content
stringlengths
10
255
id
stringlengths
20
23
An ICC Enforcement arm would bring in a higher proportion of defendants in to trial
perspectrum-corpus-1100
With ICC Enforcement we would have more violators brought to trial.
perspectrum-corpus-1101
The number of defendants and ICC Enforcement are related.
perspectrum-corpus-1102
An ICC enforcement arm would be highly detrimental to the relations between the ICC and state parties
perspectrum-corpus-1103
The relations of the ICC and state parties would deteriorate if the ICC had its own enforcement arm.
perspectrum-corpus-1104
The ICC would wind up clashing with state parties if it had a separate enforcement arm.
perspectrum-corpus-1105
An ICC enforcement arm would be unduly expensive
perspectrum-corpus-1106
It would be very expensive to implement an ICC enforcement arm.
perspectrum-corpus-1107
The cost would be prohibitive to create an enforcement arm of the ICC.
perspectrum-corpus-1108
An ICC enforcement arm would make the ICC more credible as an organization
perspectrum-corpus-1109
Enforcement is important for others to value the ICC organization.
perspectrum-corpus-1110
An ICC enforcement is a necessity if there is to be international criminal justice
perspectrum-corpus-1111
We must have international criminal justice through ICC enforcement for good international relations.
perspectrum-corpus-1112
ICC enforcement and international criminal justice are valuable to each other.
perspectrum-corpus-1113
Creates the perception that the rich are not immune to the consequences of their actions
perspectrum-corpus-1114
The rich are now also deterred
perspectrum-corpus-1115
Creates the perception that fines are like taxes, rather than a punishment
perspectrum-corpus-1116
A flat rate is more just
perspectrum-corpus-1117
It is unfair to penalize a higher income with a larger fine.
perspectrum-corpus-1118
Fines should be according to crime, not income.
perspectrum-corpus-1119
The Schengen Area eases the free movement of goods and people that the EU strives for
perspectrum-corpus-1120
Schengen tightens external borders, creating a ‘wall’ around Europe.
perspectrum-corpus-1121
Schengen creates an invisible wall around Europe
perspectrum-corpus-1122
As the Schengen area gets bigger, it becomes more difficult to police and this increases the risk of rogue elements being able to move freely between countries
perspectrum-corpus-1123
It is difficult to monitor the area as it increases in size
perspectrum-corpus-1124
There is currently too little supervision over the area because of its increase in size
perspectrum-corpus-1125
The Schengen Agreement is both a symbol of and fundamental means of upholding the unity of the European Union
perspectrum-corpus-1126
The Agreement helps to promote the stability of the European Union
perspectrum-corpus-1127
The Agreement helps keep the European Union intact
perspectrum-corpus-1128
Schengen has allowed cooperation in fighting global crime
perspectrum-corpus-1129
Schengen helps countries work together to abolish crime
perspectrum-corpus-1130
Schengen allows countries to aid each other in their quest to abolish crime on a global scale
perspectrum-corpus-1131
The Schengen Agreement is an anachronism of a safer age.
perspectrum-corpus-1132
The pursuit of pain for the purpose of achieving pleasure is an immoral act
perspectrum-corpus-1133
Decriminalisation will protect practitioners of sadomasochism
perspectrum-corpus-1134
Decriminalization will make SM play less dangerous, as people will be able to seek the proper authorities without consequence, if anything goes wrong.
perspectrum-corpus-1135
Sadomasochistic practices should be legal between informed, consenting adults.
perspectrum-corpus-1136
The criminalisation of sadomasochism infringes on individual liberty
perspectrum-corpus-1137
It is not possible to meaningfully consent to sadomasochistic sex
perspectrum-corpus-1138
The principle behind attorney-client privilege is declining in relevance
perspectrum-corpus-1139
Attorney client privilege need not be sacrosanct in all situations
perspectrum-corpus-1140
Sanctions are ineffective because they hurt ordinary people more than leadership.
perspectrum-corpus-1141
Sanctions do not harm the right people.
perspectrum-corpus-1142
Sanctions are ineffective because they can be counterproductive.
perspectrum-corpus-1143
Sanctions cause more harm than good.
perspectrum-corpus-1144
Sanctions can backfire.
perspectrum-corpus-1145
The veto power was granted legally to the P5 by the other participating states, and therefore the P5 have a right to those powers.
perspectrum-corpus-1146
It is appropriate for the veto power to remain in place.
perspectrum-corpus-1147
The war is too expensive, so a deal needs to be made to end it.
perspectrum-corpus-1148
The power sharing deal would stop a significant financial drain for the countries involved.
perspectrum-corpus-1149
The Taliban failed to provide good government for Afghanistan.
perspectrum-corpus-1150
We have successful precedents in Iraq and Africa, proving that a power-sharing approach works.
perspectrum-corpus-1151
africa and iraq are proof that power sharing works.
perspectrum-corpus-1152
the power sharing aproach has been proven successful by irag and africa
perspectrum-corpus-1153
Afghan history shows failings of foreign invasion, so this campaign is also doomed to failure.
perspectrum-corpus-1154
The Taliban supports terrorist organizations, so they are not to be trusted.
perspectrum-corpus-1155
you can not trust the taliban because of their support of terrorist groups.
perspectrum-corpus-1156
The Taliban is a cruel and undemocratic regime, and so it should not be given any power.
perspectrum-corpus-1157
the taliban should not be given power.
perspectrum-corpus-1158
The campaign is unpopular among the majority of NATO countries citizens, so we should solve the Afghan problem in diplomatic way, specifically through a power-sharing deal with the Taliban.
perspectrum-corpus-1159
NATO countries have citizens who are weary of the war so they would welcome such a power sharing settlemetn.
perspectrum-corpus-1160
The concept of federalism lacks political support
perspectrum-corpus-1161
The federal model has proved to be a success previously
perspectrum-corpus-1162
Previous federal models have proven to be successful
perspectrum-corpus-1163
A federal Europe will protect the cultural diversity of its member states
perspectrum-corpus-1164
Protection of cultural diversity is one benefit of a federal Europe.
perspectrum-corpus-1165
Existing contributive inequalities within the Union would be amplified by a formal federal system
perspectrum-corpus-1166
Formal federalism creates extra inequalities.
perspectrum-corpus-1167
A federal Europe will benefit the citizens of its member states
perspectrum-corpus-1168
Citizens will benefit from a federal Europe.
perspectrum-corpus-1169
Member states will reap the benefits of a federal Europe.
perspectrum-corpus-1170
A federal Europe will be a stronger international actor
perspectrum-corpus-1171
Europe is stronger if federal.
perspectrum-corpus-1172
If Europe went federal, they would have a larger international impact
perspectrum-corpus-1173
A federal Europe will ensure that large, multinational businesses remain accountable for their actions
perspectrum-corpus-1174
Federalism holds massive corporations accountable.
perspectrum-corpus-1175
Moves toward federalism will endanger the stability of the EU
perspectrum-corpus-1176
Every nation should be allowed to respect its war dead
perspectrum-corpus-1177
every nation has a right to their dead war heroes
perspectrum-corpus-1178
Honouring war criminals is wrong
perspectrum-corpus-1179
War criminals should not be honored, even after they're dead.
perspectrum-corpus-1180
Visits sour relations
perspectrum-corpus-1181
Social stability through the use of dictatorships.
perspectrum-corpus-1182
Dictatorships can prevent social unrest
perspectrum-corpus-1183
Society is put at ease when everyone is as equally under the thumb of the dictator as everyone else.
perspectrum-corpus-1184
Dictatorship helps achieve social stability
perspectrum-corpus-1185
Democracy acts in the interest of the general population, which is good for development
perspectrum-corpus-1186
Dictatorships assure low cost political stability
perspectrum-corpus-1187
Dictatorships offer political stability by eliminating competition.
perspectrum-corpus-1188
Development occurs when a dictatorship revert into democracy
perspectrum-corpus-1189
Democratic rule of law is the best ground for political stability and growth
perspectrum-corpus-1190
Democracy lets a country grow naturaly
perspectrum-corpus-1191
Dictatorship outperforms democracy in growth and economic develpment
perspectrum-corpus-1192
The loger lasting and biggest economic miracles have ocurred under dictatorships
perspectrum-corpus-1193
Democracies can't mobilize a country as fast as a dictatorship can.
perspectrum-corpus-1194
In order to develop quickly, a dictator must be in power to sped things up.
perspectrum-corpus-1195
A dictatorship breeds order and it's a needed step for both development and liberal democracy
perspectrum-corpus-1196
Dictatorships breed development and liberal democracy.
perspectrum-corpus-1197
Breeding of development and liberal democracy under dictatorial rule.
perspectrum-corpus-1198
Dictatorships have a flexibility in economic policy that breeds growth
perspectrum-corpus-1199