that plaintiffs observations, without more, were insufficient to defeat summary judgment for employer",
"sentence": "See Burley, 801 F.3d at 298-99, 2015 WL 5474078, at *6 (finding that plaintiffs observations, without more, we... | 4,160,419 | b |
As is readily apparent from the analysis quoted above, the Wilder Court made perfectly clear that in concluding that "there can be little doubt that healthcare providers are the intended beneficiaries of the Boren Amendment," it was relying on the language in the Boren Amendment requiring a state plan to provide for "p... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "6 F.3d 519, 526",
"parenthetical": "\"Wilder concluded that institutional providers were intended beneficiaries of the Boren Amendment because the Amendment concerned their reimbursement.\"",
"sentence": "See Ark. Med. Soc’y, Inc. v. Reynolds, 6 F.3d 519, 526 (8th Cir.1993) (“W... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "93 F.3d 997, 1004",
"parenthetical": "\"The Wilder Court ... observed that the statute 'is phrased in terms benefitting health care providers,' and ... then proceeded to illustrate how the plain language of the Boren Amendment 'establishes a system for reimbursement of provi... | 9,510,408 | a |
These cardholders have no other realistic source of information regarding this litigation. Thus, in light of the cardholders' dependence on defendants for their future credit needs and information, this Court finds that Chase's and Citibank's actions are potentially coercive and improper. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "2001 WL 1035132, at *4",
"parenthetical": "\"[A] finding of potential coercion is warranted here,\" because \"the potential class members depend upon the defendant for information, supplies, and credit.\"",
"sentence": "See Ralph Oldsmobile, 2001 WL 1035132, at *4 (“[A] finding... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "751 F.2d 1203, 1203",
"parenthetical": "\"Unsupervised, unilateral communications with the plaintiff class sabotage the goal of informed consent by urging exclusion on the basis of a one-sided presentation of the facts, without opportunity for rebuttal.\"",
"sentence": "Se... | 9,013,416 | a |
These cardholders have no other realistic source of information regarding this litigation. Thus, in light of the cardholders' dependence on defendants for their future credit needs and information, this Court finds that Chase's and Citibank's actions are potentially coercive and improper. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "2001 WL 1035132, at *4",
"parenthetical": "\"[A] finding of potential coercion is warranted here,\" because \"the potential class members depend upon the defendant for information, supplies, and credit.\"",
"sentence": "See Ralph Oldsmobile, 2001 WL 1035132, at *4 (“[A] finding... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "156 F.R.D. 633, 633",
"parenthetical": "noting that because the defendant and potential class members were involved in an on-going business relationship, there was a potential for coercion",
"sentence": "See Ralph Oldsmobile, 2001 WL 1035132, at *4 (“[A] finding of potenti... | 9,013,416 | a |
We do so, however, because Fulwood is entitled to qualified immunity for each of the claims in Redmond's complaint. Accordingly, we need not and do not reach the question of whether Fulwood is entitled to absolute immunity for actions taken during his tenure as Chairman of .the United States Parole Commission. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "685 F.3d 1110, 1113",
"parenthetical": "\"Because we conclude that the [Parole Commission] defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, we do not address the issue of absolute immunity.\"",
"sentence": "See Taylor v. Reilly, 685 F.3d 1110, 1113 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (“Because we c... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"[W]e are free to affirm the lower court on alternative grounds.\"",
"sentence": "See Taylor v. Reilly, 685 F.3d 1110, 1113 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (“Because we conclude that the [Parole Commission] defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, we do not ... | 12,276,251 | a |
Under this rule, an expert may express an opinion based on inadmissible hearsay evidence so long as that evidence is of the type reasonably relied on by experts in the particular field. Here, Blum's report and, especially, the supporting documents are the kind of evidence on which a forensic chemist reasonably relies i... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "647 F.2d 1048, 1051",
"parenthetical": "under rule 703, \"[i]t is quite reasonable for a chemist to review another chemist's analysis when forming an opinion as to the veracity of the latter's test results\"",
"sentence": "See Reardon v. Manson, 806 F.2d 39, 42 (2d Cir.198... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "806 F.2d 39, 42",
"parenthetical": "upholding admission of drug composition testimony by supervising toxicologist who based his opinion on results of tests, including chromatography and spectrophotometry, performed by subordinates",
"sentence": "See Reardon v. Manson, 806 F.2d ... | 3,499,414 | b |
Under this rule, an expert may express an opinion based on inadmissible hearsay evidence so long as that evidence is of the type reasonably relied on by experts in the particular field. Here, Blum's report and, especially, the supporting documents are the kind of evidence on which a forensic chemist reasonably relies i... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "647 F.2d 1048, 1051",
"parenthetical": "under rule 703, \"[i]t is quite reasonable for a chemist to review another chemist's analysis when forming an opinion as to the veracity of the latter's test results\"",
"sentence": "See Reardon v. Manson, 806 F.2d 39, 42 (2d Cir.198... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding admission of drug composition testimony by supervising toxicologist who based his opinion on results of tests, including chromatography and spectrophotometry, performed by subordinates",
"sentence": "See Reardon v. Manson, 806 F.2d 39, 42 (2d Ci... | 3,499,414 | b |
Under this rule, an expert may express an opinion based on inadmissible hearsay evidence so long as that evidence is of the type reasonably relied on by experts in the particular field. Here, Blum's report and, especially, the supporting documents are the kind of evidence on which a forensic chemist reasonably relies i... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding admission of drug composition testimony by supervising toxicologist who based his opinion on results of tests, including chromatography and spectrophotometry, performed by subordinates",
"sentence": "See Reardon v. Manson, 806 F.2d 39, 42 (2d Ci... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "647 F.2d 1048, 1051",
"parenthetical": "under rule 703, \"[i]t is quite reasonable for a chemist to review another chemist's analysis when forming an opinion as to the veracity of the latter's test results\"",
"sentence": "See Reardon v. Manson, 806 F.2d 39, 42 (2d Cir.198... | 3,499,414 | a |
Under this rule, an expert may express an opinion based on inadmissible hearsay evidence so long as that evidence is of the type reasonably relied on by experts in the particular field. Here, Blum's report and, especially, the supporting documents are the kind of evidence on which a forensic chemist reasonably relies i... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "647 F.2d 1048, 1051",
"parenthetical": "under rule 703, \"[i]t is quite reasonable for a chemist to review another chemist's analysis when forming an opinion as to the veracity of the latter's test results\"",
"sentence": "See Reardon v. Manson, 806 F.2d 39, 42 (2d Cir.198... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "upholding admission of drug composition testimony by supervising toxicologist who based his opinion on results of tests, including chromatography and spectrophotometry, performed by subordinates",
"sentence": "See Reardon v. Manson, 806 F.2d 39, 42 (2d Ci... | 3,499,414 | b |
Kearney does not point to any evidence sufficient to create a genuine factual question as to whether the defendants' explanation is a pretext for discrimination. That some of the candidates had blemishes on their redore! of that Kearney feels that the selection process should have produced a different result does not s... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "802 F.2d 638, 641",
"parenthetical": "\"The employer need not prove that the person promoted had superior objective qualifications, or that it made the wisest choice, but only that the reasons for the decision were nondiscriminatory.\"",
"sentence": "See Davis v. State Univ. of... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "243 F.3d 93, 103",
"parenthetical": "stating that a material factual issue can be created only in a situation not present here -- where \"the plaintiffs credentials [are] so superior to the credentials of the person selected for the job that 'no reasonable person, in the exe... | 3,728,237 | a |
The Appellants raised this argument in the context of their general contention that they were entitled to summary judgment based on official immunity. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "287 Ga. 618, 620",
"parenthetical": "\"Where there is an established policy requiring an official to take specified action in a specified situation, the policy creates a ministerial duty on the part of the official to perform the specified task.\"",
"sentence": "See Gilber... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "264 Ga. 744, 752",
"parenthetical": "\"The doctrine of official immunity... provides that while a public officer or employee may be personally liable for his negligent ministerial acts, he may not be held liable for his discretionary acts unless such acts are wilful, wanton, or o... | 12,441,555 | b |
The Appellants raised this argument in the context of their general contention that they were entitled to summary judgment based on official immunity. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "264 Ga. 744, 752",
"parenthetical": "\"The doctrine of official immunity... provides that while a public officer or employee may be personally liable for his negligent ministerial acts, he may not be held liable for his discretionary acts unless such acts are wilful, wanton, or o... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "279 Ga. 480, 482",
"parenthetical": "\"A ministerial act is commonly one that is simple, absolute, and definite, arising under conditions admitted or proved to exist, and requiring merely the execution of a specific duty.\"",
"sentence": "See Gilbert v. Richardson, 264 Ga.... | 12,441,555 | a |
Based upon the foregoing, we reverse the final judgment as to the trial court's $20,000 valuation of the tools and remand the case for further proceedings as to this issue. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "768 So.2d 472, 474",
"parenthetical": "holding that the trial court erred in valuing the wife's jewelry at $10,000 and distributing that amount to her as part of her share of marital assets where the only testimony as to the value of the jewelry came from the husband and concludi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "80 So.3d 405, 407-10",
"parenthetical": "noting that the former wife's financial affidavit reflected that the parties owned $10,000 worth of jewelry and that she testified regarding \"each piece of jewelry and its value\" and \"each piece of furniture and household item,\" h... | 7,002,779 | a |
Based upon the foregoing, we reverse the final judgment as to the trial court's $20,000 valuation of the tools and remand the case for further proceedings as to this issue. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "768 So.2d 472, 474",
"parenthetical": "holding that the trial court erred in valuing the wife's jewelry at $10,000 and distributing that amount to her as part of her share of marital assets where the only testimony as to the value of the jewelry came from the husband and concludi... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "727 So.2d 972, 974-75",
"parenthetical": "rejecting the husband's argument that the assignment of $10,000 worth of furniture and furnishings was unsupported by competent evidence where the wife introduced photographs of the furniture and her financial affidavit valued the furnitu... | 7,002,779 | a |
Based upon the foregoing, we reverse the final judgment as to the trial court's $20,000 valuation of the tools and remand the case for further proceedings as to this issue. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "727 So.2d 972, 974-75",
"parenthetical": "rejecting the husband's argument that the assignment of $10,000 worth of furniture and furnishings was unsupported by competent evidence where the wife introduced photographs of the furniture and her financial affidavit valued the furnitu... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "80 So.3d 405, 407-10",
"parenthetical": "noting that the former wife's financial affidavit reflected that the parties owned $10,000 worth of jewelry and that she testified regarding \"each piece of jewelry and its value\" and \"each piece of furniture and household item,\" h... | 7,002,779 | b |
CDN may eventually be entitled to a return of excess or unclaimed funds. See Six Mex. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "129 F.3d 1026, 1027",
"parenthetical": "assuming that when absent class members do not have a calculable interest in unclaimed money, the balance of a fund is returned to defendants",
"sentence": "Workers v. Ariz. Citrus Growers, 904 F.2d 1301, 1308 (9th Cir.1990) (“Reversion t... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "904 F.2d 1301, 1308",
"parenthetical": "\"Reversion to the defendant may be appropriate when deterrence is not a goal of the statute or is not required by the circumstances.\"",
"sentence": "Workers v. Ariz. Citrus Growers, 904 F.2d 1301, 1308 (9th Cir.1990) (“Reversion t... | 3,791,981 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 3,465,174 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | 3,465,174 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 3,465,174 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 3,465,174 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 3,465,174 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | 3,465,174 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 3,465,174 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 3,465,174 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 3,465,174 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp fraud requires proof that the accused knew his use was unauthorized",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibit... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "810 F.2d 1215, 1222-23",
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 10,532,912 | b |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | 10,532,912 | a |
The prosecution, noting in its brief that the instruction was "perhaps ill-advised" and may have been "overstated," virtually concedes that the district court's instruction was erroneous. The prosecution does not dispute that although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, there are important exceptions. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "ignorance of the law may be an excuse where legislation criminalizes \"wholly passive\" conduct by a person who is \"unaware of any wrongdoing\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conv... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "conviction for failing to register as a felon requires proof of knowledge of obligation to register",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419, 105 S.Ct. 2084, 85 L.Ed.2d 434 (1985) (conviction under statute prohibiting food stamp f... | 10,532,912 | b |
"Showup identification procedures that occurred within temporal and geographic proximity to the crime have generally not been found to be unduly suggestive." | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "2008 WL 4960454, at *23",
"parenthetical": "holding that a show-up identification that occurred less than ninety minutes after the commission of the crime and within one mile of the crime scene was not unnecessarily suggestive because of its close temporal and geographic pr... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "23 F.3d 730, 730",
"parenthetical": "affirming admission of on-scene show-up identification finding that \"[t]he fact that the suspects were handcuffed, in the custody of law enforcement officers, and illuminated by flashlights also did not render the pretrial identification... | 4,344,728 | a |
Although this contention may be correct, it misses the point. Shore does not seek to hold the federal agencies vicariously liable for the torts of the independent contractors; rather, it imputes primary negligence to the federal agencies in the selection of the contractor, a viable theory under the Act. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "412 U.S. 532, 532-33",
"parenthetical": "government not liable for negligence of employees of independent contractors, but remand to determine if federal employee was negligent",
"sentence": "See Logue v. United States, supra, 412 U.S. at 532-33, 93 S.Ct. at 2222 (government no... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "604 F.2d 417, 428-30",
"parenthetical": "employment of independent contractor does not insulate government from liability for its own employees' acts of negligence that occur in connection with the work of the independent contractor",
"sentence": "See Logue v. United States, su... | 3,919,479 | a |
Although this contention may be correct, it misses the point. Shore does not seek to hold the federal agencies vicariously liable for the torts of the independent contractors; rather, it imputes primary negligence to the federal agencies in the selection of the contractor, a viable theory under the Act. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "604 F.2d 417, 428-30",
"parenthetical": "employment of independent contractor does not insulate government from liability for its own employees' acts of negligence that occur in connection with the work of the independent contractor",
"sentence": "See Logue v. United States, su... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "93 S.Ct. 2222, 2222",
"parenthetical": "government not liable for negligence of employees of independent contractors, but remand to determine if federal employee was negligent",
"sentence": "See Logue v. United States, supra, 412 U.S. at 532-33, 93 S.Ct. at 2222 (government not... | 3,919,479 | b |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"it would be unjust to saddle the plaintiff with the burden of isolating the precise failure\"",
"sentence": "See 128 Vt. 393-95, 264 A.2d at 799-800. This point is made explicit in Wollerman, 221 A.2d at 515 (“it would be unjust to saddle the plaintiff ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "36 P.3d 11, 13-14",
"parenthetical": "evidence of store's failure to inspect premises within reasonable period of time is sufficient to allow jury to infer that dangerous condition was present long enough for store to have opportunity to discover and remedy condition",
"sentenc... | 1,605,902 | a |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"it would be unjust to saddle the plaintiff with the burden of isolating the precise failure\"",
"sentence": "See 128 Vt. 393-95, 264 A.2d at 799-800. This point is made explicit in Wollerman, 221 A.2d at 515 (“it would be unjust to saddle the plaintiff ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "664 A.2d 846, 848",
"parenthetical": "plaintiff need not prove that store had notice of specific condition giving rise to plaintiffs injury as long as plaintiff can establish that store was aware of recurrence of hazardous condition on premises",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Cobb, 6... | 1,605,902 | a |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "264 A.2d 799, 799-800",
"parenthetical": "\"it would be unjust to saddle the plaintiff with the burden of isolating the precise failure\"",
"sentence": "See 128 Vt. 393-95, 264 A.2d at 799-800. This point is made explicit in Wollerman, 221 A.2d at 515 (“it would be unjust to sa... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "36 P.3d 11, 13-14",
"parenthetical": "evidence of store's failure to inspect premises within reasonable period of time is sufficient to allow jury to infer that dangerous condition was present long enough for store to have opportunity to discover and remedy condition",
"sentenc... | 1,605,902 | a |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "664 A.2d 846, 848",
"parenthetical": "plaintiff need not prove that store had notice of specific condition giving rise to plaintiffs injury as long as plaintiff can establish that store was aware of recurrence of hazardous condition on premises",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Cobb, 6... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "264 A.2d 799, 799-800",
"parenthetical": "\"it would be unjust to saddle the plaintiff with the burden of isolating the precise failure\"",
"sentence": "See 128 Vt. 393-95, 264 A.2d at 799-800. This point is made explicit in Wollerman, 221 A.2d at 515 (“it would be unjust to sa... | 1,605,902 | b |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "221 A.2d 515, 515",
"parenthetical": "\"it would be unjust to saddle the plaintiff with the burden of isolating the precise failure\"",
"sentence": "See 128 Vt. 393-95, 264 A.2d at 799-800. This point is made explicit in Wollerman, 221 A.2d at 515 (“it would be unjust to saddle... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "36 P.3d 11, 13-14",
"parenthetical": "evidence of store's failure to inspect premises within reasonable period of time is sufficient to allow jury to infer that dangerous condition was present long enough for store to have opportunity to discover and remedy condition",
"sentenc... | 1,605,902 | a |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "221 A.2d 515, 515",
"parenthetical": "\"it would be unjust to saddle the plaintiff with the burden of isolating the precise failure\"",
"sentence": "See 128 Vt. 393-95, 264 A.2d at 799-800. This point is made explicit in Wollerman, 221 A.2d at 515 (“it would be unjust to saddle... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "664 A.2d 846, 848",
"parenthetical": "plaintiff need not prove that store had notice of specific condition giving rise to plaintiffs injury as long as plaintiff can establish that store was aware of recurrence of hazardous condition on premises",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Cobb, 6... | 1,605,902 | a |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "661 P.2d 76, 76",
"parenthetical": "notwithstanding plaintiff's inability to show defendant's actual or constructive knowledge of hazardous condition caused by grapes on floor, jury could infer that store failed to take reasonable steps to address known hazard",
"sentence": "Se... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "36 P.3d 11, 13-14",
"parenthetical": "evidence of store's failure to inspect premises within reasonable period of time is sufficient to allow jury to infer that dangerous condition was present long enough for store to have opportunity to discover and remedy condition",
"sentenc... | 1,605,902 | a |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "664 A.2d 846, 848",
"parenthetical": "plaintiff need not prove that store had notice of specific condition giving rise to plaintiffs injury as long as plaintiff can establish that store was aware of recurrence of hazardous condition on premises",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Cobb, 6... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "661 P.2d 76, 76",
"parenthetical": "notwithstanding plaintiff's inability to show defendant's actual or constructive knowledge of hazardous condition caused by grapes on floor, jury could infer that store failed to take reasonable steps to address known hazard",
"sentence": "Se... | 1,605,902 | b |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "648 S.W.2d 292, 295",
"parenthetical": "even in absence of evidence showing store's actual or constructive knowledge of spilled substance, jury could find store liable based on evidence tending to show store's failure to take reasonable steps to protect customers from known hazar... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "36 P.3d 11, 13-14",
"parenthetical": "evidence of store's failure to inspect premises within reasonable period of time is sufficient to allow jury to infer that dangerous condition was present long enough for store to have opportunity to discover and remedy condition",
"sentenc... | 1,605,902 | a |
P 19. Fortier makes it clear that, under Vermont law, a jury may find a self-service store liable in a slip-and-fall case based on the store's failure to take reasonable steps to address a foreseeable hazard -- even if the plaintiff is unable to demonstrate precisely how long the dangerous condition existed. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "664 A.2d 846, 848",
"parenthetical": "plaintiff need not prove that store had notice of specific condition giving rise to plaintiffs injury as long as plaintiff can establish that store was aware of recurrence of hazardous condition on premises",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Cobb, 6... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "648 S.W.2d 292, 295",
"parenthetical": "even in absence of evidence showing store's actual or constructive knowledge of spilled substance, jury could find store liable based on evidence tending to show store's failure to take reasonable steps to protect customers from known hazar... | 1,605,902 | b |
See generally Utah R. Civ. P. 11. On August 26, 1991, the trial court granted the Kurzets' partial summary judgment motion, dismissing Bailey-Alien's mechanics' lien cause of action. Bailey-Alien then filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Dismissing the Mechanie[s'] Lien Claim, which the court later denied. B... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "920 P.2d 1159, 1161",
"parenthetical": "reviewing appellate court jurisdiction over appeal from denial of motion to reconsider",
"sentence": "See Ross v. Schackel, 920 P.2d 1159, 1161 (Utah 1996) (reviewing appellate court jurisdiction over appeal from denial of motion to recon... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "768 P.2d 950, 970",
"parenthetical": "\"If Schettler believed the trial court erred in denying his first motion to set aside the default judgment, the appropriate remedy was by direct appeal_\"",
"sentence": "See Ross v. Schackel, 920 P.2d 1159, 1161 (Utah 1996) (reviewing appe... | 11,895,203 | a |
As for whether the breach must be material to the transaction, we need not address this argument because the case at hand satisfied any such requirement. The very reason bribes were paid to the adjusters was to obtain favorable results in settlements. The insurance companies, acting as reasonable entities, were bound t... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "786 F.2d 77, 80-81",
"parenthetical": "holding, in a case involving falsified insurance claims, that \"the government needed to prove only that [defendant] employed a deceptive scheme intending to prevent the insurer from determining for itself a fair value of recovery\"",
... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "86 F.3d 277, 280",
"parenthetical": "affirming jury instruction charging that a representation was material if \"a reasonable person might have considered [it] important in making a decision\"",
"sentence": "See United States v. Dinome, 86 F.3d 277, 280 (2d Cir.1996) (affirming... | 153,664 | b |
This is the test urged upon us by Parks, and endorsed by a panel of the Eighth Circuit. Under the "alternative avenues" test, a title of an expressive work will not be protected from a false advertising claim if there are sufficient alternative means for an artist to convey his or her idea. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "836 F.2d 397, 402",
"parenthetical": "creator of parody tee-shirts not protected by First Amendment because he could still produce parody editorials in books, magazines, or film",
"sentence": "See Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Novak, 836 F.2d 397, 402 (8th Cir.1987) (creator of p... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "28 F.3d 769, 776",
"parenthetical": "First Amendment protection not available to parodist because the confusing trademark use was \"wholly unnecessary\" to the parodist's stated purpose",
"sentence": "See Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Novak, 836 F.2d 397, 402 (8th Cir.1987) (crea... | 9,125,451 | a |
This is the test urged upon us by Parks, and endorsed by a panel of the Eighth Circuit. Under the "alternative avenues" test, a title of an expressive work will not be protected from a false advertising claim if there are sufficient alternative means for an artist to convey his or her idea. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "35 F.Supp.2d 727, 734",
"parenthetical": "no First Amendment protection for an infringing movie title because there were other titles the producers could use",
"sentence": "See Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Novak, 836 F.2d 397, 402 (8th Cir.1987) (creator of parody tee-shirts not... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "28 F.3d 769, 776",
"parenthetical": "First Amendment protection not available to parodist because the confusing trademark use was \"wholly unnecessary\" to the parodist's stated purpose",
"sentence": "See Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Novak, 836 F.2d 397, 402 (8th Cir.1987) (crea... | 9,125,451 | a |
The federal government's immunity from state and local taxation is based upon the Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const. Art. VI, el. 2, and is therefore absolute. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "958 F.2d 555, 558",
"parenthetical": "noting that the Supreme Court has adopted a broad reading of \"the Supremacy Clause, viewing all state taxes on federal entities as insults to national sovereignty and impermissible burdens on federal operations\"",
"sentence": "See United ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "455 U.S. 720, 733",
"parenthetical": "noting that \"the Court has never questioned the propriety of absolute federal immunity from state taxation\"",
"sentence": "See United States v. Delaware, 958 F.2d 555, 558 (3d Cir.1992) (noting that the Supreme Court has adopted a br... | 4,124,920 | a |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.