content stringlengths 10 255 | id stringlengths 20 23 |
|---|---|
Open primaries promote moderate, non-partisan politics | perspectrum-corpus-900 |
Moderate, non-partisan politics are promoted by open primaries. | perspectrum-corpus-901 |
Open primaries are beneficial for the nurturing of moderate, non-partisan politics. | perspectrum-corpus-902 |
Earmarks transfer too much power to political parties' central leadership | perspectrum-corpus-903 |
Earmarks allow the leaders of political parties to be too powerful. | perspectrum-corpus-904 |
Earmarks give the central leaders of political parties too much leverage. | perspectrum-corpus-905 |
Earmarks erode trust in the government | perspectrum-corpus-906 |
Earmarks contribute to a loss of confidence in the government. | perspectrum-corpus-907 |
Earmarks make people suspicious of the government. | perspectrum-corpus-908 |
Earmarks circumvent the normal legislative processes and erode confidence in government | perspectrum-corpus-909 |
McCain's Economic Adviser Says Earmarks Erode Public Trust | perspectrum-corpus-910 |
Earmarks do not accord with democratic principles of equity, fairness and justice | perspectrum-corpus-911 |
Earmarks are against our basic principles of fairness. | perspectrum-corpus-912 |
Earmarks aren't fair to everyone. | perspectrum-corpus-913 |
Abolishing earmarks will save money | perspectrum-corpus-914 |
Getting rid of earmarks will cut down on government waste. | perspectrum-corpus-915 |
Eliminating earmarks will help save tax dollars. | perspectrum-corpus-916 |
Should congressional earmarks be abolished? | perspectrum-corpus-917 |
Debate: Congressional Earmarks | perspectrum-corpus-918 |
Congressional earmarks are a check on an excessively powerful executive branch | perspectrum-corpus-919 |
Without congress to check the executive branch it could run wild. | perspectrum-corpus-920 |
Congress is one of the checks of the check and balance system that reins in the executive branch. | perspectrum-corpus-921 |
Earmarks do not represent an efficient use of taxpayers' money | perspectrum-corpus-922 |
Earmarks waste the taxpayer's money. | perspectrum-corpus-923 |
Earmarks aren't the best way to spend tax dollars. | perspectrum-corpus-924 |
Earmarks: The end of congressional pork? | perspectrum-corpus-925 |
Oversight , and Impact of Congressional Earmarks 2 | perspectrum-corpus-926 |
Imposing a ban on earmarking will destabilise congrerss | perspectrum-corpus-927 |
Congress would be destabilised without earmarks. | perspectrum-corpus-928 |
A ban on earmarks would negatively affect congress. | perspectrum-corpus-929 |
Terrorism can bring attention | perspectrum-corpus-930 |
Terrorism is relative | perspectrum-corpus-931 |
Terrorism can lead to discussion | perspectrum-corpus-932 |
The longer a single leader remains in power, the more entrenched his grip becomes, and the more likely he is to use his office to his personal advantage. | perspectrum-corpus-933 |
Longer terms for Politicians could lead to unfairness in governing | perspectrum-corpus-934 |
If a single leader sits on the throne for too long, it's more likely for the leader to exploit his or her power. | perspectrum-corpus-935 |
The longer a politician remains in office, the more entrenched his grip becomes, and the more likely he is to use his office to his personal advantage: | perspectrum-corpus-936 |
If there's no term limit, the leader will likely exploit his power to personal advantages by staying too long in the office. | perspectrum-corpus-937 |
the longer someone is in power, the more likely he will use it for personal advantage | perspectrum-corpus-938 |
as times went one, the more someone is in control of his power, the more likely he will succumb to use such power for personal advantage | perspectrum-corpus-939 |
By imposing mandatory term limits on politicians, we are saying the citizens are not capable of making good decisions about their elected officials. | perspectrum-corpus-940 |
Term limits are undemocratic and suggest, falsely, that voters cannot make intelligent decisions about their leaders on their own. | perspectrum-corpus-941 |
The use of term limits in politics shows a lack of faith in the ability of voters to choose the best candidate for office. | perspectrum-corpus-942 |
Term limits should be voted on | perspectrum-corpus-943 |
By having term limits, it makes voters feel that they can't decide on a leader by themselves | perspectrum-corpus-944 |
With term limits, voters are not seen as intelligent voters | perspectrum-corpus-945 |
Term limits are undemocratic and suggest, falsely, that voters cannot make intelligent decisions about their representatives without guidance: | perspectrum-corpus-946 |
congress needs term limits to ensure different points of views | perspectrum-corpus-947 |
term limits help with fresh ideas | perspectrum-corpus-948 |
Term limits allows new blood in the office and prevents one leader from staying in power for too long. | perspectrum-corpus-949 |
Term limits check the power of incumbency as an election-winning tool and allow new and energetic leaders and ideas to flourish. | perspectrum-corpus-950 |
term limits allow a balance check and allow for new fresh leaders to take position | perspectrum-corpus-951 |
it is our best interest to have term limits for diversity | perspectrum-corpus-952 |
Term limits create more competitive elections for public office that empower new leaders and ideas: | perspectrum-corpus-953 |
Having a new leader allow new ideas and thoughts in the office. | perspectrum-corpus-954 |
The incentive for corruption and self-enrichment in office is increased by term limits: | perspectrum-corpus-955 |
Term limits could lead one to be more dishonest to get the job done quicker | perspectrum-corpus-956 |
Having term limits on some leaders, puts too much power in the hands of non-limited officials. | perspectrum-corpus-957 |
When some leaders are subject to term limits and some are not, the balance of power in uneven. | perspectrum-corpus-958 |
With term limits, there is too much power given to those that aren't leaders | perspectrum-corpus-959 |
Term limits take too much power away from the leaders that were chosen | perspectrum-corpus-960 |
A strong, consistent executive may be desirable in many cases. | perspectrum-corpus-961 |
There are some circumstances when one would want a strong, consistent executive branch of government in place. | perspectrum-corpus-962 |
There are many instances when having a powerful, unlimited executive branch of government is best. | perspectrum-corpus-963 |
It may at some point be desirable to keep around a certain executive longer than terms decide | perspectrum-corpus-964 |
In some instances it may be better to not have term limits if there is a good leader at the time | perspectrum-corpus-965 |
Freeing the executive from re-election concerns can help focus attention on the public interest | perspectrum-corpus-966 |
The executive branch of government, having no countervailing voices to the leader s’ within it, must be checked by limiting tenancy in office. | perspectrum-corpus-967 |
By imposing a term limit in office, we can limit the power of executive branch of government. | perspectrum-corpus-968 |
The power of executive branch of government must be checked by having a term limit for the leader in the office. | perspectrum-corpus-969 |
there should be a tenancy for the executive branch of government as to keep in check the power of its leaders | perspectrum-corpus-970 |
the executives brances with no opposing voices to the leaders must be imposed term limits | perspectrum-corpus-971 |
Federal states are better able to protect their citizens. | perspectrum-corpus-972 |
Citizens are better protected in federal states. | perspectrum-corpus-973 |
Federal States often have persistent losers. | perspectrum-corpus-974 |
Losers abound in federal states. | perspectrum-corpus-975 |
Being a federal state helps large states deal with divergent economic performance | perspectrum-corpus-976 |
Federal United States are better off economically. | perspectrum-corpus-977 |
Federal governments often extend their powers and usurp local authority, especially if one or more federal units are disproportionately powerful. | perspectrum-corpus-978 |
Federal states are economically stronger | perspectrum-corpus-979 |
Having no elections is honest | perspectrum-corpus-980 |
Not having any elections is honest. | perspectrum-corpus-981 |
Refraining from elections is honest. | perspectrum-corpus-982 |
At least no elections would be more honest | perspectrum-corpus-983 |
Sham elections do not mean the elections have no influence or impact. | perspectrum-corpus-984 |
Just because an election is fake does not mean it will not have an impact. | perspectrum-corpus-985 |
Avoids the costs and uncertainty of elections | perspectrum-corpus-986 |
Doing so would limit the costs and uncertainty that come with others | perspectrum-corpus-987 |
It would mean there would be less costs spent on uncertainties | perspectrum-corpus-988 |
Even a sham election demonstrates what the people want | perspectrum-corpus-989 |
Fake elections are still a demonstration of the peoples desires. | perspectrum-corpus-990 |
The peoples desires will always be conveyed even in false elections. | perspectrum-corpus-991 |
Some kind of election is more likely to lead to real democracy than no election | perspectrum-corpus-992 |
Having elections is beneficial to the end result of democracy. | perspectrum-corpus-993 |
No elections are in direct contradiction to the desired effect of democracy. | perspectrum-corpus-994 |
Participation Is Good In Itself | perspectrum-corpus-995 |
Participatory Democracy Preserves our Natural Liberty | perspectrum-corpus-996 |
Participatory Democracy Produces Better Decisions | perspectrum-corpus-997 |
Participatory Democracy Facilitates the Misrepresentation of Issues | perspectrum-corpus-998 |
We cannot make any judgments about whose life is valuable and whose is not | perspectrum-corpus-999 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.