repo stringlengths 7 67 | org stringlengths 2 32 ⌀ | issue_id int64 780k 941M | issue_number int64 1 134k | pull_request dict | events list | user_count int64 1 77 | event_count int64 1 192 | text_size int64 0 329k | bot_issue bool 1 class | modified_by_bot bool 2 classes | text_size_no_bots int64 0 279k | modified_usernames bool 2 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
kubernetes/kubernetes | kubernetes | 182,407,559 | 34,580 | null | [
{
"action": "created",
"author": "colemickens",
"comment_id": 253090941,
"datetime": 1476234411000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I hit it too, direct link to build: https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/34416/kubernetes-pull-test-unit-integration/48793/ PR here: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/34416",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dims",
"comment_id": 253094273,
"datetime": 1476235829000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 : can you try rebasing on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/commit/3d2674b2ddbdea485e1114479b03392ce2589c4c ? That should have fixed this problem",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "colemickens",
"comment_id": 253097030,
"datetime": 1476237019000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Looks like they finally passed and retest is skipped for the submit-queue for that PR, so I'd prefer not to rebase and risk encountering another flake.\r\n\r\nIf you need it as a confirmation of 3d2674b, let me know and I'll force push my rebase.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dims",
"comment_id": 253097913,
"datetime": 1476237433000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 no worries. things are looking up in the gate. we can close this issue out tomorrow",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gmarek",
"comment_id": 253155714,
"datetime": 1476262190000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "This is still happening and blocking the build. @apelisse please treat this as a real P0.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "piosz",
"comment_id": 253187924,
"datetime": 1476271609000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "cc @username_4 @kargakis",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "deads2k",
"comment_id": 253195860,
"datetime": 1476274086000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "opened https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/34608",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "piosz",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1476277187000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 6 | 14 | 2,557 | false | true | 891 | true |
lukasz-pyrzyk/Kronos | null | 193,822,068 | 116 | {
"number": 116,
"repo": "Kronos",
"user_login": "lukasz-pyrzyk"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "lukasz-pyrzyk",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1481042448000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "async accepting socket, .NET 461",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 0 | false | true | 0 | false |
apache/incubator-echarts | apache | 241,968,350 | 6,183 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Lily-Jian",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1499762049000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "<!--\r\n为了方便我们能够复现和修复 bug，请遵从下面的规范描述您的问题。\r\n-->\r\n\r\n\r\n### One-line summary [问题简述]\r\n\r\n1.当节点过多或者比较发散时，边缘节点会超出div容器，怎么设置可以在保证不缩小图形的情况下，让超出容器的节点显示在容器内？\r\n2.图形稳定之后，动画停止。能否设置让图形一直动，这样更酷炫？\r\n3.图形稳定后是以圆形中心向外发散的，整个图形趋近圆形。但是一般浏览器都是长方形的，所以一般图形都不能填满整个容器的长度。能否设置让图形左右拉伸，而不是以圆形方式发散？\r\n详情请见：http://gallery.echartsjs.com/editor.html?c=xS1Z_c-MSb&v=1\r\n\r\n\r\n### Version & Environment [版本及环境]\r\n+ ECharts version [ECharts 版本]: 最新版\r\n+ Browser version [浏览器类型和版本]: chrome\r\n+ OS Version [操作系统类型和版本]: win7 64\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n### Expected behaviour [期望结果]\r\n节点不超出div容器；\r\n图形稳定之后，能一直微动；\r\n图形能左右拉伸，而不是以圆的方式发散。\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n### ECharts option [ECharts配置项]\r\n<!-- Copy and paste your 'echarts option' here. -->\r\n<!-- [下方贴你的option，注意不要删掉下方 ```javascript 和 尾部的 ``` 字样。最好是我们能够直接运行的 option。如何得到能运行的 option 参见上方的 guidelines for contributing] -->\r\n```javascript\r\noption = {\r\n\r\n}\r\n\r\n```\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n### Other comments [其他信息]\r\n<!-- For example: Screenshot or Online demo -->\r\n<!-- [例如，截图或线上实例 (JSFiddle/JSBin/Codepen)] -->\r\n\r\n",
"title": "节点超过div容器高度 / 动画停止 的问题",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 1,266 | false | true | 1,094 | false |
pavel-v-chernykh/keystore-go | null | 258,759,222 | 4 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "yougg",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1505814256000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Validity \r\n Not Before: Sep 15 17:30:21 2017 GMT \r\n Not After : Sep 13 17:30:21 2027 GMT \r\n......\r\n\r\nplease help check the issue, thanks.",
"title": "keystore date is wrong when list by keytool",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "pavel-v-chernykh",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1505832348000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pavel-v-chernykh",
"comment_id": 330563767,
"datetime": 1505832440000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hi, @username_0. Thanks for the report.\r\nHave fixed the issue in 63bed89\r\nPlease, check, does it work for you?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "yougg",
"comment_id": 330716345,
"datetime": 1505869843000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 :+1: yes, it works. thanks again",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 4 | 318 | false | false | 318 | true |
vuejs/vue-loader | vuejs | 102,306,887 | 18 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "BirdEggegg",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1440137070000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I follow ES6 with Babel example in readme, and installed babel-runtime.But get `Object.assign is not a function` in vue file.\r\n```\r\nvar vue = require('vue-loader')\r\n\r\nmodule.exports = {\r\n // entry, output...\r\n module: {\r\n loaders: [\r\n {\r\n test: /\\.vue$/,\r\n loader: vue.withLoaders({\r\n // apply babel transform to all javascript\r\n // inside *.vue files.\r\n js: 'babel?optional[]=runtime'\r\n })\r\n }\r\n ]\r\n },\r\n devtool: 'source-map'\r\n}\r\n```\r\nThen I tried writing `<script lang=\"babel?optional[]=runtime>\"` in vue file, and it worked",
"title": "vue.withLoaders not work?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "BirdEggegg",
"comment_id": 133302480,
"datetime": 1440138610000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I shouldn't use `<script lang=\"babel\">` with that webpack config....",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "BirdEggegg",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1440138616000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1 | 3 | 664 | false | false | 664 | false |
opendatacube/datacube-core | opendatacube | 240,854,531 | 257 | {
"number": 257,
"repo": "datacube-core",
"user_login": "opendatacube"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jeremyh",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1499321690000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "- The project name is now \"Open Data Cube\", not just \"Data Cube\"\r\n- When using the Click arguments in other scripts, it's worth clarifying that the version printed is the core version, not the script version, so I've appended 'core'.\r\n\r\nFlashy demo:\r\n\r\n jez@kveikur:~/prog/datacube (develop) $ datacube --version\r\n Open Data Cube core, version 1.4.1+100.ged4183b\r\n jez@kveikur:~/prog/datacube (develop) $",
"title": "Update project name in printed '--version'",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 707 | false | true | 414 | false |
ipfs/community | ipfs | 182,086,637 | 184 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "RichardLitt",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1476125361000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I will likely be in Tokyo in November. Would anyone in the area be interested in an informal IPFS meetup?",
"title": "Tokyo Meetup in Novemeber",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "diasdavid",
"comment_id": 293501701,
"datetime": 1491983582000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 did this happen? Let us know if there were any talks and or pics \\o/",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "diasdavid",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1491983582000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "RichardLitt",
"comment_id": 293576225,
"datetime": 1492003789000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Nope! No one seemed to notice. But I had a meet up by myself anyway, and good times were had by all.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 4 | 286 | false | false | 286 | true |
pypa/pip | pypa | 136,520,609 | 3,517 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "xavfernandez",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1456436520000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Now that #1646 is implemented, it would interesting to show this information in `pip show`.",
"title": "Show INSTALLER from PEP376 in pip show",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "dstufft",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1457108189000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 91 | false | false | 91 | false |
daimajia/AndroidSwipeLayout | null | 168,575,359 | 353 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ljhUncle",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1470032729000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "右滑出现隐藏界面，再滑动一下关闭的时候，那个滑动关闭的界面抖动的很厉害",
"title": "SwipeLayout item 滑动关闭抖动很厉害",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Jeese1226",
"comment_id": 243676808,
"datetime": 1472627055000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "在特定机型上面会出现该情况。",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "cnazev",
"comment_id": 245827402,
"datetime": 1473401178000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "在小米测试机上发现了这个问题 右滑关闭时 bottom抖动",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "DanielDong",
"comment_id": 249473166,
"datetime": 1474861248000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "滑动的时候严重的抖动",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "haishuang",
"comment_id": 250047192,
"datetime": 1475025893000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "有谁找到了解决方法吗？",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 5 | 5 | 99 | false | false | 99 | false |
bh107/bohrium | bh107 | 109,251,336 | 45 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "madsthoudahl",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1443687683000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "running the following\r\nt_in = np.max(np.array([np.min(txs, axis=0),np.min(tys, axis=0),np.min(tzs, axis=0)]),axis=0)\r\n\r\nwhere \r\nnp is bohrium\r\ntxs,tys,tzs are bohrium arrays shaped (2,20,20,20,400) containing float64s.\r\n\r\nyields \r\nTraceback (most recent call last):\r\n File \"ndarray.pyx\", line 239, in ndarray.get_bhc_data_pointer (/home/koeus/hpc/bohrium/build/bridge/npbackend/ndarray.c:4065)\r\n File \"ndarray.pyx\", line 171, in ndarray.get_bhc (/home/koeus/hpc/bohrium/build/bridge/npbackend/ndarray.c:2986)\r\nRuntimeWarning: tp_compare didn't return -1 or -2 for exception",
"title": "min() and max() issues runtime warning",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "madsbk",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1482308408000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 576 | false | false | 576 | false |
akkadotnet/akka.net | akkadotnet | 178,185,969 | 2,314 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Aaronontheweb",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1474407157000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "```[Step 2/2] System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.\r\n[21:09:38]\t[Step 2/2] at Akka.Actor.HashedWheelTimerScheduler.Run() in D:\\BuildAgent\\work\\d26c9d7f36545acd\\src\\core\\Akka\\Actor\\Scheduler\\HashedWheelTimerScheduler.cs:line 187\r\n[21:09:38]\t[Step 2/2] at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)\r\n[21:09:38]\t[Step 2/2] at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)\r\n[21:09:38]\t[Step 2/2] at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state)\r\n[21:09:38]\t[Step 2/2] at System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart()\r\n```\r\nCrashed the test run. Need to fix this before we ship 1.1.2.",
"title": "HashedWheelTimer NRE bug",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Aaronontheweb",
"comment_id": 248466324,
"datetime": 1474414045000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Figured it out - looks like a race condition that occurs when the `HashedWheelTimerScheduler` attempts to shut down.\r\n\r\n```csharp\r\n// return the list of unprocessedRegistrations and signal that we're finished\r\n _stopped.Value.TrySetResult(_unprocessedRegistrations); // <- NREs\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Aaronontheweb",
"comment_id": 248466731,
"datetime": 1474414182000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Ooooooooooohhh subtle.\r\n\r\n```csharp\r\n private Task<IEnumerable<SchedulerRegistration>> Stop()\r\n {\r\n var p = new TaskCompletionSource<IEnumerable<SchedulerRegistration>>();\r\n#pragma warning disable 420\r\n if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref _workerState, WORKER_STATE_SHUTDOWN, WORKER_STATE_STARTED) == WORKER_STATE_STARTED\r\n#pragma warning restore 420\r\n && _stopped.CompareAndSet(null, p))\r\n {\r\n // Let remaining work that is already being processed finished. The termination task will complete afterwards\r\n return p.Task;\r\n }\r\n return Completed;\r\n }\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis half of the `if` statement executes first, which is what signals shutdown to the HWT:\r\n\r\n```csharp\r\nInterlocked.CompareExchange(ref _workerState, WORKER_STATE_SHUTDOWN, WORKER_STATE_STARTED) == WORKER_STATE_STARTED\r\n```\r\n\r\nThe second half of the `if` statement may not have a chance to complete its CAS operation before the worker thread reaches the area where it depends on the value:\r\n\r\n```csharp\r\n&& _stopped.CompareAndSet(null, p)\r\n```\r\n\r\nSwitching the order of operations around will fix this, so the value is always set before the loop is allowed to exit.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "alexvaluyskiy",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1474439429000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 4 | 2,439 | false | false | 2,439 | false |
grails/grails-core | grails | 162,854,707 | 10,016 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "a200612",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1467183738000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "### Steps to Reproduce\r\n\r\n1. mkdir mymultiproject\r\n2. cd mymultiproject\r\n3. grails create-app myapp\r\n4. grails create-plugin myplugin\r\n5. echo \"include 'myapp', 'myplugin'\" >> settings.gradle\r\n6. cd myplugin\r\n7. grails create-domain-class com.example.Person\r\n8. cd ../myapp\r\n9. grails generate-controller com.example.Person\r\n\r\n### Expected Behaviour\r\n\r\nA controller should be generated in the myapp project using the domain class from myplugin.\r\n\r\n### Actual Behaviour\r\n\r\n| Error Domain class not found for name com.example.Person\r\n\r\n### Environment Information\r\n\r\n- **Operating System**: Ubuntu 16.04\r\n- **Grails Version:** 3.1.7\r\n- **JDK Version:** OpenJDK 1.8.0_91",
"title": "Grails CLI generate-controller throws \"Domain class not found\" on multi-project",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "sdelamo",
"comment_id": 303391509,
"datetime": 1495544773000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Before Step 9. you need to add the dependency between `myapp` and `myplugin`. \r\n\r\nexample repository: \r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/grails-core-issues-forks/github-issue-10016",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "ilopmar",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1529661242000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 3 | 3 | 837 | false | false | 837 | false |
t1m0n/air-datepicker | null | 191,665,590 | 151 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "nicolasburg",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1480068276000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I've created a datepicker with multipleDates option and range option in order to select multiple ranges of dates but it only allow me to add one range of dates.\r\nAm I doing it wrong? Is it possible to fix?\r\nMaybe you should add a rangeDateSeparator option too?\r\n\r\nThanks",
"title": "Add multiple ranges",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "t1m0n",
"comment_id": 262935133,
"datetime": 1480072462000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "There is no possibility to select multiple date ranges. You can use `multipleDatesSeparator` to separate dates in range mode.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "MaximeDevalland",
"comment_id": 275915786,
"datetime": 1485698615000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I would love to see this option. @username_0 : have you find a way to do a multiple date range selection ?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 3 | 502 | false | false | 502 | true |
khartec/waltz | khartec | 180,018,485 | 632 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "rovats",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1475147103000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Potentially show preview on tree node click as well, similar to org/person/other rollup pages",
"title": "Indicator detail view: Show indicator nav tree",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "davidwatkins73",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1476434698000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 93 | false | false | 93 | false |
Automattic/kue | Automattic | 219,172,492 | 1,045 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "VoYakymiv",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1491293744000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Thanks for project.\r\nI found it very useful, but have a problem with search option.\r\n\r\nI've enabled search option, installed reds, but search isn`t working. I`m trying to search using API and web UI.\r\nI found that whatever search keys I`m adding to job, in redis it still using same index \"UNTFN\".\r\nAnd if I will try to search directly with this index string \"UNTFN\", it will find all jobs, but it doesn`t find with search keys.\r\nHow could it be fixed?",
"title": "Search doesn`t work",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1 | 1 | 452 | false | false | 452 | false |
PowerShell/PowerShell | PowerShell | 209,919,156 | 3,194 | {
"number": 3194,
"repo": "PowerShell",
"user_login": "PowerShell"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "daxian-dbw",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1487893585000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I should have updated this comment a long time ago ... Fix #1658",
"title": "Update a comment in Credential.cs to make it accurate",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "PaulHigin",
"comment_id": 282432105,
"datetime": 1487978380000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "LGTM",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "daxian-dbw",
"comment_id": 282445050,
"datetime": 1487984138000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@TravisEz13 I will just merge this PR since it's just comment change and also got approved by Paul.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 167 | false | false | 167 | false |
sonata-project/SonataNotificationBundle | sonata-project | 71,316,317 | 136 | {
"number": 136,
"repo": "SonataNotificationBundle",
"user_login": "sonata-project"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "OskarStark",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1430148077000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Updated some german translations",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Soullivaneuh",
"comment_id": 111710941,
"datetime": 1434202928000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "This is not really a correction, another translations as the same `Id` notation.\r\n\r\nSee here: https://github.com/sonata-project/SonataNotificationBundle/blob/master/Resources/translations/SonataNotificationBundle.en.xliff#L17-L20\r\n\r\nRegards.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "OskarStark",
"comment_id": 111727637,
"datetime": 1434213401000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "In the Otter Sonata bundles they use it like this",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "OskarStark",
"comment_id": 111727647,
"datetime": 1434213413000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Other *",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Soullivaneuh",
"comment_id": 111808854,
"datetime": 1434276223000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 on which ones?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 5 | 323 | false | false | 323 | true |
jaquadro/NBTExplorer | null | 96,307,695 | 36 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "AnrDaemon",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1437483023000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "```\r\n\t\t\"GameRules\": \r\n\t\t{\r\n\t\t\t\"doTileDrops\": \"true\",\r\n\t\t\t\"doFireTick\": \"true\",\r\n\t\t\t\"mobGriefing\": \"true\",\r\n\t\t\t\"commandBlockOutput\": \"true\",\r\n\t\t\t\"openblocks:spawn_graves\": \"true\",\r\n\t\t\t\"doMobSpawning\": \"true\",\r\n\t\t\t\"naturalRegeneration\": \"true\",\r\n\t\t\t\"doMobLoot\": \"true\",\r\n\t\t\t\"doDaylightCycle\": \"true\",\r\n\t\t\t\"keepInventory\": \"false\"\r\n\t\t},\r\n```\r\nThere's special types for true/false values. They must not be represented as strings.\r\nRef: http://json.org/",
"title": "Wrong JSON export",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "LB--",
"comment_id": 123321044,
"datetime": 1437487475000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "All Minecraft game rules are stored as strings in the NBT.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "AnrDaemon",
"comment_id": 123349264,
"datetime": 1437489781000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Missed that somehow. Thanks.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "AnrDaemon",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1437489781000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 4 | 534 | false | false | 534 | false |
owncloud/documentation | owncloud | 74,536,007 | 1,123 | {
"number": 1123,
"repo": "documentation",
"user_login": "owncloud"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "carlaschroder",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1431129793000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "re UI updates in https://github.com/owncloud/documentation/issues/1108\r\n\r\n@schiesbn please review. \r\n\r\nEncryption cannot be disabled in the Web UI, but ``occ encryption:disable`` is still available, and you can disable the encryption app. How do you want the documentation to address this? Because the Admin page has that scary warning that encryption is not reversible.",
"title": "update encryption docs with new UI features",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "MorrisJobke",
"comment_id": 101529232,
"datetime": 1431498424000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "cc @username_2 @schiesbn Regarding the deactive encryption",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nickvergessen",
"comment_id": 101540771,
"datetime": 1431500481000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Well `occ` is more of a \"we expect you to know what you are doing\" since you can break shares etc with a `files:scan` and so on. So I think just removing it form the docs (like this PR did) is fine.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 3 | 629 | false | false | 629 | true |
MobileChromeApps/cordova-crosswalk-engine | MobileChromeApps | 55,548,594 | 15 | {
"number": 15,
"repo": "cordova-crosswalk-engine",
"user_login": "MobileChromeApps"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jbavari",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1422312169000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "onFilePickerResult is no longer listed on CordovaWebView.\r\n\r\nWe should either remove the method entirely or just remove the `@Override` attribute.\r\n\r\nThis is currently causing some breaks in some builds we are using with the `@Override` and cordova-android 4.0.x",
"title": "Removing the @Override - due to the latest changes on cordova-android, o...",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jbavari",
"comment_id": 71554775,
"datetime": 1422312346000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Just got latest, saw @username_1 removed the method. Closing.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "agrieve",
"comment_id": 71572285,
"datetime": 1422320976000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "how's that for timing :P",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 344 | false | false | 344 | true |
jpillora/jquery.rest | null | 183,174,248 | 54 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "holgersindbaek",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1476489418000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I have a post request that looks like this:\r\n\r\n # Make request\r\n @client().v3.create(path, options).success (data) =>\r\n console.log(\"success\")\r\n .error (errorMessage) =>\r\n console.log(\"error\")\r\n\r\nWhen I make a request where I know I'll get a 400 response, I get this output:\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIssue is that the page has basically crashes at this point. I can't press anything or reload the site. 10-20 seconds passes and then I get this screen:\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nSo what's the correct way to handle an error response with jQuery rest?",
"title": "400 response crashes browser",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "holgersindbaek",
"comment_id": 254263346,
"datetime": 1476722693000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "No response? Is this a dead library? Should I find another library to use?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1 | 2 | 905 | false | false | 905 | false |
rust-lang/rust | rust-lang | 62,696,438 | 23,477 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "sp3d",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1426685921000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Compiling the following program with `rustc -g` fails an LLVM assertion:\r\n```\r\n#![feature(core)]\r\n#![crate_type = \"lib\"]\r\n\r\nextern crate core;\r\nuse core::raw::Repr;\r\n\r\npub struct Dst {\r\n\tpub a: (),\r\n\tpub b: (),\r\n\tpub data: [u8],\r\n}\r\n\r\npub unsafe fn borrow(bytes: &[u8]) -> &Dst {\r\n\tlet slice = bytes.repr();\r\n\tlet dst: &Dst = std::mem::transmute((slice.data, slice.len));\r\n\tdst\r\n}\r\n```\r\n\r\n```\r\n$ rustc -g crash-rustc-g.rs \r\nrustc: /home/rustbuild/src/rust-buildbot/slave/nightly-dist-rustc-linux/build/src/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DataLayout.h:484: uint64_t llvm::StructLayout::getElementOffset(unsigned int) const: Assertion `Idx < NumElements && \"Invalid element idx!\"' failed.\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis is basically a minimal test-case, as removing pretty much anything (including fields a or b!) avoids the assertion. Similarly, compiling without `-g` does not produce an assertion failure.\r\n\r\nThe backtrace looks like this:\r\n```\r\n#0 0x00007ffff6ff44b7 in raise () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6\r\n#1 0x00007ffff6ff588a in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6\r\n#2 0x00007ffff6fed41d in __assert_fail_base () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6\r\n#3 0x00007ffff6fed4d2 in __assert_fail () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6\r\n#4 0x00007ffff2fd009d in LLVMOffsetOfElement () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_llvm-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#5 0x00007ffff6c84326 in iter::Map$LT$I$C$$u20$F$GT$.Iterator::next::h1347171284529675023 () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#6 0x00007ffff6c7e375 in trans::debuginfo::set_members_of_composite_type::h557c9a9bddb8036bKSE () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#7 0x00007ffff6c7d24c in trans::debuginfo::RecursiveTypeDescription$LT$$u27$tcx$GT$::finalize::hcc3c0cb5c91492bb7oE () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#8 0x00007ffff6c76fe3 in trans::debuginfo::type_metadata::h6cb0d45057c320e9U8E () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#9 0x00007ffff6c78031 in trans::debuginfo::type_metadata::h6cb0d45057c320e9U8E () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#10 0x00007ffff6c85083 in trans::debuginfo::subroutine_type_metadata::he917a06bcf81ed42u4E () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#11 0x00007ffff6c764b4 in trans::debuginfo::type_metadata::h6cb0d45057c320e9U8E () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#12 0x00007ffff6c0fb87 in trans::debuginfo::create_function_debug_context::h603196dd6899b3baGMD () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#13 0x00007ffff6b4d0e8 in trans::base::new_fn_ctxt::heff0d89eaf6a93a31Vs () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#14 0x00007ffff6c15178 in trans::base::trans_closure::h295e0a8c0302a522Rjt () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#15 0x00007ffff6b28f59 in trans::base::trans_fn::h475c276dfb9092deKut () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#16 0x00007ffff6b24bb2 in trans::base::trans_item::hc022dcad9f32230fCSt () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#17 0x00007ffff6c2158d in trans::base::trans_crate::ha116a53daafe15a4fPu () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_trans-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#18 0x00007ffff7afe554 in driver::phase_4_translate_to_llvm::hb0c3ed9b413b640akOa () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_driver-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#19 0x00007ffff7ada144 in driver::compile_input::h56dbe0e66fe8a956Rba () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_driver-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#20 0x00007ffff7b91a43 in run_compiler::hbbbe30f1ad654d0ex2b () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_driver-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#21 0x00007ffff7b8f88d in thunk::F.Invoke$LT$A$C$$u20$R$GT$::invoke::h9510793753674638958 () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_driver-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#22 0x00007ffff7b8e911 in rt::unwind::try::try_fn::h15118916039308917284 () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_driver-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#23 0x00007ffff7561f59 in rust_try_inner () from /usr/local/lib/libstd-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#24 0x00007ffff7561f46 in rust_try () from /usr/local/lib/libstd-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#25 0x00007ffff7b8edb7 in thunk::F.Invoke$LT$A$C$$u20$R$GT$::invoke::h8595907971712275588 () from /usr/local/lib/librustc_driver-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#26 0x00007ffff74df996 in sys::thread::thread_start::h9f0c06661d546448B1G () from /usr/local/lib/libstd-4e7c5e5c.so\r\n#27 0x00007ffff13a7374 in start_thread () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0\r\n#28 0x00007ffff70a927d in clone () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6\r\n```\r\n\r\nRustc version is `rustc 1.0.0-nightly (30e1f9a1c 2015-03-14) (built 2015-03-15)`.",
"title": "LLVM assertion failure when on struct with unsized trailing field",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "michaelwoerister",
"comment_id": 83010273,
"datetime": 1426690766000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Nice catch! Thanks a lot for the report and the great test case.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "alexcrichton",
"comment_id": 185080635,
"datetime": 1455694883000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "This has apparently since been fixed, yay!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "c3st7n",
"comment_id": 225461885,
"datetime": 1465767326000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Raised a PR to add test case: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/34243",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "bors",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1465867601000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 5 | 5 | 4,490 | false | false | 4,490 | false |
cloudera/livy | cloudera | 183,154,213 | 206 | {
"number": 206,
"repo": "livy",
"user_login": "cloudera"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "tc0312",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1476480465000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Minor. Fixed rsc shaded jar isn't regenerated after its dependency is updated.",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 0 | false | true | 0 | false |
NjlsShade/overshield | null | 191,646,325 | 17 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "NjlsShade",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1480061787000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "If uMod is running and you start Overshield, the game's UI cinematic will act as though it is having a hard time pivoting; not rotating at all, or postponing the rotation and quickly rotating after some time to make up for the rotation time it failed to offer.\r\n\r\nThis issue just arose, and may be a temporary fluke, however, I've noted it to be safe.",
"title": "The title screen cinematic refuses to work as it should when utilizing uMod",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "NjlsShade",
"comment_id": 391868715,
"datetime": 1527197254000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This was unrelated to uMod and rather seemed to be caused by uncapping the FPS.\r\n\r\nVsync is enabled by default moving forward and seems to have resolved the issue.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "NjlsShade",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1527197260000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1 | 3 | 514 | false | false | 514 | false |
vkhatri/chef-filebeat | null | 135,011,556 | 33 | {
"number": 33,
"repo": "chef-filebeat",
"user_login": "vkhatri"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "dissonanz",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1455928759000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Added multiline support for LWRP",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "vkhatri",
"comment_id": 186486749,
"datetime": 1455934561000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 thanks! :+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dissonanz",
"comment_id": 187314204,
"datetime": 1456166780000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Awesome. When do you plan to release this change?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 72 | false | false | 72 | true |
airbnb/lottie-android | airbnb | 236,566,164 | 342 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "charleston10",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1497639497000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Is there a solution to this problem? I researched issues, but I did not find :(\r\nAre there any frame limitations?\r\n\r\nTks\r\n\r\n**OutOfMemoryError**\r\n```\r\nFatal Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: An error occured while executing doInBackground()\r\n at android.os.AsyncTask$3.done(AsyncTask.java:299)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerSetException(FutureTask.java:273)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.setException(FutureTask.java:124)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:307)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:137)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1076)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:569)\r\n at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:856)\r\nCaused by java.lang.OutOfMemoryError\r\n at android.support.v4.view.animation.PathInterpolatorGingerbread.(Unknown Source)\r\n at android.support.v4.view.animation.PathInterpolatorGingerbread.(Unknown Source)\r\n at android.support.v4.view.animation.PathInterpolatorCompatBase.create(Unknown Source:46)\r\n at android.support.v4.view.animation.PathInterpolatorCompat.create(Unknown Source:83)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.Keyframe$Factory.newInstance(Unknown Source:134)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.Keyframe$Factory.parseKeyframes(Unknown Source:154)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.AnimatableValueParser.parseKeyframes(Unknown Source:40)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.AnimatableValueParser.parseJson(Unknown Source:31)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.AnimatableIntegerValue$Factory.newInstance(Unknown Source:40)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.AnimatableTransform$Factory.newInstance(Unknown Source:84)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.Layer$Factory.newInstance(Unknown Source:229)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.LottieComposition$Factory.parseLayers(Unknown Source:202)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.LottieComposition$Factory.fromJsonSync(Unknown Source:194)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.LottieComposition$Factory.fromInputStream(Unknown Source:163)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.FileCompositionLoader.doInBackground(Unknown Source:17)\r\n at com.airbnb.lottie.FileCompositionLoader.doInBackground(Unknown Source:7)\r\n at android.os.AsyncTask$2.call(AsyncTask.java:287)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:305)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:137)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1076)\r\n at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:569)\r\n at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:856)\r\n```",
"title": "RuntimeException",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gpeal",
"comment_id": 309812067,
"datetime": 1497975693000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 how big is your animation? Would it be possible to send it to me?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gpeal",
"comment_id": 311846256,
"datetime": 1498703913000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 also, in your animation, are you exporting every frame as a keyframe? If so, you can dramatically optimize the animation by using time interpolators between keyframes.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "gpeal",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1498719597000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gpeal",
"comment_id": 311879897,
"datetime": 1498719597000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "This is a duplicate of #39",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 5 | 2,995 | false | false | 2,995 | true |
facebook/fbthrift | facebook | 68,910,335 | 86 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "joan2015",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1429186342000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I can't find any example ,need help\r\nthe test dir has no server code",
"title": "how to user async interface with cpp2",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "andrewcox",
"comment_id": 93830659,
"datetime": 1429215610000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "One example is here:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/facebook/fbthrift/blob/master/thrift/perf/cpp/AsyncClientWorker2.cpp\r\n\r\nThis example is our from our perf load generator. It generates a bunch of pipelined calls on a client up to N outstanding requests on that client, and keeps the pipe full.\r\n\r\nIt is not the greatest example, but it is something.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "facebook-github-bot-8",
"comment_id": 128092732,
"datetime": 1438797734000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Thank you for reporting this issue and appreciate your patience. We've notified the core team for an update on this issue. We're looking for a response within the next 30 days or the issue may be closed.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "djwatson",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1448992382000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 4 | 4 | 614 | false | false | 614 | false |
CFETeam/weapp-session | CFETeam | 207,126,502 | 4 | {
"number": 4,
"repo": "weapp-session",
"user_login": "CFETeam"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "lxjerry",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1486964325000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "如果有中文需要指定编码",
"title": "Update sha1.js",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "techird",
"comment_id": 290036317,
"datetime": 1490780020000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "👍",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 12 | false | false | 12 | false |
ganeti/ganeti | ganeti | 237,700,273 | 199 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Ganeti-Issues-Migrator",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1498091131000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Originally reported of Google Code with ID 143.\n\n```\ngnt-node list ignores completely the vm_capable flag on nodes, leading to RPC calls querying the hypervisor/storage being made. This leads to RS_NODATA insteadl of RS_UNAVAIL being returned for these nodes.\n```\nOriginally added on 2011-02-17 13:26:39 +0000 UTC.",
"title": "gnt-node list doesn't handle properly non-vm_capable nodes",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Ganeti-Issues-Migrator",
"comment_id": 310241260,
"datetime": 1498091140000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "```\nThis was fixed:\r\n\r\ncommit effab4c\r\nAuthor: Iustin Pop <iustin@google.com>\r\nDate: Thu Feb 17 14:42:57 2011 +0100\r\n\r\n NodeQuery: mark live fields as UNAVAIL for non-vm_capable nodes\r\n \r\n Since we don't have the data per design, UNAVAIL is appropriate here,\r\n while NODATA is not.\r\n \r\n The patch also adds a comment: if we extend the live fields list to\r\n contain other data in the future, we need to reevaluate this solution.\r\n \r\n This should fix issue 143. The listing now shows (node2==ofline,\r\n node3==not vm_capable):\r\n \r\n Node DTotal DFree MTotal MNode MFree Pinst Sinst\r\n node1 698.6G 630.5G 32.0G 1.0G 30.0G 8 7\r\n node2 (offline) (offline) (offline) (offline) (offline) 9 4\r\n node3 (unavail) (unavail) (unavail) (unavail) (unavail) 0 0\r\n \r\n Signed-off-by: Iustin Pop <iustin@google.com>\r\n Reviewed-by: Michael Hanselmann <hansmi@google.com>\r\n\r\ncommit 74f258b\r\nAuthor: Iustin Pop <iustin@google.com>\r\nDate: Thu Feb 17 14:41:29 2011 +0100\r\n\r\n NodeQuery: don't query non-vm_capable nodes\r\n \r\n Because non-vm_capable nodes most likely don't have a hypervisor\r\n configured and/or storage, so the call will fail anyway.\r\n \r\n \r\n\n```\nOriginally added on 2011-02-18 13:40:58 +0000 UTC.\n\nMentioned Issue with GoogleCode ID 143 has been migrated to GitHub with ID #199.\nChanged State: Fixed",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Ganeti-Issues-Migrator",
"comment_id": 310498808,
"datetime": 1498164630000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "```\n-- Empty comment --\n```\nOriginally added on 2012-10-22 08:57:08 +0000 UTC.\n\nChanged State: Released",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "Ganeti-Issues-Migrator",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1498165805000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1 | 4 | 1,851 | false | false | 1,851 | false |
c-cube/ocaml-containers | null | 258,253,744 | 150 | {
"number": 150,
"repo": "ocaml-containers",
"user_login": "c-cube"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "copy",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1505590704000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This adds test for the empty vector case, and fixes `CCVector.append_array` in said case.\r\n\r\nIn celebration of containers' 1000th test, I also added myself to the authors list.",
"title": "Tests for CCVector.append{,_array} and fix for CCVector.append_array",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "c-cube",
"comment_id": 330075868,
"datetime": 1505675968000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Very nice. Thank you, and 💯 for the 1000th test!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 224 | false | false | 224 | false |
fastlane/fastlane | fastlane | 140,852,666 | 3,746 | {
"number": 3746,
"repo": "fastlane",
"user_login": "fastlane"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "KrauseFx",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1458008859000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Related https://github.com/fastlane/fastlane/issues/3744",
"title": "Fix crashlytics secrets",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "i2amsam",
"comment_id": 196927470,
"datetime": 1458061783000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "LGTM",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 60 | false | false | 60 | false |
aspnet/Home | aspnet | 53,563,755 | 260 | {
"number": 260,
"repo": "Home",
"user_login": "aspnet"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "peterblazejewicz",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1420578684000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This PR refactors method creating the User model instance in controller to silence compiler warnings (as per the issue description):\r\n- change method name to be more explicit about method role\r\n- update method use in controller\r\n\r\nWith this change running:\r\n```\r\nkpm build\r\n```\r\nin `HelloMvc` sample project will output no warnings:\r\n```\r\nBuild succeeded.\r\n 0 Warnings(s)\r\n 0 Error(s)\r\n\r\nTime elapsed 00:00:02.4029731\r\n```\r\nI've already signed Microsoft CLA.\r\nThanks!",
"title": "Refactor method to explicit helper. Fixes #253",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Eilon",
"comment_id": 69606707,
"datetime": 1421083007000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "CLA confirmed. (Sorry for the delay, was in Hawaii :palm_tree: :palm_tree: :palm_tree:)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Praburaj",
"comment_id": 69607237,
"datetime": 1421083201000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Thanks username_1. \r\n\r\nSorry @username_0 just noticed your change to `master` branch. Could you send your change to `dev` branch instead?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "peterblazejewicz",
"comment_id": 69636230,
"datetime": 1421093227000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I want to close this PR in favor of this with better history:\r\nhttps://github.com/aspnet/Home/pull/268\r\nThanks!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 4 | 809 | false | false | 809 | true |
Windows-XAML/Template10 | Windows-XAML | 134,744,158 | 669 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "sayzenberg",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1455844345000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I have a requirement to shift the text within the PageHeader over by X number of pixels. Right now I'm accomplishing this by using a Rectangle of appropriate width, whose fill is set to the color of the PageHeader. This works in general, but causes some pretty weird behavior when the visual state changes. Is there a way to override the text margin in the PageHeader so I don't have to do this stuff? Sadly, setting a margin on the PageHeader itself doesn't work since it just leaves a chunk of background inbetween the HamburgerMenu and the PageHeader.",
"title": "Is it possible to override the text margin in PageHeader?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JerryNixon",
"comment_id": 186004577,
"datetime": 1455845199000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Yes, use PageHeader.Content and set it to a TextBlock you control.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "JerryNixon",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1455845199000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JerryNixon",
"comment_id": 186004662,
"datetime": 1455845236000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Will you PLEASE ask this on Stack Overflow so this answer can be seen by other developers?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "JerryNixon",
"comment_id": 186004683,
"datetime": 1455845242000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/template10",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 5 | 762 | false | false | 762 | false |
contiv/netplugin | null | 103,567,155 | 140 | {
"number": 140,
"repo": "netplugin",
"user_login": "contiv"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "abhinandanpb",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1440700004000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Added 2 cases : \r\n1) Continuous addition and deletion of Containers created and testing the ping\r\n2) Continuous addition and deletion of Configs.",
"title": "Updating sanity test with additional cases",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jainvipin",
"comment_id": 136242314,
"datetime": 1440991669000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 - LGTM\r\nNot sure why sanity would fail with your changes...",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "erikh",
"comment_id": 136242422,
"datetime": 1440991776000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Please squash your commits with `git rebase -i`. If you're having trouble, reach out to me, or I can do it for you.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 3 | 333 | false | false | 333 | true |
magus/react-native-facebook-login | null | 210,220,953 | 214 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "EasonWang01",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1488011364000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I have the following setting but still not works\r\n<img width=\"1280\" alt=\"2017-02-25 4 25 48\" src=\"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/11001914/23329649/8458faa4-fb77-11e6-85d2-7416d39295ff.png\">\r\n<img width=\"1280\" alt=\"2017-02-25 4 26 08\" src=\"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/11001914/23329652/85c9ec90-fb77-11e6-8efa-0b263476872e.png\">\r\n![Uploading 螢幕快照 2017-02-25 下午4.26.19.png…]()",
"title": "Could not build module FBSDKCoreKit",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Amerr",
"comment_id": 294218910,
"datetime": 1492197787000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEKpjN1pm2s&t=1s&spfreload=10 , This is best tutorial so far, he has explained all the setup of Facebook SDK from scratch",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "valerybodak",
"comment_id": 424994684,
"datetime": 1538034911000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_0 \r\nHi, I had this issue also. My dependencies in package.json:\r\n\r\n```\r\n\"react\": \"16.5.0\",\r\n\"react-native\": \"0.57.0\",\r\n\"react-native-facebook-login\": \"1.6.0\"\r\n```\r\nI have fixed it in the following way:\r\n\r\n1. Please follow all instructions from https://github.com/magus/react-native-facebook-login#setup\r\nPlease note, that according to setup instructions you need to use the following path to **Framework Search Paths**:\r\n_$(SRCROOT)/../node_modules/react-native-facebook-login/FacebookSDK_\r\n\r\n2. Uncomment this line in the Podfile:\r\n_use_frameworks!_\r\n\r\n3. Run **pod install** again\r\n\r\nIt works for me.\r\n\r\nMy Podfile:\r\n\r\n```\r\n# Uncomment the next line to define a global platform for your project\r\nplatform :ios, '9.0'\r\n\r\ntarget 'HopNBr' do\r\n # Uncomment the next line if you're using Swift or would like to use dynamic frameworks\r\n use_frameworks!\r\n\r\n # Pods for HopNBr\r\n pod 'GoogleSignIn'\r\n pod 'FBSDKLoginKit'\r\n\r\nend\r\n```\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nresolved this issue in the following way",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 3 | 1,557 | false | false | 1,557 | true |
ManageIQ/manageiq | ManageIQ | 208,432,605 | 13,960 | {
"number": 13960,
"repo": "manageiq",
"user_login": "ManageIQ"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "isimluk",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1487335762000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "## WIP\r\n - depends on https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/13661\r\n - includes https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/13661\r\n\r\n## What\r\nAnother step for ManageIQ/manageiq#13375\r\n\r\n@miq-bot add_label technical debt, chargeback, euwe/no, wip",
"title": "[WIP] Extract chargeable field [6/7] -- stop seeding the stuff",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 4 | 1,416 | false | true | 246 | false |
croconaut/wifon | croconaut | 210,271,089 | 4 | {
"number": 4,
"repo": "wifon",
"user_login": "croconaut"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "spili",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1488066462000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi @username_1, \r\n this PR serves as a \"backlog\" for all of the things that needs to be done during implementation. Also, you can use it to track my progress as well as review my code if you want to.\r\n<hr>\r\n\r\n# What needs to be done:\r\n - [x] [TicTacToe game logic: Implement the TicTacToe game logic.](https://github.com/croconaut/wifon/pull/4/commits/feab34e4195f64e84e8f84e03055e6bac06a4451) \r\n - [x] [TicTacToe game logic tests: Implement and integrate units tests that cover all possible test cases](https://github.com/croconaut/wifon/pull/4/commits/feab34e4195f64e84e8f84e03055e6bac06a4451).\r\n - [ ] Extend current RMB implementation: This covers implementing and integrating new payload messages as well user access to TicTacToe from drawer or conversation with another user.\r\n- [ ] UI: implement the UI of the game.\r\n\r\n# What would be nice to have:\r\n- [ ] Storage: Create persistent storage for storing the game. Think of additional logic when exactly is this useful. \r\n- [ ] Instrumental tests: Create instrumental units test for persistent storage as well the whole UI of the game. \r\n\r\n<hr> \r\n\r\n One note ... I'll squash commits into logical units so it is easier for us to track down what has been done already. Also, when this is PR done and therefore ready to merge, I'll rebase and squash all commits into one so we'll keep our repo history clean.\r\n\r\nBR,\r\n Matej",
"title": "Integration of TicTacToe game into WiFON as separate module. ",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "spili",
"comment_id": 282522247,
"datetime": 1488067825000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Also, @username_1 please [define the mergeability of pull requests](https://help.github.com/articles/defining-the-mergeability-of-pull-requests/), so this won't get merged by accident.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mikrosk",
"comment_id": 282523021,
"datetime": 1488068903000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0: `master` is now a protected branch.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "spili",
"comment_id": 282523270,
"datetime": 1488069250000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Great! thanks a lot 👍 \r\n\r\ncc. @username_1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mikrosk",
"comment_id": 307932882,
"datetime": 1497302479000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Integrated manually.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 5 | 1,659 | false | false | 1,659 | true |
pyserial/pyserial | pyserial | 233,857,356 | 234 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Marrakchino",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1496747535000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi,\r\nI'm here to enquire about any plans to add a parameter which enables copying serial output to a file (sort of a log file to keep a trace of the serial communication) to **miniterm**.\r\n\r\nRegards.",
"title": "[miniterm.py] Add option to save output to a file?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ssldemon",
"comment_id": 320792329,
"datetime": 1502143115000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "`miniterm.py @port @baudrate > output.txt`\r\nshould do the trick. my output is directed to output.txt when I use that",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nelqatib",
"comment_id": 320794874,
"datetime": 1502143856000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Does it preserve printing to standard output? I'm not sure...\r\nThe enhancement I asked about was to have both real-time printing to standard output, and (in the background), appending the same output to a file.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nelqatib",
"comment_id": 322554447,
"datetime": 1502822885000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@zsquareplusc would you be interested if I work on this feature?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "craighurley",
"comment_id": 393764435,
"datetime": 1527831358000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "On *nix based systems, if you want to view the serial traffic in the terminal as well as log to a file:\r\n\r\n```sh\r\nminiterm.py @port @baudrate | tee output.log\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "marrakchino",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1567090784000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 5 | 6 | 752 | false | false | 752 | false |
sonata-project/SonataDoctrineMongoDBAdminBundle | sonata-project | 274,238,720 | 243 | {
"number": 243,
"repo": "SonataDoctrineMongoDBAdminBundle",
"user_login": "sonata-project"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "core23",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1510766592000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "<!-- THE PR TEMPLATE IS NOT AN OPTION. DO NOT DELETE IT, MAKE SURE YOU READ AND EDIT IT! -->\r\n\r\n<!--\r\n Show us you choose the right branch.\r\n Different branches are used for different things :\r\n - 2.x is for everything backwards compatible, like patches, features and deprecation notices\r\n - master is for deprecation removals and other changes that cannot be done without a BC-break\r\n More details here: https://github.com/sonata-project/SonataDatagridBundle/blob/2.x/CONTRIBUTING.md#the-base-branch\r\n-->\r\nI am targeting this branch, because this is BC.\r\n\r\n## Changelog\r\n\r\n<!-- MANDATORY\r\n Fill the changelog part inside the code block.\r\n Follow this schema: http://keepachangelog.com/\r\n-->\r\n\r\n<!-- REMOVE EMPTY SECTIONS -->\r\n```markdown\r\n### Changed\r\n - Changed internal folder structure to `src`, `tests` and `docs`\r\n```\r\n\r\n## Subject\r\n\r\nAdopt the new folder structure discussed on the [dev-kit](https://github.com/sonata-project/dev-kit/issues/278)",
"title": "Refactor folder structure",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "greg0ire",
"comment_id": 345039888,
"datetime": 1510861289000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thanks @username_0 !",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 989 | false | false | 989 | true |
saltstack-formulas/collectd-formula | saltstack-formulas | 213,779,596 | 99 | {
"number": 99,
"repo": "collectd-formula",
"user_login": "saltstack-formulas"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "b13n1u",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1489414561000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Not every java app runs a tomcat, but tomcat always runs on java :) So by setting tomcat to true you will enable collection of catalina mbeans. If set `tomcat: false` or it is not defined then don't do anything.\r\n\r\nBesides the catalina part in java plugin was not working anyway as the Collect statements were missing ;)",
"title": "Fix for tomcat catalina metrics in java plugin",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "fintanmm",
"comment_id": 315055672,
"datetime": 1499946669000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hi all,\r\n\r\nDoes anyone mind if I merge this? \r\n\r\nFintan",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "aboe76",
"comment_id": 315100858,
"datetime": 1499957350000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_1 no problem if you are ok with the changes...",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "fintanmm",
"comment_id": 315184667,
"datetime": 1499975676000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Yeah @username_2 it's something that I would use.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 4 | 474 | false | false | 474 | true |
Microsoft/RTVS | Microsoft | 162,578,651 | 2,018 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Marchen",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1467074373000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "From RTVS, windows() opens a blurred device like\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nFrom MRO, \r\n\r\n",
"title": "windows() function open low resolution graphic window on high DPI display.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "huguesv",
"comment_id": 230944387,
"datetime": 1467850262000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hi username_0,\r\n\r\nI tried it out, and I was able to disable display scaling when running in RTVS by changing the compatibility setting for:\r\n\"C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\\Common7\\IDE\\Extensions\\Microsoft\\R Tools for Visual Studio\\Microsoft.R.Host.exe\"\r\n\r\nPS: Sorry for the delay, I've just returned from a vacation.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Marchen",
"comment_id": 231115485,
"datetime": 1467905606000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi Hugues,\r\n\r\nThanks for your help. I could set compatibility setting and could use high DPI plot window.\r\nIs it possible to make external plot window (i.e., window made by `windows()` function) to use Windows DPI setting like internal plot window?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "huguesv",
"comment_id": 231122583,
"datetime": 1467906822000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "For the internal plot window, we use `png()` where we pass in a `res` that we adjust based on DPI setting (96 for 100%, 144 for 150%, etc).\r\nThere is no `res` parameter for `windows()`, but you can set a larger font size with `pointsize` parameter, and that gives similar result.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Marchen",
"comment_id": 231593928,
"datetime": 1468163546000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Thanks for the comment and I'm sorry for my late reply.\r\n\r\nIf I use `pointsize` parameter of `windows()`, I can set a larger font size, but the resolution of the plot window is still low.\r\nI think it is better to control resolution of the plot window by modifying the compatibility option of the R Host.\r\nIs it difficult for RTVS to automatically set the compatibility setting of Microsoft.R.Host.exe (or use manifest file or something) to adjust DPI setting of plot window?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "huguesv",
"comment_id": 231906561,
"datetime": 1468283926000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I think it would be fine if we added the necessary manifest for Microsoft.R.Host.exe. I was worried that the Save Variable and Get From Variable UI wouldn't respect the DPI settings, but it looks like they do.\r\n\r\nI'm curious -- what makes you want to use the `windows()` plots instead of the RTVS plot window?\r\n\r\nWhat could we add or fix in RTVS plots (other than that bug you filed) that would make the RGui window unnecessary in your work flow?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Marchen",
"comment_id": 231923476,
"datetime": 1468291655000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi Hugues,\r\n\r\nThanks for your comment.\r\nI'm greatly loving functionality of the RTVS plot window, but in my work flow, sometimes I need external windows.\r\n\r\nFirst, sometimes I want to see several graphs together and think about meaning of the graphs. \r\nFor such purpose making multiple graphs by `windows()` function and aligning them like usual window and switching with task bar is more comfortable for me.\r\nI know RTVS plot window provides graph history function, but for this purpose, multiple windows by `windows()` function are more useful for me.\r\n\r\nSecond, sometimes I put several graphs into a single plot window (e.g., using `par(mfrow = c(5, 5))`).\r\nAlthough usually I'm using plot window pinned with R editor, I need to enlarge plot window to see such a complicated graph because I'm using a laptop with 13'' display.\r\nI found I can maximize the RTVS plot window by double clicking the title bar.\r\nBut if I maximize the window, it completely hides the editor window.\r\nSo switching editor window and plot window again and again is more difficult (or seems to require more steps) than using external window.\r\n\r\nFinally, when I make a graph for some publication, its shape (i.e., height and width of the window) is not similar to that of pinned window.\r\nFor this case, switching editor window and external plot window again and again is important because I need to edit graphic parameter again and again to make good looking graph.\r\nTherefore, external window that is easily hidden under the editor window is more preferable for this case.\r\n\r\nIn conclusion, if RTVS provides a way to create multiple plot window and provide a way to hide large plot window under the editor, maybe I don't need external window made by `windows()`.\r\n\r\n\r\nMichio",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "huguesv",
"comment_id": 232226385,
"datetime": 1468371751000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thank you very much for taking the time to write this down.\r\nMultiple plot windows is already very high on our TODO list.\r\nAs for hiding a large plot window in the background, we never realized that this was a problem, so it's great to have that feedback :)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "huguesv",
"comment_id": 246557537,
"datetime": 1473734709000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Fixed for RTVS 0.5: `windows()` devices should no longer be blurry when used from RTVS.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "huguesv",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1473734709000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 10 | 4,164 | false | false | 4,164 | true |
odota/dotaconstants | odota | 179,978,946 | 4 | {
"number": 4,
"repo": "dotaconstants",
"user_login": "odota"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "roman-kosov",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1475136353000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Add description of ability to response to odota/ui#204",
"title": "Master",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "howardchung",
"comment_id": 250408035,
"datetime": 1475139039000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Interesting. I think it should be possible to generate the abilities file using only the data from d2vpkr. I'll open a separate issue for this, but I don't know when I'll be able to get to it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 248 | false | false | 248 | false |
sindresorhus/atom-editorconfig | null | 164,757,903 | 96 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mclo",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1468211003000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Force Unix-style newlines in windows 10",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "florianb",
"comment_id": 233259391,
"datetime": 1468828795000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hi @username_0 -- thanks for getting in touch!\r\n\r\nI'm sorry to hear atom-editorconfig is not working as expected.\r\n\r\nDoes the file only contain your preferred line-endings? You may face inconsistencies if you \"change\" the line endings through editorconfig if the given file was formatted using another line ending in first place.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dlebedynskyi",
"comment_id": 236974651,
"datetime": 1470158125000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Having same issue. editorconfig has LF. \r\nAtom has line-ending-selector default package. It has - Os default. Editorconfig is completely ignored. \r\nyou can change default to LF there. But even if you put crlf in editorconfig - LF still will be used. \r\nIt looks like default package override editorconfig",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "florianb",
"comment_id": 237162154,
"datetime": 1470208836000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hi @username_2 - thanks for getting in touch. Could you please check if the file you're editing is consistently being formatted with the line-endings you're finally want to use?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dlebedynskyi",
"comment_id": 237688805,
"datetime": 1470346040000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_1 it does not look like it is constantly changing. But even with line-ending-selector default to LF, all new fles come with CRLF still.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Clijsters",
"comment_id": 237972439,
"datetime": 1470433114000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Windows 7 here and same issue.\r\n(Only files which came already with `lf` as ending keep its default.)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "florianb",
"comment_id": 238012999,
"datetime": 1470472668000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_2 @username_3 - Atom guesses the linendings based upon which linenendings already exist in the file and then overrides the settings of atom-editorconfig. So if there exist any non-conforming linenedings (to the editorconfig) it is normal behavior that Atom changes the line endings and it is very difficult to change that behavior.\r\n\r\nIf you can be sure, that a file already contains only desired line endings (as defined in the editorconfig) and Atom still changes the line endings - that is a bug.\r\n\r\nI then need a copy of the file you're starting with, your editorconfig-files used in that project and a list of the activated packages.\r\n\r\nI am really sorry that i don't have an easy answer to this issue.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dlebedynskyi",
"comment_id": 238566735,
"datetime": 1470752174000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_1 Thank you for explanation. \r\nso far I checked that a new file is created with LF as expected. I'll keep watching if I see what could this bug. But it could we not a bug at all after you explained how atom works. Thanks",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "florianb",
"comment_id": 251603699,
"datetime": 1475653055000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I close this issue in favor of #89 -- feel free to get in touch if there is anything you'd like to add. Thanks everybody!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "florianb",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1475653055000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 4 | 10 | 2,119 | false | false | 2,119 | true |
lanrion/qy_wechat | null | 69,272,583 | 12 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "zqj",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1429335636000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "MultiXml::ParseError (Start tag expected, '<' not found):\r\n multi_xml (0.5.5) lib/multi_xml/parsers/nokogiri.rb:15:in `parse'\r\n multi_xml (0.5.5) lib/multi_xml.rb:138:in `parse'\r\n /home/deploy/xiaoshouke/shared/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/bundler/gems/qy_wechat-31d0c92ad14e/app/controllers/qy_wechat/qy_wechat_controller.rb:32:in `setup_wechat_message'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:424:in `block in make_lambda'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:143:in `call'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:143:in `block in halting_and_conditional'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:149:in `call'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:149:in `block in halting_and_conditional'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:86:in `call'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:86:in `run_callbacks'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/abstract_controller/callbacks.rb:19:in `process_action'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_controller/metal/rescue.rb:29:in `process_action'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_controller/metal/instrumentation.rb:31:in `block in process_action'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/notifications.rb:159:in `block in instrument'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/notifications/instrumenter.rb:20:in `instrument'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/notifications.rb:159:in `instrument'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_controller/metal/instrumentation.rb:30:in `process_action'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_controller/metal/params_wrapper.rb:250:in `process_action'\r\n activerecord (4.1.8) lib/active_record/railties/controller_runtime.rb:18:in `process_action'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/abstract_controller/base.rb:136:in `process'\r\n actionview (4.1.8) lib/action_view/rendering.rb:30:in `process'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_controller/metal.rb:196:in `dispatch'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_controller/metal/rack_delegation.rb:13:in `dispatch'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_controller/metal.rb:232:in `block in action'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:82:in `call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:82:in `dispatch'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:50:in `call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:73:in `block in call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:59:in `each'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:59:in `call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:678:in `call'\r\n railties (4.1.8) lib/rails/engine.rb:514:in `call'\r\n railties (4.1.8) lib/rails/railtie.rb:194:in `public_send'\r\n railties (4.1.8) lib/rails/railtie.rb:194:in `method_missing'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:73:in `block in call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:59:in `each'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:59:in `call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:678:in `call'\r\n simple_captcha2 (0.3.2) lib/simple_captcha/middleware.rb:26:in `call'\r\n rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/etag.rb:23:in `call'\r\n rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/conditionalget.rb:35:in `call'\r\n rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/head.rb:11:in `call'\r\n remotipart (1.2.1) lib/remotipart/middleware.rb:27:in `call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/params_parser.rb:27:in `call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/flash.rb:254:in `call'\r\n rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/session/abstract/id.rb:225:in `context'\r\n rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/session/abstract/id.rb:220:in `call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/cookies.rb:560:in `call'\r\n activerecord (4.1.8) lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:36:in `call'\r\n activerecord (4.1.8) lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:621:in `call'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/callbacks.rb:29:in `block in call'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:82:in `run_callbacks'\r\n actionpack (4.1.8) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/callbacks.rb:27:in `call'",
"title": "两个不同的套件，第一个套件的应用发送消息正常，第二个套件下的应用就报一下错误",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "zqj",
"comment_id": 94632746,
"datetime": 1429589334000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "QyAuthAgent Load (0.3ms) SELECT `qy_auth_agents`.* FROM `qy_auth_agents` WHERE `qy_auth_agents`.`qy_secret_key` = 'agent_wxfac088bb438a96d7' LIMIT 1\r\nDEBUG WECHAT MESSAGE: <xml><ToUserName><![CDATA[wxfac088bb438a96d7]]></ToUserName>\r\n<Encrypt><![CDATA[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]]></Encrypt>\r\n<AgentID><![CDATA[43]]></AgentID>\r\n</xml>\r\n QySuite Load (0.2ms) SELECT `qy_suites`.* FROM `qy_suites` WHERE `qy_suites`.`suite_id` = 'tj248c47c1714be67c' LIMIT 1\r\n/home/deploy/xiaoshouke/shared/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/bundler/gems/qy_wechat-3f339d806d79/lib/qy_wechat/helpers/prpcrypt.rb:20 Failure because corpid != from_corpid\r\nCompleted 500 Internal Server Error in 4ms\r\n (0.1ms) COMMIT\r\n\r\nMultiXml::ParseError (Start tag expected, '<' not found):\r\n multi_xml (0.5.5) lib/multi_xml/parsers/nokogiri.rb:15:in `parse'\r\n multi_xml (0.5.5) lib/multi_xml.rb:138:in `parse'\r\n /home/deploy/xiaoshouke/shared/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/bundler/gems/qy_wechat-3f339d806d79/app/controllers/qy_wechat/qy_wechat_controller.rb:33:in `setup_wechat_message'\r\n activesupport (4.1.8) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:424:in `block in make_lambda'",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "zqj",
"comment_id": 94647834,
"datetime": 1429595790000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "encoding_aes_key: 1nvFPSVnuVMuaBs2RtJJqYX5w37UiOszgmqBstBnzta, qy_token: VCH8cv, corp_id: wxfac088bb438a96d7\r\nDEBUG WECHAT MESSAGE: <xml><ToUserName><![CDATA[wxfac088bb438a96d7]]></ToUserName>\r\n<Encrypt><![CDATA[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]]></Encrypt>\r\n<AgentID><![CDATA[43]]></AgentID>\r\n</xml>\r\n/home/deploy/xiaoshouke/shared/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/bundler/gems/qy_wechat-8905fc0c911d/lib/qy_wechat/helpers/prpcrypt.rb:20 Failure because wxfac088bb438a96d7 != \r\nDECRYPT WECHAT MESSAGE: ???9O??C?$?2R??9ˬ???-E?[?+h??i??3>(??W?%g1QU5ʔ??j??oA???,?>?a?w&???????{?y????ʀ<???W?_࢝???\r\n h7???2,???????????ܟ?}?k??A,??+\"4H*?\tZ?M???AE???7?\r\n&?ff?^1-??ba䛨?H5s???nشh?G?,???e?%r?????o???IE\r\n ?!3??V?>???l??3????[?`k?A?G?oE??????#?{?t?Ȗ??=??|3???q6???:p?]?<_0+g??_,???˰AӧT??a?\r\n?8(?{???<B???????X?̉???c?ϩ+1??ԩYI?Q)?RB????٬K4+%ĺ?ƌՋ#?L?ʐ1??s͢/l?Χ:?????Y?M9?i=??!?B4??,??yh?Y??\r\n ?????q??9?ۙ??$?^՝?Bsѡ?Q`?O?@???[t??tn&¦|r??x=,?hb^3???f?<H÷?4ۣ?cZ?\"??\r\nCompleted 500 Internal Server Error in 4ms\r\n\r\nMultiXml::ParseError (Start tag expected, '<' not found):",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "zqj",
"comment_id": 94648225,
"datetime": 1429595878000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "encoding_aes_key: 1nvFPSVnuVMuaBs2RtJJqYX5w37UiOszgmqBstBnzta, qy_token: VCH8cv, corp_id: wxfac088bb438a96d7\r\nDEBUG WECHAT MESSAGE: <xml><ToUserName><![CDATA[wxfac088bb438a96d7]]></ToUserName>\r\n<Encrypt><![CDATA[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]]></Encrypt>\r\n<AgentID><![CDATA[9]]></AgentID>\r\n</xml>\r\n (0.2ms) COMMIT\r\nDECRYPT WECHAT MESSAGE: <xml><ToUserName><![CDATA[wxfac088bb438a96d7]]></ToUserName>\r\n<FromUserName><![CDATA[mooogo]]></FromUserName>\r\n<CreateTime>1429595815</CreateTime>\r\n<MsgType><![CDATA[event]]></MsgType>\r\n<AgentID>9</AgentID>\r\n<Event><![CDATA[view]]></Event>\r\n<EventKey><![CDATA[https://open.weixin.qq.com/connect/oauth2/authorize?appid=wxfac088bb438a96d7&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcrm.xiaoshouke.cn%2Fapp_index%2Fapply_leaves%3Fagent_id%3D9%26user_id%3D2&response_type=code&scope=snsapi_base&state=xiaoshoukecrm#wechat_redirect]]></EventKey>\r\n</xml>",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "lanrion",
"comment_id": 95243560,
"datetime": 1429717729000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "确保 配置正确。",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "lanrion",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1429717729000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 6 | 9,688 | false | false | 9,688 | false |
ebu/ebu-tt-live-toolkit | ebu | 192,801,831 | 292 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "malikbeytrison",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1480586729000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "[DELAY NODE] add appliedProcessing in document metadata",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nigelmegitt",
"comment_id": 276688098,
"datetime": 1485963061000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Following EBU meeting and discussion, this applies only to retiming delay nodes and not to buffer delay nodes.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "nigelmegitt",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1495645635000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 110 | false | false | 110 | false |
fantasyland/fantasy-land | fantasyland | 139,291,619 | 128 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "CrossEye",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1457447432000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I'm bothered by the definition of [`Traversable`][tr]. The remaining specifications use plain English, depend on one another, and build on \"value\" and \"equivalent\" from the [Terminology][te] section.\r\n\r\nBut `Traversable` uses three terms not covered in any of these places:\r\n\r\n * natural transformation\r\n * `Id`\r\n * `Compose`\r\n\r\nMy least favorite course in grad school was Category Theory, and I remember little of it, but it means that when I run across this stuff 25 years later, it's at least familiar, and I have some intuitive feel for what makes something a natural transformation. But intuitive feel is not a good basis for a specification.\r\n\r\nAnd it's pretty easy to guess at what `Id` and `Compose` should be and how they should work. But there should be no guessing in a spec.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, I don't feel a strong enough grasp of Traversable to offer a reasonable alternative, and I apologize. But I still think it's worth pointing out the issue.\r\n \r\n\r\n [te]: https://github.com/fantasyland/fantasy-land#terminology\r\n [tr]: https://github.com/fantasyland/fantasy-land#traversable",
"title": "Traversable definition uses undefined terms",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 197555656,
"datetime": 1458163523000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "It would be great to have natural transformation definition in terms of laws a JS function must obey in order to be natural transformation.\r\n\r\nI'm trying to grasp it by reading https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_transformation but not there yet.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 197556867,
"datetime": 1458163755000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "As for `Id` and `Compose` maybe we can refer to implementations js files in this repo? We don't have one for Compose though, but I think I could make a PR.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 197852925,
"datetime": 1458217093000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hm, isn't natural transformation a pair of functions and not one function?\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nFor example, given our functors are Array and Maybe, we need a function that can convert `[] -> Maybe` and another one that converts `Maybe -> []`. And those two functions must obey the 'naturality square' law.\r\n\r\nIs that correct?\r\n\r\nWhat confuses me is that in Traversable law only one function is used. How a one function alone can be natural transformation?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 197854700,
"datetime": 1458217360000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I tried to express law for natural transformation in js, is it correct?\r\n\r\n```\r\nt(f.of(x)).map(a) ≡ t(f.of(x).map(a))\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "CrossEye",
"comment_id": 197936087,
"datetime": 1458229037000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I believe that a specification should not refer to implementations. Moreover, I think it would be better to reconstrue this in terms of plain functions rather than these otherwise unmotivated types.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 197941290,
"datetime": 1458229635000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hm, but laws written using snippets of JS code anyway. Isn't `id.js` and `compose.js` just bigger snippets?\r\n\r\nAlthough `Id.js` has irrelevant to the Traversable law code in it, which may be a bad thing if we refer to it from spec. Because in this case it's not clear whether that additional code part of law or not.\r\n\r\nMaybe we could inline minimal implementations of `Id` and `Compose` needed for that law in .md file?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "joneshf",
"comment_id": 197961627,
"datetime": 1458232239000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "The problem with not referring to specific data types is that `traverse` and `sequence` require an applicative of some other type. The laws only make sense for certain applicatives, because the laws encode the effects of those applicatives. So when the `identity` law is stated, it's saying, that if you \"traverse\" a data type with no additional effects, it's the same as embedding the data type into another with no additional effects.\r\n\r\nIf you try to formulate this with functions you end up complicating the actual law based on the effects that the `Applicative` instance of `(->) r` has.\r\n\r\nYou end up with something like:\r\n\r\n`u.map(x => y => x).sequence(x => y => x)(z)` is equivalent to `(x => y => x)(u)(z)` (identity)\r\n\r\nOr pulling out the duplication:\r\n\r\n`u.map(always).sequence(always)(z)` is equivalent to `always(u)(z)` (identity)\r\n\r\nIs that clearer than this formulation?\r\n\r\n`u.map(Id).sequence(Id.of)` is equivalent to `Id(u)` (identity)\r\n\r\nI would say not. Specifically because you have to explain the `Applicative` effects either way, and it's much easier to explain the effects of `identity` than `(->) r`. I am also not sure how to formulate the `composition` law.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 197966773,
"datetime": 1458232906000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Yes, this is less clear. I don't understand it. So our `of` method here is `x => y => x`, which returns a function, but `of` should return a value that implements Applicative, which a function not implements.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "CrossEye",
"comment_id": 197998563,
"datetime": 1458237061000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I would argue that both are clearer. (The latter only if you actually define `always` somewhere in the spec as `x => y => x`.)\r\n\r\nIf the spec read\r\n\r\n`u.map(Floop).sequence(Floop.grizzle)` is congligial to `Floop(u)` (identity)\r\n\r\nwould you object? What if we changed from \"congligial\" to \"equivalent\"? What if we included the Floop type alongside the spec but made no reference to it anywhere within? What if we switched from `grizzle` to `of` so at least it _looked_ like an Applicative?\r\n\r\nIf you would object to \r\n\r\n`u.map(Floop).sequence(Floop.of)` is equivalent to `Floop(u)` (identity)\r\n\r\nwith the local (unreferenced) version of Id renamed to Floop, but are happy with\r\n\r\n`u.map(Id).sequence(Id.of)` is equivalent to `Id(u)` (identity)\r\n\r\nthen I believe there is something very wrong with how we are doing this specification. Yes, things should be named to appeal to our intuitions, but if the very name of an undefined term is central to our understanding, we are probably standing on shaky ground.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "joneshf",
"comment_id": 198217233,
"datetime": 1458279677000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I am probably not the right person to answer these questions :). Most of the time when I read unfamiliar specs or docs, I am aware that I won't know what all the terminology in it means and I'm fine with that. I just assume it'll become clear later.\r\n\r\nIf `Id` gets renamed to `Floop` it makes no difference, so long as the `Applicative` effects don't change. It's when the `Applicative` effects change that it makes things more complex.\r\n\r\nMaybe I don't understand what I meant when I asked if one was clearer than the other. But it sounds subjective.\r\n\r\nWhile the version:\r\n\r\n`u.map(x => y => x).sequence(x => y => x)(z)` is equivalent to `(x => y => x)(u)(z)` (identity)\r\n\r\nmight be easier to read, it is necessarily more complex than:\r\n\r\n`u.map(Id).sequence(Id.of)` is equivalent to `Id(u)` (identity)\r\n\r\nprecisely because a data type with no effects (Id) is simpler than a data type with ANY effects (Function).\r\n\r\nI'll say this, `Traversable` isn't like the other algebras we've defined. It's probably the most useful one and definitely the most complex one as well. So whatever we can do to simplify and make more clear, I'm behind. But changing from `Id` to `Function` for the `Applicative` effects only makes it more complex.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "joneshf",
"comment_id": 198218014,
"datetime": 1458279823000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Whoops forgot about that. Then we'd have to monkey patch `Function` in the spec for the spec to be accurate.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "CrossEye",
"comment_id": 198394083,
"datetime": 1458312572000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "But how do you know what those effects are? `Floop` is not in the spec. Neither is `Id`. That's what is bothering me. The spec is using `'Id'` and `'Compose'` as well as `'natural transformation'` as though the user will understand them, without _defining_ them anywhere. So how do you know anything about the `Applicative` effects of `Id`. Am I missing something? Is it something you can actually derive from\r\n\r\n`u.map(Id).sequence(Id.of)` is equivalent to `Id(u)` (identity)\r\n\r\n? Because I thought this was the other way around, trying to explain `sequence` in terms of (supposedly-) understood properties of `Id`. Moreover is there something magic about `Id` in this definition, or is this simply a handy `Applicative` to use?\r\n\r\nI was probably being a bit hyperbolic before when I said that this is a clearer formulation:\r\n\r\n`u.map(x => y => x).sequence(x => y => x)(z)` is equivalent to `(x => y => x)(u)(z)` (identity)\r\n\r\nIt's not that this is actually clear to me. I haven't really tried to understand any of them yet. But I feel that I might have a chance of understanding this one without having to make leaps of faith that I understand what these undefined terms are about. This depends on `'map'`, defined as part of `Functor`, `'equivalent'`, given as an initial definition, and standard Javascript notation to explain a law affecting `'sequence'`.\r\n\r\nThe other formulation requires me to know about something called `'Id'`, which has a method called `'of'`, that from what I can tell might or might not be the `Applicative` `of`. Is it? _How do you know that?_ These are my concerns.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 198409015,
"datetime": 1458314885000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I agree, If we find a way to express the law with some functions, that would be great. But this particular example doesn't seem right to me. And as it seems to me these laws can't be expressed with functions, we need some types like `Id` and `Compose` here.\r\n\r\nIMO, the solution lies somewhere near inlining minimal `Id` and `Compose` implementations in the .md file, or we could write down the laws `Id` and `Compose` must obey in the spec.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 201945008,
"datetime": 1459032344000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I'm still very curious about formalizing natural transformation laws in terms of JS code. Could someone please answer my question from https://github.com/fantasyland/fantasy-land/issues/128#issuecomment-197854700 ?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "joneshf",
"comment_id": 202085800,
"datetime": 1459092231000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "If you remove that `f.of` part, then yes. That's correct. It should be:\r\n\r\n```js\r\nt(x).map(a) ≡ t(x.map(a))\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 202099230,
"datetime": 1459096698000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Opened a PR just to have something more concrete to discuss.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rpominov",
"comment_id": 226473638,
"datetime": 1466080947000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "This probably can be closed since #131 merged, @username_0?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "SimonRichardson",
"comment_id": 238488008,
"datetime": 1470731448000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Closing this, reopen if you've got any concerns.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "SimonRichardson",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1470731449000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 4 | 20 | 9,085 | false | false | 9,085 | true |
JuliaQuantum/QuBase.jl | JuliaQuantum | 52,784,099 | 3 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "i2000s",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1419377841000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "As you have noticed, Jarrett (username_1) is going to present some of our works in the 17th SQuInT workshop on February 19-21, 2015—I will also be there for sure. Therefore, we have to stick to a tight timeline and workflow to efficiently achieve a basic version of the project before the workshop. Here, I tentatively propose a framework on this direction in order to integrate this project into the big picture of JuliaQuantum’s roadmap. @username_1 will take over the leadership on the coordination of this project as he has been working on the antecedent package on the same line and is going to present the work. Let’s see if everyone involved happy with the short-term plan, and I’ll update the plan accordingly. You can open new issues to discuss specific topics. Thanks. \r\n\r\n1. Basic typing system of quantum mechanics. \r\n 1. Timeline:\r\n - [ ] A tentative version before Jan 15 so that other people can play with it?\r\n - [ ] A prerelease version before Feb 1st?\r\n - [ ] Technical status frozen on Feb 10? \r\n 2. concepts to be covered (@username_1: most can be moved from QuDirac.jl code base. Can you start another post to monitor the planned hierarchy of those types or start documenting the plan in Docile.jl? This may help avoid repeated work and conflicts for others.):\r\n * quantum states (bra-ket vector space notation should be enough).\r\n * quantum operators (with some important operators implemented in the base).\r\n * density operator or density matrix (may be absorbed into the quantum operator type).\r\n * super-operators.\r\n * propagators (@acroy: can you think about this part?)\r\n * others.\r\n\r\n2. Unit test -- Timeline:\r\n - [ ] Before Feb 1st (Sunday): Think out and implement some simple tests on each part. Pay enough comments in the code file. All work should be mainly done by who defines the types. \r\n - [ ] All tests done by Feb 10? A second person should be involved in this testing process. \r\n\r\n3. Systematic test and making examples -- Timeline:\r\n - [ ] Before Feb 1st: making some simple quantum dynamics solvers based on the QuBase.jl for demonstration purpose (@acroy: can lead this part? I believe you have enough foundation to achieve it easily. This part could be evolved into the future quantum solver project for JuliaQuantum). Finish some simple demonstrations of how to use this the basic types to make more complicated operator-state calculations (@username_1: I believe you have enough material to cover this).\r\n - [ ] Before Feb 7 (Saturday): find some interesting problems in literature with plots to solve with and without the programmed quantum dynamics solvers. Again, @acroy, should be easy for you. I will also think of some interesting examples in quantum information and control field. Feedbacks to the code base if there is anything wrong. If possible, compare with other packages and do some benchmarks. Examples and results will be used for the vivid graphs in the poster and future tutorials, documentations. Yes, poster presentation like fancy plots. \r\n\r\n4. Documentations (@username_1) -- Timeline:\r\n - [ ] Generate a brief description with Docile.jl before Feb 1, so that I can link it to the website and give a feedback. If we have time, we can consider using http://readthedocs.org but optional for now. \r\n - [ ] Work out the framework of the post before Feb 15 with completed examples and demons. Report progress with draft file [back to public](https://github.com/JuliaQuantum/JuliaQuantum.github.io/issues/12). \r\n - [ ] Final beautification and modification upon feedbacks before Feb 17. I can print out the poster for free and bring it to Berkeley on Feb 18. \r\n\r\n5. Future work and asides:\r\n * More complete types and functions. @jutho: can you point out the hierarchy of the type system you are working on with tensor algebra before Feb 1st? We will consider those possibilities while working on the basic version of QuBase.jl as early as possible. \r\n \r\n * You can leave more suggestions on future below. \r\n\r\nEdited on Jan 6: we may not necessarily stick to the timeline I proposed at the early stage of this repo. I think @username_1 and @acroy know better than I do on organizing this project. See: #7 .",
"title": "On the Timeline and Workflow of QuBase.jl",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jrevels",
"comment_id": 75393361,
"datetime": 1424553379000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Seeing as how we're now past these dates, I'll go ahead and close this one up. The goals with regards to documentation and unit testing are particularly worthy of attention but will probably have to wait for the resolution of #9.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "jrevels",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1424553379000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 4,481 | false | false | 4,481 | true |
adobe/brackets-shell | adobe | 131,856,487 | 549 | {
"number": 549,
"repo": "brackets-shell",
"user_login": "adobe"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ficristo",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1454766237000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "The warnings fixed were:\r\n- GetVersionEx is deprecated and so will raise warning as errors. There were two case: in one it checked if on Windows Vista or later in the second if on Windows XP or later.\r\nAFAICT the platforms supported are from Vista onwards: I removed the checks.\r\n- GdiPlus.h inclusion will raise some warnings so I disabled them\r\n- there were some redeclaration warnings\r\n\r\n/cc @username_2",
"title": "VS2015: fix some warnings",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "petetnt",
"comment_id": 181836658,
"datetime": 1455019213000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Nice to see someone working on the VS2015 support: it's one of the two pain points of not being able to contribute so much on the `brackets-shell` side :+1: (Other one being that I don't have that much native coding experience but that's just a sidematter :joy_cat:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nethip",
"comment_id": 206702490,
"datetime": 1460006563000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_0 Highly appreciate this.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nethip",
"comment_id": 227763840,
"datetime": 1466606105000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Thanks @username_0",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 4 | 716 | false | false | 716 | true |
websanova/js-url | null | 253,722,871 | 61 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "gizmooo",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1504023294000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "The domain-first domain approach is incorrect. For example, goo.gl returns undefined",
"title": "some domains is not defined",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "websanova",
"comment_id": 325888711,
"datetime": 1504072209000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Are you using to version?\n\nAlso note that it's not a full to list as there are literally thousands of\nthem nowadays.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gizmooo",
"comment_id": 325930790,
"datetime": 1504084038000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I'm using the latest version of the plugin.\r\nHow do I get a domain?\r\nhttps://plnkr.co/edit/YWy7BYrPxvGhW6F5aH3i?p=preview",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "websanova",
"comment_id": 325939300,
"datetime": 1504086025000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "*I meant TLD version...\n\nhttps://github.com/username_1/js-url/blob/master/url-tld.min.js",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gizmooo",
"comment_id": 325941625,
"datetime": 1504086596000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Same thing with this version.\r\nCan i do something wrong?\r\nhttps://plnkr.co/edit/F4QlagpjcJNTBHKIfp8m?p=preview",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "websanova",
"comment_id": 325944128,
"datetime": 1504087195000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Show your code",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gizmooo",
"comment_id": 325955442,
"datetime": 1504090386000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "`var LINK = 'https://goo.gl/maps/smEKk1kZtq72'\r\n var domain = url('domain', LINK);\r\n var hostname = url('hostname', LINK);`",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "websanova",
"comment_id": 326032160,
"datetime": 1504107755000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Ok, so I added \"gl\" to the domain list. But that will only solve the issue with this domain.\r\n\r\nI kind of gave up on keeping the tld list up to date because there are just too many nowadays.\r\n\r\nYou might want to try using the `url('.-1)` type structure for domain parts.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "websanova",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1504107755000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 9 | 927 | false | false | 927 | true |
bradwestness/EPPlusEnumerable | null | 110,820,523 | 13 | {
"number": 13,
"repo": "EPPlusEnumerable",
"user_login": "bradwestness"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mgpeter",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1444516430000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "See: #12 , #10 \r\n\r\nThis pull request is initially just a request for review, I don't fully expect it to be merged in straight away, rather after some discussion and fixes on my part; I'd appreciate if it happens though : )\r\n\r\nCovered changes\r\n\r\n * Add [SpreadsheetExcludeFromOutput] attribute. This works along the ExcludeFromOutput fllag in tabnames for now. Ideally I feel TabName and Exclude attributes should be used separately to follow SRP, also \"cohesion, not coupling\" (so that the exclude flag should be dropped from name attribute if we are actually to include my suggested changes in the library\r\n * update the solution to VS 2015, might need revert - depends on further decision by @username_1 \r\n * refactor the code a little to deduplicate logic for passing IEnumerables to work sheets\r\n * allow adding data to existing excel packages through AddData(ref ExcelPackage package, IEnumerable ...). One might question the *ref* usage, decided on this to make sure that implementors and clients are aware that passed excel package is being changed after all.\r\n * add unit test for exclude from output, refactor unit tests a little.",
"title": "ExcludeFromOutput and small refactorings",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "bradwestness",
"comment_id": 147414416,
"datetime": 1444660405000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I feel like there's too much going on in this PR for me to feel comfortable merging it. If you check the [contributing guidelines document](https://github.com/username_1/EPPlusEnumerable/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md), I've requested that PR's include only one \"unit of work,\" i.e. I'd love it if you could submit separate pull requests for the attribute, the refactoring, the VS2015 upgrade, etc.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mgpeter",
"comment_id": 147600227,
"datetime": 1444711618000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "hey @username_1 thanks for quick response. That's not a problem and I will do so. Just couldn't allocate more time to it that weekend before actually having a discussion to see if we are on the same page here.\r\n\r\nWill properly divide the pull request this week I think.\r\n\r\nIn the meantime, can you take a moment to think about what is basically your opinion in regards to the following:\r\n\r\n - Unit Tests - I can introduce BDD style tests with SpecFlow further on if you want ( http://www.specflow.org/getting-started/ ). I already see few scenarios when it would be beneficial for the project, basically saving time needed to write subsequent tests. It would allow to use \"steps\" as building blocks for bigger test scenarios. I can elaborate more if needed.\r\n - VS2015/VS2013 and nuGet - are you ok with going the automatic nuget restore way so that we can drop the nuget.exe ? ( http://www.xavierdecoster.com/migrate-away-from-msbuild-based-nuget-package-restore )\r\n - is \"adding data to existing excel package\" a desired functionality in your opinion? I thought so as I need it in the customer's solution. What do you think about exposing it, as it might seem like providing more access to clients of the code? However we are going to isolate the internal logic from the public method.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 2,828 | false | false | 2,828 | true |
opendatakit/collect | opendatakit | 194,367,660 | 290 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "yanokwa",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1481211544000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "#### Software and hardware versions \r\nODK Collect v1.4.12, Android v6.0.1, Nexus 5\r\n\r\n#### Problem description\r\nCollect does not download media folders when form and form-media are on Google Drive\r\n\r\n#### Steps to reproduce the problem\r\n1. Option, but recommended: Setup a test Gmail account\r\n1. Configure Collect to use Google Drive/Sheets\r\n1. Unzip [test.zip](https://github.com/opendatakit/collect/files/639815/test.zip) and upload the attached test.xml and test-media folder to Google Drive\r\n1. Get Blank Form, search for test\r\n1. Select and download test.xml\r\n1. Download succeeds, but when you open form, it does not have necessary icons\r\n\r\n\r\n#### Expected behavior\r\nThe form should have the icons. Or rather, for a formName.xml, the Google Drive Downloader should also download the \"formName-media\" folder. \r\n\r\n\r\n#### Other information\r\nI can confirm that the media folder is not present on the SD card.\r\n\r\n[GoogleDriveActivity.java](https://github.com/opendatakit/collect/blob/81f8038c0723c023d1e1dbf360dc0de41a913798/collect_app/src/main/java/org/odk/collect/android/activities/GoogleDriveActivity.java#L740) is a good place to start.",
"title": "Collect does not download media folders when form is on Google Drive",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "lognaturel",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1484365441000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 1,363 | false | false | 1,363 | false |
cms-sw/cmssw | cms-sw | 63,025,028 | 8,417 | {
"number": 8417,
"repo": "cmssw",
"user_login": "cms-sw"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "apfeiffer1",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1426780969000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "add listGTs sub-command to commandline tool (conddb) to list all GTs in condDBv2",
"title": "add functionality to list all GTs in condDBv2",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ggovi",
"comment_id": 83990490,
"datetime": 1426851137000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "+1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "davidlange6",
"comment_id": 84022034,
"datetime": 1426859937000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "+1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 4 | 9 | 1,863 | false | true | 84 | false |
KiCad/kicad-doc | KiCad | 106,188,518 | 153 | {
"number": 153,
"repo": "kicad-doc",
"user_login": "KiCad"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "MarcoHess",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1442097476000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I rewrote the section on DXF import to make it more clear on how best to prepare the DXF file for import.",
"title": "Updated section on DXF import ",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nickoe",
"comment_id": 139849048,
"datetime": 1442129667000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thank you. I skimmed through it quickl and looks ok to me, so I will merge it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 3 | 334 | false | true | 183 | false |
dotse/zonemaster-gui | dotse | 59,249,743 | 83 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "cdybedahl",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1425050570000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "The GUI really needs documentation describing what functionalities are implemented where and how. It's not obvious what functionality is implemented on the Perl side and what is in AngularJS code. In between the double layers of templating, the AJAX calls and the AngularJS directives, it's difficult to know how things fit together. Documentation describing the control flow and data manipulation would be very helpful.",
"title": "Maintainer documentation needed",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "sandoche2k",
"comment_id": 102813592,
"datetime": 1431875493000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@pawal - assignee @mtoma and to release .2",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "sandoche2k",
"comment_id": 113078489,
"datetime": 1434617006000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@mtoma - This is part of the release 2015.2. Can you have a look at this issue?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "sandoche2k",
"comment_id": 114426642,
"datetime": 1435053356000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Basic documentation to be done by @mtoma\r\nThen, work with @mattias-p and @sandstrand to complete this issue.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pamasse",
"comment_id": 347540289,
"datetime": 1511879370000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "New GUI upcoming with its documentation.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pamasse",
"comment_id": 382370028,
"datetime": 1524054712000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Very simple documentation will be done in the Readme.\r\nSince all is done in javascript (Angular 5), no need to describe any custom behavior.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "pamasse",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1524576687000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 3 | 7 | 830 | false | false | 830 | false |
Rapptz/discord.py | null | 220,864,478 | 533 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Exahilosys",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1491896275000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Shorthand for `Client.get_user(id)`, makes more sense for something like that to be accessible from classes with borderline identical functionality.",
"title": "Add a member.user method",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "diceroll123",
"comment_id": 293177009,
"datetime": 1491896372000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "but..\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/username_2/discord.py/blob/async/discord/member.py#L78",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Rapptz",
"comment_id": 293177675,
"datetime": 1491896558000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I cannot see the use case considering both `User` and `Member` meet the `abc.User` interface which allows you to use both of them as-if it was a `User`. ergo, this would be indistinguishable in a duck typing scenario.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "Rapptz",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1495300663000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Rapptz",
"comment_id": 302886610,
"datetime": 1495300663000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Considering `User` and `Member` are comparable again I think this use case has been met differently.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 5 | 543 | false | false | 543 | true |
PaulSchweizer/flowpipe | null | 283,681,656 | 32 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "PaulSchweizer",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1513800704000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Serialize to and from graphml",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "PaulSchweizer",
"comment_id": 455617883,
"datetime": 1547831147000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 , good idea! Yes, adding these two methods to the graph would be really good.\r\nIt could look something like this maybe (just a quick idea):\r\n```xml\r\n<graph id=\"{graph.name}\" edgedefault=\"directed\">\r\n <node id=\"{node1.identifier}\"/>\r\n <node id=\"{node2.identifier>\"/>\r\n <edge id=\"{node1.outputs[output_name].name}-{node2.inputs[input_name].name}\" source=\"{node1.identifier}\" target=\"{node2.identifier}\"/>\r\n </graph>\r\n```\r\nNot sure where to put the other attributes of the Node like \"metadata\", \"class\", \"module\" etc. but you'll find a way :D \r\nThanks again!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Anton-4",
"comment_id": 457174948,
"datetime": 1548331811000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I started working on this and thought: do we really need full serialization and deserialization or just exporting of graph, nodes and edges without attributes like metadata, class, module... ?\r\n\r\nI mainly wanted to export to graphml to have a standardized format to feed into the visualizer.\r\nWhat was your intended use-case for full serialization and deserialization?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "PaulSchweizer",
"comment_id": 457220679,
"datetime": 1548340936000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I see your point @username_1 but if we would fully serialize the graph like we currently do in json, we could use the graphml file to fully reconstruct the graph afterwards. Otherwise we would need to keep another (json) file for that purpose. \r\nIf it is too much work though, we can start by only serializing as much as you need for visualizing the graph, it should be possible to extend the graphml serialization later.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Anton-4",
"comment_id": 457229348,
"datetime": 1548342311000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I now found how I can cleanly add in nested xml. That issues was kind of holding me back.\r\nI will make it work :)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "PaulSchweizer",
"comment_id": 457229714,
"datetime": 1548342366000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Amazing! Thanks @username_1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "PaulSchweizer",
"comment_id": 508947229,
"datetime": 1562439745000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 I'm planning to put some time into flowpipe over the next weeks and am browsing through the backlog here, trying to get back into it and do some planning. Let me know if you're still working on this",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Anton-4",
"comment_id": 510106147,
"datetime": 1562771863000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I have not continued working in this. This did require some work to define the complex types as explained [here](http://graphml.graphdrawing.org/primer/graphml-primer.html#Complex).\r\nFeel free to continue working on the schema definition I started [here](https://github.com/username_1/flowpipe/commit/a574b1eecf552e2a21b80e45063890e1df206b52).",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "PaulSchweizer",
"comment_id": 511201198,
"datetime": 1563109619000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Perfect! Thanks for the links and the work you put into this already! I'm going to put some time into this after the compound plugs are done",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 9 | 2,184 | false | false | 2,184 | true |
HOL-Theorem-Prover/HOL | HOL-Theorem-Prover | 60,917,221 | 243 | {
"number": 243,
"repo": "HOL",
"user_login": "HOL-Theorem-Prover"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ptroja",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1426198031000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Minor fixes in .doc files and some whitespace cleanup",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mn200",
"comment_id": 78680230,
"datetime": 1426201780000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thanks for these!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 17 | false | false | 17 | false |
aspnet/Localization | aspnet | 99,167,951 | 61 | {
"number": 61,
"repo": "Localization",
"user_login": "aspnet"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "hishamco",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1438768264000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Base on my commit https://github.com/aspnet/Localization/commit/5f83c0df434d117abbca89dc7b5e2e2286d738c3, I forgot to rename the namespace of ```ResourceManagerStringLocalizerTest``` class, so i did this fix",
"title": "Fix namespace typo",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "hishamco",
"comment_id": 127944279,
"datetime": 1438768991000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "/cc @username_1",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "kirthik",
"comment_id": 128102344,
"datetime": 1438799685000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "[:shipit]. Will merge",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "hishamco",
"comment_id": 136793086,
"datetime": 1441126486000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": ":watch: \r\nBTW is there someone will look into Localization repo PRs while Damian is busy",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "kirthik",
"comment_id": 139406937,
"datetime": 1441926324000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "merged 2faf31727ed5cdded889239892fa3ce25966ee36",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 5 | 375 | false | false | 375 | true |
ipfs/ipfs-cluster | ipfs | 219,769,117 | 90 | {
"number": 90,
"repo": "ipfs-cluster",
"user_login": "ipfs"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "hsanjuan",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1491445739000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This should fix what I meant in #84\r\n\r\nLicense: MIT",
"title": "WIP: A guide to running ipfs cluster",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "hsanjuan",
"comment_id": 292652666,
"datetime": 1491599428000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Would be good to get feedback here.\r\n\r\n@username_1, would you like to read this guide and provide some feedback? Like things that are missing, or not clear enough and can be better explained...",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "bgadmin",
"comment_id": 292859379,
"datetime": 1491805210000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 sure thing, sorry for late reply will get back to you today :)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "VictorBjelkholm",
"comment_id": 292866558,
"datetime": 1491807934000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Would be nice to have a quickstart in the top, similar to what was in the top-level readme.md before, where you just list the minimal set of commands to get up and running.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "hsanjuan",
"comment_id": 296367958,
"datetime": 1492861762000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I have added the quickstart to the main README.. The guide is meant for a more in-depth approach.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 4 | 9 | 1,661 | false | true | 582 | true |
Microsoft/vcpkg | Microsoft | 220,373,855 | 919 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "saedrna",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1491624896000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi,\r\n\r\nI am trying to port [openblas](http://www.openblas.net/), the strategy is to directly download the binary distribution and copy the include , lib and dlls to the desired place.\r\n\r\nHere is my temporary code,\r\n\r\n```\r\n\r\ninclude(vcpkg_common_functions)\r\nif(VCPKG_LIBRARY_LINKAGE STREQUAL \"static\")\r\n message(WARNING \"openblas only support dynamic link for msvc\")\r\n set(VCPKG_LIBRARY_LINKAGE \"dynamic\")\r\nendif()\r\nif(TARGET_TRIPLET STREQUAL \"x86-windows\")\r\n message(WARNING \"current only port openblas for x64-windows\")\r\n set(TARGET_TRIPLET \"x64-windows\")\r\nendif()\r\n\r\nset(SOURCE_PATH ${CURRENT_BUILDTREES_DIR}/src)\r\nset(SOURCE_OPENBLAS ${SOURCE_PATH}/OpenBLAS-v0.2.19-Win64-int32)\r\nset(SOURCE_MINGW64 ${SOURCE_PATH}/mingw64_dll)\r\n\r\nvcpkg_download_distfile(ARCHIVE\r\n URLS \"https://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/project/openblas/v0.2.19/OpenBLAS-v0.2.19-Win64-int32.zip\"\r\n FILENAME \"OpenBLAS-v0.2.19-Win64-int32.zip\"\r\n SHA512 2bb13bf5e322d35e0bef7ef1ca986653117ef74e1071108520273ee9703e6b9cbec3cd615bfac6b52965fb7d661b76628a5526a8e658628b172fb7585cde2219\r\n)\r\nvcpkg_download_distfile(MINGW64_DLL\r\n URLS \"https://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/project/openblas/v0.2.14/mingw64_dll.zip\"\r\n FILENAME \"mingw64_dll.zip\"\r\n SHA512 8fabb10c6556686d1b04816f6ba62702f607d90cdae9c3c20e598d0330acfcbb361a3fd811402f34f896c88a232e29541ec2e98cfa9ae698b2f7c6216e2b8420\r\n)\r\nvcpkg_extract_source_archive(${ARCHIVE})\r\nvcpkg_extract_source_archive(${MINGW64_DLL})\r\n\r\n# apply patches\r\nvcpkg_apply_patches(\r\n SOURCE_PATH ${SOURCE_OPENBLAS}\r\n PATCHES \"${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/config-file-use-relative-path.patch\"\r\n)\r\n\r\n# copy include headers\r\nfile(COPY ${SOURCE_OPENBLAS}/include \r\n DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR})\r\n\r\n# copy lib\r\nfile(COPY ${SOURCE_OPENBLAS}/lib/libopenblas.dll.a \r\n DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/lib)\r\nfile(COPY ${SOURCE_OPENBLAS}/lib/libopenblas.dll.a \r\n DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/debug/lib)\r\nfile(RENAME ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/lib/libopenblas.dll.a ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/lib/libopenblas.lib)\r\nfile(RENAME ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/debug/lib/libopenblas.dll.a ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/debug/lib/libopenblas.lib)\r\n\r\n#copy dlls\r\nfile(COPY ${SOURCE_OPENBLAS}/bin \r\n DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR})\r\nfile(COPY ${SOURCE_OPENBLAS}/bin \r\n DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/debug)\r\nfile(GLOB MINGW64_DLL_FILES ${SOURCE_MINGW64}/*.dll)\r\n\r\nfile(COPY ${MINGW64_DLL_FILES}\r\n DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/bin)\r\nfile(COPY ${MINGW64_DLL_FILES}\r\n DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/debug/bin)\r\n\r\n# copy cmake\r\nfile(COPY ${SOURCE_OPENBLAS}/lib/cmake\r\n DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/share/openblas)\r\n\r\n# copy license\r\nfile(COPY ${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/LICENSE\r\n DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/share/openblas)\r\nfile(RENAME ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/share/openblas/LICENSE ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/share/openblas/copyright)\r\n```\r\n\r\nAnd I have successfully get the packages in the `./vcpkg/packages/openblas_x64-windows` as below,\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nBut at last, I have encountered the error, and I have no idea what is this.\r\n```\r\n-- Performing post-build validation\r\nCould not find proper second linker member\r\n```\r\n\r\nSo, is this strategy OK to only copy the files but no compilation? Because openblas is C, and I think it is ABI compatible if only dynamic link is used.\r\n\r\nIf it's OK, how could I solve the `Could not find proper second linker member` problem?\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\n\r\nHan",
"title": "How to solve \"Could not find proper second linker member\"?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ras0219-msft",
"comment_id": 292756744,
"datetime": 1491700591000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Hi @username_0, thanks for starting this!\r\n\r\nTo answer the primary question up front: \"Could not find proper second linker member\" is an error from our internal COFF reader implementation. As part of package verification, we check several attributes of the binaries such as architecture, APPCONTAINER, and CRTs. It seems that the gcc-built import libs have some differences from the MSVC linker's import libs -- based on the error, they probably don't output the second linker member table which is used for improved link speed.\r\n\r\nI think the best option in this case is to generate fresh import libs using the MSVC linker: see [2] for an example of this. It's probably easiest to write a short powershell script to do that.\r\n\r\nA few comments on the overall approach (precompiled binaries):\r\n\r\nThis works as long as the library is C, doesn't allocate/free across the DLL boundary, doesn't expect shared CRT state, and has no dependencies. In this case, there is a concern that other packages might want to also use libgfortran, so that may need to be split into a separate package (with some way to verify ABI compatibility?).\r\n\r\nAnother concern with these particular libraries is that although OpenBLAS is licensed as BSD, it appears that libgfortran is only available under the GPL (note: _not_ LGPL). If we go this route, it is very important to deploy the copyright notices for all of the packaged runtime libraries as well.\r\n\r\nSmall nit: the `mingw64_dll.zip` download should probably be `openblas-0.2.14-mingw64_dll.zip`.\r\n\r\nFinally, it looks like in 0.2.15+ the OpenBLAS project has started to support VS/MSVC directly through CMake [1]. In the long term, we would much prefer using this option and contributing back to the upstream project to make it \"first-class\". However, there may be reasons in the short term to prefer precompiled DLLs.\r\n\r\nThanks again for starting this port and let us know if you hit any other obstacles!\r\n\r\n[1] https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/wiki/How-to-use-OpenBLAS-in-Microsoft-Visual-Studio#2-cmake-and-visual-studio\r\n[2] https://adrianhenke.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/create-lib-file-from-dll/",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ras0219-msft",
"comment_id": 292757462,
"datetime": 1491701681000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "One other thing I forgot: you should use\r\n```cmake\r\nif(NOT VCPKG_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE STREQUAL \"x64\")\r\n message(FATAL_ERROR \"openblas can only be built for x64 currently\")\r\nendif()\r\n```\r\nto check the architecture. This will enable it to work when building for x64-windows-static and will fail faster when someone requests x86 (with the current approach, we will just fail later, in the post-build checks which ensures you have packaged the right architecture of libraries). Unlike with static vs dynamic, it doesn't make sense to give the user x64 libraries when they requested x86 -- they can't use them!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "saedrna",
"comment_id": 292762987,
"datetime": 1491711476000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I have modified the lib part, use `lib /def:libopenblas.lib /OUT:libopenblas.lib` to create the lib file.\r\nHowever, it seems that the openblas binary distribution is also dependent on `msvcrt.dll` and generate another error. I know that vs2015 uses vcruntime140.dll and that's what the error means,\r\n\r\n```\r\nDetected outdated dynamic CRT in the following files:\r\n\r\n C:/workspace/build/vcpkg/packages/openblas_x64-windows/debug/bin/libopenblas.dll: msvcrt.dll\r\n C:/workspace/build/vcpkg/packages/openblas_x64-windows/bin/libopenblas.dll: msvcrt.dll\r\n```\r\n\r\nAnd here is the depends of libopenblas.dll, I didn't assume it also depends on vc, that's werid,\r\n```\r\n libgcc_s_seh-1.dll\r\n libgfortran-3.dll\r\n KERNEL32.dll\r\n msvcrt.dll\r\n USER32.dll\r\n```\r\n\r\nbelow is how I create libopenblas.lib, and the def file is created manually and puts into the ports directory,\r\n\r\n```\r\nfind_file(LIB_EXE lib.exe \r\n PATHS \"C:\\\\Program Files (x86)\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\\\\VC\\\\bin\\\\amd64\\\\lib.exe\"\r\n \"C:\\\\Program Files (x86)\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio 15.0\\\\VC\\\\bin\\\\amd64\\\\lib.exe\")\r\nmessage(STATUS \"${LIB_EXE}\")\r\nfile(MAKE_DIRECTORY ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/lib)\r\nfile(MAKE_DIRECTORY ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/debug/lib)\r\nexecute_process(COMMAND \"${LIB_EXE}\" /machine:X64 /def:${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/libopenblas.def /OUT:${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/lib/libopenblas.lib\r\n WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/lib)\r\nfile(COPY ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/lib/libopenblas.lib DESTINATION ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/debug/lib)\r\nfile(REMOVE ${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/lib/libopenblas.exp)\r\n```\r\n\r\nOne more comment on using cmake to build libopenblas, first it only support x86 for the time being and second it only uses plain C implementation and may be slow. If we really need to build from source of libopenblas, I think it's better to hook into something like msys or other similar subsystem.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "saedrna",
"comment_id": 292855283,
"datetime": 1491803255000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Furthermore, even of I cross compile libopenblas in linux with cross compile mingw-w64, I have found that it will depend on msvcrt.dll. Below is the command to cross compile libopenblas\r\n```\r\nmake CC=x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc FC=x86_64-w64-mingw32-gfortran TARGET=NEHALM HOSTCC=gcc\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ras0219-msft",
"comment_id": 293122349,
"datetime": 1491873537000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "PATHS \"C:\\\\Program Files (x86)\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\\\\VC\\\\bin\\\\amd64\\\\lib.exe\"\r\n \"C:\\\\Program Files (x86)\\\\Microsoft Visual Studio 15.0\\\\VC\\\\bin\\\\amd64\\\\lib.exe\")`\r\n\r\nWe ensure that the toolchain is available on the PATH inside the portfile, so you don't need to (and shouldn't!) specify any search PATHS. This helps to ensure consistent behavior across everyone's environments. Also, `find_program()` may be more appropriate here than `find_file()`.\r\n\r\n[1] https://github.com/Microsoft/vcpkg/blob/2f8d8d8b18f8a6dd7dad6e3290074dc6044395ce/scripts/cmake/vcpkg_acquire_msys.cmake\r\n[2] https://github.com/Microsoft/vcpkg/blob/master/toolsrc/src/PostBuildLint.cpp#L683",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "saedrna",
"comment_id": 293140353,
"datetime": 1491881677000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Thanks, after some searches, I think I have come to the same dead end of #23 .\r\n\r\nAlthough openblas comes with a cmake system, only blas part is available without touching the fortran code. For lapack part, I didn't find a library without fortran and mingw uses msvcrt as the C runtime. \r\n\r\nIs it possible to port mkl? If the license is fine for vcpkg? It now has a comminity license, and I have seen others redistribute mkl freely, such as Anaconda.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ras0219-msft",
"comment_id": 294265657,
"datetime": 1492221829000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Generally, vcpkg doesn't have any problem with licenses; we do not distribute sources or binaries of the packaged libraries. So even proprietary community/evaluation licenses are conceptually fine for us.\r\n\r\nMKL would be great to have! I see two obstacles:\r\n1. Unfortunately our \"replacement\" support isn't as excellent as we'd like yet, so the experience of selecting between openBLAS and MKL will unfortunately involve manually manipulating the dependency list of everyone who needs BLAS. We're working on this!\r\n2. I don't see a simple download on the website[1]. If the library owner insists on signing up/in to download a library, we can't package it _easily_. We might be able to fail the build and ask the user to download the archive for us, but that's a pretty terrible experience.\r\n\r\n[1] https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl/",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "dan-shaw",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1586477062000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 3 | 9 | 10,472 | false | false | 10,472 | true |
Friend-LGA/LGSideMenuController | null | 97,801,381 | 5 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ndmeiri",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1438117306000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "The inline documentation in LGSideMenuController.h is incomplete. For example, the properties associated with these getters are undocumented.\r\n```\r\n- (UIViewController *)rootViewController;\r\n- (UIView *)leftView;\r\n- (UIView *)rightView;\r\n```\r\n\r\nWould you please consider documenting these properties and other members of LGSideMenuController?",
"title": "Add documentation",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1 | 1 | 342 | false | false | 342 | false |
bazelbuild/bazel | bazelbuild | 165,526,341 | 1,523 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "abergmeier-dsfishlabs",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1468491258000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Currently it is not supported to write `[foo] * 5`.\r\nMessage is:\r\n\r\n unsupported operand type(s) for *: 'list' and 'int'.",
"title": "Skylark operator list * int missing",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dslomov",
"comment_id": 265811608,
"datetime": 1481220679000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Isn't this fixed already?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "fweikert",
"comment_id": 265975515,
"datetime": 1481277258000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Andreas's fix is still pending: https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/pull/1524",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "abergmeier-dsfishlabs",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1481878222000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "abergmeier-dsfishlabs",
"comment_id": 267546196,
"datetime": 1481878222000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Is merged.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "fweikert",
"comment_id": 267568302,
"datetime": 1481885427000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Thank you!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 6 | 246 | false | false | 246 | false |
bazaarvoice/jolt | bazaarvoice | 209,695,412 | 323 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "gangakrishh",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1487838691000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "INPUT\r\n---------\r\n\r\n'{\r\n\t\"author\": [\r\n\t\t\"krish\",\r\n\t\t\"dev\"\r\n\t]\r\n}`\r\n\r\nExpected OUTPUT\r\n\r\n`{\r\n \"author\": {\"firstName\":\"krish\",\"lastName\":\"dev\"}\r\n}`",
"title": "convert string array into list of objects",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "houjincheng1992",
"comment_id": 282043854,
"datetime": 1487867390000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "how about the following:\r\n\r\n[\r\n {\r\n \"operation\": \"shift\",\r\n \"spec\": {\r\n \"author\": {\r\n \"0\": \"author.firstName\",\r\n \"1\": \"author.lastName\"\r\n }\r\n }\r\n }\r\n]",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gangakrishh",
"comment_id": 282260665,
"datetime": 1487932793000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "this is ok, can we split the string into array of String\r\n\r\n`{ \"author\": \"krish, dev\"}` = { \"author\": [\"krish\", \"dev\"]}",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "milosimpson",
"comment_id": 283447752,
"datetime": 1488397434000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Yes, it is an odd usage, but works.\r\n\r\nInput\r\n```\r\n{\r\n\t\"author\": \"krish, dev\"\r\n}\r\n```\r\n\r\nSpec\r\n```\r\n[\r\n {\r\n \"operation\": \"shift\",\r\n \"spec\": {\r\n \"author\": {\r\n \"*, *\": {\r\n \"$(0,1)\": \"author[0]\",\r\n \"$(0,2)\": \"author[1]\"\r\n }\r\n }\r\n }\r\n }\r\n]\r\n```\r\n\r\nOutput\r\n```\r\n{\r\n \"author\" : [ \"krish\", \"dev\" ]\r\n}\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "jsurls",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1559751608000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mcandar",
"comment_id": 554248850,
"datetime": 1573803392000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "Hey, isn't there any way to do this transformation dynamically?\r\n\r\n{ \"author\": \"word1,word2,word3,......\"} = { \"author\": [\"word1\",\"word2\",\"word3\",....]}\r\n\r\nHardcoding does not provide a good generalization.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 5 | 6 | 1,012 | false | false | 1,012 | false |
Addepar/ember-widgets | Addepar | 168,960,714 | 242 | {
"number": 242,
"repo": "ember-widgets",
"user_login": "Addepar"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "embooglement",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1470164037000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "A previous commit (6826e00) added the ability for popover links to choose whether or not to respond to left and right click events. These events were never bubbled. This commit bubbles events if they are ignored by the popover link.",
"title": "Bubble Popover Link Click Events",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "embooglement",
"comment_id": 237007230,
"datetime": 1470164358000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@Addepar/fire @Addepar/pants review?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jordansmith42",
"comment_id": 237008762,
"datetime": 1470164615000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "LGTM",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 272 | false | false | 272 | false |
Catel/Catel | Catel | 250,041,536 | 1,096 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "DanielKuehner",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1502719630000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "### Feature description\r\n\r\nIntroduce the new MixedConsolidate which consolidates the multiply events of mode MixedBash as the following example demonstrates:\r\n`using (list.SuspendChangeNotifications(SuspensionMode.MixedConsolidate))`\r\n` {`\r\n` list.Add(1)`\r\n` list.Add(2)`\r\n` list.Add(3)`\r\n` list.Remove(3)`\r\n` list.Remove(2)`\r\n` list.Add(2)`\r\n` }`\r\n\r\nWill raise only this event:\r\n1. Add; NewItems = {1,2}\r\n\r\nSo events adding and removing the same items are consolidated to reduce the amount of fired events.",
"title": "Introduce new MixedConsolidate mode for FastObservableCollection",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "DanielKuehner",
"comment_id": 322200514,
"datetime": 1502719830000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Some implementation details dicussed with @GeertvanHorrik and @username_1:\r\n- This mode does not collect any more data or does process data while the suspension is active\r\n- When the suspension is ended the collected data of the Mixed mode are used to produce the new events\r\n- This post processing is placed within an extension",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "DanielKuehner",
"comment_id": 322208875,
"datetime": 1502721667000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Chat discussion starts here: https://gitter.im/Catel/Catel?at=59919e82bc46472974802f9d",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "DanielKuehner",
"comment_id": 322451194,
"datetime": 1502799472000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I have merged from #1095/#1098 to have a up to date code base.\r\nThan I did a raw take over from #1091 so you can see your code in the original state for which the two unit tests are succeeding.\r\nNow I will refactor the code.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "DanielKuehner",
"comment_id": 322455858,
"datetime": 1502800957000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Wow, I am proud to say that our post processing idea seems to work and Alexanders approach has shrinked to minimum of lines. I hope you take this a starting point - but I believe FOC is done at all :-)\r\nI hade not to do any changes to the my Mixed mode approach. All fits together - I am very happy.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "DanielKuehner",
"comment_id": 322456084,
"datetime": 1502801029000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "If you want I can recreate my hybrid branch after the other PR is accepted.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "alexfdezsauco",
"comment_id": 322456791,
"datetime": 1502801247000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Great",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "DanielKuehner",
"comment_id": 322470120,
"datetime": 1502804821000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 I have added many unit tests (copied from Mixed mode) but most of them fail. I think most of them are because of different expectations. So I believe it is up to you what to expect and than change your approach.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "alexfdezsauco",
"comment_id": 322471198,
"datetime": 1502805051000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Agree",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "DanielKuehner",
"comment_id": 322496320,
"datetime": 1502809768000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@GeertvanHorrik, @username_1: how to proceed with my branch? It is fully merged with the other branches. Just leave it or create a pull requests?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "alexfdezsauco",
"comment_id": 322543707,
"datetime": 1502820485000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Just renamed a single test because MixedConsolidated raises a single event for\r\n\r\n using (sourceCollection.SuspendChangeNotifications(SuspensionMode.MixedConsolidate))\r\n {\r\n sourceCollection.Add(2); // { 2 }\r\n sourceCollection.Add(1); // { 2, 1 }\r\n sourceCollection.Move(1, 0); // { 1, 2 }\r\n }\r\n\r\nAdd - {1,2}",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "alexfdezsauco",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1502828575000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 3 | 13 | 2,441 | false | true | 2,292 | true |
18F/State-TalentMAP | 18F | 246,374,288 | 276 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mjoyce91",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1501254231000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Make a reusable component that can handle different types of alerts, such as login errors and successful shares. Use the USWDS alerts from https://standards.usa.gov/components/alerts/",
"title": "Create alert component",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "mjoyce91",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1501850335000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mjoyce91",
"comment_id": 320238156,
"datetime": 1501850335000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Completed in #296",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1 | 3 | 200 | false | false | 200 | false |
GhostofGoes/sneaky-scripts | null | 251,830,007 | 27 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "loopyd",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1503373542000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "C:\\Users\\lupin\\Downloads\\sneaky-scripts-master>sneaky --config sneaky-config.json\r\nTraceback (most recent call last):\r\n```\r\n File \"C:\\Python\\Python27\\Scripts\\sneaky-script.py\", line 11, in <module>\r\n load_entry_point('sneaky-scripts==0.3.1', 'console_scripts', 'sneaky')()\r\n File \"C:\\Python\\Python27\\lib\\site-packages\\sneaky_scripts-0.3.1-py2.7.egg\\sneaky\\sneaky_scripts.py\", line 47, in main\r\n system = Windows(args)\r\n File \"C:\\Python\\Python27\\lib\\site-packages\\sneaky_scripts-0.3.1-py2.7.egg\\sneaky\\windows.py\", line 18, in __init__\r\n BasePlatform.__init__(self, args)\r\n File \"C:\\Python\\Python27\\lib\\site-packages\\sneaky_scripts-0.3.1-py2.7.egg\\sneaky\\base_platform.py\", line 21, in __init__\r\n self._log = logging.getLogger(self.__class__)\r\n File \"C:\\Python\\Python27\\lib\\logging\\__init__.py\", line 1574, in getLogger\r\n return Logger.manager.getLogger(name)\r\n File \"C:\\Python\\Python27\\lib\\logging\\__init__.py\", line 1038, in getLogger\r\n raise TypeError('A logger name must be string or Unicode')\r\nTypeError: A logger name must be string or Unicode\r\n```\r\n\r\nFix - MessageLogger",
"title": "Config issues - logger crash",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "GhostofGoes",
"comment_id": 324083523,
"datetime": 1503419995000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "That fixes that, but there are other bugs. I haven't actually tested this since I rewrote as a package 😄",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "GhostofGoes",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1503420002000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 1,204 | false | false | 1,204 | false |
GWTReact/gwt-react | GWTReact | 235,818,505 | 9 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ivmarkov",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1497432723000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I would expect `JsFunction` to correspond to `java.util.Function`, i.e. to be a one-arg rather than 0-arg function.\r\n\r\n0-arg functions are modeled in Java 8 with `java.util.Supplier`, so I suggest:\r\n* Rename `JsFunction` to `JsSupplier`\r\n* Implement a new `JsFunction` that matches the signature of `java.util.Function`\r\n\r\nFurthermore, it would be good if:\r\n* The method names of `JsSupplier`, `JsFunction`, `JsBiFunction` and `JsConsumer` match the corresponding names of `Supplier`, `Function`, `BiFunction` and `Consumer`, i.e. `get()`, `apply(..)` and `accept(...)` respectively.\r\n* We need a `JsRunnable`, matching `java.util.Runnable`\r\n\r\nLast but not least, it would be good if each of the Js* interfaces are having two additional methods:\r\n* A `default` method, which converts a Js* instance, to the corresponding `java.util` instance\r\n* A static `@JsOverlay` method, which takes a `java.util` instance and constructs a corresponding Js* instance",
"title": "JsFunction has a wrong signature",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ivmarkov",
"comment_id": 311625861,
"datetime": 1498647174000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Any feedback?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pstockley",
"comment_id": 311730567,
"datetime": 1498670867000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Sorry, I haven't had much chance to take a look. Given that it could be a breaking change, I would like to tackle this at the same time as the refactoring for elemental2. I am waiting for this to stabilize before I make any changes.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ivmarkov",
"comment_id": 312188791,
"datetime": 1498805020000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "That's fine of course - I can wait as well. I just wanted to raise the topic.\r\n\r\nOn a related note, there are a lot of extra helper @JsFunction-s which are probably not strictly necessary either. A few examples:\r\n* ChildrenForEachFn - JsConsumer<ReactElement<?, ?>> can be used instead\r\n* ChildrenMapFn - JsFunction<ReactElement<?, ?>, ReactElement<?, ?>> can be used instead\r\n* SetStateCallback - JsBiFunction<S, P, S> can be used instead\r\n* All functions/predicates currently used in Array.java from gwt-interop-utils, like Testfn, TestFullFn, ForEachFn, ForEachFullFn, MapFn, MapFullFn, ReduceFn, ReduceFullFn, SortFn, SortFullFn\r\n\r\nTo summarize, I think it would be easier for the user if she sees familiar Supplier/Consumer/Function interfaces everywhere, even if those are not the java util ones, but your \"@JsFunction\" ones. And then we can implement converters from one to the other.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pstockley",
"comment_id": 342950099,
"datetime": 1510173170000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Do you want to work on a pull request for this?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ivmarkov",
"comment_id": 345423473,
"datetime": 1510988454000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Yes, however, we have quite some time pressure at work ATM, so this might come slowly over time.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pstockley",
"comment_id": 345439676,
"datetime": 1511008717000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "No problem. I think after the react 16.1 release, I would like to do one big release with as many breaking changes as possible. So there is no rush.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ivmarkov",
"comment_id": 381861494,
"datetime": 1523946360000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I see you have started this. The one bit in need of fixing is JsProcedure, which is identical to the j.u.Runnable contract. How about renaming JsProcedure to JsRunnable then, and renaming JsProcedure's method to \"run()\"?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ivmarkov",
"comment_id": 381861826,
"datetime": 1523946441000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "What are your thoughts?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pstockley",
"comment_id": 382821826,
"datetime": 1524159789000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I will look into making JsProcedure match runnable. Regarding the conversions I am less sure. The problem is that you cannot take a java.util lambda and convert it to a Js equivalent because the java.util class wasn't annotated with @JsFunction. So it wouldn't be equivalent and would cause strange errors if you passed it to Js. For that reason, I think it would be better if we didn't provide these conversion functions. You can always create helpers outside the library to do this.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ivmarkov",
"comment_id": 382823688,
"datetime": 1524160161000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Huh.\r\n\r\nYou mean, this won't work:\r\n\r\n```\r\n@JsFunction\r\ninterface JsRunnable {\r\n void run();\r\n\r\n default Runnable asRunnable(JsRunnable jsRunnable) {\r\n return () -> jsRunnable.run();\r\n }\r\n\r\n static JsRunnable create(Runnable runnable) {\r\n return () -> runnable.run();\r\n }\r\n}\r\n```\r\n\r\n?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "pstockley",
"comment_id": 383926555,
"datetime": 1524575843000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I thought you meant a direct cast not wrapping with another lambda. This should work. I don't really have any need for this. However, if you want to make the change I will happily merge it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ivmarkov",
"comment_id": 384181040,
"datetime": 1524639641000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "For now, let's just rework JsProcedure to match the Runnable API contract (method name \"run\" and class name JsRunnable instead of JsProcedure).\r\n\r\nShall I do this or will you do it?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "pstockley",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1524668174000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 14 | 3,792 | false | false | 3,792 | false |
go-redis/redis | go-redis | 104,084,136 | 159 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "lght",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1441037867000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi guys,\r\n\r\nso far I've been doing this:\r\n\r\n```\r\nimport (\r\n\t_redis \"gopkg.in/redis.v3\"\r\n\t\"strconv\"\r\n\t\"time\"\r\n)\r\n\r\ntype Redis struct {\r\n\tConnector\t*_redis.Client\r\n\tPubSub \t\t*_redis.PubSub\r\n}\r\n\r\nvar redis *Redis = nil\r\n\r\nfunc NewRedis() bool {\r\n\tif redis == nil {\r\n\t\tredis = new(Redis)\r\n\t\tredis.Connector = _redis.NewClient(&_redis.Options{\r\n\t\t\tAddr: config.RedisHostname + \":\" + strconv.FormatInt(config.RedisPort, 10),\r\n\t\t\tPassword: \"\",\r\n\t\t\tDB: 0,\r\n\t\t})\r\n\t\tLogger.Log(nil, \"Connected to Redis\")\r\n\t\terr := redis.Init()\r\n\t\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\t\tLogger.Fatal(nil, \"Cannot setup Redis:\", err.Error())\r\n\t\t\treturn false\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t\treturn true\r\n\t}\r\n\treturn false\r\n}\r\n\r\nfunc (this *Redis) Init() error {\r\n\tpubsub, err := this.Connector.Subscribe(\"test\")\r\n\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\treturn err\r\n\t}\r\n\tdefer pubsub.Close()\r\n\tthis.PubSub = pubsub\r\n\tfor {\r\n\t\tmsgi, err := this.PubSub.ReceiveTimeout(100 * time.Millisecond)\r\n\t\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\t\tLogger.Error(nil, \"PubSub error:\", err.Error())\r\n\t\t\terr = this.PubSub.Ping(\"\")\r\n\t\t\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\t\t\tLogger.Error(nil, \"PubSub failure:\", err.Error())\r\n\t\t\t\tbreak\r\n\t\t\t}\r\n\t\t\tcontinue\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t\tswitch msg := msgi.(type) {\r\n\t\t\tcase *_redis.Message:\r\n\t\t\t\tLogger.Log(nil, \"Received\", msg.Payload, \"on channel\", msg.Channel)\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t}\r\n\treturn nil\r\n}\r\n```\r\n\r\nMy Connector is a redis.Client, it's working because I was able to publish messages as well.\r\n\r\nWhen I run my program, I get the following error:\r\n`PubSub error: WSARecv tcp 127.0.0.1:64505: i/o timeout`\r\n\r\nDo you have any idea of what I'm doing wrong ?",
"title": "Can't manage to have a working pub/sub",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "vmihailenco",
"comment_id": 136609142,
"datetime": 1441091219000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "You did not show the full code so it is hard to say what exactly you are doing wrong. I suppose that you have something like that:\r\n\r\n```\r\nNewRedis() // this method blocks forever reading messages from the channel\r\nredis.Connector.Publish(\"test\", \"hello\") // Publish is never called\r\n```\r\n\r\nYou you need to refactor `NewRedis`, e.g. extract pubsub reading loop and add proper synchronization. I suggest you to start with following code and adapt it as you need:\r\n\r\n```\r\npackage main\r\n\r\nimport (\r\n\t\"fmt\"\r\n\t\"time\"\r\n\r\n\tgoredis \"gopkg.in/redis.v3\"\r\n)\r\n\r\nfunc consumeMessages(pubsub *goredis.PubSub) {\r\n\tdefer pubsub.Close()\r\n\r\n\tfor {\r\n\t\tmsgi, err := pubsub.ReceiveTimeout(time.Second)\r\n\t\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\t\terr := pubsub.Ping(\"\")\r\n\t\t\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\t\t\tpanic(err)\r\n\t\t\t}\r\n\t\t\tcontinue\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\tswitch msg := msgi.(type) {\r\n\t\tcase *goredis.Subscription:\r\n\t\t\t// Ignore.\r\n\t\tcase *goredis.Message:\r\n\t\t\tfmt.Println(\"received\", msg.Payload, \"on\", msg.Channel)\r\n\t\tcase *goredis.Pong:\r\n\t\t\t// Ignore.\r\n\t\tdefault:\r\n\t\t\tpanic(fmt.Sprintf(\"unknown message: %#v\", msgi))\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t}\r\n}\r\n\r\nfunc main() {\r\n\tredis := goredis.NewClient(&goredis.Options{\r\n\t\tAddr: \":6379\",\r\n\t})\r\n\r\n\tpubsub, err := redis.Subscribe(\"mychannel\")\r\n\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\tpanic(err)\r\n\t}\r\n\tgo consumeMessages(pubsub)\r\n\r\n\tfor _ = range time.Tick(time.Second) {\r\n\t\terr := redis.Publish(\"mychannel\", \"hello\").Err()\r\n\t\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\t\tpanic(err)\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t}\r\n}\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "lght",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1441097336000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "lght",
"comment_id": 136638697,
"datetime": 1441097336000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Answer is there (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32315648/golang-redis-pubsub-timeout/32319061#32319061), and that's obvious, you don't really need to have a timeout in a routine (at least, in my case, I don't)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 4 | 3,151 | false | false | 3,151 | false |
spark/particle-cli | spark | 203,852,788 | 332 | {
"number": 332,
"repo": "particle-cli",
"user_login": "spark"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "kennethlimcp",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1485669450000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Related to: https://github.com/spark/particle-cli/issues/331\r\n\r\nThis PR probably did not handle the flashing of knownApp: https://github.com/spark/particle-cli/commit/eadd6790e83c19f180557a0ac8e4548ebd0d1eb3\r\n\r\nOutput from `fileMapping` using a knownApp: \r\n```\r\n{ list: [ '/Users/username_0/Desktop/particle/particle-cli/binaries/photon_tinker.bin' ] }\r\n```\r\n\r\nOutput from `fileMapping` for source files:\r\n```\r\n { basePath: '/Users/username_0/Desktop/particle/particle-cli',\r\n map: { 'test.ino': '../../test/test.ino' } }\r\n\r\n```",
"title": "add: test case for flashing knownApp",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "m-mcgowan",
"comment_id": 276771541,
"datetime": 1485980714000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Bravo! Our first PR with acceptance tests included 👍",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 585 | false | false | 585 | true |
Homebrew/homebrew-core | Homebrew | 200,264,621 | 8,753 | {
"number": 8753,
"repo": "homebrew-core",
"user_login": "Homebrew"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "woodruffw",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1484188927000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "macvim puts its build flags in its version output, so we can\r\ntest against that instead of calling `otool`.\r\n\r\n- [x] Have you followed the [guidelines for contributing](https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)?\r\n- [x] Have you checked that there aren't other open [pull requests](https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pulls) for the same formula update/change?\r\n- [ ] Have you built your formula locally with `brew install --build-from-source <formula>`, where `<formula>` is the name of the formula you're submitting?\r\n- [ ] Does your build pass `brew audit --strict <formula>` (after doing `brew install <formula>`)?\r\n\r\n-----",
"title": "macvim: Remove otool usage in favor of build flags check.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "woodruffw",
"comment_id": 272060649,
"datetime": 1484188946000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Follows up on #8049.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1 | 2 | 681 | false | false | 681 | false |
NixOS/nixpkgs | NixOS | 156,613,764 | 15,680 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "abbradar",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1464125326000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "## Issue description\r\n\r\n```\r\nCollecting acme<0.6,>=0.4.1 (from simp-le==0)\r\n Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement acme<0.6,>=0.4.1 (from simp-le==0) (from versions: )\r\n```\r\n\r\n### Steps to reproduce\r\n\r\n```\r\nnix-build -A simp_le .\r\n```\r\n\r\n## Technical details\r\n\r\nnixpkgs: cc41cb30e33a071e4e5e86d277579fc02d0bf7de",
"title": "simp_le (and security.acme) is broken because certbot is too new",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "abbradar",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1464125389000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "abbradar",
"comment_id": 221407275,
"datetime": 1464125389000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Oh, sorry, this was fixed on master with cc41cb30e33a071e4e5e86d277579fc02d0bf7de and I haven't noticed.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 1 | 3 | 434 | false | false | 434 | false |
spotify/docker-gc | spotify | 97,973,662 | 30 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "keithpitt",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1438186815000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "When I run `docker-gc` on Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS, I get the following error message:\r\n\r\n```\r\ndate: invalid date ‘\"2015-07-29 16:16:2’\r\n/usr/sbin/docker-gc: line 69: 1438186643 - : syntax error: operand expected (error token is \"- \")\r\n```\r\n\r\nAm I doing something wrong? Thanks!",
"title": "Failing to parse date on Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "mbruggmann",
"comment_id": 126069637,
"datetime": 1438198526000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "This is likely caused by the same issue as https://github.com/spotify/docker-gc/issues/29.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rohansingh",
"comment_id": 143803094,
"datetime": 1443459220000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Should be fixed like #29.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "rohansingh",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1443459220000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 3 | 4 | 387 | false | false | 387 | false |
ninenine/nodebb-plugin-beep | null | 175,534,737 | 14 | {
"number": 14,
"repo": "nodebb-plugin-beep",
"user_login": "ninenine"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "barisusakli",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1473262424000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "filter chat messages as well",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ninenine",
"comment_id": 245320577,
"datetime": 1473262538000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Nice, I'll have a look at the updates tonight",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "barisusakli",
"comment_id": 245320929,
"datetime": 1473262599000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Thanks :+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 56 | false | false | 56 | false |
proxb/PoshRSJob | null | 89,115,637 | 21 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "willemdh",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1434572404000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hello,\r\n\r\nI was trying to do some tests with your rsjobs module and received an error saying I'm trying to divide by zero when I try using wait-rsjob\r\n\r\n$Test = 42\r\n$AnotherTest = 7\r\n$String = 'SomeString'\r\n$ProcName = 'powershell_ise'\r\n$ScriptBlock = {\r\n Param($y,$z)\r\n [pscustomobject] @{\r\n Test = $y\r\n Proc = (Get-Process -Name $Using:ProcName)\r\n String = $Using:String\r\n AnotherTest = ($z+$_)\r\n PipedObject = $_\r\n }\r\n}\r\n \r\n1..5|Start-RSJob $ScriptBlock -ArgumentList $test, $anothertest\r\nWait-RSJob\r\n6..10|Start-RSJob $ScriptBlock -ArgumentList $test, $anothertest\r\nGet-RSJob | Receive-RSJob\r\n\r\n$Test = 42\r\n$AnotherTest = 7\r\n$String = 'SomeString'\r\n$ProcName = 'powershell_ise'\r\n$ScriptBlock = {\r\n Param($y,$z)\r\n [pscustomobject] @{\r\n Test = $y\r\n Proc = (Get-Process -Name $Using:ProcName)\r\n String = $Using:String\r\n AnotherTest = ($z+$_)\r\n PipedObject = $_\r\n }\r\n}\r\n \r\n1..5|Start-RSJob $ScriptBlock -ArgumentList $test, $anothertest\r\nWait-RSJob\r\n6..10|Start-RSJob $ScriptBlock -ArgumentList $test, $anothertest\r\nGet-RSJob | Receive-RSJob\r\n\r\nAt C:\\Program Files\\WindowsPowerShell\\Modules\\PoshRSJob\\Scripts\\Wait-RSJob.ps1:143 char:21\r\n+ ... Write-Progress -Activity \"RSJobs Tracker\" -Status (\"Remai ...\r\n+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r\n + CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [], RuntimeException\r\n + FullyQualifiedErrorId : RuntimeException\r\n\r\nOr am I doing something wrong?",
"title": "Attempt to divide by zero error when using wait-rsjob",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "proxb",
"comment_id": 113010321,
"datetime": 1434593009000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Weird. I will have to check and see what is going on. It shouldn't be using Write-Progress at all if not using -ShowProgress so it seems like a bug to me.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "willemdh",
"comment_id": 113060718,
"datetime": 1434611994000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hey, sorry the output was with a write-progress in the command. The issue I was talking about was the divide by zero.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "proxb",
"comment_id": 113974536,
"datetime": 1434934271000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I couldn't re-produce this in Windows 7, but appears to be an issue with Windows Server 2012 R2. I'll dig some more to see what the issue is and get it fixed.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "proxb",
"comment_id": 113978454,
"datetime": 1434936337000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Ok, the bug should be fixed now. Had to change a couple of lines of code to avoid that error from popping up.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "proxb",
"comment_id": 113979356,
"datetime": 1434936926000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Ok, it took me a while to realize what was going on but you aren't actually piping anything into Wait-RSjob or specifying a Name, ID or InstanceID parameter. This is why there are DivideByZero errors.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "proxb",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1435145905000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 7 | 2,271 | false | false | 2,271 | false |
Microsoft/vscode | Microsoft | 175,517,217 | 11,634 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mkyjakova",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1473258508000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hi, we have a question from our translator. Can you help please? Thanks!\r\n \r\nSource:\r\n Sort By: Install Count\r\n\r\nFile Name:\r\n src\\vs\\workbench\\parts\\extensions\\electron-browser\\extensionsViewlet.nls.resx\r\n\r\nResource ID:\r\n \".resx\", 0; \"sort by installs\"\r\n\r\nQuery:\r\n \r\nPlease, explain \"Install Count\"\tCristina Carrasco\t9/6/2016 7:04:52 AM",
"title": "[loc][Query][VSCode] Please clarify the string",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ramya-rao-a",
"comment_id": 245444770,
"datetime": 1473288980000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "It means \"Number of times the extension has been installed\"",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "ramya-rao-a",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1473288980000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 395 | false | false | 395 | false |
ambiata/mafia | ambiata | 131,569,943 | 69 | {
"number": 69,
"repo": "mafia",
"user_login": "ambiata"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jystic",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1454654570000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "When a dependency fails to install, we now automatically dump the package specific dependency tree, seeing as that's what you were going to do next anyway:\r\n\r\n```\r\n~/src/ambiata/ambiata-cli $ mafia build\r\n-- snip --\r\nConfiguring psqueues-0.2.1.0...\r\nBuilding psqueues-0.2.1.0...\r\nPreprocessing library psqueues-0.2.1.0...\r\n[1 of 7] Compiling Data.BitUtil ( src/Data/BitUtil.hs, dist/dist-sandbox-18bdbe61/build/Data/BitUtil.o )\r\n[2 of 7] Compiling Data.OrdPSQ.Internal ( src/Data/OrdPSQ/Internal.hs, dist/dist-sandbox-18bdbe61/build/Data/OrdPSQ/Internal.o )\r\n\r\nsrc/Data/OrdPSQ/Internal.hs:82:40:\r\n Not in scope: type constructor or class ‘Traversable’\r\n\r\nsrc/Data/OrdPSQ/Internal.hs:94:40:\r\n Not in scope: type constructor or class ‘Traversable’\r\n\r\nsrc/Data/OrdPSQ/Internal.hs:122:40:\r\n Not in scope: type constructor or class ‘Traversable’\r\n[4 of 7] Compiling Data.IntPSQ.Internal ( src/Data/IntPSQ/Internal.hs, dist/dist-sandbox-18bdbe61/build/Data/IntPSQ/Internal.o )\r\n\r\nsrc/Data/IntPSQ/Internal.hs:108:40:\r\n Not in scope: type constructor or class ‘Traversable’\r\ncabal: Error: some packages failed to install:\r\npsqueues-0.2.1.0 failed during the building phase. The exception was:\r\nExitFailure 1\r\nWaiting for bifunctors-4.2.1-97994dd3c3fefe74de4d1699e498657043f1ec93\r\nInstalled bifunctors-4.2.1\r\nInstalled profunctors-4.4.1\r\nWaiting for profunctors-4.4.1-61498b834d5cb7913c902e31b0ed416c29e1fafa\r\nFailed to install psqueues-0.2.1.0\r\nProcess failed: cabal install --ghc-options=-j4 --max-backjumps=0 psqueues-0.2.1.0 --constraint hashable == 1.2.4.0 --constraint psqueues == 0.2.1.0 --constraint text == 1.2.1.3 --constraint text -integer-simple (exit code: 1)\r\nscotty-0.11.0\r\n └─╼ warp-3.2.2\r\n └─╼ http2-1.4.4\r\n └─╼ psqueues-0.2.1.0\r\n```\r\n\r\n/cc @nhibberd",
"title": "Dump package specific tree when it fails to install",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tranma",
"comment_id": 180225067,
"datetime": 1454654632000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I need this so much\r\n:+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 1,814 | false | false | 1,814 | false |
mui-org/material-ui | mui-org | 187,367,133 | 5,512 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "dht",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1478274215000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I am trying to implement a multiple-anwers question for a survey. For this I use the RadioButtonGroup:\r\nhttp://www.material-ui.com/#/components/radio-button\r\n\r\nHowever I need to implement an option for \"other\" as a TextField and I can't think of a way of doing so...\r\n\r\n",
"title": "How to implement RadioButtonGroup with other",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "MAbdulHalim",
"comment_id": 352892083,
"datetime": 1513719003000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "can you please tell me how to implement this with material-ui v 0.19.4 ?\r\n\r\nThanks",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 461 | false | false | 461 | false |
anishathalye/dotbot | null | 87,306,119 | 41 | {
"number": 41,
"repo": "dotbot",
"user_login": "anishathalye"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "joshblum",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1434021078000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Add a link to the [easy-dotfiles](https://github.com/Aviator45003/easy-dotfiles) repository.",
"title": "add easy-dotfiles link",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "anishathalye",
"comment_id": 111213478,
"datetime": 1434043552000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I wonder if it would be better to add a separate \"user-contributed\" section to the README and put this in there (along with anything anyone else makes in the future).\r\n\r\nAlso, I'm going to wait till the name of the thing is finalized.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "joshblum",
"comment_id": 111217884,
"datetime": 1434044300000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Yeah waiting for the name change is good, just wanted to put this in before I forgot. \r\n\r\nFor this specific case I feel it makes more sense to put here since new users will otherwise clone the template repo and not use the automated script..",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "anishathalye",
"comment_id": 111357124,
"datetime": 1434084069000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I don't want to remove the link to the template. There may be people who are more comfortable with using something like that rather than a script.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "anishathalye",
"comment_id": 111357152,
"datetime": 1434084072000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "How's this: https://github.com/username_1/dotbot-dev/commit/dcc3a1947a85aaa038d143f9f6a0c2a1c1a76a15",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "joshblum",
"comment_id": 111373690,
"datetime": 1434089689000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Lgtm :)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "anishathalye",
"comment_id": 111495168,
"datetime": 1434116337000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Okay, done!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 7 | 833 | false | false | 833 | true |
elBukkit/MagicArenas | elBukkit | 177,572,699 | 3 | {
"number": 3,
"repo": "MagicArenas",
"user_login": "elBukkit"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "killme",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1474114683000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This uses the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval for a Bernoulli parameter. (Read: Statistics voodo)\r\nThis tends to give a more reasonable sorting as it factors in the amount of games played.\r\n\r\n# Example:\r\n\r\n\r\nThe first picture is ranked third because of the high amount of games played and a generally high win ratio. Even though the second picture has a much higher win ratio, the amount of games played makes the system less confident. (The value between the parentheses is the confidence)\r\n\r\n# See also:\r\nhttp://www.evanmiller.org/how-not-to-sort-by-average-rating.html",
"title": "Short scoreboard on win/loss confidence instead of win/loss ratio",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "NathanWolf",
"comment_id": 247781507,
"datetime": 1474126384000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Neat, I love statistics voodoo!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 685 | false | false | 685 | false |
reactor/reactor | reactor | 43,144,928 | 380 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ukjbrown",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1411053657000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This may be a local configuration issue, but the Google Group won't allow me to post a question...\n\nI have a simple Spring Boot application and in it I have the following component:\n\n``` java\n@Component\n@ComponentScan\n@Consumer\npublic class HelloWorldReactor\n{\n @Autowired\n private Reactor reactor;\n\n @PostConstruct\n public void initialize()\n {\n reactor.notify(\"hello.world\", Event.wrap(\"Hello, World!\"));\n }\n\n @Selector(\"hello.world\")\n public void handleHelloWorld(Event<String> event)\n {\n System.out.println(\"Hello, World!\");\n }\n}\n```\n\nWhen the application runs, the reactor.notify is called but the handleHelloWorld method is not invoked.\n\nIf I modify the class as follows, then the application will print \"Hello!\".\n\n``` java\npublic class HelloWorldReactor\n{\n ...\n @PostConstruct\n public void initialize()\n {\n reactor.on($(\"hello.world\"), ev -> System.out.println(\"Hello!\"));\n reactor.notify(\"hello.world\", Event.wrap(\"Hello, World!\"));\n }\n ...\n}\n```\n\nCalls to reactor.notify(\"hello.world\", Event.wrap(\"Hello, World!\")); at a later point in the application (i.e. outside the initialize method) work correctly.\n\nI added a breakpoint to ConsumerBeanAutoConfiguration[149] where the annotation scanning happens for Selector, and noticed that the program did not break until after the initialize method had been called, which would suggest that it is being executed in parallel (or after) the bean is wired.\n\nI'm not sure if this is a problem with the annotation scanner, my configuration or Spring in general. I've never experienced this kind of issue with Spring before.\n\nIs this expected behaviour?\n\nThanks.",
"title": "@Selector annotation scanner invoked too late in the Spring lifecycle",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "smaldini",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1483531901000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 1,637 | false | false | 1,637 | false |
moneroexamples/openmonero | null | 245,734,575 | 35 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Jaqueeee",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1501078109000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Will be needed in future, when api gets updated. Ideally it should be aligned with mymonero api. \r\n@vtnerd",
"title": "Add api version to get_version call",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "moneroexamples",
"comment_id": 318186489,
"datetime": 1501104117000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I can add it rpc api version to current `get_version` call. A api version number similar to `CORE_RPC_VERSION` in monero would be good i think?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Jaqueeee",
"comment_id": 318186813,
"datetime": 1501104191000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Yes. That's a great idea.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "moneroexamples",
"comment_id": 318235726,
"datetime": 1501120513000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I added tentatively the api version to upgrade_angularjs branch. It is already being displayed in the dev testnet version: http://139.162.32.245:81 . The versioning in the backend is based on `CORE_RPC_VERSION` stype, i.e., \r\n\r\n```c++\r\n#define OPENMONERO_RPC_VERSION_MAJOR 1\r\n#define OPENMONERO_RPC_VERSION_MINOR 0\r\n#define MAKE_OPENMONERO_RPC_VERSION(major,minor) (((major)<<16)|(minor))\r\n#define OPENMONERO_RPC_VERSION \\\r\n MAKE_OPENMONERO_RPC_VERSION(OPENMONERO_RPC_VERSION_MAJOR, OPENMONERO_RPC_VERSION_MINOR)\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Jaqueeee",
"comment_id": 318281091,
"datetime": 1501140183000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Thanks!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "Jaqueeee",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1501140183000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 6 | 801 | false | false | 801 | false |
janko-m/shrine | null | 173,637,368 | 79 | {
"number": 79,
"repo": "shrine",
"user_login": "janko-m"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "willnet",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1472375710000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "current http://shrinerb.com/rdoc/files/doc/direct_s3_md.html\r\n\r\n",
"title": "Add missing link of FineUploader in docs",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "janko-m",
"comment_id": 242976875,
"datetime": 1472393384000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Thanks for the fix!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 191 | false | false | 191 | false |
spotify/heroic | spotify | 242,689,735 | 326 | {
"number": 326,
"repo": "heroic",
"user_login": "spotify"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "gabrielgerhardsson",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1499950166000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Reimplement so that we avoid using a seemingly problematic rate limiter implementation.\r\n\r\nInstead of using the Guava SmoothWarmingUp implementation, use the\r\nsimple SmoothBursty and apply a manual slow start period to it in a\r\nwrapper. Slow start duration is still configurable with\r\nrateLimitSlowStartSeconds. The amount of slow start is hard coded to\r\nfactor 4. During startup the rate will be 4 times lower for x seconds.",
"title": "Fix consumer slow-start mode",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gabrielgerhardsson",
"comment_id": 322703994,
"datetime": 1502872557000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 Can we revisit this? I rebased again and pushed now.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "udoprog",
"comment_id": 322792694,
"datetime": 1502894278000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 hm, it might be more straight forward if just set a timer at start (using the global `ScheduledExecutorService`) that will update the rate accordingly instead of spinning on `isSlowStartMode` and then racing to call `setRate`.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gabrielgerhardsson",
"comment_id": 322800416,
"datetime": 1502895664000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 That's a good point, thanks. That would be much more straight forward.\r\nI'll look at this when I get the chance.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dmichel1",
"comment_id": 423291241,
"datetime": 1537469080000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_0 do you think this is still needed? Do you remember what you were observing internally with the rate limiter implementation?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "gabrielgerhardsson",
"comment_id": 423488813,
"datetime": 1537525955000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 The were observing spikes of requests going out from consumer nodes to ES clusters, after restart (and after reconnect, if I remember correctly). We believed it was caused by the SmoothWarmingUp rate limiter - looked like it was letting too much traffic through at the very beginning, which was drowning the ES clusters in traffic when they first came back up after being down. Possibly, the ES clusters were extra sensitive to load at the very beginning, perhaps that they were still syncing the shards among nodes etc. So we felt it important to have a proper slow start method.\r\nWe decided to try a more simple one instead. The more simple one did look good indeed. \r\n\r\nI'm not able to verify right now that the current code uses the same SmoothWarmingUp. I seem to remember that we switched to a straight rate limit instead (and probably choose a lower rate value).\r\n\r\nUsing the warmup implementation in this ticket could possibly allow us to increase the write rate to ES per node, while maintaining a slow rate speed at warmup, making us not drown ES. Worth looking into perhaps.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dmichel1",
"comment_id": 424067187,
"datetime": 1537811874000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_0 thank you for the explanation.\r\n\r\nI verified the rate limiter is still using the same `SmoothWarmingUp` even after the upgrade to guava 20 (from 19).\r\n\r\nOne thing we observed when migrating to Google Pubsub is the cache expiration happening roughly at the same time across all consumers (because they are often restarted or deployed together). This puts a LOT of extra load on the ES clusters until the write-though-cache fills up again. \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nWe mostly smoothed out this graph with the new consumers by adding a random amount of time to each one.\r\n\r\nSo we have not specially ran in the issue you are describing but this is very useful information for us to know so we can watch out for it.\r\n\r\nI'm going to close this and we can re-open if this comes up again.\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\nDrew",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 4 | 8 | 3,030 | false | true | 3,030 | true |
rust-lang/rust | rust-lang | 103,343,836 | 28,023 | {
"number": 28023,
"repo": "rust",
"user_login": "rust-lang"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jmesmon",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1440616177000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This fixes the case where we try to re-build & re-install rust to the\r\nsame prefix (without uninstalling) while using an llvm-root that is the\r\nsame as the prefix.\r\n\r\nWithout this, builds like that fail with:\r\n\t'error: multiple dylib candidates for `std` found'\r\n\r\nSee https://github.com/username_0/meta-rust/issues/6 for some details.\r\n\r\nMay also be related to #20342.",
"title": "mk: tell rustc that we're only looking for native libs in the LLVM_LIBDIR",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rust-highfive",
"comment_id": 135142713,
"datetime": 1440616192000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "r? @username_2\n\n(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "alexcrichton",
"comment_id": 135204462,
"datetime": 1440631599000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_3: r+ 2d0cb31d3011224c33ec780b8b2ff7bd17b6ab7f\r\n\r\nThanks!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "bors",
"comment_id": 135299258,
"datetime": 1440653704000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": ":hourglass: Testing commit 2d0cb31 with merge 0d5142f...",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "bors",
"comment_id": 135317402,
"datetime": 1440659581000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": ":sunny: Test successful - [auto-linux-32-nopt-t](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux-32-nopt-t/builds/6217), [auto-linux-32-opt](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux-32-opt/builds/6231), [auto-linux-64-nopt-t](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux-64-nopt-t/builds/6171), [auto-linux-64-opt](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux-64-opt/builds/6197), [auto-linux-64-x-android-t](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux-64-x-android-t/builds/6175), [auto-mac-32-opt](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-mac-32-opt/builds/6249), [auto-mac-64-nopt-t](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-mac-64-nopt-t/builds/6243), [auto-mac-64-opt](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-mac-64-opt/builds/6207), [auto-win-gnu-32-nopt-t](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-win-gnu-32-nopt-t/builds/1191), [auto-win-gnu-32-opt](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-win-gnu-32-opt/builds/1190), [auto-win-gnu-64-nopt-t](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-win-gnu-64-nopt-t/builds/1189), [auto-win-gnu-64-opt](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-win-gnu-64-opt/builds/1193), [auto-win-msvc-32-opt](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-win-msvc-32-opt/builds/472), [auto-win-msvc-64-opt](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-win-msvc-64-opt/builds/1171)",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 4 | 5 | 1,925 | false | false | 1,925 | true |
thoughtbot/factory_bot | thoughtbot | 4,004,135 | 335 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "seymour",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1333720848000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I have this simple factory for Mongoid model\n\n``` ruby\n FactoryGirl.define do\n factory :mongo_group, :class => MongoGroup do\n name 'Group'\n membership_type Group::GROUP_TYPE[:public]\n description 'Description'\n welcome_header 'Welcome'\n welcome_message 'Message'\n memberships_count 10\n\n factory :myapp_mongo_group do\n name 'MyApp'\n end\n end\n end\n```\n\nwhen trying to make FactoryGirl.create(:myapp_mongo_group) I get exception with message \"Trait not registered: created_by\" where created_by is belongs_to association in mongoid model (belongs_to :created_by, :class_name => 'MongoUser').\nIf I make factory to be non-inherited\n\n``` ruby\n factory :myapp_mongo_group, :class => MongoGroup do\n name 'MyApp'\n membership_type Group::GROUP_TYPE[:public]\n description 'Description'\n welcome_header 'Welcome'\n welcome_message 'Message'\n memberships_count 10\n end\n```\n\nthen problem persists.",
"title": "Trait not registered",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "sanchez2210",
"comment_id": 680325441,
"datetime": 1598399725000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "For anybody still getting this error: `factory :mongo_group, aliases: [:created_by]` or better: `association :created_by, factory: :mongo_group`",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 1,151 | false | false | 1,151 | false |
zalando/connexion | zalando | 132,172,942 | 142 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jvgutierrez",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1454945458000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Function get_function_parameters from connexion/decorators/parameters.py changes its behavior from python 2.7 to python 3.5:\r\n\r\n```python\r\ndef get_function_arguments(function): # pragma: no cover\r\n \"\"\"\r\n Returns the list of arguments of a function\r\n :type function: Callable\r\n :rtype: list[str]\r\n \"\"\"\r\n if six.PY3:\r\n return list(inspect.signature(function).parameters)\r\n else:\r\n return inspect.getargspec(function).args\r\n```\r\n\r\nIf the parameter function is a decorated function (i.e basicauth example) with parameters in python 2.7 the result is always an empty list while in python 3.5 the result is the list with the actual parameters of the decorated function.",
"title": "get_function_arguments() behavior changes between python 2.7 and python 3.5",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jvgutierrez",
"comment_id": 181425448,
"datetime": 1454945498000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This it's why I was misleaded to open #141 :(",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rafaelcaricio",
"comment_id": 184172859,
"datetime": 1455535296000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Could you please provide an example of a function that have different behaviour so we can reproduce this situation?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jvgutierrez",
"comment_id": 184175790,
"datetime": 1455536067000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_1 Take your basicauth example (https://github.com/zalando/connexion/blob/master/examples/basicauth/app.py#L36). Modify /secret to receive one parameter. For instance:\r\n```yaml\r\n /secret/{secret_id}:\r\n get:\r\n summary: Return secret string\r\n operationId: app.get_secret\r\n parameters:\r\n - in: path\r\n name: secret_id\r\n type: string\r\n required: true\r\n responses:\r\n 200:\r\n description: secret response\r\n schema:\r\n type: string\r\n```\r\n\r\nAnd of course the controller to handle the new parameter:\r\n```python\r\n@requires_auth\r\ndef get_secret(secret_id: str) -> str:\r\n return 'This is a very secret string requiring authentication!'\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis will only work in python 3, in python 2.7 get_secret will be always invoked without parameters",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rafaelcaricio",
"comment_id": 184279033,
"datetime": 1455553303000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 I have been investigating this issue and seems like there it is a problem when you use the `functools.wraps` or nothing in your decorators. The `functools.wraps` does not pass the information about parameters of the original function to the decorated instance. This makes connexion fail to get the argument list defined in the original function.\r\n\r\nA solution I recommend is to use the [`decorator`](https://github.com/micheles/decorator) package since [pass the information](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3972290/how-can-i-get-the-argument-spec-on-a-decorated-function) about the defined argument list of the original function to the decorated instance.\r\n\r\nI will update our example to use the `decorator` package and try to fit in our documentation an alert on that matter.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "hjacobs",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1455564772000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 3 | 6 | 2,489 | false | false | 2,489 | true |
LeaVerou/awesomplete | null | 59,173,474 | 10,004 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "Foxgeorge",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1424999513000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 연산동오피,역곡오피,의정부오피,부천오피 ?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피",
"title": "?ｂａｍｗＡｒ·「.C O M」?역곡오피?의정부오피?부천오피?연산동오피",
"type": "issue"
}
] | 1 | 1 | 2,192 | false | false | 2,192 | false |
martyjs/marty | martyjs | 67,920,444 | 275 | {
"number": 275,
"repo": "marty",
"user_login": "martyjs"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "ordinathorreur",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1428848228000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": "Fixed broken link to example todo mvc repo",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "jhollingworth",
"comment_id": 92076957,
"datetime": 1428850993000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":+1: thanks!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 12 | false | false | 12 | false |
eslint/eslint | eslint | 134,090,675 | 5,306 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "EvanCarroll",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1455655102000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I'm just wondering how this is better than not having it. The only thing I can see it doing is causing code to go from..\r\n\r\n```javascript\r\nlogin: (options) => {\r\n options.url = // stuff\r\n```\r\n\r\nto\r\n\r\n```javascript\r\nlogin: (argsOptions) => {\r\n let options = argsOptions;\r\n options.url = // stuff\r\n```\r\n\r\nWhich becomes something we can't check for... Not to mention, attaching methods on a object is frequently done, as in the case of reduce's accumulator (https://github.com/airbnb/javascript/issues/719). This is just part of Javascript. If you don't want your object being muddled with by the function you're sending it too, then you should look at \r\n\r\n* Object.freeze()\r\n* Object.seal()",
"title": "What is the purpose of props:true in no-param-reassign?",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ilyavolodin",
"comment_id": 184869543,
"datetime": 1455655719000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I believe this is the reason for `props` argument: https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/1600#issuecomment-113007156",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ljharb",
"comment_id": 184869856,
"datetime": 1455655758000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "It is a common (albeit not the only) coding style that mutation should be avoided in all its forms. JavaScript makes this very difficult. This particular rule causes a programmer who is mutating a passed-in object to have it brought to their attention - clearly there's a number of patterns that they can use to work around it, but that's not the point. The concern for me is that this linter warning will likely suggest them to copy the object (avoiding mutation), or, ask why it's bad (creating the discussion).\r\n\r\nAs to your second example, I don't see any reason why the linter can't check for that too, but again the purpose is not to *prevent* programmers from doing bad things, it's to prevent them from *unknowingly* doing bad things.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "EvanCarroll",
"comment_id": 184883969,
"datetime": 1455658636000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "But, there is no reasonable way to fix that.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ljharb",
"comment_id": 184890932,
"datetime": 1455659761000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "The warning here isn't to fix it - it's to prevent you from not knowing that what you're doing is dangerous. If you know what you're doing, that's what override comments are for, but the default should be for the linter to assume you don't realize you're doing it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ilyavolodin",
"comment_id": 184903381,
"datetime": 1455662227000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_0 ESLint's job is not to prevent errors, it's to notify you when there's a potential for an error. We have other rules that go against JavaScript syntax. Like `no-use-before-define`. In JavaScript due to hoisting, this is not a problem, but a lot of developers come to JavaScript from other languages, and might not be aware of the potential problems that could occur due to JS syntax, so we warn them about it. You always have an option of turning off rule completely if you don't agree with those warning, or don't find them helpful (or even harmful/limiting in some cases).",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "EvanCarroll",
"comment_id": 184914596,
"datetime": 1455664359000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Sure, it's the job to *notify you of errors* seems to be an excuse here.. Though it's not really an error, it's just JavaScript: namely that the language itself is not call-by-value, but instead call-by-sharing. We're assuming I don't know that, and that's why it's notifying me. But, we don't assume that the user knows `=` is assign by reference and not by value. So the end result is that the user, in trying to work around the linter, makes the code more obtuse and solves no problems. So long as we agree that the behavior likely to arise out of from\r\n\r\n error Assignment to function parameter 'options' no-param-reassign\r\n\r\nin\r\n\r\n```javascript\r\nlogin: (options) => {\r\n options.url = // stuff\r\n```\r\n\r\nis a modification like this\r\n\r\n```javascript\r\nlogin: (argsOptions) => {\r\n let options = argsOptions;\r\n options.url = // stuff\r\n```\r\n\r\nBecause again, you have to know that `a = b` is not `a = _.deepCopy(b)`..",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ljharb",
"comment_id": 184915712,
"datetime": 1455664620000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "I would never expect (nor have I ever seen) someone bypass this linter rule with your second example, unless they are explicitly trying to sneak past the spirit of the linter rule.\r\n\r\nAt any rate, this is a rule that some of us find helpful. Thus, objectively, it is a useful rule to have. If you do not find it helpful, there's tons of easy ways to disable it! However, even if you are not convinced of its usefulness, the simple fact that others merely *say* it is useful to them makes it objectively so ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯ \r\n\r\nIt seems like the purpose of this rule has been explained, and I don't see `eslint` removing a rule many find useful simply because it can't convince somebody of its usefulness.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ilyavolodin",
"comment_id": 184918391,
"datetime": 1455665185000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Agree with @username_2 this is a useful rule for some people. If you do not find it useful, just turn it off in the config completely, and you will never have to worry about it's errors. Not every rule in ESLint apply to everyone, nor should they. We have a lot of users, and they do not have the same needs.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "alberto",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1455665817000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 4 | 10 | 4,387 | false | false | 4,387 | true |
angular/material2 | angular | 245,190,808 | 6,005 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "njust",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1500926124000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "#### Bug, feature request, or proposal:\r\nBug\r\n\r\n#### What is the expected behavior?\r\nThe option list should be above the input\r\n\r\n#### What is the current behavior?\r\nThe option list is shown below the input\r\n\r\n#### What are the steps to reproduce?\r\nhttp://plnkr.co/edit/g11P3TIUpGEXjUvOt0RF?p=preview\r\nThe problem occours if the input is at the bottom of the page and the option list items are provided delayed\r\n\r\n#### What is the use-case or motivation for changing an existing behavior?\r\nBetter user experience - the user is not able to select an item\r\n\r\n#### Which versions of Angular, Material, OS, TypeScript, browsers are affected?\r\nlatest",
"title": "[MdAutocomplete] Option list is shown below the input, even if the input is already at the bottom of the page",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "rafaelss95",
"comment_id": 317540523,
"datetime": 1500927171000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Works here https://plnkr.co/edit/NN6QmUeKLglGWQN9W0Ld",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "njust",
"comment_id": 317542326,
"datetime": 1500927601000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "remove the \".startWith(null)\" and it won't work anymore, because the intial input is delayed.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 791 | false | false | 791 | false |
alanrenouf/vCheck-vSphere | null | 58,468,320 | 337 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "jefflevy",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1424541916000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "I am having issues with this particular script. I am running the latest VMware PowerCLI, vSphere 5.5 U2, and vCD 5.5.2. If I have the connection, global, and this script in the plugins folder, it will run but the output does not contain any data for the firewall rules.",
"title": "vCD Audit vApp Firewall Rules",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "Sneddo",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1457041759000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "Sneddo",
"comment_id": 191979897,
"datetime": 1457041759000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Might be better tracked through appropriate repository. Although development is not really active on these projects...\r\nhttps://github.com/alanrenouf/vCheck-vCD\r\nhttps://github.com/alanrenouf/vCheck-vCDAudit",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 478 | false | false | 478 | false |
unt-libraries/coda | unt-libraries | 128,639,141 | 78 | {
"number": 78,
"repo": "coda",
"user_login": "unt-libraries"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "damonkelley",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1453756282000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "* Clean up if statements.\r\n* Fix xfailing tests. Fixes #39.",
"title": "Refactor xmlToQueueEntry",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "damonkelley",
"comment_id": 176286819,
"datetime": 1454001018000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "ping @username_1 @username_2",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "somexpert",
"comment_id": 176290356,
"datetime": 1454001684000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": ":thumbsup:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ldko",
"comment_id": 176371688,
"datetime": 1454010438000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Of partial relevance to this PR, I noticed xmlToQueueEntry is unnecessarily imported by views.py.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "damonkelley",
"comment_id": 176387974,
"datetime": 1454012350000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "That is probably best left for a PR where the views imports need to be touched. There were a few imports in `presentation.py` that were able to be removed, so went ahead and cleaned up all of them.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ldko",
"comment_id": 176393082,
"datetime": 1454012652000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": ":+1:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 4 | 7 | 390 | false | true | 390 | true |
framework7io/Framework7 | framework7io | 259,140,633 | 1,807 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "J05HI",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1505909501000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Please add a tooltip component.\nFor example on button long press. \n\n ",
"title": "[v2] Add Tooltips",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "httpiago",
"comment_id": 331082058,
"datetime": 1505980755000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "I would also like this component!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "identy",
"comment_id": 332687003,
"datetime": 1506556057000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "https://github.com/enyo/opentip ?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "nolimits4web",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1528974783000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "nolimits4web",
"comment_id": 397258682,
"datetime": 1528974788000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Added in v3",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 4 | 5 | 182 | false | false | 182 | false |
Azure/sonic-swss | Azure | 229,746,594 | 218 | {
"number": 218,
"repo": "sonic-swss",
"user_login": "Azure"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "andriymoroz-mlnx",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1495128024000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "portsyncd synchronizes net device settings with the PORT_TABLE\r\nAdded code to set MTU to hardware on PORT_TABLE update",
"title": "Add MTU set on port (issue #77)",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "andriymoroz-mlnx",
"comment_id": 302482486,
"datetime": 1495128256000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "```\r\nroot@arc-switch1028:/home/admin# ifconfig Ethernet0\r\nEthernet0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 24:8a:07:05:31:40\r\n inet addr:10.0.0.0 Bcast:255.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.254\r\n inet6 addr: fe80::268a:7ff:fe05:3140/64 Scope:Link\r\n UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:9216 Metric:1\r\n RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0\r\n TX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0\r\n collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000\r\n RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:1740 (1.6 KiB)\r\n\r\nroot@arc-switch1028:/home/admin# docker exec -it syncd sx_api_ports_dump.py\r\n[+] Redirecting stderr to: /tmp/python_err_log.txt\r\n[+] opening sdk\r\nMay 18 17:03:06 INFO LOG: Initializing SX log with STDOUT as output file.\r\nsx_api_open handle:0x1c05d44 , rc 0\r\nsx_api_port_device_get port_cnt:33 , rc 0, port_list :\r\n======================================================================================\r\n| log_port|local_port|label_port| mtu| admin_s| oper_s| module_s| pvid|\r\n======================================================================================\r\n| 0x10100| 1| 17| 9238| UP| DOWN| UNPLUGGED| 1|\r\n| 0x10300| 3| 18| 9238| UP| DOWN| UNPLUGGED| 1|\r\n| 0x10500| 5| 19| 9238| UP| DOWN| UNPLUGGED| 1|\r\n| 0x10700| 7| 20| 9238| UP| DOWN| UNPLUGGED| 1|\r\n| 0x10900| 9| 21| 9238| UP| DOWN| UNPLUGGED| 1|\r\n| 0x10b00| 11| 22| 9238| UP| DOWN| UNPLUGGED| 1|\r\n| 0x10d00| 13| 23| 9238| UP| DOWN| UNPLUGGED| 1|\r\n| 0x10f00| 15| 24| 9238| UP| DOWN| UNPLUGGED| 1|\r\n```\r\n`ping 10.0.0.0 -s 8888`\r\ncaptured on switch (request comes fragmented but reply is jumbo):\r\n```\r\n17:15:57.062343 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: ICMP echo request, id 39690, seq 9, length 1480\r\n17:15:57.062357 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:57.062362 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:57.062368 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:57.062430 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:57.062437 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:57.062442 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:57.062534 IP 10.0.0.0 > 10.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 39690, seq 9, length 8896\r\n17:15:58.062464 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: ICMP echo request, id 39690, seq 10, length 1480\r\n17:15:58.062475 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:58.062481 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:58.062486 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:58.062491 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:58.062496 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:58.062501 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:58.062637 IP 10.0.0.0 > 10.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 39690, seq 10, length 8896\r\n17:15:59.062372 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: ICMP echo request, id 39690, seq 11, length 1480\r\n17:15:59.062383 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:59.062389 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:59.062395 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:59.062401 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:59.062487 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:59.062493 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.0: icmp\r\n17:15:59.062585 IP 10.0.0.0 > 10.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 39690, seq 11, length 8896\r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "stcheng",
"comment_id": 303218457,
"datetime": 1495486749000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "verified. thanks.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 3,423 | false | false | 3,423 | false |
greenmail-mail-test/greenmail | greenmail-mail-test | 51,678,013 | 45 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "camann9",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1418298868000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "The website is being rewritten based on Bootstrap. First prototype ready.",
"title": "Rewrite Greenmail website",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "marcelmay",
"comment_id": 69071685,
"datetime": 1420657046000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Merged pull request (see #54 ) overwriting original site with new bootstrap based site.\r\n\r\nTechnical, the redesigned site is based on:\r\n- Bootstrap 3.3.1\r\n- Colors from http://www.google.com/design/spec/style/color.html#color-color-palette using “Teal” palette\r\n- Syntax highlighting via prism.js from http://prismjs.com/",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "buildscientist",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1423854107000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "buildscientist",
"comment_id": 74307148,
"datetime": 1423854107000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "Closing this as the new site is live!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 4 | 431 | false | false | 431 | false |
igrigorik/videospeed | null | 230,032,914 | 215 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "igrigorik",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1495213199000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Reported by @fredsa: \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nWe have custom code to change position for YouTube, need to do the same here..",
"title": "Video controller overlaps Google Photos controls",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "SeanSilke",
"comment_id": 305490922,
"datetime": 1496323240000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "Controls also seams positioned in odd place in fullscreen mode.\r\n![Uploading Screenshot at Jun 01 16-17-23.png…]()",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "igrigorik",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1498421387000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
}
] | 2 | 3 | 329 | false | false | 329 | false |
golang/go | golang | 232,112,201 | 20,527 | null | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "tycho",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1496100830000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!\r\n\r\n### What version of Go are you using (`go version`)?\r\n```\r\n$ go version\r\ngo version go1.8.3 linux/amd64\r\n```\r\n\r\n### What operating system and processor architecture are you using (`go env`)?\r\nI'm running on Arch Linux.\r\n```\r\n$ go env\r\nGOARCH=\"amd64\"\r\nGOBIN=\"\"\r\nGOEXE=\"\"\r\nGOHOSTARCH=\"amd64\"\r\nGOHOSTOS=\"linux\"\r\nGOOS=\"linux\"\r\nGOPATH=\"/home/steven/Development/gocode\"\r\nGORACE=\"\"\r\nGOROOT=\"/usr/lib/go\"\r\nGOTOOLDIR=\"/usr/lib/go/pkg/tool/linux_amd64\"\r\nGCCGO=\"/usr/bin/gccgo\"\r\nCC=\"gcc\"\r\nGOGCCFLAGS=\"-fPIC -m64 -pthread -fmessage-length=0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/tmp/go-build883327425=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches\"\r\nCXX=\"g++\"\r\nCGO_ENABLED=\"1\"\r\nPKG_CONFIG=\"pkg-config\"\r\nCGO_CFLAGS=\"-g -O2\"\r\nCGO_CPPFLAGS=\"\"\r\nCGO_CXXFLAGS=\"-g -O2\"\r\nCGO_FFLAGS=\"-g -O2\"\r\nCGO_LDFLAGS=\"-g -O2\"\r\n```\r\n\r\n### What did you do?\r\n\r\n```\r\n$ go get github.com/yohcop/openid-go\r\n$ cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/yohcop/openid-go\r\n$ go run -exec gdb _example/server.go \r\nGNU gdb (GDB) 7.12.1\r\nCopyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\r\nLicense GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>\r\nThis is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\r\nThere is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type \"show copying\"\r\nand \"show warranty\" for details.\r\nThis GDB was configured as \"x86_64-pc-linux-gnu\".\r\nType \"show configuration\" for configuration details.\r\nFor bug reporting instructions, please see:\r\n<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.\r\nFind the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:\r\n<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.\r\nFor help, type \"help\".\r\nType \"apropos word\" to search for commands related to \"word\"...\r\nReading symbols from /tmp/go-build581838362/command-line-arguments/_obj/exe/server...b(no debugging symbols found)...done.\r\n(gdb) break main\r\nBreakpoint 1 at 0x456c80\r\n(gdb) run\r\nStarting program: /tmp/go-build581838362/command-line-arguments/_obj/exe/server \r\n[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]\r\nUsing host libthread_db library \"/usr/lib/libthread_db.so.1\".\r\n\r\nBreakpoint 1, 0x0000000000456c80 in main ()\r\n(gdb) list\r\nNo symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.\r\n(gdb)\r\n```\r\n\r\n### What did you expect to see?\r\nI expected GDB **not** to say \"no debugging symbols found\" or \"no symbol table loaded\". I also expected it to show me a source listing when requested.\r\n\r\n### What did you see instead?\r\nGDB apparently doesn't see any debug symbols in the binary.\r\n\r\n---\r\n\r\nAny idea what I'm doing wrong? I'm pretty sure it's not just my distribution of Go. Tried a Fedora 25 image (which has go1.7.5 and GDB 7.12.1-48-fc25) and got the same result.\r\n\r\nFrom [what I've read](https://golang.org/doc/gdb), it sounds like my version of Go and GDB should be working better than this, albeit with the numerous caveats mentioned on that page.\r\n\r\nAlso, I'm trying to figure out the right workflow for developing Go programs, and one of my first bullet points is a debugger. Is there a more appropriate debugger for Go? I'd prefer to not have to resort to \"printf debugging\" everything.",
"title": "gdb can't find symbols in go1.8.3-compiled binaries",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "ianlancetaylor",
"comment_id": 304751751,
"datetime": 1496106791000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "The `main` function is not a user-written function in Go. Try breaking on `main.main`. Since gdb doesn't understand that Go function names contain a dot character, you have to literally type\r\n\r\n break 'main.main'\r\n\r\nwith the quotes.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tycho",
"comment_id": 304752363,
"datetime": 1496107188000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Still no debug symbols, so it can't show me anything useful:\r\n\r\n```\r\n(gdb) break 'main.main' \r\nBreakpoint 1 at 0x6fa000 \r\n(gdb) run \r\nStarting program: /tmp/go-build564374196/command-line-arguments/_obj/exe/server \r\n[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] \r\nUsing host libthread_db library \"/usr/lib/libthread_db.so.1\". \r\n[New Thread 0x7ffff7817700 (LWP 15886)] \r\n[New Thread 0x7ffff7016700 (LWP 15887)] \r\n[New Thread 0x7ffff6815700 (LWP 15888)] \r\n[New Thread 0x7ffff6014700 (LWP 15889)] \r\n \r\nThread 1 \"server\" hit Breakpoint 1, 0x00000000006fa000 in main.main () \r\n(gdb) list\r\nNo symbol table is loaded. Use the \"file\" command.\r\n(gdb) \r\n```",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "cherrymui",
"comment_id": 304757103,
"datetime": 1496109890000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "`go run` builds a binary without debug info. Use `go build` to build the binary and run `gdb` with it.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tycho",
"comment_id": 304762210,
"datetime": 1496112419000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "@username_2 Perfect! That did it. Thanks!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "closed",
"author": "tycho",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1496112420000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "",
"title": null,
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dcheney-atlassian",
"comment_id": 304765660,
"datetime": 1496114413000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Is this true?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tycho",
"comment_id": 306076702,
"datetime": 1496621229000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Sure seems that way.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dcheney-atlassian",
"comment_id": 306077531,
"datetime": 1496622000000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "Wow. TIL.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tycho",
"comment_id": 306078243,
"datetime": 1496622749000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Yeah, I would kind of expect that \"go run -exec gdb\" would be a common use\ncase but I guess not. There's no apparent flags to enable or disable debug\nsymbols there either.",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dcheney-atlassian",
"comment_id": 306078473,
"datetime": 1496622975000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "You're not expected to use go run for anything larger than throw away\nsnippets (think a local play.golang.org)\n\nOn Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Steven Noonan <notifications@github.com>\nwrote:\n\n> Yeah, I would kind of expect that \"go run -exec gdb\" would be a common use\n> case but I guess not. There's no apparent flags to enable or disable debug\n> symbols there either.\n>\n>",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "tycho",
"comment_id": 306087358,
"datetime": 1496628920000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Hmm. Then what's the typical development workflow? I'm coming from a c/c++\nbackground so I'm not sure how it all works.\n\nOn 4 Jun 2017 5:36 pm, \"David Cheney\" <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n\n> You're not expected to use go run for anything larger than throw away\n> snippets (think a local play.golang.org)\n>\n> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Steven Noonan <notifications@github.com>\n> wrote:\n>\n> > Yeah, I would kind of expect that \"go run -exec gdb\" would be a common\n> use\n> > case but I guess not. There's no apparent flags to enable or disable\n> debug\n> > symbols there either.\n> >\n> >",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "bradfitz",
"comment_id": 306088705,
"datetime": 1496629674000,
"masked_author": "username_4",
"text": "See https://golang.org/doc/code.html",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "dcheney-atlassian",
"comment_id": 306091294,
"datetime": 1496631075000,
"masked_author": "username_3",
"text": "I use\n\ngo install && $GOPATH/bin/$BINARY\n\nOn Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Steven Noonan <notifications@github.com>\nwrote:\n\n> Hmm. Then what's the typical development workflow? I'm coming from a c/c++\n> background so I'm not sure how it all works.\n>\n> On 4 Jun 2017 5:36 pm, \"David Cheney\" <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n>\n> > You're not expected to use go run for anything larger than throw away\n> > snippets (think a local play.golang.org)\n> >\n> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Steven Noonan <notifications@github.com\n> >\n> > wrote:\n> >\n> > > Yeah, I would kind of expect that \"go run -exec gdb\" would be a common\n> > use\n> > > case but I guess not. There's no apparent flags to enable or disable\n> > debug\n> > > symbols there either.\n> > >\n> > >",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 5 | 14 | 6,884 | false | false | 6,884 | true |
halfhp/androidplot | null | 207,029,390 | 31 | {
"number": 31,
"repo": "androidplot",
"user_login": "halfhp"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "mriveralee",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1486875695000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "Calling `clear()` on a `SimpleXYSeries` with ArrayFormat `SimpleXYSeries.ArrayFormat.Y_VALS_ONLY` causes a crash due to a null pointer exception on `xVals.clear();`\r\n\r\n**Stack Trace:** \r\n```\r\nE/AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: main\r\n Process: com.mikeriv.stepup, PID: 23454\r\n java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to invoke virtual method 'void java.util.LinkedList.clear()' on a null object reference\r\n at com.androidplot.xy.SimpleXYSeries.clear(SimpleXYSeries.java:344)\r\n at com.mikeriv.stepup.StepUpMainActivity.resetAccelerometerData(StepUpMainActivity.java:179)\r\n at com.mikeriv.stepup.StepUpMainActivity.onSensorData(StepUpMainActivity.java:151)\r\n at com.mikeriv.stepup.sensors.SensorController.onSensorChanged(SensorController.java:68)\r\n at android.hardware.SystemSensorManager$SensorEventQueue.dispatchSensorEvent(SystemSensorManager.java:466)\r\n at android.os.MessageQueue.nativePollOnce(Native Method)\r\n at android.os.MessageQueue.next(MessageQueue.java:143)\r\n at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:122)\r\n at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5254)\r\n at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)\r\n at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)\r\n at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:903)\r\n at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:698)\r\nI/Process: Sending signal. PID: 23454 SIG: 9\r\nDisconnected from the target VM, address: 'localhost:8600', transport: 'socket'`\r\n```",
"title": "Fix crash when clearing SimpleXYSeries with SimpleXYSeries.ArrayFormat.Y_VALS_ONLY",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "halfhp",
"comment_id": 279235449,
"datetime": 1486922013000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "lgtm - thx!",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 2 | 2 | 1,785 | false | false | 1,785 | false |
enriched/typed-ramda | null | 149,610,139 | 2 | {
"number": 2,
"repo": "typed-ramda",
"user_login": "enriched"
} | [
{
"action": "opened",
"author": "pserwylo",
"comment_id": null,
"datetime": 1461108030000,
"masked_author": "username_0",
"text": "This is required to prevent compiler errors when using the `noImplicitAny` compiler flag.\r\n\r\nWhen using that flag with these definitions, you would have gotten the following errors:\r\n\r\n```\r\ntypings/main/definitions/ramda/ramda.d.ts(388,38): error TS7006: Parameter 'l' implicitly has an 'any' type.\r\ntypings/main/definitions/ramda/ramda.d.ts(388,41): error TS7006: Parameter 'r' implicitly has an 'any' type.\r\ntypings/main/definitions/ramda/ramda.d.ts(390,41): error TS7006: Parameter 'k' implicitly has an 'any' type.\r\ntypings/main/definitions/ramda/ramda.d.ts(390,44): error TS7006: Parameter 'l' implicitly has an 'any' type.\r\ntypings/main/definitions/ramda/ramda.d.ts(390,47): error TS7006: Parameter 'r' implicitly has an 'any' type.\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis change explicitly types those arguments as `any` to prevent this.",
"title": "Add explicit `any` types for `mergeWith` and `mergeWithKey`.",
"type": "issue"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "blakeembrey",
"comment_id": 220130348,
"datetime": 1463599158000,
"masked_author": "username_1",
"text": "@username_2 I might start forking some of your typings into `typed-typings`. Not sure if you're ok?\r\n\r\n@username_0 Would you be interested helping maintain these typings after I fork?",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "enriched",
"comment_id": 220176397,
"datetime": 1463610277000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_1 grab whatever you want, one of the things that I love about typings is that I can quickly whip up a repo and use it when I need something quick :metal:",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
},
{
"action": "created",
"author": "enriched",
"comment_id": 220176593,
"datetime": 1463610337000,
"masked_author": "username_2",
"text": "@username_0 thanks for the PR 👍",
"title": null,
"type": "comment"
}
] | 3 | 4 | 1,189 | false | false | 1,189 | true |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.